Speaker 1: You know how much I love my pillow, how much
Speaker 1: it's changed my life for the better. Well, I figured
Speaker 1: it was about time that I let you know about
Speaker 1: my pillow sheets Now. Mike Lindell has a passion to
Speaker 1: help you get the best sleep of your life. That's
Speaker 1: why he has created the new Giza Dream Bedsheets. Now.
Speaker 1: These sheets are made from the world's best cotton, Giza
Speaker 1: that's only grown in a very small region where the
Speaker 1: Sahara Desert, Mediterranean Sea, and the Nile River all meet
Speaker 1: to create the ideal weather conditions for growing cotton. These
Speaker 1: Giza sheets are available in a variety of colors. They
Speaker 1: come with Mike's ten year warranty sixty day money back guarantee.
Speaker 1: The first night you sleep on these sheets, it's heaven.
Speaker 1: You'll never want to sleep on anything else. Now, right now,
Speaker 1: you my listeners, You're gonna save thirty percent and get
Speaker 1: free shipping when you use the promo code Shawn seven
Speaker 1: Sea and seven when you go to my pillow dot
Speaker 1: com again, that's promo code Sewn seven Sea and seven
Speaker 1: at mipillow dot com. All right, glad you with us
Speaker 1: Right down our toll free telephone number, It's eight hundred
Speaker 1: and nine for one, Shawn, if you want to be
Speaker 1: a part of the program, We're back to big issues
Speaker 1: with the border. Will hit it at the top of
Speaker 1: the next hour. Is what thirty one thousand illegal immigrants
Speaker 1: now in Yuma, Arizona, and another migrant caravan is on
Speaker 1: its way. But don't worry, there's uh, this is a
Speaker 1: there's there's not a crisis at our southern border at all.
Speaker 1: What do they say? What's the word? We keep having
Speaker 1: the same word being used by Democrats and the media. It's, oh,
Speaker 1: a manufactured crisis, That's what it is. That you know why,
Speaker 1: because they can't even think of their own talking points.
Speaker 1: So rather than you know, come up with the media,
Speaker 1: you know, some bifurcation of some kind, you know, some
Speaker 1: some separation. No, it is an unbroken chain between the
Speaker 1: alliance between the corrupt media mob and of course the
Speaker 1: Democratic Party and their radical leftist, socialist Green New Deal agenda.
Speaker 1: You know. Oh, we've got the tape to prove it. Listen,
Speaker 1: President Trump must stuff holding the American people hostage. Let's
Speaker 1: stop manufacturing a crisis. This president just used the backdrop
Speaker 1: of the Oval Office to manufacture a CISACS the president
Speaker 1: has manufactured one heck of a political crisis for himself.
Speaker 1: Donald Trump is manufacturing a national security crisis. You will
Speaker 1: hear them say is that this is a manufactured crisis.
Speaker 1: It's not a national security crisis. The big scam of
Speaker 1: the whole address was that there's a crisis. There's not
Speaker 1: a crisis. The notion that we have a crisis, their
Speaker 1: security crisis is absolute nonsense. It remains a Seinfeld shutdown
Speaker 1: about saying all about nothing. What happens when there is
Speaker 1: a real crisis, when there is a real emergency. Does
Speaker 1: he take to the airways? Do we give him the airwaves?
Speaker 1: Do we believe him? There is not a crisis at
Speaker 1: the border. It's manufactured crisis for the president to get
Speaker 1: a political when he's determined to convince you there is
Speaker 1: a crisis at the border, even though an intelligence official
Speaker 1: Tellson and quote, no one is saying this is a
Speaker 1: crisis except them, accept them. You know that they don't
Speaker 1: do When are they ever gonna take the time and
Speaker 1: meet angel mom's dads or talk to the families of well,
Speaker 1: in that two year period, let's just look at that
Speaker 1: two year period. We often tell you about four thousand
Speaker 1: plus homicides, thirty thousand plus sexual assaults by illegal immigrant aliens,
Speaker 1: and let's talk about the one hundred thousand assault victims
Speaker 1: violent assault victims by illegal immigrant families. You know, it's
Speaker 1: just nauseating. But now even they they've pulled back on
Speaker 1: the manufactured crisis line because it's so obvious and true
Speaker 1: what's happening. We'll get into that also, all the comings
Speaker 1: and goings, all that's happening in Venezuela as they now
Speaker 1: have of, you know, an uprising as it relates to
Speaker 1: well what many are even calling a coup attempt there
Speaker 1: as Maduro is gone and one Whido is holding a
Speaker 1: contingent of heavily armed troops on the streets of Caracas
Speaker 1: as we speak, in a military build up. We're watching
Speaker 1: that today. We'll look at the poll numbers today as
Speaker 1: Biden now his big numbers have dropped quite significantly. You know,
Speaker 1: this is Look, this is not an indicator, and it's
Speaker 1: gonna be straight up about it. It's I think, well,
Speaker 1: I actually believe in some ways, if this continues, this
Speaker 1: is going to be a huge indicator. Now, if you
Speaker 1: go back to two thousand and eight and you see
Speaker 1: the size of the crowds for Obama and hope and
Speaker 1: change and yes we can and Obama, you know, and
Speaker 1: chanting and all that going on. I mean, there was
Speaker 1: a movement, a huge movement in the country towards Obama.
Speaker 1: He read a great teleprompter, you know, seemed personable, and
Speaker 1: nobody wanted to talk at all or vet his background
Speaker 1: or his experience because he had none. I mean, his
Speaker 1: experience was he was indoctrinated. And we did all the
Speaker 1: vetting from his youth and his time in Hawaii and
Speaker 1: so on and so forth, and his family. We did
Speaker 1: the job the media wouldn't do. And what is a
Speaker 1: community organizer? And Acorn and Olynsky, and then we went
Speaker 1: a little bit deeper into the thoughts and what does
Speaker 1: it mean to be a disciple of Olynsky? And then
Speaker 1: of course in his own book when he talked about
Speaker 1: black liberation theology and over a couple of decades in
Speaker 1: the church of you know, pastor g D America, pastor
Speaker 1: Reverend Wright then starting his political career in the Home
Speaker 1: of Unrepented Terrorists, and we did ask the question, had
Speaker 1: he ever met Lewis Farakano just happened to be another
Speaker 1: guy in the neighborhood like Arison dorm, and it turned
Speaker 1: out we were right. We just couldn't get the picture
Speaker 1: until his eight years in office were over, as they
Speaker 1: successfully hid the truth from the American people, and nobody
Speaker 1: in the media ever took the time to ask him, well,
Speaker 1: you live in the neighborhood. Do you know Farrakon? Have
Speaker 1: you ever met Farrakon? Have you ever had a picture
Speaker 1: taken with Farrakon? Nobody bothered to ask, and the answer
Speaker 1: was obviously yes, and we now know the truth. But anyway,
Speaker 1: the turnout look. Sometimes you can draw conclusions from or
Speaker 1: in terms of enthusiasm, and polsters do this all the time.
Speaker 1: They ask him out, well, okay, what is the enthusiasm
Speaker 1: level for a particular candidate. Now, for the entire time
Speaker 1: Trump has been running, we have seen when he holds
Speaker 1: a campaign rally the other night in Wisconsin, the crowd
Speaker 1: is routinely, you know, it fills arenas. I've never seen
Speaker 1: one with an empty seat that I can think of.
Speaker 1: And then you have an overflow crowd. They often put
Speaker 1: TVs up outside and you know, in some locations you've
Speaker 1: had ten thousand people outside and you know, twelve thousand
Speaker 1: people inside, and Obama had big crowds. Remember the night
Speaker 1: that he won the election. Remember that big crowd in
Speaker 1: Chicago's massive. So you would think after all the publicity
Speaker 1: that Obama's vice president Joe Biden, that you know, him announcing,
Speaker 1: and he was supposed to be the instant front runner,
Speaker 1: and he became that, but his numbers are dwindling quickly.
Speaker 1: But his debut appearance on the presidential as a presidential
Speaker 1: candidate and then goes to his hometown in Pennsylvania, you
Speaker 1: would think, all right, well, all right, Biden's no Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: But maybe he got five thousand or six thousand or
Speaker 1: seven thousand people, But you know, the guy just entered
Speaker 1: the race the undisputed Democratic presidential front runner. We know
Speaker 1: that because the media tells us that. And I actually
Speaker 1: had to really do a search. It was not easy
Speaker 1: to find. This morning when I got up, just came
Speaker 1: in my hand, well, how many people showed up for
Speaker 1: that speech yesterday of Biden? And it made me suspicious
Speaker 1: because Biden had drawn a big crowd. I'm assuming the
Speaker 1: media would have printed that. And if it wasn't a
Speaker 1: big crowd, well then they probably avoided it. When the
Speaker 1: longer that I had to do my search to find
Speaker 1: something that would corroborate what the crowd size was. I
Speaker 1: began to pretty much know that I was likely right.
Speaker 1: And then I found in the La Times, the only
Speaker 1: place that I can find the information. You know, this
Speaker 1: huge mega media event on every cable network hailing the
Speaker 1: arrival of the Democratic Party's new messiah. Well it only
Speaker 1: drew a pathetic six hundred people. And that's in Pennsylvania,
Speaker 1: you know. Jumping into the presidential race for twenty twenty,
Speaker 1: either apparent front runner, Biden from the La Times flashed
Speaker 1: his political calling card Monday with a kickoff rally at
Speaker 1: a Pennsylvania union hall that under scored his claim to
Speaker 1: be the candidate best equipped to win over blue collar
Speaker 1: workers in crucial states that gave Donald Trump his victory
Speaker 1: in twenty sixteen. And he even said in the speech,
Speaker 1: if I'm gonna beat Donald Trump in twenty twenty, it's
Speaker 1: it's going to happen here. He told the crowd of
Speaker 1: six thousand they were packed at a teamsters hall. Okay,
Speaker 1: what does that mean? That means they're all teamsters. That
Speaker 1: means when the teamsters say that their leadership show up,
Speaker 1: you pretty much show up. That's kind of the way
Speaker 1: unions work. And I know he got the coveted firefighters
Speaker 1: union endorsement. I don't think he has rank and file
Speaker 1: endorsement at all, I adventure because so often, you know,
Speaker 1: these unions think they speak for rank and file and
Speaker 1: they do not. Or steel workers. Remember I told you
Speaker 1: about you know, the steel industry and they're booming comeback
Speaker 1: in America thanks to Donald Trump's policies and how they
Speaker 1: actually had mothballed a steel manu facturing center in Alabama.
Speaker 1: And since Trump's been president and he's insisting on you
Speaker 1: using US steel, like comrade de Blasio that wants to
Speaker 1: eliminate all skyscrapers that use steel and windows. I don't
Speaker 1: know what you're gonna build them with. But anyway, so
Speaker 1: he had six hundred people according to a Biden aid
Speaker 1: citing a fire department estimate. All right, if it's a
Speaker 1: Biden aid, given the LA Times the estimate, you probably
Speaker 1: you got to knock a couple one hundred off. So
Speaker 1: it was probably three or four hundred. And you can
Speaker 1: bet the teamsters guys probably was sent there by union bosses.
Speaker 1: And I'm not sure the rank and file are going
Speaker 1: to be here. All right, what does that mean? All right,
Speaker 1: Let's see what happens as Biden now hits the campaign trail.
Speaker 1: Let's see what ratings are like when he shows up
Speaker 1: on you know, these liberal news channels and tries to
Speaker 1: defend the horrific rat record that he's going to have
Speaker 1: to defend. You want to run through the short list
Speaker 1: of things when all is said and done on the
Speaker 1: issue of run and election interference. Even Rod Rosenstein a
Speaker 1: speech last week, excoriated the Obama administration for doing nothing
Speaker 1: to inform anybody about the potential of Russian interference. The
Speaker 1: only one that was saying, Hey, these guys want to
Speaker 1: hack us. They've done it before. They hack all of
Speaker 1: our allies. And the way what they like to do
Speaker 1: is create election chaos and they're good at it. Well,
Speaker 1: that was Devin Nounez, the head of the House Intel Committee.
