WEBVTT - Morgan Housel on the New Way We Think About Money

0:00:10.160 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Odd Locks Podcast.

0:00:14.080 --> 0:00:16.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm Joe Wisenthal and I'm Tracy Allaway.

0:00:16.800 --> 0:00:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Tracy, you know what topic we'd never really talk about

0:00:21.280 --> 0:00:23.040
<v Speaker 1>or really do. It's like we never really do anything

0:00:23.079 --> 0:00:25.120
<v Speaker 1>related like personal finance, person.

0:00:25.000 --> 0:00:27.720
<v Speaker 2>Like what to actually do with all the information that

0:00:27.760 --> 0:00:30.960
<v Speaker 2>we talk about on a bi weekly basis. Yeah, what

0:00:31.080 --> 0:00:32.200
<v Speaker 2>it means for making money.

0:00:32.280 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 1>It's like a huge part of like financial media. But

0:00:34.640 --> 0:00:37.640
<v Speaker 1>it's like, you know, I like to usually like what's

0:00:37.640 --> 0:00:39.120
<v Speaker 1>going to happen with the quantitative titaning.

0:00:39.240 --> 0:00:41.279
<v Speaker 2>It's a tough one because I feel like you can

0:00:41.320 --> 0:00:45.080
<v Speaker 2>talk about it generally, but also there's the temptation a

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:49.680
<v Speaker 2>lot of people end up doing this to give specific recommendations.

0:00:49.400 --> 0:00:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Right like get this credit card, Tesla, or yeah, either

0:00:52.680 --> 0:00:56.800
<v Speaker 1>buy this dock, get this credit card, don't buy avocado

0:00:56.880 --> 0:00:59.080
<v Speaker 1>toast like all this stuff, or like you know, move

0:00:59.080 --> 0:01:02.440
<v Speaker 1>your money. But like it's kind of like cliche topic.

0:01:02.520 --> 0:01:04.640
<v Speaker 1>But like, on the other hand, I do think it's

0:01:04.720 --> 0:01:07.240
<v Speaker 1>interesting right now because we've just had this like a

0:01:07.360 --> 0:01:10.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of extraordinary like three years of like inflation, which

0:01:10.800 --> 0:01:13.920
<v Speaker 1>many people have never really experienced in their lives, And

0:01:14.000 --> 0:01:16.200
<v Speaker 1>so to my mind, that raises some interesting questions like

0:01:16.280 --> 0:01:18.760
<v Speaker 1>how is this going to like change people's behavior and

0:01:18.800 --> 0:01:20.720
<v Speaker 1>what should what have people done in the past during

0:01:20.760 --> 0:01:23.560
<v Speaker 1>periods of inflation? Like there are really interesting sort of

0:01:23.560 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 1>like personal finance, spending investing questions that like will come

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:28.440
<v Speaker 1>out of this era well.

0:01:28.319 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, and also the prospect of just finally actually earning

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 2>some interest on a basic savings account. I know it's

0:01:35.720 --> 0:01:38.880
<v Speaker 2>still below the level of inflation, but for people who've

0:01:38.920 --> 0:01:41.800
<v Speaker 2>been earning zero percent for most of their professional lives,

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:42.559
<v Speaker 2>I think it's very.

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:44.679
<v Speaker 1>I think now it's kind of positive, right because you

0:01:44.680 --> 0:01:47.440
<v Speaker 1>could play five percent in the CD and maybe inflation

0:01:47.560 --> 0:01:49.680
<v Speaker 1>we three gonna have, right, you know. I asked my

0:01:49.800 --> 0:01:53.320
<v Speaker 1>dad recently about his memory of the nineteen seventies. I

0:01:53.360 --> 0:01:55.000
<v Speaker 1>was like, what was that like? You know, the first

0:01:55.000 --> 0:01:56.800
<v Speaker 1>thing he said was like I could really get a

0:01:56.800 --> 0:01:58.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of money out of bank account day.

0:01:58.480 --> 0:01:59.120
<v Speaker 2>Oh, there we go.

0:01:59.280 --> 0:01:59.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:01:59.800 --> 0:02:02.600
<v Speaker 1>So, you know, there's all kinds of interesting things about

0:02:02.640 --> 0:02:04.440
<v Speaker 1>like how people actually deal.

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 2>With right and also what happens when we have a

0:02:07.480 --> 0:02:10.360
<v Speaker 2>sort of regime change and how do people react to

0:02:10.400 --> 0:02:12.760
<v Speaker 2>it and how much have things actually changed?

0:02:12.880 --> 0:02:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, you know, and we've been talking about some you know,

0:02:14.600 --> 0:02:16.760
<v Speaker 1>some of the real estate episodes. Yeah, like how much

0:02:16.840 --> 0:02:19.360
<v Speaker 1>people like anchored to the ZIP era. They're like, you know,

0:02:19.400 --> 0:02:21.560
<v Speaker 1>as if like that was normal. Yeah, so it's like

0:02:21.800 --> 0:02:24.919
<v Speaker 1>when have people adjusted? Is there still a big adjustment

0:02:25.000 --> 0:02:28.200
<v Speaker 1>left to go? Like, there's just some really interesting questions. Absolutely, Okay,

0:02:28.240 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 1>well I think we should talk about them. And we

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:33.160
<v Speaker 1>really do have the perfect guest. We're going to be

0:02:33.200 --> 0:02:37.040
<v Speaker 1>speaking with Morgan Household, longtime writer, the author of the

0:02:37.040 --> 0:02:40.560
<v Speaker 1>best selling book The Psychology of Money is More books

0:02:40.760 --> 0:02:44.160
<v Speaker 1>coming out hugely popular in this area. Morgan, thank you

0:02:44.200 --> 0:02:45.800
<v Speaker 1>so much for coming on Outlass.

0:02:45.440 --> 0:02:46.920
<v Speaker 3>Well, Joe and Tracy happy to be here, Thanks for

0:02:46.919 --> 0:02:47.200
<v Speaker 3>having me.

0:02:47.240 --> 0:02:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Can I just say, all right, I'm gonna just say

0:02:49.280 --> 0:02:52.200
<v Speaker 1>something just to let's set this scene a little bit,

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:54.920
<v Speaker 1>like I said in the beginning of the conversation, like

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:59.040
<v Speaker 1>personal finances a genre. It's this little hackney, this kind.

0:02:58.880 --> 0:03:00.600
<v Speaker 2>Of cliche, but Morgan does it well.

0:03:01.360 --> 0:03:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Years ago, like twenty eleven, twenty twelve, I was a

0:03:04.880 --> 0:03:08.600
<v Speaker 1>business insider Morgan was it the Motley Fool? And I

0:03:08.760 --> 0:03:13.160
<v Speaker 1>said to my former colleague at BI Sam Row, Morgan

0:03:13.240 --> 0:03:15.799
<v Speaker 1>is the first personal finance writer that I like. And

0:03:16.200 --> 0:03:17.440
<v Speaker 1>now here's this huge.

0:03:17.280 --> 0:03:20.079
<v Speaker 2>That's high praise. High praise from that means I was.

0:03:20.120 --> 0:03:22.359
<v Speaker 1>I just want to say I was long Morgan Household

0:03:22.720 --> 0:03:23.360
<v Speaker 1>very early on.

0:03:23.520 --> 0:03:23.840
<v Speaker 2>I was.

0:03:23.919 --> 0:03:26.519
<v Speaker 3>I was long Joe during that period as well as well.

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:28.680
<v Speaker 3>So this is this is open up to Since then,

0:03:29.040 --> 0:03:31.040
<v Speaker 3>I've always I feel like I've always done the same

0:03:31.080 --> 0:03:32.960
<v Speaker 3>thing since two thousand and eight when I started this,

0:03:33.120 --> 0:03:35.560
<v Speaker 3>which was you know you mentioned most personal finance writing

0:03:35.760 --> 0:03:38.000
<v Speaker 3>kind of falls into two buckets. It's either here's the

0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 3>credit card you should you should use, or here's the

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:44.120
<v Speaker 3>hot stock you should buy. The credit card part, you know,

0:03:44.240 --> 0:03:46.000
<v Speaker 3>I was never just I was never that interested in it,

0:03:46.200 --> 0:03:49.200
<v Speaker 3>and the here's the stock you should buy always felt

0:03:49.360 --> 0:03:51.760
<v Speaker 3>almost immoral to me because you don't know who's reading

0:03:51.840 --> 0:03:54.200
<v Speaker 3>your stuff. Is this an eighteen year old day trader

0:03:54.320 --> 0:03:55.960
<v Speaker 3>or a ninet year old widow? Like who are you

0:03:56.000 --> 0:03:58.640
<v Speaker 3>recommending this to? So because of that, I always I

0:03:58.680 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 3>just kind of naturally fell into this bucket of like

0:04:01.720 --> 0:04:03.400
<v Speaker 3>what's going through people's heads. I don't want to give

0:04:03.400 --> 0:04:05.400
<v Speaker 3>anybody advice. I don't want to tell anybody what to

0:04:05.400 --> 0:04:07.680
<v Speaker 3>do because I don't know you, but I'm really curious

0:04:07.680 --> 0:04:10.280
<v Speaker 3>what's going on inside your head. Particularly I started as

0:04:10.320 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 3>a writer in two thousand and eight, so the world

0:04:12.160 --> 0:04:14.640
<v Speaker 3>was falling to pieces, and it was just this idea

0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:17.239
<v Speaker 3>of like, well, what the heck just happened here? Yeah,

0:04:17.279 --> 0:04:20.159
<v Speaker 3>And I think once I kind of realized that you

0:04:20.200 --> 0:04:23.040
<v Speaker 3>could not explain two thousand and eight through the lens

0:04:23.080 --> 0:04:25.480
<v Speaker 3>of a finance or an economics textbook. It's just not

0:04:25.720 --> 0:04:29.120
<v Speaker 3>in there to explain the bubble, the bus, the bailouts,

0:04:29.279 --> 0:04:32.160
<v Speaker 3>not an economics textbook. But psychology had a lot to

0:04:32.160 --> 0:04:35.000
<v Speaker 3>say about it. Sociology like keeping up the Joneses that

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:37.360
<v Speaker 3>perfectly explained the housing bubble. So there are all these

0:04:37.400 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 3>other fields outside of finance that filled in the gaps.

0:04:40.440 --> 0:04:41.880
<v Speaker 3>So that to me was like, ah, I'm just really

0:04:41.920 --> 0:04:45.160
<v Speaker 3>interested in how you can connect psychology and sociology and

0:04:45.200 --> 0:04:48.279
<v Speaker 3>political science to try to explain what people are thinking

0:04:48.400 --> 0:04:50.000
<v Speaker 3>rather than what they should do. Yeah.

0:04:50.040 --> 0:04:52.880
<v Speaker 2>Both Joe and I we sort of started our financial

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:58.640
<v Speaker 2>journalism careers around two thousand and eight, and it was

0:04:58.680 --> 0:05:00.320
<v Speaker 2>a great time to do it because you're sort of

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:02.599
<v Speaker 2>on the same level as everyone else. No one knew

0:05:02.640 --> 0:05:05.000
<v Speaker 2>really what was going on, but talk to us a

0:05:05.040 --> 0:05:08.159
<v Speaker 2>little bit more than about your approach. How does taking

0:05:08.200 --> 0:05:12.640
<v Speaker 2>that sociological or psychological angle actually inform the way you

0:05:12.760 --> 0:05:14.279
<v Speaker 2>think about personal finance investing.

