WEBVTT - Paramount Makes $108 Billion Hostile Bid for Warner Bros 

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:10.559
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:10.600 --> 0:00:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:14.600 --> 0:00:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Business App. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts,

0:00:21.360 --> 0:00:23.560
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:24.239 --> 0:00:25.799
<v Speaker 2>You know, you wait five more minutes and there's going

0:00:25.840 --> 0:00:27.800
<v Speaker 2>to be a new headline here to paramount S Guidance

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:30.720
<v Speaker 2>versus Netflix for Warner Brothers. But we know that this

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:33.640
<v Speaker 2>will be a deal that takes a long time to resolve.

0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:34.720
<v Speaker 3>You know, there are differences.

0:00:34.760 --> 0:00:37.479
<v Speaker 4>You know, the Paramount deal is all cash and it

0:00:37.560 --> 0:00:40.680
<v Speaker 4>is for the entire company. So those two things make

0:00:40.720 --> 0:00:45.000
<v Speaker 4>it much much cleaner than the Netflix one, which includes

0:00:45.400 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 4>twenty seven to seventy five and cash plus four dollars

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:51.720
<v Speaker 4>per share in Netflix stock, which has historically been a

0:00:51.720 --> 0:00:56.000
<v Speaker 4>great thing to own. But it's contingent upon the separation

0:00:56.160 --> 0:00:58.840
<v Speaker 4>of the Warner brother separation of its cable networks, which

0:00:58.960 --> 0:01:01.520
<v Speaker 4>was a plan all law banned all along, and they've

0:01:01.760 --> 0:01:04.080
<v Speaker 4>already done a lot of work on it. And then

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:07.759
<v Speaker 4>so the value, the value total value seems pretty darn similar.

0:01:08.200 --> 0:01:10.600
<v Speaker 4>It's just probably going to come down to who has

0:01:10.640 --> 0:01:14.600
<v Speaker 4>a cleaner path to approval, and you know, you could

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:16.679
<v Speaker 4>do that math we talked to generally and it's that

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:20.000
<v Speaker 4>math is pretty darn straightforward. But now we have the

0:01:20.120 --> 0:01:23.039
<v Speaker 4>added uncertainty which we historically had not had an M

0:01:23.040 --> 0:01:26.200
<v Speaker 4>and a of you know, this is becoming politicized, you know.

0:01:26.440 --> 0:01:31.040
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, because so we'll see Paramount Skuideance controlled by David Ellison,

0:01:31.720 --> 0:01:35.199
<v Speaker 2>son of Larry Ellison. Ellison's have a very good relationship

0:01:35.240 --> 0:01:38.119
<v Speaker 2>with President Trump, with the White House, and so they

0:01:38.240 --> 0:01:42.760
<v Speaker 2>have made the argument implicitly or explicitly that this deal

0:01:42.880 --> 0:01:46.000
<v Speaker 2>has the President's blessing, so therefore it will go through

0:01:46.040 --> 0:01:48.640
<v Speaker 2>more easily. Whereas we know that there's a lot of

0:01:48.640 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 2>concern here about Netflix and it's bid for Warner Brothers

0:01:53.200 --> 0:01:56.080
<v Speaker 2>dis great assets, not even the entire company here, and

0:01:56.120 --> 0:01:58.880
<v Speaker 2>it all depends on how you define the streaming market,

0:01:58.880 --> 0:02:00.240
<v Speaker 2>whether it includes YouTube or not.

0:02:00.720 --> 0:02:02.480
<v Speaker 5>So there's a lot here to get through.

0:02:02.560 --> 0:02:04.840
<v Speaker 2>Let's bring in Chris Paul Mary Bloomberg News Senior editor

0:02:04.880 --> 0:02:08.040
<v Speaker 2>and Entertainment team leader on this deal. Chris, just give

0:02:08.080 --> 0:02:10.080
<v Speaker 2>us a sense of what people in LA are saying,

0:02:10.120 --> 0:02:14.120
<v Speaker 2>because most of these businesses take place in LA. Maybe

0:02:14.120 --> 0:02:16.560
<v Speaker 2>not as much as they once did, and I'm curious

0:02:16.800 --> 0:02:19.320
<v Speaker 2>to get a sense of how the industry is thinking

0:02:19.360 --> 0:02:19.799
<v Speaker 2>about it.

0:02:22.639 --> 0:02:24.959
<v Speaker 6>I can tell you I was having dinner Saturday night

0:02:25.200 --> 0:02:28.760
<v Speaker 6>at a time restaurant with the family, and my daughter's

0:02:28.760 --> 0:02:29.760
<v Speaker 6>friend who's seventeen.

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:32.520
<v Speaker 7>She goes, Netflix is buying Water Brothers.

0:02:32.639 --> 0:02:34.600
<v Speaker 6>I mean, this is just one of those things that

0:02:34.800 --> 0:02:37.639
<v Speaker 6>just is shocking to everybody, but particularly to people that

0:02:37.720 --> 0:02:38.520
<v Speaker 6>work in Hollywood.

0:02:38.600 --> 0:02:40.320
<v Speaker 7>It's been a really tough few years.

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:45.040
<v Speaker 6>We've seen, you know, so much consolidation in the industry already,

0:02:45.520 --> 0:02:49.360
<v Speaker 6>and job losses and movies and TVs shows being shot

0:02:49.400 --> 0:02:53.680
<v Speaker 6>overseas and strikes and just the you know, the promise

0:02:53.720 --> 0:02:55.960
<v Speaker 6>of another big merger like this. It's just, you know,

0:02:56.720 --> 0:02:59.680
<v Speaker 6>people are really unhappy and in shock.

0:03:00.720 --> 0:03:05.320
<v Speaker 4>Chris Surah feeling it seems like if Paramount were to

0:03:05.320 --> 0:03:08.919
<v Speaker 4>acquire Warner Brothers this discovery, there will be more overlap

0:03:09.040 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 4>therefore more jobs at risk.

