WEBVTT - Pasatiempo Is So, So Good

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:02.800
<v Speaker 1>I miss a green for example, I'm already upset. When

0:00:02.800 --> 0:00:04.920
<v Speaker 1>I find my ball in the bunker, I'm really upset.

0:00:05.000 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>And when I find my ball in a bride egg

0:00:07.200 --> 0:00:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Friday Egg, the dreaded Frida Egg, Friday, Frida Egg Egg,

0:00:10.640 --> 0:00:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Frida Egg, Bride Egg, Lie, I'm about ready to run off.

0:00:13.200 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 2>Of the hump.

0:00:35.120 --> 0:00:37.839
<v Speaker 1>Hello and welcome to the Frida Egg Podcast. My name

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:41.479
<v Speaker 1>is Garrett Morrison. I am here with Andy Johnson, or

0:00:41.520 --> 0:00:44.720
<v Speaker 1>at least a portion of Andy Johnson. You've had a

0:00:44.800 --> 0:00:47.280
<v Speaker 1>rough go of it lately. How are you doing, Andy.

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:50.240
<v Speaker 2>Garrett, I'm doing well. I feel like a million bucks

0:00:50.280 --> 0:00:53.200
<v Speaker 2>compared to however I was last year. I or last

0:00:53.200 --> 0:00:57.040
<v Speaker 2>week coming out of health and safety last year protocols

0:00:57.120 --> 0:01:00.720
<v Speaker 2>from from the Masters. So it's been a it's been

0:01:00.760 --> 0:01:04.240
<v Speaker 2>a long last few days. But we're back here.

0:01:04.440 --> 0:01:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Good. Yeah, No, it's it's great to have you back

0:01:07.720 --> 0:01:12.160
<v Speaker 1>at near full strength. So thanks for being here today.

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:17.200
<v Speaker 1>So today we are going to be talking about Pas Tiempo,

0:01:17.840 --> 0:01:21.680
<v Speaker 1>probably my favorite course, and I'll get into why it's

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:24.160
<v Speaker 1>my favorite course, but is it up there for you

0:01:24.240 --> 0:01:26.800
<v Speaker 1>as well? Just as a general impression.

0:01:26.360 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think I would. Yeah, it's one of my

0:01:29.640 --> 0:01:32.120
<v Speaker 2>favorite golf courses. Would it be the course that I'd

0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:35.160
<v Speaker 2>play every day? Probably not. It's a bit of a

0:01:35.160 --> 0:01:40.600
<v Speaker 2>bit of a physical challenge for everyday place. But in

0:01:40.720 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 2>terms of bucket list golf courses, and especially when you

0:01:45.200 --> 0:01:48.720
<v Speaker 2>start to look at courses that anybody could play any

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:52.840
<v Speaker 2>day of the week, pas Tiepo gets near the very

0:01:52.880 --> 0:01:56.080
<v Speaker 2>top of the courses you must see before you die.

0:01:56.320 --> 0:01:59.240
<v Speaker 2>And I think in terms, you could make an argument

0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 2>that of any American public golf course, you can make

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:06.120
<v Speaker 2>an argument that this should be number one on your

0:02:06.120 --> 0:02:09.760
<v Speaker 2>bucket list because of the significance of the architecture, the

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:15.440
<v Speaker 2>architect and where it sits in kind of American golf architecture.

0:02:15.960 --> 0:02:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Its main competitor for that number one spot I feel

0:02:19.680 --> 0:02:22.119
<v Speaker 1>for the public golfer would be Pebble Beach.

0:02:21.960 --> 0:02:24.799
<v Speaker 2>Right, I would say, I would actually argue, I think

0:02:24.840 --> 0:02:29.400
<v Speaker 2>Pebble Beach obviously has you know, the architectural significance of

0:02:29.440 --> 0:02:33.640
<v Speaker 2>Pebble Beach is rather small in comparison. I mean, Pebble

0:02:33.639 --> 0:02:38.239
<v Speaker 2>Beach's significance has been founded through its beautiful site and

0:02:38.360 --> 0:02:43.960
<v Speaker 2>its historic moments of championships that have happened there PASTA

0:02:44.000 --> 0:02:48.679
<v Speaker 2>Tiempo is probably the greatest architect of all time and

0:02:48.919 --> 0:02:54.280
<v Speaker 2>public access and mostly almost everything there is original of

0:02:54.880 --> 0:02:58.480
<v Speaker 2>what was built. I would say the place that rivals

0:02:58.520 --> 0:03:00.079
<v Speaker 2>it Pinehurst number two.

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:04.680
<v Speaker 1>In terms of architectural significance significant.

0:03:04.720 --> 0:03:09.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm saying from pure design standpoint, I don't think because

0:03:09.880 --> 0:03:11.680
<v Speaker 2>you could go play a lot of there's a lot

0:03:11.680 --> 0:03:16.000
<v Speaker 2>of Bill Corr or Tom Doak public golf out there,

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:18.560
<v Speaker 2>like you could you know beyond if you want to

0:03:18.600 --> 0:03:22.560
<v Speaker 2>take bandoned trails and Pacific dunes and put those is

0:03:22.639 --> 0:03:27.040
<v Speaker 2>to places, right, but there's there's very there's very little

0:03:27.440 --> 0:03:32.560
<v Speaker 2>public access Alistair McKenzie in America. And then with with

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:34.800
<v Speaker 2>Pineers number two, it would be you know, one of

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:39.480
<v Speaker 2>maybe the top doll ross golf course right where another

0:03:40.360 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 2>legendary golf architect of the Golden Age that you can

0:03:43.480 --> 0:03:46.720
<v Speaker 2>go see. So from an architecture standpoint, I think you

0:03:46.720 --> 0:03:49.320
<v Speaker 2>can make an argument this should be number one on

0:03:49.360 --> 0:03:50.080
<v Speaker 2>your bucket list.

0:03:50.960 --> 0:03:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean I think I would put it there.

0:03:53.680 --> 0:03:56.920
<v Speaker 1>I would say that I am biased, and just to

0:03:56.960 --> 0:04:00.920
<v Speaker 1>give an idea of my relationship with this course over time,

0:04:00.960 --> 0:04:04.520
<v Speaker 1>it was probably the first truly great golf course that

0:04:04.560 --> 0:04:07.640
<v Speaker 1>I played. I played it when I was thirteen or fourteen.

0:04:07.680 --> 0:04:10.560
<v Speaker 1>I believe it was nineteen ninety eight with my dad.

0:04:11.080 --> 0:04:14.440
<v Speaker 1>This was prior to the work that Tom Doak and

0:04:14.520 --> 0:04:17.719
<v Speaker 1>his team at Renaissance Golf Design did there, and so

0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:21.120
<v Speaker 1>the course was, you know, had a ways to go

0:04:21.320 --> 0:04:24.320
<v Speaker 1>before it could get to the course that it is today.

0:04:24.839 --> 0:04:27.599
<v Speaker 1>But even then it made such a massive impression on me,

0:04:28.240 --> 0:04:30.680
<v Speaker 1>and throughout my life, I've had the opportunity to get

0:04:30.720 --> 0:04:33.320
<v Speaker 1>back there a number of times. I lived in the

0:04:33.360 --> 0:04:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Monterey area for a few years, and I would get

0:04:36.480 --> 0:04:39.599
<v Speaker 1>up to Pas Tiampo two or three times a year

0:04:39.720 --> 0:04:43.440
<v Speaker 1>and play it. This is just one of my absolute

0:04:43.480 --> 0:04:47.320
<v Speaker 1>favorite places to go, and I think it really is

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:50.000
<v Speaker 1>my favorite golf course. It's probably not the best golf

0:04:50.000 --> 0:04:53.960
<v Speaker 1>course that I've played overall in terms of its capacity

0:04:54.040 --> 0:04:58.120
<v Speaker 1>to meet its full potential, but just in terms of

0:04:58.120 --> 0:05:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the place and the design and what it has meant

0:05:01.520 --> 0:05:04.640
<v Speaker 1>to me, it's my favorite course. You know that this

0:05:04.839 --> 0:05:08.680
<v Speaker 1>is the place for me, and so I truly love

0:05:08.760 --> 0:05:11.880
<v Speaker 1>this golf course. Now we are going to have a

0:05:12.560 --> 0:05:16.120
<v Speaker 1>honest and nuanced discussion of this course. It's not going

0:05:16.160 --> 0:05:19.960
<v Speaker 1>to be all puffing Pas Tiempo up because this course

0:05:20.000 --> 0:05:24.279
<v Speaker 1>has some flaws and also the club has made a

0:05:24.360 --> 0:05:29.240
<v Speaker 1>decision recently about the future of the course that there

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:33.479
<v Speaker 1>could be a debate about. You know, they're about to

0:05:33.560 --> 0:05:37.919
<v Speaker 1>rebuild their greens essentially, and they're doing this with the

0:05:37.920 --> 0:05:41.040
<v Speaker 1>best of intentions, apparently to you know, restore some of

0:05:41.640 --> 0:05:45.279
<v Speaker 1>the Mackenzie features that have supposedly been lost over time.

0:05:46.200 --> 0:05:49.680
<v Speaker 1>But there is a again, an honest and nuanced discussion

0:05:49.760 --> 0:05:52.520
<v Speaker 1>to have about that decision. So those are the places

0:05:52.520 --> 0:05:54.479
<v Speaker 1>that we're going to go in this podcast. But I

0:05:54.480 --> 0:05:57.279
<v Speaker 1>think first we just wanted to talk about the course

0:05:57.320 --> 0:06:01.680
<v Speaker 1>itself and some of the design features that really make

0:06:01.720 --> 0:06:05.239
<v Speaker 1>it special. So why don't we start with the front nine.

0:06:05.760 --> 0:06:09.400
<v Speaker 1>The front nine gets somewhat underrated because the back nine

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:11.039
<v Speaker 1>is so brilliant, and we're going to get to the

0:06:11.040 --> 0:06:16.000
<v Speaker 1>back nine, but the front nine is really remarkable.

0:06:16.200 --> 0:06:19.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's it's super good. I think the back nine

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:21.920
<v Speaker 2>obviously is one of the best nines in all of golf,

0:06:22.040 --> 0:06:25.680
<v Speaker 2>and I think that's where you get obscured a little bit.

0:06:26.279 --> 0:06:29.560
<v Speaker 2>But the front nine is kind of one of those

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:33.880
<v Speaker 2>instances where you sit and there's a lot of great

0:06:33.880 --> 0:06:36.839
<v Speaker 2>holes on it. There's a really great stretch of holes.

0:06:36.960 --> 0:06:40.880
<v Speaker 2>I think two through five is phenomenal. But what I

0:06:40.920 --> 0:06:44.000
<v Speaker 2>always kind of go back to is, man, I wish

0:06:44.080 --> 0:06:47.239
<v Speaker 2>one was the way it should be. I wish six

0:06:47.520 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 2>was the way it should be. I wish seven was

0:06:49.920 --> 0:06:52.080
<v Speaker 2>the way it should be. I wish nine was the

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:54.760
<v Speaker 2>way it should be. And that's what kind of holds

0:06:54.800 --> 0:06:59.159
<v Speaker 2>me back from kind of truly loving the front nine.

0:06:59.279 --> 0:07:02.599
<v Speaker 2>I always find myself though, what I'm either in, like

0:07:02.640 --> 0:07:06.920
<v Speaker 2>the second fairway or the thirty or the second green.

0:07:07.080 --> 0:07:09.279
<v Speaker 2>At that point, I'm just like, God, the front nine

0:07:09.320 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 2>is really great, is what I always think to myself.

0:07:12.000 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Well, okay, so I've done a poor job of setting

0:07:14.240 --> 0:07:18.160
<v Speaker 1>this episode up. We've kind of gone straight into talking

0:07:18.160 --> 0:07:21.440
<v Speaker 1>about the golf course, but should mention it's an Alistair

0:07:21.480 --> 0:07:25.480
<v Speaker 1>mackenzie design. It opened in nineteen twenty nine. It had

0:07:25.520 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 1>an opening day where Bobby Jones played alongside a few

0:07:29.600 --> 0:07:34.120
<v Speaker 1>other great players of the time, including Marion Hollins, who

0:07:34.320 --> 0:07:39.400
<v Speaker 1>was a fantastic golfer, and she was the driving force,

0:07:39.560 --> 0:07:43.720
<v Speaker 1>the visionary behind the Pasa Tempo project. She was also

0:07:44.040 --> 0:07:47.720
<v Speaker 1>a very important figure in the building of Cyprus Point Club.

0:07:47.760 --> 0:07:51.200
<v Speaker 1>She worked for Samuel Morse was the director of athletics.

0:07:51.240 --> 0:07:54.920
<v Speaker 1>I believe for the Pebble Beach Company. Pasa Tiempo was

0:07:54.960 --> 0:07:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Marion Hollins's baby. Marion Hollins was recently inducted into the

0:07:59.680 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 1>World Golf Hall of Fame posthumously, but it was a

0:08:02.720 --> 0:08:07.640
<v Speaker 1>great moment to appreciate her incredible career and contribution to golf.

0:08:08.040 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Pas Tiempo is at the center of that contribution. She

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:16.480
<v Speaker 1>was behind every decision about this entire development, and it

0:08:16.560 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 1>really is a development. It's not just a golf course.

