WEBVTT - Markets, Currencies, And The Dollar (Podcast)

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets podcast

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>called Apple Podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.560
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com Slash Podcast. You've gone on this

0:00:22.680 --> 0:00:26.239
<v Speaker 1>roller coaster wide with Elon Musk, with the Twitter CEO

0:00:26.320 --> 0:00:29.000
<v Speaker 1>as well, and really just shareholders trying to figure out

0:00:29.040 --> 0:00:32.120
<v Speaker 1>what exactly is Twitter going to look like? And then

0:00:32.200 --> 0:00:35.680
<v Speaker 1>we get the earnings well, I mean massive emphasis on

0:00:35.720 --> 0:00:38.680
<v Speaker 1>the monetization this time around. H Yeah, and you've gotta

0:00:38.680 --> 0:00:40.440
<v Speaker 1>wonder whether it really matters if it's just going to

0:00:40.479 --> 0:00:44.280
<v Speaker 1>be a private company tomorrow. But there's other companies pretty

0:00:44.520 --> 0:00:47.160
<v Speaker 1>that we'd like to talk to. We're gonna get into

0:00:47.200 --> 0:00:49.519
<v Speaker 1>it now with Lauren Gilbert. She is the CEO of

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:52.000
<v Speaker 1>wealth Wise Discussing. She's going to discuss how markets are

0:00:52.000 --> 0:00:54.440
<v Speaker 1>going to react to all of these massive, massive earnings.

0:00:54.880 --> 0:00:57.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, as our analysts like to remind us, Twitter

0:00:57.480 --> 0:01:00.640
<v Speaker 1>is just a small company compared to Apple, All and

0:01:00.880 --> 0:01:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Amazon and some of the big numbers we have had, Lorien,

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:05.920
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us. When you look

0:01:05.959 --> 0:01:10.959
<v Speaker 1>at the risks that these big big companies Apple, Amazon, Facebook,

0:01:11.680 --> 0:01:13.720
<v Speaker 1>the they're just so big when you look at them

0:01:13.760 --> 0:01:15.560
<v Speaker 1>compared to the rest of the market. So when you're

0:01:15.560 --> 0:01:17.480
<v Speaker 1>looking at the next set of earnings, what are the

0:01:17.480 --> 0:01:21.640
<v Speaker 1>biggest risks to you to not just these companies, but

0:01:21.680 --> 0:01:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the broader markets at large. Right, Well, this is a

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:28.679
<v Speaker 1>big week for earnings with technology and focus and understanding

0:01:28.760 --> 0:01:31.640
<v Speaker 1>where are these companies heading and get some guidance from

0:01:31.680 --> 0:01:34.440
<v Speaker 1>these companies, and so you know what we're looking at.

0:01:34.600 --> 0:01:37.880
<v Speaker 1>We want to hear from Apple, what are what do

0:01:37.959 --> 0:01:41.400
<v Speaker 1>they see with the consumer. Apple has been very good

0:01:41.440 --> 0:01:46.399
<v Speaker 1>at predicting consumer behavior um predicting how the consumer will

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:48.680
<v Speaker 1>be able to spend, and we want to hear if

0:01:48.720 --> 0:01:52.559
<v Speaker 1>new products are going to be focused on more affordable

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:56.040
<v Speaker 1>products or if the consumer they expect will still be

0:01:56.120 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 1>strong with some of the products that are more expensive. Well,

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:02.480
<v Speaker 1>so glad you mentioned that consumer behavior beacon, because I

0:02:02.520 --> 0:02:06.560
<v Speaker 1>remember when the markets were trading, the entire market would

0:02:06.640 --> 0:02:09.320
<v Speaker 1>rally or tank on these Apple store closures, which was

0:02:09.400 --> 0:02:12.800
<v Speaker 1>essentially this idea of uh kind of Apple companies and

0:02:12.800 --> 0:02:16.120
<v Speaker 1>these services that they provide for iPhone repairs, that foot

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:20.160
<v Speaker 1>traffic essentially being almost a proxy for mobility data, which

0:02:20.240 --> 0:02:22.359
<v Speaker 1>is interesting to me. And speaking of that mobility data,

0:02:22.400 --> 0:02:25.560
<v Speaker 1>we're getting uh, not so great mobility data from China

0:02:25.840 --> 0:02:28.880
<v Speaker 1>and this idea that COVID lockdowns in China will have

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:33.359
<v Speaker 1>ripple effects around the world. How worried shure investors being

0:02:33.360 --> 0:02:35.520
<v Speaker 1>about that. Well, that's a great point. That's another thing

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:38.160
<v Speaker 1>that we want to hear from companies like Apple. How

0:02:38.160 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 1>are the lockdowns impacting them as far as um product

0:02:44.280 --> 0:02:48.120
<v Speaker 1>completion as well as shipping, so all of those things

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:50.919
<v Speaker 1>are very important and how is that going to affect

0:02:51.280 --> 0:02:53.880
<v Speaker 1>these companies going forward? So when we do look at

0:02:53.960 --> 0:02:56.919
<v Speaker 1>risk the risks, there are many risks to look at.

0:02:57.440 --> 0:03:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Um however, if so far in earning season, companies continue

0:03:01.639 --> 0:03:04.600
<v Speaker 1>to be profitable, so, you know, looking to see how

0:03:04.639 --> 0:03:08.079
<v Speaker 1>the companies are able to pass along price increases to

0:03:08.240 --> 0:03:11.560
<v Speaker 1>consumers and who are those price setters. And I think

0:03:11.600 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 1>that's a very important thing for investors to look at

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:17.400
<v Speaker 1>when they're deciding which companies to invest in. You know,

0:03:17.440 --> 0:03:20.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm really curious here about what the limit is. One

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:23.760
<v Speaker 1>person we spoke to is the CEO of Chippotle, for example,

0:03:23.760 --> 0:03:27.160
<v Speaker 1>where prices have increased. They're seeing avocado prices, paper prices,

0:03:27.160 --> 0:03:30.320
<v Speaker 1>all these prices rising, but he's not quite willing to

0:03:30.440 --> 0:03:33.280
<v Speaker 1>raise prices more. And so when you look at the

0:03:33.320 --> 0:03:37.160
<v Speaker 1>next couple of months, how much inslation can consumers really

0:03:37.200 --> 0:03:39.320
<v Speaker 1>take and how much our company is going to have

0:03:39.360 --> 0:03:41.680
<v Speaker 1>to start eating the costs well, and that is the

0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:44.320
<v Speaker 1>big question. And and Chippotle has done a great job

0:03:44.440 --> 0:03:48.440
<v Speaker 1>of continuing to raise prices and maintain profit margins. But

0:03:48.520 --> 0:03:51.560
<v Speaker 1>to your point, how far can they go and how

0:03:51.600 --> 0:03:54.800
<v Speaker 1>far will the consumers allow these companies to go? So

0:03:54.880 --> 0:03:57.760
<v Speaker 1>I think now is when you start seeing us some

0:03:58.000 --> 0:04:00.839
<v Speaker 1>consumers just saying In fact, a recent poll that came

0:04:00.840 --> 0:04:06.480
<v Speaker 1>out said of Americans, we're looking to decrease their expenses

0:04:06.800 --> 0:04:10.240
<v Speaker 1>because of their concerns of inflation, because of the cost

0:04:10.320 --> 0:04:13.640
<v Speaker 1>of goods rising, right, And we're also looking for the

0:04:13.680 --> 0:04:18.520
<v Speaker 1>consumers to be shifting from good spending to services spending.

