Speaker 1: Thanks to all of you for being one of us.
Speaker 1: Right down are toll free telephone number if you want
Speaker 1: to be a part of the program ATS eight hundred
Speaker 1: and ninety four one Sean if you want to join us.
Speaker 1: All right, we have a lot of breaking news and
Speaker 1: some hope on the horizon as it relates to winding
Speaker 1: now in this conflict in Iran. Although you know, based
Speaker 1: on everything that I can put together and everything I
Speaker 1: can muster, and everything that I think is happening and
Speaker 1: all my sources put together, I think that this could
Speaker 1: likely be a big breakthrough. And I'm hoping. By the way,
Speaker 1: one other thing that we're going to get to today
Speaker 1: is Donald Trump. I mean, you know, Democrats can't stand
Speaker 1: this announce that he plans on sending ice to airports,
Speaker 1: and right now there are ice agents helping out it,
Speaker 1: for example JFK Airport. I don't know any of you
Speaker 1: that have traveled, or any of you that know people
Speaker 1: that work for TSA. I mean, these people have not
Speaker 1: been paid in thirty seven days. The lines at airports
Speaker 1: are absolutely astronomical. People weren't waiting four five, six, seven hours,
Speaker 1: you know, just to get through TSA. Then to just
Speaker 1: attempt to make their plane. They have to get to
Speaker 1: the airport that early, which is insane. And this is
Speaker 1: all caused by the Democrats. The Democrats thought they were
Speaker 1: being cute. Oh, we'll fund all of the DHS except
Speaker 1: for ICE. Oh and if the TSA agents do show
Speaker 1: up at the airport to help. If they do show up,
Speaker 1: they can't wear a mask, which I think should be
Speaker 1: non negotiable. Why do they Why are they obsessed with
Speaker 1: were boxing ICE agents when there's an eight thousand percent
Speaker 1: at eight thousand percent increase in the threat level against
Speaker 1: ICE agents. This is absolutely madness on their part anyway,
Speaker 1: But we definitely need help. It's a it's just a nightmare.
Speaker 1: It's all caused by Democrats. They've refused to fund the
Speaker 1: Department of Home Land Security at a time when we
Speaker 1: are in conflict with the world's number one state sponsor
Speaker 1: of terror. They have absolutely no shame. So we'll see
Speaker 1: what happens now. The President announced today and he put
Speaker 1: it on truth Social I am pleased to report that
Speaker 1: the United States of America and the country of Iran
Speaker 1: have had over the last two days very good and
Speaker 1: productive conversations regarding a complete and total resolution of our
Speaker 1: hostilities in the Middle East. Based on the tenor and
Speaker 1: tone of these in depth, detailed, constructive conversations, which will
Speaker 1: continue throughout the week, I have instructed the Department of
Speaker 1: War to postpone any and all military strikes against Iranian
Speaker 1: power plans and energy infrastructure for a five day period.
Speaker 1: Now the President had given them what did he given
Speaker 1: four days, I believe, Linda, or a five day period
Speaker 1: to either knock off what they're doing attacking infrastructure or
Speaker 1: they were going to be obliterated on that front. Two,
Speaker 1: the President has been hitting military targets. He's been trying
Speaker 1: to preserve for the Iranian people and probably also for America,
Speaker 1: the infrastructure as it relates to energy, which is their
Speaker 1: entire economy. I mean, otherwise you're knocking out the entire
Speaker 1: country and the amount of suffering is going to be incalculable.
Speaker 1: And the President, I mean the Iranians, they target densely
Speaker 1: populated areas of civilians, the Israelis, the Americans. They have
Speaker 1: been hitting military targets, well over eight thousand of them,
Speaker 1: and they have been knocking out their ballistic missile systems,
Speaker 1: their air defense systems, any ships that they may have
Speaker 1: where they would mine in the Strait of Hormuz. They
Speaker 1: have been taking out nuclear facilities any remnants after Operation
Speaker 1: Midnight Hammer. Anyway, he said, these will continue throughout the week.
