Speaker 1: You are entering the freedom hunt. The Muller probe tries
Speaker 1: to claim yet another victim who is in the way
Speaker 1: of the politics of the left. We'll talk about what
Speaker 1: they've done to Jerome Corsi. Also, Julia Desange met with
Speaker 1: Manaford or did he looks like the medium might have
Speaker 1: fallen for a massive hope story right at the point
Speaker 1: at which it could have been the most damaging if
Speaker 1: the Muller probe was winding down. We've got that and
Speaker 1: an update on the caravan coming up on the buck
Speaker 1: Sexton Show. This is the buck Sexton Show, where the
Speaker 1: mission or mission is to decode what really matters with
Speaker 1: actionable intelligence. Mag Noo, mistake American, You're a great American
Speaker 1: Again the buck Sexton Show begins. Remember the Animal. The
Speaker 1: special counsel came in and blew up, and they actually
Speaker 1: sent me home and gave me an opportunity to review
Speaker 1: the emails. When I came back, I amended the testimony
Speaker 1: to say that I now remember the email, and Special
Speaker 1: Counsel was happy with that until I couldn't give them
Speaker 1: what they wanted, which was a connection that I had
Speaker 1: with a Sange that they assumed I had, which I
Speaker 1: didn't have. Now suddenly they forgot. They allowed me to
Speaker 1: amend my testimony, and they're going back to the mistake
Speaker 1: I made day one when I forgot the email. So
Speaker 1: it's really, I think, completely fraudulent, the charge that they
Speaker 1: were trying to get me to plead to and I
Speaker 1: refused to plead to a line, refused to plead to
Speaker 1: a lie. Welcome to the Buck Sexton Show. That's Jerome Corsi,
Speaker 1: who was talking on Tucker Show last night right before
Speaker 1: I got a chance to chat with Talker about the caravan.
Speaker 1: We'll get into that in the second hour tonight. But
Speaker 1: this is a toxic waste dump of political hits. Now.
Speaker 1: That's what the Muller probe is. It's what we've known
Speaker 1: it was going to be all along. Now we have
Speaker 1: more than ample evidence. But what is more likely that
Speaker 1: the people that keep getting caught in Muller's crosshairs are
Speaker 1: so reckless and foolish that they think that they can
Speaker 1: get away with telling insignificant lies for no reason, or
Speaker 1: that Muller and his team of as the President says,
Speaker 1: democratic henchman are putting people through the Ringer, putting them
Speaker 1: through this process so that they can find a way
Speaker 1: to charge them all in the hopes of accomplishing two things.
Speaker 1: One that they can get one of them to flip
Speaker 1: and finally give that moment of aha where Trump and
Speaker 1: Russia and Hillary really did win. All that stuff's gonna happen.
Speaker 1: And number two, by just racking up conviction after conviction
Speaker 1: for process crimes, you can have the idiot brigade of
Speaker 1: the left in the media MSNBCCNN, all the New York Times,
Speaker 1: Washington Posts. They can pat themselves in the back and say,
Speaker 1: you know, ten convictions, twenty convictions, fifty convictions, I mean,
Speaker 1: and I don't care how many Russian Facebook trolls you
Speaker 1: level charges against when not a single one of them
Speaker 1: is ever setting foot in a US courtroom, and nothing
Speaker 1: that they did matters to any normal, sane, rational person
Speaker 1: in terms of the election outcome in twenty sixteen. That
Speaker 1: that's not a victory. There's no aspect of this that
Speaker 1: you look at and say, oh, yeah, yeah, I can
Speaker 1: see what you can see what they're doing there that
Speaker 1: that makes sense. We know absolutely not. This is worse
Speaker 1: than a scam. This is a travesty. The Muller probe
Speaker 1: is destroying our faith in the justice system, in the
Speaker 1: ability of the Department of Justice to function in a
Speaker 1: highly politicized atmosphere and not give incredibly partisan outcomes that
Speaker 1: all go in one direction. And oh, that's right. They
Speaker 1: favor the party of the state and the statists, the
Speaker 1: Democrat Party. Jerome Corsi is not going to take this
Speaker 1: one lying down, it seems now. I understand in the
Speaker 1: past he's been involved with conspiracy theories. I understand that
Speaker 1: he's not always the most reliable source. He's friends with
Speaker 1: Roger Stone. I've interviewed Roger Stone. Roger Stone's a pretty
Speaker 1: weird guy. Does have a giant tattoo of Richard Nixon
Speaker 1: on his back, which is dedication. Can say that that
Speaker 1: is dedication to what I can't even tell you. But
Speaker 1: but when you look at what's being done to these men,
Speaker 1: Corsi and Papadopolis and General Flynn three decades of service
Speaker 1: the United States Military, ran the Department, ran the Defense
Speaker 1: Intelligence Agency, and his thanks for that is to have
Speaker 1: Yates and McCabe and the rest of the never Trump
Speaker 1: hashtag resistance brigade over at DJ and the FBI find
Speaker 1: some pretext to ruin his reputation charge him with the
Speaker 1: felony and threatened to charge his son as well. These
Speaker 1: people stop at nothing. They stop at nothing, and the
Speaker 1: only boundaries that they respect are the boundaries of well,
Speaker 1: if we were to do this or that thing in
Speaker 1: this investigation, it would look it would be too much,
Speaker 1: and then there might actually be a ground swell of
Speaker 1: same support from the American people that goes beyond just
Speaker 1: those who support Trump, just normal Americans to say this
Speaker 1: whole thing is a sham. And it is. And notice
Speaker 1: how it's just all served its purpose for the left
Speaker 1: this whole time. Oh, it can't be shut down. Oh
Speaker 1: they want they want a special law pass to protect Mueller,
Speaker 1: Saint Muller. They say, nobody can interfere with his work
Speaker 1: work for what exactly what is he even looking into
Speaker 1: at this point, We're going to have our friend Andy
Speaker 1: McCarthy joining later this hour just to really take stock
Speaker 1: of all this and what's going on here. You know,
Speaker 1: Andy has had a real progression. I think you'll well,
Speaker 1: we'll ask him about this. You recall, if you've been
Speaker 1: listed me for a while. He's somebody who in the
Speaker 1: early days, I was always well pat him a back,
Speaker 1: mister Buckyer. I was always saying, special counsel is a
Speaker 1: terrible idea. It's unjust, it's unfair, it's a nightmare. And
Speaker 1: there were a whole bunch of even some pretty, you know,
Speaker 1: somewhat pro Trump conservatives who were saying, oh, no, no,
Speaker 1: we need a special counsel. It's okay, and I'm like, no,
Speaker 1: absolutely not, absolutely not. Andy was saying, look, we shouldn't
Speaker 1: have a special counsel, but now that we have one,
Speaker 1: let's see how it does. And he was not as
Speaker 1: hard on them as I was from the beginning, because
Speaker 1: I just I had I could add a funky smell.
Speaker 1: I knew that something was up with them, and just
Speaker 1: as you did too. And I see this from all
Speaker 1: your messages and your calls and emails. You've known this
Speaker 1: all along, and now we see it in action. But
Speaker 1: then there's another another add into this whole story, which
Speaker 1: is tough to keep up with. It's just because on
Speaker 1: the one end, you have so much hysteria from the
Speaker 1: left on this that you know that they'll report breathlessly
Speaker 1: on something. You'll say, is that Why is that even
Speaker 1: of interest to anyone? Why does this get them so
Speaker 1: excited and so energize? What is it? About anything that
Speaker 1: touches on for example, you know a person that met
Speaker 1: with somebody who met with somebody who was once in Russia.
Speaker 1: That could get a normal, sane human being so excited
Speaker 1: as it doesn't love because they're looking for any desperate
Speaker 1: shred that they can pull together here to cobble some
Speaker 1: final narrative of Trump's defeat. That's what they're trying to do.
Speaker 1: And this is all really about taking back the presidency
Speaker 1: from a president that they believe is a usurper. I
Speaker 1: feel like that's more of a term that use in
Speaker 1: medieval times, right, But he's he's the anti president to
Speaker 1: the left. He's not the president. He doesn't count. They
Speaker 1: don't care that you and I voted for him. They
Speaker 1: don't care that tens of millions of Americans, over sixty
Speaker 1: three million, I think, voted for this president. They they
Speaker 1: all think that it was a couple of Russian Facebook
Speaker 1: puppets and at a Papadopolis meeting and Corusi and wiki leagues,
Speaker 1: And even if the wiki league theory they have that
Speaker 1: the campaign reached out to WikiLeaks. Even if this is true,
Speaker 1: it is not apparent to me that any crime was committed.
Speaker 1: And if we're going to talk about using foreigners for
Speaker 1: oppo research. Guess what. The Hillary Clinton campaign created oppo
Speaker 1: research with the with the dossier through Fusion GPS that
Speaker 1: relying almost entirely on foreign sources. Christopher Steele is a foreigner,
Speaker 1: by the way, those are Oh he's British. Yeah, he's
Speaker 1: a foreigner. He's not allowed to vote in our election,
Speaker 1: not allow to be a part of our election. And
Speaker 1: he collected information from Russians. These are the people who
Speaker 1: are going to lecture us on election propriety. I don't
Speaker 1: think so. I don't think so. And there's I just
Speaker 1: the more details we get about this Guardian Assan story,
Speaker 1: the better I love this. The Guardian runs with this.
Speaker 1: A day ago they said that Mana Fort had secret
Speaker 1: talks with Assange in the Ecuadorian embassy in London. And
Speaker 1: as I've mentioned to you earlier this week, Asange is
Speaker 1: not just underlock and key, he cannot leave the embassy,
Speaker 1: the Ecuadorian embassy, and if he did, he'd be arrested.
Speaker 1: And trust me, foreign intelligence of all kinds have eyes
Speaker 1: on that building for a whole bunch of reasons, Assange
Speaker 1: probably being the very top of the list. Along with
Speaker 1: law enforcement and journalists and a whole bunch. There is
Speaker 1: no chance no rational person could think that Julian Assange
Speaker 1: had I think they said three meetings with Manafort. Sources
Speaker 1: have said Manafort went to see Assange in twenty thirteen,
Speaker 1: twenty fifteen, and in spring twenty sixteen. In a statement,
Speaker 1: Manafort denied meeting Assange. He said, quote, I have never
Speaker 1: met Julian Assange or anyone connected to him. I have
Speaker 1: never been contacted by anyone connected a Weekly Leagues, either
Speaker 1: directly or into rectly. I've never reached out to Assandra
Speaker 1: WikiLeaks on any matter. This is one of these things
Speaker 1: where if Manaphord is lying, by the way, at this point,
Speaker 1: why lie and at this point, why not just you know,
Speaker 1: if he knew he was caught, what's the point. I mean,
Speaker 1: he's already facing decades in prison. They've already violated they
Speaker 1: say he's violated his plea agreement, and they're gonna try
Speaker 1: to slam him away for as long as they can.
Speaker 1: But as you know, oh, the blue check journos, the
Speaker 1: so called guardians of our democracy. Yesterday there were so
Speaker 1: many of them who were just I just thought this
Speaker 1: was delicious Oh, they were so excited about menaphorted because
Speaker 1: this is what they this is what they think they need. Oh,
Speaker 1: the Manaford is the campaign. He's dirty. WikiLeaks hacked the emails,
Speaker 1: they're dirty. This could be the connection, and that's gonna
Speaker 1: be ball game for Russia collusion. It's all over right now.
Speaker 1: That also have to prove that Wiki leagues and Russia,
Speaker 1: and there's some other aspects of this, but they don't
Speaker 1: worry themselves about those details. They're not going to spend
Speaker 1: too much time thinking about that. Okay, Well, prom with
Speaker 1: this is it is completely unbelievable, meaning it is not
Speaker 1: possible to believe this story. Why would anyone without any
Speaker 1: verification other than anonymous sourcing run this in a major newspaper,
Speaker 1: and then why would so many other people run with
Speaker 1: it as well? Because, unfortunately, my friends, the media does
Speaker 1: not care about the damage done to their credibility from this,
Speaker 1: because they don't really have any credibility anymore. It's all
Speaker 1: about activism and placating their readers, their supporters, their base.
Speaker 1: It's all about the cause, the cause of the left
Speaker 1: and anti trumpism, and just to run a story for
Speaker 1: twenty four hours and then to run with it even further,
Speaker 1: as long as there's the flimsiest pretext for it, so
Speaker 1: that when it blows up in your face, you say, oh,
Speaker 1: I didn't know, let's just move on to the next thing.
Speaker 1: It served its purpose. It put for twenty four hours
Speaker 1: the news cycle Manafort and Assange side by side, people
Speaker 1: talking about both of them, Menaphortasange, Manaphortasange. That there is
Speaker 1: no Menaphortasange connection isn't going to matter in a day
Speaker 1: or two to them, because they've just spread this lie everywhere,
Speaker 1: and a lot of people are going to continue to
Speaker 1: believe it even when the story falls apart. This is
Speaker 1: how propaganda works. Think of it this way. The mainstream
Speaker 1: media is marketing a narrative of Russia collusion to the public,
Speaker 1: and this crap, lousy b s story about Asange and
Speaker 1: Manaphort having these three meetings that escaped everyone's attention until
Speaker 1: now they serve the purpose of essentially three advertising for
Speaker 1: the Russia collusion narrative gets everyone everyone thinking about everyone
Speaker 1: talking about it again. Oh it's nothing, Well, you know,
Speaker 1: lots of the stuff they've said is nothing. Think about
Speaker 1: the dossier itself was Michael Cohen in Prague. No, Michael
Speaker 1: Coleen was never in Prague. Oh, but at least we
Speaker 1: had that for you know, we had that going for
Speaker 1: us for a few days, where they're golden showers at
Speaker 1: a hotel in Moscow. No, nobody really believes that. Well,
Speaker 1: at least we got to talk about the about Trump
Speaker 1: in the most degrading way possible in the national news cycle.
Speaker 1: This is what they're doing. These people are smearmongers. They
Speaker 1: are not journalists, not when it comes to Trump. Sure,
Speaker 1: if you want to read about the you know, the latest,
Speaker 1: you know, great Peruvian Chinese restaurant that's open in some neighborhood, Yeah,
Speaker 1: read the New York Times. I mean they do. They
Speaker 1: do a great job on some of that stuff. You
Speaker 1: can't read them the arts anymore, about the arts because
Speaker 1: you know they're Leftism infects everything else they do, but food,
Speaker 1: you know, clothing. Maybe there's some stuff they can still do,
Speaker 1: local news, traffic chairs. Media doesn't care about lying, do you.
Speaker 1: The media knows they're lying to you. Why do they
Speaker 1: hate Trump so much? Because he's the only person with
Speaker 1: the megaphone as big or bigger than theirs who shouts back. Actually,
Speaker 1: you're the liars. And just remember that when they try
Speaker 1: to prosecute Jerome Corsi send him to prison, he's an
Speaker 1: old man. For what. They had all of his communications,
Speaker 1: all of his emails, his cell phone records, and they
Speaker 1: asked him if he had ever forded along and or
Speaker 1: if he had ever sent an email to a person.
