WEBVTT - The Age of Disruption with PIMCO

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast name m Keene, jay Leie.

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course on the Bloomberg Place

0:00:27.800 --> 0:00:30.800
<v Speaker 1>to say, We're in Newport Beach, California, at Pimcoe's global

0:00:30.840 --> 0:00:34.400
<v Speaker 1>headquarters alongside me as the CEO Money Roman and the

0:00:34.520 --> 0:00:37.120
<v Speaker 1>c i O Dan Iverson. Guys Greater to catch up

0:00:37.120 --> 0:00:39.440
<v Speaker 1>with you both. What a day to be speaking about

0:00:39.440 --> 0:00:41.760
<v Speaker 1>the global bond market. I actually want to begin though

0:00:42.080 --> 0:00:46.760
<v Speaker 1>in Q four the equity markets crater in the credit

0:00:46.800 --> 0:00:50.040
<v Speaker 1>market arguably is seizing GARB, and pretty much every single

0:00:50.040 --> 0:00:53.920
<v Speaker 1>one of the major funds here at Pimco delivers positive returns.

0:00:54.760 --> 0:00:58.280
<v Speaker 1>How do we arrive at that moment? Monny Well, I

0:00:58.280 --> 0:01:02.240
<v Speaker 1>would say that's the occasion to show we get tested,

0:01:03.000 --> 0:01:05.600
<v Speaker 1>and we get tested in difficult markets, and we had

0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:09.120
<v Speaker 1>a view thanks too down on value and what the

0:01:09.240 --> 0:01:13.800
<v Speaker 1>right position was to have before QUE four. I wouldn't

0:01:13.800 --> 0:01:17.160
<v Speaker 1>say we saw that coming, but proper risk management and

0:01:17.280 --> 0:01:20.600
<v Speaker 1>proper liquidity medic avoid the problem and we're quite pleased

0:01:20.640 --> 0:01:24.080
<v Speaker 1>about the result in QUE four defensive arguably twelve months

0:01:24.120 --> 0:01:28.440
<v Speaker 1>ago down going into the key final quarter, coming out

0:01:28.480 --> 0:01:31.840
<v Speaker 1>of it and deciding to re risk is a different proposition.

0:01:32.360 --> 0:01:35.319
<v Speaker 1>De risking is one thing than having the I guess,

0:01:35.440 --> 0:01:38.280
<v Speaker 1>enthusiasm confidence to say now is the time to re risk,

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:42.000
<v Speaker 1>that's a different question. You approached that by saying now

0:01:42.120 --> 0:01:44.680
<v Speaker 1>is the time to re risk, slightly buy some of

0:01:44.720 --> 0:01:46.759
<v Speaker 1>the weakness what we three, what you actually did coming

0:01:46.760 --> 0:01:49.680
<v Speaker 1>into the new year. I think that's right. That you know,

0:01:49.840 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 1>in response to an environment in the fourth quarter where

0:01:52.400 --> 0:01:56.600
<v Speaker 1>we did sense that markets were overshooting fundamentals, we decided

0:01:56.640 --> 0:02:00.360
<v Speaker 1>as a firm in across these strategies to add risk

0:02:00.520 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 1>in liquid more liquid areas of the market, as more

0:02:03.720 --> 0:02:07.120
<v Speaker 1>of a tactical view, uh, not trying to be too

0:02:07.200 --> 0:02:10.919
<v Speaker 1>overconfident and looking at time bottoms and markets, but usually

0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity where others needed liquidity at that point in

0:02:13.560 --> 0:02:16.400
<v Speaker 1>time to add risk on the margin and look to

0:02:16.440 --> 0:02:19.000
<v Speaker 1>generate a bit more total return, at least during the

0:02:19.040 --> 0:02:21.000
<v Speaker 1>first half of the year. So many people talk about

0:02:21.000 --> 0:02:23.399
<v Speaker 1>the process and how the process is different. It doesn't

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:25.120
<v Speaker 1>matter what asset manager I speak to, they say, our

0:02:25.120 --> 0:02:27.799
<v Speaker 1>process is different. That gives us our ridge. What is

0:02:27.840 --> 0:02:30.600
<v Speaker 1>so special about the process here down We have a

0:02:30.680 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 1>large team, we have a global footprint. I think that

0:02:33.840 --> 0:02:36.880
<v Speaker 1>it starts there um, so we have access to different

0:02:36.880 --> 0:02:40.280
<v Speaker 1>areas of the markets that certain firms do not. And

0:02:40.280 --> 0:02:41.640
<v Speaker 1>then I think the other key theme, and one of

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:44.440
<v Speaker 1>the reasons we're here discussing the secular outlook today is

0:02:44.440 --> 0:02:47.360
<v Speaker 1>that we take a long term orientation. We don't try

0:02:47.360 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 1>to time markets over different quarters, you know, even over

0:02:51.560 --> 0:02:54.240
<v Speaker 1>the course of you know, a one year period. With

0:02:54.320 --> 0:02:56.880
<v Speaker 1>that longer term orientation, you know, we try to protect

0:02:56.880 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 1>our clients from areas of the market where from the

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:02.680
<v Speaker 1>ellups and where the ingredients are there for work extreme underperform.