Speaker 1: And I've shown you that article and read it from
Speaker 1: twenty fourteen. And if we don't ever get a hold
Speaker 1: of you know, what's happening in the vulnerability in terms
Speaker 1: of cybersecurity for the secrets of our state and our country,
Speaker 1: you know, we have big problems. We supposedly have two
Speaker 1: hundred and fifty thousand IT workers that now worked for
Speaker 1: the federal government. How we cannot stop this is unbelievable
Speaker 1: to me. It's unacceptable to me. You can't allow these
Speaker 1: countries to do that. I know, maybe over people's heads,
Speaker 1: but nuke Ingridge is talking about China's advancement with five
Speaker 1: G and you know how this is the first battle
Speaker 1: of the cyber wars for the you know, next hundred years,
Speaker 1: and that we better get involved and we better catch
Speaker 1: up as quickly as we can. Now. There was a
Speaker 1: fake news CNN poll and it turned out that two
Speaker 1: thirds of Biden's supporters say that their decision about Biden
Speaker 1: is not final and that they could change their minds
Speaker 1: and vote for somebody else. I was surprised that newt
Speaker 1: yesterday thought it was Buddha judge that could end up
Speaker 1: winning this thing. Guy hadn't even really thought about mayor Pete,
Speaker 1: you know, I know he has. Biden has his liberal
Speaker 1: friends in the media, like Mika that dismissed the allegations
Speaker 1: of being creepy. You know, the nose rubbing and the
Speaker 1: hair fondling, and the massaging of the back and shoulders,
Speaker 1: and the long awkward kisses on the lips and everything
Speaker 1: else this guy does. I'll let other people decide, but
Speaker 1: it's creepy to me. Creezy, creepy Uncle Joe. We know
Speaker 1: that Real Clear Politics had twenty seven percent of Democrats
Speaker 1: in his corner taking two days before his announcement, and
Speaker 1: he had other one showing it as high. But anyway,
Speaker 1: CNN says that Biden led the pack at thirteen percent.
Speaker 1: All right, that was a quick decline. And I don't
Speaker 1: see Kamala Harris anywhere. I mean, some people thought she
Speaker 1: was going to be the front runner, and she seems
Speaker 1: to have no zero enthusiasm or support for her candidacy.
Speaker 1: And you got Beto, Robert Francis, bozo, we only have
Speaker 1: ten years left to address climate change, he said, all right,
Speaker 1: here you go. He's going full Acasio Cortez on this.
Speaker 1: One of the jokes is that Biden says the Obama
Speaker 1: administration was not corrupt in any way. Okay, not one
Speaker 1: single whisper of scandal. Well, I've got a list of
Speaker 1: seventy that I can give you if you really want them. Oh,
Speaker 1: poor Robert Francis only had a couple of dozen people
Speaker 1: show up thirty five people in total to see him
Speaker 1: at UNLV. That's not a good turnout. I can get
Speaker 1: thirty five people at UNLB and the Democratic race shows
Speaker 1: it's gonna get nasty and the and it's interesting, and
Speaker 1: then everybody's kissing Al Sharpton's ring. I mean, you had
Speaker 1: Mayor Pete Buddha Judge meeting Al Sharpton at Sylvia's restaurant
Speaker 1: in Harlem, New York, and you know, apparently to confront
Speaker 1: him on homophobia, but clearly wanting his endorsement. I never
Speaker 1: how did he become the the kingmaker in all this?
Speaker 1: All right, we got a lot to get to today
Speaker 1: other news. We're gonna get to the socialist agenda and
Speaker 1: how more extreme it gets by the day. Right as
Speaker 1: we roll along eight hundred and nine fold one, Sean,
Speaker 1: you want to be a part of the program. M. Well,
Speaker 1: we have an update a little bit here as it
Speaker 1: relates to where the testimony involving the Attorney General Bar
Speaker 1: may end up in all of this, because obviously you
Speaker 1: know it's the threat. I mean, Barr is saying that
Speaker 1: congressional oversight ought to be done by the people elected,
Speaker 1: it ought not be done by the attorneys because they're
Speaker 1: so incapable of doing their job. And I think what's
Speaker 1: interesting here. You know, Senate Dems to grill Barr in
Speaker 1: a preview of the House hearings. Well, that's all fine,
Speaker 1: that's going to happen. But I mean if the oversight
Speaker 1: or the checks and balances, or you know which, by
Speaker 1: the way, is the role of Congress. Nobody's denying the
Speaker 1: constitutionality of all of that. But anyway, Barr will testify,
Speaker 1: believe tomorrow before the Senate Judiciary Committee. It's all but
Speaker 1: guarantee you'll face hostility from the Democrats on that committee.
Speaker 1: And but you know, you got to remember that there's
Speaker 1: gonna be overreach here. And I think one of the
Speaker 1: things that Nadler and the people in the House are
Speaker 1: afraid of is that bar is extraordinarily smart, understands the law,
Speaker 1: and when he testifies, he probably knows a lot more
Speaker 1: about law than the lawmakers. He is. You know, this
Speaker 1: is not his first rodeo, as he's now back in
Speaker 1: this position for the second time in his life. And
Speaker 1: I think Senate Republicans on the committee will provide a
Speaker 1: blueprint for the follow up questions from Democrats and Republicans alike,
Speaker 1: and whatever they're going to ask in the Senate probably
Speaker 1: is going to be, you know, something they dig back
Speaker 1: into in the House. But think about this. All they
Speaker 1: want is to reopen an investigation that now has been
Speaker 1: basically investigated four separate times and this big epic Muller
Speaker 1: prediction and fail and let down. You know, it's sort
Speaker 1: of like what Bill Maher said. You know, people like
Speaker 1: the Cowardly Shift are stalking now President Trump. You know,
Speaker 1: I remember smoking was socially acceptable. Everybody pretty much was
Speaker 1: doing it. People smoked in malls and restaurants, even on airplanes.
Speaker 1: Now you've got a lot of disapproving looks, especially from
Speaker 1: loved ones. So after many years of me smoking, finally
Speaker 1: made the switch to Jewel. Now there's no more worrying
Speaker 1: about the way my clothes smell or worrying about what
Speaker 1: people are going to say, because with Jewel everything is
Speaker 1: so much easier. Jewel is a vaporizer that contains nicotine
Speaker 1: for a satisfying transition. Now, Jewel was designed by smokers
Speaker 1: for smokers to be an alternative to cigarettes. Jewel has
Speaker 1: no cigarette ash, zero odor, no mess. So if you're
Speaker 1: one of the thirty four million adults in America that
Speaker 1: smoke will know that there is an alternative to cigarettes.
Speaker 1: Just go to Jewel dot com slash switch America. That's
Speaker 1: j Uuel dot com slash switch America and warning this
Speaker 1: product does contain nicotine, and nicotine is an addictive chemical.
Speaker 1: All right, as we roll along twenty five now till
Speaker 1: the top of the hour, eight hundred and nine for
Speaker 1: one Shan, you know, it's just funny that the witch
Speaker 1: hunt is never gonna end. It really is. I mean,
Speaker 1: you look at these, it's like the media is now
Speaker 1: recovering from the shock and awe of being so wrong
Speaker 1: and having lied and having you know, spun so many
Speaker 1: conspiracy theories for two plus years that you know, I
Speaker 1: predicted what is so painfully obvious now that they're never
Speaker 1: going to admit that they're wrong. They're not going to
Speaker 1: say that they lied. They're not going to say that
Speaker 1: their coverage was abusively biased and prejudiced. They're not going
Speaker 1: to say that they were caught up in an agenda,
Speaker 1: which they are and continue to be that they would
Speaker 1: just you know, kind of absorb the blow and then
Speaker 1: move on to the next group of lies. The next
Speaker 1: conspiracy theories, which is what they're doing now. And part
Speaker 1: of that includes that, Okay, well, now we're gonna have hearings.
Speaker 1: Now we're going to go after the attorney general. Now
Speaker 1: we're going to go after Rod Rosenstein. Now we're going
Speaker 1: to go after I guess the office of Legal Counsel
Speaker 1: that all made the quick determination has handed off to
Speaker 1: them bar that without any consideration of the constitutional or
Speaker 1: Department of Justice policy that might or might not allow
Speaker 1: the indictment of a sitting president, and I said, no,
Speaker 1: the evidence doesn't rise to the account. And then when
Speaker 1: you actually look at the report, you know, when you
Speaker 1: know it was would have been easy for any prosecutor
Speaker 1: to determine exactly what the Attorney General, Deputy Attorney General
Speaker 1: Rosenstein in office illegal Counsel determined, which was okay, Yeah,
Speaker 1: if the President said that he wanted to fire Muller
Speaker 1: while he was saying at all publicly, maybe I should,
Speaker 1: and he was venting because he knew that there was
Speaker 1: no underlying crime, which has now corroborated four separate times,
Speaker 1: lastly by the Muller report itself in clear, unambiguous language,
Speaker 1: no collusion with Russia in the campaign or the Trump campaign,
Speaker 1: no collusion whatsoever. Now this is now the fourth time
Speaker 1: we've determined this. But again, you know, it was funny
Speaker 1: because I saw something a mediaite, Lawrence O'Donnell and Rachel
Speaker 1: Maddow talking about, well, why does Fox talk about Hillary? Well,
Speaker 1: Hillary was in the news last night because she was
Speaker 1: selectively on some show reading aspects of the Muller report,
Speaker 1: including Trump's reaction when he found out that a special
Speaker 1: counsel had been appointed. And he just said, oh, bleep
Speaker 1: because and then he explained, because I've been told when
Speaker 1: that happens, that all progress in an administration stops. Because
Speaker 1: instinctively he knew that this was going to now consume
Speaker 1: massive portions of his time as it did, which he
Speaker 1: should have felt. Now, they didn't do the reading of
Speaker 1: when it said no collusion. I didn't see Hillary read
Speaker 1: that part or the part of the Muller report that
Speaker 1: destroys any of the credibility of the Clinton dossier. I
Speaker 1: gotta imagine when Hillary heard that Comey was reopening the
Speaker 1: investigation into her server that in October twenty sixteen because
Speaker 1: of the Anthony Wiener laptop, they were trying to hide it.
Speaker 1: They had had it for weeks and weeks, but apparently
Speaker 1: somebody within New York law enforcement was willing to be
Speaker 1: a whistleblower and come out with it, so Comey had
Speaker 1: to come out with it, so I hear. Anyway, when
Speaker 1: that was announced, what did Hillary say, Oh, this is
Speaker 1: great news, and Hillary doesn't curse and she's the perfect person.
Speaker 1: I doubt it because based on other reports and even
Speaker 1: people that were members of the secret service detail of
Speaker 1: the Clinton they have a very different picture that they
Speaker 1: paint of her and her infamous temper or I could
Speaker 1: only imagine what she thought of, you know, first of all,
Speaker 1: the investigation into her illegal server in this mom and
Speaker 1: pop bathroom closet. I know she's happy that. Well, it
Speaker 1: looks like the meeting on the tarmac with Bill and
Speaker 1: Loretta Lynch worked, because that's what struck In Paige said
Speaker 1: behind closed doors and closed door testimony, both of them,
Speaker 1: both of them saying that, yeah, well, Loretta Lynch, the
Speaker 1: Department of Justice, they're all full of Democrats, and this
Speaker 1: is not an investigation. This whole thing is done. It's complete.
Speaker 1: And then, of course structed his part when he interviewed Hillary.
Speaker 1: Of course, he didn't interview her until three days before
Speaker 1: her exoneration. But they were writing the exoneration in May.
Speaker 1: I mean nobody else would get rid of nobody else
Speaker 1: would have gotten away with that. So what are we
Speaker 1: talking about. Well, for all these people that are so
Speaker 1: seemingly obsessed with Russia collusion and obstruction, you know what
Speaker 1: they don't seem to want to ever deal with is
Speaker 1: the fact that they rigged her investigation. They only want
Speaker 1: to talk about Trump twenty sixteen. They only want to
Speaker 1: talk about Trump and Russia. Well, Milania, the spouse of
Speaker 1: the president, didn't go over to Russia, get twice a
Speaker 1: normal speaking fee and meet with Vladimir Putin, especially at
Speaker 1: an important time when he first wanted to meet with
Speaker 1: nuclear regulators in Russia because of the uranium one deal
Speaker 1: that we now know in retrospect, Hillary would sign off
Speaker 1: on what it would allow Putin's thugs in America to
Speaker 1: get what you know, a foothold to twenty percent of
Speaker 1: America's uranium, which is the foundational material for nuclear weapons.
