WEBVTT - The Big Tech Stories of 2024 

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Tech Stuff, a production from iHeartRadio. Hey there,

0:00:12.480 --> 0:00:16.320
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host Jonathan Strickland.

0:00:16.320 --> 0:00:19.599
<v Speaker 1>I'm an executive producer with iHeart Podcasts and how the

0:00:19.680 --> 0:00:22.880
<v Speaker 1>tech are you. Well, it's time for us to look

0:00:22.920 --> 0:00:26.360
<v Speaker 1>back on some of the big tech stories that shaped

0:00:26.720 --> 0:00:29.840
<v Speaker 1>the last twelve months. I always like to take some

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:32.000
<v Speaker 1>time at the end of a year to reflect back

0:00:32.080 --> 0:00:35.960
<v Speaker 1>on what has happened, and this year, there was an

0:00:36.080 --> 0:00:38.839
<v Speaker 1>awful lot of stuff going on. So we're just going

0:00:38.920 --> 0:00:42.160
<v Speaker 1>to look at some of the big stories and headlines

0:00:42.159 --> 0:00:45.159
<v Speaker 1>in tech in twenty twenty four. This is by no

0:00:45.320 --> 0:00:48.640
<v Speaker 1>means an exhaustive list, and of course some of these

0:00:48.640 --> 0:00:51.920
<v Speaker 1>stories continue to play out. Some of them are arguably

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:54.560
<v Speaker 1>not as big as ones that I left out of

0:00:54.600 --> 0:00:57.000
<v Speaker 1>this list, But these were ones that I thought were

0:00:57.160 --> 0:00:59.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of interesting because I feel like they're a commentary,

0:00:59.840 --> 0:01:03.480
<v Speaker 1>no just on where we are in tech, but where

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:06.480
<v Speaker 1>we're going. But that's enough jibber jabber. We got a

0:01:06.480 --> 0:01:10.479
<v Speaker 1>lot to get through. Let's get started, and where else

0:01:10.520 --> 0:01:14.720
<v Speaker 1>to begin but to talk about AI. No one was

0:01:14.760 --> 0:01:18.560
<v Speaker 1>surprised that artificial intelligence dominated the news cycle in twenty

0:01:18.640 --> 0:01:21.679
<v Speaker 1>twenty four. Everyone said it was going to happen, because

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:23.800
<v Speaker 1>it was clear that that's how it was going to

0:01:24.280 --> 0:01:27.880
<v Speaker 1>turn out, and it did. The gears were already turning

0:01:27.920 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty three. In fact, in late twenty twenty two,

0:01:30.680 --> 0:01:34.080
<v Speaker 1>that's when AI really started to capture the public's attention.

0:01:35.040 --> 0:01:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Generative AI in particular has received a ton of focus.

0:01:40.000 --> 0:01:41.959
<v Speaker 1>Though this is a good time to remind all of

0:01:42.000 --> 0:01:46.319
<v Speaker 1>y'all that generative AI is just one subset of artificial

0:01:46.400 --> 0:01:49.400
<v Speaker 1>intelligence disciplines. Sometimes it can be easy to forget that,

0:01:49.840 --> 0:01:53.800
<v Speaker 1>seeing as how much of our attention goes to generative AI.

0:01:54.080 --> 0:01:57.200
<v Speaker 1>But there are lots of other types of AI. But

0:01:57.280 --> 0:02:00.160
<v Speaker 1>one company that's always at the forefront of these conversation

0:02:00.440 --> 0:02:03.520
<v Speaker 1>is open Ai. That's the company that's perhaps best known

0:02:03.720 --> 0:02:09.200
<v Speaker 1>for chat GPT. Open ai began as a non profit

0:02:09.680 --> 0:02:13.600
<v Speaker 1>organization a few years ago, and it was dedicated to

0:02:13.639 --> 0:02:17.680
<v Speaker 1>the responsible and safe development and deployment of artificial intelligence

0:02:17.720 --> 0:02:20.480
<v Speaker 1>with kind of an open approach. Thus the name like

0:02:20.520 --> 0:02:23.799
<v Speaker 1>this idea that they were going to share their findings

0:02:23.840 --> 0:02:27.560
<v Speaker 1>and research and knowledge with others in order to ensure

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:31.920
<v Speaker 1>that the AI that the company developed would ultimately be

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:36.440
<v Speaker 1>put to beneficial use with the lowest risk of harm,

0:02:37.080 --> 0:02:41.880
<v Speaker 1>but that nonprofit would spawn a for profit arm because,

0:02:41.919 --> 0:02:46.280
<v Speaker 1>as it turns out, AI is crazy expensive. Yo. I mean,

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:50.239
<v Speaker 1>R and D costs a lot, but just running the

0:02:50.240 --> 0:02:54.080
<v Speaker 1>stuff you've already developed also costs a huge amount. And

0:02:54.120 --> 0:02:57.040
<v Speaker 1>I've talked in the past about how AI applications typically

0:02:57.040 --> 0:03:02.200
<v Speaker 1>require enormous amounts of compute power, and that stuff isn't free.

0:03:03.040 --> 0:03:06.280
<v Speaker 1>In fact, in September of this year, New York Times

0:03:06.280 --> 0:03:09.680
<v Speaker 1>reporters Mike Isaac and Aaron Griffith wrote a piece about

0:03:09.680 --> 0:03:13.959
<v Speaker 1>how much money open ai was making versus how much

0:03:14.000 --> 0:03:17.520
<v Speaker 1>it was spending, and the numbers are jaw dropping. The

0:03:17.639 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 1>article is titled open ai is growing fast and burning

0:03:21.280 --> 0:03:24.959
<v Speaker 1>through piles of money, and it published on September twenty seventh,

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:28.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty four. In that piece, the authors revealed that

0:03:28.720 --> 0:03:32.359
<v Speaker 1>open AI's revenue reached three hundred million dollars in August

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:34.800
<v Speaker 1>of this past year. Now that's a lot of cash,

0:03:35.560 --> 0:03:39.960
<v Speaker 1>and the company overall expected a three point seven billion

0:03:40.000 --> 0:03:43.200
<v Speaker 1>dollars in sales by the end of twenty twenty four.

0:03:44.120 --> 0:03:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Now that's even more cash if I'm doing my math right.

0:03:46.880 --> 0:03:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Let's see three point seven billion versus three hundred Yeah, no,

0:03:49.880 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 1>that's a lot. However, this same company was on track

0:03:53.840 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 1>to lose five billion dollars in operating costs. Even with

0:03:58.720 --> 0:04:02.120
<v Speaker 1>all that in consideration, that's how expensive it is to

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 1>run a cutting edge AI company. Some of that money,

0:04:06.000 --> 0:04:09.680
<v Speaker 1>of course, went to normal overhead operations that any regular

0:04:09.760 --> 0:04:12.840
<v Speaker 1>business would encounter, you know, stuff like salaries and office

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:15.480
<v Speaker 1>space and that kind of stuff. But the bulk of

0:04:15.520 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 1>it presumably went to running operations and R and D work. Now.

0:04:19.240 --> 0:04:22.440
<v Speaker 1>I say presumably, because, as Isaac and Griffith point out

0:04:22.520 --> 0:04:26.720
<v Speaker 1>in that article, there were quote several large expenses not

0:04:26.880 --> 0:04:31.239
<v Speaker 1>fully explained in the documents end quote. The cash churn

0:04:31.360 --> 0:04:35.279
<v Speaker 1>prompted several pieces that were speculating that without a truly

0:04:35.400 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 1>massive influx of cash from investors, open Ai could spend

0:04:40.560 --> 0:04:44.799
<v Speaker 1>itself out of business. But then, like literally, the next week,

0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:48.040
<v Speaker 1>headlines announced that open ai had brokeered a six point

0:04:48.080 --> 0:04:53.279
<v Speaker 1>six billion dollar round of new investments. Covering the spread

0:04:53.720 --> 0:04:56.960
<v Speaker 1>if you will. This would put the valuation of open

0:04:57.000 --> 0:05:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Ai at around one hundred and fifty seven billion dollars,

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:05.160
<v Speaker 1>and the company predicted it would hit one hundred billion

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:09.359
<v Speaker 1>dollars in revenue by twenty twenty nine. Which might be

0:05:09.400 --> 0:05:12.479
<v Speaker 1>the case, and investors might be eager enough to see

0:05:12.520 --> 0:05:15.279
<v Speaker 1>that happen in order to, you know, like, they'll continue

0:05:15.320 --> 0:05:18.800
<v Speaker 1>pouring truckloads of cash into the company at a rate

0:05:18.839 --> 0:05:22.359
<v Speaker 1>that just outpaces open AI's spending habits in order to

0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:25.960
<v Speaker 1>actually get to that destination. I always get nervous about

0:05:26.000 --> 0:05:28.520
<v Speaker 1>stories like these because it's hard to believe that this

0:05:28.640 --> 0:05:32.119
<v Speaker 1>is all sustainable. But I guess if folks are determined enough,

0:05:32.400 --> 0:05:37.960
<v Speaker 1>then if they have access to enough resources, anything is possible. Now,

0:05:38.000 --> 0:05:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Earlier this month, I talked about another story involving open Ai,

0:05:41.920 --> 0:05:45.719
<v Speaker 1>one that has raised many concerns. Open Ai has signed

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:49.000
<v Speaker 1>a deal with the defense tech company and a Rill,

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:52.960
<v Speaker 1>which is a total keen reference. That company was founded

0:05:52.960 --> 0:05:58.360
<v Speaker 1>by the creator of the Oculus VR headset, Palmer Lucky. Now, again,

0:05:58.440 --> 0:06:00.680
<v Speaker 1>the original pitch for open ai is that it was

0:06:00.760 --> 0:06:03.360
<v Speaker 1>meant to be an organization dedicated to the safe and

0:06:03.400 --> 0:06:07.240
<v Speaker 1>responsible development of AI. So this announcement has caused a

0:06:07.240 --> 0:06:10.719
<v Speaker 1>lot of concern with people in the AI space, including

0:06:10.760 --> 0:06:17.360
<v Speaker 1>people who were formerly part of open ai itself. So specifically,

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:21.000
<v Speaker 1>these two companies are working to improve US military technology

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:24.880
<v Speaker 1>in order to defend against unpiloted aerial attacks. So you

0:06:24.880 --> 0:06:27.279
<v Speaker 1>can think of it as all right, they're working to

0:06:27.360 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 1>create systems that can identify target and bring down unmanned drones. Now,

0:06:35.160 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 1>considering that the end of this year has also brought

0:06:37.440 --> 0:06:40.919
<v Speaker 1>with it reports of mysterious drones flying over places like

0:06:41.000 --> 0:06:44.520
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey and Pennsylvania and other areas, you could argue

0:06:44.520 --> 0:06:46.880
<v Speaker 1>that there's a growing need for this kind of technology.