0:03:02.840 --> 0:03:06.360
<v Speaker 1>What do you think that froth is right now, there's

0:03:06.360 --> 0:03:08.680
<v Speaker 1>froth you know, across different areas of the market, But

0:03:08.760 --> 0:03:11.000
<v Speaker 1>by far the area of most concerned for us here

0:03:11.000 --> 0:03:14.079
<v Speaker 1>at PIMCO is in the credit markets and specifically relating

0:03:14.080 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 1>to corporate credit risk. That's an area where you know,

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:19.639
<v Speaker 1>we've had about a decade now, are very low yields

0:03:19.639 --> 0:03:21.960
<v Speaker 1>in an area where we're getting you know, a lot

0:03:21.960 --> 0:03:24.560
<v Speaker 1>more concerned about fundamentals. And it's course spader spading, and

0:03:24.600 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 1>it's been a great time for week issuers to issue

0:03:27.880 --> 0:03:29.800
<v Speaker 1>paper in Europe and in the US who was very

0:03:29.840 --> 0:03:31.760
<v Speaker 1>weak covenant, and it's been good for them. And I

0:03:31.840 --> 0:03:35.920
<v Speaker 1>think we've shy away from morning disposition. And when things

0:03:36.000 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 1>get worse, do you think we'd have many opportunity to

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:41.000
<v Speaker 1>buy them cheap? You think things aren't gonna get worse

0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:43.840
<v Speaker 1>for sure? On the on the week on the weak

0:03:44.040 --> 0:03:48.160
<v Speaker 1>high credit was weak covenant in business which are cyclical.

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Of course, what was interesting about spending the day with

0:03:51.720 --> 0:03:56.160
<v Speaker 1>you guys is actually how bearish you sound around corporate credit.

0:03:56.560 --> 0:03:59.320
<v Speaker 1>But we bond managers were always barish, right well, typically

0:03:59.400 --> 0:04:01.920
<v Speaker 1>that's the store, sorry, but but much more so relative

0:04:01.920 --> 0:04:04.320
<v Speaker 1>to your competition. I speak to bond investors on a

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 1>daily basis. I have to say I've been struck by

0:04:06.320 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 1>just how bearished down the firm seems to be on

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:12.000
<v Speaker 1>corporate credit right now. It's a it's a subtle point.

0:04:12.200 --> 0:04:14.600
<v Speaker 1>I think when we look at the world today, we

0:04:14.720 --> 0:04:18.120
<v Speaker 1>see some near tournament certainty that could be resolved, at

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:22.200
<v Speaker 1>least to some degree, tremendous mental liquidity combinative central banks,

0:04:22.440 --> 0:04:25.600
<v Speaker 1>so within the credit sector, spreads can certainly go tighter

0:04:25.640 --> 0:04:28.480
<v Speaker 1>over the short term but this is the signal area

0:04:29.240 --> 0:04:31.760
<v Speaker 1>of the financial markets that are prone to overshooting to

0:04:31.839 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 1>the downside when people's views towards economic growth change, and

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:39.680
<v Speaker 1>as many said, as primarily fixed income managers, the most

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:42.760
<v Speaker 1>important task that we need to focus on is avoiding

0:04:42.880 --> 0:04:46.520
<v Speaker 1>permanent capital impairment or the type of downside volatility that's

0:04:46.560 --> 0:04:49.559
<v Speaker 1>likely to take place when people begin to fear credit

0:04:49.680 --> 0:04:51.800
<v Speaker 1>risk once again money. You mentioned some of the excesses

0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:54.040
<v Speaker 1>that we've experienced over the last couple of years. It's

0:04:54.040 --> 0:04:55.880
<v Speaker 1>being with some members of the team. They think maybe

0:04:56.200 --> 0:04:58.480
<v Speaker 1>things could get a whole lot more excessive in the

0:04:58.560 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 1>coming years. There was a comparison used earlier on It's

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:04.039
<v Speaker 1>way now in the period approaching the mid two thousand's.

0:05:04.680 --> 0:05:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Is that historical parallel that you're thinking about increasingly in

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 1>the coming years. I think we do. I think I

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:12.720
<v Speaker 1>think we will both say it's very hard to call

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:17.360
<v Speaker 1>the turn of the market. But what you want to

0:05:17.440 --> 0:05:20.040
<v Speaker 1>have is a framework where you think of value and

0:05:20.200 --> 0:05:23.520
<v Speaker 1>you say, given us enario, what are you going to do?

0:05:23.680 --> 0:05:26.120
<v Speaker 1>What are the things you want to buy? And make

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:29.080
<v Speaker 1>sure that we do what we say we're going to do.

0:05:29.640 --> 0:05:32.920
<v Speaker 1>So you know, why do we take pride in what

0:05:33.400 --> 0:05:37.160
<v Speaker 1>of funds offered because in times of turbanent market, when

0:05:37.200 --> 0:05:40.480
<v Speaker 1>equity go down, we need to perform. We are the

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:44.039
<v Speaker 1>building block in people's portfolio where they want to count

0:05:44.080 --> 0:05:46.599
<v Speaker 1>on us to perform in difficult markets, and the last

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:49.520
<v Speaker 1>thing they need is us to be overweight in lazy

0:05:49.680 --> 0:05:54.240
<v Speaker 1>credit where the credit drops fifteen points and we haven't

0:05:54.279 --> 0:05:57.520
<v Speaker 1>done property or work. Within the secular outlook, number five

0:05:57.880 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 1>is the one that really stuck out. So make financial

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:03.560
<v Speaker 1>or market vulnerabilities the idea that the market no longer

0:06:03.640 --> 0:06:07.000
<v Speaker 1>absorbs the news, it makes the news. Dan, talk to

0:06:07.040 --> 0:06:08.520
<v Speaker 1>me a little bit more about that. How concerned are

0:06:08.560 --> 0:06:11.760
<v Speaker 1>you about this financial market vulnerability that you've highlighted in

0:06:11.800 --> 0:06:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the report. We're quite concerned. Now again, you know this dynamic. Uh.