Speaker 1: I've instructed the Department of War to postpone any and
Speaker 1: all strikes against the Iranian power plants, energy infrastructure for
Speaker 1: a five day period, subject to the success of the
Speaker 1: ongoing meetings and discussions. For your attention to this matter,
Speaker 1: Donald J. Trump, So there is some hope there now,
Speaker 1: I wouldn't. Obviously, the markets have responded in a major way,
Speaker 1: which I'll explain in some detail, and then I think
Speaker 1: this is important. Oil prices plunged by twelve percent upon
Speaker 1: this truth post by the President. The Dow sored immediately
Speaker 1: by a thousand points after the President revealed the new negotiations,
Speaker 1: relief ripping through the financial markets. Either way, I don't
Speaker 1: think I mean now it's down over twelve I think
Speaker 1: it's down over twenty percent. The last time I looked, Linda,
Speaker 1: it's it was like an eighty six, and it had
Speaker 1: been well over one hundred, I mean at one twenty
Speaker 1: at one point last week. So it's down considerably, nearly
Speaker 1: forty eighty seven. Seventy nine, so it keeps going down.
Speaker 1: What is the dow up now.
Speaker 2: It's down almost eleven percent today from where it was.
Speaker 1: Yeah, okay, but anyway, so Iran can say through state media,
Speaker 1: but the state media has no power. We don't even
Speaker 1: the problem is we don't even really know who in power.
Speaker 1: And the President addressed that today and said, I don't
Speaker 1: really want to tell anyone who we're talking to because
Speaker 1: the odds of them surviving the next twenty four hours
Speaker 1: would go down precipitously. But anyway, obvious, look, if the
Speaker 1: president can get a peace deal, it's it's going to
Speaker 1: be very complicated. You have to ask yourself, at what
Speaker 1: point the Iranians want to continue to take such a
Speaker 1: beating now. The President was also very clear in stating
Speaker 1: that if they want him to continue, that he will continue.
Speaker 1: And you know, it's it's sort of like, okay, how
Speaker 1: much how much abuse do you want? At some point?
Speaker 1: And so he just said that if the Iranian new
Speaker 1: the new Iranian talks fail, will just keep bombing our
Speaker 1: little hearts out seen. Your administration officials will speak with
Speaker 1: the RAMS leadership later today after the two sides found
Speaker 1: According to the President, fifteen separate issues that the Iranians
Speaker 1: have agree and I personally hope that this is true.
Speaker 1: But among them has got to be that they've got
Speaker 1: to give up any nuclear ambition. Remember when Steve Whitcoff
Speaker 1: and Jared Kushner went to negotiate with the Iranians in
Speaker 1: the hopes of preventing Operation Epic Fury. Steve Witkoff, we
Speaker 1: played the interview here on this program, was very clear
Speaker 1: in saying that they were bragging how they had four
Speaker 1: hundred and sixty kilograms of sixty percent and rich uranium.
Speaker 1: I'll repeat it for those that may not have hurt,
Speaker 1: but sixty percent in rich uranium can be turned into
Speaker 1: ninety percent enrichment weapons great enrichment ninety percent within seven
Speaker 1: to ten days, which means that would give them enough
Speaker 1: fuel for eleven nuclear weapons. That was the imminent threat
Speaker 1: that President Trump was saying. Now, the President says that
Speaker 1: they had strong talks with Iran. If they want to
Speaker 1: make a deal, we'll make a deal. This is exactly
Speaker 1: what he told them in the lead up to Midnight Hammer.
Speaker 1: He gave them fifty days. They didn't listen. This is
Speaker 1: exactly what he told them in the lead up to
Speaker 1: Operation Epic Fury. Again the uranium regime didn't listen. They
Speaker 1: have paid a very very heavy price. Here's the President
Speaker 1: in announcing that we've had strong talks with the RAN.
Speaker 1: If they want to make a deal, we'll make a deal. Listen.
Speaker 3: We have had very very strong talks. We'll see where
Speaker 3: they lead. We have points of major points of agreement.
Speaker 3: I would say almost all points of agreement. Perhaps that
Speaker 3: hasn't been conveyed. The communication, as you know, has been
Speaker 3: blown to pieces. They were unable to talk to each other.
