WEBVTT - Nostalgia is not the most toxic impulse

0:00:00.840 --> 0:00:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Chuck, let's go over the Stuff you Should Know concert calendar.

0:00:05.040 --> 0:00:06.840
<v Speaker 1>My friend, we are hitting the road for the Spring

0:00:06.880 --> 0:00:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Had Sprung Tour. We are going to be at the

0:00:08.480 --> 0:00:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Neptune Theater and Lovely Seattle, Washington on April eighth, my friend.

0:00:12.360 --> 0:00:14.520
<v Speaker 1>The next day, we're gonna head south to Portland, Oregon,

0:00:15.000 --> 0:00:18.239
<v Speaker 1>Revolution Hall April night, We're going to Houston, Texas, my

0:00:18.360 --> 0:00:23.920
<v Speaker 1>friend and Warehouse Live on Memorial Day weekend, and finally

0:00:24.320 --> 0:00:28.400
<v Speaker 1>finishing up Denver, Colorado at the Gothic Theater on May

0:00:28.440 --> 0:00:31.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty night. Two more dates coming. Yeah, keep your ears

0:00:31.800 --> 0:00:33.880
<v Speaker 1>out and in the meantime, if you want to get tickets,

0:00:33.920 --> 0:00:35.880
<v Speaker 1>you can go to s y s K live dot com,

0:00:35.920 --> 0:00:39.000
<v Speaker 1>power by squarespace and we'll see you guys on the road.

0:00:40.360 --> 0:00:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff you Should Know from House Stuff Works

0:00:43.840 --> 0:00:52.960
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh Clark,

0:00:53.000 --> 0:00:55.960
<v Speaker 1>There's Child's w W Chuck Bryant, There's Jerry, and this

0:00:56.080 --> 0:00:58.880
<v Speaker 1>is Stuff you Should Know. There's so many things I

0:00:58.920 --> 0:01:01.400
<v Speaker 1>could do right now. I could my Buddy theme song,

0:01:02.320 --> 0:01:05.760
<v Speaker 1>could sing the theme song the Thunder of the Barbarian. Okay.

0:01:06.560 --> 0:01:10.600
<v Speaker 1>I could talk about tops baseball cards, yeah, and that

0:01:10.600 --> 0:01:16.760
<v Speaker 1>that rock card stick dumb that came. Yeah, um, I

0:01:16.800 --> 0:01:18.600
<v Speaker 1>don't think they have gum in baseball cards any more,

0:01:18.640 --> 0:01:20.800
<v Speaker 1>do they? And maybe they just gave up the ghosts.

0:01:20.800 --> 0:01:23.520
<v Speaker 1>They were like one wants that, nobody wants it. It

0:01:23.560 --> 0:01:27.840
<v Speaker 1>took out some kid's eye and that was that. Uh yeah, nostalgia.

0:01:28.959 --> 0:01:34.120
<v Speaker 1>So I think we should dedicate this show too, John Hodgeman.

0:01:34.840 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Let's I thought we kind of implicitly dedicated every show

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:44.400
<v Speaker 1>to Hodgeman, but we do why explicitly this time? Hodgeman

0:01:44.560 --> 0:01:49.279
<v Speaker 1>is uh, he is on record time and time again

0:01:50.000 --> 0:01:54.800
<v Speaker 1>with the following quote, Nostalgia is the most toxic impulse.

0:01:56.320 --> 0:01:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, that's he doesn't like a Christmas story? Does

0:01:59.160 --> 0:02:02.160
<v Speaker 1>he now think he's seen a Christmas story? But he uh,

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:06.000
<v Speaker 1>he is very adamant and has been on record many

0:02:06.040 --> 0:02:09.480
<v Speaker 1>many times on his own podcast, Judge John Hodgeman and

0:02:09.600 --> 0:02:12.800
<v Speaker 1>to me in person when he wants to go on

0:02:12.800 --> 0:02:16.080
<v Speaker 1>about how much he hates nostalgia, about how bad it

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:18.800
<v Speaker 1>is and in his deal and I'm gonna mention him

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:21.639
<v Speaker 1>quite a bit in here. So he's either gonna listen

0:02:21.639 --> 0:02:22.840
<v Speaker 1>to this and be like, oh my god, it's about

0:02:22.840 --> 0:02:25.560
<v Speaker 1>nostalgia and these are my friends, or he's gonna skip

0:02:25.600 --> 0:02:27.840
<v Speaker 1>it all together. I could see him skipping it all

0:02:27.840 --> 0:02:29.359
<v Speaker 1>together because he didn't want to hear about it. We

0:02:29.440 --> 0:02:31.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe should clue him in and be like Hodgeman, you're

0:02:31.560 --> 0:02:34.079
<v Speaker 1>in this. He'll listen to it a million times if

0:02:34.080 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 1>you tell him that. So his notion is that, uh,

0:02:37.880 --> 0:02:41.400
<v Speaker 1>it's a longing for a better time that does not exist,

0:02:42.360 --> 0:02:44.600
<v Speaker 1>that we look back with rose colored glasses and it

0:02:44.680 --> 0:02:47.320
<v Speaker 1>was not in fact better, and that it's toxic to

0:02:47.400 --> 0:02:52.960
<v Speaker 1>do so, right, And that's absolutely a correct definition of nostalgia.

0:02:53.040 --> 0:02:56.040
<v Speaker 1>But no idea falls apart at the end when he

0:02:56.080 --> 0:02:59.520
<v Speaker 1>says that it's toxic, because quite the contrary, nostalgia has

0:02:59.520 --> 0:03:02.240
<v Speaker 1>been proven again and again to be quite helpful. Um,

0:03:02.280 --> 0:03:04.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't even agree that that's the definition of nostalgia.

0:03:04.919 --> 0:03:07.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't think it has to be longing

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:11.200
<v Speaker 1>for a time in your past, because for me, nostalgia

0:03:11.280 --> 0:03:14.840
<v Speaker 1>is not longing for that. It is just very warm

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:19.000
<v Speaker 1>remembrances and wrapping myself up in that. God, man, I

0:03:19.040 --> 0:03:22.239
<v Speaker 1>wish I could be fourteen again. You don't wish you

0:03:22.280 --> 0:03:26.280
<v Speaker 1>could be fourteen, No, not at all. I wish I

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:30.480
<v Speaker 1>could be twenty six again. Nostalgia. It's a pretty dope

0:03:30.520 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 1>time in one's life, nostalgia. But I don't I don't

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:37.840
<v Speaker 1>look back and say man, And I also take issue

0:03:37.880 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 1>with you know, sometimes things were better back then. Yeah.

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:43.280
<v Speaker 1>But Hodgeman makes a pretty good point, and so do

0:03:43.480 --> 0:03:49.600
<v Speaker 1>the social scientists that so support his point. Um, when basically,

0:03:49.680 --> 0:03:55.000
<v Speaker 1>by definition, when you are experiencing the emotion, this very complex, weird,

0:03:55.320 --> 0:04:01.680
<v Speaker 1>understudied emotion of nostalgia, you're thinking about something in a

0:04:01.760 --> 0:04:06.280
<v Speaker 1>way that it really kind of didn't actually happen. Like

0:04:06.320 --> 0:04:09.480
<v Speaker 1>the negative stuff gets cut out. Um, you know, like

0:04:09.960 --> 0:04:14.520
<v Speaker 1>stepping on a rusty nail right after that great memory

0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 1>from camp or whatever. Uh, that part gets cut out,

0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:20.200
<v Speaker 1>And I disagree with that, just the good stuff. So

0:04:21.480 --> 0:04:24.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about like the studies that support it. Yeah,

0:04:24.760 --> 0:04:27.000
<v Speaker 1>but they they don't think these studies are right because

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:30.480
<v Speaker 1>the subjective it's very personal. Like I can remember that

0:04:30.640 --> 0:04:33.039
<v Speaker 1>social science for you. I can remember the smell of

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:35.719
<v Speaker 1>my grandparents house, their first house, and how much I

0:04:35.760 --> 0:04:37.240
<v Speaker 1>loved it in that one summer I went on my

0:04:37.240 --> 0:04:40.240
<v Speaker 1>first plane trip. And I also remember biting my tongue

0:04:40.240 --> 0:04:43.560
<v Speaker 1>off playing soccer and how awful that was. Like I

0:04:43.600 --> 0:04:45.680
<v Speaker 1>don't edit that out and be like, no, everything about

0:04:45.680 --> 0:04:47.920
<v Speaker 1>it was great, Like no, I bet my tongue off

0:04:47.960 --> 0:04:52.760
<v Speaker 1>and it was terrible. Um. So okay, I think then

0:04:52.800 --> 0:04:56.320
<v Speaker 1>what you're talking about is the difference between reminiscing, which

0:04:56.360 --> 0:05:00.359
<v Speaker 1>is more of an episodic memory, and nostalgia, which is

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:05.040
<v Speaker 1>almost purely just an emotional memory. No, that's an emotional memory.

