WEBVTT - Championship Week, DFS Style 0:00:00.760 --> 0:00:04.480 Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly, a production of I Heart Radio. 0:00:06.320 --> 0:00:09.680 Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly from I Heart Radio, 0:00:09.960 --> 0:00:14.360 your weekly source for the nation's best fantasy football advice, speculation, 0:00:14.520 --> 0:00:18.079 and whatever stupid stuff they decided to drop into the show. Now, 0:00:18.120 --> 0:00:24.720 here's your host. Welcome to a conference championship edition of 0:00:24.800 --> 0:00:28.040 Fantasy Football Weekly. I am Paul Charchy In. My co 0:00:28.200 --> 0:00:31.560 host this week is Brian Johnson. As it has been 0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:35.360 the last several weeks high Brian, you know Scott and Matt. Okay, Yeah, 0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:37.120 I'm starting to worry about them a little bit, and 0:00:37.159 --> 0:00:39.680 it's uh, I can only I can only presume the worst. 0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:44.240 I'll reach out um to quote the naked gun movies, 0:00:44.280 --> 0:00:46.640 which I just watched a little of last night because 0:00:46.680 --> 0:00:48.720 if I bump into it, it's hard not to watch it. 0:00:49.640 --> 0:00:52.080 Which one went down in a freaked, rigible accident, I 0:00:52.120 --> 0:00:56.440 believe the first naked gun movie with Frank Drebin and 0:00:57.280 --> 0:01:00.760 two and a half. Right, there were there were others. 0:01:00.840 --> 0:01:05.160 There were others. First One's classic and the opening scene 0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:08.440 with O J when he breaks into the ship and 0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:15.480 it's just it's sixty minutes of just raw nonsense hilarity 0:01:15.520 --> 0:01:18.400 that slays me every time I see it. It's hard 0:01:18.440 --> 0:01:21.920 to like o J these days, these decades. But watch 0:01:24.200 --> 0:01:28.200 exactly exactly Nordberg. It's such a funny scene and there's 0:01:28.240 --> 0:01:31.160 so many great just as angers in that movie. Oh man, 0:01:31.640 --> 0:01:34.560 the Zuckers and Pat Proft at the peak of their game. 0:01:34.760 --> 0:01:37.800 I think, now you got me wanted to watch Naked Gun. 0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:40.520 It's been a long time. Yeah, it holds up shockingly well, 0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:43.399 I'm sure it really does. There's there's very few bits 0:01:43.480 --> 0:01:47.520 in that that are really time sensitive, I'm happy to say. So. 0:01:48.120 --> 0:01:52.000 This is a conference championship edition of Fantasy Football Weekly, Brian. 0:01:52.080 --> 0:01:53.960 That means that we're going to concentrate on the two 0:01:54.000 --> 0:01:56.800 remaining games in the NFL schedule, and like last week, 0:01:57.520 --> 0:02:00.800 our focus is on the DFS side. It's something we 0:02:01.000 --> 0:02:03.240 love to talk about what can't normally do, and we're 0:02:03.280 --> 0:02:07.520 doing it because for people who are playing playoff long 0:02:07.920 --> 0:02:11.040 fantasy football, there's not like bench start decisions to make. 0:02:11.080 --> 0:02:12.920 It's like, you know, you're starting everybody. I think the 0:02:12.919 --> 0:02:15.519 people that still have decisions to make right now are 0:02:15.560 --> 0:02:19.040 the people that are playing DFS, and the information will 0:02:19.080 --> 0:02:21.760 certainly certainly be useful for those in the you know, 0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:23.760 where you you pick up you can use a player 0:02:23.800 --> 0:02:26.160 once type pool. I'm in one of those where each 0:02:26.200 --> 0:02:28.760 around you know, you play a quarterback, wide receiver, tight end, 0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:31.639 running back, you don't use them once. So helpful there too, 0:02:32.080 --> 0:02:34.800 for sure. And I'll mention this. The letter grades are 0:02:34.800 --> 0:02:39.560 going to hear are relative to the cost of the player. 