WEBVTT - MLB: Leading Off June 15th, 2022 (Ep. 532)

0:00:00.680 --> 0:00:17.640
<v Speaker 1>I love gold Schmidt. Let's play ball. Welcome in everybody

0:00:17.640 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>to Fantasy pros. This is leading Off, brought to you

0:00:20.079 --> 0:00:22.720
<v Speaker 1>by bet MGM, the King of sports Books. It's me

0:00:22.800 --> 0:00:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Joey p Joe. Pi's appia with me today again. Back

0:00:25.800 --> 0:00:28.880
<v Speaker 1>is the Welsh and it's you, the Peanuts, the Cracker Jacks,

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:30.360
<v Speaker 1>the Randos.

0:00:30.440 --> 0:00:32.519
<v Speaker 2>Hi, Randos, Hi, how are you doing?

0:00:33.240 --> 0:00:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Hey? Oh my goodness, gracious yesterday all these look see

0:00:37.240 --> 0:00:40.880
<v Speaker 1>see the team Randos. See look there's doctor Glenn started

0:00:40.920 --> 0:00:45.040
<v Speaker 1>to lester. Everybody's Team Rando today, Go cards, Team Rando.

0:00:45.560 --> 0:00:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Rando's make the world go round Welsh. That's what they do.

0:00:49.080 --> 0:00:52.599
<v Speaker 3>Listen, we wouldn't have what we have without Randos. So

0:00:52.640 --> 0:00:57.280
<v Speaker 3>we we've listen. How good would a video game be

0:00:57.720 --> 0:01:03.040
<v Speaker 3>if there weren't random not whatever characters just walking around

0:01:03.040 --> 0:01:05.360
<v Speaker 3>the streets that you could potentially run over you're playing

0:01:05.400 --> 0:01:07.880
<v Speaker 3>GTA or you just talked to for a side mission.

0:01:08.040 --> 0:01:11.800
<v Speaker 3>You gotta have side mission Randos. So congratulations to everybody.

0:01:12.000 --> 0:01:15.800
<v Speaker 1>You can be a side mission Randos. There you go.

0:01:15.840 --> 0:01:18.080
<v Speaker 1>We love all of you. We're happy that you're here

0:01:18.080 --> 0:01:20.200
<v Speaker 1>with us, hanging out talking to baseball today. A lot

0:01:20.240 --> 0:01:22.479
<v Speaker 1>of baseball to get to Let's start with another man

0:01:22.520 --> 0:01:24.640
<v Speaker 1>with a glorious mustache, shall we watched Let's start with

0:01:24.640 --> 0:01:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Miles Micholas one out Shy of the no hitter on strikes.

0:01:28.440 --> 0:01:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Shy just is crushing. He's terrible.

0:01:30.560 --> 0:01:33.200
<v Speaker 2>But he said, he's like, it sucks. It kind of sucks.

0:01:33.760 --> 0:01:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Not after Yeah, well, I remember in the eighties that's

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:39.600
<v Speaker 1>happened to Dave Steve on multiple occasions. I want to

0:01:39.640 --> 0:01:42.800
<v Speaker 1>say he was within a strike twice or two outs

0:01:42.840 --> 0:01:44.880
<v Speaker 1>twice in his career for a no hitter. Both times

0:01:44.959 --> 0:01:46.600
<v Speaker 1>didn't get it. I think he did get a no

0:01:46.680 --> 0:01:48.000
<v Speaker 1>hitter at some point in time, but there were two

0:01:48.040 --> 0:01:49.600
<v Speaker 1>times where he did not. He was one of the

0:01:49.600 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 1>more underrated pictures of the eighties. But Micholas, look, he

0:01:53.160 --> 0:01:55.920
<v Speaker 1>has been absolutely spectacular this year. And you know you

0:01:56.000 --> 0:01:58.840
<v Speaker 1>are getting Jack Flaherty back today for the Cardinals. That's

0:01:59.000 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 1>that's a big addition into this team, to the starting rotation. Now,

0:02:02.560 --> 0:02:05.040
<v Speaker 1>if you're the Cardinals, you've got Miles Miiglass, You've got

0:02:05.240 --> 0:02:08.399
<v Speaker 1>Adam Waynwright, You've got Flaherty back. You've got a chance

0:02:08.440 --> 0:02:10.880
<v Speaker 1>to compete right now for this division long term. And

0:02:10.880 --> 0:02:13.040
<v Speaker 1>they've already overtaken the Brewers. We'll see how long they

0:02:13.040 --> 0:02:15.360
<v Speaker 1>can hold that spot. But he has been a revelation

0:02:15.480 --> 0:02:17.080
<v Speaker 1>as a player. I have no shares of I'm just

0:02:17.120 --> 0:02:20.200
<v Speaker 1>curious what's your take on his performance this year, because

0:02:20.200 --> 0:02:22.239
<v Speaker 1>it has been nothing short of outstanding. Yeah.

0:02:22.240 --> 0:02:24.320
<v Speaker 3>I actually have a decent amount of shares because it's

0:02:24.320 --> 0:02:26.920
<v Speaker 3>just one of those cheap guys that you're able to

0:02:27.639 --> 0:02:29.200
<v Speaker 3>you know, you're able to get in for back end

0:02:29.240 --> 0:02:32.399
<v Speaker 3>of rotation stuff. You know, the strikeouts have never been there,

0:02:32.400 --> 0:02:35.520
<v Speaker 3>but he's obviously become a completely different pitcher since you know,

0:02:35.560 --> 0:02:37.760
<v Speaker 3>he came back over Stateside a couple of years ago.

0:02:38.360 --> 0:02:41.200
<v Speaker 3>I don't think this is like a lynch pin to

0:02:41.320 --> 0:02:43.960
<v Speaker 3>your offense type of guy or anything like that. I mean,

0:02:44.200 --> 0:02:47.320
<v Speaker 3>like I said, the strikeouts have never been immaculate, but

0:02:47.360 --> 0:02:48.480
<v Speaker 3>he's going deep in the games.

0:02:48.520 --> 0:02:50.760
<v Speaker 2>We're seeing more of those guys. We're seeing more of

0:02:50.800 --> 0:02:52.200
<v Speaker 2>those guys. You get eleven.

0:02:52.040 --> 0:02:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Pictures pitchers, guys who pitch having success and being a frigation,

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:00.600
<v Speaker 1>not trying to strike out everybody pitching.

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:03.239
<v Speaker 3>It is odd that it's like old school baseball and

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:06.440
<v Speaker 3>just looking you know, at that performance this, I mean,

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:08.840
<v Speaker 3>you just don't see this that often. He had four

0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:13.640
<v Speaker 3>different pitches that were double digit in percentile, and he

0:03:13.800 --> 0:03:16.640
<v Speaker 3>was one percent away from having four different pitches be

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:19.400
<v Speaker 3>twenty percent of his repertoire. So I mean, like that

0:03:19.639 --> 0:03:22.639
<v Speaker 3>is relatively incredible. I would throw out there too that

0:03:22.639 --> 0:03:25.280
<v Speaker 3>that you know, the guy doesn't have the biggest stuff

0:03:25.320 --> 0:03:27.920
<v Speaker 3>in the world. I think he was as I'm looking here.

0:03:28.040 --> 0:03:30.520
<v Speaker 3>He did hit ninety six on the fastball, averaging around

0:03:30.600 --> 0:03:33.440
<v Speaker 3>ninety three, same with the sinker, and he almost as

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 3>a twenty mile pro hoor deviation between his lowest pitch,

0:03:37.080 --> 0:03:40.320
<v Speaker 3>which is his curveball, and the highest on the fastball.

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:44.080
<v Speaker 3>You take that type of stuff with okay, spin you take,

0:03:44.160 --> 0:03:46.720
<v Speaker 3>and you take four different pitches. You're mixing up you

0:03:46.800 --> 0:03:49.920
<v Speaker 3>getting great results. Cardinals are wizards with what they do

0:03:50.000 --> 0:03:53.280
<v Speaker 3>with pitchers. You have an incredible offense and defense that's

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:56.480
<v Speaker 3>around you as well. The Cardinals are the perfect recipe

0:03:56.520 --> 0:03:59.280
<v Speaker 3>for success for even the middle line pitcher.

0:03:59.680 --> 0:04:02.720
<v Speaker 1>And well, and yati or Molina has a lot to

0:04:02.760 --> 0:04:04.920
<v Speaker 1>do with that. So he's all right, I forget about

0:04:04.920 --> 0:04:08.120
<v Speaker 1>that boy. He's pretty good at baseball. Wilson Contreras is

0:04:08.160 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 1>pretty good too. He went deep twice yesterday in a

0:04:10.720 --> 0:04:14.080
<v Speaker 1>loss Luke Voight. I drove in five guys and it

0:04:14.120 --> 0:04:15.800
<v Speaker 1>went over the Cubs. Remember yesterday, I was a little

0:04:15.800 --> 0:04:19.279
<v Speaker 1>sketch on Manaya, Like I'm glad I was sketch on Manaya.

0:04:19.360 --> 0:04:21.400
<v Speaker 1>I was not sketched on Gonsolin. He goes to eight

0:04:21.400 --> 0:04:22.880
<v Speaker 1>to oh and went over the Angels. Look, I know

0:04:22.920 --> 0:04:26.039
<v Speaker 1>it's it's sunshine and roses right now for Gonsolin. It look,

0:04:26.480 --> 0:04:28.320
<v Speaker 1>it's not gonna be. He's not gonna be twenty and one.

0:04:28.600 --> 0:04:30.840
<v Speaker 1>This is not gonna happen. Like, it's not gonna happen.

0:04:30.880 --> 0:04:33.200
<v Speaker 1>It's going to come back around at some point. Chris

0:04:33.279 --> 0:04:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Bassett spends eight shutout innings to win on Tuesday. Fun

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:39.159
<v Speaker 1>fact here, nobody has had more shutouts so far this

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:41.280
<v Speaker 1>year than the Mets. So that's a very interesting thing.

0:04:41.320 --> 0:04:44.520
<v Speaker 1>That's telling you that they've got good defense, bullpen, starting, pitching, offense,

0:04:44.560 --> 0:04:46.839
<v Speaker 1>the whole nine. Tyler Molly was one of our favorite

0:04:46.839 --> 0:04:48.600
<v Speaker 1>pitchers yesterday. I told you he's been on a really

0:04:48.640 --> 0:04:50.960
<v Speaker 1>good streak. He is pitching his way out of Cincinnati.

