WEBVTT - NFL WEEK 11 Bets: Patriots-Jets, Broncos-Chiefs, Bills-Bucs, Lions-Eagles, Bears-Vikings and more

0:00:00.880 --> 0:00:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Sharper Square, presented by a hard brought bet.

0:00:04.280 --> 0:00:07.320
<v Speaker 1>We are part of the Volume podcast Network. This is

0:00:07.360 --> 0:00:10.000
<v Speaker 1>the show that makes the squares sharper and makes the

0:00:10.039 --> 0:00:13.200
<v Speaker 1>wise guys pay attention. I am Chad Millman. I'm joined

0:00:13.240 --> 0:00:16.680
<v Speaker 1>as always by my bff, my companion, my padre, my

0:00:17.280 --> 0:00:19.960
<v Speaker 1>co host, professional better Simon Hunter.

0:00:20.680 --> 0:00:22.919
<v Speaker 2>Hello, Simon Chat.

0:00:23.000 --> 0:00:23.800
<v Speaker 3>Are we doing buddy?

0:00:24.560 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 1>I think we're pretty good, you know what I mean?

0:00:27.840 --> 0:00:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Although I will say this, you're younger than me, but yeah,

0:00:33.520 --> 0:00:36.800
<v Speaker 1>a little bit in only in age, not in spirit.

0:00:36.960 --> 0:00:40.800
<v Speaker 1>I think we're complete opposites when it comes to spiritual

0:00:41.479 --> 0:00:47.080
<v Speaker 1>age and probably street sense one hundred percent. I believe

0:00:47.080 --> 0:00:49.960
<v Speaker 1>everything is sunshiny and roses, and you're know someone's looking

0:00:49.960 --> 0:00:56.320
<v Speaker 1>to scam us every single turn. Michael Ray Richardson, the

0:00:57.640 --> 0:01:02.360
<v Speaker 1>former All Star point guard mainly for the Knicks and

0:01:02.400 --> 0:01:07.720
<v Speaker 1>the Nets from the nineteen eighties, passed away from prostate cancer.

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:15.479
<v Speaker 1>And as someone who loves the NBA and who was deeply,

0:01:15.760 --> 0:01:18.720
<v Speaker 1>deeply in love with the NBA in the mid eighties,

0:01:19.760 --> 0:01:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Michael Ray Richardson was this sort of sad sack story

0:01:28.000 --> 0:01:31.399
<v Speaker 1>where he was so good, so dominant, led the league

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:35.080
<v Speaker 1>in steals three times and then got banned from the

0:01:35.160 --> 0:01:38.240
<v Speaker 1>league because this was in the mid eighties where coke

0:01:38.440 --> 0:01:41.800
<v Speaker 1>was everywhere and it was the scourge of the leagues.

0:01:41.840 --> 0:01:47.520
<v Speaker 1>It was the betting of today for professional sports in general,

0:01:47.760 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 1>but especially the NBA. He got banned from the NBA

0:01:50.760 --> 0:01:52.840
<v Speaker 1>after four All Star seasons with the Knicks and the

0:01:52.880 --> 0:01:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Nets and one other team. I forgot which one, but

0:01:55.440 --> 0:01:58.800
<v Speaker 1>the dude was a baller and it was just like, Wow,

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Richardson was seventy and I just have a vision of

0:02:02.240 --> 0:02:08.240
<v Speaker 1>him in his very short short Nets uniform like beating

0:02:08.320 --> 0:02:10.320
<v Speaker 1>up on the Sixers in the playoffs, who I loved

0:02:10.360 --> 0:02:14.000
<v Speaker 1>at the time, and uh, you know, support one out

0:02:14.000 --> 0:02:14.600
<v Speaker 1>for Michael Ray.

0:02:15.240 --> 0:02:18.600
<v Speaker 3>It's sad Dorman, a rhyming name like that I would remember,

0:02:18.680 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 3>don't even recognize or remember the name.

0:02:20.800 --> 0:02:21.480
<v Speaker 2>That's amazing.

0:02:21.600 --> 0:02:23.639
<v Speaker 3>He is just truly dust in the win that guy.

0:02:23.880 --> 0:02:26.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna have to educate you on Michael Ray Richardson.

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:31.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm also going to have to tell you, Simon, despite

0:02:31.680 --> 0:02:39.760
<v Speaker 1>the controversy and the confusion and our miscommunication with the

0:02:39.800 --> 0:02:44.440
<v Speaker 1>audience on the Broncos and thank freaking God, you listen

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:47.440
<v Speaker 1>to all the wise guys and we had a probably

0:02:47.600 --> 0:02:50.440
<v Speaker 1>the best conversation we've ever had on a Sunday morning.

0:02:50.919 --> 0:02:53.440
<v Speaker 1>We took out the Niners, we put in the Eagles,

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles won. We kind of bet against ourselves because

0:02:56.480 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 1>we had been on the Packers earlier in the week.

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:02.919
<v Speaker 1>We went three and two last week, and our five

0:03:02.960 --> 0:03:05.639
<v Speaker 1>favorite picks one with the Eagles, one with the Ravens,

0:03:05.720 --> 0:03:08.560
<v Speaker 1>one with the Dolphins, lost with the Cardinals. In box

0:03:08.639 --> 0:03:10.440
<v Speaker 1>for the year twenty eight and twenty two through ten

0:03:10.480 --> 0:03:16.320
<v Speaker 1>weeks as an Eagles fan, thoughts, comments, concerns, criticisms.

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:20.679
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, no, just because earlier in the week, I'm on

0:03:20.760 --> 0:03:22.600
<v Speaker 3>a position. I'm going to try not to be so

0:03:22.680 --> 0:03:25.600
<v Speaker 3>hard on holding ourselves to it because a lot can change,

0:03:25.720 --> 0:03:30.119
<v Speaker 3>information can change. And yeah, thank god I spoke up,

0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:32.160
<v Speaker 3>because again, you're catching me in a weird time. I've

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 3>been up all night. If we were doing the show,

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:36.560
<v Speaker 3>I had been sleeping, I'd probably be a little meanor

0:03:36.600 --> 0:03:38.640
<v Speaker 3>to you chat a little harder on our picks and

0:03:38.720 --> 0:03:41.040
<v Speaker 3>what we should and shouldn't do on our Sunday morning show.

0:03:41.120 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 3>You catch me in a very vulnerable soft spot that

0:03:43.480 --> 0:03:47.320
<v Speaker 3>early in the morning, no sleep, and I just I'm

0:03:47.400 --> 0:03:51.600
<v Speaker 3>very agreeable. So thank God, we got off because we

0:03:51.640 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 3>can't have these back to back losing weeks. I have

0:03:53.520 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 3>been brutal, So yeah, I happy. I'm pivot on it.

0:03:58.160 --> 0:04:02.440
<v Speaker 3>Gross game. As an Eagles fan, I love these games.

0:04:02.440 --> 0:04:04.160
<v Speaker 3>These are the games we're built to win. These are

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:06.320
<v Speaker 3>the exact games we do win. We just pull these

0:04:06.320 --> 0:04:09.840
<v Speaker 3>teams into the mud. The funniest thing is just how

0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:14.080
<v Speaker 3>people react to these certain games, where again I hate

0:04:14.120 --> 0:04:15.920
<v Speaker 3>the conversation of these NFL players saying, well, you never

0:04:15.960 --> 0:04:18.080
<v Speaker 3>played the game before, so you shouldn't have an opinion.

0:04:18.600 --> 0:04:21.080
<v Speaker 3>But when you hear some people speak, well, the most

0:04:21.120 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 3>basic thing is like they were like, oh, both these

0:04:23.160 --> 0:04:25.839
<v Speaker 3>quarterbacks were awful, right, Jordan loved terrible. Hurts was terrible

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:29.279
<v Speaker 3>last night. It's dry air. They can't get griped on

0:04:29.279 --> 0:04:31.640
<v Speaker 3>the ball. There's a reason all their passes are sailing

0:04:32.000 --> 0:04:34.640
<v Speaker 3>or having bad throws. Like it's just like, oh, it's

0:04:34.640 --> 0:04:37.080
<v Speaker 3>an off night. It's like, well, look at the conditions.

0:04:37.200 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 3>And then you look at the field. Guys can't get

0:04:38.800 --> 0:04:41.760
<v Speaker 3>their feet under them, right, it's slippery, it's slick. A

0:04:41.800 --> 0:04:43.599
<v Speaker 3>lot of those things add up to be a really stupid,

0:04:43.680 --> 0:04:47.040
<v Speaker 3>low scoring, sloppy game. On the other side, both offenses

0:04:47.080 --> 0:04:49.839
<v Speaker 3>just had terrible luck, right, couldn't convert. And you know,

0:04:49.839 --> 0:04:52.160
<v Speaker 3>we talked a little about Green Bay, the Tucker Craft stuff.

0:04:52.600 --> 0:04:55.840
<v Speaker 3>That was a real issue, right, And we talked around

0:04:55.839 --> 0:04:57.839
<v Speaker 3>the week. I said, maybe we're overlooking this whole Tucker

0:04:57.839 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 3>Craft And you saw that that safety for Jordan Love

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:04.840
<v Speaker 3>on third down or key key downs, it's just not there.

0:05:04.880 --> 0:05:06.559
<v Speaker 3>It wasn't there for them. They were nothing to scheme

0:05:06.640 --> 0:05:08.520
<v Speaker 3>up where that guy has been such a difference to

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:11.800
<v Speaker 3>making for that offense. And yeah, that Eagles team definitely

0:05:11.880 --> 0:05:15.680
<v Speaker 3>stole one there, right, But I said it before the season.

0:05:15.880 --> 0:05:17.960
<v Speaker 3>It's hard to complain as an Eagles fan if you're

0:05:18.040 --> 0:05:21.480
<v Speaker 3>in the greatest era of our you know, football dynasty,

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:26.719
<v Speaker 3>seven years too super Bowls and after a Super Bowl

0:05:26.760 --> 0:05:28.920
<v Speaker 3>I thought there would be a falloff. I think anyone did, right.

0:05:29.160 --> 0:05:31.120
<v Speaker 3>If you're looking at this Eagles team, a lot of

0:05:31.120 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 3>injury luck, base, had a really young defensive front, and

0:05:35.839 --> 0:05:38.599
<v Speaker 3>you know, Saquon has not been himself. The Madden cover

0:05:38.720 --> 0:05:42.480
<v Speaker 3>SI cover is the curse is real. Still number one

0:05:42.520 --> 0:05:45.400
<v Speaker 3>seed right now in ren at Week eleven in the NFC.

0:05:45.520 --> 0:05:48.560
<v Speaker 3>So pretty pretty crazy as an Eagles fan that this

0:05:48.640 --> 0:05:51.080
<v Speaker 3>team I have so much doubt about the offensive Coiner

0:05:51.120 --> 0:05:54.760
<v Speaker 3>or all of it. I can't help but be impressed

0:05:54.760 --> 0:05:56.760
<v Speaker 3>with this team. Somehow is the one seed right netwhere

0:05:56.880 --> 0:05:59.000
<v Speaker 3>there is still lingering doubts about this offense.

0:05:59.440 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Two things.

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Number one, I never think of you as vulnerable or

0:06:04.360 --> 0:06:06.440
<v Speaker 1>agreeable on a Sunday morning.

0:06:06.480 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 2>So if that is you vulnerable and agreeable.

0:06:10.040 --> 0:06:12.360
<v Speaker 3>Is as nice as you get, Chad, God.

0:06:12.560 --> 0:06:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Help any future relationships that you have, because that is

0:06:17.800 --> 0:06:21.680
<v Speaker 1>just going to be just plaining messy number one.

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:26.800
<v Speaker 2>Number two. Number two, how do you.

0:06:25.240 --> 0:06:27.839
<v Speaker 3>Know that was very Chad has never had a brother.

0:06:27.920 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 3>You can tell up on that right there. Chad is

0:06:29.880 --> 0:06:30.760
<v Speaker 3>very soft people.

0:06:31.160 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 2>Number two, don't get defensive on me. I can criticize you.

0:06:36.600 --> 0:06:38.160
<v Speaker 3>I take off kid gloves with you. Hey, we got

0:06:38.200 --> 0:06:39.680
<v Speaker 3>to take out four nights put the Eagles in with

0:06:39.760 --> 0:06:42.440
<v Speaker 3>kid gloves. And that's me being hard on you. You're unreal.

0:06:42.640 --> 0:06:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Who said you were? I didn't say you were being

0:06:44.279 --> 0:06:46.640
<v Speaker 1>hard on me. You said that was you being vulnerable.

0:06:46.720 --> 0:06:48.960
<v Speaker 1>I was like, yeah, I'm very mp with you. Hey,

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:50.120
<v Speaker 1>I gotta take this team out.

0:06:50.200 --> 0:06:53.080
<v Speaker 3>Wasn't mean? Did say anything? Man was very gentle about.

0:06:52.920 --> 0:06:54.039
<v Speaker 2>Why would it have to be mean?

0:06:55.279 --> 0:06:58.000
<v Speaker 3>Regardless I would have to because sometimes you're disagreeable in

0:06:58.480 --> 0:07:00.839
<v Speaker 3>that you were like, no, I want to be on

0:07:00.880 --> 0:07:03.120
<v Speaker 3>this side. But luckily you were along.

0:07:02.880 --> 0:07:05.160
<v Speaker 2>For the ride, so maybe I was agreeable.

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:08.320
<v Speaker 3>That's true. Maybe number two.

0:07:09.040 --> 0:07:11.360
<v Speaker 1>If you know the SI cover Jinks, then you got

0:07:11.400 --> 0:07:13.800
<v Speaker 1>to know who Michael Ray Richardson is because they basically

0:07:13.840 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 1>were born at the same time. Their legends were born

0:07:16.360 --> 0:07:20.280
<v Speaker 1>at the same time. Listen Simon. More importantly, it's veterans.

0:07:21.000 --> 0:07:23.000
<v Speaker 3>This guy's getting tons of air time today.

0:07:23.280 --> 0:07:27.520
<v Speaker 1>He deserves it. It's Veterans Day. A sincere thanks to

0:07:28.000 --> 0:07:31.240
<v Speaker 1>all of our veterans, those who have served, those who

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:34.720
<v Speaker 1>do serve. It's a privilege to live in a country

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:38.960
<v Speaker 1>where we have people volunteering. So thank you to all

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the veterans on Veterans Day.

0:07:42.600 --> 0:07:46.080
<v Speaker 3>Back to back World War champions, best military in the world,

0:07:46.080 --> 0:07:48.440
<v Speaker 3>Thank you for your service. Everybody cook at.

0:07:48.320 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 2>His crowd on its feet, what a tribute. This is

0:07:51.400 --> 0:07:53.520
<v Speaker 2>our Tuesday show. We're going to review the entire slave.

0:07:53.600 --> 0:07:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Make sure to check out the Sunday am show if

0:07:56.120 --> 0:07:58.480
<v Speaker 1>you want the games. That will be our official five

0:07:58.760 --> 0:08:01.880
<v Speaker 1>after we've had a chance to review the line moves

0:08:01.920 --> 0:08:04.560
<v Speaker 1>and the injuries. There's definitely been lots of moves on

0:08:04.640 --> 0:08:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Sundays this season, as you've seen in some controversy. We

0:08:08.720 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 1>had so make sure you pay attention to that one.

0:08:10.760 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Don't forget. You can get the shows on Sharper Square

0:08:13.160 --> 0:08:16.480
<v Speaker 1>YouTube like this video subscribe while you're at it. You

0:08:16.520 --> 0:08:19.560
<v Speaker 1>can also subscribe to Sharper Square on Apple Pods, Spotify,

0:08:19.840 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your pots. Okay, Thursday Night Football eight fifteen,

0:08:25.960 --> 0:08:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Amazon Prime, New York Jets at the New England Patriots. Boy,

0:08:29.960 --> 0:08:32.559
<v Speaker 1>this number is big, eleven and a half for the Patriots.

0:08:33.679 --> 0:08:34.719
<v Speaker 2>Look, the Jets are just a.

0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Bad team, and I think right now, coming off that

0:08:38.000 --> 0:08:40.720
<v Speaker 1>win against the Browns where everyone sort of believed that

0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:43.120
<v Speaker 1>was the spot where you had to bet the Jets

0:08:43.280 --> 0:08:47.400
<v Speaker 1>as we did, whatever work for them against Cleveland in

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the perfect spot for their defense to be motivated against

0:08:51.000 --> 0:08:55.280
<v Speaker 1>a lower level QB will not work against a very

0:08:55.720 --> 0:09:02.960
<v Speaker 1>good QB and a brilliant coach in Mike Vrabel. Last week,

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:05.559
<v Speaker 1>Justin Fields went six of eleven for fifty four yards.

0:09:05.600 --> 0:09:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Forty two of those yards came on a screen pass

0:09:07.640 --> 0:09:10.280
<v Speaker 1>to Breeze Hall that he ran for a touchdown. The

0:09:10.320 --> 0:09:14.480
<v Speaker 1>strength of this team is their rushing offense, and I

0:09:14.559 --> 0:09:16.160
<v Speaker 1>put strength in quotes.

0:09:17.559 --> 0:09:18.280
<v Speaker 2>Here's the problem.