0:02:40.080 --> 0:02:43.600 Patrick Mahomes might normally be in a grade, but we'll 0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:45.800 see where Brian grade. Brian's gonna give him. But but 0:02:45.960 --> 0:02:49.480 weighed against his salary, is he in a grade? And 0:02:49.520 --> 0:02:52.160 of course against the other salaries of the other quarterbacks, 0:02:52.560 --> 0:02:54.640 which is relevant as well. We can almost go a 0:02:54.720 --> 0:02:58.399 B C D just for the quarterbacks, to almost because 0:02:58.440 --> 0:03:00.680 there's four of them. Um, all right, I'm gonna let 0:03:00.720 --> 0:03:05.320 you start, Brian. You've got the Bills traveling to the Chiefs. 0:03:05.440 --> 0:03:08.600 UH as to be expected at pretty high over under 0:03:08.639 --> 0:03:11.679 here or around four fifty four points. These teams did 0:03:11.680 --> 0:03:17.680 play in Week six Kansas City one to seventeen and uh. Lastly, 0:03:17.680 --> 0:03:20.560 the weather looking like low forties with a little bit 0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:23.480 of rain in Kansas City, but the winds won't be 0:03:23.600 --> 0:03:25.600 much of a factor under ten miles per hour, So 0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:29.320 there's that. Starting on the Buffalo side Josh Allen six 0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:33.120 point nine k on DraftKings. In that first meeting, he 0:03:33.200 --> 0:03:36.960 had only twenty two passing yards two passing touchdowns. In 0:03:37.000 --> 0:03:39.640 the pick he did have eight carries for forty two 0:03:39.720 --> 0:03:43.680 yards um. The Chiefs before last week had allowed multiple 0:03:43.680 --> 0:03:47.720 passing touchdowns in eight street games. Baker only had one 0:03:47.720 --> 0:03:50.880 passing touchdown. He pretty much had to that one of 0:03:50.920 --> 0:03:54.240 that touch back. Where do you stand on that rule? 0:03:54.280 --> 0:03:56.360 By the gotta change, it needs to change. But what's 0:03:56.520 --> 0:04:01.360 what's your number one solution? Mine is spotted where the 0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:02.840 ball is fumbled and if it goes out of the 0:04:02.920 --> 0:04:06.800 end zone, it's ten yards from there. So in that instance, 0:04:07.280 --> 0:04:11.360 the Browns goal from the ten or the eleven yard line, 0:04:11.520 --> 0:04:13.680 or we can move it back even further. But turning 0:04:13.680 --> 0:04:16.840 over the ball and then given on the twenty exactly 0:04:16.880 --> 0:04:20.120 going yeah, it's it's double, it's double jeopardy. Well, hopefully 0:04:20.120 --> 0:04:22.560 they changed that. But anyway, back to the matchup. Alan, 0:04:22.839 --> 0:04:24.680 because of the health of Mahomes, so we'll talk about 0:04:24.680 --> 0:04:27.799 in a minute, has the highest ceiling on this slate 0:04:27.839 --> 0:04:30.080 with his feet and his arm. In this matchup, it's 0:04:30.080 --> 0:04:34.239 not a great matchup on paper, even though they've allowed 0:04:34.279 --> 0:04:37.200 eight passing touched multiple passing touchdowns in eight straight games 0:04:37.240 --> 0:04:41.280 the Chiefs. That is uh Brashad Brelan wasn't looking like 0:04:41.279 --> 0:04:43.240 he was gonna play with the concussion, but I think 0:04:43.240 --> 0:04:45.560 he practiced all week. I think he's going so they'll 0:04:45.600 --> 0:04:47.920 be at full strength in their secondary. So it's not 0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:51.480 like a super high passing ceiling for Alan, but not 0:04:51.520 --> 0:04:53.800 a very scary floor at all. And when you factor 0:04:53.880 --> 0:04:56.440 in his rushing ability, I think there. I like the 0:04:56.480 --> 0:04:58.600 high ceiling here because I don't think they're gonna run 0:04:58.640 --> 0:05:00.360 at all. No, not much, not much at all. But 0:05:00.600 --> 0:05:02.960 I do respect the secondary, especially with Honey Badger back. 0:05:02.960 --> 0:05:05.280 They're playing out great football. But Alan, I'm gonna give 0:05:05.360 --> 0:05:08.040 him the a. Uh. If I was rolling out one lineup, 0:05:08.080 --> 0:05:10.920 he would probably be the quarterback I go with. Just 0:05:11.560 --> 0:05:13.120 you probably would have been my homes I don't worry 0:05:13.120 --> 0:05:14.640 about the toe. Will get to that in a second. 