0:05:05.080 --> 0:05:07.000
<v Speaker 1>All right. Well then you you'll just have to say

0:05:07.040 --> 0:05:15.039
<v Speaker 1>I believe you, Chuck, I Burns, I believe you Chuck.

0:05:15.160 --> 0:05:17.960
<v Speaker 1>All right, So let's go back in time a little bit. Um.

0:05:18.000 --> 0:05:25.200
<v Speaker 1>There's a Swiss doctor named uh Johannes Hofer, and he

0:05:25.240 --> 0:05:29.000
<v Speaker 1>was studying some Swiss soldiers that were stationed abroad, and

0:05:29.040 --> 0:05:31.000
<v Speaker 1>he said, you know what, there's something going on here.

0:05:31.600 --> 0:05:35.640
<v Speaker 1>They are depressed, they're anxious, they can't sleep, they're tired,

0:05:36.160 --> 0:05:41.080
<v Speaker 1>they're even having heart palpitations and fever. Um. They're angry,

0:05:41.200 --> 0:05:45.360
<v Speaker 1>really easily um, and they just can't stop thinking about

0:05:45.400 --> 0:05:49.440
<v Speaker 1>their home. It is almost as if they are home sick. Right,

0:05:50.200 --> 0:05:53.280
<v Speaker 1>And he coined the term. He coined the term um

0:05:53.440 --> 0:05:57.839
<v Speaker 1>the nostalgia from Greek nostos, which means to return home

0:05:58.640 --> 0:06:02.960
<v Speaker 1>and I'll go or al jos pain so the pain

0:06:03.040 --> 0:06:06.520
<v Speaker 1>of yearning to return home. Yeah, it is what he described.

0:06:06.560 --> 0:06:09.400
<v Speaker 1>He literally said, it's a cerebral disease of essentially demonic

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:13.479
<v Speaker 1>cause ideas of the fatherland, making them sick and longing

0:06:13.520 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 1>for home. It's a no brainer. It's like these guys

0:06:16.680 --> 0:06:19.120
<v Speaker 1>are fighting a war and they'd rather be back home. Yeah.

0:06:19.160 --> 0:06:21.719
<v Speaker 1>It sounds like he was describing PTSD though as well,

0:06:22.360 --> 0:06:25.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe because when these attendant symptoms that he talked about,

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:28.440
<v Speaker 1>like not being able to sleep or eat and having

0:06:28.480 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 1>fever and heart palpitations, that's not nostalgia. But Johannes Hoffer

0:06:33.560 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 1>did um set the tone for nostalgia for centuries, so

0:06:37.480 --> 0:06:41.000
<v Speaker 1>either it was viewed as a physical malady or disorder

0:06:41.120 --> 0:06:45.479
<v Speaker 1>or disease or a psychological one up until basically the

0:06:45.560 --> 0:06:49.359
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighties. To tell you the truth, UM. And at first,

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:52.600
<v Speaker 1>because the Hawfer's study of the Swiss soldiers UM, they

0:06:52.640 --> 0:06:56.680
<v Speaker 1>actually thought that possibly it was just the Swiss who

0:06:56.680 --> 0:07:00.719
<v Speaker 1>were afflicted by nostalgia. And one of the other alternative

0:07:00.720 --> 0:07:04.360
<v Speaker 1>explanations for it was that the constant clanging of cow

0:07:04.440 --> 0:07:08.880
<v Speaker 1>bells had done something to the nerves connecting the ear

0:07:08.960 --> 0:07:12.920
<v Speaker 1>drum to the brain and was basically driving these people crazy,

0:07:13.280 --> 0:07:16.400
<v Speaker 1>wanting them to making them want to go home, or

0:07:16.480 --> 0:07:19.840
<v Speaker 1>at least steal the cow bell, right, get it off

0:07:19.880 --> 0:07:23.360
<v Speaker 1>the neck. You want to hear something weird. So Hawfer

0:07:23.440 --> 0:07:27.560
<v Speaker 1>also said that, um, the ideas of the fatherland that

0:07:27.600 --> 0:07:32.320
<v Speaker 1>were vibrating in the soldier's brains. Um, he said that

0:07:32.320 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 1>that was brought on by animal spirits. And I read

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 1>this yesterday. The same night I was reading an article

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:46.560
<v Speaker 1>by Dr Jack Cavorkian about human experimentation among the condemned

0:07:46.560 --> 0:07:50.200
<v Speaker 1>and executed, because that's what I do, right, He mentions

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 1>animal spirits in the exact same way. So apparently there

0:07:54.240 --> 0:07:56.840
<v Speaker 1>was a time when they thought that the they called

0:07:56.880 --> 0:07:59.160
<v Speaker 1>but what we would now call the electricity and the

0:07:59.160 --> 0:08:03.280
<v Speaker 1>central nervousist them animal spirits, right, one of those old terms. Right.

0:08:03.640 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 1>And I ran across it twice in one day, which

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:10.720
<v Speaker 1>is basically the bottom line haff phenomenon. I just thought

0:08:10.760 --> 0:08:12.640
<v Speaker 1>that was so weird. I mean, like, yeah, and that's

0:08:12.640 --> 0:08:15.640
<v Speaker 1>pretty obscure, you know, very It's not like, oh I

0:08:15.680 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 1>saw eleven eleven on the clock again today, you know, right,

0:08:19.280 --> 0:08:25.080
<v Speaker 1>those people animal spirits? Alright, So uh, fast forward a

0:08:25.080 --> 0:08:27.640
<v Speaker 1>little bit. Uh, and we like you said, for many,

0:08:27.680 --> 0:08:30.080
<v Speaker 1>many years it was looked at as a mental illness

0:08:30.080 --> 0:08:35.400
<v Speaker 1>called melancholia or immigrant psychosis. Yeah, that was another thing.

0:08:35.480 --> 0:08:39.440
<v Speaker 1>They thought that just immigrants, semen, soldiers and kids who

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:42.400
<v Speaker 1>went off to school were the ones who suffered from it. Yeah. Basically,

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:44.840
<v Speaker 1>you get shipped off somewhere and you yearn for the

0:08:44.840 --> 0:08:50.000
<v Speaker 1>place that you liked better, which is called just homesickness. Homesickness, right,

0:08:50.040 --> 0:08:53.520
<v Speaker 1>but then different things. But but not until the the

0:08:53.559 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 1>eighties even, um, did it begin to get separated. Yeah,

0:08:57.400 --> 0:08:59.920
<v Speaker 1>and this article points out very astutely, I thought this

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:03.960
<v Speaker 1>was pretty good. Um, that homes Julia Layton joint. Yeah,

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:06.319
<v Speaker 1>she's been around house stiff works for a while. She's

0:09:06.360 --> 0:09:13.440
<v Speaker 1>a vet. Uh, not a veterinarian or a veteran soldier. Um,

0:09:13.480 --> 0:09:16.160
<v Speaker 1>although I don't know, Julie, she might be both. Yes,

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:20.280
<v Speaker 1>you could have you never know, served the mp dogs

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:25.719
<v Speaker 1>as a vet in the army. In the army. Um, homesickness,

0:09:25.800 --> 0:09:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Julie points out, is distressing, which makes a lot of sense.

0:09:28.600 --> 0:09:32.720
<v Speaker 1>And that's different from nostalgia because nostalgia generally is even

0:09:32.720 --> 0:09:36.480
<v Speaker 1>though it is complex. Uh, and we'll get to all that,

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:39.280
<v Speaker 1>it is generally looked at as a feeling of like

0:09:39.440 --> 0:09:42.480
<v Speaker 1>pleasant feelings watch over you when you think of the

0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:51.240
<v Speaker 1>good old days, in direct contraditioniction to Hodgeman's ideas. Um,

0:09:51.280 --> 0:09:54.960
<v Speaker 1>all right, so let's talk about it, okay, So um,

0:09:55.160 --> 0:09:59.199
<v Speaker 1>Since it was up until again the late nineteen eighties

0:09:59.280 --> 0:10:04.160
<v Speaker 1>viewed as basically an attendant symptom or somehow tied into

0:10:04.280 --> 0:10:09.920
<v Speaker 1>depression or some other psychological malady. UM, it wasn't until

0:10:10.040 --> 0:10:12.360
<v Speaker 1>very recently that the social science has started to say,

0:10:12.600 --> 0:10:15.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if that's necessarily true, let's look into it.

