WEBVTT - Tech News: CES 2022 Roundup and More

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:12.160 --> 0:00:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:15.440 --> 0:00:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Jothan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio

0:00:19.079 --> 0:00:23.920
<v Speaker 1>and how the Tech Area. It is time for the

0:00:23.960 --> 0:00:29.120
<v Speaker 1>tech News for Thursday, January six, twenty twenty two, and

0:00:29.600 --> 0:00:33.000
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna focus a lot on c E S in

0:00:33.000 --> 0:00:35.440
<v Speaker 1>this episode. So we're gonna look with a at a

0:00:35.560 --> 0:00:38.479
<v Speaker 1>roundup of some of the interesting things, uh that I

0:00:38.560 --> 0:00:42.800
<v Speaker 1>learned about at C E S two. Full disclosure, I

0:00:42.840 --> 0:00:46.720
<v Speaker 1>didn't go to c E S. I mostly was following

0:00:46.880 --> 0:00:50.080
<v Speaker 1>the reporting of others and you know, kind of looking

0:00:50.120 --> 0:00:53.479
<v Speaker 1>at all the different stuff that companies were promoting. But

0:00:53.880 --> 0:00:58.320
<v Speaker 1>I did not attend. I thought that it was irresponsible

0:00:58.600 --> 0:01:02.200
<v Speaker 1>for me to go, not projecting that on anyone else.

0:01:02.680 --> 0:01:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Everyone has their reasons about going or not going, so

0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:07.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm not trying to apply that to everyone. I just

0:01:07.920 --> 0:01:10.120
<v Speaker 1>felt it was the wrong decision for me. But in

0:01:10.200 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Tuesday's episode, I mentioned Samsung's remote control that can harvest

0:01:14.560 --> 0:01:18.240
<v Speaker 1>energy from WiFi signals. Very similar to a lot of

0:01:18.240 --> 0:01:21.320
<v Speaker 1>other wireless charging technologies, but this one is really cool

0:01:21.319 --> 0:01:23.920
<v Speaker 1>because you don't have to set it down on like

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:28.760
<v Speaker 1>a special pad or anything. It's it's just harvesting energy

0:01:28.840 --> 0:01:31.920
<v Speaker 1>from WiFi signals on its own. That to me is

0:01:31.920 --> 0:01:34.240
<v Speaker 1>super cool. And I also I think I talked about

0:01:34.280 --> 0:01:37.760
<v Speaker 1>smart kitty litter box that connects to stuff like Amazon's Alexa,

0:01:38.120 --> 0:01:39.960
<v Speaker 1>which sounds silly on the surface of it, but I

0:01:39.959 --> 0:01:43.040
<v Speaker 1>actually think it's kind of a cool idea. However, obviously

0:01:43.040 --> 0:01:45.240
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot more we could talk about, so I

0:01:45.280 --> 0:01:47.000
<v Speaker 1>figured I would go through some of the things I

0:01:47.040 --> 0:01:50.920
<v Speaker 1>came across and I thought were interesting and talk about those. Now,

0:01:51.000 --> 0:01:54.200
<v Speaker 1>keep in mind, this is the tippy tippy top of

0:01:54.240 --> 0:01:57.440
<v Speaker 1>the iceberg that is c E s. You could just

0:01:57.520 --> 0:02:00.840
<v Speaker 1>follow the announcements from one company and spend a week

0:02:00.960 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 1>talking about it. So this is by no means the

0:02:05.280 --> 0:02:07.160
<v Speaker 1>best of the best or anything like that. It's just

0:02:07.200 --> 0:02:09.840
<v Speaker 1>the stuff I found interesting. And we are going to

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:14.240
<v Speaker 1>go in a particular order. It's called alphabetical, So we'll

0:02:14.240 --> 0:02:17.360
<v Speaker 1>start off with the Amica robot. Amaca has spelled a

0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:21.560
<v Speaker 1>M E c A. A video of Amica was posted

0:02:21.560 --> 0:02:24.400
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter back in and it went viral. You might

0:02:24.440 --> 0:02:28.360
<v Speaker 1>have seen it. It had a very expressive robot in it.

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Ce S was the first time I'm aware of where

0:02:32.080 --> 0:02:36.240
<v Speaker 1>a larger audience was able to see Amica in the

0:02:36.360 --> 0:02:39.760
<v Speaker 1>robotic flesh. I guess Amaca comes out of a company

0:02:39.800 --> 0:02:43.280
<v Speaker 1>called Engineered Arts and they build a robot as quote,

0:02:43.639 --> 0:02:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the world's most advanced human shaped robot representing the forefront

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:52.200
<v Speaker 1>of human robotics technology end quote. The big deal with

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Amica is that it has a very flexible and really

0:02:55.720 --> 0:03:00.720
<v Speaker 1>expressive face with like eyebrow ridges and lots of points

0:03:00.720 --> 0:03:03.680
<v Speaker 1>of movement around the eyes and the mouth, so it

0:03:03.720 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 1>can give very human expressions. So Amica can make these

0:03:07.360 --> 0:03:12.280
<v Speaker 1>really compelling facial expressions, and Engineered Arts calls it a

0:03:12.360 --> 0:03:15.280
<v Speaker 1>development platform. So in other words, this is kind of

0:03:15.280 --> 0:03:18.240
<v Speaker 1>a starting point or a stepping stone, which could be

0:03:18.320 --> 0:03:21.800
<v Speaker 1>one of the paths that lead us to robots interacting

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:26.120
<v Speaker 1>with us within human spaces. But the folks that Engineered

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Arts are very quick to point out that that future

0:03:29.280 --> 0:03:32.480
<v Speaker 1>is still a pretty good ways off. Amaca is a

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:36.480
<v Speaker 1>great example of using robotics to mimic human expression, but

0:03:36.600 --> 0:03:38.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of other pieces have to fall into place

0:03:38.600 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 1>before you've got a robot capable of navigating through human

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:46.680
<v Speaker 1>spaces safely. For example, having a robot that can natively

0:03:46.800 --> 0:03:51.480
<v Speaker 1>understand what expressions to pair with different kinds of data.

0:03:51.600 --> 0:03:54.120
<v Speaker 1>That starts to get pretty complicated. Like if you were

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:59.040
<v Speaker 1>to incorporate, say a smart speaker in a robot like Amica,

0:03:59.160 --> 0:04:01.640
<v Speaker 1>and you were asking it to give you news, and

0:04:01.720 --> 0:04:05.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe the news is pretty dark and disturbing. You don't

0:04:05.280 --> 0:04:09.320
<v Speaker 1>want Amca looking all cheery and happy while delivering that, right,

0:04:09.360 --> 0:04:12.360
<v Speaker 1>that would be a disconnect. These are things that are

0:04:12.960 --> 0:04:14.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, going to take time for us to really

0:04:15.200 --> 0:04:18.400
<v Speaker 1>suss out. But in the nearer term, a robot like

0:04:18.440 --> 0:04:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Amica could be used as like a point of information.

0:04:21.400 --> 0:04:23.960
<v Speaker 1>For example, like you could go perhaps into an office

0:04:24.000 --> 0:04:26.599
<v Speaker 1>building and behind a desk, you might see a robot

0:04:26.920 --> 0:04:30.240
<v Speaker 1>that looks like Amica that's able to give you directions,

0:04:30.279 --> 0:04:33.359
<v Speaker 1>answer basic questions about the building and the tenants in

0:04:33.400 --> 0:04:36.719
<v Speaker 1>the building, perhaps um and to be able to create

0:04:36.760 --> 0:04:40.400
<v Speaker 1>expressions that are human like. Now, that kind of robot

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:44.799
<v Speaker 1>would be stationary. That drastically simplifies the requirements needed for

0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:47.080
<v Speaker 1>the use case. Right, they don't have to throw what

0:04:47.160 --> 0:04:50.039
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have to get up and walk around? Uh, Because

0:04:50.080 --> 0:04:52.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, the more the robot needs to do in

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:55.480
<v Speaker 1>order to fulfill whatever the job is, the more complicated.

0:04:55.480 --> 0:04:58.479
<v Speaker 1>The design has to be. However, when you look at

0:04:58.560 --> 0:05:01.840
<v Speaker 1>videos of robots from say Boston Dynamics, it only takes

0:05:01.880 --> 0:05:06.159
<v Speaker 1>a little imagination to combine those capabilities with the really

0:05:06.240 --> 0:05:10.600
<v Speaker 1>expressive amica and to think, yeah, you know what, it is,

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:12.960
<v Speaker 1>the robots world, and we're all just living in it.