0:06:46.960 --> 0:06:50.920
<v Speaker 1>But critics worry that the same tech could be used

0:06:50.920 --> 0:06:55.080
<v Speaker 1>to identify target and bring down normal aircraft, you know,

0:06:55.120 --> 0:06:57.680
<v Speaker 1>the kind that's actually piloted by a human being in

0:06:57.720 --> 0:07:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the cockpit, And that definitely does not sound like it's

0:07:02.040 --> 0:07:07.200
<v Speaker 1>a safe or responsible application for artificial intelligence, especially when

0:07:07.200 --> 0:07:10.800
<v Speaker 1>you consider that AI is far from perfect. It can

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:14.440
<v Speaker 1>make some mistakes. Now, there's a lot more we could

0:07:14.440 --> 0:07:17.960
<v Speaker 1>say about open AI, but let's move on to some

0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:22.120
<v Speaker 1>other companies that made headlines that involve artificial intelligence. Now,

0:07:22.160 --> 0:07:25.520
<v Speaker 1>one of those was in Vidia, which is perhaps best

0:07:25.560 --> 0:07:29.520
<v Speaker 1>known as a company that designs graphics processing units or GPUs.

0:07:30.120 --> 0:07:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Those are the things that gamers and some cryptominers really

0:07:34.240 --> 0:07:36.920
<v Speaker 1>want to get hold of. Well, it turns out that

0:07:37.000 --> 0:07:41.239
<v Speaker 1>parallel processing, which is what GPUs really specialize in, also

0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:45.200
<v Speaker 1>happens to be really great for at least some AI processes,

0:07:45.480 --> 0:07:49.200
<v Speaker 1>and so Nvidia has embraced the AI industry really. In

0:07:49.280 --> 0:07:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Vidia now identifies itself as an AI chip maker and

0:07:52.960 --> 0:07:55.480
<v Speaker 1>has turned out lots of chip designs meant to handle

0:07:55.560 --> 0:07:59.800
<v Speaker 1>large AI compute loads. This has more than doubled Nvidia's

0:07:59.840 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 1>value from the end of twenty twenty three to the

0:08:02.800 --> 0:08:05.840
<v Speaker 1>end of twenty twenty four, which is huge because at

0:08:05.840 --> 0:08:08.160
<v Speaker 1>the end of twenty twenty three, and Video was valued

0:08:08.200 --> 0:08:13.520
<v Speaker 1>at one point two trillion dollars already. That was a

0:08:13.520 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 1>two hundred and forty percent increase over what it had

0:08:16.360 --> 0:08:19.920
<v Speaker 1>been in twenty twenty two. However, today, in twenty twenty four,

0:08:19.960 --> 0:08:23.640
<v Speaker 1>and Vidia's value is at more than three trillion dollars.

0:08:23.920 --> 0:08:26.080
<v Speaker 1>In fact, it puts in Vidia in the top three

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 1>most valuable publicly traded companies, and depending upon when you're

0:08:30.760 --> 0:08:34.160
<v Speaker 1>looking at that list, it typically falls right behind Apple

0:08:34.440 --> 0:08:37.720
<v Speaker 1>and right in front of Microsoft. That kind of depends

0:08:37.760 --> 0:08:40.640
<v Speaker 1>on which day you look at that list, because these

0:08:40.720 --> 0:08:43.600
<v Speaker 1>numbers do shift around a lot. But yeah, Nvidia had

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:46.040
<v Speaker 1>a pretty huge year in twenty twenty four. Now that

0:08:46.120 --> 0:08:49.960
<v Speaker 1>being said, as I record this episode which is on

0:08:50.040 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 1>December nineteenth when I'm recording it. Just to be transparent,

0:08:53.600 --> 0:08:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Nvidia is currently recovering from an overall market dip that

0:08:57.480 --> 0:09:01.079
<v Speaker 1>saw shares of Nvidia drop by around fourteen percent, And

0:09:01.160 --> 0:09:04.920
<v Speaker 1>when you're valued in the trillions, any single percent represents

0:09:04.960 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 1>a whole lot of money, so that that represents a

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:15.040
<v Speaker 1>considerable drop, But the estimates I've seen recently seem to

0:09:15.040 --> 0:09:19.560
<v Speaker 1>say that it's a very temporary situation. One more AI

0:09:19.679 --> 0:09:21.920
<v Speaker 1>related story that I would like to touch on, keeping

0:09:21.920 --> 0:09:24.640
<v Speaker 1>in mind that, of course there were countless other noteworthy

0:09:24.679 --> 0:09:27.800
<v Speaker 1>AI stories the unfolded this past year is that twenty

0:09:27.920 --> 0:09:30.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty four is the year where we started seeing companies

0:09:30.120 --> 0:09:34.400
<v Speaker 1>incorporate processors meant to handle AI applications on the device level.

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:38.240
<v Speaker 1>So Open AI's business model largely focuses on companies and

0:09:38.360 --> 0:09:42.440
<v Speaker 1>other customers using an Internet connection to tap into like

0:09:42.600 --> 0:09:47.319
<v Speaker 1>massive server farms that have the awesome powers of AI processing.

0:09:47.720 --> 0:09:51.960
<v Speaker 1>But another approach is to dedicate processors at the device

0:09:52.040 --> 0:09:54.719
<v Speaker 1>level so that you can do AI implementations on your

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:59.160
<v Speaker 1>own computer, you know, or whatever other device. Earlier this year,

0:09:59.200 --> 0:10:02.240
<v Speaker 1>I did an episode about the Yoga laptop from Lenovo

0:10:02.400 --> 0:10:06.920
<v Speaker 1>that's a copilot plus PC and Copilot is Microsoft's AI product,

0:10:07.360 --> 0:10:11.320
<v Speaker 1>and the laptop I talked about features an NPU that's

0:10:11.360 --> 0:10:15.120
<v Speaker 1>a neural processing unit. So just as a GPU is

0:10:15.200 --> 0:10:19.200
<v Speaker 1>optimized to process graphics, and NPU is optimized to handle

0:10:19.280 --> 0:10:23.640
<v Speaker 1>AI applications. Now, there are several benefits to having AI

0:10:23.760 --> 0:10:26.600
<v Speaker 1>native on a device, and the big ones really are

0:10:26.640 --> 0:10:30.600
<v Speaker 1>security and privacy. With cloud based AI computing, there's always

0:10:30.600 --> 0:10:33.000
<v Speaker 1>a risk of data breaches. You don't have full control

0:10:33.040 --> 0:10:36.640
<v Speaker 1>over your information because it's being handled by a third party.

0:10:37.080 --> 0:10:39.800
<v Speaker 1>There's also a risk that the provider you use might

0:10:40.040 --> 0:10:44.240
<v Speaker 1>train future AI models on your information, and if that

0:10:44.520 --> 0:10:49.400
<v Speaker 1>data includes proprietary information or trade secrets or something like that,

0:10:49.400 --> 0:10:53.160
<v Speaker 1>that represents a huge security risk. And I bring it

0:10:53.200 --> 0:10:57.439
<v Speaker 1>up because we have seen examples of AI agents revealing

0:10:57.640 --> 0:11:02.439
<v Speaker 1>stuff that they shouldn't, stuff that involved other users of

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:06.280
<v Speaker 1>the AI agents. Where let's say person one is using

0:11:06.320 --> 0:11:09.440
<v Speaker 1>the AI agent too, I don't know, plan out their

0:11:09.480 --> 0:11:13.679
<v Speaker 1>insurance and then person two, while asking questions, happens to

0:11:13.720 --> 0:11:19.080
<v Speaker 1>start getting information about Person one and the situations they're

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:22.400
<v Speaker 1>in that are leading to them to seeking these solutions

0:11:22.400 --> 0:11:28.000
<v Speaker 1>to their insurance problem. That's a terrible, terrible privacy problem

0:11:28.040 --> 0:11:31.200
<v Speaker 1>and a security problem for companies particularly. You don't want

0:11:31.640 --> 0:11:35.760
<v Speaker 1>your trade secrets to become industry wide knowledge, so moving

0:11:35.800 --> 0:11:41.439
<v Speaker 1>AI applications to the device level somewhat mollifies those concerns. Now,

0:11:41.440 --> 0:11:43.880
<v Speaker 1>of course, you still have to practice good security protocols.

0:11:43.960 --> 0:11:46.120
<v Speaker 1>You also have to maintain control of your device so

0:11:46.120 --> 0:11:49.040
<v Speaker 1>that someone else doesn't get physical access to it and

0:11:49.080 --> 0:11:51.000
<v Speaker 1>then is able to see it. But that's true no

0:11:51.040 --> 0:11:54.840
<v Speaker 1>matter what. But the fear of some other company profiting

0:11:54.840 --> 0:11:57.520
<v Speaker 1>off of your information or potentially leaking your data to

0:11:57.640 --> 0:12:01.520
<v Speaker 1>others is greatly reduced. At least, I expect we'll continue

0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:04.280
<v Speaker 1>to see more on device implementations of AI, and I'm

0:12:04.280 --> 0:12:08.199
<v Speaker 1>not the only one making that. Guess Gartner predicts that

0:12:08.440 --> 0:12:12.080
<v Speaker 1>all aipcs rather will make up like forty three percent

0:12:12.240 --> 0:12:15.080
<v Speaker 1>of all PC shipments by twenty twenty five, and you know,

0:12:15.120 --> 0:12:17.920
<v Speaker 1>by my calendar, we're nearly there. So we'll have to

0:12:17.920 --> 0:12:21.320
<v Speaker 1>see if that becomes truth. Now, before we go to break,

0:12:21.400 --> 0:12:25.640
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned earlier that Copilot is one of Microsoft's products.

