WEBVTT - Ep 52 "What is lucid dreaming?" (Sleeping & Dreaming Part 3)

0:00:04.680 --> 0:00:09.159
<v Speaker 1>Does ten seconds in a dream equal ten seconds in

0:00:09.240 --> 0:00:13.320
<v Speaker 1>real life? How do you get information to somebody when

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:16.320
<v Speaker 1>they're in a dream and how can they answer you

0:00:16.440 --> 0:00:19.960
<v Speaker 1>back while they're inside their dream. Why might you see

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.000
<v Speaker 1>someone in real life flicking the light switch on and

0:00:23.040 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 1>off every time they enter a room? Can you prompt

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:29.880
<v Speaker 1>your brain the way you prompt a large language model

0:00:29.920 --> 0:00:33.760
<v Speaker 1>like chatchpt And if so, if you could pose one

0:00:33.880 --> 0:00:40.240
<v Speaker 1>question to your unconscious brain, what would it be. Welcome

0:00:40.280 --> 0:00:44.080
<v Speaker 1>to Inner Cosmos with me, David Eagleman. I'm a neuroscientist

0:00:44.120 --> 0:00:47.080
<v Speaker 1>and an author at Stanford and in these episodes we

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:52.120
<v Speaker 1>sail deeply into our three pound universe to understand why

0:00:52.200 --> 0:01:04.240
<v Speaker 1>and how our lives look the way they do. Today's

0:01:04.280 --> 0:01:07.720
<v Speaker 1>episode takes us on a journey into the world of

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:12.600
<v Speaker 1>lucid dreaming. What is that? How can you experience it?

0:01:13.040 --> 0:01:15.039
<v Speaker 1>And what does it teach us about the nature of

0:01:15.080 --> 0:01:18.479
<v Speaker 1>our own consciousness. Joining us in a little bit will

0:01:18.520 --> 0:01:21.840
<v Speaker 1>be my friend and colleague Jonathan Barrant, who is very

0:01:21.880 --> 0:01:26.479
<v Speaker 1>knowledgeable about the art and science of lucid dreaming. So

0:01:26.880 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 1>get comfortable and let's dive in. So maybe you saw

0:01:30.520 --> 0:01:34.200
<v Speaker 1>this great movie Inception In case you didn't or as

0:01:34.240 --> 0:01:39.400
<v Speaker 1>a reminder, this is a Christopher Nolan science fiction heist thriller.

0:01:39.920 --> 0:01:44.600
<v Speaker 1>The star is Leonardo DiCaprio, and he's a skilled thief

0:01:44.640 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 1>who specializes in extraction, which is this fictional process of

0:01:50.840 --> 0:01:55.360
<v Speaker 1>entering a person's dream and stealing valuable secrets from deep

0:01:55.600 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 1>within their subconscious Now, the core of the story revolved

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:03.960
<v Speaker 1>around this idea of inception, which is the idea of

0:02:04.400 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 1>planting an idea into somebody's subconscious mind without them knowing. So,

0:02:09.840 --> 0:02:14.440
<v Speaker 1>without giving away any details, DiCaprio sets out to incept

0:02:14.520 --> 0:02:19.520
<v Speaker 1>an idea into a business magnate's dream and this is

0:02:19.520 --> 0:02:24.000
<v Speaker 1>a really complex operation that requires his team to navigate

0:02:24.440 --> 0:02:28.799
<v Speaker 1>through dreams within dreams within dreams. And I won't give

0:02:28.800 --> 0:02:33.000
<v Speaker 1>away any spoilers here, but one of the very cinematically

0:02:33.120 --> 0:02:36.320
<v Speaker 1>cool ideas of the movie is that each layer of

0:02:36.480 --> 0:02:41.280
<v Speaker 1>dreams has successive time dilation. So when you go down

0:02:41.320 --> 0:02:44.440
<v Speaker 1>into the first level, ten seconds in the real world

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:48.840
<v Speaker 1>might correspond to a minute of dream time, and as

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:52.640
<v Speaker 1>you go deeper, the ten seconds might correspond to a

0:02:52.800 --> 0:02:56.480
<v Speaker 1>year or a decade of dream time. So the idea

0:02:56.520 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 1>in the movie is that dream time does not correspond

0:03:00.480 --> 0:03:03.720
<v Speaker 1>to real time. Now. It's a terrific movie, and if

0:03:03.760 --> 0:03:06.600
<v Speaker 1>you haven't seen it, you should. But there's this question

0:03:06.800 --> 0:03:10.040
<v Speaker 1>which lots of people have wondered about, which is, how

0:03:10.040 --> 0:03:12.680
<v Speaker 1>would you know if that's true? How would you know

0:03:13.320 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 1>whether dream time matches real time or not? Now you

0:03:18.520 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 1>might feel like they don't correspond. And this is in

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:24.560
<v Speaker 1>part because sometimes you wake up from a dream and

0:03:24.600 --> 0:03:27.520
<v Speaker 1>you want to tell someone about it, but the telling

0:03:27.760 --> 0:03:30.400
<v Speaker 1>of the dream often seems to take a long time,

0:03:30.520 --> 0:03:33.480
<v Speaker 1>even if the dream only took you a second. And

0:03:33.560 --> 0:03:35.960
<v Speaker 1>in the last episode, I touched on why this can

0:03:36.080 --> 0:03:39.800
<v Speaker 1>be confusing because sometimes you have to explain a bunch

0:03:39.840 --> 0:03:44.240
<v Speaker 1>of background details, and sometimes you have false memories in

0:03:44.280 --> 0:03:46.600
<v Speaker 1>the dream that need to be included, and so it

0:03:46.640 --> 0:03:50.440
<v Speaker 1>sometimes takes time to get the whole thing put into words.

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:55.280
<v Speaker 1>So it can be difficult to answer whether dream time

0:03:55.440 --> 0:03:59.320
<v Speaker 1>and real time correspond. But today we're going to go

0:03:59.400 --> 0:04:02.240
<v Speaker 1>one step deeper. We're going to ask is there a

0:04:02.280 --> 0:04:06.960
<v Speaker 1>way that you could actually test this? Now, think about

0:04:06.960 --> 0:04:09.640
<v Speaker 1>what a difficult question this is, because it would require

0:04:09.960 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 1>somebody to be inside of their dream, and somehow they

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:17.480
<v Speaker 1>would need to communicate with you what they are experiencing.

0:04:17.560 --> 0:04:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Privately in their head. Now that sounds totally impossible under

0:04:21.720 --> 0:04:25.400
<v Speaker 1>normal circumstances, But the question is, could you ever be

0:04:25.480 --> 0:04:30.080
<v Speaker 1>inside a dream and figure out how to communicate outside

0:04:30.240 --> 0:04:34.159
<v Speaker 1>of the dream, Or even better, could we think of

0:04:34.200 --> 0:04:37.960
<v Speaker 1>a way to get bi directional communications so that someone

0:04:38.200 --> 0:04:42.560
<v Speaker 1>outside can communicate with you in your dream and then

0:04:42.640 --> 0:04:46.200
<v Speaker 1>you communicate back out to them. Well, it turns out

0:04:46.560 --> 0:04:48.960
<v Speaker 1>there is a way to do that, and that's what

0:04:49.000 --> 0:04:51.440
<v Speaker 1>we're going to talk about today. We're going to talk

0:04:51.480 --> 0:04:57.479
<v Speaker 1>about lucid dreaming, and this is when a sleeper realizes

0:04:57.839 --> 0:05:01.119
<v Speaker 1>that he or she is dreaming and then is able

0:05:01.160 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 1>to take some control over the plot of their dream.

0:05:05.120 --> 0:05:07.839
<v Speaker 1>They might choose to fly, or they can try to

0:05:07.880 --> 0:05:12.400
<v Speaker 1>control other people's actions, or generally just manipulate the physical

0:05:12.480 --> 0:05:16.440
<v Speaker 1>world of the dream. So here's my analogy. You know

0:05:16.520 --> 0:05:19.679
<v Speaker 1>those kids rides at the amusement park where you're sitting

0:05:19.800 --> 0:05:22.760
<v Speaker 1>in a car and you can steer the wheel, but

0:05:22.800 --> 0:05:25.599
<v Speaker 1>the wheel doesn't actually do anything. You're just on a

0:05:25.720 --> 0:05:29.760
<v Speaker 1>track and the car just follows wherever the track goes.

0:05:30.240 --> 0:05:33.719
<v Speaker 1>So imagine if you could get the steering wheel to

0:05:34.040 --> 0:05:38.359
<v Speaker 1>work and actually steer off that track. That's what a

0:05:38.440 --> 0:05:42.560
<v Speaker 1>lucid dream is instead of you always being the follower

0:05:42.640 --> 0:05:46.920
<v Speaker 1>in your dream, you are now the driver. Now, to

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:50.599
<v Speaker 1>many people, lucid dreaming might sound like a concept straight

0:05:50.600 --> 0:05:54.000
<v Speaker 1>out of science fiction, but it's a well documented state

0:05:54.040 --> 0:05:58.599
<v Speaker 1>of sleep. A dreamer can become aware that they are dreaming,

0:05:58.760 --> 0:06:02.640
<v Speaker 1>and this awareness can from a faint recognition of the

0:06:02.720 --> 0:06:06.680
<v Speaker 1>dream state to a more profound acuity where the dreamer

0:06:06.760 --> 0:06:12.559
<v Speaker 1>takes control over their own actions and manipulates their environment. Now,

0:06:12.960 --> 0:06:15.400
<v Speaker 1>to understand this, we need to remember what we talked

0:06:15.440 --> 0:06:18.360
<v Speaker 1>about in the last two episodes, which is that our

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:22.240
<v Speaker 1>sleep during the night moves through various phases. One of

0:06:22.240 --> 0:06:25.799
<v Speaker 1>these is called the rapid eye movement stage of sleep,

0:06:25.920 --> 0:06:30.520
<v Speaker 1>or REM sleep, and this is where our vivid dreams occur,

0:06:31.040 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 1>and it's during REM sleep that lucid dreaming is most

0:06:35.040 --> 0:06:37.760
<v Speaker 1>likely to take place. Now, I mentioned last week that

0:06:37.920 --> 0:06:43.000
<v Speaker 1>during REM sleep, our body's major muscles are paralyzed, which

0:06:43.040 --> 0:06:46.000
<v Speaker 1>prevents us from acting out our dreams, and this is

0:06:46.040 --> 0:06:50.360
<v Speaker 1>also true during a lucid dream. But certain other parts

0:06:50.360 --> 0:06:53.919
<v Speaker 1>of the brain, especially those involved in self awareness and

0:06:54.000 --> 0:06:59.479
<v Speaker 1>executive function. These become more active when you're having a

0:06:59.600 --> 0:07:03.760
<v Speaker 1>lucid dream, so we usually think of brains as having

0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:08.359
<v Speaker 1>two possible states. You're either awake or you're asleep, but

0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:12.280
<v Speaker 1>being in a lucid dream is somewhere in between, and

0:07:12.320 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 1>the brainwave activity measured by EEG is different from normal

0:07:16.880 --> 0:07:22.080
<v Speaker 1>rem sleep. So this makes lucid dreaming a unique state

0:07:22.160 --> 0:07:26.560
<v Speaker 1>of consciousness where the dreaming mind wakes up but the

0:07:26.600 --> 0:07:31.040
<v Speaker 1>body remains in the sleep state. So the first question

0:07:31.160 --> 0:07:33.360
<v Speaker 1>is how do you do this? How do you become

0:07:33.560 --> 0:07:37.280
<v Speaker 1>lucid in a dream? Sometimes, if you're very lucky, a

0:07:37.360 --> 0:07:41.240
<v Speaker 1>lucid dream will happen. Accidentally. I had won many years

0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:44.160
<v Speaker 1>ago when I was in a dream where I was

0:07:44.560 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 1>at my high school locker bay with all my classmates,

0:07:48.560 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 1>and it slowly dawned on me that I was in

0:07:51.480 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 1>a dream and that none of this was real, and

0:07:54.880 --> 0:07:57.480
<v Speaker 1>I was able to take control of my dream. But

0:07:57.520 --> 0:08:00.240
<v Speaker 1>it only lasted a few seconds before I woke up up.

0:08:01.080 --> 0:08:05.840
<v Speaker 1>But lucid dream efficionados can train themselves in a variety

0:08:05.880 --> 0:08:09.960
<v Speaker 1>of ways that we'll talk about to have lucidity more

0:08:10.040 --> 0:08:14.480
<v Speaker 1>often and for longer. The main technique involves setting an

0:08:14.520 --> 0:08:19.680
<v Speaker 1>intention just before going to sleep to look for signs

0:08:19.760 --> 0:08:23.679
<v Speaker 1>that you're dreaming. Little clues that something doesn't quite make sense,

0:08:24.200 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 1>and then the idea is if you see those things

0:08:27.520 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 1>that will alert you that you are inside a dream,

0:08:31.000 --> 0:08:33.720
<v Speaker 1>and then you can try to take control. The general

0:08:33.760 --> 0:08:37.280
<v Speaker 1>story is that if we get good enough at questioning reality,

0:08:37.840 --> 0:08:42.120
<v Speaker 1>we can then pass more easily into lucid dreaming. So

0:08:42.200 --> 0:08:44.600
<v Speaker 1>what is lucid dreaming all about? And how can you

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:47.080
<v Speaker 1>get good at it? To explore this in depth, I

0:08:47.120 --> 0:08:50.600
<v Speaker 1>called up my friend Jonathan Barrent JB. As he goes by.

0:08:50.880 --> 0:08:54.200
<v Speaker 1>He worked for many years at Google, including at X

0:08:54.240 --> 0:08:58.040
<v Speaker 1>the Moonshot Factory, and he is a connoisseur of lucid

0:08:58.120 --> 0:09:00.560
<v Speaker 1>dreaming and he lectures at Stanford about it. So I

0:09:00.600 --> 0:09:04.400
<v Speaker 1>wanted to get his take on this rare and amazing

0:09:04.520 --> 0:09:14.439
<v Speaker 1>version of consciousness. So, Jonathan, what is a lucid dream?

0:09:14.880 --> 0:09:18.959
<v Speaker 2>A lucid dream is any dream we're actually aware that

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:20.199
<v Speaker 2>you are dreaming.

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:23.080
<v Speaker 1>What got you interested in lucid dreaming?

0:09:23.960 --> 0:09:27.600
<v Speaker 2>There was a book called The Shaping Room, and it

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:30.080
<v Speaker 2>was a fictional book, but the character in it had

0:09:30.120 --> 0:09:33.840
<v Speaker 2>the ability to imagine these landscapes. He would actually put

0:09:33.840 --> 0:09:36.920
<v Speaker 2>his hand in this clay and I just got curious,

0:09:36.960 --> 0:09:39.840
<v Speaker 2>and I think, you know, one day in a bookstore,

0:09:39.840 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 2>I came across Stephen Laberge's exploring the world of lucid dreaming,

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:45.960
<v Speaker 2>and I read that and I realized, like, wow, there's

0:09:46.080 --> 0:09:48.520
<v Speaker 2>actually a way to get into a state of consciousness

0:09:48.520 --> 0:09:52.959
<v Speaker 2>where you can envision different dreamscapes and you can have

0:09:53.000 --> 0:09:56.320
<v Speaker 2>some measure of control. And I was hooked ever since.