0:08:19.400 --> 0:08:23.720
<v Speaker 1>It's also a residential community and it was imagined that

0:08:23.800 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 1>way from the very beginning. Okay, so that's just laying

0:08:26.880 --> 0:08:30.240
<v Speaker 1>some groundwork in case people didn't know about the backstory

0:08:30.240 --> 0:08:33.199
<v Speaker 1>of Mackenzie and Mary and Hollins. These are the major

0:08:33.280 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 1>driving forces behind this whole creation. Okay. So the front nine,

0:08:40.080 --> 0:08:43.000
<v Speaker 1>it kind of has two sections, right, there's this upper

0:08:43.040 --> 0:08:46.720
<v Speaker 1>section and there's this lower section. And in the upper

0:08:46.760 --> 0:08:52.120
<v Speaker 1>section our holes one to nine, most of six, seven,

0:08:52.640 --> 0:08:57.360
<v Speaker 1>and eight, and then the lower section consists of holes two, three, four,

0:08:57.679 --> 0:09:03.480
<v Speaker 1>and five. The lower section is brilliant and very much intact.

0:09:04.320 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 1>The upper section. Those holes were originally designed to be

0:09:08.800 --> 0:09:13.360
<v Speaker 1>have these big, wide shared corridors and since nineteen twenty nine,

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:18.119
<v Speaker 1>there have been trees planted to separate out the fairways,

0:09:18.440 --> 0:09:20.840
<v Speaker 1>and so those holes no longer share fairways. They have

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 1>their own fairways, and a couple of those fairways are

0:09:23.800 --> 0:09:27.679
<v Speaker 1>pretty narrow, pretty restricted, and the holes just played differently

0:09:28.120 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 1>than they were designed to play, and that's just kind

0:09:30.800 --> 0:09:33.400
<v Speaker 1>of the reality. I'm not sure that's going to change.

0:09:34.040 --> 0:09:37.600
<v Speaker 1>And so there are some places in that upper section

0:09:37.679 --> 0:09:40.319
<v Speaker 1>of the front nine that feel cramped.

0:09:40.880 --> 0:09:43.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, and that's I think the big question

0:09:44.160 --> 0:09:47.920
<v Speaker 2>about the golf courses is what makes what happens with

0:09:47.960 --> 0:09:51.080
<v Speaker 2>those holes over the next, you know, fifty years. Obviously

0:09:51.520 --> 0:09:55.760
<v Speaker 2>the reason that they were planted was safety. Somebody lost

0:09:55.760 --> 0:09:58.719
<v Speaker 2>their life on the eighth green from a wayward t

0:09:58.840 --> 0:10:01.200
<v Speaker 2>shot from the seventh so they planted a bunch of

0:10:01.240 --> 0:10:03.680
<v Speaker 2>trees to prevent that kind of thing from happening.

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:05.800
<v Speaker 1>As there's a fence up there too.

0:10:05.679 --> 0:10:07.559
<v Speaker 2>You might want to do. You know, you don't want

0:10:07.600 --> 0:10:12.280
<v Speaker 2>people dying on your golf course. And you know the

0:10:12.360 --> 0:10:17.200
<v Speaker 2>thing about it is the trees really mask how good

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:20.040
<v Speaker 2>the greens are there. Like the sixth Green is a

0:10:20.160 --> 0:10:25.000
<v Speaker 2>terrific green, you know, with so many neat little kind

0:10:25.000 --> 0:10:27.840
<v Speaker 2>of nooks. You know, you have that left nook and

0:10:27.880 --> 0:10:30.240
<v Speaker 2>then you have the back one that that part of

0:10:30.280 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 2>the back that runs away there. And what happens is

0:10:35.200 --> 0:10:38.560
<v Speaker 2>that that hole gets so narrow that you lose the

0:10:38.600 --> 0:10:41.200
<v Speaker 2>dimension of really wanting to push up and go for

0:10:41.280 --> 0:10:45.120
<v Speaker 2>it because it's so narrow at the green because of

0:10:45.160 --> 0:10:47.040
<v Speaker 2>the houses that came in. And then you have the

0:10:47.080 --> 0:10:50.680
<v Speaker 2>trees on the right, and then the seventh, Like the

0:10:50.800 --> 0:10:52.880
<v Speaker 2>seventh is one of the best greens on the golf

0:10:52.920 --> 0:10:57.200
<v Speaker 2>course and it's really obscured by the trees making it

0:10:57.240 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, opening that up would be make it such

0:10:59.480 --> 0:11:03.320
<v Speaker 2>a fun little drive and pitch hole. And I think

0:11:03.360 --> 0:11:06.480
<v Speaker 2>that that that hole, you know, you when you're at

0:11:06.520 --> 0:11:08.800
<v Speaker 2>seven green. The only reason I know this is because

0:11:08.840 --> 0:11:14.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm flying a drone, you know there, But the you're

0:11:14.559 --> 0:11:16.680
<v Speaker 2>right next to the third green and the fourth tee,

0:11:17.679 --> 0:11:20.880
<v Speaker 2>and it's really an amazing thing. Like you get spun

0:11:20.960 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 2>around by that routing a lot, but it's a really

0:11:23.800 --> 0:11:26.360
<v Speaker 2>cool little focal point. And you talk about the upper

0:11:26.400 --> 0:11:29.160
<v Speaker 2>and the lower holes, you're effectively just on the ridge

0:11:29.200 --> 0:11:33.160
<v Speaker 2>above those those greens there, and it's you're no more

0:11:33.200 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 2>than fifty yards. You're basically there's just a house between.

0:11:35.960 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 1>You, yeah, And what separates the upper section of the

0:11:39.920 --> 0:11:42.160
<v Speaker 1>front nine from the lower section of the front nine

0:11:42.960 --> 0:11:46.640
<v Speaker 1>is this hill and the hill and now has houses

0:11:46.640 --> 0:11:48.400
<v Speaker 1>on it, and so it's a little bit hard to

0:11:48.400 --> 0:11:52.959
<v Speaker 1>see the natural feature, but it is this little hill

0:11:53.120 --> 0:11:57.160
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of this general down slope, and a

0:11:57.200 --> 0:12:01.160
<v Speaker 1>bunch of holes play around this hill. So the second

0:12:01.200 --> 0:12:05.160
<v Speaker 1>hole goes along the side of the hill. The third hole,

0:12:05.559 --> 0:12:08.600
<v Speaker 1>a long par three spectacular hole, plays back up into

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:11.440
<v Speaker 1>the hill. The fourth hole plays off of the hill,

0:12:11.920 --> 0:12:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the sixth hole plays along the other side of the hill,

0:12:15.120 --> 0:12:17.760
<v Speaker 1>the seventh hole plays back into the hill as you

0:12:17.760 --> 0:12:20.200
<v Speaker 1>were saying, and getting pretty close to the third green

0:12:20.280 --> 0:12:22.599
<v Speaker 1>and the fourth tee, and then eight plays off of

0:12:22.640 --> 0:12:24.880
<v Speaker 1>the hill. So in that way, this is sort of

0:12:24.920 --> 0:12:27.600
<v Speaker 1>a classic Mackenzie routing. He did this at Cypress Point.

0:12:27.640 --> 0:12:30.720
<v Speaker 1>He did this at Valley Club, where there was a

0:12:30.840 --> 0:12:33.199
<v Speaker 1>hill or in the case of Cypress Point, a dune,

0:12:33.720 --> 0:12:36.360
<v Speaker 1>and a bunch of holes play into and off of

0:12:36.400 --> 0:12:38.880
<v Speaker 1>it in different ways. The same thing was done at

0:12:38.920 --> 0:12:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Pasa Tiampo on the front nine, but it's a little

0:12:40.760 --> 0:12:44.240
<v Speaker 1>bit hard to see because of the trees and the

0:12:44.240 --> 0:12:47.600
<v Speaker 1>development that has happened on the fringes of the golf course,

0:12:47.640 --> 0:12:50.839
<v Speaker 1>but it's certainly still there. That principle of that routing

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:51.360
<v Speaker 1>is still there.

0:12:51.400 --> 0:12:56.160
<v Speaker 2>What's interesting, too, is that the back nine actually plays

0:12:56.480 --> 0:13:00.400
<v Speaker 2>in and out of a valley. Effectively. The focal point

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:03.520
<v Speaker 2>on the back nine isn't a high hill. It's actually

0:13:03.600 --> 0:13:07.160
<v Speaker 2>a low valley, and everything kind of spires off of that.

0:13:07.320 --> 0:13:10.120
<v Speaker 2>It is a meeting point. If you think about the

0:13:10.160 --> 0:13:14.480
<v Speaker 2>back nine, the tenth, the sixteenth, the twelfth, the eleventh,

0:13:14.520 --> 0:13:19.040
<v Speaker 2>t the thirteenth tee, all of those that area right

0:13:19.080 --> 0:13:21.160
<v Speaker 2>there is at kind of a low point.

0:13:21.800 --> 0:13:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and well the Baranka runs through the lowest point

0:13:24.840 --> 0:13:27.240
<v Speaker 1>of all, and so all those holes on the back

0:13:27.320 --> 0:13:30.520
<v Speaker 1>nine center around that, you know, that low point where

0:13:30.520 --> 0:13:33.760
<v Speaker 1>the water runs through. So in any case on the

0:13:33.800 --> 0:13:36.840
<v Speaker 1>front nine, if you were to point people to a

0:13:36.920 --> 0:13:39.839
<v Speaker 1>hole that you think represents the best of the front nine,

0:13:40.440 --> 0:13:41.160
<v Speaker 1>where would you go?

0:13:41.880 --> 0:13:44.840
<v Speaker 2>I really like the fourth It's a short, shortist Part four.

0:13:45.840 --> 0:13:47.760
<v Speaker 2>One of the things I like about it it's got

0:13:47.760 --> 0:13:52.319
<v Speaker 2>a few key McKenzie features. It's got the layered bunkers

0:13:52.320 --> 0:13:55.760
<v Speaker 2>that everybody likes to point out, the camouflage. It's got

0:13:55.800 --> 0:13:59.720
<v Speaker 2>a bunker in the fairway that's probably about ninety yards

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:02.880
<v Speaker 2>away from the green. Seventy to ninety yards, I don't

0:14:02.880 --> 0:14:07.080
<v Speaker 2>know exactly off the top of my head. And then

0:14:07.640 --> 0:14:11.000
<v Speaker 2>that bunker appears to be kind of like stacked right

0:14:11.080 --> 0:14:14.760
<v Speaker 2>up against the green side bunker, and it looks from

0:14:14.840 --> 0:14:17.920
<v Speaker 2>the tee like it's all one big bunker complex, but

0:14:18.080 --> 0:14:21.880
<v Speaker 2>in reality there's a huge gap between them and the

0:14:21.880 --> 0:14:25.880
<v Speaker 2>green side bunkers. There's a bunker also short and right

0:14:26.000 --> 0:14:29.040
<v Speaker 2>off the tee. And what I think is really interesting

0:14:29.080 --> 0:14:32.200
<v Speaker 2>about it, and you know, kind of picked up the

0:14:32.280 --> 0:14:34.960
<v Speaker 2>latest time that we went around it, and it's because

0:14:35.000 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 2>you hit your shot over to the right. I hit

0:14:37.720 --> 0:14:41.240
<v Speaker 2>mine way up just short of that bunker. Perfect spot

0:14:41.760 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 2>the left.

0:14:42.440 --> 0:14:43.240
<v Speaker 1>The one on the left.

0:14:43.440 --> 0:14:46.040
<v Speaker 2>You hit yours over kind of over the right bunker,

0:14:46.320 --> 0:14:49.840
<v Speaker 2>but you know, kind of shorter off the tee, and

0:14:50.840 --> 0:14:54.480
<v Speaker 2>we both had really good avenues into a right pin.

0:14:55.000 --> 0:14:58.520
<v Speaker 2>And what was interesting was your shot. You were able

0:14:58.560 --> 0:15:01.040
<v Speaker 2>to use a feature on the green, which is you know,

0:15:01.160 --> 0:15:03.560
<v Speaker 2>it kind of is built up on the left to

0:15:04.040 --> 0:15:07.640
<v Speaker 2>funnel your kind of slingshot your ball towards the middle

0:15:07.640 --> 0:15:10.840
<v Speaker 2>of the green from that right side. Well, mine, I'm

0:15:10.960 --> 0:15:14.240
<v Speaker 2>staring right down you know, perfect angle to hit to

0:15:14.320 --> 0:15:18.600
<v Speaker 2>that to a middle right pin, and you know it is.

0:15:19.440 --> 0:15:23.280
<v Speaker 2>You know, there's just different methods, different routes. And something

0:15:23.320 --> 0:15:25.720
<v Speaker 2>I think with Alistair Mackenzie is he's one of the

0:15:25.800 --> 0:15:29.920
<v Speaker 2>few not great players truly great. Now he could get

0:15:29.920 --> 0:15:33.800
<v Speaker 2>the golf ball around, but he wasn't a great distinguished

0:15:33.840 --> 0:15:36.520
<v Speaker 2>amateur champion. And I think one of the things that

0:15:36.520 --> 0:15:39.880
<v Speaker 2>that did was it created a sympathy for lots of

0:15:39.960 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 2>styles of play, and he accommodated different types of players

0:15:45.000 --> 0:15:48.120
<v Speaker 2>with different options of play. And that's a perfect example.

