Speaker 1: Welcome verdict to a Senator Ted Cruz ben Ferguson with you, Senator,
Speaker 1: the babysitting interview took place, and it started with seen
Speaker 1: in lying by having the word live up on the
Speaker 1: screen while the interview was taped.
Speaker 2: You can't make that up, Kenya.
Speaker 3: Well you can't, but to call it an interview as
Speaker 3: it is actually false advertising. This was a Harris presidential
Speaker 3: campaign ad. They hired a situation actor named Dana Bash
Speaker 3: to read the Kamala Harris talking points to her and
Speaker 3: then she repeated them back at her. I have to
Speaker 3: say this interview and we're gonna break it down. We're
Speaker 3: gonna break it down systematically. But this interview was embarrassing.
Speaker 3: Like everybody at CNN whoever thought they were a journalist,
Speaker 3: every producer, every reporter, every host ought to be collectively
Speaker 3: embarrassed because this was not news. Can you imagine if
Speaker 3: Tim Russert had done this interview, how massively totally different
Speaker 3: it was. This was Dana Bash. The interview would not
Speaker 3: have been different. If Kamala Harris had seeded her own
Speaker 3: press secretary to ask her the questions, the same questions
Speaker 3: would have been asked.
Speaker 4: It was.
Speaker 3: It was It was embarrassing, but it was. It was
Speaker 3: pure propaganda. It was it actually is what Rfka Junior
Speaker 3: said when he endorsed Trump. The press is the media
Speaker 3: organ of the Democrat campaign. CNN were not journalists tonight.
Speaker 3: They were part of the Kamala Harris campaign and anyone
Speaker 3: watching it it was embarrassing.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it really was.
Speaker 1: I want to tell you quickly about our friends at
Speaker 1: the International Fellowship of Christians and Jews, and I say
Speaker 1: this because many of you are just incredible patriots and
Speaker 1: you are standing with the people in Israel. We're quickly
Speaker 1: approaching the one year inniverse of the horrific Commas attack
Speaker 1: on Israel, and still the Holy Land continues to be
Speaker 1: attacked on multiple fronts. Deadly threats are increasing in northern Israel.
Speaker 1: They're still dealing with constant rocket attacks from Hesblov that
Speaker 1: have been fired at Israel, causing widespread damage, with raging
Speaker 1: wildfires destroying precious farmland. Since the war started, the International
Speaker 1: Fellowship of Christians and Jews has been on the front
Speaker 1: lines in Israel addressing the needs of the most vulnerable
Speaker 1: people there. That's why I have partnered with IFCJ and
Speaker 1: many of you have already given life saving donations that
Speaker 1: are helping provide emergency food as well as critical security
Speaker 1: needs such as flat jackets, firefighting equipment, armored vehicles that
Speaker 1: include armored ambulances that have already gone into hot areas
Speaker 1: and saved people's lives. It is amazing to see the
Speaker 1: donations and how they're being used. They've all so put
Speaker 1: in bomb shelters and much more. Now we're asking for
Speaker 1: five hundred of you to join the Fellowship and me
Speaker 1: by donating one hundred and fifty dollars to help meet
Speaker 1: the urgent security needs of the Jewish people. Now, thanks
Speaker 1: to a generous IFCJ donor, your gift will be matched,
Speaker 1: meaning it's going to double your impact in the Holy Land.
Speaker 3: Now.
Speaker 1: To make your gift right now and to help the
Speaker 1: people in Israel and to say I stand with the
Speaker 1: people in Israel, call eight to eight four eight eight IFCJ.
Speaker 1: That's eight eight eight four eight eight IFCJR four three
Speaker 1: two five, or go online and you can donate securely
Speaker 1: there at SUPPORTIFCJ dot org. To gift, that's one word,
Speaker 1: support IFCJ dot org. Israel needs your support now more
Speaker 1: than ever. Senator, let's go back to the very beginning.
Speaker 1: CNN was promoting the crap this interview wall to wall
Speaker 1: all day long with you know, just everything was about
Speaker 1: this big day, and that right there, I think tells
Speaker 1: you just how messed up this race is and how
Speaker 1: messed up the media is. It should not be a
Speaker 1: mussy TV moment for the person who's running for president
Speaker 1: of the United States of America to do a damn interview.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 3: Look, I mean it's been over a month since she
Speaker 3: was the presumptive nominee. Kamala Harris has done zero interviews
Speaker 3: prior to this one, none whatsoever. Then this one, she
Speaker 3: her campaign reached out and presumably asked every network who
Speaker 3: will do the softest interview, who will give us the
Speaker 3: most softballs, who will not push us, who will make
Speaker 3: sure Kamala is protected and you know what winter winter
Speaker 3: chicken dinner. CNN stepped up and said, we have no
Speaker 3: journalistic integrity whatsoever. We are happy to be part of
Speaker 3: the Kamala Harris campaign. So Dana Bash, won you look
Speaker 3: at this interview that the opening question, Uh, you know,
Speaker 3: the the nation is so excited to hear what you're
Speaker 3: going to do as president. Breathlessly Oh, it's like a group. Yeah,
Speaker 3: we're so excited. Oh, we're so excited. What are you
Speaker 3: going to do as president? Please tell us what are
Speaker 3: you going to do on day one? Now? Then let
Speaker 3: me start by saying, this is not a difficult question
Speaker 3: for most candidates for office. This is not a surprise question,
Speaker 3: this is not an unexpected question. What the hell are
Speaker 3: you going to do in office? Is pretty simple and basic.
Speaker 3: Kamala's answer, I'm going to strengthen the middle class? What
Speaker 3: like like what like? She gave this this word salad
Speaker 3: answer about four to five the middle class. That is
Speaker 3: not actually anything the president does on day one or
Speaker 3: any day thereafter, like like it actually meant anything, meant
Speaker 3: nothing and so so that didn't point out, yeah, you
Speaker 3: didn't answer my question at all, but she did at
Speaker 3: least repeat the question for a moment that there was
Speaker 3: a tiny bit of being a question. She said, Okay,
Speaker 3: so what are you going to do on day one?