0:09:19.200 --> 0:09:23.360
<v Speaker 1>The Pats strength on defense against the run top five

0:09:23.440 --> 0:09:28.440
<v Speaker 1>across every advanced metric, first overall in some of the

0:09:28.480 --> 0:09:33.280
<v Speaker 1>more superficial categories. And even though their past defense is suspect,

0:09:33.320 --> 0:09:36.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm almost done with my soluquis here, even though their

0:09:36.520 --> 0:09:40.360
<v Speaker 1>past defense is suspect. I just gave you the justin

0:09:40.400 --> 0:09:44.040
<v Speaker 1>field stats and Garrett Wilson is out for three to

0:09:44.080 --> 0:09:46.760
<v Speaker 1>four weeks. Krippoor, Christian Gonzales, He's not gonna have anyone

0:09:46.760 --> 0:09:51.600
<v Speaker 1>to guard this week. I'll be clear, I'll be clear.

0:09:51.720 --> 0:09:54.120
<v Speaker 1>This will not be a Final five pick. I'm gonna

0:09:54.160 --> 0:09:57.720
<v Speaker 1>be clear. No, but I'm having a hard time getting

0:09:57.720 --> 0:10:00.000
<v Speaker 1>to the Jets even with a massive, massive number.

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:02.800
<v Speaker 3>Come on, we know the Jets are gonna win this

0:10:02.840 --> 0:10:05.040
<v Speaker 3>one out right again? Right? Can we bet the Jets

0:10:05.080 --> 0:10:07.160
<v Speaker 3>money line three weeks in a row, Chad, it's been

0:10:07.200 --> 0:10:08.920
<v Speaker 3>good to us. We're running a heater right now, the

0:10:09.000 --> 0:10:09.760
<v Speaker 3>Jets money line.

0:10:09.800 --> 0:10:13.160
<v Speaker 2>Come on, No, no, no, no, come on.

0:10:14.800 --> 0:10:17.160
<v Speaker 3>We're being real. This is the definition of a letdown

0:10:17.200 --> 0:10:19.640
<v Speaker 3>trap spot. But we been saying this for about a month,

0:10:19.679 --> 0:10:22.400
<v Speaker 3>this Newland team. So that's what I mean, yeah, this

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:24.600
<v Speaker 3>is it. They should win this by thirty points. They

0:10:24.600 --> 0:10:26.640
<v Speaker 3>are better across the board. Everything they do to well

0:10:26.720 --> 0:10:31.320
<v Speaker 3>defensively is a weakness for this Jets team. So yeah,

0:10:31.440 --> 0:10:34.000
<v Speaker 3>I'll I'm happy that we're avoiding it. I'll be on

0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:36.640
<v Speaker 3>the Jets steam. I know plenty of guys. We're gonna

0:10:36.640 --> 0:10:38.360
<v Speaker 3>be on New England. No, plenty of pros already taking

0:10:38.400 --> 0:10:40.880
<v Speaker 3>positions on New England. Like you said that number ten,

0:10:41.040 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 3>it's gonna push up to eleven and a half now.

0:10:42.880 --> 0:10:47.640
<v Speaker 3>So I hate it. But it's just New England again.

0:10:47.679 --> 0:10:50.000
<v Speaker 3>They're fans. They shouldn't care what someone like me thinks.

0:10:50.200 --> 0:10:52.640
<v Speaker 3>They have possibility in the one seed. They're just not

0:10:52.760 --> 0:10:55.040
<v Speaker 3>that good of a team. They have so many weaknesses

0:10:55.080 --> 0:10:58.480
<v Speaker 3>that they just keep overcoming and having sane QB play

0:10:58.640 --> 0:11:02.160
<v Speaker 3>and it's just all hitting right now. So they'll keep

0:11:02.160 --> 0:11:03.840
<v Speaker 3>getting away from it. They're gonna get caught. I mean,

0:11:03.880 --> 0:11:05.319
<v Speaker 3>they are going to get caught, and this is going

0:11:05.360 --> 0:11:08.320
<v Speaker 3>to go the other way. But I get why you're hesitant.

0:11:08.360 --> 0:11:10.319
<v Speaker 3>It's why would we just tried to stand in front

0:11:10.360 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 3>of this team last week and got demolished. I get

0:11:13.120 --> 0:11:15.120
<v Speaker 3>what you don't want to do it again. But to me,

0:11:15.280 --> 0:11:17.800
<v Speaker 3>this is just yeah, you gotta just bet the Jets Lafe.

0:11:17.800 --> 0:11:20.720
<v Speaker 3>It's bumped up too much. It doesn't matter who's on

0:11:20.760 --> 0:11:23.200
<v Speaker 3>the field of this team. Like last week, they had

0:11:23.240 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 3>no right cover in that number. We said they had

0:11:24.840 --> 0:11:27.400
<v Speaker 3>two special teams touchdown. So if you want to fade

0:11:27.400 --> 0:11:29.559
<v Speaker 3>this Jets team, it's a Thursday night. We always say

0:11:29.559 --> 0:11:32.720
<v Speaker 3>the favorite, especially home teams. It does well long term.

0:11:32.720 --> 0:11:35.800
<v Speaker 3>It's just skewed that way. But man, I can't get

0:11:35.800 --> 0:11:37.240
<v Speaker 3>I can't get over how big of a number this

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:39.440
<v Speaker 3>is for Drake Madi try to cover. It's mass a

0:11:39.440 --> 0:11:40.120
<v Speaker 3>lot of points.

0:11:40.360 --> 0:11:44.160
<v Speaker 2>It's a massive, massive number. Let's go across the pond.

0:11:44.200 --> 0:11:45.120
<v Speaker 2>We're going to Madrid.

0:11:45.920 --> 0:11:49.400
<v Speaker 1>We're going to a city where most people when the

0:11:49.480 --> 0:11:53.040
<v Speaker 1>game starts are getting home from dinner at nine point

0:11:53.040 --> 0:11:56.520
<v Speaker 1>thirty in the morning. We got Washington at Miami, and

0:11:56.559 --> 0:12:00.319
<v Speaker 1>as producer Matt Mitchell pointed out, if there's ever been

0:12:00.760 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 1>a game in a city where a team has a

0:12:05.360 --> 0:12:11.920
<v Speaker 1>chance to just completely disappear into the nightlife when their

0:12:11.960 --> 0:12:16.200
<v Speaker 1>season is lost and their coach make it fired, it

0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:18.360
<v Speaker 1>is this Miami Dolphins team, who are currently two and

0:12:18.360 --> 0:12:21.760
<v Speaker 1>a half point favorites. Huge swing in the game, by

0:12:21.800 --> 0:12:24.320
<v Speaker 1>the way, because the game is one and a half

0:12:24.360 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday night, even after the about while the Lions

0:12:29.320 --> 0:12:34.080
<v Speaker 1>were getting demolished, and it's swung to the to Miami

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:37.840
<v Speaker 1>minus two and a half, so huge four point swing.

0:12:39.440 --> 0:12:45.400
<v Speaker 1>Are the Commodoores, the Commodoor's great band, the Commodoors, the

0:12:45.480 --> 0:12:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Commanders such a dreadful team against the run that Devon

0:12:50.280 --> 0:12:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Han can again run for one thousand yards.

0:12:54.280 --> 0:12:56.360
<v Speaker 3>I'm shocked you didn't sing there, good on you, Chet,

0:12:56.440 --> 0:12:56.920
<v Speaker 3>good on you.

0:12:58.080 --> 0:13:00.239
<v Speaker 2>I would have, but I couldn't think of any.

0:13:00.400 --> 0:13:11.840
<v Speaker 3>Matt Mitchell's got to jump then he would know, dude, great,

0:13:12.080 --> 0:13:14.360
<v Speaker 3>that's why you're the best. Matt. Probably supposed to be

0:13:14.400 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 3>the Commanders, but it's under three if it's gonna be

0:13:17.400 --> 0:13:20.360
<v Speaker 3>Marriot again with all these injuries that they've had, washing

0:13:20.440 --> 0:13:23.439
<v Speaker 3>in their defense is just atrocious. Like you said, it's

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 3>I've been killing us for not faitting this Commander's team

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:28.800
<v Speaker 3>this whole time, like we just keep every week we've

0:13:28.800 --> 0:13:30.440
<v Speaker 3>been I've been going against him somehow we have not

0:13:30.520 --> 0:13:32.320
<v Speaker 3>taken them in the contest, and every week it's just

0:13:32.800 --> 0:13:36.080
<v Speaker 3>they're just terrible. Like the coaching staff. I think the

0:13:36.120 --> 0:13:41.480
<v Speaker 3>head coach that he's taken over defensive duties. Yeah, so

0:13:42.480 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 3>you know, will that changed much. I just don't know

0:13:44.920 --> 0:13:46.360
<v Speaker 3>if they have the pieces. They just have had so

0:13:46.400 --> 0:13:48.280
<v Speaker 3>many injuries when they're already an older team with a

0:13:48.320 --> 0:13:52.720
<v Speaker 3>lot of weaknesses. So, yeah, it's under three, I guess

0:13:52.720 --> 0:13:54.240
<v Speaker 3>I'll take it. But we always say we don't. We

0:13:54.280 --> 0:13:56.240
<v Speaker 3>don't want to bet to a let alone to it

0:13:56.320 --> 0:13:58.520
<v Speaker 3>as a favorite on the road. So happy to avoid

0:13:58.520 --> 0:14:01.320
<v Speaker 3>this game, and just like one else, I'll be there

0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:03.960
<v Speaker 3>seven am, eight am and be like, well, game starts

0:14:04.000 --> 0:14:05.480
<v Speaker 3>an hour and a half. I gotta bet some side

0:14:05.480 --> 0:14:07.560
<v Speaker 3>and I'll probably end up on Miami. So I hate

0:14:07.559 --> 0:14:08.680
<v Speaker 3>this one, but got to take a side.

0:14:08.800 --> 0:14:10.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, to me, it was anything.

0:14:10.840 --> 0:14:12.800
<v Speaker 1>If Miami is still under three, I would take it

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:17.400
<v Speaker 1>because I do think in terms of sort of if

0:14:17.440 --> 0:14:22.080
<v Speaker 1>this is a spirit Bowl, the spirit for Miami after

0:14:22.240 --> 0:14:26.560
<v Speaker 1>beating Buffalo is a little bit higher, they might be

0:14:26.640 --> 0:14:30.960
<v Speaker 1>able to see some opportunities versus I think the commanders

0:14:31.080 --> 0:14:33.320
<v Speaker 1>like we got a backup quarterback, We've got a defense

0:14:33.360 --> 0:14:36.880
<v Speaker 1>that can't stop anybody. They're geriatric, like, we got nothing

0:14:36.920 --> 0:14:38.800
<v Speaker 1>going on here. So I know the professionals, I know

0:14:38.840 --> 0:14:40.640
<v Speaker 1>they're going to do the best they can, but I

0:14:40.680 --> 0:14:44.920
<v Speaker 1>think that the scheme favors Miami over Washington.

0:14:45.040 --> 0:14:48.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, shockingly only had Miami minus one year, so I

0:14:48.120 --> 0:14:50.520
<v Speaker 3>think that's what most guys. It's like. Shockingly, this is

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:54.520
<v Speaker 3>probably a lot closer than people realize matchup wise. So

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:57.520
<v Speaker 3>we're very public in our pick, but we both agree

0:14:57.560 --> 0:14:59.120
<v Speaker 3>it's about the number, the fact that it's under a

0:14:59.160 --> 0:14:59.600
<v Speaker 3>field goal.

0:15:00.400 --> 0:15:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Cincinnati at Pittsburgh Simon, this line opened at five and

0:15:04.560 --> 0:15:07.520
<v Speaker 1>a half. It has moved down to four and a half.

0:15:08.080 --> 0:15:13.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna be totally honest. This was nearly Chat's choice. Wow,

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:17.880
<v Speaker 1>I bet Cincinnati at plus five and a half. Couple

0:15:17.960 --> 0:15:22.680
<v Speaker 1>things here. Number one, Joe Flacco just being healthier and

0:15:22.760 --> 0:15:28.800
<v Speaker 1>having these receivers against the Steelers diminished.

0:15:28.560 --> 0:15:31.120
<v Speaker 2>Secondary, they just they can't seem to figure it out.

0:15:31.120 --> 0:15:32.760
<v Speaker 1>They had that one good game where they tried to

0:15:32.760 --> 0:15:35.000
<v Speaker 1>play zone against the Colts a few weeks ago, and

0:15:35.600 --> 0:15:40.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, they moved Jalen Ramsey to safety. But this team,

0:15:40.240 --> 0:15:43.440
<v Speaker 1>like defensively is not in a good spot. And I

0:15:43.480 --> 0:15:46.960
<v Speaker 1>know we now got the Steelers look terrible and so

0:15:47.880 --> 0:15:52.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe I'm buying into fading the Steelers here,

0:15:52.840 --> 0:15:55.360
<v Speaker 1>but this is really a bet on Joe Flacco and

0:15:55.440 --> 0:15:59.360
<v Speaker 1>that receiving corps just being able to score whenever they

0:15:59.360 --> 0:16:02.920
<v Speaker 1>want and keep this game closer than the line reflects.

0:16:03.080 --> 0:16:05.280
<v Speaker 1>The line has moved to four and a half at

0:16:05.320 --> 0:16:07.200
<v Speaker 1>hard Rock, so I bettert a five and a half.

0:16:07.240 --> 0:16:09.480
<v Speaker 1>It's moved in that direction. It's one of the reasons

0:16:09.480 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 1>why I didn't make a catch choice is because it's

0:16:12.280 --> 0:16:13.320
<v Speaker 1>got down to four and a half.

0:16:13.920 --> 0:16:20.600
<v Speaker 3>The Cincinnati Bengals game roaring back, I think most of degree.

0:16:20.640 --> 0:16:22.920
<v Speaker 3>Why is this not three three and a half? These

0:16:22.920 --> 0:16:28.000
<v Speaker 3>two teams already played this season Bengals one thirty three

0:16:28.080 --> 0:16:30.920
<v Speaker 3>to thirty one. I know it was a Thursday game

0:16:30.960 --> 0:16:33.840
<v Speaker 3>and weird things happen on Thursday. But I don't know

0:16:33.840 --> 0:16:36.280
<v Speaker 3>about you, but this is giving me a ton of

0:16:36.320 --> 0:16:39.160
<v Speaker 3>the same vibes for that's forty nine ers Rams game,

0:16:39.800 --> 0:16:42.640
<v Speaker 3>Like the forty nine Ers on a Thursday beat That

0:16:42.720 --> 0:16:46.400
<v Speaker 3>Rams team stole that game. It's given me a lot

0:16:46.400 --> 0:16:49.360
<v Speaker 3>of vibes here where it feels too easy and I'm

0:16:49.400 --> 0:16:51.560
<v Speaker 3>a little worried about this Bengal side. But I agree

0:16:51.560 --> 0:16:53.800
<v Speaker 3>with you if you want to take the number five

0:16:53.840 --> 0:16:55.440
<v Speaker 3>and a half, that feels like that's a sharp number.

0:16:55.440 --> 0:16:58.720
<v Speaker 3>It's moving that way. Maybe I'll get there on the

0:16:58.720 --> 0:17:00.760
<v Speaker 3>Steelers brow City right now, chat like, I want to

0:17:00.760 --> 0:17:02.360
<v Speaker 3>be in the Bengals, but I'm just worried there's something

0:17:02.400 --> 0:17:05.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm missing here because I just this line feels way off.

0:17:05.720 --> 0:17:07.280
<v Speaker 3>I don't get why this is not three three and

0:17:07.320 --> 0:17:10.640
<v Speaker 3>a half. Like you just said, Pittsburgh's defense, we've said, all, yeah,

0:17:10.640 --> 0:17:13.440
<v Speaker 3>they're super suspect. The only time they perform well is

0:17:13.480 --> 0:17:16.840
<v Speaker 3>and they get these insane turnovers. So not good to

0:17:16.840 --> 0:17:18.440
<v Speaker 3>be banking a defense with. You need a ton of

0:17:18.480 --> 0:17:21.320
<v Speaker 3>turnover luck. And then on the flip side, Rogers has

0:17:21.400 --> 0:17:24.439
<v Speaker 3>just been very questionable. But this is a great matchup him,

0:17:24.480 --> 0:17:27.160
<v Speaker 3>especially if Trey Hendrick's still out. I no pressure type

0:17:27.160 --> 0:17:29.479
<v Speaker 3>of game. I mean, we haven't really beat him up start,

0:17:29.560 --> 0:17:32.600
<v Speaker 3>but we bullyed that guy coming the season. He had

0:17:32.600 --> 0:17:35.720
<v Speaker 3>one good week one and he has been nothing since.

0:17:36.000 --> 0:17:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Further, Oh my god, he's been. He's been a meme.

0:17:39.760 --> 0:17:42.639
<v Speaker 1>He's become like every single week someone is finding a

0:17:42.720 --> 0:17:45.040
<v Speaker 1>video of him doing something where he just doesn't know

0:17:45.080 --> 0:17:45.640
<v Speaker 1>what he's doing.

0:17:45.680 --> 0:17:46.520
<v Speaker 3>He doesn't know what he's doing.

0:17:46.840 --> 0:17:50.119
<v Speaker 1>And that's a classic horrible pick, classic Bengals pick. We

0:17:50.200 --> 0:17:52.919
<v Speaker 1>said all like, like, as I told.

0:17:52.800 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 3>You, who gets four sacks in college?