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:16.800
<v Speaker 3>We let's say there's two elements to this. One is

0:05:16.920 --> 0:05:19.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm a writer, and then the other is I'm interested

0:05:19.240 --> 0:05:21.360
<v Speaker 3>in behavioral finance, and you really have to mix both

0:05:21.360 --> 0:05:23.680
<v Speaker 3>of those because in writing, particularly as a finance writer,

0:05:24.000 --> 0:05:26.880
<v Speaker 3>if you're just writing about data and charts, like a

0:05:26.960 --> 0:05:29.240
<v Speaker 3>lot of people, even in the industry, it's like it's boring,

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 3>You're not going to catch you. So you got to

0:05:30.520 --> 0:05:33.080
<v Speaker 3>tell a good story. And so I'm always trying to

0:05:33.120 --> 0:05:35.839
<v Speaker 3>find examples from fields that have nothing to do with

0:05:35.920 --> 0:05:39.359
<v Speaker 3>finance that explain how people think about greed and fear

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:41.560
<v Speaker 3>and risk, because not only do I think that gets

0:05:41.560 --> 0:05:43.800
<v Speaker 3>you closer to the truth of what's happening in finance,

0:05:43.839 --> 0:05:45.840
<v Speaker 3>if you can really get like, why are people thinking

0:05:45.839 --> 0:05:48.360
<v Speaker 3>the way they are? But from a writing standpoint, I

0:05:48.360 --> 0:05:50.040
<v Speaker 3>think it's more interesting if you can be like, oh,

0:05:50.080 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 3>here's a story from World War two that explains how

0:05:53.080 --> 0:05:54.800
<v Speaker 3>people think about risk, and let me tell you how

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:58.320
<v Speaker 3>that bleeds into finance. I think it's more interesting as

0:05:58.360 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 3>a writer to catch people's attention that way.

0:06:00.200 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 2>So we're recording this at an event in Huntington Beach

0:06:03.400 --> 0:06:06.680
<v Speaker 2>at Future Proof isn't one of your most famous stories

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:10.600
<v Speaker 2>about parking cars in Los Angeles at one point being

0:06:10.640 --> 0:06:11.080
<v Speaker 2>a valet.

0:06:11.200 --> 0:06:13.599
<v Speaker 3>So yes, it was a hotel here in Los Angeles

0:06:13.880 --> 0:06:16.440
<v Speaker 3>that I was a valet at during college, and it

0:06:16.480 --> 0:06:18.279
<v Speaker 3>was a high end, five star hotel, a lot of

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:21.800
<v Speaker 3>rich people coming through, and there was one member who

0:06:21.880 --> 0:06:25.440
<v Speaker 3>was just an absolute animal with money. He was very,

0:06:25.560 --> 0:06:27.479
<v Speaker 3>very wealthy. I think he was worth hundreds of millions

0:06:27.520 --> 0:06:30.800
<v Speaker 3>of dollars and money has never burnt a hole in

0:06:30.839 --> 0:06:34.560
<v Speaker 3>someone's pocket so fast. He wandered around, he was he

0:06:34.600 --> 0:06:36.840
<v Speaker 3>was always drunk, and he wandered around with a stack

0:06:36.839 --> 0:06:40.360
<v Speaker 3>one hundred dollar bills I swear six inches thick, and

0:06:40.440 --> 0:06:43.520
<v Speaker 3>he would just flash money like no other. And we

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 3>did a lot of errands for this guy. As a

0:06:45.480 --> 0:06:48.120
<v Speaker 3>vala tipped very well. And one day he came to

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:50.559
<v Speaker 3>one of my colleagues and he peeled off a thick

0:06:50.960 --> 0:06:53.039
<v Speaker 3>stack of one hundred dollars bills and he said, go

0:06:53.120 --> 0:06:55.560
<v Speaker 3>down to the jewelry store down the street and buy

0:06:55.560 --> 0:06:57.359
<v Speaker 3>me some gold coins. I think there were a thousand

0:06:57.400 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 3>dollars gold coins. And he came back any gold courts

0:07:00.360 --> 0:07:03.120
<v Speaker 3>and this guy with a group of friends sat there

0:07:03.160 --> 0:07:07.280
<v Speaker 3>at the Pacific Ocean skipping a gold coins to see

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:09.400
<v Speaker 3>how far they could go. Oh my god, And I

0:07:09.480 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 3>remember thinking I was twenty one at the time, and

0:07:11.920 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 3>I remember watching this and thinking like, how long can

0:07:14.360 --> 0:07:18.160
<v Speaker 3>this last? And it was probably ten years later that

0:07:18.280 --> 0:07:20.040
<v Speaker 3>I said, what's this guy up to? And I googled

0:07:20.040 --> 0:07:21.880
<v Speaker 3>his name and sure enough, he went bankrupt. He went,

0:07:21.920 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 3>his company went out of business. He went, And it

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:24.880
<v Speaker 3>was like, when I saw the headline, he was like,

0:07:24.920 --> 0:07:27.680
<v Speaker 3>of course, of course this guy. So to me, it

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 3>was always so interesting that he was so smart. He

0:07:30.840 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 3>was an entrepreneur who made a lot of his companies

0:07:34.120 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 3>built parts for satellites, and he had a patent that's

0:07:37.600 --> 0:07:39.800
<v Speaker 3>in every Wi Fi device, Like he was such a

0:07:39.840 --> 0:07:44.280
<v Speaker 3>genius technically, but his relationship with money was so broken

0:07:44.640 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 3>and so bad. So that was like, it doesn't matter

0:07:47.120 --> 0:07:49.880
<v Speaker 3>how smart you are, it's not about like what your

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:53.120
<v Speaker 3>IQ is. If your behavior with money is wrong, you're done.

0:07:53.240 --> 0:07:55.440
<v Speaker 3>It's out. And then there's a flip side of that.

0:07:55.440 --> 0:07:57.000
<v Speaker 3>It's true too, which is that some people who are

0:07:57.040 --> 0:08:00.160
<v Speaker 3>not that intelligent by their test scores or whatever, but

0:08:00.200 --> 0:08:02.840
<v Speaker 3>they have a great behavior with money can do spectacular

0:08:02.840 --> 0:08:03.240
<v Speaker 3>over time.

0:08:03.480 --> 0:08:06.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm probably taking the wrong lesson away from this anecdote,

0:08:06.080 --> 0:08:07.960
<v Speaker 2>but did anyone go after the coins?

0:08:08.440 --> 0:08:09.000
<v Speaker 3>For all I know?

0:08:09.040 --> 0:08:12.560
<v Speaker 1>They're still there all right later today, Joe, this is

0:08:12.640 --> 0:08:14.920
<v Speaker 1>this is this is good to know. So this is

0:08:15.160 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, obviously there are going to be individuals who

0:08:17.400 --> 0:08:19.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe don't have high income but or do a good

0:08:19.840 --> 0:08:22.840
<v Speaker 1>job of accumulating savings over years, or people of massive

0:08:22.840 --> 0:08:25.480
<v Speaker 1>incomes that blow it all kinds of things. You know,

0:08:25.560 --> 0:08:28.640
<v Speaker 1>you always hear these other stories about the cohorts and

0:08:28.720 --> 0:08:31.920
<v Speaker 1>people who went through something together, like people who came

0:08:31.960 --> 0:08:34.840
<v Speaker 1>out of the Great Depression and then they like you know,

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 1>were like hoarders or something like that, or people who

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:40.040
<v Speaker 1>came out of whatever it is. Is that true? People

0:08:40.080 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 1>say that all the time, or people experience like the

0:08:43.080 --> 0:08:45.840
<v Speaker 1>inflation in Wymar Germany and support like when you in

0:08:45.880 --> 0:08:48.000
<v Speaker 1>your research when you read take It, you read a

0:08:48.000 --> 0:08:50.000
<v Speaker 1>ton of history, like does that seem to be a

0:08:50.040 --> 0:08:50.439
<v Speaker 1>real thing?

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:53.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, definitely. I think every generation experiences the economy in

0:08:53.520 --> 0:08:56.160
<v Speaker 3>their own unique way, and those experiences, particularly what you

0:08:56.200 --> 0:08:59.040
<v Speaker 3>experience in your teens and twenties, like your formative years

0:08:59.040 --> 0:09:01.000
<v Speaker 3>where you're starting to pay it attention to the economy

0:09:01.280 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 3>really sticks with you. Everyone is seen or probably heard

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:05.760
<v Speaker 3>of the studies about the generation that went through the

0:09:05.760 --> 0:09:07.680
<v Speaker 3>Great Depression, and then right after that it was World

0:09:07.720 --> 0:09:10.880
<v Speaker 3>War Two. So that was fifteen years of hell, and

0:09:10.920 --> 0:09:12.760
<v Speaker 3>those people coming out of it like that stayed with

0:09:12.800 --> 0:09:15.320
<v Speaker 3>them forever, and there's been academics who have measured how

0:09:15.400 --> 0:09:18.560
<v Speaker 3>that impacted them. They're very scared of debt, didn't want

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:21.040
<v Speaker 3>to invest in the stock market way more so even

0:09:21.080 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 3>when you talk about people in warmer Germany, or that

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:26.240
<v Speaker 3>people went through World War Two in Germany or in

0:09:26.280 --> 0:09:30.080
<v Speaker 3>France or in Russia, those people were completely scarred economically

0:09:30.080 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 3>for the rest of their lives. And more recently, all

0:09:32.800 --> 0:09:35.920
<v Speaker 3>three of us became young adults in the early two thousands,

0:09:35.960 --> 0:09:38.160
<v Speaker 3>So for me nine to eleven was the first like

0:09:38.280 --> 0:09:41.760
<v Speaker 3>adult big event and then so that was massive, and

0:09:41.800 --> 0:09:45.720
<v Speaker 3>I think for our parents' generation, who were adults in

0:09:45.720 --> 0:09:48.720
<v Speaker 3>the nineteen nineties, when things were so at least in

0:09:48.760 --> 0:09:52.800
<v Speaker 3>relative terms, calm, stable, prosperous, not just economically but politically

0:09:52.920 --> 0:09:56.200
<v Speaker 3>and geopolitically, we're like so solid and there was a

0:09:56.240 --> 0:09:58.480
<v Speaker 3>recession or you know, there's a hiccup at ninety four

0:09:58.480 --> 0:10:00.120
<v Speaker 3>and ninety eight, but for most people that was like

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:02.040
<v Speaker 3>unless you were a bond trader, didn't matter. The nineties

0:10:02.080 --> 0:10:04.880
<v Speaker 3>were great. Nine to eleven was like, oh wow, like

0:10:05.160 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 3>we really got knocked down here, but that was a

0:10:07.000 --> 0:10:09.679
<v Speaker 3>one time event, like America is still as strong as

0:10:09.679 --> 0:10:11.679
<v Speaker 3>it's ever been. And then in two thousand and eight,

0:10:11.679 --> 0:10:14.080
<v Speaker 3>I was like, wow, we got knocked down again, like

0:10:14.400 --> 0:10:16.560
<v Speaker 3>two times in the last eight years. That's pretty bad.

0:10:16.920 --> 0:10:19.880
<v Speaker 3>And then COVID twenty twenty, it's like the world broke again,

0:10:20.760 --> 0:10:24.280
<v Speaker 3>like three times in twenty years. The world has broken

0:10:24.360 --> 0:10:25.880
<v Speaker 3>in the United States, and I think that is like,

0:10:26.440 --> 0:10:29.160
<v Speaker 3>what's the quote, fool me wants shame on you for

0:10:29.240 --> 0:10:31.360
<v Speaker 3>me twice. Now that people have been fooled, so to speak,

0:10:31.440 --> 0:10:34.079
<v Speaker 3>three times in twenty years, I think we now our

0:10:34.200 --> 0:10:39.320
<v Speaker 3>generation believes that the world breaks every five to ten years,

0:10:39.320 --> 0:10:41.960
<v Speaker 3>and I think that's a good I think that's the truth.