0:15:48.160 --> 0:15:52.800
<v Speaker 2>On the fourth is that being long and left is ideal,

0:15:53.600 --> 0:15:56.240
<v Speaker 2>but if you're short and right, you're not out of

0:15:56.240 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 2>the equation yet you still have a shot if you

0:15:58.800 --> 0:16:01.720
<v Speaker 2>understand the contours of the green, and that green's really cool.

0:16:01.720 --> 0:16:05.800
<v Speaker 2>It's kind of got a left tier, a front leftier,

0:16:06.320 --> 0:16:10.080
<v Speaker 2>a right mid right tier that's depressed down into kind

0:16:10.080 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 2>of a bowl, and then a back right tier. It

0:16:12.360 --> 0:16:17.280
<v Speaker 2>embodies those those Mackenzie greens where that bolpin is really

0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:19.840
<v Speaker 2>gettable and everybody can kind of get at it. It

0:16:20.000 --> 0:16:22.560
<v Speaker 2>looks harder than it is because it you know, if

0:16:22.640 --> 0:16:25.760
<v Speaker 2>you if you didn't understand the contours, you might think

0:16:25.760 --> 0:16:28.800
<v Speaker 2>that's the toughest pin. But then that back right pin

0:16:29.680 --> 0:16:32.840
<v Speaker 2>is so hard. It's such a small little target. So

0:16:32.880 --> 0:16:37.240
<v Speaker 2>it's got this malleability about it where it's got these

0:16:37.280 --> 0:16:41.080
<v Speaker 2>pins that are really difficult, really hard to get at

0:16:41.240 --> 0:16:43.960
<v Speaker 2>and make birdie. But it's also got some pins that

0:16:44.000 --> 0:16:46.600
<v Speaker 2>are really fun funnel pins that you can make a

0:16:46.600 --> 0:16:47.760
<v Speaker 2>lot of birdies.

0:16:47.360 --> 0:16:51.400
<v Speaker 1>With great hole. Now the second green, the fourth green,

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:54.920
<v Speaker 1>the fifth green, all are really good examples. I think

0:16:55.040 --> 0:16:58.080
<v Speaker 1>of how Mackenzie was designing greens when he was building

0:16:58.120 --> 0:17:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Passa Tiempo, and they have these kind of amoeba shapes

0:17:02.160 --> 0:17:04.760
<v Speaker 1>to them, where there are these little fingers that kind

0:17:04.800 --> 0:17:07.679
<v Speaker 1>of extend out from the center of the green, and

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:10.000
<v Speaker 1>then there are bunkers that kind of fit into the

0:17:10.119 --> 0:17:14.040
<v Speaker 1>notches that those fingers create. I know I'm mixing metaphors here,

0:17:14.040 --> 0:17:17.359
<v Speaker 1>but just imagine these sort of amoeba shapes with bunkers

0:17:17.800 --> 0:17:20.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of stuck into them. And a lot of the

0:17:20.600 --> 0:17:24.879
<v Speaker 1>greens that Pasa Tiempo have these shapes, and it just

0:17:24.960 --> 0:17:27.800
<v Speaker 1>gives a great variety of pin positions and all that

0:17:27.880 --> 0:17:31.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of stuff. Now, in addition to the weird shapes

0:17:31.960 --> 0:17:34.359
<v Speaker 1>that the greens have, they have wonderful contours as well.

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:39.480
<v Speaker 1>They're all very different. This is a truly kind of memorable,

0:17:39.840 --> 0:17:41.320
<v Speaker 1>wonderful set of greens.

0:17:41.520 --> 0:17:44.119
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the greens are I think on top of the

0:17:44.880 --> 0:17:50.680
<v Speaker 2>topography is jaw dropping, but the greens are really you

0:17:50.720 --> 0:17:55.639
<v Speaker 2>could just spend so much time putting around hitting different

0:17:55.680 --> 0:18:00.919
<v Speaker 2>little sections, and you know, it's the perfect example. I

0:18:00.960 --> 0:18:04.160
<v Speaker 2>always talk about how hard it is to have bad

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:08.160
<v Speaker 2>holes when you have great greens, and how great greens

0:18:08.200 --> 0:18:11.680
<v Speaker 2>are fun to play from anywhere, like any yardage. If

0:18:11.720 --> 0:18:15.680
<v Speaker 2>you put like truly world class greens, you could play

0:18:15.680 --> 0:18:18.280
<v Speaker 2>from twenty yards, you could play from two hundred yards,

0:18:18.320 --> 0:18:20.840
<v Speaker 2>you could play from six hundred yards, and the hole

0:18:20.920 --> 0:18:23.360
<v Speaker 2>is going to be fun because of the green. And

0:18:23.480 --> 0:18:25.520
<v Speaker 2>I think about a lot of the greens out there

0:18:25.720 --> 0:18:28.959
<v Speaker 2>and how enjoyable they would be to have in your

0:18:29.000 --> 0:18:33.920
<v Speaker 2>backyard because they present so many different quirks and shots

0:18:34.359 --> 0:18:37.800
<v Speaker 2>in places where you can use slopes to bank them

0:18:37.800 --> 0:18:41.400
<v Speaker 2>off into little pockets. You know, there's easy spots, there's

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:45.800
<v Speaker 2>difficult spots, and you know, the greens have a wonderful

0:18:45.880 --> 0:18:50.159
<v Speaker 2>variety and cadence to them. They are intense. Let's not

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:52.560
<v Speaker 2>be you know, let's not beat around the bush. These

0:18:52.560 --> 0:18:55.200
<v Speaker 2>are probably some of the most difficult greens to put

0:18:55.280 --> 0:18:58.719
<v Speaker 2>on in the country, just because of the combination of

0:18:58.800 --> 0:19:03.160
<v Speaker 2>their slope as well. Is there different positions that these

0:19:03.200 --> 0:19:06.399
<v Speaker 2>pins you can find them in. It just they have

0:19:06.520 --> 0:19:08.520
<v Speaker 2>these pockets. They're so hard to get at.

0:19:09.280 --> 0:19:13.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, they're almost sort of experimental. And you know, coming

0:19:14.000 --> 0:19:17.919
<v Speaker 1>off of this podcast that I did with Bob Crosby recently,

0:19:18.040 --> 0:19:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Bob was a contributor to the Postmasters episode that I did,

0:19:22.160 --> 0:19:25.679
<v Speaker 1>and he talked about how Augusta National late in Alistair

0:19:25.720 --> 0:19:29.520
<v Speaker 1>McKenzie's career, was part of an attempt to find a

0:19:29.640 --> 0:19:32.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of new way of doing architecture. You know, Mackenzie

0:19:32.840 --> 0:19:36.679
<v Speaker 1>at this point was looking for other options, ways to

0:19:36.760 --> 0:19:39.359
<v Speaker 1>kind of change what he was doing. Now. By the

0:19:39.400 --> 0:19:43.000
<v Speaker 1>time he got to Augusta, mackenzie had become convinced that

0:19:43.400 --> 0:19:46.680
<v Speaker 1>golf courses that were built in the twenties just had

0:19:46.720 --> 0:19:49.280
<v Speaker 1>too many bunkers, and he was looking for ways to

0:19:49.359 --> 0:19:52.880
<v Speaker 1>reduce the number of bunkers. Pasa Tiempo does not reflect

0:19:53.000 --> 0:19:56.320
<v Speaker 1>that mode of Alistair McKenzie's thinking. There are a lot

0:19:56.320 --> 0:20:00.240
<v Speaker 1>of bunkers out there. They're very artistically presented, a specially

0:20:00.320 --> 0:20:03.760
<v Speaker 1>around the greens. There's a kind of excess to them,

0:20:03.840 --> 0:20:08.200
<v Speaker 1>but a real beauty as well. So we're not dealing

0:20:08.200 --> 0:20:10.639
<v Speaker 1>with a Mackenzie who was kind of trying to limit

0:20:10.680 --> 0:20:12.480
<v Speaker 1>the number of bunkers that he was building on his

0:20:12.560 --> 0:20:16.840
<v Speaker 1>golf courses. But I think where you get the experimental

0:20:17.000 --> 0:20:21.080
<v Speaker 1>nature of mackenzie's later career at Pasa Tiempo is in

0:20:21.119 --> 0:20:24.440
<v Speaker 1>the design of those greens. They are just different from

0:20:24.480 --> 0:20:27.399
<v Speaker 1>what he was building earlier. You just have to go

0:20:27.440 --> 0:20:30.280
<v Speaker 1>look at Metal Club, which is a beautifully restored course,

0:20:30.320 --> 0:20:33.280
<v Speaker 1>a wonderful golf course. So I don't mean to slam

0:20:33.280 --> 0:20:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Metal Club for having uninteresting greens, because they're certainly not that,

0:20:37.520 --> 0:20:40.600
<v Speaker 1>but they're really really different. And Metal Club was built

0:20:40.640 --> 0:20:44.679
<v Speaker 1>just really a few years before Pasa Tempo. But by

0:20:44.800 --> 0:20:47.240
<v Speaker 1>the time McKenzie got to Pasa Tiempo, he was just

0:20:47.960 --> 0:20:51.520
<v Speaker 1>clearly looking for different ways to do things, you know,

0:20:51.600 --> 0:20:55.560
<v Speaker 1>and these greens are a great example of that attempt

0:20:55.600 --> 0:20:55.960
<v Speaker 1>I think.

0:20:56.560 --> 0:20:58.679
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So one other thing that I picked up on

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:02.359
<v Speaker 2>Big played Pasta Tiempo a couple of weeks before the

0:21:02.400 --> 0:21:05.280
<v Speaker 2>Masters of that's spending a week there, you know, I'm

0:21:05.280 --> 0:21:10.560
<v Speaker 2>particularly enamored with the ground contours that Mackenzie built. They're

0:21:10.600 --> 0:21:13.040
<v Speaker 2>all over the place at Augusta, nashvill and a lot

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:15.600
<v Speaker 2>of them have been taking out, taken out, you know,

0:21:15.760 --> 0:21:18.119
<v Speaker 2>some of them. And they are all over the place

0:21:18.280 --> 0:21:20.879
<v Speaker 2>at at Pasta Tiempo. And what I mean by that

0:21:21.160 --> 0:21:25.480
<v Speaker 2>is like mounds that are by no means natural, but

0:21:25.600 --> 0:21:29.480
<v Speaker 2>they were created to influence play. And there are these

0:21:29.680 --> 0:21:33.480
<v Speaker 2>contours that they help you if you're approaching from the

0:21:33.560 --> 0:21:35.840
<v Speaker 2>right angle. They hurt you if you're approaching from the

0:21:35.880 --> 0:21:39.080
<v Speaker 2>wrong angle. But one place where if you see an

0:21:39.119 --> 0:21:43.320
<v Speaker 2>old photo of one at Pasta Tiempo, you see those

0:21:43.359 --> 0:21:46.760
<v Speaker 2>beautiful mounds that were kind of littered the fair away,

0:21:46.960 --> 0:21:50.240
<v Speaker 2>and particularly the right side of the fairway, and the

0:21:50.400 --> 0:21:53.159
<v Speaker 2>obvious play was up the left, which is now a

0:21:53.240 --> 0:21:57.240
<v Speaker 2>driving range was the ideal play, and that got you

0:21:57.359 --> 0:21:59.439
<v Speaker 2>kind of over by the left. There there was that

0:21:59.560 --> 0:22:03.119
<v Speaker 2>first Ranka really showed up there on the left side

0:22:03.200 --> 0:22:06.000
<v Speaker 2>of one, but you saw all these mounds, and the

0:22:06.040 --> 0:22:09.720
<v Speaker 2>mounds are still kind of there now, and those mounds

0:22:09.840 --> 0:22:13.679
<v Speaker 2>are on the un the safer line, and it's I

0:22:13.760 --> 0:22:16.600
<v Speaker 2>just love the randomness of that, Like, oh, you hit

0:22:16.640 --> 0:22:19.000
<v Speaker 2>it over to the right, you play safe, and you're

0:22:19.119 --> 0:22:21.520
<v Speaker 2>in effectively a mogl field. It'd be like if you

0:22:21.520 --> 0:22:25.080
<v Speaker 2>were doing a ski race and you know you had

0:22:25.160 --> 0:22:30.200
<v Speaker 2>one one route that was barren of moguls, but it's

0:22:30.240 --> 0:22:33.720
<v Speaker 2>a much tougher route to take to get to. And

0:22:33.760 --> 0:22:36.840
<v Speaker 2>then you know you have the safer, the wider, easier

0:22:36.960 --> 0:22:40.119
<v Speaker 2>route to get to, but it's filled with moguls. And

0:22:40.160 --> 0:22:43.880
<v Speaker 2>that's kind of like this this. You know one as

0:22:43.960 --> 0:22:46.320
<v Speaker 2>a fully restored hole. If they ever got rid of

0:22:46.359 --> 0:22:49.800
<v Speaker 2>the driving, rage would present. And and these are why

0:22:49.840 --> 0:22:52.120
<v Speaker 2>that I think the front nine comes up shorter of

0:22:52.160 --> 0:22:54.840
<v Speaker 2>the of the back. Lind Is you look at things

0:22:54.880 --> 0:22:58.280
<v Speaker 2>like that one hole, the first hole is severely compromised

0:22:58.280 --> 0:22:58.959
<v Speaker 2>from what it was.