Speaker 3: But we've had very strong talks. Mister Witchcoff and mister
Speaker 3: Kushner had them. They went I would say perfectly. I
Speaker 3: would say that if they carry through with that, it'll
Speaker 3: end that problem, that conflict, and I think it'll end
Speaker 3: it very very substantially. We have very much in mind
Speaker 3: our partners in the Middle East. We've had great relationships
Speaker 3: with a lot of them. As you know, a lot
Speaker 3: of them were surprisingly hit and I was surprised to
Speaker 3: see it, and so was everyone else. But we have
Speaker 3: they're very much in mind in the discussions. So the
Speaker 3: discussions took place yesterday, they went into yesterday evening. They
Speaker 3: want very much to make a deal. We'd like to
Speaker 3: make a deal too.
Speaker 1: Okay, so they've had strong talks and they want to
Speaker 1: make a deal. Now did they learn anything that Donald
Speaker 1: Trump means what he says, because he's also saying that
Speaker 1: he would re engage and that if this fails, they're
Speaker 1: going to continue to bomb the living daylights out of them.
Speaker 1: That's going to be up to the Iranians. Here's the
Speaker 1: most important part. It's only seven seconds. Iran has agreed
Speaker 1: to no enrichment, even for medical purposes. In other words,
Speaker 1: that's now off the table. That was on the table
Speaker 1: when they were negotiating before epic fury. Now it's off
Speaker 1: the table. Listen, are we talking to Iran directly? You know, Rickman,
Speaker 1: petical person they.
Speaker 3: Have, thank you.
Speaker 1: They've agreed that they can't have a medical purposes or
Speaker 1: civilian purposes. That is a big change of heart. It's
Speaker 1: an amazing what you know when you knock out four
Speaker 1: levels of leadership, how one's mind gets convinced to change.
Speaker 1: Whoever might be negotiating this. He said, Iran has agreed
Speaker 1: to not having a nuclear weapon. Another important point, listen,
Speaker 1: you said there's many points of agreement with Iran right now,
Speaker 1: what can.
Speaker 3: You give us a like fifteen points? Fifteen points? Yes, well,
Speaker 3: they're not going to have a nuclear weapon. That's number one.
Speaker 3: That's number one, two and three, they will never have
Speaker 3: a nuclear weapon. Yes to that.
Speaker 1: They've agreed to that. And then he joked that he
Speaker 1: doesn't want to say who Steve Whitkoff is speaking with
Speaker 1: in Iran because he doesn't want them to be killed.
Speaker 1: I won't play that now because we have too much
Speaker 1: else to get to anyway. So the price of oil
Speaker 1: from it's high of nearly one twenty last week now
Speaker 1: down in the eighties. Obviously, markets are responding very very
Speaker 1: well to this announcement today. By the way, one other thing,
Speaker 1: the Trump Department of Interiors secured a landmark agreement with
Speaker 1: the energy giant Total Energies to read it, direct nearly
Speaker 1: a billion dollars away from this idiotic, unreliable, ideological wind
Speaker 1: farm project approved under the Biden administration and instead invest
Speaker 1: in US oil and natural gas. I know everybody doesn't
Speaker 1: want the price of gas or energy to go up,
Speaker 1: and if even in a worst case scenario, I really
Speaker 1: can't see this going on much longer than a month
Speaker 1: from now. Under any scenario. I'm hoping. I'm hopeful that
Speaker 1: it ends even sooner. I really am. I think like
Speaker 1: most of us are US. By the way, if you're
Speaker 1: interested in in production, is the global leader in oil
Speaker 1: production now thanks to President Donald Trump and when he
Speaker 1: first started in twenty sixteen, and the US now produces
Speaker 1: more oil than Saudi Arabia and Russia combined. I mean
Speaker 1: this is in terms of millions of barrels a day
Speaker 1: and liquefied natural gas production more than more than Saudi
Speaker 1: Arabia and Russia. On any given day, the US now
Speaker 1: produces more natural gas than Russia, Iran, and China combined.