0:17:54.960 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Before the season, an NFL scouts said to me, there's

0:17:57.800 --> 0:18:01.320
<v Speaker 1>nobody in college who's game planning to keep your best

0:18:01.359 --> 0:18:04.960
<v Speaker 1>player out of the action. If he's not getting plays,

0:18:05.280 --> 0:18:08.000
<v Speaker 1>it's not because he's a freak athlete who they just

0:18:08.040 --> 0:18:09.880
<v Speaker 1>can't figure out how to use. It's because he doesn't

0:18:09.880 --> 0:18:12.040
<v Speaker 1>know how to play football. And that's what we're seeing

0:18:12.440 --> 0:18:18.200
<v Speaker 1>with Stewart right now. And yeah, that obviously, I'm making

0:18:18.200 --> 0:18:21.520
<v Speaker 1>a bet behind the Bengals keeping it being able to

0:18:21.520 --> 0:18:23.920
<v Speaker 1>score every time they want. I'm not expecting the Bengals

0:18:23.920 --> 0:18:27.440
<v Speaker 1>defense to stop Aaron Rodgers. I'm expecting him to look

0:18:27.520 --> 0:18:29.880
<v Speaker 1>like he's thirty one years old in this game.

0:18:29.880 --> 0:18:31.879
<v Speaker 2>But I just think that on.

0:18:31.920 --> 0:18:33.879
<v Speaker 3>Joe Flacker to keep up like he had the previous

0:18:33.920 --> 0:18:36.560
<v Speaker 3>matchup again thirty three to thirty one the first time

0:18:36.600 --> 0:18:38.560
<v Speaker 3>they played, maybe we should be looking more towards the

0:18:38.600 --> 0:18:40.080
<v Speaker 3>over here even playing aside.

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:44.320
<v Speaker 1>To be honest, that's interesting, interesting, all right, Carolina visiting Atlanta.

0:18:44.400 --> 0:18:46.479
<v Speaker 1>Carolina is a three and a half point underdog. Let

0:18:46.480 --> 0:18:49.560
<v Speaker 1>me ask you this question, Simon Hunter, are you ready

0:18:50.200 --> 0:18:53.280
<v Speaker 1>if you're a fan, which one of these teams.

0:18:53.320 --> 0:18:56.440
<v Speaker 2>Do you feel better about going into the future.

0:18:56.800 --> 0:18:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Would you rather right now be a fan of Bryce

0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:06.639
<v Speaker 1>Dave Knalys and the Carolina Panthers. Would you rather be

0:19:06.720 --> 0:19:10.280
<v Speaker 1>a fan of Raheem Morris, Michael Pennix and the Atlanta Falcons.

0:19:10.880 --> 0:19:17.600
<v Speaker 4>Would I don't know about the head coach, but Atlanta's

0:19:17.640 --> 0:19:20.560
<v Speaker 4>foundation I really like, like you have the receiver, you

0:19:20.640 --> 0:19:23.920
<v Speaker 4>have the running backs, and what we think is potentially

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:24.399
<v Speaker 4>the quarterback.

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:27.520
<v Speaker 3>Like Penis has a great arm, He's got a real

0:19:27.640 --> 0:19:30.120
<v Speaker 3>arm talent. It's can you add the other tools? Right?

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:33.240
<v Speaker 3>He just we always keep saying it's I know people

0:19:33.240 --> 0:19:35.199
<v Speaker 3>want them to be better, and you can kind of

0:19:35.240 --> 0:19:37.160
<v Speaker 3>close your eyes a little bit with this Falcons team,

0:19:37.240 --> 0:19:39.120
<v Speaker 3>or they have a couple of games where it's like, oh,

0:19:39.119 --> 0:19:40.560
<v Speaker 3>they could have won that one, they could have stole

0:19:40.600 --> 0:19:43.439
<v Speaker 3>that game. There, What are they three and six this year?

0:19:43.520 --> 0:19:45.720
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, it's I get if their fan base is

0:19:45.760 --> 0:19:47.360
<v Speaker 3>down on it. But like we said, it's just hard

0:19:47.400 --> 0:19:49.480
<v Speaker 3>to be patient as a fan. You gotta be patient

0:19:49.520 --> 0:19:52.439
<v Speaker 3>with Penix. He's just he's doing things that he looks

0:19:52.600 --> 0:19:55.440
<v Speaker 3>like a first year quarterback. He's just inconsistent, makes you

0:19:55.480 --> 0:19:58.440
<v Speaker 3>really dumb throws and he's just locked in on Drake London,

0:19:58.440 --> 0:20:00.800
<v Speaker 3>which isn't an issue because Drake London so good, but

0:20:00.840 --> 0:20:02.679
<v Speaker 3>you're gonna you're not gonna win games that way, right.

0:20:02.720 --> 0:20:05.600
<v Speaker 3>You can't just focus feet on a guy, especially on

0:20:05.680 --> 0:20:07.960
<v Speaker 3>third downs of defense. They're gonna do that. So for me,

0:20:08.000 --> 0:20:11.359
<v Speaker 3>the Panthers, I still I don't know. I once we

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:15.760
<v Speaker 3>love the Panthers and Bryce Young, he's he's just not

0:20:15.760 --> 0:20:16.760
<v Speaker 3>looking like Bryce Young.

0:20:17.040 --> 0:20:19.720
<v Speaker 2>He's kind of regressed the past couple of weeks, I know.

0:20:19.880 --> 0:20:22.720
<v Speaker 3>And it's like painful to watch because it's like you

0:20:22.760 --> 0:20:24.359
<v Speaker 3>want to say, well, it's the coach, maybe it's the

0:20:24.359 --> 0:20:26.960
<v Speaker 3>past protection. It's like, no, it's it's him. He's not

0:20:27.080 --> 0:20:29.640
<v Speaker 3>making the right reads. He's got guys open certain spots

0:20:29.680 --> 0:20:32.359
<v Speaker 3>where he's not seen and comes back down to the

0:20:32.400 --> 0:20:35.240
<v Speaker 3>height stuff. I know, it's it sounds lazy, but it's true.

0:20:35.600 --> 0:20:37.960
<v Speaker 3>There's a reason most of these teams won six four

0:20:37.960 --> 0:20:40.800
<v Speaker 3>to six five quarterbacks guys like him. He doesn't see

0:20:40.800 --> 0:20:42.400
<v Speaker 3>that open guy in the flat because he can't see

0:20:42.400 --> 0:20:45.640
<v Speaker 3>over his left tackle. So I don't know, Chad. If

0:20:45.680 --> 0:20:47.720
<v Speaker 3>I was a fan for this year, i'd be excited.

0:20:47.720 --> 0:20:49.879
<v Speaker 3>If I'm a Panthers fan, because you can kind of

0:20:50.320 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 3>lie your something to think we could be the wildcard

0:20:53.640 --> 0:20:57.720
<v Speaker 3>team and Bryce could keep improving. But yeah, I would

0:20:57.720 --> 0:20:59.840
<v Speaker 3>be a little worried about him and what he's gonna

0:20:59.880 --> 0:21:02.480
<v Speaker 3>be like going forward. Were Pennix, I still haven't seen

0:21:02.600 --> 0:21:04.760
<v Speaker 3>enough to really make a judgment call in that. So, uh,

0:21:06.119 --> 0:21:07.560
<v Speaker 3>I like it landing here too. I don't know about

0:21:07.560 --> 0:21:10.000
<v Speaker 3>you in this matchup, but I thought this on number

0:21:10.000 --> 0:21:11.680
<v Speaker 3>is really interesting. The fact that they opened this a

0:21:11.760 --> 0:21:14.879
<v Speaker 3>mystere and a half. Yeah, yeah, you like you like

0:21:14.920 --> 0:21:15.480
<v Speaker 3>a lander or now.

0:21:15.560 --> 0:21:18.240
<v Speaker 2>I actually wanted to get your opinion. I couldn't.

0:21:18.440 --> 0:21:22.640
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't land anywhere, it feels like because the reason

0:21:22.680 --> 0:21:26.040
<v Speaker 1>I asked the question is because when I went through it,

0:21:27.320 --> 0:21:29.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, you and I, when we both eyeball these

0:21:29.280 --> 0:21:31.919
<v Speaker 1>things before we even do any work, we sort of

0:21:32.840 --> 0:21:36.040
<v Speaker 1>instinctively say, who do I like here? And my instinct

0:21:36.200 --> 0:21:38.920
<v Speaker 1>was to like Carolina at three and a half getting

0:21:38.920 --> 0:21:40.879
<v Speaker 1>the hook in the division, I think two teams.

0:21:40.640 --> 0:21:42.240
<v Speaker 3>Well with the pros. I know a couple of pros

0:21:42.280 --> 0:21:45.399
<v Speaker 3>who right away Sunday they grabbed that. So but it

0:21:45.400 --> 0:21:46.000
<v Speaker 3>hasn't moved.

0:21:46.200 --> 0:21:48.480
<v Speaker 1>But it hasn't moved, which is interesting, right because like

0:21:48.560 --> 0:21:52.840
<v Speaker 1>normally these lines we've seen with some other division games

0:21:52.840 --> 0:21:54.359
<v Speaker 1>that opened to three, they've moved to two and a

0:21:54.400 --> 0:21:56.080
<v Speaker 1>half or they moved to three and a half. This

0:21:56.119 --> 0:21:57.280
<v Speaker 1>one was at three and a half and it's just

0:21:57.280 --> 0:21:59.800
<v Speaker 1>stayed and it's the only one that has stayed of

0:21:59.800 --> 0:22:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the Division games. And so I wanted to like Carolina,

0:22:05.200 --> 0:22:07.600
<v Speaker 1>but I think that's because we always like Carolina and

0:22:07.640 --> 0:22:09.440
<v Speaker 1>we want to believe in Bryce Young and we think

0:22:09.480 --> 0:22:12.120
<v Speaker 1>we've seen something in the way he plays that we've

0:22:12.119 --> 0:22:15.840
<v Speaker 1>actually won money on, and you know, and so but look,

0:22:16.359 --> 0:22:18.840
<v Speaker 1>he was terrible against the Packers and they won because

0:22:18.880 --> 0:22:20.439
<v Speaker 1>he made some good plays down the stretch.

0:22:20.560 --> 0:22:22.520
<v Speaker 2>But really it was Rico daubdle.

0:22:22.320 --> 0:22:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Right last week against the Saints, he was truly awful,

0:22:27.119 --> 0:22:29.719
<v Speaker 1>Like he made bad plays, the same things he had

0:22:29.720 --> 0:22:32.520
<v Speaker 1>done against the Packers, only they didn't overcome them against

0:22:32.560 --> 0:22:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the Saints, and so that was pretty disconcerting. And it

0:22:36.000 --> 0:22:37.960
<v Speaker 1>looked to me like he was regressing a little bit.

0:22:38.200 --> 0:22:41.360
<v Speaker 1>And the things that had made him magical when he's

0:22:41.400 --> 0:22:43.480
<v Speaker 1>stepping up in the pocket and being accurate and hitting

0:22:43.520 --> 0:22:46.040
<v Speaker 1>guys that keeps them in the game, he was just

0:22:46.160 --> 0:22:51.240
<v Speaker 1>throwing picks and he was fumbling and like not playing

0:22:51.280 --> 0:22:54.440
<v Speaker 1>like a professional quarterback who's on a winning team. And

0:22:54.480 --> 0:22:57.920
<v Speaker 1>then I look at the Falcons and if you squint,

0:22:58.080 --> 0:23:00.520
<v Speaker 1>not just on the offensive side, like you can see

0:23:00.520 --> 0:23:04.119
<v Speaker 1>them getting to the ball defensively, there's just a couple

0:23:04.080 --> 0:23:09.200
<v Speaker 1>of plays away, like some bad calls away meeting schematically

0:23:09.720 --> 0:23:11.920
<v Speaker 1>that let the Colts stay in it. They should have

0:23:12.000 --> 0:23:15.360
<v Speaker 1>killed the Colts in that game. It shouldn't have been

0:23:15.520 --> 0:23:19.400
<v Speaker 1>It shouldn't have been a game. And so that's when

0:23:19.400 --> 0:23:21.080
<v Speaker 1>I started to lean to the Falcons.

0:23:21.400 --> 0:23:23.959
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and it's a game that I just earmarked right

0:23:23.960 --> 0:23:26.000
<v Speaker 3>away because of my model had a two and a half.

0:23:26.400 --> 0:23:28.840
<v Speaker 3>So it's like, Okay, I'm already gonna like the Panthers.

0:23:28.920 --> 0:23:31.520
<v Speaker 3>My model likes the Panthers as well, and it probably

0:23:31.560 --> 0:23:33.040
<v Speaker 3>is going to be something I'm a little blind through

0:23:33.080 --> 0:23:35.440
<v Speaker 3>right now, which is we're giving a lot of praise

0:23:35.440 --> 0:23:37.920
<v Speaker 3>to Atlanta here. Let's make no mistake. This is a

0:23:38.000 --> 0:23:40.000
<v Speaker 3>defense just gave up what two hundred and fifty yards

0:23:40.040 --> 0:23:43.479
<v Speaker 3>rushing to doctor David. Yeah, and you could say, well

0:23:43.520 --> 0:23:46.119
<v Speaker 3>that was flicky. Well go watch that Miami game against

0:23:46.160 --> 0:23:49.000
<v Speaker 3>eight Chan where they struggled. So you're seeing a little

0:23:49.000 --> 0:23:51.520
<v Speaker 3>bit of pattern that when they face really dominant running backs,

0:23:51.840 --> 0:23:54.119
<v Speaker 3>their defense does struggle and their offense seems not to be

0:23:54.119 --> 0:23:57.280
<v Speaker 3>able to keep up with it. But you know, and

0:23:57.400 --> 0:23:59.320
<v Speaker 3>landing here is on a slot. That's why it's like

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:03.080
<v Speaker 3>I really wanted to be on the Panthers. But just situationally,

0:24:03.600 --> 0:24:07.120
<v Speaker 3>they win that Bills game, everyone thinks, you know, that's

0:24:06.880 --> 0:24:09.120
<v Speaker 3>a win that's going to send them to another level.

0:24:09.160 --> 0:24:12.320
<v Speaker 3>That's a young Atlanta team. They've lost four straight. I mean,

0:24:12.720 --> 0:24:16.640
<v Speaker 3>tough road, but forty nine ers Miami New England Colts,

0:24:17.720 --> 0:24:21.240
<v Speaker 3>they've dropped them. You would expect this team to get

0:24:21.320 --> 0:24:24.520
<v Speaker 3>right here at home against the Panthers. But like Chad's

0:24:24.520 --> 0:24:27.280
<v Speaker 3>saying here, maybe I should trust my model and trust

0:24:27.280 --> 0:24:29.160
<v Speaker 3>my instincts here. This is a great matchup. Rico data

0:24:29.200 --> 0:24:30.760
<v Speaker 3>on this Carolina Panthers team to take the three and

0:24:30.800 --> 0:24:32.720
<v Speaker 3>a half. But I just I don't get why this

0:24:32.800 --> 0:24:34.919
<v Speaker 3>number is what it is, because to me, if they

0:24:34.920 --> 0:24:37.160
<v Speaker 3>opened it two and a half three, that made more

0:24:37.200 --> 0:24:39.840
<v Speaker 3>sense for this matchup than what they're putting here, which

0:24:39.880 --> 0:24:41.800
<v Speaker 3>is they're thinks they think the Falcons are a much

0:24:41.800 --> 0:24:44.119
<v Speaker 3>better team than the Panthers. So and just see what

0:24:44.160 --> 0:24:45.960
<v Speaker 3>the market will do with this one. Like Chad said,

0:24:46.160 --> 0:24:48.000
<v Speaker 3>if you want the early read with the pros, they're

0:24:48.000 --> 0:24:50.159
<v Speaker 3>on the Panthers supposed three and a half. I'll be

0:24:50.240 --> 0:24:52.320
<v Speaker 3>patient here, maybe take a position on the Falcons later.

0:24:53.000 --> 0:24:54.639
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we're gonna We're gonna hold off on this one.

0:24:54.640 --> 0:24:56.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to see how the market plays it. Let's

0:24:56.400 --> 0:24:59.880
<v Speaker 1>do a quick word from our friends at hard Rock.

0:25:00.920 --> 0:25:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Today's show is brought to you by our new presenting sponsor,

0:25:03.560 --> 0:25:06.560
<v Speaker 1>hard Rock Bet. It's that time of year when every

0:25:06.600 --> 0:25:09.720
<v Speaker 1>day feels like a big game day. You've got Pro football,

0:25:09.800 --> 0:25:12.840
<v Speaker 1>college football, NBA, college hoops, hockey, it's all happening, and

0:25:12.880 --> 0:25:14.879
<v Speaker 1>on hard Rock Bet, there's always something to bet on.

0:25:15.560 --> 0:25:17.560
<v Speaker 1>If you haven't tried your first bet on hard Rock

0:25:17.600 --> 0:25:20.159
<v Speaker 1>Bet yet, there's still time for you to get one

0:25:20.240 --> 0:25:22.160
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty dollars in bonus bets.

0:25:21.880 --> 0:25:22.440
<v Speaker 2>If you win.

0:25:22.640 --> 0:25:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Just place a five dollar bet and if it hits,

0:25:25.119 --> 0:25:26.879
<v Speaker 1>you get not only your winnings, but one hundred and

0:25:26.920 --> 0:25:29.919
<v Speaker 1>fifty dollars in extra bonus bets. And if you're not

0:25:29.960 --> 0:25:32.800
<v Speaker 1>sure what to place your first bet on, check out

0:25:32.840 --> 0:25:35.240
<v Speaker 1>the hard Rock Bet Stats Hub.

0:25:35.480 --> 0:25:36.880
<v Speaker 2>It's loaded with trends.