0:23:01.880 --> 0:23:04.560
<v Speaker 1>This episode of the Frida Egg podcast invites you to

0:23:04.640 --> 0:23:09.800
<v Speaker 1>discover the greatness within Elijah Craig small Batch. Elijah Craigbourbon

0:23:10.280 --> 0:23:12.919
<v Speaker 1>never settles for less than the best. Every bottle of

0:23:12.920 --> 0:23:16.800
<v Speaker 1>their award winning small batch carries a signature warm spice

0:23:16.920 --> 0:23:21.360
<v Speaker 1>and subtle smoke flavor. It is exceptionally smooth and well balanced.

0:23:21.800 --> 0:23:23.359
<v Speaker 1>I like to drink it on the rocks. I'm a

0:23:23.400 --> 0:23:25.560
<v Speaker 1>pretty simple guy that way, but I just like the

0:23:25.600 --> 0:23:28.400
<v Speaker 1>cool bite of a chilled drink combined with the warmth

0:23:28.520 --> 0:23:32.320
<v Speaker 1>of the bourbon flavor. I get complex aromas of vanilla beans,

0:23:32.359 --> 0:23:36.439
<v Speaker 1>sweet fruit, and fresh mint. The palate is pleasantly woody,

0:23:36.560 --> 0:23:41.200
<v Speaker 1>with accents of spice, smoke, and nutmeg. Elijah Craig won

0:23:41.280 --> 0:23:44.520
<v Speaker 1>double Gold at the San Francisco World Spirits Competition last

0:23:44.640 --> 0:23:47.680
<v Speaker 1>year and the Tried and True Award from the Ultimate

0:23:47.720 --> 0:23:51.359
<v Speaker 1>Spirits Challenge in twenty twenty. Pick up a bottle today

0:23:51.520 --> 0:23:55.240
<v Speaker 1>or order online at drizzly dot com that's d r

0:23:55.440 --> 0:23:59.440
<v Speaker 1>i z l y dot com and save five dollars

0:23:59.520 --> 0:24:02.240
<v Speaker 1>on a bottle of Elijah Craig delivered right to your

0:24:02.320 --> 0:24:07.119
<v Speaker 1>door with code fried Egg five. That's fried egg and

0:24:07.160 --> 0:24:10.600
<v Speaker 1>the number five all one word. The fried Egg is

0:24:10.600 --> 0:24:15.359
<v Speaker 1>brought to you by Elijah Craig, Kentucky. Straight bourbon whiskey, Bardstown, Kentucky,

0:24:15.600 --> 0:24:19.159
<v Speaker 1>forty seven percent alcohol by volume. Elijah Craig reminds you

0:24:19.320 --> 0:24:24.080
<v Speaker 1>to think wisely, drink wisely. All right, So why don't

0:24:24.080 --> 0:24:27.399
<v Speaker 1>we get to the back nine. It's a brilliant back nine.

0:24:27.800 --> 0:24:31.240
<v Speaker 1>It's it's just about close to perfect. What are some

0:24:31.280 --> 0:24:34.280
<v Speaker 1>of the virtues of the back nine that you think of? First?

0:24:34.880 --> 0:24:38.760
<v Speaker 2>I think, just in general, the variety of ways that

0:24:38.840 --> 0:24:42.000
<v Speaker 2>a central hazard is used. So the central hazard is

0:24:42.240 --> 0:24:46.360
<v Speaker 2>this baranka. It's a dramatic baranka. It's not a small,

0:24:46.440 --> 0:24:50.560
<v Speaker 2>little dried up creek. It's a canyon baranca variety. So

0:24:50.640 --> 0:24:55.760
<v Speaker 2>it's it's wide. The general variety in which this is

0:24:56.000 --> 0:25:00.440
<v Speaker 2>used in the ways you play along it, over it,

0:25:01.119 --> 0:25:05.159
<v Speaker 2>through it in different parts of the back nine. So

0:25:05.480 --> 0:25:08.680
<v Speaker 2>this is the central theme of the back nine. Is

0:25:09.160 --> 0:25:13.840
<v Speaker 2>this you're effectively your adventure or battle with the baranca.

0:25:14.520 --> 0:25:16.600
<v Speaker 2>It's going to ask you right off the bat to

0:25:16.680 --> 0:25:19.080
<v Speaker 2>hit it over it on ten. And this used to

0:25:19.080 --> 0:25:21.320
<v Speaker 2>be a much larger carry when it was a par five,

0:25:21.960 --> 0:25:25.680
<v Speaker 2>so you know today it's not a huge part of it.

0:25:25.760 --> 0:25:28.040
<v Speaker 2>But when when the t shot was in the middle

0:25:28.080 --> 0:25:31.080
<v Speaker 2>of that parking lot like it used to be, this

0:25:31.280 --> 0:25:36.040
<v Speaker 2>was a imposing carry and you know the So you

0:25:36.119 --> 0:25:38.280
<v Speaker 2>start with it and it runs up the left on

0:25:38.440 --> 0:25:42.159
<v Speaker 2>that hole on ten and up into the green. The

0:25:42.640 --> 0:25:46.680
<v Speaker 2>eleventh that cuts up the left and across the twelfth

0:25:46.680 --> 0:25:49.280
<v Speaker 2>that plays up the left and then in front of

0:25:49.320 --> 0:25:52.960
<v Speaker 2>the green, so you're contending with it on a different shot,

0:25:53.560 --> 0:25:55.760
<v Speaker 2>different part of the shot. It's kind of you know,

0:25:55.840 --> 0:25:58.679
<v Speaker 2>on the approach, you know at the green as opposed

0:25:58.680 --> 0:26:02.280
<v Speaker 2>to eleven. It's it's over early on and off the

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:05.439
<v Speaker 2>tee that you're dealing with it. Thirteen it runs up

0:26:05.480 --> 0:26:07.520
<v Speaker 2>the left. Again, I guess one of the things that

0:26:07.600 --> 0:26:09.359
<v Speaker 2>I would say is that it does run up the

0:26:09.440 --> 0:26:09.960
<v Speaker 2>left a lot.

0:26:10.200 --> 0:26:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so that's the orientation of the nine. It kind

0:26:12.880 --> 0:26:16.240
<v Speaker 1>of goes counterclockwise, and so the baranca is often on

0:26:16.240 --> 0:26:16.600
<v Speaker 1>the left.

0:26:16.680 --> 0:26:19.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So thirteen is up the left, fourteen it's up

0:26:19.560 --> 0:26:21.959
<v Speaker 2>the left, but it's also in the fairway. One of

0:26:22.000 --> 0:26:24.439
<v Speaker 2>the things I love with thirteen and fourteen is the

0:26:24.440 --> 0:26:29.960
<v Speaker 2>way that Mackenzie brought the baranca feature out into the

0:26:30.000 --> 0:26:34.719
<v Speaker 2>golf features that weren't necessarily, you know, baranca features. So

0:26:35.200 --> 0:26:38.000
<v Speaker 2>on thirteen, if you kind of look at the way

0:26:38.160 --> 0:26:42.160
<v Speaker 2>he built that hole, the dramatic bunkering around the green

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:45.280
<v Speaker 2>is unforgettable. But really what that is supposed to do

0:26:45.440 --> 0:26:48.880
<v Speaker 2>is to mimic the Baranca. So it's supposed to kind

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:51.720
<v Speaker 2>of feel like it comes right out of that Baranca

0:26:51.760 --> 0:26:54.199
<v Speaker 2>on the left, which it does a great job of

0:26:54.400 --> 0:26:58.440
<v Speaker 2>like that. It's supposed to be resemble that. And then

0:26:58.560 --> 0:27:02.360
<v Speaker 2>on fourteen it across the fairway and makes just such

0:27:02.400 --> 0:27:06.720
<v Speaker 2>a compellingly strategic golf hole with the you know, hit

0:27:06.800 --> 0:27:08.920
<v Speaker 2>it over this on the left and you've got the

0:27:08.960 --> 0:27:11.119
<v Speaker 2>perfect spot to hit a shot in, but you have

0:27:11.160 --> 0:27:13.600
<v Speaker 2>to deal with you know, you could lose your ball

0:27:13.640 --> 0:27:16.560
<v Speaker 2>on the left, and if you don't clear over that

0:27:17.000 --> 0:27:19.919
<v Speaker 2>central fairway feature, which is kind of about probably like

0:27:20.000 --> 0:27:23.760
<v Speaker 2>eight feet tall, you're going to have a blind shot

0:27:23.840 --> 0:27:27.600
<v Speaker 2>with a potentially really awkward lie. And then and then

0:27:27.680 --> 0:27:31.840
<v Speaker 2>obviously fifteen is the par three in the baranca, and

0:27:31.880 --> 0:27:34.959
<v Speaker 2>then sixteen you're coming out of it with it up

0:27:35.000 --> 0:27:37.439
<v Speaker 2>the left and it cuts across the green again, and

0:27:37.840 --> 0:27:41.000
<v Speaker 2>seventeen you have it behind the green, and eighteen is

0:27:41.040 --> 0:27:44.119
<v Speaker 2>that one last shot over the biggest part of the

0:27:44.119 --> 0:27:46.760
<v Speaker 2>baranca to a green that sits right on the other

0:27:46.840 --> 0:27:47.360
<v Speaker 2>side of it.

0:27:48.040 --> 0:27:51.840
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned seventeen and eighteen. They can be controversial holes.

0:27:52.160 --> 0:27:55.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, if people are trying to pick nets about

0:27:55.280 --> 0:27:59.960
<v Speaker 1>the back nine at Pasa Tiempo, they'll often focus on seven,

0:28:00.560 --> 0:28:02.879
<v Speaker 1>a shortish par four that a lot of people find

0:28:03.560 --> 0:28:07.520
<v Speaker 1>somewhat undistinguished compared to the other holes, and then eighteen,

0:28:07.680 --> 0:28:11.240
<v Speaker 1>which is a par three finisher, and people often don't

0:28:11.320 --> 0:28:15.240
<v Speaker 1>like par three finishers. Could we briefly say a couple

0:28:15.240 --> 0:28:17.600
<v Speaker 1>of words about seventeen. I'm not saying it's the best

0:28:17.640 --> 0:28:20.959
<v Speaker 1>hole on the back nine, but I think it's a

0:28:21.040 --> 0:28:24.560
<v Speaker 1>really good golf hole that gets underrated, and especially if

0:28:24.600 --> 0:28:28.560
<v Speaker 1>you haven't been there since they restored the green, since

0:28:28.600 --> 0:28:31.680
<v Speaker 1>they extended that green all the way back essentially to

0:28:31.720 --> 0:28:34.280
<v Speaker 1>the Baranka. It used to be a much smaller green.

0:28:34.359 --> 0:28:38.400
<v Speaker 1>It had reduced to that size, but now it's this long,

0:28:38.640 --> 0:28:41.240
<v Speaker 1>strange green. Kind of I think it's kind of a

0:28:41.240 --> 0:28:41.680
<v Speaker 1>cool hole.

0:28:42.120 --> 0:28:47.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's super cool. I think, Well, here are the reasons.

0:28:47.640 --> 0:28:53.880
<v Speaker 2>The topography is pretty syneicially severe. You're playing significantly uphill,

0:28:54.600 --> 0:28:58.840
<v Speaker 2>but also that that slope, that side slope is pretty

0:28:58.880 --> 0:29:01.880
<v Speaker 2>severe left or right, and you're hitting a shorter iron

0:29:01.920 --> 0:29:06.600
<v Speaker 2>in and it's this long, narrow green that presents a

0:29:06.720 --> 0:29:10.479
<v Speaker 2>very hard shot for a shorter iron. Your tendency is

0:29:10.520 --> 0:29:14.560
<v Speaker 2>to miss it short right. And with that lie and

0:29:14.840 --> 0:29:18.680
<v Speaker 2>with that green, it's an awful shot to miss short

0:29:18.760 --> 0:29:21.560
<v Speaker 2>right because you're you end up way below the green

0:29:21.960 --> 0:29:24.960
<v Speaker 2>with all the slope in the ground, so the green

0:29:25.080 --> 0:29:28.680
<v Speaker 2>kind of sits high up and if you miss short right,

0:29:28.720 --> 0:29:32.480
<v Speaker 2>you're kind of dead. And the other aspect is then

0:29:32.520 --> 0:29:35.240
<v Speaker 2>it gets you to bail left, and if you bail

0:29:35.320 --> 0:29:37.040
<v Speaker 2>left and you miss it over on the left side

0:29:37.040 --> 0:29:41.040
<v Speaker 2>of the green. I cannot tell you that I've had

0:29:41.040 --> 0:29:44.479
<v Speaker 2>the putt probably three times, and every time I end

0:29:44.560 --> 0:29:47.479
<v Speaker 2>up like ten to fifteen feet past. It is so

0:29:48.120 --> 0:29:53.000
<v Speaker 2>unbelievably fast. Even when you know it's so fast, it's

0:29:53.040 --> 0:29:56.640
<v Speaker 2>almost impossible to not hit it past the hole, so

0:29:56.720 --> 0:30:00.760
<v Speaker 2>you end up I also like that the green, this long,

0:30:00.880 --> 0:30:04.719
<v Speaker 2>skinny green. It's so different from every other green on

0:30:04.760 --> 0:30:07.400
<v Speaker 2>the on the back nine and the whole course in general,

0:30:08.120 --> 0:30:11.760
<v Speaker 2>and those backpins are impossible to get back to it is.

