WEBVTT - Keep learning, with Alexandra Levit

0:00:03.000 --> 0:00:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Before Breakfast, a production of iHeartRadio. Good Morning,

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>This is Laura. Welcome to the Before Breakfast podcast. Today's

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:17.799
<v Speaker 1>episode is going to be a longer one part of

0:00:17.800 --> 0:00:21.160
<v Speaker 1>this series where I interview fascinating people about how they

0:00:21.160 --> 0:00:24.079
<v Speaker 1>take their days from great to awesome and any advice

0:00:24.160 --> 0:00:26.759
<v Speaker 1>they have for the rest of us. So today I

0:00:26.800 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 1>am delighted to welcome Alexandra Lovitt to Before Breakfast. Alexandra

0:00:30.680 --> 0:00:33.600
<v Speaker 1>is the founder and CEO of Inspiration at Work, which

0:00:33.640 --> 0:00:36.800
<v Speaker 1>is a futurist consulting business. She is also a speaker

0:00:37.120 --> 0:00:39.800
<v Speaker 1>and the author of They Don't Teach Corporate in College

0:00:39.840 --> 0:00:43.520
<v Speaker 1>and the new book Make School Work. So Alexandra, welcome

0:00:43.520 --> 0:00:44.080
<v Speaker 1>to the show.

0:00:44.520 --> 0:00:47.040
<v Speaker 2>Thanks Laura. So good to be back and chatting with

0:00:47.080 --> 0:00:50.640
<v Speaker 2>you after a little bit of time has passed. Yeah.

0:00:50.720 --> 0:00:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's so good to reconnect with people. I'm loving

0:00:53.360 --> 0:00:56.360
<v Speaker 1>that I'm getting to share these conversations with everyone. Why

0:00:56.360 --> 0:00:58.360
<v Speaker 1>don't you tell our listeners a little bit about yourself?

0:00:59.400 --> 0:01:04.640
<v Speaker 2>Well, these days, I am a fashioned workforce futurist and

0:01:04.800 --> 0:01:08.600
<v Speaker 2>what this essentially means is that I work with organizations

0:01:08.840 --> 0:01:13.360
<v Speaker 2>and governments to ascertain what has the greatest potential for

0:01:13.440 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 2>disruption in the world of work and then devise scenarios

0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:21.800
<v Speaker 2>and plans for getting through those disruptions in the most

0:01:21.840 --> 0:01:26.160
<v Speaker 2>productive way possible. And how I became connected with the

0:01:26.200 --> 0:01:31.560
<v Speaker 2>future of education was through an organization called GPS Education Partners,

0:01:31.800 --> 0:01:36.720
<v Speaker 2>and they are shaping the world of work through training

0:01:38.040 --> 0:01:42.039
<v Speaker 2>students at a younger age to participate meaningfully in the

0:01:42.080 --> 0:01:46.320
<v Speaker 2>workforce through work based learning experiences. And you and I

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:49.680
<v Speaker 2>we've probably talked about this before, but since I've gotten

0:01:49.680 --> 0:01:52.520
<v Speaker 2>into this field about twenty five years ago, there's been

0:01:53.160 --> 0:01:58.120
<v Speaker 2>a pretty persistent problem that has just kept me up

0:01:58.120 --> 0:02:01.240
<v Speaker 2>at night, niggled in my brain. And that's that there

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:04.800
<v Speaker 2>is this gap between the jobs that are available for

0:02:04.880 --> 0:02:08.840
<v Speaker 2>people to take and the talent that is wanting to

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 2>take those jobs. And so throughout the course of my career,

0:02:12.600 --> 0:02:15.079
<v Speaker 2>I've been on the hunt for a solution that would

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:18.840
<v Speaker 2>pair effectively talent that is available for work with the

0:02:18.919 --> 0:02:23.040
<v Speaker 2>jobs that organizations need to fill. And so by pipelining

0:02:23.120 --> 0:02:28.239
<v Speaker 2>students at a younger age into a specific career, or

0:02:28.280 --> 0:02:31.280
<v Speaker 2>at least giving them good exposure to it, I think

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:34.840
<v Speaker 2>we start to mitigate the problem of not having the

0:02:34.960 --> 0:02:36.960
<v Speaker 2>right people for the right positions.

0:02:37.639 --> 0:02:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Well, what are we doing wrong with education that leads

0:02:41.400 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 1>to this mismatch, this gap.

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:45.880
<v Speaker 2>Well, Laura goes all the way back to my first book,

0:02:45.960 --> 0:02:47.960
<v Speaker 2>which I know we talked about a long time ago.

0:02:48.480 --> 0:02:51.799
<v Speaker 2>They don't teach corporate in college, and that more or

0:02:51.919 --> 0:02:54.160
<v Speaker 2>less sums up at least part of the problem, which

0:02:54.200 --> 0:02:58.480
<v Speaker 2>is that the mandates of education don't really match up

0:02:58.520 --> 0:03:01.400
<v Speaker 2>to what students need to know in the real world.

0:03:01.919 --> 0:03:04.320
<v Speaker 2>And this has only become in the last twenty five

0:03:04.400 --> 0:03:09.480
<v Speaker 2>years more relevant because things are changing faster. So when

0:03:09.480 --> 0:03:12.760
<v Speaker 2>you think about an established curriculum in high school or college,

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:16.120
<v Speaker 2>it is static for a long period of time, and

0:03:16.200 --> 0:03:18.680
<v Speaker 2>often by the time a student gets out of a

0:03:18.720 --> 0:03:21.399
<v Speaker 2>degree program, whether it's a secondary degree or a post

0:03:21.480 --> 0:03:25.800
<v Speaker 2>secondary degree, that material has become obsolete or at the

0:03:25.880 --> 0:03:29.560
<v Speaker 2>very least needs to be substantially updated or assimilated into

0:03:29.760 --> 0:03:33.280
<v Speaker 2>the reality of business today. So I think what we've

0:03:33.320 --> 0:03:37.880
<v Speaker 2>been still doing is relying on education, the traditional model

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:42.240
<v Speaker 2>of education, to adequately prepare young people for the workforce.