Speaker 1: It is the lifeblood of the world's economy. The US
Speaker 1: is the energi's global leader by far, and that's good
Speaker 1: for Americans. You know. This is what makes what NATO
Speaker 1: did in Great Britain and France and Spain did so unconscionable.
Speaker 1: You know, Donald Trump said, hey, might be in your
Speaker 1: best interest to keep the straight oh hor moves open.
Speaker 1: Rather than helping the president and being a reliable ally.
Speaker 1: It's not that we really needed their help. They're the
Speaker 1: ones that are the beneficiaries of the Strait being open.
Speaker 1: Way more than we are. And now they've finally gotten
Speaker 1: on board at the last minute. But it's frankly meaningless
Speaker 1: to me. But you know, we'll see what happens. Now
Speaker 1: the ball is in whoever is in charge in Iran
Speaker 1: at this moment, although the Israelis took out the head
Speaker 1: quarters of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard and the Cuds forces
Speaker 1: all in one day in the last twenty four hours,
Speaker 1: so that's getting pretty interesting to watch too. Now Democratic
Speaker 1: polster Doug Shown has a poll out, you know, and
Speaker 1: he found that overall support for the war is forty
Speaker 1: four to forty one. Sixty one percent of young conservatives.
Speaker 1: If you listen to some people you know, support what
Speaker 1: the president is doing here, only twenty four percent disagree. Look,
Speaker 1: you have to go back to you know, you worry
Speaker 1: about Mission Creep. Everyone should worry about Mission Creep. But
Speaker 1: what was the original objectives of the president? The Iranians
Speaker 1: cannot have a nuclear weapon period, end of end of sentence.
Speaker 1: There go. Other goals were to eradicate the Iranian missile program,
Speaker 1: destroy their defense industrial base, eliminate their military. All of
Speaker 1: that has now happened. Now the president also at this point,
Speaker 1: you know, the president has never been really about regime change.
Speaker 1: He mentioned at one time he said, it looks like
Speaker 1: the time may come that it's better for the uranium
Speaker 1: people to take this into their own hands. Now their
Speaker 1: moment is coming. What they'll do with that, I guess
Speaker 1: is anybody's business. But it's not going to be nation
Speaker 1: building on the part of Donald Trump. It's not part
Speaker 1: of the Trump doctrine. The most significant aspect of what
Speaker 1: would be left, I would argue, or part of any
Speaker 1: deal with the Iranians, has got to be what happens
Speaker 1: to the sixty percent enriched uranium that they are bragging
Speaker 1: about and more bragging about in the previous negotiations. Now
Speaker 1: those negotiators are dead, so the new negotiators we do
Speaker 1: know where it is, according to all the sources I've
Speaker 1: talked to, So we know where this enriched uranium is.
Speaker 1: That means it would either have to be neutralized or
Speaker 1: we would have to extract it safely so that there
Speaker 1: wouldn't be in any kind of radiological event in the country,
Speaker 1: in Iran, in the region that wouldn't be good for anybody.