0:04:51.000 --> 0:04:54.960
<v Speaker 1>He can help somebody. No decision, but twelve strikeouts, so

0:04:55.279 --> 0:04:57.560
<v Speaker 1>really good. Nine shoutout innings for him. Zach Daniels.

0:04:57.680 --> 0:04:59.279
<v Speaker 3>That was a perfect matchup, by the way, just throwing

0:04:59.320 --> 0:05:02.320
<v Speaker 3>out with the diamond perfect matchup against the Diamondbacks, and

0:05:02.360 --> 0:05:05.760
<v Speaker 3>he is underlying one of those guys even when he

0:05:05.760 --> 0:05:08.600
<v Speaker 3>had like a six era, one of those guys that

0:05:08.640 --> 0:05:11.120
<v Speaker 3>you wanted to make sure you got because all the

0:05:11.160 --> 0:05:13.840
<v Speaker 3>Enderlanting strike cup measures there. He had eighteen swing and

0:05:13.920 --> 0:05:17.640
<v Speaker 3>missus yesterday in that matchup, which you know, again pitching

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:19.800
<v Speaker 3>your way out. He will be one of those guys.

0:05:19.880 --> 0:05:22.039
<v Speaker 3>He has very Joe Musgrove esque to me. It's like,

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:24.120
<v Speaker 3>get him out, put him on a good team, and

0:05:24.160 --> 0:05:26.039
<v Speaker 3>all of a sudden he really has a chance to

0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:28.160
<v Speaker 3>be elite if he can put it together a nightly basis.

0:05:28.200 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 3>But he did face the Diamondbacks, who are strikeout machines.

0:05:31.560 --> 0:05:33.920
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, come on, oh look it is and Zach

0:05:34.000 --> 0:05:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Davies at the Diamondbacks, Bobbin's favorite pitcher went seven scorels

0:05:37.320 --> 0:05:39.320
<v Speaker 1>sittings Logan Web struck out nine. It was good to

0:05:39.320 --> 0:05:41.240
<v Speaker 1>see him have a solid outing, a really strong like

0:05:41.400 --> 0:05:43.839
<v Speaker 1>I think everybody kind of needed a big Logan Web outing,

0:05:43.920 --> 0:05:47.400
<v Speaker 1>so this was very good. Hazer's Agilar went Dong twice,

0:05:47.720 --> 0:05:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Reyese Hoskins two home runs. That's who Bogmin picked yesterday.

0:05:51.320 --> 0:05:54.799
<v Speaker 1>I believe Mayor picked him as well, So there you go. Also,

0:05:54.880 --> 0:05:57.680
<v Speaker 1>the Boston Red Sox are going to be recalling Jared

0:05:57.760 --> 0:06:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Duran and Corey Kaniebel will be pitching in lower leverage

0:06:02.360 --> 0:06:05.160
<v Speaker 1>situations for the Phillies. Welsh, what do you make of this?

0:06:05.400 --> 0:06:06.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't like that.

0:06:06.200 --> 0:06:08.760
<v Speaker 2>Bridge, don't like that at all.

0:06:08.880 --> 0:06:13.400
<v Speaker 3>My shares hate that. That's like nice speak for being like, well,

0:06:13.440 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 3>you suck. You're out of the role and we can't

0:06:15.640 --> 0:06:17.800
<v Speaker 3>put you in anything that's important. So we're gonna put

0:06:17.800 --> 0:06:19.760
<v Speaker 3>you at the kids table. You're gonna the kids table

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:22.880
<v Speaker 3>in the sixth inning. Maybe we're down by six runs,

0:06:22.920 --> 0:06:26.000
<v Speaker 3>that's where we're gonna go. That's not a good place

0:06:26.080 --> 0:06:26.279
<v Speaker 3>to be.

0:06:26.400 --> 0:06:30.040
<v Speaker 2>And because now we're now we're back into this rotating

0:06:30.200 --> 0:06:32.840
<v Speaker 2>chair of again. We talked about trades so much.

0:06:33.200 --> 0:06:35.240
<v Speaker 3>Philly would be in a great spot to just go

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:37.440
<v Speaker 3>get somebody locked down, you know, if they're not going

0:06:37.480 --> 0:06:41.200
<v Speaker 3>to develop somebody or you know, maybe they they simply do.

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:45.240
<v Speaker 1>Exactly or Welsh, I mean, realistically, what what closers are

0:06:45.279 --> 0:06:47.360
<v Speaker 1>out there available on the market that they could add

0:06:47.360 --> 0:06:50.719
<v Speaker 1>on bad teams right now? And who's who's good enough

0:06:50.760 --> 0:06:51.360
<v Speaker 1>to add.

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:53.960
<v Speaker 3>As David Bednar, Dave Bennar would be the number one.

0:06:54.000 --> 0:06:57.640
<v Speaker 3>Darn Arwood Pirates, who's absolute they're trash and but it

0:06:57.640 --> 0:07:00.640
<v Speaker 3>would take probably a king's ransom. But I if I'm

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:03.719
<v Speaker 3>a heavy competitive team and I don't have a steady,

0:07:03.920 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 3>especially closer on my bullpen, they should go all out.

0:07:07.800 --> 0:07:09.960
<v Speaker 2>They should pay the price of what it takes to get.

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:13.080
<v Speaker 3>A guy like that David Bednar on the Phillies. Listen,

0:07:13.200 --> 0:07:15.160
<v Speaker 3>David Bednar has been awesome.

0:07:14.800 --> 0:07:16.760
<v Speaker 2>This year and he's done on the Pirates. If you

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:18.000
<v Speaker 2>put Bednar.

0:07:17.880 --> 0:07:20.520
<v Speaker 3>On the Phillies, on that type of team, you would

0:07:20.560 --> 0:07:25.720
<v Speaker 3>probably have Bednar as a top five closer at first.

0:07:25.880 --> 0:07:28.679
<v Speaker 3>I think at this point maybe not any maybe not better.

0:07:28.880 --> 0:07:31.840
<v Speaker 3>So uh yeah, I think they should absolutely go to

0:07:31.880 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 3>any team that does not have solidified closing that is

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 3>a high end playoff team should be in Philly. That's

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:38.840
<v Speaker 3>not what you want to hear. This is not especially

0:07:38.840 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 3>with the manager stuff. And you know a Harper tapered

0:07:41.520 --> 0:07:44.320
<v Speaker 3>back a little bit like you want you want to roll,

0:07:44.400 --> 0:07:46.000
<v Speaker 3>you want to roll, and they need to do that.

0:07:47.000 --> 0:07:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Oh says Milanson's available.

0:07:49.440 --> 0:07:50.960
<v Speaker 2>I was, I mean, I don't want to say it.

0:07:51.040 --> 0:07:52.760
<v Speaker 2>Like on Obagman's line here, I didn't want.

0:07:52.600 --> 0:07:54.960
<v Speaker 1>To say this is another guy. Mister Buster brings up Gregory.

0:07:55.000 --> 0:07:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Soto's been great. I just don't think the Tigers want

0:07:57.240 --> 0:07:59.400
<v Speaker 1>to deal him necessarily. I don't see them.

0:07:59.480 --> 0:08:01.920
<v Speaker 2>But see I don't think and that's the problem.

0:08:02.040 --> 0:08:04.440
<v Speaker 3>None of the even the loser of loser teams, they

0:08:04.440 --> 0:08:08.240
<v Speaker 3>don't want to move these younger, controllable closers, right, but

0:08:08.360 --> 0:08:11.000
<v Speaker 3>they understand that these are the assets and it's got

0:08:11.000 --> 0:08:13.080
<v Speaker 3>to be a king's ransom. And what's interesting is the

0:08:13.120 --> 0:08:16.240
<v Speaker 3>market has kind of moved a little bit into understanding

0:08:16.280 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 3>you have to pay crazy prices for closers at this

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 3>point unless teams are just willing to continuously develop, if

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:25.440
<v Speaker 3>they want to develop some of their other arms that

0:08:25.480 --> 0:08:27.520
<v Speaker 3>they got starting pitchers that aren't working, and they want

0:08:27.560 --> 0:08:30.960
<v Speaker 3>to do like how Boston was doing with how that's

0:08:31.280 --> 0:08:32.839
<v Speaker 3>what you got to do. But Philly's not doing that,

0:08:33.000 --> 0:08:35.200
<v Speaker 3>and Kennebel being out is bad news.

0:08:35.600 --> 0:08:39.600
<v Speaker 1>In a bigger meta conversation, you know, Bedner, I don't

0:08:39.600 --> 0:08:42.199
<v Speaker 1>have any Bendner's shares, but I do have Soto shares everywhere.

0:08:42.600 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 1>And this was my whole thing to shares like I'm

0:08:44.200 --> 0:08:45.600
<v Speaker 1>not paying Yeah, I know you were at the very

0:08:45.640 --> 0:08:47.960
<v Speaker 1>other end of the spectrum paying for closer. I have not.

0:08:48.120 --> 0:08:50.480
<v Speaker 1>I just I refuse to do it now at this point.

0:08:50.640 --> 0:08:52.120
<v Speaker 1>And I'm just looking for the guys that I think

0:08:52.440 --> 0:08:56.160
<v Speaker 1>are are more likely to just keep the job by default,

0:08:56.800 --> 0:08:59.559
<v Speaker 1>and maybe they'll pleasantly surprise you and pitch well for

0:08:59.600 --> 0:09:02.240
<v Speaker 1>a bad And Sodo's like the poster child for that

0:09:02.320 --> 0:09:05.160
<v Speaker 1>strategy working out this year. He's been outstanding. All right,

0:09:05.200 --> 0:09:06.800
<v Speaker 1>let's go to some of the injury nos. There's a

0:09:06.840 --> 0:09:09.080
<v Speaker 1>lot to get to on here. Today he engine Rio

0:09:09.080 --> 0:09:10.880
<v Speaker 1>out for the year officially with the elbow that is

0:09:10.920 --> 0:09:13.679
<v Speaker 1>now official done. We knew it was coming. There you go.

0:09:13.800 --> 0:09:17.079
<v Speaker 1>Wah wah wah. Anthony Rendon is aggravated his wrist again.