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft was in the news a lot in twenty twenty

0:12:28.600 --> 0:12:31.520
<v Speaker 1>four for a lot of different reasons, but one story

0:12:31.559 --> 0:12:36.319
<v Speaker 1>focused on a different feature found in some Copilot plus PCs,

0:12:36.880 --> 0:12:41.400
<v Speaker 1>and that is Microsoft Recall. So the company announced this

0:12:41.440 --> 0:12:44.840
<v Speaker 1>feature in June of twenty twenty four, and the reaction

0:12:45.120 --> 0:12:50.000
<v Speaker 1>was rather critical. To put it gently, Recall takes screenshots

0:12:50.360 --> 0:12:54.760
<v Speaker 1>of your activities on your PC. These screenshots are searchable,

0:12:55.320 --> 0:12:57.560
<v Speaker 1>and it's intended to make it easier for users to

0:12:57.600 --> 0:12:59.840
<v Speaker 1>look back on their past activities in order to find

0:13:00.320 --> 0:13:03.319
<v Speaker 1>like files or data or whatever. You know, if you've

0:13:03.320 --> 0:13:07.440
<v Speaker 1>ever said, gosh, what was that website I visited where

0:13:07.480 --> 0:13:09.920
<v Speaker 1>I found that awesome recipe or something like that, and

0:13:09.960 --> 0:13:13.920
<v Speaker 1>you didn't bookmarket or whatever, screenshots is one way that

0:13:14.000 --> 0:13:16.320
<v Speaker 1>you might use to try and track that information down

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:19.480
<v Speaker 1>by searching the database that's on your machine. Now, some

0:13:19.520 --> 0:13:22.840
<v Speaker 1>folks worried right away that recall would be sending screenshots

0:13:22.880 --> 0:13:26.319
<v Speaker 1>back to Microsoft, which obviously would represent a huge threat

0:13:26.360 --> 0:13:30.240
<v Speaker 1>to both privacy and security. So imagine being an executive

0:13:30.320 --> 0:13:32.959
<v Speaker 1>at a big company and working on an internal report

0:13:33.360 --> 0:13:35.960
<v Speaker 1>only to find out that your computer has been screenshotting

0:13:36.000 --> 0:13:38.480
<v Speaker 1>everything and then sending it off to Microsoft servers. That

0:13:38.480 --> 0:13:42.679
<v Speaker 1>would surely violate company policies at the very least, But

0:13:42.720 --> 0:13:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft was quick to state that the screenshots would not

0:13:45.480 --> 0:13:48.560
<v Speaker 1>be sent over the Internet to any other location. They

0:13:48.600 --> 0:13:52.559
<v Speaker 1>would live squarely on the native device. However, this did

0:13:52.559 --> 0:13:58.680
<v Speaker 1>not stop the criticism. Now, originally recall was apparently unencrypted,

0:13:58.960 --> 0:14:02.360
<v Speaker 1>meaning it would store these screenshots essentially in plain text

0:14:02.400 --> 0:14:05.240
<v Speaker 1>on the user's computer, So if someone gained access to

0:14:05.280 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 1>your machine, even if it wasn't administrative access, they would

0:14:08.960 --> 0:14:11.400
<v Speaker 1>be able to go back and look at all those screenshots,

0:14:11.440 --> 0:14:15.880
<v Speaker 1>which potentially could include stuff like login information for various

0:14:15.920 --> 0:14:19.840
<v Speaker 1>accounts and services. So again the concerns around privacy and

0:14:19.840 --> 0:14:24.720
<v Speaker 1>safety were flaring up. Ultimately, these and other criticisms prompted

0:14:24.760 --> 0:14:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft to delay recalls rollout and ended up turning it

0:14:29.600 --> 0:14:34.400
<v Speaker 1>from a mandated feature to an opt in feature so

0:14:34.440 --> 0:14:38.160
<v Speaker 1>you can actually elect to make use of this feature.

0:14:39.720 --> 0:14:44.040
<v Speaker 1>So they also would go back and change it so

0:14:44.080 --> 0:14:48.680
<v Speaker 1>that the screenshots are encrypted, so you should only be

0:14:48.760 --> 0:14:52.360
<v Speaker 1>able to access these if you have administrative level like

0:14:52.440 --> 0:14:56.240
<v Speaker 1>access to the machine. However, that also could mean that

0:14:56.400 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 1>perhaps a company could have access to that sort of stuff,

0:15:00.280 --> 0:15:05.400
<v Speaker 1>right like, if you have an employer provided computer as

0:15:05.480 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 1>part of your work, then presumably your employer or someone

0:15:09.200 --> 0:15:13.200
<v Speaker 1>at the company you work for has that administrator level

0:15:13.560 --> 0:15:16.240
<v Speaker 1>access to the machine, which means they can go back

0:15:16.240 --> 0:15:18.800
<v Speaker 1>and look at all the screen shots, which could potentially

0:15:18.800 --> 0:15:22.640
<v Speaker 1>become a monitoring issue if some bosses decide, hey, this

0:15:22.720 --> 0:15:24.800
<v Speaker 1>is a great way for me to see if you know,

0:15:24.880 --> 0:15:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan over there is actually doing his work, or if

0:15:27.920 --> 0:15:32.400
<v Speaker 1>he's goofing off, you know, playing Galaga or something and

0:15:32.720 --> 0:15:36.040
<v Speaker 1>on his company machine, which he should not do. So

0:15:36.480 --> 0:15:39.240
<v Speaker 1>there are those concerns still, but again, since it's opt

0:15:39.280 --> 0:15:43.560
<v Speaker 1>in unless your company forces you to activate it, I

0:15:43.560 --> 0:15:48.240
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's that big of an issue. Microsoft also

0:15:48.320 --> 0:15:50.520
<v Speaker 1>enabled some security and privacy features that are meant to

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:53.600
<v Speaker 1>obscure stuff like your login credentials. You know, in theory,

0:15:53.960 --> 0:15:57.160
<v Speaker 1>the screenshots will skip screens where you're filling in that

0:15:57.240 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of info, so that if someone were somehow to

0:15:59.880 --> 0:16:02.960
<v Speaker 1>get access to your machine, even if they searched through

0:16:03.040 --> 0:16:06.200
<v Speaker 1>for log in stuff, they wouldn't find it. However, some

0:16:06.360 --> 0:16:10.840
<v Speaker 1>folks have found that this is not foolproof because sometimes,

0:16:10.840 --> 0:16:14.560
<v Speaker 1>like if someone's filling out say a PDF, an interactive PDF,

0:16:14.960 --> 0:16:17.640
<v Speaker 1>then they put login information on that. Well, Microsoft doesn't

0:16:17.680 --> 0:16:22.840
<v Speaker 1>necessarily detect that the PDF is related to logins, and

0:16:22.880 --> 0:16:25.120
<v Speaker 1>so you might end up with screenshots that show in

0:16:25.160 --> 0:16:29.880
<v Speaker 1>plain text. Well, once you decrypt the screenshot but show

0:16:30.200 --> 0:16:34.440
<v Speaker 1>that log in credential. So there are still some concerns,

0:16:34.720 --> 0:16:38.880
<v Speaker 1>but from one to understand, it's miles better than what

0:16:39.440 --> 0:16:41.800
<v Speaker 1>the company initially announced when they rolled it out. The

0:16:41.840 --> 0:16:44.720
<v Speaker 1>tool is now out for Windows eleven users. I have

0:16:44.920 --> 0:16:47.200
<v Speaker 1>not seen any stats on how many people are actually

0:16:47.320 --> 0:16:50.200
<v Speaker 1>using it. It'll be interesting to hear in twenty twenty

0:16:50.240 --> 0:16:53.640
<v Speaker 1>five if it becomes a more widely accepted feature. Okay,

0:16:54.160 --> 0:16:56.480
<v Speaker 1>we're going to take a quick break for our sponsors.

0:16:56.480 --> 0:16:59.720
<v Speaker 1>When we come back. More top tech stories of twenty

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:11.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty four. We're back so here. In the United States,

0:17:11.160 --> 0:17:14.520
<v Speaker 1>several big tech companies have faced scrutiny from regulatory agencies

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:18.960
<v Speaker 1>such as the Federal Trade Commission or FTC this year. Microsoft,

0:17:19.000 --> 0:17:21.479
<v Speaker 1>for example, has recently found itself the subject of an

0:17:21.520 --> 0:17:25.000
<v Speaker 1>antitrust investigation, not for the first time, but in this

0:17:25.119 --> 0:17:29.400
<v Speaker 1>case it's in businesses ranging from cloud computing to cybersecurity.

0:17:29.880 --> 0:17:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Other members of the Big five tech companies, those being Apple, Amazon, Meta,

0:17:34.400 --> 0:17:38.200
<v Speaker 1>and Google, have also felt the heat. As Christine Bartholomew

0:17:38.440 --> 0:17:43.120
<v Speaker 1>of pro Market wrote, quote, anti trust enforcers filed new

0:17:43.240 --> 0:17:47.159
<v Speaker 1>Section two claims against Amazon and Apple while continuing to

0:17:47.240 --> 0:17:50.920
<v Speaker 1>prosecute older cases like the Federal Trade Commissions suit against

0:17:50.920 --> 0:17:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Meta originally filed in twenty twenty end. Quote that section

0:17:55.480 --> 0:17:59.320
<v Speaker 1>two that Bartholomew mentions refers to a section in a

0:17:59.440 --> 0:18:02.960
<v Speaker 1>very old piece of legislation, namely the Sherman Act, which

0:18:03.000 --> 0:18:06.399
<v Speaker 1>is an anti trust piece of legislation. But Google in

0:18:06.440 --> 0:18:10.200
<v Speaker 1>particular could potentially face government mandates to spin off certain

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:15.000
<v Speaker 1>key business units or face massive consequences. So the US

0:18:15.080 --> 0:18:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Department of Justice alleged that Google has engaged in anti

0:18:18.240 --> 0:18:21.600
<v Speaker 1>competitive practices, one of which is the company's practice of

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:25.240
<v Speaker 1>paying other platforms so that Google Search remains the default

0:18:25.240 --> 0:18:29.720
<v Speaker 1>search engine on those platforms. So Google spends billions of dollars,

0:18:29.800 --> 0:18:33.480
<v Speaker 1>in fact, it spends billions of dollars paying Apple alone

0:18:33.880 --> 0:18:36.399
<v Speaker 1>in order to be the default search engine of choice,

0:18:36.720 --> 0:18:40.240
<v Speaker 1>and the DOJ has argued that Google is effectively suppressing

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:43.480
<v Speaker 1>competition this way. The case has made its way to court.