Speaker 1: It turns out he forded an email at one point.
Speaker 1: That's not something that if he knew he had done,
Speaker 1: he would lie about because he would know that they
Speaker 1: have the emails. Folks, You'll notice this is this keeps happening.
Speaker 1: It is not believable that a person, you know, if
Speaker 1: somebody asked me if they had my phone records and
Speaker 1: they said, do you know, did you call miss Molly
Speaker 1: earlier today? I would not knowingly lie about that, because
Speaker 1: yes I did, so that's going to show up in
Speaker 1: my phone records obviously. But if you said, you know,
Speaker 1: you did you call somebody who worked for this publication,
Speaker 1: you know, two and a half years ago and ask
Speaker 1: them for comment, I might say I I don't really know,
Speaker 1: but I wouldn't be a lie because I wouldn't know.
Speaker 1: And if they have that information, they know. So what
Speaker 1: difference does it make to borrow from Hillary. This is
Speaker 1: not about justice. This is about politics. You know it,
Speaker 1: I know it, and unfortunately it's going to get a
Speaker 1: lot uglier before it gets better. Got caravan updates coming
Speaker 1: your way. We're gonna have my friend Andy McCarthy with
Speaker 1: us shortly. Also, Benny Johnson's gonna light it up an
Speaker 1: hour three talking about how Malania is clapping back at
Speaker 1: some of the nasty noess in the media and the
Speaker 1: in the culture in general. The show is going to
Speaker 1: be phenomenal. So stay right there. We've already seen the
Speaker 1: forced resignation of the Attorney general a day after the election.
Speaker 1: It's clear, therefore, or that something has to be done
Speaker 1: to protect mister Muller's investigation. Special Counsel Independence, Integratactor is
Speaker 1: a buy partisan bill. I again repeat, this is about
Speaker 1: the legislative branch asserting a common sense check and balance
Speaker 1: on presidential overreach. That's right. They want to pass a
Speaker 1: law to truncate presidential authority on the guests on the
Speaker 1: hunch that Trump is going to tell his new acting
Speaker 1: Attorney general to do something bad with regard to the
Speaker 1: Muller probe. What they don't even know has he done anything? No,
Speaker 1: they want a preemptive law to take away presidential authority,
Speaker 1: or do you interfere with presidential authority when it comes
Speaker 1: to firing, you know, firing somebody or giving a in
Speaker 1: order in the executive branch. And this is something we've
Speaker 1: been hearing now for how many months. He's not going
Speaker 1: to fire. Okay, they just they just need to stop
Speaker 1: with us. It's so boring. It's one of the ways
Speaker 1: that you know that the Mueller probe is just a
Speaker 1: manifestation of the left's anti Trump media is they can't
Speaker 1: help themselves. It's a compulsion. Now, Russia collusion, Mueller, You've
Speaker 1: got to save Muller. Russia collusion. I mean, people have
Speaker 1: some kind of a disorder. At this point, Annie McCarthy
Speaker 1: is going to join us to really lay it down here.
Speaker 1: At the second hour, we'll get into immigration, the latest
Speaker 1: on Kashogie, a lot of kerfuffle over that and Obama
Speaker 1: saying Obama like things. That's all coming your way. So
Speaker 1: stay right there. Team Mueller is not going to produce
Speaker 1: a neutral report. If he's not going to be fair,
Speaker 1: he's going to produce what he believes is going to
Speaker 1: be a devastating attack. He's gonna put together everything. He's
Speaker 1: gonna use information from Manaphor and others without necessarily disclosing
Speaker 1: that their wires, and so the president's team has to
Speaker 1: be ready some bold analysis there from the dersh that
Speaker 1: somebody else is going to offer up some true legal
Speaker 1: and prosecutorial expertise. Here. Andy McCarthy is back in action, folks.
Speaker 1: You all know him, of course from Fox News and
Speaker 1: from National Review, and he joins us, Andy, great to
Speaker 1: have you on the show, but great to be with you.
Speaker 1: So let's just have you react first to what Professor
Speaker 1: Dershowitz is saying there. Did you agree with him that
Speaker 1: it's Is it a near certainty? I mean, I don't
Speaker 1: believe anyone can predict the future. Is it a near
Speaker 1: certainty that the Mueller report is going to be a
Speaker 1: political attack on Trump? I don't think it's a certainty,
Speaker 1: because I don't think it should happen. And you hope
Speaker 1: that eventually adult leadership jumps in here. I hear what
Speaker 1: Professor Dershowitz is saying, and I don't doubt, given the
Speaker 1: way that Muller's team has investigated this case, that they
Speaker 1: might be hopeful of going that direction. And inclined to
Speaker 1: go in that direction. There's a certain desperation I think
Speaker 1: that has set into this investigation of no crime. And
Speaker 1: I call it an investigation of no crime, Buck, because
Speaker 1: everybody in the case pleads guilty to making false statements.
Speaker 1: And the reason that's the case is that's the only
Speaker 1: thing you can charge them with. The underlying thing that
Speaker 1: the prosecutor is investigating ever since he was unable to
Speaker 1: establish because it didn't happen that the Trump campaign was
Speaker 1: in a conspiracy with the Kremlin to hack democratic accounts.
Speaker 1: That was the crime. Remember, Putin hacked the election and
Speaker 1: Trump was in on it. And once they learned that
Speaker 1: that allegation in the Steel dossier could not be proved,
Speaker 1: and in fact, if you look at Muller's indictments against
Speaker 1: the Russians, it's not just that it can't be proved,
Speaker 1: it's that it didn't happen. The Russians were not looking
Speaker 1: to have alignment with an American side of this conspiracy.
Speaker 1: In fact, what they wanted was deniability. They can do
Speaker 1: hacking all by themselves. They didn't need any help from
Speaker 1: an Americans Trump included. But the thing, Buck, is that
Speaker 1: was the crime here hacking is a crime. Conspiracy is
Speaker 1: an agreement between two or more people to commit a crime.
Speaker 1: So once they didn't have that, what do they have
Speaker 1: they have. The best interpretation of the evidence for Muller
Speaker 1: is that people in the Trump orbit we're trying to
Speaker 1: get unsavory information about Hillary Clinton that was in the
Speaker 1: possession of third parties like wiki leagues and in one instance,
Speaker 1: the Russian government itself, with this lawyer, Vesselmitskaya. It's ikey,
Speaker 1: it's unseemly, it's the side of politics that's kind of
Speaker 1: the dark underbelly that no one ever wants to talk about.
Speaker 1: But it's not criminal to try to get unsavory information.
Speaker 1: So you have this big to do here where they're investigating,
Speaker 1: you know, did you meet with this Russian and did
Speaker 1: you talk to wiki leagues, and did you have a
Speaker 1: source in wikey leagues and did you tell anyone who
Speaker 1: It all sounds very nefarious until you take a step
Speaker 1: back and you realize there's nothing criminal about this. And
Speaker 1: if there was something criminal about this, somebody like Jerry Corsey,
Speaker 1: who is now the one who was in the cross
Speaker 1: airs for Muller, they wouldn't be bringing him in and
Speaker 1: proposing to him that he plead guilty to false statements.
Speaker 1: They would be giving him a plea agreement to say,
Speaker 1: we need you to plead guilty to an espionage conspiracy,
Speaker 1: and we need you to go in there and say
Speaker 1: there was a conspiracy between the Kremlin and Trump. Here's
Speaker 1: what was my role in it. Here's what Trump did,
Speaker 1: Here's what the Kremlin did. Here's how we hacked the
Speaker 1: accounts and got the information. They don't have anything like that. So, Andy,
Speaker 1: I wanted to ask you next about the Corsi situation.
Speaker 1: I was actually at I was at Tucker's show last night.
Speaker 1: Of course he was on right before me, so I
Speaker 1: was watching this interview, and it's pretty jaw dropping in
Speaker 1: terms of the allegations that course he's making about Mueller.
Speaker 1: I mean, how much of that has taken with a
Speaker 1: grain of salt? How likely do you think it is
Speaker 1: that he voluntarily gave up his laptop, his phones, all
Speaker 1: of his stuff and they nailed him on something that
Speaker 1: they had first let him amend but then later came
Speaker 1: back and decided they're going to nail him anyway. I mean,
Speaker 1: you were a prosecutor for over twenty years. How does
Speaker 1: this all smell to you, well, Buck, it all smells bad.
Speaker 1: And I started out here wanting to give the benefit
Speaker 1: of the doubt to Muller. Yeah you did. By the way,
Speaker 1: just as a quick aside, Andy, you were very fair
Speaker 1: in the early stages. You were saying, let's see what
Speaker 1: Mueller does. I remember you were coming on this show.
Speaker 1: But anyway, go ahead. Yeah, well, I didn't think there
Speaker 1: should be a special cancel. On the other hand, Mueller
Speaker 1: is you know a guy who have a lot of
Speaker 1: people have a lot of respect for her. I always have.
Speaker 1: He's a serious person. I expected him to conduct a
Speaker 1: sei investigation. I thought the fact that I didn't think
Speaker 1: there should be a special counsel didn't mean he couldn't
Speaker 1: do a credible job. But now, look, Buck, I look
Speaker 1: at what's happening, and again I think that they are
Speaker 1: criminalizing politics. I think what they are investigating here is
Speaker 1: not a crime, and they're trying to camouflage that by
Speaker 1: getting a bunch of pleas to false statements charges, some
Speaker 1: of which are very flimsy false statements charges. I mean,
Speaker 1: the thing you just described with Corsi, that's not the
Speaker 1: first time we've heard something like that in this investigation.
Speaker 1: Mike Flynn. Originally, when he was interviewed by the FBI,
Speaker 1: the agents who interviewed him thought he was truthful, which
Speaker 1: is why he was never charged. Then Mueller comes in
Speaker 1: and lo and behold the thing that the guys who
Speaker 1: were in the room decided he was being truthful about.
Speaker 1: Mueller and his team decided was alive. And they got
Speaker 1: you know, they told Flynn that they're going to investigate
Speaker 1: his son, and they're doing all kinds of other stuff.
Speaker 1: So the guy comes in and pleads guilty. It's not
Speaker 1: exactly when you eat the charge. It certainly isn't the
Speaker 1: false statement of all time. Right, And then you have Papadopholis,
Speaker 1: who they file a fourteen page statement with where collusion
Speaker 1: pours off every page. Right, He's meeting with Russians. They're
Speaker 1: scheduling meetings. Maybe we'll have a meeting with Putin and
Speaker 1: Trump in Russia. Maybe it'll be in New York. They're
Speaker 1: talking about emails and all this other stuff. And you
Speaker 1: get at the end of the rainbow, what did they
Speaker 1: charge him with a false statement lying to the FBI
Speaker 1: about the date of a meeting. I mean, really, in
Speaker 1: a normal case, you get a cooperator who comes in
Speaker 1: and gives you the underlying scheme that you're investigating here.
Speaker 1: They don't have that because what they're investigating is in
Speaker 1: a crime. Andy, I think it's hard for anybody who
Speaker 1: we're speaking to Annie McCarthy of Nash Review and Fox
Speaker 1: News contributor, An, it's hard for anybody to be observing
Speaker 1: this and not think that this is, just to put
Speaker 1: it in Layman's terms, this is really unfair. I mean,
Speaker 1: this whole thing. It just strikes me that it makes people,
Speaker 1: you know, feel like they can't trust the justice system
Speaker 1: when there's politics involved. Yes, and and this buck goes
Speaker 1: exactly back to the first question that you answer asked
Speaker 1: me that I went on and rant and forgot to
Speaker 1: get around to answering. But what it goes to is,
Speaker 1: you know, this whole business about what Professor Dershowood says,
Speaker 1: and is Muller going to file this very political damaging
Speaker 1: report that won't charge Trump with a crime but will
Speaker 1: be very damaging in terms of his political standing and
Speaker 1: people's perception of his fitness for office. And what I
Speaker 1: keep going back to when I hear stuff like that
Speaker 1: is who is Bob Muller or more properly, what is
Speaker 1: Bob Muller. And the reason I think we should be
Speaker 1: asking that basic basic question is we need to recognize
Speaker 1: that he is not counsel to a committee of Congress
Speaker 1: that's considering impeachment. He is not Bob Woodward writing a
Speaker 1: biography or a biotype account of the Trump administration and
Speaker 1: making judgments about Trump's fitness for office. He is a
Speaker 1: federal prosecutor. His only job is to tell us, with
Speaker 1: respect to A, B and C factual transactions that he's
Speaker 1: been authorized to investigate, is there sufficient evidence to charge
Speaker 1: or is there not sufficient evidence to charge? That does
Speaker 1: not require a warranty style narrative. For twenty years when
Speaker 1: I was a prosecutor, when we closed a case, there's
Speaker 1: a little fought. There's a little form that you fill
Speaker 1: out when you close a case, and usually with about
Speaker 1: a paragraph, you could explain why it is that you're
Speaker 1: closing the investigation without charges. It's insufficient evidence. Generally speaking,
Speaker 1: that's the grounds for it. But Mueller's job is not
Speaker 1: to give us a narrative on everything he learned about Trump.
Speaker 1: And in fact, if you remember the guy who was
Speaker 1: supervising Muller for most of this investigation was Rod Rosenstein,
Speaker 1: the Deputy Attorney General. The membo that he wrote to
Speaker 1: justify the firing of Komi was mainly a condemnation of
Speaker 1: Komi for outlining publicly the evidence against Hillary Clinton under
Speaker 1: circumstances where she was not being charged with a crime,
Speaker 1: because we don't do that in the Justice Department. You know,
Speaker 1: if the Justice Department wants to accuse somebody, they're supposed
Speaker 1: to file an indictment, and then you're accused, but you
Speaker 1: get all the protections that our system gives to an
Speaker 1: accused person, all the due process of law. We're not
Speaker 1: supposed to go out do an investigation, gather all this information,
Speaker 1: decide that you have engaged in ikey behavior but not
Speaker 1: criminal behavior, and then get out on some podium and
Speaker 1: tell everyone what the ikey behavior was. If you don't
Speaker 1: have a crime, you shut up. Yeah, this is really
Speaker 1: important because I think Andy, there's a there's a perception
Speaker 1: out there that a lot of people have been intentionally
Speaker 1: feeding into that they're supposed to be a set what
Speaker 1: would really be an OPO report of sorts coming from Muller,
Speaker 1: so that you know, he has to give us a
Speaker 1: This is everything that I learned every shady conversation. And
Speaker 1: what you're saying is no as a federal projector you say, look,
Speaker 1: we're not bringing any charges, no charges to bring case closed, right.