0:05:13.480 --> 0:05:16.039
<v Speaker 1>One of the neatest computer designs I saw coming out

0:05:16.080 --> 0:05:19.920
<v Speaker 1>of c S two was the a sus zen Book

0:05:20.120 --> 0:05:23.800
<v Speaker 1>seventeen fold. Now, as the name suggests, this is a

0:05:23.920 --> 0:05:30.000
<v Speaker 1>seventeen technically seventeen point three inch foldable computer. So when

0:05:30.040 --> 0:05:32.680
<v Speaker 1>folded like a laptop, so that you have you know,

0:05:32.720 --> 0:05:36.040
<v Speaker 1>an upper half and then the desktop half. The top

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:38.640
<v Speaker 1>screen measures twelve and a half inches, and the bottom

0:05:38.640 --> 0:05:41.359
<v Speaker 1>half can act as a virtual keyboard. You can have

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:44.320
<v Speaker 1>an on screen keyboard there. You could also pair it

0:05:44.400 --> 0:05:47.960
<v Speaker 1>with a Bluetooth keyboard and either operated like your standard

0:05:48.040 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 1>laptop with the Bluetooth keyboard position on top of the

0:05:52.120 --> 0:05:56.680
<v Speaker 1>lower folded portion, or you can unfold the screen and

0:05:56.760 --> 0:05:59.120
<v Speaker 1>use a little backstop, turn it on side and it

0:05:59.200 --> 0:06:02.919
<v Speaker 1>serves as a desktop monitor. So this is another hybrid

0:06:02.920 --> 0:06:06.000
<v Speaker 1>device that can perform like a tablet, a laptop, or

0:06:06.040 --> 0:06:09.159
<v Speaker 1>a desktop PC. It can also serve as a multi

0:06:09.200 --> 0:06:13.480
<v Speaker 1>screen display all on one screen. Now, I am notoriously

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:17.359
<v Speaker 1>negative about touch screen interfaces for computers, but if I

0:06:17.400 --> 0:06:20.280
<v Speaker 1>were to go for one, this is probably what I

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:24.360
<v Speaker 1>would gravitate toward. I find it pretty interesting, it's versatile,

0:06:24.440 --> 0:06:27.240
<v Speaker 1>and I gotta admit it's also kind of pretty. Uh.

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:29.720
<v Speaker 1>The o led screen is a big part of it

0:06:29.800 --> 0:06:32.160
<v Speaker 1>being pretty. It's also a big part of how it

0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:35.200
<v Speaker 1>can be foldable in the first place. Asus says the

0:06:35.279 --> 0:06:38.960
<v Speaker 1>launch should be sometime mid year. Uh they hepefully said

0:06:39.120 --> 0:06:42.320
<v Speaker 1>the year in question would be two, so sometime in

0:06:42.360 --> 0:06:44.960
<v Speaker 1>the middle of this year, but there is no price

0:06:45.080 --> 0:06:49.160
<v Speaker 1>information as of yet. Get ready to hear that particular

0:06:49.480 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 1>phrase on repeat throughout a lot of these stories. One

0:06:53.160 --> 0:06:56.440
<v Speaker 1>thing that I have started doing more since the pandemic

0:06:56.520 --> 0:06:59.960
<v Speaker 1>started is to spend time at this quiet little how

0:07:00.760 --> 0:07:06.279
<v Speaker 1>that that I occasionally occupy well outside of Atlanta, and

0:07:06.320 --> 0:07:08.839
<v Speaker 1>I just look out at nature. The place I go

0:07:08.920 --> 0:07:11.280
<v Speaker 1>to has got a lot of birds around it, and

0:07:11.280 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 1>I've gotten kind of into bird watching. I just recently

0:07:14.680 --> 0:07:18.400
<v Speaker 1>got a pair of inexpensive binoculars to kind of dip

0:07:18.440 --> 0:07:20.920
<v Speaker 1>my toe in that. And that's why I feel I

0:07:20.960 --> 0:07:24.360
<v Speaker 1>have to talk about the bird Buddy smart bird feeder,

0:07:25.320 --> 0:07:28.360
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, it's a bird feeder with smart technology, which

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:31.640
<v Speaker 1>I know it sounds ridiculous. It sounds just as crazy

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:34.520
<v Speaker 1>as a smart kitty litter box, But like the kitty

0:07:34.600 --> 0:07:38.040
<v Speaker 1>litter box, this thing has convinced me that I want one. See.

0:07:38.120 --> 0:07:41.560
<v Speaker 1>It's a bird feeder that has an incorporated battery powered

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:45.280
<v Speaker 1>camera inside it, and the camera can take images and

0:07:45.440 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 1>video of the birds that visit your feeder and send

0:07:48.240 --> 0:07:51.400
<v Speaker 1>them to a connected app that's on your smartphone. And

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:54.040
<v Speaker 1>it's that connected app that I really love because not

0:07:54.120 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 1>only do you get to see the little birdies as

0:07:56.000 --> 0:07:58.600
<v Speaker 1>they come to visit your bird feeder, you go alert

0:07:58.640 --> 0:08:01.440
<v Speaker 1>saying hey, there's a bird there. The app will actually

0:08:01.960 --> 0:08:05.760
<v Speaker 1>identify the types of birds visiting your feeder and we'll

0:08:05.800 --> 0:08:08.200
<v Speaker 1>give you a little bit of information on them. So

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:10.440
<v Speaker 1>it takes a picture and then identifies the bird based

0:08:10.440 --> 0:08:12.120
<v Speaker 1>on the picture and tells you, oh, well, this is

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the bird. You know, the kind of range that it

0:08:14.520 --> 0:08:17.000
<v Speaker 1>lives in, the kind of foods it likes. And it's

0:08:17.080 --> 0:08:19.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of like a gamification system in the app. You

0:08:19.920 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 1>can you know, collect virtual cards of the birds that

0:08:23.000 --> 0:08:25.800
<v Speaker 1>visit you and you can try and catch them all, except,

0:08:25.840 --> 0:08:28.600
<v Speaker 1>of course you're not catching birds, you're feeding them. The

0:08:28.640 --> 0:08:31.600
<v Speaker 1>app also contains hints on how to attract more birds

0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:34.959
<v Speaker 1>to the feeder. Uh. And this was an extremely successful

0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Kickstarter project before they went to c S. Kind of

0:08:38.080 --> 0:08:41.240
<v Speaker 1>reminds me of Pebble in that regard, r I p

0:08:41.240 --> 0:08:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Pebble And Uh. They're now taking pre orders for bird feeders,

0:08:45.600 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 1>which are, as you might have guessed, pretty expensive that

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:51.560
<v Speaker 1>we're talking two dollars for one, and that's technically a

0:08:51.559 --> 0:08:55.000
<v Speaker 1>fift discount off the what is projected to be the

0:08:55.000 --> 0:08:58.240
<v Speaker 1>final sales price when it does launch. The shipping is

0:08:58.280 --> 0:09:02.280
<v Speaker 1>scheduled for June of twenty twenty two. And yeah, I

0:09:02.400 --> 0:09:06.680
<v Speaker 1>ordered one. I know, I know it's crazy in a

0:09:06.720 --> 0:09:08.960
<v Speaker 1>way to spend two hundred bucks on a bird feeder,

0:09:09.080 --> 0:09:13.120
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, I'm like, it's pretty neat. Uh.

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:15.880
<v Speaker 1>And I like the idea a lot, and I kind

0:09:15.880 --> 0:09:17.680
<v Speaker 1>of want to support this company to see what else

0:09:17.720 --> 0:09:20.000
<v Speaker 1>they come up with, because I love the idea of

0:09:20.000 --> 0:09:24.079
<v Speaker 1>being able to observe nature without disturbing it. That's really

0:09:24.559 --> 0:09:28.360
<v Speaker 1>my go to on this. But yeah, I don't know.

0:09:29.000 --> 0:09:31.679
<v Speaker 1>I got a little swept up in it. Well, if

0:09:31.720 --> 0:09:33.480
<v Speaker 1>you were to visit c E S you would know

0:09:33.720 --> 0:09:36.040
<v Speaker 1>or you would soon find out that the North hall

0:09:36.120 --> 0:09:38.360
<v Speaker 1>of the Las Vegas Convention Center is where you see

0:09:38.400 --> 0:09:41.520
<v Speaker 1>most of the car stuff. One car innovation shown off

0:09:41.640 --> 0:09:45.599
<v Speaker 1>during c e S was BMW's i X flow e

0:09:45.920 --> 0:09:49.840
<v Speaker 1>ink tech. Alright, So e ink is the technology that's

0:09:49.840 --> 0:09:52.960
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of your basic e book gadgets, like

0:09:53.040 --> 0:09:55.920
<v Speaker 1>think of your old, old, old school kindles before they

0:09:55.960 --> 0:09:59.280
<v Speaker 1>became tablets. So it uses a pretty simple principle in

0:09:59.280 --> 0:10:02.280
<v Speaker 1>which you have els under the screen and they're filled

0:10:02.280 --> 0:10:06.720
<v Speaker 1>with electrically charged pigments, typically white and black pigments, and

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:10.120
<v Speaker 1>you manipulate them with electric fields that either you know,

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:12.720
<v Speaker 1>that move them to either the surface of the display

0:10:12.800 --> 0:10:14.720
<v Speaker 1>so that they're right up against the back of the screen,

0:10:15.440 --> 0:10:17.520
<v Speaker 1>or they're moved back behind it where you can't see it.