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:20.120
<v Speaker 1>So the actual study of nostalgia itself is extremely new,

0:10:20.760 --> 0:10:24.440
<v Speaker 1>and um it's still very much understudy, which is to

0:10:24.480 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 1>say that the social sciences has not yielded any kind

0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:31.800
<v Speaker 1>of definitive answers to what nostalgia is, where it comes from.

0:10:32.240 --> 0:10:34.440
<v Speaker 1>The There seems to be a general consensus that it

0:10:34.520 --> 0:10:38.480
<v Speaker 1>is an emotion, but the complex secondary emotion, meaning it's

0:10:38.520 --> 0:10:41.280
<v Speaker 1>not anger, it's not fear, it's not joy. But it

0:10:41.280 --> 0:10:44.360
<v Speaker 1>seems to be secondary and it seems to spring from

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:47.720
<v Speaker 1>um society in the same way that a secondary emotion

0:10:47.760 --> 0:10:51.760
<v Speaker 1>like embarrassment or self consciousness UM has arisen from our

0:10:52.200 --> 0:10:56.080
<v Speaker 1>experience in society. The nostalgist seems to have come in

0:10:56.120 --> 0:10:59.360
<v Speaker 1>the same way. Yeah, and they've noticed some trends, which

0:10:59.400 --> 0:11:01.240
<v Speaker 1>is about as good as you can do when you're

0:11:01.240 --> 0:11:03.920
<v Speaker 1>studying something like nostalgia. And when we talk about some

0:11:03.920 --> 0:11:08.520
<v Speaker 1>of these real studies, it's they're frustrating for me to read,

0:11:08.720 --> 0:11:11.440
<v Speaker 1>but we'll we'll get to those. But some of the trends.

0:11:11.480 --> 0:11:14.040
<v Speaker 1>If you are a worry wart, you might be a

0:11:14.080 --> 0:11:18.640
<v Speaker 1>little more prone to nostalgize because you know, you're you're

0:11:18.679 --> 0:11:21.160
<v Speaker 1>trying to escape your worries and think about like a

0:11:21.160 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 1>happier time when you're on the beach, toes in the

0:11:23.559 --> 0:11:27.480
<v Speaker 1>sand maybe, uh. And they experts think that if you

0:11:27.480 --> 0:11:31.160
<v Speaker 1>are in transitional periods of your life, you're going to

0:11:31.240 --> 0:11:34.200
<v Speaker 1>be more prone, Like if you're a kid growing into

0:11:34.240 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 1>an adult, or if you are in your forties and

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:40.520
<v Speaker 1>fifties and you're transitioning into uh, let's say fifties or sixties.

0:11:40.600 --> 0:11:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Well from in my forties, from middle age in two

0:11:43.120 --> 0:11:47.040
<v Speaker 1>senior adulthood. Yeah, these transitional, big transitions in your life,

0:11:47.320 --> 0:11:49.560
<v Speaker 1>you might might be a little more prone to sort

0:11:49.559 --> 0:11:52.440
<v Speaker 1>of look at your life and think, because what have

0:11:52.480 --> 0:11:55.560
<v Speaker 1>I done with my life? Is also tied to nostalgia.

0:11:55.679 --> 0:11:58.760
<v Speaker 1>And that makes sense utterly and completely because what they

0:11:58.880 --> 0:12:01.760
<v Speaker 1>found with nostalgia is that it's a it's like you said,

0:12:01.760 --> 0:12:04.880
<v Speaker 1>it's a means of escapism. And during these times where

0:12:04.920 --> 0:12:09.680
<v Speaker 1>you're going from adolescence into young adulthood UM or middle

0:12:09.720 --> 0:12:13.760
<v Speaker 1>aged into old adulthood, that's a that's a place of fear.

0:12:14.520 --> 0:12:17.480
<v Speaker 1>You know what's coming next, and you start thinking about

0:12:17.640 --> 0:12:21.400
<v Speaker 1>the good times that you've had. UM. Almost involuntarily, it

0:12:21.440 --> 0:12:26.280
<v Speaker 1>seems like nostalgia happens. You think, yeah, let me, uh,

0:12:26.760 --> 0:12:30.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm a little nervous right now, let me nostalgize. It's

0:12:30.679 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 1>almost like an involuntary mental trigger that takes place. Although

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:38.319
<v Speaker 1>that is a thing. Uh. Julia points out that, UM,

0:12:38.320 --> 0:12:41.720
<v Speaker 1>people can use it almost like a bag of tricks

0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:45.800
<v Speaker 1>if they are prone to depression to call upon these things.

0:12:45.960 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 1>And it's like nostalgia can be a tool. I mean,

0:12:49.840 --> 0:12:52.680
<v Speaker 1>you'd have to kind of conjure it up. Sure, no, no,

0:12:52.760 --> 0:12:55.400
<v Speaker 1>I know you can, you know, but you don't necessarily,

0:12:55.480 --> 0:12:58.200
<v Speaker 1>that's not necessarily how it happens. And and they found

0:12:58.200 --> 0:13:02.600
<v Speaker 1>that there are plenty of things that trigger like music, UM,

0:13:02.640 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 1>like smells, uh, different things that you that basically serve

0:13:07.320 --> 0:13:11.880
<v Speaker 1>as mnemonic devices in the formation of emotional memories. Um.

0:13:11.920 --> 0:13:15.120
<v Speaker 1>And the thing that's come up from the study that

0:13:15.200 --> 0:13:17.600
<v Speaker 1>has been done on nostalgia is that it seems to

0:13:17.640 --> 0:13:22.439
<v Speaker 1>be universal. That's it's not culturally bound, and the triggers

0:13:22.520 --> 0:13:26.680
<v Speaker 1>that trigger nostalgia are also universal. So it'll be like

0:13:26.720 --> 0:13:31.040
<v Speaker 1>a social memory of a social experience with friends and family,

0:13:31.559 --> 0:13:33.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, and like that might be culturally bound, like

0:13:33.800 --> 0:13:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Thanksgiving in America or Canada where they have fake Thanksgiving

0:13:37.640 --> 0:13:42.360
<v Speaker 1>a month early, um, but then it might be Carnival

0:13:42.520 --> 0:13:45.280
<v Speaker 1>down in Buenos Aireas or something like that, so that

0:13:45.440 --> 0:13:48.560
<v Speaker 1>the actual experience might be culturally bound, but the trigger itself,

0:13:48.760 --> 0:13:53.240
<v Speaker 1>having a good time at like a holiday is universal. Yeah.

0:13:53.320 --> 0:13:55.920
<v Speaker 1>So let's take a break. Uh, we'll come back and

0:13:55.960 --> 0:13:58.800
<v Speaker 1>talk about triggers more after this, and we'll let Hodgeman

0:13:59.360 --> 0:14:02.240
<v Speaker 1>take a deep then maybe run around the block because

0:14:02.240 --> 0:14:23.040
<v Speaker 1>I since he's getting angry. So we're back, Yeah, we are.

0:14:23.560 --> 0:14:25.720
<v Speaker 1>We had to establish that because I got confused. You

0:14:25.760 --> 0:14:31.160
<v Speaker 1>mentioned music being a trigger that is very powerful. Um.

0:14:31.200 --> 0:14:35.760
<v Speaker 1>And again it's it's variant among people's individual experience, but music,

0:14:35.840 --> 0:14:40.920
<v Speaker 1>for me still I thinking about this is huge nostalgia trigger.

0:14:41.360 --> 0:14:45.240
<v Speaker 1>But I think I realized that almost add percent of

0:14:45.280 --> 0:14:47.760
<v Speaker 1>the time, it's a song that I haven't heard for

0:14:47.800 --> 0:14:52.960
<v Speaker 1>a long long time. So if I hear Jay Giles

0:14:53.000 --> 0:14:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Fands Centerfold, great song reminds me of elementary school in

0:14:57.920 --> 0:15:02.320
<v Speaker 1>a very powerful way and even specific things. But I've

0:15:02.320 --> 0:15:04.600
<v Speaker 1>heard that song a gazillion times. I hear it once

0:15:04.640 --> 0:15:08.360
<v Speaker 1>a week on classic rock radio, So it doesn't flood

0:15:08.400 --> 0:15:10.680
<v Speaker 1>you with nostalgia. No, no no more. You've heard it too much.