Speaker 3: And again Kamala has no answer, and let me give look,
Speaker 3: the fundamental disconnect in this fake interview was the same
Speaker 3: as the fundamental disconnect in Kamala's convention speech, which is
Speaker 3: the entire Kamala Harris campaign is pretending she's the candidate
Speaker 3: of change and is ignoring it. It is utterly divorced
Speaker 3: from reality that she's the sitting vice president, that Joe
Speaker 3: Biden is the sitting president today right now. So, by
Speaker 3: the way, the question what are you going to do
Speaker 3: on day one is a weird question for Eddie VP
Speaker 3: running to succeed a president, because the way VP is
Speaker 3: running to succeed president's run is they say, Hey, we've
Speaker 3: had a great record, here's what we've done in office.
Speaker 3: We're going to continue these policies. We're going to grow
Speaker 3: these policies. But we're running on our success. Kamala Uh.
Speaker 3: She's claiming that she is going to turn the page.
Speaker 3: She's going to change that. There's an exchange later in
Speaker 3: the interview where she says, we're going to put the
Speaker 3: past decade behind us. The past decade. She and Joe
Speaker 3: Biden have been president and vice president for four years
Speaker 3: and by the way, before Trump, Obama was president for
Speaker 3: eight years. Like idiot is, we're gonna put this horrible
Speaker 3: decade behind us, all but four years of which the
Speaker 3: Democrats have been in charge of the White House.
Speaker 1: There was a moment in this conversation as I was
Speaker 1: watching it tonight and I and I was sitting there
Speaker 1: and Joe Kancha over at Fox came on. He had
Speaker 1: a great way of putting it after his fact checking
Speaker 1: Harris on her fracking for example, flip flop and he said,
Speaker 1: Harris is a human chernobyl when you take out the teleprompter,
Speaker 1: and that really is what it was.
Speaker 2: It was a train wreck.
Speaker 1: But at the same time, Senator, train wrecks don't mean
Speaker 1: what they used to me, Like, the only way that
Speaker 1: there is accountability for doing a bad interview or having
Speaker 1: a bad moment is if it's as bad as Joe
Speaker 1: Biden in the first debate. I think Democrats probably look
Speaker 1: at this sign, I'm.
Speaker 3: Like, wasn't that bad? No, Democrats are happy. Democrats are
Speaker 3: very happy. And I actually don't think it was a
Speaker 3: train wreck for Kamala Harris. I think it was a
Speaker 3: train wreck for CNN. This was not an interview. This
Speaker 3: is a campaign commercial. And you know what they did
Speaker 3: find for a campaign commercial. So on questions, Kamala would
Speaker 3: say something like strength in the middle class. I'm just
Speaker 3: gonna I'm gonna lift people up, not push people down.
Speaker 3: I'm going to go forward, not backwards. I'm going to
Speaker 3: hope he changed, not sady hurt look like that. There
Speaker 3: was a bunch of vapid, empty statements. And it would
Speaker 3: be a train wreck if there had been a journalist
Speaker 3: in the room, because a journalist in the room would
Speaker 3: point out the actual record. Oh, she flip flops on fracking.
Speaker 3: And and you know, Dana Bash so gently, well you
Speaker 3: said you would cancel fracking. Well, no, no, I changed
Speaker 3: my mind in twenty twenty. Why why did why? Why did?
Speaker 5: Why?
Speaker 4: So?
Speaker 3: There was no question about Biden and Harris's record, So,
Speaker 3: for example, the fracking thing. All right, you want to
Speaker 3: ask about energy, Okay, Dana, here's a rocket rocket scientist's idea.
Speaker 3: Ask about the disastrous record of Joe Biden. Kamala. Harris
Speaker 3: on energy, Kamala. Why on the first day in office
Speaker 3: did did did Joe Biden and your administration canceled the
Speaker 3: Keystone pipeline, Kamala?
Speaker 6: Why?
Speaker 3: Why did Joe Biden and your administration shut down oil
Speaker 3: and gas leasing on federal lands? Why did your administration
Speaker 3: shut down offshore drilling? Kamala? Why did your administration ban
Speaker 3: new permits new export permits for liquid natural gas? Why
Speaker 3: do you not want America to produce oil and gas?
Speaker 3: Why have you implemented over ninety different executive orders regulations
Speaker 3: decide to design to destroy jobs and oil and guests.
Speaker 3: That would be an actual reporter, by the way, Tim
Speaker 3: Russert would have played the clips one after the other,
Speaker 3: Well here's you doing this, here's you doing this, here's
Speaker 3: you doing this, And she'd say no, no, no, we're
Speaker 3: gonna We're gonna just, you know, help the middle class. Well,
Speaker 3: what about all the middle class jobs you destroyed? That's
Speaker 3: actually an interview, an interview that is based on facts.
Speaker 3: None of those words, Kate Kate came out of.
Speaker 1: The new word for flip flopping is clarify. And and
Speaker 1: you mentioned this, so let's play part of it again.
Speaker 1: See it in lying to your on screen saying this
Speaker 1: is live, it's nighttime. But if you look at the
Speaker 1: setting where they were doing the interview at stay time outside,
Speaker 1: so seeing an excus exclusive what's live of the American people?
Speaker 2: Just on the premise of the interview. But then this
Speaker 2: was the question.
Speaker 4: I want to get some already on where you stand
Speaker 4: on some key policy issues. Energy is a big one.
Speaker 4: When you were in Congress, you supported the Green New Deal,
Speaker 4: and in twenty nineteen, you said, quote, there is no
Speaker 4: question I'm in favor of banning fracking. Cracking, as you know,
Speaker 4: is a pretty big issue, particularly in your must win
Speaker 4: state of Pennsylvania.
Speaker 5: Do you still want to ban fracking?
Speaker 6: No, And I made that clear on the debate stage
Speaker 6: in twenty twenty that I would not ban fracking as
Speaker 6: vice president, I did not ban fracking.
Speaker 7: As president, I will not banfracking.
Speaker 4: In twenty nineteen, I believe in a town hall you
Speaker 4: said you were asked, would you commit to implementing a
Speaker 4: federal ban on fracking on your first day in office,
Speaker 4: and you said, there's no question, I'm in favor of
Speaker 4: banning fracking.
Speaker 5: So yes.
Speaker 7: So it changed in that campaign in twenty twenty. I'm
Speaker 7: made very clear where I stand.
Speaker 6: We are in twenty twenty four and I've not changed
Speaker 6: that position, nor will I going forward.
Speaker 7: I kept my word and I will keep my word.
Speaker 5: What made you chant change that position at the time.