0:10:17.960 --> 0:10:21.400
<v Speaker 1>So let's say you've got negatively charged black pigments and

0:10:21.480 --> 0:10:25.760
<v Speaker 1>positively charged white pigments. Well, opposite charges attract, so you

0:10:25.760 --> 0:10:29.720
<v Speaker 1>could use a positive electric field to pull all the

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:32.160
<v Speaker 1>black pigment to the top of the cell and you've

0:10:32.200 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 1>get yourself a black image on the screen. Well, e

0:10:35.280 --> 0:10:38.959
<v Speaker 1>INK displays consists of tons of these cells, each filled

0:10:38.960 --> 0:10:42.200
<v Speaker 1>with these electrically charged pigments. The i X flow body

0:10:42.280 --> 0:10:46.240
<v Speaker 1>tech with BMW takes this concept and applies it to cars,

0:10:46.679 --> 0:10:49.559
<v Speaker 1>So you can have a BMW that has a body

0:10:49.600 --> 0:10:54.480
<v Speaker 1>that can actually change color on demand. The model on

0:10:54.520 --> 0:10:56.960
<v Speaker 1>display at c e S could go from white to

0:10:57.080 --> 0:11:00.640
<v Speaker 1>black and black to white, and could e in display

0:11:00.840 --> 0:11:04.720
<v Speaker 1>changing patterns. So you've got a paint job that you

0:11:04.760 --> 0:11:06.880
<v Speaker 1>can change whenever you like. You can even have it

0:11:07.160 --> 0:11:10.760
<v Speaker 1>essentially be animated as you're driving. So this isn't just

0:11:10.920 --> 0:11:13.920
<v Speaker 1>flashy though. It is that it can also be practical

0:11:14.000 --> 0:11:16.240
<v Speaker 1>when you want to do stuff like reflect light or

0:11:16.280 --> 0:11:20.640
<v Speaker 1>absorb more light depending upon weather conditions. BMW also says

0:11:20.679 --> 0:11:22.760
<v Speaker 1>it's working on a color version of the tech for

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:25.520
<v Speaker 1>future vehicles. I have no idea how well this will

0:11:25.559 --> 0:11:28.720
<v Speaker 1>hold up to wear and tear, and I imagine if

0:11:28.760 --> 0:11:30.800
<v Speaker 1>you're in a traffic accident, it could be a little

0:11:30.880 --> 0:11:34.120
<v Speaker 1>more expensive to repair than your typical body and paint job,

0:11:34.679 --> 0:11:37.480
<v Speaker 1>but it's still pretty neat. We've got some more ce

0:11:37.640 --> 0:11:40.079
<v Speaker 1>S stories to talk about and a couple of other things,

0:11:40.320 --> 0:11:50.960
<v Speaker 1>but first let's take a quick break. Okay, we're back now.

0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:54.600
<v Speaker 1>If you've dipped your toe into home automation. You know

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:57.080
<v Speaker 1>that it can get a little bit frustrating if you're

0:11:57.120 --> 0:12:01.520
<v Speaker 1>not all in on a single ecosystem. Um the devices

0:12:01.600 --> 0:12:06.120
<v Speaker 1>and systems typically work pretty well within their own system,

0:12:06.160 --> 0:12:08.719
<v Speaker 1>but they don't always play well with each other if

0:12:08.720 --> 0:12:11.559
<v Speaker 1>you mix and match. In fact, sometimes they can't communicate

0:12:11.600 --> 0:12:14.200
<v Speaker 1>with each other at all, and that gets very frustrating

0:12:14.240 --> 0:12:18.800
<v Speaker 1>when you're trying to you know, kit out your automated home.

0:12:19.600 --> 0:12:24.439
<v Speaker 1>We've seen some movement to try and address this issue. Google, Amazon, Samsung,

0:12:24.480 --> 0:12:27.800
<v Speaker 1>and Apple formed a group called MATTER that will launch

0:12:27.880 --> 0:12:31.439
<v Speaker 1>later this year. The naimes to standardized technologies across home

0:12:31.480 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 1>automation devices. But to confuse matters a little bit, we

0:12:35.480 --> 0:12:40.880
<v Speaker 1>also now have the Home Connectivity Alliance or h c A. Samsung,

0:12:40.920 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 1>by the way, also joined the h c A as

0:12:43.679 --> 0:12:46.880
<v Speaker 1>well as MATTER. Maybe Samsung can be the liaison between

0:12:46.880 --> 0:12:50.280
<v Speaker 1>the two standards alliance groups anyway. Other members of the

0:12:50.440 --> 0:12:54.679
<v Speaker 1>h c A include g E, Train, Residential, and electro Lux.

0:12:55.400 --> 0:12:58.200
<v Speaker 1>So we might slowly be moving toward the world where

0:12:58.200 --> 0:13:01.960
<v Speaker 1>consumers can just freely choose which components from which companies

0:13:01.960 --> 0:13:04.640
<v Speaker 1>they want to integrate into their automated home set up

0:13:05.280 --> 0:13:08.280
<v Speaker 1>without having to worry if they're all compatible. It's no

0:13:08.400 --> 0:13:12.760
<v Speaker 1>fun if you've got like a dozen different hubs connected

0:13:12.800 --> 0:13:16.680
<v Speaker 1>to your Internet system and you have to use like

0:13:16.720 --> 0:13:20.400
<v Speaker 1>three different types of smart speakers to interact with them,

0:13:20.640 --> 0:13:23.320
<v Speaker 1>and remember which one controls the lights versus the air

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 1>conditioning and all that kind of stuff. People just want

0:13:26.400 --> 0:13:29.040
<v Speaker 1>their stuff to work, right, That's that's all we want.

0:13:29.080 --> 0:13:31.079
<v Speaker 1>We just want our stuff to work, and we want

0:13:31.080 --> 0:13:33.560
<v Speaker 1>to be able to pick which devices go where. So

0:13:33.720 --> 0:13:36.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a good move. Now, those of it,

0:13:37.040 --> 0:13:39.559
<v Speaker 1>y'all who who know what I look like, you might

0:13:39.600 --> 0:13:43.240
<v Speaker 1>be surprised to hear my next ce S takeaway, which

0:13:43.280 --> 0:13:47.199
<v Speaker 1>is the Loureal Color Sonic. This is device used to

0:13:47.360 --> 0:13:51.280
<v Speaker 1>dye your hair from home without dealing with unpredictable results

0:13:51.280 --> 0:13:54.800
<v Speaker 1>and all the mess that home dying jobs typically encounter.

0:13:55.559 --> 0:13:58.000
<v Speaker 1>At least that's the sales pitch for the device. Now,

0:13:58.000 --> 0:14:01.400
<v Speaker 1>the device looks a bit like an elect tronic brush. Uh.

0:14:01.440 --> 0:14:04.000
<v Speaker 1>They have bristles that oscillate, and in between the bristles

0:14:04.040 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 1>there are little nozzles. The device also has a space

0:14:07.200 --> 0:14:10.520
<v Speaker 1>where you insert a cartridge of hair dye. Then they're

0:14:10.520 --> 0:14:13.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna have something like forty different colors when they actually

0:14:13.080 --> 0:14:16.840
<v Speaker 1>launched this thing, which will be in twenty three. The

0:14:16.880 --> 0:14:19.720
<v Speaker 1>device pushes the hair dye through those nozzles that are

0:14:19.720 --> 0:14:23.360
<v Speaker 1>interspersed with the bristles, and the nozzles zigzag while the

0:14:23.360 --> 0:14:26.000
<v Speaker 1>bristles oscillate, and you just brush it through your hair,

0:14:27.120 --> 0:14:29.080
<v Speaker 1>so you you know, it's like you're doing just a

0:14:29.120 --> 0:14:32.240
<v Speaker 1>once over through each section of your hair with this thing,

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:35.400
<v Speaker 1>and then you wait about half an hour, then you

0:14:35.480 --> 0:14:39.440
<v Speaker 1>rense it out and voila, says Loreal, you have a reliable,

0:14:39.560 --> 0:14:43.560
<v Speaker 1>consistent home hair dye job. This device is not scheduled

0:14:43.560 --> 0:14:45.960
<v Speaker 1>to launch until twenty three, like I said, and I

0:14:46.000 --> 0:14:48.520
<v Speaker 1>do not know how much it will cost, nor how

0:14:48.600 --> 0:14:52.160
<v Speaker 1>much the cartridges will cost. I do know that they

0:14:52.240 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 1>say that for most hair dye jobs, a single cartridge

0:14:56.280 --> 0:14:59.400
<v Speaker 1>will be sufficient to do the full job. And for

0:14:59.440 --> 0:15:01.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people, you might not even use up

0:15:01.680 --> 0:15:03.760
<v Speaker 1>all the dye that's in a single cartridge, and you

0:15:03.760 --> 0:15:06.480
<v Speaker 1>can just hold on to that and use it for

0:15:06.760 --> 0:15:10.160
<v Speaker 1>a future application so that you're not having die go

0:15:10.320 --> 0:15:14.000
<v Speaker 1>to waste. Uh. Seems pretty simple, at least as simple

0:15:14.000 --> 0:15:16.520
<v Speaker 1>as brushing your hair, which I admit I have not

0:15:16.680 --> 0:15:19.800
<v Speaker 1>done in about twenty three years, so it's possible that

0:15:19.800 --> 0:15:24.520
<v Speaker 1>it's trickier than I remember. But whatever, Okay, y'all, I

0:15:24.560 --> 0:15:29.040
<v Speaker 1>live in Georgia, and even without the issues of climate change,

0:15:29.600 --> 0:15:33.680
<v Speaker 1>we rarely see significance amounts of snow. You're talking like

0:15:33.800 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe an inch or inch and a half. Possibly we

0:15:36.920 --> 0:15:40.280
<v Speaker 1>see more ice than snow, which is way worse. But yeah,

0:15:40.360 --> 0:15:42.360
<v Speaker 1>we don't get a less snow here. And since the

0:15:42.400 --> 0:15:45.560
<v Speaker 1>weather this week the first week of January was hovering

0:15:45.600 --> 0:15:49.080
<v Speaker 1>around seventy degrees fahrenheit, I suspect it might be a

0:15:49.080 --> 0:15:51.560
<v Speaker 1>while before I get another big snowfall in my life.