0:15:10.680 --> 0:15:13.920
<v Speaker 1>It's over you. But if I hear a song from

0:15:14.080 --> 0:15:16.520
<v Speaker 1>like all of my CDs are packed up in the attic,

0:15:16.640 --> 0:15:19.120
<v Speaker 1>and most of those are from like a certain period

0:15:19.120 --> 0:15:20.800
<v Speaker 1>of my life where I bought CDs, So if you

0:15:20.840 --> 0:15:23.520
<v Speaker 1>hear true Blue, you just start weeping. With true Blue

0:15:23.600 --> 0:15:25.400
<v Speaker 1>more recent than that. But if I hear a song

0:15:25.480 --> 0:15:28.320
<v Speaker 1>from like one of my CDs from the mid nineties

0:15:28.960 --> 0:15:30.840
<v Speaker 1>that I just may not have heard in a long time,

0:15:31.320 --> 0:15:34.200
<v Speaker 1>that is like super super powerful. Well, like what song

0:15:34.680 --> 0:15:36.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, just like a song from my l

0:15:36.440 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 1>a days maybe um or or just something I don't

0:15:40.120 --> 0:15:42.640
<v Speaker 1>listen like, uh, something from college that I don't listen

0:15:42.640 --> 0:15:44.920
<v Speaker 1>to anymore, and it's like never played on the radio.

0:15:45.240 --> 0:15:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Like I'll hear Urban Dance squad deeper Shade of Soul, uh,

0:15:52.640 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 1>deep shade of Soul. Right, remember now it sounds like

0:15:58.680 --> 0:16:01.120
<v Speaker 1>a pretty nineties song though it was very nineties, and like,

0:16:01.280 --> 0:16:03.720
<v Speaker 1>you never hear that song anymore. So if I hear

0:16:03.760 --> 0:16:06.920
<v Speaker 1>that song like just now, I just sang a little

0:16:06.920 --> 0:16:09.480
<v Speaker 1>bit of it. How how are you feeling, I'm feeling great,

0:16:09.760 --> 0:16:12.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm not. I'm not feeling toxic. Hodgman is mad at

0:16:12.440 --> 0:16:15.040
<v Speaker 1>you right now. I know it feels wonderful. Stop stop

0:16:15.920 --> 0:16:18.120
<v Speaker 1>so And I don't want to go back in time

0:16:18.200 --> 0:16:20.760
<v Speaker 1>too then either, I'm just remembering, like, man, what a

0:16:20.800 --> 0:16:23.680
<v Speaker 1>great song that takes me back to college. Yeah, And

0:16:23.680 --> 0:16:26.680
<v Speaker 1>and the reason why songs tend to be so powerful

0:16:26.720 --> 0:16:32.360
<v Speaker 1>and potent um, especially from a certain age, typically adolescents, right,

0:16:32.840 --> 0:16:35.480
<v Speaker 1>supposedly has to do with the way that the brain

0:16:35.640 --> 0:16:38.160
<v Speaker 1>is working right then. You know everyone says teenagers have

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:41.160
<v Speaker 1>like raging hormones going on. Well, there is a lot

0:16:41.240 --> 0:16:46.000
<v Speaker 1>more brain chemistry floating around than happens throughout the rest

0:16:46.000 --> 0:16:49.760
<v Speaker 1>of your life, so it's easier to form very powerful

0:16:49.800 --> 0:16:54.840
<v Speaker 1>emotional memories. Um, and when when you're listening to music

0:16:55.040 --> 0:16:56.840
<v Speaker 1>at that age, So that when you go back and

0:16:56.880 --> 0:17:00.040
<v Speaker 1>listen to it, it's basically going back and you're a

0:17:00.160 --> 0:17:04.280
<v Speaker 1>card catalog of a brain and unlocking that emotional memory

0:17:04.359 --> 0:17:06.280
<v Speaker 1>so you get to experience it a little bit again.

0:17:06.560 --> 0:17:09.399
<v Speaker 1>And then that's nostalgia brought on from by music. Yeah,

0:17:09.480 --> 0:17:12.280
<v Speaker 1>that makes sense for me. The one that gets me

0:17:12.320 --> 0:17:15.800
<v Speaker 1>the most is sent Yes, Senten tastes for me are

0:17:15.800 --> 0:17:19.840
<v Speaker 1>really powerful too, so like um, the smell of um

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Pillsberry cinnamon rolls and orange rolls. It's like Christmas age eight,

0:17:26.359 --> 0:17:29.120
<v Speaker 1>like every time. Now do you ever eat that stuff? Now?

0:17:29.440 --> 0:17:33.040
<v Speaker 1>I just did yesterday as a little trip down memory lane. Yes,

0:17:33.240 --> 0:17:37.960
<v Speaker 1>well not as it you know, but it inevitably brought

0:17:38.000 --> 0:17:40.000
<v Speaker 1>it on. Okay, so you didn't say, like I'm doing

0:17:40.040 --> 0:17:42.040
<v Speaker 1>a nostalgia podcast, I'm gonna go get some of those

0:17:42.040 --> 0:17:45.280
<v Speaker 1>sweet rolls. No, it was totally coincidental. Actually, like the

0:17:45.320 --> 0:17:48.240
<v Speaker 1>animal spirits. Yeah, what I've been doing lately is seeking

0:17:48.280 --> 0:17:51.119
<v Speaker 1>out things that I haven't had and forever, just to

0:17:51.720 --> 0:17:55.399
<v Speaker 1>see what happens. Oh yeah, So so basically you're the

0:17:55.440 --> 0:18:01.360
<v Speaker 1>other day, you're like strange Days. Remember that movie with Refines. Yeah, boy,

0:18:01.400 --> 0:18:05.040
<v Speaker 1>that takes me back, but with but with nostalgia. How

0:18:05.119 --> 0:18:07.800
<v Speaker 1>what what flavor s? I did the same, always did

0:18:07.840 --> 0:18:10.879
<v Speaker 1>a mixed cherry and coke. And I haven't had a

0:18:10.880 --> 0:18:14.560
<v Speaker 1>slurpie since probably like high school. And it was it.

0:18:14.920 --> 0:18:18.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, that taste was so familiar and exactly how

0:18:18.280 --> 0:18:21.040
<v Speaker 1>I remember. But it wasn't like, oh, this takes me

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:23.639
<v Speaker 1>back to those days. I'm just like, oh, this is interesting.

0:18:23.720 --> 0:18:26.919
<v Speaker 1>I ate a circus peanut the other days. Now they're awful,

0:18:26.960 --> 0:18:29.200
<v Speaker 1>but I haven't had one since I was probably ten.

0:18:29.359 --> 0:18:31.800
<v Speaker 1>I've avoided those of my whole life. Yeah, and um

0:18:32.400 --> 0:18:34.960
<v Speaker 1>those you know those uh, the other one that gets

0:18:35.000 --> 0:18:36.960
<v Speaker 1>me of those, remember when you were a kid trick

0:18:37.000 --> 0:18:39.920
<v Speaker 1>or treating and you would get those kind a chewy

0:18:39.960 --> 0:18:42.680
<v Speaker 1>peanut butter treats and the wax the waxy rappers. Yeah,

0:18:42.720 --> 0:18:45.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember what they're called that, there were no name,

0:18:45.480 --> 0:18:50.080
<v Speaker 1>like but email that really Yeah, it's got to be

0:18:50.119 --> 0:18:56.359
<v Speaker 1>that orange or like those man instant of nostalgia. Nice

0:18:56.520 --> 0:19:00.800
<v Speaker 1>not toxic. Yeah, it's wonderful. Um, peanut butter twicks can

0:19:00.800 --> 0:19:02.840
<v Speaker 1>do that for me. It was one of my first

0:19:02.880 --> 0:19:04.800
<v Speaker 1>favorite candy bars. I'll thought you about say like it

0:19:04.840 --> 0:19:08.399
<v Speaker 1>takes me back to two eight, No, they had peanut

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:10.199
<v Speaker 1>butter twicks in the eighties, they tried it for a

0:19:10.200 --> 0:19:12.600
<v Speaker 1>little while they were all stopped. Yeah, they don't have

0:19:12.600 --> 0:19:17.119
<v Speaker 1>those anymore, do they. Okay, is that one in your pocket?