0:03:42.480 --> 0:03:44.360
<v Speaker 2>And by the way, this is any workforce. It's not

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:48.160
<v Speaker 2>just a traditional white collar workforce, or it's any kind

0:03:48.160 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 2>of job. Students don't have an intuitive, natural sense of

0:03:52.320 --> 0:03:55.840
<v Speaker 2>how those work because they've never had the experience before.

0:03:56.320 --> 0:04:00.000
<v Speaker 2>So we are not providing students with enough concrete operation

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:05.200
<v Speaker 2>ttunities to experience the work world, to experience the different

0:04:05.240 --> 0:04:08.480
<v Speaker 2>career paths that they might be interested in, both to

0:04:08.520 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 2>determine what they do like and also what they don't like.

0:04:12.240 --> 0:04:16.160
<v Speaker 2>That's just as much of a valuable experience too, because

0:04:16.480 --> 0:04:21.599
<v Speaker 2>if you, for example, are interested in engineering, you might,

0:04:21.800 --> 0:04:24.560
<v Speaker 2>as a high school student, have absolutely no idea what

0:04:24.600 --> 0:04:27.919
<v Speaker 2>that means in practicality. And if you don't have an

0:04:28.000 --> 0:04:31.719
<v Speaker 2>experience like work based learning, you may go to a

0:04:31.800 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 2>four year college and you may get a degree in engineering,

0:04:35.880 --> 0:04:38.920
<v Speaker 2>and you may realize that somewhere down the line, either

0:04:38.960 --> 0:04:42.599
<v Speaker 2>in an internship or a post graduation work situation, that

0:04:42.680 --> 0:04:44.919
<v Speaker 2>it's nothing like what you expected, you don't like it

0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:47.599
<v Speaker 2>at all, And then you've just spent four years of

0:04:47.640 --> 0:04:52.240
<v Speaker 2>a very expensive education to not do something that has

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:55.800
<v Speaker 2>anything to do with that degree. So I view it

0:04:55.880 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 2>as something that needs to be at least investigated at

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 2>an early your stage in a student's development.

0:05:02.920 --> 0:05:05.000
<v Speaker 1>So what would that look like, I mean, is like

0:05:05.160 --> 0:05:08.800
<v Speaker 1>more internships, more stuff that like courses that look like work.

0:05:08.839 --> 0:05:10.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm very curious what it would what it

0:05:10.400 --> 0:05:10.960
<v Speaker 1>would look like.

0:05:11.160 --> 0:05:12.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean this is this is a great question,

0:05:13.120 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 2>and I think we can look to other countries as

0:05:17.120 --> 0:05:18.880
<v Speaker 2>an example. Here in the US we are not as

0:05:18.960 --> 0:05:24.240
<v Speaker 2>good at things like apprenticeships as many organizations who are

0:05:24.320 --> 0:05:28.200
<v Speaker 2>European based, for example, and many governments they've got really

0:05:28.520 --> 0:05:32.480
<v Speaker 2>much more robust public and private sector partnerships over there,

0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:35.880
<v Speaker 2>where it's expected almost that you do some kind of

0:05:35.880 --> 0:05:38.240
<v Speaker 2>work based learning in at the high school level and

0:05:38.240 --> 0:05:41.440
<v Speaker 2>sometimes even earlier. So what we are trying to and

0:05:41.800 --> 0:05:45.039
<v Speaker 2>I say we it's it's not really me, it's organizations

0:05:45.160 --> 0:05:48.640
<v Speaker 2>like GPS Education Partners, who I worked with on this book.

0:05:49.279 --> 0:05:54.000
<v Speaker 2>What we are trying to do is establish a six

0:05:54.120 --> 0:05:58.640
<v Speaker 2>part framework for if you are interested in launching a

0:05:58.680 --> 0:06:01.600
<v Speaker 2>work based learning program, which is basically what it sounds like.

0:06:01.760 --> 0:06:06.120
<v Speaker 2>It's learning by working in a real world situation such

0:06:06.120 --> 0:06:11.960
<v Speaker 2>as on a factory floor, and to be able to

0:06:12.040 --> 0:06:17.680
<v Speaker 2>work with other stakeholders and other constituents in your immediate purview.

0:06:17.800 --> 0:06:20.719
<v Speaker 2>And obviously this is going to vary depending on where

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:23.120
<v Speaker 2>you are or what your role is. So let's say

0:06:23.200 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 2>you are an employer who wants to stay in a

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:29.719
<v Speaker 2>given geographic area, but has no idea where to get

0:06:29.720 --> 0:06:32.640
<v Speaker 2>talent and is struggling to get talent. Maybe you're a

0:06:32.680 --> 0:06:35.039
<v Speaker 2>mid sized company and you don't know how to get

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:39.720
<v Speaker 2>talent to compete with the bigger companies that have name recognition.