0:10:42.360 --> 0:10:45.440
<v Speaker 3>I think the previous generation that was America strong and

0:10:45.480 --> 0:10:48.160
<v Speaker 3>stable and nothing bad happens, that was the anomaly, and

0:10:48.240 --> 0:10:52.000
<v Speaker 3>I think I think we're a more pessimistic generation because

0:10:52.000 --> 0:10:52.320
<v Speaker 3>of it.

0:10:52.520 --> 0:10:55.240
<v Speaker 1>So I was kind of going to go into that,

0:10:55.320 --> 0:10:57.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, the one thing that I've been really fastened

0:10:57.960 --> 0:11:01.480
<v Speaker 1>by over the last few years is what sort of

0:11:01.520 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 1>strikes me, and particularly in like market it's an investing

0:11:04.480 --> 0:11:07.360
<v Speaker 1>is this sort of like I almost call it like

0:11:07.400 --> 0:11:10.160
<v Speaker 1>a sort of like nihilistic bullishness, like you saw it

0:11:10.200 --> 0:11:13.040
<v Speaker 1>like buying NFTs or duage coin or whatever, where it's like,

0:11:13.080 --> 0:11:16.600
<v Speaker 1>on some level it looks like optimistic speculative activity like

0:11:16.640 --> 0:11:19.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe we saw in the late nineties, but it also

0:11:19.240 --> 0:11:21.080
<v Speaker 1>has this sort of like edge of like none of

0:11:21.080 --> 0:11:22.120
<v Speaker 1>this really means anything.

0:11:22.360 --> 0:11:25.960
<v Speaker 2>You're knowingly chasing a bubble or buying a lottery because

0:11:25.960 --> 0:11:27.440
<v Speaker 2>there's no other way to make money for the.

0:11:27.480 --> 0:11:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street bets like bragging about going broken your robin

0:11:30.840 --> 0:11:32.680
<v Speaker 1>hood thing. Like it seems like we're in this era

0:11:32.760 --> 0:11:35.440
<v Speaker 1>of like speculation but not coming out of a place

0:11:35.440 --> 0:11:36.000
<v Speaker 1>of optimism.

0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:39.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. I almost think like the yolo mentality of trading

0:11:39.240 --> 0:11:41.080
<v Speaker 3>NFTs or whatever it may be, is actually like comes

0:11:41.080 --> 0:11:44.320
<v Speaker 3>from a very pessimistic place. If you're optimistic, then you're like,

0:11:44.360 --> 0:11:46.320
<v Speaker 3>I want to own the S and P five hundred for

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:49.800
<v Speaker 3>the next fifty years. That's optimism. Pessimism is it's all

0:11:49.840 --> 0:11:51.920
<v Speaker 3>going to go to hell anyways, Let's just throw it

0:11:51.920 --> 0:11:54.720
<v Speaker 3>all on an NFT yeah, so it looks from the

0:11:54.720 --> 0:11:58.520
<v Speaker 3>outset like a very like bullish, Like I'm so bullish

0:11:58.559 --> 0:12:00.120
<v Speaker 3>on crypto. I know. I think it comes from a

0:12:00.120 --> 0:12:02.760
<v Speaker 3>pessimistic place. You made this point years ago that stuck

0:12:02.800 --> 0:12:05.720
<v Speaker 3>with me during the gold bubble, if we call it

0:12:05.760 --> 0:12:09.360
<v Speaker 3>that around twenty eleven, that there's nothing more pessimistic than

0:12:09.440 --> 0:12:12.960
<v Speaker 3>betting on a rock. It's like, if you're optimistic, you

0:12:12.960 --> 0:12:15.480
<v Speaker 3>bet on people. And how pessimistic do you have to

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:18.640
<v Speaker 3>be to say a rock is going to outperform humans?

0:12:19.040 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 3>It's like the most pessimistic thing. And I think there's

0:12:21.040 --> 0:12:23.319
<v Speaker 3>a very like there's an analogy in there with NFTs.

0:12:23.440 --> 0:12:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:12:24.120 --> 0:12:27.480
<v Speaker 2>Wait, I take the point about people being pessimistic about

0:12:27.480 --> 0:12:31.840
<v Speaker 2>these big sort of sociological breaks breaks in society. But

0:12:32.080 --> 0:12:34.040
<v Speaker 2>if you look at the legacy of the two thousand

0:12:34.040 --> 0:12:39.360
<v Speaker 2>and eight financial crisis, it wasn't necessarily a terrible time

0:12:39.520 --> 0:12:43.080
<v Speaker 2>to start accumulating wealth and money. You know, if you

0:12:43.360 --> 0:12:45.400
<v Speaker 2>bought the S and P five hundred in two thousand

0:12:45.400 --> 0:12:49.160
<v Speaker 2>and nine, right up until twenty twenty, you'd be doing

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:53.040
<v Speaker 2>reasonably well. Like, what do you think the legacy is

0:12:53.360 --> 0:12:57.440
<v Speaker 2>of that particular era where we're still sifting through the

0:12:57.440 --> 0:12:59.960
<v Speaker 2>wreckage of two thousand and eight, we have ultra low

0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:04.280
<v Speaker 2>interest rates. Everyone's worried about deflation and subpar growth.

0:13:04.400 --> 0:13:06.400
<v Speaker 3>I remember, I don't know if it was twenty eleven,

0:13:06.480 --> 0:13:08.959
<v Speaker 3>So if I'm getting this date wrong, I'm sorry, but

0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:10.680
<v Speaker 3>I remember I think it was twenty eleven and the

0:13:10.720 --> 0:13:13.400
<v Speaker 3>market went up substantially. Does that sound right to you?

0:13:13.520 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 3>Twenty eleven? I think twenty twenty five percent? It was.

0:13:16.760 --> 0:13:17.920
<v Speaker 3>Maybe it was twenty ten.

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Twenty even bought him in October.

0:13:20.920 --> 0:13:24.080
<v Speaker 3>Maybe I was twenty year year. Maybe it was twenty ten.

0:13:24.080 --> 0:13:25.760
<v Speaker 3>Maybe it's twenty twelve. I forget the year, but the

0:13:25.800 --> 0:13:28.120
<v Speaker 3>market went up twenty twelve. I think maybe it's twenty twelve.

0:13:28.160 --> 0:13:30.280
<v Speaker 3>The market went up twenty or twenty five percent. And

0:13:30.320 --> 0:13:32.760
<v Speaker 3>I think it was Gallup who pulled Americans and said,

0:13:33.200 --> 0:13:35.520
<v Speaker 3>did the stock market go up or down this year?

0:13:36.200 --> 0:13:38.480
<v Speaker 3>And it was like sixty percent of Americans thought the

0:13:38.520 --> 0:13:41.240
<v Speaker 3>market went down during a year when it went up

0:13:41.400 --> 0:13:43.920
<v Speaker 3>twenty five percent. I actually think this was two thousand

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:46.480
<v Speaker 3>and nine, which makes sense. Okay, it makes more sense, right,

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:49.120
<v Speaker 3>And so that wasn't I think this explains the question

0:13:49.240 --> 0:13:51.599
<v Speaker 3>of like, in hindsight, it was a great time to

0:13:51.640 --> 0:13:53.920
<v Speaker 3>accumulate assets. But during the time, even a year when

0:13:53.920 --> 0:13:56.200
<v Speaker 3>the market went up twenty five percent, people were so

0:13:56.240 --> 0:13:58.880
<v Speaker 3>sure that the economy was bad that they assumed the

0:13:58.960 --> 0:14:02.439
<v Speaker 3>market went down. And Joe, both of you will remember this,

0:14:03.360 --> 0:14:07.080
<v Speaker 3>from basically twenty nine to twenty sixteen, if you were

0:14:07.120 --> 0:14:08.960
<v Speaker 3>a bullish on the stock market, you looked kind of

0:14:08.960 --> 0:14:11.000
<v Speaker 3>like a fool and you got dragged on Twitter. This

0:14:11.160 --> 0:14:13.000
<v Speaker 3>was like, oh, the cape ratio is too high, and

0:14:13.040 --> 0:14:15.360
<v Speaker 3>there was all this. So in hindsight it was a

0:14:15.480 --> 0:14:19.120
<v Speaker 3>generational buying opportunity, but it was that's all hindsight. It

0:14:19.160 --> 0:14:21.560
<v Speaker 3>was very hard to be bullish during that era, and

0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:24.080
<v Speaker 3>a lot of it was twenty eleven was double dip

0:14:24.080 --> 0:14:27.280
<v Speaker 3>recession right around the corner, and the idea that the

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:29.280
<v Speaker 3>financial crisis of two thousand and eight was just to

0:14:29.320 --> 0:14:32.240
<v Speaker 3>prelude to what was to the big crash that was coming.

0:14:32.840 --> 0:14:35.040
<v Speaker 3>That was a very popular view during those years, and

0:14:35.080 --> 0:14:36.840
<v Speaker 3>I think it was it was really hard to be

0:14:36.880 --> 0:14:37.560
<v Speaker 3>a long term goal.

0:14:54.280 --> 0:14:58.120
<v Speaker 1>So we talked about this in the intro. This phenomenon

0:14:58.160 --> 0:15:01.000
<v Speaker 1>of like people started like anchoring to what they know,

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:05.200
<v Speaker 1>and I feel like for a lot of people like ZERP,

0:15:05.800 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 1>really low nominal interest rates like, oh, that's normal, and

0:15:08.760 --> 0:15:10.840
<v Speaker 1>what we have right now, where like the ten years

0:15:10.920 --> 0:15:13.840
<v Speaker 1>yielding four percent and a mortgage is over seven percent,

0:15:14.320 --> 0:15:17.680
<v Speaker 1>that feels like aberrationally high. Like again, going sort of

0:15:17.680 --> 0:15:19.720
<v Speaker 1>back to the past, like does it take a while?

0:15:19.800 --> 0:15:21.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean it must you sort of as you describe it,

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:23.320
<v Speaker 1>like it seems to like take a while for like

0:15:23.360 --> 0:15:25.400
<v Speaker 1>at this sink in that It's like, no, that was

0:15:25.600 --> 0:15:29.119
<v Speaker 1>that was then, and it wasn't necessarily like normal or abnormal,

0:15:29.160 --> 0:15:30.080
<v Speaker 1>but that was a different time.

0:15:30.120 --> 0:15:31.960
<v Speaker 3>I think that that does make sense. But the counter

0:15:32.000 --> 0:15:34.440
<v Speaker 3>to that would be in the other direction. You know,

0:15:34.520 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 3>in the late nineties, a mortgage was seven percent run

0:15:37.240 --> 0:15:39.600
<v Speaker 3>by two thousand and three it was three or four percent,

0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:41.800
<v Speaker 3>And I think people got used to that really quickly.

0:15:42.240 --> 0:15:44.600
<v Speaker 3>That was kind of the basis of the housing bubble

0:15:44.600 --> 0:15:46.160
<v Speaker 3>that peaked in two thousand and six, is that by

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:48.160
<v Speaker 3>two thousand and six people were already completely used to

0:15:48.160 --> 0:15:50.520
<v Speaker 3>low interest rates that didn't exist four years prior.

0:15:50.640 --> 0:15:51.240
<v Speaker 1>That's wild.

0:15:51.280 --> 0:15:54.120
<v Speaker 3>So I do think people get accustomed to it fairly quickly.