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:47.920
<v Speaker 1>A US district judge named Ahmit Meta ruled against Google,

0:18:48.440 --> 0:18:51.919
<v Speaker 1>and that brings us up to what happens next. So

0:18:53.320 --> 0:18:55.520
<v Speaker 1>the answer to that is that it's not going to

0:18:55.600 --> 0:18:59.080
<v Speaker 1>unfold until later in twenty twenty five, and depending on

0:18:59.119 --> 0:19:01.920
<v Speaker 1>how things go with the courts maybe even later than that.

0:19:01.960 --> 0:19:04.960
<v Speaker 1>These things can stretch on for many years, as was

0:19:05.480 --> 0:19:08.800
<v Speaker 1>indicated by Bartholomew. You know that FTC case that started

0:19:08.800 --> 0:19:11.960
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty. But the DOJ wants to make Google

0:19:12.080 --> 0:19:15.800
<v Speaker 1>divest itself of several business units, including the Chrome browser,

0:19:16.080 --> 0:19:20.080
<v Speaker 1>and to stop entering into those exclusionary agreements with companies

0:19:20.119 --> 0:19:24.159
<v Speaker 1>like Apple and such. The recommendations go much further, and Google,

0:19:24.280 --> 0:19:28.240
<v Speaker 1>understandably has protested them all. The company has argued that

0:19:28.280 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 1>it didn't really do anything anti competitive in the first place,

0:19:30.760 --> 0:19:33.639
<v Speaker 1>no matter what that judge thought. And anyway, if the

0:19:33.680 --> 0:19:35.920
<v Speaker 1>DOJ gets its way, it's going to have a huge

0:19:35.960 --> 0:19:40.680
<v Speaker 1>harmful effect on the tech sector, nay, the very world.

0:19:40.359 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 1>It definitely gets a bit over dramatic. I think both

0:19:43.880 --> 0:19:47.240
<v Speaker 1>sides get over dramatic to be fair. Now, a separate

0:19:47.320 --> 0:19:49.800
<v Speaker 1>judge is going to have to decide which measures should

0:19:49.840 --> 0:19:53.720
<v Speaker 1>actually be enforced against Google later in twenty twenty five,

0:19:53.880 --> 0:19:56.959
<v Speaker 1>so the story is far from over. One thing that

0:19:57.040 --> 0:19:59.840
<v Speaker 1>was a potential concern is that the change in administration

0:20:00.520 --> 0:20:03.399
<v Speaker 1>could affect the outcome. So typically when we see a

0:20:03.440 --> 0:20:06.040
<v Speaker 1>big shift in power dynamics here in the United States,

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:09.960
<v Speaker 1>we also see a lot of change in practices and policies. However,

0:20:10.040 --> 0:20:12.920
<v Speaker 1>in this case, pressure against big tech is something that

0:20:12.960 --> 0:20:17.439
<v Speaker 1>both sides of the aisle feel is necessary, although often

0:20:17.480 --> 0:20:22.080
<v Speaker 1>for completely different reasons. But that pressure actually began under

0:20:22.119 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Trump's first presidential administration, so there's every reason to believe

0:20:26.359 --> 0:20:29.360
<v Speaker 1>that the same will be true this go around. Now,

0:20:29.359 --> 0:20:32.080
<v Speaker 1>while I expect the Trump administration to stick generally to

0:20:32.440 --> 0:20:34.719
<v Speaker 1>big businesses are great and they should get away with

0:20:34.760 --> 0:20:38.760
<v Speaker 1>whatever they want, I think big tech companies are a

0:20:38.760 --> 0:20:41.600
<v Speaker 1>potential exception to that rule, though a lot of analysts

0:20:41.600 --> 0:20:46.119
<v Speaker 1>say that they'll probably face lighter consequences. They won't be

0:20:46.240 --> 0:20:50.640
<v Speaker 1>forced to divest themselves of business units. Perhaps under Trump's

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:54.639
<v Speaker 1>DOJ We'll have to see Something else in tech that

0:20:54.760 --> 0:20:58.240
<v Speaker 1>is a looming question mark. Is the fate of TikTok

0:20:58.520 --> 0:21:01.560
<v Speaker 1>in the United States. A huge story in twenty twenty

0:21:01.560 --> 0:21:04.479
<v Speaker 1>four was that the legislative branch of the US government

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:08.000
<v Speaker 1>passed a law that requires TikTok's parent company, Byte Dance,

0:21:08.400 --> 0:21:11.720
<v Speaker 1>to divest itself of TikTok or else face a ban

0:21:12.080 --> 0:21:15.880
<v Speaker 1>for the app throughout the entire United States. Now, byte

0:21:15.960 --> 0:21:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Dance is a Chinese company, and the lawmakers share a

0:21:18.600 --> 0:21:20.840
<v Speaker 1>concern that the app could serve as a way to

0:21:20.960 --> 0:21:24.520
<v Speaker 1>siphon data from the United States and send it on

0:21:24.600 --> 0:21:27.520
<v Speaker 1>over to China. Plus it could serve as a delivery

0:21:27.560 --> 0:21:32.560
<v Speaker 1>platform for Chinese propaganda. Basically, these claims, even if they

0:21:32.600 --> 0:21:34.560
<v Speaker 1>were to turn out to be one hundred percent true,

0:21:34.840 --> 0:21:38.359
<v Speaker 1>are kind of moot as far as I'm concerned, because

0:21:38.480 --> 0:21:42.119
<v Speaker 1>China can both collect data from other sources and deliver

0:21:42.200 --> 0:21:47.119
<v Speaker 1>propaganda using other platforms without ever needing TikTok. So to me,

0:21:47.240 --> 0:21:49.720
<v Speaker 1>this is kind of missing the forest for the trees

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:53.199
<v Speaker 1>sort of situation. But then TikTok is also an easier

0:21:53.240 --> 0:21:55.600
<v Speaker 1>thing to wrap your head around as opposed to the

0:21:55.640 --> 0:21:59.159
<v Speaker 1>whole US approach to data privacy and security, which I

0:21:59.320 --> 0:22:03.439
<v Speaker 1>feel is severely out of touch. Now. President Biden signed

0:22:03.480 --> 0:22:06.040
<v Speaker 1>that bill into law earlier this year, and byte Dance

0:22:06.080 --> 0:22:09.439
<v Speaker 1>faces a deadline of January nineteenth to divest itself of

0:22:09.480 --> 0:22:13.440
<v Speaker 1>TikTok or else TikTok gets the ban hammer now. Back

0:22:13.480 --> 0:22:16.280
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty, President Trump at that time was all

0:22:16.359 --> 0:22:19.600
<v Speaker 1>gung ho on banning TikTok, even sign an executive order

0:22:20.520 --> 0:22:24.600
<v Speaker 1>ordering as much, but it got overturned. More recently, he's

0:22:24.680 --> 0:22:27.679
<v Speaker 1>changed his tune for reasons that remain rather opaque, at

0:22:27.760 --> 0:22:30.639
<v Speaker 1>least if you take his own statements at face value.

0:22:31.400 --> 0:22:34.280
<v Speaker 1>I won't get into that, but people have been listening

0:22:34.320 --> 0:22:37.159
<v Speaker 1>to the show for a wild No more about that story,

0:22:37.200 --> 0:22:41.040
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, Trump doesn't come into office until January twentieth,

0:22:41.119 --> 0:22:45.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty five, So the deadlines of the day before that.

0:22:45.920 --> 0:22:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Byte Dance and TikTok are hoping to extend that deadline

0:22:49.200 --> 0:22:51.520
<v Speaker 1>so that Trump can weigh in on this and potentially

0:22:51.560 --> 0:22:54.200
<v Speaker 1>reverse course before a ban is actually put in place.

0:22:54.800 --> 0:22:57.880
<v Speaker 1>But that would require intervention from the US Supreme Court,

0:22:58.000 --> 0:23:00.960
<v Speaker 1>and right now that intervention is are from certain. It

0:23:01.080 --> 0:23:03.879
<v Speaker 1>might happen, but it might not. So it could be

0:23:03.960 --> 0:23:06.600
<v Speaker 1>that one day before Trump takes off as TikTok gets

0:23:06.640 --> 0:23:09.480
<v Speaker 1>banned here in the United States. Now what happens after that?

0:23:09.600 --> 0:23:12.920
<v Speaker 1>I got no clue. TikTok still maintains there's no feasible

0:23:12.960 --> 0:23:15.320
<v Speaker 1>way to separate from its parent company, which I also

0:23:15.440 --> 0:23:18.320
<v Speaker 1>find a little hard to believe, but it may be true.