0:09:17.440 --> 0:09:19.560
<v Speaker 1>For Anthony Rendel Man, I just feel terrible. FI guy

0:09:19.640 --> 0:09:22.560
<v Speaker 1>can't stay on the field. Also, Astros had to place

0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:24.839
<v Speaker 1>your boy Jeremy Penya on the injured list with a

0:09:24.920 --> 0:09:27.439
<v Speaker 1>thumb issue. And a little bit of a bad news

0:09:27.520 --> 0:09:29.440
<v Speaker 1>here for all of us who have investments in Fernando

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Teptis Junior. He has not been clear to resume swinging

0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the bat yet. I guess the latest round of the

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:36.959
<v Speaker 1>imaging said that it hadn't healed to the point where

0:09:36.960 --> 0:09:40.280
<v Speaker 1>they feel comfortable with that activity. So what was looking

0:09:40.320 --> 0:09:43.080
<v Speaker 1>like things were progressing at a faster clip, Maybe have

0:09:43.160 --> 0:09:44.880
<v Speaker 1>to slow down a little bit. So my guess is

0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:48.080
<v Speaker 1>some time after the All Star break would be what what?

0:09:48.440 --> 0:09:50.120
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if it's liking it right? Yeah, I

0:09:50.160 --> 0:09:52.200
<v Speaker 2>don't have his bad news. I didn't necessarily look at

0:09:52.240 --> 0:09:52.840
<v Speaker 2>it like it's.

0:09:53.240 --> 0:09:56.200
<v Speaker 1>I guess it's not bad news. It's not the trajectory

0:09:56.280 --> 0:09:59.240
<v Speaker 1>was starting to go in the early since now it's

0:09:59.280 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 1>not so now yeah, because he's like a freak.

0:10:01.760 --> 0:10:04.240
<v Speaker 3>He's a freak, and how in his recovery times and stuff.

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:06.840
<v Speaker 3>So I think when you saw, okay, he's gonna have imaging.

0:10:07.080 --> 0:10:09.839
<v Speaker 3>He's been out there, here we go. But they just

0:10:09.840 --> 0:10:11.679
<v Speaker 3>said it hasn't healed to the point they're taking it.

0:10:11.640 --> 0:10:12.200
<v Speaker 2>Week by week.

0:10:12.240 --> 0:10:14.520
<v Speaker 3>I will say, there's video out there that he was

0:10:14.520 --> 0:10:17.960
<v Speaker 3>actually taking full on grounders in field stuff. Not anything insane,

0:10:18.040 --> 0:10:20.320
<v Speaker 3>but you know, he was able to take the grounders

0:10:20.520 --> 0:10:23.800
<v Speaker 3>do full throws. They had said he was doing it

0:10:23.840 --> 0:10:25.679
<v Speaker 3>the other day and all he was simply doing was

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:28.560
<v Speaker 3>just taking the grounders and nothing else. This was like

0:10:28.679 --> 0:10:31.600
<v Speaker 3>full on boom boom, get the ball, turn it back

0:10:31.679 --> 0:10:35.400
<v Speaker 3>and throw. I think that's a really good sign. When

0:10:35.480 --> 0:10:38.880
<v Speaker 3>they give him the go, he's going to fly. I

0:10:38.880 --> 0:10:40.680
<v Speaker 3>don't think this is going to be a situation where

0:10:40.679 --> 0:10:43.240
<v Speaker 3>they're like, all right, so go to complex, go to rookie.

0:10:43.320 --> 0:10:45.200
<v Speaker 3>Now it's a ball, it's go to double. It's like, no,

0:10:45.360 --> 0:10:47.640
<v Speaker 3>dude's been with the team the whole time. I wouldn't

0:10:47.679 --> 0:10:50.200
<v Speaker 3>I honestly would not even be shocked if they're like,

0:10:50.240 --> 0:10:52.760
<v Speaker 3>now we're not gonna even do a rehab stant We're

0:10:52.800 --> 0:10:54.480
<v Speaker 3>just gonna put him out there. I really, really truly

0:10:54.480 --> 0:10:57.080
<v Speaker 3>believe it would be crazy because of the time he's missed.

0:10:57.400 --> 0:11:00.760
<v Speaker 3>But I don't know if it is that that you've

0:11:00.760 --> 0:11:03.000
<v Speaker 3>got the All Star Game about a week away, about

0:11:03.040 --> 0:11:05.200
<v Speaker 3>a month away. Not a week that'd be great, about

0:11:05.200 --> 0:11:07.680
<v Speaker 3>a month away. I still kind of feel like it's

0:11:07.720 --> 0:11:10.520
<v Speaker 3>going to be an after All Star break type of thing.

0:11:10.640 --> 0:11:12.920
<v Speaker 3>But he's got to get some positive signs if that's

0:11:12.920 --> 0:11:13.480
<v Speaker 3>going to happen.

0:11:13.760 --> 0:11:17.160
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, yeah, he does. Frustrating because he's such as

0:11:17.160 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 1>such a great talent, he's so fun to watch, and

0:11:19.679 --> 0:11:22.760
<v Speaker 1>cannot have him on the field. It's tough, plus puts

0:11:22.760 --> 0:11:24.320
<v Speaker 1>the Padres in this mad spot too. I think they

0:11:24.320 --> 0:11:26.440
<v Speaker 1>were getting anxious to say, Okay, maybe we're ahead of schedule.

0:11:26.480 --> 0:11:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Now we're not. Don't be surprised if they don't make

0:11:28.160 --> 0:11:30.280
<v Speaker 1>a move for somebody. They need some more offense on

0:11:30.320 --> 0:11:33.040
<v Speaker 1>that coler To. You think I mean, and he's an

0:11:33.080 --> 0:11:35.400
<v Speaker 1>aggressive GM, you're one hundred percent right. All right, let's

0:11:35.400 --> 0:11:37.120
<v Speaker 1>get to can we talk about this and let's talk

0:11:37.120 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 1>about Bob Nightingale who tweeted Atlanta has well, you know

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:43.959
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk about his tweet. Yeah, Atlanta has pulverized the

0:11:44.040 --> 0:11:48.240
<v Speaker 1>opposition ninety two to thirty nine in his last thirteen

0:11:48.280 --> 0:11:50.600
<v Speaker 1>games that they won with a two seven eight ERA,

0:11:50.800 --> 0:11:53.520
<v Speaker 1>leading all baseball with thirty two home runs. Now they've

0:11:53.559 --> 0:11:57.080
<v Speaker 1>lost Albi's but still Welsh. He will eventually heal and

0:11:57.120 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 1>come back. We talked a little bit yesterday just about

0:11:59.880 --> 0:12:01.640
<v Speaker 1>like the win total of Braves, But today I want

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 1>to talk about something else, which is their odds to

0:12:04.120 --> 0:12:06.920
<v Speaker 1>win the National League, which is plus seven hundred. They

0:12:06.920 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 1>are the defending champions. They are going to get Soroka back.

0:12:09.400 --> 0:12:12.360
<v Speaker 1>They have that great pitching from Freed and Kyle Wright.

0:12:14.240 --> 0:12:17.679
<v Speaker 1>They I mean obviously, you know, Kunya, Riley Olsen healthy,

0:12:17.679 --> 0:12:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Albi's At some point, are we sleeping on the Braves

0:12:20.480 --> 0:12:21.800
<v Speaker 1>a little bit? You know, all we talked about is

0:12:21.800 --> 0:12:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the Mets and the Dodgers in the National League, and

0:12:24.000 --> 0:12:26.560
<v Speaker 1>those guys are we're talking about plus two twenty and

0:12:26.600 --> 0:12:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the consensus of betting pros plus three fifty for the Mets,

0:12:29.000 --> 0:12:31.640
<v Speaker 1>plus two twenty for the Dodgers. That's the consensus line.

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:34.200
<v Speaker 1>But the Braves, the Braves that are still seven to one.

0:12:34.240 --> 0:12:36.400
<v Speaker 1>That's a really solid number for a smaller investment. Do

0:12:36.440 --> 0:12:36.960
<v Speaker 1>you agree?

0:12:37.280 --> 0:12:39.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean I was. I was preseason Braves.

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:40.839
<v Speaker 3>I didn't think the Mets were going to be as

0:12:40.840 --> 0:12:43.720
<v Speaker 3>good as they are five games back, so, like you know,

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 3>you have Philly underperformed. We just talked about Philly and

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:48.680
<v Speaker 3>the bullpen and just everything. They're nine and a half

0:12:48.760 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 3>games back from the Mets, four and a half down

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:53.559
<v Speaker 3>from the Braves. The Marlins have been you know, wishy

0:12:53.720 --> 0:12:57.120
<v Speaker 3>washy Nationals out of it. It's it really looks like

0:12:57.200 --> 0:13:00.440
<v Speaker 3>it's a two horse race. I hit eight Albi's out.

0:13:00.480 --> 0:13:03.120
<v Speaker 3>I really hate it for this team, especially when you

0:13:03.120 --> 0:13:08.440
<v Speaker 3>get a Kunya back. I do love the the performance

0:13:08.679 --> 0:13:10.920
<v Speaker 3>like the upping performance of some of the pitching, like

0:13:10.960 --> 0:13:13.480
<v Speaker 3>Spencer Strider has come in and really benefited this team.

0:13:13.520 --> 0:13:17.679
<v Speaker 3>Michael Harris has obviously been really solid. I think this

0:13:17.760 --> 0:13:19.280
<v Speaker 3>is a bet you can make. I don't think this

0:13:19.400 --> 0:13:21.520
<v Speaker 3>is a safe man's bet, you know. I think there's

0:13:21.520 --> 0:13:23.000
<v Speaker 3>a lot of people that approach gamble.

0:13:22.880 --> 0:13:25.040
<v Speaker 1>It's a small investment. I mean, you put twenty bucks

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:26.599
<v Speaker 1>on this, you win one forty if it does, I

0:13:26.640 --> 0:13:28.760
<v Speaker 1>mean twenty bucks is going to break you. Yeah, But

0:13:28.800 --> 0:13:30.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the way I look at this investment.

0:13:30.600 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 3>But I don't think a lot of people. I mean

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:34.920
<v Speaker 3>it's all balanced. I don't know how many people they're

0:13:34.960 --> 0:13:37.440
<v Speaker 3>big in anything they do in gambling is based on

0:13:37.520 --> 0:13:40.680
<v Speaker 3>all futures. You know, we're talking like simply futures here.