Speaker 1: And that we even had a spy within Putin's network
Speaker 1: in America, and that spy, William Campbell, reported back while
Speaker 1: he was watching Putin's thugs involved in blackmail and extortion
Speaker 1: and money laundering and kigpacks. How they ever allowed that
Speaker 1: deal to go through when we had all that information
Speaker 1: as one to ponder for the ages or maybe something
Speaker 1: that we better get a hold of, especially if we
Speaker 1: view Vladimir Putin as the hostile actor he is and
Speaker 1: Russia as the hostile regime that it is. You know
Speaker 1: that that makes no sense, especially when you know that
Speaker 1: uranium is a rare mineral and it's needed the foundational
Speaker 1: material for those are nuclear weapons, and we don't have
Speaker 1: enough of it to the point we have to import uranium. Well,
Speaker 1: why would we allow any outside and to d country
Speaker 1: or or group of people to have any access to
Speaker 1: that limited resource that we have, especially if it's Putin connected.
Speaker 1: Then we can add, of course, if you want to
Speaker 1: talk about Russian interference. I know it's taken the New
Speaker 1: York Times and people like Bob Woodward a long time
Speaker 1: to get on board, but you know, the idea that
Speaker 1: they have finally caught up with us on the issue,
Speaker 1: which I think is important to Dirty Dossier. Bob Woodward,
Speaker 1: you know this is really important. I think we really
Speaker 1: got to dig deep into this in the New York
Speaker 1: Times saying, well, this dossier seems like Russian disinformation. Hold
Speaker 1: on a second, you mean the Clinton bought and paid
Speaker 1: for Russian dossier, and remember how she got it. If
Speaker 1: it was Trump that funneled, then the Trump campaign the
Speaker 1: funneled money to a law firm. Okay, that's supposed to
Speaker 1: be written down campaign finance wise, Michael Cohen in trouble
Speaker 1: for a campaign finance violation. It's supposed to it's campaign
Speaker 1: finance issue. So you give it to a law firm,
Speaker 1: that should be a law expense. But then if they
Speaker 1: funneled the money to an odd research firm and then
Speaker 1: funnels money to a foreign entity agent, am I said.
Speaker 1: Christopher Steele and Christopher Steele puts together, you know a
Speaker 1: group of documents that later become known as the dossier,
Speaker 1: and then you get a place like BuzzFeed that in
Speaker 1: January of twenty seventeen, just before Trump becomes He's the
Speaker 1: inauguration happens, you know, but before that, remember it was
Speaker 1: leaked before the election. David Corn, Michael Lizzakofwashington Post. They
Speaker 1: were all we were hearing all about the hookers urinating
Speaker 1: on the bed story. Now, Matt just put Donald Trump's
Speaker 1: name in here, and you would have a real Rushier problem.
Speaker 1: So why because when you go back to Hillary, you
Speaker 1: actually have a real underlying crime with the illegal server
Speaker 1: that we've confirmed and even Comey confirmed had top secret
Speaker 1: classified information on this hard drive and this mom and
Speaker 1: pop shop operation Platt's nip River network and a closet.
Speaker 1: And remember the original writing or of the exonerational draft
Speaker 1: of the exoneration had the gross negligence phrase in it,
Speaker 1: which was then taken out and they put in its
Speaker 1: place extreme carelessness, because gross negligence is the legal standard. Well,
Speaker 1: I think it's grossly negligent if you have top secret
Speaker 1: classified information on an unsecure server, which we were told
Speaker 1: six farign aged Farign. You know, agents or countries had
Speaker 1: hacked into probably Russia, probably China, probably Iran, probably North Korea,
Speaker 1: and you can pick the rest. It could have been
Speaker 1: anybody there in between. You know, when Trump said, well,
Speaker 1: I hope that you know Russia, if they're listening, maybe
Speaker 1: they want to give us the thirty three thousand deleted emails.
Speaker 1: Oh he was asking Russia to interfere. Well, no, he's
Speaker 1: probably assuming what most intelligence people knew and we now
Speaker 1: know from the Freedom of Information Act with Tom Fitton's
Speaker 1: Judicial Watch that when they tested forty of those emails
Speaker 1: and four of them had top secret classified information on it,
Speaker 1: they freaked out at the FBI. They could not believe
Speaker 1: that it had happened, and the danger that it might
Speaker 1: have posed to sources and methods and brave Americans and
Speaker 1: even our intel people or people on the ground at
Speaker 1: their names are mentioned. And if this is only four
Speaker 1: in beginning, we had sixty thousand emails, she turned over
Speaker 1: sixty three thousands, she turned over sixty got rid of
Speaker 1: thirty three thousand. Who knows what was in those emails.
Speaker 1: That's why it mattered. And then you have a crime.
Speaker 1: It's called the Espionage Act eighteen USC. Seven ninety three.
Speaker 1: So that's the crime. The underlying intent behind that, well,
Speaker 1: why don't we delete the emails and bleach bid and
Speaker 1: use hammers and remove sim cards was to cover up
Speaker 1: to destroy the evidence of that crime, which is so obvious.
Speaker 1: So the answer to fake news conspiracy TV MSNBC is
Speaker 1: you're a bunch of hypocrites and you're a bunch of phonies,
Speaker 1: and you don't give a rip about the truth. Because
Speaker 1: if you really cared about the hostile regime of Russia,
Speaker 1: and you're really cared about the bad actor Putin, and
Speaker 1: I believe that's all true, then you would care a
Speaker 1: lot about what happened he year because our national security
Speaker 1: was put at risk and then she destroyed the evidence.
Speaker 1: But you only seem to care about anything Russia related
Speaker 1: if the name Donald Trump's associated with it, and ignore
Speaker 1: a truth that is now undeniable, overwhelming, and incontrovertible, which is,
Speaker 1: we have four investigations clearing Donald Trump, including the FBI
Speaker 1: nine month investigation where Lisa Page behind closed doors. If
Speaker 1: we don't have anything before the appointment of month they
Speaker 1: were trying to find it. You don't think Muller was
Speaker 1: trying his hardest to find this information. They were. They
Speaker 1: were digging as deep as they possibly could. They wanted it.
Speaker 1: This team of Trump paters that he put on his team,
Speaker 1: they wanted it and wanted it badly. Robert Muller didn't
Speaker 1: want to write no collusion whatsoever, no evidence or collusion whatsoever.
Speaker 1: But you have to then ask, this connection with Russia
Speaker 1: and the Clinton is way too cozy. And now that
Speaker 1: we're even now that the New York Times, I guess
Speaker 1: they've been embarrassed to such a degree even they have
Speaker 1: to now look at the dossier, and what is the
Speaker 1: dossier showing them? The dossier showing them. Oh man, wow,
Speaker 1: looking at this and maybe we now see something else here.
Speaker 1: Oh my gosh, this might be Russian disinformation. And you
Speaker 1: can't make it up. You couldn't write a novel with
Speaker 1: this many twists and turns and have everybody get it
Speaker 1: up so wrong, so often, spin every lie in conspiracy
Speaker 1: because they all wanted it to happen. The Democrats wanted it,
Speaker 1: the deep state wanted it, the media wanted it. All
Speaker 1: these people that didn't want Trump, the people that raged
Speaker 1: Hillary's investigation and gave her a get out of jail
Speaker 1: free card that no one else in America could ever obtain,
Speaker 1: and then for her then to use her bought and
Speaker 1: paid for Russian disinformation potentially, according to the New York Times,
Speaker 1: to then let's see use it in FISA applications. But
Speaker 1: you don't tell the FISA judges. Hillary's Hillary is the
Speaker 1: one that paid for this stuff. You don't tell the
Speaker 1: FISA judges that is not verified and not corroborated. You
Speaker 1: don't tell the FISA judge is anything that represents the truth.
Speaker 1: You put your good faith name in your years as
Speaker 1: a professional law enforcement person behind your signature to get
Speaker 1: the FISA application through, as McCabe said, no dossier, no
Speaker 1: FISA warrant, and you get it before the election. And
Speaker 1: what you do with it is you get a backdoor
Speaker 1: through Carter page right into all threeings Trump campaign world
Speaker 1: and then all Trump world, and you keep in that world.
Speaker 1: And you stay in that world because those warrants went
Speaker 1: on for an entire year, because you had three subsequent
Speaker 1: renewal applications, all of which the bulk of information presented
Speaker 1: to the FISA court and the FISA application war Hillari's
Speaker 1: Russian disinformation dossier that she paid for. You can't, You
Speaker 1: cannot write a novel like this and all that's happened,
Speaker 1: and now we see ourselves and they're not gonna stop. Now,
Speaker 1: we're just moving on. Well, if you can't get him here,
Speaker 1: well we'll just well, I have never ending Russia for
Speaker 1: four years, and then we want to access. We want
Speaker 1: to empower the ir rest, weaponize them now to go
Speaker 1: after Trump. The intel community has been weaponized to go
Speaker 1: after Trump and his opponents and his supporters rather, now
Speaker 1: we'll weaponize the irs. Now, you give us all his
Speaker 1: tax information because we don't like him, no specific reason,
Speaker 1: just the fishing expedition. Deutsche Bank, give us all Trump
Speaker 1: records old fish over here. Then we're gonna fish in
Speaker 1: this quarters. They will go over a year and eventually
Speaker 1: will hope and we're gonna find something that we could
Speaker 1: use to take this guy down. Because they didn't like
Speaker 1: the outcome of the election. They had planned every other
Speaker 1: scenario except Trump winning. They don't like the people's choice.
Speaker 1: The river's dry right now, so it's easy to get through.
Speaker 1: Who is this running right Here's a family group that
Speaker 1: that's just crossed. A family group is just crossing while
Speaker 1: we're right here right now, we have another group that's
Speaker 1: coming up. O. We're here basically walk So they find
Speaker 1: an agent and they turn themselves in. So they want
Speaker 1: to see you right now. Definitely, they want to get apprehended.
Speaker 1: They want to get processed. I want to get processed.
Speaker 1: Giving the papers. Then they go north and they have
Speaker 1: legal papers to be wherever they're going to be at
Speaker 1: there by themselves. She's ten years of ages of money
Speaker 1: to ten years of age eight, ten and eight and
Speaker 1: you've been traveling alone for how long they were traveling? Um?
Speaker 1: Their mom set them back, set them down. She says
Speaker 1: she was gonna go buy something for them to eat
Speaker 1: and never returned. Donald Trump is manufacturing a national security crisis.
Speaker 1: You will hear them say, is that this is a
Speaker 1: manufactured crisis. It's not a national security crisis. The big
Speaker 1: scam of the whole address was that there's a crisis.
Speaker 1: There's not a crisis. The notion that we have a
Speaker 1: crisis there security crisis is absolute nonsense. It remains a
Speaker 1: Seinfeld shutdown about saying all about nothing. What happens when
Speaker 1: there is a real crisis, when there is a real emergency.
Speaker 1: Does he take to the airwaves? Do we give him
Speaker 1: the airwaves? Do we believe him? There is not a
Speaker 1: crisis at the border. It's a manufactured crisis for the
Speaker 1: president to get a political when he's determined to convince
Speaker 1: you there is a crisis at the border, even though
Speaker 1: an intelligence official tell sin and quote. No one is
Speaker 1: saying this is a crisis except them. Manufactured crisis, manufactured crisis.
Speaker 1: You look deeper and deeper every day. We had thirty
Speaker 1: one thousand people now in just recent weeks ending up
Speaker 1: in Yuma, Arizona, in Tucson, Arizona, and nobody knows what
Speaker 1: to do with them. Here's the headline, thirty one thousand
Speaker 1: illegal aliens have flooded Yuma, Arizona in the last six months,
Speaker 1: six months alone. That imagine that if every American city
Speaker 1: had to absorb that many illegal aliens, it increased their
Speaker 1: total population by a third. So explain to me how
Speaker 1: the infrastructure works under that scenario. In other words, you
Speaker 1: pay for the criminal justice system, the educational system, the
Speaker 1: healthcare system. We're already paying billions of dollars. In other words,
Speaker 1: American taxpayers, Oh, do we expect that they're gonna immediately
Speaker 1: start paying taxes, get jobs, contribute to society. And of
Speaker 1: the thirty one thousand, what percentage, Let's say it's one
Speaker 1: percent happened to have bad in tensions or a criminal element.
Speaker 1: That will add to the homicide numbers that we've talked
Speaker 1: about at length, the sexual assault numbers we've talked about
Speaker 1: at length, and the violent assaults that we've discussed at length.