0:06:17.800 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 1>It may take some time for this dynamic to rear

0:06:19.880 --> 0:06:24.200
<v Speaker 1>it's ugly head, but we're concerned about the markets being

0:06:24.240 --> 0:06:29.120
<v Speaker 1>able to facilitate risk transfer when investor mindsets change. Uh.

0:06:29.320 --> 0:06:31.400
<v Speaker 1>We saw a preview of that in the fourth quarter.

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:34.400
<v Speaker 1>So as an active manager, you need to be prepared

0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:38.000
<v Speaker 1>for market overshooting and ideally, if you're prepared, you could

0:06:38.040 --> 0:06:41.840
<v Speaker 1>profit from that. The keyword there many active UM. I

0:06:41.920 --> 0:06:44.120
<v Speaker 1>imagine the argument for active is a whole lot stronger

0:06:44.160 --> 0:06:47.039
<v Speaker 1>over the last twelve months that it once was were

0:06:47.480 --> 0:06:49.960
<v Speaker 1>active for fixed income. So I think I think we

0:06:50.080 --> 0:06:53.000
<v Speaker 1>have a very different view than most waiving active fixed

0:06:53.000 --> 0:06:55.680
<v Speaker 1>income management, that it is the good and it's as

0:06:55.720 --> 0:06:57.600
<v Speaker 1>simple as this, and there are reason why this is

0:06:57.640 --> 0:07:00.880
<v Speaker 1>the case. They are structural reason in terms of how

0:07:00.920 --> 0:07:07.400
<v Speaker 1>the indices are computed. There are behavior reasons why some

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 1>agents in the market have none company non economic reason

0:07:11.720 --> 0:07:14.760
<v Speaker 1>to buy papers. Think of the Central Bank. I think

0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:18.720
<v Speaker 1>sometimes of insurance company who have servency issues. And so

0:07:19.520 --> 0:07:23.120
<v Speaker 1>we think we can deliver constituentally axcess return of a

0:07:23.160 --> 0:07:26.960
<v Speaker 1>benchmark in a much easier way than equity managers can.

0:07:27.320 --> 0:07:29.760
<v Speaker 1>And so when I hear about active versis passive, I said,

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:31.880
<v Speaker 1>don't talk to us. We've delivered a good on a one,

0:07:31.960 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 1>three or five, an ten year basis. But there are reasons,

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:39.880
<v Speaker 1>and our job is somehow easier than equity managers, and

0:07:39.960 --> 0:07:42.640
<v Speaker 1>I think we we acknowledge this. But it's a lot

0:07:42.720 --> 0:07:44.840
<v Speaker 1>of tools we can do. Imagine a company. A company

0:07:44.880 --> 0:07:49.720
<v Speaker 1>always has two hundred bonds outstanding, some trading dollars, some

0:07:49.840 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 1>trading years. You can serve them back there's so many

0:07:53.400 --> 0:07:55.360
<v Speaker 1>things we can do. We can use derivative, there's so

0:07:55.400 --> 0:07:59.880
<v Speaker 1>many things we can do to enhance value and deliver better.

0:08:00.560 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 1>It sounds to me like, do you think you can

0:08:02.320 --> 0:08:05.440
<v Speaker 1>avoid the right of department phase? You won't be part

0:08:05.520 --> 0:08:07.160
<v Speaker 1>of that. We won't be part of this. You need

0:08:07.200 --> 0:08:09.200
<v Speaker 1>to stigment your offering. You need to say this is

0:08:09.240 --> 0:08:12.440
<v Speaker 1>a value proposition. We're never going to be the cheapest.

0:08:13.000 --> 0:08:15.440
<v Speaker 1>We're trying to add value day after day. We want

0:08:15.440 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 1>to be there when things are difficult, and we want

0:08:18.360 --> 0:08:20.360
<v Speaker 1>to be too, you know, we need to invest into

0:08:20.400 --> 0:08:24.360
<v Speaker 1>our business and have other things to offer which go

0:08:24.520 --> 0:08:27.760
<v Speaker 1>beyond simple performance. Well, do do you think that's unique

0:08:27.760 --> 0:08:30.239
<v Speaker 1>to PIMCO or just unique to fixed income bond investors?

0:08:30.280 --> 0:08:32.480
<v Speaker 1>To to manage point quite clear that there's a big

0:08:32.520 --> 0:08:35.720
<v Speaker 1>difference between the equity investor and the fixed income investors

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:38.760
<v Speaker 1>as specific to PIMP or specific to fixed income investing.

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:42.679
<v Speaker 1>But I think the advantages that we have relate to

0:08:42.760 --> 0:08:44.760
<v Speaker 1>the fact that we're operating in the fixed in camacy

0:08:44.840 --> 0:08:48.719
<v Speaker 1>class where you have noneconomic players that work, you know,

0:08:48.880 --> 0:08:52.600
<v Speaker 1>literally every day that trading markets are open. I would

0:08:52.880 --> 0:08:55.640
<v Speaker 1>uh and do believe that PIMCO has some advantages at

0:08:55.679 --> 0:08:58.240
<v Speaker 1>this stage of the cycle. We've had about a decade

0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:03.160
<v Speaker 1>of convergence in terms of beta compensation. Going forward, we

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:05.760
<v Speaker 1>think it's gonna be much more challenging environment and environment

0:09:05.840 --> 0:09:09.280
<v Speaker 1>with lower base case returns but much higher volatility. And

0:09:09.640 --> 0:09:12.959
<v Speaker 1>in that type of environment, Pimpco should excel given the

0:09:13.040 --> 0:09:16.079
<v Speaker 1>depth and breadth of our resources across markets and size matters.