0:23:18.440 --> 0:23:23.720
<v Speaker 1>I am no expert in these matters. Okay, more big

0:23:23.760 --> 0:23:26.560
<v Speaker 1>stories from twenty twenty four. So early in the year,

0:23:26.640 --> 0:23:30.399
<v Speaker 1>the US Senate Judiciary Committee called leaders of several social

0:23:30.440 --> 0:23:34.480
<v Speaker 1>media companies to testify about how social platforms have contributed

0:23:34.480 --> 0:23:39.439
<v Speaker 1>to harming children. Folks like Mark Zuckerberg, who actually offered

0:23:39.680 --> 0:23:44.040
<v Speaker 1>an apology, were compelled to listen to numerous cases brought

0:23:44.080 --> 0:23:47.120
<v Speaker 1>before them by parents who had tragic stories to share

0:23:47.119 --> 0:23:51.360
<v Speaker 1>about their kids. The overall response from the committee side

0:23:51.720 --> 0:23:54.720
<v Speaker 1>was that none of the tech leaders actually acquitted themselves

0:23:54.880 --> 0:23:58.199
<v Speaker 1>very well or appeared to make any concrete plans to

0:23:58.240 --> 0:24:02.000
<v Speaker 1>actually address the underlying con concerns. There was also a

0:24:02.040 --> 0:24:05.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of lawmakers questioning Section two thirty. That's a law,

0:24:05.920 --> 0:24:09.119
<v Speaker 1>or rather it's part of a law that provides protection

0:24:09.200 --> 0:24:14.359
<v Speaker 1>to online platforms. Essentially, Section two thirty says online platforms

0:24:14.359 --> 0:24:17.120
<v Speaker 1>cannot be held legally liable for the stuff that their

0:24:17.240 --> 0:24:21.520
<v Speaker 1>users post to those platforms. But even those protections do

0:24:21.560 --> 0:24:24.159
<v Speaker 1>have limits. So, for example, if a platform becomes aware

0:24:24.200 --> 0:24:27.840
<v Speaker 1>of illegal activity, it is supposed to take action. But

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:30.320
<v Speaker 1>the thing that drove me bonkers with this hearing was

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:33.159
<v Speaker 1>that some of these lawmakers seemed to behave like Section

0:24:33.240 --> 0:24:37.000
<v Speaker 1>two thirty was written by the social media companies and

0:24:37.119 --> 0:24:39.679
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't. It was actually created by Congress as a

0:24:39.680 --> 0:24:42.960
<v Speaker 1>way to protect companies in the Internet space from being

0:24:43.000 --> 0:24:46.840
<v Speaker 1>squashed before they could even establish themselves, and to encourage

0:24:46.840 --> 0:24:50.199
<v Speaker 1>investors to put money into that stuff. If an investor thinks, oh, well,

0:24:50.240 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to invest in that because I could

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:55.280
<v Speaker 1>be held legally responsible for something that someone else did

0:24:55.800 --> 0:24:58.000
<v Speaker 1>that would have killed the early Internet. So that's why

0:24:58.040 --> 0:25:03.080
<v Speaker 1>section two thirty exists. But let's then move on and

0:25:03.240 --> 0:25:06.920
<v Speaker 1>dive into our Muskie segment, shall we. That means it's

0:25:06.960 --> 0:25:11.119
<v Speaker 1>time to talk about Elon Musk. He continued to alienate

0:25:11.200 --> 0:25:15.600
<v Speaker 1>some users of x formerly known as Twitter, and alternative

0:25:15.640 --> 0:25:20.000
<v Speaker 1>platforms like Threads, Mastedon and Blue Sky benefited from Elon

0:25:20.119 --> 0:25:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Musk's shenanigans because users began to bail and go to

0:25:23.640 --> 0:25:27.040
<v Speaker 1>those alternatives. Blue Sky in particular, has had a heck

0:25:27.080 --> 0:25:30.320
<v Speaker 1>of a year. The service emerged from beta and became

0:25:30.359 --> 0:25:34.200
<v Speaker 1>available to the general public relatively early in twenty twenty four,

0:25:34.920 --> 0:25:38.320
<v Speaker 1>and it has experienced a couple of bursts of popularity,

0:25:38.400 --> 0:25:41.440
<v Speaker 1>including a big one following the twenty twenty four elections

0:25:41.440 --> 0:25:44.400
<v Speaker 1>here in the United States. So right now it boasts

0:25:44.440 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 1>more than twenty five million users, which isn't bad at

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:51.600
<v Speaker 1>all for the first year in operation. More than eleven

0:25:51.640 --> 0:25:55.440
<v Speaker 1>million of those joined following the US election, and you

0:25:55.520 --> 0:26:00.040
<v Speaker 1>know that that's pretty impressive. It is still miles and

0:26:00.320 --> 0:26:03.399
<v Speaker 1>miles behind X, which has an estimated six hundred million

0:26:03.520 --> 0:26:06.520
<v Speaker 1>or so monthly users. So it's not like Blue Sky's

0:26:06.600 --> 0:26:09.760
<v Speaker 1>poised to topple X. We're not. This is not even

0:26:09.840 --> 0:26:14.119
<v Speaker 1>David versus Goliath. This is Goliath and David's very short

0:26:14.160 --> 0:26:19.800
<v Speaker 1>friend Dwayne or something. Upon Trump's win in the election,

0:26:19.920 --> 0:26:23.399
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk would become part of the new administration. He

0:26:23.440 --> 0:26:28.680
<v Speaker 1>will co chair a new Department of Government Efficiency akadge

0:26:29.000 --> 0:26:34.440
<v Speaker 1>or I can't believe I'm saying this doge. That suggests

0:26:34.480 --> 0:26:36.480
<v Speaker 1>to me that Musk may have had a hand in

0:26:36.560 --> 0:26:40.159
<v Speaker 1>naming the organization, knowing his past with the doge coin

0:26:40.280 --> 0:26:43.760
<v Speaker 1>and other memes. Considering the Musk is also in an

0:26:43.760 --> 0:26:47.840
<v Speaker 1>ongoing battle regarding his compensation package at TESLA, I imagine

0:26:47.840 --> 0:26:50.080
<v Speaker 1>we're going to see a lot of Musk's fingerprints on

0:26:50.160 --> 0:26:52.840
<v Speaker 1>government actions in the near future. Also, it's kind of

0:26:52.880 --> 0:26:55.560
<v Speaker 1>wild that the guy who's put in place of authority

0:26:55.840 --> 0:26:59.119
<v Speaker 1>over government spending is also the guy who happens to

0:26:59.119 --> 0:27:03.160
<v Speaker 1>be the richest human in the world. It's just weird now,

0:27:03.200 --> 0:27:06.560
<v Speaker 1>speaking of election stuff. As you are probably aware, twenty

0:27:06.600 --> 0:27:10.679
<v Speaker 1>twenty four was a year of unprecedented misinformation campaigns, some

0:27:10.760 --> 0:27:15.840
<v Speaker 1>of which were fueled by generative AI, and it continues

0:27:15.880 --> 0:27:18.280
<v Speaker 1>to be an issue. While elections in the United States

0:27:18.280 --> 0:27:21.200
<v Speaker 1>are over for the time being, other elections are around

0:27:21.240 --> 0:27:24.520
<v Speaker 1>the world. They're preparing for a flood of misinformation. A

0:27:24.520 --> 0:27:27.679
<v Speaker 1>lot of the effort in misinformation campaigns appears to be

0:27:27.720 --> 0:27:31.280
<v Speaker 1>coming out of Russia. Pewtin has long relied on Internet

0:27:31.359 --> 0:27:34.320
<v Speaker 1>channels to help push pro Russian policies and leaders and

0:27:34.440 --> 0:27:37.879
<v Speaker 1>other nations. Not all of those campaigns have been successful

0:27:37.920 --> 0:27:41.280
<v Speaker 1>in their goals, but they've definitely been all over the place.

0:27:41.920 --> 0:27:45.119
<v Speaker 1>So we expect that that's going to be a continuing

0:27:45.200 --> 0:27:48.919
<v Speaker 1>trend moving into twenty twenty five. And we're going to

0:27:48.920 --> 0:27:51.359
<v Speaker 1>take another quick break right now. When I get back,

0:27:51.440 --> 0:27:53.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to wrap this up with some more tech

0:27:54.040 --> 0:27:57.600
<v Speaker 1>headlines and stories from the past year. But first let's

0:27:57.600 --> 0:28:08.280
<v Speaker 1>thank our sponsors. All right, we're in the home stretch,

0:28:08.480 --> 0:28:11.719
<v Speaker 1>though again I'm only touching on some of the stories

0:28:11.720 --> 0:28:15.720
<v Speaker 1>that I thought were particularly interesting. I am leaving an

0:28:15.880 --> 0:28:21.399
<v Speaker 1>awful lot of stuff untouched, so you know, don't get

0:28:21.480 --> 0:28:24.040
<v Speaker 1>upset if your favorite tech story doesn't get a mention here,

0:28:24.200 --> 0:28:26.679
<v Speaker 1>there's too much to go over. But one thing that

0:28:26.720 --> 0:28:31.720
<v Speaker 1>remains untouched by yours truly is the Apple Vision Pro headset.

0:28:32.800 --> 0:28:35.920
<v Speaker 1>I just don't have like more than three thousand dollars

0:28:36.000 --> 0:28:38.320
<v Speaker 1>just lying around waiting to be spent on an augmented

0:28:38.360 --> 0:28:42.080
<v Speaker 1>reality headset from Apple that has limited utility in my

0:28:42.200 --> 0:28:45.800
<v Speaker 1>day to day life. But the long rumored technology finally

0:28:45.840 --> 0:28:50.240
<v Speaker 1>emerged early in twenty twenty four. Now, the Apple Vision

0:28:50.280 --> 0:28:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Pro was a far cry from like the Blue Sky

0:28:55.560 --> 0:28:59.720
<v Speaker 1>early concepts, because, rather than like a sleek pair of glasses,

0:29:00.440 --> 0:29:02.800
<v Speaker 1>it was a headset that could project images of the

0:29:02.880 --> 0:29:05.720
<v Speaker 1>user's eyes on the forward facing side of the visor,

0:29:06.080 --> 0:29:07.800
<v Speaker 1>so everyone else could see that you were wearing a

0:29:07.800 --> 0:29:11.920
<v Speaker 1>big visor, but you had gigantic digital eyes projected on

0:29:12.040 --> 0:29:15.640
<v Speaker 1>the back of it, apparently staring at folks. It was

0:29:15.640 --> 0:29:18.760
<v Speaker 1>something that I thought was super creepy. Now, the reviews

0:29:18.800 --> 0:29:22.520
<v Speaker 1>I read about the device all said it was legitimately impressive,

0:29:22.840 --> 0:29:26.800
<v Speaker 1>like it's well made and it does a really good job.