Speaker 6: Well, let's be clear, my values have not changed. I
Speaker 6: believe it is very important that we take seriously what
Speaker 6: we must do to guard against what is a clear
Speaker 6: crisis in terms of the climate and to do that.
Speaker 7: We can do what we.
Speaker 6: Have accomplished thus far, the Inflation Reduction Act, what we
Speaker 6: have done to invest by my calculation, over probably a
Speaker 6: trillion dollars over the next ten years, investing in a
Speaker 6: clean energy economy.
Speaker 7: What we've already done.
Speaker 6: Creating over three hundred thousand new clean energy jobs.
Speaker 2: By the way, I just had to stop there, center
Speaker 2: and go back.
Speaker 1: How much money did they get from the American people
Speaker 1: to build a bunch of charging stations? They were going
Speaker 1: to build all over the country, and we built I
Speaker 1: think the real virtually none of them. Yeah, like two
Speaker 1: or three, I think, is what we've done so far.
Speaker 1: And she sits there and she just flat out lying
Speaker 1: to the American People Act.
Speaker 3: And by the way, why didn't Dana Bash point that out? Well,
Speaker 3: why didn't Dana Bash point that out? And look so
Speaker 3: so she so Dana focuses on one quote from twenty nineteen.
Speaker 3: What about the rest of her record? This is the
Speaker 3: incumbent administration right now? And by the way, on this front, well,
Speaker 3: hold on, yeah, I want you to keep playing that
Speaker 3: clip you were playing, because then Dana tries to coax
Speaker 3: her in an answer, and it really is pitiful It
Speaker 3: is as if they brought in Koreine Jean Pierre to
Speaker 3: do the interview. Play the rest of what Danna says that.
Speaker 6: Tells me, from my experience as vice president, we can
Speaker 6: do it without banning fracking. In fact, Dana, Dana, excuse me,
Speaker 6: I cast the tie breaking vote that actually increased leases
Speaker 6: for fracking as vice president. So I'm very clear about
Speaker 6: where I stand.
Speaker 4: And was there some policy or scientific data that you
Speaker 4: saw that you said, Oh, okay, I get it now.
Speaker 6: What I have seen is that we can we can grow,
Speaker 6: and we can increase a thriving clean energy economy without
Speaker 6: banning fracking.
Speaker 1: Okay, there we go like, okay, sounds great, Thank you guy.
Speaker 2: We sum that up.
Speaker 1: It's embarrassing, by the way, for Dana Mash, I'm sorry,
Speaker 1: it just is.
Speaker 2: It's embarrassing.
Speaker 3: And she goes on to say she goes on to say,
Speaker 3: how should voters look at some of the changes you've made.
Speaker 3: Is it because you have more experience now and you've
Speaker 3: learned more about the information. Is it because you were
Speaker 3: running for president a Democratic primary? And should they feel
Speaker 3: comfortable and confident that what you're saying now is going
Speaker 3: to be your policy moving forward, Madam President. I'm so
Speaker 3: excited to see you as president, and I'm going to
Speaker 3: be cheering and crying the moment you're elected. Oh my god,
Speaker 3: I'm so excited. Yay Kamala. Oh wait, I'm a journalist.
Speaker 1: Crap, And let's go back to what she said. When
Speaker 1: she said and I'm sorry, she's a liar. My values
Speaker 1: have not changed. Let's remind people of Kamway Harris's values.
Speaker 1: Then this is a montage of her values.
Speaker 7: My values have not changed.
Speaker 6: You spread meat specifically, Yes, it's a Boston marathon bomber.
Speaker 3: They should be able to vote.
Speaker 7: I think we should have that conversation.
Speaker 5: Abolish ice, yes, would you ban off shore drilling yes?
Speaker 7: And I'm in favor of banning frack.
Speaker 6: I am prepared to pass a green you deal, and
Speaker 6: I support a mandatory buyback program. We're not going to
Speaker 6: treat people who are undocumented across the borders criminals. The
Speaker 6: idea that more police equals more safety, that's just wrong.
Speaker 5: Policing as we know, goes all the way back to
Speaker 5: slave patrols and that idea.
Speaker 3: And you are absolutely right, where do you stand on
Speaker 3: defund the police.
Speaker 7: We need to take a look at these budgets. Do
Speaker 7: you ban plastic straws? And then we'sh a seventy to
Speaker 7: eighty percent tax rate. I think that's fantastic.
Speaker 3: Chipping now to the Minnesota Freedom Fund.
Speaker 7: How dare we speak Merry Christmas? Yeah? I am radical.
Speaker 2: I do believe that we.
Speaker 6: Need to get radical about what we are doing.
Speaker 1: I mean, she says, my values have not changed. You
Speaker 1: might as well believe comrade Kamala on this one. She's
Speaker 1: somebody that wants a seventy to eighty percent tax rate
Speaker 1: and said it was awesome. No cash bail, gun confiscation,
Speaker 1: zero fracking, a ban on gasoline powered cars she's in
Speaker 1: favor of as well.
Speaker 3: So Ben and on all of those. So it's clear
Speaker 3: the phrase my values have not changed is something your
Speaker 3: campaign came up. She said that, like I don't know
Speaker 3: three or four times in the interview that they scripted.
Speaker 3: That was her lead talking point on any flip flop
Speaker 3: that she got pressed with as well, my values have
Speaker 3: not changed. And actually, at some level that's the truest
Speaker 3: statement she made the entire interview. Because Kamala Harris is
Speaker 3: a radical leftist. She is extreme and she still believes
Speaker 3: all this stuff and you know what, it's the reason
Speaker 3: why nobody on the left is unhappy that she's suddenly
Speaker 3: running away from a position, because they know she's lying. Like,
Speaker 3: let's be clear, borders are Kamala Harris was in charge
Speaker 3: of this invasion. It happened on her watch, and if
Speaker 3: God forbid, she becomes president, it will get worse. And
Speaker 3: everyone gets the joke. All the leftists know she still
Speaker 3: believes all this stuff. She just has to say some
Speaker 3: more conservative things in the camp and pain to fool
Speaker 3: the gullible voters. But none of her radical supporters believe
Speaker 3: for a moment she's right. Her values have not changed.
Speaker 3: She still believes every word of that montage, and God forbid,
Speaker 3: if she's in the Oval office, she'll do all of
Speaker 3: that and more. Unlike Joe Biden, Joe Biden is a
Speaker 3: senile puppet. Kamala Harris is a true believer.