0:04:18.880 --> 0:04:20.599
<v Speaker 1>And so we do see there. I think there's going

0:04:20.640 --> 0:04:25.200
<v Speaker 1>to be some weakness there on durables as consumers then

0:04:25.279 --> 0:04:29.279
<v Speaker 1>shift over to services and hopefully do some shifting, you know,

0:04:29.360 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 1>like we're seeing in travel. Yeah, And I got to

0:04:32.240 --> 0:04:35.040
<v Speaker 1>ask here. I mean, we've we've seen all of these

0:04:35.400 --> 0:04:37.920
<v Speaker 1>really just downside moves, a lot of stocks just tanking

0:04:38.480 --> 0:04:41.680
<v Speaker 1>across the board. Where are the dip buyers? Where are

0:04:41.680 --> 0:04:44.040
<v Speaker 1>the what the dip buyers? Dip buyers? You would think

0:04:44.080 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 1>if it sells off long enough, someone would say, well,

0:04:46.440 --> 0:04:49.200
<v Speaker 1>that's that's a state, right right, right, Well, we've got

0:04:49.279 --> 0:04:52.120
<v Speaker 1>some cash on the sidelines for that very purpose, and

0:04:52.200 --> 0:04:55.360
<v Speaker 1>we don't see capitulation yet, So I think the dip

0:04:55.440 --> 0:04:58.880
<v Speaker 1>buyers are looking for capitulation, which I don't think we've

0:04:58.880 --> 0:05:01.440
<v Speaker 1>seen yet, So I still see some more downside pressure.

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:05.680
<v Speaker 1>I think for any big bank or asset manager, the

0:05:05.800 --> 0:05:08.839
<v Speaker 1>question is what's the low what's the downside? How do

0:05:08.920 --> 0:05:11.240
<v Speaker 1>you know? And and frankly it's a question for anyone

0:05:11.279 --> 0:05:14.200
<v Speaker 1>who's looking to buy a stock, So how how low

0:05:14.240 --> 0:05:17.400
<v Speaker 1>can it go from here? SMP for example, Well, we've

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:21.360
<v Speaker 1>already seen a correction, so we're in correction territory. And

0:05:21.800 --> 0:05:24.520
<v Speaker 1>the big question when you're in a correction is are

0:05:24.560 --> 0:05:27.159
<v Speaker 1>you heading into a recession? Because if we are heading

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:29.839
<v Speaker 1>into a recession, there could be quite a bit more

0:05:29.920 --> 0:05:33.240
<v Speaker 1>downside pressure. However, when we look at a lot of

0:05:33.279 --> 0:05:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the data, including employment, numbers which continue to be very strong,

0:05:37.880 --> 0:05:41.600
<v Speaker 1>and the demand for employers to hire more people. When

0:05:41.640 --> 0:05:44.880
<v Speaker 1>we look at that, we still see the economy being strong.

0:05:44.920 --> 0:05:48.039
<v Speaker 1>When we look at p m I manufacturing numbers still

0:05:48.200 --> 0:05:50.839
<v Speaker 1>very strong. So you know, I think we will see

0:05:50.880 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 1>some capitulation. Hard to know exactly where that bottom is

0:05:53.920 --> 0:05:56.520
<v Speaker 1>going to be, but we're probably pretty close before we

0:05:56.560 --> 0:06:00.040
<v Speaker 1>start seeing some more rallies. Well, Laureen Gilbert found to

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:02.280
<v Speaker 1>see a Wealthwise Financial Services joining us right here in

0:06:02.320 --> 0:06:05.240
<v Speaker 1>our interactive broker studio, making the track all the way

0:06:05.360 --> 0:06:12.640
<v Speaker 1>from Dallas, Texas. Let's stick with the market perspective. Because

0:06:12.640 --> 0:06:15.360
<v Speaker 1>we talked about G ten currencies with John Authors, we've

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:17.039
<v Speaker 1>got to talk about the e M side of things.

0:06:17.040 --> 0:06:20.800
<v Speaker 1>There are so many countries out there who who have

0:06:21.000 --> 0:06:23.320
<v Speaker 1>a whole other set of issues that the average American

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 1>probably can't even fathom. No better person to break it

0:06:27.120 --> 0:06:30.400
<v Speaker 1>all down with then Damien sass Our, chief EM fixed

0:06:30.440 --> 0:06:33.480
<v Speaker 1>income strategist at Bloomberg Intelligence. We just like to call

0:06:33.560 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 1>him the master of e M over here. But we're

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 1>so good, so good, so good, and and decided to

0:06:41.040 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 1>come into the office today, which we extra appreciate. Damian.

0:06:44.480 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Let's start with these Chinese lockdowns, how seriously should we

0:06:47.720 --> 0:06:49.760
<v Speaker 1>be taking them? We need to be taking them seriously.

0:06:49.800 --> 0:06:51.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you look at the mobility data which

0:06:51.360 --> 0:06:54.800
<v Speaker 1>everybody is talking about Shanghai and Ningbao, poor congestion is

0:06:54.880 --> 0:06:57.280
<v Speaker 1>still egregious. And you know, basically if you just look

0:06:57.279 --> 0:07:01.240
<v Speaker 1>at peak traffic in in Shanghai, it's running at lower

0:07:01.240 --> 0:07:03.040
<v Speaker 1>than on a year over year basis. If you look

0:07:03.080 --> 0:07:06.360
<v Speaker 1>at the two major airports in Shanghai, I think capacities

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:09.360
<v Speaker 1>running up below ten percent. So certainly the lockdowns are

0:07:09.360 --> 0:07:11.960
<v Speaker 1>having an impact. But really the story in China isn't China.

0:07:12.160 --> 0:07:14.440
<v Speaker 1>It's the Japanese yen and the fact that we have

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:16.600
<v Speaker 1>seen this depreciation of the end and how that's spilling

0:07:16.640 --> 0:07:18.760
<v Speaker 1>over into the broader Asian block. I mean, that is

0:07:18.800 --> 0:07:20.880
<v Speaker 1>really why you see China u on now it's six

0:07:21.080 --> 0:07:23.760
<v Speaker 1>sixty three. Just to put things in perspective, that is

0:07:23.800 --> 0:07:27.520
<v Speaker 1>a thirty big figure move this month alone. We haven't

0:07:27.520 --> 0:07:30.280
<v Speaker 1>seen something like that since, so I think that's got

0:07:30.320 --> 0:07:32.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people's attentions. And certainly the Korean juan

0:07:32.760 --> 0:07:35.320
<v Speaker 1>and some mothers are are are are are depreciating as well,

0:07:35.360 --> 0:07:37.320
<v Speaker 1>so you know, it's got a broader impact on Asia

0:07:37.680 --> 0:07:39.520
<v Speaker 1>and that's spilling over into the broader young pop U

0:07:39.920 --> 0:07:42.440
<v Speaker 1>m complex. Do we get a seven handle on the Uan?

0:07:42.640 --> 0:07:44.720
<v Speaker 1>What do you think? I think that's definitely possible. I

0:07:44.760 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 1>mean we were there just a few years back, right

0:07:46.520 --> 0:07:49.160
<v Speaker 1>during the during you know, the Trump and the trade war.

0:07:49.240 --> 0:07:51.800
<v Speaker 1>But I think you know, for me, it's it's it's

0:07:51.840 --> 0:07:54.040
<v Speaker 1>it's about the near term. And if you look at

0:07:54.040 --> 0:07:57.320
<v Speaker 1>the offshore on shore China Uan basis, we're now running

0:07:57.360 --> 0:08:00.680
<v Speaker 1>it close to four hundred pips. That's like on three

0:08:00.840 --> 0:08:03.320
<v Speaker 1>three and a half standard deviations above the five year average.

0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:05.400
<v Speaker 1>So that just shows the stress. Let's be clear, the

0:08:05.680 --> 0:08:08.840
<v Speaker 1>ento you on has a two percent band on either side,

0:08:08.840 --> 0:08:10.560
<v Speaker 1>so it's kind of managed by the government. It's not

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:12.560
<v Speaker 1>allowed to move as freely as the offshore you on.