0:03:11.400 --> 0:03:13.040
<v Speaker 3>Is that the Is that the correct way to think

0:03:13.040 --> 0:03:13.400
<v Speaker 3>about it.

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:17.600
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, although you know they both acquires in Paramount and

0:03:17.600 --> 0:03:20.440
<v Speaker 6>one of Brothers, they're trying to downplay, you know, the

0:03:20.520 --> 0:03:24.040
<v Speaker 6>job loss as part of it. Netflix did say they

0:03:24.040 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 6>looked at two to three billion dollars in annual savings.

0:03:26.960 --> 0:03:30.720
<v Speaker 6>Much of that basically in overhead, you know, redundant jobs.

0:03:32.120 --> 0:03:35.400
<v Speaker 6>But they were each trying to make the case that

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:37.680
<v Speaker 6>their merger would be a little bit less worse.

0:03:37.720 --> 0:03:38.920
<v Speaker 7>I guess you could say.

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:43.200
<v Speaker 2>Just a quick note here, we have a correction to make.

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:45.880
<v Speaker 2>The Bureau of Labor Statistics will now publish the October

0:03:45.880 --> 0:03:49.360
<v Speaker 2>and November PPI data together in January. I mean, the

0:03:49.400 --> 0:03:50.920
<v Speaker 2>net effect is at the end of the day, Paul,

0:03:50.960 --> 0:03:52.920
<v Speaker 2>All this data will come out after the fed's meeting

0:03:53.400 --> 0:03:54.080
<v Speaker 2>this Wednesday.

0:03:54.560 --> 0:03:58.960
<v Speaker 4>Hey, Chris Paramount owns the Paramount movie in television studio.

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 4>Warner Brothers are It's the Warner Brothers studio, is there, right?

0:04:04.080 --> 0:04:05.880
<v Speaker 4>Can you put those two things together there? From a

0:04:05.920 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 4>regulatory perspective.

0:04:07.960 --> 0:04:11.760
<v Speaker 6>Well, what they're doing is they both said both Paramount

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:14.520
<v Speaker 6>and Netflix have said they want to kind of maintain

0:04:14.600 --> 0:04:18.520
<v Speaker 6>the creative executives is working separately at Warner Brothers. Warner

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:22.080
<v Speaker 6>Brothers has had a phenomenal TV business. One of the

0:04:22.120 --> 0:04:25.560
<v Speaker 6>issues for Netflix is that historically Netflix has produced just

0:04:25.800 --> 0:04:29.159
<v Speaker 6>stuff for Netflix. But they have said they, you know,

0:04:29.240 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 6>will continue the policy of Warner Brothers making shows for

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:37.279
<v Speaker 6>other people, you know, and they do, you know, have

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:40.640
<v Speaker 6>had a huge track record of that historically, so that's

0:04:40.640 --> 0:04:43.360
<v Speaker 6>one of the things. Paramount also has said it would

0:04:43.440 --> 0:04:45.560
<v Speaker 6>keep the Warner Brothers creative team together.

0:04:46.520 --> 0:04:49.159
<v Speaker 4>I'm not sure I believe that I would argue just

0:04:49.160 --> 0:04:51.720
<v Speaker 4>from my own perspective, Chris, I'm I wonder what the

0:04:51.720 --> 0:04:54.560
<v Speaker 4>folks in la are thinking. This is kind of a

0:04:54.839 --> 0:04:58.760
<v Speaker 4>more of a must have for Paramount sky Dance versus Netflix.

0:04:58.839 --> 0:05:02.640
<v Speaker 4>It's nice to have. Do you think that's accurate?

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:07.360
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I you know, I think if you just look

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:11.680
<v Speaker 6>at the public commentence from the two Netflix co CEOs,

0:05:11.760 --> 0:05:14.159
<v Speaker 6>you know, Greg Peters was initially kind of dismissive of

0:05:14.200 --> 0:05:17.320
<v Speaker 6>media mergers and was really paring cold water on this idea.

0:05:17.760 --> 0:05:20.680
<v Speaker 7>So I think that the idea that Netflix is.

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:25.039
<v Speaker 6>That all in uh is, you know, is definitely a

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:30.320
<v Speaker 6>legitimate one. Uh, you know, Paramount, I think, you know,

0:05:30.640 --> 0:05:34.640
<v Speaker 6>Michael Maffat Nathanson put out of you know something over

0:05:34.680 --> 0:05:37.080
<v Speaker 6>the weekend saying, and I think this is true. Netflix

0:05:37.120 --> 0:05:39.440
<v Speaker 6>has been the winner historically, and so if you want

0:05:39.440 --> 0:05:42.280
<v Speaker 6>to find a home, best home for your you know,

0:05:42.560 --> 0:05:46.360
<v Speaker 6>outstanding intellectual property, Batman, Harry Potter, Game of Thrones, on

0:05:46.400 --> 0:05:48.479
<v Speaker 6>and on, you know, they're the ones that are going

0:05:48.520 --> 0:05:50.320
<v Speaker 6>to get it all around the globe and invested in

0:05:50.440 --> 0:05:55.920
<v Speaker 6>all that. Putting two struggling companies together is it raises

0:05:55.920 --> 0:05:58.719
<v Speaker 6>more issues. It's it's everyone always sort of seems to

0:05:58.760 --> 0:06:01.239
<v Speaker 6>suggest that and almost any industry, but it doesn't always

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:03.839
<v Speaker 6>translate into outperformance.

0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:08.000
<v Speaker 2>Chris, this deal, no matter who wins out, Netflix or

0:06:08.160 --> 0:06:10.640
<v Speaker 2>Paramounts guidance will take a while to resolve. There's going

0:06:10.720 --> 0:06:12.559
<v Speaker 2>to be legal challenges there. It's gonna be anti trust

0:06:12.560 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 2>regulators looking into it. What does that mean that long

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:19.359
<v Speaker 2>lead time mean for Warner Brothers is ability to just

0:06:19.480 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 2>do business and be the best performing studio it can be.