Speaker 1: No one seems to think that's that's the way this goes, though,
Speaker 1: which is pretty amazing. Right. Usually you don't even get
Speaker 1: the case closed, right buck. I mean, usually they won't
Speaker 1: even confirm or deny the existence of an investigation, let
Speaker 1: alone tell you whether it's been close enough. And for
Speaker 1: good reason. It's because you know, if you close a
Speaker 1: case close there's insufficient evidence, but then all of a
Speaker 1: sudden another witness comes out of nowhere and you can
Speaker 1: now make the case. You reopen it, right, So so
Speaker 1: closing it isn't that big of a deal in the
Speaker 1: sense that there's no finality to it, if you know,
Speaker 1: if it can be revived at any time. But my
Speaker 1: point is the government is not supposed to talk about
Speaker 1: the evidence in cases that it doesn't bring. And I
Speaker 1: look very carefully at the Special Council, the Special Council
Speaker 1: regulations that Muller was appointed under. They do require him
Speaker 1: to write a report to the Attorney General, but the
Speaker 1: report is simply to explain what his charging decisions were.
Speaker 1: You know, why did you indict or why didn't you indict?
Speaker 1: That is not an invitation to write a narrative of
Speaker 1: what a creepy guy you think the defendant is. If
Speaker 1: for a prosecutor, that's a very clinical question about you know,
Speaker 1: every offense has three or four essential elements of the
Speaker 1: offense that you have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt
Speaker 1: in order to proceed with a case. If you have
Speaker 1: insufficient evidence, then that's the reason you don't bring the case.
Speaker 1: It's not an invitation to tell the world what a
Speaker 1: creep you think the defendant is or the target is.
Speaker 1: Any What do we make of the fact that there
Speaker 1: are so many people who had been, at one point
Speaker 1: in recent memory held up as nonpartisan instruments of the
Speaker 1: law or the executive branch, and they've shown themselves to
Speaker 1: be really maniacally anti Trump. I mean, in a way
Speaker 1: that's embarrassing. Pre Berarra is one of them who I
Speaker 1: know is stomping around in your old neck of the woods,
Speaker 1: southern just New York, and US Attorney pre Barrara falls
Speaker 1: in that category. James Coby falls in that category. Brennan
Speaker 1: has I think the stock at the CIA is plummeting
Speaker 1: because of what Brennan has been doing. I don't want
Speaker 1: to tell anybody I work there because of this guy.
Speaker 1: What are we to take from all this is it
Speaker 1: just supposed to be a coincidence that some of these
Speaker 1: very powerful senior government figures in the executive branch, the
Speaker 1: prosecutorial side, just happened to hate Trump with a crazy passion. Well,
Speaker 1: I think it's it's a couple of things. Fuck, it's yes,
Speaker 1: they think that Trump is unfit to be president and
Speaker 1: they thought that. I mean, that's evident from the text
Speaker 1: between Struck and Page, the Lisa Page, the FBI lawyer,
Speaker 1: and Peter Struck, the agent. It's evident in their in
Speaker 1: their texts. And I think their texts are reflective of
Speaker 1: the greater, broader attitude that existed in the hierarchy of
Speaker 1: the FBI at the time. You know, those texts don't
Speaker 1: really they don't convey any idea that Page and Struck
Speaker 1: are kind of outliers. You know, it looks like they're representatives. Yeah,
Speaker 1: they're they're expressing the consensus of the institution. I think, yeah,
Speaker 1: exactly right. And I think number one, they despised Trump.
Speaker 1: Number Two, they made a decision, which was a controversial decision,
Speaker 1: to investigate Trump and to use the awesome powers that
Speaker 1: the government's granted to do national security surveillance and to
Speaker 1: do other kinds of investigation, and in the throes of
Speaker 1: a political campaign. And I believe they did it for
Speaker 1: two reasons. Number One, they thought that since it was counterintelligence,
Speaker 1: it would be classified, so no one would ever be
Speaker 1: the wiser. And secondly, the most obvious Hillary was going
Speaker 1: to win, so who needed to worry about how aggressive
Speaker 1: they got and what they decided to do with respect
Speaker 1: to Trump. Once Trump won, it became inevitable that the
Speaker 1: public was going to find out that they conducted an
Speaker 1: investigation of Trump during the campaign. So you either sit
Speaker 1: back and let the public learn that, or you prepare
Speaker 1: the public by trying to justify that you had very
Speaker 1: good reasons to investigate him. And I think that's what
Speaker 1: they're trying to do. They Andy, We're gonna have to
Speaker 1: have to have you back when this report just real quick?
Speaker 1: Is it going to drop soon? You think no? I
Speaker 1: don't think. I think that there's still more rounds to play.
Speaker 1: I'd be yeah, I think so too. People. Yeah, I
Speaker 1: think I think we're gonna be having you on to
Speaker 1: tell us about the final end, the end stage of
Speaker 1: the more investigation and about six months. It's my guess.
Speaker 1: But anyway, Annie McCarthy, everybody National Review, the best in
Speaker 1: the business Checkout is writing there. Look for him on
Speaker 1: Fox News, Annie, my friend, thank you so much for
Speaker 1: making the time. Hey, thanks, but take care team big
Speaker 1: hour two on the way, stay with me. This is
Speaker 1: us solution in search of a problem. The President's not
Speaker 1: going to far Probert Mueller, nor do I think he should,
Speaker 1: nor do I think he should not be allowed to finish.
Speaker 1: We have a lot of things to do to try
Speaker 1: to finish up this year without taking votes on things
Speaker 1: that are completely irrelevant to outcomes. You know, Mitch at
Speaker 1: least holding the line there on. No, we don't need
Speaker 1: to pass some law that says that Mueller has to
Speaker 1: be protect because you know what happens if they do that,
Speaker 1: then all we hear about us. Oh, oh my gosh,
Speaker 1: the Congress had to pass a law to protect Muther.
Speaker 1: We know how the Democrats play the game. We all know.
Speaker 1: We all know. Oh man, they're so shady and slimy.
Speaker 1: We know exactly how they play the game. We gotta
Speaker 1: we gotta get into some immigration talk here, folks that
Speaker 1: the caravan, the lies that have been told about it,
Speaker 1: had a really, really enjoyable segment with the one Only
Speaker 1: Tucker Carlson last night on his show. I put it
Speaker 1: up on Facebook if you want to see it, Facebook
Speaker 1: dot com slash buck Sexton. But we got some updates
Speaker 1: on immigration coming up here in just a moment. Stay
Speaker 1: with me. Sorry to spoil the surprise, but if you're
Speaker 1: getting a gift for me this Christmas, you're gonna be
Speaker 1: getting coffee from the best coffee company out there, Black
Speaker 1: Rifle Coffee. I start my day with Black Rifle, and
Speaker 1: then I keep my day going around noon or one o'clock,
Speaker 1: usually with another cup of Black Rifle. I think it
Speaker 1: is simply the most delicious coffee you can get out there.
Speaker 1: And unlike a lot of those commie corporate brands, guess what,
Speaker 1: Black Rifle is run by veterans, in fact, veterans of
Speaker 1: these special Operations community. They give back to veteran causes,
Speaker 1: and they've got a coffee club, by the way, that
Speaker 1: makes everything so easy. You just pick the blend you want,
Speaker 1: whether it's whole being ground or even k cup and
Speaker 1: have it delivered to your door. The best tasting, most energizing, veteran,
Speaker 1: helping and fantastic coffee all around. Black Rifle Coffee, It's
Speaker 1: the gift that keeps on giving. Go to Black Riflecoffee
Speaker 1: dot com slash buck received fifteen percent off your order.
Speaker 1: That's Black Riflecoffee dot com slash buck for fifteen percent
Speaker 1: off Black Riflecoffee dot com slash buck. It's our fault
Speaker 1: for not welcoming them because they're sincere asylum seekers. Is
Speaker 1: that true. No, it's a scam, and people know it's
Speaker 1: a scam based on the percentage of individuals in the
Speaker 1: past who have come and tried to claim asam in
Speaker 1: this way and the fact that they're being coached to lie.
Speaker 1: This is actually a form of fraud. When you say
Speaker 1: that I'm an imminent fear of my life, because people
Speaker 1: along the way have said this is what you have
Speaker 1: to say to get into the asylum process, you can
Speaker 1: later be adjudicated you're a lying to people in a
Speaker 1: vast majority of these cases. And by the way, if
Speaker 1: just being from Honduras, for example, means you're in such
Speaker 1: that are violence that you can get asylum, then the
Speaker 1: whole country would qualify for asylum. So this is a
Speaker 1: scam and people realize that now, but the media was
Speaker 1: pretending along that it is not. The last night on
Speaker 1: Tucker's show on Fox, Tucker was very gracious. We had
Speaker 1: a lot of fun chatting about this issue on air
Speaker 1: and off air, and I would just note that right
Speaker 1: after me, there was this exchange between Tucker and his
Speaker 1: other guests where the other guest try to pull this,
Speaker 1: Oh well, because because because I told Tucker another one
Speaker 1: of these points. Because you remember when last night I
Speaker 1: led the show about the lies, Tucker want to have
Speaker 1: me on to talk about the lies that I've been
Speaker 1: told about the caravan, and I pointed out that these
Speaker 1: people who claim to be seeking asylum have been offered
Speaker 1: asylum in Mexico and they've chosen not to take that asylum.
Speaker 1: So given that reality, why are we sort for them
Speaker 1: as a somseekers. They're just immigrants who want to come
Speaker 1: into the country through any means they can, including fraud, right,
Speaker 1: And people keep saying, oh, they're they're entitled to apply
Speaker 1: for asylum. Yeah, but they're not until to lie about it. Right,
Speaker 1: you're entitled to apply for a bank loan. You're not
Speaker 1: entitled to make up ten million dollars of assets you'll
Speaker 1: get one hundred million dollars loan or whatever. Right, you
Speaker 1: can't do that. You're getting a lot of trouble if
Speaker 1: you do that. And that's the part of this that
Speaker 1: gets left out of the conversation. But he had on
Speaker 1: a guy from I think it was from Univision, but
Speaker 1: it could have been from a different Spanish language news network.
Speaker 1: I forget. But he the guy comes on and he says, well,
Speaker 1: you know, they don't want to claim asylum Mexico because
Speaker 1: Mexico is so dangerous, to which point I just say,
Speaker 1: you know, their argument doesn't hold up. And Tucker, thankfully,
Speaker 1: I wasn't part of this conversation. I just was sitting
Speaker 1: off set. But if Mexico is so dangerous that people
Speaker 1: from Honduras don't consider themselves safe anywhere in the country,
Speaker 1: because remember, once you're in Mexico, you're granted, let me
Speaker 1: go anywhere, you don't have to stay in any area,
Speaker 1: and you speak the same language, your cultures are very similar.
Speaker 1: It's actually a pretty easy fit. Right. If Mexico so dangerous.
Speaker 1: Then why can't any Mexicans show up at our border
Speaker 1: and say, I'm too scared to be in Mexico. I
Speaker 1: need to claim asylum. And if that is the case,
Speaker 1: then we might as well just accept that we're going
Speaker 1: to be taken in another twenty or thirty million Mexicans
Speaker 1: the next few year. I mean, it's just, you know,
Speaker 1: to say we have a border as a joke, to
Speaker 1: say borders joke. By the way, another thing that's a
Speaker 1: lot or when I say there's a lot of lies
Speaker 1: of omission at the border, turns out that a lot
Speaker 1: of these family units because we keep getting told there's
Speaker 1: families of the border. It's all families. Yeah, there's some
Speaker 1: families where a kind of people. I feel badly that
Speaker 1: anyone's circumstances are so desperate in their own eyes, they
Speaker 1: would come to the border, pay coyotes, be in cartel
Speaker 1: control territory, take all those risks, bring their children with them.
Speaker 1: But there's also people showing up who are lying about
Speaker 1: being a family unit. Again, this is now fraud, This
Speaker 1: is now lying to the federal government. And I understand
Speaker 1: that libs are okay with a different set of rules
Speaker 1: for illegal aliens. You know, illegal aliens are allowed to
Speaker 1: engage in so security card fraud, document fraud, tax fraud.
Speaker 1: You know, sign their names to things fraudulently, you know,
Speaker 1: forge signatures, all that, they do, all that stuff, and
Speaker 1: if you prosecute them for it, you're a big meaning. Meanwhile,
Speaker 1: if you did any of that stuff, you'd be in
Speaker 1: big trouble. It would be a real problem for you.
Speaker 1: You know, you tell the i RS you haven't filed
Speaker 1: taxes in five years, that's going to be an issue
Speaker 1: if you're an illegal. It's oh, but I'm I'm in
Speaker 1: the shadows, you see. Well, yeah, because you're not supposed
Speaker 1: to be in the country. But they don't. They don't. Look,
Speaker 1: they don't enforce the laws the same way. There's really
Speaker 1: a special set of US law for illegals. It's just
Speaker 1: the truth. There's a lot of laws that are non
Speaker 1: enforced against illegals when they're here, and they're treated differently,
Speaker 1: and there's there's this whole political movement to give lenients
Speaker 1: and additional support to illegals. You, as a citizen, you
Speaker 1: don't get any of that. You know, you get the
Speaker 1: Jerome Corsi treatment. You get, Oh man, we could prosecute you.
Speaker 1: We're gonna we're gonna crush you. That's that's how they
Speaker 1: view dealing with you. But it's it's uh, oh, oh wait,
Speaker 1: we do we have us yet at MSNBC. This guy
Speaker 1: who's saying that, Oh, by the way, they're they're also
Speaker 1: not only is it all? Not all? It is mostly dudes,
Speaker 1: mostly guys showing up as part of this caravan. It
Speaker 1: turns out that some of them are like, oh man,
Speaker 1: this isn't what we thought it was. Maybe maybe the
Speaker 1: situations not as awesome as we were told. Play Cliff too.
Speaker 1: Most of the members of this caravan. This is a
Speaker 1: line for single men that you can see, and it
Speaker 1: stretches much longer as it does every single morning. Many
Speaker 1: of these men tell us that they heard in Honduras
Speaker 1: that it would be easy to cross into the United States.
Speaker 1: Some of them told us that they had heard that
Speaker 1: there were programs, work programs that they would be eligible for.
Speaker 1: And so now that they are here in Tijuana and
Speaker 1: they have realized that it is very difficult to get
Speaker 1: into the United States, especially after what happened on Sunday,
Speaker 1: some of them are deciding to turn back. Deciding to
Speaker 1: turn back well, isn't that interesting. I thought they were
Speaker 1: fleeing for their lives. We can journalists do a little
Speaker 1: detective work here, they do a little connecting of the dots.
Speaker 1: I was led to believe because all the journals are saying,
Speaker 1: and I was told that they are fleeing for their lives.
Speaker 1: And yet what we see here is sure enough individuals
Speaker 1: who are like, oh man, it's gonna be hard. I'm
Speaker 1: gonna have to go through a process. I might get denied.
