WEBVTT - From the Vault: Invertebrate Emotions, Part 2

0:00:05.720 --> 0:00:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind. My name

0:00:07.680 --> 0:00:10.800
<v Speaker 1>is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick, and it's Saturday.

0:00:10.880 --> 0:00:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Time to go into the vault for a classic episode

0:00:13.039 --> 0:00:17.600
<v Speaker 1>of the show. This one originally aired March seventeen, and

0:00:17.720 --> 0:00:21.360
<v Speaker 1>it's the second of our two part series about invertebrate emotions.

0:00:21.400 --> 0:00:23.640
<v Speaker 1>So we hope you enjoy and maybe fall in love

0:00:23.680 --> 0:00:29.680
<v Speaker 1>with the slug Welcome to s About to Blow your

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Mind production of My Heart Radio. Hey, welcome to Stuff

0:00:39.320 --> 0:00:41.559
<v Speaker 1>to Blow Your Mind. My name is Robert Lamb and

0:00:41.640 --> 0:00:43.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joe McCormick, and we're back with part two of

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:47.519
<v Speaker 1>our exploration of invertebrate emotions. In the last episode, we

0:00:47.560 --> 0:00:49.760
<v Speaker 1>talked about the paper Nautilus or the argonaut. We read

0:00:49.800 --> 0:00:53.320
<v Speaker 1>that great Marion more poem. We talked about what emotions

0:00:53.360 --> 0:00:57.080
<v Speaker 1>are the difficulties and studying them, and we talked about

0:00:57.120 --> 0:01:01.360
<v Speaker 1>anecdotes about people really seeing personnel, pity, character, and emotion

0:01:01.480 --> 0:01:05.800
<v Speaker 1>in octopuses, but then also scientific studies looking for certain

0:01:05.840 --> 0:01:10.600
<v Speaker 1>types of measurable cognitive effects of emotions or emotion like

0:01:10.840 --> 0:01:14.920
<v Speaker 1>states in invertebrates like bees. We talked about the judgment

0:01:15.000 --> 0:01:18.679
<v Speaker 1>bias test and how bees might have biases that come

0:01:18.720 --> 0:01:22.440
<v Speaker 1>about in optimistic or pessimistic ways based on how they're

0:01:22.720 --> 0:01:26.199
<v Speaker 1>quote feeling. Yeah, A big part of the conversation last

0:01:26.200 --> 0:01:29.360
<v Speaker 1>episode was I think, ultimately about stripping down emotion to

0:01:29.440 --> 0:01:33.679
<v Speaker 1>something that doesn't depend upon the subjective human experience, and

0:01:33.720 --> 0:01:37.280
<v Speaker 1>in doing so something that I don't want to make

0:01:37.319 --> 0:01:39.360
<v Speaker 1>it sound like we're, oh, we're just we're cutting out

0:01:39.400 --> 0:01:40.840
<v Speaker 1>all the important stuff. I think a lot of what

0:01:40.840 --> 0:01:44.800
<v Speaker 1>we're cutting out is the poetic stuff, the the the

0:01:44.800 --> 0:01:47.440
<v Speaker 1>the extra like self contemplation stuff, and getting down to

0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:50.520
<v Speaker 1>the root of what is an emotional state, how does

0:01:50.520 --> 0:01:54.760
<v Speaker 1>it affect um our behavior and our expectations, and then

0:01:55.120 --> 0:01:57.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, how do we see that echoed in other organisms? Right? Well,

0:01:57.640 --> 0:02:00.400
<v Speaker 1>we're cutting out yeah this by cutting out the subjective element,

0:02:00.440 --> 0:02:02.600
<v Speaker 1>We're cutting out the part that would be impossible to

0:02:02.640 --> 0:02:05.320
<v Speaker 1>study in other animals and just trying to say what

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:09.520
<v Speaker 1>our emotional states as manifested externally. Yeah, But of course

0:02:09.520 --> 0:02:11.959
<v Speaker 1>the difficulty, as we discussed, is by taking out the

0:02:12.000 --> 0:02:14.400
<v Speaker 1>subjective aspect of it, we're taking out the part that

0:02:14.520 --> 0:02:17.240
<v Speaker 1>is closest to us and the thing that you instantly

0:02:17.280 --> 0:02:20.320
<v Speaker 1>think about when we even say the word emotion of course,

0:02:20.320 --> 0:02:25.800
<v Speaker 1>sweet emotion. Oh no, that song fills me with bad emotion,

0:02:26.400 --> 0:02:28.000
<v Speaker 1>did you. Oh, I don't know if I ever gotten

0:02:28.000 --> 0:02:30.640
<v Speaker 1>to do this rant before. Y'all know I hate Aerosmith.

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, I don't know. Well, I think you may

0:02:32.600 --> 0:02:35.080
<v Speaker 1>have mentioned it once in passing. Yeah, even even the

0:02:35.080 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 1>early stuff. I don't know. I mean, I can be

0:02:37.360 --> 0:02:40.040
<v Speaker 1>that classic rock radio uncle, like you know when led

0:02:40.080 --> 0:02:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Zeppelin comes on, I'm like, yeah, I feel it, but

0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:45.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that something about Aerosmith just turns my

0:02:45.960 --> 0:02:50.280
<v Speaker 1>head three sixty degrees. Well, I have to admitted really

0:02:50.280 --> 0:02:52.040
<v Speaker 1>like a dream on. That's that's if I hear that

0:02:52.040 --> 0:02:54.880
<v Speaker 1>one on classic rock radio, I'll tune in and listen. Well,

0:02:54.880 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad you like it. Hey, folks, this is Joe

0:02:59.440 --> 0:03:02.040
<v Speaker 1>from the Few. You're swooping in to alter the past.

0:03:02.440 --> 0:03:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Sorry about the audio, but I realized on listening back

0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:08.400
<v Speaker 1>to this episode that in our excitement about the topic,

0:03:08.520 --> 0:03:10.839
<v Speaker 1>we forgot to reintroduce the paper that we were talking

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 1>about in the first episode, and then we're gonna be

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:15.640
<v Speaker 1>talking about throughout this one as well. So that paper

0:03:15.760 --> 0:03:18.919
<v Speaker 1>was by Clint J. Perry and Luigi Bachi at Donna

0:03:19.320 --> 0:03:22.960
<v Speaker 1>and it's called studying emotion and invertebrates. What has been done,

0:03:23.040 --> 0:03:26.280
<v Speaker 1>what can be measured, and what they can provide. It

0:03:26.440 --> 0:03:30.560
<v Speaker 1>was published in the Journal of Experimental Biology in Okay,

0:03:30.720 --> 0:03:36.400
<v Speaker 1>now back to our original conversation. Okay, But so the

0:03:36.480 --> 0:03:38.720
<v Speaker 1>last time we talked about one of the main three

0:03:38.720 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 1>branches of external ways of studying emotions and animals. We

0:03:42.080 --> 0:03:45.640
<v Speaker 1>talked about you know that they're they're perhaps cognitive effects

0:03:45.640 --> 0:03:48.360
<v Speaker 1>of emotions, that emotions affect how you perceive the world

0:03:48.400 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 1>and how you think. That there are behavioral tests of emotions,

0:03:52.280 --> 0:03:54.840
<v Speaker 1>that emotions affect how you act, and that there are

0:03:54.880 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 1>physiological tests of emotions that emotions affect involuntary physical reaction

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:02.840
<v Speaker 1>in the body. And we last time we looked at cognition.

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:04.920
<v Speaker 1>This time we're gonna look at the other two. So

0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:10.200
<v Speaker 1>the first would be behavioral tests behavioral signs of emotional states.

0:04:10.280 --> 0:04:12.200
<v Speaker 1>And one of the things that I think we should

0:04:12.200 --> 0:04:15.119
<v Speaker 1>first acknowledge is that I'd say, this is the primary

0:04:15.200 --> 0:04:18.200
<v Speaker 1>way that we sense emotions in other people. What do

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:21.800
<v Speaker 1>people usually do with their bodies, especially their faces, when

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:26.240
<v Speaker 1>they're feeling various emotions. But as the authors point out

0:04:26.360 --> 0:04:31.040
<v Speaker 1>quite helpfully, they say, quote invertebrates lack the facial musculature

0:04:31.080 --> 0:04:33.440
<v Speaker 1>for any real type of comparisons to be made in

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:36.279
<v Speaker 1>this regard, so I think that the jury is in.

0:04:36.560 --> 0:04:39.279
<v Speaker 1>You can't tell if a hornet is smiling. You can't

0:04:39.279 --> 0:04:42.240
<v Speaker 1>tell if there is disgusted on the face of that crab. Yeah,

0:04:42.240 --> 0:04:47.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean, as if a crab had a face anyway. Right, Um,

0:04:47.800 --> 0:04:51.039
<v Speaker 1>but my flogging that horse again, it's not really a

0:04:51.080 --> 0:04:53.720
<v Speaker 1>horse I flog. But no, no, no no, Actually, you're right.

0:04:53.760 --> 0:04:56.560
<v Speaker 1>I think i'd agree the crab. I don't know crabs

0:04:56.600 --> 0:04:59.320
<v Speaker 1>pushing it. I don't know if a crab has a face. Yeah,

0:04:59.360 --> 0:05:02.279
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it definitely has the front of a head,

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:05.440
<v Speaker 1>But that front of a head with the crab is

0:05:05.520 --> 0:05:08.520
<v Speaker 1>not really it's not used for communication. Crabs depend on

0:05:08.640 --> 0:05:11.359
<v Speaker 1>sound as well as you know. The claw waving and

0:05:11.440 --> 0:05:15.599
<v Speaker 1>overall movement displays general body language, but predominantly sound is

0:05:15.839 --> 0:05:18.920
<v Speaker 1>their their form of communication. The wasp for their part, uh,

0:05:18.960 --> 0:05:21.520
<v Speaker 1>they depend primarily on smell for communication. We will get

0:05:21.520 --> 0:05:23.160
<v Speaker 1>into that a little bit in the last episode with

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the bees. So their communication since realm is not really

0:05:27.520 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 1>our own. Um, they exist in a in a different

0:05:31.560 --> 0:05:35.039
<v Speaker 1>realm in that regard, right, But the behavioral effects of

0:05:35.120 --> 0:05:39.040
<v Speaker 1>underlying emotional states are not limited to facial expressions alone,

0:05:39.080 --> 0:05:41.520
<v Speaker 1>just because that's maybe the main way we see emotions

0:05:41.520 --> 0:05:44.880
<v Speaker 1>in other people. Uh, the author's right quote. A substantial

0:05:44.880 --> 0:05:48.400
<v Speaker 1>amount of work in mammals has utilized other bodily expressions

0:05:48.400 --> 0:05:52.039
<v Speaker 1>and motor behavior in response to stimuli to assess both

0:05:52.200 --> 0:05:56.400
<v Speaker 1>valence meaning the pleasantness, and intensity meaning the level of

0:05:56.440 --> 0:06:00.080
<v Speaker 1>arousal of emotions. And I really think the horse is

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:01.800
<v Speaker 1>a great example of this for a couple of reasons.