0:09:56.720 --> 0:09:58.920
<v Speaker 1>And for anyone who doesn't know, Stephen Laberge is a

0:09:58.960 --> 0:10:02.480
<v Speaker 1>colleague of ours who is a century the pioneer in

0:10:02.559 --> 0:10:05.840
<v Speaker 1>lucid dreaming. And so the question is, JB, what are

0:10:05.880 --> 0:10:09.320
<v Speaker 1>the best ways that somebody can train up to allow

0:10:09.400 --> 0:10:12.960
<v Speaker 1>themselves to have a lucid dream. Sure, there's a few

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:16.959
<v Speaker 1>key steps. The first one is working on dream recall.

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:18.760
<v Speaker 1>You want to get to a place where you can

0:10:18.880 --> 0:10:22.160
<v Speaker 1>remember two, three, maybe even four dreams a night. So

0:10:22.520 --> 0:10:24.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, having a dream journal, having the intention to

0:10:24.720 --> 0:10:28.120
<v Speaker 1>remember your dreams is you know, the first key. As

0:10:28.160 --> 0:10:30.280
<v Speaker 1>you build your dream journal, you're going to find what

0:10:30.360 --> 0:10:33.040
<v Speaker 1>are sometimes called dream signs. You'll find that there are

0:10:33.120 --> 0:10:36.360
<v Speaker 1>some certain patterns, like for me, if a dream sign

0:10:36.480 --> 0:10:38.960
<v Speaker 1>is being back in Indiana, where I was from. And

0:10:39.040 --> 0:10:41.160
<v Speaker 1>so as you start to learn your dream signs, you

0:10:41.200 --> 0:10:44.560
<v Speaker 1>can then start to anchor on that being something that

0:10:44.600 --> 0:10:47.400
<v Speaker 1>triggers lucidity. If I can just clarify for the listeners,

0:10:47.640 --> 0:10:52.319
<v Speaker 1>a dream sign meaning a sign that you are dreaming exactly.

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:54.840
<v Speaker 2>Yes, you're looking for these sign posts because we don't

0:10:54.920 --> 0:10:57.960
<v Speaker 2>naturally question reality right now, we're not even questioning that

0:10:58.400 --> 0:11:01.520
<v Speaker 2>this might be a dream. But we because we are

0:11:01.679 --> 0:11:04.760
<v Speaker 2>often fooled in most of the dreams we have, we

0:11:04.880 --> 0:11:07.880
<v Speaker 2>don't have that recognition. So you need cues, and we

0:11:07.920 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 2>call those dream signs. And the more you journal about

0:11:10.640 --> 0:11:14.600
<v Speaker 2>your dreams, the more you'll find some patterns. So that's

0:11:14.760 --> 0:11:17.840
<v Speaker 2>the first step, is you have your dream journaling and

0:11:17.880 --> 0:11:19.320
<v Speaker 2>you have your dream signs.

0:11:19.200 --> 0:11:21.720
<v Speaker 1>So that you can get good at recognizing I am

0:11:21.800 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 1>I must be in a dream right now?

0:11:23.840 --> 0:11:28.160
<v Speaker 2>Correct. Now. There are some ways that have been really

0:11:28.320 --> 0:11:33.240
<v Speaker 2>scientifically studied and rather robustly to ensure you have sort

0:11:33.280 --> 0:11:36.000
<v Speaker 2>of a maximum chance. And so one of those is

0:11:36.040 --> 0:11:39.680
<v Speaker 2>the mnemonic induction of lucid dreams. And so that means,

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:42.480
<v Speaker 2>as you are going to bed, you can say, next

0:11:42.520 --> 0:11:44.800
<v Speaker 2>time I'm dreaming, I want to remember that I'm dreaming.

0:11:44.840 --> 0:11:46.880
<v Speaker 2>You sort of place this little hook and they call

0:11:46.920 --> 0:11:50.360
<v Speaker 2>that prospective memory where you're trying to remember something in

0:11:50.400 --> 0:11:53.440
<v Speaker 2>the future. Now, you can make it even easier on

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:56.640
<v Speaker 2>yourself if you wake yourself up after about three or

0:11:56.640 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 2>four hours of sleep, and that method is called the

0:11:59.080 --> 0:12:02.240
<v Speaker 2>wake back to bed. Why, well, you get through most

0:12:02.280 --> 0:12:05.880
<v Speaker 2>of the denser part of your sleep at the first

0:12:05.880 --> 0:12:09.240
<v Speaker 2>part of your night, the slow wave sleep, the restorative sleep,

0:12:09.320 --> 0:12:12.080
<v Speaker 2>and then the latter half is more rem sleep. So

0:12:12.280 --> 0:12:14.640
<v Speaker 2>if you wake yourself up after three or four hours

0:12:14.800 --> 0:12:18.240
<v Speaker 2>and then you do that mnemonic induction of lucid dreaming, say,

0:12:18.360 --> 0:12:20.840
<v Speaker 2>next time I'm dreaming, I want to remember I'm dreaming. Well,

0:12:20.960 --> 0:12:23.679
<v Speaker 2>you chances are you'll go directly into REM. And when

0:12:23.720 --> 0:12:26.839
<v Speaker 2>you go directly into REM after having slept for four

0:12:26.880 --> 0:12:28.679
<v Speaker 2>hours and maybe being up for a little bit, you're

0:12:28.720 --> 0:12:31.319
<v Speaker 2>going to be more likely to actually see that trigger

0:12:31.360 --> 0:12:33.480
<v Speaker 2>and remember it that you're actually in a lucid dream.

0:12:33.480 --> 0:12:35.280
<v Speaker 2>That's one of the most effective ways to become a

0:12:35.320 --> 0:12:35.960
<v Speaker 2>lucid dreamer.

0:12:36.320 --> 0:12:38.439
<v Speaker 1>Let me just understand it. It's what do you mean

0:12:38.520 --> 0:12:42.000
<v Speaker 1>I want to remember that I'm dreaming? You mean I

0:12:42.040 --> 0:12:45.920
<v Speaker 1>want to recognize that I'm dreaming. Yes, okay, yes, So

0:12:46.000 --> 0:12:48.200
<v Speaker 1>you're in a dream and you say, wait a minute,

0:12:48.240 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm back in Indiana. This doesn't seem real, I must

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:57.120
<v Speaker 1>be in a dream. And so then what do you do.

0:12:57.800 --> 0:13:00.480
<v Speaker 2>When you recognize or you think you recognize, it's good

0:13:00.480 --> 0:13:02.720
<v Speaker 2>to do what's called a reality check. You want to

0:13:02.760 --> 0:13:05.280
<v Speaker 2>see are you truly in a dream state? And so

0:13:05.360 --> 0:13:08.440
<v Speaker 2>there's been lots of different reality checks along the way.

0:13:08.520 --> 0:13:12.320
<v Speaker 2>Some people look at their hand. That was popularized by

0:13:12.480 --> 0:13:17.880
<v Speaker 2>Carlos Cassandra and his books on the Pathways of Dreaming.

0:13:18.280 --> 0:13:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Why look at your hand? What are you looking for?

0:13:20.640 --> 0:13:22.640
<v Speaker 2>Well, when you look at your hand in a dream,

0:13:22.840 --> 0:13:25.320
<v Speaker 2>it just doesn't look like a five fingered hand. Often

0:13:25.360 --> 0:13:28.240
<v Speaker 2>there'll be like a sixth finger. It will it will

0:13:28.240 --> 0:13:30.679
<v Speaker 2>have some sort of blurring, you know, to it for

0:13:30.720 --> 0:13:34.240
<v Speaker 2>some reason. Although the mind can recreate many, many things

0:13:34.240 --> 0:13:38.320
<v Speaker 2>with exquisite detail and dreams, it has trouble recreating a

0:13:38.400 --> 0:13:39.120
<v Speaker 2>perfect hand.

0:13:39.200 --> 0:13:42.839
<v Speaker 1>This sounds like Dolly, yeah. So the idea is you

0:13:44.080 --> 0:13:46.840
<v Speaker 1>get in the habit of looking at your hand and

0:13:46.920 --> 0:13:50.600
<v Speaker 1>if it looks odd, then you say, why does my

0:13:50.760 --> 0:13:53.240
<v Speaker 1>hand look so odd? And then you think, wait, wait,

0:13:53.360 --> 0:13:54.640
<v Speaker 1>I must be dreaming.

0:13:54.960 --> 0:13:57.880
<v Speaker 2>That's the idea, right, that's right, that's the idea. Other

0:13:58.000 --> 0:14:01.599
<v Speaker 2>people might try to fly. Obviously, you jump up and

0:14:02.280 --> 0:14:05.240
<v Speaker 2>gravity holds you down, then you know you're most likely

0:14:05.280 --> 0:14:09.920
<v Speaker 2>in this reality, which lucid dreamers like to call consensus reality.

0:14:10.480 --> 0:14:13.040
<v Speaker 2>And you know, there's another one that's kind of interesting

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:15.600
<v Speaker 2>that if you pinch your nose and try to breathe,

0:14:16.480 --> 0:14:18.679
<v Speaker 2>which I wasn't able to do, but in a dream,

0:14:18.720 --> 0:14:22.400
<v Speaker 2>there's no constriction and you actually will breathe right through that.

0:14:22.520 --> 0:14:25.280
<v Speaker 2>So that's kind of an unusual reality check. There's many

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:28.600
<v Speaker 2>of them, but the main thing is to have one

0:14:28.680 --> 0:14:31.280
<v Speaker 2>or two reality checks that you can do both during

0:14:31.320 --> 0:14:34.200
<v Speaker 2>the day at a time like this, and then when

0:14:34.280 --> 0:14:36.720
<v Speaker 2>you are you know, have some sort of recognition that

0:14:36.720 --> 0:14:38.760
<v Speaker 2>you're in a dream, you can perform that reality check

0:14:38.880 --> 0:14:40.320
<v Speaker 2>and then it'll either pass or fail.

0:14:40.840 --> 0:14:43.520
<v Speaker 1>So the idea is to get in the habit of

0:14:43.600 --> 0:14:46.800
<v Speaker 1>doing reality checks, like seeing if you can breathe with

0:14:46.840 --> 0:14:50.240
<v Speaker 1>your nose pinched, or whether you can see your hand.

0:14:50.480 --> 0:14:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Another one that I'm fond of is you put your

0:14:54.640 --> 0:14:56.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, your thumbnail up on your tooth and you

0:14:56.560 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 1>try to flick your tooth off, and in consensus re reality,

0:15:00.440 --> 0:15:02.560
<v Speaker 1>your tooth doesn't come off. But often what will happen

0:15:02.600 --> 0:15:05.120
<v Speaker 1>in a dream is your tooth goes flying off into

0:15:05.120 --> 0:15:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the air and you think, what the heck just happened?

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:10.560
<v Speaker 1>You think, oh, yes, I must be in a dream.

0:15:11.360 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 2>That's right. All those are better than what has been

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:16.200
<v Speaker 2>popularized in the movie Inception, which is the spinning top.

0:15:16.440 --> 0:15:18.560
<v Speaker 2>Of course that makes for a good graphic and a

0:15:18.920 --> 0:15:22.440
<v Speaker 2>good movie, but that's not really a great reality check.

0:15:22.560 --> 0:15:24.240
<v Speaker 2>Any of these other ones that we've talked about are

0:15:24.320 --> 0:15:24.720
<v Speaker 2>much better.

0:15:24.800 --> 0:15:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Wait, I had forgotten about the spinning top. Why what

0:15:27.840 --> 0:15:30.480
<v Speaker 1>were they doing? And why is that not a good check?

0:15:31.000 --> 0:15:34.880
<v Speaker 2>So you know, Leonardo's character spins it, and if it

0:15:35.080 --> 0:15:38.320
<v Speaker 2>falls down, then he knows he's in a that he's

0:15:38.360 --> 0:15:40.640
<v Speaker 2>in consensus reality. But if it keeps on spinning, then

0:15:40.920 --> 0:15:42.880
<v Speaker 2>he's in a dream. And of course the movie ends

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:46.360
<v Speaker 2>with this you know, undefined state of like who knows

0:15:46.360 --> 0:15:49.000
<v Speaker 2>if this whole movie was a dream, But you know,

0:15:49.080 --> 0:15:53.520
<v Speaker 2>in an actual dream, you know, when you're spinning, there's

0:15:53.880 --> 0:15:57.520
<v Speaker 2>no evidence that the top will keep on spinning in

0:15:57.920 --> 0:16:00.760
<v Speaker 2>a lucid dream versus you know, fall down. Much more

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:03.120
<v Speaker 2>tried and true methods are the ones that we've talked about.

0:16:04.000 --> 0:16:06.600
<v Speaker 2>The only other one that gets, you know, a little

0:16:06.600 --> 0:16:09.640
<v Speaker 2>bit closer to something like that is a light switch.

0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:13.920
<v Speaker 2>For some reason, when you flip light switches in lucid dreams,

0:16:14.120 --> 0:16:16.880
<v Speaker 2>they tend not to work. But the by far the

0:16:16.920 --> 0:16:19.960
<v Speaker 2>most robust one that with the science behind it, is

0:16:20.000 --> 0:16:22.880
<v Speaker 2>one that we haven't mentioned, So that one is looking

0:16:23.000 --> 0:16:25.800
<v Speaker 2>at a piece of text, so something that's been written,

0:16:25.880 --> 0:16:27.640
<v Speaker 2>and that could be you know, could you know, be

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:30.320
<v Speaker 2>your watch? You know, twelve thirty nine. You look away

0:16:30.600 --> 0:16:32.800
<v Speaker 2>and then you look back, and indeed it's the same.

0:16:33.040 --> 0:16:35.320
<v Speaker 2>And so Leberg's i think, was the first to study

0:16:35.320 --> 0:16:38.360
<v Speaker 2>that and found about eighty to eighty five percent of

0:16:38.360 --> 0:16:41.680
<v Speaker 2>the time that was a reliable measure that the brain

0:16:41.840 --> 0:16:42.840
<v Speaker 2>doesn't recreate.

0:16:43.320 --> 0:16:46.560
<v Speaker 1>You say, it's the same in consensus reality, but in

0:16:46.640 --> 0:16:49.000
<v Speaker 1>a dream when you look back at the clock, it

0:16:49.080 --> 0:16:49.600
<v Speaker 1>is different.

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:54.880
<v Speaker 2>It's different, yes, And that's because there's no sensory constraints

0:16:54.640 --> 0:16:57.560
<v Speaker 2>in the dream, right. And so I think one of

0:16:57.600 --> 0:17:02.400
<v Speaker 2>the one of the interesting things that Lebert's used to say,

0:17:02.560 --> 0:17:04.600
<v Speaker 2>and he was, you know, my mentor for years, and

0:17:04.640 --> 0:17:07.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm very grateful for all the things that I learned

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:12.639
<v Speaker 2>from him. He said that dreaming is really perceiving without

0:17:12.680 --> 0:17:19.480
<v Speaker 2>sensory constraints, and perceiving is dreaming with sensory constraints. It's

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:21.040
<v Speaker 2>a little bit of a play on words, but it's

0:17:21.040 --> 0:17:24.119
<v Speaker 2>really getting across a fairly important piece of meaning that

0:17:24.160 --> 0:17:28.680
<v Speaker 2>the dreaming mechanism and the perceiving mechanisms are very very similar.