0:19:18.440 --> 0:19:21.400
<v Speaker 1>It's been tucked into my cheek right now. So a taste,

0:19:21.680 --> 0:19:26.760
<v Speaker 1>they think, and induces nostalgia pretty heavily because the pathways

0:19:27.119 --> 0:19:30.879
<v Speaker 1>carrying information from taste buds are in the limbic system

0:19:31.480 --> 0:19:33.520
<v Speaker 1>and where scent is as well. Yeah, and your old

0:19:33.520 --> 0:19:36.560
<v Speaker 1>factory bulb is super duper in the limbic system, and

0:19:36.600 --> 0:19:39.440
<v Speaker 1>it's actually got a direct connection to the amygdala, which

0:19:39.840 --> 0:19:45.080
<v Speaker 1>helps experience emotions. And um, what's the other component of

0:19:45.080 --> 0:19:49.280
<v Speaker 1>the olympics system, the hippocampus. Yeah, the hippocampus which sorts

0:19:49.320 --> 0:19:52.840
<v Speaker 1>in stores memories. So your old factory bulb itself is

0:19:54.880 --> 0:19:59.360
<v Speaker 1>almost literally plugged in to the two components of your

0:19:59.400 --> 0:20:02.960
<v Speaker 1>brain that form emotional memories, which is one reason why

0:20:02.960 --> 0:20:06.560
<v Speaker 1>I scent can trigger nostalgist so powerfully too. Yeah. Does

0:20:06.600 --> 0:20:10.080
<v Speaker 1>that I wondered if that means that if it's more immediate,

0:20:10.119 --> 0:20:12.840
<v Speaker 1>then it's stronger, like if it's just a quicker link,

0:20:13.080 --> 0:20:17.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe like literally the pathway is shorter. It could be

0:20:17.240 --> 0:20:22.680
<v Speaker 1>interesting that I mean that's that's what Layton um supposed. Yeah,

0:20:22.720 --> 0:20:26.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think she'd uh pull that out of her head.

0:20:26.040 --> 0:20:29.159
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the common belief, right for something that

0:20:29.200 --> 0:20:31.560
<v Speaker 1>they don't understand that much. Yeah, And I that I

0:20:31.600 --> 0:20:35.640
<v Speaker 1>think that's probably got to be coming through to dear listeners, right,

0:20:35.760 --> 0:20:39.359
<v Speaker 1>that this is like this is there's a lot of

0:20:39.400 --> 0:20:42.280
<v Speaker 1>grasping at threads going on, in part because it is

0:20:42.359 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 1>just very um, it's very early on in the study

0:20:46.760 --> 0:20:49.119
<v Speaker 1>of nostalgia. There's not a lot of people studying it,

0:20:49.600 --> 0:20:53.199
<v Speaker 1>and so the number of theories is kind of narrow,

0:20:53.760 --> 0:20:56.040
<v Speaker 1>but a lot of it does make sense. Yeah, And

0:20:56.040 --> 0:20:58.080
<v Speaker 1>when you look at these studies, which we'll talk about

0:20:58.480 --> 0:21:02.000
<v Speaker 1>so many of them hinge on. All right, you're feeling nostalgic,

0:21:02.080 --> 0:21:03.960
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's do something to you, right, Or you're

0:21:03.960 --> 0:21:06.600
<v Speaker 1>not feeling nostalgic, Let's do the same thing to you,

0:21:07.359 --> 0:21:09.920
<v Speaker 1>which I mean, this is a very tough study to

0:21:09.960 --> 0:21:12.000
<v Speaker 1>pull off. It totally is. And that's a big problem

0:21:12.040 --> 0:21:14.720
<v Speaker 1>that the social sciences run up against, Like they are

0:21:15.520 --> 0:21:20.359
<v Speaker 1>studying subjective reports. Well, the average person can't tell you

0:21:20.400 --> 0:21:22.440
<v Speaker 1>how they're feeling, even when they sit there and think

0:21:22.440 --> 0:21:26.600
<v Speaker 1>about how they're feeling. So there are standardized, standardized questionnaires

0:21:26.600 --> 0:21:29.639
<v Speaker 1>that have become accepted in the field that that say

0:21:29.760 --> 0:21:34.639
<v Speaker 1>this scores of persons like UM like feeling of nostalgia.

0:21:34.680 --> 0:21:38.560
<v Speaker 1>There's actually a questionnaire that that is designed to rate

0:21:38.880 --> 0:21:41.359
<v Speaker 1>how nostalgic you are at the time you take it.

0:21:41.840 --> 0:21:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Um and and there's there are ways to study. It's

0:21:45.200 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 1>not just totally willy nilly, but when you compare it

0:21:47.880 --> 0:21:51.600
<v Speaker 1>to something say like um biology or something like that,

0:21:51.680 --> 0:21:56.639
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a little it's it's slightly whispier. Agreed, Um,

0:21:56.960 --> 0:21:59.439
<v Speaker 1>Should we take a whispy break and talk about some

0:21:59.440 --> 0:22:18.280
<v Speaker 1>of these studies to this? Yes, all right, buddy, we

0:22:18.880 --> 0:22:23.240
<v Speaker 1>teased on some studies. Uh and I don't want to

0:22:23.240 --> 0:22:24.800
<v Speaker 1>say I made fun of them, but they're they're just

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:27.640
<v Speaker 1>I think you pointed out some of their inherent flaw.

0:22:28.280 --> 0:22:32.240
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about them. Um. Here is one where

0:22:32.280 --> 0:22:37.919
<v Speaker 1>they had subjects read about different things. One was a

0:22:37.960 --> 0:22:42.160
<v Speaker 1>tsunami disaster, one was like one bad thing, two good things.

0:22:42.520 --> 0:22:45.240
<v Speaker 1>One was a disaster, one was the successful landing of

0:22:45.240 --> 0:22:47.359
<v Speaker 1>a space pro another one was the birth of a

0:22:47.400 --> 0:22:50.000
<v Speaker 1>polar bear in a zoo, which I mean depending on

0:22:50.280 --> 0:22:52.119
<v Speaker 1>like that right there, you might hate polar bears, you

0:22:52.200 --> 0:22:56.280
<v Speaker 1>might hate zoos. You know, it's a good point. Uh yeah,

0:22:56.320 --> 0:22:58.600
<v Speaker 1>it's a real good point. They probably shouldn't use that.

0:22:59.000 --> 0:23:02.639
<v Speaker 1>And it's a problem with any kind of standardized questionnaire,

0:23:02.680 --> 0:23:06.640
<v Speaker 1>whether it's the S A T or the Standardized Questionnaire

0:23:06.640 --> 0:23:10.760
<v Speaker 1>for nostalgia totally. Uh So, after reading these they answered

0:23:10.800 --> 0:23:14.200
<v Speaker 1>questions assessing their current levels of nostalgia. What they found

0:23:14.320 --> 0:23:17.040
<v Speaker 1>was the people who read about the tsunami, we're the

0:23:17.080 --> 0:23:22.200
<v Speaker 1>most nostalgic, which led them to believe that people call

0:23:22.359 --> 0:23:26.120
<v Speaker 1>upon nostalgia when they're not feeling good about something right,

0:23:26.119 --> 0:23:29.520
<v Speaker 1>and that use it. That is the prevailing predominant theory

0:23:29.960 --> 0:23:34.600
<v Speaker 1>of nostalgia these days, that it is a um It

0:23:34.760 --> 0:23:37.920
<v Speaker 1>is you can do it voluntarily, but it's basically an

0:23:37.920 --> 0:23:43.840
<v Speaker 1>involuntary defense mechanism when we experience what's called discontinuity, and

0:23:43.920 --> 0:23:46.800
<v Speaker 1>discontinuity comes in many forms, but all of it amounts

0:23:46.800 --> 0:23:50.640
<v Speaker 1>to a reminder that we are going to eventually die

0:23:50.720 --> 0:23:54.880
<v Speaker 1>one day, and that thought can come in all sorts

0:23:54.920 --> 0:23:57.919
<v Speaker 1>of different forms. It can come when we have a

0:23:57.960 --> 0:24:01.440
<v Speaker 1>relationship that's breaking down, when we're far away from our

0:24:01.480 --> 0:24:04.960
<v Speaker 1>social network. We there are any number of ways that

0:24:05.000 --> 0:24:08.119
<v Speaker 1>were reminded of our own mortality, right, and one of

0:24:08.160 --> 0:24:12.280
<v Speaker 1>our big defense mechanisms is growing nostalgic. And uh, it's

0:24:12.320 --> 0:24:17.399
<v Speaker 1>basically built in suicide prevention because it makes you wonder, like,

0:24:17.440 --> 0:24:19.520
<v Speaker 1>if we didn't have a way to get back on track,

0:24:20.760 --> 0:24:26.520
<v Speaker 1>like through nostalgia, and you just like entered a period

0:24:26.560 --> 0:24:31.080
<v Speaker 1>of discontinuity and never got back to you know, life's

0:24:31.080 --> 0:24:34.040
<v Speaker 1>good again, where would we be as a species? Who knows?

0:24:34.320 --> 0:24:37.240
<v Speaker 1>So nostalgia seems to be some sort of evolutionary trick

0:24:37.359 --> 0:24:40.280
<v Speaker 1>where um, when we look into the void and think,

0:24:40.320 --> 0:24:42.640
<v Speaker 1>oh God, I'm gonna die or my life is meaningless

0:24:42.720 --> 0:24:46.880
<v Speaker 1>or whatever, we experienced nostalgia and it has this incredible

0:24:46.920 --> 0:24:52.640
<v Speaker 1>flood of beneficial um effects on the person who's feeling nostalgic.