0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:17.880 So an a for Alan. Over to the receivers. And 0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:20.520 by the way, all the wide receivers on DraftKings way 0:05:20.640 --> 0:05:23.400 under priced this week. There it's very soft. You can 0:05:23.920 --> 0:05:25.880 you can squeeze in a lot of these top past catchers. 0:05:25.880 --> 0:05:28.360 When we're talking top pass catchers will start with Stefon 0:05:28.440 --> 0:05:31.159 Diggs only seven thousand, he should be at least eight 0:05:31.160 --> 0:05:33.680 thousand dollars in my opinion. In the first meeting, he 0:05:33.720 --> 0:05:37.040 had six catches forty six yards and a touchdown. Kind 0:05:37.040 --> 0:05:41.120 of a quiet game dig standards. We've run out of 0:05:41.160 --> 0:05:44.360 good things to say about digs. To fade him UH 0:05:44.560 --> 0:05:46.960 rolling out one line up, it would be uber contrarian. 0:05:47.080 --> 0:05:50.960 At this point, he'll probably be sixty to seventy owned 0:05:51.200 --> 0:05:54.120 in the bigger tournaments. He was listed UH with an 0:05:54.160 --> 0:05:57.400 oblique injury all week, but they took him off the 0:05:57.400 --> 0:06:00.160 injury part on Friday. So again, if Prashad lance him 0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:03.000 out does not sit UH major boon for digs. But 0:06:03.080 --> 0:06:08.640 even if it's official official as it's no, they haven't 0:06:08.680 --> 0:06:10.760 said it's official. He has not said he's cleared the 0:06:10.760 --> 0:06:13.760 concussion protocol, but he practiced all week. He's I think 0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:16.400 he's likely to go. Even though Baker didn't put up 0:06:16.400 --> 0:06:19.760 big numbers, his receivers got open Breland only UH. He 0:06:19.800 --> 0:06:22.880 allowed five catches on six targets. Shar Various Ward gave 0:06:22.960 --> 0:06:25.520 up five catches fifty eight yards in a touchdown on 0:06:25.600 --> 0:06:29.680 six targets. Those are the boundary receiver, so Digs you 0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:32.400 just have to give him an A. But if you're 0:06:32.440 --> 0:06:35.040 running multiple lineups, it would be in your best interest 0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:37.440 to fade him in one or two because if he 0:06:37.440 --> 0:06:39.240 does go belly up, you have a huge edge on 0:06:39.279 --> 0:06:42.120 the field. There, So and A for Diggs and Uh, 0:06:42.240 --> 0:06:44.120 the rest of the receivers gets a little modeled. We'll 0:06:44.120 --> 0:06:46.000 start with John Brown, who had zero catches in the 0:06:46.000 --> 0:06:50.560 wild card week on four and then the wild card game. 0:06:50.600 --> 0:06:52.640 He also had zero catches on four targets when these 0:06:52.640 --> 0:06:56.240 teams met in Week six. But last week big bounce 0:06:56.279 --> 0:06:58.520 back for Smokey as was to be expected. He wasn't 0:06:58.520 --> 0:07:00.440 only ten percent owned in the Millionaire Make It, which 0:07:00.440 --> 0:07:03.360 is kind of a shocker, but at four point three K, 0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:06.279 that is way too cheap for John Brown. We saw 0:07:06.360 --> 0:07:09.320 Richard Higgins operating as the number two receiver last week. 0:07:09.320 --> 0:07:11.400 He had a pretty good game, should have had a 0:07:11.400 --> 0:07:13.960 touchdown basically did so I on gonna give Brown and 0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:17.040 be here. Uh. The only real concern is his ownership 0:07:17.040 --> 0:07:19.080 percentage is going to be through the roof when it 0:07:19.120 --> 0:07:21.880 comes through comes to Bill's receivers, at least probably looking 0:07:21.880 --> 0:07:25.640 at so just to be for Brown, then over to 0:07:25.720 --> 0:07:29.640 Cole Beasley, who just isn't looking right at knee injury. Well, 0:07:29.640 --> 0:07:32.080 they took him off on Friday, so you know, I 0:07:32.080 --> 0:07:34.560 got to assume that. Well, they took him off on Wednesday, 0:07:34.680 --> 0:07:37.560 and then he reappeared on