0:15:54.200 --> 0:15:55.920
<v Speaker 3>And a lot of that, I mean, at the corporate level,

0:15:55.960 --> 0:15:58.560
<v Speaker 3>a lot of that debt rolls over every five years,

0:15:58.640 --> 0:16:00.640
<v Speaker 3>so there's gonna be like that, the credit cycle is

0:16:00.640 --> 0:16:02.920
<v Speaker 3>going to wash out in a fairly quick period of time.

0:16:03.200 --> 0:16:05.960
<v Speaker 3>But interest rate cycles are also pretty long. Like interest

0:16:06.040 --> 0:16:08.560
<v Speaker 3>rates bottomed after World War Two in the early fifties

0:16:08.680 --> 0:16:11.280
<v Speaker 3>and then peaked in the late or the early eighties,

0:16:11.320 --> 0:16:13.280
<v Speaker 3>Like it was a really long cycle for them to

0:16:13.280 --> 0:16:14.920
<v Speaker 3>go from three percent to fifteen percent.

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:19.800
<v Speaker 2>What sort of different behavioral patterns do you observe between

0:16:20.080 --> 0:16:23.360
<v Speaker 2>eras of low interest rates versus eras of high interest rates.

0:16:23.400 --> 0:16:26.000
<v Speaker 3>I think because the interest rate cycles are so long,

0:16:26.080 --> 0:16:27.960
<v Speaker 3>and there's only been a couple cycles in the post

0:16:28.000 --> 0:16:30.480
<v Speaker 3>World War two era, it was like they went, what.

0:16:30.400 --> 0:16:32.640
<v Speaker 2>Were people in the nineteen sixties doing? Tell us?

0:16:32.720 --> 0:16:35.000
<v Speaker 3>So much of that debt, though, didn't really exist, like

0:16:35.320 --> 0:16:37.120
<v Speaker 3>at the end of World War two and forty five,

0:16:37.200 --> 0:16:40.200
<v Speaker 3>consumer credit barely existed at all. In fact, a lot

0:16:40.240 --> 0:16:43.200
<v Speaker 3>of the GI Bill was introducing new forms of consumer

0:16:43.280 --> 0:16:45.720
<v Speaker 3>credit to make sure the economy didn't collapse after World

0:16:45.720 --> 0:16:47.680
<v Speaker 3>War Two. It was like, we want you to be spenders,

0:16:48.040 --> 0:16:50.560
<v Speaker 3>so like credit cards and installment loans. A lot of

0:16:50.560 --> 0:16:53.440
<v Speaker 3>that just exploded after World War Two. But then the

0:16:53.600 --> 0:16:55.760
<v Speaker 3>rates were so high during that period that it really

0:16:55.800 --> 0:16:58.800
<v Speaker 3>wasn't until the nineties that consumer credit just like exploded,

0:16:59.000 --> 0:17:02.200
<v Speaker 3>So we don't have that much history about what it is,

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:05.080
<v Speaker 3>and so I don't think there's a ton of precedent

0:17:05.320 --> 0:17:07.119
<v Speaker 3>for what we're dealing with in terms of like the

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:10.359
<v Speaker 3>consumer credit. But there's also a thing where you've seen

0:17:10.520 --> 0:17:11.959
<v Speaker 3>I know, Joe, you've seen this chart. I think you've

0:17:12.000 --> 0:17:15.040
<v Speaker 3>tweeted this chart of as a percentage of income, household

0:17:15.040 --> 0:17:18.280
<v Speaker 3>debt payments right now are actually very low, like historically

0:17:18.520 --> 0:17:20.680
<v Speaker 3>near the bottom that they've been in the last forty years.

0:17:21.080 --> 0:17:22.840
<v Speaker 3>So if you just look at the nominal amount of

0:17:22.880 --> 0:17:25.840
<v Speaker 3>household debt, it looks scary, but actually, as like a

0:17:25.840 --> 0:17:28.840
<v Speaker 3>percentage of income, it's actually very low right now.

0:17:29.280 --> 0:17:34.639
<v Speaker 1>You know, Obviously, economists, like macroeconomists, the last real inflationary

0:17:34.640 --> 0:17:37.639
<v Speaker 1>period that anyone remembers was the seventies. And interestingly, like

0:17:37.720 --> 0:17:40.520
<v Speaker 1>I sort of the grandees of economics, many of them

0:17:40.800 --> 0:17:44.439
<v Speaker 1>came during the seventies, So like looms very large. But

0:17:44.560 --> 0:17:49.000
<v Speaker 1>setting aside like how academic economists think from the from

0:17:49.040 --> 0:17:51.760
<v Speaker 1>your perspective, we're looking at sociology and history, etcetera, Like,

0:17:52.119 --> 0:17:54.040
<v Speaker 1>does this remind you of the seventies or is that

0:17:54.119 --> 0:17:57.119
<v Speaker 1>just sort of like a fake analogy because inflation was

0:17:57.200 --> 0:17:57.800
<v Speaker 1>high then too.

0:17:57.920 --> 0:18:00.280
<v Speaker 3>I think the seventies were really unique too, because because

0:18:00.280 --> 0:18:04.119
<v Speaker 3>in addition to inflation that was so crippling, there was

0:18:04.160 --> 0:18:07.320
<v Speaker 3>so much social unrest between Vietnam. All of that blended

0:18:07.320 --> 0:18:09.639
<v Speaker 3>together to just an era of pessimism. So a lot

0:18:09.680 --> 0:18:12.080
<v Speaker 3>of the pessimism wasn't just because of inflation or just

0:18:12.119 --> 0:18:14.639
<v Speaker 3>because of FED policy, Like there's all these other things

0:18:14.640 --> 0:18:17.399
<v Speaker 3>boiling up that made people just really upset about the

0:18:17.440 --> 0:18:19.639
<v Speaker 3>state of America that all falls in it. And I

0:18:19.640 --> 0:18:21.159
<v Speaker 3>think that was true in the nineties as well. It

0:18:21.200 --> 0:18:24.399
<v Speaker 3>wasn't just economic prosperity. It was economic prosperity mixed with

0:18:24.720 --> 0:18:28.280
<v Speaker 3>political stability, mixed with Soviet Union was gone, so America

0:18:28.359 --> 0:18:31.199
<v Speaker 3>is untouchable. It was just like all these things mixed together.

0:18:31.560 --> 0:18:34.880
<v Speaker 3>And I think if you view optimism solely through an

0:18:34.880 --> 0:18:39.000
<v Speaker 3>economic lens, like ninety percent of households don't read the

0:18:39.040 --> 0:18:41.160
<v Speaker 3>Wall Street Journal, don't know what the Dow did yesterday.

0:18:41.200 --> 0:18:43.320
<v Speaker 3>They're putting all of these things together. It's not just

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:47.280
<v Speaker 3>is the economy strong, it's is Washington in good shape?

0:18:47.640 --> 0:18:49.840
<v Speaker 3>Are their political fights? Or is my kids school in

0:18:49.840 --> 0:18:51.600
<v Speaker 3>good shape? It's like all these things mixed in one,

0:18:51.720 --> 0:18:54.639
<v Speaker 3>and I think a lot of financial economists and journalists

0:18:54.840 --> 0:18:57.359
<v Speaker 3>only view it through one narrow lens. But that's not

0:18:57.400 --> 0:18:58.440
<v Speaker 3>how most households think.

0:18:58.560 --> 0:19:00.399
<v Speaker 2>All right, So just on this point, I mean, one

0:19:00.400 --> 0:19:03.400
<v Speaker 2>of the oddities of our current economic environment is that

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 2>the hard data says we're doing relatively well, but if

0:19:06.520 --> 0:19:08.399
<v Speaker 2>you look at the survey based data, if you just

0:19:08.400 --> 0:19:11.040
<v Speaker 2>look at what people are talking about on a daily basis,

0:19:11.600 --> 0:19:15.159
<v Speaker 2>it's like we're already in a depression. Basically, how do

0:19:15.200 --> 0:19:16.840
<v Speaker 2>you explain that discrepancy?

0:19:16.920 --> 0:19:19.600
<v Speaker 3>I remember years ago someone saying that consumer confidence, like

0:19:19.640 --> 0:19:22.600
<v Speaker 3>the statistic that's released, is fueled by three things the

0:19:22.640 --> 0:19:26.240
<v Speaker 3>stock market, gas prices, and politics. And to the extent

0:19:26.280 --> 0:19:29.679
<v Speaker 3>that that's true, then I think it's it's politics is

0:19:29.680 --> 0:19:33.359
<v Speaker 3>probably what's why that's being partisan in the way it

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:36.199
<v Speaker 3>is partisanship. Yeah, and I almost think it's it's so

0:19:36.359 --> 0:19:39.639
<v Speaker 3>extreme that no matter, the Dow could double and the

0:19:39.720 --> 0:19:42.400
<v Speaker 3>unemployment right could collapse to one percent. I mean, someone

0:19:42.440 --> 0:19:44.200
<v Speaker 3>brought up recently, I think it was Josh Brown, who

0:19:44.240 --> 0:19:46.040
<v Speaker 3>was like, you, guys, the stock market's near an all

0:19:46.040 --> 0:19:48.560
<v Speaker 3>time high, unemployments three and a half percent. You can

0:19:48.600 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 3>earn five percent on your cash. Why are you not

0:19:50.920 --> 0:19:53.399
<v Speaker 3>why are you not happy here? And I think for

0:19:53.560 --> 0:19:56.119
<v Speaker 3>a lot of people, the answer is politics.

0:19:57.359 --> 0:20:00.919
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully inflation is soon going to be back at target

0:20:01.280 --> 0:20:03.480
<v Speaker 1>or you know, defence target. But we don't know for sure.

0:20:03.520 --> 0:20:06.120
<v Speaker 1>But we obviously, you know, we had the highest recently

0:20:06.160 --> 0:20:10.560
<v Speaker 1>had the highest inflation in forty years, something we haven't seen.

0:20:10.720 --> 0:20:12.280
<v Speaker 1>We talked a little bit about like some of the

0:20:12.359 --> 0:20:15.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of like nihilistic speculation, what do you see as

0:20:15.800 --> 0:20:18.960
<v Speaker 1>some other knock on effects from the last few years,

0:20:18.960 --> 0:20:21.720
<v Speaker 1>whether it's the inflation or just the COVID disruption or

0:20:21.760 --> 0:20:24.280
<v Speaker 1>anything else that we've experienced since March twenty twenty.

0:20:24.359 --> 0:20:27.600
<v Speaker 3>COVID was so interesting because it was so binary in

0:20:27.680 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 3>terms of if you were a tech worker in twenty twenty,

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:31.760
<v Speaker 3>it had never been better, Whereas if you owned a laundromat,

0:20:31.840 --> 0:20:35.160
<v Speaker 3>it's worse than the Great Depression, and the actual Great Depression,

0:20:35.200 --> 0:20:38.879
<v Speaker 3>in facted virtually everyone at the same worst. COVID was

0:20:39.000 --> 0:20:43.399
<v Speaker 3>so different, and so you have probably half of America

0:20:43.720 --> 0:20:46.320
<v Speaker 3>for whom twenty twenty was a great year financially, and

0:20:46.400 --> 0:20:49.000
<v Speaker 3>half it was the worst it's ever been by an

0:20:49.080 --> 0:20:51.040
<v Speaker 3>order of magnitude. And because of that, I think when

0:20:51.040 --> 0:20:53.679
<v Speaker 3>you have half the country that doesn't understand what the

0:20:53.720 --> 0:20:57.000
<v Speaker 3>other half went through, that also leads to an era

0:20:57.080 --> 0:21:00.880
<v Speaker 3>of like, I don't trust this the numbers, trust the statistics,

0:21:00.920 --> 0:21:03.240
<v Speaker 3>I don't trust the politicians because what this guy is

0:21:03.280 --> 0:21:06.719
<v Speaker 3>saying is so counter to what I experienced in either direction.