0:24:53.119 --> 0:24:55.439
<v Speaker 1>I thought this one article was pretty great. When they

0:24:55.440 --> 0:25:00.360
<v Speaker 1>were talking about discontinuity, they referenced Sweet Jude de Blue

0:25:00.400 --> 0:25:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Eyes by Crosby Stills Nash and I think young right, Like,

0:25:05.119 --> 0:25:08.159
<v Speaker 1>I know, you know the song very popular? Can you

0:25:08.200 --> 0:25:11.360
<v Speaker 1>sing it like an urban dance squad song? Come on,

0:25:11.640 --> 0:25:15.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, sweet? I don't If you have heard any

0:25:15.320 --> 0:25:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Crosby Steals in Nash song, you've heard this one. It's

0:25:18.920 --> 0:25:24.200
<v Speaker 1>very very famous. I'm thinking Bob Seeger right now? Is it?

0:25:24.600 --> 0:25:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Is it? The Bob Seger song is what you mean?

0:25:27.680 --> 0:25:30.399
<v Speaker 1>But here's a line by Steven Stills, don't let the

0:25:30.440 --> 0:25:34.520
<v Speaker 1>past remind us of what we are not now right.

0:25:34.600 --> 0:25:37.399
<v Speaker 1>That's again Hodgman's criticis Hodgman is not alone in his

0:25:37.480 --> 0:25:43.720
<v Speaker 1>criticism that that it seems like, uh, nostalgia could lead

0:25:43.760 --> 0:25:46.600
<v Speaker 1>you down this road where you're You're just like, oh,

0:25:46.680 --> 0:25:49.159
<v Speaker 1>the past is so much better than the present. But

0:25:49.280 --> 0:25:52.560
<v Speaker 1>apparently from study of nostalgia, it does the exact opposite.

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:55.600
<v Speaker 1>It affirms the meaning of your life. It reminds you

0:25:55.680 --> 0:25:59.600
<v Speaker 1>that you are loved um, now here and now, and

0:25:59.800 --> 0:26:02.920
<v Speaker 1>it get you back on track after um an experience

0:26:02.960 --> 0:26:06.320
<v Speaker 1>of discontinuity, which is bizarre. I'm gonna sing a little

0:26:06.359 --> 0:26:10.560
<v Speaker 1>bit of it, Okay, you know, Uh I am yours,

0:26:11.000 --> 0:26:15.040
<v Speaker 1>you are mine, We are what we are? What have

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:18.800
<v Speaker 1>we got to lose? That's that song I got you?

0:26:19.320 --> 0:26:21.840
<v Speaker 1>That's so yeah. See, it's a great song. That's better

0:26:21.920 --> 0:26:24.199
<v Speaker 1>than the Bob Seekers song. I think there is no

0:26:24.200 --> 0:26:29.240
<v Speaker 1>good Bob Seeker song that's not true. Name one uh

0:26:29.359 --> 0:26:32.280
<v Speaker 1>all time rock and roll, no terrible, worst song ever

0:26:32.440 --> 0:26:35.520
<v Speaker 1>turned the page awful like a rock awful catman, Do

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:38.960
<v Speaker 1>kill Me. There's one though, that's not bad. I think

0:26:38.960 --> 0:26:41.359
<v Speaker 1>we've had this conversation before. I think I've been on

0:26:41.440 --> 0:26:44.240
<v Speaker 1>record as being a big Bob Seeker hater. I'm not

0:26:44.280 --> 0:26:46.439
<v Speaker 1>big on him either, but there's there's at least one

0:26:46.560 --> 0:26:48.439
<v Speaker 1>or two. Oh you'd love him. You want to get

0:26:48.520 --> 0:26:51.720
<v Speaker 1>you want to get married to him? All right, it's

0:26:51.840 --> 0:26:57.360
<v Speaker 1>enough about me and Bob Seger. Yeah, see he got uncomfortable. Um,

0:26:57.440 --> 0:27:01.080
<v Speaker 1>so I'm having a moment of dis kind nuity. Yeah.

0:27:01.119 --> 0:27:04.560
<v Speaker 1>We were talking about the studies, right, Well. I think

0:27:04.600 --> 0:27:06.679
<v Speaker 1>what we were saying was that if you look at

0:27:06.680 --> 0:27:10.200
<v Speaker 1>nostalgia from the way that Hodgeman looks at it, which

0:27:10.280 --> 0:27:13.080
<v Speaker 1>makes sense, um, you would think, well, nostalgia is a

0:27:13.119 --> 0:27:17.119
<v Speaker 1>bad thing, when in fact, studies have shown that nostalgia

0:27:17.119 --> 0:27:19.359
<v Speaker 1>actually gets you back on track when you're feeling like,

0:27:19.400 --> 0:27:21.640
<v Speaker 1>oh God, I'm gonna die one day, or oh I'm

0:27:21.720 --> 0:27:25.720
<v Speaker 1>not loved or whatever. Rather than getting stuck in reminiscing

0:27:25.760 --> 0:27:28.199
<v Speaker 1>about how great the past was compared to the present,

0:27:28.480 --> 0:27:32.919
<v Speaker 1>it reaffirms that the present is pretty great. Yeah, they said, uh,

0:27:32.960 --> 0:27:35.719
<v Speaker 1>and we always say they like it's sort of an

0:27:35.720 --> 0:27:38.840
<v Speaker 1>ambiguous body of sometimes we get called up by people

0:27:38.880 --> 0:27:44.320
<v Speaker 1>who are paying attention. The researchers of nostalgia say they

0:27:44.320 --> 0:27:48.080
<v Speaker 1>that UM positive mental states include UM higher self esteem,

0:27:48.480 --> 0:27:54.240
<v Speaker 1>more socially connected, more generous, more altruistic or optimistic, worry

0:27:54.320 --> 0:27:57.639
<v Speaker 1>less about the future and death and good and that

0:27:57.680 --> 0:27:59.879
<v Speaker 1>makes it a part of terror management theory, which we

0:28:00.040 --> 0:28:03.280
<v Speaker 1>actually did a really cool episode one. It was one

0:28:03.320 --> 0:28:05.520
<v Speaker 1>of those sleepers you know that probably not a lot

0:28:05.600 --> 0:28:08.320
<v Speaker 1>of people listened to, but it was awesome. Yeah. And

0:28:08.720 --> 0:28:11.199
<v Speaker 1>they did some other studies and this to me is

0:28:11.440 --> 0:28:16.800
<v Speaker 1>really interesting. UM in China, uh was one study and

0:28:16.920 --> 0:28:23.800
<v Speaker 1>elsewhere they have determined that nostalgic feelings might literally make

0:28:23.840 --> 0:28:29.480
<v Speaker 1>you warmer, right, like physically warmer. And when I said,

0:28:29.520 --> 0:28:31.920
<v Speaker 1>the warm thing watches over you. They think it might

0:28:31.920 --> 0:28:34.760
<v Speaker 1>have played a role in evolution, like when you're colder

0:28:35.000 --> 0:28:37.800
<v Speaker 1>and you think of these thoughts, you get warmer. Yeah.

0:28:38.080 --> 0:28:41.920
<v Speaker 1>From the study in China, UM they found that the

0:28:42.280 --> 0:28:48.960
<v Speaker 1>study participants were when they were cold and they were nostalgizing,

0:28:49.680 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 1>they were imagining themselves or they were remembering an experience

0:28:53.480 --> 0:28:57.080
<v Speaker 1>in a warm place, and apparently it had the effect

0:28:57.120 --> 0:29:01.400
<v Speaker 1>of making them feel physically warmer and less susceptible to

0:29:01.760 --> 0:29:04.600
<v Speaker 1>the pain of extreme cold. And another study to head

0:29:04.680 --> 0:29:08.320
<v Speaker 1>nostalgic and non nostalgic subjects hold their hands in thirty

0:29:08.400 --> 0:29:11.360
<v Speaker 1>nine degree fahrenheit water until they couldn't take it anymore,

0:29:11.920 --> 0:29:14.560
<v Speaker 1>and if you were feeling nostalgic, you could hold your

0:29:14.600 --> 0:29:18.360
<v Speaker 1>hand in there longer. So that proves that it warms

0:29:18.400 --> 0:29:21.520
<v Speaker 1>you up right right, not really, but it's interesting, it

0:29:21.680 --> 0:29:24.720
<v Speaker 1>is interesting. All of this is pretty interesting, and there

0:29:24.800 --> 0:29:28.040
<v Speaker 1>is there is supposedly a point where nostalgia can become