Speaker 1: All right, I'm gonna go back to Honduras. Thanks, it's
Speaker 1: been real. But but wait, if if you were if
Speaker 1: you were fleeing the country because you were in imminent
Speaker 1: fear of death, you'd go back to that country because
Speaker 1: the process wasn't as easy in America as you were
Speaker 1: told it would be. Does that sound like desperate refugee
Speaker 1: behavior to you, because it doesn't sound like that to me.
Speaker 1: Sounds like something else is going on here. It sounds
Speaker 1: like there's another factor at work. Oh wow, what a surprise.
Speaker 1: We have been lied to and lied to in line.
Speaker 1: Oh also they're lying about there. They're eighteen year olds
Speaker 1: who are saying that there are people that are over
Speaker 1: eighteen saying they're minors as well at the border. So
Speaker 1: we have documented cases now if people who are lying
Speaker 1: up being family units, lying about their age, this is
Speaker 1: all fraud. Fraud, fraud, fraud, lying to the government to
Speaker 1: get a tangible benefit, in this case, access and entry
Speaker 1: the United States. You do that, you get prosecuted. These
Speaker 1: illegals do it, and oh we're you know, what about
Speaker 1: the Emma Lazarus poem on the statue of Liberty. Oh,
Speaker 1: my gosh, the Emma Lazarus poem. That's the way it
Speaker 1: all comes down to the poem at the basis statu liberty.
Speaker 1: That has nothing to do with anything. But that's the
Speaker 1: way we're told to think about this all the time.
Speaker 1: O way, Lindsey Graham, sometimes you get you know, Lindsey
Speaker 1: Graham can do great stuff these days, sometimes a little disappointing.
Speaker 1: But here's what he said, Play thirteen. Donald Trump was
Speaker 1: right to call the caravan out weeks ago. He's right
Speaker 1: to make sure it never crosses the border. People throughout
Speaker 1: the world are watching the president. If he blinks here,
Speaker 1: his credibility on securing the border is dead. He's not
Speaker 1: gonna blink into my democratic friends, how do you expect
Speaker 1: the public to work with us to fix a broken
Speaker 1: immigration system. If you support one wave after another, a
Speaker 1: lots at stake here. The President's not gonna bend, He's
Speaker 1: not gonna back down, and I hope the Republicans and
Speaker 1: Congress will stand behind it. Every Democrat, if we had
Speaker 1: an honest media that we're really trying to provide necessary
Speaker 1: information to the American people so that they can make
Speaker 1: intelligent decisions about what to ask their leadership to do
Speaker 1: and who to support in elected office, every Democrat would
Speaker 1: be asked, what about the next caravan? What about the
Speaker 1: next caravan? If they shouldn't be let in, why not?
Speaker 1: And if they shouldn't be let in, why should this one.
Speaker 1: They don't get asked that question because the Democrat media,
Speaker 1: the CNN, frauds and all the rest of them know
Speaker 1: that if the American people knew what the Democrat parties
Speaker 1: become an immigration they would revolt. I just had some
Speaker 1: Omaha Steaks earlier today. I had the surloins and they
Speaker 1: cooked up beautifully. Little salt, little pepper, all you really need,
Speaker 1: absolutely delicious. Right now, Omaha Steaks is giving an amazing
Speaker 1: limited time offer to my listeners. When you go to
Speaker 1: Omaha Steaks dot Com. Enter promo code Buck into the
Speaker 1: search bar. You'll get seventy four percent off Omaha Steaks
Speaker 1: Family Gift Package Originally one hundred and ninety five dollars,
Speaker 1: now only forty nine ninety nine. Order now and you'll
Speaker 1: get four hand cut top sirloins, two Premium port chops,
Speaker 1: four chicken fried steaks, four Omaha Steaks Burgers, four snappy
Speaker 1: killed Bosses, all beef meatballs, four perfectly brown potatoes, Oh Gretta,
Speaker 1: and four caramel apple tartlets. Plus you'll get four more
Speaker 1: burgers free. Omah Steaks is a fifth generation family owned
Speaker 1: company over a hundred years of experience delivering perfectly aged
Speaker 1: beef hand cut by Master Butcher's in Omaha. Again. Get
Speaker 1: this limited time package for only forty nine ninety nine.
Speaker 1: When you go to Omaha Steaks dot Com. Type Buck
Speaker 1: in the search bar at the Family Gift Package to
Speaker 1: your cart. Don't wait. This offer end soon Omaha Steaks
Speaker 1: dot Com. Type Buck in the search bar. Our bill
Speaker 1: contains the President's full request for the border, but ultimately
Speaker 1: the President and the Senate Democrats are gonna have to
Speaker 1: come to agreement as well as you know this takes
Speaker 1: sixty votes in the Senate. They're four Senate Democrats have
Speaker 1: a say so inappropriation matters, and so I think what
Speaker 1: we're gonna have to do is just sort all of
Speaker 1: this out between all the parties that are involved. Hopefully
Speaker 1: after the election, Democrats realize a secure border should not
Speaker 1: be a Republican thing. It shouldn't be a Democrat thing.
Speaker 1: It's just good for the country to actually secure our border.
Speaker 1: The House is there. We hope the Senate comes with us.
Speaker 1: It's the final shutdown. Hello, Yeah, that's right, it's not
Speaker 1: the final shutdown because there's not gonna be one. Not
Speaker 1: gonna be a shutdown, folks. I know we're all We're
Speaker 1: gonna the Republicans will stand up like Leonidas at Thermopolite. Nope,
Speaker 1: they will not. There's gonna be a shutdown. It's about
Speaker 1: twenty percent of the government actually shuts down over the
Speaker 1: when there is a shutdown. I mean, the rest of
Speaker 1: the government's all essential employees. Nothing changes for them. But
Speaker 1: you know, by remember when the obamainistration had this situation
Speaker 1: and they actually prevented veterans from going to memorials on
Speaker 1: the mall, and you know, that they tried to make
Speaker 1: a spectacle of it so that there'd be more media
Speaker 1: pressure for Republicans to end the shutdown. And they figured
Speaker 1: also that the media, of course, would be completely on
Speaker 1: the side of the Democrats and the whole thing, and
Speaker 1: that gives obviously a huge advantage to them. So, you know,
Speaker 1: these are the things that these things that I remember
Speaker 1: about about the whole shutdown. But I wish Paul Ryan.
Speaker 1: I mean, he's on his way out. He's not running again.
Speaker 1: This guy's been, this guy's you know, Speaker of the House.
Speaker 1: Could he just just have a little more fire in
Speaker 1: the belly on something, you know, what's there to lose
Speaker 1: at this point. He's gonna get some cushy job. He's
Speaker 1: gonna be running a big think tank and you know,
Speaker 1: be on the speaker circle. He's good to go. This
Speaker 1: guy's gonna be making seven figures, you know the day
Speaker 1: he walks out the door of Congress. I'm sure. And
Speaker 1: you know, why can't he at least really make the
Speaker 1: case if you say border security, Oh that's right, because
Speaker 1: Paul Ryan's a squish on the border. He is. Go
Speaker 1: back and listen to this guy. He's not somebody that
Speaker 1: you would want, would want handling the border as you
Speaker 1: at all, because his whole thing is the sort of
Speaker 1: chamber of commerce view of let's just take in more
Speaker 1: and more illegals that you know. I would just note
Speaker 1: that there is in fact a even a left wing
Speaker 1: argument against that, and I think that it doesn't get enough,
Speaker 1: it doesn't get enough attention. But there is an argument
Speaker 1: to be had and used to be had by the
Speaker 1: left that all you're doing or bringing in all these
Speaker 1: illegals and these foreign workers and guess workers all the
Speaker 1: time in huge numbers, is depressing the wages of Americans
Speaker 1: who compete with that labor. And there's this notion out
Speaker 1: there that, oh, you know, it doesn't it doesn't really
Speaker 1: really matter, because why supply and demand doesn't count when
Speaker 1: you're talking about illegals. It's just, oh, because they're doing
Speaker 1: the job that we won't do. Well. That's because they're
Speaker 1: getting paid less, and they're often getting paid off the books,
Speaker 1: and they're half the time not paying any taxes and
Speaker 1: sending twenty billion dollars of untax remittances back to Mexico,
Speaker 1: by the way. But you know, is Ryan gonna tackle
Speaker 1: any of that stuff? No of course not. He He
Speaker 1: is firmly in favor of more and more cheap labor
Speaker 1: in this country, for the donor class, for the kind
Speaker 1: of people who write big checks to major conservative think
Speaker 1: tanks and foundations, the kind of places that you know
Speaker 1: Ryan is going to spend the next thirty years. That's
Speaker 1: that's what's going on here. That's why there's no fire
Speaker 1: in the belly on this issue, because Ryan doesn't feel
Speaker 1: that way. He is he is not strong on border issues,
Speaker 1: not strong American sovereigny. You notice other countries, other countries
Speaker 1: don't have this problem the way that we do. What
Speaker 1: happened in Europe where you had Angelo Gordon talk Angola
Speaker 1: accepting a million refugees asylum seekers in Germany. That's in
Speaker 1: a huge shockwave to the rest of Europe, where they're like,
Speaker 1: whoa hold on a second. And there's a lot of
Speaker 1: people who are saying that the long term trend in
Speaker 1: Europe is not toward harmony with some of the predominantly
Speaker 1: Muslim immigrant populations that have shown off in the last
Speaker 1: thirty forty fifty years. It's not looking like things are
Speaker 1: going to go toward a more perfect union. In places
Speaker 1: like France and Germany and Italy with regard to the
Speaker 1: different major populations and the demographics in those countries. But
Speaker 1: there's no country where you just get remember a Merkell.
Speaker 1: I mean, they decided they were going to take in
Speaker 1: these asylum seekers. They made an affirmative decision. These European
Speaker 1: countries said, Okay, we'll take in these immigrants. No country
Speaker 1: just says, oh, you know what, Yeah, you're just gonna
Speaker 1: show up as many as you want, just come in
Speaker 1: and you get to stay. And that's fine. But we're
Speaker 1: the bad guys for doing that. Somehow we're the the
Speaker 1: mean country in this whole process. Yeah, the Democrats are
Speaker 1: just they are unserious on this issue, as I keep saying,
Speaker 1: but speaking about the border, and we're to get more
Speaker 1: into Obama later on this hour. Have some talks about
Speaker 1: you know, you know, Obama can't stay out of the limelight.
Speaker 1: People say, oh, he's he's not gonna run again because
Speaker 1: he can, and Michelle's not gonna run again. But oh,
Speaker 1: Obama's almost like president in exile. Now for the Democrats,
Speaker 1: Obama thinks of himself as you know, the next best
Speaker 1: thing to being president is having Obama giving speeches and
Speaker 1: being on social media and going around doing all these
Speaker 1: things and were so interesting is there's all this focus
Speaker 1: on the tear gas at the border, as though that's
Speaker 1: a bad You know, people throwing rocks at you, you're
Speaker 1: gonna you're gonna respond with non lethal measures to get
Speaker 1: them to disperse and stop the running rocks full stop,
Speaker 1: you know. I mean I would also say this to
Speaker 1: you if if let's just say, some cartel member, uh,
Speaker 1: you know, pulled pulled out an AK forty seven and
Speaker 1: started to take shots at border patrol and you know
Speaker 1: he was, you know, beat beating ten yards behind a
Speaker 1: female that he'd put there as a as a human shield. Yeah,
Speaker 1: they're gonna try to not hit the woman, but they're
Speaker 1: gonna return fire. I'm not gonna say, oh, you know,
Speaker 1: there's a there's a woman involved here, so we can't.
Speaker 1: I mean, this is just we're talking about self defense
Speaker 1: and when people throwing rocks at you, Yeah, you can't
Speaker 1: just open fire on them because it's not an imminent
Speaker 1: lethal issue the same way that gunfire would be. But
Speaker 1: you're gonna respond with your guys. But what's so interesting
Speaker 1: is how and I'm probably shouldn't waste your time with
Speaker 1: this because they're gonna be like Buck, it's the view.
Speaker 1: Who cares? But you turn on a show like the View.
Speaker 1: Joy bay Huh paid millions of dollars to be on
Speaker 1: television and be an idiot. Hello, I'm Joy by High
Speaker 1: sound a little like Hillary but more of an exit.
Speaker 1: It's amazing to me. I think someone told me that
Speaker 1: she makes three million dollars a year to be in
Speaker 1: the view or two million dollars year to be in
Speaker 1: the view some crate and it's just what really, that's right,
Speaker 1: it's worth every penny to have Joy Bayha. Then it's
Speaker 1: say stupid things. But she doesn't have to know what
Speaker 1: he g because she's the Conadian. Uh. Here's here's what.
Speaker 1: Here's what the views view of tear gas and the
Speaker 1: Obama administration was Play seven. Now they point out that
Speaker 1: Obama had border patrol angents. He's tear gas at the
Speaker 1: border too, and no one was interested in covering it.
Speaker 1: Then is there is there evidence of that? Because I
Speaker 1: saw a picture. I'll show you this photo that I'm
Speaker 1: that's circulating right now. These two little girls shoeless fleeing
Speaker 1: from tear gas. So they have a photo like that
Speaker 1: when Obama wasn't on the last I check. President Obama
Speaker 1: is no longer in office. Trump is in office, and
Speaker 1: he's drawing and he's the country and this but Obama defense,
Speaker 1: you know, doesn't work for me. That's not going to
Speaker 1: say using tear gas. I think it's immoral when you're
Speaker 1: using tear gas against children. Okay, So Obama can do
Speaker 1: things and it's fine, and if Trump does it, it's
Speaker 1: terrible and immoral. That's I'm glad that that's now the
Speaker 1: the you know, that's another defense. That's what's offered up
Speaker 1: all the time. Okay, good to know, you know what
Speaker 1: she's like. Well, but did they have a photo? Is
Speaker 1: there a photo of this day with the children, of
Speaker 1: running with the buzz and the whole No, Joy, we
Speaker 1: don't need to worry about the photo because we know
Speaker 1: because Customs Border Patrol have already told us that, Yes,
Speaker 1: in fact, they did have to fire pepper spray projectiles
Speaker 1: under the Obama administration at the border because of riot
Speaker 1: like conditions. Yes, we have been told this. This is
Speaker 1: now a This is a fact that is verified. But
Speaker 1: are you sure it wasn't verified by somebody who's really
Speaker 1: smart he uses Google? Yes, Joy, very smart people who
Speaker 1: use the Google. We have no smoking gun that the
Speaker 1: Crown French was involved, not the intelligence community or anyone else.
Speaker 1: There is no smoking gun. We have not changed that.