0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:42.679
<v Speaker 3>If you like to okay, so here's a better way

0:13:42.720 --> 0:13:45.000
<v Speaker 3>to put it. If you are a futures person and

0:13:45.040 --> 0:13:47.480
<v Speaker 3>you really like to dabble in futures, this is a

0:13:47.480 --> 0:13:50.400
<v Speaker 3>great bet. Is this the bet that's jumping out at

0:13:50.440 --> 0:13:52.120
<v Speaker 3>you and you should and you don't really do futures,

0:13:52.160 --> 0:13:54.840
<v Speaker 3>and you should do it? I think if you like

0:13:54.920 --> 0:13:58.520
<v Speaker 3>to play really risky, yeah, absolutely, because it's a great Payday.

0:13:58.520 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 2>I just don't like it's a you want to play

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:01.400
<v Speaker 2>really risky.

0:14:01.640 --> 0:14:03.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know if it's really risky. Plus fourteen

0:14:03.600 --> 0:14:06.360
<v Speaker 1>hundred Cardinals are fascinating. I mean that's double what the

0:14:06.360 --> 0:14:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Braves are. I'm just saying like, now's an interesting time.

0:14:09.520 --> 0:14:12.600
<v Speaker 2>To win the Oh National League.

0:14:12.640 --> 0:14:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Yah ye yeah, Well fourteen National fourteen one, fourteen to

0:14:16.440 --> 0:14:18.679
<v Speaker 1>one right now, that's a consensus betting pro's line. They're

0:14:18.720 --> 0:14:21.000
<v Speaker 1>thirteen to one on FanDuel, but bet MGM as a

0:14:21.080 --> 0:14:23.400
<v Speaker 1>fourteen to one, DK has him a fourteen to one.

0:14:23.400 --> 0:14:26.240
<v Speaker 1>It's just it's an interesting conversation that, you know, despite

0:14:26.280 --> 0:14:28.960
<v Speaker 1>losing Albi's too, you know, seven to one is still

0:14:28.960 --> 0:14:31.160
<v Speaker 1>really good. Number fourteen it is extraordinary. And I think

0:14:31.320 --> 0:14:33.440
<v Speaker 1>you want to talk about a cake division. The National

0:14:33.480 --> 0:14:35.160
<v Speaker 1>League Central is the cake division. The Cubs are terrible,

0:14:35.160 --> 0:14:36.840
<v Speaker 1>the Pirates are terrible, The Reds are getting rid of

0:14:36.880 --> 0:14:39.120
<v Speaker 1>every way they can. I bet d is not the

0:14:39.160 --> 0:14:41.280
<v Speaker 1>off that team. Drury's another guy too that I think

0:14:41.360 --> 0:14:43.280
<v Speaker 1>is going to help a contender. Somebody's gonna want him.

0:14:43.320 --> 0:14:45.480
<v Speaker 1>It always reminds me of you know, how like you know,

0:14:45.600 --> 0:14:48.240
<v Speaker 1>as Drubal Cabrera was always a player that was useful

0:14:48.280 --> 0:14:51.000
<v Speaker 1>to teams. I feel like Drewi's that guy. He's versatile,

0:14:51.200 --> 0:14:53.600
<v Speaker 1>you can play different spots, swings are pretty good bad,

0:14:53.600 --> 0:14:55.200
<v Speaker 1>He's been in the league a long time. He's a pro.

0:14:55.800 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 1>He's like at that Asdrubal Cabrera kind of quality about him.

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:01.960
<v Speaker 3>I'll bet you Cardinals Division for Central is like minus

0:15:01.960 --> 0:15:04.360
<v Speaker 3>three hundred. There are three of the five teams in

0:15:04.400 --> 0:15:08.080
<v Speaker 3>the division are one and nine over the last ten games,

0:15:08.120 --> 0:15:10.520
<v Speaker 3>one and nine, and the Reds are five and five.

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:12.880
<v Speaker 3>So there's not a team over five hundred in the.

0:15:12.840 --> 0:15:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Central plus one ten to win the division right now,

0:15:15.920 --> 0:15:20.080
<v Speaker 1>the division that's there's still plus plus and a half.

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:21.280
<v Speaker 2>That feels like free money.

0:15:21.480 --> 0:15:24.600
<v Speaker 1>What are Brewers are minus one seventy seven consensus still.

0:15:25.560 --> 0:15:27.400
<v Speaker 2>One and nine in the last ten two What are

0:15:27.400 --> 0:15:30.680
<v Speaker 2>the Braid for the East.

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:33.920
<v Speaker 1>The Braves for the East? Just to answer that question,

0:15:34.040 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 1>let's take a look here. Well, the Mets are minus

0:15:36.160 --> 0:15:38.680
<v Speaker 1>two thirty five because they sure they have patted the

0:15:38.920 --> 0:15:40.960
<v Speaker 1>plus two fifty the Braves for the East.

0:15:41.760 --> 0:15:44.320
<v Speaker 2>Okay, and then five they're five back. Yeah, that's fine.

0:15:44.360 --> 0:15:45.960
<v Speaker 2>I like the Cardinals bet way more than I like

0:15:46.000 --> 0:15:46.920
<v Speaker 2>the Braves. Bet four.

0:15:47.640 --> 0:15:49.800
<v Speaker 3>Uh if you wanted to take that risk for the

0:15:49.960 --> 0:15:53.080
<v Speaker 3>entire n L. The Braves and the Cardinals, both for

0:15:53.160 --> 0:15:54.960
<v Speaker 3>the division, I think are fun bets as well.

0:15:55.560 --> 0:15:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Another fun one too. I mean this is fantasy, it's

0:15:57.560 --> 0:16:00.720
<v Speaker 1>also betting. Is Paul Goldmian Okay, I mean I've been

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:02.600
<v Speaker 1>harping on the Paul Goldschman. I told everybody I made

0:16:02.640 --> 0:16:04.600
<v Speaker 1>investment in Goldsman. I told you on Friday, Right, it's

0:16:04.800 --> 0:16:06.560
<v Speaker 1>time to go move into the gold Schmidth for n

0:16:06.680 --> 0:16:10.480
<v Speaker 1>L MVP conversation. Nine plus hits, nine plus RBI, six

0:16:10.520 --> 0:16:13.160
<v Speaker 1>plus runs scored, five extra base hits, four plus one run,

0:16:13.280 --> 0:16:15.960
<v Speaker 1>zero strikeouts over a two day span. The only other

0:16:15.960 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 1>guy to do that ty Cobb in nineteen twenty five.

0:16:20.600 --> 0:16:22.360
<v Speaker 1>It's the last time anyone had the runner.

0:16:22.440 --> 0:16:24.160
<v Speaker 2>He's good. He's good.

0:16:24.440 --> 0:16:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Paul, And I remember last year after he started

0:16:26.640 --> 0:16:29.240
<v Speaker 1>slow and that, people were like, oh no. And you know,

0:16:29.480 --> 0:16:31.600
<v Speaker 1>you talk about Goldschman and Arnado with the corners. You

0:16:31.640 --> 0:16:33.680
<v Speaker 1>see what the Cardinals have done. Cardinals are one of

0:16:33.720 --> 0:16:36.280
<v Speaker 1>the best organizations in baseball history. I mean, it's just

0:16:36.360 --> 0:16:39.520
<v Speaker 1>unbelievable how they want if Tyler O'Neill reinvent themselves and if.

0:16:39.440 --> 0:16:42.000
<v Speaker 2>Tyler O'Neill can come back, you know, you just recently

0:16:42.040 --> 0:16:43.760
<v Speaker 2>came back from injury. If he can come back and.

0:16:43.720 --> 0:16:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Just ca Carlson's hitting now to all of a sudden.

0:16:45.920 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 2>Too, Carlston's hitting.

0:16:46.840 --> 0:16:50.400
<v Speaker 3>If O'Neil gets back into form, they're massively a problem.

0:16:50.440 --> 0:16:52.160
<v Speaker 3>They are massive, massively a problem.

0:16:52.600 --> 0:16:56.080
<v Speaker 1>This is a fun one here. The Astros are fourteen hundred.

0:16:56.160 --> 0:16:57.200
<v Speaker 2>Are you really?

0:16:57.640 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 3>I hope they are. I hope that's a real Is

0:16:59.720 --> 0:17:01.400
<v Speaker 3>that a real number? Give me the real number?

0:17:01.600 --> 0:17:04.480
<v Speaker 1>No? Oh, no, it is the consensus Lies buys fourteen

0:17:04.560 --> 0:17:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Hundred's right, they're eight and a half, well minus twelve

0:17:07.800 --> 0:17:08.560
<v Speaker 1>at bet MGM.

0:17:08.960 --> 0:17:12.000
<v Speaker 2>I want to point this out. This is how bad.

0:17:12.280 --> 0:17:14.640
<v Speaker 3>Okay, this is one of the things why we can

0:17:14.640 --> 0:17:16.840
<v Speaker 3>continue having We won't, but we can continue having this

0:17:16.840 --> 0:17:21.400
<v Speaker 3>so tawy MVP situation. The Angels are third in the division. There,

0:17:21.800 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 3>it's a big number, but they're still only nine and

0:17:24.080 --> 0:17:26.600
<v Speaker 3>a half back from the Astros. On June fifteenth, and

0:17:26.680 --> 0:17:29.240
<v Speaker 3>the and the Astros are minus fourteen.

0:17:29.560 --> 0:17:31.120
<v Speaker 2>They're fourteen to one.

0:17:32.119 --> 0:17:36.879
<v Speaker 1>A negative vegas like fire manager. Hundred vegas senses blood

0:17:36.920 --> 0:17:39.600
<v Speaker 1>in the water when you fire a manager and they're right,

0:17:40.040 --> 0:17:44.400
<v Speaker 1>that's why they build those hotels. Okay, they build these

0:17:44.400 --> 0:17:47.600
<v Speaker 1>hotels off of good data that typically when you fire

0:17:47.600 --> 0:17:50.240
<v Speaker 1>a manager, things do not go well. Every now and

0:17:50.280 --> 0:17:53.120
<v Speaker 1>then it does, but the vast majority means there's a problem. Also,

0:17:53.160 --> 0:17:55.400
<v Speaker 1>shout out to this is like the love of the Cardinals.