Speaker 1: They would have to agree to that. They would probably
Speaker 1: have to agree to anywhere any place anytime inspections. And
Speaker 1: if I know Donald Trump, it's going to be pretty
Speaker 1: high on his priority list. Is He's going to want
Speaker 1: the Iranians to pay for this entire mission, and they
Speaker 1: would easily be able to do so by US not
Speaker 1: destroying Carg Island, the infrastructure for energy production in that country,
Speaker 1: and allowing them to keep their lifeblood of their economy open. Remember,
Speaker 1: so far Israel and the US have not attacked any
Speaker 1: of that infrastructure of Carg Island. They have every ability
Speaker 1: to do so. They could wipe it out in five
Speaker 1: minutes if they wanted to, But that's really being saved
Speaker 1: for the uranium people in the hopes that they will
Speaker 1: once again be able to rebuild as once great Persian culture. Anyway,
Speaker 1: so we have some hope today. The sooner this ends,
Speaker 1: the better, and until by the way that uranium is extracted,
Speaker 1: I'm sure our military presidents will remain high in the
Speaker 1: region until that is complete. And then anywhere any place,
Speaker 1: any time, inspections probably has to be a part of
Speaker 1: any negotiated settlement as well. Let me go back to
Speaker 1: our top story of the day. I'm pleased to report
Speaker 1: the US and the country of Iran have had over
Speaker 1: the last two days very good productive conversations regarding a
Speaker 1: complete total resolution of our hostilities in the Middle East,
Speaker 1: and based on the tenor and tone of these in depth, detailed,
Speaker 1: constructive conversations, which will continue through the week, I have
Speaker 1: instructed the Department of War to postpone any and all
Speaker 1: military strikes against Iranian power plants and energy infrastructure or
Speaker 1: a five day period, subject to the success of the
Speaker 1: ongoing meetings and discussions. You know, if the President hits this,
Speaker 1: it's game over for the Iranians. And I know we're
Speaker 1: at the third or fourth tier now it has been
Speaker 1: revealed who the President is talking to. Otherwise I probably
Speaker 1: would not even discuss it. And you know, if they
Speaker 1: weren't so successful in what their mission has been, and
Speaker 1: that is to you know, make sure they can no
Speaker 1: longer have a nuclear weapon and eradicate their missile program,
Speaker 1: their air defense programs, their defense and industrial base, eliminate
Speaker 1: their navy. You know, we've been so really, really really
Speaker 1: dialed into that. Now, I would imagine any deal has
Speaker 1: got to include the sixty percent in enrich uranium that
Speaker 1: the President said. Now it is being reported the Jerusalem Post,
Speaker 1: the New York Post all have it, so I'm not
Speaker 1: giving you information I shouldn't. I have known about it
Speaker 1: but from my sources. But the Trump administration is in
Speaker 1: talks with Iran's parliament leader in terms of trying to
Speaker 1: end this war. Now, whether this parliament leader and speaker
Speaker 1: is in a position to actually make this happen, we'll
Speaker 1: find out soon enough. It's probably one of the first
Speaker 1: orders of business will be the removal or neutralization of
Speaker 1: the sixty percent in rich uranium enough four hundred and
Speaker 1: sixty kilograms, enough to build eleven nuclear weapons. That would
Speaker 1: probably be one of the first things. But they you know,
Speaker 1: the Iranians had stupidly been vowing to destroy Middle Eastern
Speaker 1: water and energy facilities, and then Donald Trump gave them
Speaker 1: an ultimatum and said, well, you've got five days you
Speaker 1: dared touch it and will obliterate everything you have. And
Speaker 1: if Iran's energy infrastructure is attacked, it would be over
Speaker 1: for them and there wouldn't be any Iran left, and sadly,
Speaker 1: that would impact the entire population. And both Israel and
Speaker 1: the US has been very careful. I mean, this is
Speaker 1: the type of societies we are. It speaks volumes we've
Speaker 1: been targeting military targets. They target densely populated cities like
Speaker 1: Tel Aviv. So you know, we'll see the president. Even
Speaker 1: prior to that, it even stated that we're very close
Speaker 1: to meeting military objectives and considering winding down this operation.
Speaker 1: Now this means basically that the Iranians would be crying uncle.
Speaker 1: I mean, the Pentagon now has deployed two a second
Speaker 1: marine unit to the Middle East should it be needed,
Speaker 1: you know, and as Victor Davis Hansen said, you know,
Speaker 1: this regime could fall pretty soon as now the global
Speaker 1: tide has turned. Now, the Iranians tried to target over
Speaker 1: the weekend a US UK military base two thousand miles away.
Speaker 1: They weren't sure they had this capability, but everyone suspected
Speaker 1: that they likely did, and it turns out they do.
Speaker 1: Every time you underestimate what Iran's military abilities are, the
Speaker 1: nuclear abilities are, we end up airing on the wrong side.