Speaker 1: Accountability for the murder is our expectation of everyone involved
Speaker 1: in the murders. Accountability is our position. Have not changed
Speaker 1: at all. And by the way, I have read all
Speaker 1: the intel. I have personally read all the intelligence. I
Speaker 1: have read all the translations. You've seen all the intelligence
Speaker 1: which you believe. Do you believe that the Crownference Society
Speaker 1: RABIA orders as the goods telling. I do believe. I've
Speaker 1: read every piece of intelligence less come in the last
Speaker 1: few hours. I think I've read it all. There is
Speaker 1: no direct reporting connecting to the ground press to the
Speaker 1: orders to murders of afferition. And that's all I can
Speaker 1: say that I possified, said two of the most respected,
Speaker 1: most adept members of the Trump administration. There in the cabinet.
Speaker 1: You had Maddess to start off with Secretary Defense and
Speaker 1: then Secretary of State Pompeio weighing in both saying, look,
Speaker 1: we've we've both read all of the stuff in the
Speaker 1: Secretary of State and the Secretary Defense have access to
Speaker 1: absolutely anything I want to see, and we do not
Speaker 1: have smoking gun of its. We don't have clear proof
Speaker 1: that MBS was involved. Now I know that you know
Speaker 1: mom had been Salmon is somebody who all the different
Speaker 1: journals running around and say, oh, he had to know. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Do we think that he knew? Sure? Do I think
Speaker 1: that he knew? Yeah? But is that enough to take
Speaker 1: action that will jeopardize important strategic relationships with Saudi Arabia
Speaker 1: in the Middle East? Is that enough when the saudiast
Speaker 1: can turn on the spigot of chaos, instability and violence
Speaker 1: in Iraq or turn it off, when the Saudis can
Speaker 1: turn on the spigot of violence or or make it
Speaker 1: even more than it currently is in Yemen, or start
Speaker 1: to tamp it down you know, when the Saudis are
Speaker 1: the only real Mid East ally we have right now
Speaker 1: that are blocking Iranian ambitions the region. Look, do I
Speaker 1: think the Saudi state is terrible? Yeah? Do I think
Speaker 1: that radical Islam and Islamism are cancerous for any country? Absolutely?
Speaker 1: Is Saudi Arabia responsible for exporting for the metastasist if
Speaker 1: you will, of that cancer more than any other country
Speaker 1: in the world. Oh yeah, definitely. But can we just
Speaker 1: completely cut off relations with Saudi Arabia? No? Is that
Speaker 1: what would happen if we went after the premiere of
Speaker 1: that country. I mean, we don't even do that with Putin,
Speaker 1: Putin's order, the murders of journalists on British soil or
Speaker 1: I should say dissidence on British soil former Russians not
Speaker 1: I mean, they're they're kind of one of them. You know,
Speaker 1: what was his name, Litvinenko? I think he was. You know,
Speaker 1: he was writing and doing things. Remember, Kaushogi was a columnist,
Speaker 1: really more than he wasn't a non partisan journalist is
Speaker 1: trying to cover. Not that that affects whether he should
Speaker 1: be harmed one or the other, but just there's been
Speaker 1: so much misinformation out there about him, and he wasn't
Speaker 1: Islamist by the way, and very favorable toward Hamas you
Speaker 1: get all these individuals in the media running around acting
Speaker 1: like that's some kind of terrible slur, well, no, it's
Speaker 1: just the truth. But as I've been telling you all along,
Speaker 1: it's really not about Kaushogie. Ultimately, for all these progressive
Speaker 1: journals running around making all this noise about it, they
Speaker 1: want to criticize Trump and so they have to create
Speaker 1: this environment around the issue of Trump is not doing enough,
Speaker 1: Trump likes dictators. It's basically Trump's fault that we are
Speaker 1: in this situation. You know that they find a way
Speaker 1: to blame Trump for the murder of a Saudi, a
Speaker 1: Saudi journalist in Turkey, and from what I understand, he
Speaker 1: was here on a visa. He is not even although
Speaker 1: I can't get confirmation, it's not even a permanent a
Speaker 1: permanent Green card holder resident, which was another area of
Speaker 1: misreporting that I think is certainly eyebrow raising to say
Speaker 1: the to say the least, But you know, you see
Speaker 1: what's going on here because who steps in to make
Speaker 1: it very clear, That's why they're so focused on this issue. Harry,
Speaker 1: play clip six. We have a president who is part
Speaker 1: of the cover up as to what happened in that
Speaker 1: consulate or embassy when mister Kashogi was murdered, And we
Speaker 1: have a president and those closest to him who have
Speaker 1: their own personal commercial interests. That's a lie. Now, Hillary
Speaker 1: Clinton lying surprises none of you listening. But to say
Speaker 1: that he's part of the cover up, I mean, that's
Speaker 1: just an allegation for which there is no evidence whatsoever.
Speaker 1: In fact, Trump is as much a part of the
Speaker 1: cover up as Hillary is, because both of them have
Speaker 1: zero evidence to support that that charge. So I could
Speaker 1: say that Hillary's every bit as responsible for the cover
Speaker 1: up as Trump is. Trump was a part of that.
Speaker 1: You could say that Trump didn't take enough action. You
Speaker 1: could say that Trump, uh, you know, Trump isn't somebody
Speaker 1: who we should be you know, mirroring what he did
Speaker 1: here in terms of you know, the immediate days of
Speaker 1: figuring out what's going on, you know what. You can
Speaker 1: criticize him fun, but to say he's part of the
Speaker 1: cover up, now you're just saying that he's effectively he's
Speaker 1: got blood on his hands. Trump had nothing, No SAE
Speaker 1: person because that Trump had anything to do with this.
Speaker 1: No SAE person could say the US government had anything
Speaker 1: to do with this. This is not our this is
Speaker 1: not our problem. We didn't you know, we're not responsible
Speaker 1: for this. We're not the reason this happened. And I
Speaker 1: just wish there'd be a little more honesty about this.
Speaker 1: Is yet again, just like with the caravan, and they're saying, oh,
Speaker 1: it's a thousand miles away, Trump is making this up.
Speaker 1: They're just they were just saying stuff that wasn't true
Speaker 1: because it was useful to them at the time. Now,
Speaker 1: all of a sudden, you have all these journalists who
Speaker 1: don't know squat about how the Middle East actually works,
Speaker 1: and they're running around saying, Oh, if only Trump was
Speaker 1: doing what exactly what do they I mean? You know,
Speaker 1: I've been saying this for all What do they really
Speaker 1: want Trump to do about a murdered journalist in Turkey?
Speaker 1: That we don't have any and there's no charges we
Speaker 1: could even break. It's not US jurisdiction. What are we
Speaker 1: going to do? We're going to without By the way,
Speaker 1: people keep saying present the evidence. No, because the stuff
Speaker 1: that Pompeo and Madis are talking about, they say, I've
Speaker 1: read all the intelligence that's going to be classified collection.
Speaker 1: Could be even human sources, could be technical sources. We
Speaker 1: don't know. But they're going to protect that information. They
Speaker 1: can't just release it because people are curious. It's not
Speaker 1: like they're just trying to entrap General Flynn, for example,
Speaker 1: by blowing classified information out there in public because to
Speaker 1: settle a political score. You know, the Libs will do that,
Speaker 1: we know. But Trump administration cabin members are trying to
Speaker 1: be a little more responsible with this information. But it's
Speaker 1: just yet again, it's just more a lot of jawing,
Speaker 1: a lot of tough talk from a bunch of people
Speaker 1: who aren't even honest about what they're really pushing for here.
Speaker 1: Why are they so focused on Cause Shoge? What do
Speaker 1: they really want? The answer is they want to complain
Speaker 1: about Trump. The answer is they want to make Trump's
Speaker 1: fondness for dictators even though the Saudis have been a
Speaker 1: dictatorship for as long as it's existed, okay, since the
Speaker 1: actual beginning of Saudi Arabia, it has been a dictatorship.
Speaker 1: It's been a monarchy. But they want to act like
Speaker 1: this is all Trump's fault that just happened to him.
Speaker 1: These people are just they're full of it. They're full
Speaker 1: of it, and the adults are making the decisions on
Speaker 1: this one, and that's a good thing. There are obviously
Speaker 1: accomplishments that that I'm extraordinarily proud of and believe deeply
Speaker 1: in um. I think the Affordable Charact was important. It
Speaker 1: was incomplete, but it was it was a starter house.
Speaker 1: I was extraordinarily proud of the Paris Accords. I know
Speaker 1: we're an oil country, and we need American energy. And
Speaker 1: by the way, American energy production you wouldn't always know it,
Speaker 1: but you know it went up every year I was president.
Speaker 1: You know that whole Suddenly America is like the biggest
Speaker 1: oil producer and the biggest gay. That was me, people,
Speaker 1: I just wanted you to so you know, sometimes you
Speaker 1: go to Wall Street and folks will be grumbling about
Speaker 1: anti business. I said, have you checked where your stocks
Speaker 1: were when I came in office? We're there, now, what
Speaker 1: what are you talking? What are you complaining about? Just
Speaker 1: to say thank you please. Obama is arrogant to the
Speaker 1: point of delusion. That's not new, but it's more apparent
Speaker 1: now that he's no longer even the president. Right, It's
Speaker 1: one thing to be incredibly insufferably arrogant when you're actually
Speaker 1: the leader of the free world. Look, Trump is an
Speaker 1: arrogant guy. I just think that Trump is much more
Speaker 1: effective at doing what he says he's going to do
Speaker 1: and much better for the country that Obama was. But
Speaker 1: you know, Trump has got a big ego, no no
Speaker 1: question about it. Right, we're all adult series speak honestly
Speaker 1: about this. But Obama's ego, you know, is is incredible
Speaker 1: in its own way. I mean, it's it's he will.
Speaker 1: This is for Obama to talk about America being an
Speaker 1: energy superpower, which, by the way, I won't know why
Speaker 1: we're not spending as much time as we used to be,
Speaker 1: at least worried about the Middle East despite all the
Speaker 1: media and wow these days about all Kashogie and Iran
Speaker 1: and all and stuff. You know, the you want to
Speaker 1: know why we're not so focused on the Middle East,
Speaker 1: it's in part because of what has changed, what has
Speaker 1: changed with regard to global energy reality, because because of
Speaker 1: shale oil, fracking, things that liberals were making movies to
Speaker 1: try to frighten people away from Liberals were lying their
Speaker 1: faces off about fracking and the new techniques that have
Speaker 1: turned I mean, shale oil has turned America into a
Speaker 1: global energy superpower. We had built all these natural gas,
Speaker 1: these natural gas portals for import of natural gas, and
Speaker 1: guess what now we've had to turn them around for
Speaker 1: export of natural gas as well. When we are just
Speaker 1: we are crushing it in all the best ways as
Speaker 1: an energy power. Now it's so important for our economy.
Speaker 1: It's been so helpful to our growth. And Obama was
Speaker 1: opposed to it at every step of the way. Obama
Speaker 1: did everything in his power literally that you can think of.
Speaker 1: I mean, and maybe there's some things he couldn't think
Speaker 1: of it. But in every way that Obama could have
Speaker 1: been in opposite, no offshore drilling, no Keystone XL pipeline up,
Speaker 1: just go down the line. In every policy matter where
Speaker 1: it came up, Obama was opposed no drilling on federal
Speaker 1: lands wherever he could oppose it, right, he did everything
Speaker 1: he could. This would be like Trump. Or here's an
Speaker 1: even easier example. This would be like me saying, so
Speaker 1: the Democrats did really well in the midterm election. You
Speaker 1: can say thank you to Buck Sexton Democrats. It's like,
Speaker 1: what all I do is try to keep Democrats from
Speaker 1: winning elections. My life's work post intelligence community has been
Speaker 1: trying to defeat the Libs. That's what I'm doing. I
Speaker 1: am open about it, I'm honest about it. I want
Speaker 1: Libs to come join our side. I want them to
Speaker 1: understand the Conservatism is a better governing philosophy for the country.
Speaker 1: But I want them to lose. I want our side
Speaker 1: to win. So you could imagine me taking credit for
Speaker 1: the Democrat victory in the midterm would seem like a
Speaker 1: kind of crazy thing to do, And that's exactly what
Speaker 1: Obama's doing here with oil. He was so hostile. But
Speaker 1: you see with Obama, it's just he's everything. You know,
Speaker 1: he takes credit for the economy. Now everything is how
Speaker 1: awesome Obama is. That's just how he goes through goes
Speaker 1: through his life, and there are a lot of people
Speaker 1: that tell him. And this is also why, Yeah, it's
Speaker 1: Trump a little bit. Does Trump have a little bit
Speaker 1: too much swagger? Sometimes? Maybe, But he's got to deal
Speaker 1: with the fact that, unlike Obama, who had ever walking
Speaker 1: around worshiping him, ever, walks around in the press corps
Speaker 1: and in the establishment hating Trump. So I feel like
Speaker 1: I give him more leeway for a big ego, not
Speaker 1: just because obviously he's president United States and pulled off
Speaker 1: a political miracle to become president the United States, but
Speaker 1: but also because he's got to, you know, put the
Speaker 1: shields up, shields high, if you will, in order to
Speaker 1: withstand these withering assaults of hatred for the media all
Speaker 1: the time. Right, So he, I mean, Trump better have
Speaker 1: a lot of confidence in himself because certainly not gonna
Speaker 1: not gonna be able to count on anybody else to
Speaker 1: prop up his confidence. And Obama, on the other hand,
Speaker 1: was just constantly told how perfect and brilliant, wonderful he was.
Speaker 1: But Obama's talk didn't stop there when it comes to
Speaker 1: the usual from this guy and this sort of self
Speaker 1: congratulation from Obama play clip three. This big contradiction, which
Speaker 1: is we talk a lot about democracy, but we're not
Speaker 1: treating everybody the same gender. Part of the reason everybody
Speaker 1: could could get along pretty good in Congress in nineteen
Speaker 1: fifty seven or nineteen sixty five was there weren't any
Speaker 1: women there to say, what you guys are doing it
Speaker 1: stupid man. They started questioning things and suddenly men are
Speaker 1: kind of uncomfortable changes the consensus, right, I mean, this
Speaker 1: is just it's just such a cheap it's such a
Speaker 1: cheap line. Really, you know. The reason people first of all,
Speaker 1: people didn't use people used to get along in Congress
Speaker 1: in the sixties. People have always this is like people
Speaker 1: will say that, oh, are you know the discourse right
Speaker 1: now is so nasty. Why can't we go back to
Speaker 1: the time of the founding, you know? And they'll say
Speaker 1: that and say, oh, you mean when you had laws
Speaker 1: passed to criminalize opposition to certain policies in this country,
Speaker 1: the Alien and Sedition Acts. For example, when when you
Speaker 1: had newspaper people running newspapers getting sent to prison for
Speaker 1: what they were printing. That happened in the early eighteen
Speaker 1: eighteen o one eighteen o two time period, that was
Speaker 1: happening in this country. You look back at what people
Speaker 1: were saying when Jefferson and Adams were at each other's throats,
Speaker 1: and Jefferson and other people, and there was not some
Speaker 1: golden era of everybody was so nice to each other anyway,
Speaker 1: this notion that yeah, everyone got along because there were
Speaker 1: there were no women to tell them how dumb they were.
