Speaker 1: Right news round up in Information Overload Hour. Here's our
Speaker 1: toll free telephone number this Monday. It is eight hundred
Speaker 1: and nine fourt one, Shawn. If you want to be
Speaker 1: a part of the program.
Speaker 2: All right.
Speaker 1: The President now is taking the events and Iran to
Speaker 1: the next level. The US Navy escorting ships through the
Speaker 1: Strait of Ormuz. Is it risky?
Speaker 3: Yes?
Speaker 4: Oh.
Speaker 2: I think the President's plan B is to obliterate them.
Speaker 2: I do.
Speaker 1: Will the Iranians fall into the trap, We'll see. Only
Speaker 1: time will tell. But as the President rightly has been saying,
Speaker 1: the Iranians are fighting themselves more than they're fighting anybody else.
Speaker 1: And there has not been one group of leadership to
Speaker 1: emerge to actually have a real negotiation with Here's what
Speaker 1: he said.
Speaker 5: We're doing everything in terms of negotiating right now. In
Speaker 5: terms of the negotiation telephonically, they've made strides, but I'm
Speaker 5: not sure if they ever get there. Tremendous discord, this
Speaker 5: tremendous having a tremendous problem getting along with each other
Speaker 5: in Iran. The leadership is very disjointed. It's got two
Speaker 5: to three groups, maybe four, and it's a very disjointed leadership.
Speaker 5: And with that being said, they all want to make
Speaker 5: a deal, but they're all messed up.
Speaker 1: It's pretty messed up anyway. Here to analyze what's going
Speaker 1: to happen next, we have Ambassador Nathan Sales. Now, he
Speaker 1: did serve in the first Trump administration as the Ambassador
Speaker 1: at Large for counter Terrorism and acting under Secretary of State.
Speaker 1: I understand what the President is doing. I understand the
Speaker 1: situation he's dealing with. I understand also because I had
Speaker 1: the conversation with him, that he can obliterate them in
Speaker 1: fifteen minutes or less, so that option always remains on
Speaker 1: the table. However, I get a little nervous when American
Speaker 1: ships are escorting other ships through the Straight of Horn moves,
Speaker 1: knowing the short distance at its narrowest point is what
Speaker 1: twenty four miles something like that.
Speaker 3: Yesom, thanks for having me on. The situation today is
Speaker 3: obviously very fluid. The US announced that we were going
Speaker 3: to be reopening the Straight and working with commercial shipping
Speaker 3: companies to reduce the risk that their cargoes and cruise face.
Speaker 3: We're also seeing Iran lashing out. Who and Iran it's
Speaker 3: actually not clear who's responsible for making these decisions to
Speaker 3: attack ships in the Gulf and to launch drones at
Speaker 3: the United Arab Emirates or these rogue commanders on the
Speaker 3: front lines who have taken matters into their own hands,
Speaker 3: or is this a strategic decision that's made by leadership,
Speaker 3: such as it is leadership that's remaining in Tehran. So
Speaker 3: we've got to watch the situation very very closely. I
Speaker 3: think the overall picture here, what the President is trying
Speaker 3: to do is maximize his leverage over the Iranian regime,
Speaker 3: using all of the instruments of the American power, diplomatic, economic,
Speaker 3: and military, to coerce the Mulas to the table to
Speaker 3: get a good deal. It looked yesterday as though we
Speaker 3: were starting to see some progress. The Iranians were starting
Speaker 3: to say, okay, well maybe we'll give up nuclear Enrichmond
Speaker 3: for fifteen years. Previously they only said five. Now fifteen
Speaker 3: is still way too short. But the fact that they
Speaker 3: were willing to move a little bit in the right
Speaker 3: direction suggest that they were starting to feel the heat
Speaker 3: of the economic blockade. So there's a lot of moving
Speaker 3: parts here. Let's watch the situation very.
Speaker 6: Carefully, all right.
Speaker 1: Scott Besson said we're suffocating them economically and they're not
Speaker 1: able to pay their soldiers. He's also saying that Iran
Speaker 1: has gotten a pittance of hormones. Holes they're losing, we're told,
Speaker 1: between four and five hundred million dollars a day, and
Speaker 1: their ability to store the oil that they are currently
Speaker 1: pumping is running out very quickly, which would mean they'd
Speaker 1: have to cap those oil wells, which would mean if
Speaker 1: they ever do reopen them, probably they'd be at best
Speaker 1: fifty to sixty percent capacity of where they are today.