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:09.360
<v Speaker 3>And I think that also just leads to an era

0:21:09.400 --> 0:21:12.479
<v Speaker 3>of hyperpartisanship of like, if you're saying that about the economy,

0:21:12.560 --> 0:21:15.120
<v Speaker 3>how disconnected are you in a way that we really

0:21:15.160 --> 0:21:16.720
<v Speaker 3>haven't dealt with. And a lot of the reason that

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:18.960
<v Speaker 3>a lot of the policies during the Great Depression, the

0:21:19.000 --> 0:21:22.359
<v Speaker 3>New Deal got through in a semi biparson ways because

0:21:22.359 --> 0:21:25.160
<v Speaker 3>it's a great depression impacted everybody. Two thousand and eight

0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:27.680
<v Speaker 3>was I think similar to that as well, like everyone

0:21:27.720 --> 0:21:29.240
<v Speaker 3>was going to be screwed if the banks went down,

0:21:29.280 --> 0:21:31.720
<v Speaker 3>so it makes it easier to push through policy.

0:21:32.119 --> 0:21:34.280
<v Speaker 2>This is also my theory of why people care more

0:21:34.280 --> 0:21:37.879
<v Speaker 2>about inflation than the unemployment rate, because if you personally

0:21:38.000 --> 0:21:40.400
<v Speaker 2>haven't lost your job, it's hard for you to sort

0:21:40.440 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 2>of envision, oh, unemployment is at you know, a multi

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:46.640
<v Speaker 2>decade low, but you can definitely see egg prices at

0:21:46.640 --> 0:21:49.359
<v Speaker 2>your local grocery. Everyone can see those, and so it

0:21:49.400 --> 0:21:53.119
<v Speaker 2>seems like it becomes a much bigger talking point. But okay,

0:21:53.359 --> 0:21:56.320
<v Speaker 2>let's talk about a bright spot, which is I guess

0:21:56.359 --> 0:21:58.480
<v Speaker 2>we can now earn four or five percent on a

0:21:58.480 --> 0:22:03.159
<v Speaker 2>bank account or a certificate of pose. It that seems great, Yeah, and.

0:22:03.040 --> 0:22:06.720
<v Speaker 3>It's it's weird. There's almost a point when if you're

0:22:06.760 --> 0:22:08.800
<v Speaker 3>buying a one year CD right now you get five

0:22:08.800 --> 0:22:10.760
<v Speaker 3>and a half percent, it almost feels like you're robbing

0:22:10.760 --> 0:22:12.880
<v Speaker 3>the bank. You're like, You're like, really, you're gonna fig

0:22:12.960 --> 0:22:15.320
<v Speaker 3>me that when you when you've had fifteen or ten

0:22:15.359 --> 0:22:18.040
<v Speaker 3>years whatever, observe. It's it's a wild thing to deal with.

0:22:18.160 --> 0:22:21.399
<v Speaker 3>But you both of you know this historically weird. This

0:22:21.520 --> 0:22:23.840
<v Speaker 3>is normal. Yeah. I think that's what's hard to wrap

0:22:23.840 --> 0:22:26.640
<v Speaker 3>your head around, is that historically this is what we're

0:22:26.680 --> 0:22:28.880
<v Speaker 3>dealing with. Is not the anomaly. This is the completely

0:22:28.920 --> 0:22:31.400
<v Speaker 3>normal part. And I think it would I think everything

0:22:31.440 --> 0:22:33.720
<v Speaker 3>would be better if we live in an era if

0:22:33.720 --> 0:22:36.040
<v Speaker 3>we never go back to deserve. Everything would be better if

0:22:36.119 --> 0:22:37.680
<v Speaker 3>we have an era where there is some sort of

0:22:37.760 --> 0:22:40.760
<v Speaker 3>anchor on speculation and people can earn a decent return

0:22:40.800 --> 0:22:43.040
<v Speaker 3>on their cash with some level of risk. I think

0:22:43.080 --> 0:22:45.720
<v Speaker 3>that's so much healthier in every aspect.

0:22:46.040 --> 0:22:49.240
<v Speaker 2>So one of the weird things though, just on that point, was,

0:22:49.440 --> 0:22:52.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, earlier this year, when interest rates on bank

0:22:52.480 --> 0:22:55.159
<v Speaker 2>accounts were starting to creep up, we actually didn't see

0:22:55.280 --> 0:22:57.920
<v Speaker 2>that many people who seem to actually be moving their

0:22:57.960 --> 0:23:01.840
<v Speaker 2>money into higher yielding accounts or money market funds. It

0:23:01.880 --> 0:23:05.120
<v Speaker 2>didn't really happen, I guess until March when we had

0:23:05.119 --> 0:23:08.040
<v Speaker 2>the SVB drama. But what do you think accounts for that?

0:23:08.160 --> 0:23:10.560
<v Speaker 2>Is it just it takes people a while to realize

0:23:10.600 --> 0:23:12.040
<v Speaker 2>this is something available to them.

0:23:12.320 --> 0:23:14.080
<v Speaker 3>Well, I mean, I think there has been quite a

0:23:14.119 --> 0:23:16.040
<v Speaker 3>bit that have moved into money market accounts. I mean,

0:23:16.040 --> 0:23:18.480
<v Speaker 3>what are money market accounts now five trillion dollars or something,

0:23:18.480 --> 0:23:20.680
<v Speaker 3>So there has been money that's that's moved over. I

0:23:20.720 --> 0:23:23.200
<v Speaker 3>think the average American just doesn't think about it that much.

0:23:23.400 --> 0:23:25.359
<v Speaker 3>And maybe if you don't have a very high level

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:28.040
<v Speaker 3>of savings, there's kind of a wide bother mentality. Yeah,

0:23:28.040 --> 0:23:30.919
<v Speaker 3>whereas most I imagine most of the high dollar amount

0:23:31.080 --> 0:23:34.040
<v Speaker 3>accounts have moved pretty quickly. And it's a wild thing

0:23:34.080 --> 0:23:37.000
<v Speaker 3>if you think about, you know, anyone's guess of future

0:23:37.040 --> 0:23:39.119
<v Speaker 3>stock market returns is as good as anyone else's. But

0:23:39.119 --> 0:23:42.399
<v Speaker 3>if you think, like at valuations stocks return like maybe

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:44.760
<v Speaker 3>six to seven percent something like that, that, my guess

0:23:44.800 --> 0:23:46.399
<v Speaker 3>is as good as anyone else is. So let's say

0:23:46.440 --> 0:23:48.040
<v Speaker 3>stocks return six and you can earn five and a

0:23:48.080 --> 0:23:49.920
<v Speaker 3>half percent in a money market account. All of a sudden,

0:23:49.920 --> 0:23:52.880
<v Speaker 3>you're like, for the first time in twenty years, it's

0:23:52.920 --> 0:23:55.120
<v Speaker 3>a really it's not an easy decision to make.

0:23:55.280 --> 0:23:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I have to say so, I think, like, you know,

0:23:57.840 --> 0:24:00.400
<v Speaker 1>this has come up a few times, you know, on show,

0:24:00.840 --> 0:24:03.440
<v Speaker 1>and the first couple of times we discussed that, I'm

0:24:03.440 --> 0:24:05.879
<v Speaker 1>like five percent, Like, that's not that.

0:24:06.119 --> 0:24:07.880
<v Speaker 2>Have you finally been rate pill Jack?

0:24:07.960 --> 0:24:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's it's like it's like it's it doesn't really

0:24:10.520 --> 0:24:13.800
<v Speaker 1>seem worth it to like move it over. But now

0:24:14.000 --> 0:24:16.280
<v Speaker 1>like after like a few months, it's like, actually, yeah,

0:24:16.359 --> 0:24:18.880
<v Speaker 1>it is, like it is like meaningful. And as you say,

0:24:18.960 --> 0:24:21.480
<v Speaker 1>like if historical returns on the stock market are like

0:24:21.520 --> 0:24:23.399
<v Speaker 1>maybe six and a half percent or something like that,

0:24:23.600 --> 0:24:25.639
<v Speaker 1>and now you can get five percent like truly.

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:27.879
<v Speaker 3>On a money market account.

0:24:27.600 --> 0:24:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's like that's like pretty good, isn't it.

0:24:29.800 --> 0:24:31.320
<v Speaker 3>But that's I think that's the world you should live.

0:24:31.440 --> 0:24:34.080
<v Speaker 3>There should be some anchor against speculation. There should be

0:24:34.080 --> 0:24:36.639
<v Speaker 3>some temptation for your money that is not just a

0:24:36.720 --> 0:24:37.679
<v Speaker 3>yolo mentality.

0:24:38.119 --> 0:24:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Do you think like it doesn't feel right now in

0:24:41.920 --> 0:24:46.399
<v Speaker 1>September twenty twenty three, that the speculative fervor that we

0:24:46.440 --> 0:24:49.159
<v Speaker 1>saw that really peaked in twenty twenty one, Like it

0:24:49.240 --> 0:24:52.440
<v Speaker 1>still feels like there's still like some embers of that right,

0:24:52.520 --> 0:24:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Like you still see meme stocks, like it's not much,

0:24:55.680 --> 0:24:56.800
<v Speaker 1>but like it's still exists.

0:24:56.840 --> 0:24:59.760
<v Speaker 3>That's still twenty five, and I think it's I think

0:24:59.800 --> 0:25:04.800
<v Speaker 3>it's wrong to just associate speculative frenzies with interest rates.

0:25:05.040 --> 0:25:07.679
<v Speaker 3>You gotta remember the nineteen ninety nine, like the peak

0:25:07.720 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 3>of the dot com bubble, interest rates were higher than

0:25:10.040 --> 0:25:12.679
<v Speaker 3>they are today. So you can have a crazy bubble

0:25:12.720 --> 0:25:15.560
<v Speaker 3>with interest rates. I'm sure it plays a role, but

0:25:15.680 --> 0:25:17.879
<v Speaker 3>I think just explaining it as like every ten to

0:25:17.920 --> 0:25:21.600
<v Speaker 3>twenty years, people collectively lose their minds financially, like irrespective

0:25:21.760 --> 0:25:24.239
<v Speaker 3>interest rates make what easier to do it. But you

0:25:24.240 --> 0:25:26.960
<v Speaker 3>could have a giant speculatve bubble with interest rates where

0:25:26.960 --> 0:25:29.080
<v Speaker 3>they are today. So it wouldn't surprise me, even with

0:25:29.200 --> 0:25:32.280
<v Speaker 3>the hikes that we've had, if there's a new crypto bubble,

0:25:32.280 --> 0:25:34.040
<v Speaker 3>a new meme bubble, like whatever it would be. I

0:25:34.040 --> 0:25:36.280
<v Speaker 3>think all that is detached from interest rates.

0:25:36.760 --> 0:25:40.320
<v Speaker 2>It feels to me like social media is also I

0:25:40.359 --> 0:25:42.640
<v Speaker 2>don't want to say new, because we had message boards

0:25:42.680 --> 0:25:45.040
<v Speaker 2>in nineteen ninety nine and two thousand where people were

0:25:45.640 --> 0:25:48.199
<v Speaker 2>talking up stocks. But it feels like that sort of

0:25:48.320 --> 0:25:51.800
<v Speaker 2>added fuel to that dynamic where people are chasing bubbles

0:25:52.119 --> 0:25:53.760
<v Speaker 2>rather than running away from them.