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:25.480
<v Speaker 5>In the meantime, it hurts it.

0:06:25.640 --> 0:06:27.960
<v Speaker 6>I mean David's ask on footoo a note last week

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:30.160
<v Speaker 6>the CEO of Warner Brothers saying, everybody just focused on

0:06:30.200 --> 0:06:32.400
<v Speaker 6>your work and listen to your business leader.

0:06:32.440 --> 0:06:33.440
<v Speaker 7>This isn't gonna This is.

0:06:33.360 --> 0:06:35.400
<v Speaker 6>Going to take a while, but you don't even have

0:06:35.440 --> 0:06:37.640
<v Speaker 6>to look very far or very long to find out.

0:06:37.760 --> 0:06:40.479
<v Speaker 6>If you remember, you know, the challenges AT and T

0:06:40.640 --> 0:06:42.640
<v Speaker 6>had when it bulable Warner Brothers a few years ago.

0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:44.480
<v Speaker 6>There was an extended there was a lawsuit by the

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:47.320
<v Speaker 6>Justice Department really extended time to.

0:06:47.279 --> 0:06:48.000
<v Speaker 7>Close that deal.

0:06:48.600 --> 0:06:48.920
<v Speaker 8>Uh.

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:51.799
<v Speaker 6>You know, many people believe that it held the company

0:06:51.880 --> 0:06:54.640
<v Speaker 6>back in terms of you know, launching its own streaming

0:06:54.960 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 6>service and you know, investing in the business. You know,

0:06:59.440 --> 0:07:03.800
<v Speaker 6>I I don't see Warner Brothers core business helped by

0:07:03.839 --> 0:07:07.560
<v Speaker 6>an extended regulatory review that really either bitter Paramount or

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:08.719
<v Speaker 6>Netflix would face.

0:07:10.040 --> 0:07:13.120
<v Speaker 3>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this.

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:20.440
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:23.920
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Applecarplay and Android Auto

0:07:24.040 --> 0:07:27.080
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever you

0:07:27.120 --> 0:07:30.520
<v Speaker 1>get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:07:31.080 --> 0:07:33.840
<v Speaker 4>All Right, the Warner Brothers Discovery deal just got a

0:07:33.880 --> 0:07:35.720
<v Speaker 4>little bit hotter here today we have an over the

0:07:35.760 --> 0:07:40.320
<v Speaker 4>top hostile bid from Paramount, sky Skydance, whatever they're called

0:07:40.360 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 4>these days.

0:07:41.120 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 3>That is for the entirety of the company. This is

0:07:43.960 --> 0:07:45.720
<v Speaker 3>going to come down to regulatory hurdles. That's going to

0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:47.000
<v Speaker 3>be one of the key key issues.

0:07:47.200 --> 0:07:50.080
<v Speaker 4>So for that return to generation covers all the antitrust

0:07:50.080 --> 0:07:55.520
<v Speaker 4>stuff here for Bloomberg Intelligence, Jen, does one potential buyer Paramount,

0:07:55.520 --> 0:07:58.680
<v Speaker 4>sky Dance or Netflix, does one have a clearer path

0:07:58.720 --> 0:07:59.720
<v Speaker 4>to regulatory approval.

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:03.520
<v Speaker 9>I think absolutely. I think Paramount has a far clearer

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:05.800
<v Speaker 9>path to approval. I mean, if you just think about

0:08:05.800 --> 0:08:08.160
<v Speaker 9>them in terms of the streaming overlap, and when I

0:08:08.160 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 9>talk about streaming, I am talking about a narrow market

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:13.280
<v Speaker 9>for just streaming services and not a broader market that

0:08:13.360 --> 0:08:17.040
<v Speaker 9>might include YouTube. They are much smaller than Netflix, and

0:08:17.080 --> 0:08:20.240
<v Speaker 9>so when you combine HBO Max with Paramount Plus versus

0:08:20.240 --> 0:08:23.920
<v Speaker 9>combining HBO Max with Netflix, it creates far less of

0:08:23.920 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 9>a problem. You know, and looking across at the creation

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:29.840
<v Speaker 9>of original scripted content, let's say that's a market that

0:08:29.880 --> 0:08:32.600
<v Speaker 9>the Department of Justice looks at. Again, the combination is

0:08:32.640 --> 0:08:36.120
<v Speaker 9>smaller than the combination of Netflix with Warner. And then

0:08:36.160 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 9>you have the added cable channels. So Paramount has cable channels,

0:08:39.360 --> 0:08:42.319
<v Speaker 9>Warner has cable channels. Netflix would not be buying those.

0:08:42.480 --> 0:08:45.320
<v Speaker 9>So that is an issue that arises in the Paramount

0:08:45.320 --> 0:08:47.800
<v Speaker 9>situation and not Netflix. But I do think if there's

0:08:47.840 --> 0:08:50.600
<v Speaker 9>any problem there, that's easily resolvable. So in my mind,

0:08:50.679 --> 0:08:53.880
<v Speaker 9>Paramount's the better buyer from an antitrust perspective.

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:56.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm curious about the termination fees involved in this deal.

0:08:57.200 --> 0:08:59.360
<v Speaker 2>Netflix says that will pay a termination fee of five

0:08:59.720 --> 0:09:02.480
<v Speaker 2>billion dollars of the deal fails. That seems really large.

0:09:02.800 --> 0:09:06.520
<v Speaker 2>Paramount Skuidances offer includes a five billion dollar termination fee.

0:09:06.800 --> 0:09:08.880
<v Speaker 2>Just talk a little bit about the amounts involved there

0:09:08.920 --> 0:09:11.600
<v Speaker 2>and what the fact that well, at least to me,

0:09:11.640 --> 0:09:14.160
<v Speaker 2>it seems pretty large, says about what each side thinks

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:15.720
<v Speaker 2>of the possibility of this going through or not.