0:06:01.839 --> 0:06:03.960
<v Speaker 1>First of all, the horse is an animal that is,

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:08.599
<v Speaker 1>that lives in close proximity to humans, that is adored

0:06:08.640 --> 0:06:11.240
<v Speaker 1>by humans. That is, that is often you know, championed

0:06:11.279 --> 0:06:13.919
<v Speaker 1>as being this next to the dog and you know

0:06:13.960 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the cat, I guess it is. It is a friend

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:19.600
<v Speaker 1>of humanity. And uh. And my wife being super into

0:06:19.680 --> 0:06:22.480
<v Speaker 1>horses and pretty knowledgeable about them, she's just told me

0:06:22.520 --> 0:06:25.360
<v Speaker 1>about some of this before, but I was I also

0:06:25.360 --> 0:06:27.520
<v Speaker 1>looked up a source on this for this episode How

0:06:27.560 --> 0:06:30.600
<v Speaker 1>to Read Your Horses Body Language by Jennifer Williams, PhD

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:35.360
<v Speaker 1>for ACQUSS Magazine, and Williams points out that if a

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 1>novice were to view a skilled horse trainer in action,

0:06:38.960 --> 0:06:42.080
<v Speaker 1>they might well guess that this individual is psychic or

0:06:42.120 --> 0:06:45.599
<v Speaker 1>has some sort of mystical Cormac McCarthy in connection to

0:06:45.680 --> 0:06:48.160
<v Speaker 1>the soul of the horse, you know, the deep, dark,

0:06:48.240 --> 0:06:50.960
<v Speaker 1>mystical soil soul of the horse. But it's really all

0:06:51.040 --> 0:06:55.000
<v Speaker 1>about knowing how to read these other signs, the overall

0:06:55.040 --> 0:06:57.760
<v Speaker 1>body language of the horse and then these other sort

0:06:57.760 --> 0:07:01.480
<v Speaker 1>of non facial or semi facial cues. Well, yeah, I mean,

0:07:01.520 --> 0:07:03.720
<v Speaker 1>I think if you're a dog person, if you've got

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:06.279
<v Speaker 1>a dog in your house, think about like, how finally

0:07:06.320 --> 0:07:10.280
<v Speaker 1>a tune you are to your dogs feelings, levels of excitement,

0:07:11.080 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 1>motivations and and quote emotional states or you know, there's

0:07:14.680 --> 0:07:18.000
<v Speaker 1>something that is analogous to these emotional states. Uh that

0:07:18.440 --> 0:07:21.040
<v Speaker 1>if somebody who had never met a dog before or

0:07:21.080 --> 0:07:23.520
<v Speaker 1>hadn't spent much time around dogs saw you interacting with

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:25.400
<v Speaker 1>your dog, they might well think the same thing. You

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:28.080
<v Speaker 1>must be psychic. Yeah, but no, A lot of it

0:07:28.120 --> 0:07:30.240
<v Speaker 1>is about picking up on all of this language, or

0:07:30.240 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 1>indeed just knowing what to look for. So in the

0:07:32.680 --> 0:07:35.640
<v Speaker 1>case of the horse, for instance, Um, your position is

0:07:35.720 --> 0:07:37.680
<v Speaker 1>very important. Is one of the apparently the first things

0:07:37.760 --> 0:07:41.960
<v Speaker 1>you tend to learn about about understanding a horse's emotional state,

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:45.200
<v Speaker 1>so that the ears may face forward, meaning they're interested.

0:07:45.320 --> 0:07:47.440
<v Speaker 1>They may be pinned back, meaning they're angry and they're

0:07:47.440 --> 0:07:51.520
<v Speaker 1>prone to bite or act you know, aggressively slash defensively. Uh.

0:07:51.560 --> 0:07:54.040
<v Speaker 1>They might be turned out to the side, meaning they're relaxed.

0:07:54.200 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 1>They might be turned back but not pinned, and this

0:07:56.840 --> 0:07:59.560
<v Speaker 1>means they're listening to something behind them, and it also

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:01.920
<v Speaker 1>means they might decide they need to turn around to

0:08:01.920 --> 0:08:04.600
<v Speaker 1>go look at it, and horses, being large animals, it's

0:08:04.600 --> 0:08:06.800
<v Speaker 1>something to be aware of. Uh. And then they also

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:11.240
<v Speaker 1>might be rapidly swiveling, meaning that they're anxious or at

0:08:11.240 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 1>their you know, at a high level of alertness. But

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 1>then on top of that there's also head carriage head

0:08:16.440 --> 0:08:20.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe lowered elevated snaking. You have to consider four leg

0:08:20.520 --> 0:08:24.720
<v Speaker 1>and hind leg movement and position, muzzle activity, which this

0:08:24.920 --> 0:08:26.440
<v Speaker 1>some of this gets more in line with what you

0:08:26.520 --> 0:08:28.360
<v Speaker 1>might expect from a face, you know, like what are

0:08:28.360 --> 0:08:31.160
<v Speaker 1>the nostrils doing? Uh, you know, what what's the mouth doing,

0:08:31.200 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 1>what are they doing with their teeth? That sort of thing.

0:08:33.640 --> 0:08:35.439
<v Speaker 1>There is a certain level of like what are their

0:08:35.480 --> 0:08:38.960
<v Speaker 1>eyes doing? Uh? You know, to someone that doesn't really

0:08:39.000 --> 0:08:40.959
<v Speaker 1>know anything about horses, it's easy to sort of think

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 1>of the eyes as being sort of like big empty

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:45.839
<v Speaker 1>glasses without a lot of emotion. But there is stuff

0:08:45.880 --> 0:08:48.120
<v Speaker 1>you can read into it. There's the movement of the tail,

0:08:48.520 --> 0:08:51.160
<v Speaker 1>and then there's just general whole body stuff like what

0:08:51.320 --> 0:08:55.240
<v Speaker 1>is the overall bodily tension of the animal, how is it,

0:08:55.720 --> 0:08:58.240
<v Speaker 1>how is it moving and uh, And you can really

0:08:58.280 --> 0:09:01.760
<v Speaker 1>take all of that and read into the emotional state

0:09:01.800 --> 0:09:04.800
<v Speaker 1>of the horse. But if you just look at you know,

0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:06.760
<v Speaker 1>what you might be tempted to call the face of

0:09:06.800 --> 0:09:08.839
<v Speaker 1>the horse, you're not necessarily going to pick up on

0:09:08.840 --> 0:09:10.839
<v Speaker 1>on all those cues you have. And I think part

0:09:10.880 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 1>of this two gets we have to think about the

0:09:12.559 --> 0:09:16.920
<v Speaker 1>human situation. So clearly humans have body language. You know,

0:09:16.960 --> 0:09:20.080
<v Speaker 1>there's more than just the facial communication array with human

0:09:20.120 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 1>beings totally, but we do depend on the facial communication

0:09:23.760 --> 0:09:27.000
<v Speaker 1>array a lot, and we do fixate on it to

0:09:27.080 --> 0:09:29.960
<v Speaker 1>a very large degree. But basically, what I'm trying to say,

0:09:30.040 --> 0:09:33.319
<v Speaker 1>using the horses in an example, that there are there

0:09:33.320 --> 0:09:36.120
<v Speaker 1>are there are various parts of an organism that you

0:09:36.160 --> 0:09:39.599
<v Speaker 1>can look to to to figure out what their emotional

0:09:39.640 --> 0:09:42.480
<v Speaker 1>state is, and it may or may not be something

0:09:43.200 --> 0:09:45.480
<v Speaker 1>that matches up with the human idea, the idea of

0:09:45.480 --> 0:09:49.040
<v Speaker 1>a face. Yes, so what would be some of these

0:09:49.080 --> 0:09:53.319
<v Speaker 1>external behaviors that we could measure in invertebrates. One of

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 1>the most obvious behavioral signs of underlying emotional states and

0:09:57.120 --> 0:10:01.080
<v Speaker 1>animals is retreat behaviors. So but you know, like in

0:10:01.240 --> 0:10:06.199
<v Speaker 1>fear or anxiety, animals will retreat, retracting or covering vulnerable

0:10:06.240 --> 0:10:10.480
<v Speaker 1>body parts, adopting defensive posture, and running away. These are

0:10:10.480 --> 0:10:12.800
<v Speaker 1>some of the clearest ones to look for in all

0:10:12.880 --> 0:10:16.040
<v Speaker 1>of animal behavior. And so the first example cited by

0:10:16.080 --> 0:10:18.800
<v Speaker 1>the authors here looks at exactly that. And it's actually

0:10:18.840 --> 0:10:22.120
<v Speaker 1>a study we've already mentioned on this show before. It

0:10:22.240 --> 0:10:26.440
<v Speaker 1>came up in our episodes titled Devour of Memories. Remember

0:10:26.480 --> 0:10:29.480
<v Speaker 1>that about about the plenaria and the and the research

0:10:29.480 --> 0:10:32.800
<v Speaker 1>about whether you could gain somebody's memories by eating their body.

0:10:33.280 --> 0:10:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Uh So in this episode that we mentioned to study

0:10:36.000 --> 0:10:38.920
<v Speaker 1>about a type of large sea slug called the California

0:10:39.040 --> 0:10:43.160
<v Speaker 1>sea hair or Aplasia californica. Uh And in that other

0:10:43.200 --> 0:10:46.720
<v Speaker 1>episode study came up because it demonstrated associate of learning

0:10:46.720 --> 0:10:51.120
<v Speaker 1>and classical conditioning in an invertebrate sea slug. So you

0:10:51.200 --> 0:10:56.480
<v Speaker 1>offer a sea hair some delicious shrimp extract. But in

0:10:56.520 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 1>the test group, well, the sea hair is munching on

0:10:59.520 --> 0:11:02.240
<v Speaker 1>the shrimp extract, it gets an electric shock to the

0:11:02.240 --> 0:11:05.800
<v Speaker 1>head that this painful stimulus results in not a frown,

0:11:05.880 --> 0:11:09.679
<v Speaker 1>of course, but measurable behaviors in the slug. It withdraws

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:13.080
<v Speaker 1>its head, it withdraws its siphon, It inks, and it

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:16.640
<v Speaker 1>moves away from the shrimp at extract. And sure enough,

0:11:16.679 --> 0:11:20.920
<v Speaker 1>if you train it on these associations. When simply when

0:11:20.960 --> 0:11:24.160
<v Speaker 1>the animals from the test group are simply presented with

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:28.199
<v Speaker 1>shrimp extract, they will pull back the siphon and move away.

0:11:28.240 --> 0:11:31.000
<v Speaker 1>By the way, see hair and the electric shrimp extract

0:11:31.200 --> 0:11:32.960
<v Speaker 1>would be a great name for a band. Just put

0:11:32.960 --> 0:11:34.960
<v Speaker 1>that out there. I think that was a Bob Weir

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:38.440
<v Speaker 1>side project. Wasn't ok um. But whether or not, it

0:11:38.480 --> 0:11:41.080
<v Speaker 1>makes sense to use the same word we use for

0:11:41.160 --> 0:11:45.160
<v Speaker 1>emotions and other mammals. Quote the observed behavioral responses to

0:11:45.240 --> 0:11:51.199
<v Speaker 1>conditions stimuli resemble the actions of conditioned fear in mammals. Subjectively,

0:11:51.280 --> 0:11:53.080
<v Speaker 1>it might not make sense to talk about fear in

0:11:53.080 --> 0:11:56.160
<v Speaker 1>a sea slug. We don't know, but it certainly behaviorally

0:11:56.240 --> 0:11:58.320
<v Speaker 1>looks like fear. It looks like the same thing we

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:01.840
<v Speaker 1>recognize this fear in mammals or in other humans. Because

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:04.800
<v Speaker 1>of course, nothing about the shrimp extract itself causes pain.

0:12:04.840 --> 0:12:07.800
<v Speaker 1>It couldn't be a simple stimulus response. It has to

0:12:07.800 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 1>be this association with pain, the memory of you know,

0:12:11.080 --> 0:12:13.720
<v Speaker 1>the fear caused by the memory. And a lot of

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:17.240
<v Speaker 1>invertebrate studies into emotions look for signs of fear because

0:12:17.720 --> 0:12:22.400
<v Speaker 1>fear is easier to study. Presumable fear inducing stimuli are

0:12:22.480 --> 0:12:26.640
<v Speaker 1>relatively easy to create, and behavioral responses are relatively easy

0:12:26.679 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 1>to detect. There's another example that the author's site here,

0:12:30.280 --> 0:12:33.959
<v Speaker 1>which is fear research into Drosophila also known commonly as

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:37.680
<v Speaker 1>fruit flies or as vinegar flies small fruit flies. UH.

0:12:37.679 --> 0:12:40.760
<v Speaker 1>This is an extremely common organism for lab research. You'll

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:44.960
<v Speaker 1>find tons of studies UH modeling other things in complex

0:12:45.080 --> 0:12:50.000
<v Speaker 1>organisms as they appear in Drosophila. So in twif Gibson

0:12:50.080 --> 0:12:54.360
<v Speaker 1>at all studied fear and Drosophila caused by the stimulus

0:12:54.400 --> 0:12:59.040
<v Speaker 1>of an overhead shadow, they used a rotating opaque paddle.

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:01.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if it was a ping pong paddle.