0:30:11.920 --> 0:30:15.120
<v Speaker 2>It's a cool hole, it's a connector. Yeah, sure it

0:30:15.160 --> 0:30:19.120
<v Speaker 2>gets you to set eighteen t. It's not sixteen. It

0:30:19.160 --> 0:30:21.120
<v Speaker 2>comes like when you think about it, in the stretch

0:30:21.160 --> 0:30:24.680
<v Speaker 2>of holes it comes in. It's understandable why people feel

0:30:24.720 --> 0:30:28.000
<v Speaker 2>like it's a miss. But there was no way you

0:30:28.040 --> 0:30:32.120
<v Speaker 2>could build a hole set from seventeen to eighteen green.

0:30:32.080 --> 0:30:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Without without like blasting out the hillside. You'd have to

0:30:35.600 --> 0:30:37.280
<v Speaker 1>like if you if you put not to pick on

0:30:37.320 --> 0:30:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Tom Fasio, but I'm gonna pick on Tom Fasio. If

0:30:40.040 --> 0:30:42.480
<v Speaker 1>you put Tom Fazio out there and said build a

0:30:42.480 --> 0:30:46.160
<v Speaker 1>long finishing hole from seventeen t to eighteen green. Then

0:30:46.160 --> 0:30:48.720
<v Speaker 1>he probably would have blasted a valley through that through

0:30:48.720 --> 0:30:52.360
<v Speaker 1>that hillside there to open up the visibility to eighteen green,

0:30:53.280 --> 0:30:56.200
<v Speaker 1>but that wasn't really an option and they decided not

0:30:56.440 --> 0:30:59.480
<v Speaker 1>to do that here fortunately, And the landscape is intact.

0:30:59.720 --> 0:31:02.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And that's the thing. So if you want to

0:31:02.640 --> 0:31:06.440
<v Speaker 2>make that a hole like the that's the problem is

0:31:06.480 --> 0:31:08.920
<v Speaker 2>that it would end up being this really awkward like

0:31:10.000 --> 0:31:13.240
<v Speaker 2>for long hitters, it would be fine, but for anybody

0:31:13.240 --> 0:31:15.160
<v Speaker 2>that's not a long hitter, they'd be laying up to

0:31:15.320 --> 0:31:18.080
<v Speaker 2>like the edge to where the eighteenth tea is just

0:31:18.120 --> 0:31:22.520
<v Speaker 2>to have a shot and hitting like a fairway wood

0:31:22.640 --> 0:31:26.720
<v Speaker 2>long iron into that green. It would be a silly,

0:31:26.760 --> 0:31:30.200
<v Speaker 2>silly hole for the vast majority of golfers.

0:31:31.000 --> 0:31:33.800
<v Speaker 1>And the baranka is like one hundred and thirty yards

0:31:33.840 --> 0:31:36.040
<v Speaker 1>wide at that point. Would you say, that's that's about

0:31:36.040 --> 0:31:36.400
<v Speaker 1>what it is.

0:31:36.440 --> 0:31:38.840
<v Speaker 2>I think. So, I mean it's from like that forward

0:31:38.880 --> 0:31:41.520
<v Speaker 2>tee to the green effectively, what's that just.

0:31:41.480 --> 0:31:43.959
<v Speaker 1>To the front of the green. Yeah, it's about one

0:31:44.040 --> 0:31:47.120
<v Speaker 1>hundred and thirty yards just to get across the baranka.

0:31:47.240 --> 0:31:49.760
<v Speaker 1>And so if you're trying to build a par four

0:31:49.800 --> 0:31:52.200
<v Speaker 1>where the landing zone is somewhere short of the baranca

0:31:52.600 --> 0:31:54.840
<v Speaker 1>and then the shot is across. There are a lot

0:31:54.840 --> 0:31:57.840
<v Speaker 1>of players who are going to be in situations where

0:31:58.440 --> 0:32:01.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, they have to like hit a little you know, pitch.

0:32:01.840 --> 0:32:05.320
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's what I've seen. My mom have to do

0:32:05.400 --> 0:32:09.160
<v Speaker 2>this on numerous occasions, and I always like think about it.

0:32:09.240 --> 0:32:12.719
<v Speaker 2>I'm like, what a silly golf hole is? Where, you know,

0:32:12.840 --> 0:32:15.040
<v Speaker 2>sometimes my mom will hit a layup shot and the

0:32:15.120 --> 0:32:17.800
<v Speaker 2>layup shots not quite good enough and she has to

0:32:17.880 --> 0:32:22.640
<v Speaker 2>lay up again, right, and it's like, what are we

0:32:22.680 --> 0:32:26.440
<v Speaker 2>doing that? Some people have to play golf this way

0:32:26.560 --> 0:32:28.560
<v Speaker 2>and I could just blast it over it, you know.

0:32:29.400 --> 0:32:31.640
<v Speaker 2>So I think that's the problem that you would run

0:32:31.680 --> 0:32:35.920
<v Speaker 2>into the seventeenth hole as it stands, though, is I

0:32:35.960 --> 0:32:38.800
<v Speaker 2>would say, it's not in my it's not in my

0:32:38.960 --> 0:32:43.360
<v Speaker 2>bottom five or four holes at pass a Tiempo.

0:32:43.920 --> 0:32:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I think there are definitely holes on the front

0:32:46.320 --> 0:32:49.800
<v Speaker 1>nine as they stand right now, they're weaker, and I

0:32:49.840 --> 0:32:52.880
<v Speaker 1>think that is an actively fun, cool golf hole to

0:32:52.920 --> 0:32:55.840
<v Speaker 1>play now, the par three finisher. You asked me at

0:32:55.840 --> 0:32:58.080
<v Speaker 1>one point, why do you think people don't like having

0:32:58.080 --> 0:33:00.520
<v Speaker 1>a part three as a finishing hole? And I came

0:33:00.600 --> 0:33:03.320
<v Speaker 1>up empty. I was like, I don't know why. I'm

0:33:03.320 --> 0:33:05.320
<v Speaker 1>not sure where that objection comes from. So I asked

0:33:05.360 --> 0:33:07.800
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter and I got a bunch of responses and

0:33:07.840 --> 0:33:10.160
<v Speaker 1>they were all, you know, it was an actually a

0:33:10.240 --> 0:33:13.160
<v Speaker 1>nice Twitter moment where where people were sort of explaining

0:33:13.200 --> 0:33:16.440
<v Speaker 1>their preferences and nobody was judging anybody else, and it

0:33:16.680 --> 0:33:19.680
<v Speaker 1>didn't turn into an argument. It was just a very satisfying,

0:33:20.440 --> 0:33:23.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, finding out of people's opinions about this. And

0:33:24.440 --> 0:33:27.720
<v Speaker 1>the most common responses that I got to this question

0:33:27.800 --> 0:33:32.120
<v Speaker 1>were one, A satisfying finishing hole on a golf course

0:33:32.120 --> 0:33:35.000
<v Speaker 1>should assess all aspects of the game, so the drive,

0:33:35.280 --> 0:33:38.440
<v Speaker 1>the approach, and the putt and whatever other shots come,

0:33:39.120 --> 0:33:41.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, as a result of poor shots or whatever.

0:33:41.840 --> 0:33:45.840
<v Speaker 1>That it just feels more satisfying and more complete for

0:33:45.920 --> 0:33:48.960
<v Speaker 1>a finishing hole to assess all those aspects of the

0:33:49.000 --> 0:33:52.520
<v Speaker 1>game instead of just the approach and the putt. Another

0:33:52.680 --> 0:33:55.800
<v Speaker 1>argument that people made against par three finishing holes is

0:33:55.840 --> 0:33:59.440
<v Speaker 1>that par four and five finishing holes have more variants,

0:33:59.560 --> 0:34:03.440
<v Speaker 1>more a greater variety of outcomes for the end of

0:34:03.520 --> 0:34:07.120
<v Speaker 1>a round or a match, and so they're more dynamic.

0:34:07.880 --> 0:34:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Another common response was that people just enjoy hitting driver

0:34:11.640 --> 0:34:13.920
<v Speaker 1>on the last hole, just one last chance to smash it.

0:34:14.960 --> 0:34:17.879
<v Speaker 1>And then finally people were saying that a par three

0:34:18.040 --> 0:34:21.280
<v Speaker 1>just feels like an abrupt way to end the round,

0:34:21.400 --> 0:34:24.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of like an anti climax, like you're being rushed

0:34:24.400 --> 0:34:27.359
<v Speaker 1>out the door, like here's the end, ook there it is.

0:34:28.120 --> 0:34:31.600
<v Speaker 2>I always think about the eighteenth hole. The eighteenth hole

0:34:31.840 --> 0:34:34.840
<v Speaker 2>is a means. The first and eighteenth hole to me

0:34:35.719 --> 0:34:38.839
<v Speaker 2>are means to get away and get to the clubhouse.

0:34:39.560 --> 0:34:42.200
<v Speaker 2>Those are the ways I think about the first in

0:34:42.280 --> 0:34:47.600
<v Speaker 2>the eighteenth hole, and I rarely you rarely see great

0:34:47.680 --> 0:34:52.200
<v Speaker 2>first holes or eighteenth holes. Yet everybody always likes to

0:34:52.239 --> 0:34:55.560
<v Speaker 2>be like, you know, is the eighteenth hole like if

0:34:55.560 --> 0:34:58.839
<v Speaker 2>the architect did his job, you know, probably should be

0:34:58.960 --> 0:35:02.920
<v Speaker 2>just like kind of street. Unless it's like an unbelievable

0:35:02.960 --> 0:35:06.960
<v Speaker 2>site with great holes everywhere, the eighteenth hole is probably

0:35:06.960 --> 0:35:09.040
<v Speaker 2>going to be underwhelming. Like when I think about the

0:35:09.080 --> 0:35:15.200
<v Speaker 2>great eighteenth holes, the truly mind blowing eighteenth holes, the

0:35:15.239 --> 0:35:19.120
<v Speaker 2>one course that pops into my mind is Sandhills, And

0:35:19.200 --> 0:35:22.840
<v Speaker 2>you know what, there's mind blowing golf holes everywhere you

0:35:22.920 --> 0:35:23.840
<v Speaker 2>turn out there.

0:35:23.840 --> 0:35:26.160
<v Speaker 1>There's a million great golf holes, and they could have

0:35:26.880 --> 0:35:28.960
<v Speaker 1>my impression of that project is that they could have

0:35:29.000 --> 0:35:32.160
<v Speaker 1>put the clubhouse anywhere a lot of different places. The

0:35:32.200 --> 0:35:35.160
<v Speaker 1>other thing, they had a huge array of options.

0:35:35.280 --> 0:35:38.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, all right, can we talk about the eighteenth at

0:35:38.200 --> 0:35:40.520
<v Speaker 2>Pasta Tampo. Yeah, here's how.

0:35:40.440 --> 0:35:42.920
<v Speaker 1>I let's talk about the why is why is it

0:35:42.960 --> 0:35:43.759
<v Speaker 1>a good golf This.

0:35:43.800 --> 0:35:45.839
<v Speaker 2>Is just this is a personal A lot of people

0:35:45.960 --> 0:35:50.080
<v Speaker 2>use personal examples there, and I'll give you one of

0:35:50.200 --> 0:35:52.720
<v Speaker 2>me is that I was I think I was playing

0:35:52.960 --> 0:35:56.839
<v Speaker 2>a match against Zach Blair, friend of the program there,

0:35:57.280 --> 0:35:59.000
<v Speaker 2>and it was it was a close match. It was

0:35:59.239 --> 0:36:03.440
<v Speaker 2>we were tied going into the last hole, and I

0:36:03.520 --> 0:36:07.120
<v Speaker 2>remember You're standing on that tee and you're just thinking, God,

0:36:07.320 --> 0:36:09.120
<v Speaker 2>I got to hit a perfect shot here. I got

0:36:09.160 --> 0:36:12.359
<v Speaker 2>to hit a truly great golf shot here, because if

0:36:12.360 --> 0:36:15.040
<v Speaker 2>I don't hit one, Zach's probably gonna hit one. And

0:36:15.320 --> 0:36:18.640
<v Speaker 2>from a match play standpoint, I think it puts the

0:36:18.880 --> 0:36:22.440
<v Speaker 2>ultimate emphasis on hitting a golf shot. And at the

0:36:22.520 --> 0:36:25.200
<v Speaker 2>time and moment, and this golf course was designed when

0:36:25.239 --> 0:36:27.960
<v Speaker 2>match play was the dominant form of game of the game.