0:17:55.480 --> 0:17:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Go Cards? Is loving the show today? Go Cards? Oh yeah,

0:17:58.119 --> 0:18:00.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, come on, you gotta love this. Yeah. At

0:18:00.880 --> 0:18:03.639
<v Speaker 1>the very top, fourteen eight hundred and sixty five putouts

0:18:03.640 --> 0:18:05.320
<v Speaker 1>as a catcher, the most all time in Major League

0:18:05.320 --> 0:18:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Baseball history. That is impressive. Today in Major League Baseball history,

0:18:09.560 --> 0:18:12.280
<v Speaker 1>reads Johnny Vandermier through his second consecutive no hitter eighty

0:18:12.280 --> 0:18:15.560
<v Speaker 1>four years ago on June fifteenth, in nineteen thirty eight.

0:18:15.600 --> 0:18:17.640
<v Speaker 1>And he did so on three days rest, the only

0:18:17.640 --> 0:18:20.320
<v Speaker 1>picture in MLB history to throw back to back no hitters.

0:18:20.560 --> 0:18:23.400
<v Speaker 1>So Johnny Vandermere gets a shout out on him. Back

0:18:23.480 --> 0:18:30.080
<v Speaker 1>in my day, they I remember Johny vandermre Yaanny no hitters.

0:18:30.200 --> 0:18:32.320
<v Speaker 2>They throw an hour and get no hitters.

0:18:32.400 --> 0:18:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Vandermir is a great like old timey last name, isn't

0:18:35.040 --> 0:18:38.399
<v Speaker 1>it too? Like? Oh, we're having dinner at the Vanderms.

0:18:38.400 --> 0:18:39.919
<v Speaker 1>I believe of this evening there's everyone.

0:18:39.960 --> 0:18:42.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I immediately am like it's a Harry Potter villain,

0:18:42.280 --> 0:18:45.920
<v Speaker 2>so very villainous or older?

0:18:46.000 --> 0:18:53.679
<v Speaker 3>Yeah for sure, Lord Johnny Vando.

0:18:53.080 --> 0:18:55.040
<v Speaker 2>All right, that a little too good?

0:18:55.600 --> 0:18:57.840
<v Speaker 1>I do it very well. Yeah. I'm still trying to decide.

0:18:57.840 --> 0:19:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Am I Voldemort or Doctor Evil for Halloween this year?

0:19:00.160 --> 0:19:01.640
<v Speaker 1>For the show? I don't know which one, but maybe

0:19:01.640 --> 0:19:02.520
<v Speaker 1>we get a pole up there.

0:19:02.880 --> 0:19:05.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm thinking I'm thinking maybe Voldemort.

0:19:06.560 --> 0:19:08.119
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, but I feel like Doctor Evil. I

0:19:08.119 --> 0:19:10.680
<v Speaker 1>can sustain longer and answer people's questions in the fun

0:19:10.680 --> 0:19:13.520
<v Speaker 1>of your fashion. Baltimore might be the Little Dark for

0:19:13.560 --> 0:19:16.359
<v Speaker 1>a while. But anyway, speaking of dark, every team in

0:19:16.359 --> 0:19:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Major League Baseball has had a Rookie of the Year

0:19:17.800 --> 0:19:20.040
<v Speaker 1>except one. Can you name that team? That's the trivia

0:19:20.119 --> 0:19:22.360
<v Speaker 1>question for today. So if you know the team that's

0:19:22.400 --> 0:19:24.520
<v Speaker 1>never had a Rookie of the Year, drop it in

0:19:24.560 --> 0:19:26.800
<v Speaker 1>the chat if you haven't already subscribed to Fancy Pros

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:29.919
<v Speaker 1>MLB channel, and then you can become an official Peanut

0:19:30.160 --> 0:19:33.119
<v Speaker 1>and cracker Jack. Oh here's what mister Buster says. I

0:19:33.160 --> 0:19:35.800
<v Speaker 1>should be Doctor Evil and you should be mister Bigglesworth.

0:19:35.840 --> 0:19:37.040
<v Speaker 1>That'd be very funny.

0:19:37.359 --> 0:19:38.840
<v Speaker 2>That be hilarious.

0:19:39.000 --> 0:19:39.640
<v Speaker 1>What are you doing?

0:19:40.440 --> 0:19:44.280
<v Speaker 2>I'd rather be I'll just be a shark with a

0:19:44.320 --> 0:19:45.000
<v Speaker 2>laser on me.

0:19:45.160 --> 0:19:47.119
<v Speaker 1>If somebody asked me how much fab should I spend

0:19:47.160 --> 0:19:50.320
<v Speaker 1>on you know player, I was like three billion dollars.

0:19:50.480 --> 0:19:52.080
<v Speaker 1>That's how much you spend on him. I think it's

0:19:52.080 --> 0:19:54.639
<v Speaker 1>a great idea. All right, let's go to some of

0:19:54.680 --> 0:19:57.440
<v Speaker 1>the stat heroes. Tyler Molly, we talked about him. Twelve k's,

0:19:57.560 --> 0:19:59.760
<v Speaker 1>nine innings, eight and two thirds for Miles Michelas six,

0:20:00.440 --> 0:20:03.359
<v Speaker 1>Chris Bassett was brilliant, seven k's, Gonsolin six k's and

0:20:03.400 --> 0:20:07.040
<v Speaker 1>no earned in six. Nick Pavetta another one. I'm telling you,

0:20:07.119 --> 0:20:09.119
<v Speaker 1>Nick Pavett has been on this role. I don't know

0:20:09.119 --> 0:20:10.760
<v Speaker 1>if this is the new Nick Pavetta. I don't know

0:20:10.760 --> 0:20:13.320
<v Speaker 1>if it's the Nick Pavetta. We can believe in holy crap,

0:20:13.359 --> 0:20:15.600
<v Speaker 1>this guy's been outstanding and I keep pound the table

0:20:15.640 --> 0:20:18.640
<v Speaker 1>for him in these tournaments on DK as the secondary

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:20.080
<v Speaker 1>arm and I hope you've been using him, but he

0:20:20.119 --> 0:20:23.080
<v Speaker 1>has been money man eight innings, one earned run, Goldschmid

0:20:23.119 --> 0:20:25.119
<v Speaker 1>four for four with two dongs. We also had two

0:20:25.160 --> 0:20:28.359
<v Speaker 1>homers from Hoskins, two from Contreras, Ryan Mountcastle hit a

0:20:28.359 --> 0:20:30.879
<v Speaker 1>home run. Mike Mayer lost his mind. I'm sure he

0:20:30.920 --> 0:20:32.960
<v Speaker 1>took his shirt off, rubed oyle On himself, ran around

0:20:32.960 --> 0:20:35.640
<v Speaker 1>the house. Travis Darnault three for five, one home run,

0:20:35.680 --> 0:20:38.359
<v Speaker 1>Luke Vod hit a home run, Michael Harris hit a

0:20:38.359 --> 0:20:40.760
<v Speaker 1>home run as well, and Haysu's aguilar two for five

0:20:40.760 --> 0:20:42.680
<v Speaker 1>with a dinger. Can he talk to me about Michael Harris?

0:20:42.720 --> 0:20:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Give me the scouting report on Michael Harris because a

0:20:45.080 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of people ask him questions about him in the chat.

0:20:47.040 --> 0:20:51.159
<v Speaker 3>He's a crazy plus speed, great defender, makes tons and

0:20:51.200 --> 0:20:54.800
<v Speaker 3>tons of contact. One of the big things that he

0:20:54.840 --> 0:20:58.080
<v Speaker 3>had done over the last like I don't know, a

0:20:58.160 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 3>year and a half or so, he'd really started the

0:21:00.880 --> 0:21:03.360
<v Speaker 3>develop into power, which was like a huge key for him.

0:21:03.800 --> 0:21:03.919
<v Speaker 1>Uh.

0:21:04.200 --> 0:21:06.000
<v Speaker 3>Just pulling up here just so I have the stats

0:21:06.040 --> 0:21:08.040
<v Speaker 3>in front of me. So far this year in the miners,

0:21:08.040 --> 0:21:11.240
<v Speaker 3>he had had five homers, eleven stolen bases with a

0:21:11.240 --> 0:21:14.960
<v Speaker 3>three or five average. Last year seven homers, twenty seven

0:21:15.280 --> 0:21:18.200
<v Speaker 3>stolen bases with a two ninety four and the home

0:21:18.280 --> 0:21:20.399
<v Speaker 3>run clip looks like it was doubling against. This is

0:21:20.400 --> 0:21:22.760
<v Speaker 3>one of those guys with high contact ability that was

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:24.280
<v Speaker 3>starting to learn to hit for power.

0:21:25.000 --> 0:21:25.840
<v Speaker 2>He's a game changer.

0:21:26.080 --> 0:21:29.000
<v Speaker 3>He's a five tool I mean he's I think he's

0:21:29.000 --> 0:21:31.560
<v Speaker 3>a five tool potential. But ultimately he's one of those

0:21:31.600 --> 0:21:34.000
<v Speaker 3>guys that you would put at the top of the order.

0:21:34.040 --> 0:21:37.919
<v Speaker 3>I actually think you could maybe get like shades of

0:21:37.960 --> 0:21:40.560
<v Speaker 3>the good Victor Roeblish, Remember the Victor Roblish you wanted.

0:21:41.080 --> 0:21:43.360
<v Speaker 3>I think that's where like Michael Harris is like, he's

0:21:43.359 --> 0:21:44.560
<v Speaker 3>gonna make a ton of contact.

0:21:44.640 --> 0:21:47.200
<v Speaker 2>He does have a beautiful swing. He's probably not say.

0:21:47.119 --> 0:21:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Michael Taylor is a player here, reminded me of like bigger, Yeah,

0:21:52.320 --> 0:21:54.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm not. I'm like, what like of what you could

0:21:54.040 --> 0:21:55.399
<v Speaker 1>expect from him kind of thing like that.