0:25:53.960 --> 0:25:57.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and it turns into like a tribal mentality, particularly

0:25:57.440 --> 0:26:01.520
<v Speaker 3>in the crypto space, where you're willingness and your ability

0:26:01.520 --> 0:26:04.720
<v Speaker 3>to buy certain kinds of crypto is your identity. And

0:26:04.760 --> 0:26:06.840
<v Speaker 3>I think that also existed in the nineteen nineties, like

0:26:06.880 --> 0:26:09.320
<v Speaker 3>I'm a tech stock trainer, that's your identity. And I

0:26:09.320 --> 0:26:12.359
<v Speaker 3>think anytime in finance where you say I'm a blank

0:26:12.440 --> 0:26:15.800
<v Speaker 3>whatever it is, even I'm a value investor, anytime you

0:26:15.840 --> 0:26:19.120
<v Speaker 3>get that kind of tribal identity, you're like outsourcing your

0:26:19.160 --> 0:26:21.720
<v Speaker 3>thinking to the madness of crowds. And I think it's

0:26:21.760 --> 0:26:23.680
<v Speaker 3>a really dangerous way to invest.

0:26:24.000 --> 0:26:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Is there a way like to deprogram that for from

0:26:27.920 --> 0:26:31.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, deprogrammed someone or deprogram yourself, because like that

0:26:31.200 --> 0:26:33.320
<v Speaker 1>lock in effect where like right, some way that you

0:26:34.000 --> 0:26:37.239
<v Speaker 1>invest you know, and I think even like professional like

0:26:37.280 --> 0:26:40.440
<v Speaker 1>professionals have this all the time, Like it seems really hard.

0:26:40.720 --> 0:26:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Just changing your mind is really tough. Is there all,

0:26:43.320 --> 0:26:46.600
<v Speaker 1>like have you in your research? Are there tools or

0:26:46.640 --> 0:26:49.280
<v Speaker 1>like ideas that actually work to like get better at

0:26:49.359 --> 0:26:49.960
<v Speaker 1>changing your minds.

0:26:49.960 --> 0:26:51.440
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if there's tools or ideas, but I

0:26:51.520 --> 0:26:53.920
<v Speaker 3>think some people are just much better at being independent

0:26:53.920 --> 0:26:56.200
<v Speaker 3>thinkers than others. Even like I said, if you said

0:26:56.200 --> 0:27:00.199
<v Speaker 3>I'm a value investor, it seems so conservative and so

0:27:00.200 --> 0:27:03.080
<v Speaker 3>so benign. But Josh Brown has made this joke that

0:27:03.119 --> 0:27:05.240
<v Speaker 3>a lot of value investors just end up owning like

0:27:05.280 --> 0:27:08.159
<v Speaker 3>typewriter companies for twenty years. And it's like even if

0:27:08.200 --> 0:27:10.360
<v Speaker 3>you lock yourself into that tribe, it's not safe.

0:27:10.440 --> 0:27:13.040
<v Speaker 1>But even like you know, I was thinking too, like

0:27:13.600 --> 0:27:15.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, in the beginning, like and you still have

0:27:15.600 --> 0:27:17.600
<v Speaker 1>this fight. It's like setting aside eve an investment to

0:27:17.720 --> 0:27:21.120
<v Speaker 1>like team Transitory or like team persons when you're debating inflation.

0:27:21.440 --> 0:27:24.040
<v Speaker 1>It's hard to change your mind really, even with new data.

0:27:24.119 --> 0:27:26.120
<v Speaker 3>And I think social media makes that really hard too,

0:27:26.160 --> 0:27:28.679
<v Speaker 3>because now there's like a timestamp on every call that

0:27:28.720 --> 0:27:31.360
<v Speaker 3>you made in a way that there wasn't before, and

0:27:31.440 --> 0:27:34.639
<v Speaker 3>people would much rather be consistent than be right. And

0:27:34.680 --> 0:27:36.440
<v Speaker 3>the reason that is is because I think when most

0:27:36.440 --> 0:27:39.000
<v Speaker 3>people are looking at a pundit online, they want their

0:27:39.000 --> 0:27:42.040
<v Speaker 3>pundit to be consistent. And most people like, if you

0:27:42.160 --> 0:27:44.480
<v Speaker 3>tell people what they want to hear, you can be

0:27:44.560 --> 0:27:47.480
<v Speaker 3>wrong forever without penalty. So if you want to be

0:27:47.480 --> 0:27:50.320
<v Speaker 3>pessimistic and you listen to Peter Schiff for ten years

0:27:50.320 --> 0:27:52.720
<v Speaker 3>saying the dollar is going to collapse next month, even

0:27:52.760 --> 0:27:54.600
<v Speaker 3>if it doesn't, he told you what you want to hear,

0:27:54.840 --> 0:27:56.960
<v Speaker 3>and you're gonna buy his newsletters and keep on going.

0:27:57.200 --> 0:28:00.880
<v Speaker 3>So in the punditry business, that's the way to do it,

0:28:01.280 --> 0:28:03.160
<v Speaker 3>even if it's like from an economic point of view,

0:28:03.160 --> 0:28:03.719
<v Speaker 3>it's terrible.

0:28:04.119 --> 0:28:07.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, we're very good at avoiding consistency on this podcast.

0:28:07.240 --> 0:28:10.320
<v Speaker 2>Yet we don't have that problem. We change our minds

0:28:10.400 --> 0:28:14.399
<v Speaker 2>all the time. No wait, you mentioned value investing, and

0:28:14.680 --> 0:28:18.080
<v Speaker 2>it does feel like, at least up until twenty twenty

0:28:18.119 --> 0:28:21.000
<v Speaker 2>and maybe even beyond it, the big money was in

0:28:21.280 --> 0:28:25.440
<v Speaker 2>chasing momentum. What does that mean because we're talking about

0:28:25.440 --> 0:28:28.000
<v Speaker 2>the fallacy of group thing. But on the other hand,

0:28:28.200 --> 0:28:30.800
<v Speaker 2>if you have a really good handle on a certain

0:28:30.920 --> 0:28:34.560
<v Speaker 2>narrative or what's going to attract people to a particular investment.

0:28:34.840 --> 0:28:36.359
<v Speaker 2>It feels like an advantage.

0:28:36.440 --> 0:28:38.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, there's a great George Soros quote quote where he says,

0:28:38.880 --> 0:28:41.080
<v Speaker 3>whenever I see a bubble, I rush into buy it.

0:28:41.560 --> 0:28:43.479
<v Speaker 3>And it seems so counterintuitive, like why would you want

0:28:43.520 --> 0:28:45.760
<v Speaker 3>to buy a bubble? I think his I don't want

0:28:45.760 --> 0:28:47.400
<v Speaker 3>to put words his mouth. I think his thinking is

0:28:47.400 --> 0:28:50.160
<v Speaker 3>he understands that a bubble is very likely to grow

0:28:50.280 --> 0:28:52.960
<v Speaker 3>bigger than you think, just because everyone else is going

0:28:53.000 --> 0:28:54.320
<v Speaker 3>to watch their neighbor to get rich and they're going

0:28:54.400 --> 0:28:56.600
<v Speaker 3>to come in, which is exactly what happens every single bubble.

0:28:57.040 --> 0:29:00.280
<v Speaker 3>So I think that like the chasing of momentum, Yeah,

0:29:00.280 --> 0:29:02.560
<v Speaker 3>it has a huge behavioral component behind it. Now the

0:29:02.640 --> 0:29:04.719
<v Speaker 3>hard thing is like getting out before everyone else is

0:29:04.720 --> 0:29:06.720
<v Speaker 3>someone like George Sorels can do, but virtually no one

0:29:06.760 --> 0:29:09.400
<v Speaker 3>else can. So it's like that has no appeal to

0:29:09.400 --> 0:29:11.320
<v Speaker 3>me whatsoever, because the idea that you're going to get

0:29:11.360 --> 0:29:13.480
<v Speaker 3>out before everyone else when you're chasing their behavior to

0:29:13.520 --> 0:29:15.800
<v Speaker 3>begin with, is betting wrong thing.

0:29:32.960 --> 0:29:34.880
<v Speaker 1>So we talked about it in the beginning like this

0:29:35.040 --> 0:29:37.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of like you know, talk about how personal finance,

0:29:37.640 --> 0:29:40.000
<v Speaker 1>personal money is like there's like two kinds and they're

0:29:40.000 --> 0:29:41.800
<v Speaker 1>both kind of I'm not that great where it's one

0:29:41.920 --> 0:29:44.680
<v Speaker 1>is like giving people stock picks and you know, let's

0:29:44.720 --> 0:29:47.000
<v Speaker 1>be honest, and the other one is this sort of

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:49.520
<v Speaker 1>like okay, here's like what credit card to get to

0:29:49.560 --> 0:29:54.040
<v Speaker 1>like maximize miles sitting aside like the speculative frenzy or

0:29:54.040 --> 0:29:56.320
<v Speaker 1>investing or mem stock. Do you think what we've experienced

0:29:56.360 --> 0:29:58.680
<v Speaker 1>over the last three years will like meaningfully change how

0:29:58.720 --> 0:30:03.120
<v Speaker 1>people consume going forward in some ways, like just general

0:30:03.120 --> 0:30:04.040
<v Speaker 1>consumption patterns.

0:30:04.880 --> 0:30:06.720
<v Speaker 3>I think it's not necessarily the last three years in

0:30:06.800 --> 0:30:09.240
<v Speaker 3>terms of COVID being the last three years. I think

0:30:09.280 --> 0:30:11.480
<v Speaker 3>it's the last ten years of social media that just

0:30:11.560 --> 0:30:14.520
<v Speaker 3>massively changes it. It's always been historically that there's no

0:30:14.600 --> 0:30:17.960
<v Speaker 3>objective level of wealth. Everything is just relative to the

0:30:17.960 --> 0:30:21.040
<v Speaker 3>people around you, your neighbors, your coworkers, and you're like,

0:30:21.120 --> 0:30:23.840
<v Speaker 3>relative to that person, here's how much money I have.

0:30:23.880 --> 0:30:26.280
<v Speaker 1>I always hear people say things like, oh, like compared

0:30:26.320 --> 0:30:29.800
<v Speaker 1>to like a king in the eighteen hundreds, you're so rich.

0:30:29.840 --> 0:30:32.280
<v Speaker 1>It's like, yeah, great, but my neighbors, Like.

0:30:33.080 --> 0:30:35.200
<v Speaker 3>Everyone just looks at the people around you, But now

0:30:35.240 --> 0:30:37.800
<v Speaker 3>it's the people around you is Instagram, and it's a

0:30:37.880 --> 0:30:41.240
<v Speaker 3>curiated highlight reel like everyone around the world. Someone said recently,

0:30:41.240 --> 0:30:42.760
<v Speaker 3>I went from keeping up with the Joneses to keeping

0:30:42.800 --> 0:30:45.280
<v Speaker 3>up with the Kardashians, Like that's what social media did.

0:30:45.320 --> 0:30:47.840
<v Speaker 3>It went from now you're comparing yourself to the highlight

0:30:47.840 --> 0:30:50.760
<v Speaker 3>reel of everyone's life. So I think expectations of what

0:30:50.800 --> 0:30:53.520
<v Speaker 3>people's definition is of a good life just exploded over

0:30:53.520 --> 0:30:55.320
<v Speaker 3>the last ten years. I can see it with my

0:30:55.320 --> 0:30:58.520
<v Speaker 3>seven year old son who spends time on YouTube and

0:30:58.560 --> 0:31:01.600
<v Speaker 3>what his definition is all at age seven, of what

0:31:01.760 --> 0:31:04.360
<v Speaker 3>success looks like. If you watch Mister Beast all day,

0:31:04.600 --> 0:31:07.040
<v Speaker 3>success is like driving a Lamborghini and throwing ten thousand

0:31:07.080 --> 0:31:09.719
<v Speaker 3>dollars at strangers. And I think there's an element of

0:31:09.760 --> 0:31:11.360
<v Speaker 3>that in social media.