Speaker 1: It was also a very weird interview for the fact
Speaker 1: that Wallace, who was I guess there to babysit and
Speaker 1: to hold her hand and try to, you know, get
Speaker 1: her out of trouble if she got in trouble without
Speaker 1: a teleprompter, he really didn't say much. It was very awkward,
Speaker 1: just kind of nodding and laughing. He did. He was
Speaker 1: asked one question about Stow and Valor and the claims
Speaker 1: he saw combat, and Dana asked him a question, and
Speaker 1: I want you to hear his excuse A it's his
Speaker 1: wife's fault in some capacity that she says.
Speaker 2: His wife says it's his fault.
Speaker 1: That sometimes times he just misspeaks about if he did
Speaker 1: or didn't go to war.
Speaker 2: Listen to this, Governor wils.
Speaker 4: The country is just starting to get to know you.
Speaker 4: I want to ask you a question about how you've
Speaker 4: described your service in the National Guard. You said that
Speaker 4: you carried weapons in war, but you have never deployed
Speaker 4: actually in a war zone.
Speaker 5: A campaign official said that you misspoke, did you well?
Speaker 8: First of all, I'm incredibly proud I've done twenty four
Speaker 8: years of wearing the uniform of this country. Equally proud
Speaker 8: of my service in a public school classroom, whether it's
Speaker 8: Congress or the governor. My record speaks for itself. But
Speaker 8: I think people are coming to get to know me.
Speaker 8: I speak like they do. I speak candidly, I wear
Speaker 8: my emotions on my sleeves, and I speak especially passionately
Speaker 8: about our children being shot in schools and around guns.
Speaker 8: So I think people know me, they know who I am,
Speaker 8: they know where my heart is. And again my record
Speaker 8: has been out there for over forty years to be so.
Speaker 4: And the idea that you said that you were in war,
Speaker 4: did you miss speak as the campaign has said.
Speaker 8: Yeah, I said we were talking about in this case,
Speaker 8: this was after school shooting, the ideas of carrying these
Speaker 8: weapons of war, and my wife the English telling my
Speaker 8: grammar's not always correct. But again, if it's not this,
Speaker 8: it's an attack on my children for showing love for me,
Speaker 8: or it's an attack on my dog. I'm not going
Speaker 8: to do that. And the one thing I'll never do
Speaker 8: is I'll never demean another member's service in any way.
Speaker 8: I never have and I never will.
Speaker 1: By the way, yes you did. You said that you
Speaker 1: had a rank you didn't have. You said you saw
Speaker 1: combat that you didn't see. You said you had these
Speaker 1: guns in war time that you didn't have. And then
Speaker 1: he says, I would never take away from anybody else.
Speaker 1: You absolutely did. I think this is now going to
Speaker 1: become even a bigger issue for him because he's like, oh,
Speaker 1: it was just you know, it was my grammar. My
Speaker 1: grammar's not always correct. Claiming you went to war center
Speaker 1: is has nothing to do with your grammar if you
Speaker 1: didn't go to war.
Speaker 3: Yeah, Ben, I've got a different take on this. I
Speaker 3: think that whole exchange is exactly what the Kamala Harris
Speaker 3: campaign wanted. It was a softball for him to talk
Speaker 3: about I served twenty four years. I'm proud of my service,
Speaker 3: and I also care about kids and keeping kids safe.
Speaker 3: Like you, listen at everything he said. It was their
Speaker 3: campaign talking points. She just Dana said, okay, here, talk
Speaker 3: about praise, serving our nation and be a little self
Speaker 3: effacing and it again. So reporters, real reporters, actually focus
Speaker 3: on records. Tim Waltz may well be the most radical
Speaker 3: governor in the entire United States of America. Governor Waltz,
Speaker 3: you signed legislation putting tampons in boys' restrooms. Is that
Speaker 3: a mainstream view? Governor Walts, You signed legislation giving children
Speaker 3: a right to being sterilized and mutilated if they believe
Speaker 3: they're a different gender, and setting the stage for parents
Speaker 3: to have their parental rights terminated if they object to
Speaker 3: their child being sterilized. You wanted to make Minnesota a
Speaker 3: sanctuary state for children who are getting permanently mutilated? Is
Speaker 3: that a mainstream position of Governor Waltz? Governor Walts, you
Speaker 3: said in an interview that the First Amendment does not
Speaker 3: protect what you call misinformation or hate speech. Do you
Speaker 3: get to decide what is and isn't misinformation and what
Speaker 3: exactly why do you think you ought to have the
Speaker 3: power to take away the free speech rights of the
Speaker 3: American people. Those would actually be questions about his actual record,
Speaker 3: but it would take a journalist raising his record now.
Speaker 3: To be honest, Walt shouldn't have been there. There is
Speaker 3: no presidential candidate in history who has been so weak
Speaker 3: that they needed their vice presidential nominee there. It was
Speaker 3: ridiculous that he was sitting. Can you imagine Trump being
Speaker 3: interviewed and saying, I need JD. Advance there, I need
Speaker 3: Mike Pence there like this interview.
Speaker 1: Ever, by the way, as a candidate, right, Like, let's
Speaker 1: be clear, they've done candidate two together before. And that's
Speaker 1: what the left has been saying, is like, well, hold on,
Speaker 1: we've had interviews that have been president and vice prend
Speaker 1: That is true, but not the first one and not
Speaker 1: after you no one voted for you, and you become
Speaker 1: the nominee.
Speaker 3: Tim Waltz was there to be an emotional support puppy.
Speaker 3: He was just there in case Kamala got into trouble
Speaker 3: to jump in and save her. And he mostly stayed quiet.
Speaker 3: But the questions Data asked him were perfectly calibrated to
Speaker 3: let him give emotional speeches about what a great guy
Speaker 3: he is, how much he loves kids, He's been a teacher,
Speaker 3: he loves kids. Did he mentioned he loves kids and
Speaker 3: he served his nation and it's great, and he also
Speaker 3: loves kids. That's not actually an interview.
Speaker 1: It's a great point, it's not an interview. I also
Speaker 1: want to get to Harris on the issue of the border.