Thursday, so they took him 0:07:37.560 --> 0:07:40.960 off Friday, so hopefully doesn't reappear on Saturday. But Uh 0:07:41.120 --> 0:07:45.120 played of the snaps last week only not only zero 0:07:45.200 --> 0:07:49.880 catches on only two targets. UH at four point one 0:07:50.000 --> 0:07:53.240 k though he if that knee isn't too much of 0:07:53.240 --> 0:07:55.480 a worry, people are gonna be off of him big time. 0:07:55.800 --> 0:08:00.440 Genarius Snead, He's pretty good. He's pretty good. He's pretty good. 0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:02.760 Might be the best matchup though when it comes to 0:08:02.760 --> 0:08:05.280 the wide receiver cornerback for the bill. So I'm gonna 0:08:05.280 --> 0:08:08.600 give Beasley. He's not a safe cash game play because 0:08:08.920 --> 0:08:11.000 his flour is scary if he if he gets zero 0:08:11.040 --> 0:08:13.800 catches on two two targets again, but in a from 0:08:13.840 --> 0:08:16.080 a tournament perspective, I'm intrigued by him at that cheap 0:08:16.120 --> 0:08:18.880 price point, and we could see the Beasley of old 0:08:18.880 --> 0:08:21.000 fifteen twenty fantasy points. So I'm gonna give him a 0:08:21.000 --> 0:08:24.880 be at four point one k Um. The Bills have 0:08:24.920 --> 0:08:27.960 a lot of wide receivers, by the way, but they 0:08:28.000 --> 0:08:31.240 may not have Gabriel Davis. He's the most of the 0:08:31.280 --> 0:08:33.920 week's practice. I mean I think I I don't think 0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:36.720 he's gonna go based on the practices that we got 0:08:36.880 --> 0:08:38.880 or lack of there up. Yeah, he heard his ankle 0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:42.440 uh in the divisional round, played forti the snaps before 0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:45.360 getting hurt. He also had zero catches before getting hurt. 0:08:45.640 --> 0:08:49.079 So if I'm gonna guess the one I lay off, yeah, 0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:51.760 if I'm dumpster diving, it's gonna be Isaiah McKenzie. At 0:08:51.760 --> 0:08:53.679 three point one k he played the fewest snaps of 0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:56.800 any wide receiver for Buffalo last week, but he actually 0:08:56.800 --> 0:08:59.040 did have two catches to only eight yards. Of course, 0:08:59.080 --> 0:09:01.360 but at three point one k he he's a punt 0:09:01.400 --> 0:09:04.640 play with a ding up. Davis and Beasley not convinced. 0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:06.960 He's a hundred percent If you're not gonna play Beasley, 0:09:07.120 --> 0:09:09.079 mackenzie might be the guy you want to pair you 0:09:09.200 --> 0:09:12.240 call him a play. He's also a special teams like that, 0:09:12.320 --> 0:09:14.600 and he want to pair it with the defense. You know, 0:09:14.679 --> 0:09:16.800 that's always a favorite angle of mine because if he 0:09:16.800 --> 0:09:19.600 happs to return to kick. Uh, he'll get you get 0:09:19.640 --> 0:09:22.120 the big bonus with the team defense, and the Bills 0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:26.040 did have a do they have two defensive special teams 0:09:26.080 --> 0:09:29.600 touchdowns just one. They had that ninety nine yard interception 0:09:29.640 --> 0:09:32.559 return that was brutal. So yeah, I like Mackenzie as 0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:35.320 a standalone play or your parent with the Bills defense, 0:09:35.360 --> 0:09:38.199 which is not ideal going up against Kansas City, or 0:09:38.480 --> 0:09:42.000 stacking along with Josh Allen and uh Stefan digs would 0:09:42.000 --> 0:09:44.160 be an obvious edition. And you know what, Dawson Knox 0:09:44.280 --> 0:09:46.040 might be a fourth you might want to throw in 0:09:46.480 --> 0:09:50.640 for the Voltron stack at two point eight k Uh 0:09:50.920 --> 0:09:53.840 very touchdown dependent, always has been, but this is a 0:09:53.960 --> 0:09:56.560 very strong matchup. The Browns tight ends did not score 0:09:56.720 --> 0:09:59.400 against Kansas City last week, but they did combine for 0:09:59.520 --> 0:10:02.680 six just seventy five yards on nine targets. It's good numbers. 