0:09:16.120 --> 0:09:18.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the reality is we have a lot of

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:22.439
<v Speaker 1>people who helped them delivers the performance from you know,

0:09:22.559 --> 0:09:26.640
<v Speaker 1>seventy credit analysts to a hundred quant and these people

0:09:26.800 --> 0:09:31.599
<v Speaker 1>matter in terms of long term sustainable returns. So what

0:09:31.920 --> 0:09:35.319
<v Speaker 1>what often people don't see is the need for investment

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 1>inside the kitchen and the need for investment is growing.

0:09:40.040 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 1>One way, if you needed twenty people twenty years ago,

0:09:42.920 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 1>you need two hundreds today. Let's talk about that further.

0:09:45.760 --> 0:09:47.600
<v Speaker 1>I have so many people say I need a bigger team,

0:09:47.640 --> 0:09:50.080
<v Speaker 1>We need to invest in technology more digdator as the future.

0:09:50.840 --> 0:09:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Help me understand what you guys are actually doing right now,

0:09:53.960 --> 0:09:57.960
<v Speaker 1>how that you create alpha developed that story by investing

0:09:58.000 --> 0:10:00.240
<v Speaker 1>in tech, investing in people actually can be so real.

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:04.439
<v Speaker 1>Examples down how does it work? There are one areas technology,

0:10:04.559 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 1>technology and analytics, acquiring larger data sets, UH, utilizing those

0:10:10.440 --> 0:10:13.880
<v Speaker 1>data sets, you know, understanding key drivers of return. We

0:10:13.960 --> 0:10:17.480
<v Speaker 1>even use this big data for economic forecasting, UH, coming

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:21.000
<v Speaker 1>through a lot of offerings as well. So that's one area,

0:10:21.200 --> 0:10:24.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, the highly technical aspects of data collection. Another

0:10:24.559 --> 0:10:26.000
<v Speaker 1>area that we've been spending a lot of time and

0:10:26.040 --> 0:10:28.520
<v Speaker 1>many has been quite helpful in this arena is in

0:10:28.720 --> 0:10:34.200
<v Speaker 1>behavioral finance, UH, working with this research to make better

0:10:34.720 --> 0:10:37.880
<v Speaker 1>personal decisions when we look to retract. And we've got

0:10:37.920 --> 0:10:39.520
<v Speaker 1>a tough in amera. I mean, I mean the the

0:10:39.840 --> 0:10:44.439
<v Speaker 1>the biggest problem of fund management is other confidence. And

0:10:44.559 --> 0:10:47.400
<v Speaker 1>so we signed this partnership with University of Chicago. Why

0:10:47.520 --> 0:10:50.160
<v Speaker 1>because we wanted to have a way to rationally see

0:10:50.160 --> 0:10:52.079
<v Speaker 1>how we make decision, what we do well, what we

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 1>do less well, how we optimize risk and a portfolio,

0:10:55.600 --> 0:10:57.800
<v Speaker 1>and be able to back that with data. Can you

0:10:57.840 --> 0:10:59.800
<v Speaker 1>give us a real life example of how this is

0:10:59.800 --> 0:11:02.679
<v Speaker 1>how in the last twelve months I've done sure. We

0:11:02.920 --> 0:11:07.800
<v Speaker 1>literally have teams that look at senior portfolio managers how

0:11:07.880 --> 0:11:11.839
<v Speaker 1>we make decisions across markets relative to what's optimal. So,

0:11:11.960 --> 0:11:15.240
<v Speaker 1>for example, do we tend to hold out to losers

0:11:15.400 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 1>a little bit longer than we should do. We run

0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:20.400
<v Speaker 1>with trades that are working out on behalf of investors

0:11:21.120 --> 0:11:25.600
<v Speaker 1>long enough. Uh, we get that information. It's sometimes puts

0:11:25.679 --> 0:11:27.439
<v Speaker 1>us a little bit of an uncomfortable area because it

0:11:27.480 --> 0:11:30.319
<v Speaker 1>reminds you of how the brain is playing tricks. But

0:11:30.400 --> 0:11:32.240
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, it leads to better

0:11:32.320 --> 0:11:35.599
<v Speaker 1>structure where we can understand our own tendencies and biases,

0:11:35.760 --> 0:11:38.920
<v Speaker 1>even within the PIMCO group, ideally learned from it, and

0:11:39.000 --> 0:11:41.480
<v Speaker 1>then make better decisions going forward. And this is a

0:11:41.559 --> 0:11:44.679
<v Speaker 1>type of research stream that we intend to continue for

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:47.800
<v Speaker 1>many years to come. You've acted on these conclusions, Manti, Yes,

0:11:47.880 --> 0:11:49.240
<v Speaker 1>we do, we do, and I think I think it's

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:52.240
<v Speaker 1>a constant evolution. Right, There's plenty of things we learned,

0:11:52.240 --> 0:11:54.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, we we were just were is welcome, Richard

0:11:55.000 --> 0:11:57.960
<v Speaker 1>THEATO is a consultant, you know, to think about a retirement,

0:11:57.960 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 1>but also to think of how we may decision. You know.