Speaker 1: She was asked a question about that. But before I
Speaker 1: get to that, let me tell you about my friends
Speaker 1: over at Bond Arms. They are a Texas company and
Speaker 1: a staunch advocate for our god given Second Amendment rights,
Speaker 1: and they have a really cool collector's firearm. Right now,
Speaker 1: it is to honor our tough forty fifth president. Anyone
Speaker 1: who can bounce back from the personal attacks and the
Speaker 1: attempted assassination like Donald Trump has and immediately go back
Speaker 1: to work is a very powerful and resilient leader, and
Speaker 1: to honor him, Bond Arms, a thirty year old Texas company,
Speaker 1: has an extremely powerful tough handgun called the forty five
Speaker 1: XLV to honor the forty fifth president called the Living Legend.
Speaker 1: I want you to check this out and you can
Speaker 1: see it online right now by going to get Bondarms
Speaker 1: dot com and you can find out more about this
Speaker 1: new forty five XLV model to honor this amazing Living Legend.
Speaker 1: There are a very limited number that will be made
Speaker 1: of this special handgun and it will only be available
Speaker 1: for a limited time at a low price of only
Speaker 1: five hundred and forty five dollars and forty seven cents. Yes,
Speaker 1: you can even in the price. Understand what they're saying.
Speaker 1: It will become a collector's item and something you will
Speaker 1: be proud to own, shoot and show your family and
Speaker 1: your friends. So if you're a collector and you want
Speaker 1: a piece of history, go to get Bondarms dot com
Speaker 1: today to see this incredible firearm. That's get Bondarms dot
Speaker 1: com today to find out more. You know Kamala Harris
Speaker 1: is the borders are anyone with a brain center knows
Speaker 1: that's what they called her. We played the montage on
Speaker 1: the show several times of the media and liberal members
Speaker 1: of the media calling her the borders are. Then it
Speaker 1: became the inconvenient truth. So they were like, well, she
Speaker 1: never really was the borders are and we were like, yeah,
Speaker 1: she was. You guys called her that. Here's when you
Speaker 1: called her that. But she was asked another softball question.
Speaker 1: This was Dana Bash and Harris.
Speaker 7: To my desk and I would sign it.
Speaker 4: Just one other question about something that you said in
Speaker 4: twenty nineteen when you first ran there was a debate.
Speaker 5: You raised your hand.
Speaker 4: When asked whether or not the border should be decriminalized.
Speaker 5: Do you still believe that?
Speaker 7: I believe there should be consequence.
Speaker 6: We have laws that have to be followed and enforced
Speaker 6: that address and deal with people who cross our border illegally,
Speaker 6: and there should be consequence. And let's be clear, in
Speaker 6: this race, I'm the only person who has prosecuted transnational
Speaker 6: criminal organizations who trafficking guns, drugs, and human beings. I'm
Speaker 6: the only person in this race who actually served a
Speaker 6: border state as attorney to enforce our laws, and I
Speaker 6: would enforce our laws as president going forward.
Speaker 7: I recognize the problem generally speaking.
Speaker 3: So so let me jump in there. Let me jump
Speaker 3: in there and say a couple of things. Number One,
Speaker 3: her statement there that she's the only person that has
Speaker 3: prosecuted transnational board transnational gangs is completely wrong. Donald Trump
Speaker 3: was president for four years. The Trump administration prosecuted drug traffickers,
Speaker 3: human traffickers, transnational gangs over and over and over again.
Speaker 3: Yet he had an entire Department of Justice. So her premise,
Speaker 3: now she s coould say, well, but I was the lawyer, okay,
Speaker 3: when you were attorney general. I'm not aware of Kama
Speaker 3: actually going to court. If her argument was she went
Speaker 3: to court, I'm not aware of her actually being personally
Speaker 3: in court. It's the same thing, which is accept The
Speaker 3: difference is the Trump administration had incredible success and commalist
Speaker 3: position she repeatedly, and let me say something else. I'm
Speaker 3: gonna go back to her position a second. D Anabashi's question,
Speaker 3: Kamala didn't answer. It's one of the reasons this was
Speaker 3: it wasn't an interview, but it was also terrible. Most
Speaker 3: of the questions Danabash asked, Kamala didn't answer. Do you
Speaker 3: still support decriminalizing crossing illegally into this country. She didn't
Speaker 3: answer that at all. She said, there must be consequences. Okay,
Speaker 3: let me go back. You said it should be decriminalized.
Speaker 3: Do you still support that, yes or no? She didn't
Speaker 3: get an answer to that. She also did not get
Speaker 3: at all into the disastrous record. So this entire interview
Speaker 3: is designed to let Kamala run away from Joe Biden
Speaker 3: and her own record, to pretend that her record does
Speaker 3: not exist. And so there wasn't a word about Under
Speaker 3: your administration, eleven and a half million illegal aliens have
Speaker 3: come into this country. Under your administration, Barack Obama used
Speaker 3: the power of parole to parole roughly five thousand illegal
Speaker 3: aliens a year to release them into the country. Donald
Speaker 3: Trump used the power parole to parole roughly five thousand
Speaker 3: illegal immigrants a year to release them into this country.
Speaker 3: Parole is an extraordinary, extraordinary discretion given to the president.
Speaker 3: Under Joe Biden your administration, you and Joe Biden used
Speaker 3: that to parole over eight hundred thousand illegal immigrants a year,
Speaker 3: over and over and over again. Was that a mistake?
Speaker 3: Will you stop doing that? Was Joe Biden wrong? Did
Speaker 3: you disagree? Did you ever, say you disagreed you were
Speaker 3: widely reported to be the borders are. Did you have
Speaker 3: any responsibility for what was happening at the border, or
Speaker 3: are you saying you had no responsibility whatsoever? Like those
Speaker 3: would be questions a journalist would ask. Not a word
Speaker 3: of that came out of CNN's mouse, Yeah, not one
Speaker 3: single bit of it. And then you go back to
Speaker 3: the policy. She says, I would enforce the law.
Speaker 1: They haven't enforced the law the entire time they've been
Speaker 1: in office, which goes back to the bigger conversation here
Speaker 1: about this interview. She said she's gonna come in day
Speaker 1: one and fix all these problems.
Speaker 2: What's stopping her from doing it? Right now?
Speaker 1: Clearly Joe Biden's not running the country. And then she
Speaker 1: says on the border, she's the damn bordersar unless she
Speaker 1: got fired from that job, which has not been publicized.