0:09:16.200 --> 0:09:18.800
<v Speaker 9>Relatively speaking, it's a very large termination fee. You know,

0:09:18.840 --> 0:09:21.120
<v Speaker 9>you usually see these as two percent or three percent

0:09:21.160 --> 0:09:24.000
<v Speaker 9>of the purchase price, and Warners had to do that

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:25.880
<v Speaker 9>when they negotiated this. I mean, there is a high

0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:29.160
<v Speaker 9>risk right that a Netflix deal would ultimately not get done,

0:09:29.200 --> 0:09:30.920
<v Speaker 9>that they could get sued in court, that they could

0:09:30.920 --> 0:09:32.320
<v Speaker 9>lose in court, it would break up.

0:09:32.600 --> 0:09:33.679
<v Speaker 3>So they need to be.

0:09:33.640 --> 0:09:38.760
<v Speaker 9>Protected because their business is just frozen for two years practically,

0:09:38.800 --> 0:09:42.280
<v Speaker 9>and it does impact a seller's business right to kind

0:09:42.280 --> 0:09:44.679
<v Speaker 9>of be in limbo that long. And that's what the

0:09:44.880 --> 0:09:47.600
<v Speaker 9>termination fee is meant to do. Now, I think they

0:09:47.640 --> 0:09:49.560
<v Speaker 9>have far less of a problem with Paramount, but you

0:09:49.640 --> 0:09:52.800
<v Speaker 9>never know, and so I think to protect themselves, Warner

0:09:52.920 --> 0:09:54.920
<v Speaker 9>would have wanted to work that in and Paramount wants

0:09:54.960 --> 0:09:56.960
<v Speaker 9>to give that kind of insurance in case there's some

0:09:57.040 --> 0:09:57.800
<v Speaker 9>problem there too.

0:09:58.160 --> 0:09:59.960
<v Speaker 3>Now, okay, so what are the next step?

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:02.440
<v Speaker 4>So here, if I'm the board of Warner Brothers Discoverer,

0:10:03.920 --> 0:10:05.960
<v Speaker 4>do I have to respond to this thing?

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 9>Well, Paramount it's a hostile takeover, so they're going against

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:11.120
<v Speaker 9>the board's wishes.

0:10:11.600 --> 0:10:13.199
<v Speaker 5>Basically, we know what the board wants.

0:10:13.240 --> 0:10:16.600
<v Speaker 9>The board seems to prefer Netflix, even with all the

0:10:16.600 --> 0:10:18.960
<v Speaker 9>anti trust risk it brings. So now it's just going

0:10:19.000 --> 0:10:21.160
<v Speaker 9>to depend on what happens here as they go forward

0:10:21.200 --> 0:10:26.520
<v Speaker 9>and they solicit the shareholders. I think the deal that

0:10:26.559 --> 0:10:30.360
<v Speaker 9>would get done more quickly and has the surest path

0:10:30.360 --> 0:10:32.520
<v Speaker 9>would be the Paramount deal. So if Warner's interested in

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:35.800
<v Speaker 9>getting something closed within the next year, I think Paramount

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:37.520
<v Speaker 9>would be the company that they'd go with. I don't

0:10:37.520 --> 0:10:39.880
<v Speaker 9>see them getting a Netflix deal closed in the next year.

0:10:40.400 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about the politics part of this. Axios is

0:10:44.920 --> 0:10:47.840
<v Speaker 2>reporting that Jared Kushner is helping to finance Paramount's bid

0:10:47.840 --> 0:10:51.200
<v Speaker 2>for Warner Brothers Discovery, and that Axios is citing a

0:10:51.240 --> 0:10:55.080
<v Speaker 2>regulatory filing on this Kushner financing bid. Does that put

0:10:55.080 --> 0:10:58.000
<v Speaker 2>it in a better position? Because Larry Ellison has a

0:10:58.000 --> 0:11:01.080
<v Speaker 2>good relationship with President Trump, Jared kush Or, the president's

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:04.440
<v Speaker 2>son in law, is involved here, even as Larry Ellison

0:11:04.480 --> 0:11:07.240
<v Speaker 2>tells other media that if he feels that the deal

0:11:07.280 --> 0:11:09.640
<v Speaker 2>was inherently biased towards Netflix.

0:11:09.400 --> 0:11:13.160
<v Speaker 9>Well, I would say if things were conventionally done, then

0:11:13.280 --> 0:11:15.480
<v Speaker 9>it shouldn't. It should be all about anti trust. It

0:11:15.480 --> 0:11:19.160
<v Speaker 9>should be the analysis the economists and their assessment of

0:11:19.320 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 9>the markets and the impact on the markets. But in

0:11:22.360 --> 0:11:25.880
<v Speaker 9>today's day and age, there is an impact from politics,

0:11:25.920 --> 0:11:30.000
<v Speaker 9>and the administration does seem to kind of micromanage these decisions,

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:33.120
<v Speaker 9>and so I think politics is a significant factor here,

0:11:33.360 --> 0:11:35.400
<v Speaker 9>right next to anti trust. And from what you just

0:11:35.440 --> 0:11:37.960
<v Speaker 9>told me and what we've read, it seems paramounts the

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:40.120
<v Speaker 9>favorite bidder by this administration as well.

0:11:40.920 --> 0:11:44.079
<v Speaker 3>Stay with us more from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this.

0:11:47.960 --> 0:11:51.679
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:11:51.760 --> 0:11:54.440
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am. He's done on Apple, Cocklay and

0:11:54.440 --> 0:11:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand

0:11:57.760 --> 0:12:01.960
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcasts, or US Live on YouTube.

0:12:02.400 --> 0:12:05.200
<v Speaker 2>One thing we didn't get to is the credit market.