Speaker 1: We underestimate what their capabilities are and their commitment to
Speaker 1: doing this. You know, whatever deal might be struck here,
Speaker 1: I would imagine anywhere, any place, anytime, inspections has got
Speaker 1: to be a part of this. You know, was I'm there,
Speaker 1: are you know, when you when you hear people like
Speaker 1: John Ratcliffe and Steve Woodkoff and people in the know
Speaker 1: talk about an imminent threat, they're not They're not coming
Speaker 1: to this conclusion in a wrong way. It was an
Speaker 1: interesting piece by Ambassador Gordon Sonlin about the truth about
Speaker 1: ransom and a threat. He said, there's nothing wrong with
Speaker 1: questioning US policy towards Iran. In fact, it's essential. And
Speaker 1: my understanding is that there are people in the administration
Speaker 1: that wanted no part of this. That's fine, but ultimately
Speaker 1: we elect one commander in chief. I think the President
Speaker 1: made the right call, and I know that she got
Speaker 1: a lot of criticism for it, Tulsey Gabbard and especially
Speaker 1: Democrats when you know, expressing disbelief when she stated in
Speaker 1: terms of what qualifies as an imminent threat, and she
Speaker 1: pointed out the intelligence community's role is to assess capability,
Speaker 1: to estimate timelines, to evaluate intent, and there's a large
Speaker 1: range of probabilities and scenarios when it's not a shot
Speaker 1: fire science here, and you know, but when people like
Speaker 1: Dan Bongino, who we interviewed, got to see see that intelligence,
Speaker 1: a lot of it based on what he saw and
Speaker 1: what's now public knowledge is that anyone that makes any
Speaker 1: other conclusion just doesn't know what the hell they're talking about.
Speaker 1: Which is and most of the people that have been
Speaker 1: against it have an agenda. It's very small in terms
Speaker 1: of support that they have. And what I've been saying
Speaker 1: for a long time now is true is that the
Speaker 1: online world that people live in is not real. You
Speaker 1: can't believe what you're reading online. You've got to understand
Speaker 1: that with the onset of artificial intelligence, that you have
Speaker 1: people with very specific agendas, in many cases an anti
Speaker 1: Israeli agenda, for example, they will spread propaganda. Usually they'll
Speaker 1: end up, you know, speaking among themselves and regurgitating the
Speaker 1: same thing. But also understand that our top geopolitical foes
Speaker 1: are targeting certain audiences, especially young people, and trying to
Speaker 1: indoctrinate them into what they believe. By the way Sentcom
Speaker 1: touted the skills of US pilots during this conflict, like
Speaker 1: landing on a movie postage staffed, I will tell you
Speaker 1: I have never been more proud or impressed with the
Speaker 1: military in this country that I am right now. I mean,
Speaker 1: this is the next generation of warfare and weaponry intelligence,
Speaker 1: all of it combined has been so beyond impressive. Now
Speaker 1: for the meantime, I know that a lot of people
Speaker 1: are just concerned about, all right, well, what's happening here
Speaker 1: at home the minute that the President put out that
Speaker 1: truth social post today about these talks that are ongoing.
Speaker 1: You know, last week a barrel of oil nearly hit
Speaker 1: one hundred and twenty dollars a barrel. Now it's down
Speaker 1: around eighty five eighty six. The Dow Jones went up
Speaker 1: over a thousand points, so sort about a thousand points.