0:13:01.440 --> 0:13:02.959
<v Speaker 1>I kind of hope it was. It was some kind

0:13:02.960 --> 0:13:05.560
<v Speaker 1>of paddle that would be made to rotate in a

0:13:05.640 --> 0:13:09.840
<v Speaker 1>circle in in in a steady progression, repeat passages over

0:13:10.000 --> 0:13:14.120
<v Speaker 1>a container of these these flies that would be as say,

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:17.199
<v Speaker 1>eating a food source or something. And the authors found

0:13:17.240 --> 0:13:22.360
<v Speaker 1>that multiple repetitive exposures to this overhead shadow caused the

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 1>flies to fly around more, to hop more, to freeze more,

0:13:26.520 --> 0:13:29.760
<v Speaker 1>and to fly away from a food source. And there

0:13:29.800 --> 0:13:32.480
<v Speaker 1>was evidence in this study that the passing shadow led

0:13:32.480 --> 0:13:36.840
<v Speaker 1>to a generalized internal state. The more times the shadow

0:13:36.880 --> 0:13:40.920
<v Speaker 1>passed over, the more avoidance responses happened. So it looks

0:13:40.960 --> 0:13:44.320
<v Speaker 1>like within the flies it wasn't just stimulus response. The

0:13:44.320 --> 0:13:48.680
<v Speaker 1>shadow passes, then you fly away. If you are repeatedly

0:13:48.880 --> 0:13:52.880
<v Speaker 1>subjected to this stress inducing stimulus, the flies appear to

0:13:53.120 --> 0:13:55.880
<v Speaker 1>enter a state where they're just they're just in a

0:13:55.920 --> 0:14:00.120
<v Speaker 1>semi permanent way agitated. They're flying around there there of

0:14:00.240 --> 0:14:02.800
<v Speaker 1>leaving the food source. It looks like they have the

0:14:02.880 --> 0:14:07.480
<v Speaker 1>internal state of being afraid, and the avoidance responses remained

0:14:08.000 --> 0:14:11.360
<v Speaker 1>remained more elevated. Even after the stimulus stopped. The shadow

0:14:11.400 --> 0:14:14.320
<v Speaker 1>would stop passing over, and for some time afterwards, the

0:14:14.360 --> 0:14:17.480
<v Speaker 1>flies acted more agitated, more likely to fly away from

0:14:17.480 --> 0:14:20.880
<v Speaker 1>the food source than flies with less exposure to the shadow,

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:23.560
<v Speaker 1>and this makes it seem as if the avoidance reactions

0:14:23.560 --> 0:14:26.920
<v Speaker 1>were not just the direct immediate response to the shadow,

0:14:27.160 --> 0:14:30.520
<v Speaker 1>but also influenced by this internal state within the flies

0:14:30.560 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 1>nervous systems, which is similar to how fear works and

0:14:32.920 --> 0:14:36.720
<v Speaker 1>humans and other vertebrates. Something jumps out and scares you,

0:14:36.720 --> 0:14:39.520
<v Speaker 1>you have an immediate response, maybe you shriek, maybe you

0:14:39.560 --> 0:14:42.400
<v Speaker 1>pee a little, you know, maybe maybe you jump, But

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:45.960
<v Speaker 1>then you also remain in a state you're on edge

0:14:46.040 --> 0:14:50.600
<v Speaker 1>for several minutes afterwards, showing these anxiety behaviors even when

0:14:50.600 --> 0:14:54.880
<v Speaker 1>the scary thing is gone or no longer represents a threat. Unfortunately,

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:57.520
<v Speaker 1>this is a lot of how we live our lives actually, Right, Like,

0:14:57.600 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 1>there's something that kind of like startle as you, gets

0:15:00.640 --> 0:15:02.600
<v Speaker 1>you on edge, and maybe it's not even something that

0:15:02.600 --> 0:15:05.840
<v Speaker 1>would be a physical threat. Maybe it's just a conceptual threat.

0:15:05.880 --> 0:15:07.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, you get an email or a tweet or

0:15:07.800 --> 0:15:09.680
<v Speaker 1>anything that kind of puts you on edge, and then

0:15:09.720 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 1>you just stay that way for a good long while. Yeah, yeah,

0:15:13.560 --> 0:15:16.240
<v Speaker 1>all day generally. Yeah, what happens when you reach for

0:15:16.320 --> 0:15:18.880
<v Speaker 1>your phone first thing in the morning, right, and I

0:15:18.920 --> 0:15:21.920
<v Speaker 1>think that that's an important thing. It calls to to

0:15:22.000 --> 0:15:26.000
<v Speaker 1>attention the difference between fear and anxiety. Fear, of course,

0:15:26.120 --> 0:15:29.000
<v Speaker 1>is a response to the perception of an immediate threat,

0:15:29.080 --> 0:15:32.720
<v Speaker 1>a clear and present danger, and it results mostly in

0:15:33.040 --> 0:15:36.080
<v Speaker 1>escape behaviors by animals. You're trying to, you know, defend

0:15:36.080 --> 0:15:40.840
<v Speaker 1>yourself and get away. Whereas anxiety is related to fear

0:15:40.880 --> 0:15:43.400
<v Speaker 1>but slightly different. Fear is a response to the clear

0:15:43.440 --> 0:15:48.520
<v Speaker 1>and present danger. Anxiety is a response to ambiguous, imagined,

0:15:48.680 --> 0:15:52.320
<v Speaker 1>or potential threats. When there's a threat that's not necessarily

0:15:52.400 --> 0:15:55.080
<v Speaker 1>right in front of you, but you imagine it might

0:15:55.160 --> 0:15:58.640
<v Speaker 1>be waiting nearby, it might be around the corner. Yeah,

0:15:58.640 --> 0:16:03.160
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of lurking in the the the information sphere

0:16:03.240 --> 0:16:05.600
<v Speaker 1>around you, as opposed to being right there in front

0:16:05.640 --> 0:16:08.600
<v Speaker 1>of you. Uh. And and of course they bringing back

0:16:08.600 --> 0:16:11.360
<v Speaker 1>to the human experience, we have no shortage of Fear

0:16:11.520 --> 0:16:14.280
<v Speaker 1>is just sort of rotating around us in the information sphere.

0:16:14.560 --> 0:16:17.480
<v Speaker 1>And this state of anxiety actually brings us to the crawdads.

0:16:17.760 --> 0:16:20.920
<v Speaker 1>I know, we promised we'd we'd get there eventually, a

0:16:21.040 --> 0:16:24.800
<v Speaker 1>k A crayfish a k A. Mudbugs. Did you grow

0:16:24.880 --> 0:16:27.160
<v Speaker 1>up calling them mudbugs? No, this is what I've just

0:16:27.240 --> 0:16:30.000
<v Speaker 1>heard them called. Did you catch them in the creek? No?

0:16:30.160 --> 0:16:31.960
<v Speaker 1>I know I was never around them growing up, but

0:16:32.000 --> 0:16:35.960
<v Speaker 1>I have family that lives in southern Mississippi, and you

0:16:35.960 --> 0:16:40.160
<v Speaker 1>know they're they're all about them, uh down there. In fact,

0:16:40.240 --> 0:16:42.360
<v Speaker 1>I've been to and then this will this will be

0:16:42.560 --> 0:16:44.480
<v Speaker 1>like an image to come back to. As we discussed

0:16:44.480 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 1>their possible emotional states. I went to a Marty Groppard,

0:16:49.280 --> 0:16:51.080
<v Speaker 1>not the main Marty grap right, but I like, you know,

0:16:51.320 --> 0:16:54.680
<v Speaker 1>one leading up to it in southern Mississippi, and there

0:16:54.760 --> 0:16:59.200
<v Speaker 1>were like games where live crawfish were thrown by children,

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:02.120
<v Speaker 1>like they road crawfish back and forth at each other

0:17:02.160 --> 0:17:04.320
<v Speaker 1>and then occasionally fall onto the concrete and all. And

0:17:05.000 --> 0:17:07.320
<v Speaker 1>um yeah, at the time I thought it was weird

0:17:07.359 --> 0:17:09.560
<v Speaker 1>and kind of barbaric. So man, maybe I'll feel even

0:17:09.640 --> 0:17:12.080
<v Speaker 1>more so as we discussed their their their inter emotional

0:17:12.160 --> 0:17:14.720
<v Speaker 1>states here, so it gets turned inward as well. Though.

0:17:14.960 --> 0:17:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Do you ever play the game I assume you didn't

0:17:17.600 --> 0:17:19.480
<v Speaker 1>or see people play the game where you just let

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:22.760
<v Speaker 1>a crawdad pinch, you know, just like let it pinch

0:17:22.800 --> 0:17:25.760
<v Speaker 1>your nose or your finger or something. Did you do

0:17:25.800 --> 0:17:28.720
<v Speaker 1>this growing up? Uh? No, but I had friends who did.

0:17:29.119 --> 0:17:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Where was this in Tennessee? They were to carl crawdads

0:17:31.720 --> 0:17:33.680
<v Speaker 1>just in the creeks. Well, I guess there were probably

0:17:33.680 --> 0:17:35.879
<v Speaker 1>a different species, I'm not quite sure than the one

0:17:35.920 --> 0:17:37.840
<v Speaker 1>we're about to talk about, but yeah, there were some

0:17:37.920 --> 0:17:44.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of crayfish shaped organism living in the creeks freshwater creeks. Yeah, okay, yeah, yeah.

0:17:44.280 --> 0:17:47.360
<v Speaker 1>My main experience with them is just occasionally eating them

0:17:47.359 --> 0:17:50.560
<v Speaker 1>as an adult. Um, but that's about it. Never got

0:17:50.560 --> 0:17:53.000
<v Speaker 1>to play with them as a child. But for anyone

0:17:53.000 --> 0:17:54.879
<v Speaker 1>out there who does doesn't, it still doesn't know what

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:58.040
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about. It's essentially a small crustacean like a

0:17:58.080 --> 0:18:02.000
<v Speaker 1>fresh a small fresh water only lobster, right, yeah, tiny lobster.

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:05.240
<v Speaker 1>The specific uh species that's going to come up in

0:18:05.280 --> 0:18:09.360
<v Speaker 1>the in the research we're getting to is Procamboris clarkey.

0:18:09.480 --> 0:18:12.560
<v Speaker 1>And yes, these are the crawlfish of the famed Louisiana

0:18:12.600 --> 0:18:15.360
<v Speaker 1>crawfish boil. So I don't know if they were if

0:18:15.359 --> 0:18:17.880
<v Speaker 1>they were boiled up with some zatarans and eating after

0:18:17.920 --> 0:18:21.879
<v Speaker 1>the test there. I should also add that sometimes you'll

0:18:21.880 --> 0:18:24.840
<v Speaker 1>see crayfish in aquarium settings and they can be quite

0:18:24.840 --> 0:18:27.520
<v Speaker 1>beautiful as well. So you know, I don't think human

0:18:27.560 --> 0:18:32.359
<v Speaker 1>and humans humanity. Relationship with the crayfish is mostly uh,

0:18:32.680 --> 0:18:35.520
<v Speaker 1>mostly something that revolves around eating them, but sometimes you'll

0:18:35.520 --> 0:18:38.000
<v Speaker 1>see them as pets. Now, to come back to the

0:18:38.040 --> 0:18:40.680
<v Speaker 1>idea of anxiety, we were talking about the difference between

0:18:40.720 --> 0:18:43.680
<v Speaker 1>fear and anxiety. You know, we're saying fear often results

0:18:43.680 --> 0:18:47.439
<v Speaker 1>in escape behaviors. Anxiety is often thought to result in

0:18:47.600 --> 0:18:52.720
<v Speaker 1>conservative or defense behavior, for example, to limit openness and

0:18:52.800 --> 0:18:56.879
<v Speaker 1>to limit exploratory behavior. Animals in an anxious state are

0:18:56.920 --> 0:19:00.080
<v Speaker 1>more likely to seek out closed familiar and protect it

0:19:00.200 --> 0:19:03.119
<v Speaker 1>in environments, whereas animals in a non anxious state are

0:19:03.119 --> 0:19:07.280
<v Speaker 1>more likely to explore unfamiliar and open environments. And one

0:19:07.320 --> 0:19:10.600
<v Speaker 1>type of experiment that has been used to study anxiety

0:19:10.600 --> 0:19:13.679
<v Speaker 1>in animals like rats and mice and now in crayfish

0:19:14.119 --> 0:19:17.800
<v Speaker 1>is the elevated plus maze. So, Robert, had you ever

0:19:17.840 --> 0:19:20.399
<v Speaker 1>seen one of these before? I don't think I'd encountered