0:08:13.120 --> 0:08:15.080
<v Speaker 1>And so this offshore you on is starting to really

0:08:15.120 --> 0:08:18.640
<v Speaker 1>depreciate aggressively, which is you know, a sign of capital flight.

0:08:19.280 --> 0:08:21.080
<v Speaker 1>So this is why they put me in Cretty together.

0:08:21.080 --> 0:08:22.960
<v Speaker 1>It's the one to punch. She gives you the Macara,

0:08:23.400 --> 0:08:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the trading strategy, so you know, the carry trade. Can

0:08:27.040 --> 0:08:29.200
<v Speaker 1>you explain how this is playing out on Wall Street?

0:08:29.200 --> 0:08:32.400
<v Speaker 1>And really what Critty has kept on outlining here truly

0:08:32.520 --> 0:08:35.640
<v Speaker 1>is a historic moment for markets. Yeah, there are there

0:08:35.679 --> 0:08:38.800
<v Speaker 1>are really three primary factors when you're looking at investing

0:08:38.800 --> 0:08:42.320
<v Speaker 1>in currencies, right, There's there's carry what you mentioned, there's value,

0:08:42.320 --> 0:08:44.679
<v Speaker 1>and there's trend. But the carry element of it has

0:08:44.679 --> 0:08:46.960
<v Speaker 1>been very, very volatile. So anybody who has been investing

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:50.640
<v Speaker 1>in carry trades the the e M currency volatility has

0:08:50.679 --> 0:08:53.800
<v Speaker 1>made it very very prohibitive to take advantage of that strategy.

0:08:53.840 --> 0:08:57.240
<v Speaker 1>And it's still look am currency volatility is still relatively high.

0:08:57.320 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's not high relative to fixed income equity,

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:03.240
<v Speaker 1>but it's certainly high relative to d MS. But d

0:09:03.400 --> 0:09:05.160
<v Speaker 1>M f X is now starting to take up higher

0:09:05.200 --> 0:09:07.959
<v Speaker 1>as well, so that may actually make the carry trade

0:09:08.000 --> 0:09:10.440
<v Speaker 1>look a little bit a little bit more attractive. And

0:09:10.480 --> 0:09:13.600
<v Speaker 1>certainly we have resource rich high carry currencies in Latin

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:17.920
<v Speaker 1>America like Brazil, Chile, Colombia even which which stand out,

0:09:17.920 --> 0:09:19.959
<v Speaker 1>I mean you know that as being perhaps a good

0:09:19.960 --> 0:09:22.560
<v Speaker 1>place to park your money and basically watch the paint dry.

0:09:22.640 --> 0:09:25.839
<v Speaker 1>If if the volatility fits. Translation here, the people who

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 1>have made a lot of money in the first three

0:09:27.440 --> 0:09:29.240
<v Speaker 1>months of the year are about to make a lot

0:09:29.280 --> 0:09:31.920
<v Speaker 1>more money trading currencies in the next two months of

0:09:31.920 --> 0:09:34.479
<v Speaker 1>the year. But you know these do have devastating consequences.

0:09:34.520 --> 0:09:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's let's be clear for many emerging markets. Damon, Yeah no,

0:09:38.240 --> 0:09:40.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, you know you can't ignore the currency

0:09:40.600 --> 0:09:43.520
<v Speaker 1>impacted for for years and years now, I mean better

0:09:43.559 --> 0:09:45.680
<v Speaker 1>part of the last decade. If you're a fixed income investor,

0:09:45.800 --> 0:09:48.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean talking not just emerging market fixed income, developed

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:51.560
<v Speaker 1>market fixed income, you know you really didn't care so

0:09:51.640 --> 0:09:54.560
<v Speaker 1>much about about the currency impact because currency vall was

0:09:54.559 --> 0:09:57.080
<v Speaker 1>was was suppressed, it was low, and you're carrying so

0:09:57.120 --> 0:10:00.520
<v Speaker 1>well with bonds rallying. Now yields your fall a rising

0:10:00.520 --> 0:10:03.080
<v Speaker 1>and bond prices are falling and currency fall is high,

0:10:03.120 --> 0:10:05.400
<v Speaker 1>So you know you need to I mean, if you're

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:07.640
<v Speaker 1>fixed income investor, you've got to be an f X investor,

0:10:07.640 --> 0:10:10.600
<v Speaker 1>you've gotta look at the currency impact on your returns,

0:10:10.880 --> 0:10:14.240
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's growing in terms of the active contribution

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:16.520
<v Speaker 1>to total returns. So I mean, yeah, you know, to

0:10:16.559 --> 0:10:18.760
<v Speaker 1>your point, you really have to have a strategy about

0:10:18.800 --> 0:10:20.520
<v Speaker 1>how you're looking at currencies. I mean, I've heard a

0:10:20.520 --> 0:10:23.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of people talking about care. If you're a Japanese

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:26.480
<v Speaker 1>yet investor, it still makes sense to to carry in

0:10:26.600 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 1>US treasuries on a hedge basis and all this crazy stuff. Look,

0:10:29.920 --> 0:10:31.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of that's going by the wayside because the

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:35.000
<v Speaker 1>cost of funding across borders is going up incrementally as

0:10:35.000 --> 0:10:36.960
<v Speaker 1>we speak, and so I think it makes a lot

0:10:37.000 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 1>of those strategies a little bit more challenging and a

0:10:39.440 --> 0:10:42.480
<v Speaker 1>little bit more difficult to hold onto. Those interest rate

0:10:42.480 --> 0:10:45.320
<v Speaker 1>differentials are really messing with I think almost every other

0:10:45.440 --> 0:10:48.640
<v Speaker 1>every country in the world right now. As Michael mckeep

0:10:48.640 --> 0:10:51.120
<v Speaker 1>pointed out, the Federal Reserve really can't do anything about

0:10:51.120 --> 0:10:53.640
<v Speaker 1>it right there. This Their job is to focus on

0:10:53.640 --> 0:10:56.320
<v Speaker 1>the American economy, but we have to talk about as

0:10:56.640 --> 0:10:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Chanelie pointed out, the consequences for the e M space,

0:10:58.920 --> 0:11:01.920
<v Speaker 1>the food consequence. I really want to point out record

0:11:02.000 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 1>high food prices, especially when it comes to the bread

0:11:04.200 --> 0:11:07.040
<v Speaker 1>basket Egypt is something Tom Keane does not stop talking

0:11:07.080 --> 0:11:10.160
<v Speaker 1>about um. But there's other places as well that are

0:11:10.720 --> 0:11:13.840
<v Speaker 1>really going to be feeling the pinch of the food spot.

0:11:14.400 --> 0:11:18.200
<v Speaker 1>The food prices in addition to perhaps some other fears.

0:11:18.200 --> 0:11:21.320
<v Speaker 1>I am F Managing Director Crystallina gorgeva In at the

0:11:21.320 --> 0:11:25.200
<v Speaker 1>I'M of Spring Meetings underscoring the possibility of sovereign debt

0:11:25.280 --> 0:11:28.520
<v Speaker 1>crises in emerging markets? What is the likelihood of that?