0:06:40.200 --> 0:06:42.360
<v Speaker 2>So you want to start a work based learning program,

0:06:42.400 --> 0:06:44.840
<v Speaker 2>but you don't know where how to get how to

0:06:44.880 --> 0:06:49.000
<v Speaker 2>get this going, and so you might partner with what

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:54.240
<v Speaker 2>we call convener and intermediary like GPS Education Partners, and

0:06:54.279 --> 0:06:58.120
<v Speaker 2>you might partner with policymakers. You might partner with school districts,

0:06:58.440 --> 0:07:01.679
<v Speaker 2>get everyone together on the same page, and just follow

0:07:01.960 --> 0:07:05.760
<v Speaker 2>this blueprint for how to get a work based learning

0:07:05.800 --> 0:07:09.600
<v Speaker 2>pilot off the ground. And the most important thing about

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:13.360
<v Speaker 2>this is it doesn't have to be done alone. If

0:07:13.400 --> 0:07:15.880
<v Speaker 2>you're an employer, obviously you might not have a frame

0:07:15.920 --> 0:07:19.120
<v Speaker 2>of reference for setting something like this up. But to

0:07:19.400 --> 0:07:21.640
<v Speaker 2>go to people who do know how to do it

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:24.200
<v Speaker 2>and do know how to get all the parts working together,

0:07:24.440 --> 0:07:26.920
<v Speaker 2>I think that's a very very critical piece of this,

0:07:27.560 --> 0:07:29.200
<v Speaker 2>and so that is what we're trying to do with

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:32.760
<v Speaker 2>our book. We're trying to literally tell people this is

0:07:32.800 --> 0:07:35.640
<v Speaker 2>what you do, step by step if you're interested in

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:39.200
<v Speaker 2>getting this set up and what it ends up as

0:07:39.280 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 2>it really does depend again on the individual situation. But

0:07:42.720 --> 0:07:45.640
<v Speaker 2>in an ideal world, students would be spending part of

0:07:45.680 --> 0:07:50.080
<v Speaker 2>their school day in a real world employment situation, learning,

0:07:50.080 --> 0:07:53.400
<v Speaker 2>for example, a new piece of manufacturing and technology that's

0:07:53.480 --> 0:07:58.080
<v Speaker 2>leveraging robotics to do work and production more efficiently. That's

0:07:58.120 --> 0:08:01.480
<v Speaker 2>just an example. The student comes in, the student is

0:08:02.120 --> 0:08:04.800
<v Speaker 2>working with employees or a bit older or have a

0:08:04.880 --> 0:08:08.080
<v Speaker 2>bit more experience, so they're learning not only these hard

0:08:08.160 --> 0:08:12.480
<v Speaker 2>technical skills, but also the skills that are necessary just

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:15.800
<v Speaker 2>interpersonally to assimilate into the work world that we talk

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:20.760
<v Speaker 2>about so often. And then they are using their academic

0:08:21.000 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 2>education to support what they are learning in the work environment.

0:08:26.080 --> 0:08:30.000
<v Speaker 2>So this might be they are taking some classes on

0:08:30.160 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 2>site at an education center that are related to let's say,

0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:38.960
<v Speaker 2>using our existing example to manufacturing, getting a manufacturing certification,

0:08:39.600 --> 0:08:44.200
<v Speaker 2>so that their academic education does actually line up with

0:08:44.440 --> 0:08:48.480
<v Speaker 2>the work based learning experience. And what I also love

0:08:48.480 --> 0:08:51.240
<v Speaker 2>about work based learning is that by the time you

0:08:51.320 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 2>get to the end of your experience, you have a

0:08:53.320 --> 0:08:55.640
<v Speaker 2>much better idea of whether this is a career path

0:08:56.040 --> 0:08:58.720
<v Speaker 2>that you would like to pursue, and if so, what

0:08:58.880 --> 0:09:02.000
<v Speaker 2>kind of education do you need in order to get

0:09:02.120 --> 0:09:05.880
<v Speaker 2>ahead in that career path. And I wish, for example,

0:09:06.040 --> 0:09:09.000
<v Speaker 2>my son, who is the person I was speaking of

0:09:09.040 --> 0:09:11.720
<v Speaker 2>when I was talking about the engineering example, I wish

0:09:11.840 --> 0:09:15.720
<v Speaker 2>that he had done something like this so that going

0:09:15.760 --> 0:09:20.000
<v Speaker 2>to a four year college was a sensible, informed decision,

0:09:20.240 --> 0:09:23.280
<v Speaker 2>Whereas right now it's kind of a crapshoot. We really

0:09:23.280 --> 0:09:27.080
<v Speaker 2>have no idea what's going to happen when he gets

0:09:27.080 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 2>that degree, or if he's even going to like that degree.

0:09:29.080 --> 0:09:32.440
<v Speaker 2>Whereas if you participate in work based learning prior to

0:09:32.520 --> 0:09:35.679
<v Speaker 2>going to college, you can ascertain is a four year

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:39.360
<v Speaker 2>college degree the next appropriate step for me? And maybe

0:09:39.400 --> 0:09:41.520
<v Speaker 2>you can even have your employer, if you're going to

0:09:41.520 --> 0:09:46.040
<v Speaker 2>continue working with that organization, help you financially with that degree,

0:09:46.080 --> 0:09:48.960
<v Speaker 2>because the employer recognizes the value in you having that

0:09:49.240 --> 0:09:54.000
<v Speaker 2>additional education. So essentially, it just means that post secondary

0:09:54.120 --> 0:09:57.600
<v Speaker 2>education makes more sense for the individual before rather than

0:09:57.640 --> 0:10:00.960
<v Speaker 2>just pipelining every student into a four year degree program,

0:10:01.000 --> 0:10:03.240
<v Speaker 2>which is the model that we in the US have

0:10:03.360 --> 0:10:04.440
<v Speaker 2>had for quite some time.

0:10:05.200 --> 0:10:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, well, we're going to take a quick ad break

0:10:07.400 --> 0:10:08.800
<v Speaker 1>and then we're going to come back and talk more

0:10:08.840 --> 0:10:12.000
<v Speaker 1>about how people can learn more while on the job

0:10:12.160 --> 0:10:21.800
<v Speaker 1>for the jobs of the future. Well, I am back

0:10:21.920 --> 0:10:25.679
<v Speaker 1>talking with Alexandra Lovett, who is a futurist also the

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:27.720
<v Speaker 1>author of They Don't Teach Corporate in College and the

0:10:27.760 --> 0:10:30.200
<v Speaker 1>new book Make School Work. We've been talking about work

0:10:30.200 --> 0:10:33.560
<v Speaker 1>based learning, but you know that's great for young people.