0:19:20.440 --> 0:19:23.040
<v Speaker 1>one of these before, and I don't remember encountering one

0:19:23.080 --> 0:19:26.439
<v Speaker 1>in a study. I've certainly never been in one. So

0:19:26.480 --> 0:19:28.800
<v Speaker 1>you imagine a simple platform in the shape of a

0:19:28.840 --> 0:19:32.000
<v Speaker 1>plus sign. You've got two arms of the plus sign

0:19:32.080 --> 0:19:35.680
<v Speaker 1>that are enclosed by walls, and then the other two

0:19:35.840 --> 0:19:40.360
<v Speaker 1>arms are open. They're just straight platforms without walls. And

0:19:40.800 --> 0:19:42.719
<v Speaker 1>this shows up in all kinds of studies. How an

0:19:42.760 --> 0:19:46.280
<v Speaker 1>animal moves within an elevated plus maze or EPM can

0:19:46.320 --> 0:19:49.280
<v Speaker 1>be manipulated by lots of variables that are thought to

0:19:49.320 --> 0:19:53.280
<v Speaker 1>control anxiety. The more time the animal spins in the

0:19:53.359 --> 0:19:56.840
<v Speaker 1>closed section enclosed by the walls, you know, sort of

0:19:56.880 --> 0:20:00.440
<v Speaker 1>protected and hidden, usually the more anxious and is thought

0:20:00.440 --> 0:20:04.120
<v Speaker 1>to be. And many animals, maybe most small animals, tend

0:20:04.160 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 1>to prefer dark, enclosed places. These are the types of

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:10.680
<v Speaker 1>places that they are more likely to be protected from

0:20:10.680 --> 0:20:14.639
<v Speaker 1>predators in their natural environments. Like the rat in your house,

0:20:15.040 --> 0:20:17.600
<v Speaker 1>it likes to hide inside the walls and behind the

0:20:17.600 --> 0:20:19.480
<v Speaker 1>fridge and stuff. It doesn't like to hang out in

0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:22.280
<v Speaker 1>the middle of the floor, right like a wide open

0:20:22.359 --> 0:20:25.480
<v Speaker 1>spaces that's where a hawk can swoop down and pick

0:20:25.520 --> 0:20:27.600
<v Speaker 1>you up. That sort of thing. Right. It will only

0:20:27.840 --> 0:20:31.320
<v Speaker 1>venture out into the open spaces in order to explore

0:20:31.359 --> 0:20:33.560
<v Speaker 1>and seek rewards. It might go out there if there's

0:20:33.600 --> 0:20:36.400
<v Speaker 1>food in the middle of the floor, um, But if

0:20:36.440 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 1>it sees something scary, what does it do? It runs

0:20:38.800 --> 0:20:42.040
<v Speaker 1>to an enclosed space. The more an animal like a rat,

0:20:42.080 --> 0:20:44.720
<v Speaker 1>has an induced state of anxiety due to an ambiguous

0:20:44.840 --> 0:20:47.240
<v Speaker 1>or possible threat, the more it will tend to confine

0:20:47.280 --> 0:20:51.720
<v Speaker 1>itself to dark, enclosed spaces. And conversely, the less anxiety

0:20:51.760 --> 0:20:53.960
<v Speaker 1>it has, the more it will feel free to explore

0:20:54.040 --> 0:20:57.520
<v Speaker 1>open spaces. Uh. And the e p M is widely

0:20:57.640 --> 0:21:00.280
<v Speaker 1>used in studying animal anxiety and in the test sting

0:21:00.280 --> 0:21:04.119
<v Speaker 1>of anti anxiety medications. Now here's where the crowd ads

0:21:04.160 --> 0:21:07.040
<v Speaker 1>come in. So the elevated plus mayze has been widely

0:21:07.119 --> 0:21:10.200
<v Speaker 1>used in anxiety research like we're saying, and almost all

0:21:10.240 --> 0:21:13.000
<v Speaker 1>these studies have been on vertebrates, but since there have

0:21:13.000 --> 0:21:16.560
<v Speaker 1>been at least two studies using the plus maze test

0:21:16.640 --> 0:21:21.200
<v Speaker 1>on crayfish. Again, this is procam Boris Clarkey, and the

0:21:21.320 --> 0:21:25.679
<v Speaker 1>updated design used an elevated plus mayze submerged in water

0:21:26.160 --> 0:21:29.399
<v Speaker 1>with the enclosed arms shaded so that they were dark

0:21:29.480 --> 0:21:34.640
<v Speaker 1>because in their protected environments, the crayfish like dark places.

0:21:34.680 --> 0:21:37.960
<v Speaker 1>That's a natural defensive preference they have. So there were

0:21:38.000 --> 0:21:40.320
<v Speaker 1>a couple of studies. One was Fawcett at all in

0:21:40.760 --> 0:21:44.840
<v Speaker 1>fourteen and one was Bacquey casanave at all in seen

0:21:45.320 --> 0:21:48.840
<v Speaker 1>and They both found that if you subjected the crayfish

0:21:48.920 --> 0:21:52.440
<v Speaker 1>to frightful stimuli ahead of time, they would spend more

0:21:52.520 --> 0:21:56.360
<v Speaker 1>time in the shielded, dark, enclosed areas of the elevated

0:21:56.359 --> 0:21:59.879
<v Speaker 1>plus may so the examples were mildly painful shocks and

0:22:00.280 --> 0:22:04.160
<v Speaker 1>harassment by a larger crawfish. So like, if you take

0:22:04.200 --> 0:22:06.840
<v Speaker 1>a smaller crayfish and then subject it to a bigger

0:22:06.840 --> 0:22:10.119
<v Speaker 1>one doing dominance displays, the one, the little one, the

0:22:10.119 --> 0:22:12.920
<v Speaker 1>one that is being harassed, will tend to spend more

0:22:12.960 --> 0:22:16.040
<v Speaker 1>time in the enclosed area in less time exploring the

0:22:16.080 --> 0:22:20.040
<v Speaker 1>open platforms. And the authors right quote. These behavioral results

0:22:20.080 --> 0:22:24.720
<v Speaker 1>fulfill criteria normally designated for anxiety and mammals, including being innate,

0:22:25.080 --> 0:22:28.800
<v Speaker 1>being unconditioned, occurring in the absence of a stressor, and

0:22:28.920 --> 0:22:33.280
<v Speaker 1>expressed in a novel context. Al Right, so in this

0:22:33.320 --> 0:22:38.800
<v Speaker 1>experiment we see the evidence that a crayfish, something we

0:22:38.880 --> 0:22:42.960
<v Speaker 1>don't think of as having emotional states, really ultimately has

0:22:43.280 --> 0:22:46.040
<v Speaker 1>something very similar that to the the fear that is

0:22:46.080 --> 0:22:49.320
<v Speaker 1>experienced by a mouse or a rat, and therefore very

0:22:49.359 --> 0:22:52.840
<v Speaker 1>similar to what we experience. Right, So it's not just

0:22:53.080 --> 0:22:56.080
<v Speaker 1>stimulus response. I mean you could you might imagine that

0:22:56.520 --> 0:22:59.600
<v Speaker 1>an animal without emotional states could say retreat in the

0:22:59.640 --> 0:23:03.280
<v Speaker 1>immat term from something that's threatening it by going into

0:23:03.320 --> 0:23:06.960
<v Speaker 1>an enclosed space. But even afterwards it seems to remain

0:23:07.160 --> 0:23:10.840
<v Speaker 1>in this internal state where it prefers to stay in

0:23:10.880 --> 0:23:14.119
<v Speaker 1>the closed protected spaces and does less exploring than a

0:23:14.200 --> 0:23:17.720
<v Speaker 1>control crayfish if it has at some recent time been

0:23:17.760 --> 0:23:22.160
<v Speaker 1>threatened or harassed. It sounds like a familiar story. Yeah, yeah,

0:23:22.520 --> 0:23:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Like like I say, if we take away sort of

0:23:24.840 --> 0:23:29.280
<v Speaker 1>the the holy human qualities of fear, uh and and

0:23:29.400 --> 0:23:33.080
<v Speaker 1>look at it objectively, like this's what we're looking at here,

0:23:33.359 --> 0:23:35.560
<v Speaker 1>We're looking at the fear of the crawfish. Well, maybe

0:23:35.560 --> 0:23:36.919
<v Speaker 1>we should take a quick break and the when we

0:23:36.960 --> 0:23:43.800
<v Speaker 1>come back we can discuss the joy of the fire. Ant. Alright,

0:23:43.800 --> 0:23:46.960
<v Speaker 1>we're back. So the authors of this study we've been

0:23:46.960 --> 0:23:49.600
<v Speaker 1>looking at point out one shortcoming of the existing body

0:23:49.600 --> 0:23:52.840
<v Speaker 1>of research on animal emotions, and it's that it is,

0:23:53.240 --> 0:23:57.400
<v Speaker 1>as on the whole, overly focused on negative emotions. Quote.

0:23:57.640 --> 0:24:00.320
<v Speaker 1>It is argued that the reasons that positive and motions

0:24:00.320 --> 0:24:03.080
<v Speaker 1>have been neglected in research, or because they are few

0:24:03.160 --> 0:24:07.000
<v Speaker 1>in number, reflected even in the imbalance of English language

0:24:07.000 --> 0:24:11.800
<v Speaker 1>words for negative over positive emotions and are harder to differentiate.

0:24:12.160 --> 0:24:15.320
<v Speaker 1>The asymmetry might also stem from our understanding that natural

0:24:15.359 --> 0:24:20.080
<v Speaker 1>selection has shaped emotions more for survival than for prosperity.

0:24:20.119 --> 0:24:24.639
<v Speaker 1>There are many more threats than treats in our environment. Also,

0:24:24.720 --> 0:24:27.200
<v Speaker 1>they point out that if we're looking for tests mirroring

0:24:27.280 --> 0:24:31.080
<v Speaker 1>work done on humans, most psychological and clinical work in

0:24:31.119 --> 0:24:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the history of science has been focused on solving problems

0:24:34.880 --> 0:24:38.000
<v Speaker 1>rather than on studying ways in which people are doing fine,

0:24:38.920 --> 0:24:40.600
<v Speaker 1>all of which I think is probably true. I mean,

0:24:40.640 --> 0:24:42.760
<v Speaker 1>I think all of those reasons are valid. But despite

0:24:42.800 --> 0:24:45.680
<v Speaker 1>these limitations, it would be great to have more research

0:24:45.720 --> 0:24:49.879
<v Speaker 1>attempting to understand positive emotions or the state's analogous to

0:24:49.920 --> 0:24:54.119
<v Speaker 1>positive emotions in non human animals and invertebrates. Like, it's

0:24:54.160 --> 0:24:56.480
<v Speaker 1>just kind of a bummer and kind of limiting when

0:24:56.480 --> 0:25:00.320
<v Speaker 1>it's overwhelmingly research on fear and aversion. Yeah, that's an

0:25:00.320 --> 0:25:04.000
<v Speaker 1>interesting point about like even the the the English language

0:25:04.680 --> 0:25:09.640
<v Speaker 1>bias for negativity as opposed to positivity. Uh, it makes

0:25:09.640 --> 0:25:13.040
<v Speaker 1>me think of going to our our neighborhood reality the

0:25:13.119 --> 0:25:17.440
<v Speaker 1>only video rental store in the city or state video Drume.

0:25:17.880 --> 0:25:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Video Drum has a sizeable horror selection, and I love

0:25:20.720 --> 0:25:23.240
<v Speaker 1>to lose myself in it. But what is the opposite

0:25:23.280 --> 0:25:26.760
<v Speaker 1>of the horror section? There's not really one. I guess

0:25:26.760 --> 0:25:30.000
<v Speaker 1>what the maybe the comedies but Robert Altman section. Maybe that.

0:25:30.280 --> 0:25:33.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean even you know, any comedy, any drum, anything

0:25:33.240 --> 0:25:36.800
<v Speaker 1>that's not like straight up like a little kids cinema.

0:25:38.119 --> 0:25:40.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, to whatever extent that exists, like anything that's

0:25:40.400 --> 0:25:44.080
<v Speaker 1>not just teletopies is going to have risk and danger

0:25:44.280 --> 0:25:46.640
<v Speaker 1>and these negative emotions that are there to at least

0:25:46.680 --> 0:25:50.600
<v Speaker 1>propel the corresponding positive ones. Yeah, I think you're exactly right,

0:25:50.680 --> 0:25:52.560
<v Speaker 1>And I think the point they're making is a good one.