0:11:28.679 --> 0:11:30.760
<v Speaker 1>So you're hitting on the nerve here, where will inflation

0:11:30.800 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 1>peak and how far will growth decline? Effectively, monetary tightening

0:11:34.320 --> 0:11:36.640
<v Speaker 1>is colliding with a it's it's colliding with the cost

0:11:36.720 --> 0:11:39.160
<v Speaker 1>of living crisis, specifically an emerging market. So you're right

0:11:39.200 --> 0:11:41.959
<v Speaker 1>to focus on you know, the Egypts, the Pakistans and

0:11:42.040 --> 0:11:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Nigeria's who are most at risk. I mean, the UN

0:11:44.280 --> 0:11:46.640
<v Speaker 1>International Food Price Index is something is up, something in

0:11:46.640 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 1>the order of seventy May. But let's talk about the

0:11:50.400 --> 0:11:52.440
<v Speaker 1>countries who are net food exporters, the ones that are

0:11:52.440 --> 0:11:54.880
<v Speaker 1>supposed to benefit. I think that's what isn't really being

0:11:54.880 --> 0:11:58.160
<v Speaker 1>talked about as much. So those countries Brazil, Chile, Thailand

0:11:58.400 --> 0:12:00.320
<v Speaker 1>are probably less at risk than some of the others.

0:12:00.320 --> 0:12:02.040
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's an interesting point that not a

0:12:02.040 --> 0:12:04.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of people are looking at the net food exporters

0:12:04.920 --> 0:12:07.040
<v Speaker 1>and how quite frankly, a lot of their currencies have

0:12:07.080 --> 0:12:11.880
<v Speaker 1>outperformed in amidst the crisis. I have a perhaps fun

0:12:12.000 --> 0:12:14.400
<v Speaker 1>slash not fun question. I know it's a dumb question.

0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:16.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna ask you to you anyway, we have to

0:12:16.640 --> 0:12:18.760
<v Speaker 1>talk about Russia. We we've talked about everything else, we

0:12:18.800 --> 0:12:21.760
<v Speaker 1>got to talk about Russia. It's pretty clear that if

0:12:21.840 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Russia ever perhaps rejoins uh the previous stage that it was,

0:12:27.080 --> 0:12:29.920
<v Speaker 1>and it might take years before before it does that

0:12:30.200 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 1>even in the best of circumstances. Does that mean the

0:12:33.640 --> 0:12:37.439
<v Speaker 1>no brainer trade here is to just buy CDs is

0:12:37.520 --> 0:12:39.720
<v Speaker 1>on Russian debt. No, I would not go near that.

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:41.640
<v Speaker 1>And and look, I mean it's not as a no

0:12:41.760 --> 0:12:43.920
<v Speaker 1>brainer trade because really the credit the fal Simat market

0:12:43.920 --> 0:12:46.520
<v Speaker 1>isn't open to retail investors or really to your average investor.

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:49.240
<v Speaker 1>It's more of an institutional headers market. But I think,

0:12:49.280 --> 0:12:51.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, just if we're focusing on Russia, we gotta

0:12:51.360 --> 0:12:53.200
<v Speaker 1>look to next week. May fourth is a key day.

0:12:53.920 --> 0:12:56.439
<v Speaker 1>That's when the grace period ends for the six hundred

0:12:56.480 --> 0:13:00.520
<v Speaker 1>and fifty million odd that Russia has paid its creditors roubles,

0:13:00.679 --> 0:13:02.760
<v Speaker 1>which would constitute a default in the eyes of the

0:13:02.840 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 1>raiding agency. So this could be again, you know, the first,

0:13:05.960 --> 0:13:08.360
<v Speaker 1>uh really the first of fault we've seen on external

0:13:08.400 --> 0:13:10.720
<v Speaker 1>debt from Russia in I mean since the early ten

0:13:10.840 --> 0:13:13.880
<v Speaker 1>nine hundreds. But I think what's also interesting is soon

0:13:13.920 --> 0:13:16.920
<v Speaker 1>thereafter we've got victory Day and that's when Russia prances.

0:13:16.960 --> 0:13:19.600
<v Speaker 1>It's military out there, they parade, they in the streets,

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:21.520
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of people are thinking that May nine,

0:13:21.600 --> 0:13:24.160
<v Speaker 1>that they're gonna want to deliver something to the Russian populace,

0:13:24.679 --> 0:13:26.679
<v Speaker 1>a victory of some sort, something in Ukraine that you

0:13:26.720 --> 0:13:28.640
<v Speaker 1>can hang your hat on. I think the one thing,

0:13:28.920 --> 0:13:31.120
<v Speaker 1>um you know about the Russia Ukraine War that's kind

0:13:31.120 --> 0:13:33.439
<v Speaker 1>of getting interesting here is you know, Ukraine's got a

0:13:33.480 --> 0:13:36.199
<v Speaker 1>lot of external debt outstanding. They've got GDP warrants and whatnot.

0:13:36.559 --> 0:13:39.000
<v Speaker 1>And if you're now the belief that Ukraine, whether or

0:13:39.040 --> 0:13:41.360
<v Speaker 1>not they come out of this, you know, in whatever

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:44.120
<v Speaker 1>form they come out of this, the positive goodwill and

0:13:44.160 --> 0:13:46.920
<v Speaker 1>the sentiment behind them, they're gonna have enough in the

0:13:47.000 --> 0:13:49.040
<v Speaker 1>kitty that these bonds are starting to look very very

0:13:49.040 --> 0:13:52.600
<v Speaker 1>attractive from a from a from an investor standpoint. And

0:13:52.640 --> 0:13:54.640
<v Speaker 1>so I think that's an interesting point amidst all of it,

0:13:54.720 --> 0:13:56.599
<v Speaker 1>is that you know, Ukraine, there is a place for

0:13:56.720 --> 0:14:00.040
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine debt and people's portfolios. It's gotten absolutely coabered. You

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:02.320
<v Speaker 1>look at CDs in Ukraine. I mean, it's just as

0:14:02.360 --> 0:14:04.520
<v Speaker 1>bad as Russia. But I would if I were I

0:14:04.520 --> 0:14:07.680
<v Speaker 1>guess a betting man, I'd probably rather put my money

0:14:07.679 --> 0:14:10.600
<v Speaker 1>in Ukraine CDs. Uh. Well, you know, looking for spreads

0:14:10.679 --> 0:14:14.359
<v Speaker 1>to tighten rather relative to Russia. Yeah, that's less controversial

0:14:14.360 --> 0:14:16.240
<v Speaker 1>of a trade to Yeah. Right, you can answer to

0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:18.679
<v Speaker 1>your fiduciaries a whole hell of a lot more easily. Well,

0:14:18.760 --> 0:14:20.600
<v Speaker 1>let's stick with the Russia theme here and talk about

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:22.840
<v Speaker 1>the ruble, because there are plenty of headlines that we're

0:14:22.840 --> 0:14:26.720
<v Speaker 1>bringing this back to our worldwide audience here. European buyers,

0:14:26.760 --> 0:14:28.880
<v Speaker 1>some of them paying in rubles, seving, some of them

0:14:28.920 --> 0:14:32.320
<v Speaker 1>refusing to pay in rubles and getting their gas flows halted. Poland,

0:14:32.360 --> 0:14:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Bulgaria come to mind. Is this potentially the start of

0:14:35.240 --> 0:14:38.240
<v Speaker 1>a broader move by Russia to block those flows, that's

0:14:38.240 --> 0:14:40.880
<v Speaker 1>the question. And how much of it is actually helping

0:14:40.920 --> 0:14:43.040
<v Speaker 1>the ruble? Well, let's put a date on it. May fifteen.

0:14:43.160 --> 0:14:45.760
<v Speaker 1>That's when the European gays to gas payments come do, right,

0:14:45.840 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 1>And that's when we're gonna get real color and clarity

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:50.360
<v Speaker 1>on how that's handled, specifically by the CE three, the

0:14:50.400 --> 0:14:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Eastern European block like Poland, Romania, Czech Republican, Hungary. I mean, look,

0:14:55.280 --> 0:14:57.880
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the Hungarian Fiens that currency has gotten.