0:29:27.760 --> 0:29:30.520
<v Speaker 1>But those reviews also indicated there were a limited number

0:29:30.560 --> 0:29:33.440
<v Speaker 1>of use cases for the technology. Now, part of that

0:29:33.640 --> 0:29:36.360
<v Speaker 1>is a chicken in the egg problem that frequently happens

0:29:36.400 --> 0:29:41.280
<v Speaker 1>in tech, and it happens between hardware and software. So

0:29:41.280 --> 0:29:45.160
<v Speaker 1>software developers have very little incentive to build stuff for

0:29:45.240 --> 0:29:49.600
<v Speaker 1>a platform that doesn't have a large install base. But

0:29:49.720 --> 0:29:52.840
<v Speaker 1>customers don't have a lot of incentive to adopt a

0:29:52.840 --> 0:29:56.800
<v Speaker 1>brand new technology, particularly a really expensive one like the

0:29:56.880 --> 0:30:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Vision Pro, if that technology doesn't also have useful library

0:30:00.960 --> 0:30:04.280
<v Speaker 1>of applications. And so, while the Vision Pro had a

0:30:04.280 --> 0:30:06.920
<v Speaker 1>brief moment in the spotlight, over the course of twenty

0:30:06.960 --> 0:30:10.400
<v Speaker 1>twenty four it became clear it just wasn't going to

0:30:10.440 --> 0:30:12.960
<v Speaker 1>be the runaway hit that Apple was kind of hoping

0:30:12.960 --> 0:30:16.800
<v Speaker 1>for in the past, so Apple rather quietly stopped mentioning it.

0:30:16.840 --> 0:30:19.320
<v Speaker 1>For the most part, the company has ended production on

0:30:19.360 --> 0:30:22.440
<v Speaker 1>the Vision Pro model, according to reports, and rumor has

0:30:22.480 --> 0:30:26.200
<v Speaker 1>it that any plans for a second Pro unit have

0:30:26.320 --> 0:30:29.240
<v Speaker 1>been scrapped. Again, that's a rumor. I haven't seen any

0:30:29.280 --> 0:30:32.480
<v Speaker 1>official announcement from the company itself, but that seems to

0:30:32.480 --> 0:30:34.360
<v Speaker 1>be the case now. That does not mean that Apple

0:30:34.440 --> 0:30:37.160
<v Speaker 1>is totally out of the mixed reality game, and we

0:30:37.240 --> 0:30:40.960
<v Speaker 1>may see a lower cost version with fewer features in

0:30:41.040 --> 0:30:43.720
<v Speaker 1>the future. That was the plan at least for a while.

0:30:44.480 --> 0:30:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Those rumors suggest that this newer version of the headset

0:30:48.600 --> 0:30:51.719
<v Speaker 1>will be you know, wicked expensive, just not as wicked

0:30:51.760 --> 0:30:54.880
<v Speaker 1>expensive as the Vision Pro. I saw one post on

0:30:55.160 --> 0:30:59.120
<v Speaker 1>XR today I guess Mixed Reality Today that suggested the

0:30:59.160 --> 0:31:02.160
<v Speaker 1>slim down model might go for something like one thousand,

0:31:02.240 --> 0:31:05.240
<v Speaker 1>five hundred bucks, or about half of what the Vision

0:31:05.240 --> 0:31:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Pro goes for. It's still awful pricey, and I'm still

0:31:11.120 --> 0:31:14.000
<v Speaker 1>not convinced that the use case is there for most people.

0:31:14.080 --> 0:31:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Like I think people who are curious about it might

0:31:17.160 --> 0:31:20.320
<v Speaker 1>feel more tempted to get a fifteen hundred dollars headset

0:31:20.320 --> 0:31:23.040
<v Speaker 1>than a three thousand dollars headset. But that's still a

0:31:23.200 --> 0:31:26.880
<v Speaker 1>huge price tag for most people. And unless you're able

0:31:26.920 --> 0:31:30.080
<v Speaker 1>to demonstrate that this technology is going to have a

0:31:30.120 --> 0:31:33.720
<v Speaker 1>massive impact on how you get stuff done, I just

0:31:33.760 --> 0:31:38.400
<v Speaker 1>don't see it really moving that far. Speaking about things

0:31:38.440 --> 0:31:40.720
<v Speaker 1>not turning out the way you had hoped, twenty twenty

0:31:40.760 --> 0:31:43.440
<v Speaker 1>four was another year of layoffs in the tech industry.

0:31:44.000 --> 0:31:48.120
<v Speaker 1>One source I read mentioned that between companies like Tesla, Intel, Cisco,

0:31:48.200 --> 0:31:51.680
<v Speaker 1>and Microsoft, there were around one hundred and fifty thousand

0:31:51.800 --> 0:31:55.760
<v Speaker 1>jobs cut. It has been a brutal couple of years

0:31:55.840 --> 0:32:00.000
<v Speaker 1>in the tech sector. I think this is partly because

0:32:00.200 --> 0:32:03.840
<v Speaker 1>of just overall economic issues. It's also partly because of

0:32:03.880 --> 0:32:07.480
<v Speaker 1>how a lot of tech companies beefed up during the pandemic,

0:32:07.680 --> 0:32:11.320
<v Speaker 1>and now in the post pandemic years, they're having to

0:32:11.360 --> 0:32:14.440
<v Speaker 1>look for ways to slim back down again. But here's

0:32:14.480 --> 0:32:17.480
<v Speaker 1>hoping that twenty twenty five sees those trends change, because

0:32:17.640 --> 0:32:21.719
<v Speaker 1>it's always rough seeing those those stories break. All right,

0:32:21.760 --> 0:32:24.200
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about crypto, because ye gads, this was a

0:32:24.280 --> 0:32:27.040
<v Speaker 1>huge year for crypto and it didn't start off that

0:32:27.120 --> 0:32:30.200
<v Speaker 1>way really, But one thing that happened was Sam Bankman

0:32:30.280 --> 0:32:34.840
<v Speaker 1>freed AKASBF found himself before a judge and sentenced to

0:32:34.960 --> 0:32:38.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty five years in prison for his role in the

0:32:38.280 --> 0:32:42.240
<v Speaker 1>FTX debacle. Now, in case you missed all that, FDx

0:32:42.520 --> 0:32:47.000
<v Speaker 1>was a cryptocurrency exchange that apparently took customer money and

0:32:47.080 --> 0:32:49.480
<v Speaker 1>used it to cover some bad investments made by a

0:32:49.480 --> 0:32:53.480
<v Speaker 1>sister company called Alimator Research. Now it gets more complicated

0:32:53.520 --> 0:32:56.560
<v Speaker 1>than that, but essentially SBF was arrested on charges of

0:32:56.640 --> 0:33:00.680
<v Speaker 1>fraud among other things. He was found guilty and now

0:33:00.920 --> 0:33:04.200
<v Speaker 1>in this year he was sentenced to prison. SBF then

0:33:04.280 --> 0:33:07.520
<v Speaker 1>filed an appeal to his sentencing, arguing that the judge

0:33:07.520 --> 0:33:09.840
<v Speaker 1>overseeing the case had a conflict of interest and was

0:33:09.880 --> 0:33:13.680
<v Speaker 1>biased against him the very damn recording this the nineteenth

0:33:13.720 --> 0:33:18.160
<v Speaker 1>of December twenty twenty four, a US court dismissed that appeal,

0:33:18.480 --> 0:33:22.760
<v Speaker 1>finding SBF's claims invalid. That doesn't come as a surprise

0:33:22.800 --> 0:33:26.200
<v Speaker 1>to me. There are allegations that SBF and or his

0:33:26.320 --> 0:33:29.520
<v Speaker 1>legal team were allegedly, you know, engaging in witnessed tampering

0:33:29.600 --> 0:33:32.360
<v Speaker 1>for example. That kind of stuff typically doesn't go over

0:33:32.400 --> 0:33:35.000
<v Speaker 1>so well when matters come to a court of law.

0:33:35.240 --> 0:33:37.720
<v Speaker 1>So it sounds like SBF's future will not be spent

0:33:37.880 --> 0:33:42.560
<v Speaker 1>on a Caribbean island, but instead in a prison. Related

0:33:42.560 --> 0:33:45.320
<v Speaker 1>to the FTX catastrophe is the failure of a bank

0:33:45.440 --> 0:33:50.960
<v Speaker 1>called Silvergate Capital. So this technically happened in twenty twenty three.

0:33:51.720 --> 0:33:54.480
<v Speaker 1>That's when we started to see a few banks fail

0:33:54.600 --> 0:33:57.800
<v Speaker 1>that were connected to the crypto world. So one called

0:33:57.840 --> 0:34:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley Bank failed, another one called Signature Bank failed,

0:34:02.240 --> 0:34:05.440
<v Speaker 1>and Silvergate was the third. The owners at the time

0:34:05.480 --> 0:34:08.760
<v Speaker 1>said that they were going to wind down operations. However,

0:34:08.840 --> 0:34:12.560
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't until this passed September in twenty twenty four

0:34:13.080 --> 0:34:16.960
<v Speaker 1>that Silvergate Capital Corporation filed for Chapter eleven bankruptcy protection.