0:25:52.600 --> 0:25:56.160
<v Speaker 1>That it's not necessarily that there's more, you know, uh,

0:25:56.240 --> 0:25:59.040
<v Speaker 1>negative emotion than positive emotion in human life, but that

0:25:59.160 --> 0:26:02.000
<v Speaker 1>for some reason we're more we're happier to let positive

0:26:02.040 --> 0:26:05.280
<v Speaker 1>emotions all kind of blend together and be the same thing.

0:26:05.840 --> 0:26:07.919
<v Speaker 1>They're all just you know, there are a million different

0:26:07.960 --> 0:26:10.959
<v Speaker 1>forms of happiness and joy, but we don't have as

0:26:11.000 --> 0:26:15.879
<v Speaker 1>many differentiated words for those states, you know, whereas you know,

0:26:16.000 --> 0:26:18.760
<v Speaker 1>we're we're very into getting down in the nitty gritty

0:26:18.800 --> 0:26:22.040
<v Speaker 1>of different types of ways to feel bad. Well, I

0:26:22.080 --> 0:26:24.119
<v Speaker 1>guess one of the it kind of comes back a

0:26:24.160 --> 0:26:26.720
<v Speaker 1>little bit probably to something we've discussed before, the idea

0:26:26.840 --> 0:26:31.040
<v Speaker 1>that when you're happy, if you contemplate about your happiness,

0:26:31.119 --> 0:26:34.240
<v Speaker 1>if you stop to consider your happiness, then it goes away.

0:26:34.840 --> 0:26:36.920
<v Speaker 1>But if you don't need to think about it too much, yeah,

0:26:37.119 --> 0:26:39.280
<v Speaker 1>you don't really have enough time to get to nuanced

0:26:39.280 --> 0:26:42.720
<v Speaker 1>in the language. Whereas a negative, a good negative emotion

0:26:42.760 --> 0:26:44.840
<v Speaker 1>will just really sit there and you can get to

0:26:44.880 --> 0:26:47.720
<v Speaker 1>know it. You can you can really uh, you know,

0:26:47.960 --> 0:26:51.520
<v Speaker 1>formalize your relationship with it. Yeah. Now, on the other hand,

0:26:51.560 --> 0:26:54.439
<v Speaker 1>there have been a few studies that have gone against

0:26:54.520 --> 0:26:57.680
<v Speaker 1>this trend of focusing overwhelmingly on negative emotions in these

0:26:57.720 --> 0:27:00.560
<v Speaker 1>animal studies. For example, in the last st episode, we

0:27:00.560 --> 0:27:03.840
<v Speaker 1>talked about the one cognitive tests, the judgment bias test,

0:27:03.920 --> 0:27:07.280
<v Speaker 1>that at least appeared to show the cognitive effects of

0:27:07.400 --> 0:27:11.000
<v Speaker 1>something like pleasure or happiness in the bumblebee. You remember,

0:27:11.040 --> 0:27:13.040
<v Speaker 1>it was like, if you give the bumble bee a

0:27:13.080 --> 0:27:16.119
<v Speaker 1>free treat, give it some free sugar, it will tend

0:27:16.160 --> 0:27:18.919
<v Speaker 1>after that to at least appear to have an optimistic

0:27:18.960 --> 0:27:23.680
<v Speaker 1>bias to interpret ambiguous information as as being something good

0:27:23.760 --> 0:27:26.879
<v Speaker 1>or approachable. The next line of research involves the behavior

0:27:26.920 --> 0:27:30.080
<v Speaker 1>and ants that some researchers think may be associated with

0:27:30.119 --> 0:27:35.040
<v Speaker 1>an internal state analogous to happiness or joy. Uh so,

0:27:35.240 --> 0:27:38.560
<v Speaker 1>what might the dreaded fire ant have in common with

0:27:38.640 --> 0:27:44.760
<v Speaker 1>your favorite cute puppy wagging? Butt wagging? Do tell, Do tell? Alright?

0:27:44.800 --> 0:27:48.200
<v Speaker 1>So the red imported fire ant or Solenopsis invicta, has

0:27:48.200 --> 0:27:52.399
<v Speaker 1>displayed a very interesting behavior observed by a number of researchers,

0:27:52.760 --> 0:27:58.200
<v Speaker 1>reported in a study in sixteen by Debbie Castle, christophord Liu,

0:27:58.359 --> 0:28:03.199
<v Speaker 1>Hun Daniels, Shiftman, and S. Bradley Vincent called a Study

0:28:03.240 --> 0:28:06.840
<v Speaker 1>on Abdominal Wagging in the fire ant Solenopsis Invicta with

0:28:06.960 --> 0:28:11.639
<v Speaker 1>Speculation on its meaning in the Journal of Bioeconomics. So,

0:28:11.800 --> 0:28:15.000
<v Speaker 1>the researchers were just watching lots of hours of video

0:28:15.160 --> 0:28:19.720
<v Speaker 1>taken from inside a fire ant nest, and from these

0:28:19.760 --> 0:28:23.920
<v Speaker 1>observations they started to notice a pattern of behavior where

0:28:24.000 --> 0:28:27.640
<v Speaker 1>the ants inside the nest would basically stick their butt

0:28:27.760 --> 0:28:30.720
<v Speaker 1>up in the air and wave it around. Quote they

0:28:30.840 --> 0:28:33.879
<v Speaker 1>position and move their abdomen up and down at forty

0:28:33.960 --> 0:28:38.760
<v Speaker 1>five degrees, and they called this behavior wagging. Now raising

0:28:38.880 --> 0:28:42.200
<v Speaker 1>and wiggling the abdomen has uses in other contexts for

0:28:42.320 --> 0:28:46.280
<v Speaker 1>fire ants. You may have seen fire ants doing this defensively.

0:28:46.440 --> 0:28:49.080
<v Speaker 1>The abdomen or back segment of the body is also

0:28:49.200 --> 0:28:52.680
<v Speaker 1>known as a gaster, which is great like Charles Dickens name,

0:28:52.760 --> 0:28:56.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, like like William Gaster uh And outside the

0:28:56.760 --> 0:28:59.920
<v Speaker 1>nest the behavior is known as gaster flagging. They'll flag.

0:29:00.240 --> 0:29:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Usually involves raising the abdomen up higher something more like

0:29:03.240 --> 0:29:08.440
<v Speaker 1>ninety degrees. Flagging is apparently used during foraging to disperse

0:29:08.760 --> 0:29:12.320
<v Speaker 1>venom into the air, and it's believed to deter other

0:29:12.440 --> 0:29:15.760
<v Speaker 1>insects like competitor ants from the foraging area. So you're

0:29:15.760 --> 0:29:18.160
<v Speaker 1>out trying to gather food for the colony and then

0:29:18.240 --> 0:29:20.840
<v Speaker 1>some other ants come in, you will stick your butt

0:29:20.960 --> 0:29:23.920
<v Speaker 1>up in the air and spit some venom out into

0:29:23.960 --> 0:29:26.240
<v Speaker 1>the air to try to drive the other ants off.

0:29:26.600 --> 0:29:29.960
<v Speaker 1>There's also some evidence that some abdominal wagging or gas

0:29:30.120 --> 0:29:33.840
<v Speaker 1>or flagging emits a sound as the gaster joint rubs

0:29:33.920 --> 0:29:37.320
<v Speaker 1>across itself, and this would be a tiny, high pitched squeak.

0:29:37.640 --> 0:29:40.520
<v Speaker 1>We're not sure what role this sound plays, but it's

0:29:40.560 --> 0:29:43.120
<v Speaker 1>possible that has a It has a role in communications,

0:29:43.160 --> 0:29:45.800
<v Speaker 1>such as calling for help when an ant is trapped

0:29:45.920 --> 0:29:48.840
<v Speaker 1>or when it's in trouble. However, Castle at all believe

0:29:48.960 --> 0:29:52.880
<v Speaker 1>that in their observations, the inside the nest wagging behavior

0:29:53.120 --> 0:29:56.640
<v Speaker 1>was not defensive in any way. Within the nest, they

0:29:56.720 --> 0:30:01.360
<v Speaker 1>found that the wagging emitted neither sound nor um, no squeaks,

0:30:01.560 --> 0:30:05.280
<v Speaker 1>no toxins, and the stinger was never extended during this period.

0:30:05.440 --> 0:30:08.320
<v Speaker 1>So if they're just wagging around and has nothing to

0:30:08.440 --> 0:30:10.920
<v Speaker 1>do with the other types of wagging that these ants

0:30:11.040 --> 0:30:14.880
<v Speaker 1>normally do, what's going on. Furthermore, they found that the

0:30:15.040 --> 0:30:18.560
<v Speaker 1>inside nest wagging happened primarily when the ants were engaged

0:30:18.640 --> 0:30:23.680
<v Speaker 1>in two activities, eating sugar or tending to the brood

0:30:23.800 --> 0:30:26.320
<v Speaker 1>in other words, taking care of the young. Well, those

0:30:26.320 --> 0:30:30.040
<v Speaker 1>are two pleasurable experiences just for humans, sure, And they

0:30:30.120 --> 0:30:33.760
<v Speaker 1>did not find any evidence of nestmates reacting to the wagging,

0:30:34.040 --> 0:30:37.600
<v Speaker 1>so they couldn't detect any role for communication in the wagging.

0:30:38.000 --> 0:30:41.920
<v Speaker 1>So what's it for. Well, the author's hypothesized that quote

0:30:42.120 --> 0:30:46.120
<v Speaker 1>this in nest behavior might be analogous to facial expressions

0:30:46.600 --> 0:30:50.120
<v Speaker 1>and bodily postures of hedonic pleasure in humans and other

0:30:50.200 --> 0:30:54.720
<v Speaker 1>mammals during pleasurable events. So that's a very interesting idea.

0:30:54.880 --> 0:30:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps a fire ant smiles by wagging its gaster in

0:30:59.560 --> 0:31:02.640
<v Speaker 1>the air. Now, we should definitely acknowledge, and the researchers

0:31:02.720 --> 0:31:05.040
<v Speaker 1>do acknowledge that this is far from proven. That there

0:31:05.040 --> 0:31:08.480
<v Speaker 1>are a few other possibilities to Maybe the wagging is

0:31:08.560 --> 0:31:12.440
<v Speaker 1>some kind of mechanical reaction in the body to certain

0:31:12.600 --> 0:31:15.000
<v Speaker 1>uses of the mouth parts, so that the mouth parts

0:31:15.040 --> 0:31:17.960
<v Speaker 1>would be engaged during eating or during tending to the brood.

0:31:18.360 --> 0:31:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Maybe something's happening that just happens to make their butt

0:31:21.040 --> 0:31:23.760
<v Speaker 1>wiggle in the air at the same time. So it

0:31:23.960 --> 0:31:25.960
<v Speaker 1>would help if this could be paired with other types

0:31:26.040 --> 0:31:29.800
<v Speaker 1>of tests. For example, would consuming sugar water or tending

0:31:29.840 --> 0:31:32.560
<v Speaker 1>to the brood also cause the fire ants to have

0:31:32.600 --> 0:31:36.120
<v Speaker 1>an optimistic bias in judgment bias tests? That would probably

0:31:36.160 --> 0:31:38.920
<v Speaker 1>strengthen the case for this wagging as a bodily expression

0:31:39.000 --> 0:31:42.800
<v Speaker 1>of something like pleasure or happiness. But I love the possibility.