Speaker 1: It's now of about eight hundred the last time I looked,
Speaker 1: and Trump, you know, is just doing everything humanly possible. Now, finally,
Speaker 1: I would argue, too little, too late. Twenty two countries
Speaker 1: have now voice support and readiness and will play. The
Speaker 1: NATO General Secretary has always been a big Trump supporter,
Speaker 1: said yes, it was an imminent threat. Yes, the President
Speaker 1: made the right choice. But other NATO nations like Spain
Speaker 1: and France and Great Britain have been far less reliable,
Speaker 1: and frankly, it's been embarrassing. And it's like they learn
Speaker 1: nothing about World War two and the rise of Hitler
Speaker 1: and fascism. It's like they learn nothing. And anyway, twenty
Speaker 1: two countries have now signed on to a joint statement
Speaker 1: signaling their readiness to contribute appropriate efforts to ensure save
Speaker 1: passage through the straight of horror moves. It's not that
Speaker 1: we're getting our oil from there now. As it relates
Speaker 1: to Great Britain, I am arguing that NATO countries and
Speaker 1: Western Europe have been compromised. They have now for decades
Speaker 1: adopted radical leftism, socialism that has hurt their economies, that
Speaker 1: has resulted in their unwillingness and inability to keep up
Speaker 1: with their national security needs. Similarly, climate alarmism has drained
Speaker 1: their coffers as well. Again and prioritizing that madness over
Speaker 1: national security and defense, Donald Trump forced them to more
Speaker 1: than double their contribution to NATO. And that was a
Speaker 1: heavy lift. And you know, for people like the Prime
Speaker 1: Minister of Great Britain Keir Starmer and Francis Macrone to
Speaker 1: be negotiating with whoever they're talking to in Iran their
Speaker 1: own passage through the strait of hormones, they're not exactly
Speaker 1: reliable allies. And this is why you know NATO in
Speaker 1: many respects, I mean we as a country, we pay
Speaker 1: more for NATO than all the other countries combined they
Speaker 1: need us. We don't really need them, as the President said, here, look,
Speaker 1: it's not our energy source to begin with, it's yours.
Speaker 1: And the same with China and Iran floating the Hormuz
Speaker 1: transit tolls as a result, well good luck. I don't
Speaker 1: even know, you know, nobody knows who's even in charge
Speaker 1: of it all right, now, moving on, So the President
Speaker 1: has sent ICE agents to JFK today, and which is
Speaker 1: the right thing to do. We have Tom Homan on
Speaker 1: Hannity tonight and already unmasked ICE agents have been deployed
Speaker 1: to major airports after the President made this announcement yesterday,
Speaker 1: and Immigration Enforcement agents film patrolling JFK airport. We have
Speaker 1: these massive lines going on three, four, five, six, seven
Speaker 1: hours and longer. Atlanta, Chicago, Cleveland, Houston, Fort Myers, Florida,
Speaker 1: New Orleans, New York, JFK, LaGuardia, Newark, I mean, Philly, Phoenix, Pittsburgh.
Speaker 1: You know, it's just all over and now we have
Speaker 1: unmasked ICE agents. They're already being harassed according to some reports.
Speaker 1: You know, we have ICE officers now film running from photographers,
Speaker 1: you know, as they were followed through JFK. More than
Speaker 1: a third of TSA staff at airports have been apps
Speaker 1: because they haven't been paid in thirty seven days. And
Speaker 1: I don't want to work like that, a Chicago Democrat
Speaker 1: says the eighteen year old Loyola College student. Now, if
Speaker 1: you haven't been following this, this is a disgrace. And
Speaker 1: I'm sure you've been following this story. I mean you
Speaker 1: have this, you know, another story of another case of
Speaker 1: another individual killed by another Biden illegal that was in
Speaker 1: the system. And at what point the Democrats not have
Speaker 1: blood on their hands when they keep allowing this to
Speaker 1: happen again and again and again. It's really really, really
Speaker 1: remarkable to me, eighteen year old lawyer.
Speaker 2: Or said about that story, Sean, is people writing stories
Speaker 2: like wrong place, wrong time?
Speaker 1: Yeah, well that by thank you for bringing that up,
Speaker 1: because that happened. What politician, you know, Chicago Democrat forty
Speaker 1: ninth ward An aldermen that it was Gorman the victim
Speaker 1: in the wrong place at the wrong time. Maria Hadden't
Speaker 1: is the older woman that said this talking about the
Speaker 1: eighteen year old Loyola University student shot and killed in
Speaker 1: the early hours on Friday morning by a Biden the
Speaker 1: illegal when she was walking with her friends at a
Speaker 1: nearby park in Chicago. Then you have this idiot Pritzger. Oh,
Speaker 1: look at how great the park is. Look at how
Speaker 1: safe it is. We'll go to some of the areas
Speaker 1: where all these shootings take place. And this happened to
Speaker 1: take place in a relatively safe area comparatively, by the way,
Speaker 1: props go out to Elon Musk offering to pay TSA agents.