Speaker 1: You know, yeah, Obama, thanks for adding that into into
Speaker 1: the conversation today. He really is somebody. This is also
Speaker 1: why when the media is telling us how terrible Trump is,
Speaker 1: how he brags about himself all the time, we're saying,
Speaker 1: you know, you they lost all credibility in the Obama years.
Speaker 1: They don't realize they lost all credibility. You know, with Clinton,
Speaker 1: they realized that he was a disgusting jerk, but they
Speaker 1: liked his policies, so they lied and covered up for him.
Speaker 1: But but they at least kind of realized that Clinton was.
Speaker 1: There were some libs, big libs. You realize Clinton was
Speaker 1: disgusting with Obama. Everything he did was perfect, and it
Speaker 1: was just it was just a joke that the media
Speaker 1: was any kind of check on his power or on
Speaker 1: you know, speaking truth to power. Now we're gonna have
Speaker 1: my buddy Benny Johnson joining us here in just a moment.
Speaker 1: Benny's always a lot of fun. We're talking to him
Speaker 1: about how the media is coming after not just Trump,
Speaker 1: but of course Milania. Here. Let's just hear quickly from
Speaker 1: the First Lady, and then we'll have Benny take up
Speaker 1: a issue in a few moments. Play fourteen. I know
Speaker 1: when I started, we'd be best and with social media
Speaker 1: initiative that I will be criticized, but I will do
Speaker 1: but what it's right for the next generation and to
Speaker 1: be focused on helping how to use it and how
Speaker 1: much to use it the social media that's very important
Speaker 1: for me, so next generation can be respectful and kind. Also,
Speaker 1: sometimes you need to fight back. I'm sorry, I listen,
Speaker 1: She's right, sometimes you do need to fight back. How
Speaker 1: and why is the First Lady felt that need recently?
Speaker 1: I thought, first ladies were kind of beyond getting attacked
Speaker 1: in nasty personal ways, you know. And certainly the media
Speaker 1: was a praetorian guard for Michelle Obama for all of
Speaker 1: her eight years as First Lady. But what's going on
Speaker 1: with the current first Lady? We got Benny Johnson. The
Speaker 1: Daily College is going to address that and more coming
Speaker 1: up our three Facebook, Twitter, Google. These are incredibly wealthy,
Speaker 1: powerful companies. They're also very progressive companies. If you just
Speaker 1: want to be chatting with folks about any topic that's
Speaker 1: on your mind, you want to share your opinions and
Speaker 1: not worry about progressive bias, snippy dot com is for you.
Speaker 1: If you look at snippy dot com in the past
Speaker 1: and left, look again. Thousands of my listeners have joistippy
Speaker 1: dot com, expressing their opinions and stirring up lively conversations.
Speaker 1: It's an unbiased social media platform all about conversation and community,
Speaker 1: so where everyone's free to express their thoughts and share
Speaker 1: their opinions, totally free to join, open to everyone. So
Speaker 1: join us at snippy dot com and let your opinion matter.
Speaker 1: No shadow banning and no suppression of conservative thought ever.
Speaker 1: Now with an updated user interface and exciting new features,
Speaker 1: also available in the Apple App Store and now available
Speaker 1: for Android. Snippy is your new alternative social media, So
Speaker 1: go check it out for yourself. Discuss topics really, no
Speaker 1: suppression from administrators, no left wing bias. Snippy dot com.
Speaker 1: It is time to own some libs. We have for
Speaker 1: that very purpose a great owner of libs, mister Benny Johnson,
Speaker 1: my former colleague at The Blaze many many eons ago,
Speaker 1: who is now at the Daily Caller where he is
Speaker 1: editor at large. Mister Johnson, we wait with bated breath.
Speaker 1: Breath breath. Pardon me, radio host can't speak apparently, What
Speaker 1: do you got for us today? Betty? Tell us what's
Speaker 1: going on with Milannia the owner of libs? That is
Speaker 1: an amazing I should just make that my title, and
Speaker 1: I should just that should just be what I get
Speaker 1: on my business card. You should put that on your
Speaker 1: Twitter bio. Probably I'm just saying great owner of libs. Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: the ownership of the liberal is the classic way to
Speaker 1: say it. So Melania has owned some libs. In recent days,
Speaker 1: a lot of people in the press followed a longstanding
Speaker 1: media tradition of hating literally everything that Donald Trump does
Speaker 1: or anything that his family does, however, interestin and even
Speaker 1: if it's celebrating the birth of our Lord and Savior
Speaker 1: Jesus Christ. So Milannia decorated the House, the White House,
Speaker 1: in beautiful decorations. They were sparkly, they were fantastic. There's
Speaker 1: literally nothing wrong with them. They are just Christmas decorations,
Speaker 1: and they are done in a classical since and they
Speaker 1: honor our troops, they honor people who serve in our
Speaker 1: military and police and firefighters. And it's really a beautiful
Speaker 1: I saw it. I saw them myself. They're beautiful. Well,
Speaker 1: the press hated honor for it, an attacked her for it,
Speaker 1: attacked her, called the Christmas decorations the Christmas from hell,
Speaker 1: said that she must be trying to make a horror film.
Speaker 1: They did this to her last year. This is not
Speaker 1: something new. I guess this is something that's going to
Speaker 1: go on for as long as Trump is in office.
Speaker 1: They're just going to hate every single stitch of the
Speaker 1: man's body. And so they wrote all these mean pieces
Speaker 1: about it. But Milania said today in a speech at
Speaker 1: Liberty University that she doesn't give a damn my words,
Speaker 1: not hers. But essentially, if she says she thinks they're fantastic.
Speaker 1: People are gonna have different opinions. I'm first lady, screw you,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna do what I want in the White House.
Speaker 1: So it was, it was, it was really great. Uh
Speaker 1: can I just catch throw in here, Betty real quick?
Speaker 1: I don't know. I'm assuming you're up on Jimmy Woods's
Speaker 1: Twitter feat even James Woods, the actor, obviously great actor
Speaker 1: and really entertaining Twitter follow and he just shared a
Speaker 1: photo of Milania and pointed out, you know, she doesn't
Speaker 1: get put on magazine cover. She does not that all
Speaker 1: the time, and she is not to you know, not
Speaker 1: to sound superficial. Probably the most probably we could say
Speaker 1: that the most beautiful first lady in the history of
Speaker 1: the United States. And yet the fashion magazines and all
Speaker 1: this they don't get. Now, who really cares for any
Speaker 1: of that? Like we voted for Trump. But it does show,
Speaker 1: to your point, just the constant animus. It's not even
Speaker 1: just a Trump. They hate his wife too. She hasn't
Speaker 1: done anything. She just walks around looking perfect all the time,
Speaker 1: trying to be nice to people. Right. They also hate Baron.
Speaker 1: There was there was a cycle where people called Baron
Speaker 1: an animal mutilator said that she's a future school shooter
Speaker 1: and he's ten, right, something like that. Right, he's twelve
Speaker 1: years old, now, well he was eleven when they entered
Speaker 1: the White House. It's it's just madness, man. So but
Speaker 1: she fought back a little bit, or at least pushed
Speaker 1: back a little bit, so that that's good to see, uh,
Speaker 1: speaking of people who should get fought back against. It's
Speaker 1: kind of a rough transition, but we'll go with it.
Speaker 1: Avanati Avanati, Michael Avanati, the lawyer Tucker who was kind
Speaker 1: of to have you on a show last night. We're
Speaker 1: going to get back to that in a moment, by
Speaker 1: the way, because we've got a great story that's on
Speaker 1: the Daily Caller from last night that I've witnessed part of.
Speaker 1: That's what we call a teaser in the business, folks.
Speaker 1: But Avanati is somebody that the Democrats were I remember
Speaker 1: Benny even a couple of months ago saying he may
Speaker 1: be a presidential contender. Now he's been accused of felony
Speaker 1: domestic abuse, arrested for it. And by the way, Stormy
Speaker 1: Daniels says, well, you tell everybody, Benny, what's the latest
Speaker 1: with the Stormy Daniels Avenati saga sure so a story
Speaker 1: that just broke minutes ago and the Daily Beast Stormy
Speaker 1: Daniels gave The Daily Beast a lengthy quote where she
Speaker 1: essentially distances herself from Michael Abanati, who has long represented
Speaker 1: her has spun this lawsuit into thousands and thousands of
Speaker 1: endless cable news bookings. I think he pretty much set
Speaker 1: up a tent inside of the green room at CNN.
Speaker 1: He was on so much and suing the present for defamation. Anyway,
Speaker 1: story Daniels and him are shockingly on the rocks. The
Speaker 1: famous porn actress is saying that he didn't represent her,
Speaker 1: effectively saying that he lied to her about the gofund
Speaker 1: me that he set up for her, that he still
Speaker 1: hasn't told her where the money went for the go
Speaker 1: fund me, essentially saying that he's he's a scam artist,
Speaker 1: which a lot of us knew in the first place,
Speaker 1: and that he was using this woman and with the
Speaker 1: auspice of saying that he's defending women. She also says
Speaker 1: that he speaks on behalf of her without her consents
Speaker 1: and isn't behaving like an attorney client relationship should. This
Speaker 1: is things that I think anyone with two eyeballs could see.
Speaker 1: But this is pretty damning for Michael Labanati. Is this
Speaker 1: to say that the creepy porn lawyer is in fact
Speaker 1: exploiting the former porn star for the purposes of advancing
Speaker 1: his own very narrow self interest in the financial and
Speaker 1: media realms. That is a shock. I mean, I think
Speaker 1: this absolutely shocks no one who's been following Michael Avanatti closely,
Speaker 1: and we've been digging into his business dealings at the
Speaker 1: Daily Caller, We've been digging into his past, finding a
Speaker 1: lot of people with a lot of really bad histories
Speaker 1: with him, and you gotta think to yourself, I mean,
Speaker 1: you know, I can the Sheeta change his spots sort
Speaker 1: of thing. And by the way, I think that I
Speaker 1: think it's a pretty strong argument, and no one can
Speaker 1: never prove this right or wrong, but I think it's
Speaker 1: a pretty strong argument that it was really because of
Speaker 1: Avanati that I think Kavanaugh, which you and I were
Speaker 1: very much, you know, in the trenches on that here
Speaker 1: in DC and talking the White House and everybody about
Speaker 1: how they needed to stay the course and keep fighting
Speaker 1: on the Kavanaugh nomination. I think that Abanati might have
Speaker 1: might have accidentally, despite his best efforts, tipped it toward
Speaker 1: Cavanaugh by coming out with the sweatneck allegation. I think
Speaker 1: that he, in a sense, Avanati has changed history for
Speaker 1: the better. Right, Yes, well, the sweatneck allegation was the
Speaker 1: allegation that is the out was the outlier that people
Speaker 1: and Republicans were able to use to say, you're looking
Speaker 1: at this guy, right, this is a guy who has
Speaker 1: to defend drinking beer, and you're telling me that he
Speaker 1: ran a gang rate circle. Yeah. I mean that the
Speaker 1: sweatneck allegation was where, all of a sudden, if people
Speaker 1: who believed that were either naive or imbeciles or both.
Speaker 1: I mean, there was no there's no third option that
Speaker 1: was that was utterly ridiculous. It would be like somebody
Speaker 1: coming forward and saying that Benny Johnson is actually a
Speaker 1: cyborg sent back in time to save us from a
Speaker 1: future where progressive Oh my god, is that really happening, Benny.
Speaker 1: I'm just thanks, I'm getting scared right now. Let's say
Speaker 1: it out loud, by the way. I want to say that,
Speaker 1: yeah exactly. I want to say that, you know, last
Speaker 1: night and this little story that Betty and I will.
Speaker 1: We'll share here all there. Last night I was I
Speaker 1: was on Tucker's show. Somebody saw that. Its great to
Speaker 1: see Tucker. I wish we had the off camera banter
Speaker 1: was even more fun than what we could talk about
Speaker 1: on air. He had common audience there. But right before
Speaker 1: I go to see Tucker, Benny, I was chatting up
Speaker 1: our mutual friend, one of the you know, the conservatives,
Speaker 1: the good God fearing America loving conservatives in DC. We
Speaker 1: all find each other, we all stick together. So I'm
Speaker 1: talking to to Harlan Hill and the three of us, Yes,
Speaker 1: the three of us, Yes, wonderful, Yeah, yeah, well yeah
Speaker 1: we we we all were all thickest thieves here in town.
Speaker 1: But I see Harlan at Fox News and this guy
Speaker 1: walks up to Harlan and shakes his hand and introduces himself,
Speaker 1: which is fine, of course, but and I hear his name.
Speaker 1: Then I look down. I realize this guy's wearing like
Speaker 1: black basketball shorts with a suit, which I had never
Speaker 1: seen before. He's not wearing like shorts that are part
Speaker 1: of the suit. He's just wearing it randomly, a suit
Speaker 1: with black basketball shorts. And it's Philippe Rains, who is
Speaker 1: the former senior Clinton You know what, is he an
Speaker 1: advisor to Hillary Clinton? Like a very senior guy in
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton circle. And he came up and afterwards I
Speaker 1: see Harland, or rather Harland texts me and he tells
Speaker 1: me that this guy went on and on air obviously
Speaker 1: started saying all the usual stuff about how the Hillary
Speaker 1: emails nonsense and Muller and all the usual Democrat talking points.
Speaker 1: But then off air accosted Harland while wearing shorts on
Speaker 1: the bottom a suit up top. Harland took a photo
Speaker 1: of this. He looks the guy looks like a lunatic.
Speaker 1: He said something incredibly crass to Harland, and it's all
Speaker 1: the front page of the Daily Caller for those of
Speaker 1: you who want to see it. You know the story
Speaker 1: I'm talking about, right, Yes, of course this was crazy
Speaker 1: that how is this guy a senior Hillary Clinton advisor?
Speaker 1: Like even for Hillary this is nuts. I mean not
Speaker 1: just not just senior advisor. I mean listen, this guy
Speaker 1: worked for her back in the White House and then
Speaker 1: moved with her into the Senate. Then was like a
Speaker 1: number one in the State Department. I believe he was
Speaker 1: chief communications deputy inside of the State Department. This guy
Speaker 1: is as bona fide as you can get inside of
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton world. He had Hillary had one. There is
Speaker 1: no doubt about it that he'd be working at a
Speaker 1: major federal agency or be working inside the White House
Speaker 1: and some type of official capacity. And this is how
Speaker 1: much twenty sixteen broke people buck. Now instead of working
Speaker 1: in the White House, he's one. I'm dering around Fox
Speaker 1: with no pants on going on tiraids, blind rage tirades
Speaker 1: against Donald Trump spokespeople. Yeah, I mean this, this guy.