Speaker 1: Not a good option for them, No.
Speaker 3: Not at all. And that's really the economic leverage that
Speaker 3: the United States has over Iran right now. We have
Speaker 3: their economy, and a vice script, so much of their
Speaker 3: economic strength, or such as it is, is dependent on
Speaker 3: oil revenues. If you turn that off, their economy craters.
Speaker 3: And their economy is not in great shape to begin with.
Speaker 3: They've been mismanaged for forty years, fifty years, they faced
Speaker 3: decades of American sanctions pressure. The war has completely obliterated
Speaker 3: their industrial base, and so their ability to weather economic
Speaker 3: storms like we unleashed with this blockade is very, very limited,
Speaker 3: and so it's ultimately a question of who's going to
Speaker 3: blink first. The Iranians think they can outlast the United States,
Speaker 3: and President Trump is looking at their fragile economy and saying,
Speaker 3: I've got all the cards. I've got all the time.
Speaker 3: So that's the question is over the next couple of weeks,
Speaker 3: is the Iranian regime going to continue to feel that
Speaker 3: economic pressure and ultimately blink and come to the table
Speaker 3: for a good deal.
Speaker 1: What is your best Yes, I mean, at this point,
Speaker 1: we don't even know who's in charge. I know that
Speaker 1: they are fighting for the leadership role. They seem to
Speaker 1: have no concern at all about any impact on the
Speaker 1: Iranian people. The one thing that I wish has happened
Speaker 1: and they've not been able to accomplish it at this point,
Speaker 1: and maybe they will be able to accomplish it, is
Speaker 1: arming the Iranian people.
Speaker 3: Yeah, the Iranian regime has no regard for the Iranian people.
Speaker 3: The Iranian people have been victimized by this regime for
Speaker 3: the past fifty some years, and most recently they killed
Speaker 3: about forty thousand of them. So American pressure on the
Speaker 3: regime has to be to impose costs that actually matter
Speaker 3: to the regime, not costs that are going to be
Speaker 3: born by the Iranian people, And that's why I'm glad
Speaker 3: that the President moved off as into earlier threats to
Speaker 3: target a lot of Iranian energy infrastructure and transportation infrastructure.
Speaker 3: That's going to disproportionately hurt the people of Iran. And
Speaker 3: if you ask the leaders in Tehran whether they care,
Speaker 3: the answer is going to be a big, fat no.
Speaker 3: What they care about out is regime continuity. They care
Speaker 3: about their abilities.
Speaker 1: But they can say they don't care. But at that
Speaker 1: point then their days are numbered. I mean things are
Speaker 1: already bad enough. Half their workforce is out of work.
Speaker 1: Reports are that the IRGC is not getting paid, Reports
Speaker 1: are their currency is down to zero, reports of a
Speaker 1: two hundred percent inflation rate, reports of food and shortages
Speaker 1: of other goods and services. So the Iranian people and
Speaker 1: if they're not paying the Iranian Revolutionary Guard forces, they're
Speaker 1: going to start to rebel too.
Speaker 3: Yeah, that's a real risk that the leaders have to
Speaker 3: worry about in Tehran because the economic pressure we're applying
Speaker 3: directed at regime targets can create fissures within the regime,
Speaker 3: can create factions. It's a smart way to exploit divisions
Speaker 3: within the regime and cause them to turn against one
Speaker 3: another and another thing that happens is if you're squeezing
Speaker 3: the pocketbooks of the revolutionary guard core and they're not
Speaker 3: getting paid Sean, as you said, maybe they start to
Speaker 3: consider alternatives. Maybe not leaders who are super ideological and
Speaker 3: committed to shea revolutionaryism around the world, But what about
Speaker 3: the rank and file who saw, now you know, this
Speaker 3: might be a good way to get ahead in life
Speaker 3: and make a good buck. Those folks who are more
Speaker 3: monetarily motivated, maybe the loss of the paycheck causes them
Speaker 3: to consider alternatives.
Speaker 1: What about these other countries that are way more dependent
Speaker 1: on the Straight of Horror moves than we are. We're
Speaker 1: not dependent on the Straight being open at all. I mean,
Speaker 1: why does France and Western European countries that do rely
Speaker 1: on energy coming out of the Straight, why don't they
Speaker 1: get involved?