0:29:28.080 --> 0:29:32.320
<v Speaker 1>harmful too. It's called pathological nostalgia, um where you basically

0:29:32.400 --> 0:29:34.840
<v Speaker 1>do get locked into the idea that everything used to

0:29:34.920 --> 0:29:37.080
<v Speaker 1>be better back in the day or whenever at some

0:29:37.200 --> 0:29:43.640
<v Speaker 1>other point. But it's um rare compared to regular what's

0:29:43.640 --> 0:29:47.080
<v Speaker 1>called personal nostalgia, which is all the nostalgia we've been

0:29:47.120 --> 0:29:50.960
<v Speaker 1>talking about. And then there's the social nostalgia too, right

0:29:51.800 --> 0:29:55.040
<v Speaker 1>like when you didn't even live through it. Yeah, where um,

0:29:55.080 --> 0:29:58.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, like seventeen year old today wearing like a

0:29:58.400 --> 0:30:01.240
<v Speaker 1>Nirvana T shirt or a Fits T shirt or something

0:30:01.280 --> 0:30:03.720
<v Speaker 1>like that, or being into that music or thinking like

0:30:03.760 --> 0:30:07.080
<v Speaker 1>how great the nineties were, and it's like dude, we

0:30:07.120 --> 0:30:09.200
<v Speaker 1>lived through the nineties. They were not great. But it's

0:30:09.200 --> 0:30:11.880
<v Speaker 1>the same thing, like I love eighties stuff. I lived

0:30:11.880 --> 0:30:15.080
<v Speaker 1>through the eighties, but um, I remember thinking the eighties sucked,

0:30:15.520 --> 0:30:17.640
<v Speaker 1>and then you know, as an older person, when the

0:30:17.640 --> 0:30:20.520
<v Speaker 1>eighties came back, I'm like, yeah, the eighties were pretty fun. Yeah.

0:30:20.520 --> 0:30:22.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that's kind of a company sometimes too, by

0:30:22.720 --> 0:30:26.080
<v Speaker 1>this feeling of like I was born in the wrong time, Like, man,

0:30:26.160 --> 0:30:28.080
<v Speaker 1>I would have been a great hippie in the sixties,

0:30:28.520 --> 0:30:31.840
<v Speaker 1>and I just don't fit in here in the nineties. Sure, Like, personally,

0:30:31.960 --> 0:30:34.480
<v Speaker 1>I think the seventies were probably the greatest decade of

0:30:34.520 --> 0:30:38.160
<v Speaker 1>all time. But that's ignoring the fact that like Richard

0:30:38.240 --> 0:30:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Nixon was president, there was an oil embargo, There's all

0:30:40.920 --> 0:30:44.280
<v Speaker 1>this bad stuff, whereas I'm just thinking like days and

0:30:44.280 --> 0:30:47.320
<v Speaker 1>confused type seventies where everything was just great and happy

0:30:47.400 --> 0:30:51.760
<v Speaker 1>and you know, and laid back, and that's nostalgia. It

0:30:51.840 --> 0:30:55.560
<v Speaker 1>washes out the negative for everyone. But you Yeah, I

0:30:55.560 --> 0:30:58.080
<v Speaker 1>would say Richard Lincoln Better is one of the more

0:30:58.160 --> 0:31:01.880
<v Speaker 1>nostalgic filmmakers out there. He plays on that. Yeah, supposedly,

0:31:01.920 --> 0:31:05.320
<v Speaker 1>his new movie that's coming out is be Awesome. Everybody

0:31:05.320 --> 0:31:07.640
<v Speaker 1>wants some is that what it is? So it's like

0:31:07.720 --> 0:31:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Days and Confused, like four or five years later, right, Yeah,

0:31:10.200 --> 0:31:13.560
<v Speaker 1>he said, it's sort of like a spiritual sequel, like

0:31:13.720 --> 0:31:17.000
<v Speaker 1>not the same characters, but um, just sort of nineteen

0:31:17.080 --> 0:31:20.719
<v Speaker 1>eighty that advent of when things were transferring to disco

0:31:20.880 --> 0:31:23.600
<v Speaker 1>from Yeah, it's gonna be awesome. He's the best. That

0:31:23.680 --> 0:31:27.480
<v Speaker 1>was a great movie. Dased and Confused agreed. Um. So

0:31:27.760 --> 0:31:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the other thing that they found is that they did

0:31:32.280 --> 0:31:34.960
<v Speaker 1>a study. Clay Routledge of North Dakota State did a

0:31:35.040 --> 0:31:38.160
<v Speaker 1>study there there. Specifically they with a name. Yeah, a

0:31:38.200 --> 0:31:41.800
<v Speaker 1>real guy, so complained to him. Uh. He did a

0:31:41.840 --> 0:31:44.360
<v Speaker 1>series of experiments with English, Dutch, and American adults, so

0:31:44.400 --> 0:31:47.080
<v Speaker 1>he kind of had some different nationalities going on. It's

0:31:47.080 --> 0:31:50.720
<v Speaker 1>not exclusively American, of course. He let them listen to

0:31:50.800 --> 0:31:54.320
<v Speaker 1>hit songs from their youth and read lyrics, and afterwards

0:31:54.320 --> 0:31:57.960
<v Speaker 1>people said, uh, they were more than likely to feel

0:31:58.000 --> 0:32:01.640
<v Speaker 1>loved and that life was worth living. Some more affirmation

0:32:02.280 --> 0:32:06.480
<v Speaker 1>when they remember these good old days. Question do you

0:32:06.520 --> 0:32:10.000
<v Speaker 1>feel life is worth living? Check yes or no? Uh?

0:32:10.040 --> 0:32:13.240
<v Speaker 1>And finally I got one more thing. Um, they say, well,

0:32:13.280 --> 0:32:15.880
<v Speaker 1>they do recommend that you not fall into that trap

0:32:16.080 --> 0:32:19.720
<v Speaker 1>of pathological and yeah, of comparing the present to the

0:32:19.720 --> 0:32:23.040
<v Speaker 1>past so much. Uh. And they also found that certain

0:32:23.120 --> 0:32:26.600
<v Speaker 1>kinds of people aren't as great with nostalgia, So maybe

0:32:26.600 --> 0:32:29.720
<v Speaker 1>you should not indulge in nostalgia if your leery of

0:32:29.760 --> 0:32:34.720
<v Speaker 1>intimate relationships, they found, or you're an avoidant person, says

0:32:34.720 --> 0:32:38.600
<v Speaker 1>they have reap smaller benefits from nostalgia compared with people

0:32:38.600 --> 0:32:42.080
<v Speaker 1>who crave closeness. So I don't know what that says

0:32:42.080 --> 0:32:46.200
<v Speaker 1>about hand, but let's throw that out there. So, uh,

0:32:46.520 --> 0:32:48.800
<v Speaker 1>what's your number one nostalgia thing? What gets it for

0:32:48.880 --> 0:32:53.040
<v Speaker 1>you more than anything else? Probably music? I got two

0:32:53.120 --> 0:32:56.959
<v Speaker 1>things are tied for first. The smell of a used

0:32:57.200 --> 0:33:00.719
<v Speaker 1>bookstore or comic book shop. That's mel of like that,

0:33:01.320 --> 0:33:06.200
<v Speaker 1>I guess rotting paper. It reminds me of Mad magazines

0:33:06.800 --> 0:33:09.680
<v Speaker 1>from back in the day. And they love them. The

0:33:09.720 --> 0:33:13.640
<v Speaker 1>fat Christmas lights. Oh yeah, the big I could just

0:33:13.720 --> 0:33:16.160
<v Speaker 1>faint from the nostalgia. Yeah, they're like they were the

0:33:16.160 --> 0:33:18.880
<v Speaker 1>big Tachi ones that are coming back now. That's all

0:33:18.880 --> 0:33:21.080
<v Speaker 1>my family ever used was the big fat ones. It

0:33:21.200 --> 0:33:23.400
<v Speaker 1>was like more Christmas light. You know, you call those

0:33:23.600 --> 0:33:27.640
<v Speaker 1>tree burners. Yeah, yeah, we never caught a tree on fire,

0:33:27.720 --> 0:33:29.800
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, they get pretty hot. You know what my

0:33:29.880 --> 0:33:32.320
<v Speaker 1>dad did for a few years as we were opening

0:33:32.320 --> 0:33:37.200
<v Speaker 1>our gifts. Towards the end, he would start dismantling the

0:33:37.280 --> 0:33:40.800
<v Speaker 1>tree and pruning the limbs and putting him in the fireplace.