0:31:11.400 --> 0:31:11.680
<v Speaker 1>It's just.

0:31:14.120 --> 0:31:15.400
<v Speaker 3>It turns into that. But it used to be when

0:31:15.400 --> 0:31:17.680
<v Speaker 3>you compare yourself to your neighbors, there's much more mundane

0:31:17.720 --> 0:31:20.840
<v Speaker 3>than comparing yourself to Instagram. So I think that's that's

0:31:20.920 --> 0:31:24.000
<v Speaker 3>the biggest change in consumption. It's just an inflated expectation,

0:31:24.360 --> 0:31:26.840
<v Speaker 3>and it's the Luis k joke of everything's amazing and

0:31:26.880 --> 0:31:30.000
<v Speaker 3>nobody's happy. If your expectations grow, that much. Then, even

0:31:30.000 --> 0:31:32.200
<v Speaker 3>when there is great economic growth and the stock market

0:31:32.280 --> 0:31:34.680
<v Speaker 3>is doing well, it never feels like it's enough because

0:31:34.680 --> 0:31:36.360
<v Speaker 3>you're comparing yourself to something crazy.

0:31:37.000 --> 0:31:39.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean, listening to that, it sounds kind of dire

0:31:39.920 --> 0:31:41.960
<v Speaker 2>in the sense that I don't think social media is

0:31:42.000 --> 0:31:45.800
<v Speaker 2>going away anytime soon. What does that mean for the

0:31:45.840 --> 0:31:48.160
<v Speaker 2>long term? Is there a way for people to break

0:31:48.200 --> 0:31:49.520
<v Speaker 2>out of that mindset?

0:31:49.640 --> 0:31:51.280
<v Speaker 3>I don't think there is, And of course social media

0:31:51.360 --> 0:31:54.120
<v Speaker 3>is not going away, so it would not surprise I'm

0:31:54.160 --> 0:31:56.440
<v Speaker 3>not a forecast kind of guy, but it would not

0:31:56.520 --> 0:31:59.520
<v Speaker 3>surprise me. In the next generation, we have very good

0:31:59.520 --> 0:32:02.920
<v Speaker 3>economic growth, very good stock market growth, and no one

0:32:03.080 --> 0:32:06.280
<v Speaker 3>is even a morsel happier for it. I think that

0:32:06.280 --> 0:32:08.959
<v Speaker 3>that it's already happened over the last generation. I mean,

0:32:09.000 --> 0:32:11.960
<v Speaker 3>that's almost the whole history of economic growth, like great growth,

0:32:11.960 --> 0:32:14.360
<v Speaker 3>but everyone just gets accustomed to it. And there's parts

0:32:14.400 --> 0:32:17.120
<v Speaker 3>of that that's great. That's what keeps people wanting to

0:32:17.160 --> 0:32:20.000
<v Speaker 3>push harder and innovate more is because it never feels

0:32:20.000 --> 0:32:21.280
<v Speaker 3>like it's enough. So a lot of that is a

0:32:21.320 --> 0:32:24.240
<v Speaker 3>great thing. But if you're looking at it's easy today

0:32:24.280 --> 0:32:27.560
<v Speaker 3>to think, oh, our grandkids, their real income is going

0:32:27.600 --> 0:32:29.720
<v Speaker 3>to be double or triple of ours, and that means

0:32:29.720 --> 0:32:32.160
<v Speaker 3>their life is going to be so great. It's like

0:32:32.200 --> 0:32:34.320
<v Speaker 3>the second part of that is where people make mistake.

0:32:34.360 --> 0:32:37.320
<v Speaker 3>There's a good chance that our grandkids, their real income

0:32:37.360 --> 0:32:39.440
<v Speaker 3>will be double or triple of ours, and I would

0:32:39.480 --> 0:32:41.959
<v Speaker 3>bet heavily that they will not be any happier for it.

0:32:42.040 --> 0:32:43.640
<v Speaker 2>Right, They'll be like that guy over there has a

0:32:43.640 --> 0:32:44.600
<v Speaker 2>bigger spaceship than.

0:32:45.040 --> 0:32:46.320
<v Speaker 3>As exactly what it's going to be.

0:32:46.400 --> 0:32:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Yes, well, what do you do like in your in

0:32:53.520 --> 0:32:55.640
<v Speaker 1>your personal life or with your family, or how you

0:32:55.680 --> 0:32:58.200
<v Speaker 1>like think about these things to like escape Some of

0:32:58.280 --> 0:33:01.320
<v Speaker 1>these traps are very hard to fall into.

0:33:01.880 --> 0:33:04.160
<v Speaker 3>It's not easy to do. I think my wife and I,

0:33:04.240 --> 0:33:07.440
<v Speaker 3>who's in the room right now, are pretty good at

0:33:07.480 --> 0:33:09.000
<v Speaker 3>just being like, this is what makes us happy, and

0:33:09.040 --> 0:33:11.200
<v Speaker 3>we're gonna we're not gonna let a lot of external

0:33:11.240 --> 0:33:13.560
<v Speaker 3>influences let us in. But it's hard for everybody. No

0:33:13.560 --> 0:33:16.040
<v Speaker 3>one can escape the comparison game. I think it's just

0:33:16.080 --> 0:33:18.320
<v Speaker 3>a natural part of how humans behave is just compare

0:33:18.360 --> 0:33:20.440
<v Speaker 3>yourself to your peers. So it's not an easy thing

0:33:20.480 --> 0:33:23.520
<v Speaker 3>to do. I think there is something to say for

0:33:24.360 --> 0:33:26.640
<v Speaker 3>the idea that nobody is thinking about you as much

0:33:26.640 --> 0:33:29.360
<v Speaker 3>as you are, so everyone is like, I got to

0:33:29.400 --> 0:33:31.479
<v Speaker 3>get the nicer clothes so that people will be impressed

0:33:31.480 --> 0:33:32.880
<v Speaker 3>with me. They're not impressed with you, and they're not thinking.

0:33:32.880 --> 0:33:35.320
<v Speaker 3>They're thinking about themselves. No one's thinking about your car,

0:33:35.360 --> 0:33:37.280
<v Speaker 3>nobody's thinking about the size of your house. They're all

0:33:37.280 --> 0:33:39.840
<v Speaker 3>busy thinking about themselves. Once you understand that, then I

0:33:39.840 --> 0:33:43.600
<v Speaker 3>think your aspiration for showing off like plunges, and that's

0:33:43.600 --> 0:33:45.720
<v Speaker 3>what you need to be. Like, I'm just happy with this,

0:33:46.320 --> 0:33:48.000
<v Speaker 3>hanging out in my family, going for a walk with

0:33:48.040 --> 0:33:49.920
<v Speaker 3>my kids. I don't need to show off to people

0:33:49.960 --> 0:33:52.800
<v Speaker 3>who aren't paying any attention to me. But some people

0:33:52.800 --> 0:33:54.280
<v Speaker 3>can do that better than others.

0:33:55.040 --> 0:33:58.400
<v Speaker 2>We've been talking a lot about how human beings respond

0:33:58.480 --> 0:34:01.040
<v Speaker 2>to change and the idea that maybe we're going from

0:34:01.120 --> 0:34:03.360
<v Speaker 2>an environment of low interest rates to one of high

0:34:03.440 --> 0:34:05.840
<v Speaker 2>interest rates. You have a new book coming out. My

0:34:06.000 --> 0:34:08.640
<v Speaker 2>understanding is it's all about change. Is that right?

0:34:08.960 --> 0:34:10.880
<v Speaker 3>It's about things that never change over time, which I

0:34:10.920 --> 0:34:12.719
<v Speaker 3>think is the more important. I got the idea many

0:34:12.800 --> 0:34:15.799
<v Speaker 3>years ago. There's a Jeff Bezos quote that I'll paraphrase.

0:34:15.840 --> 0:34:18.440
<v Speaker 3>He said, people always ask me what's going to change

0:34:18.440 --> 0:34:21.120
<v Speaker 3>in technology? And a better question is what is never

0:34:21.160 --> 0:34:23.680
<v Speaker 3>going to change? And he said, you can never imagine

0:34:23.680 --> 0:34:27.200
<v Speaker 3>a future at Amazon where customers don't want low prices

0:34:27.200 --> 0:34:30.120
<v Speaker 3>and big selection. So because you can't imagine that future,

0:34:30.320 --> 0:34:32.640
<v Speaker 3>you can invest all of your money into that knowing

0:34:32.680 --> 0:34:34.839
<v Speaker 3>it's going to be just as important fifty years from

0:34:34.840 --> 0:34:37.040
<v Speaker 3>now as it is today, which you can't say about

0:34:37.040 --> 0:34:39.719
<v Speaker 3>most other technologies. Most other technologies have a shelf life

0:34:39.719 --> 0:34:41.960
<v Speaker 3>of a year or two and then they're absollete. So

0:34:42.040 --> 0:34:44.920
<v Speaker 3>it was the idea that part of the started for

0:34:45.040 --> 0:34:47.120
<v Speaker 3>me with just the observation that both of you know,

0:34:47.239 --> 0:34:50.520
<v Speaker 3>most economic predictions and stock market predictions are very bad.

0:34:50.920 --> 0:34:53.000
<v Speaker 3>Our ability to predict what the stock it's not very good,

0:34:53.480 --> 0:34:56.320
<v Speaker 3>so and I think part of that reason is because

0:34:56.360 --> 0:34:58.520
<v Speaker 3>we focus, we try to pay attention on what's going

0:34:58.560 --> 0:35:01.480
<v Speaker 3>to change, and if we instead pay attention on what

0:35:01.520 --> 0:35:03.920
<v Speaker 3>we know is not going to change, how people pay

0:35:03.960 --> 0:35:06.960
<v Speaker 3>attention and respond to risk and greed and fear. Let's

0:35:07.000 --> 0:35:09.279
<v Speaker 3>just focus on that, knowing for certain that's going to

0:35:09.320 --> 0:35:11.440
<v Speaker 3>be part of our future, rather than pretending like we

0:35:11.480 --> 0:35:13.640
<v Speaker 3>can predict what might change in the future.

0:35:13.840 --> 0:35:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's funny like even on the stock market, like

0:35:17.120 --> 0:35:21.080
<v Speaker 1>our friend Sam Row, like who has a great newslettercare

0:35:21.200 --> 0:35:24.240
<v Speaker 1>dot com. His whole thing is like stocks usually go up, yes,

0:35:24.520 --> 0:35:26.680
<v Speaker 1>and you know, we could talk all about, oh, what's

0:35:26.719 --> 0:35:29.520
<v Speaker 1>going to happen with like you know, the if the

0:35:29.520 --> 0:35:31.440
<v Speaker 1>FED doesn't hike it, you know, the FED hikes in

0:35:31.440 --> 0:35:33.839
<v Speaker 1>November and the FED hikes twice, et cetera. But like

0:35:34.160 --> 0:35:36.640
<v Speaker 1>history seems pretty clear, like in the long term, they

0:35:36.680 --> 0:35:38.080
<v Speaker 1>just the line basically goes up.

0:35:38.120 --> 0:35:40.320
<v Speaker 3>There's another version of that. Derek Thompson from The Atlantic

0:35:40.480 --> 0:35:42.880
<v Speaker 3>I think he wrote this in like twenty fifteen, twenty sixteen.

0:35:42.920 --> 0:35:44.440
<v Speaker 3>He said, you know, since two thousand and eight, there

0:35:44.480 --> 0:35:47.279
<v Speaker 3>have been hundreds of thousands of articles written about the

0:35:47.280 --> 0:35:49.160
<v Speaker 3>economy and what's going to happen. And you can summarize

0:35:49.200 --> 0:35:51.800
<v Speaker 3>all of that period by just saying things got better slowly.