Speaker 1: You've got one of the most senior Hillary people out
Speaker 1: there walking around a cable news a cable news channel,
Speaker 1: like a guy who's you know, lost his sense of
Speaker 1: where he is and he's walking around and like his
Speaker 1: pj's down below. It's crazy, except they're not even pants.
Speaker 1: This was really a sickening photo. It was it was,
Speaker 1: it was. It was sickening. You expect people to be
Speaker 1: doing that when they're like doing a hit from Palm
Speaker 1: Beach and they know a lot of people like you do.
Speaker 1: A ton of cable news people do hits from all
Speaker 1: over the country and they're just wearing a pair of shorts.
Speaker 1: You're not gonna see what. Yeah, but you don't go
Speaker 1: into the news bureau and it's freezing outside inside the bureau.
Speaker 1: It's very cold in DC right now. This was Did
Speaker 1: you know he was kind of a whack of due beforehand.
Speaker 1: I didn't know this guy. I just figured he's Clinton,
Speaker 1: so he's obviously a soul is corrupted monster. And he
Speaker 1: was mean to Harland too, which I don't like. But
Speaker 1: you know, I didn't realize that he was a total
Speaker 1: wha could do. Apparently he is. Tells you something about
Speaker 1: the Clintons he is. I mean, John Podesta kicked him
Speaker 1: off the Hillary Clinton campaign because he was such a sociopath.
Speaker 1: There's some really great there's some really great behind the
Speaker 1: scenes stories about him and Podesta butting heads and Podesta
Speaker 1: winning out, and hence he didn't ryans, didn't have a sleep,
Speaker 1: did not have a huge hand in Hillary Clinton's election
Speaker 1: campaign in twenty sixteen. I'm not sure he could have helped.
Speaker 1: I'm not sure he could have helped anything. Probably would
Speaker 1: have just heard everything. But yeah, this guy has filled
Speaker 1: my DMS on Twitter with This guy's filled my DMS
Speaker 1: on Twitter with Warren Peace of Twitter DM conversations getting
Speaker 1: angry at me for writing stories about him and then
Speaker 1: blocks me. So so yeah, you gotta Whenever a DEM
Speaker 1: slides into your DMS, you gotta run for cover man,
Speaker 1: because who knows what's going to happen. Benny Johnson, everybody,
Speaker 1: he is doing God's work down here in DC for
Speaker 1: the Daily Caller. He's the editor at large. Follow him
Speaker 1: on Twitter, mister Johnson, come back soon, Hey, thank you
Speaker 1: so much. Fuck all right, team much more coming to
Speaker 1: stay with me. Holidays for me means a lot of
Speaker 1: online shopping, a lot of searching around for stuff to get,
Speaker 1: and that means that my information is often out there right,
Speaker 1: especially if from using public WiFi. If you want to
Speaker 1: be in a position where you don't have to worry
Speaker 1: about somebody else getting access to your data, selling your
Speaker 1: data to third parties, or even worse, hacking into your computer,
Speaker 1: you want Express VPN. Express VPN has easy use apps.
Speaker 1: They just run in the background protecting you online. They
Speaker 1: encrypt your data, and they hide your public IP address.
Speaker 1: Costs less than seven dollars a month. I love my
Speaker 1: Express VPN. You need to check it out for yourself.
Speaker 1: It's so easy and it just gives you peace of
Speaker 1: mind online. Protect your online activity today and find out
Speaker 1: how you can get three months free at express vpn
Speaker 1: dot com slash buck. That's Express vpn dot com slash
Speaker 1: buck for three months free with a one year package. Again.
Speaker 1: Visit express vpn dot com slash buck to learn more.
Speaker 1: I mean, he's doing great. That's saying bat that right now.
Speaker 1: You can look at what happened at it's terrible. I'm
Speaker 1: saying that slows, which even the White House says it
Speaker 1: will in the twenty nineteen year. He can't just be
Speaker 1: blaming everybody else. Hey, can I can I give you
Speaker 1: can interesting to lost the house? Did you know, Philippe
Speaker 1: that we just had record tax revenues. Despite that record
Speaker 1: tax revenue, people are losing their jobs under tax to
Speaker 1: say thank you so much. Harlan and Philippe play. You
Speaker 1: could tell it was about to get testy. It was
Speaker 1: about that was that was our man, Harlan. We just
Speaker 1: we just reached out to him. Now we'll get him
Speaker 1: on the show tomorrow. Oh Man, Harland's great. I actually
Speaker 1: think Harlan might be filling in by the way over
Speaker 1: the holidays on radio for you know, hopefully we'll get
Speaker 1: some Harlan, some raheem. There's anybody I want to put
Speaker 1: this out there at all of you in Team Buckland.
Speaker 1: If there's anybody that you really think would be a
Speaker 1: great guest host, please don't send me somebody that nobody's
Speaker 1: ever heard of before, Okay, because that's not gonna fly,
Speaker 1: because I have to get it the my bosses at Premiere.
Speaker 1: I have to be like, oh, yeah, that person. But
Speaker 1: Harlan Raheem, I mean, anybody that you know it would
Speaker 1: be great actually be ah Seb Gorka probably, but I
Speaker 1: don't know if he might might already be in the
Speaker 1: rotation to do he might be doing Hannity's I think
Speaker 1: he subs for Hannity sometimes. Anyway, if you got somebody
Speaker 1: that you think would be great, let me know and
Speaker 1: we will will we'll reach out to them and over
Speaker 1: the holidays because I'm gonna be taking off some days,
Speaker 1: taking off some time at the end of the month
Speaker 1: in December because buck buck is running on fumes. But
Speaker 1: so we'll get some great guest hosts and and make
Speaker 1: sure you have fresh content in the Freedom Hunt. But anyway,
Speaker 1: so back to this Harlan Philip Rains thing. Man, it's
Speaker 1: just because I was there and I saw it unfold
Speaker 1: I don't know why this guy's walking around in shorts,
Speaker 1: but if you haven't seen the photos, they're worth They're
Speaker 1: worth checking out. And Harlan put Up debated Hillary This
Speaker 1: is on Twitter debated Hillary Clinton's former senior advisor, Philip Rains. Afterwards,
Speaker 1: he came at me screaming like a maniac. I thought
Speaker 1: he was going to cry. He told me to clean
Speaker 1: the blank blank off my face. I can't tell you
Speaker 1: what he wrote, whatever that means. Best part he had
Speaker 1: no pants on hashtag unhinged. Oh my gosh, it is.
Speaker 1: It is quite a fashion statement that this guy pulls off.
Speaker 1: I've never seen it before, so man, good time, John,
Speaker 1: have you seen you've seen the photos. I think everybody
Speaker 1: should know that this is he needs to I see,
Speaker 1: I can't make fun of anybody for not being tann
Speaker 1: because I am as I'm as pasty white as anybody
Speaker 1: could ever know. It's winter, but no one should be
Speaker 1: that pasty white. Yeah, I guess so. Oh by the way,
Speaker 1: I didn't get in as before. But you know, it
Speaker 1: turns out Pelosi POI oh, what a shock. She's gonna
Speaker 1: be the Speaker of the House. Everybody, the vote has
Speaker 1: happened she's gonna be Speaker of the House. And sure enough,
Speaker 1: you know, there was there was like a week ago,
Speaker 1: I think there were what eighteen members, eighteen Democrats in
Speaker 1: the Congress who are like, we're not going to vote
Speaker 1: for Pelosi. Of course, we want fresh leadership here in
Speaker 1: the House. Yeah right, Um, turns out that that's not
Speaker 1: gonna be. That's not gonna be what happens here. Uh,
Speaker 1: Pelosi is there's not gonna be fresh leadership. That's for sure.
Speaker 1: It's gonna be Pelosi. And that's that's kind of what
Speaker 1: we got on this one. Oh but here's Pelosi speaking
Speaker 1: about her much expected by anybody paying attention, victory today.
Speaker 1: I play fifteen John. I think we're in a pretty
Speaker 1: good shape. But again, I don't speak. I don't want
Speaker 1: to make other people's announcements for them. But we go
Speaker 1: forward with confidence, and you melitate with you, and that
Speaker 1: just risk her concern. I would word about okay, but
Speaker 1: you want to tell you something. I'm talking about. Scores
Speaker 1: of members of Congress who just gave me a vote,
Speaker 1: are giving me a vote of confidence. That is where
Speaker 1: our focuses are there. Dissenters, yes, but I expect to
Speaker 1: have a powerful vote as we go forward. So Pelosi is,
Speaker 1: according to political one step closer to the Speaker of
Speaker 1: the House position. She won her party's nomination for the
Speaker 1: one hundred and sixteenth Congress. She also has to pick
Speaker 1: up fifteen votes to get back to Speaker's chair, and
Speaker 1: she's confidence you'll get there. The vote was two or
Speaker 1: three to thirty two or three to thirty two with
Speaker 1: three bank blank ballots. Uh, Pelosi said, a vote of confidence.
Speaker 1: There are some dissenters. Guess what it's gonna happen. Pelosi
Speaker 1: is going to be a next Speak of the House.
Speaker 1: That's just astonishing that this is the only this is
Speaker 1: the only woman. Apparently the Democrats are able to put
Speaker 1: in this this position. Only anybody male or female Democrats
Speaker 1: are putting in this position of leadership. And I just
Speaker 1: sit here and I say to you, why is it
Speaker 1: that there's all this rhetoric from Democrats about, you know,
Speaker 1: the Party of youth, and and they talk about how
Speaker 1: in this last this last series of congressional elections, they
Speaker 1: have so much diversity, so much new idea, new new ideas,
Speaker 1: new thinking coming from Democrats. But then when it comes
Speaker 1: time for their leader to pick their leader. It's Posi.
Speaker 1: Oh man, it's gonna be at help. I think the Republicans,
Speaker 1: insofar as they can run on this a little bit,
Speaker 1: because Pelosi is about as out of touch with normal
Speaker 1: Americans as any politician could ever be. But she knows
Speaker 1: how to look. She's the one who got Obamacare through.
Speaker 1: So you're gonna have a monolithic Democratic Party. Don't be
Speaker 1: surprised when you got that coming your way, Speaker Pelosi.
Speaker 1: It's gonna happen. Buck gets results. My friends probably thinking,
Speaker 1: what is what is he? What is he gonna get
Speaker 1: all braggadocious about right now? I like I like humble Buck.
Speaker 1: I don't like this bragging fellow. Well, I'm sorry, but
Speaker 1: this is one area, this is one issue where I
Speaker 1: feel like I'm allowed to not take a victory lap,
Speaker 1: but at least say that I was a bit ahead
Speaker 1: of the curve. Turns out that my hatred of mosquitoes,
Speaker 1: and I've told you about some of my battles of mosquitoes.
Speaker 1: That told you that. You know, I've been kept up
Speaker 1: all night and I remember I had this light and
Speaker 1: I had to hold it to my chest and flick
Speaker 1: on my reading light. Whenever you hear, you know, a
Speaker 1: little mosquito flower on my head and I finally it
Speaker 1: kept me up for hours one night in New York.
Speaker 1: I finally got him, and with one swipe in my
Speaker 1: hand and the red splatter on my wall, I couldn't
Speaker 1: get it out of the wall for like weeks afterwards,
Speaker 1: but it was worth it. I hate mosquitoes, and mosquitoes
Speaker 1: are the greatest animal foe of mankind. If you're not
Speaker 1: including single celled organisms like viruses and things like that,
Speaker 1: mosquitoes are the worst. I guess. Actually, a virus is
Speaker 1: not a I know some of your yelling at me.
Speaker 1: It's not okay, I know it's not a Technically, a
Speaker 1: virus is not even really an organism. It's kind of
Speaker 1: something else. But the point being here, the point being,
Speaker 1: mosquitoes are terrible. And I've been saying, why can't we,
Speaker 1: with all of our fancy technology, we landed a man
Speaker 1: on the moon, or at least we created a video
Speaker 1: to make it seem like we did. I'm kidding, I'm kidding.
Speaker 1: Silicon Valley researchers, it turns out, are attacking blood suckers
Speaker 1: in California's Fresno County is according to Bloomberg, it's the
Speaker 1: first salvo and an an unlikely war for Alphabet, the
Speaker 1: parent company of Google, eradicating mosquito born disease around the world.
Speaker 1: A white high top Mercedes. Oh, it goes into some
Speaker 1: background here, high top Mercedes van blah blah. And here's
Speaker 1: how they're doing it. They are using a mosquito control
Speaker 1: technique with incredible potential. They have mosquitoes that were bred
Speaker 1: in an ultra high tech surrounding, and they were infected
Speaker 1: with wall Bossia, a common bacterium. When the eighty thousand
Speaker 1: lab bred wall Bossia infected male mosquitoes mate with their
Speaker 1: counterpart females in the wild, the result is stealth annihilation.
Speaker 1: The offspring never hatch. This is amazing. Just think about this.
Speaker 1: Okay for those you, especially those you live in the
Speaker 1: warmer parts of the country, imagine if you never had
Speaker 1: to worry about mosquitoes again. By the way, people who say, oh,
Speaker 1: they're sary for life and bull crap, we have lost
Speaker 1: exponential amounts more species over the history of the planet
Speaker 1: than exists currently right now. We don't have to protect
Speaker 1: every species. I'm sorry. I know we're told as a
Speaker 1: little old book, but they're not. There are other bugs.
Speaker 1: There's no shortage of bugs out there all right. The
Speaker 1: little birds, little tweet tweets flying around, they can find
Speaker 1: something else to chase after when they're tweet tweeting and eat.
Speaker 1: There's lots of little flies and things. They Mosquitoes are
Speaker 1: responsible for so much misery. There's so much misery, including
Speaker 1: the spread of dengey fever chicken gunya in the tropics,
Speaker 1: and obviously West Nile malaria zeka. I mean, mosquitos are
Speaker 1: the worst. And if they actually are able to come
Speaker 1: up with this way to prevent mosquitoes from breeding, I
Speaker 1: think this would be This would be fantastic. It's not
Speaker 1: just something that'll make our camp trips more fun or
Speaker 1: going out fishing enough to worry now about. I mean,
Speaker 1: it just it gives me the It puts me on
Speaker 1: edge even just thinking about it. This would be one
Speaker 1: of those things in technology that really would help all
Speaker 1: of us, and it would save just millions and millions
Speaker 1: of lives. Think about that. We think of mosquitoes as
Speaker 1: a nuisance, but they're really deadly and they put people
Speaker 1: through tremendous suffering. Malaria is Malaria is a horrible disease.
Speaker 1: I will say I was out with the buddy of mine,
Speaker 1: former agency buddy, not long ago, and he managed to
Speaker 1: work into a conversation. Yeah, I must have missed that game.
Speaker 1: I was unable to watch because I was recovering from
Speaker 1: DN gay fever. And the way he's slipped in the conversation,
Speaker 1: We're like, oh, sorry, most interesting man in the world,
Speaker 1: you know, with your your your rare tropical diseases from
Speaker 1: your travels abroad. But you know it's it's it's really
Speaker 1: serious stuff. And I've been saying that we should we
Speaker 1: should do this, we should eradicate all of them bucks.