0:10:02.720 --> 0:10:05.280 And before that game, the Chiefs had surrendered six tight 0:10:05.360 --> 0:10:08.920 end touchdowns over their last seven games. So we're gonna 0:10:08.920 --> 0:10:10.640 talk about the Chiefs in a minute, but it's another 0:10:10.679 --> 0:10:12.880 week where you can go to tight ends very easily. 0:10:12.880 --> 0:10:16.480 With Travis Kelsey being arguably the top option of any players, 0:10:16.559 --> 0:10:19.800 so I almost think you have to start your entire 0:10:20.160 --> 0:10:24.280 your entire DFS portfolio has to start a tight end. 0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:27.679 Am I going Kelsey? Am I going Tony in? Or 0:10:27.679 --> 0:10:31.160 am I going elsewhere? And because though you know there's 0:10:31.400 --> 0:10:35.640 there's Kelsey is super expensive, there's Tony in who's reasonably price, 0:10:35.720 --> 0:10:37.360 and then you're just dumpster diving. And I think that 0:10:37.440 --> 0:10:40.160 to me, that that's the catalyst for my whole all 0:10:40.200 --> 0:10:42.160 the rest of my lineup decisions. Yeah, if you're not 0:10:42.160 --> 0:10:43.800 gonna go to tight ends and you're not gonna go 0:10:43.840 --> 0:10:45.839 elite with Kelsey being the most elade and Tony of 0:10:45.880 --> 0:10:47.520 the second best option, and you can maybe throw a 0:10:47.559 --> 0:10:50.520 gronk in there, but yeah, Dawson Knock certainly in play. 0:10:50.520 --> 0:10:53.120 He might be a little more than just touchdown dependent 0:10:53.120 --> 0:10:56.400 on this one. Uh, we shall see. And lastly to 0:10:56.520 --> 0:10:59.200 the running backs for Buffalo, not a ton to talk about. 0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:02.600 We're really just gonna talk about Devin Singletary at four 0:11:02.600 --> 0:11:05.920 point five K. He was pretty chalky last week at 0:11:05.920 --> 0:11:08.880 this price point, which I was shocked by because we 0:11:08.960 --> 0:11:11.000 just knew he wasn't gonna do anything. And there as 0:11:11.040 --> 0:11:12.960 much get it carried for the whole first quarter, there 0:11:13.000 --> 0:11:15.040 were there was much better options out there, but there's 0:11:15.080 --> 0:11:17.360 not it's under great options at running back this week. 0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:21.199 So despite you know, just ten touches for thirty seven 0:11:21.240 --> 0:11:25.320 scoreless combo yards last week, he only had forty five 0:11:25.840 --> 0:11:28.880 combo yards scoreless combo yards in the first meeting. And 0:11:28.880 --> 0:11:31.320 in that game is Zack Moss only a ten rushing yards. 0:11:31.320 --> 0:11:32.880 Of the running backs did nothing like they have all 0:11:32.880 --> 0:11:36.600 the year basically for the Bills. But at Singletary played 0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:40.440 of the snaps. His thirty three pass routes run led 0:11:40.440 --> 0:11:43.880 all week nineteen running backs. And even though Buffalo is 0:11:43.920 --> 0:11:47.240 not going to run the ball out the the options 0:11:47.240 --> 0:11:49.520 out there are just so brutal and trucked tough to 0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:51.720 pick between. We'll get the four net and Ronald Jones 0:11:51.760 --> 0:11:53.600 and I got a strong I got a strong angle 0:11:53.640 --> 0:11:55.600 in there. Then we'll talk about and we even see 0:11:55.600 --> 0:11:58.480 Aaron Jones continue to get vultured at times by Jamal 0:11:58.520 --> 0:12:01.680 Williams and uh a A. Dylan even got some runs. 0:12:01.720 --> 0:12:04.160 So I'm gonna give Singletary a very strong b here. 0:12:04.440 --> 0:12:06.800 He doesn't have a high ceiling, but he is on 0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:08.280 the field. He will be on the field a lot. 0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:11.320 And uh Kansas City did allow the fourth most catches 0:12:11.320 --> 0:12:15.640 to running backs this season, and even though his his 0:12:15.760 --> 0:12:18.280 chalk level will probably pretty high, even though he went 0:12:18.320 --> 0:12:21.040 the bed last week. I like Singletary. I can't say 0:12:21.080 --> 0:12:23.680 I like him, but at that price, he's he's a 0:12:23.720 --> 0:12:26.120 strong b for me. And uh, we're not gonna talk 0:12:26.120 --> 0:12:28.400 about t J. Yelden or any other Buffalo back. All right, 0:12:28.760 --> 0:12:31.480 your side, chief side, I gotta start with Patrick Mahomes. 