0:12:05.320 --> 0:12:09.000
<v Speaker 2>And of course we've seen yields, we've seen spreads really

0:12:09.040 --> 0:12:11.960
<v Speaker 2>really tight, even as we've seen a lot more supply

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:14.280
<v Speaker 2>come into the market because of all the spending on AI,

0:12:14.520 --> 0:12:16.559
<v Speaker 2>and there's going to be even more spending in twenty

0:12:16.600 --> 0:12:19.720
<v Speaker 2>twenty six. So let's bring in right now Steven Flynn,

0:12:19.720 --> 0:12:22.320
<v Speaker 2>he's a senior credit analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence, and Stephen,

0:12:22.440 --> 0:12:26.680
<v Speaker 2>we want to really dig into Netflix because as part

0:12:26.679 --> 0:12:29.600
<v Speaker 2>of this bid for Warner Brothers Discovery, it's going to

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:32.040
<v Speaker 2>be getting a fifty nine billion dollar bridge loan, the

0:12:32.040 --> 0:12:34.960
<v Speaker 2>biggest investment grade bridge loan in a while, and of

0:12:34.960 --> 0:12:37.400
<v Speaker 2>course that means eventually that will be replaced by corporate

0:12:37.480 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 2>debt as well. How are you thinking about what kind

0:12:40.559 --> 0:12:42.000
<v Speaker 2>of market impact that will have.

0:12:42.400 --> 0:12:44.360
<v Speaker 10>Well, first of all, it's sort of that Netflix is

0:12:44.400 --> 0:12:47.920
<v Speaker 10>a very strong credit So Netflix has a significant market cap.

0:12:48.000 --> 0:12:50.080
<v Speaker 10>It's you know, four hundred and twenty five billion dollars

0:12:50.200 --> 0:12:53.520
<v Speaker 10>or so. The company is growing, revenue, growing evada, growing

0:12:53.559 --> 0:12:56.800
<v Speaker 10>free cash flow. It's net leverage ratio is very modest,

0:12:56.880 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 10>talking zero point four turns of leverage.

0:13:00.240 --> 0:13:02.319
<v Speaker 8>A company generates a ton of free cash flow.

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 10>So Netflix is a very strong credits rted A three A,

0:13:05.960 --> 0:13:08.679
<v Speaker 10>so they have the ability to borrow. So within that

0:13:08.720 --> 0:13:11.440
<v Speaker 10>fifty billion dollars that they have as acquisition debt. There's

0:13:11.440 --> 0:13:13.679
<v Speaker 10>been a reporter that's twenty five billion dollars will likely

0:13:13.720 --> 0:13:15.760
<v Speaker 10>be bonds, and there remain will probably be a combination

0:13:15.840 --> 0:13:18.560
<v Speaker 10>of term loans and maybe some other borrowing. And while

0:13:18.600 --> 0:13:20.520
<v Speaker 10>twenty five billion sounds like a lot, if we think

0:13:20.520 --> 0:13:24.040
<v Speaker 10>about Netflix bonds in the market right now, they're relatively scarce.

0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:26.520
<v Speaker 10>Right So if Netflix is part of communications, you think

0:13:26.520 --> 0:13:30.680
<v Speaker 10>about borrowers like a teen T Verise and Comcast T Mobile.

0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:33.680
<v Speaker 10>Those companies have huge debt loads and are large parts

0:13:33.760 --> 0:13:36.960
<v Speaker 10>of the investment grade corporate bond indict. So Netflix is

0:13:37.360 --> 0:13:39.520
<v Speaker 10>relatively small, So I think that there could be a

0:13:39.520 --> 0:13:41.280
<v Speaker 10>lot of interest in Netflix bonds, So I don't think

0:13:41.320 --> 0:13:42.199
<v Speaker 10>it's a problem at all.

0:13:42.640 --> 0:13:44.640
<v Speaker 4>And then the news of the day here Paramount coming

0:13:44.679 --> 0:13:48.160
<v Speaker 4>back over the top of the hostile bid Warner Brothers Discovery.

0:13:49.440 --> 0:13:52.040
<v Speaker 4>They're talking about fifty four billion dollars of debt commitments

0:13:52.040 --> 0:13:54.880
<v Speaker 4>from Bank of America, City and Apollo. So again, your

0:13:54.920 --> 0:13:57.360
<v Speaker 4>market is going to have a lot to say about

0:13:57.440 --> 0:13:59.839
<v Speaker 4>how this deal gets done, isn't it.

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:02.560
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, this is a completely different story, right So Netflix,

0:14:02.679 --> 0:14:06.640
<v Speaker 10>of sorry, paramounts guiddances on the edge of investment grade.

0:14:06.679 --> 0:14:10.440
<v Speaker 10>So the investment grade by excuse me, by Moody's and Fitch,

0:14:10.679 --> 0:14:13.760
<v Speaker 10>High yield by S and P. If you you know,

0:14:13.760 --> 0:14:15.920
<v Speaker 10>they're talking about the combined company could have about one

0:14:16.000 --> 0:14:17.480
<v Speaker 10>hundred billion dollars a debt.

0:14:17.559 --> 0:14:19.360
<v Speaker 8>So if we look at the debt loads at.

0:14:19.320 --> 0:14:22.440
<v Speaker 10>Both paramounts, Guidance and Warner Brothers, you're talking about an

0:14:22.480 --> 0:14:23.800
<v Speaker 10>incremental fifty billion dollars.

0:14:23.800 --> 0:14:25.320
<v Speaker 8>You just they have a you know, fifty four billion

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:26.080
<v Speaker 8>dollar commitment.