0:25:36.640 --> 0:25:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Streaks, and stats to help guid your picks. Numbers don't lie,

0:25:40.560 --> 0:25:43.520
<v Speaker 1>and neither does the data in there. Here's one that

0:25:43.560 --> 0:25:46.400
<v Speaker 1>stood out to me. Green Bay's Josh Jacobs has scored

0:25:46.440 --> 0:25:49.840
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown in thirteen straight games against NFC opponents. Check

0:25:49.880 --> 0:25:51.720
<v Speaker 1>out the stats hub now, get the edge and bet

0:25:51.720 --> 0:25:56.159
<v Speaker 1>with confidence. The hard Rock Bet sports book app is

0:25:56.200 --> 0:26:00.360
<v Speaker 1>the only legal sports book for whenever you're on Flora,

0:26:00.480 --> 0:26:05.399
<v Speaker 1>and it's also live in Arizona, Ohio, New Jersey, Indiana, Tennessee, Virginia, Illinois.

0:26:05.000 --> 0:26:09.760
<v Speaker 2>And Colorado, coming soon to more states. Two plus. Hard

0:26:09.880 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 2>Rock Bet.

0:26:10.640 --> 0:26:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Offers new promos every single day, so whenever you're listening,

0:26:13.560 --> 0:26:15.600
<v Speaker 1>just open the app and check out what you've got

0:26:15.640 --> 0:26:18.960
<v Speaker 1>any day of the week. Download the hard Rock Bet

0:26:19.000 --> 0:26:22.920
<v Speaker 1>app and make your first deposit payable in bonus bets,

0:26:23.000 --> 0:26:26.520
<v Speaker 1>not a cash offer offered by the Seminole Tribe of Florida.

0:26:26.560 --> 0:26:28.120
<v Speaker 2>In Florida offered.

0:26:27.840 --> 0:26:31.080
<v Speaker 1>By Seminal hard Rock Digital, ELC and all other states,

0:26:31.280 --> 0:26:36.119
<v Speaker 1>must be twenty one and over and physically present in Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Indiana,

0:26:36.240 --> 0:26:39.080
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey, Ohio, Tennessee or Virginia to play. Terms and

0:26:39.119 --> 0:26:42.880
<v Speaker 1>conditions apply. Concerned about gambling in Florida called one eight

0:26:42.960 --> 0:26:46.439
<v Speaker 1>three three playwise in Indiana, if you or someone you

0:26:46.440 --> 0:26:48.440
<v Speaker 1>know as a gambling problem and wants help, call one

0:26:48.440 --> 0:26:51.080
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred and nine with it gambling problem called one

0:26:51.080 --> 0:26:54.240
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred gambler on Arizona, Colorado, Illinois, New Jersey, Ohio,

0:26:54.280 --> 0:26:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee or Virginia Houston at Tennessee.

0:26:57.880 --> 0:27:01.640
<v Speaker 2>Tennessee is now a seven point underdog at hard Rock Bet.

0:27:01.680 --> 0:27:03.400
<v Speaker 1>This had been seven and a half and it still

0:27:03.440 --> 0:27:05.840
<v Speaker 1>is in most places. You know what I realized last

0:27:05.840 --> 0:27:07.960
<v Speaker 1>week when I was putting together my notes in the

0:27:07.960 --> 0:27:10.600
<v Speaker 1>script yesterday, how nice it was not to have to

0:27:10.600 --> 0:27:14.800
<v Speaker 1>think about Tennessee last week. Agreed, truly, it was amazing.

0:27:15.119 --> 0:27:18.080
<v Speaker 1>A lot of questions here. Who's playing quarterback for the Texans.

0:27:18.119 --> 0:27:20.520
<v Speaker 1>We don't know yet yet, I mean will know. You

0:27:20.560 --> 0:27:23.720
<v Speaker 1>know the status of C. J. Stroud later this week

0:27:23.760 --> 0:27:27.040
<v Speaker 1>as he goes through the concussion protocol. Jeffrey Simmons, I

0:27:27.119 --> 0:27:31.199
<v Speaker 1>don't think is going to play for the Texans. And

0:27:31.240 --> 0:27:34.720
<v Speaker 1>when I think about the Titans, like the last time

0:27:34.760 --> 0:27:39.240
<v Speaker 1>we bet against them, and we rarely have in the contest,

0:27:39.720 --> 0:27:42.679
<v Speaker 1>was two weeks ago against the Chargers, and they burned

0:27:42.800 --> 0:27:45.919
<v Speaker 1>us with a punt return and a pick six and

0:27:45.960 --> 0:27:51.080
<v Speaker 1>then they got a you know, backdoor field goal. So

0:27:51.160 --> 0:27:52.560
<v Speaker 1>I kind of want to go back to not having

0:27:52.560 --> 0:27:54.200
<v Speaker 1>to think about the Texans, especially when I don't know

0:27:54.200 --> 0:27:58.520
<v Speaker 1>who's playing quarterback and a team that is significantly offensive challenged.

0:27:59.440 --> 0:28:01.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I love the Texas here. I'm shocked this numbers

0:28:01.880 --> 0:28:03.760
<v Speaker 3>come down, So I'm interested to talk to pros this

0:28:03.800 --> 0:28:07.119
<v Speaker 3>week see why they're taking this Titans team. But just

0:28:07.160 --> 0:28:09.760
<v Speaker 3>a nightmare match for the Titans, as if these teams

0:28:09.760 --> 0:28:11.960
<v Speaker 3>didn't play earlier in the year. And I think the

0:28:12.040 --> 0:28:15.360
<v Speaker 3>score was twenty six nothing or thirty nothing the Houston one.

0:28:15.400 --> 0:28:19.000
<v Speaker 3>I guess it's really yeah, And it's it's just about

0:28:19.080 --> 0:28:22.040
<v Speaker 3>the matchups where it's like, what can this Titans team

0:28:22.080 --> 0:28:25.359
<v Speaker 3>offensively do to beat this Texans team matchup and scheme wise,

0:28:25.400 --> 0:28:27.239
<v Speaker 3>and I just can't find one. So so I think

0:28:27.240 --> 0:28:29.119
<v Speaker 3>they get shut out again. No, CJ. I think we'll

0:28:29.160 --> 0:28:31.320
<v Speaker 3>get one of them. They'll steal one, maybe get a touchdown,

0:28:31.359 --> 0:28:35.760
<v Speaker 3>and you know, like you said, it's it's interesting they

0:28:35.800 --> 0:28:37.640
<v Speaker 3>hung this line when no one knows who the quarterback

0:28:37.760 --> 0:28:41.160
<v Speaker 3>is going to be. Where I feel like even if

0:28:41.160 --> 0:28:43.800
<v Speaker 3>they hung six five and a half, they would have

0:28:43.800 --> 0:28:46.160
<v Speaker 3>got the same amount of action they hung at seven

0:28:46.160 --> 0:28:48.840
<v Speaker 3>and a half. And it's all Titans money, all of it.

0:28:49.040 --> 0:28:50.920
<v Speaker 3>Like I'm looking right now out a bunch of different books,

0:28:50.920 --> 0:28:54.680
<v Speaker 3>it's just all Titans money. So I don't know. Maybe

0:28:54.720 --> 0:28:56.520
<v Speaker 3>I'll just be patient and I'll get the better number

0:28:56.560 --> 0:28:58.120
<v Speaker 3>of the Texans. But if this sets six and a half,

0:28:58.160 --> 0:29:01.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna have a real time hard time avoiding this game.

0:29:01.400 --> 0:29:03.560
<v Speaker 3>And maybe I'll convintion you come Sunday for six a

0:29:03.560 --> 0:29:06.800
<v Speaker 3>half in the contest. But Titans, I don't know how

0:29:06.840 --> 0:29:10.520
<v Speaker 3>they score. And the other side, Houston wants to run

0:29:10.560 --> 0:29:13.520
<v Speaker 3>the ball. Guess who's horrible against the run, the Tennessee Titans.

0:29:13.560 --> 0:29:14.320
<v Speaker 2>Tennessee Titans.

0:29:14.360 --> 0:29:16.920
<v Speaker 3>Right, Yeah, we'll see Jeffrey Simmons is back. If he's not,

0:29:17.520 --> 0:29:20.280
<v Speaker 3>I don't think he's back. It's gonna be another great matchup,

0:29:20.280 --> 0:29:23.560
<v Speaker 3>great spot for this Texans team. So yeah, it's I'm

0:29:23.560 --> 0:29:25.400
<v Speaker 3>gonna go back and I'll rewatch that Houston game for

0:29:25.400 --> 0:29:28.040
<v Speaker 3>early year. But I just remember they fled out dominated

0:29:28.040 --> 0:29:30.640
<v Speaker 3>across the board with something stupid like nine or six

0:29:30.760 --> 0:29:33.720
<v Speaker 3>nothing at a half. In the second half, they just ran

0:29:33.800 --> 0:29:35.640
<v Speaker 3>it down the throats of Tennessee and Tennessee couldn't do

0:29:35.640 --> 0:29:38.240
<v Speaker 3>anything offensively, So it just feels a good match for

0:29:38.280 --> 0:29:40.880
<v Speaker 3>this Texans team here coming off such an emotional win,

0:29:41.120 --> 0:29:42.320
<v Speaker 3>and keep those vibes rolling.

0:29:42.800 --> 0:29:44.320
<v Speaker 2>I don't think Simmons is going to be back. We'll

0:29:44.400 --> 0:29:45.320
<v Speaker 2>updated on Thursday.

0:29:45.320 --> 0:29:48.080
<v Speaker 1>But when I was checking the reports yesterday, most of

0:29:48.120 --> 0:29:50.440
<v Speaker 1>them said they didn't expect him back until week twelve.

0:29:50.960 --> 0:29:56.360
<v Speaker 1>So that changes that. Listen, you know me on Sunday mornings, I.

0:29:56.320 --> 0:30:00.080
<v Speaker 2>Am easy, easy.

0:29:59.760 --> 0:30:01.960
<v Speaker 1>To by the way, that might be a common door

0:30:02.000 --> 0:30:05.320
<v Speaker 1>song too, and that's a great callback and we didn't

0:30:05.320 --> 0:30:06.520
<v Speaker 1>even plan that.

0:30:06.520 --> 0:30:10.320
<v Speaker 2>That was solo Lionel, Richie, Chad, come on, get it together,

0:30:10.720 --> 0:30:11.400
<v Speaker 2>let's go, Mack.

0:30:11.880 --> 0:30:15.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't need a ton of persuading on betting against

0:30:15.400 --> 0:30:18.440
<v Speaker 1>the Titans. I had a little bit of trepidation just

0:30:18.480 --> 0:30:20.480
<v Speaker 1>because I saw the number move and I don't know

0:30:20.480 --> 0:30:23.280
<v Speaker 1>who the quarterback is. But if you feel that strongly

0:30:23.320 --> 0:30:25.800
<v Speaker 1>about it, I'm gonna be all in on it. I

0:30:25.880 --> 0:30:27.280
<v Speaker 1>might make it my biggest bet of the year.

0:30:27.920 --> 0:30:30.160
<v Speaker 3>I hope not. I wouldn't do that. If it's Davis.

0:30:30.000 --> 0:30:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Mills, all right, well we're gonna put a hold on

0:30:32.080 --> 0:30:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Houston minus seven.

0:30:32.880 --> 0:30:35.760
<v Speaker 2>We'll see who the players are Green.

0:30:35.560 --> 0:30:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Bay at the New York Giants plus seven and a half.

0:30:40.440 --> 0:30:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Since the news of Brian Dayball being fired, since the

0:30:45.000 --> 0:30:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay Packers put up seven points at home and

0:30:48.680 --> 0:30:53.280
<v Speaker 1>had a myriad of miscues against the Philadelphia Eagles, this

0:30:53.400 --> 0:30:54.920
<v Speaker 1>number has come down from eight and a half to

0:30:54.960 --> 0:30:57.720
<v Speaker 1>seven and a half. And I don't know about you,

0:30:58.280 --> 0:31:00.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a ton of feelings about Brian David

0:31:00.320 --> 0:31:04.400
<v Speaker 1>I can't tell if like he was just an arrogant

0:31:04.480 --> 0:31:09.440
<v Speaker 1>dude or a football dude or a guy who is

0:31:09.480 --> 0:31:14.760
<v Speaker 1>getting screwed. I think it's mostly Brian Dayball getting screwed.

0:31:14.840 --> 0:31:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Forget about his ability to coach and scheme and get

0:31:17.880 --> 0:31:20.320
<v Speaker 1>along with, you know, people on the coaching staff and

0:31:20.360 --> 0:31:21.360
<v Speaker 1>the players don't seem to.

0:31:21.280 --> 0:31:22.000
<v Speaker 2>Like him very much.

0:31:22.040 --> 0:31:24.400
<v Speaker 1>He seems to be a little bit of a manage

0:31:24.480 --> 0:31:27.600
<v Speaker 1>the star and not manage anybody else kind of coach.

0:31:28.120 --> 0:31:32.280
<v Speaker 2>But boy, the videos that are.

0:31:32.120 --> 0:31:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Coming out about Joe Shine and his reactions to Jackson's

0:31:36.880 --> 0:31:38.520
<v Speaker 1>dart and how he didn't want to take him, and

0:31:38.560 --> 0:31:41.680
<v Speaker 1>how he got rid of Saquon when Brian Daball wanted

0:31:41.720 --> 0:31:44.080
<v Speaker 1>to keep him, and how he signed Daniel Jones to

0:31:44.120 --> 0:31:48.400
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and forty million dollars deal. Like he seems

0:31:48.440 --> 0:31:50.960
<v Speaker 1>a little easily in this whole situation.

0:31:52.000 --> 0:31:53.680
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you come across all these people on life

0:31:53.680 --> 0:31:55.320
<v Speaker 3>where you're just like, how does this guy have and

0:31:55.400 --> 0:31:57.600
<v Speaker 3>maintain these jobs? And he's one of those people.

0:31:57.800 --> 0:32:01.000
<v Speaker 2>It's like he's managing up. In the corporate world, it's

0:32:01.000 --> 0:32:01.880
<v Speaker 2>called managing up.

0:32:02.520 --> 0:32:05.040
<v Speaker 3>Okay, well he's doing it. Definition We have a couple

0:32:05.040 --> 0:32:07.720
<v Speaker 3>of people like that in my world as well, but uh,

0:32:07.800 --> 0:32:09.600
<v Speaker 3>they always get theirs. I don't. Hopefully it goes the

0:32:09.600 --> 0:32:12.040
<v Speaker 3>same in the business world. But I look at this

0:32:12.120 --> 0:32:15.680
<v Speaker 3>move as I guess a positive for the Giants. I mean,

0:32:15.720 --> 0:32:18.160
<v Speaker 3>this guy is blown. Was a four double digit fourth

0:32:18.200 --> 0:32:21.160
<v Speaker 3>quarter leads this season with the Giants. Yeah, had to do.

0:32:21.280 --> 0:32:22.719
<v Speaker 3>If you're the owner, you have to show your fan

0:32:22.800 --> 0:32:25.640
<v Speaker 3>base you have a pulse and make that move. So yeah,

0:32:26.000 --> 0:32:27.720
<v Speaker 3>just burn it all down, get rid of him, get

0:32:27.760 --> 0:32:32.000
<v Speaker 3>rid of the GM start over. Like we joke with Dart,

0:32:32.240 --> 0:32:36.120
<v Speaker 3>tons and tons of talents, no brains. Guy is a

0:32:36.160 --> 0:32:39.960
<v Speaker 3>full on idiot when it comes to protecting himself. I

0:32:39.960 --> 0:32:41.600
<v Speaker 3>mean someone joked I think it's true. I think he

0:32:41.600 --> 0:32:44.200
<v Speaker 3>has three concussions this year, Like, well.

0:32:44.120 --> 0:32:46.680
<v Speaker 1>I think he's been checked for three concussions. He's been

0:32:46.720 --> 0:32:48.960
<v Speaker 1>checked for four check for multiple concussions.

0:32:49.240 --> 0:32:53.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but it's still like, I mean, he just needs

0:32:53.000 --> 0:32:55.960
<v Speaker 3>to understand he's got so much talent. The league is

0:32:56.000 --> 0:32:58.320
<v Speaker 3>set up to protect yourself if you're a quarterback, especially

0:32:58.320 --> 0:33:01.400
<v Speaker 3>as a runner. It's just crazy the stuff he put

0:33:01.480 --> 0:33:05.560
<v Speaker 3>himself into. So I am all over green Bay here,

0:33:06.040 --> 0:33:08.280
<v Speaker 3>especially if this might be Russell Wilson. Oh my god,

0:33:08.360 --> 0:33:11.080
<v Speaker 3>and we've seen it. Yeah, Russell Wilson could have a

0:33:11.120 --> 0:33:13.760
<v Speaker 3>flute game where it all puts it all together. This

0:33:13.960 --> 0:33:16.480
<v Speaker 3>is ain't it? Like? This is a defensive front on

0:33:16.560 --> 0:33:18.480
<v Speaker 3>Green Bay that can get pressure on a quarterback. They

0:33:18.520 --> 0:33:20.840
<v Speaker 3>have a lot of guys that can win one on ones.