0:33:40.840 --> 0:33:44.200
<v Speaker 1>He would literally burn the Christmas tree on Christmas Morning's

0:33:44.280 --> 0:33:48.520
<v Speaker 1>here he Uh wow, that's very efficient, was he Germans?

0:33:48.480 --> 0:33:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Why do we look at it? Uh No? Uh, I

0:33:52.360 --> 0:33:55.080
<v Speaker 1>should say is he? He is not? And I wish

0:33:55.120 --> 0:33:58.840
<v Speaker 1>I would have given you a specific nostalgic thing, but um,

0:33:58.920 --> 0:34:02.720
<v Speaker 1>you did urban dance. Uh No, just music in general taste,

0:34:02.800 --> 0:34:06.760
<v Speaker 1>smell music got you nice. Put those three together and

0:34:06.920 --> 0:34:10.960
<v Speaker 1>look out. Chuck's eyes roll back into his head and

0:34:11.040 --> 0:34:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Hodgeman claps over him and says, get up. Uh. If

0:34:15.080 --> 0:34:17.080
<v Speaker 1>you want to know more about nostalgy, you can type

0:34:17.120 --> 0:34:19.520
<v Speaker 1>that word into search bar how stuff works dot com,

0:34:19.600 --> 0:34:22.080
<v Speaker 1>And I said, search bars, it's time for listener mail.

0:34:24.719 --> 0:34:27.440
<v Speaker 1>This is from Christina about the makeup episode. He points

0:34:27.440 --> 0:34:30.400
<v Speaker 1>out some good things. I think, Hey, guys have to

0:34:30.440 --> 0:34:33.000
<v Speaker 1>weigh in on how makeup works. I think you failed

0:34:33.040 --> 0:34:36.640
<v Speaker 1>to adequately acknowledge something. Uh. We are not, in fact

0:34:36.760 --> 0:34:40.480
<v Speaker 1>at a stage where makeup is truly optional for women

0:34:41.760 --> 0:34:45.799
<v Speaker 1>and I think we said that basically, did we Yeah,

0:34:45.920 --> 0:34:49.759
<v Speaker 1>at the end, well, I think we said, like it

0:34:49.800 --> 0:34:51.680
<v Speaker 1>should be your option, but I think she doesn't feel

0:34:51.680 --> 0:34:53.719
<v Speaker 1>like it truly is an option, right, No, we said that.

0:34:53.800 --> 0:34:56.440
<v Speaker 1>We said, like the the very fact that there was, like,

0:34:56.640 --> 0:35:00.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, taking a picture of yourself and posting on

0:35:00.160 --> 0:35:04.359
<v Speaker 1>Twitter without makeup was rebellious. Says that it's still not

0:35:04.440 --> 0:35:08.600
<v Speaker 1>really an option. We said that, all right, So forget it, Christina,

0:35:08.680 --> 0:35:11.439
<v Speaker 1>We're not reading now, We're gonna read it. While many

0:35:11.480 --> 0:35:13.920
<v Speaker 1>love wearing makeup, many women simply feel obliged to wear

0:35:13.920 --> 0:35:16.480
<v Speaker 1>it and are in fact penalized if they choose not to,

0:35:17.200 --> 0:35:19.680
<v Speaker 1>comes in the form of failing to be promoted maybe

0:35:19.800 --> 0:35:22.800
<v Speaker 1>or taking seriously getting raises, even being hired. It is

0:35:22.840 --> 0:35:25.520
<v Speaker 1>a hugely expensive habit too, especially if you like to

0:35:25.520 --> 0:35:30.239
<v Speaker 1>buy the prestige makeup brands. Yeah, so she recommended to

0:35:30.280 --> 0:35:32.880
<v Speaker 1>people read an article from The Atlantic, which is always

0:35:32.880 --> 0:35:36.120
<v Speaker 1>a good recommendation, called the makeup Tax, and it kind

0:35:36.120 --> 0:35:38.719
<v Speaker 1>of sums up the problem like this, women invest time

0:35:38.719 --> 0:35:40.680
<v Speaker 1>and money into doing the makeup because it impacts their

0:35:40.680 --> 0:35:44.040
<v Speaker 1>relationships and their paychecks. While both genders tend to buy

0:35:44.040 --> 0:35:46.960
<v Speaker 1>haircut shaving cream and moisturizer. The price of makeup is

0:35:47.000 --> 0:35:50.279
<v Speaker 1>something men never have to worry about. And then she

0:35:50.360 --> 0:35:53.320
<v Speaker 1>goes on to point on point out just how expensive

0:35:54.800 --> 0:35:57.800
<v Speaker 1>the gap is between like a man's haircut, no woman's

0:35:57.800 --> 0:36:01.759
<v Speaker 1>hair cut even you know, yeah, oh it's huge. It

0:36:01.800 --> 0:36:03.759
<v Speaker 1>depends on where you go. Yeah, but I mean if

0:36:03.800 --> 0:36:07.799
<v Speaker 1>you're a woman that goes to a like a you know,

0:36:07.880 --> 0:36:10.400
<v Speaker 1>not super cuts, right, it depends on where the man

0:36:10.480 --> 0:36:12.239
<v Speaker 1>goes though too. If you go to a salon and

0:36:12.239 --> 0:36:14.200
<v Speaker 1>you get like a cut in color as a woman,

0:36:14.239 --> 0:36:16.880
<v Speaker 1>you're paying like several hundred dollars. But that's the color

0:36:16.960 --> 0:36:20.879
<v Speaker 1>jack both. I don't mean to be contrary. That's yes,

0:36:21.000 --> 0:36:24.919
<v Speaker 1>I agree that they pay a lot more money. Christina. Yeah,

0:36:24.920 --> 0:36:28.560
<v Speaker 1>I go to Great Clips. Big shout out to Great Clips.

0:36:29.080 --> 0:36:32.640
<v Speaker 1>There's a free cut in your future. So Christina says, yeah,

0:36:32.680 --> 0:36:35.880
<v Speaker 1>after my tenth cut, if you have the card, no,

0:36:36.040 --> 0:36:38.120
<v Speaker 1>not a card, but they give you your receipt every

0:36:38.120 --> 0:36:42.399
<v Speaker 1>now and then it says off your fat collar cut,

0:36:43.000 --> 0:36:45.239
<v Speaker 1>which amounts to eight dollars. It's actually one than it's

0:36:45.239 --> 0:36:48.400
<v Speaker 1>like fourteen or fifteen. But remember in tipping it's fourteen.

0:36:48.400 --> 0:36:51.359
<v Speaker 1>I give them twenty and you were like what Oh, yeah,

0:36:51.360 --> 0:36:55.120
<v Speaker 1>that's right, that's right. Uh so Christine me all over again.

0:36:55.600 --> 0:36:57.319
<v Speaker 1>She finishes up with I look forward to a day

0:36:57.320 --> 0:37:00.600
<v Speaker 1>when wearing makeup is really truly a choice anyone of

0:37:00.600 --> 0:37:04.840
<v Speaker 1>any gender in both individuals and institutions respect those choices.

0:37:04.920 --> 0:37:07.319
<v Speaker 1>In the meantime, I choose to save my pennies and

0:37:07.400 --> 0:37:10.719
<v Speaker 1>stick it to the man by not buying makeup and

0:37:10.800 --> 0:37:14.600
<v Speaker 1>normalizing my own bear face. Good for you. Uh. And

0:37:14.719 --> 0:37:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Christina is a California native listening in Dublin, Ireland. Ahoy,

0:37:19.840 --> 0:37:24.200
<v Speaker 1>as they say in Ireland, is yeah, all right, we'll

0:37:24.239 --> 0:37:28.200
<v Speaker 1>find out. I think, I hope. Uh, thanks a lot, Christina,

0:37:28.440 --> 0:37:31.360
<v Speaker 1>all points agreed. Uh. If you want to get in

0:37:31.400 --> 0:37:34.360
<v Speaker 1>touch with us like Christina did, whether you're in Dublin

0:37:34.640 --> 0:37:38.640
<v Speaker 1>or Los Angeles or wherever, you can tweet to us

0:37:38.640 --> 0:37:41.160
<v Speaker 1>at s y ESK podcast. You can join us on

0:37:41.200 --> 0:37:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Facebook dot com, slash stuff you Should Know. You can

0:37:43.719 --> 0:37:46.120
<v Speaker 1>send us an email to Stuff Podcast at how stuff

0:37:46.160 --> 0:37:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Works dot com, and as always, join us at our

0:37:48.640 --> 0:37:56.600
<v Speaker 1>home on the web, Stuff you Should Know dot com

0:37:56.640 --> 0:37:59.080
<v Speaker 1>For more on this and thousands of other topics. Does

0:37:59.080 --> 0:38:07.600
<v Speaker 1>it how stuff Works Com