0:34:17.880 --> 0:34:21.719
<v Speaker 1>The filing included passages that accused regulators of interfering too

0:34:21.800 --> 0:34:24.839
<v Speaker 1>much in the cryptocurrency realm, and that perhaps Silvergate would

0:34:24.840 --> 0:34:27.480
<v Speaker 1>have been able to write itself if it weren't for

0:34:28.440 --> 0:34:33.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, imperial entanglements. As Obi Wan Kenobi might say,

0:34:34.480 --> 0:34:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin itself had a heck of a year. So in

0:34:37.000 --> 0:34:40.160
<v Speaker 1>January twenty twenty four, bitcoin was trading at around forty

0:34:40.200 --> 0:34:43.759
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars per bitcoin. That's a lot of money, and

0:34:43.760 --> 0:34:46.960
<v Speaker 1>that was already an impressive improvement over the previous January

0:34:47.000 --> 0:34:48.960
<v Speaker 1>back in twenty twenty three, when it was in the

0:34:49.080 --> 0:34:53.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty thousand dollars range, but it was still pretty far

0:34:53.560 --> 0:34:56.360
<v Speaker 1>off from its peak that it had hit previously in

0:34:56.400 --> 0:34:58.680
<v Speaker 1>the spring of twenty twenty when it was around sixty

0:34:58.800 --> 0:35:02.480
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars per bitcoin. All of that was left behind

0:35:02.600 --> 0:35:06.360
<v Speaker 1>the dust recently when the price of bitcoin skyrocketed to

0:35:06.560 --> 0:35:10.719
<v Speaker 1>more than one hundred thousand dollars per bitcoin. Now, a

0:35:10.719 --> 0:35:12.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of that I attribute to the outcome of the

0:35:12.680 --> 0:35:15.919
<v Speaker 1>US elections, As I believe the crypto community at large

0:35:16.000 --> 0:35:18.520
<v Speaker 1>views President Trump is being much more friendly to the

0:35:18.520 --> 0:35:22.080
<v Speaker 1>crypto industry. So will this mean that cryptocurrency has become

0:35:22.120 --> 0:35:25.319
<v Speaker 1>a viable currency alternative or will they just remain more

0:35:25.480 --> 0:35:30.040
<v Speaker 1>like investment assets. I would probably guess on the latter,

0:35:30.239 --> 0:35:33.600
<v Speaker 1>but I'm no expert. It is wild to me that

0:35:33.640 --> 0:35:37.720
<v Speaker 1>the pizza guy in Florida bought pizzas for ten thousand

0:35:37.719 --> 0:35:40.560
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin way back in twenty ten, and those ten thousand

0:35:40.560 --> 0:35:43.799
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin today are worth a billion dollars, So I sure

0:35:43.880 --> 0:35:47.719
<v Speaker 1>hope that was a good pizza. Also, one other thing

0:35:47.719 --> 0:35:50.240
<v Speaker 1>that happened with bitcoin is that the number of coins

0:35:50.320 --> 0:35:55.560
<v Speaker 1>per block mind on the blockchain reduced by half this year. Now,

0:35:55.600 --> 0:36:00.560
<v Speaker 1>this is a planned feature that's built into bitcoin. In short,

0:36:00.600 --> 0:36:03.720
<v Speaker 1>there's a finite number of bitcoin that will ever be released,

0:36:04.120 --> 0:36:07.400
<v Speaker 1>and once all of those are mined, no new bitcoin

0:36:07.480 --> 0:36:10.399
<v Speaker 1>will ever emerge. The ones that are in circulation will

0:36:10.440 --> 0:36:13.520
<v Speaker 1>be the only ones to ever exist. To control the

0:36:13.600 --> 0:36:17.840
<v Speaker 1>supply of bitcoin going into circulation, the system actually has

0:36:18.000 --> 0:36:21.720
<v Speaker 1>the number of bitcoins awarded per block of transactions every

0:36:21.800 --> 0:36:26.279
<v Speaker 1>few years. It's like approximately every four years. So it

0:36:26.360 --> 0:36:28.600
<v Speaker 1>used to be that if you were to mine a

0:36:28.719 --> 0:36:30.920
<v Speaker 1>block on the blockchain, you would get six point two

0:36:31.080 --> 0:36:35.200
<v Speaker 1>five bitcoin per block mind now it's down to three

0:36:35.280 --> 0:36:38.879
<v Speaker 1>point one point two five, which could affect the incentives

0:36:38.920 --> 0:36:43.680
<v Speaker 1>for mining bitcoin. However, now that bitcoin is worth more

0:36:43.719 --> 0:36:47.120
<v Speaker 1>than one hundred thousand dollars per unit, that still means

0:36:47.200 --> 0:36:49.880
<v Speaker 1>the value of mining a block on the blockchain is

0:36:50.040 --> 0:36:52.440
<v Speaker 1>almost as much as it would have been back at

0:36:52.480 --> 0:36:57.200
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin's previous height of around sixty thousand dollars. Cause, yeah,

0:36:57.320 --> 0:37:00.360
<v Speaker 1>the number of bitcoins you get is cut in half,

0:37:00.400 --> 0:37:05.080
<v Speaker 1>but the amount that it's worth has almost not quite,

0:37:05.080 --> 0:37:08.120
<v Speaker 1>but almost doubled, So there's still a huge incentive for

0:37:08.239 --> 0:37:11.760
<v Speaker 1>mining operations to pour tons of assets into mining bitcoin.

0:37:12.280 --> 0:37:15.000
<v Speaker 1>That means consuming a lot of electricity, and I have

0:37:16.080 --> 0:37:18.359
<v Speaker 1>quite a bit of anxiety over how the next US

0:37:18.400 --> 0:37:21.920
<v Speaker 1>administration is going to handle matters like energy consumption and

0:37:22.000 --> 0:37:24.920
<v Speaker 1>where we turn to in order to generate electricity. So

0:37:24.960 --> 0:37:26.319
<v Speaker 1>I think crypto is going to be in a lot

0:37:26.400 --> 0:37:29.120
<v Speaker 1>of conversations about stuff like climate change for the next

0:37:29.280 --> 0:37:33.240
<v Speaker 1>several years, and I'm not looking forward to that. Okay,

0:37:33.840 --> 0:37:37.360
<v Speaker 1>let's finish up with some stuff about space. That's typically

0:37:37.400 --> 0:37:40.600
<v Speaker 1>how I like to end my news items. First up,

0:37:40.680 --> 0:37:43.120
<v Speaker 1>we have the trials and tribulations of Boeing, So the

0:37:43.160 --> 0:37:46.200
<v Speaker 1>aerospace company has long been associated with the space industry,

0:37:46.239 --> 0:37:48.400
<v Speaker 1>but this year Boeing has had a really rough one.

0:37:48.840 --> 0:37:51.720
<v Speaker 1>It actually started quite early because on January fifth, twenty

0:37:51.760 --> 0:37:55.359
<v Speaker 1>twenty four, and Alaskan Airlines Boeing seven thirty seven Max

0:37:55.440 --> 0:38:00.360
<v Speaker 1>aircraft experienced a terrifying failure. At sixteen thousand feet, a

0:38:00.440 --> 0:38:03.239
<v Speaker 1>door plug, meaning a plug that takes the place of

0:38:03.280 --> 0:38:07.160
<v Speaker 1>what otherwise would have been an emergency door, blew out

0:38:07.480 --> 0:38:13.319
<v Speaker 1>of the airplane, which meant the cabin experienced rapid, uncontrolled decompression. Fortunately,

0:38:13.480 --> 0:38:16.359
<v Speaker 1>everyone on board the aircraft survived the incident. There were

0:38:16.400 --> 0:38:19.480
<v Speaker 1>only three people I think who reported minor injuries, so

0:38:19.600 --> 0:38:21.240
<v Speaker 1>all of that is good. I mean, it was still

0:38:21.840 --> 0:38:25.840
<v Speaker 1>an incredibly traumatic experience. I can't imagine what I would

0:38:25.840 --> 0:38:28.640
<v Speaker 1>feel like if I had been on that flight. So

0:38:28.719 --> 0:38:32.440
<v Speaker 1>an investigation showed that the door plug perhaps was reinstalled

0:38:32.440 --> 0:38:35.279
<v Speaker 1>improperly and was missing some bolts meant to secure it

0:38:35.320 --> 0:38:38.000
<v Speaker 1>in place. There's still a question of whether or not

0:38:38.000 --> 0:38:40.600
<v Speaker 1>the bolts had been in place, or perhaps they were

0:38:41.120 --> 0:38:45.440
<v Speaker 1>ripped out during the incident, but either way, it certainly

0:38:45.480 --> 0:38:48.680
<v Speaker 1>seems like a big oversight. So the Federal Aviation Administration

0:38:48.800 --> 0:38:51.960
<v Speaker 1>or FAA ordered all seven to three seven Max nine

0:38:52.080 --> 0:38:55.800
<v Speaker 1>aircraft that had a similar door plug to be grounded

0:38:55.880 --> 0:38:59.359
<v Speaker 1>until each one could undergo a thorough inspection. Boeing would

0:38:59.400 --> 0:39:02.000
<v Speaker 1>end up paying various airlines a whole lot of money

0:39:02.080 --> 0:39:04.240
<v Speaker 1>due to the fact that those airlines could not operate

0:39:04.280 --> 0:39:07.760
<v Speaker 1>the aircraft they had purchased while the FAA was conducting

0:39:07.800 --> 0:39:11.320
<v Speaker 1>this inspection process. But that wasn't the only headache Boeing

0:39:11.400 --> 0:39:14.560
<v Speaker 1>encountered this year. Another relates to the long awaited spacecraft,

0:39:14.600 --> 0:39:17.680
<v Speaker 1>the Boeing Starliner. The spacecraft's purpose is to serve as

0:39:17.680 --> 0:39:20.279
<v Speaker 1>a cargo and crew transport for space missions that go

0:39:20.360 --> 0:39:24.239
<v Speaker 1>into low Earth orbit, and the spacecraft itself is reusable.

0:39:24.280 --> 0:39:27.760
<v Speaker 1>It's also a tad roomier than the SpaceX crew Dragon

0:39:27.840 --> 0:39:31.960
<v Speaker 1>capsule or the old Apollo capsules. The rollout of the

0:39:32.000 --> 0:39:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Starliner faced numerous delays. Originally, the hope was that it

0:39:35.719 --> 0:39:38.799
<v Speaker 1>would enter into service by twenty seventeen, but that did

0:39:38.840 --> 0:39:42.680
<v Speaker 1>not happen. The first successful test flight wouldn't happen until

0:39:42.719 --> 0:39:46.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty two. That was an uncrewed test flight, and

0:39:46.520 --> 0:39:49.279
<v Speaker 1>this was the year when Starliner finally would bring astronauts

0:39:49.360 --> 0:39:53.360
<v Speaker 1>up to the space station. Unfortunately, the spacecraft would not

0:39:53.400 --> 0:39:56.520
<v Speaker 1>bring those astronauts back down again because on the way

0:39:56.560 --> 0:39:59.879
<v Speaker 1>to the space station, the Starliner experienced a partial thruster fail.