0:14:57.920 --> 0:14:59.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they just had two high rates again and

0:14:59.360 --> 0:15:02.040
<v Speaker 1>it's still not doing anything to stem the bleeding on

0:15:02.040 --> 0:15:03.520
<v Speaker 1>on the foreign So I mean, you know, if you

0:15:03.520 --> 0:15:05.600
<v Speaker 1>look at some of these countries, now, let's just be clear,

0:15:05.880 --> 0:15:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Poland has definitively pivoted away from Russia, and you know,

0:15:09.800 --> 0:15:13.200
<v Speaker 1>we're obviously providing all sorts of arms to Ukraine and

0:15:13.320 --> 0:15:16.040
<v Speaker 1>very supportive. Hungry not so much, and so Hungry can't

0:15:16.040 --> 0:15:17.440
<v Speaker 1>get out of its own way, it seems. And it

0:15:17.480 --> 0:15:19.800
<v Speaker 1>seems like a lot of these countries that are kind

0:15:19.800 --> 0:15:22.240
<v Speaker 1>of like Serbia for example, that are kind of signing

0:15:22.240 --> 0:15:24.720
<v Speaker 1>with Russia, are really getting penalized in the capital markets

0:15:24.720 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 1>because of it. And I don't see that changing anytime soon.

0:15:26.680 --> 0:15:28.800
<v Speaker 1>So that's certainly something that you know, a lot of

0:15:28.840 --> 0:15:31.440
<v Speaker 1>investors are taking advantage of and that we're monitoring very closely.

0:15:32.080 --> 0:15:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Tabian sass Hour as brilliant as promised chief em Fixed

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Income Strategies over Bloomberg Intelligence. We thank you so much.

0:15:38.520 --> 0:15:41.240
<v Speaker 1>I literally think in the span of I'm just looking

0:15:41.240 --> 0:15:43.760
<v Speaker 1>at the clock here, ten minutes, we literally went around

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:48.760
<v Speaker 1>the world, right, so the world with you, pretty and

0:15:48.840 --> 0:15:50.800
<v Speaker 1>it is most fun to do it. With Damien, who

0:15:50.960 --> 0:15:54.200
<v Speaker 1>somehow knows everything about every detail of every bond being

0:15:54.200 --> 0:15:56.840
<v Speaker 1>traded in the world. And it's really I don't know

0:15:56.840 --> 0:15:58.480
<v Speaker 1>how well you know, guys. He comes in with his

0:15:58.520 --> 0:16:00.560
<v Speaker 1>piece of paper and I've got no it's with yellow

0:16:00.640 --> 0:16:05.040
<v Speaker 1>highlights on highlights ribbles. Let me tell you one time, Shinnali,

0:16:05.600 --> 0:16:07.200
<v Speaker 1>I caught him in the TV set and he's about

0:16:07.200 --> 0:16:08.800
<v Speaker 1>to throw this piece of paper and the recycling and

0:16:08.800 --> 0:16:11.000
<v Speaker 1>I said, no, I want that, and I still have it. Actually,

0:16:11.440 --> 0:16:14.640
<v Speaker 1>the other day Damien pulled up his screen, shared it

0:16:14.680 --> 0:16:17.760
<v Speaker 1>with me and went through all the different Russian bonds.

0:16:18.000 --> 0:16:20.600
<v Speaker 1>If only audience was as lucky as we are to

0:16:20.640 --> 0:16:23.680
<v Speaker 1>get inside access to Damien's mind. We know you are

0:16:23.720 --> 0:16:26.200
<v Speaker 1>a very busy man, Damien, so we will let you go,

0:16:26.360 --> 0:16:29.680
<v Speaker 1>release you of us picking your brains, which will not

0:16:29.720 --> 0:16:36.200
<v Speaker 1>stop anytime. Then. I think the strongest move here is

0:16:36.200 --> 0:16:39.040
<v Speaker 1>going to be in the currency market. Extremely strong dollar,

0:16:39.600 --> 0:16:42.640
<v Speaker 1>a one thirty on dollar. Yet who better to break

0:16:42.680 --> 0:16:45.640
<v Speaker 1>it all down with than Christina Quino, our team leader,

0:16:45.720 --> 0:16:48.040
<v Speaker 1>really the head of our coverage for FX and rates

0:16:48.040 --> 0:16:49.960
<v Speaker 1>based out of London. Christine, thank you so much for

0:16:50.040 --> 0:16:53.720
<v Speaker 1>joining us. How much lower can the Japanese yen fall.

0:16:53.760 --> 0:16:56.960
<v Speaker 1>How much weaker can it get? Well? Pretty I think

0:16:57.080 --> 0:16:59.560
<v Speaker 1>people now are starting to look at one thirty five

0:17:00.160 --> 0:17:02.600
<v Speaker 1>versus the US dollar as the next level to watch.

0:17:02.640 --> 0:17:05.679
<v Speaker 1>But you know, we really looking at a twenty year

0:17:05.800 --> 0:17:08.760
<v Speaker 1>history of of Japan's history of interventions, which there have

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:13.040
<v Speaker 1>been several I think was the past trigger for end

0:17:13.080 --> 0:17:18.960
<v Speaker 1>weakness that convinced policymakers to jump in and strengthen the currency.

0:17:19.040 --> 0:17:21.080
<v Speaker 1>So that's definitely going to be a key level to

0:17:21.119 --> 0:17:23.399
<v Speaker 1>watch as well. But certainly it seems like there's a

0:17:23.440 --> 0:17:26.199
<v Speaker 1>lot of upper momentums here, probably a lot more end

0:17:26.240 --> 0:17:29.159
<v Speaker 1>weakness to come. I mean, we're also saying weakness in

0:17:29.200 --> 0:17:30.760
<v Speaker 1>the euro here, right one oh five and one. It's

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:33.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna comes down to the same story, these interest rate differentials,

0:17:33.840 --> 0:17:38.440
<v Speaker 1>an inflationary environment, a hawkish federal reserve. A lot of

0:17:38.480 --> 0:17:41.040
<v Speaker 1>people are calling for parody on the euro dollar. How

0:17:41.080 --> 0:17:43.040
<v Speaker 1>long will it take to get us there? And what

0:17:43.200 --> 0:17:47.120
<v Speaker 1>happens when you get parody? Well, cratty, you know, we

0:17:47.200 --> 0:17:50.320
<v Speaker 1>already have a number of forecasters saying that parody is

0:17:50.359 --> 0:17:53.040
<v Speaker 1>going to come in a matter of months, so potentially

0:17:53.800 --> 0:17:56.760
<v Speaker 1>by the summer months here in the Northern Hemisphere and

0:17:57.080 --> 0:18:01.080
<v Speaker 1>what that actually means in terms of hitting that level

0:18:01.119 --> 0:18:03.280
<v Speaker 1>is it's quite a significant level. Of course, it's it's

0:18:03.320 --> 0:18:06.120
<v Speaker 1>something that we haven't seen in years and years over

0:18:06.160 --> 0:18:09.360
<v Speaker 1>here in in Europe and potentially a very very big

0:18:09.400 --> 0:18:14.040
<v Speaker 1>implications depending on whether you're an exporting company in Germany

0:18:14.160 --> 0:18:18.840
<v Speaker 1>or whether you're an energy importing economy elsewhere in the

0:18:18.920 --> 0:18:21.399
<v Speaker 1>year Zone. You know, because again the level of your

0:18:21.400 --> 0:18:24.680
<v Speaker 1>exchange it really determines how much pricing power, or rather

0:18:24.760 --> 0:18:27.560
<v Speaker 1>how much purchasing power you have internationally. And so if

0:18:27.560 --> 0:18:30.480
<v Speaker 1>you're an exporter, good for you. If you are someone

0:18:30.520 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 1>who's buying up for instance, energy or supplies or anything

0:18:34.480 --> 0:18:37.480
<v Speaker 1>that kind of counts as intermediate goods, then your costs

0:18:37.520 --> 0:18:40.439
<v Speaker 1>are probably going to be a lot higher. Well, Christina

0:18:40.440 --> 0:18:41.919
<v Speaker 1>and Kane, now I mean I think you hit it

0:18:42.040 --> 0:18:44.959
<v Speaker 1>right on the head ahead of our FS and rate coverage.