Speaker 1: What about the victims? What about the angel moms and dads?
Speaker 1: The permanent separation anyway, our two Sean Hannity Show eight
Speaker 1: hundred and ninety four one Sean, if you want to
Speaker 1: be a part of this extravaganza here to react to
Speaker 1: what is now yet another growing crisis at the border.
Speaker 1: That was Fox News's Maria Barrett to Romo and conducting
Speaker 1: a special episode of Sunday Morning Features about the problem
Speaker 1: that's going on at the border and her talking with
Speaker 1: Border patrol officers. Mark Morgan is the former chief of
Speaker 1: Border Patrol under the Obama administration retired Assistant Director of
Speaker 1: the FBI. Maria Salazar is a Cuban American journalist, broadcast
Speaker 1: TV presenter, if You Will, or and has worked for CNN,
Speaker 1: Univision Telemundo to discuss the border crisis, the overcrowding at
Speaker 1: the detention centers. What happens now that when we're so
Speaker 1: overcrowded that people just get let go. I think a
Speaker 1: lot of this Mark Morgan is rooted in the fact
Speaker 1: that you know a lot of people from these countries
Speaker 1: in Latin America and Nicoagua Salvador, Guatemala, and of course
Speaker 1: people in Mexico. They're seeing the walls being repaired and built,
Speaker 1: and they probably think that the time is short, that
Speaker 1: they'll have an opportunity to sneak in across that southern border. Yeah,
Speaker 1: so and so, I think you're absolutely right. And there's
Speaker 1: a couple of things unpacked there. One is absolutely I
Speaker 1: think you're correct. They're seeing some stuff done. So there
Speaker 1: is some element of the hey, we got to get in,
Speaker 1: But really the biggest element is our system and the
Speaker 1: United States, make no mistake, the American people need to
Speaker 1: understand the reason why they're coming is because we're telling
Speaker 1: to come. Our laws provide an open border for these individuals.
Speaker 1: They're being educated more and more each and every day.
Speaker 1: You're seeing more countries now make themselves come towards the
Speaker 1: Northern Triangle, countries to make their way up because everybody knows,
Speaker 1: you come here, you grab a kid, you're in free.
Speaker 1: The United States open borders, never to be heard from again.
Speaker 1: It's not going to stop unless we fix our laws.
Speaker 1: You having been down at the border, we know that
Speaker 1: Mexican authorities, the Ministry of Interior, Northeastern Regional delegate, this guy,
Speaker 1: Enrique Avolano, you know he's saying straight up that authorities
Speaker 1: have deported many MS thirteen gang members that they detected,
Speaker 1: and the migrant caravans. We have another big one yet
Speaker 1: coming again and they have found them. What they do
Speaker 1: is they mix into these migrant caravans headed towards the US,
Speaker 1: which means that if the caravans get through, that means
Speaker 1: they get through or have you seen that a lot?
Speaker 1: So absolutely, and I'm just I'm so glad that you
Speaker 1: keep sitting this. This is the one thing that's just
Speaker 1: so incredulous for me that the American people aren't understanding
Speaker 1: because of our broken laws and system. And we're looking
Speaker 1: at this year a million and because sixty five to
Speaker 1: seventy percent are going to be family units, are in
Speaker 1: a company of miners, that means we're going to allow
Speaker 1: in six hundred and fifty thousand individuals. The borders are
Speaker 1: wide open to those individuals. You don't think there's a
Speaker 1: bad element in there, of course there is. And then Sean,
Speaker 1: let's not forget that's just what we see. Don't forget
Speaker 1: there's a couple hundred thousand easily there are illegally entering
Speaker 1: that we don't catch, that we don't see. And what
Speaker 1: do you think the makeup of those individuals are. I'll
Speaker 1: unstimate to you the majority of those individuals are a
Speaker 1: majority not good people. I don't understand what Americans miss.
Speaker 1: I don't understand what Congress is missing. This isn't about
Speaker 1: legal immigration. This is about illegal immigration and protecting the
Speaker 1: citizens of this country. The Angel families, as you mentioned, Chuck,
Speaker 1: how many more Angel families has to be created? How
Speaker 1: many more American cities don't I don't think anybody talks
Speaker 1: to them but me and maybe a couple of other
Speaker 1: people on Fox and the President, because I don't Nancy Pelosi.
Speaker 1: I know the Democrats. You know that they literally scream
Speaker 1: about well child separation, which the person that fixed that
Speaker 1: is Donald Trump. That separation is temporary and the idea
Speaker 1: is to get kids that are alone back with their parents.
Speaker 1: And now, you know, nobody talked about the fact that
Speaker 1: Obama and the Bush administrations did it. Let me go
Speaker 1: to Maria Salazar. Maria you are You're a Cuban American
Speaker 1: and you're a journalist. And the narrative, if you listen
Speaker 1: to the media mob in America is that, well, if Republicans,
Speaker 1: you know, continue to build border barriers, well to stop
Speaker 1: the ninety percent of heroin, the human trafficking, gangs, cartels
Speaker 1: and all the other crime associated with the border. If
Speaker 1: Americans do that, and Republicans push that that this is
Speaker 1: gonna be really bad for them politically with the Hispanic community,
Speaker 1: do you buy that? I don't buy that one bit,
Speaker 1: And I thank you very much for giving me the
Speaker 1: opportunity to day to your audience how embarrassed we are
Speaker 1: as Hispanic Americans, because what we're seeing is, well, let
Speaker 1: me just stop you right there. No, you don't need
Speaker 1: to be embarrassed about anything. You are in this country legally.
Speaker 1: You are part of our family. I don't care where
Speaker 1: people come from. Nobody cares about that. We're just asking
Speaker 1: that we have an opportunity to vet you and make
Speaker 1: sure that you're capable of taking care of yourself. So
Speaker 1: it's not a burden on the American people, it's not.
Speaker 1: I don't think we're asking too much to obey our laws,
Speaker 1: respect our sovereignty in our borders. And that's the way
Speaker 1: my parents came in, and hundreds of other millions of
Speaker 1: nick Roguins and Salvadorians. But what I'm saying to you
Speaker 1: is that since I am Hispanic, I can explain to you,
Speaker 1: Sean that millions of Hispanics feel the same way I do.
Speaker 1: But then the problem with the Democrats is that they're
Speaker 1: trying to project that the Hispanic Americans are with the Dems,
Speaker 1: that we're voting with them, and that we agree with
Speaker 1: Century Cities, and that we agree with the caravans because
Speaker 1: we have to protect the Central Americans that want to
Speaker 1: come in legally. And I want to tell you that
Speaker 1: is not true, because you know I live in Miami.
Speaker 1: I'm surrounded by undocumented, by legals, people that are mowing
Speaker 1: the lawn and picking up the tomatoes, and I always
Speaker 1: stop and in Spanish, I asked them, I want you
Speaker 1: to tell me. I'm gonna go to Fox News and
Speaker 1: I'm gonna talk to Sean Hannity and the people at Fox,
Speaker 1: and I want you to tell me, mister guy mowing
Speaker 1: the lawn, do you agree with the caravan And they go, no,
Speaker 1: we don't. Why because they fear the same fear that
Speaker 1: you're feeling. Their kids could be kidnapped, could be killed,
Speaker 1: buy the MS thirteen, or they could be angel parents.
Speaker 1: Because the angel parents are not only Americans. You have
Speaker 1: a lot of Hispanics that have lost their children at
Speaker 1: the hands of people like the people that Kate that
Speaker 1: killed Kate's finally, so we don't agree with what's happening,
Speaker 1: and that is one of my major frustrations is that
Speaker 1: Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats are trying to check themselves
Speaker 1: as the saviors of the Hispanics and they're not. They
Speaker 1: have played political football with us, and right now they're
Speaker 1: playing it again because they are not allowing President Trump
Speaker 1: and his administration to reach an agreementonomic ration area. Do
Speaker 1: you believe that the Democrats are looking at the long
Speaker 1: ball game here and for them, they think the majority
Speaker 1: of people that might be coming to America will be
Speaker 1: in need of governmental assistance and therefore be more inclined
Speaker 1: to go with Democrats and their promises that everything's going
Speaker 1: to be free in America. Do you think that's what
Speaker 1: they're thinking, that's their bet. And that's why I feel
Speaker 1: so frustrated, because I want my people to understand and
Speaker 1: to read the game that they are trying to sell
Speaker 1: to us, because but at the same time, the Republicans
Speaker 1: need to understand that they have to smell the votes
Speaker 1: and they have to approach us in a more in
Speaker 1: a more friendly manner and saying, you Hispanics in the
Speaker 1: United States, you belong to the Republican Party because we
Speaker 1: share the same values that are entrenched in the Republican Party.
Speaker 1: Self reliance, paying taxes, god fearing, law abiding, leave me alone.
Speaker 1: I don't want to have anything to do with the government.
Speaker 1: I want to raise my family, and I want to
Speaker 1: go to church. Those are the values of those people
Speaker 1: that are trying to come in that obviously they come
Speaker 1: out come in this way. But yeah, Mark, having been
Speaker 1: a former, having been the former chief of Border Patrol
Speaker 1: under Obama, now when he was president again, they supported
Speaker 1: building a wall, they supported funding the wall, they supported DACA,
Speaker 1: they supported Dreamers, all of which the president offered as
Speaker 1: part of a deal when the government was shut down.
Speaker 1: My question to you is having served in that position
Speaker 1: under that president, and you're advocating pretty much the same
Speaker 1: principles that you did then. But from what I understand
Speaker 1: is you're taking a lot of heat when you talk
Speaker 1: to people like me, and somehow you're being attacked. Is
Speaker 1: that true? Yeah? And so, but that's okay. I mean,
Speaker 1: when when I decided to break my silence, I knew
Speaker 1: that was gonna happen. And first of all, I just
Speaker 1: gotta say, Sean, you know Maria, Amen to what you
Speaker 1: just said. We need to hear more of you. We
Speaker 1: need to hear that perspective. That hypocrisy on the other
Speaker 1: side is just so overwhelming. All right, gotta take a
Speaker 1: quick break. We have the issue of involving Venezuela, the
Speaker 1: uprising against Baduro, and we'll tell you all about that
Speaker 1: on the other side with Maria Salazar, Mark Morgan, don't
Speaker 1: forget Hannity tonight nine Eastern on the Fox News Channel. Also,
Speaker 1: Congressman Chip Roy will check in with us on our posters.
Speaker 1: All right, now, the creepy crazy Uncle Joe is in.
Speaker 1: What do the numbers look like? We'll check in with
Speaker 1: John and Jim McLaughlin. One of them will be late.
Speaker 1: I won't tell you which one. That's in our news
Speaker 1: roundup hour as we continue. Right, as we continue, Mark
Speaker 1: Morgan as the former chief of Border Patrol under the
Speaker 1: Obama administration. Maria Salazar find information on her at Maria
Speaker 1: Salazar dot com. I always talk about the ninety eight
Speaker 1: of people that well, then I respect in our laws,
Speaker 1: our sovereignty, in our borders, but I do understand when
Speaker 1: you come from and I've been down to the border
Speaker 1: fourteen times at this point. And I have met many
Speaker 1: of the people that are trying to cross in and
Speaker 1: what they're seeing. I remember specifically being on the border
Speaker 1: of San Diego and you know, on one side of
Speaker 1: that border is a what looked like, you know, a
Speaker 1: garbage dump with wheels and garbage. And I'm looking at
Speaker 1: that side of the border, you could see right through
Speaker 1: when you see kids playing, you know, in something we
Speaker 1: would never want our kids to play in. On the
Speaker 1: other side of the border, a half million dollars, quarter
Speaker 1: million dollars, million dollar homes. And if I'm on that side,
Speaker 1: in a shock, and that's exactly what most people at
Speaker 1: that section we're look living in. And I'm looking over
Speaker 1: at this section, I'm saying, I want to be in
Speaker 1: that section. I understand the desire to make a better
Speaker 1: life for them tells in their family. And we don't
Speaker 1: have a problem with people coming in legally, John, if
Speaker 1: you can't check them out. In the day and age
Speaker 1: of radicalism and these gangs and cartels, we need to
Speaker 1: be able to vet every person. Sean, That's that's exactly
Speaker 1: so I for the FBI. I've lived and worked in
Speaker 1: a pass and every day on ten I got to
Speaker 1: see exactly what you described on either side. So there's
Speaker 1: no issue with understanding somebody wants a better economic life.