Speaker 3: A second Dana Bash starts the border discussion not by
Speaker 3: saying you're the borders are, but by saying, you were
Speaker 3: asked to address the root causes of migration. Yeah, in
Speaker 3: northern Central America. Literally, those are the Kamala Harris talking points.
Speaker 3: That's what they say. That's Dana Bash's question, Hey, here's
Speaker 3: your talking points on this, and she says, oh, I
Speaker 3: did great things to address the root causes.
Speaker 4: It.
Speaker 3: There is, by the way, let's go back again. I
Speaker 3: actually think the Tim Russer con trust is enormously like
Speaker 3: Tim Russert was the most feared interviewer in journalism because
Speaker 3: he would have a politician on and he would take
Speaker 3: your prior statements and your prior record. He put your
Speaker 3: record in front of you over and over and over
Speaker 3: and over. Yet it was the gold standard in this instance,
Speaker 3: Annabash didn't ask Man and Vice President. The Inspector General
Speaker 3: of the Department of HHS found that your administration lost
Speaker 3: three hundred and twenty thousand children. What should the American
Speaker 3: people think of your administration losing three hundred and twenty
Speaker 3: thousand children? Do you know where they are? What are
Speaker 3: you doing to find them? Have you done anything to
Speaker 3: find them? How many of those children right now are
Speaker 3: being sexually abused? How many of them are trapped in
Speaker 3: horribly abusive situations? Do you take any responsibility for that?
Speaker 3: Like that would be normal questioning that a journalist would ask. So,
Speaker 3: of course, because there was not a journalist in the room.
Speaker 3: None of those questions happened.
Speaker 1: When you look at this interview, and it obviously depends
Speaker 1: on who you talk to. Right, you go and look
Speaker 1: at conservative headlines and it's like train wreck. CNN pushes
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris hard on issues. Another headline says Harris unprepared,
Speaker 1: no good answers, Waltz hit on stolen valor. VP defends Bidenomics,
Speaker 1: fails to explain why she did not lower prices. I mean,
Speaker 1: the headlines, my point is, are all over the place.
Speaker 1: But on Bidenomics is a great example. She referred to
Speaker 1: it as good work.
Speaker 2: Center.
Speaker 1: It's good work. Really like Bidenomics, which has been a disaster.
Speaker 1: She says, no, no, no, it's not really a disaster.
Speaker 2: It's pretty good work.
Speaker 5: And you maintain Bidenomics is a success.
Speaker 6: I maintain that when we do the work of brandown
Speaker 6: prescription medication for the American people, including capping the cost
Speaker 6: of the annual cost of prescription medication for seniors at
Speaker 6: two thousand dollars, When we do what we did in
Speaker 6: the first year of being in office to extend a
Speaker 6: child tax credit so that we cut child poverty in
Speaker 6: America by over fifty percent, When we do what we
Speaker 6: have done to invest in the American people in bringing
Speaker 6: manufacturing back to the United States, so that we created
Speaker 6: over eight hundred thousand new manufacturing jobs, bringing business back
Speaker 6: to America.
Speaker 7: What we have done to improve.
Speaker 6: The supply chain so we're not relying on foreign governments
Speaker 6: to supply American families with their basic needs. I'll say
Speaker 6: that that's good work. There's more to do, but that's
Speaker 6: good work.
Speaker 1: I mean, where do you even start grocery prices, home prices, food,
Speaker 1: I mean, do you want to go with?
Speaker 3: But let me give my bottom line. This interview did
Speaker 3: absolutely nothing to impact the presidential election in November. The
Speaker 3: Kamala Harris campaign is high fiving. They're thrilled because now
Speaker 3: they have an excuse not to do another interview for
Speaker 3: at least another month because they'll say they did an interview,
Speaker 3: so they will quickly rush her back to the Joe
Speaker 3: Biden's basement and hide her there. And all this was
Speaker 3: was a campaign commercial. What she's saying there, she's reading
Speaker 3: their talking points. It the headlines you read. I don't
Speaker 3: know what outlets they are, but I'm gonna guess that
Speaker 3: everyone that says train wreck is a right of Center outlet.
Speaker 3: You've got Bright barton Fox News and all of those,
Speaker 3: and you know what, so what the people reading that
Speaker 3: aren't going to vote for her anyway, Like, I don't
Speaker 3: think there was a single thing in this interview that
Speaker 3: moved even one voter to change how they're going to
Speaker 3: vote in November. And if there was, I'm sorry to
Speaker 3: say it moved them towards Kamala Harris. Because if there's
Speaker 3: a voter who's a naive and ignorant voter who doesn't
Speaker 3: know anything, they listened to twenty some odd minutes of
Speaker 3: her reading campaign talking points look foreign policy. On foreign policy, okay,
Speaker 3: there was no question about Ukraine and the disaster that
Speaker 3: the administration is done on that. There was no question
Speaker 3: about Afghanistan and the disaster there. There was no question
Speaker 3: about why why Joe Biden denied that thirteen servicemen and
Speaker 3: women were killed in Afghanistan due to their utter incompetence
Speaker 3: and the disgrace of this administration. None of those were questions.
Speaker 3: The question was instead about Israel and what did it do.
Speaker 3: It gave Kamala Harris a chance to say October seventh
Speaker 3: was terrible and to say I will always stand for Israel,
Speaker 3: and Dana Bash asked, as president, will you cut off
Speaker 3: weapons to Israel? And Kamala Harris refuses to answer. She
Speaker 3: says Israel has a right to defend itself, doesn't answer
Speaker 3: the question at all. Okay, Dana, here's a crazy question.
Speaker 3: Joe Biden. Right now, this instant, your administration has frozen
Speaker 3: weapons to Israel. Is not sending the weapons to Israel
Speaker 3: that Congress appropriated. Do you agree with that? Is Joe
Speaker 3: Biden wrong to refuse to send weapons to Israel? That
Speaker 3: would be a real question. So of course Dana Bash
Speaker 3: didn't ask that. She also didn't ask men and Vice
Speaker 3: President You and Joe Biden sent hundreds of millions of
Speaker 3: dollars to Gaza. You did so after your administration concluded
Speaker 3: that it was likely that that money would be used
Speaker 3: by Hamas to carry out terrorism, in light of October seventh,
Speaker 3: in light of the determination that it was highly likely
Speaker 3: that was your administration's determination, it would be used for terrorism.