0:40:00.120 --> 0:40:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Ye Now, NASA, the astronauts aboard both the ISS and

0:40:04.120 --> 0:40:06.879
<v Speaker 1>the star Liner were collectively able to compensate for this,

0:40:07.400 --> 0:40:11.040
<v Speaker 1>and the spacecraft did dock safely with the International Space Station.

0:40:11.600 --> 0:40:14.480
<v Speaker 1>But after long consideration, NASA came to the determination that

0:40:14.520 --> 0:40:16.680
<v Speaker 1>it would be too risky to have the two astronauts

0:40:16.760 --> 0:40:19.880
<v Speaker 1>returned to Earth aboard the star Liner, and instead they

0:40:19.880 --> 0:40:22.280
<v Speaker 1>would have to wait for another opportunity to come home.

0:40:23.120 --> 0:40:25.960
<v Speaker 1>So what was supposed to be a short mission lasting

0:40:26.000 --> 0:40:28.919
<v Speaker 1>like less than two weeks, has now stretched into one

0:40:28.960 --> 0:40:31.439
<v Speaker 1>that's going to go all the way into twenty twenty five.

0:40:31.560 --> 0:40:34.440
<v Speaker 1>In fact, right now, NASA says that they can get

0:40:34.440 --> 0:40:37.080
<v Speaker 1>back no earlier than March twenty twenty five, and it

0:40:37.160 --> 0:40:40.200
<v Speaker 1>might be later than that. The incident, along with the

0:40:40.239 --> 0:40:43.560
<v Speaker 1>revelations regarding how expensive the star Liner missions are compared

0:40:43.560 --> 0:40:47.560
<v Speaker 1>to alternatives like SpaceX, have really created a great deal

0:40:47.600 --> 0:40:51.000
<v Speaker 1>of criticism directed both at Boeing and at NASA. Boeing's

0:40:51.040 --> 0:40:53.239
<v Speaker 1>been rather cagy about the whole thing. The company was

0:40:53.239 --> 0:40:57.080
<v Speaker 1>supposed to hold a press conference upon the uncrewed Starliner's

0:40:57.160 --> 0:41:00.880
<v Speaker 1>return to Earth this past September. The Boeing canceled that

0:41:00.960 --> 0:41:03.440
<v Speaker 1>event at the very last minute and didn't offer a

0:41:03.480 --> 0:41:06.640
<v Speaker 1>reason as to why they canceled it. Starliner's future in

0:41:06.680 --> 0:41:09.120
<v Speaker 1>the American space program remains another one of those big

0:41:09.200 --> 0:41:12.880
<v Speaker 1>question marks that we just don't know enough about yet. Theoretically,

0:41:12.960 --> 0:41:16.480
<v Speaker 1>once Boeing demonstrates to NASA's satisfaction that the star Liner

0:41:16.640 --> 0:41:20.279
<v Speaker 1>is spaceworthy, Boeing will then provide the star Liner for

0:41:20.320 --> 0:41:23.879
<v Speaker 1>three space missions. That's what a contract has agreed upon.

0:41:24.440 --> 0:41:27.880
<v Speaker 1>There's also an option for NASA to purchase additional missions,

0:41:27.880 --> 0:41:30.960
<v Speaker 1>I think three more per that contract. But as some

0:41:31.080 --> 0:41:33.560
<v Speaker 1>have pointed out, we're getting closer to the retirement date

0:41:33.600 --> 0:41:36.680
<v Speaker 1>of the International Space Station. We're talking like twenty thirty.

0:41:36.920 --> 0:41:39.960
<v Speaker 1>So by that time it may be that star Liner

0:41:40.000 --> 0:41:42.800
<v Speaker 1>has nowhere to take anybody because all the low Earth

0:41:42.920 --> 0:41:46.760
<v Speaker 1>orbit space stations we would go to will be gone,

0:41:46.880 --> 0:41:49.280
<v Speaker 1>all the ones that the United States has an interest

0:41:49.280 --> 0:41:52.960
<v Speaker 1>in it anyway. And finally, twenty twenty four was the

0:41:53.080 --> 0:41:57.040
<v Speaker 1>swan song for the Ingenuity Helicopter, the little aircraft on

0:41:57.080 --> 0:42:00.120
<v Speaker 1>Mars that flew far more times than was planned. The

0:42:00.280 --> 0:42:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Ingenuity was an experiment, could we design an aircraft that

0:42:03.360 --> 0:42:06.680
<v Speaker 1>could actually fly on Mars. So the atmosphere on Mars

0:42:06.719 --> 0:42:09.439
<v Speaker 1>is considerably thinner than what we have here on Earth,

0:42:09.480 --> 0:42:13.080
<v Speaker 1>which makes it hard to fly, but Mars's gravity is

0:42:13.080 --> 0:42:15.879
<v Speaker 1>about a third of Earth's, so that helps a little bit.

0:42:16.200 --> 0:42:18.200
<v Speaker 1>So the Ingenuity was a test to see if maybe

0:42:18.200 --> 0:42:20.799
<v Speaker 1>we could create an aircraft that could further explore the

0:42:20.800 --> 0:42:24.279
<v Speaker 1>Red planet and add to our scientific knowledge to that end.

0:42:24.320 --> 0:42:28.080
<v Speaker 1>While Ingenuity carried some basic sensors, it wasn't fully kitted out.

0:42:28.120 --> 0:42:30.640
<v Speaker 1>It was more of a proof of concept. The plan

0:42:30.800 --> 0:42:33.360
<v Speaker 1>was for Ingenuity to go on five flights when it

0:42:33.440 --> 0:42:35.919
<v Speaker 1>landed on Mars as part of the Perseverance Rover way

0:42:35.960 --> 0:42:39.560
<v Speaker 1>back in February twenty twenty one. The aircraft had to

0:42:39.560 --> 0:42:42.080
<v Speaker 1>fly autonomously because Mars is far enough away from Earth

0:42:42.120 --> 0:42:44.360
<v Speaker 1>that it takes several minutes for radio waves to travel

0:42:44.400 --> 0:42:47.439
<v Speaker 1>between the two, so you can't remote control it from Earth.

0:42:48.160 --> 0:42:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Rather than just complete five flights, however, Ingenuity would ultimately

0:42:51.800 --> 0:42:56.360
<v Speaker 1>take off seventy two times. These flights were relatively modest,

0:42:56.400 --> 0:42:59.600
<v Speaker 1>with altitudes of around ten to sixteen feet in flight

0:42:59.640 --> 0:43:01.320
<v Speaker 1>times light i to around a minute and a half,

0:43:01.640 --> 0:43:06.200
<v Speaker 1>but by golly, Ingenuity outperformed all expectations until finally this year.

0:43:07.080 --> 0:43:10.560
<v Speaker 1>One of Ingenuity's rotors broke off in January when it

0:43:10.600 --> 0:43:13.120
<v Speaker 1>came in for a landing and there was a miscalculation.

0:43:13.200 --> 0:43:16.480
<v Speaker 1>So apparently the Ingenuity made an error because it was

0:43:16.520 --> 0:43:19.600
<v Speaker 1>passing over what NASA referred to as a largely featureless

0:43:19.640 --> 0:43:23.000
<v Speaker 1>region and it just made a miscalculation of where the

0:43:23.040 --> 0:43:26.040
<v Speaker 1>ground was. That this is something the agency said will

0:43:26.080 --> 0:43:27.600
<v Speaker 1>not be a problem in the future when they have

0:43:27.680 --> 0:43:33.040
<v Speaker 1>a better mapped system of Mars's surface. But considering that

0:43:33.239 --> 0:43:35.439
<v Speaker 1>Ingenuity was only supposed to fly five times, it's still

0:43:35.440 --> 0:43:39.440
<v Speaker 1>really impressive. While Ingenuity will go sailing no more, I mean,

0:43:39.480 --> 0:43:43.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, flying no more, it is still operating even

0:43:44.000 --> 0:43:49.480
<v Speaker 1>as it's out of range radio communications leave perseverance. Ingenuity

0:43:49.520 --> 0:43:52.040
<v Speaker 1>is serving as a stationary platform that's testing stuff like

0:43:52.120 --> 0:43:55.719
<v Speaker 1>solar panel performance and battery operations. That's information that will

0:43:55.719 --> 0:43:57.960
<v Speaker 1>be invaluable should we ever take the step of actually

0:43:57.960 --> 0:44:01.160
<v Speaker 1>sending humans to Mars, or maybe even the grander dreams

0:44:01.200 --> 0:44:04.359
<v Speaker 1>of perhaps establishing a semi permanent colony there. But that's

0:44:04.360 --> 0:44:07.680
<v Speaker 1>putting the space cart before the space horse and that's it.

0:44:07.800 --> 0:44:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Those are the top stories of twenty twenty four that

0:44:10.160 --> 0:44:13.040
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to focus on, not saying that's all the

0:44:13.080 --> 0:44:15.240
<v Speaker 1>top stories, just the ones I wanted to talk about.

0:44:15.760 --> 0:44:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Hope you enjoyed this look back on some of the

0:44:17.840 --> 0:44:20.879
<v Speaker 1>big events of twenty twenty four, and I look forward

0:44:20.880 --> 0:44:29.279
<v Speaker 1>to chatting with you again really soon. Tech Stuff is

0:44:29.320 --> 0:44:33.880
<v Speaker 1>an iHeartRadio production. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the

0:44:33.920 --> 0:44:37.560
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your

0:44:37.600 --> 0:44:41.800
<v Speaker 1>favorite shows.