Speaker 1: We get that, we support that. This is about legal
Speaker 1: versus legal. This is about making sure we're vetting every
Speaker 1: single person that's coming into this country for the safety
Speaker 1: and security of our citizens. So what we have now,
Speaker 1: Sean that I've been trying to tell people, this is
Speaker 1: actually the worst crisis along the Southwest border we've ever seen.
Speaker 1: Right now, the borders are complete open, we have kids,
Speaker 1: we have adults, and cartels that are that are supporting
Speaker 1: renting the kids, so so that illegal adults can come
Speaker 1: into this country right now. Our system is so overwhelmed.
Speaker 1: They're coming with faith documents, no documents, but because of
Speaker 1: our laws, we can't bet them. The American people need
Speaker 1: to understand, you grab the kids, you come here, right
Speaker 1: We don't. We don't, we can't fit. We're losing three
Speaker 1: hundred kids a week to Heroin, ninety percent of acrosses
Speaker 1: that border at fentonol to that, and it's an unmitigated
Speaker 1: disaster for small towns and big cities in this country.
Speaker 1: All right, stay right there, Maria Salo's are Mark Morgan Willis.
Speaker 1: We support the people of Venezuela. We're sad that they
Speaker 1: have been starved by Maduro. They've been denied food and
Speaker 1: medicine and basic humanitarian needs having been met. The United
Speaker 1: States has gotten supplies there to them. Sometimes those have
Speaker 1: been obstructed or burned. But we stand with the people
Speaker 1: of Venezuela, and we stand with Alan Guido. Maduro has
Speaker 1: to go. We've made that very clear for a number
Speaker 1: than the WII is, the President of the Vice President,
Speaker 1: of Secretary State, Ambassador Bolton. I think that Secretary State
Speaker 1: Pompeo put it best this morning when he said, this
Speaker 1: is Operation Libertad, and this will finally get the Venezuelan
Speaker 1: people the freedom that they need. And three million Venezuelans
Speaker 1: have fled to neighboring countries like Colombia and Brazil. So
Speaker 1: they have They've told you all you need to know.
Speaker 1: They I'm sure they would prefer to be in their
Speaker 1: home country, but they simply can't stay there and be
Speaker 1: expected to survive or thrive. So we are watching it, monitoring.
Speaker 1: I got a briefing this morning before I came out,
Speaker 1: and monitoring very closely the situation there. We want a
Speaker 1: peaceful transition. Chavez stuck around for about twenty years. These
Speaker 1: things don't happen overnight. But in three short months, I
Speaker 1: think the world has seen the horrors of the Madua regime.
Speaker 1: The average Venezuelan has lost about twenty pounds and over
Speaker 1: a year. That's just a tragedy. As the president has
Speaker 1: said many times, Venezuela was once one of the wealthiest
Speaker 1: countries in the world. Is now you've seen what's happened
Speaker 1: to the people there. So these dictators to including to
Speaker 1: power and wealth for their own purposes, they must go,
Speaker 1: beginning with Maduro, all right, they must go with Maduro,
Speaker 1: as we now see the uprising in Venezuela. You know
Speaker 1: the sad thing about Venezuela. You know, even going back
Speaker 1: to Hugo Chavas should be one of the richest countries
Speaker 1: that is prospering at a level that would be unprecedented.
Speaker 1: They have more oil reserves for that country. They could
Speaker 1: be providing the entire world in part with the lifeblood
Speaker 1: of our economy. Look, the great news is, we don't
Speaker 1: need Venezuela's oil. We don't need anybody's oil or natural gas.
Speaker 1: We've got enough of our own. And the President, through deregulation,
Speaker 1: now has opened up two pipelines Dakota Keystone Pipeline. He's
Speaker 1: opened up and more for drilling, and he is now
Speaker 1: made America energy independent for the first time in seventy
Speaker 1: five years. Now we are in net exporter of energy,
Speaker 1: which means, oh, there's gonna be hundreds of thousands, if
Speaker 1: not millions, of jobs, high paying career jobs for Americans
Speaker 1: as long as we're not stupid enough to buy into this.
Speaker 1: We've got to eliminate oil and gas and the combustion engine,
Speaker 1: and we got to get rid of cows and planes
Speaker 1: and everything. From the moment you're born, daycare, preschool, kindergarten,
Speaker 1: grammar school, high school, college is going to be paid
Speaker 1: for by your government. Then followed up by oh, you
Speaker 1: get a guaranteed job, guaranteed salary, guaranteed government vacation. I
Speaker 1: wonder where they're gonna send me, and then guaranteed government
Speaker 1: healthy food, and guaranteed healthcare. But you can't buy your
Speaker 1: own healthcare plan, no more choice. How did keep your
Speaker 1: doctor plan and save money work out for you? Then
Speaker 1: it's the other promise, when you're retired, totally taken care
Speaker 1: of by the way, whether you're willing or unwilling or work, well,
Speaker 1: that's the promise that was Venezuela and socialism, and of
Speaker 1: course power and corruption and greed by those powerful few
Speaker 1: resulted in mass poverty. Remember Jorge Ramos went to Venezuela
Speaker 1: and was I think it was interviewing Maduro at the time.
Speaker 1: And what happened? Oh, yeah, they took a confiscate, did
Speaker 1: it film because he was asked a few questions he
Speaker 1: didn't like about people leading out of garbage trucks. Is
Speaker 1: pretty disgusting anyway, So Vice President Pence, the Trump administration
Speaker 1: of the top ranking members today of the administration voicing
Speaker 1: their full support for the opposition leader in Venezuela, who
Speaker 1: is and he's a pretty fascinating figure. And what you
Speaker 1: have as a contingent of heavily armed troops that are
Speaker 1: in the streets of Caracas amid the call for the
Speaker 1: military to rise up and ounced Nicholas Maduro. We continue
Speaker 1: now with Maria Salazar Maria Salazar dot Com, Cuban American
Speaker 1: Journalists or for CNN, Univision Telemundo. Mark Morgan, former chief
Speaker 1: Border Patrol under the Obama administration, now Maria, I understand
Speaker 1: you interviewed both Wido and you also Maduro. Correct, yes, correct,
Speaker 1: And I just created a little contrast between one and
Speaker 1: the other. And I've very good friends with Leopoldolopus, who
Speaker 1: I don't know if your audience recognizes that name, but
Speaker 1: Leopololopus was the creator of this movement, and it is
Speaker 1: the guy who named one Guido to be the entering president,
Speaker 1: and he was released today by I'm sure that you
Speaker 1: have reported this shaan by the Guido forces. That is,
Speaker 1: that's an extraordinary event happening today, which I think indicates
Speaker 1: that this has been the beginning of the end of
Speaker 1: the Madure regime. And Leopoldo Loopus, when I spoke with
Speaker 1: him via a telephone a couple of weeks ago, told
Speaker 1: me something that is very very important, which is if
Speaker 1: it thanks to Donald Trump. And remember you know, these
Speaker 1: people are not Americans and they do not know Trump.
Speaker 1: If you would have not been for the Trump presidency,
Speaker 1: we would not be liberating Venezuela the way we are
Speaker 1: right now. Remember that Chavez was in power for twenty years.
Speaker 1: We had the Bush administration, we had the Clinton, we
Speaker 1: had the Obama, we had another Bush and no one
Speaker 1: really did anything for the Venezuelan freedom except the Trump administration.
Speaker 1: And I'm not brown nosing. I'm just stating the facts.
Speaker 1: And if we just heard I think Kelley and Conway,
Speaker 1: we heard Vice President penns. We have heard President Trump,
Speaker 1: who received Leopolgolope's wife at the Oval Office a couple
Speaker 1: of years ago. If Trump would have not been behind
Speaker 1: this movement, we would not be having this Operasion lib
Speaker 1: tag Operation Freedom happening today. Those are the fact, and
Speaker 1: we have to be not only Cuban Americans, but the
Speaker 1: Venezuelan Americans, then the Colombians and the Central Americans, and
Speaker 1: the whole Latin American community that lives in the United States.
Speaker 1: We have to be very grateful. You know why, because
Speaker 1: Venezuela is the first step. After Venezuela comes Cuba, and
Speaker 1: then the whole hemisphere is free. Do you think that
Speaker 1: happens in Cuba? I mean, you know, I met this
Speaker 1: guy a long time ago, and I'll ask Mark about
Speaker 1: this too and get his perspective. But when I was
Speaker 1: in Huntsville, Alabama, I lived in a town called Athens,
Speaker 1: who was next to Huntsville, kind of midway between Huntsville
Speaker 1: and Decatur, Alabama. But there was a guy that was
Speaker 1: from Cuba and during the Cuban Revolution when Castro came
Speaker 1: to power. He came from a fairly wealthy family and
Speaker 1: they owned a lot of property. And he told me
Speaker 1: hours and hours of stories about how he and other
Speaker 1: families were part of their resistance and many people were
Speaker 1: killed and their lands confiscated. I mean, Castro was a
Speaker 1: murdering thug that stole and confiscated everybody's property, and how
Speaker 1: he barely escaped with his life. I mean, you know,
Speaker 1: life is pretty miserable when people will insert themselves and
Speaker 1: you know, rickety broken down dilapidated boats and shark infested waters,
Speaker 1: or throw themselves on an inner tube in the hope
Speaker 1: that they can make it to the United States and
Speaker 1: get one foot on dry land so that they can
Speaker 1: be in safety and security. That's all reality. You've got
Speaker 1: to be pretty desprit to take that perilous journey, and
Speaker 1: Mark they do it all the time because of the
Speaker 1: you know, to them, it's worth the risk because living
Speaker 1: there is just a living hell, and the poverty and
Speaker 1: the lack of bare necessities frankly forces them to take
Speaker 1: an extreme measure. That's that's absolutely right, and you can't
Speaker 1: blame them. And you know, as I was listening to Maria,
Speaker 1: you know, I wish you could see my face because
Speaker 1: you know, she's doing something that you know, mainstream media
Speaker 1: doesn't do at all, and that's talk about the fact. Right,
Speaker 1: Just look at the facts that she just laid out
Speaker 1: with respective this issue with the current administration is doing
Speaker 1: and it's absolutely right. But what do we do? There's
Speaker 1: that old saying, right, I'm sure we've all heard, don't
Speaker 1: let uh, you know, facts get in the way of
Speaker 1: a good emotional argument, and you guys describe it. That's
Speaker 1: exactly what's going on. We need to staying behind this
Speaker 1: administration on this. Yeah, well, I think all right, so
Speaker 1: where is this? Where is this headed? Maria? You've been
Speaker 1: down there and we're going to move on after this.
Speaker 1: But I mean, it's what I think is important here
Speaker 1: is that people understand that what how this ends up
Speaker 1: is going to be important. Why do you think Hido
Speaker 1: is as a better candidate, as a better person to lead?
Speaker 1: We already know about Maduro. Why is he better? Well,
Speaker 1: he is better because he represents freedom. He has announced
Speaker 1: and he has said that he will hold elections as
Speaker 1: soon as all the political parties can regroup, and he
Speaker 1: can call for fair and transparent and elections that will
Speaker 1: be observed by international observers. Not only that, is that
Speaker 1: the United States has was able to the Trump administration
Speaker 1: was and you know, and I don't work for Trump.
Speaker 1: I'm just telling you, like your your guest was saying,
Speaker 1: I'm stating the fact Trump was able to create a
Speaker 1: coalition that, unfortunately, during the Cuban Revolution was John Kennedy
Speaker 1: was not able to put together. Because because we know
Speaker 1: who the Kennedys are, and you know, I'm Cuban Americans.
Speaker 1: So I know the story that you were just saying
Speaker 1: very vividly, because that's the story of my family, of
Speaker 1: my mom, my dad, and my grandparents. We lost everything
Speaker 1: and thank God that I was able to be born
Speaker 1: in this country, so on first generation. So I know
Speaker 1: what the Cubans went through, and the Venezuelans were able
Speaker 1: to escape that because of the Trump administration. Why because
Speaker 1: when the Europeans, the Italians, the Frens, the Germans, the Canadians,
Speaker 1: the Mexicans and the Brazilians and the Colombians saw that
Speaker 1: Trump was really serious to get Maduro out of power.