Speaker 1: But Trump killed this funding deal. Democrats thought they were
Speaker 1: going to be clever, and they said, well, we'll fund
Speaker 1: the we'll fund the Department of Homeland Security, but we
Speaker 1: won't fund ICE, and we won't let ICE agents wear masks,
Speaker 1: even though there's an eight thousand percent increase of threats
Speaker 1: against ICE agents. Now, the President, in this truth announcement
Speaker 1: that he put out said, okay, he might be willing
Speaker 1: to He tells, no masks at airport with ICE. He says,
Speaker 1: I'm a big proponent of ICE wearing masks as they
Speaker 1: search for and are forced to deal with hardened criminals.
Speaker 1: He goes on to say, I would greatly appreciate, However,
Speaker 1: no masks when helping our country at airports. I'm not
Speaker 1: sure if they should have to do that. I don't
Speaker 1: know if I agree with that, because these guys are
Speaker 1: being threatened. They have everyone taking their picture and Schumer
Speaker 1: knocking Trump on Iran and a plan to send ICE
Speaker 1: to airports. Why don't they in the middle of a
Speaker 1: war against the number one state sponsor of terror, why
Speaker 1: don't they support it? Then you have this idiot mayor
Speaker 1: in Minneapolis, you know, Mayor French Fry small Fry, criticizing
Speaker 1: Donald Trump and his plan to deploy ICE agents. Why
Speaker 1: doesn't he just hire more TSA agents because your Democratic
Speaker 1: Party is not funding it? You idiot? Is he really
Speaker 1: that stupid? He can't be as dumb as he as
Speaker 1: he sounds, can he? And there might be some Republicans
Speaker 1: that are willing to go along with his I personally
Speaker 1: am not. They need to fund the Department of Homeland
Speaker 1: Security and cut it out. By the way, did you
Speaker 1: hear that AOC pulled a George Santos. This is in
Speaker 1: the New York Post. It wasn't long ago. Republicans had
Speaker 1: George Santos at one point. He was my congress person. Anyway,
Speaker 1: In December of twenty twenty three, he was accused by
Speaker 1: the House Ethics Committee of spending fifteen hundred dollars in
Speaker 1: campaign cash on boatox treatments along with other SPA services,
Speaker 1: and he also dipped into his campaign account to cover
Speaker 1: expenses for personal trips to Atlantic City, Vegas, and the Hamptons. Oh,
Speaker 1: it looks like AOC spent nearly nineteen thousand, according to
Speaker 1: The New York Post in campaign cash last year, on
Speaker 1: a shrink that specializes in ketamine therapy. I don't know
Speaker 1: if she took it or not. It's rather controversial, don't
Speaker 1: you think. I think you'd think so. Oh tink activist
Speaker 1: party in a five star Cuban hotel as the rest
Speaker 1: of the nation suffers from blackouts and food shortages. What
Speaker 1: is Code Pink doing in Cuba as the nation is
Speaker 1: facing nationwide blackouts in a collapsing economy.
Speaker 2: I know you hear that they actually had a concert
Speaker 2: that pulled all of the electric and then a bunch
Speaker 2: of people were sick, didn't have anything the little bit
Speaker 2: that they did have because they were running all these events.
Speaker 1: Guess what's going to happen. Cuba is going to fall
Speaker 1: and American investment will go in and they will be
Speaker 1: a close ally of the US. And the entire Western
Speaker 1: hemisphere will be more safe and more secure with less
Speaker 1: influence from our top geopolitical foes the Middle East. Whenever
Speaker 1: this ends, sooner than later, I hope is going to
Speaker 1: be more safe and more secure in the world, will
Speaker 1: be more safe and more secure, and you can thank
Speaker 1: Donald J. Trump and just now a matter of time.
Speaker 1: And that's why I'm telling people that, well, we got to
Speaker 1: get this over because we've got to get you know,
Speaker 1: we got to win the midterms. A lot's going to
Speaker 1: happen between now and November. All right, what are the
Speaker 1: real process expect for peace. We'll analyze that when we
Speaker 1: get back later on. We'll check him with Chip Roy
Speaker 1: and the battle on TSA and airports and much much
Speaker 1: more in funding BHS straight ahead