0:12:00.960 --> 0:12:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Then there's something great in the I. C is always

0:12:03.240 --> 0:12:05.720
<v Speaker 1>the last one to talk, so everyone has a chance

0:12:05.760 --> 0:12:09.040
<v Speaker 1>to opine, and the most senior guy is not the

0:12:09.160 --> 0:12:11.520
<v Speaker 1>one who lecture everybody for ten minutes before everyone has

0:12:11.520 --> 0:12:13.920
<v Speaker 1>a chance to talk with Guess what you know? People

0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:16.839
<v Speaker 1>usually don't disagree with the buss once it's talk for

0:12:16.960 --> 0:12:19.839
<v Speaker 1>ten minutes and so and so you need to have

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:22.360
<v Speaker 1>a process and you need to think about the process,

0:12:22.480 --> 0:12:26.719
<v Speaker 1>so everyone has a voice from other portfolio managers to

0:12:26.880 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 1>quant to behavior, finance and be able to kind of

0:12:29.360 --> 0:12:31.920
<v Speaker 1>combine all of this together to you know, make the

0:12:32.000 --> 0:12:35.120
<v Speaker 1>best possible portrait, even in the new office outside of

0:12:35.160 --> 0:12:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the comfort of the West coast. How's that going and

0:12:37.800 --> 0:12:40.440
<v Speaker 1>how does that attract the kind of talent Ultimately one

0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:42.960
<v Speaker 1>of attracts at them card. So we thought, I mean,

0:12:43.000 --> 0:12:45.360
<v Speaker 1>I think Dan and I an executive committee, thought that

0:12:45.520 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 1>we needed an office to be able to hire talent

0:12:48.960 --> 0:12:52.319
<v Speaker 1>and technology. And I think it's fair to say than

0:12:52.440 --> 0:12:56.000
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to hire tech people, we compete against

0:12:56.040 --> 0:13:00.480
<v Speaker 1>other financial companies, but we also compete against big tech

0:13:00.559 --> 0:13:04.720
<v Speaker 1>company and also startup And we looked at six different

0:13:04.800 --> 0:13:11.959
<v Speaker 1>locations and concluded that Austin, given the university, was the

0:13:12.040 --> 0:13:14.319
<v Speaker 1>best place for us over the next twenty years to

0:13:14.480 --> 0:13:17.760
<v Speaker 1>hire significant amount of talent and technology. And then we're

0:13:17.760 --> 0:13:19.719
<v Speaker 1>going to move, you know, some small part of the

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:22.719
<v Speaker 1>businesses which makes sense to be in Texas, and so

0:13:22.880 --> 0:13:24.800
<v Speaker 1>that was quite attractive and we did a quite in

0:13:24.880 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 1>depth study and and and and you know, so far

0:13:27.880 --> 0:13:30.320
<v Speaker 1>we have a better hundred people down there. You've been expanding,

0:13:30.840 --> 0:13:34.000
<v Speaker 1>you've expanded in some municiples as well. What's left any

0:13:34.040 --> 0:13:36.120
<v Speaker 1>gaps here at PIMCOW that you're looking to fill and

0:13:36.240 --> 0:13:37.880
<v Speaker 1>it holds that you'd like to fill out the next

0:13:37.920 --> 0:13:40.839
<v Speaker 1>coming years. I think the main thing is not so

0:13:40.960 --> 0:13:42.880
<v Speaker 1>much what you need to feel, is whether you know

0:13:43.040 --> 0:13:45.120
<v Speaker 1>something about it and how you're going to grow it.

0:13:45.600 --> 0:13:48.319
<v Speaker 1>And I think we are of the view that we

0:13:48.440 --> 0:13:51.480
<v Speaker 1>want to grow organically and that from time to time

0:13:51.559 --> 0:13:55.360
<v Speaker 1>there may be small things we can do and bring

0:13:55.520 --> 0:14:00.319
<v Speaker 1>to the PIMCO organization, but by large, it's hurrying people,

0:14:00.440 --> 0:14:03.240
<v Speaker 1>and it's make sure that we understand what we're good

0:14:03.280 --> 0:14:05.319
<v Speaker 1>at and what we're not good at, and and and

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:08.439
<v Speaker 1>and there's a lot of introspection which comes into this

0:14:08.640 --> 0:14:10.880
<v Speaker 1>and making sure that we do that well. And a

0:14:10.920 --> 0:14:12.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of what we're trying to do is anticipate the

0:14:12.440 --> 0:14:15.599
<v Speaker 1>next investment opportunity for our clients. So, you know, we

0:14:15.640 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 1>talked about credit, credit issuance, development of markets. A lot

0:14:19.480 --> 0:14:21.880
<v Speaker 1>of that's a credit outside the United States with an

0:14:21.880 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 1>emerging markets across Asia. You know, even in pockets of Europe.

0:14:25.680 --> 0:14:29.120
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of our growth areas are focused on

0:14:29.240 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 1>where we anticipate there to be the best return. In

0:14:32.360 --> 0:14:36.160
<v Speaker 1>this business, you have to start sometimes multiple years before

0:14:36.760 --> 0:14:39.200
<v Speaker 1>that opportunity actually is out there and ready to be

0:14:39.280 --> 0:14:41.520
<v Speaker 1>realized upon. So that's one of the key areas of

0:14:41.600 --> 0:14:45.440
<v Speaker 1>our focus resources with a slight tilt towards credit outside

0:14:45.440 --> 0:14:48.440
<v Speaker 1>the United States, let's talk about private credit markets. Is

0:14:48.440 --> 0:14:50.760
<v Speaker 1>that an opportunity money that you'd like to ded what

0:14:50.880 --> 0:14:52.720
<v Speaker 1>it is? An opportunity and it's something that we've been

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:57.120
<v Speaker 1>doing for limited that right, eleven years and it's an

0:14:57.120 --> 0:15:00.400
<v Speaker 1>opportunity and it's going to become even more attractive when

0:15:00.440 --> 0:15:03.880
<v Speaker 1>the business cycle turns. How scalable is it, Well, it's

0:15:04.000 --> 0:15:06.600
<v Speaker 1>never going to be as scalable as what PIMCO does

0:15:06.920 --> 0:15:09.960
<v Speaker 1>on the liquid side, and you know what, it doesn't matter.