Speaker 1: They joined the bandwagon. It was Trump the one who
Speaker 1: led the way to say to the rest of the hemisphere,
Speaker 1: this is my plan. I want to liberate Venezuela, then Cuba,
Speaker 1: then Nicaragua, because those are the three communists spots in
Speaker 1: this hemisphere. But if it would have not been for Trump,
Speaker 1: it would not be happening today because the Colombians and
Speaker 1: the Brazilians would have been scared to go against Maduro,
Speaker 1: and then the Canadians would have continued doing business, and
Speaker 1: the Europeans even more. So. That's why the White Joe
Speaker 1: is gonna win because the United States Secretary Manuchin just
Speaker 1: had a couple of days ago that there is ten million,
Speaker 1: ten billion dollars behind this plan to revive the Venezuelan economy.
Speaker 1: So that's the reason why he's gonna win, because we're
Speaker 1: behind him, all right. Thank you both. Maria, Congratulations to
Speaker 1: you and all your success and the fact that you
Speaker 1: have that kind of access is pretty amazing. Also, Mark Morgan,
Speaker 1: thank you for your outspoken voice. We really appreciate it.
Speaker 1: Eight hundred and nine for one Seawan told free telephone
Speaker 1: number if you want to be a part of the program.
Speaker 1: Well more on all of this happening tonight on Hannity
Speaker 1: on the Fox News Channel. All right, as we continue,
Speaker 1: we check in with Chip Roy, congressman in Texas, is
Speaker 1: twenty first district member of the House Budget Committee, Oversight
Speaker 1: and Reform Committee, and anyway, there's been a lot of
Speaker 1: attacks against the president and his family and Congressman. Welcome
Speaker 1: to the program. Glad you're with us. Sean, How are
Speaker 1: you doing. I hope you had a blessed easter. It
Speaker 1: did being back in Texas and the work period, raving
Speaker 1: with the family to get a perspective. It's different than
Speaker 1: what you just rattled off what the American people actually
Speaker 1: care about versus what Democrats want to force the country
Speaker 1: to go down to waste time doing so. I appreciate
Speaker 1: all you do and highlighting that. Let's talk first about
Speaker 1: one thing that is flagrantly missing in all of this
Speaker 1: is I don't see any democratic agenda. What are the
Speaker 1: Democrats for? What are they going to do to make
Speaker 1: our lives better? Because we went from the horrible Obama
Speaker 1: economy to record low unemployment and job growth and economic growth.
Speaker 1: We haven't seen this in well over a decade. Everything
Speaker 1: you just said, Sean, is what I heard from the
Speaker 1: people of Texas and Central Texas that I'm proud to represent.
Speaker 1: And we talked about what matters to them. But they're
Speaker 1: proud that the punson is doing what he said he
Speaker 1: would do. And that's what they were saying about me.
Speaker 1: There was I'm glad we worked hard to get you
Speaker 1: elected and you're going up to the fighting against this
Speaker 1: ridiculous Democrat stonewall and fishness edition and whatever agenda they
Speaker 1: do have is contrary to the values of Texas. The
Speaker 1: Green New Deal that was cost job be crippling to
Speaker 1: our economy, all tilting at windmills that won't actually do
Speaker 1: anything to clean the environment when we've got good, clean
Speaker 1: burning natural gas that's helping the world. Wants to speaking
Speaker 1: talking about Medicare for all on thirty two trillion or
Speaker 1: forty trillion dollars to cripple or healthcare system. They're talking
Speaker 1: about what the president is doing. You rattled off the list,
Speaker 1: trying to work secure border, even though Democrats fault work
Speaker 1: with him, getting rid of the stupid Clean Powered Plan
Speaker 1: and this so called Paris Agreement, it would have crippled
Speaker 1: our economy. Getting good judges making sure that we've got
Speaker 1: a Supreme Court that's closer to the rule of law.
Speaker 1: All of those things, the things that people care about.
Speaker 1: They don't want to see Congress wasting time going down
Speaker 1: the road that Nablin wants to go down where he's
Speaker 1: trying to witch hunt the president and now the Attorney General.
Speaker 1: He's been on the job for a few months and
Speaker 1: he's really doing a great job getting this all wrapped up,
Speaker 1: working with Moher to get the report out. And now
Speaker 1: they're gonna think, well, you got to come before and
Speaker 1: have subpoenas with staff attorneys. Scary committee in the House
Speaker 1: is thrilled with lawyers. The Article one tigress can sit
Speaker 1: home with the Article two attorney General and have a
Speaker 1: conversation and interview the Attorney General, which he's willing to do.
Speaker 1: They don't want to do that because they want to
Speaker 1: show we want to witch hunt. We don't care about
Speaker 1: the American people. We don't care about three thousand, four
Speaker 1: thousand people coming across our border every day. They don't
Speaker 1: care about the fact Helsner cousts are doubling and tripling
Speaker 1: because they want control. They want command and control from Washington,
Speaker 1: DC and we're standing in the way of it, and
Speaker 1: it's making them mad. And the President is staying in
Speaker 1: the way of it, and it's making them mad. And
Speaker 1: that's what I hear when I go back to telf
Speaker 1: All Right, Congressmanship, broy thank you for being with us.
Speaker 1: We appreciate your time and wish you the best. Thank
Speaker 1: you appreciate it very much. All right, so thank you.
Speaker 1: Hope to see you again. Eight hundred nine four one
Speaker 1: Seawan is our toll free telephone number. You want to
Speaker 1: be a part of the program, all right with Biden
Speaker 1: in What are the polls like. We'll check in with
Speaker 1: John Jim McLaughlin at the top of the hour, then
Speaker 1: we'll get to your calls. Eight hundred nine for one.
Speaker 1: Shaan an amazing Hannity to Night nine Eastern with a
Speaker 1: massive breaking story. Yep, we're on top of it by
Speaker 1: John Solomon. We'll tell you more about it later. Listen.
Speaker 1: Want to remind you, all right, you have to mail
Speaker 1: something something private, something that gives personal information, like tax
Speaker 1: documents that have your Social Security number on it, other
Speaker 1: financial information. Coming up next, our final News round up
Speaker 1: and Information Overload Hour. All Right, News Roundup, Information Overload Hour,
Speaker 1: Sean Hannity's show. You know, I saw this on Drudge
Speaker 1: and I said to my staff, you know, I was
Speaker 1: on the year. We were doing the show and creepy
Speaker 1: crazy Uncle Joe was out there given as a big
Speaker 1: speech in Pennsylvania. You know, Pennsylvania's economy is so good
Speaker 1: right now. There was an article yesterday about how employeers
Speaker 1: are going into jails because they need employees so bad
Speaker 1: that they're looking for people that might soon be getting
Speaker 1: released and offering them jomps. I mean, that's how good
Speaker 1: the Pennsylvania economy is under Donald Trump. Anyway, So people,
Speaker 1: it was on Drudge it said that Biden was slurring
Speaker 1: through his speech a little bit, and then you know
Speaker 1: Biden kind of curses a lot. And we put a
Speaker 1: little montage of both together to see what you think.
Speaker 1: I want to thank richar fards Gerald Accounty executive, Baalghetti
Speaker 1: account executive being here and all my time in public
Speaker 1: life from the stuff gotten involved. The country wasn't built
Speaker 1: by Wall Street bankers, CEOs and Hudson and Hudge fund manager.
Speaker 1: If the enterprise, it's hard times. Everybody took a hit.
Speaker 1: Union workers, the UAW took instredible cuts in their future
Speaker 1: and their and their pensions and the let to get
Speaker 1: GM working. They also got that last year and try
Speaker 1: to cut wages or freeze wages for their people right today,
Speaker 1: the same as happening in the big huspital, in big
Speaker 1: hospital systems. I think we got to rethink how we
Speaker 1: define a concert successful economy. Folks in America don't think
Speaker 1: their children would have the same standard of mean they had.
Speaker 1: How can a person digney be maintained? Why? Why they
Speaker 1: do that? It means investing much more in medical research
Speaker 1: to conquer devastating diseases like cancer and addiction. They'm all
Speaker 1: as Simons, So God bless you all and may God
Speaker 1: protect our church. Thank you. Watching this campaign as we
Speaker 1: all have for so long, it seems like every ten
Speaker 1: minutes there's a shift. Inserve what the strategy is again,
Speaker 1: it gives it. What do you think or anybody thinks
Speaker 1: they're going to stick to a message? This is blarkety.
Speaker 1: This is outrageous, outrageous for the President of United States
Speaker 1: to go to a foreign country sitting the cannesse and
Speaker 1: if that's where I'm told, ladies and gentlemen, the President
Speaker 1: of the United States of America, Barack Obama crazy creepy
Speaker 1: Uncle Joe eight hundred nine for one Seawan. You want
Speaker 1: to be a part of the program, News round Up,
Speaker 1: Information Overload, all right? Joining us John and Jim McLaughlin,
Speaker 1: both pollsters, founders of McLaughlin and Associates. Remember, John was
Speaker 1: working on most recently Prime Minister Benjaminette and Yahoo's successful
Speaker 1: reelection campaign, which was not particularly easy considering they came
Speaker 1: out with a recommended indictment five weeks before the Prime
Speaker 1: Minister's re election. I think he accepted free cigars? Is
Speaker 1: that pretty much the essence of his horrible crime that
Speaker 1: they were accusing him of. Well, it was. It was
Speaker 1: a lot of trumped up things, but in the meantime
Speaker 1: of phony stuff. But the meantime, by the way, I
Speaker 1: have to congratulate you. You were the first one in
Speaker 1: the American media to call from mister Neet Yaho a
Speaker 1: winner while they were saying over in Israel he might
Speaker 1: have lost, and his opponent was declaring, vic I have
Speaker 1: good sources on the ground in Israel, and everybody knew
Speaker 1: that what they were saying, because the polls came out,
Speaker 1: and the polls they don't have a lot of media
Speaker 1: in Israel, we ought to sort of paint the picture
Speaker 1: for people. It's all liberal media. The only time they
Speaker 1: get conservative media is that people have satellite dishes and
Speaker 1: they're able to pick up Fox News, or we work
Speaker 1: on Tel Aviv Radio one or two FM, which we
Speaker 1: have done a number of shows from there when we're
Speaker 1: in Israel, or we actually have done shows just for
Speaker 1: Israel from the United States, which was a lot of fun.
Speaker 1: And as the Prime Minister said, it's it's it's like
Speaker 1: left wing press like you have in America, except no
Speaker 1: Sean Hannity, no Fox News. You were the first one
Speaker 1: to call it right and say that, yeah, who would
Speaker 1: be reelected? So all right, let me go to your
Speaker 1: brother Jim, who rarely shows up on time. I guess
Speaker 1: we should reward him for being here on time and
Speaker 1: sometimes does well you say that, but you know how
Speaker 1: many times do you forget to call or you won't
Speaker 1: pick up the phone, or you know your brother has
Speaker 1: to cover for you because you're out busy, you know,
Speaker 1: gallivant and do whatever it is that you do. But um,
Speaker 1: all right, so crazy uncle Joe gets in the race.
Speaker 1: Conventional wisdom is he's the more moderate candidate. I don't
Speaker 1: buy that notion at all. I think that, you know,
Speaker 1: he has to run on the Obama Biden record, the
Speaker 1: Biden Obama record that means all the Russia stuff that's
Speaker 1: going to be coming out that was on his watch,
Speaker 1: that means the horrible economy, thirteen million more Americans on
Speaker 1: food stamps, eight million more in poverty, more debt than
Speaker 1: forty three presidents before combined, and the worst recovery since
Speaker 1: the forties. I don't think that's a good track record
Speaker 1: to run on, or the Iranian deal or any of
Speaker 1: the other dumb things that they did. And he's not
Speaker 1: getting those questions yet. New Gingrich yesterday surprised me, and
Speaker 1: he actually thinks that it's actually this guy Pete Buddha,
Speaker 1: Judge mayor Pete he thinks might win this thing. That
Speaker 1: is not out of the realm of possibility. Because the
Speaker 1: press seems, you know, they want to. They are so
Speaker 1: invested in trying to beat Donald Trump right now, they're
Speaker 1: doing everything in their power to try to elevate Joe Biden.
Speaker 1: And let me tell you something, those primary voters, because
Speaker 1: Joe Biden, in many ways, he's what we call a
Speaker 1: pseudo incumbent in this thing, and they're making a big
Speaker 1: deal like always up to thirty percent. That means over
Speaker 1: seven out of ten these Democratic primary voters that know
Speaker 1: who Joe Biden is, they're not voting for him. His
Speaker 1: numbers are weaker than what Hillari's were last time around.