0:14:27.120 --> 0:14:30.520
<v Speaker 10>You're talking about pro form net leverage over five times,

0:14:30.800 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 10>and that's including synergies, right, so that's going to be

0:14:34.880 --> 0:14:37.760
<v Speaker 10>much tougher. You're talking probably a good chunk of that

0:14:37.840 --> 0:14:40.880
<v Speaker 10>will be high yield, and that is a lot for

0:14:40.920 --> 0:14:43.920
<v Speaker 10>the highield market. Now, the highal markets very strong. Issuance

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:46.360
<v Speaker 10>is up, yields are down. I think you know it's

0:14:46.760 --> 0:14:49.800
<v Speaker 10>the highal market is very favorable. But this would probably

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:51.520
<v Speaker 10>be the biggest name in high yald. The biggest name

0:14:51.560 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 10>highyield right now is Charter, So Charter unsecured bonds are

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:57.400
<v Speaker 10>the biggest name. There's about twenty five billion dollars market

0:14:57.440 --> 0:15:01.160
<v Speaker 10>value for Charter bonds in the Bloomberg Highyield in it

0:15:01.240 --> 0:15:03.120
<v Speaker 10>depending on how they set it up but this could

0:15:03.120 --> 0:15:05.840
<v Speaker 10>easily become you know, the biggest name or close to it,

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:07.480
<v Speaker 10>So that makes it much tougher.

0:15:07.520 --> 0:15:08.880
<v Speaker 8>Now we have to see all the details.

0:15:08.920 --> 0:15:12.760
<v Speaker 4>But so if I'm a shareholder Warner Brothers Discovery a

0:15:12.920 --> 0:15:15.640
<v Speaker 4>the regulatory aspect which Jenery just walked us through.

0:15:15.880 --> 0:15:16.840
<v Speaker 3>But now I've got the sitting there.

0:15:16.840 --> 0:15:18.840
<v Speaker 4>If I'm an equity shoulder, do I want to be

0:15:18.960 --> 0:15:22.160
<v Speaker 4>sitting there with a balance sheet of five times leverage?

0:15:23.360 --> 0:15:25.840
<v Speaker 10>Well, if you're a Warner brother shareholder, you're getting cash, right,

0:15:25.960 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 10>so you could only But if you're a paramount shaholder, yes,

0:15:28.760 --> 0:15:30.240
<v Speaker 10>you have to be concerned that the pro form of

0:15:30.280 --> 0:15:32.800
<v Speaker 10>company will have a significant amount of leverage.

0:15:33.160 --> 0:15:34.880
<v Speaker 8>And that has a big name in high yield.

0:15:35.720 --> 0:15:37.680
<v Speaker 10>But you do you know they also have big backers

0:15:37.680 --> 0:15:40.800
<v Speaker 10>behind them, right between the Allison family and Redbird Capital.

0:15:41.600 --> 0:15:43.720
<v Speaker 3>Pramon scot Dance stock is up five percent today.

0:15:44.000 --> 0:15:45.280
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, well, I mean, but this is not going to

0:15:45.360 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 5>end anytime soon. This is going to drag on.

0:15:47.320 --> 0:15:51.080
<v Speaker 2>So Stephen, media companies being heavily indebted, what do we

0:15:51.240 --> 0:15:55.760
<v Speaker 2>know from about the appeal of this sector to investors?

0:15:55.760 --> 0:15:58.440
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think about Warner Brothers Discovery when it

0:15:58.600 --> 0:16:00.680
<v Speaker 2>came into being. It took on a lot of David

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:02.680
<v Speaker 2>Zasov spent years trying to pair that down.

0:16:03.080 --> 0:16:04.320
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, and he was unsuccessful.

0:16:04.400 --> 0:16:06.840
<v Speaker 10>Right, the company was junked and they ended up doing

0:16:06.880 --> 0:16:08.840
<v Speaker 10>a massive tender offer where they put in a lot

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:11.120
<v Speaker 10>of secure debt ahead of the existing bonds and then

0:16:11.200 --> 0:16:13.840
<v Speaker 10>use that to tender for existing bonds at a discount

0:16:13.840 --> 0:16:16.840
<v Speaker 10>to par So bondholders really got hurt then, and then

0:16:16.880 --> 0:16:18.320
<v Speaker 10>the company, you know, was junked.

0:16:18.360 --> 0:16:19.480
<v Speaker 8>So it's been tough.

0:16:19.520 --> 0:16:21.560
<v Speaker 10>It's you know, when you think about communications in general,

0:16:21.600 --> 0:16:24.320
<v Speaker 10>people feel a lot more comfort. We're lending to more

0:16:24.360 --> 0:16:28.200
<v Speaker 10>traditional communications companies like telecom cable, you have hard assets,

0:16:28.920 --> 0:16:30.240
<v Speaker 10>it's a little bit easier to lend to.

0:16:30.280 --> 0:16:31.680
<v Speaker 8>It is a little bit tougher in media. So this

0:16:31.680 --> 0:16:33.040
<v Speaker 8>would be a large name for media.

0:16:33.720 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 3>What's paramounts?

0:16:34.800 --> 0:16:38.880
<v Speaker 4>Does Paramount have a view like does a marketplace have

0:16:38.920 --> 0:16:39.840
<v Speaker 4>a view on powamount?

0:16:40.040 --> 0:16:43.120
<v Speaker 10>Well, Paramount, it's not a very large name and it

0:16:43.200 --> 0:16:47.400
<v Speaker 10>is on the cusp of IG. It trades very wide

0:16:47.440 --> 0:16:49.600
<v Speaker 10>for IG, but that's because it's on the cusp and

0:16:49.640 --> 0:16:51.840
<v Speaker 10>there's fears of a certain deal like this. Now there's

0:16:51.840 --> 0:16:54.160
<v Speaker 10>two sides, right, you have the positive of the Elson

0:16:54.240 --> 0:16:57.800
<v Speaker 10>family and Redbird coming in and saying, hey, there's support there.

0:16:58.200 --> 0:17:00.760
<v Speaker 10>You know, I know we have somebody that's that backing us.

0:17:00.800 --> 0:17:03.440
<v Speaker 10>Things can't get too bad. And the flip side, you know,

0:17:03.720 --> 0:17:05.680
<v Speaker 10>the business is challenged, and you know there is the

0:17:05.760 --> 0:17:06.200
<v Speaker 10>risk of.