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:14.520
<v Speaker 1>But what we do think is that there are opportunity

0:15:14.600 --> 0:15:17.120
<v Speaker 1>because of what banks used to do that they don't

0:15:17.160 --> 0:15:20.880
<v Speaker 1>do anymore, for us to do various things. And it

0:15:21.040 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 1>goes from lending against real estate to buying securities in housing,

0:15:27.640 --> 0:15:32.600
<v Speaker 1>to being able to opportunistically do direct lending, to do

0:15:33.000 --> 0:15:39.000
<v Speaker 1>various private credit transaction which if managed properly and constructed

0:15:39.040 --> 0:15:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the right way, should deliver ten to twelve of the

0:15:42.600 --> 0:15:44.680
<v Speaker 1>business cycle, never fit and and and and that's the

0:15:44.760 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 1>opportunity for us and for other people and then big returns.

0:15:47.480 --> 0:15:49.840
<v Speaker 1>And they key question is other people. I mean, it's

0:15:49.840 --> 0:15:52.880
<v Speaker 1>an incredibly competitive environment right now. And we've talked about

0:15:53.040 --> 0:15:55.120
<v Speaker 1>areas whether it might be froth. Is that an area

0:15:55.160 --> 0:15:58.480
<v Speaker 1>down where that might be a better froth? Well, again,

0:15:58.640 --> 0:16:00.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, consistent with our views are corporate credit on

0:16:00.920 --> 0:16:03.560
<v Speaker 1>the public side. That's where we see the froth in

0:16:03.720 --> 0:16:07.480
<v Speaker 1>terms of direct corporate credit issuance. Outside the financial space.

0:16:08.160 --> 0:16:11.520
<v Speaker 1>We look at areas like commercial real estate, residential real estate,

0:16:12.000 --> 0:16:16.040
<v Speaker 1>private or public, we continue to see considerable opportunity. That's

0:16:16.040 --> 0:16:19.880
<v Speaker 1>a sector that, despite the global financial crisis being eleven

0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:24.320
<v Speaker 1>years past, where we still see frictions and markets where

0:16:24.360 --> 0:16:27.880
<v Speaker 1>we still see opportunities for investors on the private side

0:16:27.920 --> 0:16:29.680
<v Speaker 1>as well as the public side. And that's really been

0:16:29.720 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 1>our focus for now looking at the harvest opportunities within

0:16:33.000 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 1>that space. How important is that alquidity premium so to speak,

0:16:36.240 --> 0:16:39.760
<v Speaker 1>that you can get out of private credit markets money, Well,

0:16:39.960 --> 0:16:42.000
<v Speaker 1>it's it's two fold. I think I think we were

0:16:42.040 --> 0:16:44.320
<v Speaker 1>just written a paper on this. It's probably a couple

0:16:44.360 --> 0:16:48.520
<v Speaker 1>of percent and and and I'm I'm so over simplifying

0:16:48.880 --> 0:16:52.880
<v Speaker 1>what the paper is about. But people get compensated for

0:16:53.040 --> 0:16:55.880
<v Speaker 1>holding eloquent securities and and and there are people who

0:16:56.320 --> 0:16:59.280
<v Speaker 1>can very easily hold this kind of paper. I think

0:16:59.320 --> 0:17:01.560
<v Speaker 1>offensition plan for example, who don't need the liquidity you

0:17:01.600 --> 0:17:04.080
<v Speaker 1>think of insurance company. And so there are people who

0:17:04.119 --> 0:17:06.520
<v Speaker 1>can own this. And clearly it's one of the most

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:10.200
<v Speaker 1>interesting risk preming. But more importantly, it's also a way

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:13.920
<v Speaker 1>to structure transaction where you think you have an edge

0:17:14.359 --> 0:17:18.680
<v Speaker 1>and where you understand an industry better than most. And

0:17:19.640 --> 0:17:23.160
<v Speaker 1>we're going to find part of what we're currently doing

0:17:23.320 --> 0:17:26.320
<v Speaker 1>very very attractive and some other things not so attractive.

0:17:26.359 --> 0:17:29.240
<v Speaker 1>And I think we we're quite cognizant of that. We're

0:17:29.280 --> 0:17:32.720
<v Speaker 1>recognizing the liquidity is one thing. The liquidity illusion in

0:17:32.760 --> 0:17:35.200
<v Speaker 1>public markets down is something you've talked about in the past,

0:17:35.240 --> 0:17:36.600
<v Speaker 1>and I'd like to talk to you about it now.

0:17:37.600 --> 0:17:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Do you think enough people are focused on that You've

0:17:39.680 --> 0:17:42.560
<v Speaker 1>talked about financial market vulnerability is the potential for more

0:17:42.720 --> 0:17:46.600
<v Speaker 1>gaping markets. It's a market that's got bigger participation, arguably

0:17:46.680 --> 0:17:50.400
<v Speaker 1>is increased over the last several years. And yet fundamentally,

0:17:50.480 --> 0:17:52.280
<v Speaker 1>just in term sort of structure, it's a market that's

0:17:52.280 --> 0:17:55.639
<v Speaker 1>got weaker. Just makes sense of that for people, Well,

0:17:55.680 --> 0:17:59.280
<v Speaker 1>people talk about it, people are aware of the risks.