0:17:29.359 --> 0:17:33.520
<v Speaker 1>So let's unpack that for the listeners. So the idea

0:17:33.640 --> 0:17:36.640
<v Speaker 1>is that, you know, you just take vision, for example,

0:17:37.320 --> 0:17:40.440
<v Speaker 1>only five percent of the input to the visual cortex

0:17:40.800 --> 0:17:44.200
<v Speaker 1>is actually coming from the retinas, from the eyeballs, and

0:17:44.359 --> 0:17:48.080
<v Speaker 1>all the rest is internally generated. And so this is

0:17:48.200 --> 0:17:52.000
<v Speaker 1>why you can have dreams, for example, where your eyes

0:17:52.000 --> 0:17:55.680
<v Speaker 1>are closed but you're having full, rich, visual experience, because

0:17:55.720 --> 0:17:58.600
<v Speaker 1>it's just this machinery running on its own without the

0:17:58.720 --> 0:18:02.520
<v Speaker 1>little bit of modulation that comes in from your eyes.

0:18:03.000 --> 0:18:06.040
<v Speaker 1>And so this is the sense in which when we're

0:18:06.040 --> 0:18:10.560
<v Speaker 1>awake it's like awake dreaming. It's the same processes that

0:18:10.600 --> 0:18:12.560
<v Speaker 1>we have when we're seeing when we're dreaming, it's just

0:18:12.600 --> 0:18:15.119
<v Speaker 1>that when your eyes are open, things are anchored a

0:18:15.160 --> 0:18:17.960
<v Speaker 1>bit more. I'm just unpacking this. So this is what

0:18:18.000 --> 0:18:20.399
<v Speaker 1>you mean when you say, actually, how do you phrase it?

0:18:20.480 --> 0:18:25.119
<v Speaker 2>Perception is Perception is dreaming with sensory constraints, and then

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:26.159
<v Speaker 2>you can you flip.

0:18:25.880 --> 0:18:29.000
<v Speaker 1>It so you're anchored to what's in front of you.

0:18:29.200 --> 0:18:31.719
<v Speaker 1>But otherwise it's the same process as dreaming. Okay, now,

0:18:31.760 --> 0:18:33.000
<v Speaker 1>what was the other half of the sentence?

0:18:33.240 --> 0:18:37.960
<v Speaker 2>Dreaming is perceiving without sensory constraints, got it, okay?

0:18:38.040 --> 0:18:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Right, in the sense that your brain is doing its thing,

0:18:42.359 --> 0:18:45.960
<v Speaker 1>but it's not tied to what's actually on a wristwatch.

0:18:46.000 --> 0:18:49.960
<v Speaker 1>It gets to invent what's on the watch at every moment.

0:18:50.359 --> 0:18:54.760
<v Speaker 2>Right now. One of the interesting studies that Stephen Labers

0:18:54.760 --> 0:18:58.720
<v Speaker 2>did and then Philips Embardo also one of your colleagues

0:18:58.920 --> 0:19:02.399
<v Speaker 2>at Stanford is they wanted to design experiment that could

0:19:02.560 --> 0:19:06.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, actually prove this, and I think it's fascinating.

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:09.480
<v Speaker 2>It was published in twenty eighteen in Nature Communications. And

0:19:10.080 --> 0:19:13.040
<v Speaker 2>as you're very well familiar, the eyes when they lock

0:19:13.080 --> 0:19:15.240
<v Speaker 2>onto something like a finger and they trace it, they

0:19:15.240 --> 0:19:16.640
<v Speaker 2>have a smooth pursuit.

0:19:17.040 --> 0:19:18.840
<v Speaker 1>So when you're hold on when you're moving your finger

0:19:18.920 --> 0:19:21.760
<v Speaker 1>back and forth in front of you, just for listeners,

0:19:21.880 --> 0:19:25.080
<v Speaker 1>your eyes are smoothly moving back and forth with your finger,

0:19:25.480 --> 0:19:28.479
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to if you're not moving your finger and

0:19:28.520 --> 0:19:30.320
<v Speaker 1>you just try to move your eyes to the left

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:33.280
<v Speaker 1>and right. Your eyes make jumps. They go jump jump, jump, jump,

0:19:33.320 --> 0:19:34.760
<v Speaker 1>and then they go jump jump jump, the other way.

0:19:34.760 --> 0:19:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Those are called secods scots.

0:19:36.840 --> 0:19:40.119
<v Speaker 2>Yes, So with that in mind and with you know

0:19:40.320 --> 0:19:44.000
<v Speaker 2>that understanding of our neurobiology, they designed a clever experiment

0:19:44.000 --> 0:19:47.080
<v Speaker 2>where they had participants look at their finger in consensus

0:19:47.080 --> 0:19:49.719
<v Speaker 2>reality and then just trace a circle. And then they

0:19:49.760 --> 0:19:53.480
<v Speaker 2>had leads eog leads to measure you know, their eye

0:19:53.520 --> 0:19:59.280
<v Speaker 2>movements electro oculargram, so measuring the potentials of the eyes.

0:19:59.320 --> 0:20:01.159
<v Speaker 2>The eyes are pulled rise, so when you move the

0:20:01.200 --> 0:20:04.600
<v Speaker 2>eyes just very you know, basic biopotential sensors can see it.

0:20:05.080 --> 0:20:07.000
<v Speaker 1>So these are little electrodes you stick on to the

0:20:07.000 --> 0:20:09.600
<v Speaker 1>outside of the eye and you can measure where the

0:20:09.680 --> 0:20:11.879
<v Speaker 1>eye is located, whether it's looking up or down or

0:20:11.920 --> 0:20:14.040
<v Speaker 1>left to right, even when the eyelids are closed.

0:20:14.480 --> 0:20:18.520
<v Speaker 2>Correct. Yes, And so they measured that while people were

0:20:18.560 --> 0:20:21.680
<v Speaker 2>tracing their finger and doing a circle, and it had

0:20:21.800 --> 0:20:25.040
<v Speaker 2>as you would expect, that smooth pursuit seeing you know,

0:20:26.119 --> 0:20:29.199
<v Speaker 2>the eye tracings in that. Then they had people you know,

0:20:29.240 --> 0:20:32.360
<v Speaker 2>close their eyes while still awake and just imagine that,

0:20:32.440 --> 0:20:34.800
<v Speaker 2>and so you know they can move their eyes, but

0:20:34.880 --> 0:20:37.640
<v Speaker 2>as you just said, they have more psychotic movements when

0:20:37.760 --> 0:20:40.119
<v Speaker 2>there's no anchor, when there's no finger to anchor on.

0:20:40.359 --> 0:20:42.720
<v Speaker 1>So if I'm just imagining my finger moving with my

0:20:42.760 --> 0:20:44.960
<v Speaker 1>eyes closed, I see jump jump, jump jump instead of

0:20:44.960 --> 0:20:45.639
<v Speaker 1>smooth pursuit.

0:20:45.680 --> 0:20:50.639
<v Speaker 2>Okay, right, So then they had these people go into

0:20:50.720 --> 0:20:55.600
<v Speaker 2>a lucid dream and remember the dream task of actually

0:20:55.840 --> 0:20:58.960
<v Speaker 2>putting their finger up their dream finger and watching it

0:20:59.240 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 2>go around and much too. I think the surprise of many,

0:21:04.080 --> 0:21:07.520
<v Speaker 2>it mirrored much more closely. I could show you the

0:21:08.440 --> 0:21:11.200
<v Speaker 2>plots in the paper much more closely to the waken

0:21:11.280 --> 0:21:14.560
<v Speaker 2>reality and compared to the imagination where it was very jagged.

0:21:14.760 --> 0:21:17.360
<v Speaker 1>So the idea is, when you're an elucid dream and

0:21:17.400 --> 0:21:21.320
<v Speaker 1>you're imagining your finger moving back and forth, your eyes

0:21:21.320 --> 0:21:25.439
<v Speaker 1>are making something more like smooth pursuit because it's like

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:26.679
<v Speaker 1>actually seeing it.

0:21:27.160 --> 0:21:30.160
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yes, it's kind of amazing because then it goes

0:21:30.200 --> 0:21:32.399
<v Speaker 2>back to what we were just saying that dreaming is

0:21:32.440 --> 0:21:36.160
<v Speaker 2>perceiving without sensory constraints, and perceiving is dreaming, And so

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:41.440
<v Speaker 2>the mechanisms are very similar. I'm not saying that they're identical,

0:21:41.560 --> 0:21:43.760
<v Speaker 2>but they are very similar, and I think that just

0:21:43.800 --> 0:21:47.000
<v Speaker 2>opens up to a lot of interesting possibilities for lucid

0:21:47.040 --> 0:21:47.680
<v Speaker 2>dream research.

0:22:04.320 --> 0:22:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Now we jumped straight into something which is doing an

0:22:07.480 --> 0:22:10.120
<v Speaker 1>experiment with lucid dreaming. But I just want to fill

0:22:10.119 --> 0:22:12.520
<v Speaker 1>out a little bit more so everyone gets this. So

0:22:12.960 --> 0:22:15.560
<v Speaker 1>let's say I look at some texts in a book

0:22:15.600 --> 0:22:17.720
<v Speaker 1>and the text doesn't really make sense, and I look

0:22:17.760 --> 0:22:21.280
<v Speaker 1>back and the text is different. I might think, Wow,

0:22:22.040 --> 0:22:25.400
<v Speaker 1>what's going on here? Oh wait, I must be dreaming,

0:22:25.840 --> 0:22:29.800
<v Speaker 1>and then I can transition into making it a lucid dream.

0:22:29.880 --> 0:22:33.040
<v Speaker 1>So what happens when I turn lucid?

0:22:33.880 --> 0:22:37.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So when people turn lucid, they often, if it's

0:22:37.600 --> 0:22:39.480
<v Speaker 2>the very first time, it might be a very short

0:22:39.520 --> 0:22:42.680
<v Speaker 2>experience because they get kind of excited, and as they

0:22:42.680 --> 0:22:46.199
<v Speaker 2>get excited, more areas of the brain light up and

0:22:46.240 --> 0:22:49.320
<v Speaker 2>they wake up. However, if they don't, or if it's

0:22:49.320 --> 0:22:52.479
<v Speaker 2>maybe their second or third time, they can then really

0:22:52.800 --> 0:22:57.080
<v Speaker 2>explore the world. They can look at the objects around them,

0:22:57.160 --> 0:22:59.680
<v Speaker 2>they can touch them, feel them, they can taste them.

0:22:59.760 --> 0:23:04.480
<v Speaker 2>All five senses are working in the dream world. They

0:23:04.520 --> 0:23:08.600
<v Speaker 2>could travel to a different location. It's interesting to note

0:23:08.640 --> 0:23:12.000
<v Speaker 2>that there's almost like skills that you can develop. It

0:23:12.040 --> 0:23:14.560
<v Speaker 2>doesn't all just happen in your first lucid dream, but

0:23:14.680 --> 0:23:20.000
<v Speaker 2>over time, you can do almost anything without the physical

0:23:20.119 --> 0:23:24.360
<v Speaker 2>laws or the social laws of convention applying.

0:23:24.080 --> 0:23:25.800
<v Speaker 1>And so one of the things that you can do

0:23:26.119 --> 0:23:30.560
<v Speaker 1>is follow the instructions of an experimenter who's told you

0:23:30.960 --> 0:23:33.280
<v Speaker 1>when you fall asleep, I want you to look at

0:23:33.320 --> 0:23:36.760
<v Speaker 1>your finger moving back and forth in your lucid dream.

0:23:37.000 --> 0:23:39.639
<v Speaker 1>So they're actually doing something that they were told to

0:23:39.720 --> 0:23:42.320
<v Speaker 1>do once they realize they are there.

0:23:43.320 --> 0:23:46.280
<v Speaker 2>That's correct. Yeah, remembering the dream task that in and

0:23:46.320 --> 0:23:48.720
<v Speaker 2>of itself is a skill. It takes a while because

0:23:48.720 --> 0:23:51.040
<v Speaker 2>you're so enamored with the lucid dream world and all

0:23:51.080 --> 0:23:53.879
<v Speaker 2>the possibilities, but it can get to a place where

0:23:54.119 --> 0:23:56.920
<v Speaker 2>you can remember, Hey, I had this intention, I'm supposed

0:23:56.920 --> 0:23:59.400
<v Speaker 2>to do this because of an experiment that I'm doing.

0:23:59.520 --> 0:24:01.600
<v Speaker 2>Or oh, I wanted to go to the Eiffel Tower

0:24:01.680 --> 0:24:03.320
<v Speaker 2>and see, you know, what does it look like from

0:24:03.320 --> 0:24:05.399
<v Speaker 2>the Eiffel Tower because I have a trip coming up

0:24:05.440 --> 0:24:07.040
<v Speaker 2>to Paris. I want to see if it compares all

0:24:07.119 --> 0:24:09.959
<v Speaker 2>kinds of very interesting things. Both can be formal experiments

0:24:10.320 --> 0:24:12.359
<v Speaker 2>or does self experiments great?

0:24:12.440 --> 0:24:15.240
<v Speaker 1>And now what allows the experiment to take place is

0:24:15.280 --> 0:24:18.520
<v Speaker 1>that there's a way that you, as the lucid dreamer,

0:24:19.160 --> 0:24:22.719
<v Speaker 1>can communicate with the outside world. And this idea of

0:24:23.080 --> 0:24:26.680
<v Speaker 1>hooking up an electro ocular gram so you can see

0:24:26.680 --> 0:24:28.560
<v Speaker 1>where the eyes are pointing. This is one way that

0:24:28.640 --> 0:24:32.760
<v Speaker 1>you can talk with the outside world. So besides the

0:24:32.760 --> 0:24:36.160
<v Speaker 1>thing of following your finger, what are some other examples

0:24:36.200 --> 0:24:39.480
<v Speaker 1>where you can talk to the experimenter through your eye movements.

0:24:40.280 --> 0:24:44.360
<v Speaker 2>Sure, well, that was sort of the fundamental piece that Stephen,

0:24:44.760 --> 0:24:47.280
<v Speaker 2>you know, contributed to the science this left right, left

0:24:47.359 --> 0:24:49.879
<v Speaker 2>right signal. So it can and it's become the de

0:24:50.040 --> 0:24:53.560
<v Speaker 2>facto uh signal that somebody is actually in a lucid state.

0:24:53.760 --> 0:24:56.840
<v Speaker 2>So just unpack that a little bit. You know, sleep

0:24:56.880 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 2>scientists they have characteristics that they look for that they

0:24:59.840 --> 0:25:03.199
<v Speaker 2>can and say definitively somebody is asleep. You know. That's

0:25:03.280 --> 0:25:07.040
<v Speaker 2>when you have an EEG hooked up to your scalp

0:25:07.080 --> 0:25:09.960
<v Speaker 2>and the eye leads and often a chin lead to

0:25:10.000 --> 0:25:13.600
<v Speaker 2>measure the muscle movement. You can definitively say somebody is

0:25:13.640 --> 0:25:16.040
<v Speaker 2>asleep and that they're in rim. And then when you

0:25:16.119 --> 0:25:19.280
<v Speaker 2>see that sharp coordinated left right, left right, that is

0:25:19.359 --> 0:25:22.320
<v Speaker 2>just a clear sign of the eyes that somebody is

0:25:22.880 --> 0:25:24.000
<v Speaker 2>actually becoming lucid.