0:12:31.480 --> 0:12:36.079 Of course, seven point six k uh cleared the concussion protocol. 0:12:36.200 --> 0:12:40.840 He's good to go there. But the the toe foot issue, yeah, 0:12:41.120 --> 0:12:45.120 tursto angle, he's he does not The mobility doesn't look right. 0:12:45.160 --> 0:12:50.200 And Brian, the single best thing that Patrick Mahomes does 0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:54.079 is create big plays when he's out of the pocket. 0:12:54.640 --> 0:12:57.000 And when he if he can't get out of the 0:12:57.040 --> 0:13:00.240 pocket cleanly and he doesn't have the same mobility and Ed, 0:13:00.840 --> 0:13:03.360 I'm I don't know. I think that takes a huge 0:13:03.400 --> 0:13:06.520 weapon out of his arsenal. And he's also he's also 0:13:06.559 --> 0:13:08.960 a rushing touchdown threat. You know, a sport last week 0:13:09.040 --> 0:13:11.400 and you know that that may come off the table 0:13:11.440 --> 0:13:15.200 a bit here too. So for me, I'm out here, 0:13:15.280 --> 0:13:19.720 this is my Homes is my least favorite quarterback on 0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:22.839 the entire slate because of the costs that he comes 0:13:22.840 --> 0:13:25.600 in and my concerns about the ankle yep, and uh, 0:13:25.840 --> 0:13:28.080 you're you're basically alluding to it even when he's outside 0:13:28.080 --> 0:13:31.920 of the pocket. We're not even meaning rushing the ballance 0:13:32.080 --> 0:13:35.320 of the off balance ad hoc throws he can make. Yeah, 0:13:35.360 --> 0:13:38.160 that's gonna he's gonna be hampered by that toe. But 0:13:39.360 --> 0:13:42.920 no higher ceiling still for any quarter Like if he 0:13:42.960 --> 0:13:46.600 can manage the pain. Uh, you're looking, he's probably gonna 0:13:46.640 --> 0:13:48.800 come in the third highest one quarterback because of the 0:13:48.840 --> 0:13:53.160 price and because of the toe injury. So I'm still 0:13:53.200 --> 0:13:55.280 gonna give him a B. He would be he would 0:13:55.280 --> 0:13:57.400 just be a plug him in and play him a 0:13:57.559 --> 0:13:59.319 for me if if it wasn't for the two injury. 0:13:59.360 --> 0:14:01.400 But I'm very concerned as our user. Just a B 0:14:01.520 --> 0:14:06.480 for Mahomes at seven point six k um. Travis Kelsey 0:14:06.480 --> 0:14:10.280 comes in at eight k tied with I believe Davante 0:14:10.280 --> 0:14:14.559 Adams the priciest player on the slate. Uh. Mark Andrews 0:14:14.760 --> 0:14:17.559 went the bed big time last week. Huge way. They 0:14:17.600 --> 0:14:20.720 threw to Andrews like he's either nine or eleven times 0:14:20.760 --> 0:14:24.760 last week and he had like two catches so I shouldn't. 0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:27.920 And then the first meeting, Kelsey had five catches sixty 0:14:27.920 --> 0:14:30.520 five yards two touchdowns. The Bills have been a money 0:14:30.520 --> 0:14:33.280 matchup for tight ends all season long, h including the 0:14:33.320 --> 0:14:36.040 wild Card round when Indie tight ends totaled like fourteen 0:14:36.040 --> 0:14:40.200 catches a hundred fifty yards in a touchdown. So I 0:14:40.200 --> 0:14:42.520 said fading Stefan Digs would be the most contrarian play. 0:14:42.560 --> 0:14:45.680 Fading Travis Kelsey. I don't. I don't see how you 0:14:45.680 --> 0:14:49.080 can do it again. I'm gonna give you do it, 0:14:49.200 --> 0:14:51.040 but you're right if you're if I'm gonna spend, if 0:14:51.080 --> 0:14:53.840 I'm going to spend big money on somebody, Kelsey's the play. 0:14:53.920 --> 0:14:55.320 The way to get contraring with it is again use 0:14:55.400 --> 0:14:58.160 him as a flex player, or you go to tight ends. 0:14:58.200 --> 0:15:01.720 But you'll see Kelsey because can go to type. I 0:15:01.720 --> 0:15:03.600 can't wait to tell what you have to say tight 0:15:03.680 --> 0:15:07.960 end talk. Uh Tyreek Hill seven point two k way 0:15:08.000 --> 0:15:10.280 too cheap, but he did have He struggled when these 0:15:10.280 --> 0:15:12.600 teams met Week six, just three catches for twenty yards. 