Speaker 1: And one of the things I think is really really interesting,
Speaker 1: and it goes why he poorly played the race card
Speaker 1: in his announcement video, was he's actually getting about half
Speaker 1: of the non white vote. He's for all in senses purposes,
Speaker 1: he's getting most of the African Americans. What's gonna happen is, though,
Speaker 1: is the election goes on in the Democratic primary, They're
Speaker 1: gonna peel away from him, just like they did with
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton when she ran in the primary against Barack Obama.
Speaker 1: So he is really soft, and you laid out the
Speaker 1: Trump contrast perfectly because it's literally the Obama Biden record
Speaker 1: of failing corruption versus the Donald Trump record of success.
Speaker 1: And to me, that's everything. I mean, look, this is
Speaker 1: going to be the comparison. This is I think john
Speaker 1: a classic choice election because all right, we have eight
Speaker 1: years of Obama. The economic track record was atrocious, and
Speaker 1: I'll go I'm not going to start this early, but
Speaker 1: soon I will go back to what that record was
Speaker 1: in detail, and then we're going to look at their
Speaker 1: foreign policy. I don't know many other people that approved
Speaker 1: the idea of dropping one hundred and fifty billion dollars
Speaker 1: in cash and other currency and cargo planes on the
Speaker 1: Mullow's tarmac. Radical Mullow's the chant death to Israel, death
Speaker 1: to America that are hell bent on a nuclear holocaust
Speaker 1: in our time. And I think that, you know, when
Speaker 1: push comes to shove, I think Americans also going to
Speaker 1: ask this question, are you better off than you wore
Speaker 1: four years ago? And I think the answer is, you know, simple,
Speaker 1: we are way better off. Does Americas stop that prosperity
Speaker 1: in and back? That's the question, absolutely not, because people
Speaker 1: six hundred ten Americans and Poland were doing now they
Speaker 1: know the economy is better had in a better direction,
Speaker 1: the six million new jobs that are created, the growth
Speaker 1: that's going on, America's strong and better shape. But on
Speaker 1: the other point about it is with the president. The
Speaker 1: President has labeled it as sleepy Joe, or before that
Speaker 1: it was creepy Joe. What he shouldn't be calling him
Speaker 1: as swampy Joe, because as you've pointed out, Joe Biden
Speaker 1: has serious problems with the Ukraine what he did over
Speaker 1: there where he forced the prosecutor to end an investigation
Speaker 1: into his son's corruption where they had there was an
Speaker 1: in Ukraine. What you're describing is Hunter Biden now Peter
Speaker 1: Schweitzer as allegations or well on allegations. He put in
Speaker 1: his book some details about Hunter Biden flying on Air
Speaker 1: Force two with Joe Biden to China and he was
Speaker 1: doing millions and millions of dollars in deals with Chinese
Speaker 1: companies on the very same trip in which he was
Speaker 1: on his father's plane, which would say a conflict of
Speaker 1: interest on the Ukraine situation. We had a prosecutor there
Speaker 1: that was investigating, based on John Solomon's reporting in The Hill,
Speaker 1: investigating Hunter Biden and some of the activities that he
Speaker 1: was involved in. And Joe Biden is in Ukraine, and
Speaker 1: he then leverages US AID money, a lot of it,
Speaker 1: and says, I'm on the ground six hours and in
Speaker 1: six hours you get to decide whether you're going to
Speaker 1: fire this prosecutor or not. And he's talking about it
Speaker 1: in the past tense and if you don't fire him.
Speaker 1: I'm not giving you the money. And if you don't
Speaker 1: believe me, call Obama. He got them to fire the
Speaker 1: prosecutor investigating his son. Let's play that tape. Said I'm
Speaker 1: not going to We're not going to give you the
Speaker 1: million dollars. They said, you have no authority, you're not
Speaker 1: the president, the president said, I said, calling him, he said,
Speaker 1: I'm telling you're not getting a billion dollars. I said,
Speaker 1: you're not getting a billion. I'm gonna be leaving here.
Speaker 1: And I think it was about six hours. I look
Speaker 1: as I'm leaving the six hours. If the prosecutors not fired,
Speaker 1: you're not getting the money. Son of them got fired.
Speaker 1: The son of a he got fired. He didn't mention
Speaker 1: that he was investigating his son, did he? No? No.
Speaker 1: And the other part here is you've got you've got
Speaker 1: a situation where Joe Biden his best day is in
Speaker 1: the polls the first day he announces, because the American
Speaker 1: media and none of his opponents have touched this shit.
Speaker 1: But you know it, I know it. He's got major
Speaker 1: ethical issue problems where he may have been part of
Speaker 1: his son's lobbying firm where they were making more money
Speaker 1: than they've ever made before, and it goes back to Ukraine,
Speaker 1: and it goes back to China, and these are big
Speaker 1: business deals where you're not talking about millions here or there,
Speaker 1: you're talking about billions. And there's no way he's going
Speaker 1: through a Democratic primary where they're not going to touch
Speaker 1: him on this. Yeah, what do you think, Jim and
Speaker 1: John's exactly right. That's gonna be his biggest problem when
Speaker 1: it comes to these issues because the class warfare, the
Speaker 1: anti corruption, the anti big money that the Democrats love
Speaker 1: to throw out there, there was nobody who was a
Speaker 1: bigger crony capitalist with the exception of maybe Hillary Clinton,
Speaker 1: than Joe Biden. And he's tried to portray himself. We
Speaker 1: saw what he was doing yesterday in Pennsylvania's He's middle
Speaker 1: class Joe, and his biggest problem is gonna be his
Speaker 1: Democratic opponents. They're gonna go after him hard, the Peter
Speaker 1: Boutages of the world, the debate on rocks. That's gonna
Speaker 1: be his real problem. And it's interesting too, is the
Speaker 1: liberal media, Whereas if Republicans give them this information, they
Speaker 1: tend not to run it, but they're gonna run it
Speaker 1: when it's coming from the Democrats who do you think
Speaker 1: has the better chance? I mean, are they gonna nominate
Speaker 1: somebody hard left? I mean after Hillary rob Bernie Sanders
Speaker 1: of the primary. I know they change some rules, especially
Speaker 1: on the superdelegates, etc. Etc. But is the system still
Speaker 1: rigged in the Democratic primaries to favor an establishment guy
Speaker 1: like Biden? John Or do you think that you know
Speaker 1: Biden is going to get his head handed to him
Speaker 1: by his own party. No? I think I think your
Speaker 1: latter comment is right on that he's going to get
Speaker 1: his hand handed to him by his own party. Because
Speaker 1: we did a national survey where we asked all Americans
Speaker 1: which they think is more fair, free market capitalism or socialism,
Speaker 1: and the majority of Americans fifty four to thirty said
Speaker 1: free market capitalism. However, among Democrats, it was socialism fifty
Speaker 1: percent and free market capitalism only thirty one percent. So
Speaker 1: they're looking for an extreme socialist and Biden isn't quite
Speaker 1: extreme enough, and he's way to Washington. So what's going
Speaker 1: to happen is you're going to see somebody, whether it's
Speaker 1: Pernie Sanders, who's the call mark of the Democrat Party,
Speaker 1: or one of these younger left wing progressives, whether it's
Speaker 1: a Harris or a Buddha Jedge. It's going to be
Speaker 1: somebody knew that really creates problems for him. And you're
Speaker 1: going to see the Democrat Party as the president's more
Speaker 1: successful jobs making America stronger. So is he's more successful,
Speaker 1: the Democrats are going to get more extremely more deranged.
Speaker 1: I gotta take a break. Our posters, John and Jim
Speaker 1: McLoughlin are with us. When we come back. We're going
Speaker 1: to compare the average size of a well, we'll show
Speaker 1: it tonight, but we'll explain in detail in a minute,
Speaker 1: the crowd size between a Trump rally and a Biden
Speaker 1: rally in Pennsylvania. Which hometown you would think it was massive, right, Well,
Speaker 1: maybe it was. We'll give you the answer on the
Speaker 1: other side, Hannity tonight, nine Eastern Fox News. We have
Speaker 1: a big show and breaking news with John Solomon. All Right,
Speaker 1: flanal moments with our posters, John and Jim mcloncklin. We'll
Speaker 1: get to your calls on the other side of the break.
Speaker 1: All right, So with the average Trump, you know rally,
Speaker 1: you have you know, ten fifteen twenty thousand people outside,
Speaker 1: you know, you have you packed these arenas, you know
Speaker 1: to the brim there's no shortage of people. It's the
Speaker 1: hottest ticking in town. So yesterday you would have thought,
Speaker 1: what John eight thousand and from Biden? Yeah, well, I
Speaker 1: actually had the hunt to find at the LA Times
Speaker 1: say that. Yeah, the New Democratic Party's Messiah had six
Speaker 1: hundred people. Hillary had no crowds either. You know, what
Speaker 1: are we supposed to draw from that? Well? I think
Speaker 1: first of all, you got to realize with the success
Speaker 1: President Trump's having with economy, a lot of people have
Speaker 1: jobs now, so they really don't want to go to
Speaker 1: a Biden rally. They'd rather work and make money. But
Speaker 1: with Trump rallies, I mean, if you can't even compare it,
Speaker 1: it's just ridiculous because the president, like you said, he'll
Speaker 1: have twenty thousand people in arena and they'll have another
Speaker 1: twenty thirty thousand people outside watching it on TV or
Speaker 1: something like that. It's you can't compare it. Yeah, And
Speaker 1: that's where Jim I'm guessing showing I'm guessing too. That
Speaker 1: was one of the reasons why he delayed the announcement
Speaker 1: was they were having trouble gaining a crowd in one
Speaker 1: of the in a campaign and I've been here before
Speaker 1: with some of our own campaigns. They did the video
Speaker 1: first because they didn't want to do they were trying
Speaker 1: to get people, they were trying to create excitement. And
Speaker 1: still even after doing the video, think about it, he's
Speaker 1: the former vice president. He gets six hundred people in
Speaker 1: a room. I'm telling you, every time Donald Trump does
Speaker 1: an event, I get six hundred emails and text from
Speaker 1: people asking me to try to get him into a
Speaker 1: Donald Trump event. I mean, there's no comparison between the two.
Speaker 1: And it's a really bad sign when you're a former
Speaker 1: vice president and you can't even get a thousand people
Speaker 1: room for your announcement for president. All I gotta let
Speaker 1: you both go. Thank you, John and Jim McLaughlin Mclocklin Associates,
Speaker 1: eight hundred and nine for one Sean. When we come back,
Speaker 1: right to the phones, some of the other news of
Speaker 1: the day and Hannity big breaking news on this Ukraine story.
Speaker 1: It's gonna blow it wide open with connections you never
Speaker 1: dreamed of. Nine Eastern Fox News Quick Break, right back,
Speaker 1: we'll continue, It's the Sean Hannity Show. I only do
Speaker 1: women like doctor Ford, who greatly comes forward, need to
Speaker 1: be heard, but they need to be beleaved. They needs
Speaker 1: to be be leaguing the men in this country. Just
Speaker 1: shut up and step up, do the right thing. Let
Speaker 1: me just say right at the asset, I believe doctor Ford.
Speaker 1: I believe the survivor here. I believe her. I stand
Speaker 1: with her and shows up on Monday. I don't think
Speaker 1: she should be bullied into this scenario. I believe her.
Speaker 1: I believe Professor Ford. I think she's credible. You know,
Speaker 1: I really think sometimes we got to get out of
Speaker 1: New York, get out of Washington, get out of the
Speaker 1: big cities, and think about what the questions are you
Speaker 1: want to ask a major candidate in terms of their
Speaker 1: candidacy for president. The amount of time that was spent
Speaker 1: on Biden's hugs. This is a guy who was hugged
Speaker 1: five to ten million people, and they love the fact
Speaker 1: that he's touchy and huggy, and they run damn and
Speaker 1: five women aren't comfortable with the way he hugged them
Speaker 1: and say one of them says she smelled his hair.