0:17:06.200 --> 0:17:08.760
<v Speaker 4>High yield I mean back of my date for this,

0:17:08.760 --> 0:17:11.000
<v Speaker 4>this kind of deal and your higeld I mean high

0:17:11.040 --> 0:17:13.520
<v Speaker 4>yield market. Five phone calls, I would I would get

0:17:13.520 --> 0:17:14.480
<v Speaker 4>a sense of whether.

0:17:14.280 --> 0:17:16.560
<v Speaker 3>The deal could get done. Is it still like that today?

0:17:16.960 --> 0:17:17.160
<v Speaker 6>Yeah?

0:17:17.200 --> 0:17:18.720
<v Speaker 8>Sure, if you call the right people, that's right.

0:17:18.760 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 3>And I knew the people to call, and they would say,

0:17:21.760 --> 0:17:23.359
<v Speaker 3>I don't think so, Paul, I don't think we can

0:17:23.400 --> 0:17:23.639
<v Speaker 3>get this.

0:17:23.840 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 11>You know.

0:17:24.280 --> 0:17:26.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, speaking of the right people, Jared Kushner is part

0:17:26.280 --> 0:17:29.920
<v Speaker 2>of this paramount hostile deal bid for Warner Brother's Discovery

0:17:29.920 --> 0:17:32.760
<v Speaker 2>through Affinity, the firm that he runs. So there's all

0:17:32.840 --> 0:17:36.080
<v Speaker 2>kinds of political considerations as well.

0:17:36.400 --> 0:17:38.240
<v Speaker 5>How do you anticipate.

0:17:39.280 --> 0:17:41.600
<v Speaker 2>Warner Brother's Discovery bonds to trade in the meantime, I mean,

0:17:41.600 --> 0:17:42.520
<v Speaker 2>what does that look like?

0:17:42.760 --> 0:17:44.560
<v Speaker 10>Well, they've been very volatile, right, So if you go

0:17:44.600 --> 0:17:46.240
<v Speaker 10>back a couple of months ago when they got jumped in,

0:17:46.280 --> 0:17:48.439
<v Speaker 10>there was the big tenor offer of the bonds were crushed,

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:51.720
<v Speaker 10>they were chart trading at large discounts to par. Then

0:17:51.720 --> 0:17:53.440
<v Speaker 10>they've had a nice run over the last couple of

0:17:53.480 --> 0:17:56.000
<v Speaker 10>months with all the speculation of being bought out. Now

0:17:56.040 --> 0:17:58.879
<v Speaker 10>the Netflick Flicks deal happened and the existing bonds appear

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:01.639
<v Speaker 10>to be left behind with global networks business which is

0:18:01.680 --> 0:18:04.320
<v Speaker 10>somewhat deteriorating. So the mons traded off a little bit

0:18:04.320 --> 0:18:07.600
<v Speaker 10>on Friday and then now coming in with having Ellison

0:18:08.040 --> 0:18:10.479
<v Speaker 10>in Redbord behind you, that's giving a little bit more

0:18:10.520 --> 0:18:13.280
<v Speaker 10>of a left but they're likely to remain very volatile.

0:18:13.880 --> 0:18:17.040
<v Speaker 3>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this.

0:18:20.920 --> 0:18:24.600
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:18:24.720 --> 0:18:27.760
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android

0:18:27.800 --> 0:18:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever

0:18:31.160 --> 0:18:34.240
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:18:35.200 --> 0:18:38.080
<v Speaker 2>IBM buying conflent for nine point three billion dollars in

0:18:38.119 --> 0:18:40.520
<v Speaker 2>cash or eleven billion dollars if you include debt on

0:18:40.640 --> 0:18:43.920
<v Speaker 2>our Agrana is Bloomberg Intelligence's technology analysts and he joins

0:18:43.960 --> 0:18:46.040
<v Speaker 2>us now, So on rag, what can you tell us

0:18:46.040 --> 0:18:49.480
<v Speaker 2>about how this fits in with IBM's ambitions, in particular

0:18:49.600 --> 0:18:53.320
<v Speaker 2>it's AI ambitions, which it's really been repositioning as business around.

0:18:53.920 --> 0:18:56.439
<v Speaker 11>ViBe's done a very good job since the acquisition of

0:18:56.440 --> 0:18:59.959
<v Speaker 11>red Hat. Not only did they pivot and move towards software,

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:02.840
<v Speaker 11>which is a much higher margin business, they actually have

0:19:03.200 --> 0:19:06.359
<v Speaker 11>margin improvement because the gross margin of those businesses is

0:19:06.440 --> 0:19:09.040
<v Speaker 11>very high. Since then, they've bought a number of companies

0:19:09.080 --> 0:19:13.159
<v Speaker 11>Harshi Corp, Appto and now Confluent. The big thing what

0:19:13.200 --> 0:19:17.119
<v Speaker 11>we want to think about over here is enterprises do

0:19:17.320 --> 0:19:21.640
<v Speaker 11>not always go with either AWS or Microsoft. They do,

0:19:21.920 --> 0:19:24.320
<v Speaker 11>you know, look at open source as a way of

0:19:24.520 --> 0:19:31.560
<v Speaker 11>building their infrastructure. Confluent specializes in open source streaming data platform,

0:19:31.800 --> 0:19:34.400
<v Speaker 11>which is when you are looking at real time data,

0:19:34.440 --> 0:19:36.800
<v Speaker 11>whether it is you know, something that comes from a

0:19:36.800 --> 0:19:40.080
<v Speaker 11>telemetric device or even transactions that are happening at a

0:19:40.119 --> 0:19:43.760
<v Speaker 11>retailer or a bank, you can ingest that data directly

0:19:43.920 --> 0:19:46.600
<v Speaker 11>into your system and then make sense out of it. Now,

0:19:46.640 --> 0:19:50.000
<v Speaker 11>that's going to be helpful as enterprises infuse more AI

0:19:50.119 --> 0:19:54.520
<v Speaker 11>into their application. So strategically, smart move financially also smart.