0:10:33.880 --> 0:10:35.720
<v Speaker 1>A lot of the people listening to this are adults

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:39.960
<v Speaker 1>and they may have student children who would like benefit

0:10:40.000 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 1>from this, But a lot of people are concerned about

0:10:43.400 --> 0:10:47.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, I need to keep learning as well. You know,

0:10:47.720 --> 0:10:49.679
<v Speaker 1>we keep hearing that the jobs of the future may

0:10:49.679 --> 0:10:52.040
<v Speaker 1>be different than the jobs of today or whatever they

0:10:52.720 --> 0:10:56.600
<v Speaker 1>catch phrases are. So how should people who are already

0:10:56.640 --> 0:10:58.880
<v Speaker 1>in the workforce now be thinking about the skills they

0:10:58.960 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 1>might need in the future.

0:11:00.640 --> 0:11:03.160
<v Speaker 2>One of my favorite topics, And you know, I get

0:11:03.200 --> 0:11:08.079
<v Speaker 2>asked every single day about AI's impact on the workforce

0:11:08.480 --> 0:11:11.360
<v Speaker 2>and its impact on skills and what we will need

0:11:11.400 --> 0:11:15.240
<v Speaker 2>to do in order to as humans meaningfully contribute to

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:18.040
<v Speaker 2>our organizations going forward. So I think this gets to

0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:21.600
<v Speaker 2>the heart of your question because AI is one of

0:11:21.600 --> 0:11:25.040
<v Speaker 2>those things where most people in the workforce today are

0:11:25.080 --> 0:11:29.480
<v Speaker 2>starting with a blank slate. Nobody really has these skills.

0:11:29.600 --> 0:11:32.640
<v Speaker 2>If you do have skills, maybe they're pretty rudimentary, like

0:11:32.720 --> 0:11:36.600
<v Speaker 2>you know how to type something into CHATGYBT or claude

0:11:36.640 --> 0:11:40.440
<v Speaker 2>and get some kind of sensible answer to it. But

0:11:40.840 --> 0:11:44.520
<v Speaker 2>that is really only the starting point for leveraging let's

0:11:44.520 --> 0:11:48.360
<v Speaker 2>say generative AI effectively. And so what I'm recommending that

0:11:48.440 --> 0:11:51.760
<v Speaker 2>everybody do is, first of all, have a mindset of

0:11:51.840 --> 0:11:56.520
<v Speaker 2>learning agility, understanding that your learning is not over just

0:11:56.559 --> 0:12:00.800
<v Speaker 2>because you're no longer in formal education, and that having

0:12:01.160 --> 0:12:06.480
<v Speaker 2>a gainful employment situation for the foreseeable future means that

0:12:06.520 --> 0:12:10.520
<v Speaker 2>you have to be continuously revisiting what skills you have

0:12:11.040 --> 0:12:13.520
<v Speaker 2>and what skills you need. And in terms of where

0:12:13.559 --> 0:12:17.120
<v Speaker 2>to start with this, I always recommend that people take

0:12:17.160 --> 0:12:21.640
<v Speaker 2>a look around and say, what are the parts of

0:12:21.720 --> 0:12:27.000
<v Speaker 2>my current job that are being automated and what do

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:31.439
<v Speaker 2>I need to learn to still have a productive role

0:12:31.640 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 2>in whatever process or workflow I'm involved in. So it

0:12:36.000 --> 0:12:40.600
<v Speaker 2>really does involve a little bit of individual employees being

0:12:40.679 --> 0:12:44.760
<v Speaker 2>MANI futurists. You have to kind of look around and say, okay,

0:12:45.000 --> 0:12:48.320
<v Speaker 2>this is the area that is most vulnerable to automation,

0:12:48.960 --> 0:12:53.080
<v Speaker 2>and what additional or adjacent skills can I develop? In

0:12:53.240 --> 0:12:56.320
<v Speaker 2>order to continue to participate. And I'll give you a

0:12:56.480 --> 0:13:01.640
<v Speaker 2>very clean example of this. I'm a workplace columnists for

0:13:01.720 --> 0:13:06.040
<v Speaker 2>several different outlets. When I think about column writing and

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:09.520
<v Speaker 2>I write on the workforce, of course, I think about

0:13:09.720 --> 0:13:13.559
<v Speaker 2>what AI is capable of doing in that process today

0:13:14.000 --> 0:13:16.080
<v Speaker 2>and what is it going to be capable of doing

0:13:16.240 --> 0:13:19.320
<v Speaker 2>at some point in the near future. And from a

0:13:19.360 --> 0:13:24.480
<v Speaker 2>writing column perspective, the writing itself is actually likely to

0:13:24.640 --> 0:13:28.160
<v Speaker 2>be done by AI. It's already, it's already happening. And

0:13:28.800 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 2>if I just rely on that writing skill, I could

0:13:32.160 --> 0:13:34.720
<v Speaker 2>be out of a job within a couple of years.

0:13:35.160 --> 0:13:38.960
<v Speaker 2>So instead, I have to look at the entire process

0:13:39.160 --> 0:13:42.600
<v Speaker 2>of the production of a column and say, h, there

0:13:42.600 --> 0:13:48.680
<v Speaker 2>are things like fact checking, interviewing with sensitive sources, editing.