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Then you'll have a volatility event like the fourth quarter

0:18:02.320 --> 0:18:05.000
<v Speaker 1>last year. When you look at returns, it appears that

0:18:05.080 --> 0:18:08.440
<v Speaker 1>people are more exposed to this. Uh. These less liquid

0:18:08.480 --> 0:18:11.040
<v Speaker 1>areas of the market then would be suggested from the rhetoric,

0:18:11.960 --> 0:18:15.359
<v Speaker 1>but we haven't been tested yet. Volatilities have been relatively

0:18:15.480 --> 0:18:19.280
<v Speaker 1>low the last several years. UM. You just have to

0:18:19.440 --> 0:18:21.760
<v Speaker 1>take a look and feel the markets from a day

0:18:21.800 --> 0:18:25.919
<v Speaker 1>to day trading perspective to know that when views shift,

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:28.920
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be overshooting. Uh. And we don't necessarily

0:18:28.960 --> 0:18:30.640
<v Speaker 1>mean that this is going to lead to another financial

0:18:30.720 --> 0:18:33.440
<v Speaker 1>crisis per se. We do think it's gonna lead a

0:18:33.480 --> 0:18:37.040
<v Speaker 1>disappointment in the form of overshooting. You'll constantly in and

0:18:37.080 --> 0:18:39.000
<v Speaker 1>out of the market. What's changed in the last five years?

0:18:39.080 --> 0:18:41.000
<v Speaker 1>What is it that has changed that you can identify

0:18:41.119 --> 0:18:43.000
<v Speaker 1>just in terms of being in and out of the market.

0:18:43.080 --> 0:18:46.040
<v Speaker 1>What's different it's really been the last decade. UM. There's

0:18:46.280 --> 0:18:49.399
<v Speaker 1>less willingness for market participants to step in and provide

0:18:49.400 --> 0:18:53.200
<v Speaker 1>a buffer when investor views change. More often than not,

0:18:53.280 --> 0:18:55.879
<v Speaker 1>in the type of markets we operate in today, it's

0:18:55.920 --> 0:18:59.080
<v Speaker 1>about lining up a buyron seller on the other side.

0:18:59.359 --> 0:19:02.359
<v Speaker 1>If that buyer does it happen to be there or

0:19:02.400 --> 0:19:04.520
<v Speaker 1>seller does it happen to be there, you end up

0:19:04.520 --> 0:19:08.280
<v Speaker 1>with this overshooting dynamic. So liquidity management from the standpoint

0:19:08.280 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 1>of an active asset manager needs to be top of

0:19:11.080 --> 0:19:13.720
<v Speaker 1>mind today and I think that that's going to be

0:19:14.680 --> 0:19:17.200
<v Speaker 1>likely one of the route awakenings that we referred to

0:19:17.760 --> 0:19:19.680
<v Speaker 1>in our in our more recent secular out And I

0:19:19.720 --> 0:19:23.080
<v Speaker 1>think generational experience also matters, and that's one of the

0:19:23.160 --> 0:19:25.320
<v Speaker 1>things that we've explored in terms of behavioral finance, the

0:19:25.400 --> 0:19:29.440
<v Speaker 1>fact that that when you've seen different business cycle you

0:19:29.600 --> 0:19:32.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of recognize pattern. You know, this looks like nineteen

0:19:32.960 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 1>one and this looks like nine, And I think what

0:19:35.760 --> 0:19:38.560
<v Speaker 1>has changes. You have a whole generation of people who

0:19:38.680 --> 0:19:41.199
<v Speaker 1>basically sort of greatest boolmarket since two dozand and nine

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:45.680
<v Speaker 1>and us keep on going up really steadily for a

0:19:45.920 --> 0:19:48.200
<v Speaker 1>very very long time. When you have the committe's meetings,

0:19:48.280 --> 0:19:50.480
<v Speaker 1>do you see the difference in terms of investor buses

0:19:50.680 --> 0:19:53.840
<v Speaker 1>within PIMCO based on the age, based on the demographics.

0:19:53.960 --> 0:19:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Is that something you see quite clearly, we noticed differences

0:19:58.600 --> 0:20:01.320
<v Speaker 1>of you. Now, whether that's I s or perspective is

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:04.760
<v Speaker 1>always tough to up front. I think it's a little

0:20:04.760 --> 0:20:07.159
<v Speaker 1>bit of both. From time to time, it is a

0:20:07.560 --> 0:20:10.760
<v Speaker 1>worry that it's been a long long time since people

0:20:10.800 --> 0:20:14.080
<v Speaker 1>have gone through a period of heightened volatility or have

0:20:14.200 --> 0:20:17.480
<v Speaker 1>gone through a credit cycle. And that's why sometimes you know,

0:20:17.520 --> 0:20:20.320
<v Speaker 1>as an active asset manager, it's best to sit back,

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:23.359
<v Speaker 1>be patient and read economic history books as opposed to

0:20:23.400 --> 0:20:25.600
<v Speaker 1>be on your terminal trading every day. I mean, it

0:20:25.640 --> 0:20:28.320
<v Speaker 1>gives you Bloomberg come on money one bias and give

0:20:28.320 --> 0:20:30.920
<v Speaker 1>you one bias one biases. You know, we do like

0:20:31.080 --> 0:20:33.800
<v Speaker 1>company who eventually makes money. Now, it's okay to lose

0:20:33.880 --> 0:20:36.720
<v Speaker 1>money for a while. It's even okay to lose money

0:20:36.800 --> 0:20:38.880
<v Speaker 1>for a long time if you're acquiring a lot of customers.