0:31:43.120 --> 0:31:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Maybe the ant smiles with its But but again, this

0:31:47.080 --> 0:31:51.200
<v Speaker 1>would this would come down to a It's some physical

0:31:51.280 --> 0:31:56.200
<v Speaker 1>body language that is observable that would potentially demonstrate the

0:31:56.360 --> 0:32:00.400
<v Speaker 1>emotional state of the creature, right, and it would helpful

0:32:00.440 --> 0:32:02.080
<v Speaker 1>if you could pare it with other things that were

0:32:02.120 --> 0:32:05.560
<v Speaker 1>presumed to be associated with that same state. Now, another

0:32:05.640 --> 0:32:08.920
<v Speaker 1>one about positive emotions comes back to bumble bees, which

0:32:08.960 --> 0:32:11.640
<v Speaker 1>we mentioned in the last episode. Remember earlier there was

0:32:11.720 --> 0:32:14.360
<v Speaker 1>this research seeming to indicate the giving a bumblebee some

0:32:14.480 --> 0:32:17.239
<v Speaker 1>free sugar would result in an optimistic bias in these

0:32:17.320 --> 0:32:20.840
<v Speaker 1>cognitive tests. Another test on bumblebees looked at the effects

0:32:20.840 --> 0:32:24.600
<v Speaker 1>of sugar water on behavior after a stressful event. So,

0:32:24.920 --> 0:32:28.719
<v Speaker 1>in the wild, bumblebees are subject to ambushes by certain

0:32:28.880 --> 0:32:32.880
<v Speaker 1>sit and wait predators, such as the crab spider. Have

0:32:32.960 --> 0:32:36.640
<v Speaker 1>you ever seen a crab spider in action? I'm not well.

0:32:36.720 --> 0:32:39.640
<v Speaker 1>So they will tend to wait on a flower, uh,

0:32:39.720 --> 0:32:42.000
<v Speaker 1>and they'll just kind of blend in there among the

0:32:42.080 --> 0:32:45.920
<v Speaker 1>petals that they've got these wide legs, uh for a

0:32:46.040 --> 0:32:48.320
<v Speaker 1>big hug. And then when the bee lands on the

0:32:48.400 --> 0:32:51.600
<v Speaker 1>flower to try to get some nectar, the crab spider

0:32:51.680 --> 0:32:54.080
<v Speaker 1>will grab it with its legs and try to bite

0:32:54.160 --> 0:32:56.760
<v Speaker 1>down and kill it. And a lot of times in

0:32:56.880 --> 0:33:00.360
<v Speaker 1>natural encounters, the bee is briefly captured by the spider,

0:33:00.440 --> 0:33:04.480
<v Speaker 1>but then manages to escape. So, in a twenty sixteen experiment,

0:33:04.800 --> 0:33:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Perry at All created a simulation of a crab spider

0:33:08.120 --> 0:33:11.480
<v Speaker 1>attack by putting together a mechanism that would ambush and

0:33:11.600 --> 0:33:16.640
<v Speaker 1>trap a bumblebee for three seconds before releasing it unharmed. Now, obviously,

0:33:16.840 --> 0:33:19.480
<v Speaker 1>after a stressful brush with death like this, the bee

0:33:19.840 --> 0:33:23.080
<v Speaker 1>will take some time before it again begins to forage

0:33:23.120 --> 0:33:25.960
<v Speaker 1>and start landing on flowers and stuff. And what Perry

0:33:26.040 --> 0:33:28.800
<v Speaker 1>at All found was that a treat of sugar water

0:33:29.000 --> 0:33:33.080
<v Speaker 1>given before the attack would shorten the duration of this

0:33:33.320 --> 0:33:36.800
<v Speaker 1>cool down period after the spider attack. So if a

0:33:36.880 --> 0:33:40.640
<v Speaker 1>bee gets a sweet treat before a simulated spider attack,

0:33:41.040 --> 0:33:44.560
<v Speaker 1>it takes the bee less time to reinitiate landing on

0:33:44.720 --> 0:33:48.320
<v Speaker 1>flowers and feeding after this stressful event. Now, again, there

0:33:48.360 --> 0:33:51.080
<v Speaker 1>could be other interpretations of what's happening here. Maybe somehow

0:33:51.120 --> 0:33:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the nutrition and the sugar makes the bee physically stronger

0:33:54.960 --> 0:33:58.120
<v Speaker 1>and less vulnerable, etcetera. And maybe something like that. But

0:33:58.640 --> 0:34:02.360
<v Speaker 1>one possibility is the the pleasurable stimuli of the sugar

0:34:02.400 --> 0:34:05.320
<v Speaker 1>water puts the bee in something analogous to a better

0:34:05.480 --> 0:34:09.920
<v Speaker 1>mood or emotional state, making it more resilient to stressful setbacks,

0:34:10.440 --> 0:34:12.680
<v Speaker 1>which I think is something that we're probably all familiar

0:34:12.719 --> 0:34:16.120
<v Speaker 1>with ourselves. Right, you know that your emotional state is

0:34:16.400 --> 0:34:22.040
<v Speaker 1>uh dictate strongly how you will react to negative incoming events, right, Right,

0:34:22.320 --> 0:34:24.160
<v Speaker 1>The same thing that floors you one day, I'll just

0:34:24.239 --> 0:34:26.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of bounce off you another right, right, Or if

0:34:26.680 --> 0:34:29.200
<v Speaker 1>you've had a particularly bad day, then bad news is

0:34:29.280 --> 0:34:32.600
<v Speaker 1>going to you know, have a more negative effect on

0:34:32.680 --> 0:34:36.800
<v Speaker 1>your well being right now. The authors identify vocalizations and

0:34:36.960 --> 0:34:40.600
<v Speaker 1>sound as a possibly very fruitful behavioral avenue for future

0:34:40.640 --> 0:34:44.759
<v Speaker 1>research and invertebrate emotions, noting that Charles Starwin himself speculated

0:34:44.800 --> 0:34:48.680
<v Speaker 1>in eighteen seventy two that quote, insects might potentially communicate

0:34:48.719 --> 0:34:53.840
<v Speaker 1>emotions such as anger, terror, jealousy, and love through their stridulation,

0:34:54.400 --> 0:34:57.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, the great rubbing together sounds that insects make.

0:34:58.000 --> 0:35:02.319
<v Speaker 1>So what does a jealous cricket sound like? I'm not sure,

0:35:02.400 --> 0:35:06.800
<v Speaker 1>but it's easy to imagine all the various anthropomorphic interpretations.

0:35:06.880 --> 0:35:10.560
<v Speaker 1>So regarding our our ideal cartoon cricket, I'm sure. Do

0:35:10.600 --> 0:35:13.959
<v Speaker 1>you even remember how in the original Pinocchio, Pinocchio kills

0:35:14.000 --> 0:35:18.120
<v Speaker 1>the cricket with a hammer? What? Yeah, the cartoon or

0:35:18.280 --> 0:35:20.320
<v Speaker 1>no story? Not? No, no, not in the movie the

0:35:20.719 --> 0:35:23.600
<v Speaker 1>movie changed it made it nicer in the original story.

0:35:24.320 --> 0:35:27.239
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy cricket, Yeah, oh man, I don't remember if he's

0:35:27.320 --> 0:35:29.720
<v Speaker 1>named Jiminy cricket. I think he's just a magic cricket

0:35:29.800 --> 0:35:32.680
<v Speaker 1>and Pinocchio kills him with a hammer. I didn't even

0:35:32.719 --> 0:35:36.080
<v Speaker 1>know that Pinocchio is in one of his bad phases. Uh.

0:35:36.280 --> 0:35:39.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, I don't think I like Pinocchio. I don't

0:35:39.239 --> 0:35:40.960
<v Speaker 1>have a lot. I don't have a strong affinity for

0:35:41.040 --> 0:35:42.800
<v Speaker 1>the Disney version either. The only thing that I have

0:35:42.880 --> 0:35:46.160
<v Speaker 1>a strong affinity for is Jimmy crickets role in the

0:35:46.440 --> 0:35:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Mickey Christmas Carol, in which he plays what the ghost

0:35:50.239 --> 0:35:52.800
<v Speaker 1>of Christmas past? I believe, I don't. I don't know

0:35:52.840 --> 0:35:54.400
<v Speaker 1>if I ever seen that. You should see. It's like

0:35:54.760 --> 0:35:58.759
<v Speaker 1>thirty minutes long, and it's it's a pretty good, streamlined

0:35:58.760 --> 0:36:01.799
<v Speaker 1>adaptation of Chris was Carroll. I'm sure it's better than

0:36:01.840 --> 0:36:04.200
<v Speaker 1>the other thirty minute version of a Christmas Carol I've seen,

0:36:04.239 --> 0:36:07.120
<v Speaker 1>which is called the Christmas Carol and it's narrated by

0:36:07.200 --> 0:36:10.719
<v Speaker 1>Vincent Price. It's very bad. Man. Well, later this year,

0:36:10.800 --> 0:36:12.880
<v Speaker 1>when Christmas frows around again, I think we should do

0:36:12.880 --> 0:36:14.520
<v Speaker 1>an episode on a Christmas Carol. I think there's a

0:36:14.560 --> 0:36:16.520
<v Speaker 1>lot to discussed there. Okay, well, maybe we should take

0:36:16.520 --> 0:36:18.000
<v Speaker 1>a break and then when we come back we can

0:36:18.040 --> 0:36:25.440
<v Speaker 1>talk about physiological tests than Alright, we're back. So we're

0:36:25.600 --> 0:36:28.320
<v Speaker 1>entering the final phase here. We're going to be discussing

0:36:28.520 --> 0:36:33.040
<v Speaker 1>physiological tests for emotion. Right, so we've talked about cognitive tests,

0:36:33.080 --> 0:36:36.600
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about behavioral tests. Physiological tests for emotion uh

0:36:36.719 --> 0:36:39.600
<v Speaker 1>in people, they look for correl It's between reported emotional

0:36:39.680 --> 0:36:42.920
<v Speaker 1>states and automatic responses in the body. So, for example,

0:36:43.320 --> 0:36:46.040
<v Speaker 1>somebody jumps out at you with a werewolf mask. You're

0:36:46.080 --> 0:36:48.600
<v Speaker 1>not just gonna jump back. It's not just gonna maybe

0:36:48.640 --> 0:36:50.920
<v Speaker 1>give you a pessimistic bias. But you will also have

0:36:51.640 --> 0:36:54.839
<v Speaker 1>increased heart rate, release of stress hormones like nora ep

0:36:54.920 --> 0:36:57.600
<v Speaker 1>and effer and and cortisol, dilation of the pupils in

0:36:57.640 --> 0:36:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the eye. You might be a bit you know, by

0:37:00.080 --> 0:37:01.640
<v Speaker 1>just stuff. I know a lot of this is because

0:37:01.680 --> 0:37:03.719
<v Speaker 1>it's not just that you saw a werewolf. It's that

0:37:03.840 --> 0:37:06.880
<v Speaker 1>your body is preparing you to fight a werewolf or

0:37:07.040 --> 0:37:09.520
<v Speaker 1>run from a werewolf. Right, The fight or flight response

0:37:09.600 --> 0:37:13.680
<v Speaker 1>kicks in and and it entails this cascade of automatic

0:37:13.760 --> 0:37:16.879
<v Speaker 1>reactions in the body, things that you don't control behaviorally.

0:37:16.960 --> 0:37:20.520
<v Speaker 1>They just happen without your say so. And these physiological

0:37:20.600 --> 0:37:23.920
<v Speaker 1>responses can usually be measured objectively pretty easily, which is

0:37:24.040 --> 0:37:28.560
<v Speaker 1>very handy. However, physiological responses alone can be They can

0:37:28.600 --> 0:37:31.680
<v Speaker 1>be hard to use to identify individual emotions. For example,

0:37:32.120 --> 0:37:35.240
<v Speaker 1>if you're measuring a heart rate, heart rate might increase

0:37:35.280 --> 0:37:38.759
<v Speaker 1>in response to anxiety or to joy. The fact that

0:37:38.840 --> 0:37:41.719
<v Speaker 1>the heart speeds up it's beating tells you there's some

0:37:41.840 --> 0:37:44.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of arousal, but it doesn't necessarily tell you which one.

0:37:45.480 --> 0:37:48.560
<v Speaker 1>The person's heart could just be full of song, right.