0:13:49.280 --> 0:13:51.760
<v Speaker 2>Those are all things that, let's say, the Wall Street Journal,

0:13:51.800 --> 0:13:55.160
<v Speaker 2>for example, is not going to allow to be done

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:59.080
<v Speaker 2>completely by AI. Some of those things, there's got to

0:13:59.200 --> 0:14:01.960
<v Speaker 2>continue to be a human in the loop. And if

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:05.280
<v Speaker 2>I want to keep writing columns or keep doing columns,

0:14:05.600 --> 0:14:07.680
<v Speaker 2>I need to think about how I can acquire the

0:14:07.840 --> 0:14:11.480
<v Speaker 2>editing skill, how I can acquire the fact checking skill,

0:14:11.559 --> 0:14:15.080
<v Speaker 2>and how I can enhance the in person or phone

0:14:15.160 --> 0:14:17.760
<v Speaker 2>or video interviewing that I do with people so that

0:14:17.880 --> 0:14:21.400
<v Speaker 2>sensitive sources can continue to feel comfortable because there are

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:24.240
<v Speaker 2>going to always be sources that are not going to

0:14:24.320 --> 0:14:27.840
<v Speaker 2>be jazzed about revealing things to an AI. And I

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:30.720
<v Speaker 2>think that's just how it's probably going to be. I

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:33.960
<v Speaker 2>could be wrong, but I am staying a step ahead

0:14:34.000 --> 0:14:36.360
<v Speaker 2>of the situation in which I do not have a

0:14:36.760 --> 0:14:41.280
<v Speaker 2>role anymore, because the writing itself is being done by AI,

0:14:41.400 --> 0:14:44.640
<v Speaker 2>and everybody who is in a job, regardless of what

0:14:44.680 --> 0:14:47.280
<v Speaker 2>that job is, needs to be doing that same type

0:14:47.320 --> 0:14:50.720
<v Speaker 2>of thinking what can be automated or what's on the

0:14:51.240 --> 0:14:54.520
<v Speaker 2>chopping block to be automated, and how can I acquire

0:14:54.560 --> 0:14:56.880
<v Speaker 2>those additional skills? And in terms of where you acquire

0:14:56.920 --> 0:14:59.800
<v Speaker 2>the skills, we are lucky in the sense that there

0:14:59.880 --> 0:15:03.760
<v Speaker 2>is more skill acquisition opportunity just out there in the

0:15:03.800 --> 0:15:06.440
<v Speaker 2>public domain than there ever was previously.

0:15:06.880 --> 0:15:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Things like well, why don't you give us some examples

0:15:09.520 --> 0:15:12.520
<v Speaker 1>of where people should go to look like, let's say

0:15:12.520 --> 0:15:15.440
<v Speaker 1>they've identified a skill that they would like to have

0:15:16.080 --> 0:15:19.040
<v Speaker 1>and then they basically need to design their own curriculum

0:15:19.080 --> 0:15:22.160
<v Speaker 1>because their company isn't doing this for them. What should

0:15:22.160 --> 0:15:22.440
<v Speaker 1>they do?

0:15:23.200 --> 0:15:25.880
<v Speaker 2>So I think looking online is just a great way

0:15:25.920 --> 0:15:30.880
<v Speaker 2>to start. There are so many really prestigious universities actually

0:15:30.920 --> 0:15:34.320
<v Speaker 2>that are offering free versions of certain classes. This is

0:15:34.400 --> 0:15:37.840
<v Speaker 2>especially true in technology, but is also relevant in other

0:15:37.920 --> 0:15:42.920
<v Speaker 2>fields as well. There are so many online repositories of

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:47.080
<v Speaker 2>learning content Coursera to me. I call it ut to me.

0:15:47.160 --> 0:15:50.520
<v Speaker 2>Some other people say you to me, but there are

0:15:50.520 --> 0:15:55.680
<v Speaker 2>dozens of those that you can go and access different

0:15:55.720 --> 0:15:59.080
<v Speaker 2>types of learning opportunities. LinkedIn learning is another really really

0:15:59.120 --> 0:16:03.480
<v Speaker 2>good one. I have taken several of those courses through

0:16:03.680 --> 0:16:06.440
<v Speaker 2>that my colleagues have produced to learn think more about

0:16:06.440 --> 0:16:09.000
<v Speaker 2>what they do and get a little bit deeper on

0:16:09.160 --> 0:16:12.000
<v Speaker 2>certain topics. You can also ask, I mean, there's the

0:16:12.560 --> 0:16:15.960
<v Speaker 2>old fashion just asking to be mentored by someone who

0:16:16.480 --> 0:16:18.080
<v Speaker 2>might be in your field and might be a little

0:16:18.080 --> 0:16:22.760
<v Speaker 2>bit further ahead on let's say that AI skill development

0:16:22.960 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 2>and how it applies specifically to your workflow or business process.

0:16:28.080 --> 0:16:31.640
<v Speaker 2>And that's what I recommend. It doesn't matter again, what

0:16:31.720 --> 0:16:34.440
<v Speaker 2>the level of the person is, because the level doesn't

0:16:34.480 --> 0:16:37.920
<v Speaker 2>necessarily correlate with the knowledge. You could have young people

0:16:37.920 --> 0:16:39.600
<v Speaker 2>who are really really good at AI. You could have

0:16:39.640 --> 0:16:41.880
<v Speaker 2>senior people who are really really good at AI. It

0:16:41.960 --> 0:16:44.400
<v Speaker 2>is a bit of a misconception that all young people

0:16:44.400 --> 0:16:47.760
<v Speaker 2>are good at technology. I don't think that's necessarily true.

0:16:47.760 --> 0:16:50.120
<v Speaker 2>It just depends on the person. And so looking for

0:16:50.200 --> 0:16:53.720
<v Speaker 2>that person within your purview who has a generosity of

0:16:53.800 --> 0:16:56.040
<v Speaker 2>spirit and who also seems to know what they're doing,

0:16:56.400 --> 0:17:00.640
<v Speaker 2>and shadowing them and learning how are they prompting the

0:17:01.120 --> 0:17:03.520
<v Speaker 2>technology to get it to work for them for what

0:17:03.560 --> 0:17:06.800
<v Speaker 2>they're trying to do. I have learned so much just

0:17:07.560 --> 0:17:10.400
<v Speaker 2>in passing with conversations people, Oh my god, you're using

0:17:10.440 --> 0:17:12.439
<v Speaker 2>AI to do that? Really, how do you do that?

0:17:12.920 --> 0:17:15.000
<v Speaker 2>And then you literally just learned it on the job

0:17:15.119 --> 0:17:17.040
<v Speaker 2>right there, And so.