0:25:24.200 --> 0:25:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Specifically, the subject is told when you realize you are

0:25:27.400 --> 0:25:30.040
<v Speaker 1>in a lucid dream, and why you look left and

0:25:30.040 --> 0:25:31.600
<v Speaker 1>then right and left and then right.

0:25:32.160 --> 0:25:35.399
<v Speaker 2>That's correct, yes, And so that was established, you know,

0:25:35.520 --> 0:25:39.480
<v Speaker 2>in the early eighties with part of his PhD work

0:25:39.480 --> 0:25:43.440
<v Speaker 2>at Stanford and since then has been the gold standard. Now,

0:25:43.520 --> 0:25:46.000
<v Speaker 2>if you think about that, though, what could you also

0:25:46.080 --> 0:25:48.560
<v Speaker 2>do with that eye movement? You don't just have to

0:25:48.720 --> 0:25:52.320
<v Speaker 2>signal lucidity. You could signal other things. You could actually

0:25:52.359 --> 0:25:55.800
<v Speaker 2>pass information based on let's just say the number of

0:25:55.920 --> 0:25:58.439
<v Speaker 2>left right, left, right. And in fact, that was some

0:25:58.520 --> 0:26:02.320
<v Speaker 2>of the you know, kind of co or thinking that

0:26:02.480 --> 0:26:05.760
<v Speaker 2>went into a series of experiments that I participated in

0:26:05.800 --> 0:26:09.280
<v Speaker 2>along with kin Power and Karen Conkly that are just

0:26:09.400 --> 0:26:11.879
<v Speaker 2>fascinating that you know, we could we could talk about.

0:26:11.920 --> 0:26:15.119
<v Speaker 2>But essentially we took it one step further where we

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:18.719
<v Speaker 2>wondered if you could get information into the dream, that

0:26:18.760 --> 0:26:21.720
<v Speaker 2>the dreamer could receive that information, do something with it,

0:26:21.800 --> 0:26:23.680
<v Speaker 2>and then communicate it back out.

0:26:24.119 --> 0:26:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Great, what's an example.

0:26:25.960 --> 0:26:28.919
<v Speaker 2>Okay, this may not be the most fun example, but

0:26:29.359 --> 0:26:32.680
<v Speaker 2>we took math problems as just a very simple way

0:26:32.840 --> 0:26:36.400
<v Speaker 2>to actually approve could we get information into a dream

0:26:36.480 --> 0:26:41.400
<v Speaker 2>such as what is six minus three? For example? And

0:26:42.040 --> 0:26:44.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, could the dreamer hear that and then could

0:26:44.680 --> 0:26:48.200
<v Speaker 2>they respond with three sets of left, right, left, right,

0:26:48.800 --> 0:26:51.760
<v Speaker 2>and that became you know, one of the things that

0:26:51.800 --> 0:26:55.680
<v Speaker 2>we found to be fairly reproducible were simple math problems

0:26:56.080 --> 0:26:59.840
<v Speaker 2>that the dreamer did not know in advance, but then

0:27:00.240 --> 0:27:03.960
<v Speaker 2>have to do the calculation and then respond back with

0:27:04.080 --> 0:27:05.960
<v Speaker 2>the appropriate number of vibe movements.

0:27:06.440 --> 0:27:09.040
<v Speaker 1>So you haven't yet told us how you got the information.

0:27:08.640 --> 0:27:13.639
<v Speaker 2>In yes, So, as it turns out, when the brain

0:27:13.840 --> 0:27:17.840
<v Speaker 2>is sleeping, it doesn't completely shut off from external stimuli.

0:27:17.920 --> 0:27:20.399
<v Speaker 2>And I think we all have probably had this experience

0:27:20.480 --> 0:27:23.520
<v Speaker 2>where an alarm goes off and somehow it gets incorporated

0:27:23.560 --> 0:27:26.160
<v Speaker 2>into the dream. You know, it's a it's a siren,

0:27:26.320 --> 0:27:29.400
<v Speaker 2>or it's a police car. We needed to have some

0:27:29.480 --> 0:27:33.960
<v Speaker 2>auditory pathways available just to survive, right, we are sort

0:27:34.000 --> 0:27:36.840
<v Speaker 2>of at risk when we're asleep. So we took advantage

0:27:36.880 --> 0:27:39.520
<v Speaker 2>of that, the fact that there is selective pass through

0:27:39.520 --> 0:27:43.080
<v Speaker 2>of auditory information into the dream. And so it was

0:27:43.320 --> 0:27:47.639
<v Speaker 2>once the dreamer was in rem sleep, and once they

0:27:47.840 --> 0:27:50.400
<v Speaker 2>signaled that they were loocid to the left, right, left, right,

0:27:50.920 --> 0:27:54.760
<v Speaker 2>then the math problem was just spoken, just spoken in

0:27:54.840 --> 0:27:57.240
<v Speaker 2>a you know, a regular normal voice.

0:27:57.640 --> 0:28:00.480
<v Speaker 1>You mean, the experimenter says, it says, what is six

0:28:00.520 --> 0:28:04.399
<v Speaker 1>minus three, right, yep, And the lucid dreamer hears that,

0:28:04.600 --> 0:28:06.920
<v Speaker 1>and what is the experience of hearing it in a

0:28:06.960 --> 0:28:07.800
<v Speaker 1>lucid dream.

0:28:08.440 --> 0:28:10.600
<v Speaker 2>It varied, you know, because at that point, you know,

0:28:10.600 --> 0:28:14.920
<v Speaker 2>the dreamer is incorporating this external stimuli into the dream.

0:28:15.080 --> 0:28:15.280
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:28:15.480 --> 0:28:18.399
<v Speaker 2>One person reported that they were in kind of like

0:28:18.440 --> 0:28:21.600
<v Speaker 2>a residential neighborhood and they were looking at the house

0:28:21.680 --> 0:28:24.760
<v Speaker 2>numbers and when the experimenter said, you know, the six

0:28:24.840 --> 0:28:28.080
<v Speaker 2>minus three, the house number just changed to that and

0:28:28.119 --> 0:28:30.960
<v Speaker 2>they solve, you know, six minus three. So each dreamer

0:28:31.119 --> 0:28:34.000
<v Speaker 2>reported a different sort of subjective experience of how it

0:28:34.040 --> 0:28:37.359
<v Speaker 2>got incorporated, everything from just hearing the words themselves to

0:28:37.760 --> 0:28:41.800
<v Speaker 2>seeing the dream somehow communicate the math problem.

0:28:42.240 --> 0:28:44.960
<v Speaker 1>And once they have heard the question in some way,

0:28:45.280 --> 0:28:48.280
<v Speaker 1>then they use their eye movement to, for example, look

0:28:48.320 --> 0:28:51.719
<v Speaker 1>to the left three times, bang, bang bang, even though

0:28:51.720 --> 0:28:54.680
<v Speaker 1>they're in their dream, they're talking to the outside world

0:28:54.720 --> 0:28:57.880
<v Speaker 1>through their eye movements. That's correct. Cool. And you guys

0:28:57.880 --> 0:29:00.000
<v Speaker 1>found that you could do this bi directional community.

0:29:01.000 --> 0:29:03.280
<v Speaker 2>Yes, and not just us. There was four labs. It

0:29:03.360 --> 0:29:07.920
<v Speaker 2>was a great collaboration across France, the Netherlands and USA.

0:29:08.440 --> 0:29:11.640
<v Speaker 2>And you know, now it's not one hundred percent of

0:29:11.680 --> 0:29:15.160
<v Speaker 2>the time. But you know, it was enough to sort

0:29:15.200 --> 0:29:17.920
<v Speaker 2>of say, this is way above chance that people are

0:29:17.960 --> 0:29:22.120
<v Speaker 2>actually hearing these and responding back with the right numbers,

0:29:22.200 --> 0:29:23.760
<v Speaker 2>and so I think it'll lead to a lot of

0:29:24.080 --> 0:29:25.200
<v Speaker 2>interesting future research.

0:29:25.680 --> 0:29:27.920
<v Speaker 1>What happened when it didn't work, was it that people

0:29:28.000 --> 0:29:31.400
<v Speaker 1>just simply didn't respond or they were answering the wrong question.

0:29:32.440 --> 0:29:35.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, by far it was a no response. There wasn't

0:29:35.960 --> 0:29:39.440
<v Speaker 2>an actual response to the math equation. Now, we were

0:29:39.440 --> 0:29:43.000
<v Speaker 2>also pretty harsh on ourselves. We had three independent scorers

0:29:43.360 --> 0:29:46.520
<v Speaker 2>and there had to be a consensus that you know,

0:29:46.640 --> 0:29:50.080
<v Speaker 2>it was the actual number of eye movements to match

0:29:50.120 --> 0:29:53.400
<v Speaker 2>the math problem. So you know, with that, I think

0:29:53.560 --> 0:29:55.640
<v Speaker 2>again it was rigorous science and that's what you need

0:29:55.680 --> 0:29:57.960
<v Speaker 2>for something that's so unusual like this. But it was

0:29:58.040 --> 0:30:01.720
<v Speaker 2>above chance. And one of the things that is was

0:30:01.760 --> 0:30:05.160
<v Speaker 2>also a little bit challenging is you know, remember we

0:30:05.160 --> 0:30:08.080
<v Speaker 2>talked about the dream task, and so we did get

0:30:08.120 --> 0:30:10.160
<v Speaker 2>people waking up and saying, hey, I had the Lucid dream,

0:30:10.160 --> 0:30:13.880
<v Speaker 2>but I'm sorry I forgot to signal, and so you know,

0:30:13.920 --> 0:30:15.480
<v Speaker 2>that kind of shows that there is sort of a

0:30:15.480 --> 0:30:18.080
<v Speaker 2>progression of skill that you can get Lucid but then

0:30:18.240 --> 0:30:21.160
<v Speaker 2>to remember to signal that you get lucid is one

0:30:21.720 --> 0:30:23.040
<v Speaker 2>thing that you need to do, and then to be

0:30:23.040 --> 0:30:25.600
<v Speaker 2>able to hear the input is another thing that you

0:30:25.640 --> 0:30:27.080
<v Speaker 2>need to do and then be able to communicate. So

0:30:27.160 --> 0:30:29.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, there's there's multiple points of failure along the way.

0:30:30.440 --> 0:30:33.760
<v Speaker 1>And did you guys do other tasks besides the math problem?

0:30:34.360 --> 0:30:37.400
<v Speaker 2>The US group focused on the math problem, the other

0:30:37.440 --> 0:30:40.520
<v Speaker 2>groups did. They did some interesting things around preferences. They

0:30:40.560 --> 0:30:43.040
<v Speaker 2>wondered if preferences were the same, you know, in the

0:30:43.120 --> 0:30:46.560
<v Speaker 2>dream world versus the outside world, and I think they

0:30:46.640 --> 0:30:49.360
<v Speaker 2>found some you know, kind of interesting results there. It

0:30:49.400 --> 0:30:52.680
<v Speaker 2>was almost like the dream the dream personality had some

0:30:52.720 --> 0:30:56.640
<v Speaker 2>different preferences than the non dreaming personality. So that's that's

0:30:56.720 --> 0:30:57.400
<v Speaker 2>kind of fascinating.

0:30:57.400 --> 0:30:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Can you give us an example chocolate?

0:30:59.800 --> 0:31:02.840
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's like, do you like chocolate? And the

0:31:02.880 --> 0:31:06.960
<v Speaker 2>the outside was was yes, and the but the dreamer

0:31:07.080 --> 0:31:08.040
<v Speaker 2>didn't like chocolate.

0:31:10.760 --> 0:31:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Fascinating. And you know, there was a stety years ago

0:31:13.960 --> 0:31:17.760
<v Speaker 1>which one of my favorites, which is asking the question

0:31:17.800 --> 0:31:22.080
<v Speaker 1>of whether dream time corresponds to real time. And the

0:31:22.120 --> 0:31:25.800
<v Speaker 1>way this was done is the loocid dreamer when they

0:31:25.840 --> 0:31:28.560
<v Speaker 1>become lucid. They you know, give a signal and then

0:31:28.600 --> 0:31:30.280
<v Speaker 1>what they do is they, let's say, look the other way,

0:31:30.280 --> 0:31:33.480
<v Speaker 1>They look to the right, and they estimate five seconds

0:31:33.520 --> 0:31:36.120
<v Speaker 1>inside their dream, and then they look to the right again.

0:31:36.240 --> 0:31:38.240
<v Speaker 1>And of course in the outside world you can look

0:31:38.240 --> 0:31:41.600
<v Speaker 1>at the signal on the electro oculogram and you find

0:31:41.680 --> 0:31:45.080
<v Speaker 1>that in general, dream time corresponds to real time.

0:31:45.600 --> 0:31:48.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think that we liked the premise of Christopher

0:31:48.520 --> 0:31:50.840
<v Speaker 2>Nolan's inception that you know each layer in the dream,

0:31:50.960 --> 0:31:52.720
<v Speaker 2>you know the time changes, but we don't really have

0:31:52.760 --> 0:31:55.840
<v Speaker 2>any evidence that you know, you can estimate and you

0:31:55.880 --> 0:31:58.040
<v Speaker 2>can count that it's about the same. Now, it doesn't

0:31:58.080 --> 0:32:01.760
<v Speaker 2>mean definitively that dream time can't be different, but I

0:32:01.800 --> 0:32:04.680
<v Speaker 2>think that when people ask me, well, it seems like

0:32:04.720 --> 0:32:07.520
<v Speaker 2>it was so long, what I come back with is like, well,

0:32:07.520 --> 0:32:10.240
<v Speaker 2>think about a movie, and how does a movie feel

0:32:10.240 --> 0:32:12.120
<v Speaker 2>to you. You can watch a two hour movie and

0:32:12.160 --> 0:32:14.760
<v Speaker 2>it can be over a lifetime. There's cut scenes, right,

0:32:14.800 --> 0:32:16.760
<v Speaker 2>And I said, you know, dreams are very similar. There's

0:32:16.800 --> 0:32:20.200
<v Speaker 2>these cut scenes, and so they can make the experience

0:32:20.360 --> 0:32:23.840
<v Speaker 2>of a twenty minute dream session can feel like you know, hours.

0:32:24.480 --> 0:32:27.000
<v Speaker 2>But so far, the evidence shows that it's about the

0:32:27.040 --> 0:32:28.000
<v Speaker 2>same amount of time.

0:32:28.360 --> 0:32:31.800
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly right, you know. I remember years ago I

0:32:31.960 --> 0:32:33.360
<v Speaker 1>was on a road trip with a buddy and I

0:32:33.400 --> 0:32:35.880
<v Speaker 1>fell asleep for just a second. I woke up and

0:32:36.640 --> 0:32:38.520
<v Speaker 1>he had noticed that I just closed my eyes and

0:32:38.520 --> 0:32:40.160
<v Speaker 1>then woke come up, and I told him about this

0:32:40.280 --> 0:32:42.800
<v Speaker 1>dream that I had. But the dream took a long

0:32:42.880 --> 0:32:47.560
<v Speaker 1>time to describe. But the dream itself was just a moment.