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:55.160
<v Speaker 1>But for y'all who do see snow, maybe you would

0:15:55.160 --> 0:15:59.200
<v Speaker 1>be interested in the Moonbike's snowbike. So yeah, it's an

0:15:59.200 --> 0:16:02.640
<v Speaker 1>electric bike for the snow kind of like a paired

0:16:02.680 --> 0:16:07.360
<v Speaker 1>down snowmobile. The handlebars steer a ski that's in the front,

0:16:07.760 --> 0:16:10.120
<v Speaker 1>and the whole thing is propelled with a battery powered

0:16:10.280 --> 0:16:13.360
<v Speaker 1>snow tread that's in the back half of the snowbike.

0:16:14.240 --> 0:16:16.240
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't be surprised to see something like this in

0:16:16.240 --> 0:16:19.000
<v Speaker 1>a James Bond film, only I don't know that it

0:16:19.040 --> 0:16:24.280
<v Speaker 1>lives up to Bonds, you know, very demanding specifications It's

0:16:24.280 --> 0:16:27.800
<v Speaker 1>two thirds the size of a normal snowmobile, and according

0:16:27.840 --> 0:16:31.080
<v Speaker 1>to Moonbike's CEO, the bike can hold up to two batteries.

0:16:31.120 --> 0:16:33.560
<v Speaker 1>You can mount two different batteries in it, and each

0:16:33.600 --> 0:16:36.360
<v Speaker 1>battery provides up to one and a half hour's worth

0:16:36.520 --> 0:16:39.560
<v Speaker 1>of writing time. Again, that's according to the CEO. I

0:16:39.600 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 1>saw other people suggest that it might be closer to

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:45.760
<v Speaker 1>like forty five minutes, which is a significant smaller amount

0:16:45.760 --> 0:16:48.640
<v Speaker 1>of time, like half the time. But I don't know.

0:16:48.720 --> 0:16:51.360
<v Speaker 1>I haven't actually tested these. But unlike a lot of

0:16:51.360 --> 0:16:53.320
<v Speaker 1>other stuff at c e S, this is a product

0:16:53.360 --> 0:16:57.120
<v Speaker 1>that's actually launched right now. You can order one here

0:16:57.120 --> 0:16:59.800
<v Speaker 1>in the United States and expect delivery before the end

0:16:59.840 --> 0:17:03.840
<v Speaker 1>of January. Now, if you're wondering how much it costs, well,

0:17:03.880 --> 0:17:08.800
<v Speaker 1>it'll set you back at minimum around bucks. That's eight thousand,

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:12.359
<v Speaker 1>five hundred dollars. That's without adding a second battery or

0:17:12.400 --> 0:17:15.720
<v Speaker 1>other options. It also doesn't include taxes, so you will

0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:18.040
<v Speaker 1>be actually paying more than that. But hey, if you

0:17:18.119 --> 0:17:20.359
<v Speaker 1>got around you know, like ten grand to burn, and

0:17:20.359 --> 0:17:22.240
<v Speaker 1>you've got a ton of snow to tool around in,

0:17:22.840 --> 0:17:25.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe this could be your new toy. I think it

0:17:25.160 --> 0:17:27.359
<v Speaker 1>sounds pretty neat, but it's obviously meant for you know,

0:17:28.280 --> 0:17:31.720
<v Speaker 1>someone else, like not me. And our next two items

0:17:31.720 --> 0:17:35.440
<v Speaker 1>are all about virtual reality, and you know, VR has

0:17:35.480 --> 0:17:38.639
<v Speaker 1>had a real slow burn as far as mass adoption goes.

0:17:39.160 --> 0:17:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Part of that might be because traditionally VR headsets are

0:17:42.400 --> 0:17:45.200
<v Speaker 1>bulky and uncomfortable to wear. In fact, the first time

0:17:45.280 --> 0:17:48.400
<v Speaker 1>I ever wore a VR headset, it was supported by

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:50.960
<v Speaker 1>cables from the ceiling in order to take some of

0:17:50.960 --> 0:17:53.840
<v Speaker 1>the weight off of the user, because otherwise it would

0:17:53.880 --> 0:17:55.479
<v Speaker 1>just been too heavy. Plus I think I was like

0:17:55.800 --> 0:17:57.800
<v Speaker 1>twelve at the time. It probably would have crushed me.

0:17:57.840 --> 0:18:00.760
<v Speaker 1>I was, I was a wee up of a lad.

0:18:01.200 --> 0:18:06.359
<v Speaker 1>But Panasonic is introducing a lightweight headset called the Megan

0:18:06.640 --> 0:18:11.240
<v Speaker 1>X VR glasses. Megan X is really hard for me

0:18:11.320 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 1>to say. It looks like Megan the name Megan followed

0:18:15.040 --> 0:18:18.200
<v Speaker 1>by X. So if your ex's name Megan, maybe it'll

0:18:18.240 --> 0:18:22.280
<v Speaker 1>be easy for you. Anyway. These glasses weigh in at

0:18:22.280 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 1>about half a pound or just over eight ounces. The

0:18:25.119 --> 0:18:27.960
<v Speaker 1>glasses look kind of like those sunglasses you see that

0:18:28.040 --> 0:18:31.480
<v Speaker 1>have the shields around them that blackout light from the sides.

0:18:32.119 --> 0:18:34.400
<v Speaker 1>I always think of Judge Doom from who framed Roger

0:18:34.480 --> 0:18:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Rabbit or David Tennant's Crowley from Good Omens, the television adaptation. Anyway,

0:18:40.720 --> 0:18:44.520
<v Speaker 1>these obviously do not have transparent lenses because it's a

0:18:44.560 --> 0:18:48.320
<v Speaker 1>VR headset, it's not an augmented reality headset. And there

0:18:48.320 --> 0:18:50.960
<v Speaker 1>are speakers embedded in the frames of the glasses. I

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:52.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know if it's bone conduction or if it's just

0:18:53.040 --> 0:18:57.760
<v Speaker 1>regular speakers. Um. And the frames actually do fold, so

0:18:57.840 --> 0:19:01.360
<v Speaker 1>the the ears pieces do fold down like a classic

0:19:01.560 --> 0:19:04.480
<v Speaker 1>pair of glasses do. And the display in these things

0:19:04.560 --> 0:19:07.640
<v Speaker 1>is no joke. It's able to project five point two

0:19:07.800 --> 0:19:11.600
<v Speaker 1>K resolution video with high dynamic range a K a

0:19:11.880 --> 0:19:14.760
<v Speaker 1>h d R, which you know, provides those really vibrant,

0:19:14.840 --> 0:19:17.880
<v Speaker 1>lifelike colors. And there's some stuff we don't know yet,

0:19:17.960 --> 0:19:19.760
<v Speaker 1>like we don't know when it's going to be launched,

0:19:20.000 --> 0:19:22.320
<v Speaker 1>we don't know how much it are gonna cost. We

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:24.359
<v Speaker 1>don't know whether or not they're going to be wireless

0:19:24.480 --> 0:19:26.520
<v Speaker 1>or if you're going to be tethered to a PC

0:19:26.760 --> 0:19:31.320
<v Speaker 1>in order to use them. Obviously, that's another big barrier

0:19:31.440 --> 0:19:35.960
<v Speaker 1>to adoption for VR. Most people aren't too keen on

0:19:36.119 --> 0:19:39.120
<v Speaker 1>having to be connected to a device. It limits your movement,

0:19:39.640 --> 0:19:43.920
<v Speaker 1>so that's you know, the price, the weight, and tethering

0:19:43.960 --> 0:19:48.720
<v Speaker 1>I think are three big barriers to mass adoption, but um,

0:19:48.760 --> 0:19:51.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, this one looks pretty cool. I'm still not

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:55.160
<v Speaker 1>sold on VR becoming mainstream just yet, but this could

0:19:55.200 --> 0:19:57.320
<v Speaker 1>be a look into a future that maybe could see

0:19:57.560 --> 0:20:00.720
<v Speaker 1>more widespread adoption, at least among the those of you

0:20:00.800 --> 0:20:04.040
<v Speaker 1>out there who could afford it. I don't count myself

0:20:04.080 --> 0:20:06.560
<v Speaker 1>among those, by the way. And the other big VR

0:20:06.640 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 1>story out of c e S is the PlayStation VR

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:14.080
<v Speaker 1>two and the VR two Sense controllers. Uh. This system

0:20:14.160 --> 0:20:17.920
<v Speaker 1>is designed specifically for the PS five, which I'm told exists,

0:20:17.920 --> 0:20:20.320
<v Speaker 1>but you know, it's still really hard to find one.