Speaker 3: Yeah, I'd like to see more from our European friends.
Speaker 3: They get about twenty five percent of their energy. I
Speaker 3: think from the Straight of Horror moves we get about
Speaker 3: ten or less. So the Europeans certainly have skin in
Speaker 3: the game. Now, the Brits have talked about a maritime
Speaker 3: coalition to keep the Straight open. I think that's valuable.
Speaker 3: I think we should encourage that and be grateful for it.
Speaker 3: All that said, it would be nice to see more
Speaker 3: effort and to see it sooner so that it comes
Speaker 3: at a time when it actually matters the most, which
Speaker 3: is right now when the Iranians are taking shots at
Speaker 3: a Korean ship and Amorat ship. And it's not just
Speaker 3: the Europeans who we'd like to see stand up and
Speaker 3: be counted. The golf partners of ours have a huge
Speaker 3: economic interest in continuing to be able to export through
Speaker 3: the Strait, and our Asian friends South Korea, Japan and
Speaker 3: others have a huge interest in being able to import oil.
Speaker 3: So we'd like to see some help from those guys
Speaker 3: as well.
Speaker 1: With China and all of this, because they get a
Speaker 1: lot of their oil through that straight Yeah.
Speaker 3: And China has really been a huge beneficiary of Iranian
Speaker 3: oil over the past number of years because the Iranians
Speaker 3: have a hard time selling it on the open market
Speaker 3: thanks to American sanctions, but the Chinese Communist Party is
Speaker 3: perfectly happy to take a discount. China and iran are
Speaker 3: inextricably linked. They have economic ties, they increasingly have military ties.
Speaker 3: A lot of the military equipment that our forces were
Speaker 3: able to go in and destroy during the opening hours
Speaker 3: and days of the campaign. We're Chinese, so we have
Speaker 3: to want under whether Shijin Ping has a lot of
Speaker 3: confidence in the ability of his equipment to withstand American
Speaker 3: military might. But what we need to do is try
Speaker 3: and separate China as much as we can from Iran.
Speaker 3: Don't provide them intelligence information, don't provide them with dual
Speaker 3: use capabilities that could be used for military purposes, and
Speaker 3: Iran certainly don't provide them with weapons. I have to
Speaker 3: imagine that that's the key message that the President and
Speaker 3: his team are delivering Decision Ping in advance of a
Speaker 3: meeting in the upcoming weeks or months.
Speaker 1: I think it's probably next week. I'm scheduled to go myself,
Speaker 1: so I might be there. Wish me luck getting in
Speaker 1: and out of China.
Speaker 2: If I go, don't.
Speaker 1: I am on Air Force one, so I should be
Speaker 1: fairly protected. I'm hoping, but you never know. But it
Speaker 1: is China. But the Iranians have been getting help from
Speaker 1: the Chinese, from the Russians and the North Koreans. That's
Speaker 1: where a lot of their weaponry came from. Now, if
Speaker 1: I'm China and I'm Russia and I'm North Korea, and
Speaker 1: I watched the obliteration of all of our missile defense system,
Speaker 1: ballistic system, air defense systems, and nuclear systems that I'm
Speaker 1: sure they assisted with. What are they thinking at this point?
Speaker 1: Are they thinking, Wow, we underestimated America's military might.
Speaker 3: I think the overwhelming dominance of the American military in
Speaker 3: this campaign is going to send a clear deterrent signal
Speaker 3: to Russia and a clear deterrent signal to China. How
Speaker 3: confident is Russia about in the future, God forbid taking
Speaker 3: a fight with NATO, not just Ukraine, but actually fighting
Speaker 3: against NATO. When you've seen what American military capabilities look
Speaker 3: like in Iran, I'm.
Speaker 1: Not sure NATO's going to exist when this is all
Speaker 1: said and done.
Speaker 3: Right, Well, you know, the eastern front country is poland
Speaker 3: the ball the Romanians. These guys are super committed to
Speaker 3: the alliance, and they're putting their money where their mouth
Speaker 3: is because they realize that it's on them first and
Speaker 3: foremost to descend their homelands against the Russian threats.
Speaker 6: And so see.