0:18:44.960 --> 0:18:47.919
<v Speaker 1>Coming out of the heart of the currency exchanges in London.

0:18:51.760 --> 0:18:53.439
<v Speaker 1>We also have John Authors. I want to pose the

0:18:53.440 --> 0:18:57.520
<v Speaker 1>same questions we pose to Mike to John John Authors

0:18:57.520 --> 0:19:00.640
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomer Opinion. Thank you again for joining us UM.

0:19:00.800 --> 0:19:03.600
<v Speaker 1>One of the things we have to discuss here to

0:19:03.720 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 1>you specifically is the currency which is not in the end,

0:19:06.720 --> 0:19:09.040
<v Speaker 1>not in these e M currencies down the pound, but

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:11.840
<v Speaker 1>in the Euro. For our listeners who don't know this,

0:19:12.040 --> 0:19:16.919
<v Speaker 1>John Authors has written several books on the European crisis

0:19:17.160 --> 0:19:21.840
<v Speaker 1>of the last decade. And I'm curious about the parody question.

0:19:21.840 --> 0:19:24.399
<v Speaker 1>We're looking at one or four on euro dollars. Is

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:28.800
<v Speaker 1>parody realistic? Yes, Its just though it is at the

0:19:28.840 --> 0:19:32.800
<v Speaker 1>moment very startled to be able to say that. But

0:19:33.080 --> 0:19:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the current trajectory, it's quite difficult to see how that

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:41.280
<v Speaker 1>gets interrupted. It requires the e c B to be,

0:19:42.560 --> 0:19:46.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, to change its approach in a way that

0:19:46.600 --> 0:19:50.960
<v Speaker 1>could be very damaging for its credibility to make quite

0:19:50.960 --> 0:19:53.960
<v Speaker 1>a strong u turn. If if we're not going to

0:19:54.040 --> 0:19:59.439
<v Speaker 1>see the dollar continue to continue to strengthen, if we

0:19:59.520 --> 0:20:02.639
<v Speaker 1>do continue to see the dollars continue to see the

0:20:02.720 --> 0:20:07.320
<v Speaker 1>dollar strengthening, what ramifications does that have globally, especially for

0:20:07.440 --> 0:20:15.280
<v Speaker 1>emerging markets, which would be very negatively tilted towards the scenario. Yes, um,

0:20:15.320 --> 0:20:18.040
<v Speaker 1>I do think it's fair to say that emerging markets

0:20:18.040 --> 0:20:21.359
<v Speaker 1>are less vulnerable to a strong dollar than they have

0:20:21.400 --> 0:20:25.040
<v Speaker 1>been in the past because they tend, with some exceptions,

0:20:25.080 --> 0:20:30.760
<v Speaker 1>to be less dependent on dollar denominated debt. That being said, plainly,

0:20:30.800 --> 0:20:34.920
<v Speaker 1>this is still an alarming situation, particularly if you are

0:20:35.000 --> 0:20:39.080
<v Speaker 1>not a commodity bought backed currency. So for example, the

0:20:39.160 --> 0:20:43.119
<v Speaker 1>Korean one has come under under pressure recently. UM. It

0:20:43.240 --> 0:20:51.440
<v Speaker 1>has fascinating, fascinating impact on China, which is now allowing

0:20:51.480 --> 0:20:56.520
<v Speaker 1>its currency to weaken in a very swift way. But

0:20:57.600 --> 0:21:00.480
<v Speaker 1>this can't be seen as some kind of an attempt

0:21:00.560 --> 0:21:02.600
<v Speaker 1>to get ahead of the game as it was twenty

0:21:02.680 --> 0:21:07.160
<v Speaker 1>years ago in an artificially weak currency. And then the

0:21:07.359 --> 0:21:15.000
<v Speaker 1>yen is altogether extraordinary if you truly a historic moment

0:21:15.040 --> 0:21:22.240
<v Speaker 1>on Dolian, and that has the important implications for China

0:21:22.400 --> 0:21:27.439
<v Speaker 1>because obviously China cares about its relative competitiveness compared to

0:21:28.320 --> 0:21:32.280
<v Speaker 1>compared to the end, and the Chinese currency started to

0:21:32.359 --> 0:21:36.119
<v Speaker 1>turn down once it had reached the level at which

0:21:36.880 --> 0:21:40.480
<v Speaker 1>to the yen, which it reversed course back in twif

0:21:40.880 --> 0:21:45.920
<v Speaker 1>causing you know, minor crisis. Elaborate on that a little bit.

0:21:46.080 --> 0:21:50.800
<v Speaker 1>What levels does China have, especially because we're thinking about

0:21:50.840 --> 0:21:55.119
<v Speaker 1>this in the context also of the China lockdowns in China, UM,

0:21:55.160 --> 0:21:57.560
<v Speaker 1>how do we think about the ability of the country

0:21:57.560 --> 0:22:02.600
<v Speaker 1>to control its currency. Here well, it continues to control

0:22:02.720 --> 0:22:05.680
<v Speaker 1>capital in a much greater way than anyone else. It's

0:22:05.680 --> 0:22:09.640
<v Speaker 1>it's an odd hybrid currency where it is um subject

0:22:09.760 --> 0:22:13.119
<v Speaker 1>to market winds, market forces, but it's also subject to

0:22:13.200 --> 0:22:16.280
<v Speaker 1>the whims of the of the leadership. So there is

0:22:16.320 --> 0:22:20.879
<v Speaker 1>some there is some possibility there you can continue. You

0:22:21.000 --> 0:22:26.840
<v Speaker 1>could continue to see, um, the China actually abandon its

0:22:26.840 --> 0:22:33.119
<v Speaker 1>hopes for fiding up the light word the real estate sector,

0:22:33.160 --> 0:22:35.800
<v Speaker 1>for for for moving away from any risk of a

0:22:36.080 --> 0:22:38.120
<v Speaker 1>of a Lehman style incidents in China. You could see

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:41.000
<v Speaker 1>them just decide, Okay, we're going to we're going to

0:22:41.080 --> 0:22:44.600
<v Speaker 1>print money again. We're going to let the credits figots

0:22:44.680 --> 0:22:49.000
<v Speaker 1>open again. Very intriguingly, despite everything kind of really hasn't

0:22:49.640 --> 0:22:52.320
<v Speaker 1>done that this time around, or anything like the extent

0:22:52.480 --> 0:22:55.879
<v Speaker 1>it's had with all its previous growth slowdowns over the

0:22:55.960 --> 0:22:58.879
<v Speaker 1>last twenties. So I guess that's one main thing they

0:22:58.880 --> 0:23:02.639
<v Speaker 1>could do which would make a lot of people very happy. Money.

0:23:02.760 --> 0:23:05.760
<v Speaker 1>What does this all mean in the context of reserves.