0:20:20.960 --> 0:20:24.280
<v Speaker 1>The headset provides four K video with HDR and a

0:20:24.320 --> 0:20:27.960
<v Speaker 1>one degree field of view. The display is an O

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:31.200
<v Speaker 1>LED display, and Sony says that the frame rate should

0:20:31.240 --> 0:20:35.120
<v Speaker 1>be between ninety two one hurts. Frame rate is how

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:38.640
<v Speaker 1>many frames are presented to you per second. Generally speaking,

0:20:38.800 --> 0:20:40.840
<v Speaker 1>you want a lot of frames to give a nice

0:20:40.840 --> 0:20:45.000
<v Speaker 1>smooth experience. You want around at least sixty hurts typically

0:20:45.040 --> 0:20:49.080
<v Speaker 1>for like the high end gamers, so hurts is good.

0:20:49.520 --> 0:20:52.119
<v Speaker 1>It's also got eye tracking technology built into it, so

0:20:52.160 --> 0:20:54.160
<v Speaker 1>not only can the headset track the way you turn

0:20:54.240 --> 0:20:56.920
<v Speaker 1>your head, you can also detect what your eyes are

0:20:57.000 --> 0:21:00.200
<v Speaker 1>looking at. That could potentially be useful for future game

0:21:00.240 --> 0:21:02.959
<v Speaker 1>developers if they can find ways to incorporate eye tracking

0:21:03.040 --> 0:21:06.480
<v Speaker 1>features that are a natural fit for the game. Obviously,

0:21:06.560 --> 0:21:08.120
<v Speaker 1>just throwing it in there to throw it in there

0:21:08.520 --> 0:21:11.000
<v Speaker 1>that never works out. We've seen it fail with stuff

0:21:11.040 --> 0:21:13.520
<v Speaker 1>like the connect. But if you can find a way

0:21:13.560 --> 0:21:16.439
<v Speaker 1>to incorporate it in a way that is fun and

0:21:16.520 --> 0:21:20.920
<v Speaker 1>makes sense, maybe includes like accessibility features for people who

0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:24.840
<v Speaker 1>otherwise would have trouble playing these things, I think that's great.

0:21:25.600 --> 0:21:28.920
<v Speaker 1>The Sense controllers have haptic feedback. I always just think

0:21:28.920 --> 0:21:31.960
<v Speaker 1>of that as a good old rumble pack and adaptive triggers,

0:21:32.000 --> 0:21:34.720
<v Speaker 1>so in other words, the tension on the triggers can change.

0:21:35.040 --> 0:21:38.919
<v Speaker 1>So Sony said, imagine that you're drawing an arrow in

0:21:38.960 --> 0:21:41.879
<v Speaker 1>a bow. You might actually feel the resistance and the

0:21:41.880 --> 0:21:44.879
<v Speaker 1>trigger to represent the resistance you would feel as you

0:21:44.920 --> 0:21:48.280
<v Speaker 1>start to draw the bowstring back. Sony will be releasing

0:21:48.359 --> 0:21:52.320
<v Speaker 1>a Horizon game for this system called Horizon Call of

0:21:52.359 --> 0:21:55.119
<v Speaker 1>the Mountain, and it will be a VR showcase for

0:21:55.160 --> 0:21:58.560
<v Speaker 1>this particular system. It was actually developed for VR from

0:21:58.600 --> 0:22:00.919
<v Speaker 1>the beginning, so it's not a game that's been adapted

0:22:00.920 --> 0:22:03.960
<v Speaker 1>for VR, but is this often the case with gadgets

0:22:04.000 --> 0:22:06.600
<v Speaker 1>at c e S. We have no release date or

0:22:06.720 --> 0:22:08.960
<v Speaker 1>price for it yet. I expect we'll hear a lot

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:11.959
<v Speaker 1>more of it later in the year. Sony typically holds

0:22:12.280 --> 0:22:15.679
<v Speaker 1>one or two big events virtual events at least throughout

0:22:15.680 --> 0:22:17.360
<v Speaker 1>the year, so I'm sure we'll hear more about it then.

0:22:17.920 --> 0:22:19.719
<v Speaker 1>All right, we have a couple more stories to go

0:22:20.320 --> 0:22:22.560
<v Speaker 1>before we get to that. Let's take another quick break.

0:22:30.080 --> 0:22:33.840
<v Speaker 1>So it sounds like the metaverse was all over CEES

0:22:33.920 --> 0:22:37.960
<v Speaker 1>this year. Actually followed a Twitter thread that was documenting

0:22:38.080 --> 0:22:41.600
<v Speaker 1>different examples of booths that incorporated the phrase or the

0:22:41.760 --> 0:22:47.560
<v Speaker 1>term metaverse in them, sometimes with no real obvious connection

0:22:47.640 --> 0:22:49.800
<v Speaker 1>to anything that you might think of as a metaverse,

0:22:50.200 --> 0:22:52.640
<v Speaker 1>but it is definitely out there in terms of marketing

0:22:52.680 --> 0:22:56.359
<v Speaker 1>and buzz. As for anything practical, that's a totally different matter.

0:22:56.600 --> 0:22:58.840
<v Speaker 1>But some stuff that frequently gets lumped in with the

0:22:58.840 --> 0:23:02.840
<v Speaker 1>metaverse did get shown off at c S, namely n

0:23:02.880 --> 0:23:06.560
<v Speaker 1>F T S. Samsung is the culprit here and they

0:23:06.600 --> 0:23:10.399
<v Speaker 1>showed off their two thousand, twenty two connected TVs that

0:23:10.440 --> 0:23:13.720
<v Speaker 1>will support art n F T S. N F T S,

0:23:13.760 --> 0:23:17.000
<v Speaker 1>by the way, that's non fungible tokens if somehow you

0:23:17.040 --> 0:23:20.320
<v Speaker 1>have avoided the term up to this point. And n

0:23:20.359 --> 0:23:23.600
<v Speaker 1>f T I can really represent anything digital. It doesn't

0:23:23.640 --> 0:23:26.720
<v Speaker 1>have to be like a digital piece of art that

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:30.040
<v Speaker 1>you look at. It could be anything digital. And it's

0:23:30.119 --> 0:23:32.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of like a certificate of ownership. Like if you've

0:23:32.600 --> 0:23:34.840
<v Speaker 1>ever seen those commercials where you can own a star

0:23:35.680 --> 0:23:37.560
<v Speaker 1>and you get a certificate that says you're the owner

0:23:37.560 --> 0:23:40.000
<v Speaker 1>of the star. I would argue that n f T

0:23:40.200 --> 0:23:43.600
<v Speaker 1>s are pretty much the same thing as that. So

0:23:43.640 --> 0:23:46.200
<v Speaker 1>what does this mean practically? That is hard to say

0:23:46.200 --> 0:23:49.840
<v Speaker 1>because digital goods, being digital, are really easy to copy

0:23:49.920 --> 0:23:53.080
<v Speaker 1>and distribute. So you have ownership of something that you

0:23:53.119 --> 0:23:55.280
<v Speaker 1>don't actually have. You don't have control over it, you

0:23:55.359 --> 0:23:58.880
<v Speaker 1>have ownership of it. It's it's a weird thing. It's

0:23:58.920 --> 0:24:01.000
<v Speaker 1>also you know, it's not like a one of a

0:24:01.080 --> 0:24:03.800
<v Speaker 1>kind physical work of art, right where there's only one

0:24:03.840 --> 0:24:07.280
<v Speaker 1>of them that exists. All the rest are copies or

0:24:07.320 --> 0:24:10.399
<v Speaker 1>prints or whatever, but only one true one exists and

0:24:10.440 --> 0:24:14.560
<v Speaker 1>it can inhabit a physical space. The tokens just represent ownership.

0:24:14.880 --> 0:24:17.359
<v Speaker 1>But Samsung TVs will let you display the n f

0:24:17.440 --> 0:24:21.080
<v Speaker 1>T art that you own in your home, so you

0:24:21.080 --> 0:24:24.119
<v Speaker 1>can show off those eight cartoons to all your guests

0:24:24.119 --> 0:24:27.840
<v Speaker 1>as they walk through your classy high rise penthouse apartment.