Speaker 1: But I could see us going into bilateral negotiations and
Speaker 1: agreements with those countries that have been loyal and have
Speaker 1: been supportive and basically saying goodbye to Spain and France,
Speaker 1: maybe even Great Britain Italy that have not been supportive,
Speaker 1: that have frankly undermined our efforts.
Speaker 3: Yeah, there's a lot of Western European countries that have
Speaker 3: yet to get true religion. Spain it is at the
Speaker 3: top of the list. Spain has said they're not going
Speaker 3: to spend the requisite five percent of gross domestic product
Speaker 3: on military spending, and the reason is because we choose
Speaker 3: not to make this sacrifice. I think that's a direct
Speaker 3: quote from Pedro Sanchez, the leader of Spain. And when
Speaker 3: an American here is that, what they think is, well,
Speaker 3: why should we make a sacrifice for Spain if the
Speaker 3: Spanish are not going to make a sacrifice to defend
Speaker 3: their own country. So that's not I.
Speaker 2: Don't think, I don't think we should do you.
Speaker 3: Yeah, well, no, I mean NATO is before you get
Speaker 3: to Article five collect a self defense, you have Article two,
Speaker 3: and that talks about readiness and preparedness, and if you're
Speaker 3: not prepared to invest in your own capabilities in your
Speaker 3: own defense, it's not reasonable to expect other countries to
Speaker 3: make up that flax. So clearly one of the key
Speaker 3: things that's come out of President Trump's two terms is
Speaker 3: more and more NATO ally stepping up. Not everybody is
Speaker 3: stepping up, and we need to see more of it.
Speaker 1: Oh, it's going to be interesting to watch this play out.
Speaker 1: We appreciate your time, Ambassador and Nathan Sales.
Speaker 3: Thank you, Thank you, Sean Kent.
Speaker 2: Let's get back to our.
Speaker 1: Busy phones eight hundred ninety four one, Sean, if you
Speaker 1: want to be a part of the program, Stacy my
Speaker 1: free State of Florida.
Speaker 2: Stacey, how are you glad you called? I am great.
Speaker 4: How are you, Sean?
Speaker 2: I'm good? Thank you.
Speaker 4: I have a two part question. The first one is
Speaker 4: why are we knee deep in the Strait? Why when
Speaker 4: we know once we open it up, i Ran will
Speaker 4: be continue in its business with China. Iran's a huge
Speaker 4: supplier of China and oil. My other one is is
Speaker 4: if we're only if the Strait isn't that important to
Speaker 4: the United States as getting our crude oil so forth,
Speaker 4: why is our oil and our gas prices so high?
Speaker 1: Well, it is temporarily because world markets do impact local markets,
Speaker 1: and that's just simple economics. But once this is over,
Speaker 1: and I do believe it will come to an end
Speaker 1: sooner than later. I think that those prices will come
Speaker 1: down rather precipitously, and I think it's going to happen quickly,
Speaker 1: and I think it'll be good for everybody. And the
Speaker 1: reality is is that we're impacted by the price of
Speaker 1: oil worldwide, regardless of our ability to be energy dominant,
Speaker 1: energy independent. And the President is trying to accomplish something
Speaker 1: here without going without using the nuclear option, and I'm
Speaker 1: not talking about nuclear weapons without without going scorched earth
Speaker 1: on Iran. That option remains on the table. It's always
Speaker 1: remained on the table. But the President and even said
Speaker 1: so last week, for humanitarian purposes, he's not chosen that
Speaker 1: route yet. But it may come down to that. If
Speaker 1: the Iranians, whoever may be in charge, whatever fourth fifthier
Speaker 1: layer of leadership that is calling the shots there, if
Speaker 1: they're stupid enough to take us on on the straight
Speaker 1: or Hormuz, I think they will seal their own fate,
Speaker 1: and then I think this will come to a quick end.
Speaker 4: Very well, very well, And you had also mentioned during
Speaker 4: your show, is harming the people might be the answer
Speaker 4: for them to fix their own country. Is what I
Speaker 4: believe is maybe we should look at that.
Speaker 2: When all this well, they have been looking at it.
Speaker 1: There have been attempts to make it happen on Unfortunately,
Speaker 1: you're dealing with a lot of unsavory characters. And my
Speaker 1: understanding is is that you know, for example, working with
Speaker 1: the Kurds, they were stealing ninety percent of the weapons,
Speaker 1: so that's not helpful. Whether we can find a different
Speaker 1: path to get arms into the hands of the Uranium
Speaker 1: people and they can be the masters of their own destiny.