0:21:55.520 --> 0:21:59.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, probably like like in a season at at I

0:21:59.640 --> 0:22:03.520
<v Speaker 3>don't want peak, but like projectable. I would put Michael

0:22:03.520 --> 0:22:06.440
<v Speaker 3>Harris as like a fifteen thirty type of guy, which

0:22:06.480 --> 0:22:10.560
<v Speaker 3>is going to be very, very valuable, a fantastic defender

0:22:10.640 --> 0:22:12.760
<v Speaker 3>for that team, and it's on a great team that's

0:22:12.760 --> 0:22:14.920
<v Speaker 3>gonna let him be hyper aggressive on the bass pass.

0:22:14.960 --> 0:22:17.160
<v Speaker 2>So, I mean he had eleven ROAs early on.

0:22:17.720 --> 0:22:20.480
<v Speaker 1>We're getting trolled by Mayor here. Victor Roblest was never

0:22:20.560 --> 0:22:21.120
<v Speaker 1>really good.

0:22:21.200 --> 0:22:23.639
<v Speaker 3>No, he that can't well, I said, I said, the

0:22:23.720 --> 0:22:26.800
<v Speaker 3>Victor Robot, the good Victor Robles that we wanted, that we.

0:22:26.640 --> 0:22:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Were we wanted, which are some glimpses, but unfortunately just

0:22:29.560 --> 0:22:31.919
<v Speaker 1>never happened. Trent Fleming was the first to get the

0:22:31.920 --> 0:22:33.440
<v Speaker 1>answer right. It's the Arizona Diamondback.

0:22:33.560 --> 0:22:35.800
<v Speaker 3>I was gonna say that, but I didn't want to

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:38.159
<v Speaker 3>be the stupid homer that I always can be about it.

0:22:38.200 --> 0:22:42.159
<v Speaker 2>But what stopped me was I was trying to remember Upton.

0:22:42.440 --> 0:22:43.320
<v Speaker 2>Did Upton do it?

0:22:43.359 --> 0:22:45.080
<v Speaker 3>Because we haven't had a lot of good rookies as

0:22:45.080 --> 0:22:47.080
<v Speaker 3>a diamonback fan Drew, I don't.

0:22:46.960 --> 0:22:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Know, no Brandon Webb, none of those guys. Nope.

0:22:52.040 --> 0:22:54.240
<v Speaker 3>I didn't even think web so all here. Yeah, I

0:22:54.240 --> 0:22:55.400
<v Speaker 3>mean Arizona diamics makes sense.

0:22:55.400 --> 0:22:56.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean they're only.

0:22:56.160 --> 0:22:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Web want to Cy Young though, But he didn't.

0:22:58.040 --> 0:22:59.680
<v Speaker 3>He did win a young but I don't. I don't

0:22:59.680 --> 0:23:01.600
<v Speaker 3>think he was good in his rookie year. It took

0:23:01.640 --> 0:23:03.080
<v Speaker 3>him a while to really find it. Took him a

0:23:03.119 --> 0:23:05.680
<v Speaker 3>little bit, I remember watching to find that, to find

0:23:05.720 --> 0:23:08.040
<v Speaker 3>that ground ball like success rate, Like you can throw

0:23:08.080 --> 0:23:10.240
<v Speaker 3>sinkers and stuff, but it doesn't mean you're gonna be

0:23:10.240 --> 0:23:10.959
<v Speaker 3>successful with it.

0:23:10.960 --> 0:23:11.800
<v Speaker 2>It took them a little bit.

0:23:11.840 --> 0:23:13.760
<v Speaker 3>But I thought I thought Upton was my one. But

0:23:13.760 --> 0:23:16.520
<v Speaker 3>the man team's only been around for whatever.

0:23:17.000 --> 0:23:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Oh you figured it was a later team. But you know,

0:23:19.560 --> 0:23:21.560
<v Speaker 1>some of these, you know, like the Rays have had

0:23:21.600 --> 0:23:23.359
<v Speaker 1>a few. You know. It's some of the you know,

0:23:23.400 --> 0:23:25.520
<v Speaker 1>expansion teams over the years have actually had a bunch

0:23:25.640 --> 0:23:27.760
<v Speaker 1>because they've had to it had to grow these young talent,

0:23:27.800 --> 0:23:29.159
<v Speaker 1>and they got a lot of high draft picks, so

0:23:29.160 --> 0:23:31.159
<v Speaker 1>sometimes you convert them. But I thought that was very

0:23:31.200 --> 0:23:33.240
<v Speaker 1>interesting that Arizona was the only team in MLB that

0:23:33.440 --> 0:23:37.000
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have a ROI in their history. The most ever,

0:23:37.119 --> 0:23:39.520
<v Speaker 1>by the ways, the Dodgers between Brooklyn and Los Angeles,

0:23:39.520 --> 0:23:42.479
<v Speaker 1>they are a Rookie of the year machine. Nobody's had

0:23:42.520 --> 0:23:43.520
<v Speaker 1>more than the Dodgers.

0:23:43.800 --> 0:23:44.840
<v Speaker 2>Is what the number is?

0:23:46.200 --> 0:23:48.080
<v Speaker 1>H Yeah, I have to go back and bring it

0:23:48.119 --> 0:23:49.400
<v Speaker 1>up there. It was a lot.

0:23:49.720 --> 0:23:51.639
<v Speaker 2>I'm just curious because I think that is interesting. It's

0:23:51.680 --> 0:23:52.119
<v Speaker 2>gonna be a bit.

0:23:52.160 --> 0:23:53.879
<v Speaker 3>I mean that Beck's got a couple of guys coming up,

0:23:54.160 --> 0:23:57.720
<v Speaker 3>Corbyn Carroll, Jordan Lawler this coming draft in about a month.

0:23:58.000 --> 0:23:59.840
<v Speaker 3>They had the two overall picks, so they got some

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:02.800
<v Speaker 3>hive like, high high volume type of guys. It's just

0:24:03.480 --> 0:24:06.200
<v Speaker 3>put that put that stuff together. Man, they don't do it.

0:24:06.680 --> 0:24:07.320
<v Speaker 2>They don't do it.

0:24:07.359 --> 0:24:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Sean Mania was a dud five earned four innings. Trevor Rodgers.

0:24:11.200 --> 0:24:14.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm just something intervention. Can we have an

0:24:14.640 --> 0:24:16.240
<v Speaker 1>intervention like on how I met your mother? When you

0:24:16.400 --> 0:24:19.200
<v Speaker 1>have that banner? They would have like interventions for their friends.

0:24:19.240 --> 0:24:20.960
<v Speaker 1>I need one for Trevor Rodgers. We just need to

0:24:20.960 --> 0:24:23.160
<v Speaker 1>figure something out here. I think I've never been more

0:24:23.160 --> 0:24:26.320
<v Speaker 1>disappointed in a player I've been in Trevor Rodgers this year.

0:24:28.520 --> 0:24:32.000
<v Speaker 2>You just you take your mouse, You're going you clicked

0:24:32.000 --> 0:24:33.840
<v Speaker 2>over by his name. Depending where you are.

0:24:34.320 --> 0:24:37.680
<v Speaker 3>Sometimes there's a little red stripe. Uh yeah, I see,

0:24:38.320 --> 0:24:41.400
<v Speaker 3>there's there's some numbers. Sometimes there's some letters, the one

0:24:41.480 --> 0:24:47.800
<v Speaker 3>look for the one who the r oh ah, and.

0:24:47.760 --> 0:24:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Then okay, yeah, okay, and then hit y okay, yeah,

0:24:52.520 --> 0:24:53.240
<v Speaker 1>there you go. Drop.

0:24:54.160 --> 0:24:56.880
<v Speaker 2>That's the best thing you Rogers doesn't feel better?

0:24:57.160 --> 0:24:59.960
<v Speaker 1>The only thing I do I feel. I feel glorious.

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:02.199
<v Speaker 1>By the way. The answer to your question, because I

0:25:02.280 --> 0:25:05.560
<v Speaker 1>just looked it up, the Dodgers have eighteen Rookies of

0:25:05.640 --> 0:25:09.960
<v Speaker 1>the year eighteen. The next closest is the Yankees with nine.

0:25:10.760 --> 0:25:12.720
<v Speaker 2>What was that was wasn't.

0:25:12.520 --> 0:25:16.400
<v Speaker 3>That equate to like like a ten percent of Baseball's

0:25:16.480 --> 0:25:18.280
<v Speaker 3>Rookie of the Year's NL's Rookie.

0:25:18.240 --> 0:25:20.439
<v Speaker 1>I mean, since they were award in nineteen forty, I

0:25:20.480 --> 0:25:24.280
<v Speaker 1>mean nineteen forty something whatever they started, I mean forty seven, well,

0:25:24.320 --> 0:25:26.200
<v Speaker 1>you gotta realize they had forty seven forty nine is

0:25:26.240 --> 0:25:29.200
<v Speaker 1>like the Jackie Robinson, Roy Campanella, Don Dukam year's right,

0:25:29.240 --> 0:25:32.680
<v Speaker 1>forty nine, fifty two, fifty three, sixty sixty five, sixty nine,

0:25:32.920 --> 0:25:35.320
<v Speaker 1>seventy nine through eighty two. Right, So in the sixties

0:25:35.359 --> 0:25:37.720
<v Speaker 1>they had like the Colfax, Drysdale, all that group. Then

0:25:37.720 --> 0:25:39.679
<v Speaker 1>in the seventies they had that run right seventy nine

0:25:39.760 --> 0:25:42.480
<v Speaker 1>to eighty two where they had some fantastic young players

0:25:42.880 --> 0:25:45.720
<v Speaker 1>ninety two to ninety six, which was the Jdeo Nomo

0:25:45.920 --> 0:25:49.840
<v Speaker 1>period Raulmandesi period, if you remember those dudes, right, that

0:25:49.960 --> 0:25:52.040
<v Speaker 1>was that run where they had four in a row,

0:25:52.800 --> 0:25:54.600
<v Speaker 1>four in a row ninety two to ninety six, and

0:25:54.640 --> 0:25:56.520
<v Speaker 1>then twenty sixteen and twenty seventeen too.

0:25:56.600 --> 0:25:59.080
<v Speaker 3>I mean, just I mean, and if the Rookie of

0:25:59.119 --> 0:26:00.959
<v Speaker 3>the Year award is eight eighty years old and they

0:26:01.320 --> 0:26:04.359
<v Speaker 3>accumulate eighteen of them, I mean they are closing in

0:26:04.400 --> 0:26:07.679
<v Speaker 3>on twenty five percent of rookie of the years have

0:26:07.760 --> 0:26:09.159
<v Speaker 3>gone to the Dodgers.