0:36:28.360 --> 0:36:30.919
<v Speaker 2>You know, Bobby Jones was the first person to play

0:36:30.920 --> 0:36:33.520
<v Speaker 2>the golf course and he made his career in his

0:36:33.560 --> 0:36:36.480
<v Speaker 2>fame playing match play and winning matches, and the eighteenth

0:36:36.560 --> 0:36:40.680
<v Speaker 2>hole as a finisher. While it might, you know, let

0:36:40.680 --> 0:36:43.000
<v Speaker 2>people down from a stroke play sense, if you're playing

0:36:43.000 --> 0:36:46.000
<v Speaker 2>a match, it will not let you down. I guarantee it.

0:36:46.040 --> 0:36:48.640
<v Speaker 2>If your match takes it to eighteen, it's so fun.

0:36:48.719 --> 0:36:52.200
<v Speaker 2>It's like the best way to finish. And I remember

0:36:52.920 --> 0:36:56.360
<v Speaker 2>I hit a shot that rolled up the slope or

0:36:56.560 --> 0:36:59.680
<v Speaker 2>landed past the flag and spun down the slope two

0:36:59.800 --> 0:37:04.239
<v Speaker 2>time true kick and range and Zach did the same thing,

0:37:04.960 --> 0:37:08.200
<v Speaker 2>and it was just like the most fun minute of

0:37:08.760 --> 0:37:12.839
<v Speaker 2>golf watching the two shots do it. And it was

0:37:13.120 --> 0:37:16.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, we both executed a shot. And but you know,

0:37:16.680 --> 0:37:19.200
<v Speaker 2>an average shot there if you don't hit a great

0:37:19.239 --> 0:37:23.680
<v Speaker 2>shot birdie is an easy task to accomplish if you

0:37:23.760 --> 0:37:26.279
<v Speaker 2>hit a great shot there. If you don't hit a

0:37:26.280 --> 0:37:30.560
<v Speaker 2>great shot there, fours and fives are easily in the ballpark.

0:37:30.680 --> 0:37:33.360
<v Speaker 2>Like you know, you're one misstep away from a double

0:37:33.360 --> 0:37:34.080
<v Speaker 2>bow gear warse.

0:37:34.800 --> 0:37:37.719
<v Speaker 1>You can four pet that green so easily. If you're

0:37:37.760 --> 0:37:38.959
<v Speaker 1>in the wrong section of the green.

0:37:39.160 --> 0:37:41.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And if you're chipping from the wrong spot, you

0:37:41.760 --> 0:37:43.919
<v Speaker 2>could be in if you say the pitt's back left,

0:37:43.920 --> 0:37:45.840
<v Speaker 2>do you miss long left, you might not even be

0:37:45.880 --> 0:37:47.040
<v Speaker 2>able to keep the ball on the green.

0:37:47.200 --> 0:37:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's probably gonna run off the front front right. Yeah.

0:37:50.680 --> 0:37:56.480
<v Speaker 2>So it presents this high variance situation for an end

0:37:56.520 --> 0:38:00.520
<v Speaker 2>of a match, which is it's thrilling, it's and you're

0:38:00.560 --> 0:38:04.600
<v Speaker 2>hitting over this baranca. It's it's symbolic because it's the

0:38:04.760 --> 0:38:07.839
<v Speaker 2>final conquest of this hazard you're playing against all day

0:38:08.200 --> 0:38:11.960
<v Speaker 2>and it's like your last you know, jolt of the

0:38:11.960 --> 0:38:15.280
<v Speaker 2>theme and what makes past tempo pasta tiempo.

0:38:15.680 --> 0:38:18.479
<v Speaker 1>I agree. I think it's a it's a thrilling last hole,

0:38:18.560 --> 0:38:21.560
<v Speaker 1>it's a great par three, and that would address a

0:38:21.560 --> 0:38:25.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of people's concerns. I think that you know, it's

0:38:25.160 --> 0:38:28.880
<v Speaker 1>hard to play that hole and think that's an anti

0:38:28.880 --> 0:38:33.320
<v Speaker 1>climax or that's an unsatisfying way to finish my round.

0:38:33.680 --> 0:38:35.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's even a great walk that you do

0:38:36.560 --> 0:38:39.880
<v Speaker 1>across the baranca. You walk across this bridge and you

0:38:40.000 --> 0:38:42.400
<v Speaker 1>have that moment of like the round is coming to

0:38:42.440 --> 0:38:45.640
<v Speaker 1>an end and I get this one last wonderful walk

0:38:45.960 --> 0:38:51.400
<v Speaker 1>across this bridge, across this beautiful natural phenomenon. And so

0:38:51.520 --> 0:38:54.839
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of people's concerns about the way

0:38:54.920 --> 0:38:58.120
<v Speaker 1>that a par three eighteenth hole might feel just anti

0:38:58.239 --> 0:39:01.400
<v Speaker 1>climactic our address just by the fact that this is

0:39:01.440 --> 0:39:05.279
<v Speaker 1>a terrific final hole. That said, I understand some of

0:39:05.280 --> 0:39:10.040
<v Speaker 1>people's arguments about not having a par three final hole.

0:39:10.080 --> 0:39:14.080
<v Speaker 1>We had some really intelligent responses from you know, Kevin

0:39:14.160 --> 0:39:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Clark saying, I don't care whether a pro course finishes

0:39:17.400 --> 0:39:19.640
<v Speaker 1>on a par three, but when playing, I want to

0:39:19.680 --> 0:39:22.360
<v Speaker 1>play a full hole and rip a drive one last time.

0:39:22.680 --> 0:39:25.720
<v Speaker 1>It's the culmination of the day. Smacking one on eighteen

0:39:25.800 --> 0:39:28.720
<v Speaker 1>feels great. We have one from Cameron Ford, who's actually

0:39:28.719 --> 0:39:31.880
<v Speaker 1>my cousin. I enjoy the longer walk on the last

0:39:31.880 --> 0:39:35.319
<v Speaker 1>hole at Chambers twice a week used to carry At

0:39:35.400 --> 0:39:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Chambers Bay, they used to start people on the back nine,

0:39:37.719 --> 0:39:40.040
<v Speaker 1>so you'd finish on nine a par three. The ending

0:39:40.120 --> 0:39:43.000
<v Speaker 1>just sort of happened versus on eighteen, where you get

0:39:43.000 --> 0:39:46.120
<v Speaker 1>to soak it in. I find those arguments like pretty

0:39:46.200 --> 0:39:50.040
<v Speaker 1>reasonable and in a sense persuasive, but in the end

0:39:50.480 --> 0:39:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that they're all sort of overwhelmed by the

0:39:54.120 --> 0:39:57.960
<v Speaker 1>principle of an architect should be allowed to find the

0:39:58.000 --> 0:40:02.200
<v Speaker 1>best possible solution the land that he or she is given,

0:40:02.840 --> 0:40:06.600
<v Speaker 1>and so I'm just really glad that Marion Hollins, as

0:40:06.640 --> 0:40:10.920
<v Speaker 1>the visionary behind this project as the owner, allowed Alistair

0:40:11.000 --> 0:40:13.480
<v Speaker 1>mackenzie to finish this course on a par three and

0:40:13.600 --> 0:40:16.200
<v Speaker 1>didn't say, oh, no, we can't do that. That's you know,

0:40:16.760 --> 0:40:18.560
<v Speaker 1>try to think of any other great course that ends

0:40:18.600 --> 0:40:21.040
<v Speaker 1>on a par three that that people wouldn't like that.

0:40:21.719 --> 0:40:24.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad that she was open to the idea of

0:40:24.480 --> 0:40:28.040
<v Speaker 1>this unwritten rule being broken. And I would hope that

0:40:28.680 --> 0:40:33.360
<v Speaker 1>in spite of people's general and in some ways understandable

0:40:33.480 --> 0:40:36.160
<v Speaker 1>preference for finishing on a par four or par five,

0:40:36.880 --> 0:40:41.840
<v Speaker 1>that that preference isn't so ingrained that future owners, that

0:40:41.960 --> 0:40:46.600
<v Speaker 1>future clients aren't telling architects. Yeah, I know that having

0:40:46.680 --> 0:40:48.880
<v Speaker 1>a par three eighteenth hole might be the best solution

0:40:49.040 --> 0:40:51.920
<v Speaker 1>for this property, but we can't do that because people

0:40:51.920 --> 0:40:55.160
<v Speaker 1>would reject it. The more we put golf architecture into

0:40:55.200 --> 0:40:58.879
<v Speaker 1>a box, the more architects have to, you know, kind

0:40:58.880 --> 0:41:02.720
<v Speaker 1>of work around these rules rules and reject what the

0:41:02.760 --> 0:41:06.320
<v Speaker 1>best routings would be, just because they have to achieve

0:41:06.400 --> 0:41:09.520
<v Speaker 1>a certain par number, a certain number of holes, and

0:41:09.800 --> 0:41:12.759
<v Speaker 1>this requirement that the eighteenth hole be a long hole.

0:41:13.280 --> 0:41:16.600
<v Speaker 1>And so I think that there is that potential danger

0:41:17.239 --> 0:41:21.200
<v Speaker 1>of being too firm in one's preference for a non

0:41:21.239 --> 0:41:24.360
<v Speaker 1>par three eighteenth hole. And I think that always the

0:41:24.719 --> 0:41:27.600
<v Speaker 1>question should be, well, was it the best solution for

0:41:27.640 --> 0:41:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the land, and if it is, then great.

0:41:30.440 --> 0:41:33.359
<v Speaker 2>I no complaints here, I you know, I think the

0:41:33.360 --> 0:41:36.440
<v Speaker 2>most important thing you said there was putting architecture in

0:41:36.480 --> 0:41:39.759
<v Speaker 2>a box, because Pasita Tempo is an example of architecture

0:41:39.840 --> 0:41:43.200
<v Speaker 2>not in a box and an architect that wasn't afraid

0:41:43.239 --> 0:41:45.840
<v Speaker 2>it wasn't afraid to experiment and try new things.

0:41:46.440 --> 0:41:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about the future of Pasa Tempo.

0:41:48.560 --> 0:41:55.239
<v Speaker 2>Oh, what a delightful, delightful topic. So the club announced

0:41:56.320 --> 0:42:01.640
<v Speaker 2>that they would be undertaking a full restoration, which is,

0:42:01.840 --> 0:42:06.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, a historical renovation really when you look at it.

0:42:06.600 --> 0:42:10.520
<v Speaker 2>They will be taking the greens that are original to

0:42:10.920 --> 0:42:14.040
<v Speaker 2>nineteen twenty nine in their current form, like they are

0:42:14.160 --> 0:42:18.360
<v Speaker 2>original greens. They have not been you know, monkeyed around with.

0:42:18.520 --> 0:42:20.799
<v Speaker 2>They are they're you know, they've been monkeyed around with

0:42:20.920 --> 0:42:23.600
<v Speaker 2>a little bit over the years, but they are the

0:42:23.640 --> 0:42:27.719
<v Speaker 2>original Alistair Mackenzie greens and they will be rebuilding them.

0:42:28.560 --> 0:42:30.799
<v Speaker 2>On top of this, they will be doing some you know,

0:42:30.920 --> 0:42:33.399
<v Speaker 2>they'll get new grass in the faraways, they will get

0:42:33.440 --> 0:42:38.560
<v Speaker 2>new irrigation, they will rebuild bunkers. They will also do

0:42:38.680 --> 0:42:44.520
<v Speaker 2>a significant project on clearing out the barancas. So overall,

0:42:45.239 --> 0:42:48.240
<v Speaker 2>you know, this is a golf course that's investing in

0:42:48.360 --> 0:42:51.919
<v Speaker 2>its product, which is overall, you know, generally a good

0:42:51.960 --> 0:42:56.720
<v Speaker 2>thing to do. They've obviously seen a rise in popularity

0:42:56.920 --> 0:43:00.320
<v Speaker 2>over the years. Of recent years, they are are charging

0:43:00.360 --> 0:43:04.040
<v Speaker 2>a much more significant greens fee than even three years ago.

0:43:05.000 --> 0:43:07.920
<v Speaker 2>I believe now it's around three hundred and fifty dollars

0:43:08.000 --> 0:43:11.480
<v Speaker 2>or so to play this. Their membership, which is one

0:43:11.480 --> 0:43:15.920
<v Speaker 2>of the most unique memberships in all of golf, kind

0:43:16.000 --> 0:43:22.400
<v Speaker 2>of operates as a lot of NFTs operate now, where

0:43:22.640 --> 0:43:26.919
<v Speaker 2>it's a you buy a membership share and you own

0:43:27.000 --> 0:43:31.040
<v Speaker 2>the membership and you can sell the membership share for

0:43:31.120 --> 0:43:34.520
<v Speaker 2>however much you want when you want out. So if

0:43:34.560 --> 0:43:37.560
<v Speaker 2>you bought a membership, say in two thousand and eight,

0:43:37.680 --> 0:43:40.040
<v Speaker 2>I think I've heard that they were going for like

0:43:40.080 --> 0:43:44.160
<v Speaker 2>twenty five grand. Today these membership units are going for

0:43:44.239 --> 0:43:46.680
<v Speaker 2>like two hundred and fifty grand. And one of the

0:43:46.760 --> 0:43:49.320
<v Speaker 2>unique with it being open to the public every day,

0:43:49.560 --> 0:43:52.080
<v Speaker 2>what it does for the membership is that they never

0:43:53.080 --> 0:43:57.440
<v Speaker 2>are going to be assessed ever. Their their fees are

0:43:57.560 --> 0:44:01.280
<v Speaker 2>capped effectively like this is what you pay every month

0:44:01.400 --> 0:44:04.640
<v Speaker 2>and you're not gonna get hit with charges beyond that.

0:44:05.400 --> 0:44:08.239
<v Speaker 2>And then you own the membership, you can sell it

0:44:08.320 --> 0:44:11.120
<v Speaker 2>for whatever you want. And the market values obviously been

0:44:11.160 --> 0:44:15.080
<v Speaker 2>going up for that. For example, this membership because of

0:44:15.120 --> 0:44:18.080
<v Speaker 2>their structure with the public play, which is why more

0:44:18.120 --> 0:44:21.359
<v Speaker 2>and more memberships should allow for public play, is they

0:44:21.360 --> 0:44:24.200
<v Speaker 2>aren't paying a dime. None of the members are paying

0:44:24.239 --> 0:44:28.080
<v Speaker 2>out of pocket for this restoration, which will be a

0:44:28.120 --> 0:44:31.759
<v Speaker 2>significant dollar amount. I believe the plan is to do

0:44:32.120 --> 0:44:35.640
<v Speaker 2>one to nine next year and the other nine the

0:44:35.680 --> 0:44:38.800
<v Speaker 2>following year. So they will take one nine out of play,

0:44:39.280 --> 0:44:42.680
<v Speaker 2>renovate it, and then they'll put the put the other nine,

0:44:42.719 --> 0:44:44.719
<v Speaker 2>take the other nine out of play the following year.

0:44:45.120 --> 0:44:47.440
<v Speaker 2>So what are your initial thoughts?

0:44:47.880 --> 0:44:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think whenever we hear the term restoration, we

0:44:53.239 --> 0:44:57.239
<v Speaker 1>get warm, cozy feelings inside like this is great. As

0:44:57.280 --> 0:45:00.319
<v Speaker 1>you said, they're investing in their golf course. I think

0:45:00.320 --> 0:45:04.680
<v Speaker 1>the Baranca clearance might be absolutely huge. That would be great.

0:45:05.719 --> 0:45:09.040
<v Speaker 2>Oh one quick thing, the projects being done by Jim

0:45:09.120 --> 0:45:12.520
<v Speaker 2>Urbina important to point out. And then this is with

0:45:12.960 --> 0:45:15.359
<v Speaker 2>Justin Mannon. They're great superintendent at the helm.

0:45:16.040 --> 0:45:19.440
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, Justin Mannon is fantastic. We spoke to him

0:45:19.440 --> 0:45:22.200
<v Speaker 1>at length the last time we were at Pasa Tiempo.

0:45:22.719 --> 0:45:25.160
<v Speaker 1>And then Jim Urbina has a lot of experience at

0:45:25.200 --> 0:45:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Pasa Tampo. He has been working with the course for

0:45:29.520 --> 0:45:33.360
<v Speaker 1>years now. I believe that when Tom Doakes firm Renaissance

0:45:33.360 --> 0:45:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Golf Design started working at Pasa Teampo, whether it was

0:45:37.080 --> 0:45:39.520
<v Speaker 1>the late nineties or early two thousands, I'm not sure,

0:45:39.920 --> 0:45:42.719
<v Speaker 1>but I believe that Jim Urbina was there pretty much

0:45:42.719 --> 0:45:43.880
<v Speaker 1>from the beginning. Am I right about that?

0:45:43.960 --> 0:45:47.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? I think he was the consultant that did the

0:45:48.200 --> 0:45:50.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, a lot of the groundwork. Tom would come

0:45:50.120 --> 0:45:52.480
<v Speaker 2>in and you know, give notes, and then Jim would

0:45:52.480 --> 0:45:53.040
<v Speaker 2>do the work.

0:45:53.920 --> 0:45:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Very few people are more deeply familiar with this golf

0:45:57.080 --> 0:46:00.479
<v Speaker 1>course than Jim Urbina, and so it totally makes sense

0:46:00.480 --> 0:46:04.280
<v Speaker 1>that he is overseeing this process. I think that where

0:46:04.480 --> 0:46:08.680
<v Speaker 1>alarm bells were triggered for me in the past week,

0:46:09.080 --> 0:46:15.160
<v Speaker 1>specifically on Twitter and regarding the official Pasa Tempo Twitter account,

0:46:15.480 --> 0:46:17.960
<v Speaker 1>is rhetoric like this, and let me just read this

0:46:18.000 --> 0:46:20.319
<v Speaker 1>is a tweet from at Pasa Tiempo Golf, which is

0:46:20.360 --> 0:46:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the official Pasa Tempo account. It's not a parody account.

0:46:24.400 --> 0:46:27.360
<v Speaker 1>This account says greens are ninety three years old and

0:46:27.400 --> 0:46:31.000
<v Speaker 1>have never been rebuilt. Green complexes are not even close

0:46:31.040 --> 0:46:34.600
<v Speaker 1>to the original design. Pin placement locations cut in half

0:46:34.640 --> 0:46:37.640
<v Speaker 1>over the years due to sand splash build up, multiple

0:46:37.680 --> 0:46:40.200
<v Speaker 1>band AID solutions over the years time to build the

0:46:40.320 --> 0:46:44.560
<v Speaker 1>USGA specs and then followed up with this. Greens currently

0:46:44.680 --> 0:46:47.719
<v Speaker 1>not Alistair mackenzie Greens. We will restore them as close

0:46:47.760 --> 0:46:51.240
<v Speaker 1>as possible to his original design work starts in April

0:46:51.280 --> 0:46:55.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty three. And that tweet was deleted because I

0:46:55.920 --> 0:46:59.960
<v Speaker 1>assume that Pasatiempo doesn't want people who are playing between

0:47:00.080 --> 0:47:02.560
<v Speaker 1>now in April twenty twenty three thinking that they're not

0:47:02.680 --> 0:47:05.480
<v Speaker 1>playing on Alistair McKenzie Greens when they are.

0:47:06.320 --> 0:47:09.879
<v Speaker 2>I agree with the sentiment here is that they have

0:47:09.960 --> 0:47:14.640
<v Speaker 2>Alistair McKenzie Greens, and you know, this type of rebuilt

0:47:14.840 --> 0:47:18.160
<v Speaker 2>to USGA spec has been done very successfully in the past.

0:47:18.719 --> 0:47:21.759
<v Speaker 2>Look no further than Winkfoot, and I think from what

0:47:21.920 --> 0:47:25.279
<v Speaker 2>I've heard talking to people in the area is that

0:47:25.800 --> 0:47:28.319
<v Speaker 2>recycled water that they use, which is a big part

0:47:28.360 --> 0:47:32.440
<v Speaker 2>of their maintenance program. As their recycled water practices, they

0:47:32.480 --> 0:47:36.719
<v Speaker 2>have their own plant effectively that recycles wastewater from a

0:47:36.760 --> 0:47:41.160
<v Speaker 2>nearby town, and that recycled water has been very, very

0:47:41.200 --> 0:47:44.879
<v Speaker 2>harsh to the greens and has created an environment that's

0:47:44.920 --> 0:47:49.160
<v Speaker 2>kind of unsustainable long term. And that the USGA greens

0:47:49.800 --> 0:47:54.440
<v Speaker 2>because of the amount of play, which is like sixty

0:47:54.520 --> 0:47:59.120
<v Speaker 2>thousand rounds a year, because of the recycled water, and

0:47:59.160 --> 0:48:03.640
<v Speaker 2>then because of the the climate, the USGA greiants present

0:48:03.760 --> 0:48:08.840
<v Speaker 2>the best playing surface for pasta tempo the next hundred years.

0:48:09.239 --> 0:48:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and who are we to argue with that? Obviously,

0:48:13.640 --> 0:48:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Justin Mandon knows way more about the year round conditions

0:48:17.600 --> 0:48:21.640
<v Speaker 1>of those greens than anybody, and so it sounds like

0:48:22.160 --> 0:48:26.680
<v Speaker 1>this project to rebuild to USGA specs has a coherent

0:48:26.960 --> 0:48:32.680
<v Speaker 1>rationale behind it. Now, there are those who would suggest

0:48:32.840 --> 0:48:35.680
<v Speaker 1>that there are different ways to go about this kind

0:48:35.680 --> 0:48:40.400
<v Speaker 1>of project. Now, I personally don't know enough about rebuilding

0:48:40.440 --> 0:48:43.480
<v Speaker 1>greens and USGA specs and the different options available to

0:48:43.840 --> 0:48:47.600
<v Speaker 1>architects and green keepers to speak authoritatively about this, but

0:48:48.040 --> 0:48:50.919
<v Speaker 1>there are definitely those who strongly believe that the right

0:48:50.960 --> 0:48:54.399
<v Speaker 1>way to go about this would be to strip off

0:48:54.400 --> 0:48:57.680
<v Speaker 1>the sod of the current greens, clear off some of

0:48:57.760 --> 0:49:00.719
<v Speaker 1>the sandy build up that has happened over the past

0:49:00.800 --> 0:49:05.960
<v Speaker 1>ninety three years, and specifically sand splash is is, you know,

0:49:06.000 --> 0:49:09.120
<v Speaker 1>an issue that the club is naming as one that

0:49:09.200 --> 0:49:11.920
<v Speaker 1>has affected the shape of the greens and has reduced

0:49:12.760 --> 0:49:16.120
<v Speaker 1>whole locations along the edges of the greens because when

0:49:16.160 --> 0:49:19.040
<v Speaker 1>people play out of bunkers, obviously sand splashes on the

0:49:19.080 --> 0:49:22.720
<v Speaker 1>green and over time those edges of the greens start

0:49:22.800 --> 0:49:26.120
<v Speaker 1>to bulge up and that affects the amount of pin

0:49:26.200 --> 0:49:28.520
<v Speaker 1>positions you can put on a green and just the

0:49:28.800 --> 0:49:32.440
<v Speaker 1>contours overall. And so you know, a suggestion would be

0:49:32.560 --> 0:49:36.640
<v Speaker 1>just to carefully clear off that sand splash and then

0:49:36.800 --> 0:49:41.479
<v Speaker 1>resaw the greens and keep the original builds in there. Now,

0:49:41.520 --> 0:49:45.120
<v Speaker 1>the reason people would argue for this is that there

0:49:45.200 --> 0:49:48.600
<v Speaker 1>is something about those original greens, and Pasa Tiempo still

0:49:48.600 --> 0:49:52.319
<v Speaker 1>has them. That's a relative rarity. It's it's pretty rare

0:49:52.360 --> 0:49:57.880
<v Speaker 1>that someone has an original set of Alistair Mackenzie greens,

0:49:58.120 --> 0:50:02.080
<v Speaker 1>eighteen original greens. It's amazing and they're awesome, awesome greens,

0:50:02.080 --> 0:50:05.360
<v Speaker 1>as we've talked about, and so the purest would argue,

0:50:05.920 --> 0:50:09.080
<v Speaker 1>you've got to do what you can to keep those

0:50:09.440 --> 0:50:12.399
<v Speaker 1>and if it's possible to keep those and to do

0:50:13.080 --> 0:50:17.239
<v Speaker 1>this work in a more kind of low profile, low

0:50:17.320 --> 0:50:20.200
<v Speaker 1>impact way, then you've got to do that. And there

0:50:20.239 --> 0:50:23.200
<v Speaker 1>are a number of courses that you could name that

0:50:23.280 --> 0:50:25.920
<v Speaker 1>have used this process. Maybe the highest profile one is

0:50:25.960 --> 0:50:28.600
<v Speaker 1>that I know of his Royal Melbourne, which which has

0:50:28.760 --> 0:50:32.720
<v Speaker 1>another great set of Alistair Mackenzie slash Alex Russell greens,

0:50:33.400 --> 0:50:37.280
<v Speaker 1>and this is the process that they use to maintain

0:50:37.840 --> 0:50:43.359
<v Speaker 1>the original greens. Rebuilding the greens to USGA specs is

0:50:43.480 --> 0:50:49.040
<v Speaker 1>a relatively aggressive way to go about this, and it's risky,

0:50:49.160 --> 0:50:52.160
<v Speaker 1>it could go wrong. You have to rebuild them really,

0:50:52.200 --> 0:50:56.440
<v Speaker 1>really well. And as anybody who has seen reproductions of

0:50:56.560 --> 0:50:59.560
<v Speaker 1>certain kinds of artwork can can tell you, like, if

0:50:59.600 --> 0:51:04.240
<v Speaker 1>somebody tried to re sculpt the you know, the statue

0:51:04.520 --> 0:51:09.279
<v Speaker 1>like a Michelangelo sculpture, then it probably just wouldn't look

0:51:09.440 --> 0:51:13.640
<v Speaker 1>quite right. Now, will Jim Orbina be able to recreate

0:51:13.719 --> 0:51:16.719
<v Speaker 1>these greens as closely as possible? I would say probably,

0:51:16.800 --> 0:51:20.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's really really familiar with these greens. But

0:51:20.360 --> 0:51:23.319
<v Speaker 1>where my concern started to kick in is when the

0:51:23.360 --> 0:51:27.399
<v Speaker 1>official Pasit Tampo account was saying things like these are

0:51:27.400 --> 0:51:30.840
<v Speaker 1>no longer Alistair mackenzie greens not even close to the

0:51:30.840 --> 0:51:33.960
<v Speaker 1>original design. Well, of course they're close to the original design.