Speaker 1: It's it's proven difficult, but I'm sure we could probably
Speaker 1: come up with an alternative plan, and I would expect
Speaker 1: that to happen. You can't win a revolution with a
Speaker 1: sling shot.
Speaker 4: Not I do appreciate your time and have a great day.
Speaker 1: I appreciate you call eight hundred and nine foot one.
Speaker 1: Shawn is on number this Monday. Quick break right back
Speaker 1: and more of your calls coming up straight.
Speaker 7: Ahead, solid as a rock, honestful. This is the Seanhannity Show.
Speaker 2: Hey dot org.
Speaker 1: Remember last week we played this idiot mayor in Seattle.
Speaker 1: Her name is Katie Wilson, you know, telling wealthy people.
Speaker 1: And by the way, the former head of Starbucks, Howard
Speaker 1: whatever his name is, moved to my free state of Florida,
Speaker 1: just like Mark Zuckerberg moved to Florida, just like all
Speaker 1: the co founders of Google moved to Florida, just like
Speaker 1: Larry Ellison of Oracle moved to Florida. Just like all
Speaker 1: of the private equity firms, big banks, investment firms in
Speaker 1: New York are all moving to Florida and Ball Street
Speaker 1: South because of the oppressive taxation. And she just mocked people.
Speaker 1: She said, you know, basically get lost because she's putting
Speaker 1: in place in her city of Seattle a wealth tax.
Speaker 2: Listen.
Speaker 4: I think the claims that millionaires are going to leave
Speaker 4: our state are like super overblown.
Speaker 7: And if you know the ones that leave, like by.
Speaker 1: So now, I mean, if you go back in time,
Speaker 1: New York is way ahead of where they are in Seattle,
Speaker 1: and you can go back, for example, and you have
Speaker 1: Andrew Cuomo.
Speaker 2: If you're pro stual.
Speaker 1: Weapon and you're pro life, you were not in New
Speaker 1: Yorker and there's no place for you in the state
Speaker 1: in New York. And he said that, and I'm like, okay,
Speaker 1: that's when that was in twenty fourteen. I believe and
Speaker 1: all these governors. I said, well, if I'm not wanted,
Speaker 1: I'm going to leave. And I just couldn't leave at
Speaker 1: that time. I'm now three years gone, and now the
Speaker 1: current governor pathy Hokeel. Remember she was telling Lee Zelden,
Speaker 1: Resident Trump, other conservatives get on the bus, got down
Speaker 1: to Florida.
Speaker 2: Remember, Bruce, and we're here.
Speaker 8: To say that the era of Trump and Zelden and
Speaker 8: mon Arro. Just jump on a bus and head down
Speaker 8: to Florida where you belong. Okay, get out of town,
Speaker 8: get out of town. Because you don't read, you don't
Speaker 8: represent our values.
Speaker 7: You are not New Yorkers.
Speaker 1: I got out of town because I agree with them.
Speaker 1: I like them. Well, now Bruce Blakeman, who was running
Speaker 1: against her, uses that and then concludes it with her
Speaker 1: now backtracking and saying that we've got to go down
Speaker 1: to Palm Beach and beg people to come back to
Speaker 1: New York.
Speaker 8: Listen to this, Zad, just jump on a bus and
Speaker 8: head down to Florida where you belong. Okay, get out
Speaker 8: of town, get out of town.
Speaker 7: Do you got to let me?
Speaker 2: No?
Speaker 9: Shoot?
Speaker 7: I still you shoot I go.
Speaker 8: If you say that, you Amma, I'll be here til
Speaker 8: the end of time.
Speaker 3: So you've got to let me know.
Speaker 2: Shoot, should I go?
Speaker 4: And so.
Speaker 7: First steps? Should we go down to Palm Beach and
Speaker 7: see what you can bring back home?
Speaker 8: Because our tax base has been wrote it.
Speaker 7: It's fine.
Speaker 2: Now I've reached out to Kathy Hokle's office.
Speaker 1: Did you know that Linda I did not know that.