Speaker 1: I can miss you. I know, Joe Biden. He went
Speaker 1: up behind her and he took a deep breath because
Speaker 1: he was about to go on stage. I want to
Speaker 1: explain that it's funny because there's a woman who accuses
Speaker 1: him of smelling her hair. He's not interested in your hair. Okay,
Speaker 1: he was going on stage, and he took a deep
Speaker 1: breath before he went on stage, and you took it
Speaker 1: deeply personal personally, and now you're writing a New York
Speaker 1: Times op ed about it, demanding an apology. This once
Speaker 1: again is completely ridiculous, and the rest of America thinks
Speaker 1: it's ridiculous too. I'm done. You guys can continue to
Speaker 1: talk about this. I won't. I refuse to give it
Speaker 1: any more time. Ah Mika, Yeah, of course everybody believes,
Speaker 1: but I'm not taking on anything involving creepy crazy uncle Joe. No, no, no, no, no.
Speaker 1: We believe everything about Justice Kavanaugh from thirty what five
Speaker 1: years ago when he was in high school, even allegation.
Speaker 1: I mean, think you think back through the prism of
Speaker 1: the Kavanaugh hearings for a second here, and you know,
Speaker 1: Democrats thought they had Cavanaugh, and there there was blood
Speaker 1: in the water to them. This was gonna be another
Speaker 1: borking of another Supreme Court nominee, and they were gonna win,
Speaker 1: and they had all the momentum on their side, and
Speaker 1: they capture the attention of the national media and pretty
Speaker 1: much with dragging this man through the mud, guilt by accusation,
Speaker 1: no due process, no presumption of innocence. They had him now,
Speaker 1: they like they did with the Clarence Thomas case. You
Speaker 1: know the story about Joe Biden calling Anita Hill and saying,
Speaker 1: apparently he didn't say I'm sorry, so Anita Hill thinks
Speaker 1: Heita still doesn't get it, which was an interesting comment
Speaker 1: because I don't, because that means he just wanted it,
Speaker 1: you know, to basically say, well, I hope you're voting Democrat,
Speaker 1: vote for me. And you know, if I like when
Speaker 1: people apology, well, if I may have offended you, well
Speaker 1: did you or did you not offend me? That's not
Speaker 1: an apology. If I if I may have blah blah blah.
Speaker 1: But when you say, you know, what what I did
Speaker 1: was wrong, I'm sincerely apologetic. I want to make it
Speaker 1: up to you. That is an apology, taking full responsibility.
Speaker 1: And you think of it got so obscene and absurd
Speaker 1: that it became, you know, one story after another, and
Speaker 1: it didn't matter how insane the allegations was or at
Speaker 1: that point and Michael Lavinati is now being in the
Speaker 1: now under a nightment. But you know, Michael Alavenati brings
Speaker 1: out Julie sweat Nick and hers became even more salacious
Speaker 1: than some of the earlier allegations. Back when Kavanaugh was
Speaker 1: in high school, she apparently was in college a pretty
Speaker 1: much every other weekend is what the story. How the
Speaker 1: story went, this group of boys and girls, obviously in
Speaker 1: high school, teenagers that they would have pretty much every
Speaker 1: other weekend these parties, and the boys would spike the
Speaker 1: punch with whatever to the point where the girls were
Speaker 1: knocked out, and then the girls were taken two rooms
Speaker 1: where the boys would line up in the hall and
Speaker 1: systematically gang rape these young girls. And it happened every
Speaker 1: other weekend. And then all of a sudden she did
Speaker 1: an interview, and then it became well, I never saw it,
Speaker 1: Justice Cavanaugh, Brett Cavanaugh. I never saw him near the
Speaker 1: punch bowl. While I saw him near the punch bowl,
Speaker 1: I never saw him pouring the punch and giving anybody punch.
Speaker 1: But he was holding a red solo cup. Well, I
Speaker 1: don't remember him standing in line, but he definitely was
Speaker 1: in a hall. Well, you're in somebody's house. I would
Speaker 1: assume you're in a hall. Nobody remembered her, Nobody if
Speaker 1: that had happened. Yeah, it just doesn't pass the smell
Speaker 1: test that one of the victims of what would be
Speaker 1: a horrific, systematic evil perpetrated and crime perpetrated against innocent
Speaker 1: young girls at that point, I can't believe wouldn't have
Speaker 1: been reported. She's acting like everybody knew it, nobody backed
Speaker 1: her up, and that would that would mean that every
Speaker 1: other weekend when they supposedly had happened, well they would
Speaker 1: you know that nobody told a teacher, a parent, an
Speaker 1: older brothers sister, a mentor of a pastor, or rabbi.
Speaker 1: Nobody told anybody. It just happened. And then all the
Speaker 1: every single allegation we got the same reaction from the
Speaker 1: Senate Democrat. I believe, I believe. In House Democrat, I believe,
Speaker 1: I believe, I believe, I believe, I believe, I believe,
Speaker 1: I believe. So, you know, if it's really the issue
Speaker 1: they care about, I keep using this example. I watched
Speaker 1: Gail King conduct these two interviews with these two women
Speaker 1: that made very serious allegations of rape and violent sexual
Speaker 1: assault against the current Lieutenant governor of Virginia, and none
Speaker 1: of the I believers seemed to care because nothing has happened.
Speaker 1: I'm probably the only one in the media that keeps
Speaker 1: bringing this up in Hello, whoa wait, I believers, where
Speaker 1: are you? I don't know what happened with the lieutenant
Speaker 1: governor and these women. And I told my two closest friends.
Speaker 1: What did you tell your two closest friends. I believe
Speaker 1: I told them that something really awful had happened and
Speaker 1: that I had been raped, and I think I said
Speaker 1: that I was so humiliated I didn't want to talk
Speaker 1: about it anymore. Did you tell them that Justin was
Speaker 1: the one who had done this to you? You just said, Oh,
Speaker 1: I told them exactly who it was. How do you
Speaker 1: process that after it happens to you? It was a
Speaker 1: huge betrayal. He was my friend. I don't understand how
Speaker 1: you do that to somebody that you've been a friend too,
Speaker 1: and who's confided in you about things. I just don't
Speaker 1: understand how you do that. What kind of things did
Speaker 1: you confide to him? He knew that the year prior
Speaker 1: that I had been righted by someone and that nothing
Speaker 1: was done about it, and he was a very good
Speaker 1: friend to me, which is why I never would have
Speaker 1: expected anything like this from him. What do you want
Speaker 1: to happen to justin Fairfax? Why are you coming forward?
Speaker 1: In my ideal world, I'd want him to resign. There
Speaker 1: were two main reasons why I came forward, right, Like,
Speaker 1: there's a million reasons to come forward. Right, It's tough.
Speaker 1: I'm not gonna lie. The Virginia people need to know
Speaker 1: who it is that they elected. They need to know.
Speaker 1: I think the Virginia people, the voters of Virginia, have
Speaker 1: a right to know. You know both my story Emeritic's story, right.
Speaker 1: I think there should be a public hearing. I think
Speaker 1: that not an investigation. But these women both said that
Speaker 1: they had corroborated their story to people at the time,
Speaker 1: and those people are willing to corroborate their corroboration if
Speaker 1: you will. We don't hear anything amazing. So is it
Speaker 1: the issue they care about or is it using an
Speaker 1: issue as a weapon of bludgeon political opponents, because it
Speaker 1: seems to be the latter. I think everybody should care
Speaker 1: about violent sexual assault, rape, drugging. If you don't care
Speaker 1: about that, you don't have a heart and a conscience
Speaker 1: and a soul period. So but to use something like
Speaker 1: that for politics, this is it's just so low. And
Speaker 1: we've seen this a lot happen a lot, you know,
Speaker 1: the rush, the race to judgment. Jesse Smalltt is an example. Um,
Speaker 1: we always go back to the now, the the this kid,
Speaker 1: Nicholas Sandman using wearing the MAGA hat. You know, think
Speaker 1: about this, all these media people they saw a snippet.
Speaker 1: The only snippet they saw was the end of what
Speaker 1: had happened. In other words, Nathan Phillips Native American activists
Speaker 1: right in the face of this, this sixteen year old
Speaker 1: kid with the Make America Great Again hat on. The
Speaker 1: kid is smiling, the kid and I'm he's right in
Speaker 1: his grill. Now, the story became well that he walked
Speaker 1: up to Nathan Phillips that that he had caused all
Speaker 1: of this, and that he provoked all of this. And
Speaker 1: this didn't go on for a day. This went on
Speaker 1: for days and days, and the ninety nine of the
Speaker 1: media that went along with all of it. Nicholas Samman,
Speaker 1: it turns out, you know, he and his fellow students
Speaker 1: from Covington High School, you know, they happened to be
Speaker 1: there for a pro life rally, they were seeing some
Speaker 1: of the sites. I think it was the Lincoln Memorial.
Speaker 1: Was that where it was the Lincoln Memorial somewhere where
Speaker 1: they ended up and I guess they were waiting for
Speaker 1: their transportation and they go to see, you know, some
Speaker 1: of the monuments, which is a normal thing to do.
Speaker 1: And when they arrived, they had no idea that the
Speaker 1: black Hebrew Israel lights are just verbally assaulting them with
Speaker 1: every name possible and taunting them. A bunch of child
Speaker 1: Moleston to see how you got these compass back hand
Speaker 1: in the middle of a a rally with a dirty
Speaker 1: hat on. You got all these dirty cra behind you
Speaker 1: with a red with a red make America great head
Speaker 1: again on and your coolies? You want to fight your brother?
Speaker 1: A bunch of babies made out of shot. And the
Speaker 1: one thing that Nicholas Sandman himself did his tell his
Speaker 1: fellow student, no, no no, no, don't respond, don't say anything,
Speaker 1: don't say a thing, which I think for a sixteen
Speaker 1: year old kid, shows an enormous amount of self restraint
Speaker 1: and discipline. I don't even though the fight half I
Speaker 1: probably wouldn't those of you that know me. I kind
Speaker 1: of have a big mouth. But he didn't do a thing.
Speaker 1: He did the right thing. Then it turns out that
Speaker 1: Nathan Phillips walked up to him and was banging that drum,
Speaker 1: which he said was a prayer in the face of
Speaker 1: Nicholas Sandman. And Nicholas tried to just as he said
Speaker 1: in one interview, just convey that he was lee and
Speaker 1: smiled and that no, what do I do with this?
Speaker 1: What I mean, you're sixteen years old. What are you
Speaker 1: supposed to do? I mean, he's banging it right in
Speaker 1: his face. But it turns out the media, the nine,
Speaker 1: the guilt by accusation media, the no due process media,
Speaker 1: the no presumption of innocence media, the selective moral outrage media. Well,
Speaker 1: they just ran with a narrative and they slandered this kid.
Speaker 1: Here's the worst part of all of this. The worst
Speaker 1: part of this is this kid did everything right and
Speaker 1: they didn't care. They didn't care at all if it
Speaker 1: meant that they could bludge in Trump with a narrative.
Speaker 1: They never made a phone call to corroborate their stories.
Speaker 1: With days of coverage, let me predict what's gonna happen.
Speaker 1: He's hired famed attorney Lynnwood who I've known since nineteen
Speaker 1: ninety six from Atlanta when I was a local host
Speaker 1: who worked for Richard Jewel. There's two lawsuits filed now
Speaker 1: against the Washington Post two hundred and fifty million dollars,
Speaker 1: fake News, CNN two hundred and seventy five million dollars,
Speaker 1: and much more to come. And I can't see a
Speaker 1: jury in this country putting up with that reckless, irresponsible.
Speaker 1: They couldn't make a phone call to corroborate that story,
Speaker 1: and they smeared, slandered, and libeled a sixteen year old kid.
Speaker 1: The jury rules in favor of Nicolas Sandman, is my prediction.
Speaker 1: But they'll settle before they get there. That's gonna wreck
Speaker 1: please up. But today, all right, Hannity watched tonight nine
Speaker 1: Eastern on the Fox News Channel. We're watching the situation
Speaker 1: in Venezuela. Of news breaks on that. We will bring
Speaker 1: it towards you. The battle, the witch hunt, the fishing expedition,
Speaker 1: it never stops, and Democrats are going and deeper and
Speaker 1: deeper into stupidity. We have judicial watch now looking for
Speaker 1: really incredible documents. We'll break that wide open tonight. Haraldo,
Speaker 1: Dan Bongino, Tom Fitton, Alan Dershowitz, responding to The New
Speaker 1: York Times. Also Solomon and Carter and Kevin McCarthy. It's
Speaker 1: all coming up Hannity tonight, ninety eastern on Fox News.
Speaker 1: We'll see you then, we'll see you back here tomorrow