0:33:20.880 --> 0:33:25.360
<v Speaker 3>And the flip side Lafloor with this Packers team, that

0:33:25.520 --> 0:33:27.280
<v Speaker 3>was kind of an oddity. I mean, we both talked

0:33:27.320 --> 0:33:30.440
<v Speaker 3>about Green Bay. He doesn't lose back to back, so

0:33:30.560 --> 0:33:31.920
<v Speaker 3>that was the first time they lost back to back

0:33:31.920 --> 0:33:35.000
<v Speaker 3>games in like two years. And Lafloor when he does

0:33:35.040 --> 0:33:37.040
<v Speaker 3>lose back to back, he really gets his team right

0:33:37.080 --> 0:33:39.719
<v Speaker 3>in that third game. It just we always give him

0:33:39.720 --> 0:33:41.160
<v Speaker 3>praise for be such a good coach. This seems like

0:33:41.200 --> 0:33:43.040
<v Speaker 3>a little floor type of game. Type of spot, So

0:33:43.880 --> 0:33:46.440
<v Speaker 3>I get with people in their doubts with love. I

0:33:46.880 --> 0:33:48.480
<v Speaker 3>like I said, I think it was the dry air

0:33:48.800 --> 0:33:50.680
<v Speaker 3>quarterbacks and able to grip the ball, and we saw

0:33:50.680 --> 0:33:53.480
<v Speaker 3>a ton of drops too from receivers. Just was really

0:33:53.520 --> 0:33:55.440
<v Speaker 3>off night all together, where I think this is a

0:33:55.440 --> 0:33:58.800
<v Speaker 3>good bounce back spot for this Backers team. So scary number.

0:33:58.960 --> 0:34:00.800
<v Speaker 3>I get it like we're bad, not a Packers team

0:34:00.840 --> 0:34:02.440
<v Speaker 3>that is not proven to be worthy of this type

0:34:02.480 --> 0:34:04.560
<v Speaker 3>of number. But I think it's got a Russell Wilson

0:34:04.680 --> 0:34:06.600
<v Speaker 3>line that it could be announced it to RUSS. So

0:34:07.160 --> 0:34:08.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to get ahead of it. See if I

0:34:08.560 --> 0:34:10.399
<v Speaker 3>can get this now, and if it is RUSS, see

0:34:10.400 --> 0:34:11.759
<v Speaker 3>if this number gets up to nine or ten.

0:34:13.719 --> 0:34:15.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the number has been moving in the opposite direction.

0:34:16.560 --> 0:34:18.720
<v Speaker 1>The other thing that I think about with this game,

0:34:20.120 --> 0:34:22.879
<v Speaker 1>Matt Laflor might want to give Josh Jacobs the ball.

0:34:23.239 --> 0:34:24.720
<v Speaker 2>Many many, many many times.

0:34:25.200 --> 0:34:27.799
<v Speaker 1>And the Giants' weakness, and we saw it again last

0:34:27.800 --> 0:34:28.440
<v Speaker 1>week against the.

0:34:28.360 --> 0:34:30.360
<v Speaker 2>Bears, was being able to stop the rush.

0:34:30.560 --> 0:34:32.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean they are thirty first, thirty second in the

0:34:32.920 --> 0:34:35.920
<v Speaker 1>league anyway you slice it, so it does play to

0:34:35.960 --> 0:34:38.080
<v Speaker 1>the strength and we saw last night even the Packers

0:34:38.480 --> 0:34:40.960
<v Speaker 1>they continue to try to run, they continue to try

0:34:40.960 --> 0:34:45.400
<v Speaker 1>to run. That's some dubious play calls, I think. But

0:34:46.560 --> 0:34:49.320
<v Speaker 1>when Josh Jacobs had the ball, he was somewhat effective

0:34:49.320 --> 0:34:53.399
<v Speaker 1>and obviously got into the end zone. So I think

0:34:53.440 --> 0:34:57.400
<v Speaker 1>it's a strength against weakness as well, regardless of Russell Wilson.

0:34:58.040 --> 0:35:00.920
<v Speaker 2>But it is a big number, big big number.

0:35:04.040 --> 0:35:10.239
<v Speaker 1>Chicago Bears, Minnesota Vikings, commodoors did not sing that song.

0:35:12.440 --> 0:35:14.960
<v Speaker 2>It's a three at hard rock. It's kind of been

0:35:15.000 --> 0:35:16.719
<v Speaker 2>bouncing around. It was at.

0:35:16.640 --> 0:35:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Three, it went down to two and a half, it

0:35:19.200 --> 0:35:21.000
<v Speaker 1>went back to three. I'm talking about the Vikings being

0:35:21.040 --> 0:35:26.160
<v Speaker 1>three point Favoritesier. I love your take on this because

0:35:26.239 --> 0:35:29.200
<v Speaker 1>my lean is Minnesota when it's under a field goal.

0:35:29.600 --> 0:35:30.880
<v Speaker 2>I have not bet it yet.

0:35:31.400 --> 0:35:33.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to get out of my head about JJ

0:35:33.280 --> 0:35:35.160
<v Speaker 1>McCarthy and trying to get out of my head about

0:35:35.719 --> 0:35:39.479
<v Speaker 1>my Bears euphoria. I was talking to my buddy Andy

0:35:39.560 --> 0:35:42.759
<v Speaker 1>last night, who I grew up with outside Chicago and

0:35:42.840 --> 0:35:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Holland Park and also.

0:35:44.120 --> 0:35:45.200
<v Speaker 2>Went to Indiana with me.

0:35:47.960 --> 0:35:52.440
<v Speaker 1>We don't even know how to react to having a

0:35:52.640 --> 0:35:58.759
<v Speaker 1>dominant college football team and a foot professional football team

0:35:58.880 --> 0:36:03.640
<v Speaker 1>that is bringing us joy and so I'm trying to

0:36:03.719 --> 0:36:06.680
<v Speaker 1>see the full picture for the Bears and not just

0:36:07.440 --> 0:36:09.680
<v Speaker 1>what they're doing in the final two minutes when the

0:36:09.719 --> 0:36:11.799
<v Speaker 1>whole game is breaking down and Caleb gets to use

0:36:11.800 --> 0:36:16.239
<v Speaker 1>his athleticism. And I'm also trying to get over JJ

0:36:16.360 --> 0:36:18.480
<v Speaker 1>McCarthy and just say I think the Vikings at two

0:36:18.480 --> 0:36:19.640
<v Speaker 1>and a half are the right size show.

0:36:21.400 --> 0:36:23.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think we have the avoided. Then I think

0:36:23.520 --> 0:36:25.279
<v Speaker 3>I'm too biased as well with this Bears team. They've

0:36:25.280 --> 0:36:28.080
<v Speaker 3>just been winning me a lot of money, you are, yeah,

0:36:28.080 --> 0:36:30.279
<v Speaker 3>And I've just been betting them, especially their money line

0:36:30.320 --> 0:36:32.960
<v Speaker 3>every week, where it's like they've just been good to me.

0:36:33.080 --> 0:36:35.399
<v Speaker 3>They just find ways to win. They're a very competitive team,

0:36:35.480 --> 0:36:38.160
<v Speaker 3>and I love the books hung this line of what

0:36:38.160 --> 0:36:42.280
<v Speaker 3>they did right because their first matchup Vikings first week,

0:36:42.600 --> 0:36:45.480
<v Speaker 3>go on the road and they win right by three

0:36:45.840 --> 0:36:48.680
<v Speaker 3>against this Bears team. So the books are just like,

0:36:48.680 --> 0:36:50.840
<v Speaker 3>we'll let you guys decide, right, We're gonna play it

0:36:50.880 --> 0:36:53.040
<v Speaker 3>right right where you just said. If it's two and

0:36:53.080 --> 0:36:55.960
<v Speaker 3>a half, how do you not tempt to take Minnesota there?

0:36:55.960 --> 0:36:58.520
<v Speaker 3>It feels a good number, a plus three. Same for

0:36:58.560 --> 0:37:00.800
<v Speaker 3>the Bears. It's like these teams are so evenly matched

0:37:01.600 --> 0:37:03.279
<v Speaker 3>I just think it's priced right. I don't really see

0:37:03.360 --> 0:37:05.520
<v Speaker 3>value either side. So if I have to make us

0:37:05.600 --> 0:37:07.440
<v Speaker 3>a pick on this side, I'm gonna go Bears. I

0:37:07.480 --> 0:37:09.720
<v Speaker 3>just like the way they're playing right now, the vibes

0:37:09.760 --> 0:37:11.520
<v Speaker 3>of the team. On the flip side, I think we

0:37:11.600 --> 0:37:14.520
<v Speaker 3>both just don't trust JJ like we don't. That's why

0:37:14.760 --> 0:37:18.040
<v Speaker 3>on script, he's great that first series, you know, first fifteen,

0:37:18.120 --> 0:37:21.319
<v Speaker 3>we always say no issue there, But after that, I

0:37:21.360 --> 0:37:23.040
<v Speaker 3>just don't think him or chaos here and sink we're

0:37:23.080 --> 0:37:26.560
<v Speaker 3>Kayleb Williams. He's not as great on the first fifteen,

0:37:27.000 --> 0:37:28.960
<v Speaker 3>but he gets better as a game goes along, especially

0:37:28.960 --> 0:37:30.560
<v Speaker 3>the run game. For this, Bears then gets better as

0:37:30.560 --> 0:37:32.880
<v Speaker 3>a game goes along. So yeah, I just at the three,

0:37:32.920 --> 0:37:35.120
<v Speaker 3>I gotta take Bears.

0:37:35.160 --> 0:37:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Not that I want to be nitpicky about the greatest

0:37:39.000 --> 0:37:46.400
<v Speaker 1>football franchise in NFL history, but he is still wildly inaccurate,

0:37:46.719 --> 0:37:48.640
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes the reason is Kaylee.

0:37:48.920 --> 0:37:51.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the reasons why they have to have.

0:37:51.840 --> 0:37:55.840
<v Speaker 1>These dramatic moments is because he's still missing the easy,

0:37:55.840 --> 0:37:59.160
<v Speaker 1>wide open throws. There were at least there were three

0:37:59.200 --> 0:38:02.160
<v Speaker 1>of them on Sunday late in the game.

0:38:03.000 --> 0:38:05.920
<v Speaker 2>One of them Colston Lovelin caught it was behind him

0:38:05.960 --> 0:38:07.440
<v Speaker 2>as he was rushing across the middle.

0:38:07.880 --> 0:38:10.160
<v Speaker 1>One of them was wide open Roma Dunese and it

0:38:10.320 --> 0:38:12.640
<v Speaker 1>just was an overthrow. Another one I can't remember who

0:38:12.680 --> 0:38:16.040
<v Speaker 1>it was. It might have been Luther Burden just didn't

0:38:16.040 --> 0:38:19.520
<v Speaker 1>connect on it and it wasn't anything but Caleb not

0:38:19.600 --> 0:38:20.399
<v Speaker 1>making a good throw.

0:38:21.280 --> 0:38:22.600
<v Speaker 2>That is killing me.

0:38:23.320 --> 0:38:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Do you get extra credit for making the spectacular but

0:38:26.640 --> 0:38:29.520
<v Speaker 1>not making the easy? But you win because of the spectacular.

0:38:31.120 --> 0:38:32.840
<v Speaker 3>Just win, baby, That's all matters to me.

0:38:34.360 --> 0:38:38.160
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting. I'm about process as much as them about results.

0:38:40.400 --> 0:38:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay visiting the Buffalo Bills.

0:38:42.960 --> 0:38:44.200
<v Speaker 2>The Buffalo Bills.

0:38:44.239 --> 0:38:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Are five and a half point favorites. I'm going to

0:38:47.160 --> 0:38:50.520
<v Speaker 1>say something here. I feel like the oh interesting, you

0:38:50.560 --> 0:38:51.240
<v Speaker 1>want to say something?

0:38:51.440 --> 0:38:52.319
<v Speaker 3>No, I said say it?

0:38:52.800 --> 0:38:54.600
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I think the Bucks.

0:38:54.320 --> 0:38:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Are getting dinged here more for losing than the Bills

0:38:57.440 --> 0:38:59.840
<v Speaker 1>are for losing, because it feels weird to me this

0:39:00.000 --> 0:39:00.960
<v Speaker 1>line is five and a half.

0:39:01.440 --> 0:39:02.240
<v Speaker 2>It should be lower.

0:39:02.960 --> 0:39:04.920
<v Speaker 3>I agree. So that's what scaring me off of it

0:39:04.960 --> 0:39:06.600
<v Speaker 3>a little bit, where it's like, just like this, since

0:39:06.640 --> 0:39:08.719
<v Speaker 3>the game, what are we not seeing here? Chad? Are

0:39:08.719 --> 0:39:11.520
<v Speaker 3>we too in love with this Bucks team? Because they

0:39:11.520 --> 0:39:13.440
<v Speaker 3>were so good to us earlier in the year, had

0:39:13.440 --> 0:39:15.520
<v Speaker 3>so many incredible wins when they were priced right, and

0:39:15.520 --> 0:39:19.520
<v Speaker 3>we're covering for us. Do not get this line at all.

0:39:20.920 --> 0:39:23.319
<v Speaker 3>This feels like I respect to this Bills team that

0:39:23.320 --> 0:39:27.520
<v Speaker 3>has not deserved the respect with this big where's that

0:39:27.680 --> 0:39:30.000
<v Speaker 3>secondary is suspect? I feel like Baker is going to

0:39:30.000 --> 0:39:32.160
<v Speaker 3>be able to get his even with these nameless guys

0:39:34.080 --> 0:39:36.359
<v Speaker 3>bizarre number. So yeah, like, let's be paid on this one.

0:39:36.560 --> 0:39:38.399
<v Speaker 3>I'll see what I can hear and talk to people

0:39:38.560 --> 0:39:40.520
<v Speaker 3>as you say here right now. I love the Bucks,

0:39:40.600 --> 0:39:44.000
<v Speaker 3>especially at five and a half, So something I must

0:39:44.040 --> 0:39:46.320
<v Speaker 3>be missing here. This just feels like such a good number.

0:39:46.520 --> 0:39:49.040
<v Speaker 3>And you know we all know the deal Josh Allen,

0:39:49.080 --> 0:39:51.520
<v Speaker 3>if you can find it and play in himself, Yeah,

0:39:51.560 --> 0:39:53.040
<v Speaker 3>they should roll here. This is a good match of

0:39:53.080 --> 0:39:56.080
<v Speaker 3>room against this Bucks team. But I feel like the

0:39:56.080 --> 0:39:59.440
<v Speaker 3>Bucks defense and embarrassing as it was last week against

0:39:59.440 --> 0:40:02.080
<v Speaker 3>the run. Don't you think the Boys would bounce back

0:40:02.120 --> 0:40:04.719
<v Speaker 3>here the following week like it was such a bad

0:40:04.800 --> 0:40:07.440
<v Speaker 3>loss for them. Where I know the Bills they can say, well,

0:40:07.440 --> 0:40:09.680
<v Speaker 3>we just had an embarrassing on ourselves. They don't have

0:40:09.719 --> 0:40:11.400
<v Speaker 3>the guys. You don't have a Vita vet. You just

0:40:11.920 --> 0:40:13.799
<v Speaker 3>I think they also another rookie to an injury this

0:40:13.880 --> 0:40:16.320
<v Speaker 3>past week, which is just it's never any of this

0:40:16.360 --> 0:40:17.920
<v Speaker 3>Pills and they just had a horrible injury look to

0:40:17.960 --> 0:40:20.239
<v Speaker 3>a defense. I couldn't afford to keep losing guys. So

0:40:20.880 --> 0:40:22.480
<v Speaker 3>I don't love this match for this Pills team. But

0:40:22.480 --> 0:40:24.160
<v Speaker 3>I let me be patient here, make sure I'm not

0:40:24.239 --> 0:40:25.759
<v Speaker 3>missing something before I really put a lot of money

0:40:25.800 --> 0:40:26.560
<v Speaker 3>to this Buck side.

0:40:26.640 --> 0:40:27.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, here's what's interesting.

0:40:27.640 --> 0:40:32.040
<v Speaker 1>You just mentioned the rush game against the Bucks for

0:40:32.120 --> 0:40:35.320
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots. The Bucks gave up I think one hundred

0:40:35.320 --> 0:40:38.320
<v Speaker 1>and sixty six yards rushing in that game, one hundred

0:40:38.320 --> 0:40:39.840
<v Speaker 1>and twenty five of them or on those.

0:40:39.640 --> 0:40:40.600
<v Speaker 2>Two broken plays.

0:40:40.960 --> 0:40:44.520
<v Speaker 1>So are we looking at the Bucks defense as having

0:40:44.520 --> 0:40:47.520
<v Speaker 1>had a bad game or did the Bucks defense have

0:40:48.280 --> 0:40:49.320
<v Speaker 1>two bad plays?

0:40:49.920 --> 0:40:53.200
<v Speaker 3>And but Cook's that same style as Henderson. He can

0:40:53.239 --> 0:40:55.560
<v Speaker 3>break it. Yeah, but.

0:40:57.040 --> 0:41:03.799
<v Speaker 2>You know to that degree, it's hard to break big runs.

0:41:03.920 --> 0:41:06.640
<v Speaker 3>It's hard out understand.

0:41:07.680 --> 0:41:10.640
<v Speaker 1>So I don't automatically think just because they've got James

0:41:10.640 --> 0:41:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Cook that he's gonna be able to do the same

0:41:12.080 --> 0:41:14.799
<v Speaker 1>things that Trevion Henderson did. I might have to lean

0:41:14.840 --> 0:41:18.880
<v Speaker 1>into this Bucks defense playing as it normally does. The

0:41:18.920 --> 0:41:23.000
<v Speaker 1>one thing that I can't get over, Bucky Irving might

0:41:23.120 --> 0:41:25.880
<v Speaker 1>just be much more important to this offense than we

0:41:25.960 --> 0:41:27.759
<v Speaker 1>even gave him credit for. And we gave him a

0:41:27.840 --> 0:41:30.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of credit, but it's not the same team since

0:41:30.719 --> 0:41:32.640
<v Speaker 1>he's been out with the foot and the shoulder and

0:41:32.680 --> 0:41:34.120
<v Speaker 1>he's not expected.