Speaker 1: I want to invite her on my shows. I'll invite
Speaker 1: her down to Palm Beach. I'll have a conversation with her,
Speaker 1: and I'm going to tell her exactly why I don't
Speaker 1: feel that I want to go back to New York
Speaker 1: and maybe she should listen to people like me. Now,
Speaker 1: Ken Griffin who was used by Mum Donnie Marxist Cammi
Speaker 1: Mumdanni in that ad saying he doesn't even live here. Well,
Speaker 1: he's scheduled to invest. He's the head of Citadel, which
Speaker 1: is a big investment firm they now are. Their home
Speaker 1: bases is in Wall Street South in South Florida. He
Speaker 1: owns a ton of property all the way from Miami
Speaker 1: to Palm Beach and very very wealthy billionaire and he
Speaker 1: had planned to spend six billion dollars. Bumdani, that dope
Speaker 1: does this ad attacking Ken Griffin that he wants to
Speaker 1: tax him even more. And now Ken Griffin is saying,
Speaker 1: I'm not sure I'm going to spend the six billion
Speaker 1: dollars in New York. Apparently he was going to meet
Speaker 1: with Hockel. My only advice to him is, I don't
Speaker 1: think you can trust Hochel. I mean, there was one
Speaker 1: moment of clarity with Cuomo back when he was governor,
Speaker 1: and he said.
Speaker 2: Tax the rich, tax the ridge, tax the rich. We did,
Speaker 2: God forbid the rich leave.
Speaker 9: Listen, so encourages he income New Yorkers to move to
Speaker 9: other states. And what you have to remember is even
Speaker 9: if a small number of high income taxpayers leave, it
Speaker 9: has a dramatic effect on this tax space.
Speaker 2: Tax the rich, Tax the rich, Tax the rich. We did.
Speaker 9: Now god forbid the rich leave.
Speaker 2: Well, the rich have been leaving in droves.
Speaker 1: I know because I live in South Florida, and in
Speaker 1: South Florida there are plenty of people that once lived
Speaker 1: in New York that are far wealthier than Sean Hannity is.
Speaker 1: I promise you and those people are not going back.
Speaker 1: They're not bringing their businesses back. They're all predicting what
Speaker 1: I'm predicting they think a wealth tax will be put
Speaker 1: in place in New York and New York City. Look
Speaker 1: at Mamdannie's proposal. For example. On the death tax. Now,
Speaker 1: New York State has a ten percent death tax. This
Speaker 1: is money you've already paid taxes on, and you die
Speaker 1: if you die in New York. My accountants, when I
Speaker 1: live there, you used to always say, whatever you do,
Speaker 1: I don't die in New York as a New York resident. Well,
Speaker 1: I'm not a New York resident anymore. So I can
Speaker 1: die in peace because they don't have a death tax
Speaker 1: in Florida. And I'd say, I'll talk to God about that.
Speaker 1: I'll see what God has to say about that, because
Speaker 1: I don't really have much say in the day that
Speaker 1: God calls me home. And they would say, don't die
Speaker 1: in New York. I'm like, okay, we have that conversation
Speaker 1: every year. It sounds stupid, but I got it.
Speaker 2: And so in New York.
Speaker 1: So the federal death tax is forty percent, which I'd
Speaker 1: like to see Trump get rid of because it's it's
Speaker 1: money you've already paid taxes on. Why does the government
Speaker 1: get a part of your wealth, your.
Speaker 2: Savings that you would prefer.
Speaker 1: Maybe you want to give it to charity, Maybe you
Speaker 1: want to leave it for your children, Maybe you want
Speaker 1: to leave it for relatives, maybe for people that have
Speaker 1: been nice to you in your life. And I, by
Speaker 1: the way, I always suggest people out of state plans.
Speaker 1: And so the federal government, federal government gets forty percent
Speaker 1: in New York, New York's state gets ten percent. That's
Speaker 1: fifty percent. Now, Mamdani is supporting if you live in
Speaker 1: New York City, a fifty percent New York City death tax,
Speaker 1: which would mean one hundred percent of your estate short
Speaker 1: of now right now, there is a you don't start
Speaker 1: paying the estate tax until you reach seven point five
Speaker 1: million dollars in wealth. It may sound like a lot
Speaker 1: of money for a lot of people in the country
Speaker 1: in New York City, that is not a lot of money, Linda,
Speaker 1: am I overstating the case.
Speaker 2: It just isn't. No, not at all, it's not.