Speaker 1: War against the mosquitoes may get a big help here
Speaker 1: from I would almost well, I was gonna say, it'll
Speaker 1: almost cancel out for me the fact that Google is
Speaker 1: probably the most powerful, single progressive company in the world. Now, no,
Speaker 1: I won't go that far, but I am psyched about
Speaker 1: the prospect of a mosquito free world. And it just
Speaker 1: goes to show you. Also, you know, I remember being
Speaker 1: taught in class in science class in like the fifth
Speaker 1: grade or sixth grade, and now, how all species are nests.
Speaker 1: There's this pyramid for species and if one goes away
Speaker 1: then the rest of the pyramid falls down. I know
Speaker 1: we were little kids, but that's obviously not true. What well,
Speaker 1: what species evaporated because we don't have the dodo bird anymore?
Speaker 1: I mean, dodo birds were kind of cute. But you
Speaker 1: know what, when a dude's running at you with a club,
Speaker 1: you should learn to run away. Survival of the fittest baby,
Speaker 1: that's how we do it, all right. We got a
Speaker 1: wonderful edition of Roll Call and a little bit of
Speaker 1: a Culinary Adventure update in just a few moments. The
Speaker 1: show ain't over yet, folks. It's time for Roll Call.
Speaker 1: So I gotta tell you all, I've really been struggling
Speaker 1: with my sauces. I've been trying so hard to get
Speaker 1: it down when it comes to deglazing the pen and
Speaker 1: reducing and because I think for me that's the next frontier.
Speaker 1: And cooking. I am really solid now at searing meat
Speaker 1: and fish. I'm good at seasoning. I've built on those
Speaker 1: basic skills that I can cook for myself, for Miss
Speaker 1: Molly and from whomever pretty well. Obviously, my eggs are
Speaker 1: world class. My scrambled eggs are as good as any
Speaker 1: that you'll ever find. But I'm having a tough time
Speaker 1: with sauces. Today, I was trying to cook for myself
Speaker 1: and yes, was it for lunch? Sure? Does it seem
Speaker 1: a little aggressive to sear a couple of surloins for
Speaker 1: lunch and make some Brussels sprouts on the side that
Speaker 1: you had cut up bacon and roast it in a
Speaker 1: pan in the oven. No, that doesn't seem aggressive. That
Speaker 1: seems brilliant to me. But I and I was using
Speaker 1: my Omaha sirloin steaks. By the way, and we know
Speaker 1: we have an Omaha steaks a gift package on the
Speaker 1: show we've been talking about. I got one for myself.
Speaker 1: The stuff is just delicious. I mean, the meat quality
Speaker 1: is really high. So I seared my Omaha steaks today
Speaker 1: and the steaks were perfect, and I se I cooked
Speaker 1: them so well. But I tried to make a bourbon
Speaker 1: pan sauce. I actually have some sorghum based bourbon that
Speaker 1: I use because its gluten free instead of what you'd
Speaker 1: normally get Anyway, everything was great, and then I added
Speaker 1: the cream. At the end, I deglazed the pan. I
Speaker 1: added my chicken stock I had seasoned well with salt
Speaker 1: and pepper. Obviously used the butter in there, a bit
Speaker 1: of garlic, smashed the garlic that, and it looked perfect,
Speaker 1: and I'm like, oh my gosh, I'm basically a TV chef.
Speaker 1: Look at this. And then all of a sudden it
Speaker 1: kind of turned and got really dark, and I guess
Speaker 1: I burned it after I added in the cream. But
Speaker 1: this sauce scout burned. It's still tasted pretty good because
Speaker 1: you put enough butter or anything, it'll be good. But man,
Speaker 1: it's all timing, you know. That's the problem I have
Speaker 1: with cooking. It's it's timing, and I was a little
Speaker 1: off my game. Anyway, my sirloins were delicious. I just
Speaker 1: had to pour some burned melted butter all over them
Speaker 1: instead of the bourbon pant sauce I was trying to use.
Speaker 1: So if any of you have any really good simple
Speaker 1: sauce tips, but he has to be made from scratch.
Speaker 1: Don't say, oh Buck, go buy some great barbecue sauce
Speaker 1: in the stores. No, no no, no, I want reduction sauces,
Speaker 1: things like that for steak. How to make a really
Speaker 1: good burr blanc sauce? Stuff like that. Send it in
Speaker 1: my Facebook inbox, Facebook dot com slash Buck sexon. Alrighty
Speaker 1: we got Kimberly writes in with the following, just got
Speaker 1: off chat with Express VPN. Gonna order it. Hope you
Speaker 1: like it. Maybe it'll be better than all the other
Speaker 1: security stuff that I spent money on every year. You know, Kimberly,
Speaker 1: it's a really great service. I really like mine, and
Speaker 1: I can tell you that you you know, it's one
Speaker 1: of these things where it doesn't cost a lot of
Speaker 1: money at all and you don't have to worry about
Speaker 1: your data getting sold all over the place. Which think
Speaker 1: about it this way. I actually pay a service to
Speaker 1: prevent robocalls from coming to me. Now it's just a
Speaker 1: couple dollars a month, but imagine for a moment I
Speaker 1: actually was able to not get any emails that annoyed
Speaker 1: me or any phone calls that annoyed me. You know,
Speaker 1: what would that be worth it worth to me? And
Speaker 1: the truth is would I pay somebody for that? Absolutely,
Speaker 1: that information all gets packaged and bundled and sold to
Speaker 1: all these marketers. So you know, Express VP and it
Speaker 1: only keeps you safe from hackers, also keeps your stuff
Speaker 1: from getting bundled and sold online, anonymizes your IP address,
Speaker 1: and I hope you really like it. Let me know
Speaker 1: what you think. Brittany writes, Hey, Buck, check out the
Speaker 1: shirt in my profile picture, Shield tie I love you well, Brittany.
Speaker 1: You are very sweet and I appreciate very much that
Speaker 1: you're writing in with a Team Buck shirt on, which
Speaker 1: is awesome. You look great in the Team Buck shirt.
Speaker 1: Thank you so much for your kind words. Much love,
Speaker 1: and please write in again soon. Timothy write, Shield tie Buck.
Speaker 1: My brilliant wife had an excellent idea. Let's have a
Speaker 1: bring your kids to work day at the border. Peace
Speaker 1: would break out and all the rock throwing would stop.
Speaker 1: My wife has an amazing sense of humor. We are
Speaker 1: podcast lestens. Both of us appreciate all your hard work. Timothy.
Speaker 1: Well you know, Timothy, Yes, I think if journalists had
Speaker 1: to bring their kids to the border, they might have
Speaker 1: a different view of what it's like to have rocks
Speaker 1: getting thrown and have border patrol of a run. But
Speaker 1: also very important, you just refer to your wife as
Speaker 1: your brilliant wife. You're going to have a long and
Speaker 1: happy marriage, my friend. From what I understand, I don't
Speaker 1: know anything about marriage because I'm not married. Please don't
Speaker 1: send me any of your recommendations for rings folks and
Speaker 1: all that stuff. I got it. Okay, I appreciate it,
Speaker 1: Thank you very much. I'm on it. John writes an
Speaker 1: action movie quote for you. You bring a horse for me,
Speaker 1: looks like looks like rare, shy one horse slowly shake's head.
Speaker 1: You brought two too many, John, I have no idea.
Speaker 1: I'm guessing it's a Western because talking about horses, but
Speaker 1: I don't know. So you can write in and say
Speaker 1: you got me on the action movie quote. Also, if
Speaker 1: you guys want action movie quote Friday to come back,
Speaker 1: that's something you should let me know. I stopped doing
Speaker 1: an after walks. I felt like one it was a
Speaker 1: fun gag. I didn't want to overdo it, and it
Speaker 1: was really a way for me to get to talk
Speaker 1: to a lot of you, get to know a lot
Speaker 1: of you in the early days when I took over
Speaker 1: this radio slot, this three hour radio show from the
Speaker 1: previous host, and and you know, it just kind of
Speaker 1: faded as a lot of other things have that I've
Speaker 1: done on the show in the past, because you got
Speaker 1: to keep things fresh and new. But if you think
Speaker 1: that that we should go back to maybe even once
Speaker 1: or twice a month doing some action movie quote Friday.
Speaker 1: I'm down, man. I love my action movie quote. So
Speaker 1: let me know David, it writes Buck and awesome producers,
Speaker 1: it's David from New Jersey. Again, great Tucker segment. In fact,
Speaker 1: you must incorporate Tucker's awesome intro for you and insert
Speaker 1: it into your opening montage. Right before Meghan Kelly says
Speaker 1: it is Buck Sexton, that's actually Kennedy, not Megan Kelly,
Speaker 1: Tucker says, let's break it all down with Buck Sexton.
Speaker 1: It's so perfect. It sounds almost as if Tucker was
Speaker 1: auditioning for your opening monologue. Peace out in kudos again for,
Speaker 1: as Tucker said, a great fact based presentation. Shield tie. David, Well, David,
Speaker 1: thank you so much, man. I really and that's a
Speaker 1: great recommendation. Actually we could pull that Tucker audio and
Speaker 1: put that in the intro, so I I like it.
Speaker 1: Thank you so much for the suggestion a producer, Mike,
Speaker 1: can you get on that. Can you pull the can
Speaker 1: you pull the Tucker audio so that we can do this?
Speaker 1: I think that's actually a good idea. Why don't we
Speaker 1: make that happen? So Mike, thank you so much. Man
Speaker 1: Or David, thank you so much, Mike as the producer,
Speaker 1: Willie hey Buck, nice to see you on Tucker. If
Speaker 1: Mully does not Mully Muller, Muller does not interview Debbie,
Speaker 1: Debbie Wasserman, Schultz and or Pakistani regarding the DNC hacking,
Speaker 1: I will call his results fake. Well, Willie, get ready
Speaker 1: to call them fake because I don't think Muller is
Speaker 1: going to do that. I think that you're gonna see
Speaker 1: the Muller investigation is everything we have feared. It was
Speaker 1: all along here and that is highly highly partisan. All
Speaker 1: right now, Eric, right, I will never buy another GM
Speaker 1: product again. I had a Chevy Colorado. I put in
Speaker 1: five thousand dollars in pairs. Never again. Well, you're not
Speaker 1: alone there, Eric, A lot of people I know not
Speaker 1: particularly happy with their GM purchases in the past. Truth is,
Speaker 1: other auto companies just make better, more efficient cars that
Speaker 1: people want to drive more. So you know it is
Speaker 1: the market speaking at some level. Katherine writes a great
Speaker 1: job with Tucker tonight, so precise and fact based. You rock,
Speaker 1: Buck Well, Katherine, you rock. Thank you for watching, Thank
Speaker 1: you for tuning in. Great to hear from you and
Speaker 1: appreciate the support. Josh rites, Hey, Buck, I've got three
Speaker 1: things on my Christmas list. Fund the dang Wall, split
Speaker 1: the Ninth Circuit, appoint multiple special counsels to investigate fives abuse,
Speaker 1: d NC election fraud, Clinton Foundation thefts and murders. Well, Josh,
Speaker 1: I don't know if Santa can make all that happen
Speaker 1: for you. Oh, here's a special counsel Clinton Foundation investigation
Speaker 1: coming right up. I don't think that's going to happen.
Speaker 1: I don't think that's likely, but I appreciate that you're
Speaker 1: a man who I was looking at all the angles
Speaker 1: and maybe maybe Santa could deliver this year. But I
Speaker 1: think you're gonna be I don't think you're getting a
Speaker 1: lump of coal in your stocking, but I wouldn't leave
Speaker 1: out too much in the way of milk and cookies
Speaker 1: for Santa this year. Aaron writes book, I just want
Speaker 1: to thank you so much for reading my tribute to
Speaker 1: my grandfather. I played it for my mom and aunt,
Speaker 1: who both wept. They were so happy you shared it
Speaker 1: with so many people. Thanks again, I really appreciate it. Ps.
Speaker 1: I also told them download your podcast. Well, Aaron, thank
Speaker 1: you so much, and thank you very much for writing
Speaker 1: in and and also for your grandfather's service. So I
Speaker 1: really appreciate you writing, and please keep keep it coming, Richard.
Speaker 1: On the next Scotus nominees, they'll probably try the same
Speaker 1: thing that trivid Sessions. They'll find a black person who's
Speaker 1: in the same room as as her sometime in the
Speaker 1: last thirty five years, who will claim she used racist
Speaker 1: terms and was condescending towards them. You know, Richard, you
Speaker 1: might be right. I mean, the racism, the false racism
Speaker 1: allegation is one of the favorite go to's of the left.
Speaker 1: I mean, this is something that they absolutely positively use
Speaker 1: whenever they can, and they're not going to be able
Speaker 1: to pull I think the sexism, sexist predator, all that stuff,
Speaker 1: you know what they try with Kavanaugh against Amy Coney Barrett.
Speaker 1: But also I'm not as confident as some other conservatives
Speaker 1: that there's even going to be a there's even gonna
Speaker 1: be a Supreme Court vacancy in this first Trump term.
Speaker 1: I think it's very possible that it will not. It
Speaker 1: will not in fact happen. You know, I think you
Speaker 1: may see Ginsberg choose not to retire specifically because she
Speaker 1: knows that Trump is the one who would be making
Speaker 1: the call. So yep, that's that's that's my prediction. I
Speaker 1: got that going for me, which is nice. Team. It's
Speaker 1: already passed the hump day, so we got a couple
Speaker 1: more days this week on the rodeo. I'm looking forward
Speaker 1: to it. Please do some of your thoughts Facebook dot com,
Speaker 1: slash buck sexon best way to do it until next time,
Speaker 1: my friends, shields high. Global Verification Network is the only
Speaker 1: dual certified and veteran owned background investigation and vetting company.
Speaker 1: Everybody needs to make sure when they're hiring people or
Speaker 1: they're thinking about a new possible property lease, that they
Speaker 1: know who they're involved with. You need to have background
Speaker 1: checks done, no matter how large or small your business,
Speaker 1: and you want Global Verification to be the ones doing
Speaker 1: them all right. They're headquartered in Chicago. They do this
Speaker 1: stuff day in and day out all across the country,
Speaker 1: and if you've got a particularly sensitive, a particularly important case,
Speaker 1: you can contact them directly and make sure it gets
Speaker 1: handled properly. Check out the risk mitigation experts of Global
Speaker 1: Verification Network. Go to my GVN dot com again, that's
Speaker 1: MYGVN dot com or call eight seven seven six nine
Speaker 1: five one, one seven nine. That's eight seven, seven, six, nine, five,
Speaker 1: eleven seventy nine. Make sure you call them, tell them
Speaker 1: Buck sex and sent you. Leave no stone unturned