0:32:48.000 --> 0:32:50.600
<v Speaker 1>In the dream, I was standing on a roof and

0:32:50.680 --> 0:32:53.000
<v Speaker 1>I was looking over the city and the city was flooding,

0:32:53.360 --> 0:32:55.880
<v Speaker 1>and I felt so guilty because I had left the

0:32:56.280 --> 0:32:58.160
<v Speaker 1>sink on. I knew I had left to sink on

0:32:58.560 --> 0:33:00.440
<v Speaker 1>and it was my fault that the city was flooding.

0:33:01.240 --> 0:33:04.520
<v Speaker 1>The dream itself was just a second, but in order

0:33:04.560 --> 0:33:07.600
<v Speaker 1>for me to explain it, I had to explain this false,

0:33:07.680 --> 0:33:10.840
<v Speaker 1>implanted memory of having left the sink on and so on,

0:33:11.120 --> 0:33:14.480
<v Speaker 1>and so often there's a lot of confusion about time

0:33:14.520 --> 0:33:17.360
<v Speaker 1>this way. But yeah, I thought that was a fascinating

0:33:17.400 --> 0:33:19.840
<v Speaker 1>study about dream time and real time being able to

0:33:20.920 --> 0:33:23.640
<v Speaker 1>correspond that way. Okay, so JB, tell me about some

0:33:23.680 --> 0:33:26.320
<v Speaker 1>other cool experiments that have been done in lucid dreaming.

0:33:27.080 --> 0:33:30.640
<v Speaker 2>Sure, Well, one of the ones that I think is

0:33:31.600 --> 0:33:35.080
<v Speaker 2>perhaps the most notable was nineteen eighty three. We have

0:33:35.160 --> 0:33:37.880
<v Speaker 2>to go a ways back, but it's an interesting story.

0:33:37.920 --> 0:33:41.160
<v Speaker 2>So there was this was when Stephen was doing his

0:33:41.200 --> 0:33:43.960
<v Speaker 2>research and there was a grad student, Beverly de Orso.

0:33:44.600 --> 0:33:48.560
<v Speaker 2>And as it turns out, not even the grad students

0:33:48.600 --> 0:33:51.440
<v Speaker 2>under Stephen, you know, they don't always get lucid every

0:33:51.520 --> 0:33:53.000
<v Speaker 2>night that they're hooked up to the machines, and it

0:33:53.080 --> 0:33:55.720
<v Speaker 2>is very costly to hook up the folks, and so

0:33:56.680 --> 0:33:59.360
<v Speaker 2>when they do get lucid, they're required to write down

0:33:59.560 --> 0:34:02.840
<v Speaker 2>their dream in detail. Well, this one night, it's clear

0:34:02.920 --> 0:34:05.600
<v Speaker 2>she got lucid, she did the signaling, but then there

0:34:05.640 --> 0:34:08.319
<v Speaker 2>was nothing in the dream journal. And Stephen asked her,

0:34:08.320 --> 0:34:10.080
<v Speaker 2>he said, you know betterly, why why is that you

0:34:10.480 --> 0:34:12.320
<v Speaker 2>know that this is really important? She got kind of

0:34:12.320 --> 0:34:14.520
<v Speaker 2>embarrassed and she said, well, I had sex in my dream.

0:34:14.760 --> 0:34:16.680
<v Speaker 2>And He's like, that's nothing to being embarrassed about. How

0:34:16.680 --> 0:34:19.920
<v Speaker 2>about we experiment and do that and she was up

0:34:19.920 --> 0:34:21.880
<v Speaker 2>for it. And so Walter Greenleaf was part of this

0:34:21.960 --> 0:34:27.000
<v Speaker 2>as well, a distinguished Stanford scholar, and so they were

0:34:27.080 --> 0:34:31.000
<v Speaker 2>able to hook up additional equipment to you know, measure

0:34:31.040 --> 0:34:34.400
<v Speaker 2>things that you would think would be necessary for orgasms

0:34:34.440 --> 0:34:37.520
<v Speaker 2>such as vaginal blood flow and muscle contractions and things

0:34:37.560 --> 0:34:41.239
<v Speaker 2>like that. Very scientific and so so the next night

0:34:41.320 --> 0:34:44.160
<v Speaker 2>she went to sleep and she got lucid. And the

0:34:44.160 --> 0:34:46.240
<v Speaker 2>funny part of the story is that she gets lucid,

0:34:46.239 --> 0:34:48.920
<v Speaker 2>she's in the lab. She remembers the dream task, but

0:34:49.000 --> 0:34:52.319
<v Speaker 2>then she sees she's in the lab with her lab

0:34:52.360 --> 0:34:54.480
<v Speaker 2>mates and she's like, no, this isn't happening. I'm not

0:34:54.520 --> 0:34:57.080
<v Speaker 2>going to write about this. So she flies out of

0:34:57.120 --> 0:34:59.960
<v Speaker 2>the building and finds a random stranger to have her

0:35:00.080 --> 0:35:02.719
<v Speaker 2>dream sex with, and then of course she wakes up

0:35:02.880 --> 0:35:06.480
<v Speaker 2>and reports it. And it is quite amazing that all

0:35:06.520 --> 0:35:09.360
<v Speaker 2>the responses that you would expect for a full sexual

0:35:09.400 --> 0:35:12.080
<v Speaker 2>response were measured in the equipment.

0:35:12.640 --> 0:35:16.200
<v Speaker 1>So she was able to achieve orgasm from a lucid dream,

0:35:16.719 --> 0:35:18.560
<v Speaker 1>from a lucid dream, and they were able to measure

0:35:18.560 --> 0:35:23.480
<v Speaker 1>it in consensus reality. So you mentioned the two things

0:35:23.520 --> 0:35:26.640
<v Speaker 1>they're flying and having sex, which I understand are the

0:35:26.719 --> 0:35:30.240
<v Speaker 1>two most popular things to do for people who become lucid.

0:35:30.239 --> 0:35:32.240
<v Speaker 1>What else do people do when they become lucid?

0:35:32.880 --> 0:35:35.759
<v Speaker 2>Those are by far the most common things. I think

0:35:35.960 --> 0:35:38.760
<v Speaker 2>you know other people are they like to meet people.

0:35:38.880 --> 0:35:40.839
<v Speaker 2>You know, there's sort of a desire because you can

0:35:40.840 --> 0:35:43.839
<v Speaker 2>meet a celebrity or you can, you know, go to

0:35:44.280 --> 0:35:48.080
<v Speaker 2>a novel place, drive fast cars. You know. One of

0:35:48.080 --> 0:35:50.760
<v Speaker 2>the things that I thought was quite interesting. Robert Wagner

0:35:50.880 --> 0:35:54.000
<v Speaker 2>is a long time practitioner and he writes many books,

0:35:54.040 --> 0:35:56.200
<v Speaker 2>and I met him at a conference and one time

0:35:56.200 --> 0:35:58.279
<v Speaker 2>he said, you know, Jamie, in my experience, for the

0:35:58.360 --> 0:36:02.040
<v Speaker 2>first five years, people are very headen stick in their

0:36:02.080 --> 0:36:04.439
<v Speaker 2>approach to lucid dreaming. But after that you get into

0:36:04.480 --> 0:36:06.680
<v Speaker 2>the more interesting stuff where you can do more self

0:36:06.719 --> 0:36:09.600
<v Speaker 2>exploration and things like that. So I think that was

0:36:09.640 --> 0:36:11.640
<v Speaker 2>true in my own experience. And then as I've met

0:36:11.680 --> 0:36:13.759
<v Speaker 2>other lucid dreamers, depending on how many years they've been

0:36:13.840 --> 0:36:16.920
<v Speaker 2>lucid dreaming, they're either still driving fast cars and jumping

0:36:16.920 --> 0:36:18.840
<v Speaker 2>off the buildings or they're doing other stuff.

0:36:19.400 --> 0:36:21.799
<v Speaker 1>So let's get back to this issue of how to

0:36:22.160 --> 0:36:24.319
<v Speaker 1>lucid dream because I know a lot of listeners will

0:36:24.360 --> 0:36:27.400
<v Speaker 1>want to start practicing that. So there's this issue of

0:36:27.480 --> 0:36:30.840
<v Speaker 1>doing reality checking. You flick your tooth, you turn the

0:36:30.920 --> 0:36:34.319
<v Speaker 1>light switches on and off, you look at texts like

0:36:34.400 --> 0:36:36.759
<v Speaker 1>in a book or on your watch, You get in

0:36:36.840 --> 0:36:40.719
<v Speaker 1>the habit of doing this all the time until such

0:36:40.800 --> 0:36:42.480
<v Speaker 1>time that you do it and it doesn't work, and

0:36:42.520 --> 0:36:45.360
<v Speaker 1>you think, wait, why didn't that work? And then you realize,

0:36:45.680 --> 0:36:49.480
<v Speaker 1>but what technologies can help us move along to have

0:36:49.560 --> 0:36:50.200
<v Speaker 1>lucid dreams?

0:36:50.800 --> 0:36:54.799
<v Speaker 2>Well, the one technology is more pharmological, So there are

0:36:54.840 --> 0:36:59.960
<v Speaker 2>some acetacoline enhancers that have been studied. So glant tomine

0:37:00.239 --> 0:37:02.880
<v Speaker 2>is one of the ones that has been been studied

0:37:02.920 --> 0:37:06.400
<v Speaker 2>and that does induce tends to increase the ability to

0:37:06.440 --> 0:37:09.080
<v Speaker 2>have dreams and more vivid dreams, which then leads to

0:37:09.160 --> 0:37:12.399
<v Speaker 2>lucid dreaming. So that's certainly one intervention that I would

0:37:12.400 --> 0:37:16.640
<v Speaker 2>put in sort of the technology realm. You know, there

0:37:16.719 --> 0:37:19.759
<v Speaker 2>are many kickstarter you know, this is interesting because I've

0:37:19.760 --> 0:37:22.560
<v Speaker 2>tracked this for years. There's been many kickstarters since Steven's

0:37:22.600 --> 0:37:25.120
<v Speaker 2>original Nova Dreamer, which was, you know, a mass that

0:37:25.160 --> 0:37:27.880
<v Speaker 2>would flash lights when you became lucid.

0:37:28.360 --> 0:37:30.880
<v Speaker 1>So wait, actually, let's let's let's zoom in on that

0:37:30.880 --> 0:37:33.200
<v Speaker 1>for one second. So the idea was you have a

0:37:33.280 --> 0:37:36.960
<v Speaker 1>mask that's measuring your electro ocograms, measuring your eye movements,

0:37:37.400 --> 0:37:40.600
<v Speaker 1>and it sees that you've gone into rems sleep, you've

0:37:40.600 --> 0:37:43.160
<v Speaker 1>gone into dream sleep. Your eyes are moving back and forth,

0:37:43.440 --> 0:37:46.880
<v Speaker 1>and so then it flashes let's say, red lights at you.

0:37:47.680 --> 0:37:50.680
<v Speaker 1>And the idea is that the dreamer is having this

0:37:50.840 --> 0:37:53.000
<v Speaker 1>normal dream and thinks, wait, what are all these red

0:37:53.080 --> 0:37:56.919
<v Speaker 1>lights going on? Why is everything flashing red? And then thinks, oh, wait,

0:37:57.400 --> 0:38:01.080
<v Speaker 1>I must be inside a dream, and that what's the

0:38:01.400 --> 0:38:04.040
<v Speaker 1>element that you need in order to turn lucid.

0:38:04.680 --> 0:38:06.759
<v Speaker 2>Right, It's like a forced dream sign. So, because you

0:38:06.760 --> 0:38:09.439
<v Speaker 2>remember we talked about how dream signs are the triggers, well,

0:38:10.120 --> 0:38:12.640
<v Speaker 2>the red lights become something you can kind of bank on.

0:38:12.760 --> 0:38:14.400
<v Speaker 2>So when you go to sleep, you can still do

0:38:14.440 --> 0:38:17.040
<v Speaker 2>the mnemonic induction. You can say, next time I see

0:38:17.120 --> 0:38:21.640
<v Speaker 2>flashing red lights, flashing stop signs, anything to do with redvite,

0:38:21.680 --> 0:38:23.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to know that I'm dreaming. So you still

0:38:23.480 --> 0:38:26.840
<v Speaker 2>practice that mnemonic induction, but it's just sort of guaranteed

0:38:26.880 --> 0:38:29.240
<v Speaker 2>because you're going to introduce that stimuli directly.

0:38:29.719 --> 0:38:31.040
<v Speaker 1>And how well do those work?

0:38:32.200 --> 0:38:34.799
<v Speaker 2>Risingly not as well as you'd think. So you know,

0:38:34.960 --> 0:38:39.080
<v Speaker 2>years later, I was looking at sort of the comparative.

0:38:39.760 --> 0:38:42.280
<v Speaker 2>Every five or ten years, somebody does a meta analysis

0:38:42.280 --> 0:38:44.200
<v Speaker 2>of all the different methods and stuff, and so you know,

0:38:44.239 --> 0:38:47.800
<v Speaker 2>recently a meta analysis showed that that type of induction

0:38:48.000 --> 0:38:51.400
<v Speaker 2>isn't as robust as one would think. You know, the

0:38:51.440 --> 0:38:55.319
<v Speaker 2>best induction methods are really combinations of things that we've

0:38:55.320 --> 0:38:58.719
<v Speaker 2>talked about. So when you combine reality checks with wake

0:38:58.800 --> 0:39:02.600
<v Speaker 2>back to bed and if you you know, add an

0:39:02.680 --> 0:39:06.400
<v Speaker 2>aceta coleen, you know, enhancer, the kind of the best

0:39:06.520 --> 0:39:09.960
<v Speaker 2>results are fifty percent in you know, two or three nights,

0:39:10.560 --> 0:39:13.360
<v Speaker 2>seemed to be in sort of the realm of possibility.

0:39:13.640 --> 0:39:17.040
<v Speaker 2>But to date, there really hasn't been any technology like

0:39:17.480 --> 0:39:20.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, the Nova dreamer, or there's you know, the

0:39:20.160 --> 0:39:22.480
<v Speaker 2>REM dreamer, which doesn't really know if you're in REM,

0:39:22.520 --> 0:39:25.120
<v Speaker 2>but it just sort of randomly, you know, flashes lights throughout.

0:39:25.680 --> 0:39:27.920
<v Speaker 2>I've heard some researchers get their hands on something called

0:39:27.920 --> 0:39:30.720
<v Speaker 2>the IBAND, but I don't think that's ever been really

0:39:30.760 --> 0:39:32.280
<v Speaker 2>available to the general public.

0:39:32.880 --> 0:39:34.719
<v Speaker 1>And what what is that? What is the I band?

0:39:34.960 --> 0:39:37.400
<v Speaker 2>The I band is is very similar. It you know,

0:39:37.440 --> 0:39:40.920
<v Speaker 2>measures the EEG and then you know, it flashes a

0:39:41.000 --> 0:39:44.760
<v Speaker 2>red light you know, when when the dreamer is there.

0:39:45.200 --> 0:39:48.680
<v Speaker 2>But I think one of the things that I learned

0:39:48.680 --> 0:39:51.440
<v Speaker 2>from Stephen and as I've practiced lucid dreams and I've

0:39:51.480 --> 0:39:54.600
<v Speaker 2>helped other people over the years, it really does come

0:39:54.640 --> 0:39:57.160
<v Speaker 2>down to motivation. You know, he would say that that,

0:39:57.480 --> 0:39:59.239
<v Speaker 2>you know, when he had to do his pH d,

0:39:59.480 --> 0:40:01.839
<v Speaker 2>when he and to have loocent dreams in order to

0:40:02.360 --> 0:40:06.279
<v Speaker 2>get that degree, that made all the difference. And and

0:40:06.360 --> 0:40:08.680
<v Speaker 2>I think that's been my experience too. So if you

0:40:08.760 --> 0:40:11.680
<v Speaker 2>have the motivation, if you know, if you learn enough

0:40:11.680 --> 0:40:15.480
<v Speaker 2>about what's possible, then then you'll you'll have it. I

0:40:15.520 --> 0:40:18.080
<v Speaker 2>mean the mind does respond. There's an element of just

0:40:18.120 --> 0:40:21.200
<v Speaker 2>sort of the mind body connection of having this intention

0:40:21.440 --> 0:40:24.279
<v Speaker 2>to enter this altered state of consciousness, and then you know,

0:40:24.280 --> 0:40:27.280
<v Speaker 2>you're motivated to practice the reality checks. You're motivated to

0:40:27.520 --> 0:40:29.400
<v Speaker 2>wake up after four and a half hours of sleep

0:40:29.480 --> 0:40:32.520
<v Speaker 2>and stay up for ten or fifteen minutes, and you know,

0:40:32.560 --> 0:40:34.480
<v Speaker 2>rehearse a dream that you want to have. That's kind

0:40:34.480 --> 0:40:36.759
<v Speaker 2>of we didn't talk that much about it, but if

0:40:36.800 --> 0:40:39.520
<v Speaker 2>you do the wake back to bed method after waking

0:40:39.960 --> 0:40:42.120
<v Speaker 2>up after four or five hours, you do want to

0:40:42.120 --> 0:40:43.920
<v Speaker 2>sort of rehearse. You want to just sort of fill

0:40:44.000 --> 0:40:46.759
<v Speaker 2>your mind with lucid dreaming. You know, the lucid dream

0:40:46.760 --> 0:40:48.319
<v Speaker 2>you want to have, where you want to have it,

0:40:48.400 --> 0:40:51.600
<v Speaker 2>what smells, And then as you lie down, you know

0:40:51.640 --> 0:40:53.680
<v Speaker 2>you're telling yourself, I want to remember that I'm dreaming.

0:40:53.680 --> 0:40:55.719
<v Speaker 2>The next time I'm dreaming, I want to recognize that

0:40:55.760 --> 0:40:59.319
<v Speaker 2>I'm dreaming or remember that I'm dreaming, and then you're

0:40:59.360 --> 0:41:01.480
<v Speaker 2>more you know, more likely. So that's sort of the

0:41:01.480 --> 0:41:04.560
<v Speaker 2>best set of methods to have a lucid dream, but

0:41:04.600 --> 0:41:06.000
<v Speaker 2>it takes a lot of motivation to do that.

0:41:22.160 --> 0:41:25.640
<v Speaker 1>A couple of episodes, I talked about what happens when

0:41:25.680 --> 0:41:30.200
<v Speaker 1>we're asleep and how the whole brain does this change

0:41:30.239 --> 0:41:33.239
<v Speaker 1>over The whole factory of the brain switches over from

0:41:33.239 --> 0:41:36.360
<v Speaker 1>waking state to sleeping state, and you know, we lose

0:41:36.520 --> 0:41:39.440
<v Speaker 1>consciousness as one of the results of that. And what's

0:41:39.440 --> 0:41:42.600
<v Speaker 1>so interesting about dreaming is it's a form that is

0:41:42.840 --> 0:41:46.640
<v Speaker 1>like consciousness and lucid dreaming even more so, how do

0:41:46.719 --> 0:41:50.520
<v Speaker 1>you see the relationship between the lucid dream and the

0:41:50.640 --> 0:41:51.359
<v Speaker 1>conscious state.

0:41:52.600 --> 0:41:55.040
<v Speaker 2>That's a great question and that's been sort of hotly

0:41:55.080 --> 0:41:58.400
<v Speaker 2>debated in the dreaming world and the lucid dreaming world

0:41:58.440 --> 0:42:01.880
<v Speaker 2>for some time. And because it is difficult to get

0:42:02.040 --> 0:42:07.120
<v Speaker 2>subjects lucid with the expensive equipment like an fMRI, there's

0:42:07.160 --> 0:42:10.880
<v Speaker 2>not a lot of neural correlates. But I will say

0:42:10.640 --> 0:42:13.480
<v Speaker 2>there have been studies of like n of five, you know,

0:42:13.640 --> 0:42:18.440
<v Speaker 2>n of six, and based on that data, I believe

0:42:18.480 --> 0:42:21.960
<v Speaker 2>it is a hybrid state. And that's you know what

0:42:22.120 --> 0:42:26.359
<v Speaker 2>the authors of that study, Ursula ass is the lead

0:42:26.400 --> 0:42:29.120
<v Speaker 2>on that that it's a hybrid state. It's not quite

0:42:29.280 --> 0:42:32.920
<v Speaker 2>rem and it's definitely not quite waking, but it's it

0:42:32.960 --> 0:42:36.840
<v Speaker 2>has little characteristics of both. And again that's sort of

0:42:36.920 --> 0:42:41.040
<v Speaker 2>objective measures from the EEG and from fMRI, like what

0:42:41.200 --> 0:42:44.400
<v Speaker 2>regions of the brain are activated versus not, and what

0:42:44.520 --> 0:42:47.120
<v Speaker 2>type of power and amplitude. And I think, you know,

0:42:47.239 --> 0:42:49.839
<v Speaker 2>if I'm honest, my own experience is fairly similar that

0:42:51.120 --> 0:42:55.600
<v Speaker 2>when I'm in a lucid state there, I'm most often

0:42:56.080 --> 0:43:00.040
<v Speaker 2>entering that from a period of awakening, you know, so

0:43:00.120 --> 0:43:02.040
<v Speaker 2>like the wake back to bed method, and then you

0:43:02.080 --> 0:43:04.719
<v Speaker 2>get into this sort of hybrid state. And again many

0:43:04.760 --> 0:43:07.960
<v Speaker 2>people subjectively know what you're talking about. You're like, oh, yeah,

0:43:07.960 --> 0:43:10.440
<v Speaker 2>I was on that car trip and I zoned out

0:43:10.440 --> 0:43:12.200
<v Speaker 2>for a little bit, and then you know, I had

0:43:12.239 --> 0:43:16.800
<v Speaker 2>a weird hypnogogic imagery or I had a weird thought

0:43:16.840 --> 0:43:19.360
<v Speaker 2>that just didn't feel like it was mine. And so

0:43:19.400 --> 0:43:21.960
<v Speaker 2>I think it is hybrid. And if you need a

0:43:21.960 --> 0:43:24.480
<v Speaker 2>lot of sleep, you'll be a deep sleeper and you

0:43:24.520 --> 0:43:27.200
<v Speaker 2>won't have a lucid dream if you are able to.

0:43:27.200 --> 0:43:30.200
<v Speaker 2>If you get up multiple times in the night, you're

0:43:30.239 --> 0:43:33.040
<v Speaker 2>probably more likely to have a lucid dream because you're

0:43:33.360 --> 0:43:36.960
<v Speaker 2>entering waking state into the dream state multiple times.

0:43:37.600 --> 0:43:39.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, when I think about lucid dreams, I think

0:43:39.560 --> 0:43:42.239
<v Speaker 1>about Stephen Leberge as the guy who pioneered all this.

0:43:42.320 --> 0:43:46.160
<v Speaker 1>But I'm just curious, was there any indication of these

0:43:46.440 --> 0:43:50.280
<v Speaker 1>in the literature, either the scientific literature or in writing

0:43:51.160 --> 0:43:52.200
<v Speaker 1>before Stephen.

0:43:53.120 --> 0:43:58.760
<v Speaker 2>Yes, there's a researcher Keith Hearn in Europe right about

0:43:58.760 --> 0:44:00.960
<v Speaker 2>the same time as Steve that was doing some of

0:44:01.000 --> 0:44:04.600
<v Speaker 2>these experiments with left right, left right, and so he

0:44:04.920 --> 0:44:08.879
<v Speaker 2>certainly gets mentioned a lot of times. And then you can,

0:44:09.000 --> 0:44:12.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, go back to you know, nineteen early nineteen hundreds,

0:44:13.320 --> 0:44:16.840
<v Speaker 2>and you'll see some writings of sort of this idea

0:44:16.840 --> 0:44:21.160
<v Speaker 2>of being conscious in the dream state. Ben Eden, I believe,

0:44:21.239 --> 0:44:24.640
<v Speaker 2>is who they cred that to. Some have even pointed

0:44:24.680 --> 0:44:28.520
<v Speaker 2>farther back. I can't verify whether Aristotle talked about this

0:44:28.600 --> 0:44:31.440
<v Speaker 2>state of consciousness or not, but I tend to focus

0:44:31.440 --> 0:44:32.399
<v Speaker 2>on the more modern folk.

0:44:32.960 --> 0:44:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Are there any downsides to lucid dreaming.

0:44:36.360 --> 0:44:39.080
<v Speaker 2>So some people have raised that concern, and I think

0:44:39.080 --> 0:44:42.160
<v Speaker 2>it's a good concern to raise. And the good news

0:44:42.280 --> 0:44:44.640
<v Speaker 2>is people have actually started to study it. You know,

0:44:44.680 --> 0:44:47.720
<v Speaker 2>lucid dreaming research has really exploded in the last ten years.

0:44:47.800 --> 0:44:50.839
<v Speaker 2>And so as that research has gone forward, of course

0:44:50.880 --> 0:44:53.080
<v Speaker 2>people are looking for kind of novel angles, and so

0:44:53.160 --> 0:44:55.040
<v Speaker 2>one of the novel angles in the last five years

0:44:55.160 --> 0:44:58.600
<v Speaker 2>is can you show some some downside. So the things

0:44:58.640 --> 0:45:03.120
<v Speaker 2>that they looked at were does it increase dissociative behavior?

0:45:03.360 --> 0:45:05.600
<v Speaker 2>And so, you know, because in a lucid dream state,

0:45:06.080 --> 0:45:07.719
<v Speaker 2>you know, you're in this kind of altered state of

0:45:07.719 --> 0:45:10.680
<v Speaker 2>consciousness that might even share some characteristics of things that

0:45:10.719 --> 0:45:14.399
<v Speaker 2>are perceived as negative where you're disassociating from yourself that's

0:45:14.440 --> 0:45:17.799
<v Speaker 2>not normally a good thing in waking life. And they

0:45:17.840 --> 0:45:21.480
<v Speaker 2>looked at things like sleep quality. Does you know people

0:45:21.480 --> 0:45:24.439
<v Speaker 2>practicing the white back to bed method, does that interrupt sleep?

0:45:24.440 --> 0:45:27.200
<v Speaker 2>Does that actually lead to less sleep? And then they

0:45:27.200 --> 0:45:30.239
<v Speaker 2>looked at does it lead to nightmares? Are people, you know,

0:45:30.280 --> 0:45:34.160
<v Speaker 2>with all this kind of flexibility, does it somehow introduce nightmares?

0:45:34.760 --> 0:45:37.440
<v Speaker 2>And there haven't been a lot of studies maybe you know,

0:45:37.480 --> 0:45:40.000
<v Speaker 2>five or less and I would say the consensus across

0:45:40.040 --> 0:45:43.239
<v Speaker 2>this is that the most negative impact really is in

0:45:43.280 --> 0:45:46.760
<v Speaker 2>the quality of sleep. You're just not sleeping as as deeply,

0:45:46.960 --> 0:45:49.080
<v Speaker 2>and so you would I would never recommend that people

0:45:49.160 --> 0:45:51.400
<v Speaker 2>try to lucid dream five nights, you know, a week.

0:45:51.800 --> 0:45:54.000
<v Speaker 2>But all those other things that they looked at, they

0:45:54.000 --> 0:45:56.160
<v Speaker 2>didn't find evidence for it. It didn't increase some sort

0:45:56.200 --> 0:46:01.520
<v Speaker 2>of disassociative behavior, and there really was more positive mood impact.

0:46:01.560 --> 0:46:04.400
<v Speaker 2>People really do feel good about lucidream. It's it's like

0:46:04.440 --> 0:46:07.040
<v Speaker 2>almost like an accomplishment, and they tend to talk about

0:46:07.080 --> 0:46:08.879
<v Speaker 2>it and that leads to sort of an elevated mood.

0:46:09.160 --> 0:46:12.200
<v Speaker 2>But it does take away from a good night's sleep,

0:46:12.200 --> 0:46:15.279
<v Speaker 2>and therefore not something people are going to do every The.

0:46:15.280 --> 0:46:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Other social disadvantage, of course, is that if you're constantly

0:46:18.200 --> 0:46:20.200
<v Speaker 1>walking into a room and flicking the lights on and

0:46:20.280 --> 0:46:22.239
<v Speaker 1>off and seeing if you can knock your tooth off,

0:46:22.280 --> 0:46:23.480
<v Speaker 1>people might think you're strange.

0:46:23.840 --> 0:46:25.959
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I think it's fair.

0:46:26.680 --> 0:46:29.640
<v Speaker 1>So what's the research that's really exciting that's going on

0:46:29.719 --> 0:46:30.240
<v Speaker 1>right now?

0:46:31.200 --> 0:46:34.719
<v Speaker 2>So I think that one of the groups that is

0:46:34.960 --> 0:46:38.520
<v Speaker 2>receiving a lot of funding is Martin Dressler out of

0:46:38.560 --> 0:46:42.719
<v Speaker 2>the Netherlands. He has been gathering more and more students

0:46:43.040 --> 0:46:46.120
<v Speaker 2>on funding that he's getting. We caught up briefly at

0:46:46.239 --> 0:46:51.160
<v Speaker 2>World Sleep in Brazil and really interesting experiments that really

0:46:51.200 --> 0:46:53.680
<v Speaker 2>are building on the things that we've already talked about.

0:46:53.800 --> 0:46:56.360
<v Speaker 2>So think about the natural extension. If you can have

0:46:56.440 --> 0:47:01.719
<v Speaker 2>two way communication between an experimenter and a dreamer, is

0:47:01.760 --> 0:47:06.600
<v Speaker 2>there anything scientifically or from an engineering perspective that prevents

0:47:06.600 --> 0:47:09.320
<v Speaker 2>that happening from a dreamer to another dreamer? And the

0:47:09.360 --> 0:47:12.000
<v Speaker 2>answer is no, So you can bet that some people

0:47:12.120 --> 0:47:14.759
<v Speaker 2>are working on that, and you know, might even be

0:47:14.840 --> 0:47:18.799
<v Speaker 2>making PhD thesises out of a dreamer to dreamer communication.

0:47:19.400 --> 0:47:22.520
<v Speaker 2>There's another group that I know less about, but they're

0:47:22.560 --> 0:47:25.040
<v Speaker 2>certainly publishing a lot of papers. I haven't met these

0:47:25.040 --> 0:47:29.239
<v Speaker 2>researchers in person, but they have published on mind controlled

0:47:29.719 --> 0:47:32.600
<v Speaker 2>avatars from within the Lucid Dream. Because if you think

0:47:32.600 --> 0:47:36.400
<v Speaker 2>about it, you know, in the BCI world, it's not

0:47:36.560 --> 0:47:39.880
<v Speaker 2>that difficult to hook somebody up to an ECG and

0:47:39.960 --> 0:47:42.960
<v Speaker 2>have them control some sort of robot or some sort

0:47:43.000 --> 0:47:47.959
<v Speaker 2>of avatar. Well, of course, a natural extension is like, well,

0:47:47.960 --> 0:47:50.439
<v Speaker 2>in a lucid dream, we've just said, you can send

0:47:50.440 --> 0:47:52.880
<v Speaker 2>off signals with your eyes, could you use that to

0:47:52.960 --> 0:47:56.160
<v Speaker 2>control an avatar? And so indeed they published a paper

0:47:56.239 --> 0:48:01.960
<v Speaker 2>on controlling a car avatar just from within the lucid dream. So,

0:48:02.160 --> 0:48:03.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, just to make sure we know what we're

0:48:03.440 --> 0:48:06.160
<v Speaker 2>talking about. They're in a lucid dream. Their task is

0:48:06.200 --> 0:48:10.000
<v Speaker 2>to somehow drive a dream car, but they've been hooked

0:48:10.040 --> 0:48:13.800
<v Speaker 2>up in a BCI format to actually driving a car

0:48:14.000 --> 0:48:15.279
<v Speaker 2>in you know the.

0:48:15.280 --> 0:48:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Lab by the way, BCI's brain computer interface. So but

0:48:19.520 --> 0:48:22.239
<v Speaker 1>what in this case EEG or what were they hooked up.

0:48:22.200 --> 0:48:23.760
<v Speaker 2>With EEG and EMG?

0:48:23.920 --> 0:48:27.560
<v Speaker 1>So, okay, electromiagram, so it's measuring their muscle. Where was

0:48:27.600 --> 0:48:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the EMG hooked up the EMG? I'm not quite sure where.

0:48:32.360 --> 0:48:34.280
<v Speaker 1>I again, I haven't looked at that one in detail.

0:48:34.320 --> 0:48:35.799
<v Speaker 1>I sort of skimmed.

0:48:35.520 --> 0:48:38.799
<v Speaker 2>It and thought this would be definitely worth, you know,

0:48:39.040 --> 0:48:42.000
<v Speaker 2>talking to them and finding out more. The other thing

0:48:42.040 --> 0:48:43.680
<v Speaker 2>that they did that I've always wanted to do. I

0:48:44.200 --> 0:48:45.680
<v Speaker 2>what's kind of fun for me is I've had a

0:48:45.719 --> 0:48:47.600
<v Speaker 2>lot of these ideas over the years, and then now

0:48:47.640 --> 0:48:51.000
<v Speaker 2>I get to see researchers implement them. The other study

0:48:51.000 --> 0:48:55.520
<v Speaker 2>they did was what happens if you consume some sort

0:48:55.760 --> 0:49:00.560
<v Speaker 2>of pharmological substance in a lucid dream says, you know,

0:49:00.600 --> 0:49:03.879
<v Speaker 2>if we think about the Beverly de orso clearly, you know,

0:49:04.200 --> 0:49:09.080
<v Speaker 2>by having an engagement of a certain type in the dream,

0:49:09.160 --> 0:49:12.799
<v Speaker 2>such as sex, it led to a physiological response. So

0:49:12.960 --> 0:49:15.640
<v Speaker 2>a natural research question is like, how far does that go?

0:49:15.920 --> 0:49:18.680
<v Speaker 2>When you drink alcohol in a dream? Does it have

0:49:18.840 --> 0:49:22.560
<v Speaker 2>any kind of physiological effect if you take ritilin or

0:49:22.600 --> 0:49:26.640
<v Speaker 2>if you take some sort of you know, illegal substance.

0:49:27.280 --> 0:49:29.400
<v Speaker 2>And they have a paper on that, and it turns

0:49:29.440 --> 0:49:33.239
<v Speaker 2>out that psychoactive substances taken in the dream have a

0:49:33.280 --> 0:49:38.160
<v Speaker 2>stronger perceived effect by the dreamer then like let's say alcohol.

0:49:38.640 --> 0:49:43.840
<v Speaker 2>And then they again, according to their research, about twenty

0:49:43.880 --> 0:49:47.360
<v Speaker 2>percent of the respondents who were able to remember to

0:49:47.440 --> 0:49:52.000
<v Speaker 2>do the intake had some subjective feeling of that even

0:49:52.160 --> 0:49:55.200
<v Speaker 2>after waking up. Now again, I think that's the type

0:49:55.239 --> 0:49:57.880
<v Speaker 2>of research that like, hmm, that's very interesting. But I

0:49:57.920 --> 0:49:59.879
<v Speaker 2>want to see that replicated, and I want to see

0:49:59.920 --> 0:50:03.120
<v Speaker 2>a you know, with you know, thirty people, forty fifty people. So,

0:50:03.440 --> 0:50:06.680
<v Speaker 2>but I think it's just it's interesting. It's an interesting thought.

0:50:06.840 --> 0:50:09.000
<v Speaker 1>What is the claim there though, that they're seeing the

0:50:09.040 --> 0:50:12.319
<v Speaker 1>placebo effect of a psychedelic they're just you know, when

0:50:12.320 --> 0:50:14.319
<v Speaker 1>someone says, hey, you've taken this drug and then you

0:50:14.400 --> 0:50:17.560
<v Speaker 1>feel like you're drugged even though you're not. That's the

0:50:17.640 --> 0:50:19.080
<v Speaker 1>idea of that exactly.

0:50:19.120 --> 0:50:21.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean, that's even the title of the paper is

0:50:21.000 --> 0:50:24.200
<v Speaker 2>is like, you know, placebo without deception. So it's a

0:50:24.280 --> 0:50:27.320
<v Speaker 2>it's a known, you know thing that you are just taking,

0:50:28.000 --> 0:50:31.239
<v Speaker 2>you know, something that is not real quote unquote in

0:50:31.280 --> 0:50:34.719
<v Speaker 2>the dream. But then the placebo effect is is really

0:50:34.719 --> 0:50:37.480
<v Speaker 2>well studied. I mean, you know, even again some some

0:50:37.520 --> 0:50:40.480
<v Speaker 2>colleagues at Stanford are looking into that quite quite extensively.

0:50:40.640 --> 0:50:43.080
<v Speaker 2>So I think that's a novel and a very interesting

0:50:43.080 --> 0:50:44.520
<v Speaker 2>application of lucidreaming.

0:50:44.719 --> 0:50:47.279
<v Speaker 1>It'll be really interesting to see whether this leads to

0:50:47.360 --> 0:50:52.480
<v Speaker 1>people being able to heal anything about themselves this way

0:50:52.719 --> 0:50:56.640
<v Speaker 1>using a placebo effect with you know, medications in a

0:50:56.760 --> 0:51:00.399
<v Speaker 1>dream and their leg gets better or some disease state

0:51:00.440 --> 0:51:00.719
<v Speaker 1>they have.

0:51:01.400 --> 0:51:03.840
<v Speaker 2>That's right well, And I think the other thing that

0:51:03.840 --> 0:51:07.800
<v Speaker 2>we haven't talked about that's worth mentioning probably one of

0:51:07.840 --> 0:51:12.200
<v Speaker 2>the most research areas that's currently therapeutic is PTSD, and

0:51:12.239 --> 0:51:17.440
<v Speaker 2>so they're using PTSD and lucid dreaming to help people

0:51:17.520 --> 0:51:20.640
<v Speaker 2>overcome that trauma. And so if, especially if there's a

0:51:20.680 --> 0:51:25.759
<v Speaker 2>reoccurring nightmare, it's a bit counterintuitive, but what the participant

0:51:25.800 --> 0:51:29.160
<v Speaker 2>has been told is that whatever you're dreaming, even though

0:51:29.160 --> 0:51:32.200
<v Speaker 2>it's very negative and it causes, you know, a strong reaction,

0:51:32.560 --> 0:51:35.400
<v Speaker 2>it's really a disassociated part of yourself. And so in

0:51:35.440 --> 0:51:38.960
<v Speaker 2>the Lucid dream, you have an opportunity to consciously, in

0:51:39.000 --> 0:51:42.359
<v Speaker 2>a very safe environment, you know, act in a different way.

0:51:42.840 --> 0:51:46.239
<v Speaker 2>And so an example of this that I'll just you know,

0:51:46.960 --> 0:51:50.080
<v Speaker 2>I'll make up a fictitious example, but it gets the

0:51:50.120 --> 0:51:52.960
<v Speaker 2>point across. Let's say that I have a dream and

0:51:53.040 --> 0:51:55.120
<v Speaker 2>in that dream, a robber you know, comes in and

0:51:55.400 --> 0:51:58.839
<v Speaker 2>breaks into my house and is you know, strangling my son,

0:51:59.320 --> 0:52:01.880
<v Speaker 2>and you know, Lucid dreamer, and they say, I get Lucid.

0:52:01.880 --> 0:52:03.880
<v Speaker 2>It's like, no, this is you know, my dream sign happened.

0:52:03.920 --> 0:52:06.640
<v Speaker 2>This is my house, but it's in Indiana, And you know,

0:52:06.760 --> 0:52:09.200
<v Speaker 2>I might be tempted to turn into the Incredible Hulk

0:52:09.239 --> 0:52:12.440
<v Speaker 2>and just throw that robber, you know, out of the building. Well,

0:52:12.480 --> 0:52:15.000
<v Speaker 2>sure I could do that, but then if this really

0:52:15.080 --> 0:52:17.920
<v Speaker 2>is a recurring nightmare, it's going to come back. Instead,

0:52:18.560 --> 0:52:21.279
<v Speaker 2>if I recognize it's a dream, and I remember what

0:52:21.320 --> 0:52:23.680
<v Speaker 2>my therapist has told me and say, hey, this robber

0:52:23.760 --> 0:52:27.000
<v Speaker 2>is really a part of me. Then I show it love.

0:52:27.280 --> 0:52:29.720
<v Speaker 2>I actually say, hey, you want to tell me something.

0:52:29.800 --> 0:52:32.200
<v Speaker 2>I love you. You're just a part of me. What's

0:52:32.239 --> 0:52:35.000
<v Speaker 2>the message you have for me? And this robber might

0:52:35.080 --> 0:52:37.520
<v Speaker 2>turn to me, he might transform. People talk about it

0:52:37.520 --> 0:52:41.319
<v Speaker 2>transforming into something beautiful, and might say, you're neglecting you

0:52:41.360 --> 0:52:44.600
<v Speaker 2>know that the play. There's you, you're you know, your

0:52:44.640 --> 0:52:47.000
<v Speaker 2>inner child wants to have more fun or more and

0:52:47.000 --> 0:52:49.239
<v Speaker 2>more play. And that's just, you know, kind of a

0:52:49.320 --> 0:52:52.080
<v Speaker 2>light example, but there are many examples that are you know,

0:52:52.280 --> 0:52:56.280
<v Speaker 2>very significant and that people have had substantial healing where

0:52:56.520 --> 0:53:00.480
<v Speaker 2>that you know, monster or that aggressor turns into something beautiful.

0:53:00.480 --> 0:53:02.920
<v Speaker 2>And then often they'll talk about an experience of it

0:53:02.960 --> 0:53:05.080
<v Speaker 2>kind of coming into their heart. And I think that

0:53:05.200 --> 0:53:07.799
<v Speaker 2>is perhaps at this point in time, from everything I've seen,

0:53:08.000 --> 0:53:11.560
<v Speaker 2>it's perhaps the most beneficial application of lucid dreaming is

0:53:11.560 --> 0:53:15.160
<v Speaker 2>that you can reintegrate these difficult memories. You can reintegrate

0:53:15.200 --> 0:53:17.960
<v Speaker 2>these difficult parts of your past because the environment's very

0:53:18.000 --> 0:53:22.560
<v Speaker 2>safe and somehow you're operating below the conscious mind, you know,

0:53:22.640 --> 0:53:25.520
<v Speaker 2>like this. Even though you have some conscious control, you

0:53:25.600 --> 0:53:28.160
<v Speaker 2>still have about you know, ninety to ninety five percent

0:53:28.160 --> 0:53:30.440
<v Speaker 2>of the dream is just generated outside.

0:53:30.040 --> 0:53:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Of your control.

0:53:30.680 --> 0:53:33.320
<v Speaker 2>So it's a really unique aspect.

0:53:33.960 --> 0:53:36.680
<v Speaker 1>So there are all kinds of therapeutic roads that might

0:53:36.760 --> 0:53:40.279
<v Speaker 1>be discovered in the future as we get better and

0:53:40.320 --> 0:53:45.239
<v Speaker 1>better as a society at implementing lucid dreaming. So, JB,

0:53:45.360 --> 0:53:48.440
<v Speaker 1>you've been exposed to lots of the great minds in

0:53:48.520 --> 0:53:51.040
<v Speaker 1>lucid dreaming. Has anyone else come across your path that

0:53:51.160 --> 0:53:52.960
<v Speaker 1>said something influential to you?

0:53:54.400 --> 0:53:58.720
<v Speaker 2>Yes? At Google, actually I found Ray Kurzweil. Many people

0:53:59.440 --> 0:54:03.560
<v Speaker 2>may no Ray kurzwhile he's considered a futurist, a great thinker,

0:54:04.040 --> 0:54:08.280
<v Speaker 2>has many patents under his name from his earlier engineering days.

0:54:08.520 --> 0:54:10.840
<v Speaker 2>I found out that he was at Google and I

0:54:10.880 --> 0:54:14.840
<v Speaker 2>came across some of his writings on his blog and

0:54:14.880 --> 0:54:18.040
<v Speaker 2>he mentioned, you know, lucid dreaming. So I initiated contact

0:54:18.040 --> 0:54:21.759
<v Speaker 2>with him and we had many good exchanges. And the

0:54:21.800 --> 0:54:24.520
<v Speaker 2>way he described it I thought was very fascinating, you know,

0:54:24.520 --> 0:54:27.480
<v Speaker 2>coming from an engineer's perspective, And he said, you know, JB,

0:54:27.680 --> 0:54:30.200
<v Speaker 2>I was trained as an engineer, but in the Lucid

0:54:30.280 --> 0:54:33.600
<v Speaker 2>dreaming state. I find that part of the mind that

0:54:33.680 --> 0:54:37.799
<v Speaker 2>has these constraints that I've sort of learned are you know, hardwired,

0:54:37.840 --> 0:54:40.600
<v Speaker 2>they get looser, and so I can in this sort

0:54:40.600 --> 0:54:43.080
<v Speaker 2>of hybrid state, I can come up with new things

0:54:43.080 --> 0:54:45.920
<v Speaker 2>that are inventive, and when I wake up, maybe you know,

0:54:46.120 --> 0:54:48.680
<v Speaker 2>eighty percent of it really isn't feasible, it's breaking the

0:54:48.719 --> 0:54:51.960
<v Speaker 2>laws of physics. But that twenty percent leads to something.

0:54:52.239 --> 0:54:54.719
<v Speaker 2>And so that is part of why I did get

0:54:54.760 --> 0:54:57.120
<v Speaker 2>quite excited about it, and I thought, you know, engineers

0:54:57.239 --> 0:55:00.560
<v Speaker 2>or creative types really can ben ait fit from this.

0:55:01.120 --> 0:55:03.920
<v Speaker 2>And you know, taking that one step, you know further,

0:55:04.120 --> 0:55:07.720
<v Speaker 2>you might say, well, how what what exactly? Well, remember

0:55:07.760 --> 0:55:09.960
<v Speaker 2>when we talked about you know, the first five years,

0:55:10.080 --> 0:55:13.799
<v Speaker 2>you know, becomes a bit you know, hedonistic. After that, well,

0:55:14.160 --> 0:55:17.160
<v Speaker 2>you can actually just call out to the dream world.

0:55:17.160 --> 0:55:19.480
<v Speaker 2>You don't even have to invent a scenario. You can

0:55:19.560 --> 0:55:22.960
<v Speaker 2>just say show me something beautiful. Let's say you're an

0:55:23.040 --> 0:55:25.560
<v Speaker 2>artist and I've done that phrase and you know, out

0:55:25.560 --> 0:55:28.520
<v Speaker 2>of the ground form this incredible marble, you know, statue

0:55:28.520 --> 0:55:31.719
<v Speaker 2>that I wish I was, you know, a sculptor, and

0:55:31.760 --> 0:55:34.200
<v Speaker 2>I think, you know, it's getting to that aspect that

0:55:34.320 --> 0:55:37.880
<v Speaker 2>Ray talked about, like, you're in this unique state imagine

0:55:37.880 --> 0:55:41.240
<v Speaker 2>as an inventor, as a writer, you could just prompt

0:55:41.400 --> 0:55:44.319
<v Speaker 2>and so you know, when I see chat, GPT and

0:55:44.320 --> 0:55:47.600
<v Speaker 2>prompt engineering, I immediately think of you need prompt engineering

0:55:47.600 --> 0:55:50.200
<v Speaker 2>for lucid dreaming because you literally can just prompt your mind.

0:55:50.440 --> 0:55:53.479
<v Speaker 2>Show me what you know. I'm most afraid of, show

0:55:53.520 --> 0:55:57.719
<v Speaker 2>me something beautiful. Stephen's favorite question is show me the

0:55:57.760 --> 0:56:01.280
<v Speaker 2>best version of myself. You know, that was the question

0:56:01.440 --> 0:56:03.600
<v Speaker 2>that he thought, you know, leads to sort of the

0:56:03.680 --> 0:56:06.600
<v Speaker 2>highest expression of what's possible. And so I would really

0:56:06.680 --> 0:56:09.279
<v Speaker 2>encourage people to, you know, learn how to lose a

0:56:09.360 --> 0:56:12.520
<v Speaker 2>dream and then think about what do they want to see,

0:56:12.600 --> 0:56:14.759
<v Speaker 2>what do they want to create, what do they want

0:56:14.800 --> 0:56:17.480
<v Speaker 2>to perhaps, you know, explore about themselves, because there's really

0:56:17.520 --> 0:56:20.600
<v Speaker 2>no other place where you can do that that is

0:56:20.640 --> 0:56:23.000
<v Speaker 2>so safe and it's just coming from your own mind

0:56:23.040 --> 0:56:25.560
<v Speaker 2>and you don't need to use any substances, you know,

0:56:25.640 --> 0:56:28.200
<v Speaker 2>to get into that state of consciousness.

0:56:32.719 --> 0:56:35.640
<v Speaker 1>So that was my interview with Jonathan Barnt, and what

0:56:35.680 --> 0:56:39.880
<v Speaker 1>we see is that first of all, achieving lucidity isn't easy,

0:56:39.960 --> 0:56:42.839
<v Speaker 1>but if you practice and get good headed, there are

0:56:42.920 --> 0:56:48.839
<v Speaker 1>opportunities for personal insight and problem solving and artistic inspiration,

0:56:49.520 --> 0:56:54.600
<v Speaker 1>possibly overcoming nightmares, and all kinds of exploration. So as

0:56:54.640 --> 0:56:57.439
<v Speaker 1>a reminder, if you want to try lucid dreaming, there

0:56:57.480 --> 0:57:01.600
<v Speaker 1>are several techniques to pursue. First is keep a dream journal,

0:57:01.600 --> 0:57:04.440
<v Speaker 1>write everything down from your dreams when you wake up.

0:57:04.640 --> 0:57:07.480
<v Speaker 1>This is really the only way to do dream recall,

0:57:07.600 --> 0:57:10.360
<v Speaker 1>so that you can then look across a bunch of

0:57:10.400 --> 0:57:14.960
<v Speaker 1>your dreams and start to recognize dream signs. In other words,

0:57:15.480 --> 0:57:18.000
<v Speaker 1>this sort of wacky thing shows up in my dreams

0:57:18.040 --> 0:57:21.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot, but rarely or never in real life, so

0:57:21.640 --> 0:57:24.920
<v Speaker 1>when you see it, you should be more likely to

0:57:25.120 --> 0:57:28.720
<v Speaker 1>recognize that you are dreaming. Then there are all the

0:57:28.800 --> 0:57:33.680
<v Speaker 1>techniques for reality testing. These all involve checking your environment

0:57:33.880 --> 0:57:37.080
<v Speaker 1>several times a day to see whether you're dreaming. So,

0:57:37.240 --> 0:57:39.920
<v Speaker 1>for example, you look at a digital clock and then

0:57:39.920 --> 0:57:41.920
<v Speaker 1>you look away, and then you look back at the

0:57:41.960 --> 0:57:45.160
<v Speaker 1>clock again to see if the time has changed in

0:57:45.240 --> 0:57:48.280
<v Speaker 1>some weird way. The key is to get into the

0:57:48.400 --> 0:57:51.080
<v Speaker 1>habit of doing this. Most of the time, you'll be

0:57:51.120 --> 0:57:53.600
<v Speaker 1>doing this in real life and it won't change, And

0:57:53.640 --> 0:57:57.080
<v Speaker 1>then at some point you'll do that habitually in a dream,

0:57:57.360 --> 0:58:00.680
<v Speaker 1>and then you'll say, whoa or is John Nathan mentioned

0:58:00.720 --> 0:58:03.920
<v Speaker 1>you can try pinching your nose and trying to breathe in.

0:58:04.920 --> 0:58:07.200
<v Speaker 1>You get in the habit of doing that several times

0:58:07.200 --> 0:58:09.680
<v Speaker 1>a day, and in real life you'll never be able

0:58:09.720 --> 0:58:11.680
<v Speaker 1>to breathe in. But at some point you'll do this

0:58:12.200 --> 0:58:15.600
<v Speaker 1>and you'll breathe in and you'll think, Wow, that's weird.

0:58:16.040 --> 0:58:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh wait a minute, And there are lots of techniques

0:58:18.600 --> 0:58:21.240
<v Speaker 1>you can try here. Another one is placing your fingers

0:58:21.320 --> 0:58:23.880
<v Speaker 1>against the palm of your other hand and trying to

0:58:23.960 --> 0:58:26.960
<v Speaker 1>push them through. That won't work in real life, that

0:58:27.000 --> 0:58:29.880
<v Speaker 1>can sometimes work in a dream. So think of what

0:58:29.920 --> 0:58:33.680
<v Speaker 1>techniques you might want to use for reality testing. And

0:58:33.720 --> 0:58:36.040
<v Speaker 1>the idea is that if you get in the habit

0:58:36.160 --> 0:58:39.919
<v Speaker 1>of running these checks frequently during the day, it makes

0:58:40.000 --> 0:58:43.880
<v Speaker 1>it more likely that you'll perform them in a dream,

0:58:44.000 --> 0:58:47.720
<v Speaker 1>and that can trigger lucidity. There are several other kinds

0:58:47.800 --> 0:58:51.600
<v Speaker 1>of complementary techniques, some of which Jonathan mentioned like the

0:58:52.160 --> 0:58:55.560
<v Speaker 1>wake back to bed method, which involves waking yourself up

0:58:55.640 --> 0:58:58.040
<v Speaker 1>after five to six hours of sleep, and you stay

0:58:58.080 --> 0:59:00.280
<v Speaker 1>awake for a little bit and then you go act

0:59:00.280 --> 0:59:04.240
<v Speaker 1>to sleep with the intention of entering a lucid dream. Now,

0:59:04.280 --> 0:59:07.080
<v Speaker 1>this method works because you have more rem sleep in

0:59:07.160 --> 0:59:10.040
<v Speaker 1>the second half of the night, and so that enhances

0:59:10.080 --> 0:59:13.840
<v Speaker 1>the chances of becoming lucid, and most lucid dreamers find

0:59:13.880 --> 0:59:18.840
<v Speaker 1>that combining techniques increases their success rate. Just be aware

0:59:18.920 --> 0:59:22.040
<v Speaker 1>that this requires patience and a lot of practice. You

0:59:22.080 --> 0:59:25.800
<v Speaker 1>probably won't achieve lucidity on your first try, but keep

0:59:25.840 --> 0:59:29.520
<v Speaker 1>trying and you'll get there. Okay, So let's wrap up.

0:59:29.840 --> 0:59:32.520
<v Speaker 1>This was the third of a three parter. The first

0:59:32.640 --> 0:59:37.320
<v Speaker 1>wason Why Brains Sleep, The next was on why Brain's Dream,

0:59:37.800 --> 0:59:41.680
<v Speaker 1>and this episode covered a rare and special form of dreaming,

0:59:42.280 --> 0:59:46.040
<v Speaker 1>lucid dreaming. So hopefully you've learned several things that you

0:59:46.080 --> 0:59:49.600
<v Speaker 1>didn't previously know. But truthfully, there are still a lot

0:59:49.640 --> 0:59:53.160
<v Speaker 1>of things that we still don't understand. As just one example,

0:59:53.520 --> 0:59:57.880
<v Speaker 1>there's the issue of the false memories inside a dream.

0:59:58.320 --> 1:00:01.080
<v Speaker 1>So I mentioned it to Jonathan Earl that I had

1:00:01.120 --> 1:00:03.760
<v Speaker 1>had this one second micro sleep when I was on

1:00:03.800 --> 1:00:06.280
<v Speaker 1>a road trip with a friend, and when trying to

1:00:06.320 --> 1:00:08.840
<v Speaker 1>describe what happened, it took a long time. Now, the

1:00:08.880 --> 1:00:12.800
<v Speaker 1>reason was that the dream itself was simply I was

1:00:12.840 --> 1:00:16.360
<v Speaker 1>standing on the top of roof looking at a city flooding.

1:00:16.800 --> 1:00:19.600
<v Speaker 1>But I had a whole set of false memories how

1:00:19.600 --> 1:00:22.760
<v Speaker 1>I had left to sink on because I wasn't thinking

1:00:22.840 --> 1:00:25.920
<v Speaker 1>and not taking appropriate responsibility, and I had all these

1:00:25.920 --> 1:00:29.200
<v Speaker 1>feelings of guilt because it seemed so stupid that I

1:00:29.240 --> 1:00:31.840
<v Speaker 1>had done that. I felt regret, And now I was

1:00:31.840 --> 1:00:34.600
<v Speaker 1>in a situation of figuring out what this meant for

1:00:34.720 --> 1:00:37.280
<v Speaker 1>the city and for me personally, and how much trouble

1:00:37.320 --> 1:00:39.520
<v Speaker 1>I was going to be in, how guilty I felt

1:00:39.520 --> 1:00:43.280
<v Speaker 1>about flooding everything. But the dream itself only took a

1:00:43.280 --> 1:00:45.960
<v Speaker 1>fraction of a second. And the question is where did

1:00:46.000 --> 1:00:49.280
<v Speaker 1>all the memories of having done that come from? And

1:00:49.760 --> 1:00:53.040
<v Speaker 1>why were they so believable to me in that moment?

1:00:53.720 --> 1:00:57.120
<v Speaker 1>And another related question I've always had is how can

1:00:57.400 --> 1:01:02.200
<v Speaker 1>characters in our dreams surprise Someone will often say something

1:01:02.200 --> 1:01:04.640
<v Speaker 1>to you in a dream and you'll think, Wow, that

1:01:04.680 --> 1:01:06.920
<v Speaker 1>doesn't feel like something I would have thought of, But

1:01:06.960 --> 1:01:09.480
<v Speaker 1>it was your brain that came up with it. Now,

1:01:09.560 --> 1:01:12.800
<v Speaker 1>just to be clear, this can result from random hurricanes

1:01:12.840 --> 1:01:16.320
<v Speaker 1>of activity in the depths of your unconscious brain, all

1:01:16.360 --> 1:01:19.000
<v Speaker 1>of the stuff that you don't have access to awareness of,

1:01:19.320 --> 1:01:22.360
<v Speaker 1>and it doesn't necessarily have to be meaningful, like a

1:01:22.400 --> 1:01:25.360
<v Speaker 1>deep hidden message. But again, the part that weirds me

1:01:25.400 --> 1:01:28.560
<v Speaker 1>out is that your brain can serve up this very

1:01:28.600 --> 1:01:32.640
<v Speaker 1>weird stuff to you and it is totally believed by you,

1:01:33.440 --> 1:01:38.000
<v Speaker 1>which should make us appropriately suspicious of all the things

1:01:38.080 --> 1:01:41.560
<v Speaker 1>that we believe in waking life. As you know from

1:01:41.640 --> 1:01:44.360
<v Speaker 1>this episode In the last I don't think that dreams

1:01:44.400 --> 1:01:49.080
<v Speaker 1>necessarily have meaning, but they may provide an interesting tool

1:01:49.200 --> 1:01:52.920
<v Speaker 1>to explore the boundaries of our own consciousness. If we

1:01:53.000 --> 1:01:57.160
<v Speaker 1>agree that the mind is the final frontier, dreams may

1:01:57.200 --> 1:02:01.120
<v Speaker 1>be one way that we can navigate its depth. Until

1:02:01.200 --> 1:02:03.920
<v Speaker 1>next time, keep dreaming and I'll see you in the

1:02:03.920 --> 1:02:10.680
<v Speaker 1>next episode. I'll link lots of papers about lucid dreaming

1:02:10.840 --> 1:02:13.880
<v Speaker 1>at eagleman dot com slash podcasts, so don't forget to

1:02:13.880 --> 1:02:16.760
<v Speaker 1>go there, and I'd love to hear about your experiences

1:02:16.880 --> 1:02:20.320
<v Speaker 1>or your questions about lucid dreaming. So send me a

1:02:20.360 --> 1:02:23.200
<v Speaker 1>note at podcast at eagleman dot com to let me

1:02:23.240 --> 1:02:26.360
<v Speaker 1>know your thoughts. If you enjoy these episodes, please consider

1:02:26.440 --> 1:02:29.960
<v Speaker 1>leaving a review on your favorite podcast platform, and check

1:02:29.960 --> 1:02:33.160
<v Speaker 1>out and subscribe to Inner Cosmos on YouTube for videos

1:02:33.160 --> 1:02:36.760
<v Speaker 1>of each episode and to leave comments until next time,

1:02:37.000 --> 1:02:40.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm David Eagleman and this is Inner Cosmos.