0:17:16.960 --> 0:17:19.479
<v Speaker 1>What are you doing using it for in your life currently?

0:17:19.680 --> 0:17:22.119
<v Speaker 2>Oh so it's a really good question. So, Laura, I

0:17:22.160 --> 0:17:25.440
<v Speaker 2>don't use it for any writing. And I'll tell you

0:17:25.520 --> 0:17:28.640
<v Speaker 2>a little bit kind of a funny story. One time

0:17:28.920 --> 0:17:31.919
<v Speaker 2>a few months ago, a client said to me that

0:17:32.000 --> 0:17:34.119
<v Speaker 2>they thought a white paper that I had written was

0:17:34.200 --> 0:17:37.879
<v Speaker 2>generated by AI. And I asked them, how how did

0:17:37.920 --> 0:17:41.000
<v Speaker 2>they come up with that? And they said, well, I

0:17:41.160 --> 0:17:45.800
<v Speaker 2>put it into one of the AI you know, detectors,

0:17:46.200 --> 0:17:49.320
<v Speaker 2>and it said it's got it's eighty five percent. Sounds

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:52.240
<v Speaker 2>like something that's already out there. But what the client

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:56.479
<v Speaker 2>didn't do was click on the source that the AI

0:17:56.840 --> 0:18:01.520
<v Speaker 2>was generating this information from and found that the source

0:18:01.560 --> 0:18:04.720
<v Speaker 2>that the AI had been trained on was my own content.

0:18:05.680 --> 0:18:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, so it was like, you know, you and.

0:18:07.880 --> 0:18:10.159
<v Speaker 2>I have been in this and in our spaces for

0:18:10.200 --> 0:18:12.440
<v Speaker 2>a while, and so we've generated a lot of content.

0:18:12.520 --> 0:18:15.240
<v Speaker 2>And AI is only as smart as the content that

0:18:15.280 --> 0:18:20.400
<v Speaker 2>it's trained on. So therefore it can't necessarily be relied

0:18:20.480 --> 0:18:24.840
<v Speaker 2>upon a to be unique in its thinking and b

0:18:25.240 --> 0:18:28.320
<v Speaker 2>to put things together in a way that makes sense.

0:18:28.720 --> 0:18:31.480
<v Speaker 2>If I look at the AI version of my content,

0:18:31.600 --> 0:18:34.880
<v Speaker 2>sometimes if I dig a little bit below the surface,

0:18:34.920 --> 0:18:37.880
<v Speaker 2>I can see that it doesn't quite make sense. And

0:18:38.080 --> 0:18:40.359
<v Speaker 2>this is why humans still need to be in the

0:18:40.400 --> 0:18:43.600
<v Speaker 2>loop when evaluating AI content, because people who are new

0:18:43.600 --> 0:18:45.840
<v Speaker 2>to an industry, are new to a role, might not

0:18:46.080 --> 0:18:49.159
<v Speaker 2>have that institutional knowledge or skills to recognize that what

0:18:49.200 --> 0:18:52.840
<v Speaker 2>they're reading is not one hundred percent accurate or relevant.

0:18:53.359 --> 0:18:58.200
<v Speaker 2>So I definitely use it for things like background research.

0:18:59.200 --> 0:19:01.280
<v Speaker 2>I do want to give the caveat with research, you

0:19:01.359 --> 0:19:03.879
<v Speaker 2>have to be very careful about the data you're getting

0:19:03.920 --> 0:19:06.959
<v Speaker 2>and making sure that you are still looking at the

0:19:07.000 --> 0:19:10.440
<v Speaker 2>sources that the AI is citing to ensure that those

0:19:10.440 --> 0:19:13.080
<v Speaker 2>are reputable sources, because a lot of times AI doesn't

0:19:13.080 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 2>know the difference. So this goes back to having some

0:19:15.720 --> 0:19:20.760
<v Speaker 2>degree of knowledge in your field, but just summarizing and

0:19:21.920 --> 0:19:28.000
<v Speaker 2>I would say collating a bunch of information that is

0:19:28.040 --> 0:19:30.399
<v Speaker 2>in a lot of different sources. I think AI is

0:19:30.440 --> 0:19:33.160
<v Speaker 2>really really good for that. I think it's sometimes it's

0:19:33.160 --> 0:19:35.119
<v Speaker 2>a good thought starter if you just don't even know

0:19:35.160 --> 0:19:38.280
<v Speaker 2>where to begin on a topic or on a project,

0:19:38.560 --> 0:19:41.280
<v Speaker 2>it can give you some starting ideas. It can absolutely

0:19:41.280 --> 0:19:46.400
<v Speaker 2>hold you accountable. I am now experimenting with using AI

0:19:46.520 --> 0:19:50.960
<v Speaker 2>for personal coaching, for career coaching, and I am recognizing

0:19:51.080 --> 0:19:54.239
<v Speaker 2>how sycophantic it is, which for those who might not

0:19:54.359 --> 0:19:57.040
<v Speaker 2>have heard that term, it really means that AI is

0:19:57.080 --> 0:20:00.760
<v Speaker 2>looking blowing smoke up your butt and validating you kind

0:20:00.760 --> 0:20:04.800
<v Speaker 2>of to an extreme extent. And it's a great point, Alexander,

0:20:06.160 --> 0:20:10.960
<v Speaker 2>that very funny. Yeah, So it does that, and you

0:20:11.080 --> 0:20:13.480
<v Speaker 2>have to you have to really be and this this

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:16.520
<v Speaker 2>goes to AI skill acquisition, right, you have to understand

0:20:16.520 --> 0:20:19.600
<v Speaker 2>how to prompt it. So it's giving you a really

0:20:19.760 --> 0:20:23.440
<v Speaker 2>unbiased view of what you're working on, not just telling

0:20:23.440 --> 0:20:26.159
<v Speaker 2>you everything that you think and do is great, but

0:20:26.200 --> 0:20:28.919
<v Speaker 2>that's a skill, just like any other skill, understanding how

0:20:28.920 --> 0:20:31.199
<v Speaker 2>to prompt AI effectively. So these are the things that

0:20:31.240 --> 0:20:34.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm I'm noodling on I'm working with. I still think

0:20:34.359 --> 0:20:37.200
<v Speaker 2>it's it's highly useful, but I don't think it's as

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:40.959
<v Speaker 2>good as we sometimes give it credit for. Will it

0:20:41.000 --> 0:20:43.920
<v Speaker 2>get that good? It might, but it still isn't going

0:20:43.960 --> 0:20:47.080
<v Speaker 2>to have the ability to think truly independently, and so

0:20:47.160 --> 0:20:51.919
<v Speaker 2>we have to continue as content providers to put really,

0:20:51.960 --> 0:20:54.879
<v Speaker 2>really good, strong content into the world so that the

0:20:54.960 --> 0:20:59.680
<v Speaker 2>AI in turn can be more accurate and effective in

0:20:59.720 --> 0:21:03.439
<v Speaker 2>what it's recommending. Because without humans, AI can't think on

0:21:03.520 --> 0:21:06.560
<v Speaker 2>its own, and we probably a while from it being

0:21:06.600 --> 0:21:07.040
<v Speaker 2>able to do.

0:21:07.080 --> 0:21:09.280
<v Speaker 1>So we're aways from there. Still, all right, Well, we're

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:10.800
<v Speaker 1>going to take one more quick ad break and then

0:21:10.800 --> 0:21:19.879
<v Speaker 1>I'll be back with more from Alexandra Lovett. Well, I

0:21:19.880 --> 0:21:22.760
<v Speaker 1>am back talking with Alexandra Lovett, who is an expert

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 1>on all things future and how to change the school

0:21:26.640 --> 0:21:29.240
<v Speaker 1>and work and how we learn these days. So I

0:21:29.280 --> 0:21:31.920
<v Speaker 1>want to pivot though to your own personal productivity. We've

0:21:31.920 --> 0:21:34.200
<v Speaker 1>been talking a little bit about what you use AI for,

0:21:34.359 --> 0:21:37.760
<v Speaker 1>but I'm curious about any routines you have. We love

0:21:37.800 --> 0:21:41.520
<v Speaker 1>to hear about people's productivity routines, morning routines, anything else

0:21:41.520 --> 0:21:43.840
<v Speaker 1>you're doing that you think makes you more productive.

0:21:44.280 --> 0:21:47.320
<v Speaker 2>Well, and I know this is your sweet spot, so

0:21:47.400 --> 0:21:49.800
<v Speaker 2>I would love some advice from you. But what I

0:21:49.920 --> 0:21:53.080
<v Speaker 2>do is I try to get started as early as

0:21:53.080 --> 0:21:56.680
<v Speaker 2>possible in the day because I find that on something

0:21:56.720 --> 0:22:01.000
<v Speaker 2>that is concrete, so not just checking emails and answering

0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:06.639
<v Speaker 2>messages or scrolling LinkedIn, but the project that I am

0:22:06.680 --> 0:22:08.919
<v Speaker 2>working on on that day, I try to get a

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 2>start by nine o'clock in the morning, so at least

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:15.280
<v Speaker 2>I've got some momentum for the rest of the day,

0:22:15.600 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 2>because I find that once I get going, I am

0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:22.960
<v Speaker 2>a lot more productive. If I'm putting things off, then

0:22:23.160 --> 0:22:25.159
<v Speaker 2>it tends to get later in the day. Then I

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:29.440
<v Speaker 2>procrastinate even more, my energy level dips. So getting started early,

0:22:29.480 --> 0:22:32.240
<v Speaker 2>getting some momentum, and then everything else that has to

0:22:32.240 --> 0:22:34.680
<v Speaker 2>be done that day on that project seems a little

0:22:34.680 --> 0:22:36.639
<v Speaker 2>bit easier. It doesn't seem like as much of a

0:22:36.720 --> 0:22:41.280
<v Speaker 2>hurdle to get past. I also, it's kind of a

0:22:41.280 --> 0:22:44.520
<v Speaker 2>similar point, but I break down very large projects into

0:22:44.560 --> 0:22:50.320
<v Speaker 2>their component parts and try to assign a component part

0:22:50.440 --> 0:22:53.199
<v Speaker 2>per week, and I do this for every single project

0:22:53.240 --> 0:22:56.320
<v Speaker 2>that I'm working on, so that I'm not following this

0:22:56.440 --> 0:22:59.000
<v Speaker 2>kind of amorphous walge. I have to write a book

0:22:59.000 --> 0:23:01.520
<v Speaker 2>in the next six months, but during the week of

0:23:01.560 --> 0:23:05.760
<v Speaker 2>February twenty third or twenty fourth, I am going to

0:23:06.320 --> 0:23:10.479
<v Speaker 2>research and write this particular chapter. And I've got a

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:13.879
<v Speaker 2>workflow that goes week by week, not day by day yet,

0:23:13.960 --> 0:23:16.280
<v Speaker 2>but week by week what needs to be accomplished. And

0:23:16.280 --> 0:23:19.280
<v Speaker 2>I find that that keeps me on track with multiple

0:23:19.320 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 2>balls that are in the air that have to be

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:25.800
<v Speaker 2>juggled effectively. Let's see what else do I do. I

0:23:25.880 --> 0:23:29.439
<v Speaker 2>try to collaborate whenever possible. Although a lot of my

0:23:29.480 --> 0:23:31.960
<v Speaker 2>work is solo, I find that I get a lot

0:23:31.960 --> 0:23:35.000
<v Speaker 2>of energy and enthusiasm out of working with other people,

0:23:35.040 --> 0:23:38.199
<v Speaker 2>and so wherever possible, I try to integrate some of

0:23:38.240 --> 0:23:40.959
<v Speaker 2>that because that helps with my motivation and my momentum.