0:23:06.200 --> 0:23:09.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, when we started, when when Russia's war in

0:23:09.400 --> 0:23:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine had started, there was a large conversation about the

0:23:12.000 --> 0:23:14.800
<v Speaker 1>dollar being the reserve currency of the world. And now

0:23:14.840 --> 0:23:17.440
<v Speaker 1>with the dollar strengthening as it is, you know, does

0:23:17.520 --> 0:23:21.040
<v Speaker 1>it still pose questions about the meaning of the dollar

0:23:21.280 --> 0:23:26.400
<v Speaker 1>for for countries around the world. Yes, one of the

0:23:27.240 --> 0:23:31.560
<v Speaker 1>really interesting suggestions Creaty could tell you. I'm also very

0:23:31.560 --> 0:23:34.320
<v Speaker 1>interested in the Britain Woods agreement, which finally ended fifty

0:23:34.400 --> 0:23:37.520
<v Speaker 1>years ago. I think it makes it makes it appearance

0:23:37.560 --> 0:23:39.840
<v Speaker 1>almost every other sense. I'm Indian, and so it's pretty

0:23:39.960 --> 0:23:45.280
<v Speaker 1>So we understand the meaning of gold. Well, you do

0:23:45.480 --> 0:23:51.760
<v Speaker 1>have the monetary global politics behind Russia saying they're going

0:23:51.800 --> 0:23:55.240
<v Speaker 1>to back the ruble with gold as an attempt to

0:23:55.320 --> 0:23:59.520
<v Speaker 1>make them established themselves as some kind of a plausible,

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:09.640
<v Speaker 1>um applausible second alternative currency and asking for payment in rubles.

0:24:09.680 --> 0:24:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Because this was actually a move made way back when

0:24:14.680 --> 0:24:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Nixon had pulled out of Breton Woods. They were no

0:24:17.560 --> 0:24:20.919
<v Speaker 1>longer the dollar was no longer backed by gold, but

0:24:21.320 --> 0:24:25.800
<v Speaker 1>they extracting an agreement that from OPEC that oil transactions

0:24:25.800 --> 0:24:28.080
<v Speaker 1>would be denominated in dollars, which meant that you did

0:24:28.119 --> 0:24:31.399
<v Speaker 1>have some kind of an oil standard to replace the

0:24:31.440 --> 0:24:35.320
<v Speaker 1>gold standard. Um, if you try to bring that under challenge,

0:24:35.520 --> 0:24:41.040
<v Speaker 1>that's a big deal. So yes, you you the risk here,

0:24:41.480 --> 0:24:45.640
<v Speaker 1>and China is the pivot on this. Russia's obviously committed

0:24:45.640 --> 0:24:50.280
<v Speaker 1>to its confrontational course. China has to decide if it's

0:24:50.320 --> 0:24:53.440
<v Speaker 1>prepared to throw in its lot into more of an

0:24:53.480 --> 0:25:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Eastern Asian block and rather than continue to steadily tensively

0:25:02.400 --> 0:25:06.320
<v Speaker 1>become more a part of the Western bloc. John, this

0:25:06.400 --> 0:25:08.399
<v Speaker 1>is a conversation that's not just hitting the b o

0:25:08.520 --> 0:25:11.720
<v Speaker 1>J or the p BOC for that matter. This is

0:25:11.760 --> 0:25:15.760
<v Speaker 1>a truly global conversation in terms of gtawn currency. Sweden,

0:25:15.840 --> 0:25:18.960
<v Speaker 1>for example, Essential Bank of Sweden, the Reichs Bank hiking

0:25:19.000 --> 0:25:21.840
<v Speaker 1>their rates today a really big u turn when it

0:25:21.840 --> 0:25:24.560
<v Speaker 1>comes to montery global policy. I think no one said

0:25:24.560 --> 0:25:27.480
<v Speaker 1>it better than one of our guests on Bloomberg Surveillance

0:25:27.560 --> 0:25:30.560
<v Speaker 1>this morning, when then he was a currency strategist on

0:25:30.720 --> 0:25:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Brown Brothers Harriman. He said, yeah, he said, the ricks

0:25:33.880 --> 0:25:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Bank delivered a rate hike, and when they're more hawkish

0:25:37.040 --> 0:25:39.760
<v Speaker 1>than you, that's saying something. So I think when it

0:25:39.800 --> 0:25:42.800
<v Speaker 1>comes to a lot of these kind of more devish

0:25:43.160 --> 0:25:46.240
<v Speaker 1>governments or or central banks, the b o J, the

0:25:46.280 --> 0:25:49.640
<v Speaker 1>p b o C, is there anything that they can

0:25:49.680 --> 0:25:53.520
<v Speaker 1>really do currency intervention aside to kind of stop this

0:25:53.600 --> 0:25:58.720
<v Speaker 1>falling knife. I'm supposed to be able to have a

0:25:58.760 --> 0:26:02.160
<v Speaker 1>good answer to that, I'm saying it's in the case

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:07.160
<v Speaker 1>of in the case in the case of most of them,

0:26:07.200 --> 0:26:10.639
<v Speaker 1>it's that they can they can, they can tighten. In

0:26:10.680 --> 0:26:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the case of Japan, where you still have much lower inflation,

0:26:17.760 --> 0:26:21.720
<v Speaker 1>I guess it is plausible for them to continue on

0:26:21.720 --> 0:26:26.359
<v Speaker 1>their their current course. In the case of the e

0:26:26.440 --> 0:26:30.360
<v Speaker 1>c B, it's very much more painful because obviously they

0:26:30.400 --> 0:26:35.359
<v Speaker 1>really do have an inflation problem. But in the you know,

0:26:35.440 --> 0:26:38.840
<v Speaker 1>the inheritance from the crisis. You know, it's almost a

0:26:38.880 --> 0:26:42.880
<v Speaker 1>decade since drug he said, whatever it takes, so it's

0:26:42.920 --> 0:26:45.280
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a long way back, but you can still

0:26:45.320 --> 0:26:49.760
<v Speaker 1>see its effect. The peripheral European countries still have very

0:26:49.840 --> 0:26:55.480
<v Speaker 1>high unemployment by by the standards of of the West. Um,

0:26:55.480 --> 0:27:01.080
<v Speaker 1>it's what they what they can do is tighten uh

0:27:01.119 --> 0:27:05.879
<v Speaker 1>and that's by strengthening the Euro. Would reduce inflation that

0:27:05.920 --> 0:27:09.880
<v Speaker 1>way as well, but they really don't want to because

0:27:10.280 --> 0:27:13.760
<v Speaker 1>their economy is in a more palless state than than

0:27:13.800 --> 0:27:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the States. I suspect that the CP has no choice

0:27:17.040 --> 0:27:21.240
<v Speaker 1>but to to tighten, but I wouldn't more aggressively than

0:27:21.280 --> 0:27:25.320
<v Speaker 1>they're currently suggesting. I think that's the way. Christine Legard

0:27:25.359 --> 0:27:28.240
<v Speaker 1>seems to be going last week and everything that's happened

0:27:28.280 --> 0:27:31.480
<v Speaker 1>since would intensify the pressure for her to do so.

0:27:31.640 --> 0:27:34.560
<v Speaker 1>But it's there are no good solutions for the CP

0:27:34.680 --> 0:27:36.800
<v Speaker 1>at this point. I mean, I have to ask when

0:27:36.800 --> 0:27:39.360
<v Speaker 1>it comes to I mean, let's tie all of these

0:27:39.359 --> 0:27:41.640
<v Speaker 1>things together, right. We have currency weakness on the one hand,

0:27:41.880 --> 0:27:44.760
<v Speaker 1>you have recession odds really hitting I think Europe the

0:27:44.800 --> 0:27:49.320
<v Speaker 1>hardest of all three regions. I mean, just recently when

0:27:49.320 --> 0:27:52.320
<v Speaker 1>you look at the market narrative questions about a growth

0:27:52.720 --> 0:27:55.679
<v Speaker 1>not slow down, but like a complete stop to growth

0:27:55.760 --> 0:27:58.600
<v Speaker 1>has really taken over these markets. This idea that if

0:27:58.640 --> 0:28:02.800
<v Speaker 1>you have COVID lockdowns can hinue in China, Americans for example,

0:28:02.800 --> 0:28:05.480
<v Speaker 1>will not get the physical goods. At the same time

0:28:05.720 --> 0:28:09.800
<v Speaker 1>that American purchasing power is actually increasing. So I mean

0:28:09.920 --> 0:28:12.960
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot going on here, John, And I mean

0:28:13.280 --> 0:28:15.800
<v Speaker 1>I wish we could have an hour or so with you,

0:28:16.480 --> 0:28:23.360
<v Speaker 1>because I mean a podcast even would be handy. But yeah,

0:28:23.400 --> 0:28:26.119
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I mean it, this, this really is fascinating.