0:37:49.040 --> 0:37:53.040
<v Speaker 1>So sometimes if you look at enough different physiological responses

0:37:53.040 --> 0:37:55.600
<v Speaker 1>at the same time and compare them, you can start

0:37:55.680 --> 0:37:59.120
<v Speaker 1>to zero in on specific emotions, but not always. And

0:37:59.280 --> 0:38:02.719
<v Speaker 1>just like it's to translate research on human facial expressions

0:38:02.760 --> 0:38:05.560
<v Speaker 1>to invertebrates, it's also hard to do so with human

0:38:05.600 --> 0:38:10.040
<v Speaker 1>physiological responses to emotions. Uh. The authors write, quote, most

0:38:10.120 --> 0:38:12.640
<v Speaker 1>of these types of measurements are quite difficult to apply

0:38:12.760 --> 0:38:16.920
<v Speaker 1>to invertebrates given their often miniature size and hard carapaces, and,

0:38:17.400 --> 0:38:20.560
<v Speaker 1>in the case of insects, an open circulatory system where

0:38:20.600 --> 0:38:23.360
<v Speaker 1>heart rate is not increased. But there has been some

0:38:23.640 --> 0:38:26.880
<v Speaker 1>interesting research. Nonetheless, they cite a bunch of it just

0:38:27.000 --> 0:38:29.920
<v Speaker 1>to pick out a couple of examples. Keita at all.

0:38:29.960 --> 0:38:32.960
<v Speaker 1>In two thousand eleven did research on fear conditioning, this

0:38:33.080 --> 0:38:38.480
<v Speaker 1>time in pond snails, very expressive species. Uh. They condition

0:38:38.560 --> 0:38:41.879
<v Speaker 1>the pond snails with an association between sugar water, which

0:38:42.000 --> 0:38:45.080
<v Speaker 1>normally you give some give some sugar water to them

0:38:45.280 --> 0:38:49.080
<v Speaker 1>and they will start feeding behaviors. But they negatively conditioned

0:38:49.200 --> 0:38:54.320
<v Speaker 1>this with potassium chloride associations, and potassium chloride causes withdrawal

0:38:54.560 --> 0:38:57.600
<v Speaker 1>of the body into the shell. Uh. Not only did

0:38:57.719 --> 0:39:00.520
<v Speaker 1>fear conditioning work the snails began to react to the

0:39:00.560 --> 0:39:05.880
<v Speaker 1>sugar by withdrawing, but physiological monitoring also found that conditioned

0:39:05.920 --> 0:39:09.200
<v Speaker 1>exposure to the sugar caused the heart to skip a

0:39:09.280 --> 0:39:14.040
<v Speaker 1>beat quote, suggesting physiological responses similar to fear in mammals.

0:39:14.480 --> 0:39:19.080
<v Speaker 1>So you train them to associate potassium chloride, this noxious chemical,

0:39:19.239 --> 0:39:22.160
<v Speaker 1>with the sugar, then later you just present them with sugar.

0:39:22.360 --> 0:39:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Not only do they not go for the sugar, it

0:39:24.320 --> 0:39:26.799
<v Speaker 1>makes their hearts skip a beat. Though. I do think

0:39:26.840 --> 0:39:29.520
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting to know potassium chloride is literally a heart

0:39:29.600 --> 0:39:32.920
<v Speaker 1>stopping poison. It's been used to cause cardiac arrest and

0:39:33.080 --> 0:39:36.800
<v Speaker 1>lethal injections. Of course, there was no potassium chloride in

0:39:36.800 --> 0:39:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the sugar once it was conditioned, but maybe that's just

0:39:39.480 --> 0:39:42.719
<v Speaker 1>a coincidence. But the idea is that been presented with

0:39:42.960 --> 0:39:45.239
<v Speaker 1>the with the sugar, then after being exposed to the

0:39:45.239 --> 0:39:50.160
<v Speaker 1>potassium chloride, there is this this moment of physiological fear

0:39:50.320 --> 0:39:53.680
<v Speaker 1>in response, right, the body reacts in a way similar

0:39:53.760 --> 0:39:57.399
<v Speaker 1>to mammals reacting to the werewolf mask, but this time

0:39:57.480 --> 0:40:00.360
<v Speaker 1>it's just sugar that the snail has come with training

0:40:00.400 --> 0:40:03.880
<v Speaker 1>to associate with a bad chemical. Uh So, it seems

0:40:03.960 --> 0:40:07.640
<v Speaker 1>that the majority of research on physiological correlates of invertebrate

0:40:07.680 --> 0:40:10.319
<v Speaker 1>emotions has to do with the presence of what are

0:40:10.360 --> 0:40:14.400
<v Speaker 1>called biogenic amines, which are thought to play a major,

0:40:14.560 --> 0:40:18.040
<v Speaker 1>if not comprehensive role in the creation and control of

0:40:18.120 --> 0:40:23.960
<v Speaker 1>emotions in the human brain, especially the hormones and neurotransmitters serotonin, dopamine,

0:40:24.320 --> 0:40:28.640
<v Speaker 1>and nora adrenaline. Now, as important as these three substances

0:40:28.800 --> 0:40:32.400
<v Speaker 1>clearly are in our emotional lives, unfortunately it is not

0:40:32.600 --> 0:40:35.320
<v Speaker 1>as simple as saying one is a happiness drug in

0:40:35.400 --> 0:40:38.319
<v Speaker 1>the body and one is a fear drug, etcetera. They

0:40:38.800 --> 0:40:43.360
<v Speaker 1>play complex interacting roles in everything from attention and arousal

0:40:43.760 --> 0:40:47.680
<v Speaker 1>to reward, motivation and sleep, and the manipulation of emotions

0:40:47.840 --> 0:40:51.279
<v Speaker 1>is generally not as simple as just saying like, well,

0:40:51.320 --> 0:40:55.200
<v Speaker 1>you need more of one of these things, but manipulating

0:40:55.239 --> 0:40:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the presence of one or more of these neurotransmitters can

0:40:58.160 --> 0:41:02.280
<v Speaker 1>have some measurable effects on emotion. For example, invertebrate nervous

0:41:02.320 --> 0:41:05.640
<v Speaker 1>systems also appear to make use of these biogenic amines

0:41:06.040 --> 0:41:09.280
<v Speaker 1>or analogs to them. For example, in bees, the hormone

0:41:09.320 --> 0:41:11.880
<v Speaker 1>octopomy and appears to play a role similar to that

0:41:12.000 --> 0:41:14.839
<v Speaker 1>of nora adrenaline and humans. And so they cite one

0:41:14.880 --> 0:41:19.200
<v Speaker 1>possible example of these physiological parallels quote Bates and and

0:41:19.320 --> 0:41:23.200
<v Speaker 1>colleagues in two thousand eleven assessed how systemic biogenic amine

0:41:23.320 --> 0:41:27.680
<v Speaker 1>levels changed in response to a presumed negative emotional event

0:41:28.120 --> 0:41:32.239
<v Speaker 1>hemal lymph. And remember that's like insect blood. Hamal Lymph

0:41:32.320 --> 0:41:35.840
<v Speaker 1>was collected from honey bees after simulating a predator attack

0:41:36.120 --> 0:41:38.920
<v Speaker 1>shaking bees on a vortex for sixty seconds. And this

0:41:39.080 --> 0:41:41.240
<v Speaker 1>is like the thing we talked about in the last episode,

0:41:41.239 --> 0:41:43.719
<v Speaker 1>where you'd shake the colony to simulate an attacked by

0:41:43.760 --> 0:41:47.759
<v Speaker 1>a honey badger. Picking up with the quote, analysis of

0:41:47.840 --> 0:41:52.600
<v Speaker 1>the hemolymph using high performance liquid chromatography or HPLC showed

0:41:52.640 --> 0:41:57.040
<v Speaker 1>that systemic levels of the biogenic amines dopamine, octopamine che

0:41:57.320 --> 0:42:00.680
<v Speaker 1>chemically similar to noor adrenaline, and so tone in all

0:42:00.960 --> 0:42:05.200
<v Speaker 1>decreased in response to bees being shaken vigorously. In humans,

0:42:05.280 --> 0:42:09.480
<v Speaker 1>it seems that depletion of biogenic amine serotonin, noor adrenaline,

0:42:09.520 --> 0:42:13.360
<v Speaker 1>and dopamine is responsible for features of depression in the

0:42:13.440 --> 0:42:18.640
<v Speaker 1>monamine Hypothesis of depression and also inteen Faucet and colleagues

0:42:19.320 --> 0:42:23.600
<v Speaker 1>reportedly used chemical manipulation of serotonin levels to alter anxiety

0:42:23.680 --> 0:42:27.600
<v Speaker 1>associated behaviors of crayfish, like in the plus maze scenario.

0:42:28.200 --> 0:42:32.480
<v Speaker 1>One last one period All in TwixT found that manipulation

0:42:32.560 --> 0:42:36.239
<v Speaker 1>of dopamine levels seemed to affect the apparent positive emotional

0:42:36.400 --> 0:42:40.240
<v Speaker 1>state of bumble bees. Remember the sugar causing the bumble

0:42:40.280 --> 0:42:43.640
<v Speaker 1>bees to have an optimistic bias. Well here quote the

0:42:43.760 --> 0:42:47.160
<v Speaker 1>optimistic behavior scene and the judgment bias test in response

0:42:47.239 --> 0:42:51.399
<v Speaker 1>to pretest sugar reward was abolished when the bees were

0:42:51.440 --> 0:42:56.800
<v Speaker 1>topically treated with the dopamine receptor antagonist flu finazine, and

0:42:56.960 --> 0:43:00.440
<v Speaker 1>apparently the same treatment eliminated the positive effect of retest

0:43:00.560 --> 0:43:04.040
<v Speaker 1>sugar during the simulated attack by a crab spider. So

0:43:04.120 --> 0:43:07.120
<v Speaker 1>if you do something to this insect's dopamine levels. By

0:43:07.239 --> 0:43:11.840
<v Speaker 1>by putting in this disruptor of dopamine, you somehow seem

0:43:11.920 --> 0:43:16.080
<v Speaker 1>to interfere with the bees ability to have an optimistic

0:43:16.200 --> 0:43:19.960
<v Speaker 1>bias in response to getting some sugar. Interesting. So, basically,

0:43:20.000 --> 0:43:22.480
<v Speaker 1>the more we reveal about sort of the underlying chemistry

0:43:23.040 --> 0:43:25.680
<v Speaker 1>of these emotional states um as as they are in

0:43:25.800 --> 0:43:28.120
<v Speaker 1>humans and as they are in these various invertebrate species,

0:43:28.280 --> 0:43:33.040
<v Speaker 1>it just reveals that, yeah, we have emotional states occurring

0:43:33.120 --> 0:43:36.279
<v Speaker 1>in these organisms, at least the physiological corelates of them.

0:43:36.680 --> 0:43:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Right Again, Yeah, we can't begin to get into the

0:43:38.960 --> 0:43:42.920
<v Speaker 1>subjective aspect of it, which you know, made very I

0:43:42.960 --> 0:43:44.360
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's a stretch at all to say that

0:43:44.480 --> 0:43:48.160
<v Speaker 1>whatever a crawfish is experiencing is fear, is different than

0:43:48.280 --> 0:43:50.800
<v Speaker 1>what a humans experienced in his fear. It can't it

0:43:50.880 --> 0:43:53.040
<v Speaker 1>can't contemplate the fear at the same level that that

0:43:53.080 --> 0:43:55.759
<v Speaker 1>a human can. But like the root of it, like

0:43:55.880 --> 0:44:01.160
<v Speaker 1>the root chemical and physic, physiological, um manifestation of that

0:44:01.239 --> 0:44:05.239
<v Speaker 1>emotion is essentially the same. Right. And I think now

0:44:05.320 --> 0:44:08.400
<v Speaker 1>we've seen maybe not conclusive, but pretty good evidence in

0:44:08.560 --> 0:44:11.279
<v Speaker 1>three different branches, not just the physiological which we were

0:44:11.320 --> 0:44:13.920
<v Speaker 1>just talking about but earlier the cognitive and in the

0:44:14.000 --> 0:44:17.080
<v Speaker 1>behavioral spheres. And I think we should emphasize again, you

0:44:17.160 --> 0:44:19.200
<v Speaker 1>know what you're getting at. None of these tests are perfect.

0:44:19.280 --> 0:44:22.359
<v Speaker 1>Even if all the results are robust, replicable, they hold

0:44:22.440 --> 0:44:25.480
<v Speaker 1>up over time, they still don't necessarily tell us anything

0:44:25.520 --> 0:44:28.360
<v Speaker 1>about what it's like to be a bumblebee or a crayfish.

0:44:28.560 --> 0:44:30.920
<v Speaker 1>I think there's always going to be that gap that

0:44:31.040 --> 0:44:35.120
<v Speaker 1>we are perhaps jumping with the rocket boots of anthropomorphic projection.

