WEBVTT - Opening Opportunities for Women in Finance and Tech

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:04.200
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg

0:00:04.240 --> 0:00:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Quick Takes Tim Stenovich on Bloomberg Radio. On the Bloomberg

0:00:08.280 --> 0:00:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Today is a story about how Silicon Valley Bank help

0:00:11.160 --> 0:00:13.920
<v Speaker 1>close the funding gap for women and minority founders. Are

0:00:14.000 --> 0:00:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Kelsey Butler reporting it out. SVB, which had relationships with

0:00:17.320 --> 0:00:19.599
<v Speaker 1>more than fifty percent of all venture back companies in

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:22.799
<v Speaker 1>the US, built a reputation for working with businesses owned

0:00:22.800 --> 0:00:26.120
<v Speaker 1>by female, Black and Latin X professionals, often when other

0:00:26.200 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>banks would not. So we want to dig a little

0:00:28.160 --> 0:00:30.800
<v Speaker 1>bit deeper into this with us as Kathy Park, She's

0:00:30.880 --> 0:00:34.599
<v Speaker 1>partner at the San Francisco based venture capital firm Andrew Capital.

0:00:34.960 --> 0:00:41.239
<v Speaker 1>They have invested in the likes of Palanteer, Sophi Stripe.

0:00:41.280 --> 0:00:44.080
<v Speaker 1>I can't read my notes, grub Market and more. It's

0:00:44.080 --> 0:00:46.640
<v Speaker 1>been a long day, sorry, Kraken, is what I wanted

0:00:46.680 --> 0:00:48.879
<v Speaker 1>to say. I just couldn't get it out. She's here

0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:51.440
<v Speaker 1>in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio. She is based in

0:00:51.479 --> 0:00:53.599
<v Speaker 1>New York. Kathy, great to have you here. It has

0:00:53.600 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 1>been a little bit fast and furious on this Thursday.

0:00:56.680 --> 0:01:00.120
<v Speaker 1>First of all, how are you and how are you reading? One?

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Of the tea leaves and some of the headlines when

0:01:02.360 --> 0:01:05.600
<v Speaker 1>it comes to what happened with Silicon Valley Bank, concerns

0:01:05.640 --> 0:01:11.560
<v Speaker 1>about venture and money for startups because of that collapse,

0:01:11.880 --> 0:01:14.960
<v Speaker 1>and then just the bigger, broader banking situation, kind of

0:01:15.000 --> 0:01:17.679
<v Speaker 1>the nervousness that's out there. Sure, sure, and thanks for

0:01:17.720 --> 0:01:20.679
<v Speaker 1>having me on. So I would say that it's it's

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:23.440
<v Speaker 1>crazy to think about the fact that this whole SBB

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:27.360
<v Speaker 1>situation has literally just been a week. And so in

0:01:27.400 --> 0:01:29.959
<v Speaker 1>the very beginning, I think there was a lot of

0:01:29.959 --> 0:01:33.640
<v Speaker 1>panic and a lot of concerned. It's a fairly small circle, so, um,

0:01:33.720 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 1>just a little bit of context around and Andra is

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 1>a growth and late stage equity fund. We focus on

0:01:40.800 --> 0:01:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley pre IPO technology companies and we were originally

0:01:45.040 --> 0:01:49.600
<v Speaker 1>founded with the mission of democratizing access to these types

0:01:49.640 --> 0:01:53.200
<v Speaker 1>of PREIPO companies. And so for US, Silicon Valley Bank

0:01:53.400 --> 0:01:57.040
<v Speaker 1>is it's just a household name in the valley. It funds,

0:01:57.080 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 1>as you pointed out, Carol funds fifty percent of start

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:02.200
<v Speaker 1>up and so there's a lot of panic because people

0:02:02.240 --> 0:02:05.760
<v Speaker 1>have both deposits, people take out mortgages from them, and

0:02:05.800 --> 0:02:09.360
<v Speaker 1>it impacted individuals on multiple levels, and so when the

0:02:09.400 --> 0:02:12.160
<v Speaker 1>run of the bank happened, initially, I think there was

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:13.959
<v Speaker 1>a lot of concern and a lot of The first

0:02:14.000 --> 0:02:16.639
<v Speaker 1>question we asked is how much exposure do we have

0:02:17.120 --> 0:02:19.680
<v Speaker 1>to SVB? And then the secondary question is how much

0:02:19.680 --> 0:02:22.400
<v Speaker 1>do our portfolio companies have exposure to SVB? How much

0:02:22.400 --> 0:02:25.880
<v Speaker 1>did you guys have? The good news is zero directly,

0:02:26.400 --> 0:02:29.880
<v Speaker 1>and we only had a couple of companies that had exposure,

0:02:29.960 --> 0:02:33.520
<v Speaker 1>but nothing where we were concerned because they had loans

0:02:33.960 --> 0:02:37.000
<v Speaker 1>and so we did have one company that had fairly