Speaker 1: It means you would probably have a decent apartment, maybe
Speaker 1: two or three bedrooms, and a nice part of town,
Speaker 1: and send your kids to a private school if you want,
Speaker 1: probably afford to go out to dinner. But you're not
Speaker 1: saving a lot of money every year you're probably you know,
Speaker 1: using your four oh one k paying your retirement. It's
Speaker 1: not making you filthy rich, I promise you. Because the
Speaker 1: cost of living is so h and so now he
Speaker 1: wants to lower that threshold. You wouldn't start paying the
Speaker 1: death tax until you hit the deductible of seven point
Speaker 1: five million. Now he wants to lower to seven hundred
Speaker 1: and fifty thousand. That means nobody will ever. You will
Speaker 1: not be able to pass on a penny to people
Speaker 1: that you love in your life, your children, your grandchildren,
Speaker 1: loved ones, friends, neighbors, charities, whatever you want to donate to.
Speaker 1: When you die, you won't be able to pay a thing.
Speaker 1: But why does the government charge us for dying anyway?
Speaker 1: I mean, after you pay taxes your whole life.
Speaker 10: Well, I think to add a little bit of color
Speaker 10: to this conversation, we should remind the audience that Mayor
Speaker 10: Wilson was actually a recipient of revenue made in New
Speaker 10: York because both of her parents live here in New
Speaker 10: York State. They're both you know, in the education system,
Speaker 10: both professors, and they subsidize her and she lived off
Speaker 10: of them because they were wealthy and they have done
Speaker 10: so well and they were giving her upwards of twenty
Speaker 10: two hundred dollars a month, which she said was totally
Speaker 10: relatable to the voters because she was working so hard
Speaker 10: on her campaign.
Speaker 2: I'm like, do I sound.
Speaker 1: Like a cheapskate when I say I don't want to
Speaker 1: give my kids a penny?
Speaker 2: No, you sound like normal in their adult life.
Speaker 1: I think God created in every person. I think that
Speaker 1: we're not on this earth to be served. We're not
Speaker 1: kings and queens, we're not princes and princesses. And I
Speaker 1: think that God designed us to serve other people in
Speaker 1: any capacity.
Speaker 2: I don't.
Speaker 1: I've told my kids, I don't really care what you do,
Speaker 1: but you've got to pay your own weight. Doesn't mean
Speaker 1: I won't leave the money, but I don't want to
Speaker 1: create trust fund brats.
Speaker 2: Does that make sense?
Speaker 7: Yeah?
Speaker 10: And that's a real problem and look like a spoiltick.
Speaker 10: This woman is out of her mind. First of all,
Speaker 10: she has absolutely no big business background. You know, her
Speaker 10: father some kind of biology guy, you know. And they're
Speaker 10: rooted in this, you know, ideological socialism works. That's their
Speaker 10: whole platform in their personal life. So now they're trying
Speaker 10: to make it the platform for her city. And unfortunately
Speaker 10: it's not going to work. In fact, it's not working,
Speaker 10: and people are leaving and they're taking all of their
Speaker 10: money with them.
Speaker 2: And she's an idiot. I'm just telling you.
Speaker 1: If Florida is full of people that have escaped New York,
Speaker 1: you just tell them.
Speaker 10: To leave their politics behind.
Speaker 2: Your politics home. That's number one. That's the number one rule.
Speaker 1: Number two rule is you better get out sooner than later,
Speaker 1: because New York's going to have a wealth tax and
Speaker 1: then they're going to have an exit tax.
Speaker 2: What is an exit tax?
Speaker 1: That means, let's say you leave next January, then New
Speaker 1: York is going to claim and make as a matter
Speaker 1: of law that they still have the right to tax
Speaker 1: your income and this was proposed in California for up
Speaker 1: to ten years. Yet out while you can, because they
Speaker 1: want to pick your pocket. And it's not just it's
Speaker 1: not just money, it's also quality of life. I mean,
Speaker 1: did you see this zombie video of all these people
Speaker 1: on this new drug out in San Francisco. I've never
Speaker 1: saw more zo It's like Dawn of the Dead, right.
Speaker 10: But that's what happens in that state. They have absolutely
Speaker 10: no border control. They've got a sanctuary state, and god
Speaker 10: knows what they're bringing across that border. And remember when
Speaker 10: we were doing those deep dives with Sarah Carter. A
Speaker 10: lot of the people that were along those borders across
Speaker 10: Texas and California, they weren't just from Central America and Mexico.