0:24:27.920 --> 0:24:32.920
<v Speaker 1>That's just the way I imagine enough T people living. Uh.

0:24:33.000 --> 0:24:35.720
<v Speaker 1>And then you get to explain to your guests why

0:24:35.880 --> 0:24:39.080
<v Speaker 1>you paid tens of thousands of dollars for eight cartoons.

0:24:39.920 --> 0:24:42.920
<v Speaker 1>More on that later in this episode. Also, apparently you'll

0:24:42.960 --> 0:24:45.160
<v Speaker 1>be able to purchase and sell n f T art

0:24:45.320 --> 0:24:48.840
<v Speaker 1>through Samsung's televisions. And can you tell that I hate

0:24:48.840 --> 0:24:52.280
<v Speaker 1>this already? For the record, I don't mind thinking of

0:24:52.440 --> 0:24:54.639
<v Speaker 1>n f T s as a way to support an artist,

0:24:54.840 --> 0:24:57.800
<v Speaker 1>at least not, you know, on the surface of it.

0:24:58.560 --> 0:25:02.119
<v Speaker 1>But then after artists sells in n f T, I

0:25:02.160 --> 0:25:04.840
<v Speaker 1>don't think you're supporting the artist anymore like that. That's

0:25:04.880 --> 0:25:07.560
<v Speaker 1>that one point of sale, right the artist sells an

0:25:07.640 --> 0:25:10.600
<v Speaker 1>n f T representing something they've created, they make money

0:25:10.640 --> 0:25:12.760
<v Speaker 1>off of it. You have supported the artists. But then

0:25:12.960 --> 0:25:15.119
<v Speaker 1>let's say you turn around and you sell the n

0:25:15.160 --> 0:25:17.520
<v Speaker 1>f T you bought for, say twenty bucks, and you

0:25:17.560 --> 0:25:19.720
<v Speaker 1>sell it to someone else for a hundred bucks, and

0:25:19.760 --> 0:25:21.800
<v Speaker 1>then that person turns around they sell it to someone

0:25:21.840 --> 0:25:24.520
<v Speaker 1>else for a thousand bucks. And this keeps on going

0:25:24.600 --> 0:25:27.680
<v Speaker 1>until the bottom falls out. Well, the original artist only

0:25:27.720 --> 0:25:29.960
<v Speaker 1>sees that first twenty bucks, right, It's not like they're

0:25:29.960 --> 0:25:34.280
<v Speaker 1>getting kickbacks of all these other sales, and so you're

0:25:34.280 --> 0:25:37.200
<v Speaker 1>not really supporting the artist. I would argue, it's really

0:25:37.240 --> 0:25:41.560
<v Speaker 1>more of a speculation engine that just keeps going until

0:25:41.600 --> 0:25:43.840
<v Speaker 1>it falls apart. At least that's how I see it.

0:25:43.960 --> 0:25:47.440
<v Speaker 1>And maybe I'm one of the blind who isn't releasing

0:25:47.440 --> 0:25:49.439
<v Speaker 1>the promise of n f T s. That's how they

0:25:49.480 --> 0:25:53.919
<v Speaker 1>come across to me anyway. Uh, Samsung is letting you

0:25:54.080 --> 0:25:57.080
<v Speaker 1>show that n f T art on your television and

0:25:57.119 --> 0:26:01.080
<v Speaker 1>we'll let you look at the metadata and everything. Yeah. Uh.

0:26:01.119 --> 0:26:02.960
<v Speaker 1>The other reason I'm not super crazy about n f

0:26:03.000 --> 0:26:05.719
<v Speaker 1>t s is they're built on top of the Ethereum blockchain,

0:26:06.040 --> 0:26:09.080
<v Speaker 1>and at least as of now, Ethereum is still on

0:26:09.119 --> 0:26:14.200
<v Speaker 1>a proof of work model of blockchain technology and cryptocurrency mining,

0:26:14.600 --> 0:26:18.480
<v Speaker 1>which means it plays into the conspicuous consumption of electricity

0:26:18.760 --> 0:26:21.440
<v Speaker 1>and thus is a contributor to stuff like carbon emissions

0:26:21.440 --> 0:26:25.359
<v Speaker 1>and climate change. Not really crazy about any of that anyway. Yeah,

0:26:25.480 --> 0:26:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Samsung TVs are r l in on that. Something else

0:26:29.119 --> 0:26:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Samsung did was they finally got into the o LED game.

0:26:32.960 --> 0:26:35.760
<v Speaker 1>See Samsung TVs for a while have been based on

0:26:36.200 --> 0:26:39.199
<v Speaker 1>l e ED technology, and they have created their own

0:26:39.280 --> 0:26:43.000
<v Speaker 1>tech called q LEAD that stands for Quantum Dot l

0:26:43.040 --> 0:26:46.280
<v Speaker 1>e ED displays. But this year Samsung showed off TV

0:26:46.359 --> 0:26:51.080
<v Speaker 1>screens and computer monitors using oh LAD technology while incorporating

0:26:51.119 --> 0:26:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the quantum dot technology with it. With an oh LAD screen,

0:26:55.560 --> 0:26:58.880
<v Speaker 1>every single pixel, that is, every single point of light

0:26:58.960 --> 0:27:02.120
<v Speaker 1>you see on the screen is its own back light,

0:27:02.640 --> 0:27:05.960
<v Speaker 1>so you can you can illuminate an individual pixel and

0:27:06.040 --> 0:27:09.000
<v Speaker 1>not illuminate anything else. So oh LAD screens are able

0:27:09.040 --> 0:27:11.439
<v Speaker 1>to show off scenes that have really dark colors like

0:27:11.520 --> 0:27:15.080
<v Speaker 1>true black, in a better way than traditional l e

0:27:15.200 --> 0:27:17.800
<v Speaker 1>D screens can. Traditional l e D s have a

0:27:17.880 --> 0:27:21.280
<v Speaker 1>backlight for the whole shebang. That means that some light

0:27:21.359 --> 0:27:24.239
<v Speaker 1>tends to bleed through l e D screens, so you

0:27:24.280 --> 0:27:27.439
<v Speaker 1>can't really display true blacks on screen very effectively. They

0:27:27.480 --> 0:27:30.400
<v Speaker 1>typically come out as more of like a dark charcoal gray,

0:27:31.240 --> 0:27:34.119
<v Speaker 1>uh so, so you don't get good contrast with really

0:27:34.240 --> 0:27:38.359
<v Speaker 1>dark sequences. I have had really bad experiences trying to

0:27:38.400 --> 0:27:42.320
<v Speaker 1>watch Batman movies on l e ED displays because of that.

0:27:42.920 --> 0:27:45.840
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know how much these televisions and computer

0:27:45.960 --> 0:27:48.640
<v Speaker 1>monitors are going to cost. My guess is it will

0:27:48.680 --> 0:27:51.159
<v Speaker 1>be a heck of a lot. We're talking on the

0:27:51.200 --> 0:27:55.920
<v Speaker 1>premium side of technology, oh lad. Screens are still expensive

0:27:56.040 --> 0:27:58.560
<v Speaker 1>in general, much less so than they were just a

0:27:58.600 --> 0:28:00.440
<v Speaker 1>few years ago. I mean a few years ago you

0:28:00.480 --> 0:28:02.840
<v Speaker 1>were talking about tens of thousands of dollars. It's much

0:28:02.920 --> 0:28:05.800
<v Speaker 1>less than that now. But my guess is that the

0:28:05.920 --> 0:28:09.120
<v Speaker 1>q d O LED screens are going to be super

0:28:09.160 --> 0:28:11.480
<v Speaker 1>prisy when they first come out and limited to the

0:28:11.520 --> 0:28:14.480
<v Speaker 1>real high rollers out there with the crazy home theater setups.

0:28:15.000 --> 0:28:18.320
<v Speaker 1>And finally rounding out our c S segments, Sony has

0:28:18.359 --> 0:28:22.679
<v Speaker 1>introduced an suv, which just seems like a weird series

0:28:22.720 --> 0:28:25.680
<v Speaker 1>of words to say. Sony is known for its consumer

0:28:25.720 --> 0:28:31.040
<v Speaker 1>electronics like televisions and Walkman's and such, but an suv. Well.

0:28:31.160 --> 0:28:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Last year, Sony showed off an electric car concept called

0:28:34.560 --> 0:28:37.040
<v Speaker 1>the Vision S, but the company made it clear that

0:28:37.160 --> 0:28:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the car was simply a prototype and it was never

0:28:40.040 --> 0:28:42.600
<v Speaker 1>going to go into production. The company was not going

0:28:42.640 --> 0:28:44.800
<v Speaker 1>to get into the car business right then and there.