0:26:09.480 --> 0:26:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Here's that run by the way ninety two, Eric Harros

0:26:11.920 --> 0:26:15.760
<v Speaker 1>ninety three, Piazza ninety four, Monda Sea ninety five, U

0:26:16.000 --> 0:26:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Hideo Nomo. Then Todd Hollinds Worth closing out ninety six

0:26:19.640 --> 0:26:23.240
<v Speaker 1>ladies and Tom and Todd Holland's worth. Let's go get

0:26:23.280 --> 0:26:26.520
<v Speaker 1>expect that. On today's show, Hitters who sucked yesterday? Josh

0:26:26.640 --> 0:26:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Rojas over four three k's, Brendan marsh over three three

0:26:29.760 --> 0:26:31.920
<v Speaker 1>k's back to his old habits, Brendan Rodgers over four

0:26:31.960 --> 0:26:35.120
<v Speaker 1>three k. So it's a short lived good burst for Rogers.

0:26:35.200 --> 0:26:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Boba Schett over five with three k's, Cody Bellinger over

0:26:37.760 --> 0:26:41.840
<v Speaker 1>three with two k's, and then we had someone named

0:26:42.320 --> 0:26:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Tucupita Marcano over today.

0:26:45.880 --> 0:26:52.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Marcinkupeita Marcano, former poet to Austin.

0:26:52.560 --> 0:26:55.320
<v Speaker 2>I know we don't want we can't get drawn into

0:26:55.359 --> 0:26:55.840
<v Speaker 2>this too much.

0:26:56.400 --> 0:27:00.000
<v Speaker 3>Are you all worried about Bobaschett just throwing it out

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:03.800
<v Speaker 3>out there? Batting average two sixty five, highest career K

0:27:03.960 --> 0:27:08.639
<v Speaker 3>percentage at least since his rookie year ISOs down.

0:27:09.200 --> 0:27:12.159
<v Speaker 1>Projector a counter question for your question. Somebody just asked me,

0:27:12.200 --> 0:27:15.200
<v Speaker 1>would you trade Josh Hater for Bobaschet? And I said, ooh,

0:27:15.240 --> 0:27:19.400
<v Speaker 1>it's a head to head category league just redrafts, yeah,

0:27:19.480 --> 0:27:21.520
<v Speaker 1>redraft head heead categories. Would you make that trade?

0:27:22.840 --> 0:27:26.000
<v Speaker 2>I would trade my Hater for Bishett?

0:27:26.840 --> 0:27:28.080
<v Speaker 1>You would do it? Now?

0:27:28.119 --> 0:27:30.239
<v Speaker 3>I assume if you're I'm assuming if you're doing it,

0:27:30.320 --> 0:27:32.960
<v Speaker 3>you've got other closers or does it?

0:27:33.080 --> 0:27:35.560
<v Speaker 1>He said he would just be putting starters into the

0:27:35.560 --> 0:27:38.240
<v Speaker 1>closer role. So basically you're punting saves, which is okay

0:27:38.280 --> 0:27:40.280
<v Speaker 1>because you're giving yourself bigger chances on w's.

0:27:40.760 --> 0:27:43.080
<v Speaker 3>You know what, I would, because if all you have

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:46.040
<v Speaker 3>is Hater holding you up, you're probably middleligning in saves.

0:27:46.080 --> 0:27:47.840
<v Speaker 3>If that's the only guy that you're putting out there,

0:27:47.840 --> 0:27:50.080
<v Speaker 3>and you're not if you can't bring in any sodas

0:27:50.160 --> 0:27:52.760
<v Speaker 3>or anything like that, I would. I guess there's just

0:27:52.800 --> 0:27:55.520
<v Speaker 3>something about like two months of this that makes me

0:27:55.520 --> 0:27:58.240
<v Speaker 3>a little bit worried. His contact percentage is the lowest

0:27:58.280 --> 0:28:01.000
<v Speaker 3>of his career. It's down four point from last year,

0:28:01.119 --> 0:28:03.920
<v Speaker 3>which I don't love. His swinging strike percentage is the highest.

0:28:04.119 --> 0:28:07.439
<v Speaker 3>Looks like he's really been struggling with I mean continuously

0:28:07.600 --> 0:28:10.840
<v Speaker 3>as off speed sliders and stuff. And it's the second

0:28:10.920 --> 0:28:13.720
<v Speaker 3>lowest contact percentage. It's two and a half points lower

0:28:13.760 --> 0:28:16.000
<v Speaker 3>than it was last year, and it just doesn't changed.

0:28:16.040 --> 0:28:18.080
<v Speaker 3>And I guess that's what worries me just a tiny bit.

0:28:18.160 --> 0:28:21.760
<v Speaker 3>But still even that projection systems are closing in on

0:28:21.840 --> 0:28:23.880
<v Speaker 3>thirty homers in double digital and basis, so I guess

0:28:23.880 --> 0:28:26.439
<v Speaker 3>you can't complain he's just not the same player. And

0:28:26.440 --> 0:28:28.320
<v Speaker 3>that actually is a perfect example. I think of a

0:28:28.320 --> 0:28:31.440
<v Speaker 3>good discount that you can get in Bobashett for Hater,

0:28:31.600 --> 0:28:35.920
<v Speaker 3>except Hater just represents the pinnacle of one specific position.

0:28:36.000 --> 0:28:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Right, Yeah, if you only got one basic good points,

0:28:37.840 --> 0:28:40.479
<v Speaker 1>I think I would all right. Plus, there gets more

0:28:40.520 --> 0:28:41.960
<v Speaker 1>closers in the second half. They'll pop up on the

0:28:41.960 --> 0:28:43.520
<v Speaker 1>waiver wire when guys get traded. Let's look at the

0:28:43.520 --> 0:28:46.520
<v Speaker 1>home run board pretty much the same as yesterday. Two

0:28:46.560 --> 0:28:49.360
<v Speaker 1>other people, one of them might be named Mike Mayer,

0:28:49.560 --> 0:28:52.360
<v Speaker 1>also tied at nineteen after yesterday's Hoskins home runs. But

0:28:52.400 --> 0:28:53.240
<v Speaker 1>I like that he's.

0:28:53.080 --> 0:28:55.920
<v Speaker 2>Not on it. I like that Joey p at nineteen

0:28:56.200 --> 0:28:57.800
<v Speaker 2>and not like mayor.

0:28:58.200 --> 0:29:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Just two other people just two other peoples. Let's talk

0:29:00.600 --> 0:29:02.840
<v Speaker 1>about some betting pros, and let's talk about betmgm, the

0:29:02.920 --> 0:29:07.280
<v Speaker 1>King of Sportsbooks. Bet ten dollars win two hundred. Whenever

0:29:07.400 --> 0:29:10.160
<v Speaker 1>you use that promo code leading off, new users go

0:29:10.240 --> 0:29:12.600
<v Speaker 1>to bed mgm, download the app, or go to bedmgm

0:29:12.640 --> 0:29:14.760
<v Speaker 1>dot com. When you do bet ten dollars to win

0:29:14.800 --> 0:29:17.719
<v Speaker 1>two hundred, doesn't matter what the outcome is. That's what

0:29:17.800 --> 0:29:20.800
<v Speaker 1>you do over at betmgm, the King of sports Books.

0:29:20.840 --> 0:29:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Again leading off, one word, that is the promo code

0:29:23.480 --> 0:29:25.880
<v Speaker 1>to use today. I got at Corbyn Burns on the

0:29:25.920 --> 0:29:27.720
<v Speaker 1>over on the strikeouts at six and a half. That

0:29:27.800 --> 0:29:30.959
<v Speaker 1>numbers on DK minus one thirty five at sugar House

0:29:31.360 --> 0:29:34.800
<v Speaker 1>task Gernandez is at one and a half a total basis,

0:29:35.320 --> 0:29:37.320
<v Speaker 1>that is at minus one seventeen. I like that number.

0:29:37.360 --> 0:29:39.440
<v Speaker 1>I like the plus one twenty number on the total

0:29:39.440 --> 0:29:41.160
<v Speaker 1>basis one and a half of Mike Troad on DK.

0:29:42.320 --> 0:29:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Same with Mookie bets. You get even money on the

0:29:44.040 --> 0:29:46.920
<v Speaker 1>one and a half total basis. You've got some McClanahan

0:29:48.280 --> 0:29:49.960
<v Speaker 1>interest this day, Is that correct?

0:29:49.960 --> 0:29:52.440
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's always mclann it's always I mean, I'm always

0:29:52.600 --> 0:29:55.480
<v Speaker 3>going to want to play McClanahan when he goes out there,

0:29:55.520 --> 0:29:57.600
<v Speaker 3>so you should be able to pick that. Apart from me,

0:29:57.960 --> 0:30:00.880
<v Speaker 3>mcclanahan's at six and a half on the over for

0:30:01.320 --> 0:30:03.360
<v Speaker 3>against the New York met New York Yankees.

0:30:03.520 --> 0:30:06.320
<v Speaker 2>What I like about it? He has seven straight or

0:30:06.320 --> 0:30:09.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm sorry, he struck out seven in more in six

0:30:09.160 --> 0:30:12.080
<v Speaker 2>of his last starts, in six straight starts and against

0:30:12.120 --> 0:30:15.840
<v Speaker 2>the Yankees. Just totally tied up here against the Yankees,

0:30:15.840 --> 0:30:17.600
<v Speaker 2>which I believe was his second or third start to go.

0:30:18.160 --> 0:30:20.600
<v Speaker 2>He had seven, So six straight games where he's had

0:30:20.640 --> 0:30:23.040
<v Speaker 2>at least seven or more strikeouts. The prop is at

0:30:23.040 --> 0:30:24.960
<v Speaker 2>six and a half. I always bet it.

0:30:25.000 --> 0:30:27.960
<v Speaker 3>They're actually the algorithm here is telling you to play

0:30:27.960 --> 0:30:30.080
<v Speaker 3>the under. At least it likes the under because it's

0:30:30.080 --> 0:30:32.920
<v Speaker 3>at one oh five plus money. But I'm going to

0:30:33.000 --> 0:30:34.800
<v Speaker 3>take the over on my klan of hand, it's a

0:30:34.880 --> 0:30:36.760
<v Speaker 3>half decent team to go up against the Yankees. And

0:30:36.800 --> 0:30:38.960
<v Speaker 3>then I'm actually going to go against something that I

0:30:38.960 --> 0:30:41.480
<v Speaker 3>always want to do. I always want to bet Spencer Strider.