0:15:12.600 --> 0:15:15.880 He would have one kerry for five yards. Trade as 0:15:15.920 --> 0:15:18.760 White is a concern by the name, but he's only 0:15:18.760 --> 0:15:21.320 played two of his snaps from the slot. This year, 0:15:21.360 --> 0:15:23.200 he will not be in the slot. Tyreeke has taken 0:15:23.240 --> 0:15:25.960 nearly six of his snaps from the slot, so they'll 0:15:26.000 --> 0:15:29.880 probably see more. Terren Johnson is your slot cornerback, and 0:15:29.920 --> 0:15:32.280 he's probably the worst cornerback they have on the field, 0:15:32.800 --> 0:15:34.960 and he is he is by Profit Ball Focus grade. 0:15:35.280 --> 0:15:38.640 And yeah, the concern here, there's really no concern with Hill. 0:15:38.720 --> 0:15:40.840 I like that he didn't have a big game last week. 0:15:40.880 --> 0:15:42.520 Really didn't have a big game. If people are gonna 0:15:42.520 --> 0:15:44.440 look into the first matchup with Buffalo, but it all 0:15:44.480 --> 0:15:48.120 goes back to Patrick Mahomes, but he would you rather 0:15:48.160 --> 0:15:49.960 have Kelsey your Hill, So you're gonna there, you know, 0:15:49.960 --> 0:15:52.640 you're gonna spend big dollars on one or the other 0:15:54.760 --> 0:15:58.080 as a one off. He would it might be Hill 0:15:58.160 --> 0:16:03.160 because I could see him, you know, running you can 0:16:03.200 --> 0:16:05.280 have a six dr touchdown rush with ease or anything 0:16:05.320 --> 0:16:07.480 like that. You don't have to And so, uh, if 0:16:07.520 --> 0:16:09.600 I had to pick one of the Hill, it would 0:16:09.600 --> 0:16:12.120 be painful to not use Kelsey, but Hill will probably 0:16:12.120 --> 0:16:15.360 be His ownership percentage would probably be half that of Kelsey. 0:16:15.400 --> 0:16:16.880 So I would go Hill, and you also save the 0:16:16.880 --> 0:16:19.840 eight hundred bucks in your your salary cap. So very 0:16:19.880 --> 0:16:22.720 strong be for Tyreek Hill. Definitely not gonna give a 0:16:22.720 --> 0:16:25.080 strong be to Sammy Watkins, even though it looks like 0:16:25.120 --> 0:16:27.640 he will play in this game, which would be a 0:16:27.640 --> 0:16:31.840 revenge game. Don't forget his former team Bills drafted him 0:16:31.960 --> 0:16:34.880 way too high overall pick they did so, I don't know, 0:16:34.920 --> 0:16:39.520 I was much too much revenge favor Robert Woods. Uh, 0:16:39.600 --> 0:16:43.280 Sammy Watkins have gone onto law and successful careers having 0:16:43.360 --> 0:16:46.440 left Buffalo. Ye. Yeah, but that was the old That 0:16:46.520 --> 0:16:49.000 was the old Buffalo. Yeah, that was the old Buffalo. 0:16:49.040 --> 0:16:51.320 There brand new. I mean, there are a lot of 0:16:51.360 --> 0:16:54.200 there are a lot of players who did it. But uh, 0:16:54.240 --> 0:16:56.560 the calf injury has to worry you. With Watkins, the 0:16:56.600 --> 0:17:00.280 kid always aggravate that he could he could, uh you know, 0:17:00.480 --> 0:17:02.080 he forced to sit the rest of the game. But 0:17:03.360 --> 0:17:06.200 again we gotta worry about Mahomes and and his mobility. 0:17:06.320 --> 0:17:08.480 Is how this toe is gonna affect his game? And 0:17:08.600 --> 0:17:11.600 but at three point eight, okay, that's pretty cheap for 0:17:11.640 --> 0:17:14.360 the number two receiver on the Chiefs. And when Watkins 0:17:14.359 --> 0:17:16.920 is healthy, he basically is the number two. There isn't 0:17:16.920 --> 0:17:19.800 a much muddy Waters but the Marcus Robinson and Mikole 0:17:19.880 --> 0:17:22.600 Hardman talk. So I'll give Watkins to see, but I 0:17:22.640 --> 0:17:25.440 don't like starting a guy who I'm not confident is 0:17:25.440 --> 0:17:29.640 gonna finish the game. So he's a very very high risk, 0:17:29.720 --> 0:17:32.159 high reward tournament play. Not I save cash game and 0:17:32.400 --> 0:17:35.160 play at all. And assuming Watkins plays, that really only 0:17:35.160 --> 0:17:38.640 puts to Marcus Robinson into play for me, Mikole Hardman, 0:17:39.040 --> 0:17:42.080 and Byron Pringle when Watkins is healthy. They their role 0:17:42.160 --> 0:17:44.720 does not has not been big enough. They're they're guys 0:17:44.760 --> 0:17:47.240 you might contemplate in like the one game showdown slate. 