0:41:33.640 --> 0:41:35.840
<v Speaker 2>To play this week. Todd Bowles said.

0:41:35.680 --> 0:41:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Yesterday he did not think Bucky Irving was going to play,

0:41:38.760 --> 0:41:40.640
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's making a much bigger difference for

0:41:40.719 --> 0:41:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Sead White is just a different player and as magical

0:41:44.320 --> 0:41:47.320
<v Speaker 1>as Baker is, if he doesn't have Bucky Bucky Irving,

0:41:47.719 --> 0:41:50.440
<v Speaker 1>and hee's down Mike Evans and he's down Chris Godwin,

0:41:51.000 --> 0:41:55.040
<v Speaker 1>even with the offensive line getting better, is there something

0:41:55.719 --> 0:41:58.880
<v Speaker 1>in the sauce that's missing that we're not seeing. I

0:41:58.880 --> 0:42:05.360
<v Speaker 1>agree that's fair La Chargers at the Jacksonville Jaguars.

0:42:06.840 --> 0:42:08.400
<v Speaker 2>Look, it's when we fade the Chargers.

0:42:08.560 --> 0:42:11.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know to tell you, like we we missed

0:42:12.160 --> 0:42:14.120
<v Speaker 1>betting on the Chargers last week when we knew we

0:42:14.120 --> 0:42:14.560
<v Speaker 1>should have.

0:42:14.480 --> 0:42:19.600
<v Speaker 2>Been betting on the Chargers. Uh, And we now would

0:42:19.920 --> 0:42:21.520
<v Speaker 2>normally want to bet on.

0:42:21.480 --> 0:42:24.959
<v Speaker 1>The Chargers as road favorites because they looked so good

0:42:25.080 --> 0:42:27.160
<v Speaker 1>last week, and we're like, all right, they figured it out.

0:42:27.920 --> 0:42:30.239
<v Speaker 1>You make quick passes, you don't let the offensive line

0:42:30.280 --> 0:42:33.400
<v Speaker 1>become a liability, and then we would bet them and

0:42:33.440 --> 0:42:36.960
<v Speaker 1>they'll go on the road as favorites and they'll loose

0:42:37.600 --> 0:42:40.200
<v Speaker 1>and they won't make us happy. So I'm just saying

0:42:40.280 --> 0:42:42.000
<v Speaker 1>right now, I don't even care who they're playing. We're

0:42:42.000 --> 0:42:42.800
<v Speaker 1>fading the Chargers.

0:42:43.200 --> 0:42:45.160
<v Speaker 3>Well they shockingly they've been winning on the road. They

0:42:45.200 --> 0:42:46.960
<v Speaker 3>just have not been covering for us. So you're right

0:42:47.000 --> 0:42:48.879
<v Speaker 3>they they've burned this exact spot twice.

0:42:48.880 --> 0:42:53.759
<v Speaker 1>A difference to me, Simon, I don't wins and losses. Yeah,

0:42:53.880 --> 0:42:56.000
<v Speaker 1>that's fair about my wins and losses.

0:42:56.800 --> 0:42:59.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, hard Rock has already moved the unfortunately, like to me,

0:42:59.600 --> 0:43:01.719
<v Speaker 3>it's plus three. Go find it if you can on

0:43:01.760 --> 0:43:04.440
<v Speaker 3>the Jags. But I don't even know how much time

0:43:04.440 --> 0:43:06.399
<v Speaker 3>when I spend this one because I honestly hate this game, Chad.

0:43:06.440 --> 0:43:07.680
<v Speaker 3>I hate that I have to better, I hate that

0:43:07.680 --> 0:43:10.520
<v Speaker 3>IM have to watch it. I just do not enjoy

0:43:10.520 --> 0:43:13.640
<v Speaker 3>the trebor Lards betting experience. I never have, never will.

0:43:14.080 --> 0:43:16.200
<v Speaker 3>So this is the random time where I'll take that

0:43:16.280 --> 0:43:17.799
<v Speaker 3>number because I know it's the right one. The midle

0:43:17.840 --> 0:43:20.840
<v Speaker 3>thinks it's the right one. Chad just basically nailed it,

0:43:20.960 --> 0:43:22.919
<v Speaker 3>like we get burned by the Chargers here every time.

0:43:23.800 --> 0:43:26.440
<v Speaker 3>Now we're going the other side. We will definitely Chargers

0:43:26.440 --> 0:43:28.920
<v Speaker 3>by thirty points in this matchup. But now it's just

0:43:29.280 --> 0:43:33.279
<v Speaker 3>we talked the matchup wise that you saw Herbert even

0:43:33.280 --> 0:43:34.839
<v Speaker 3>against the Pittsburgh they feel like they got a way

0:43:34.840 --> 0:43:36.600
<v Speaker 3>with a bunch of stuff just because there's so many

0:43:36.640 --> 0:43:39.200
<v Speaker 3>turnovers by Rogers and everything kind of went their way.

0:43:39.239 --> 0:43:42.040
<v Speaker 3>Where this feels like a good spot right for this

0:43:42.120 --> 0:43:45.120
<v Speaker 3>Jaguars team and the fact that games should be a pick.

0:43:45.680 --> 0:43:48.320
<v Speaker 3>Jaguars gave up was the twenty nine points on a

0:43:48.360 --> 0:43:51.959
<v Speaker 3>fourth quarter embarrassing loss. This numbers moved a whole another

0:43:52.000 --> 0:43:55.799
<v Speaker 3>point to this Chargers team. So plus three, I'll take

0:43:55.840 --> 0:43:57.640
<v Speaker 3>on this Shacks team. But my guy, do I hate it?

0:43:58.040 --> 0:43:58.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:43:58.880 --> 0:44:02.919
<v Speaker 1>Seattle let Los Angeles Rams, two of the best teams

0:44:02.960 --> 0:44:04.480
<v Speaker 1>in the conference. Right now, Rams are two and a

0:44:04.520 --> 0:44:07.400
<v Speaker 1>half point favors. This is one of those games where

0:44:07.760 --> 0:44:11.279
<v Speaker 1>I was referring to earlier, like open to three moved

0:44:11.280 --> 0:44:15.080
<v Speaker 1>to two and a half, and the Wise guys are

0:44:15.120 --> 0:44:17.319
<v Speaker 1>clearly coming on Seattle.

0:44:20.040 --> 0:44:20.480
<v Speaker 2>Talk to me.

0:44:23.640 --> 0:44:26.880
<v Speaker 3>I should have said, pause, Uh yeah, it's it's a

0:44:26.960 --> 0:44:30.879
<v Speaker 3>it's a great matchup Seahawks. How do we not take

0:44:30.880 --> 0:44:33.000
<v Speaker 3>them here? How do we not take the shocks? I

0:44:33.040 --> 0:44:35.480
<v Speaker 3>know why people are betting the Rams. The Rams are

0:44:35.480 --> 0:44:38.879
<v Speaker 3>getting all the early money. This number, like you just said,

0:44:38.880 --> 0:44:41.399
<v Speaker 3>it is two and a half. Now, a couple three

0:44:41.520 --> 0:44:43.319
<v Speaker 3>still out there you can find if you can. But

0:44:44.360 --> 0:44:45.600
<v Speaker 3>that's that's where I want to be the shocks. I

0:44:45.600 --> 0:44:48.800
<v Speaker 3>wanted to be on the three early. This Rams team,

0:44:49.719 --> 0:44:51.680
<v Speaker 3>I get it, they're an absolute juggernaut, right, No, they're

0:44:51.680 --> 0:44:54.560
<v Speaker 3>the hottest team of football. But there are things you

0:44:54.600 --> 0:44:56.839
<v Speaker 3>look at the matchup wise that the Seahawks team can

0:44:56.880 --> 0:44:59.279
<v Speaker 3>do that's gonna give the Rams real problems offensively. And

0:44:59.280 --> 0:45:01.360
<v Speaker 3>I'm excited to see al Sean mcbays gonna counter that

0:45:01.760 --> 0:45:04.239
<v Speaker 3>because you know, this year we've been talking a lot

0:45:04.280 --> 0:45:06.640
<v Speaker 3>about this Yowks team has been a different team on

0:45:06.760 --> 0:45:10.480
<v Speaker 3>the road. This feels like the true test for them

0:45:10.640 --> 0:45:13.680
<v Speaker 3>on the road this year, right Like I'm I'm trying

0:45:13.680 --> 0:45:15.680
<v Speaker 3>to find another game this year they've faced the team

0:45:15.680 --> 0:45:17.400
<v Speaker 3>on the road that's at this type of level. I

0:45:17.400 --> 0:45:20.839
<v Speaker 3>really can't find it. And the Rams we've talked about,

0:45:20.840 --> 0:45:22.680
<v Speaker 3>they're probably the best off at some football right now.

0:45:22.719 --> 0:45:24.680
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, it's.

0:45:24.600 --> 0:45:26.880
<v Speaker 3>A huge game, right this is their first time meeting

0:45:26.960 --> 0:45:28.840
<v Speaker 3>up in this division. Feels like they're the two teams

0:45:28.840 --> 0:45:31.560
<v Speaker 3>at the top. They're by far the two teams that

0:45:31.920 --> 0:45:33.759
<v Speaker 3>as an Eagles fan, probably give you the most worry

0:45:33.880 --> 0:45:37.359
<v Speaker 3>right now in football. So I, as an Egles fan,

0:45:37.400 --> 0:45:40.600
<v Speaker 3>can't wait to watch this one. This I would say

0:45:40.600 --> 0:45:41.520
<v Speaker 3>this is the game of the week. I know a

0:45:41.560 --> 0:45:43.680
<v Speaker 3>lot of people think Eagles Detroit is because I believe

0:45:43.680 --> 0:45:46.239
<v Speaker 3>they're both number one in their divisions right now. But

0:45:46.920 --> 0:45:49.080
<v Speaker 3>I love this type of game because divisionally, and like

0:45:49.120 --> 0:45:51.359
<v Speaker 3>you just said, it's the type of game that it's

0:45:51.360 --> 0:45:56.200
<v Speaker 3>going to have huge ramifications going forward. So Seattle wise,

0:45:57.520 --> 0:46:01.160
<v Speaker 3>our big warry here. It's we're back Darnald over Stafford

0:46:01.160 --> 0:46:03.759
<v Speaker 3>when Stafford's super high right now, and we're talking about

0:46:03.800 --> 0:46:06.880
<v Speaker 3>confidence with the last possession in the game, it's gonna

0:46:06.960 --> 0:46:10.160
<v Speaker 3>be Stafford. So I'm not shocked to see professionals and

0:46:10.200 --> 0:46:11.920
<v Speaker 3>early money here coming on the Rams at the two

0:46:11.920 --> 0:46:14.919
<v Speaker 3>and a half. But I just love this matchup wise,

0:46:15.000 --> 0:46:18.839
<v Speaker 3>Seahawks against this Rams offense. Defensively, on the flip side,

0:46:18.920 --> 0:46:21.160
<v Speaker 3>I don't really think the Rams have guys that can

0:46:21.200 --> 0:46:24.319
<v Speaker 3>get stops against the Seahawks team that it's the play

0:46:24.360 --> 0:46:26.239
<v Speaker 3>action pass, it's what's working, and they don't have a

0:46:26.239 --> 0:46:29.239
<v Speaker 3>corner that could take away JSN. So I like the

0:46:29.280 --> 0:46:32.360
<v Speaker 3>matchup schipsmatically for the Seahawks team, So really really excited

0:46:32.400 --> 0:46:34.360
<v Speaker 3>to this one. Maybe a game we don't bet or

0:46:34.400 --> 0:46:35.880
<v Speaker 3>put in our contests because it's just going to be

0:46:35.920 --> 0:46:37.759
<v Speaker 3>a game where you don't really need to invest a

0:46:37.800 --> 0:46:39.600
<v Speaker 3>lot into because there's too many UKNOWN factors and how

0:46:39.640 --> 0:46:42.240
<v Speaker 3>good of a matchup it is. But at the three,

0:46:42.400 --> 0:46:44.200
<v Speaker 3>I think you got to take the Seahawks of that number.

0:46:44.480 --> 0:46:46.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm hoping it'll get back there. I don't know

0:46:46.440 --> 0:46:47.000
<v Speaker 2>if it will.

0:46:47.320 --> 0:46:52.799
<v Speaker 1>But I like Seattle's defense here. They are so good

0:46:52.840 --> 0:46:56.080
<v Speaker 1>at rushing the passer and if there's anything we know,

0:46:56.239 --> 0:46:58.600
<v Speaker 1>especially up the middle, if there's anything we know can

0:46:58.640 --> 0:47:02.719
<v Speaker 1>bother Matthew Stafford's pass rush up the middle where he's

0:47:02.760 --> 0:47:06.000
<v Speaker 1>got to evade going outside, and that's just harder for

0:47:06.080 --> 0:47:07.640
<v Speaker 1>him to do. It's always been hard for him to do,

0:47:07.920 --> 0:47:10.120
<v Speaker 1>even when he was younger, and now that he's older,

0:47:10.480 --> 0:47:12.480
<v Speaker 1>that to me is the biggest challenge. It's always the

0:47:12.520 --> 0:47:14.880
<v Speaker 1>biggest challenge for older quarterbacks. So when someone's coming at

0:47:14.920 --> 0:47:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you directly in front of you, it's hard to figure

0:47:17.840 --> 0:47:19.680
<v Speaker 1>out which way you're going to go, and you don't

0:47:19.719 --> 0:47:23.840
<v Speaker 1>have the legs to sort of get there. I really

0:47:23.920 --> 0:47:28.160
<v Speaker 1>like Seattle's defense. They're so freaking good, and I think

0:47:28.200 --> 0:47:31.320
<v Speaker 1>they're better than the Rams defense, to be honest, especially

0:47:31.400 --> 0:47:33.640
<v Speaker 1>from the pass rush. So, yeah, we don't have to

0:47:33.640 --> 0:47:36.160
<v Speaker 1>invest a ton in this, but we're gonna like Seattle

0:47:36.200 --> 0:47:39.600
<v Speaker 1>and we're gonna be rooting for Seattle on Sunday San

0:47:39.680 --> 0:47:44.279
<v Speaker 1>Francisco at Arizona. So we talked about the Sunday night.

0:47:44.480 --> 0:47:46.759
<v Speaker 1>My first instinct was take the Cardinals of plus three.

0:47:47.120 --> 0:47:50.920
<v Speaker 1>The line has moved to two and a half. My

0:47:51.440 --> 0:47:54.720
<v Speaker 1>instinct was it's just natural off of a blowout loss.

0:47:55.400 --> 0:47:59.680
<v Speaker 1>The things that happened in that game against Seattle are unprecedented.

0:48:00.719 --> 0:48:04.080
<v Speaker 1>The same guy forcing a fumble to a teammate and

0:48:04.120 --> 0:48:06.360
<v Speaker 1>the same teammate picking up the fumble and running it

0:48:06.400 --> 0:48:08.719
<v Speaker 1>back for a touchdown, and that happened twice in the

0:48:08.719 --> 0:48:10.319
<v Speaker 1>first sixteen minutes of the game.

0:48:11.000 --> 0:48:17.120
<v Speaker 3>Holy smokes, another touchdown for the same.

0:48:16.920 --> 0:48:20.240
<v Speaker 2>Guy, and like after that, Simon.

0:48:21.280 --> 0:48:26.799
<v Speaker 1>After that, Cardinals played lights out and they actually outscored

0:48:26.840 --> 0:48:28.640
<v Speaker 1>the Seahawks the rest of the game.

0:48:29.440 --> 0:48:31.440
<v Speaker 2>So that's why I like the Cardinals.

0:48:31.680 --> 0:48:34.480
<v Speaker 1>They just got blown out, and it's the right side

0:48:35.120 --> 0:48:36.280
<v Speaker 1>the week after a blowout.

0:48:37.120 --> 0:48:38.719
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think it's anesoly a good match for them

0:48:38.719 --> 0:48:41.480
<v Speaker 3>against what we keep talking about, a four niners defense

0:48:41.560 --> 0:48:43.959
<v Speaker 3>that they can only keep getting away with so much

0:48:44.000 --> 0:48:46.400
<v Speaker 3>scheme wise. Eventually, it does matter when you don't have

0:48:46.440 --> 0:48:48.120
<v Speaker 3>players that can put any type of pressure on a

0:48:48.200 --> 0:48:51.040
<v Speaker 3>quarterback right you need some type of pass rush. You

0:48:51.040 --> 0:48:55.600
<v Speaker 3>don't have any type of cover corners. The Fred Warner injury.

0:48:55.640 --> 0:48:57.880
<v Speaker 3>As the weeks have gone alonger, it's grown more and

0:48:57.880 --> 0:48:59.759
<v Speaker 3>more where you just see in game adjustments just aren't

0:48:59.760 --> 0:49:02.160
<v Speaker 3>the same about him in the middle. Commanded it there.

0:49:02.200 --> 0:49:06.000
<v Speaker 3>So I I gave out the road talk I can

0:49:06.080 --> 0:49:08.359
<v Speaker 3>give out, right, I gave out that Texans gave out

0:49:08.360 --> 0:49:10.680
<v Speaker 3>Green Bay. People are gonna hat these next couple games.