0:44:35.320 --> 0:44:38.400
<v Speaker 1>But for now, experiments like these are the best evidence

0:44:38.440 --> 0:44:41.200
<v Speaker 1>we have to try to figure out what kinds of emotions,

0:44:41.280 --> 0:44:45.520
<v Speaker 1>if any, are present in insects, crustaceans, gastropods, and all

0:44:45.640 --> 0:44:49.080
<v Speaker 1>manner of creatures without a spine. And those things we

0:44:49.239 --> 0:44:52.520
<v Speaker 1>learned could be very helpful in helping us understand how

0:44:52.600 --> 0:44:57.839
<v Speaker 1>emotions in mammals, including humans, developed over evolutionary time, because there,

0:44:57.960 --> 0:45:01.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, we we look at modern invertebrates and see

0:45:01.680 --> 0:45:05.080
<v Speaker 1>nervous systems. You know that their brain structure is very

0:45:05.160 --> 0:45:08.040
<v Speaker 1>similar to what we think our ancestors may have had

0:45:08.040 --> 0:45:10.600
<v Speaker 1>at certain times in history. We can learn what the

0:45:10.680 --> 0:45:14.680
<v Speaker 1>chemical mechanisms of emotional motivation states are how they came

0:45:14.760 --> 0:45:18.040
<v Speaker 1>to be humans ain't crawd ads, but crawd ads can

0:45:18.120 --> 0:45:21.479
<v Speaker 1>still teach us a lot. I think now at this point,

0:45:21.960 --> 0:45:25.359
<v Speaker 1>I bet one question a lot of people may have is, Okay, well,

0:45:25.400 --> 0:45:28.360
<v Speaker 1>what sorts of animals don't have emotions? Then? Like, is

0:45:28.400 --> 0:45:30.560
<v Speaker 1>there is there any level that we can say, all right,

0:45:30.600 --> 0:45:33.600
<v Speaker 1>here's the cut off point? Um. You know, it's it's

0:45:33.600 --> 0:45:37.800
<v Speaker 1>an interesting question to consider. UM. And I was poking

0:45:37.840 --> 0:45:39.960
<v Speaker 1>around and basically one thing I have to realize is

0:45:39.960 --> 0:45:43.000
<v Speaker 1>that is, like we said earlier, the quest for invertebrate

0:45:43.640 --> 0:45:48.880
<v Speaker 1>emotions is is not as expansive as as other areas

0:45:48.920 --> 0:45:52.840
<v Speaker 1>of emotional research, certainly in higher organisms. So there's just

0:45:52.920 --> 0:45:56.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of data we don't have. UM. So you know,

0:45:56.360 --> 0:45:57.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know when you get down to like single

0:45:57.920 --> 0:46:01.160
<v Speaker 1>cell organisms, I don't see. I didn't find any papers

0:46:01.280 --> 0:46:05.320
<v Speaker 1>arguing for emotional states there no, uh. And even in

0:46:05.840 --> 0:46:10.040
<v Speaker 1>weirdly like we think octopuses are more complex, uh, you know,

0:46:10.200 --> 0:46:13.160
<v Speaker 1>in terms of intelligence than these other than like insects

0:46:13.280 --> 0:46:17.160
<v Speaker 1>and crayfish are. But I wasn't really finding much in

0:46:17.239 --> 0:46:20.120
<v Speaker 1>the way of studying emotions and octopuses. It was mostly

0:46:20.160 --> 0:46:23.880
<v Speaker 1>in these simpler organisms. So yeah, there's clearly still lots

0:46:23.920 --> 0:46:27.000
<v Speaker 1>of ground to cover. Yeah, now, I mean, you know,

0:46:27.080 --> 0:46:30.080
<v Speaker 1>it's one of the I don't think anybody's actually arguing that, say,

0:46:30.160 --> 0:46:32.960
<v Speaker 1>a slime mold has emotions either. But we have discussed

0:46:32.960 --> 0:46:36.520
<v Speaker 1>in the show how a slime mold, uh, an organism

0:46:36.560 --> 0:46:40.000
<v Speaker 1>without like a central nervous system, is still able to learn,

0:46:40.200 --> 0:46:43.080
<v Speaker 1>it's still engaging in things that are are are like

0:46:43.360 --> 0:46:47.120
<v Speaker 1>problem solving. So you know, the stuff like that adds

0:46:47.400 --> 0:46:51.000
<v Speaker 1>uh some complexity to this question. But then another thing

0:46:51.040 --> 0:46:54.800
<v Speaker 1>we came to mind, uh plants the topic itself. I

0:46:54.840 --> 0:46:56.680
<v Speaker 1>think we'll have to wait wait for another episode, but

0:46:56.800 --> 0:47:00.480
<v Speaker 1>plants can essentially here, see, smell, and respond to stimuli,

0:47:01.120 --> 0:47:03.800
<v Speaker 1>and they are, according to a University of Missouri in

0:47:03.880 --> 0:47:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Columbia plant science professor Jack C. Schultz, essentially quote just

0:47:08.600 --> 0:47:14.239
<v Speaker 1>very slow animals um which uh, which I think it is.

0:47:14.960 --> 0:47:18.520
<v Speaker 1>It is hilarious. But at the same time it you know,

0:47:18.600 --> 0:47:22.440
<v Speaker 1>you you you look at say time time lapse footage

0:47:22.600 --> 0:47:27.160
<v Speaker 1>of save vines in action and flowers and uh and

0:47:27.320 --> 0:47:30.480
<v Speaker 1>so forth. They're just the movements of of of plants

0:47:30.520 --> 0:47:33.440
<v Speaker 1>in general. And this does have that seem to have

0:47:33.440 --> 0:47:35.360
<v Speaker 1>a ring of truth to it that this is this

0:47:35.520 --> 0:47:37.480
<v Speaker 1>is an organism that is not as still as we

0:47:37.800 --> 0:47:40.240
<v Speaker 1>uh as we may think. We touched the this briefly

0:47:40.280 --> 0:47:42.960
<v Speaker 1>and the recent Tolkien episodes, you know, the the idea

0:47:43.000 --> 0:47:45.800
<v Speaker 1>of the end, the moving tree, the tree that thinks

0:47:45.840 --> 0:47:49.200
<v Speaker 1>and reasons, um may not be as far fetched as

0:47:49.640 --> 0:47:53.920
<v Speaker 1>as some of us think. But as for emotions and plants, uh,

0:47:54.040 --> 0:47:57.279
<v Speaker 1>there's actually some fascinating research there as well. But that

0:47:57.480 --> 0:48:00.920
<v Speaker 1>is another story and shall be told another time time. Okay,

0:48:01.800 --> 0:48:03.960
<v Speaker 1>So hopefully we give everybody some food for thought here

0:48:03.960 --> 0:48:07.839
<v Speaker 1>about our own emotional states, what the human emotional state

0:48:08.080 --> 0:48:10.840
<v Speaker 1>is and what it isn't and then to what degree

0:48:11.640 --> 0:48:17.960
<v Speaker 1>we can perceive and attribute emotional states to other organisms,

0:48:18.040 --> 0:48:20.600
<v Speaker 1>even though you know, the the lowly crawfish. I mean,

0:48:20.680 --> 0:48:24.520
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if understanding the way that that anxiety might

0:48:24.560 --> 0:48:28.839
<v Speaker 1>affect bees or crawfish or something like that could in wait,

0:48:29.080 --> 0:48:31.719
<v Speaker 1>help give you a foothold in controlling your own emotions.

0:48:31.760 --> 0:48:33.759
<v Speaker 1>I mean again, this is something we we sort of

0:48:33.800 --> 0:48:38.279
<v Speaker 1>began the last episode talking about how the emotions are

0:48:38.440 --> 0:48:41.040
<v Speaker 1>from our brains. They are within us, but often it

0:48:41.120 --> 0:48:43.239
<v Speaker 1>can feel as if we are in them, you know,

0:48:43.400 --> 0:48:45.480
<v Speaker 1>there see, on which we're aflow and we have no

0:48:45.719 --> 0:48:48.719
<v Speaker 1>power over them, right, or their external forces like something

0:48:48.800 --> 0:48:51.520
<v Speaker 1>from out of Greek mythology, or you know, some sort

0:48:51.560 --> 0:48:56.040
<v Speaker 1>of you know, a fundamentalist um you know, Christian worldview,

0:48:56.280 --> 0:48:58.920
<v Speaker 1>angel on one shoulder, devil on the other, affecting our

0:48:58.920 --> 0:49:00.960
<v Speaker 1>mental states. But no, it's it's all within and it

0:49:01.160 --> 0:49:03.000
<v Speaker 1>is and it is you know, a part of the

0:49:03.120 --> 0:49:06.759
<v Speaker 1>same navigation, a reality that is taking place in all

0:49:06.800 --> 0:49:09.719
<v Speaker 1>these other organisms as well. And yeah, therefore if we

0:49:09.880 --> 0:49:11.680
<v Speaker 1>demystify it a bit, if we sort of take a

0:49:11.719 --> 0:49:15.400
<v Speaker 1>step back from it and in fact increase awareness of

0:49:15.520 --> 0:49:17.759
<v Speaker 1>what it is, then yeah, that gives us, I think,

0:49:17.800 --> 0:49:21.440
<v Speaker 1>a tremendous strength. You know, it keeps basically keeping uh,

0:49:22.000 --> 0:49:26.600
<v Speaker 1>keeping our our our irksome brains from deceiving ourselves about

0:49:26.640 --> 0:49:30.399
<v Speaker 1>what we are. You are that churning ocean, Yes, which

0:49:30.480 --> 0:49:35.520
<v Speaker 1>perhaps is some ambiguous information that you may either see

0:49:35.680 --> 0:49:39.120
<v Speaker 1>in a negative or a positive light, depending on your predisposition.

0:49:40.560 --> 0:49:43.360
<v Speaker 1>All right, so obviously you all have emotions, and you

0:49:43.440 --> 0:49:46.919
<v Speaker 1>all have various interactions with animals, be it a dog,

0:49:47.040 --> 0:49:50.359
<v Speaker 1>a cattle, horse, or a crayfish or or or a bee.

0:49:50.880 --> 0:49:52.919
<v Speaker 1>So we would love to hear from everyone out there

0:49:53.080 --> 0:49:55.800
<v Speaker 1>on the topic that we've discussed in these two episodes

0:49:56.040 --> 0:49:58.080
<v Speaker 1>of Stuff to Blow Your Mind. Hey, even if you

0:49:58.120 --> 0:50:00.200
<v Speaker 1>have some thoughts about plants, go ahead and go ahead

0:50:00.200 --> 0:50:02.840
<v Speaker 1>and let us know about those. Uh. In the meantime,

0:50:02.840 --> 0:50:04.439
<v Speaker 1>if you want to check out other episodes of Stuff

0:50:04.440 --> 0:50:06.799
<v Speaker 1>to Blow Your Mind, where can you find this show? Well,

0:50:06.800 --> 0:50:10.360
<v Speaker 1>you can find this show anywhere you find podcasts, wherever

0:50:10.480 --> 0:50:12.760
<v Speaker 1>that happens to be. Just make sure you rate, review,

0:50:12.880 --> 0:50:15.480
<v Speaker 1>and subscribe. Those are the acts that help us out

0:50:16.080 --> 0:50:18.839
<v Speaker 1>huge thanks as always to our excellent audio producer Seth

0:50:18.960 --> 0:50:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Nicholas Johnson. If you would like to get in touch

0:50:21.239 --> 0:50:23.560
<v Speaker 1>with feedback on this episode or any other, to suggest

0:50:23.640 --> 0:50:25.520
<v Speaker 1>a topic for the future, or just to say hi,

0:50:25.680 --> 0:50:28.600
<v Speaker 1>you can email us at contact dot stuff to Blow

0:50:28.680 --> 0:50:38.640
<v Speaker 1>your Mind dot com. Stuff to Blow Your Mind is

0:50:38.680 --> 0:50:41.360
<v Speaker 1>production of I Heart Radio. For more podcasts for my

0:50:41.400 --> 0:50:44.480
<v Speaker 1>heart Radio, visit the iHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or

0:50:44.480 --> 0:51:01.640
<v Speaker 1>wherever you listening to your favorite shows. I Pass has

0:51:01.719 --> 0:51:03.040
<v Speaker 1>a fad backed by a part