0:35:52.360 --> 0:35:55.320
<v Speaker 3>That's all the economic news you needed to know during

0:35:55.320 --> 0:35:57.640
<v Speaker 3>that ten year period. And so I think I think

0:35:57.640 --> 0:35:58.080
<v Speaker 3>there's a lot.

0:35:58.000 --> 0:36:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Of true I love talking about all this stuff every

0:36:00.239 --> 0:36:03.239
<v Speaker 1>once in a while, I'm like, it's just sort of fun.

0:36:03.320 --> 0:36:06.640
<v Speaker 3>But I don't know, no, I think that's an important topic.

0:36:06.800 --> 0:36:09.160
<v Speaker 3>I've been open about how I invest I dollar cost

0:36:09.239 --> 0:36:11.520
<v Speaker 3>average into index funds, but I pay attention to the

0:36:11.520 --> 0:36:14.600
<v Speaker 3>stock market every day. I read all the economic news.

0:36:14.640 --> 0:36:16.160
<v Speaker 3>I read the Wall Street Journal every day because I

0:36:16.160 --> 0:36:18.799
<v Speaker 3>think it's interesting. I think markets are interesting, and you

0:36:18.800 --> 0:36:21.759
<v Speaker 3>don't need to take that news and become a day

0:36:21.800 --> 0:36:24.080
<v Speaker 3>trader with that news. But I think markets are such

0:36:24.120 --> 0:36:27.200
<v Speaker 3>a fascinating window into human behavior, and there's no other

0:36:27.840 --> 0:36:31.359
<v Speaker 3>window that shows like how people think about greed and

0:36:31.440 --> 0:36:33.680
<v Speaker 3>fear and risk, which are such important topics in all

0:36:33.719 --> 0:36:36.319
<v Speaker 3>areas of life, but you see it in finance in

0:36:36.360 --> 0:36:38.000
<v Speaker 3>a starker way than any other topic.

0:36:38.560 --> 0:36:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Morgan Housel, so great to finally have you on Outlaws.

0:36:43.560 --> 0:36:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much. This is a really fun company.

0:36:45.239 --> 0:36:48.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the perfect person for our first personal finance episode.

0:36:48.719 --> 0:36:49.520
<v Speaker 3>I think this has been fun.

0:36:49.560 --> 0:36:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Thanks, this is great. Thank you so much.

0:36:51.560 --> 0:36:52.840
<v Speaker 3>Thanks guys.

0:37:04.600 --> 0:37:06.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm so glad we've finally had Morgan on.

0:37:06.360 --> 0:37:06.799
<v Speaker 3>That was great.

0:37:06.920 --> 0:37:09.359
<v Speaker 2>That was fantastic, and I'm looking forward to the new

0:37:09.360 --> 0:37:12.520
<v Speaker 2>book for sure. I also thought the summary of Markets

0:37:12.520 --> 0:37:15.640
<v Speaker 2>and Economics as like, it's not really about the line

0:37:15.719 --> 0:37:19.040
<v Speaker 2>going up or down, but it's about the human beings

0:37:19.160 --> 0:37:22.520
<v Speaker 2>involved in it, the emotions, the sort of like intellectual

0:37:22.600 --> 0:37:26.360
<v Speaker 2>rigor around these ideas. That's the perfect way of summing it.

0:37:26.400 --> 0:37:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Up, Yeah, I totally agree because I basically am of

0:37:30.560 --> 0:37:33.920
<v Speaker 1>this view. It's like the economy will probably overtime grow

0:37:34.000 --> 0:37:36.839
<v Speaker 1>and the stock market over time will go up. And

0:37:36.880 --> 0:37:39.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to just leave it at that because

0:37:39.120 --> 0:37:40.040
<v Speaker 1>I do think.

0:37:39.880 --> 0:37:41.319
<v Speaker 2>All this, that's your job, this.

0:37:41.440 --> 0:37:42.160
<v Speaker 3>Is my job.

0:37:42.200 --> 0:37:44.040
<v Speaker 1>I want people to pay attention. But every once in

0:37:44.040 --> 0:37:45.600
<v Speaker 1>a while, I'm like, Okay, why do we pay attention?

0:37:45.640 --> 0:37:48.359
<v Speaker 1>And I think that Morgan captured it as you and

0:37:48.440 --> 0:37:50.360
<v Speaker 1>as you said right there, it's like, it's interesting, we

0:37:50.440 --> 0:37:53.400
<v Speaker 1>learned a lot about how people think and how people behave.

0:37:53.600 --> 0:37:56.000
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't necessarily mean like it makes sense to like

0:37:56.040 --> 0:37:58.920
<v Speaker 1>try to like trade to like Morgan Stanley or Goldman's

0:37:58.920 --> 0:38:01.160
<v Speaker 1>like s and p Year in Target or something, right.

0:38:01.200 --> 0:38:03.440
<v Speaker 2>I also thought the point about like one of the

0:38:03.480 --> 0:38:08.279
<v Speaker 2>things that happened in COVID was the fracturing of people's experiences.

0:38:08.680 --> 0:38:10.640
<v Speaker 2>I thought that was really interesting because I think the

0:38:10.680 --> 0:38:13.759
<v Speaker 2>knee jerk reaction to a global event like that is

0:38:13.800 --> 0:38:16.360
<v Speaker 2>to think, oh, well, we all went through this big,

0:38:16.600 --> 0:38:21.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, history making thing. But actually, as Morgan said,

0:38:22.160 --> 0:38:25.960
<v Speaker 2>individual experiences varied widely, and I think it makes sense

0:38:26.000 --> 0:38:28.600
<v Speaker 2>that that might be one reason why people now are

0:38:28.680 --> 0:38:31.319
<v Speaker 2>much more distrustful of what they're hearing on a sort

0:38:31.360 --> 0:38:32.680
<v Speaker 2>of collective basis.

0:38:33.200 --> 0:38:34.560
<v Speaker 1>That was such a good point. That was like a

0:38:34.640 --> 0:38:36.719
<v Speaker 1>light bulb because I guess on some level it's like

0:38:37.000 --> 0:38:39.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe that seems obvious, but like that was really well

0:38:39.600 --> 0:38:44.239
<v Speaker 1>put in. Like I remember July twenty twenty and I

0:38:44.280 --> 0:38:46.759
<v Speaker 1>was like, things don't seem very good. But then I did,

0:38:46.800 --> 0:38:48.239
<v Speaker 1>like you know, I would like follow like these tech

0:38:48.239 --> 0:38:51.040
<v Speaker 1>people and they're like like close another deal today, yeah,

0:38:51.160 --> 0:38:53.080
<v Speaker 1>like over zoom, and I was like wow, like this is.

0:38:53.000 --> 0:38:55.480
<v Speaker 2>A yeah, I'm working from home and like my personal

0:38:55.480 --> 0:38:57.239
<v Speaker 2>wealth just went up by ten person, Like.

0:38:57.160 --> 0:39:00.400
<v Speaker 1>That's really that bifurcation is really striking. I was like

0:39:00.440 --> 0:39:03.280
<v Speaker 1>this idea of like we had three in the span

0:39:03.440 --> 0:39:07.440
<v Speaker 1>of less than twenty years, yeah, nine to eleven, two

0:39:07.480 --> 0:39:10.080
<v Speaker 1>thousand and one, the Great Financial Layman two thousand and eight,

0:39:10.120 --> 0:39:12.120
<v Speaker 1>and then COVID so less than twenty or three, like

0:39:12.200 --> 0:39:16.520
<v Speaker 1>pretty like sort of earth shattering moments of one way

0:39:16.719 --> 0:39:19.600
<v Speaker 1>or another, Like you see like how like cumulative we

0:39:19.760 --> 0:39:22.320
<v Speaker 1>just begin to expect like oh this is the norm.

0:39:22.440 --> 0:39:24.799
<v Speaker 2>No totally, And I think people also react to those

0:39:24.800 --> 0:39:27.080
<v Speaker 2>in different ways because some people might think, well, I

0:39:27.160 --> 0:39:29.279
<v Speaker 2>need to save a ton of money. Yeah, because I

0:39:29.280 --> 0:39:31.120
<v Speaker 2>never know when there's going to be a great recession

0:39:31.120 --> 0:39:33.120
<v Speaker 2>coming up next and I'm going to lose my job,

0:39:33.360 --> 0:39:35.960
<v Speaker 2>and other people might just think, you know, screw it,

0:39:36.040 --> 0:39:38.680
<v Speaker 2>none of this matters. Even if I accumulate all this

0:39:38.760 --> 0:39:41.480
<v Speaker 2>wealth put it in an index fund, Maybe another two

0:39:41.520 --> 0:39:43.759
<v Speaker 2>thousand and eight happens tomorrow and it doesn't matter. So

0:39:43.800 --> 0:39:45.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to buy an NFT instead, right?

0:39:45.560 --> 0:39:47.239
<v Speaker 1>Or am I going to be happy with the five

0:39:47.280 --> 0:39:49.920
<v Speaker 1>percent on the CD? Or you know, like I always think,

0:39:50.040 --> 0:39:52.479
<v Speaker 1>you know about the Chinese economy, which is does seem

0:39:52.480 --> 0:39:56.640
<v Speaker 1>to have this same phenomenon of high savings, right, Yeah,

0:39:56.760 --> 0:39:58.560
<v Speaker 1>but as you've written a lot about, like some of

0:39:58.600 --> 0:40:02.240
<v Speaker 1>the most intense speculative the worldlike people like day trading,

0:40:02.320 --> 0:40:04.560
<v Speaker 1>like iron ore futures and stuff like that.

0:40:04.640 --> 0:40:07.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly. All right, well shall we leave it there.

0:40:07.600 --> 0:40:08.319
<v Speaker 1>Let's leave it there.

0:40:08.400 --> 0:40:11.680
<v Speaker 2>Okay. This has been another episode of the ad Thoughts Podcast.

0:40:11.719 --> 0:40:15.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me at Tracy Alloway.

0:40:14.760 --> 0:40:17.640
<v Speaker 1>And I'm Joe Wisenthal. You can follow me at the Stalwart.

0:40:17.920 --> 0:40:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Follow our guest Morgan Housel at Morgan Housel. Follow our

0:40:21.400 --> 0:40:25.920
<v Speaker 1>producers Kerman Rodriguez at Carman Arman and Dash Bennett at Dashbot.

0:40:26.040 --> 0:40:28.719
<v Speaker 1>And check out all of our podcasts at Bloomberg under

0:40:28.719 --> 0:40:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the handle at podcasts, and for more oddlogs content, go

0:40:32.239 --> 0:40:36.200
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg dot com slash Odlogs. We have transcripts, a blog,

0:40:36.280 --> 0:40:40.120
<v Speaker 1>and a newsletter. And check out our discord discord dot

0:40:40.160 --> 0:40:43.320
<v Speaker 1>gg slash Odlogs where listeners like yourself, we're chading twenty

0:40:43.360 --> 0:40:45.480
<v Speaker 1>four to seven about all of these topics.

0:40:45.680 --> 0:40:48.239
<v Speaker 2>And if you enjoy Oddlots, if you want us to

0:40:48.280 --> 0:40:51.440
<v Speaker 2>do more personal finance episodes, then please leave us a

0:40:51.480 --> 0:41:12.120
<v Speaker 2>positive review on your favorite podcast platform. Thanks for listening

0:41:00.920 --> 0:41:00.960
<v Speaker 2>in

0:41:13.640 --> 0:41:13.680
<v Speaker 1>In