0:17:47.320 --> 0:17:50.199 So I will give Robinson a very soft sea at 0:17:50.240 --> 0:17:53.679 three point seven K just in under Watkins. I probably 0:17:53.760 --> 0:17:56.080 rather play Robbins and over Watkins because I'm more confident 0:17:56.119 --> 0:17:59.080 he can start the game. So that's it for the 0:17:59.119 --> 0:18:01.679 past catchers. And now you got a whole other headache 0:18:01.680 --> 0:18:04.560 with the running backs, right, So leavy on Bell may 0:18:04.640 --> 0:18:06.320 not go. We have two guys that are basically game 0:18:06.320 --> 0:18:10.400 time decisions, both guys nursing injuries and a running game 0:18:10.400 --> 0:18:14.840 that's been ineffective for most of the season for the Chiefs. Yeah, 0:18:14.840 --> 0:18:18.440 the one game Glyde Edwards Layer the player here referencing 0:18:18.520 --> 0:18:21.199 along with Bell, who might not play. It sort of 0:18:21.240 --> 0:18:22.639 seems like he will. But this is one of the 0:18:22.680 --> 0:18:24.919 games where he was very effective in the regular season 0:18:24.960 --> 0:18:27.119 when he had uh the twenty six carries for a 0:18:27.160 --> 0:18:29.399 hundred and sixty one yards and uh he didn't score, 0:18:29.440 --> 0:18:31.520 but he had a monster game on the ground. He's 0:18:31.560 --> 0:18:34.280 at five thousand Bells at four point one K. We're 0:18:34.280 --> 0:18:36.399 just not gonna talk about Lavian Bell. His niece swelled 0:18:36.480 --> 0:18:40.320 up on Thursday's practice and he only played snaps. Also, 0:18:40.359 --> 0:18:42.960 he stinks, he sinks, so he's he's dead. To us, 0:18:43.320 --> 0:18:47.120 it's the rail will Darryl Williams comes in just under 0:18:47.520 --> 0:18:49.959 c e h at four point eight K. He actually 0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:52.440 scored in that first meeting he had he had twenties. 0:18:52.480 --> 0:18:54.840 So the Chiefs ran all over the Bills in that 0:18:54.880 --> 0:18:57.239 first game. Even Darwin Thompson had a few carries. So 0:18:58.200 --> 0:19:02.919 Darryll Williams might be the highest one running back on 0:19:02.960 --> 0:19:05.560 this late this week, especially if Edwards A layers sits 0:19:05.720 --> 0:19:08.600 every las sis, he probably will be. My angle is 0:19:09.400 --> 0:19:12.000 I might go Thompson little if it's just looking like 0:19:12.080 --> 0:19:17.560 Thompson and Williams active and healthy for the Chiefs. Yeah, 0:19:17.600 --> 0:19:21.360 if if Bella is out and out and bell is out. 0:19:21.400 --> 0:19:24.400 Even if he's in, he's you know, but he MUCKs 0:19:24.480 --> 0:19:26.800 up the works for for Thompson. You can't play Thompson 0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:29.359 if c h is active, No, you can't know not 0:19:29.440 --> 0:19:33.280 if if he's inactive, then of course Williams in elite 0:19:33.320 --> 0:19:35.879 level play. But Thompson would definitely be in play for me. 0:19:36.040 --> 0:19:39.320 Uh if c H out Williams is an A despite 0:19:39.359 --> 0:19:41.880 he'll be the highest zone running back on the slate. 0:19:41.880 --> 0:19:43.720 You have to run him, run him out there. The 0:19:43.720 --> 0:19:45.760 Bill or the Ravens running backs combined for an hundred 0:19:45.800 --> 0:19:48.520 and fifty yards on the ground against Buffalo last week. 0:19:48.560 --> 0:19:52.000 So c H in he's a C because he's you 0:19:52.000 --> 0:19:54.240 can't trust him to finish the game. He'd be at 0:19:54.320 --> 0:19:57.960 uber contrarian, high risk YRO Award play. Williams would be 0:19:58.000 --> 0:19:59.960 a B. And then but then if c H out 0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:03.160 Williams A and I give Thompson a pretty safe see. 0:20:03.200 --> 0:20:05.720 I think he would still see ten twelve touches in 0:20:05.720 --> 0:20:08.400 this game. When we come back, we'll go through the 0:20:08.520 --> 0:20:13.240 NFC side. Bucks taking on the Packers another Week six rematch, 0:20:13.680 --> 0:20:16.680 and that one was a one sided demolition of the Packers. 0:20:16.720 --> 0:20:19.080