Speaker 3: Was it a mistake to send hundreds of millions of
Speaker 3: dollars that were highly likely to be used by terrorism?
Speaker 3: By the way, you want to talk foreign policy Iran,
Speaker 3: your administration, Madame Vice President has sent over one hundred
Speaker 3: billion dollars to Iran. Iran provides ninety percent of the
Speaker 3: funding for Hamas, ninety percent of the funding for Hesbela.
Speaker 3: In a very real sense, the death squads on October
Speaker 3: seventh was funded by your administration. Do you regret that?
Speaker 3: Was that a mistake? Madame Vice President? Why do you
Speaker 3: continue today to refuse to enforce the oil sanctions against Iran?
Speaker 3: Why are you allowing Iran to sell two million barrels
Speaker 3: a day of oil? When you became vice president, they
Speaker 3: were selling three hundred thousand barrels a day. It was
Speaker 3: crushing the Iranian economy and men and Vice President, by
Speaker 3: the way, on fracking, you said a minute ago you
Speaker 3: weren't at a man fracking. Why is it that you're
Speaker 3: so eager to support oil and gas production in Iran
Speaker 3: led by a theocratic lunatic who chanced death to America,
Speaker 3: but you and your administration had put in regulation after
Speaker 3: regulation hammering oil and gas jobs in the United States.
Speaker 3: Those are questions an actual journalist would ask.
Speaker 1: There's only one moment in this whole debate center that
Speaker 1: or I should say this television interview that I think
Speaker 1: that the Trump campaign could really use to their advantage
Speaker 1: in a TV AD and I want to play it
Speaker 1: for you and get your thoughts because there was this
Speaker 1: moment for me where I was like, Okay, maybe this
Speaker 1: is useful.
Speaker 5: So you have been vice president for three and a
Speaker 5: half years.
Speaker 4: The steps that you're talking about, now, why haven't you
Speaker 4: done them already?
Speaker 6: Well, first of all, we had to recover as an economy,
Speaker 6: and we have done that. I'm very proud of the
Speaker 6: work that we have done that has brought inflation down
Speaker 6: to less than three percent, the work that we have
Speaker 6: done to cap the cost of insulin at thirty.
Speaker 7: Five dollars a month for seniors.
Speaker 6: Donald Trump said he was going to do a number
Speaker 6: of things, including allowing Medicare to negotiate drug prices.
Speaker 7: Never happened.
Speaker 6: We did it so now and as I travel in
Speaker 6: the state of Georgia and around our country, the number
Speaker 6: of seniors that have benefited I've met. I was in
Speaker 6: Nevada recently a grandmother who showed me her receipts and
Speaker 6: before we capped the cost of insullent for seniors at
Speaker 6: thirty five dollars a muss, she was playing hundreds of
Speaker 6: dollars up to thousands of dollars a month for her insulin.
Speaker 7: She's not doing that anyman.
Speaker 1: I mean, that's that might be your only moment where
Speaker 1: you could say, Okay, maybe we could make a campaign
Speaker 1: out of this that why didn't you do what you
Speaker 1: say you're going to do one?
Speaker 3: Now, I'm not with you on that. I actually think
Speaker 3: Dana Bash gave her a perfect opportunity, give me your
Speaker 3: talking point. So the only questions that she had that
Speaker 3: were sort of pretend questions. When she asked Tim Waltz
Speaker 3: about stolen valor, it was a softball for him to
Speaker 3: give a speech about how important military service is and
Speaker 3: how much he loves America. When she asked her that question, Look,
Speaker 3: it's such an obvious question that it was sort of like,
Speaker 3: what is your talking point in response to this? And
Speaker 3: that whole riff there. If you are a voter who's
Speaker 3: not paying much attention he doesn't know the record, that
Speaker 3: riff sounds pretty good. Okay, So we had a pandemic,
Speaker 3: you had to deal with that, and then hey, we
Speaker 3: did this thing on insulin. I'm not sure what the
Speaker 3: thing on insulin is. The person listening might be saying,
Speaker 3: but you told me about a woman who had really
Speaker 3: high receipts and then they went down. So wow, okay,
Speaker 3: apparently you did something. That whole riff is a prepared riff.
Speaker 3: That is their defense, and and and there is there
Speaker 3: was nothing actually calling to account for the actual record,
Speaker 3: the disaster of the record. But by the way, going
Speaker 3: back to the border, her statements were not just not
Speaker 3: just the statement you raise your hand and said that
Speaker 3: you would decriminalize illegal immigration. You've also said you would
Speaker 3: abolish ICE. You still want to abolish ICE. You've also
Speaker 3: said the wall was ridiculous. Do you still want to
Speaker 3: do that? Well, now you've said you want to build
Speaker 3: the wall. You know her positions you said, And by
Speaker 3: the way, a real interview would would play this. You
Speaker 3: said on day one you would shut down every ICE
Speaker 3: detention center and you would not detain illegal immigrants. To
Speaker 3: believe that abolish but also shut down the detention centers.
Speaker 3: You know, you know what was nowhere in the question
Speaker 3: Jocelyn Nunger, lacol and Riley Rachel Marin, Like a real
Speaker 3: question would be Lacln Riley was killed by an illegal
Speaker 3: immigrant that you and Joe Biden released. Was that a
Speaker 3: mistake to release that immigrant. Rachel Marin was raped and
Speaker 3: murdered by a needlegal immigrant that you and Joe Biden released.
Speaker 3: Was that a mistake to release that illegal immigrant? Joscelyn
Speaker 3: Nungary was raped and killed by two illegal immigrants that
Speaker 3: you and Joe Biden released. Was that a mistake to
Speaker 3: release that immigrant? How many is enough? Like that? Actually
Speaker 3: would be laying out and have you changed anything? Why
Speaker 3: do you continue to release illegal immigrants who go on
Speaker 3: every day to murder Americans, to rape women, to violate children.
Speaker 3: You know, we talked about in the previous podcasts. They
Speaker 3: just halted their plan. Your administration flew into America over
Speaker 3: three hundred thousand illegal immigrants a year, flew them in.
Speaker 3: They didn't cross the border. You flew them in from Haiti,
Speaker 3: from Cuba, from Nicaraguan. Venezuela. One of the illegal immigrants
Speaker 3: you flew in. You flew into Boston. You released him
Speaker 3: in Boston and he raped a fifteen year old girl
Speaker 3: with severe mental disabilities. Was that a mistake to fly
Speaker 3: into this country an illegal immigrant who raped a teenage girl?