0:19:55.080 --> 0:19:58.359
<v Speaker 4>Red headline crossing the Bloomberg terminal the BLS to not

0:19:58.720 --> 0:20:01.520
<v Speaker 4>publish October PPI data, which I.

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:04.320
<v Speaker 2>Believe makes sense given that if I recall correctly, the

0:20:04.359 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 2>BILS already told us that it's not publishing October jobs

0:20:07.640 --> 0:20:10.120
<v Speaker 2>or CPI data either, right, So that's kind.

0:20:10.000 --> 0:20:11.320
<v Speaker 3>Of what we heard from a lot of it at Connors.

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:13.600
<v Speaker 3>We'll talk to Mike McKey about that. Yes, absolutely, Yeah,

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:17.080
<v Speaker 3>that's coming up all right. IBM, this is as a kid.

0:20:17.280 --> 0:20:21.120
<v Speaker 4>IBM was technology, that was the impitomy of tech technology.

0:20:21.359 --> 0:20:23.359
<v Speaker 4>Then the Internet came along and they kind of missed it,

0:20:23.760 --> 0:20:25.680
<v Speaker 4>so you didn't think about them a whole lot. Now,

0:20:25.720 --> 0:20:27.639
<v Speaker 4>if you put up a stock chart, over the last

0:20:27.720 --> 0:20:30.800
<v Speaker 4>five years, the S ANDP has compounded at about fifteen

0:20:30.800 --> 0:20:34.680
<v Speaker 4>percent per year. IBM over that timeframe twenty six percent

0:20:35.240 --> 0:20:39.119
<v Speaker 4>per year ANAG what's the what is the turnaround of

0:20:39.119 --> 0:20:42.000
<v Speaker 4>this aircraft carry over the last five years? Now?

0:20:42.080 --> 0:20:43.840
<v Speaker 11>As I said, I think it is the acquisition of

0:20:43.880 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 11>red Hot. I think the CEO has done a very

0:20:45.760 --> 0:20:50.359
<v Speaker 11>good job of blending that particular you could say, operations

0:20:50.480 --> 0:20:53.439
<v Speaker 11>within their services platform, because when you think about the

0:20:53.480 --> 0:20:56.920
<v Speaker 11>IBM prior to that, it was very services heavy. That's

0:20:56.960 --> 0:21:00.280
<v Speaker 11>a business that has forty fifty percent gross margin, not

0:21:00.440 --> 0:21:04.560
<v Speaker 11>as profitable as software businesses. By being open, by going

0:21:04.560 --> 0:21:08.199
<v Speaker 11>out and buying software businesses, their financial profile has changed,

0:21:08.440 --> 0:21:10.800
<v Speaker 11>their cash flow has changed, and I think it's more

0:21:10.880 --> 0:21:13.840
<v Speaker 11>stable in nature. They're still not at a point that

0:21:13.880 --> 0:21:16.040
<v Speaker 11>their sales growth is going to be in double digits,

0:21:16.240 --> 0:21:18.520
<v Speaker 11>but they are inching towards their target and it may

0:21:18.520 --> 0:21:20.879
<v Speaker 11>be you know, two to three years before they get there.

0:21:21.560 --> 0:21:24.399
<v Speaker 2>So, Honor rog what's interesting about this particular acquisition is

0:21:24.920 --> 0:21:27.760
<v Speaker 2>IBM is definitely making inroads or greater inroads into AI,

0:21:27.880 --> 0:21:31.040
<v Speaker 2>but this is not a data center driven acquisition.

0:21:31.560 --> 0:21:33.720
<v Speaker 5>What do you think that means in terms of the next.

0:21:33.480 --> 0:21:35.320
<v Speaker 2>Stage of M and A that we're going to hear

0:21:35.400 --> 0:21:38.359
<v Speaker 2>from the tech industry when it comes to taking advantage

0:21:38.440 --> 0:21:42.560
<v Speaker 2>of opportunities in AI, but not necessarily buying AI data centers.

0:21:43.400 --> 0:21:45.800
<v Speaker 11>You see, everybody has their own strategy what they are

0:21:45.840 --> 0:21:48.520
<v Speaker 11>focusing on. IBM luckily, and it's good for them that

0:21:48.560 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 11>they don't want to be in that, you know, a

0:21:50.680 --> 0:21:54.119
<v Speaker 11>capital intensive heavy data center business. Because this is a

0:21:54.119 --> 0:21:57.359
<v Speaker 11>company that generates let's say fourteen fifteen billion in free

0:21:57.359 --> 0:21:59.880
<v Speaker 11>cash flow. They can't go out and buy another day

0:22:00.359 --> 0:22:03.440
<v Speaker 11>expand into a data center space where the capital investments

0:22:03.480 --> 0:22:06.080
<v Speaker 11>is multiples of that. They are doing the smart thing

0:22:06.080 --> 0:22:10.399
<v Speaker 11>of buying software companies that are not capital intensive heavy.

0:22:10.800 --> 0:22:13.399
<v Speaker 11>When you are going out and creating a new application,

0:22:13.800 --> 0:22:16.399
<v Speaker 11>you know the raw material You need the raw materials

0:22:16.440 --> 0:22:19.159
<v Speaker 11>to create or embed that. And that's where they are

0:22:19.160 --> 0:22:21.800
<v Speaker 11>focused on and I think for what they do, it's

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:23.080
<v Speaker 11>it's a very smart place to be in.

0:22:24.560 --> 0:22:29.280
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:22:29.440 --> 0:22:32.920
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each

0:22:32.960 --> 0:22:36.600
<v Speaker 1>weekday ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:22:36.840 --> 0:22:40.399
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:22:40.800 --> 0:22:43.720
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:22:44.119 --> 0:22:47.240
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal