WEBVTT - Single Best Idea with Tom Keene: Amy Wu Silverman & Katy Kaminski

0:00:04.960 --> 0:00:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Single best idea, and today was an extraordinary day on

0:00:08.200 --> 0:00:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg's surveillance. Our team just did a great job of

0:00:10.960 --> 0:00:14.560
<v Speaker 1>eclectic guess We finished strong with the elliot Ackerman in

0:00:14.680 --> 0:00:18.200
<v Speaker 1>celebration of his new book twenty fifty four with James Travetis.

0:00:18.600 --> 0:00:20.320
<v Speaker 1>I'll have a lot more to say about that. I'm

0:00:20.320 --> 0:00:22.279
<v Speaker 1>thinking in April or may I actually try to read

0:00:22.320 --> 0:00:25.240
<v Speaker 1>the books that I'm big on, and I'll have to

0:00:25.520 --> 0:00:28.760
<v Speaker 1>wait through twenty fifty four about the tensions that are

0:00:28.840 --> 0:00:34.160
<v Speaker 1>military faces. But today was wonderfully eclectic in equities. Tony

0:00:34.240 --> 0:00:36.199
<v Speaker 1>Dwyer was with us with a broad view of the

0:00:36.240 --> 0:00:41.000
<v Speaker 1>linkage of recession and those fears to tepid participation inequities.

0:00:41.040 --> 0:00:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Away from mag seven there were all sorts of others,

0:00:44.240 --> 0:00:47.560
<v Speaker 1>but what we really had was dueling quants. I can't

0:00:47.600 --> 0:00:49.400
<v Speaker 1>say enough. I'm not going to go into it here

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:52.479
<v Speaker 1>because we're trying to keep this podcast tight, but I

0:00:52.520 --> 0:00:56.880
<v Speaker 1>can't say enough about the development of modern quantitative academics,

0:00:57.480 --> 0:01:01.360
<v Speaker 1>which came out of Imperial College and London with Paul Wilmot,

0:01:01.960 --> 0:01:05.560
<v Speaker 1>with all sorts of workout of other institutions, including foundational

0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:10.200
<v Speaker 1>work at Princeton and particularly Andrew Lowe l Andrew low

0:01:10.560 --> 0:01:14.679
<v Speaker 1>Up at Massachusetts Institute of Technology. We are thrilled to

0:01:14.720 --> 0:01:19.920
<v Speaker 1>bring you today Katherine Kaminski at Alpha Simplex out of

0:01:19.959 --> 0:01:24.200
<v Speaker 1>the MIT combine, but first Amy Wu Silverman of RBC,

0:01:24.480 --> 0:01:29.160
<v Speaker 1>out of the Princeton QUANDT combine. These people are wicked smart.

0:01:29.240 --> 0:01:31.640
<v Speaker 1>They're the ones that got the A in your math class.

0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:35.680
<v Speaker 1>And the answer is they really try to devolve the

0:01:35.720 --> 0:01:38.560
<v Speaker 1>complexities of the Greek letters and what are called cross

0:01:38.600 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 1>moments down to a mere mortal conversation like you can

0:01:43.280 --> 0:01:47.480
<v Speaker 1>digest on Bloomberg's surveillance. We digressed with Amy Wu Silverman,

0:01:47.920 --> 0:01:51.520
<v Speaker 1>and of course we looked at her cross moments and bitcoin.

0:01:52.000 --> 0:01:55.040
<v Speaker 2>The really interesting thing I would say about bitcoin, because

0:01:55.120 --> 0:01:57.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, you can't dabble in volatility without dabbling and

0:01:57.840 --> 0:02:01.760
<v Speaker 2>crypto a little is the This has historically been a

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 2>risk acid correlation that's actually been positive, even though it's

0:02:04.680 --> 0:02:07.240
<v Speaker 2>been made out not to be. However, we are actually

0:02:07.320 --> 0:02:10.919
<v Speaker 2>seeing that correlation decline. So if you look three years ago,

0:02:11.040 --> 0:02:14.040
<v Speaker 2>the correlation between just the simple equity market and bitcoin

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:17.120
<v Speaker 2>was fairly positive and it is still positive, to be clear,

0:02:17.360 --> 0:02:19.520
<v Speaker 2>but it's actually come in a lot and so it

0:02:19.560 --> 0:02:24.160
<v Speaker 2>may actually begin to be behaving in the inflation hedge

0:02:24.240 --> 0:02:27.240
<v Speaker 2>slash equity hedge that it was purported to be in

0:02:27.280 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 2>the beginning.

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Amy was Silverman there with RBC on bitcoin, and of

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:33.680
<v Speaker 1>course we did talk to her about the broader equity

0:02:33.760 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 1>market and some of the oddities out there, particularly the

0:02:36.680 --> 0:02:41.320
<v Speaker 1>mass speculation and options in option day trading. I guess

0:02:41.320 --> 0:02:44.520
<v Speaker 1>it's speculation, or maybe it's almost like the roulette wheel

0:02:44.960 --> 0:02:48.600
<v Speaker 1>at a casino. Katie Kaminski is with Alpha Simplex, and

0:02:48.639 --> 0:02:50.280
<v Speaker 1>the heart and soul of what they do, which I'm

0:02:50.320 --> 0:02:54.519
<v Speaker 1>familiar with, is trend following. This is a cottage industry

0:02:54.919 --> 0:02:57.280
<v Speaker 1>which goes back a solid forty years, much of it

0:02:57.280 --> 0:03:00.600
<v Speaker 1>out of the greater New York City area. And the

0:03:00.639 --> 0:03:02.800
<v Speaker 1>idea here is not so much to catch the knife

0:03:02.840 --> 0:03:04.680
<v Speaker 1>in the dark. The idea here is not to get

0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:07.040
<v Speaker 1>right on the bottom of the trend going up or

0:03:07.120 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 1>the top of the trend going down, but rather just

0:03:09.919 --> 0:03:14.120
<v Speaker 1>to find the trend and monitor it as you invest,

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:18.960
<v Speaker 1>and not day trading, but invest out weeks, quarters, in months.

0:03:19.320 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Katie commencing, of course, looking at this extraordinary bull market

0:03:23.400 --> 0:03:26.840
<v Speaker 1>here she is on the quants, the cross moments of

0:03:26.880 --> 0:03:27.959
<v Speaker 1>our equity market.

0:03:28.440 --> 0:03:31.120
<v Speaker 3>When you look right now at where equities have moved,

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 3>the turning point was in October and it's been I mean,

0:03:34.960 --> 0:03:37.600
<v Speaker 3>look at S and P. It's up almost twenty five

0:03:37.600 --> 0:03:41.320
<v Speaker 3>percent since October, so pretty much over any window where

0:03:41.320 --> 0:03:43.680
<v Speaker 3>you measure the strength of the trend, you're seeing a

0:03:43.720 --> 0:03:46.560
<v Speaker 3>pretty strong signal that we're going straight to the moon.

0:03:47.400 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 3>And so I think that's where, you know, I'm surprised

0:03:51.280 --> 0:03:55.560
<v Speaker 3>at how incredibly resilient this market has been. If you

0:03:55.680 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 3>told me in January that February is going to be

0:03:58.040 --> 0:04:00.640
<v Speaker 3>as amazing as it was, I would have not believe you.