Speaker 3: You know what? Those are hard questions for her to answer.
Speaker 3: That's why she doesn't do interviews. But she still doesn't
Speaker 3: do interviews. This was not an interview. They sat there
Speaker 3: and knew Dana Bash is part of the campaign. Just
Speaker 3: like if she was sitting there with Kareeine John Pierre
Speaker 3: to do a fake interview, they'd know they would never
Speaker 3: get those questions because those are questions that are a
Speaker 3: real problem. They knew they'd never get them from Dana
Speaker 3: Bash either.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and it was a parent that, like you said,
Speaker 1: this was nothing but propaganda. Patriot Mobile is the only
Speaker 1: conservative Christian wireless provider in the country. And I've been
Speaker 1: telling you about them for quite some time. And if
Speaker 1: you haven't switched to Patriot Mobile, now's the time to
Speaker 1: do it, especially in this election cycle. Patriot Mobile is
Speaker 1: proud of what they believe in and what they stand for,
Speaker 1: and they take five percent of your bill every single
Speaker 1: month and they give it back to conservative causes.
Speaker 2: It no extra costs to you.
Speaker 1: They give them the causes of support and are fighting
Speaker 1: on the front lines for our First and our Second
Speaker 1: Amendment rights, the sanctity of life, our military, our wounded warriors,
Speaker 1: our veterans, and our first responders who are heroes. This
Speaker 1: is why I switch to Patriot Mobile, because Big Mobile
Speaker 1: gives big donations, especially right now in this election cycle,
Speaker 1: to hardcore Democrats that are running for office. They also
Speaker 1: give money to radic organizations that pay and support for abortions.
Speaker 1: If you're sick and tired of your money being used
Speaker 1: against your family values, your Christian values, that make the
Speaker 1: switch to Patriot Mobile. It is easy to switch now
Speaker 1: in twenty twenty four. You do it literally over the
Speaker 1: phone or online, and you get to keep your same number,
Speaker 1: You get to keep your same coverage you're used to
Speaker 1: right now, go to Patriotmobile dot com slash verdict. That's
Speaker 1: Patriot Mobile dot com slash verdict. Patriot Mobile dot com
Speaker 1: slash verdict. You're going to get a free month of
Speaker 1: service when you use the offer code vertict, or you
Speaker 1: can call them nine to seven to two Patriot. That's
Speaker 1: nine to seven to two Patriot. Use the promo code
Speaker 1: vertict to get a free month of service today and
Speaker 1: make a difference with every phone call you make. Senator finally,
Speaker 1: on this, I want to go over the list. It
Speaker 1: was an interesting list that was thrown out right after
Speaker 1: the interview. Trump and Vance put this out in the campaign.
Speaker 1: It said, here are all the things Kamla ayers failed
Speaker 1: to address tonight with CNN. Com was support for ending
Speaker 1: cash bail for violent criminals. Com was fundraising for the
Speaker 1: Minnesota Freedom Fund, which freed rioters. Coma's tie breaking vote
Speaker 1: for the American Rescue Plan, which economists say fueled inflation.
Speaker 1: Coma was support support for defunding the police. Coma was
Speaker 1: comments comparing policing to slavery. Coma was repeated praise of
Speaker 1: by nomics. Comma was support for Medicare for All, a
Speaker 1: socialist takeover of our healthcare system. And that's just some
Speaker 1: of the highlights here. Is that really what this election
Speaker 1: is going to be about? And is that what he
Speaker 1: has to bring out in the debate that's going to
Speaker 1: be coming up fairly soon.
Speaker 3: Yes. Look, look, if this election is on Kamala's record
Speaker 3: and Donald Trump's record, If this election is on the issues,
Speaker 3: we win. If it's not, if it is all about
Speaker 3: hopey changey joy uh and Trump derangement syndrome, then Kamala
Speaker 3: could win and the media is going to spend billions
Speaker 3: of dollars trying to cover up all of the substantive issues. Look,
Speaker 3: you want to see what propaganda is like, Look at
Speaker 3: the last two questions, Dana Bash has, now, I understand
Speaker 3: this is the first interview in over a month of
Speaker 3: the Democrat nominee to be president, so she has been
Speaker 3: hiding from interviews for more than a month, like every
Speaker 3: question is precious real estate. Her last two questions, she
Speaker 3: turns to Tim Waltz and says, oh, there was an
Speaker 3: amazing image of your son at the convention, so excited
Speaker 3: saying I'm proud of my dad, and they play the
Speaker 3: video and he says, oh, I'm so that was an
Speaker 3: amazing moment in his dad. I feel great, Like cue
Speaker 3: the music. Could we put some kittens and puppies around him?
Speaker 3: You know? Maybe hearts like he's a soft, tender dad.
Speaker 3: And then that's not enough. Then she turns to Kamala, Oh,
Speaker 3: there was a picture from the convention of your niece,
Speaker 3: an adorable little girl with two picked and the picture
Speaker 3: shows her looking at you, speaking, gazing adoringly. It was inspirational.
Speaker 3: It's a moment, oh, Kamala, I mean, this is not journalism,
Speaker 3: this is Kareem. John Pierre would not have gushed more
Speaker 3: if it was the campaign putting out a fake documentary.
Speaker 3: The fake documentary would have closed with those two questions
Speaker 3: and the image. In fact, they would have faded out
Speaker 3: on the image of the little girl with pigtails gazing
Speaker 3: at Kamala as an inspirational hero. That was CNN's objective.
Speaker 3: And that's a lot of things. But you know what
Speaker 3: it ain't. It ain't journalism.
Speaker 1: Yeah, when the fake interviews like this are done, don't worry.
Speaker 1: We're always here to analyze it and let you know
Speaker 1: what happened, especially if you miss it. Don't forget to
Speaker 1: share this podcast with your family and friends wherever you
Speaker 1: are on social media. We do this show Monday, Wednesday, Friday,
Speaker 1: so hit that subscriber or download button. Then on those
Speaker 1: other days of the week grab my podcast to Ben
Speaker 1: ferguson Podcasts. I will keep you up to date on
Speaker 1: the latest breaking news and the Center and I will
Speaker 1: see you back here next week.