0:51:34.040 --> 0:51:37.240
<v Speaker 1>They are the original design, and so I would hope

0:51:37.280 --> 0:51:40.680
<v Speaker 1>that those that people in the club have a really

0:51:41.080 --> 0:51:45.160
<v Speaker 1>keen regard for what is currently in the ground at

0:51:45.160 --> 0:51:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Pasa Tampo, and that everybody takes a super close look

0:51:49.280 --> 0:51:52.160
<v Speaker 1>at what is actually there before they go about this

0:51:52.239 --> 0:51:54.520
<v Speaker 1>process of rebuilding. Now. Of course I think Jim or

0:51:54.520 --> 0:51:56.359
<v Speaker 1>Bean is going to do that. Of course I think

0:51:56.480 --> 0:51:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Justin Mannon is going to do that. But it's also

0:51:58.920 --> 0:52:02.799
<v Speaker 1>important that the narve within the club is not we

0:52:03.040 --> 0:52:05.799
<v Speaker 1>have strayed way far away from Alistair Mackenzie's greens, and

0:52:05.840 --> 0:52:09.000
<v Speaker 1>we need to rebuild them because they're junk. Right now.

0:52:09.160 --> 0:52:13.040
<v Speaker 1>The narrative is we have an amazing set of original

0:52:13.120 --> 0:52:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Alstro Mackenzie greens. We're going to be so careful in

0:52:16.440 --> 0:52:19.160
<v Speaker 1>the way that we reproduce them. We need to rebuild

0:52:19.160 --> 0:52:20.840
<v Speaker 1>them in this way because of X, Y and Z,

0:52:21.640 --> 0:52:24.600
<v Speaker 1>but we understand what we have. That would be a

0:52:24.640 --> 0:52:27.680
<v Speaker 1>more reassuring message I think out of the club.

0:52:28.320 --> 0:52:30.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I think it would be. And I think,

0:52:30.840 --> 0:52:35.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, when it comes to these types of you know, decisions,

0:52:35.080 --> 0:52:39.800
<v Speaker 2>this this is it's just a it's a risky one.

0:52:39.840 --> 0:52:42.400
<v Speaker 2>That's the thing. I think it all comes from, you know,

0:52:43.040 --> 0:52:47.480
<v Speaker 2>a love of of that what's there right now, understanding

0:52:47.520 --> 0:52:50.239
<v Speaker 2>it's a you know, world class set of greens right now.

0:52:51.600 --> 0:52:54.480
<v Speaker 2>And I think a lot of this centers around the

0:52:54.600 --> 0:52:59.320
<v Speaker 2>idea of expectations with with maintenance and where it's gone,

0:52:59.560 --> 0:53:03.879
<v Speaker 2>and the idea that every green needs to perform identical

0:53:04.160 --> 0:53:06.600
<v Speaker 2>to the last green, which I think is a bunch

0:53:06.600 --> 0:53:10.520
<v Speaker 2>of bullshit. And the idea of uniform conditions around a

0:53:10.520 --> 0:53:13.880
<v Speaker 2>golf course, especially a golf course like Pasta Tiempo, I

0:53:13.920 --> 0:53:17.720
<v Speaker 2>think is a fleeting race. It's a race to the bottom.

0:53:18.280 --> 0:53:21.760
<v Speaker 2>It's it's conveying that, like the game should be fair,

0:53:21.880 --> 0:53:25.239
<v Speaker 2>uniform and fair. I think the last thing you want

0:53:25.239 --> 0:53:31.319
<v Speaker 2>to do at Pas Tempo is create uniformity. That I

0:53:31.440 --> 0:53:34.319
<v Speaker 2>love the way it looks. That's got this wild kind

0:53:34.360 --> 0:53:37.320
<v Speaker 2>of hodgepodge turf look that I think they're going to keep.

0:53:38.520 --> 0:53:40.840
<v Speaker 2>You know, you want that place to look old, you

0:53:40.960 --> 0:53:43.759
<v Speaker 2>want it to be different. And I think one of

0:53:43.840 --> 0:53:47.040
<v Speaker 2>the things that's that's masked in all this this idea

0:53:47.080 --> 0:53:51.120
<v Speaker 2>of finding more pins is that inevitably there is going

0:53:51.200 --> 0:53:55.160
<v Speaker 2>to be a softening of greens out there because of

0:53:55.200 --> 0:53:57.640
<v Speaker 2>their you know, there aren't pins right now at the

0:53:57.640 --> 0:54:00.640
<v Speaker 2>current speeds that are maintaining it. And I think the club,

0:54:01.239 --> 0:54:03.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, it was on display at the Western Intercollegiate

0:54:03.680 --> 0:54:06.799
<v Speaker 2>last week. They keep the greens probably about four to

0:54:06.880 --> 0:54:11.520
<v Speaker 2>five feet too fast for that tournament. You know, this

0:54:11.719 --> 0:54:15.279
<v Speaker 2>is a course that could be a leader and say, hey,

0:54:15.320 --> 0:54:19.040
<v Speaker 2>we've got Alistair McKenzie original greens and we're gonna keep

0:54:19.080 --> 0:54:22.400
<v Speaker 2>them at eight and we're gonna have a lot of pins.

0:54:22.840 --> 0:54:25.520
<v Speaker 2>You're gonna they're gonna be slower on uphill putts then

0:54:25.560 --> 0:54:28.080
<v Speaker 2>you're used to putting, but they're gonna be really fast

0:54:28.120 --> 0:54:30.719
<v Speaker 2>on downhill puss because you're never gonna see as much

0:54:30.719 --> 0:54:35.520
<v Speaker 2>slope and putts as we offer here. And I think

0:54:35.560 --> 0:54:38.840
<v Speaker 2>that's the thing when I read everything that they're doing

0:54:39.000 --> 0:54:42.880
<v Speaker 2>that's masked, is that this is a convenient way to

0:54:43.040 --> 0:54:47.839
<v Speaker 2>soften slopes on certain greens that have become completely unpinnable

0:54:47.960 --> 0:54:51.600
<v Speaker 2>because of the green speeds that are expected of the membership.

0:54:52.000 --> 0:54:55.280
<v Speaker 2>And UH to charge four hundred dollars around.

0:54:55.480 --> 0:55:00.359
<v Speaker 1>That is the kind of dark lingering concern here. And

0:55:00.560 --> 0:55:02.200
<v Speaker 1>I guess we'll just see where it goes, and it

0:55:02.239 --> 0:55:05.799
<v Speaker 1>would really be tragic to see the slopes of these

0:55:05.840 --> 0:55:08.840
<v Speaker 1>greens softened because that is so much part of the

0:55:08.960 --> 0:55:13.080
<v Speaker 1>character of this course. And you know, furthermore, people can

0:55:13.120 --> 0:55:18.280
<v Speaker 1>point to successful rebuilds of greens. You know, Wingfoot's greens

0:55:18.320 --> 0:55:23.560
<v Speaker 1>are famously were rebuilt and are are still terrific. But

0:55:23.840 --> 0:55:26.759
<v Speaker 1>the thing is that Pasa Tempo is not Wingfoot. Yeah,

0:55:26.800 --> 0:55:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Wingfoot is an entirely different type of club with a

0:55:31.280 --> 0:55:36.560
<v Speaker 1>very wealthy membership that they assessed for that project. Pasa Tempo,

0:55:37.440 --> 0:55:41.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, makes ends meet off of these memberships and

0:55:42.000 --> 0:55:46.160
<v Speaker 1>off of public tea times, and those green fees have

0:55:46.320 --> 0:55:49.439
<v Speaker 1>gone up over the past several years. You know, five

0:55:49.520 --> 0:55:52.040
<v Speaker 1>years ago there were about two fifty and on a

0:55:52.080 --> 0:55:56.799
<v Speaker 1>certain tea time app you could reliably find about one

0:55:56.880 --> 0:56:00.600
<v Speaker 1>hundred and ten dollars tea times at Pasa Tiempo. It

0:56:00.640 --> 0:56:03.400
<v Speaker 1>was very possible for me as a high school teacher

0:56:04.040 --> 0:56:06.960
<v Speaker 1>to go up there two, three, even four times a

0:56:07.040 --> 0:56:10.600
<v Speaker 1>year and play that golf course. If the green fees

0:56:10.719 --> 0:56:14.359
<v Speaker 1>keep creeping up, then it's going to start to become

0:56:14.400 --> 0:56:16.640
<v Speaker 1>a totally different kind of golf course. And if you know,

0:56:16.800 --> 0:56:19.120
<v Speaker 1>that's the membership's call. If they want to be more

0:56:19.160 --> 0:56:21.360
<v Speaker 1>a golf course where people make it a once in

0:56:21.400 --> 0:56:24.680
<v Speaker 1>a lifetime destination and pay a premium for the experience

0:56:25.160 --> 0:56:28.440
<v Speaker 1>and travel from far places to come play it, then

0:56:28.480 --> 0:56:31.360
<v Speaker 1>I think that the quality of the course justifies that

0:56:31.360 --> 0:56:33.200
<v Speaker 1>that they're going to be able to get that kind

0:56:33.200 --> 0:56:38.200
<v Speaker 1>of business. But Pasatiempo, for years and years and years,

0:56:38.640 --> 0:56:41.160
<v Speaker 1>part of its charm is that it has been a

0:56:41.200 --> 0:56:44.600
<v Speaker 1>little bit rugged. It has been an old feeling course.

0:56:44.760 --> 0:56:46.920
<v Speaker 1>And I hope that it doesn't just feel kind of

0:56:47.000 --> 0:56:50.719
<v Speaker 1>like brand spaking, shining new. I hope it doesn't look

0:56:50.760 --> 0:56:53.080
<v Speaker 1>like Wingfoot. I hope it looks like Pasatiempo.

0:56:53.960 --> 0:56:57.040
<v Speaker 2>It's got Yeah, it's got to retain its old feel.

0:56:57.480 --> 0:57:01.320
<v Speaker 2>I think the thing that gets me about potentially softening

0:57:01.360 --> 0:57:05.799
<v Speaker 2>greens Is is losing the aspect of the wildness of

0:57:06.000 --> 0:57:09.960
<v Speaker 2>Pasa Tiempo. Is that is with the Baranka. It's a

0:57:10.120 --> 0:57:12.719
<v Speaker 2>it's an adventure. It's not a it's not a round

0:57:12.719 --> 0:57:16.640
<v Speaker 2>of golf. It's it's an adventure against the elements. And

0:57:16.880 --> 0:57:20.840
<v Speaker 2>that's the key to the golf course it is is

0:57:21.040 --> 0:57:23.920
<v Speaker 2>what you're going up against is always not fair, and

0:57:23.960 --> 0:57:27.880
<v Speaker 2>it shouldn't be fair. And I think that a lot

0:57:27.920 --> 0:57:31.680
<v Speaker 2>of this centers around the idea of fair and modern

0:57:31.680 --> 0:57:36.240
<v Speaker 2>maintenance practices and beliefs that that you know from memberships

0:57:36.240 --> 0:57:39.240
<v Speaker 2>in public play that greens should be X speed if

0:57:39.240 --> 0:57:41.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm paying this much for my membership and this much

0:57:42.040 --> 0:57:43.080
<v Speaker 2>to play around of golf.

0:57:44.000 --> 0:57:46.840
<v Speaker 1>That said, we'll see how it turns out. It could

0:57:46.880 --> 0:57:49.680
<v Speaker 1>turn out great. I know that I'm going to go

0:57:49.760 --> 0:57:52.840
<v Speaker 1>back there and play for as long as I'm able,

0:57:53.440 --> 0:57:57.920
<v Speaker 1>as long as they'll have it. I mean, it is

0:57:57.960 --> 0:58:01.600
<v Speaker 1>such a wonderful golf course. Great to discuss it with you, Andy,

0:58:01.880 --> 0:58:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Thanks so much. This episode of the Frida Egg Podcast

0:58:15.000 --> 0:58:17.920
<v Speaker 1>was edited by Meg Atkins. I'd like to include a

0:58:17.920 --> 0:58:20.200
<v Speaker 1>plug here for the Frida Egg Pro Shop, which you

0:58:20.240 --> 0:58:23.760
<v Speaker 1>can find at proshop dot the Fridagg dot com. Available

0:58:23.840 --> 0:58:26.200
<v Speaker 1>right now in the pro shop is an aerial photo

0:58:26.280 --> 0:58:29.600
<v Speaker 1>of all eighteen greens at PASA TMO. It's pretty cool,

0:58:29.640 --> 0:58:33.000
<v Speaker 1>so check it out at proshop dot the Fridagg dot com.

0:58:33.040 --> 0:58:33.920
<v Speaker 1>And thanks for listening.