0:28:45.200 --> 0:28:48.400
<v Speaker 1>It was more of a platform upon which Sony could

0:28:48.440 --> 0:28:52.640
<v Speaker 1>display numerous technologies that could be incorporated into vehicles made

0:28:52.640 --> 0:28:56.680
<v Speaker 1>by other companies. This year, Sony introduced the Vision s

0:28:56.720 --> 0:29:00.840
<v Speaker 1>O two and electric suv. It's also act with Sony

0:29:00.880 --> 0:29:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Technology Moreover. This time, Sony exacts say the company is

0:29:04.560 --> 0:29:08.120
<v Speaker 1>considering the possibility of going into production with this suv,

0:29:08.520 --> 0:29:11.280
<v Speaker 1>so there's no commitment. So my guess is that the

0:29:11.360 --> 0:29:15.800
<v Speaker 1>chances of Sony actually producing the s O two are

0:29:15.880 --> 0:29:19.280
<v Speaker 1>pretty low, but there is a chance. Sony did announce

0:29:19.320 --> 0:29:22.840
<v Speaker 1>the formation of a new subsidiary called Sony Mobility Incorporated,

0:29:23.120 --> 0:29:25.400
<v Speaker 1>which will be in the business of developing and producing

0:29:25.440 --> 0:29:28.640
<v Speaker 1>electric vehicles. So Sony is getting into the electric car business.

0:29:28.640 --> 0:29:31.680
<v Speaker 1>They have created a subsidiary just for that. So if

0:29:31.680 --> 0:29:35.200
<v Speaker 1>the Vision s O two never materializes as a consumer vehicle,

0:29:35.640 --> 0:29:39.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure we will see cars and SUVs descended from

0:29:39.600 --> 0:29:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the s O two is design in the future. The

0:29:42.480 --> 0:29:45.240
<v Speaker 1>prototype that they showed off included sensors and systems for

0:29:45.280 --> 0:29:48.400
<v Speaker 1>autonomous driving, though again I hastened to add, no one

0:29:48.440 --> 0:29:51.760
<v Speaker 1>has developed a fully autonomous vehicle yet, but again it

0:29:51.800 --> 0:29:55.360
<v Speaker 1>was kind of a showcase Sony technology. Okay, that's the

0:29:55.440 --> 0:29:58.000
<v Speaker 1>c E S round up. Let's talk about some other

0:29:58.040 --> 0:30:01.760
<v Speaker 1>news before we conclude. Uh, well, one thing is that

0:30:01.800 --> 0:30:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Google continues to give its employees reasons to be angry

0:30:05.040 --> 0:30:08.280
<v Speaker 1>at the company. Google is a publicly traded company. That

0:30:08.360 --> 0:30:10.800
<v Speaker 1>means that the company has to file documents with the

0:30:10.880 --> 0:30:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Securities and Exchange Commission or SEC in the United States

0:30:14.760 --> 0:30:17.840
<v Speaker 1>and include stuff like you know how much revenue they generated,

0:30:17.960 --> 0:30:21.440
<v Speaker 1>what their expenses were, what are the executive salaries? That

0:30:21.520 --> 0:30:24.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing, And a recent SEC filing showed that

0:30:24.560 --> 0:30:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Google has given a group of four executives a pay rise.

0:30:28.120 --> 0:30:30.920
<v Speaker 1>They went from a salary of six fifty thousand dollars

0:30:31.000 --> 0:30:34.520
<v Speaker 1>a year to one million dollars a year each, with

0:30:34.560 --> 0:30:37.680
<v Speaker 1>a potential bonus of up to two million dollars plus

0:30:37.720 --> 0:30:41.160
<v Speaker 1>company shares worth millions more. Now, that alone might not

0:30:41.280 --> 0:30:44.440
<v Speaker 1>be enough to upset humble Googlers, except only a couple

0:30:44.480 --> 0:30:49.040
<v Speaker 1>of weeks ago. In the dying days of one, employees

0:30:49.080 --> 0:30:51.520
<v Speaker 1>were told that the company was probably not going to

0:30:51.600 --> 0:30:55.000
<v Speaker 1>issue employee raises to compensate for inflation, so there was

0:30:55.080 --> 0:30:58.760
<v Speaker 1>not going to be a salary adjustment to help employees

0:30:58.800 --> 0:31:01.920
<v Speaker 1>deal with the fact at inflation is a thing. So

0:31:02.000 --> 0:31:06.200
<v Speaker 1>your average Google employee isn't getting a raise or pay adjustment.

0:31:06.440 --> 0:31:09.520
<v Speaker 1>But these four executives are seeing their salaries nearly double.

0:31:10.120 --> 0:31:14.280
<v Speaker 1>It is not, as they say, a good look. France

0:31:14.480 --> 0:31:18.760
<v Speaker 1>also isn't giving good looks towards Google and also Meta

0:31:18.960 --> 0:31:23.760
<v Speaker 1>slash Facebook. French regulators have issued fines for both companies,

0:31:23.840 --> 0:31:26.800
<v Speaker 1>citing issues with the companies using cookies to track user

0:31:26.840 --> 0:31:31.840
<v Speaker 1>activities see in France, especially really in the European Union.

0:31:31.880 --> 0:31:35.240
<v Speaker 1>In general, citizens are supposed to have full control over

0:31:35.280 --> 0:31:38.680
<v Speaker 1>that kind of stuff, over their information. They're supposed to

0:31:38.720 --> 0:31:41.160
<v Speaker 1>be able to opt out of cookies and having their

0:31:41.200 --> 0:31:43.760
<v Speaker 1>data tracked and leveraged, and it's supposed to be easy

0:31:43.920 --> 0:31:47.360
<v Speaker 1>and transparent. But the regulators say that both Google and

0:31:47.480 --> 0:31:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Meta have failed to meet those standards. In Google's case,

0:31:50.760 --> 0:31:53.400
<v Speaker 1>the fine amounts to around a hundred fifty million euros

0:31:53.440 --> 0:31:57.640
<v Speaker 1>that's about a hundred sixty nine point five million US dollars,

0:31:57.680 --> 0:31:59.920
<v Speaker 1>and then a slash Facebook faces a fine of six

0:32:00.040 --> 0:32:04.120
<v Speaker 1>sea million euros or around sixty eight million dollars. Moreover,

0:32:04.400 --> 0:32:07.719
<v Speaker 1>the two companies have three months to fix things and

0:32:07.800 --> 0:32:10.960
<v Speaker 1>remove those cookies, or at least give French citizens options

0:32:10.960 --> 0:32:14.080
<v Speaker 1>to opt out that aren't buried in settings menus and

0:32:14.360 --> 0:32:17.440
<v Speaker 1>made very difficult to find. If the companies failed to

0:32:17.480 --> 0:32:21.360
<v Speaker 1>do that, then they will get find one thousand euros

0:32:21.480 --> 0:32:26.280
<v Speaker 1>per day that they failed to meet those standards. Interestingly,

0:32:26.320 --> 0:32:28.040
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, there is a move to push

0:32:28.120 --> 0:32:30.880
<v Speaker 1>for data privacy laws that sound to be similar to

0:32:30.960 --> 0:32:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the ones under g DPR in Europe. The argument mostly

0:32:34.920 --> 0:32:38.680
<v Speaker 1>centers around how social network sites like Facebook have served

0:32:38.680 --> 0:32:42.080
<v Speaker 1>as a way to radicalize people and to spread misinformation,

0:32:42.560 --> 0:32:47.720
<v Speaker 1>even though presumably that is not the intent of those companies. Basically,

0:32:47.800 --> 0:32:51.320
<v Speaker 1>the argument goes like this, These companies collect user data

0:32:51.520 --> 0:32:54.480
<v Speaker 1>to determine what to serve to those users to keep

0:32:54.480 --> 0:32:57.520
<v Speaker 1>them on the platform as long as possible. The content

0:32:57.680 --> 0:33:01.760
<v Speaker 1>served to users starts to push them to increasingly radicalized

0:33:01.800 --> 0:33:06.840
<v Speaker 1>groups and facilitates the spread of misinformation. The platforms scoop

0:33:06.920 --> 0:33:09.400
<v Speaker 1>up the cash because their concern is just keeping the

0:33:09.440 --> 0:33:11.720
<v Speaker 1>folks on the sites for as long as possible. It

0:33:11.760 --> 0:33:14.280
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter to them what is being shown to those

0:33:14.360 --> 0:33:17.920
<v Speaker 1>users to make that happen, So, say the advocates, what

0:33:18.120 --> 0:33:22.080
<v Speaker 1>is needed are more stringent data privacy laws that would

0:33:22.120 --> 0:33:25.440
<v Speaker 1>prevent companies from vacuuming up personal details left, right and

0:33:25.520 --> 0:33:28.800
<v Speaker 1>center and give the power back to the individual to

0:33:29.080 --> 0:33:32.520
<v Speaker 1>decide what they want and don't want to share with

0:33:32.560 --> 0:33:36.800
<v Speaker 1>these companies and how it gets used now that undercuts

0:33:36.800 --> 0:33:39.840
<v Speaker 1>the entire system and it protects user privacy. This is

0:33:39.880 --> 0:33:43.120
<v Speaker 1>an interesting angle to take see. Over in Europe, the

0:33:43.200 --> 0:33:46.080
<v Speaker 1>general message was g d p R is about protecting