0:28:26.119 --> 0:28:28.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we're gonna stick with you or we're actually

0:28:29.040 --> 0:28:31.440
<v Speaker 1>going to bring you back for Nope, We're gonna stick

0:28:31.480 --> 0:28:33.720
<v Speaker 1>with you. A lot going on here, A lot of

0:28:33.760 --> 0:28:36.040
<v Speaker 1>balls to be juggling for our listeners. We are waiting

0:28:36.320 --> 0:28:39.400
<v Speaker 1>a press conference from President Biden to discuss his latest

0:28:39.680 --> 0:28:42.960
<v Speaker 1>American assistance for Ukraine to stick with us as we

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:45.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of balance everything going on in the market with

0:28:45.880 --> 0:28:50.520
<v Speaker 1>everything going on with the geopolitics as well. But John, quickly,

0:28:50.560 --> 0:28:53.080
<v Speaker 1>if I can post to you, how do you square this?

0:28:53.200 --> 0:28:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Are these growth fears in the market really worth considering?

0:28:59.680 --> 0:29:05.880
<v Speaker 1>I I would have said no with greater confidence before

0:29:05.880 --> 0:29:11.000
<v Speaker 1>the GDP number came out this morning, which did genuinely

0:29:11.040 --> 0:29:15.320
<v Speaker 1>surprised me. Um, A lot of this is about timing.

0:29:16.040 --> 0:29:18.240
<v Speaker 1>There's going to be another recession at some point. All

0:29:18.280 --> 0:29:22.080
<v Speaker 1>of economic history tells you that periodically economy is slowed down.

0:29:23.040 --> 0:29:27.520
<v Speaker 1>The question is how quickly it comes and whether the

0:29:27.600 --> 0:29:32.680
<v Speaker 1>market has got ahead of itself in thinking that the

0:29:32.720 --> 0:29:34.800
<v Speaker 1>economic logic is going to play out so that we

0:29:34.840 --> 0:29:38.840
<v Speaker 1>actually have a recession this year, which I don't think

0:29:38.960 --> 0:29:41.200
<v Speaker 1>is is very likely. The amount of the amount of

0:29:41.200 --> 0:29:44.480
<v Speaker 1>consumer strength, particularly here in there in the US, makes

0:29:44.520 --> 0:29:49.640
<v Speaker 1>it hard to to make that assertion. That said, it

0:29:49.680 --> 0:29:56.680
<v Speaker 1>does look as though, um, the economy is already feeling

0:29:56.840 --> 0:29:59.560
<v Speaker 1>some of the effects. Who are just talking about that

0:30:00.680 --> 0:30:04.320
<v Speaker 1>that inflation is beginning to destroy demand, that that there

0:30:04.360 --> 0:30:08.720
<v Speaker 1>have been the issues caused that that the renewed supply

0:30:08.840 --> 0:30:14.200
<v Speaker 1>chain problems have had an effect. Um. The one big

0:30:14.360 --> 0:30:19.320
<v Speaker 1>possibility that, trying to be positive, I'd like to this

0:30:19.440 --> 0:30:22.600
<v Speaker 1>is this is something Dari Perkins at TS Lombard but

0:30:22.960 --> 0:30:27.160
<v Speaker 1>which which was that if the economy flows a little

0:30:27.400 --> 0:30:33.240
<v Speaker 1>quicker and a little earlier, it becomes more possible to

0:30:34.120 --> 0:30:39.080
<v Speaker 1>get out of this without engineering a really serious recession.

0:30:39.160 --> 0:30:43.160
<v Speaker 1>You could become more like a mid cycle slowdown or

0:30:43.200 --> 0:30:52.480
<v Speaker 1>a very shallow recession. Allab I'm wondering about the recessionary

0:30:52.520 --> 0:30:54.840
<v Speaker 1>impacts that we might see here. I mean the fact

0:30:55.120 --> 0:30:59.880
<v Speaker 1>that this might have really serious ramifications for inequality moving forward.

0:31:00.920 --> 0:31:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Have you thought about what this could mean in terms of,

0:31:03.440 --> 0:31:05.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, coming out of pandemic where already the rich

0:31:05.880 --> 0:31:08.560
<v Speaker 1>got richer, the poor got poorer, and they're facing inflation

0:31:08.600 --> 0:31:11.360
<v Speaker 1>where you can't pay for food. So what would a

0:31:11.400 --> 0:31:17.880
<v Speaker 1>recession then due to that backdrop, it's we're now getting

0:31:17.880 --> 0:31:21.440
<v Speaker 1>into areas it's really painful even to even the councidence.

0:31:22.160 --> 0:31:24.719
<v Speaker 1>One thing that has been positive about the last twelve

0:31:24.760 --> 0:31:33.000
<v Speaker 1>months is that inequality has actually dampened somewhat because there's

0:31:33.000 --> 0:31:37.680
<v Speaker 1>been greater earning power and greater negotiating power for people

0:31:38.040 --> 0:31:41.360
<v Speaker 1>on low wages, so that there has been some sign

0:31:42.240 --> 0:31:50.680
<v Speaker 1>of reducing inequality. That is, ultimately what is really poisoning

0:31:50.720 --> 0:31:53.840
<v Speaker 1>society at the moment. I think it's why we're why. Ultimately,

0:31:53.880 --> 0:31:59.000
<v Speaker 1>it's why the debate is polarized and as unpleasant as

0:31:59.040 --> 0:32:04.760
<v Speaker 1>it is. Um, if you look at where the recession

0:32:05.000 --> 0:32:07.680
<v Speaker 1>is moving at this point, or sorry, where the economy

0:32:07.760 --> 0:32:13.720
<v Speaker 1>is moving at this point, Um, it's possible that you

0:32:13.800 --> 0:32:17.320
<v Speaker 1>get a move in an egalitarian direction because asset prices

0:32:18.120 --> 0:32:24.880
<v Speaker 1>take the hit, um, rather than therefore therefore that the

0:32:25.040 --> 0:32:29.280
<v Speaker 1>rich feel it more than the poor. But but, but,

0:32:29.280 --> 0:32:33.720
<v Speaker 1>but there's no denying your opening opening point. We've just

0:32:33.840 --> 0:32:37.800
<v Speaker 1>been through COVID. If we're going to if people's patients

0:32:37.880 --> 0:32:42.160
<v Speaker 1>is going to be tried by another recession this quickly

0:32:43.280 --> 0:32:47.040
<v Speaker 1>with inflation this time, that's that's a very concerning. Look.

0:32:47.240 --> 0:32:49.600
<v Speaker 1>That's that's not easy for any society to deal with.

0:32:50.440 --> 0:32:53.520
<v Speaker 1>John Arthur's of Bloomberg Opinion, everybody, I mean, a real

0:32:53.640 --> 0:32:56.040
<v Speaker 1>treat to have. He can talk about anything, We can

0:32:56.040 --> 0:33:01.880
<v Speaker 1>throw anything at him. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg

0:33:01.920 --> 0:33:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Markets podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews of

0:33:05.360 --> 0:33:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller.

0:33:10.440 --> 0:33:13.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at Matt Miller nineteen seventy three. Put

0:33:14.000 --> 0:33:16.240
<v Speaker 1>on fal Swoeney. I'm on Twitter at p T. Sweeney.

0:33:16.320 --> 0:33:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Before the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide at

0:33:19.000 --> 0:33:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio