Speaker 1: Well, the sixth time was not a charm for Kevin McCarthy.
Speaker 1: They have now decided to wait till seven Central, eight
Speaker 1: Eastern to get back at this, trying to figure out
Speaker 1: what they're gonna do now. David Jolly said on MSNBC
Speaker 1: there's just not a pathway now for Kevin McCarthy. It's
Speaker 1: time for him to withdraw se n Jake Tapper says, quote,
Speaker 1: democracy is messy, and he actually is defending the Republicans
Speaker 1: who refused to vote for Kevin McCarthy, which may be
Speaker 1: the most interesting and shocking moment of the day on CNN.
Speaker 1: Let me just turn and just say, like I know
Speaker 1: the viewers out there, this probably seems like chaotic and insane,
Speaker 1: but hey, this is democracy. I mean, we can't pretend
Speaker 1: that this is I mean, I think Congressman Gallagher was
Speaker 1: right earlier today he said this is messy, and democracy
Speaker 1: is messy. It's a feature, not a bug. That's true.
Speaker 1: These people are exercising they're right to do that, and
Speaker 1: a lot of them, I don't know all of them,
Speaker 1: but a lot of the why rebels are voting the
Speaker 1: way they're voting because they actually want substantive changes to
Speaker 1: the rules. I think that is really an open question.
Speaker 1: I was literally now, I'm not gonna let you hear
Speaker 1: their fodder. But it was an interesting moment there from
Speaker 1: Jake Tapper asking this question, joining me as a guest
Speaker 1: of mine. You heard her yesterday and we're going to
Speaker 1: talk to her again today. Senior congressional reporter Washington Times
Speaker 1: Kerry Picketts with McCarry. You heard you heard that moment
Speaker 1: there from Jake Tapper, who we actually said, look house
Speaker 1: to Republicans refused to vote for Kevin McCarthy a speaker.
Speaker 1: Are doing this because they want real changes to the rules.
Speaker 1: We've now gone through six votes, they've adjourned again. Where
Speaker 1: are we and what are they doing behind closed doors
Speaker 1: right now? Okay, Well, it appears that I spoke with
Speaker 1: Chip Roy earlier today and he's one of the negotiators
Speaker 1: for the for the never Kevin's as they are as
Speaker 1: they are being called, uh, and you know he says that, uh,
Speaker 1: negotiations are moving in a positive direction. But look, I
Speaker 1: want to be very clear about this. There isn't so
Speaker 1: much the never Kevin's and the always Kevin's. Uh what
Speaker 1: you have here? Uh like sort of like the twenty
Speaker 1: or so, never Kevin's. Then you have the always Kevin's Okay,
Speaker 1: no one will say, you know, we're supporting Kevin to
Speaker 1: no matter what. And then you have the vast majority
Speaker 1: of the Republican Conference, which is basically, we don't really
Speaker 1: care so much as we'll support the person who really
Speaker 1: has the majority of the votes. We'll go that way.
Speaker 1: Just pick somebody, damn it. Okay, yeah, I mean no,
Speaker 1: it's as right. I mean, I've talked to members of
Speaker 1: Congress who are at this point like this is just ridiculous,
Speaker 1: hurry up and do it. Yeah, exactly. It's not so
Speaker 1: much that they're just like, oh yeah, we're like all
Speaker 1: about Kevin McCarthy, all right. Yeah, it's it's just that
Speaker 1: they're going to look, if it seems like, you know,
Speaker 1: Kevin McCarthy is like the guy that everyone seems to
Speaker 1: be sort of going with, then like that, you know,
Speaker 1: that huge faction is gonna go with Kevin McCarthy. But
Speaker 1: if it seems like the vibe is going towards somebody else,
Speaker 1: then that huge faction is gonna go towards, you know,
Speaker 1: towards like somebody else, you know. But they're not so
Speaker 1: much they're like die hards towards any one person. Uh.
Speaker 1: They are the ones who are just like, look, we
Speaker 1: just want to we just want to move on. And look,
Speaker 1: I'm sure like the you know, twenty or so anti
Speaker 1: Kevin's and then twenty or so uh pro Kevin diehards
Speaker 1: also want to move on, you know, badly as well.
Speaker 1: But you know they're the ones who are really like
Speaker 1: the most vocal about their position students right now. So
Speaker 1: those are sort of like the three factions right now
Speaker 1: that that are really uh you know out there. When
Speaker 1: you when you mentioned earlier by the way you spoke
Speaker 1: with Chip Rory Roy, he seems to be a guy
Speaker 1: that is trying to somehow get the rules changes and
Speaker 1: then go to the never Kevin say all right, look
Speaker 1: we got a lot more than any of us could
Speaker 1: have imagined, and let's get this done. He does seem
Speaker 1: to be I guess you'd say the most level headed.
Speaker 1: Then you look at people like Matt Gates and Bobert,
Speaker 1: they're pretty much like, the hell with you, He's not
Speaker 1: getting it. We'll stay here as long as it takes
Speaker 1: to prove that point. Has there been in the movement
Speaker 1: behind closed Doors on how to deal with that. As
Speaker 1: of now, it doesn't seem like it. The big problem
Speaker 1: is that no one really seems to know what the
Speaker 1: demands are of the never Kevins, because honestly, ben of
Speaker 1: the of the twenty never Kevins, it's like all of
Speaker 1: them have kind of different demands. So for example, uh,
Speaker 1: Matt Gates, you know, at first, as we talked about
Speaker 1: very recently, Uh, it was more of a personal problems
Speaker 1: that that like he had with Kevin McCarthy. Okay, fine,
Speaker 1: Now uh, apparently he is asking for a sub subcommittee
Speaker 1: chairmanship uh on on on one of the committees. Uh.
Speaker 1: And so there's some horse trading that he started putting forward. Uh,
Speaker 1: and that is kind of being thrown out there. And
Speaker 1: then there's also um other things where you have someone
Speaker 1: like Ralph Norman who's saying, well, my problem, as we
Speaker 1: discussed uh, you know very previously, has to do with spending. Okay, well,
Speaker 1: there's like another demand there. Then there's issues about uh, well,
Speaker 1: we don't want leadership to be getting into any of
Speaker 1: our primaries. Okay, there's another issue. Then there's issues about earmarks.
Speaker 1: Uh don't we want to ban earmarks? Because you had
Speaker 1: the Democratic majority last time around who brought earmarks back.
Speaker 1: So it's a whole morgeseport of like different demands from
Speaker 1: twenty different people who you know, many of them just
Speaker 1: got to Capitol Hill about two minutes ago. And you
Speaker 1: know what, if you had a grievance with Kevin McCarthy,
Speaker 1: you know, years ago and so on so forth, all right,
Speaker 1: maybe I can get it. But if you just got
Speaker 1: here and don't even know where the bathroom is, some
Speaker 1: people are sort of wondering what exactly your agenda? Maybe,
Speaker 1: and it may just be to raise your personal persona
Speaker 1: and the number of people that follow you on Twitter
Speaker 1: and people now believe that, you know, having your name
Speaker 1: be known by people gives you political capital in DC.
Speaker 1: Not actually the truth, but you know, hey, it's popularity contests.
Speaker 1: I want to talk about Lauren Boebert real quick. She
Speaker 1: nominated representative Byron Donald's Republican Florida for the House Speaker,
Speaker 1: called on former President Trump to nudge Kevin McCarthy out
Speaker 1: of the race, saying you do not have the votes
Speaker 1: and it's time to withdrawal, saying it from the four
Speaker 1: of the House. Donald Trump has made it clear today,
Speaker 1: get this thing done. He's backing Kevin McCarthy, saying move
Speaker 1: on and enjoy the moment and celebrate, sending Nancy Pelosi
Speaker 1: back home. This is a weird situation that Trump has
Speaker 1: kind of gotten himself into because here you have the
Speaker 1: faction that relies on Donald Trump's support, but at the
Speaker 1: same time they're not being slayed by mister Trump's, uh,
Speaker 1: you know, call to support Kevin McCarthy. There, I mean,
Speaker 1: I I spoke a ship royd Adame. He's like, what
Speaker 1: Donald Trump made a statement like that's news? Like who cares?
Speaker 1: You had a Lauren Bobert who said something you know
Speaker 1: who like said for as you just said, for to
Speaker 1: persuade Kevin McCarthy to get out of the race. Uh,
Speaker 1: none of them are being swayed by mister Trump's call
Speaker 1: to do this. So, uh it looks like this may
Speaker 1: be a big, big problem for him, not just now,
Speaker 1: but maybe in twenty four. What point does this going
Speaker 1: back to Kevin McCarthy, does he give up or say
Speaker 1: screw it, and or does he have that perspective of look,
Speaker 1: I'm still in the driver's seat. There is no one
Speaker 1: else that is as close as I am. We'll just
Speaker 1: keep going and eventually maybe of the twenty fifteen, what
Speaker 1: does he need fifteen of him to come back to him?
Speaker 1: Or fourteen or sixteen? Um, he he would need at
Speaker 1: least uh, you know, a good fifteen at least, you know,
Speaker 1: to to uh you know, or maybe seventeen at least,
Speaker 1: you know, Like, I mean, how many can only how
Speaker 1: many can you lose? Can you lose? Is I've seen
Speaker 1: say four or five? He can only lose. He can
Speaker 1: only lose four. So is there a way that Kevin
Speaker 1: McCarthy can get of these twenty sixteen of them back? Uh?
Speaker 1: That's you know, that's a high bar for him. That's
Speaker 1: a very very high bar. And uh that's why anytime, look,
Speaker 1: don't bother uh really talking to those uh you know,
Speaker 1: never Kevin's or always Kevin's to really change their minds
Speaker 1: on anything. The ones who are sort of like if
Speaker 1: people are kind of talking to right now, are the
Speaker 1: who cares it's a you know, we just want somebody, okay,
Speaker 1: And those are the ones that people are talking to.
Speaker 1: They're the ones who may have to go up to McCarthy.
Speaker 1: And this is only if this is only if uh,
Speaker 1: you know, McCarthy is uh and having to be persuaded
Speaker 1: to step aside, or they would have to go up
Speaker 1: to McCarthy. And these the ones who have been consistently
Speaker 1: voting for McCarthy, They say, look, we've been voting for
Speaker 1: you round after round after round. Now I'm getting you know,
Speaker 1: we're gonna have to go somebody in like some other
Speaker 1: direction if you can't close the deal? Dude, what was
Speaker 1: the hope of this adjournment? Till eight o'clock eastern, seven Central?
Speaker 1: And my guests, I mean you need to follow on Twitter.
Speaker 1: Carry Pickett, Senior Congression reporter for Washington Times, M Carrie,
Speaker 1: I mean the hope was what? Because it didn't help
Speaker 1: him adjourney yesterday overnight? I mean it part of me says,
Speaker 1: just wait him out and if you just go fifty
Speaker 1: rounds with him, at some point, would somebody to say
Speaker 1: screw it, will vote for you, be done with it? Uh?
Speaker 1: You know what, the it's the same thing. It's the same.
Speaker 1: It's basically trying to hammer around a deal, all right,
Speaker 1: and like, but is it one? But here's my question.
Speaker 1: Is it one deal or is it fifteen different deals?
Speaker 1: It's funny you mentioned the uh, the number fifteen because
Speaker 1: some people will mentioned sixteen rounds, so you know, we
Speaker 1: could go up to fifteen rounds or sixteen rounds. But
Speaker 1: the thing that could really start to get some members,
Speaker 1: some lawmakers to really start to think about whether or
Speaker 1: not they should be supporting or not supporting Kevin McCarthy.
Speaker 1: Are the district offices all right? I want everyone to
Speaker 1: think about that, because, first off, how are people going
Speaker 1: to maybe let's say that they need they need to
Speaker 1: go overseas for for whatever reason, to visit family, for
Speaker 1: an emergency, for work, and uh and they need a
Speaker 1: last minute passport. Oh sorry, you can't get it from
Speaker 1: your from your congressman's office because you don't have a congressman.
Speaker 1: As far as on the House side is concerned, what
Speaker 1: if you need your congressman for whatever district service? Your
Speaker 1: district office is closed for any type of service. If
Speaker 1: I can't believe I'm asking you this question, but right now,
Speaker 1: if I call a congressman's office who is quote newly elected,
Speaker 1: is anyone at local office? Is anyone going to answer that?
Speaker 1: Or is that staff not allowed to go in there
Speaker 1: until this is official? I would imagine that there's at
Speaker 1: least one staffer. But as far as doing services, constituent services.
Speaker 1: They're not up and running, is what you're basically telling me. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's that's going to be very very hard to get
Speaker 1: constituent services from a House member. All right, arrogance factor,
Speaker 1: and I'm going to take a very quick break and
Speaker 1: come back, my guest. Let me carry Pickett Senior Congression
Speaker 1: report at Washingtimes there was an X factor question of
Speaker 1: he already moved in the Speaker's office and that was
Speaker 1: a really stupid move. Did that actually happen? There are
Speaker 1: some people that said they were angry over the arrogance
Speaker 1: to Kevin McCarthy because he got the boxes shipped over
Speaker 1: and was moving into the speaker's office or false. Uh, yeah,
Speaker 1: that's that's a true you had he he had a
Speaker 1: number of his belongings from his minority leader's office put
Speaker 1: over to the Speaker's office. Uh, sort of assuming that
Speaker 1: he would end up winning right away. But in this
Speaker 1: but in the same light, sometimes it's uh, it's also
Speaker 1: a strategy to say, hey, look I got the votes,
Speaker 1: because if he didn't do that, that could have that
Speaker 1: could have also indicated that he wasn't right exactly. So
Speaker 1: it was sort of like a double edged sword. Uh,
Speaker 1: you know where is he meeting? Now? Where where is
Speaker 1: like the meetings? He's not meeting in the Speaker's office,
Speaker 1: I'm assuming so is he meeting in his old office? Still?
Speaker 1: How is that? No? No, no, no, no, there is
Speaker 1: an office um right off the floor, um like right
Speaker 1: off the house floor. Uh that sometimes uh, like the
Speaker 1: leaders meet, uh and they can kind of had their
Speaker 1: little huddles. So that's where he is meeting with Gooke members.
Speaker 1: So it's not exactly ideal, but it's a place for
Speaker 1: him to talk with other lawmakers. All right, let me
Speaker 1: ask you another question the news strategy and last night
Speaker 1: people were talking about free pizza. Were they meeting directly
Speaker 1: with these twenty holdouts or were they meeting with intermediarias
Speaker 1: who were then meeting with the other twenty? Were they
Speaker 1: meeting in groups individually? What's how's this work? The strategy?
Speaker 1: How's that working? Because it failed last night, I'd assume
Speaker 1: they try to change the strategy now. Well, here was
Speaker 1: a weird thing was that when I was doing some
Speaker 1: of the steak out last night, I noticed that he
Speaker 1: was mainly talking to lawmakers who were on his side
Speaker 1: as far as seeing any of the never Kevins. I
Speaker 1: didn't see any of them walking in theirs. But for
Speaker 1: all we know, he made been talking to them through
Speaker 1: conference you know, like a conference call, so that that
Speaker 1: made have been going on. But as far as uh,
Speaker 1: you know, negotiations were concerned, as we saw today, whatever
Speaker 1: was being talked about just didn't worked out. So you know,
Speaker 1: I think the main problem once again is just not
Speaker 1: knowing what his opponents want from him. Well, and that's
Speaker 1: and that's where it's at some point, I do think
Speaker 1: the American people and this is a point made earlier
Speaker 1: today on Fox and I don't remember you said it,
Speaker 1: but it made It was an interesting point, and that's
Speaker 1: why I want to bring it up again. There was
Speaker 1: there was a certain point today where somebody said, if
Speaker 1: you don't know what the demands of the other person are,
Speaker 1: then it's impossible to negotiate with them. If he walked
Speaker 1: in and said, all right, every one of you tell
Speaker 1: me what you want, I'm going to give it to you.
Speaker 1: Can he even facilitate that this moment or is it?
Speaker 1: For some of these twenty it's you, Kevin, and you
Speaker 1: can't fix that. You see, That's just it because a
Speaker 1: good number of them just don't want him. Like, I know,
Speaker 1: I know what chip Roy wants, right, you know that
Speaker 1: he's made it clear. But when you listen to the
Speaker 1: speech that was given earlier by Bobert, I mean, I
Speaker 1: have no idea what she wants. I really don't, except
Speaker 1: I guess I don't like Kevin and I'm gonna make
Speaker 1: sure he's not the speaker right right, Basically, they're trying
Speaker 1: to make his life such a living hell that he
Speaker 1: just backs out. Now, let's just say, let's just say,
Speaker 1: for example, they get what they want. Let's say McCarthy
Speaker 1: is so worn down that he steps out. Well, there
Speaker 1: is some talk on the hill at whoever ends up
Speaker 1: stepping in that McCarthy behind the scenes and his and
Speaker 1: his die hard supporters are going to make that person's
Speaker 1: life a living hell. That is, um in fact, a
Speaker 1: big reason why a lot of the you know, people
Speaker 1: who are are being put up there or are being
Speaker 1: talked about, whether it's Jim Jordan or Steve Scalies and whatnot,
Speaker 1: don't want the job because they don't want to deal
Speaker 1: with any sort of backlash from the Kevin McCarthy diehards. Yeah,
Speaker 1: it's weird that the most powerful job in the Republican
Speaker 1: Party right now. There's not a lot of people saying
Speaker 1: I want it outside of Kevin McCarthy, who's totally obsessed
Speaker 1: with being it right exactly. They're just like, oh yeah,
Speaker 1: because if I step in and then I'm looking and
Speaker 1: then I'm looked as a backstabb er to Kevin McCarthy
Speaker 1: by all the Kevin McCarthy hearts in, I'm going to
Speaker 1: be the one who's going to have to deal with
Speaker 1: all these people who are gonna hate my guts and
Speaker 1: try and basically make me a big failure in the end.
Speaker 1: I heard earlier today from one member of Congress, and
Speaker 1: I'll end with this because I know you'd need to
Speaker 1: get back at it. But I was told today that
Speaker 1: there was a idea floated of if McCarthy drops out,
Speaker 1: bringing back someone to be speaker like Mike Pence. Is
Speaker 1: that something that could really happen or is that just
Speaker 1: give me a break? That's that's called give me a
Speaker 1: huge freaking break. Okay. I mean, I mean, you hear
Speaker 1: at this point everybody's throwing out every different possibility. And
Speaker 1: I heard that was like, well, never thought i'd hear
Speaker 1: that one again. But Okay, here we are. Yeah, I
Speaker 1: mean that's called desperation. All right, your guests, eight o'clock eastern,
Speaker 1: seventh Central, look into your DC crystal ball. What do
Speaker 1: you think's gonna happen? And will anything change on the
Speaker 1: first ballot I or the next ballot? The next ballot? Yet? Nah? Noah,
Speaker 1: I don't see anything changing the next ballot right now?
Speaker 1: Is there a chance it's an all nighter for you
Speaker 1: if I can help it? No? Okay, there you go.
Speaker 1: I like it all right. I love bothering you. Carry Pickett,
Speaker 1: senior congressional reporter for Washingtimes. Give everybody your handle on
Speaker 1: where to follow you. Hey, find me on Twitter with
Speaker 1: at carry picket. That's k e r y p I
Speaker 1: c k et just like the fence. There you go,
Speaker 1: bother to night. You can tweet at her. She'll give
Speaker 1: you updates. It's great stuff. That's why I love having
Speaker 1: her on. Thank you, Carrie. I'll probably bother you again tomorrow. Now.
Speaker 1: There is one Congresswoman, Lauren Bobert, who barely won a
Speaker 1: reelection Colorado, who feels like she was hung out to
Speaker 1: dry by the Republican Party. Why because many of them
Speaker 1: thought she was hard to deal with. They didn't like her,
Speaker 1: she didn't play well with others. Was there complaints, So
Speaker 1: they were kind of hoping they could get rid of her.
Speaker 1: They didn't. She's a maga individual. She wrapped herself around
Speaker 1: Donald Trump, and Donald Trumps even said now to her,
Speaker 1: hey move on with Kevin McCarthy. Warren Bobert nominated represented
Speaker 1: Byron Donald's Republican from Florida for House Speaker, and then
Speaker 1: called on the former President Trump to nudge Kevin McCarthy
Speaker 1: out of the race. Take a listen, rise, Madam Clark.
Speaker 1: I rise to nominate Congressman Byron Donalds. The gentlewoman is recognized.
Speaker 1: I rise today to nominate Byron Donalds, my friend, an
Speaker 1: amazing man of Florida, an amazing leader, someone who almost
Speaker 1: even took leadership here in our Republican party and came
Speaker 1: very close in doing so. And it was a very
Speaker 1: brave run that he took. He's a man who understands
Speaker 1: what tough times look like and it's come out of
Speaker 1: those tough times even stronger, more liberally liberated, and as
Speaker 1: a leader. Now, we just heard from my respected colleague
Speaker 1: from Ohio and he stated some amazing rules that we
Speaker 1: have been able to get an agreement on I think
Speaker 1: we were threatened pretty heavily in conference, saying if we
Speaker 1: don't do as we ought, then some of those rules
Speaker 1: may just go away. But even naming the Germanist rule,
Speaker 1: which is really fantastic after Morgan Griffith, well that was
Speaker 1: our idea too. My question is why didn't the supposed
Speaker 1: leader of the Republican Party present these rules? Why were
Speaker 1: we fought so hard on these rules. The barrier that
Speaker 1: still stands in the way of these rules is the
Speaker 1: structure that prevents us from rolling over. And as my
Speaker 1: friend from chip Roy stated, we need the tools and
Speaker 1: the leadership to do our job correctly, and that Byron
Speaker 1: Donalds is the man to lead us to that path
Speaker 1: of getting America on track and uniting the Republican Party.
Speaker 1: My colleagues and I have worked tirelessly for months to
Speaker 1: build consensus, to negotiate in good faith, to help unify
Speaker 1: our party on border security, energy security, debt reduction, term limits, earmarks,
Speaker 1: among other many common sense policies. But too often our
Speaker 1: efforts have fallen on deaf ears. Our border is wide open,
Speaker 1: inflation is out of control. The Senate just passed one
Speaker 1: point seven trillion dollars without our input. So let me
Speaker 1: be clear. Our job is not to coronate the biggest fundraiser,
Speaker 1: or rubber stamp the status quo, or keep on going
Speaker 1: along to get along. It's to use our votes to
Speaker 1: elect a speaker who will enable us to get our
Speaker 1: country back on track. Getting the job done is what
Speaker 1: we were elected to do, and that starts with having
Speaker 1: a leader who supports Republican principles, builds consensus, and has
Speaker 1: a proven track record of success. Byron Donalds is that leader. Republicans,
Speaker 1: including many moderates, have been impressed by Byron Donalds. They're
Speaker 1: impressed by his ability to work together. They respect his leadership.
Speaker 1: We see him as someone who can communicate what we
Speaker 1: are all wanting to do in this House to Americans,
Speaker 1: and he represents so much more than just his district
Speaker 1: in Florida. Many millions of Americans all over this nation
Speaker 1: praise the work and the leadership of Byron Donalds. Let's
Speaker 1: work together. Let's stop with the campaign smears and tactics
Speaker 1: to get people to turn against us. Even having my
Speaker 1: favorite president call us and tell us we need to
Speaker 1: knock this off. I think it actually needs to be reversed.
Speaker 1: The president needs to tell Kevin McCarthy that, sir, you
Speaker 1: do not have the votes and it's time to withdraw.
Speaker 1: With that, I yield. Thank you. There it was, That's
Speaker 1: what she had to say. Now there's people asking the
Speaker 1: question do you stand with that? Chip Roy also making
Speaker 1: it clear today in a speech on CNN, I think
Speaker 1: doing a brilliant job. Okay, a brilliant job explaining what
Speaker 1: he wants. It's a lot different than Bobert and what
Speaker 1: you just heard from Bobert. Take a listen to Chip
Speaker 1: roy or earlier today as McCarthy suffered another defeat on
Speaker 1: another ballot, we're now up to sit he's not one
Speaker 1: any of these obviously that you seem actually focused on
Speaker 1: a set of principles and rule changes that you want
Speaker 1: to see enacted as opposed to having a personal animus
Speaker 1: against Kevin McCarthy. Do you agree with that assessment or no? Yeah,
Speaker 1: First of all, thanks for having me on. I think
Speaker 1: that's pretty close to correct. I would take some issue
Speaker 1: with saying that I've been in constant opposition to McCarthy
Speaker 1: as much as trying to offer changes that I think
Speaker 1: are paramount to make the housework again. That is, by
Speaker 1: the way, bipartisan criticism. We haven't had an amendment offered
Speaker 1: an open debate on the floor of the House since
Speaker 1: May of twenty sixteen. We cannot keep spending money we
Speaker 1: don't have. We cannot continue to allow our border to
Speaker 1: be wide open and dangering Americans and immigrants. We cannot
Speaker 1: keep business as usual going. It's failing the country. And
Speaker 1: everybody agrees, frankly, both sides of the aisle. So I've
Speaker 1: got differences of opinion with colleagues across both sides of
Speaker 1: the aisle. But the one thing we need to do
Speaker 1: is change. We need the leadership and the tools to
Speaker 1: stop the swamp from running over and stepping all over
Speaker 1: the American people who want change in this town. So
Speaker 1: that's what I've been pushing for. There's still some things
Speaker 1: that might change that I could get there, but right
Speaker 1: now I'm holding the line because I think we need
Speaker 1: this place to operate differently. And that's not a partisan statement,
Speaker 1: it's just something that I believe. So you want an
Speaker 1: open amendment process, which has happened in the past, but
Speaker 1: obviously leaders of Congress, especially in the majority partner, don't
Speaker 1: like it because they don't like to. It's losing control
Speaker 1: of what's going to happen and what's going to be
Speaker 1: in the legislation. You want an open amendment process. What
Speaker 1: else would you want to see happen in order for
Speaker 1: you to get to yes? For Kevin McCarthy or whoever, Well,
Speaker 1: let's just say Kevincarthy. Yeah, sure, we'll putting aside personalities,
Speaker 1: just take that out of it and just saying what
Speaker 1: would give me to yes is I need to make
Speaker 1: sure that the Rules Committee is structured in such a
Speaker 1: way that those of us who are what I would
Speaker 1: call physical conservatives, who want to stop the sort of
Speaker 1: train of the swamp right, the powerbrokers, the defense industrial complex,
Speaker 1: if you will, plus the non defense discretionary. You know,
Speaker 1: folks on the other side of the Alto want to
Speaker 1: spend more money. They all come together. As you know
Speaker 1: you follow this town closely. We just saw it happen
Speaker 1: with the one point seven trillion dollars Omnibus bill without
Speaker 1: debating the merits of any particular substance in the bill.
Speaker 1: We can't keep doing that. It was a ten percent
Speaker 1: increase in defense, a six percent increase in non defense
Speaker 1: discretionary forty five billion for Ukraine, forty one billion for
Speaker 1: emergency spending. None of that extra spending was paid for.
Speaker 1: So when are we going to stop that? So we
Speaker 1: can't stop that if we don't have the tools in
Speaker 1: the Rules Committee to stop it. I'd love to have
Speaker 1: open debate. I'd love to have more amendments with the
Speaker 1: seventy two hour rule you were just talking about. That's
Speaker 1: all good stuff, But I got to take issue with
Speaker 1: one thing that Jamie talked about just a minute ago,
Speaker 1: which she was still on because I don't want to
Speaker 1: talk about her in the third person, but she said
Speaker 1: that we were asking for things for personal handouts, spots
Speaker 1: on committees, which she wasn't talking about you. She wasn't.
Speaker 1: We were very clear to distinguish you from others. We
Speaker 1: talked about how your opposition was based in principle having
Speaker 1: to do with rules. We were talking more about the
Speaker 1: meeting between McCarthy and Gates, Bobert and at the Perry.
Speaker 1: But if I might offer a defense of them, what
Speaker 1: was offered, or at least meant to be offered, was
Speaker 1: they were a response to the request from Kevin. Hey,
Speaker 1: we need actual names to know what you want on
Speaker 1: certain committees. So for example, we put my name on
Speaker 1: the Rules committee. Jake, I don't want to be on
Speaker 1: the Rules committee if I don't have to, because you
Speaker 1: got to fly up on Sunday and I want to
Speaker 1: be with my family on Sunday night in Texas. But
Speaker 1: I offered to do it in order to try to
Speaker 1: advance the ball. Andy Biggs didn't want to be on Appropriations,
Speaker 1: but we put his name on the list. My point
Speaker 1: is that was offered in good faith. It's unfair for
Speaker 1: Jamie to say that and then to say, oh, they
Speaker 1: want their goodies. These other guys have worked so hard.
Speaker 1: You listen to what he's sang here, and he said
Speaker 1: this consistently. He's made it clear what he wants. This
Speaker 1: is not crazy. Chip Roy was on Fox News channels
Speaker 1: saying this about what's about to happen with a vote. Listen,
Speaker 1: we're having conversations about the substance the American people want
Speaker 1: us to have. Our Democratic colleagues didn't do that at
Speaker 1: all over the last two years. Right, they jam jam
Speaker 1: bills through. They didn't a glow us to mend on
Speaker 1: the floor. But let's be clear, Republicans have their problems too,
Speaker 1: and we talk about, oh, you guys just want to
Speaker 1: get in charge so you can start getting things done.
Speaker 1: You gotta get them done the right way. The American
Speaker 1: people didn't send us up here to continue the status quo.
Speaker 1: So Kevin's gonna have to give us the ability to
Speaker 1: constrain the swamp, the same swamp that passed the one
Speaker 1: point seven trillion dollar bill that had seventy five march
Speaker 1: or sixteen billion dollars, that didn't allow us to secure
Speaker 1: the border, that had forty five billion for Ukraine without
Speaker 1: a single vote on the floor. I understand all of that,
Speaker 1: I really do. And we have first charged the swamp.
Speaker 1: Who talked about the swamp first, former President Trump, as
Speaker 1: he was campaigning to be president, he talked about the
Speaker 1: swamp and changing the swamp all the time. And then
Speaker 1: this statement endorsing McCarthy, He says, I think it's a
Speaker 1: dangerous game, and frankly, if they're not happy with them,
Speaker 1: they can do something about it at a later date.
Speaker 1: I support McCarthy and I support getting the deal done.
Speaker 1: What I don't support is allowing this to continue to
Speaker 1: go forward. Do you think that at some point this
Speaker 1: is hurting the Republican Party understanding your stady on principle,
Speaker 1: do you think that the split screen of President Biden
Speaker 1: with Mitch McConnell talking about infrastructure and the chaos on
Speaker 1: the House floor is eventually hurting your party that maybe
Speaker 1: there should be a deal to get something forward. There
Speaker 1: should only be a deal if it's a deal worth
Speaker 1: doing for the American people who sent us here to
Speaker 1: stop the swamp from rolling over what they want us
Speaker 1: to do. Brett and President Trump can say whatever he wants.
Speaker 1: It won't be the first time I disagree with a minute,
Speaker 1: it won't be the last. The fact here is, I'm
Speaker 1: not going through a list of who he's endorsing or
Speaker 1: not endorsing. I understand I'm doing is standing up for
Speaker 1: the people that sent me here to stop doing the
Speaker 1: same old thing, stop spending money we don't have. You're
Speaker 1: saying Kevin McCarthy is the swamp and that if he
Speaker 1: was speaker that it would be more of the same.
Speaker 1: What I'm saying is that you're saying. What I'm saying
Speaker 1: is that the people who have been here carrying out
Speaker 1: the status quo, they need to give us the kinds
Speaker 1: of rules and changes necessary to make sure that we
Speaker 1: can check that, stop it and stand up for the
Speaker 1: American people. How far will you go? What ballot will
Speaker 1: you say? Okay, enough enough, whatever ballot it takes to
Speaker 1: actually protect the American people. We're having a conversation tonight.
Speaker 1: We're going to keep talking about it. We want rules
Speaker 1: committee changes, we want to protect the rules that we've
Speaker 1: already been able to advance. We want to make sure
Speaker 1: we have spending restraint like the cut cap and balance
Speaker 1: from a decade ago. We're having those conversations as we speak,
Speaker 1: but we're not going to relent unless we can actually
Speaker 1: do our job and stop this town, this broken town,
Speaker 1: from rolling over the American people. That's my job. And
Speaker 1: if Kevin McCarthy says, you know what, I'll give you
Speaker 1: everything you want, what will you say, Well, you mean
Speaker 1: give me everything I want? Right? I mean, I've got
Speaker 1: to be able to go to the What you want
Speaker 1: is not Kevin McCarthy. But I didn't say that. If
Speaker 1: I if I get everything that I want, that's great.
Speaker 1: But we got to get to two hundred and eighteen.
Speaker 1: So right now in the room, Brett aren't. It's not
Speaker 1: just Chip Roy, it's people like Brian Fitzpatrick. You know
Speaker 1: Byron Donald's other people where we're sitting down and talking.
Speaker 1: So it's not about getting everything I want. It's about
Speaker 1: getting what is necessary for the American people. And that's
Speaker 1: the conversations question. There's Chip Roy moments ago on Fox
Speaker 1: make it clear they're not close. Kevin McCarthy is in
Speaker 1: the crosshairs of Matt Gates. This is what Matt Gates
Speaker 1: had to say about him today. Those of us who
Speaker 1: will not be voting for Kevin McCarthy today take no
Speaker 1: joy in this discomfort that this moment has brought. But
Speaker 1: if you want to drain the swamp, you cannot put
Speaker 1: the biggest alligator in charge of the exercise. I'm a
Speaker 1: Florida man, and I know of what I speak. We
Speaker 1: offered Kevin McCarthy terms last evening that he rejected. We
Speaker 1: sought a vote in the first quarter of the one
Speaker 1: hundred and eighteenth Congress on term limits. He refused. We
Speaker 1: wanted a budget from the Republican Study Committee that balances
Speaker 1: on the floor in the first quarter, he refused. We
Speaker 1: wanted the border plan that the Texas Delegation put together
Speaker 1: on the floor, he refused. And it is true that
Speaker 1: we struggle with trust with mister McCarthy, because time and
Speaker 1: again his points, his positions, they shift like sands underneath you.
Speaker 1: Even Kevin McCarthy's own mentor recently said that the lies
Speaker 1: always change. And mister McCarthy is not only responsive to
Speaker 1: pressure from the right. Time and again he has failed
Speaker 1: to achieve the goals that we seek on spending and
Speaker 1: on the fight. For months, we have been asking mister
Speaker 1: McCarthy for his battle plan. How do we ensure that
Speaker 1: we stand up for folks in the military who feel
Speaker 1: like they're being perched. How do we ensure that if
Speaker 1: there is the passage of a farm bill, it includes
Speaker 1: things like work requirements? And all we got was a
Speaker 1: handful of howdy and a mouthful of much obliged. So
Speaker 1: I think it's pretty clear you're not gonna get Matt
Speaker 1: Gates anytime soon on your side on this one. Lastly,
Speaker 1: we're also being told right now Representative Donald's on McCarthy says,
Speaker 1: and I'm gonna let you hear what he had to
Speaker 1: say for himself a moment ago on Fox. We're gonna
Speaker 1: go back and we're gonna have this round of ballots,
Speaker 1: and we're gonna have more conversations. One thing I can
Speaker 1: tell you is nobody is at two hundred and eighteen
Speaker 1: votes right now. Nobody. Well, we're gonna get this figured out,
Speaker 1: and we're gonna get this business done because every Republican
Speaker 1: up here on Capitol Hill is committed to getting to
Speaker 1: the agenda that we all campaigned for last November. Okay,
Speaker 1: so we're gonna let you go there, get back to
Speaker 1: the House floor. Do you see a path forward for
Speaker 1: Kevin McCarthy real quick? I think it's possible, but there's
Speaker 1: a lot of work that needs to be done right now,
Speaker 1: and for yourself less likely. But you know what is DC,
Speaker 1: You never know what happens here. Okay, we appreciate you
Speaker 1: joining us. Thanks for your time, sir. This is a
Speaker 1: man who has been nominated to be Speaker of the House,
Speaker 1: and he's like, I didn't come here thinking that's what
Speaker 1: was going to happen, had no idea. Also, to make
Speaker 1: things even more complicated, moments ago, on Guy Benson's radio show,
Speaker 1: Representative Dan Crenshaw has now called, and this is a
Speaker 1: guy who went to war, these twenty Republicans terror that's
Speaker 1: gonna help him come to your side of things, Dan
Speaker 1: Crenshaw say it again, is an idiot, get another scalp,
Speaker 1: another scalp, whether it's whether it's Bayner or Paul Ryan
Speaker 1: or then McCarthy. Scalise would just be next. And we
Speaker 1: all know it. We just can't allow that to happen.
Speaker 1: That's why those of us are saying, like, look, you
Speaker 1: pushed us into this corner, so now we're now we're
Speaker 1: saying we won't go for anyone but McCarthy. That's why
Speaker 1: we're saying it because we cannot let the terrorists win that.
Speaker 1: That's basically what's happening. We cannot. Let's just listen to
Speaker 1: this again. That's a Republican calling these other Republicans who
Speaker 1: needs to get over to his side. Darist the terrorists
Speaker 1: win that. That's basically what's happening. Wow, what a moron,
Speaker 1: What an idiot. That's why we're saying it because we
Speaker 1: cannot let the terrorists win that. That's basically what's happening.
Speaker 1: We cannot let the terrorists win. Dan Crenshaw calling his
Speaker 1: fellow Republicans terrorists. All right, last, please make sure you
Speaker 1: hit that subscribe button or auto download button wherever you
Speaker 1: are listening to this podcast, right now and take a
Speaker 1: moment to write us a five star review. Many on
Speaker 1: the left have been attacking our podcast, writing us bad
Speaker 1: reviews on purpose. So if you would help us fight
Speaker 1: back by writing us a good review, a five star review,
Speaker 1: and share this podcast with your family and friends on
Speaker 1: social media to help us grow. See you back here tomorrow.