Speaker 10: They were from China and they were bringing with them
Speaker 10: all of these laced drugs. They were bringing the meth infentamine,
Speaker 10: they were bringing the fetanyl. They were bringing the marijuana
Speaker 10: with the fetanyl. And these are lethal doses a fetanyl
Speaker 10: and people are.
Speaker 2: Out of their Derek Carter's on TV to I did
Speaker 2: you know that?
Speaker 10: I did not. She's amazing.
Speaker 2: I will watch, well, you should watch anyway. Are you
Speaker 2: watching it?
Speaker 3: No?
Speaker 10: But now I'll watch and I might like wind and
Speaker 10: watch it again just because she's great.
Speaker 1: Woody in Gavin's Communist Utopia of California. Next, what's up, Boddy?
Speaker 6: Hey? Thank you predicting my call. I listen and watch
Speaker 6: it every day.
Speaker 2: Thank you, my friend. What's going on?
Speaker 6: Yeah? I wanted to talk about fraud. I know I'm
Speaker 6: off topic here.
Speaker 5: But.
Speaker 6: I think President Trump and the whole Republican Party should
Speaker 6: be running those numbers on a loop reminding people of
Speaker 6: the fraud because I know, pissed off people vote and
Speaker 6: if the Democratic Party was in power right now, you
Speaker 6: wouldn't even know about that fraud.
Speaker 1: Well, I've just got to tell you the fraud, waste, fraud,
Speaker 1: abused corruption, it's being exposed. The person that's exposing the
Speaker 1: most is doctor Oz and he's telling me it's hundreds
Speaker 1: of billions of dollars. By the time we get through
Speaker 1: an audit of Minnesota and places like New York and
Speaker 1: New Jersey and your state of California, it's going to
Speaker 1: be hundreds of billions of dollars in fraud, waste, fraud, abuse, corruption.
Speaker 1: Look at what Nick Shirley was able to expose in
Speaker 1: just a short period of time.
Speaker 6: They're trying to outlaw the Nick Shirley's of even exposing anything.
Speaker 1: Well, I mean, they have this law that they proposed
Speaker 1: out in your state, like the you know, silence Nick
Speaker 1: Shirley act out there right unbelievable.
Speaker 6: Crazy crazy.
Speaker 1: All right, my friend, we got very little time here.
Speaker 1: Really quick, We'll say, Hi, did Julio is in South Carolina? Julio,
Speaker 1: you got less than a minute, Gosar.
Speaker 11: Listen, I was in Columbia, South America. About three years ago,
Speaker 11: Ivanka Trump was there same place. I was staying in
Speaker 11: the Grand Hyatt and Bowata, Columbia. I went sightseeing with
Speaker 11: my distant family and but I get back, there's m
Speaker 11: sixteen guys all over the place, not allowed to go
Speaker 11: back in until I had credentials get into my room
Speaker 11: and to the lobby. And when I get up to
Speaker 11: my room, I felt as if somebody's been in my
Speaker 11: room or our dog's been in my room. Why can't
Speaker 11: we do that here? That's ridiculous that we can't do
Speaker 11: that here. You know, I had the pleasure of meeting
Speaker 11: our president back in when he was forty five. What
Speaker 11: a wonderful man. We got to take care of him.
Speaker 11: He is changing the world for the better.
Speaker 1: Well, he's consequential, and I think that's one of the
Speaker 1: reasons they hate him so much. And all these attempts
Speaker 1: keep happening, and we've got to protect our president, period.
Speaker 2: And the sentence. We appreciate you, Julio, God bless you.
Speaker 2: Eight hundred.
Speaker 1: All right, that's going to wrap things up, But today
Speaker 1: it looks like military action back on the table. We'll
Speaker 1: check in with General Keith kell Ogg, Lindsay Graham tonight.
Speaker 1: Also drugs Are Sarah Carter, Greg Jarrett Write's previous Brianna
Speaker 1: Lyneman say you DVR news you'll never get from the
Speaker 1: Legacy Media Mob. Also a preview of my podcast with
Speaker 1: the one and only FBI director Cash Butt Tell. The
Speaker 1: stuff he's said is unbelievable. Anyway, nine Eastern Tonight Hannony
Speaker 1: on Fox. Will see you then back here tomorrow. Thank
Speaker 1: you for making this show possible.