0:20:38.880 --> 0:20:40.520
<v Speaker 1>But at the end of the day, we're sort of

0:20:40.600 --> 0:20:42.680
<v Speaker 1>hoping that there will be an at some point in

0:20:42.760 --> 0:20:44.720
<v Speaker 1>time and people do make money. So you guys, I

0:20:44.800 --> 0:20:47.000
<v Speaker 1>think that's that's that's there's a generation of people who

0:20:47.080 --> 0:20:50.520
<v Speaker 1>clearly think it doesn't matter. Essentially, you guys, then therefore

0:20:50.640 --> 0:20:53.879
<v Speaker 1>looking to be what you called liquidity providers and not

0:20:54.080 --> 0:20:57.879
<v Speaker 1>liquidity demanders. There's a period of time that you're waiting

0:20:57.960 --> 0:20:59.800
<v Speaker 1>for that's building a moment where you want to keep

0:20:59.840 --> 0:21:02.720
<v Speaker 1>this dry powderforn have senced it all day speaking to you, guys,

0:21:03.160 --> 0:21:04.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean this could be several years away. Are you

0:21:05.119 --> 0:21:08.480
<v Speaker 1>willing to sit out the period of excess that could develop?

0:21:09.080 --> 0:21:11.080
<v Speaker 1>I've prepaired us a couple of years. Then are you

0:21:11.160 --> 0:21:13.239
<v Speaker 1>willing to want to perform what say some of your

0:21:13.240 --> 0:21:16.520
<v Speaker 1>payers could be delivering in terms of gains by being defensive?

0:21:17.200 --> 0:21:19.919
<v Speaker 1>The answer is yes. The good news is there's been

0:21:20.040 --> 0:21:24.880
<v Speaker 1>enough localized volatility dislocation over the last couple of years

0:21:25.040 --> 0:21:28.480
<v Speaker 1>where you can be defensive, you can be patient, you

0:21:28.560 --> 0:21:32.280
<v Speaker 1>can be relatively liquid and still generating incremental return. If

0:21:32.359 --> 0:21:33.960
<v Speaker 1>you get to a point like we were in back

0:21:34.000 --> 0:21:36.080
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand five or two thousand six, where there's

0:21:36.080 --> 0:21:39.200
<v Speaker 1>a direct trade off between short term performance UH and

0:21:39.680 --> 0:21:43.240
<v Speaker 1>being defensive, we absolutely willing to do that. It's absolutely

0:21:43.320 --> 0:21:46.360
<v Speaker 1>essential as an active manager and perfectly consistent with generating

0:21:46.400 --> 0:21:48.520
<v Speaker 1>strong returns open It's not just something you're willing to do,

0:21:48.560 --> 0:21:52.280
<v Speaker 1>it's something you're anticipating happening, isn't it. That's correct? And

0:21:52.359 --> 0:21:54.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that you know, maybe you see a boxers

0:21:54.000 --> 0:21:58.640
<v Speaker 1>analogy that this is a counterpunching type market. Um, sit back,

0:21:58.920 --> 0:22:02.399
<v Speaker 1>be patient, and wait for others in the market to

0:22:02.520 --> 0:22:06.520
<v Speaker 1>ask for liquidity and then provided, assuming you're getting sufficiently compensated.

0:22:06.880 --> 0:22:09.560
<v Speaker 1>So it's subtle, but it means be defensive, the patient,

0:22:09.680 --> 0:22:12.320
<v Speaker 1>be more liquid, look for lots of little trades along

0:22:12.359 --> 0:22:15.040
<v Speaker 1>the way that hopefully can generate some incremental return, and

0:22:15.119 --> 0:22:17.960
<v Speaker 1>then strike when you have these bouts of volatility. We

0:22:18.040 --> 0:22:19.879
<v Speaker 1>haven't had that much of that the last decade, but

0:22:19.960 --> 0:22:22.000
<v Speaker 1>going forward the next five or ten years, we think

0:22:22.040 --> 0:22:24.840
<v Speaker 1>it's a type of environment where that style of active

0:22:24.880 --> 0:22:28.159
<v Speaker 1>management's going to win out in the end. No, I

0:22:28.320 --> 0:22:30.159
<v Speaker 1>very much agree, and I think I think that we

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:33.320
<v Speaker 1>were sort of hoping for more difficult environment and and

0:22:33.560 --> 0:22:35.879
<v Speaker 1>and once again, whether it happens in six months so

0:22:36.040 --> 0:22:38.040
<v Speaker 1>in in two years, it's very hard to chord it.

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:40.960
<v Speaker 1>But um, but I think we're going the firm for

0:22:41.240 --> 0:22:45.040
<v Speaker 1>more to mature of this market and and and making

0:22:45.040 --> 0:22:46.840
<v Speaker 1>sure we have the resources and we have a game bran.

0:22:46.960 --> 0:22:48.840
<v Speaker 1>And I think having a game bran and sort of

0:22:48.880 --> 0:22:53.119
<v Speaker 1>thinking about various options and various opportunities is what we

0:22:53.200 --> 0:22:56.320
<v Speaker 1>get paid to do. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg

0:22:56.359 --> 0:23:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Surveillance Podcast. Subscribe and listen to interview us on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:23:02.680 --> 0:23:06.880
<v Speaker 1>or whichever podcast platform you prefer. I'm on Twitter at

0:23:06.960 --> 0:23:11.159
<v Speaker 1>Tom Keene before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide.

0:23:11.680 --> 0:23:12.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm Bloomberg Radio