0:49:10.680 --> 0:49:12.560
<v Speaker 3>I just love all these home dogs, and it starts

0:49:12.600 --> 0:49:15.759
<v Speaker 3>with this game here. So, like Chad said, if you

0:49:15.760 --> 0:49:18.320
<v Speaker 3>can find the plus three, that's where I would prefer

0:49:18.360 --> 0:49:21.000
<v Speaker 3>to be. Don't hate the two and a half. Just

0:49:21.000 --> 0:49:24.000
<v Speaker 3>want to always get the best number available. So I

0:49:24.000 --> 0:49:25.840
<v Speaker 3>don't know if this will be a game comes someday

0:49:25.880 --> 0:49:28.799
<v Speaker 3>we'll even talk about really, because it's just it's just

0:49:28.800 --> 0:49:30.400
<v Speaker 3>not going to be there with us with the number.

0:49:30.880 --> 0:49:32.200
<v Speaker 1>We're not going to get a three and a half.

0:49:32.200 --> 0:49:33.800
<v Speaker 1>We're only going to get a two and a half.

0:49:34.120 --> 0:49:36.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and I just don't love it. Like I like it.

0:49:36.040 --> 0:49:37.319
<v Speaker 3>I'm betting at two and a half, but I'm not

0:49:37.320 --> 0:49:39.680
<v Speaker 3>crazy about it, especially wh where we don't know who

0:49:39.680 --> 0:49:42.040
<v Speaker 3>the quarterrecsent. You don't know if it's me, Mac or Pretty. Still,

0:49:42.760 --> 0:49:44.640
<v Speaker 3>the foty nitrews have been really quiet about it. So

0:49:45.320 --> 0:49:47.920
<v Speaker 3>I look at this as Pretty was close last week,

0:49:48.560 --> 0:49:50.640
<v Speaker 3>maybe he comes back this week. But last week we

0:49:50.640 --> 0:49:52.840
<v Speaker 3>said last week that wasn't really a Mac Jones' fault.

0:49:53.239 --> 0:49:59.120
<v Speaker 3>They lost that game. So another game where I was like, Okay,

0:49:59.360 --> 0:50:01.600
<v Speaker 3>maybe I'll be on the under here because I just

0:50:01.640 --> 0:50:03.279
<v Speaker 3>know the polks that are coming really heavy on the

0:50:03.360 --> 0:50:07.640
<v Speaker 3>end over Again, it's only Tuesday here. I've seen three

0:50:07.680 --> 0:50:11.920
<v Speaker 3>different books that give out their betting line info. Ninety

0:50:12.000 --> 0:50:13.960
<v Speaker 3>five to one hundred percent of the money is on

0:50:14.000 --> 0:50:16.880
<v Speaker 3>the over in this matchup, so people love it here.

0:50:17.000 --> 0:50:19.439
<v Speaker 3>I just like this. As a divisional game, it's always

0:50:19.480 --> 0:50:21.440
<v Speaker 3>a risky bet, especially if it's a high total of

0:50:21.520 --> 0:50:24.360
<v Speaker 3>forty eight and a half. So another sneaky little playout, like,

0:50:24.400 --> 0:50:25.200
<v Speaker 3>here's the under in.

0:50:25.160 --> 0:50:27.880
<v Speaker 2>This game, Simon.

0:50:28.840 --> 0:50:32.919
<v Speaker 1>The Baltimore Ravens are visiting the Cleveland Browns at hard

0:50:33.000 --> 0:50:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Rock Bet. The Cleveland Browns are eight point underdogs. There

0:50:37.080 --> 0:50:39.839
<v Speaker 1>are plenty of eight and a half's out there. I'm

0:50:39.880 --> 0:50:45.520
<v Speaker 1>telling you right now, the Cleveland Browns plus eight are

0:50:45.600 --> 0:50:52.760
<v Speaker 1>going to be Chad's Choice presented by hard Rock Bet.

0:50:53.200 --> 0:50:54.360
<v Speaker 2>Are you sure you want to do this?

0:50:54.960 --> 0:50:58.200
<v Speaker 3>Are you willing to make a choice? What choice? We

0:50:58.280 --> 0:51:02.040
<v Speaker 3>can't run from a way out, sharp dudes can just

0:51:02.080 --> 0:51:03.239
<v Speaker 3>see it, you know what I mean.

0:51:06.840 --> 0:51:13.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm obviously hoping and praying that Dylan Gabriel can find

0:51:13.400 --> 0:51:15.759
<v Speaker 1>a way to get into the end zone at some

0:51:15.920 --> 0:51:19.960
<v Speaker 1>point in this game. But really, we've established a pattern

0:51:20.040 --> 0:51:22.719
<v Speaker 1>here that has worked well for us, not because it's

0:51:22.719 --> 0:51:25.760
<v Speaker 1>a trend, but because we actually see this with our eyes.

0:51:26.640 --> 0:51:29.799
<v Speaker 1>The Browns defense is just a different team at home.

0:51:29.880 --> 0:51:32.319
<v Speaker 1>This is going back two seasons now in which they

0:51:32.400 --> 0:51:35.400
<v Speaker 1>continue to be able to dominate against much better teams

0:51:35.800 --> 0:51:38.319
<v Speaker 1>at home and keep themselves in a position to win

0:51:38.360 --> 0:51:41.640
<v Speaker 1>these games. And right now we're getting a Baltimore Ravens

0:51:41.680 --> 0:51:44.080
<v Speaker 1>team that has won three in a row that now

0:51:44.120 --> 0:51:48.640
<v Speaker 1>just looked great against the Vikings team that everyone expected

0:51:48.960 --> 0:51:52.120
<v Speaker 1>might be a little bit closer of a game, and

0:51:52.440 --> 0:51:55.719
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, it's a massive, massive number in

0:51:55.760 --> 0:51:59.160
<v Speaker 1>the division against a still very stingy defense.

0:51:59.239 --> 0:52:02.560
<v Speaker 2>So give me the stingy defense. You know.

0:52:02.640 --> 0:52:04.680
<v Speaker 1>I like to bet a team when I feel like

0:52:04.680 --> 0:52:07.759
<v Speaker 1>they're massive underdogs and I know they can have at.

0:52:07.719 --> 0:52:10.080
<v Speaker 2>Least one dominant.

0:52:11.719 --> 0:52:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Area of the game between offense, defense and special teams.

0:52:16.160 --> 0:52:19.000
<v Speaker 1>They've got a unit, and I think their defensive unit

0:52:19.080 --> 0:52:19.880
<v Speaker 1>can be dominant.

0:52:21.320 --> 0:52:24.359
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's a game we both pick Sunday night, and

0:52:24.400 --> 0:52:25.960
<v Speaker 3>I knew right away. It's like, Okay, this is a

0:52:26.000 --> 0:52:28.080
<v Speaker 3>good game. We're probably gonna be talking Sunday morning, but

0:52:28.239 --> 0:52:30.560
<v Speaker 3>we just everything about it. We love, love the matchup

0:52:30.640 --> 0:52:34.880
<v Speaker 3>of the scheme. Wise, like you said, these teams already

0:52:34.880 --> 0:52:39.840
<v Speaker 3>played Ravens won forty one to seventeen much earlier in

0:52:39.840 --> 0:52:42.160
<v Speaker 3>this season. And as much as you want to take

0:52:42.160 --> 0:52:44.120
<v Speaker 3>away from that game that this Brown seam, maybe it

0:52:44.120 --> 0:52:46.600
<v Speaker 3>doesn't match up well for them, Like we said, that's

0:52:46.600 --> 0:52:49.080
<v Speaker 3>on the road. It's a difference. They're just a different

0:52:49.120 --> 0:52:52.520
<v Speaker 3>team at home this season. Believe the most points they've

0:52:52.560 --> 0:52:55.919
<v Speaker 3>lost by is four. So we've just seen they play

0:52:55.960 --> 0:52:58.480
<v Speaker 3>close games at home. It's a really tough team to

0:52:58.480 --> 0:53:02.120
<v Speaker 3>beat at home, you know, the Browns. As bad as

0:53:02.160 --> 0:53:06.000
<v Speaker 3>that loss was against that Juts team. You know, we

0:53:06.080 --> 0:53:09.080
<v Speaker 3>said it's special teams. Like Gabriel wasn't that terrible. It

0:53:09.080 --> 0:53:11.920
<v Speaker 3>seems like he's getting more comfortable in this offense as

0:53:12.320 --> 0:53:15.560
<v Speaker 3>the season is going along here, So like we need one,

0:53:15.719 --> 0:53:17.320
<v Speaker 3>we need one from him. Needn't get a one or

0:53:17.360 --> 0:53:20.120
<v Speaker 3>two touchdows from at least because Lamar will eventually get

0:53:20.160 --> 0:53:22.200
<v Speaker 3>his just the way it is, he's one of the

0:53:22.239 --> 0:53:25.640
<v Speaker 3>best players in all football. So matchup wise, can they

0:53:25.680 --> 0:53:28.480
<v Speaker 3>take away the run? Can they keep a little more contained?

0:53:28.880 --> 0:53:31.520
<v Speaker 3>They got the guys like that's this front is just

0:53:31.560 --> 0:53:36.080
<v Speaker 3>so impressive, so dominant, So both love it, can't avoid it.

0:53:36.480 --> 0:53:37.840
<v Speaker 3>Like you said, shop around for the eight and a

0:53:37.880 --> 0:53:40.279
<v Speaker 3>half people, it's such a key number, go get it.

0:53:40.880 --> 0:53:42.640
<v Speaker 3>Could see this being like Miami though, could see this

0:53:42.680 --> 0:53:44.880
<v Speaker 3>get into seven seven and a half by kickoff as

0:53:44.920 --> 0:53:47.080
<v Speaker 3>a professional when he comes in. But it's gonna be

0:53:47.080 --> 0:53:49.160
<v Speaker 3>funny see what the Brooks do with it, because it's

0:53:49.200 --> 0:53:53.360
<v Speaker 3>gonna be huge parlays, huge teasers. Everyone's just fully comfortable

0:53:53.360 --> 0:53:55.480
<v Speaker 3>all in on this Ravens team, especially after last week

0:53:55.640 --> 0:53:57.680
<v Speaker 3>where they won so big for us and the public.

0:53:57.760 --> 0:53:59.680
<v Speaker 3>It was a big win in a cover by them.

0:53:59.680 --> 0:54:01.600
<v Speaker 3>I think everyone's slowly bought in now at this point

0:54:01.640 --> 0:54:02.520
<v Speaker 3>on this Ravens team.

0:54:03.239 --> 0:54:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, totally true, all true. Everything you just said, Cleveland

0:54:08.480 --> 0:54:11.959
<v Speaker 1>Browns Chat Choice presented by hard Rock Bet Kansas City

0:54:11.960 --> 0:54:14.200
<v Speaker 1>at Denver. You like this one on Sunday Night? You

0:54:14.280 --> 0:54:17.719
<v Speaker 1>like Kansas City. You said Kansas City minus three. It

0:54:17.760 --> 0:54:19.400
<v Speaker 1>has now moved to three and a half.

0:54:19.600 --> 0:54:20.640
<v Speaker 3>No way, did I really?

0:54:21.160 --> 0:54:22.360
<v Speaker 2>I think you did? Didn't you?

0:54:22.480 --> 0:54:23.120
<v Speaker 3>Oh man?

0:54:23.800 --> 0:54:25.240
<v Speaker 2>I could have sworn you did.

0:54:26.200 --> 0:54:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Oh By the way, I do have one more stat

0:54:28.000 --> 0:54:32.360
<v Speaker 1>for the Browns that I forgot to mention from Killer Sports.

0:54:32.719 --> 0:54:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Teams playing their third straight road game, coming off a

0:54:36.320 --> 0:54:38.840
<v Speaker 1>straight up and against the spread wind like the Ravens,

0:54:39.280 --> 0:54:41.120
<v Speaker 1>the opposing team is sixty five.

0:54:40.960 --> 0:54:45.319
<v Speaker 2>Percent against the spread. I'm wrong. You like Denver. I'm

0:54:45.360 --> 0:54:47.200
<v Speaker 2>looking at right now. You like Denver.

0:54:47.480 --> 0:54:50.480
<v Speaker 3>This was like a Denver line Denver game in a

0:54:50.480 --> 0:54:53.120
<v Speaker 3>million different ways where I knew this time would be

0:54:53.160 --> 0:54:56.000
<v Speaker 3>semi inflated, thought it would be four four and a half,

0:54:56.840 --> 0:54:59.360
<v Speaker 3>maybe we get there, And we always talked about we

0:54:59.440 --> 0:55:02.600
<v Speaker 3>just don't try my homes as more than a three

0:55:02.640 --> 0:55:05.839
<v Speaker 3>point favorite, especially in divisional against these type of games

0:55:05.840 --> 0:55:08.000
<v Speaker 3>where we just know it's gonna be grueling, ugly close

0:55:08.120 --> 0:55:11.960
<v Speaker 3>type of games. So not shockingly everyone hates Denver now,

0:55:12.080 --> 0:55:16.399
<v Speaker 3>I mean, that was painful to watch last Thursday. Costs

0:55:16.600 --> 0:55:18.880
<v Speaker 3>a bunch of people, a bunch of money. And you know,

0:55:18.960 --> 0:55:21.600
<v Speaker 3>the Chiefs still look like one of the best teams

0:55:21.640 --> 0:55:24.120
<v Speaker 3>in all football right when it's clicking for them offensive.

0:55:24.160 --> 0:55:25.759
<v Speaker 3>I know the record doesn't reflect it, but we all

0:55:25.840 --> 0:55:27.880
<v Speaker 3>view them this is one of the better teams. So

0:55:29.160 --> 0:55:31.759
<v Speaker 3>I hope this gets higher. I was gonna make this,

0:55:31.960 --> 0:55:34.120
<v Speaker 3>Simon says, but I didn't just because I do think

0:55:34.360 --> 0:55:36.040
<v Speaker 3>we could get a four to four and a half here.

0:55:36.080 --> 0:55:38.319
<v Speaker 3>I just could see a ton of public love for

0:55:38.360 --> 0:55:40.279
<v Speaker 3>this Chiefs team, and I could see the professionals being

0:55:40.320 --> 0:55:43.120
<v Speaker 3>patient because this won't dip back to three. There's just

0:55:43.160 --> 0:55:45.000
<v Speaker 3>no way the books take a stand that way. So

0:55:45.880 --> 0:55:48.319
<v Speaker 3>I do like Denver here, but I'm not gonna make

0:55:48.360 --> 0:55:49.920
<v Speaker 3>it better yet. I do think we can get some

0:55:49.960 --> 0:55:51.520
<v Speaker 3>fours here poping up pretty soon.

0:55:52.000 --> 0:55:52.359
<v Speaker 2>All right.

0:55:53.080 --> 0:55:56.080
<v Speaker 1>To be clear, you did say Denver on Sunday night.

0:55:56.280 --> 0:55:58.800
<v Speaker 1>I misremembered.

0:55:58.960 --> 0:56:00.440
<v Speaker 3>It is weak. It was late.

0:56:00.480 --> 0:56:03.239
<v Speaker 2>It was late at the end of those days. I'm

0:56:03.280 --> 0:56:06.359
<v Speaker 2>a mass man. I'm tired, I'm a little dehydrated.

0:56:06.400 --> 0:56:08.839
<v Speaker 1>My head starts to hurt a little bit. You know,

0:56:09.200 --> 0:56:13.719
<v Speaker 1>you're not yourself on Sunday mornings. Sunday night. I'm a

0:56:13.760 --> 0:56:14.359
<v Speaker 1>morning guy.

0:56:15.280 --> 0:56:18.000
<v Speaker 2>You're an evening guy.

0:56:18.200 --> 0:56:19.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. I think it's the fact I've been up twenty

0:56:19.600 --> 0:56:21.680
<v Speaker 3>four hours straight. By that point, I'm already kind of loopy,

0:56:22.239 --> 0:56:24.760
<v Speaker 3>ye until living my mind by.

0:56:24.600 --> 0:56:26.719
<v Speaker 2>Then could be well. By that point, I've been up,

0:56:26.920 --> 0:56:30.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, thirteen hours straight, and so I'm exhausted.

0:56:30.560 --> 0:56:33.440
<v Speaker 1>There you go, all right, Primetime Spotlight. We got some

0:56:33.520 --> 0:56:35.360
<v Speaker 1>island games, standalone games.

0:56:35.680 --> 0:56:39.160
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about it. Detroit plus two at Philadelphia.

0:56:39.680 --> 0:56:42.520
<v Speaker 3>Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, famous for the.

0:56:42.480 --> 0:56:45.319
<v Speaker 4>Liberty Bell, Blue Laws soft pretzels.

0:56:45.840 --> 0:56:50.000
<v Speaker 3>True Philadelphia fan learns daboo before he learns to speak.

0:56:50.400 --> 0:56:50.640
<v Speaker 2>I think.

0:56:50.680 --> 0:56:53.600
<v Speaker 1>On Sunday night, we both talked about liking Detroit, but

0:56:53.680 --> 0:56:55.200
<v Speaker 1>we wanted to wait to see what happened in the

0:56:55.200 --> 0:56:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Monday night game because we thought the line would move.

0:56:57.680 --> 0:56:59.880
<v Speaker 1>It was at one and a half, it's two at hard.

0:57:00.360 --> 0:57:03.520
<v Speaker 1>It's two and a half in a lot of other places.

0:57:04.000 --> 0:57:07.200
<v Speaker 1>I still like Detroit here. I feel like it's a

0:57:07.200 --> 0:57:09.920
<v Speaker 1>pretty good spot for them. And I don't know that

0:57:09.960 --> 0:57:13.680
<v Speaker 1>what we saw offensively from the Eagles last night was

0:57:13.719 --> 0:57:17.400
<v Speaker 1>an anomaly. It seems to be how they play the

0:57:17.440 --> 0:57:20.080
<v Speaker 1>game with a lot a lot of rhythm, with some

0:57:20.160 --> 0:57:24.600
<v Speaker 1>weird play calling, and they win. They find ways to win.