0:33:46.160 --> 0:33:50.840
<v Speaker 1>citizen privacy and giving them, you know, more agency. Here

0:33:50.840 --> 0:33:55.520
<v Speaker 1>in the US, it's being framed more about curtailing radicalization

0:33:55.800 --> 0:33:59.800
<v Speaker 1>and the spread of misinformation. Anyway, while there's a movement

0:34:00.000 --> 0:34:01.720
<v Speaker 1>a way to push for those regulations here in the

0:34:01.800 --> 0:34:03.960
<v Speaker 1>United States, there are a lot of steps that have

0:34:04.040 --> 0:34:06.080
<v Speaker 1>to be taken before we ever see anything like that

0:34:06.320 --> 0:34:10.320
<v Speaker 1>actually happened. And then a couple more stories. Russia's space

0:34:10.360 --> 0:34:13.120
<v Speaker 1>program had a bit of a whoop see this week. Actually,

0:34:13.160 --> 0:34:15.920
<v Speaker 1>the whoop see happened last week, but the ultimate consequence

0:34:15.920 --> 0:34:20.200
<v Speaker 1>of the whoop see happened yesterday. Namely, Russia launched an Angara,

0:34:20.400 --> 0:34:23.600
<v Speaker 1>a five heavy lift rocket which was carrying a pur

0:34:23.680 --> 0:34:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Si or per C a p E R S E

0:34:27.440 --> 0:34:31.879
<v Speaker 1>I my Russian is non existent. Anyway, They launched an

0:34:31.920 --> 0:34:35.240
<v Speaker 1>upper stage booster as a test mission to test that booster,

0:34:35.360 --> 0:34:38.880
<v Speaker 1>and unfortunately the test was a failure. Uh the Angara

0:34:38.960 --> 0:34:42.200
<v Speaker 1>lifted off as it was supposed to, but when it's

0:34:42.239 --> 0:34:45.000
<v Speaker 1>separated with the upper stage, the upper stage failed to

0:34:45.120 --> 0:34:48.880
<v Speaker 1>attain orbit, so it didn't get high enough to avoid

0:34:48.880 --> 0:34:52.160
<v Speaker 1>falling back to Earth, which it finally did yesterday. It

0:34:52.320 --> 0:34:56.879
<v Speaker 1>launched late last week, but the the the the uncontrolled

0:34:56.920 --> 0:35:01.240
<v Speaker 1>descent of the upper stage happened yesterday, several pieces plunging

0:35:01.280 --> 0:35:05.120
<v Speaker 1>into the Pacific Ocean in an uncontrolled re entry, which

0:35:05.160 --> 0:35:08.880
<v Speaker 1>is the nice space way of saying a crash. And finally,

0:35:08.920 --> 0:35:11.080
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned earlier that we would talk a little bit

0:35:11.080 --> 0:35:13.600
<v Speaker 1>more about n f t s. One thing I did

0:35:13.600 --> 0:35:15.680
<v Speaker 1>not think we would hear a lot about with n

0:35:15.760 --> 0:35:18.400
<v Speaker 1>f t s would be art heists because it's a

0:35:18.440 --> 0:35:22.160
<v Speaker 1>digital token, right, it's a representation of ownership. I didn't think, oh,

0:35:22.200 --> 0:35:24.840
<v Speaker 1>this is gonna be a heist thing. And I guess

0:35:24.840 --> 0:35:27.839
<v Speaker 1>you could break into someone's home or their office and

0:35:27.840 --> 0:35:30.359
<v Speaker 1>try to steal a physical hard drive that holds the

0:35:30.360 --> 0:35:33.440
<v Speaker 1>wallet that contains those n f t s, but then

0:35:33.440 --> 0:35:35.200
<v Speaker 1>you have to figure out how to get access to it.

0:35:35.560 --> 0:35:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Now it turns out I am way too shortsighted. Hackers

0:35:39.360 --> 0:35:43.560
<v Speaker 1>using phishing techniques were able to steal fifteen n f

0:35:43.600 --> 0:35:48.520
<v Speaker 1>t s from a an art uh gallery owner named

0:35:48.560 --> 0:35:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Todd Kramer. These n f T s, which included ape

0:35:52.760 --> 0:35:55.839
<v Speaker 1>cartoons from the board Ape Yacht Club, which is why

0:35:55.880 --> 0:35:59.319
<v Speaker 1>I was referencing apes earlier. They were valued at more

0:35:59.360 --> 0:36:04.320
<v Speaker 1>than two million dollars because, and I cannot stress this enough,

0:36:05.360 --> 0:36:11.120
<v Speaker 1>n f T s are stupid. Anyway, the hackers gained

0:36:11.160 --> 0:36:14.680
<v Speaker 1>access to Kramer's n f T wallet through fishing and

0:36:14.680 --> 0:36:17.360
<v Speaker 1>then went on to sell those n f T s.

0:36:17.520 --> 0:36:19.239
<v Speaker 1>They had control of them, so they went ahead and

0:36:19.280 --> 0:36:22.520
<v Speaker 1>sold them. And n f T platform called open c

0:36:23.080 --> 0:36:26.640
<v Speaker 1>that's s e A helped Cramer out and froze the

0:36:26.680 --> 0:36:29.120
<v Speaker 1>stolen n f T s on the market and helped

0:36:29.200 --> 0:36:32.120
<v Speaker 1>him retrieve at least some of them. But even that

0:36:32.200 --> 0:36:34.880
<v Speaker 1>action has caused a stir in the n f T community.

0:36:35.280 --> 0:36:39.920
<v Speaker 1>See if a platform can intervene and prevent or reverse

0:36:40.280 --> 0:36:45.600
<v Speaker 1>n f T transactions, well then that whole decentralized, unregulated

0:36:45.680 --> 0:36:49.879
<v Speaker 1>market thing kind of starts to fall apart. So ironically,

0:36:50.320 --> 0:36:52.440
<v Speaker 1>the fact that Kramer was able to retrieve at least

0:36:52.480 --> 0:36:55.560
<v Speaker 1>some of his n f T s might mean that

0:36:55.600 --> 0:36:58.160
<v Speaker 1>we could see confidence waiver with n f T s

0:36:58.320 --> 0:37:02.439
<v Speaker 1>as a whole, and the value of that collection could

0:37:02.520 --> 0:37:05.799
<v Speaker 1>take a hit. Then again, maybe it won't. Maybe it

0:37:05.840 --> 0:37:07.799
<v Speaker 1>really will just go to the moon and the only

0:37:07.840 --> 0:37:09.960
<v Speaker 1>person who will be left out will be me. But

0:37:10.040 --> 0:37:12.160
<v Speaker 1>you know what, I'm okay with that. I don't mind

0:37:12.160 --> 0:37:15.160
<v Speaker 1>if I'm wrong about this. I worry about it. I

0:37:15.280 --> 0:37:17.359
<v Speaker 1>worry that a lot of n f t s are

0:37:17.560 --> 0:37:20.600
<v Speaker 1>just scams, and that the ones that are quote unquote

0:37:20.640 --> 0:37:24.480
<v Speaker 1>legit are just scams in in waiting, like they weren't

0:37:24.480 --> 0:37:28.280
<v Speaker 1>necessarily intended to be scams. But I think that I'm

0:37:28.320 --> 0:37:31.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm worried that there won't be any there there, and

0:37:31.600 --> 0:37:33.640
<v Speaker 1>then it will all fall apart and people will lose

0:37:33.680 --> 0:37:36.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money. I'm hoping that the people who

0:37:36.040 --> 0:37:38.520
<v Speaker 1>lose a lot of money are people who kind of

0:37:38.560 --> 0:37:40.680
<v Speaker 1>deserve to lose a lot of money. But my worry

0:37:40.760 --> 0:37:43.600
<v Speaker 1>is that, you know, good people who got suckered in

0:37:44.280 --> 0:37:46.879
<v Speaker 1>will be the victims of this, and I don't want

0:37:46.880 --> 0:37:50.440
<v Speaker 1>to see that happen. Okay, that's it. That's the news

0:37:50.600 --> 0:37:53.879
<v Speaker 1>for a Thursday, January six two. This was a long

0:37:53.920 --> 0:37:56.560
<v Speaker 1>one for a news episode, but we had a lot

0:37:56.600 --> 0:37:58.640
<v Speaker 1>of ce S stuff to get through. If you have

0:37:58.719 --> 0:38:00.960
<v Speaker 1>suggestions for topics I should over in future episodes of

0:38:00.960 --> 0:38:03.080
<v Speaker 1>tech Stuff, please reach out to me on Twitter. The

0:38:03.080 --> 0:38:05.840
<v Speaker 1>handle for the show is text stuff H s W

0:38:06.719 --> 0:38:15.080
<v Speaker 1>and I'll talk to you again really soon. Tech Stuff

0:38:15.160 --> 0:38:18.319
<v Speaker 1>is an I heart Radio production. For more podcasts from

0:38:18.320 --> 0:38:22.120
<v Speaker 1>my Heart Radio, visit the i heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:38:22.239 --> 0:38:24.200
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.