0:04:00.800 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Katiekiminski there, and I really want to talk with Alpha Simplex,

0:04:03.840 --> 0:04:06.080
<v Speaker 1>and I really want to talk for a moment here

0:04:06.520 --> 0:04:10.400
<v Speaker 1>about the underlying here in the Bloomberg terminal. All of

0:04:10.440 --> 0:04:14.040
<v Speaker 1>this came out of really a bunch of really really

0:04:14.080 --> 0:04:19.080
<v Speaker 1>smart people working off Sun Microsystems Spark stations way in

0:04:19.080 --> 0:04:23.039
<v Speaker 1>the back. It wasn't PCs and decad Wang and you

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:25.640
<v Speaker 1>know what Microsoft did with Intel and all that. It

0:04:25.680 --> 0:04:28.960
<v Speaker 1>was more sophisticated right from the get go. And it

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:33.560
<v Speaker 1>involves Sun microsystem I can't remember the name midframe computers

0:04:33.600 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 1>I think is what they were called, but they did

0:04:35.800 --> 0:04:39.080
<v Speaker 1>it off Spark station. What Mike Bloomberg and Tom Sekunda

0:04:39.120 --> 0:04:42.960
<v Speaker 1>did to bring some of those mathematical dynamics over to

0:04:43.000 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg terminal was at the time, and I remember

0:04:46.440 --> 0:04:49.560
<v Speaker 1>this clearly nothing short of an act of God. They

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:54.440
<v Speaker 1>basically took high powered Sun Microsystem's work and brought over

0:04:54.520 --> 0:04:58.400
<v Speaker 1>those chart dynamics so you could establish a trend for

0:04:58.440 --> 0:05:00.760
<v Speaker 1>those of you that have a Bloomberg. For those of

0:05:00.760 --> 0:05:02.840
<v Speaker 1>you that want to get a Bloomberg, one of the

0:05:02.960 --> 0:05:08.520
<v Speaker 1>major major reasons is what's called stochastic analysis, but far

0:05:08.720 --> 0:05:11.080
<v Speaker 1>far more importantly, and you know I'm on this. I

0:05:11.080 --> 0:05:14.080
<v Speaker 1>think if Chris Verona's strateigue, it's the same way we

0:05:14.120 --> 0:05:17.520
<v Speaker 1>are into trend based following. And you do that with

0:05:17.839 --> 0:05:20.920
<v Speaker 1>moving averages. You do that with all sorts of other

0:05:21.000 --> 0:05:24.120
<v Speaker 1>technical studies, much of them founded by a guy named

0:05:24.120 --> 0:05:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Wells Wilder and brought forward in the quantitative finance space

0:05:29.240 --> 0:05:32.440
<v Speaker 1>of people at Princeton and people at MIT like Amy

0:05:32.440 --> 0:05:36.040
<v Speaker 1>wou Silverman and Katie Kaminski. You can do all that

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:40.200
<v Speaker 1>on the Bloomberg. Check it out. This is single best idea,

0:05:40.240 --> 0:05:43.080
<v Speaker 1>And don't forget you can see us on Apple car Play.

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:45.840
<v Speaker 1>It's really working out the Bloomberg Business app. It's free,

0:05:46.200 --> 0:05:49.720
<v Speaker 1>you go there. It's safer and better is Apple, says Apple,

0:05:49.800 --> 0:05:51.720
<v Speaker 1>and we were thrilled by the numbers. I actually got

0:05:51.720 --> 0:05:54.880
<v Speaker 1>brief done it this morning. I was like, really, sixty

0:05:55.360 --> 0:05:58.880
<v Speaker 1>nine nations are listening to us on Apple car Play

0:05:59.440 --> 0:06:02.200
<v Speaker 1>and on YouTube. We're thrilled by the international coverage and

0:06:02.240 --> 0:06:07.280
<v Speaker 1>of course across the nation on YouTube. Search Bloomberg Podcasts

0:06:07.279 --> 0:06:09.960
<v Speaker 1>and you'll find us there. Seven to ten for Wall

0:06:09.960 --> 0:06:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Street Time again, Bloomberg Surveillance, an Apple CarPlay, and on

0:06:14.760 --> 0:06:17.839
<v Speaker 1>YouTube