0:57:25.600 --> 0:57:31.840
<v Speaker 1>But I think Detroit's offense, with Dan Campbell calling the plays,

0:57:32.520 --> 0:57:36.320
<v Speaker 1>might have a better chance to find their rhythm as well.

0:57:36.760 --> 0:57:41.200
<v Speaker 3>Huge, huge mistake. No, I'm not gonna give you two

0:57:41.200 --> 0:57:43.560
<v Speaker 3>more of a time about it. I did like the Lions.

0:57:43.600 --> 0:57:47.560
<v Speaker 3>I thought it was probably a good spot, but already

0:57:47.600 --> 0:57:51.120
<v Speaker 3>took some shit about my love for the lines and

0:57:51.160 --> 0:57:54.480
<v Speaker 3>how I'm stepping in it, walking in really a little bit.

0:57:54.880 --> 0:57:59.400
<v Speaker 3>And it is fair like they've faced one good defense

0:57:59.440 --> 0:58:01.640
<v Speaker 3>this year, this Lion's team, and they put up seventeen

0:58:01.680 --> 0:58:05.280
<v Speaker 3>points against the Chiefs. This is not a good matchup

0:58:05.280 --> 0:58:08.320
<v Speaker 3>for golf. Like you just saw that front now Phillips

0:58:08.360 --> 0:58:11.320
<v Speaker 3>on this Eagles team, they got some guys now Befron,

0:58:11.360 --> 0:58:13.520
<v Speaker 3>they can get pressure and one on one matchups against

0:58:14.040 --> 0:58:19.320
<v Speaker 3>other teams quarterbacks, So I'll be patient here. I hate

0:58:19.320 --> 0:58:21.360
<v Speaker 3>when I do get flipped all these type of games

0:58:21.400 --> 0:58:22.920
<v Speaker 3>and the number has gone against me. Like if this

0:58:23.040 --> 0:58:25.840
<v Speaker 3>was one and a half, I've said, I still feel

0:58:25.880 --> 0:58:27.440
<v Speaker 3>much better about the Eagles team, Like you said, now

0:58:27.440 --> 0:58:29.480
<v Speaker 3>it's up to two to two and a half. I

0:58:29.520 --> 0:58:31.280
<v Speaker 3>don't know how much I'm gonna really dig in here,

0:58:31.680 --> 0:58:34.080
<v Speaker 3>but it seems like Eagles might be the wrong side

0:58:34.120 --> 0:58:37.400
<v Speaker 3>this Lions team, as good as they are, they do

0:58:37.480 --> 0:58:40.920
<v Speaker 3>have some flaws. Defensively, they are banged up, and I

0:58:40.960 --> 0:58:43.439
<v Speaker 3>don't know if Campbell call on your offenses to where

0:58:43.440 --> 0:58:46.040
<v Speaker 3>you want to be. I really don't like that. When

0:58:46.080 --> 0:58:49.520
<v Speaker 3>I heard that, I was like, ah Man, Campbell's now

0:58:49.600 --> 0:58:53.640
<v Speaker 3>they're offensive coordinator, Like Chad's gonna get his wish A

0:58:53.680 --> 0:58:55.520
<v Speaker 3>lot of runs up the middle and fourth and one.

0:58:55.600 --> 0:58:58.200
<v Speaker 3>I guarantee you that even if you could stop three

0:58:58.200 --> 0:59:01.560
<v Speaker 3>times in a row. So I don't know, Like this

0:59:01.640 --> 0:59:04.560
<v Speaker 3>is a team that, like we said, they got embarrassed

0:59:05.200 --> 0:59:08.600
<v Speaker 3>with that Chiefs game, then they we loved them in

0:59:08.640 --> 0:59:11.120
<v Speaker 3>the spot they beat up on the Bucks at home,

0:59:11.880 --> 0:59:16.040
<v Speaker 3>had to buy a week, lost to JJ McCarthy, and

0:59:16.080 --> 0:59:18.280
<v Speaker 3>then just beat up on a Washington team. So I

0:59:18.320 --> 0:59:19.640
<v Speaker 3>just have a lot of questions that much be a

0:59:19.720 --> 0:59:23.000
<v Speaker 3>question about this Eagles team. It's a good number for them.

0:59:23.040 --> 0:59:26.320
<v Speaker 3>They're at home under a field goal, catching a team

0:59:26.360 --> 0:59:30.000
<v Speaker 3>that might be overvalued and overrated publicly just because they

0:59:30.040 --> 0:59:32.240
<v Speaker 3>already forgot about that bad Vikings loss and they just

0:59:32.280 --> 0:59:34.520
<v Speaker 3>come off a dominant win. So I just have some

0:59:35.200 --> 0:59:38.200
<v Speaker 3>little questions here about why the pros hit me up

0:59:38.240 --> 0:59:39.880
<v Speaker 3>so hard about beating on the Eagles. And they were

0:59:39.920 --> 0:59:41.800
<v Speaker 3>right once again last night about the Eagles team. That

0:59:41.960 --> 0:59:44.360
<v Speaker 3>was a game they covered from the minute the game

0:59:44.440 --> 0:59:46.400
<v Speaker 3>kicked off to the very end. They covered the entire

0:59:46.400 --> 0:59:49.520
<v Speaker 3>way through. So yeah, we might be understanding this Eagles

0:59:49.520 --> 0:59:51.600
<v Speaker 3>team that just it doesn't look pretty Chad, but they

0:59:51.680 --> 0:59:53.880
<v Speaker 3>keep winning. And I think they're six and one down

0:59:53.960 --> 0:59:57.040
<v Speaker 3>one score games this season. It's under a field goal,

0:59:57.080 --> 0:59:58.560
<v Speaker 3>so this might be an Eagles line.

0:59:58.920 --> 1:00:05.720
<v Speaker 1>All right, Look, I can be agreeable, and uh, look

1:00:05.840 --> 1:00:07.720
<v Speaker 1>what I thought about this last night. There was one

1:00:07.720 --> 1:00:11.560
<v Speaker 1>of the plays where Jalen Hurts was pushed out of

1:00:11.600 --> 1:00:14.800
<v Speaker 1>the pockets scrambling right early in the game to convert

1:00:14.800 --> 1:00:17.960
<v Speaker 1>a third down. I forgot who he hit and Shipley

1:00:18.000 --> 1:00:19.760
<v Speaker 1>I think Will Shipley, Yeah, and.

1:00:21.760 --> 1:00:22.360
<v Speaker 2>He was so.

1:00:23.920 --> 1:00:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Relaxed and smooth and unbothered, and that's how he's always

1:00:31.000 --> 1:00:33.520
<v Speaker 1>playing as quarterback of the Eagles.

1:00:33.600 --> 1:00:37.720
<v Speaker 2>Like it just all seems as though he's seen it,

1:00:38.000 --> 1:00:38.680
<v Speaker 2>he gets it.

1:00:39.120 --> 1:00:41.040
<v Speaker 1>He understands how to win, which he has done his

1:00:41.200 --> 1:00:44.760
<v Speaker 1>entire career going back to college, so I get it.

1:00:44.800 --> 1:00:45.760
<v Speaker 2>Like it's a hard team.

1:00:45.840 --> 1:00:48.400
<v Speaker 3>Took him a quarter to shake that fumble, though instantly enough,

1:00:48.400 --> 1:00:51.240
<v Speaker 3>like you're saying, frustrated, he did seem after that he

1:00:51.320 --> 1:00:54.360
<v Speaker 3>was like forcing throws that usually doesn't force and it's

1:00:54.440 --> 1:00:56.240
<v Speaker 3>like they need again in his ear tell him to

1:00:56.280 --> 1:01:00.320
<v Speaker 3>kind of bring it back. So yeah, like, I will

1:01:00.360 --> 1:01:01.760
<v Speaker 3>not be shocked if this is one of the most

1:01:01.760 --> 1:01:04.040
<v Speaker 3>public dogs of the week Detroit. The Eagles looks so

1:01:04.760 --> 1:01:07.919
<v Speaker 3>bad on a short week now facing the Detroit team

1:01:07.960 --> 1:01:09.960
<v Speaker 3>that looks so good in the eyes of the public.

1:01:10.040 --> 1:01:13.479
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, it's an interesting line that the book's opened

1:01:13.520 --> 1:01:13.840
<v Speaker 3>here with.

1:01:22.040 --> 1:01:24.000
<v Speaker 2>We still low with Simon says, and there's only one

1:01:24.040 --> 1:01:26.720
<v Speaker 2>game left. It's Dallas at Las Vegas.

1:01:26.800 --> 1:01:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Vegas is a three and a half point dog. By

1:01:28.720 --> 1:01:33.480
<v Speaker 1>the way, this line on Sunday Monday was Dallas minus

1:01:33.520 --> 1:01:36.960
<v Speaker 1>one and a half, so it's gone up two points

1:01:37.320 --> 1:01:38.000
<v Speaker 1>at this point.

1:01:38.360 --> 1:01:40.080
<v Speaker 2>Simon, what say you.

1:01:40.960 --> 1:01:43.439
<v Speaker 3>Chad knows me so well. Simon says, give me Las

1:01:43.560 --> 1:01:46.000
<v Speaker 3>Vegas or A eight is plus three and a half.

1:01:46.280 --> 1:01:49.960
<v Speaker 3>I want to play a game. Simon says, I feel

1:01:50.000 --> 1:01:52.080
<v Speaker 3>like all year, I'm gonna keep telling people you fade

1:01:52.160 --> 1:01:54.200
<v Speaker 3>Dallas when they're more than a three point favorite, and

1:01:54.240 --> 1:01:56.640
<v Speaker 3>it's hit every game. I'm trying to think what game

1:01:56.680 --> 1:01:59.680
<v Speaker 3>we lost this year on it. There was some stupid

1:01:59.680 --> 1:02:03.720
<v Speaker 3>game that one. But yeah, like just this matchup, it

1:02:03.720 --> 1:02:05.520
<v Speaker 3>feels like the same with the Panthers. Panthers were three

1:02:05.560 --> 1:02:07.920
<v Speaker 3>and a half. They covered it. Cardinals are three and

1:02:07.920 --> 1:02:10.560
<v Speaker 3>a half against this Dallas team covered went out right.

1:02:10.600 --> 1:02:14.920
<v Speaker 3>It's just an offense that you know, the Broncos were

1:02:14.960 --> 1:02:18.040
<v Speaker 3>a really good defense and they did what we thought

1:02:18.080 --> 1:02:19.760
<v Speaker 3>they would do right. Like again, I can't believe we

1:02:19.760 --> 1:02:21.840
<v Speaker 3>didn't cover that. If you would have told me the

1:02:21.920 --> 1:02:25.600
<v Speaker 3>Raiders road score seven points out of block field goal,

1:02:25.680 --> 1:02:30.080
<v Speaker 3>block punt, you know, nine penalties, you would think you

1:02:30.080 --> 1:02:32.520
<v Speaker 3>would have covered that one. But this Raiders team is

1:02:32.520 --> 1:02:35.000
<v Speaker 3>still playing hard, I mean as bad as I thought

1:02:35.040 --> 1:02:37.560
<v Speaker 3>they would look. It's a team that has been playing

1:02:37.560 --> 1:02:40.720
<v Speaker 3>hard for their coach, and when you look at this matchup,

1:02:41.240 --> 1:02:44.160
<v Speaker 3>I think they're under rating this, you know, getting rid

1:02:44.160 --> 1:02:47.880
<v Speaker 3>of Myers and the fact that this offense, you know,

1:02:48.200 --> 1:02:50.000
<v Speaker 3>people look are just so downplaying them because of that

1:02:50.000 --> 1:02:53.360
<v Speaker 3>Broncos game where you know, getting Brock Bowers back. It's

1:02:53.400 --> 1:02:55.040
<v Speaker 3>a huge upgrade to this team. I know they didn't

1:02:55.120 --> 1:02:57.680
<v Speaker 3>use them in the previous week, but against Dallas, who

1:02:57.680 --> 1:02:59.760
<v Speaker 3>cannot cover the middle of the field, this is the

1:03:00.440 --> 1:03:03.600
<v Speaker 3>matchup for him. So, you know, Dak, this is a

1:03:03.600 --> 1:03:05.120
<v Speaker 3>get right game for him. He can put up a

1:03:05.120 --> 1:03:06.760
<v Speaker 3>ton of points. But I just see this this team

1:03:06.840 --> 1:03:08.920
<v Speaker 3>keeping up with them and this being a closer game

1:03:08.960 --> 1:03:11.800
<v Speaker 3>than people realize. So as a city here right now,

1:03:12.120 --> 1:03:13.680
<v Speaker 3>there's a couple of threes out there. I'm seeing a

1:03:13.720 --> 1:03:15.360
<v Speaker 3>lot of books move to three and a half. So

1:03:16.200 --> 1:03:17.760
<v Speaker 3>getting well you can Hard Rock is one of the

1:03:17.800 --> 1:03:19.240
<v Speaker 3>first books to get to three and a half. I

1:03:19.480 --> 1:03:21.440
<v Speaker 3>do think I'll go back down as professionals coming on

1:03:21.440 --> 1:03:23.320
<v Speaker 3>this Raiders team. But we'll see, you know, like we

1:03:23.360 --> 1:03:25.840
<v Speaker 3>always say, the Monday night games, the public is a

1:03:25.920 --> 1:03:27.960
<v Speaker 3>ton of users, tuple of money line parlay is all

1:03:28.000 --> 1:03:30.960
<v Speaker 3>tied to that money line that Monday game. So right

1:03:31.000 --> 1:03:33.520
<v Speaker 3>now we're looking at a Dallas team on the road,

1:03:34.200 --> 1:03:36.800
<v Speaker 3>probably even getting by kickoff eighty percent of the money,

1:03:36.840 --> 1:03:39.120
<v Speaker 3>eighty percent of the tickets. Like that's I just think

1:03:39.120 --> 1:03:42.680
<v Speaker 3>the public's gonna hammer them this matchup. So a dog

1:03:42.840 --> 1:03:44.840
<v Speaker 3>at home getting that least amount of money like that,

1:03:44.880 --> 1:03:46.840
<v Speaker 3>I just love this matchup for this Raiders team.

1:03:47.280 --> 1:03:47.920
<v Speaker 2>All right, Look, we.

1:03:48.000 --> 1:03:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Got a lot of games to talk about on Thursday.

1:03:52.600 --> 1:03:56.040
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna have to talk about the Browns. We're probably

1:03:56.080 --> 1:03:59.439
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to talk about Cincinnati. We're gonna talk about

1:03:59.480 --> 1:04:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Houston because we want to know who's playing quarterback. We'll

1:04:03.480 --> 1:04:06.880
<v Speaker 1>be curious about Green Bay to see how that number moves.

1:04:06.720 --> 1:04:08.680
<v Speaker 3>And the Houston there is there is a six and

1:04:08.720 --> 1:04:10.320
<v Speaker 3>a half out there. Now. People are gonna hear this

1:04:10.640 --> 1:04:11.600
<v Speaker 3>six and a half half.

1:04:11.440 --> 1:04:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Pop Now, we gotta go bet six and a half

1:04:13.320 --> 1:04:17.640
<v Speaker 1>on Houston the box. We're very curious to see how

1:04:17.640 --> 1:04:20.720
<v Speaker 1>the line moves on the Bears and the Vikings, the Jags.

1:04:20.720 --> 1:04:22.360
<v Speaker 2>We're not going to talk about it Seattle.

1:04:22.680 --> 1:04:25.880
<v Speaker 1>We're interested in Arizona if we can get it to three.

1:04:26.000 --> 1:04:30.000
<v Speaker 1>We're interested in Denver plus three and a half. We

1:04:30.040 --> 1:04:32.160
<v Speaker 1>want more on the Philly Detroit game in Las Vegas

1:04:32.200 --> 1:04:36.040
<v Speaker 1>plus three and a half. A Simon says, man it

1:04:36.160 --> 1:04:37.560
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be busy.

1:04:38.280 --> 1:04:41.000
<v Speaker 3>Another and one more line shift before we go. Jets

1:04:41.080 --> 1:04:43.919
<v Speaker 3>up to twelve and a half now, so oh my god,

1:04:43.960 --> 1:04:45.920
<v Speaker 3>probably gonna have probably gonna get the thirteen shot. We're

1:04:45.960 --> 1:04:47.720
<v Speaker 3>not gonna have a choice, but the bettt come Thursday

1:04:47.840 --> 1:04:49.040
<v Speaker 3>night once I get to thirteen.

1:04:49.840 --> 1:04:52.080
<v Speaker 2>Poor jets, Poor jets.

1:04:52.720 --> 1:04:54.800
<v Speaker 1>All right, this has been Sharper Square, part of the

1:04:54.880 --> 1:04:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Volume podcast network. We'll be back on Thursday with the

1:04:58.040 --> 1:05:00.680
<v Speaker 1>games we're zeroing in on, plus our head to head battle,

1:05:01.440 --> 1:05:03.640
<v Speaker 1>our brass balls better the week, so much more. Watch

1:05:03.720 --> 1:05:09.280
<v Speaker 1>or listen on YouTube at Sharp or Square. Like the video,

1:05:09.440 --> 1:05:12.640
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to the channel. Also Donald's from Spotify, Apple Pods,

1:05:12.680 --> 1:05:16.840
<v Speaker 1>where video pods rate review, subscribe feedback is a gift

1:05:16.960 --> 1:05:19.320
<v Speaker 1>to leave us five stars until next time.

1:05:20.080 --> 1:05:26.440
<v Speaker 2>Love you, Hey, let's recare for