0:30:41.560 --> 0:30:44.120
<v Speaker 3>I always want that number. But the books have put

0:30:44.120 --> 0:30:47.040
<v Speaker 3>it so high you never see, you know, they don't

0:30:47.080 --> 0:30:48.880
<v Speaker 3>even dabble at four and a half or five and

0:30:48.880 --> 0:30:51.800
<v Speaker 3>a half anymore. So this is actually an agreement I

0:30:51.840 --> 0:30:55.880
<v Speaker 3>have with the Betting Pros MLB prop sheet, which you

0:30:55.880 --> 0:30:58.080
<v Speaker 3>guys can check at Betting Pros. Just if you also

0:30:58.160 --> 0:31:00.560
<v Speaker 3>can type in prop sheet Betting pro prom sheet and.

0:31:00.520 --> 0:31:01.239
<v Speaker 2>It'll pop right up.

0:31:01.480 --> 0:31:04.640
<v Speaker 3>They've got the under on strikeouts for Spencer Strider, and

0:31:04.680 --> 0:31:08.320
<v Speaker 3>he's going up against Washington. Washington strikes out the second

0:31:08.480 --> 0:31:12.120
<v Speaker 3>least in Major League Baseball. Strider has only hit seven

0:31:12.160 --> 0:31:15.800
<v Speaker 3>strikeouts twice this year, and he's only gone over five

0:31:15.840 --> 0:31:19.120
<v Speaker 3>innings once. He's obviously getting into form a little bit more.

0:31:19.280 --> 0:31:20.320
<v Speaker 2>They're stretching on a.

0:31:20.320 --> 0:31:22.880
<v Speaker 3>Bit more, but this is not the team that I

0:31:22.920 --> 0:31:25.160
<v Speaker 3>would be looking for him to be able to get

0:31:25.200 --> 0:31:27.960
<v Speaker 3>seven strikeouts on. So I actually really like the under

0:31:28.000 --> 0:31:30.800
<v Speaker 3>on Spencer Strider, and I love the over on mcclana hand.

0:31:30.880 --> 0:31:33.680
<v Speaker 1>So, all right, DFS is simple tonight, boys and girls,

0:31:33.680 --> 0:31:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Shane McClanahan versus Nester Cortez, pick aside. I'm gonna pick

0:31:36.560 --> 0:31:38.600
<v Speaker 1>the McLanahan side. Then I'm gonna go with Barrios as

0:31:38.640 --> 0:31:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the secondary arm at eight point nine because he has

0:31:40.600 --> 0:31:43.600
<v Speaker 1>been better lately. So I'm just gonna go ahead and

0:31:43.600 --> 0:31:46.240
<v Speaker 1>take a chance on that. If you want to switch

0:31:46.280 --> 0:31:49.280
<v Speaker 1>around and go with Corbyn Burns, having McClanahan lineup with Barrios.

0:31:49.400 --> 0:31:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Have a Corbyn Burns line up with Barrios. I think

0:31:51.480 --> 0:31:53.880
<v Speaker 1>that's the way to go. Single picture site. You have

0:31:53.920 --> 0:31:56.800
<v Speaker 1>a McLanahan lineup, you have a Nester Cortez, you have

0:31:56.840 --> 0:31:58.720
<v Speaker 1>a Corbyn Burns. If you want to play in cash,

0:31:58.760 --> 0:32:00.800
<v Speaker 1>you have to kind of pick and chew. I'm still

0:32:00.800 --> 0:32:03.040
<v Speaker 1>on the McClanahan side. He's just been so dominant. That's

0:32:03.080 --> 0:32:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the way I'm going. And then Barrios is your tournament

0:32:06.040 --> 0:32:09.080
<v Speaker 1>pitcher at eight point seven Stacks tonight San Diego, Boston,

0:32:09.120 --> 0:32:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Saint Louis DK lineup builders you got Nico Horner three four,

0:32:12.760 --> 0:32:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Delan Carlson at three, k Adam Duval three five, also

0:32:16.480 --> 0:32:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Justin Turner on FanDuel two six, Taskars Nandez a two

0:32:19.520 --> 0:32:22.960
<v Speaker 1>five and Frank Schwindel at two point five. Also, I'm

0:32:23.000 --> 0:32:27.040
<v Speaker 1>going Manny Machado tonight in Chicago for my dinger. Where

0:32:27.040 --> 0:32:28.320
<v Speaker 1>you going Welsh for your home run.

0:32:28.360 --> 0:32:30.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna go back to my roots. I'm gonna go

0:32:30.360 --> 0:32:33.120
<v Speaker 3>back to what got me here, Byron Buxton. I'm going

0:32:33.120 --> 0:32:37.920
<v Speaker 3>back to Byron Buckston's got a great career PVB versus

0:32:38.640 --> 0:32:41.840
<v Speaker 3>our BVP versus Marco Gonzaz who's going up against tonight.

0:32:41.840 --> 0:32:44.280
<v Speaker 3>And I would also add I like the total base

0:32:44.360 --> 0:32:47.080
<v Speaker 3>marker for him as well. It's even money. He hits

0:32:47.080 --> 0:32:51.600
<v Speaker 3>Gonzales pretty well. I'm going back, going, going back back.

0:32:51.360 --> 0:32:53.960
<v Speaker 2>To Buxton Bucks County. I need to get back to

0:32:53.960 --> 0:32:54.760
<v Speaker 2>those roots.

0:32:55.200 --> 0:32:57.480
<v Speaker 1>There you go, There you have it. Mike Merrick continuing

0:32:57.520 --> 0:33:00.240
<v Speaker 1>to stay with his boy Rhys Hoskins. He is, he's

0:33:00.280 --> 0:33:02.239
<v Speaker 1>doubling down, so we'll see that if that works for him.

0:33:02.280 --> 0:33:03.719
<v Speaker 1>And if you want to get in that home run contest,

0:33:03.760 --> 0:33:06.760
<v Speaker 1>join our discord Fancaybros. Dot Com slash Chat free to join,

0:33:07.040 --> 0:33:10.360
<v Speaker 1>but if you're a Premium Pro subscriber you get access

0:33:10.400 --> 0:33:13.280
<v Speaker 1>to stages with welsh Ama channels with me. They are

0:33:13.320 --> 0:33:16.080
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of fun stuff, and you can also participate

0:33:16.160 --> 0:33:20.400
<v Speaker 1>in the Ryan Mountcastle channel that Mike Mayor has spearheaded,

0:33:20.400 --> 0:33:23.680
<v Speaker 1>which is very very popular. You know what that channel

0:33:23.840 --> 0:33:26.000
<v Speaker 1>and Mike Mayor, I think those are the two people

0:33:26.000 --> 0:33:26.440
<v Speaker 1>in it.

0:33:26.320 --> 0:33:28.960
<v Speaker 3>And Ryan Mountcastle, like I could see that channel being

0:33:29.000 --> 0:33:30.120
<v Speaker 3>something where he added Ryan.

0:33:30.320 --> 0:33:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Actually it's a guy named Brian Mountcastle, so I don't

0:33:33.080 --> 0:33:33.640
<v Speaker 1>know if that's Eve.

0:33:33.760 --> 0:33:36.000
<v Speaker 3>I like the idea that there's a room that Mike

0:33:36.040 --> 0:33:38.640
<v Speaker 3>Mayor sits in every day and then he's just he's

0:33:38.640 --> 0:33:41.360
<v Speaker 3>sent an invite to Mountcastle and he's just wait. Every day,

0:33:41.400 --> 0:33:43.520
<v Speaker 3>it's him waiting for Ryan to join the room.

0:33:43.560 --> 0:33:44.280
<v Speaker 2>Did he join today?

0:33:44.320 --> 0:33:47.120
<v Speaker 1>He had a Twitter campaign for Ryan Mountcastle to follow

0:33:47.160 --> 0:33:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Mike Mayor on Twitter. Oh that's all I want. If

0:33:49.120 --> 0:33:50.520
<v Speaker 1>he hasn't already, he probably doesn't.

0:33:50.560 --> 0:33:51.240
<v Speaker 2>Oh, you know what, I know?

0:33:51.240 --> 0:33:53.320
<v Speaker 3>We got to go who would be the one baseball

0:33:53.320 --> 0:33:56.000
<v Speaker 3>player that should follow each person? And Buxton would clearly

0:33:56.000 --> 0:33:58.520
<v Speaker 3>be mine? Should follow me Mountcastle?

0:33:58.680 --> 0:34:00.719
<v Speaker 2>For Mayor? Who would be for me?

0:34:01.320 --> 0:34:11.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, No, because a good one. I'm no,

0:34:11.160 --> 0:34:13.239
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I would probably want somebody who like

0:34:13.360 --> 0:34:15.960
<v Speaker 1>is maybe very unliked. May think that would be funny.

0:34:16.040 --> 0:34:20.879
<v Speaker 1>You know it's almost Angel Hernandez. I want no thank

0:34:20.920 --> 0:34:24.480
<v Speaker 1>you On that note, We're getting out of here before

0:34:24.520 --> 0:34:26.799
<v Speaker 1>this goes awry. Thanks for hanging out with us, talking

0:34:26.880 --> 0:34:28.920
<v Speaker 1>to baseball back again tomorrow a new needster to do

0:34:28.960 --> 0:34:31.279
<v Speaker 1>it all again. Plus check out the Bilo sell High

0:34:31.320 --> 0:34:34.000
<v Speaker 1>video that it's up on Fantasy Rose MLB right now.

0:34:34.040 --> 0:34:36.239
<v Speaker 1>Make sure you like this video and subscribe as well

0:34:36.440 --> 0:34:39.480
<v Speaker 1>to Fantasy Rose m LB channel over on the YouTube

0:34:39.480 --> 0:34:40.640
<v Speaker 1>and I'll do it for us, but the story of

0:34:40.640 --> 0:34:43.279
<v Speaker 1>the game goes on for Welsh. I'm Joey P See

0:34:43.280 --> 0:35:05.320
<v Speaker 1>you next time, kids,