0:23:41.440 --> 0:23:44.280
<v Speaker 2>So those are just some topline things. I mean, it's

0:23:44.280 --> 0:23:48.400
<v Speaker 2>important as a solopreneur, and a lot of your listeners

0:23:48.440 --> 0:23:51.600
<v Speaker 2>are going to be entering gig like work over the

0:23:51.600 --> 0:23:53.560
<v Speaker 2>next couple of years, just the way the world's moving,

0:23:53.640 --> 0:23:56.240
<v Speaker 2>and I think it's harder to motivate yourself and to

0:23:56.320 --> 0:23:58.280
<v Speaker 2>keep yourself on a schedule than if you have a

0:23:58.320 --> 0:24:01.040
<v Speaker 2>boss who's looking over your shoulder or an organization that

0:24:01.080 --> 0:24:04.959
<v Speaker 2>has very concrete goals. And therefore, I think self monitoring

0:24:05.000 --> 0:24:07.720
<v Speaker 2>of productivities and what you talk about is so critically

0:24:07.760 --> 0:24:12.360
<v Speaker 2>important because you're not going to have that external reinforcement. Yeah.

0:24:12.400 --> 0:24:14.639
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely well. I love the idea of doing a little

0:24:14.640 --> 0:24:16.560
<v Speaker 1>bit on a big project every week just so you

0:24:16.680 --> 0:24:20.359
<v Speaker 1>keep touching it. So Alex Sandra, I always ask my guests,

0:24:20.400 --> 0:24:22.800
<v Speaker 1>what is something you have done recently to take a

0:24:22.880 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 1>day from great to awesome?

0:24:26.840 --> 0:24:30.760
<v Speaker 2>So I like the days that I've done this a

0:24:30.800 --> 0:24:34.440
<v Speaker 2>few times now where I have devoted an entire day

0:24:34.760 --> 0:24:37.959
<v Speaker 2>to getting to know new people in my field. So

0:24:38.000 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 2>you could call that networking. You could call that informational interviewing,

0:24:41.720 --> 0:24:45.080
<v Speaker 2>or skill acquisition, depending on the person. It could be

0:24:46.400 --> 0:24:49.840
<v Speaker 2>any It could serve any number of purposes. But my

0:24:50.040 --> 0:24:54.640
<v Speaker 2>best days are when I make an interpersonal connection. Because

0:24:54.680 --> 0:24:57.240
<v Speaker 2>I do work a lot. As I said on my own,

0:24:58.240 --> 0:24:59.879
<v Speaker 2>I find that I'm in an echo chamber of my

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:02.760
<v Speaker 2>own ideas a lot of the time, and I just

0:25:02.880 --> 0:25:05.920
<v Speaker 2>love to talk with people about things that we mutually

0:25:05.960 --> 0:25:10.439
<v Speaker 2>find exciting, invigorating to get a new idea in the

0:25:10.480 --> 0:25:13.560
<v Speaker 2>pipeline about a new way of thinking about things. So

0:25:13.880 --> 0:25:16.000
<v Speaker 2>I've done this now a few times. But that's how

0:25:16.119 --> 0:25:18.720
<v Speaker 2>if I can take my day from just being good

0:25:19.160 --> 0:25:21.640
<v Speaker 2>writing what I normally know, to let me think about

0:25:21.640 --> 0:25:24.119
<v Speaker 2>this in a whole new way and also feel like

0:25:24.200 --> 0:25:26.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm motivated just through the process of collaboration.

0:25:27.520 --> 0:25:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's the best. It's the best to bounce ideas

0:25:29.960 --> 0:25:33.879
<v Speaker 1>off of intelligent people. So, Alexandra, where can people find you?

0:25:34.240 --> 0:25:37.439
<v Speaker 2>Well, I'm at Alexandralevitt dot com and are if you

0:25:37.440 --> 0:25:40.440
<v Speaker 2>want to learn more about work based learning or what

0:25:40.480 --> 0:25:42.320
<v Speaker 2>that's like or how you might get a program off

0:25:42.320 --> 0:25:46.160
<v Speaker 2>the ground, we have make schoolwork dot org and feel

0:25:46.160 --> 0:25:47.639
<v Speaker 2>free to get in touch and just let us know

0:25:47.680 --> 0:25:49.920
<v Speaker 2>what you think of these ideas and what you think

0:25:49.960 --> 0:25:52.080
<v Speaker 2>you might be doing with it in your community, and

0:25:52.119 --> 0:25:54.280
<v Speaker 2>we would love to hear about it and perhaps help.

0:25:55.200 --> 0:25:58.159
<v Speaker 1>Awesome. Well, Alexandra, thank you so much for joining us.

0:25:58.200 --> 0:26:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Thank you to everyone for listening. If you have feedback

0:26:01.000 --> 0:26:04.000
<v Speaker 1>about this or any other episode, you can always reach

0:26:04.080 --> 0:26:07.760
<v Speaker 1>me at Laura at Laura vandercam dot com. In the meantime,

0:26:08.040 --> 0:26:11.359
<v Speaker 1>this is Laura. Thanks for listening, and here's to making

0:26:11.400 --> 0:26:21.320
<v Speaker 1>the most of our time. Thanks for listening to Before Breakfast.

0:26:21.880 --> 0:26:25.640
<v Speaker 1>If you've got questions, ideas, or feedback, you can reach

0:26:25.680 --> 0:26:35.360
<v Speaker 1>me at Laura at Laura vandercam dot com. Before Breakfast

0:26:35.400 --> 0:26:39.680
<v Speaker 1>is a production of iHeartMedia. For more podcasts from iHeartMedia,

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:43.760
<v Speaker 1>please visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you

0:26:43.840 --> 0:26:45.080
<v Speaker 1>listen to your favorite shows.