0:02:37.080 --> 0:02:40.679
<v Speaker 1>large cash balances there. But the good news is by Sunday,

0:02:40.960 --> 0:02:46.720
<v Speaker 1>I think between Chairman Secretary Yellen and the FDIC, they

0:02:46.760 --> 0:02:49.440
<v Speaker 1>had already come in put the markets to rest, basically

0:02:50.880 --> 0:02:54.560
<v Speaker 1>contained the contagion, if you will, Yeah, and that gave

0:02:54.639 --> 0:02:56.840
<v Speaker 1>us a lot of it. We were able to finally

0:02:57.560 --> 0:03:00.480
<v Speaker 1>basically take us a sigh of relief by day because

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:02.960
<v Speaker 1>we knew that people would then be able to access

0:03:03.000 --> 0:03:06.880
<v Speaker 1>not only the two fifty two hundred fifty K of deposits,

0:03:06.880 --> 0:03:09.079
<v Speaker 1>but the full amount, and so that was good. We'd

0:03:09.120 --> 0:03:11.880
<v Speaker 1>also been able to connect with the companies and just

0:03:12.000 --> 0:03:15.640
<v Speaker 1>in just confirm that they were in okay shape. So

0:03:15.639 --> 0:03:18.639
<v Speaker 1>so that's so that was the near term right now,

0:03:18.680 --> 0:03:22.760
<v Speaker 1>what we're saying is um, while it is concerning, I

0:03:22.800 --> 0:03:26.320
<v Speaker 1>think people at least feel like there are some breaks on.

0:03:26.760 --> 0:03:29.720
<v Speaker 1>We know that the government, maybe having learned from the

0:03:29.760 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 1>GF the great the financial crisis before, understands what the

0:03:34.360 --> 0:03:37.680
<v Speaker 1>rule book looks like, even down to having the equivalent

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:40.920
<v Speaker 1>of help but having these funds available rum so that

0:03:40.960 --> 0:03:43.720
<v Speaker 1>they will buy securities back at par including treasuries and

0:03:43.720 --> 0:03:47.440
<v Speaker 1>things like that. So so that's great. Um. Now what

0:03:47.480 --> 0:03:51.800
<v Speaker 1>does this mean though after this near term panic? And

0:03:51.880 --> 0:03:55.800
<v Speaker 1>so it's um And just to turn this towards a

0:03:55.840 --> 0:03:58.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of the women in minority UM startups, so who

0:03:58.680 --> 0:04:01.160
<v Speaker 1>struggled to begin with you having to it and have

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:04.320
<v Speaker 1>been on a mission, but you do wonder, right, So

0:04:04.360 --> 0:04:07.320
<v Speaker 1>this is our concern. It is it was already hard

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:12.880
<v Speaker 1>enough for women and people of color to tap into

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the system. They're not part of this club in Silicon

0:04:17.560 --> 0:04:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Valley and there was increasing focus. Now the concern that

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:24.960
<v Speaker 1>we have is if banks and lenders become even more conservative,

0:04:25.480 --> 0:04:28.360
<v Speaker 1>they're going to just continue the path that they went

0:04:28.400 --> 0:04:31.680
<v Speaker 1>on before, but be even even more so. Right so,

0:04:31.760 --> 0:04:36.160
<v Speaker 1>what we worry about is that some of these ventures

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 1>that maybe don't look in and don't quite fit into

0:04:40.080 --> 0:04:44.240
<v Speaker 1>the mold of what you think a traditional venture, you know,

0:04:44.320 --> 0:04:48.440
<v Speaker 1>founder looks like um or business models that might serve

0:04:49.279 --> 0:04:54.279
<v Speaker 1>communities that maybe are not the mainstream in America. Those

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 1>are the companies that we think are going to struggle

0:04:56.640 --> 0:05:00.520
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more to get funding. And so, if anything,

0:05:00.640 --> 0:05:03.359
<v Speaker 1>it's very important. I'm so glad we're talking about this

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 1>today because it is important for people to, you know,

0:05:05.960 --> 0:05:09.920
<v Speaker 1>instead of just pulling back to really think about maybe

0:05:09.920 --> 0:05:12.839
<v Speaker 1>we should lean in more and really focus on this

0:05:12.920 --> 0:05:18.080
<v Speaker 1>and make sure that that we're not essentially right after

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:20.520
<v Speaker 1>making some progress, yes, in the last few years, and

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:22.960
<v Speaker 1>so so that's I think that's kind of where we're

0:05:23.279 --> 0:05:25.720
<v Speaker 1>We're what we're trying to focus on. Well, yeah, Kathy,

0:05:25.760 --> 0:05:27.720
<v Speaker 1>and I mean, the good news obviously is that those

0:05:27.760 --> 0:05:31.760
<v Speaker 1>deposits are safe now. But even before that acute bank

0:05:31.880 --> 0:05:34.280
<v Speaker 1>run on Silicon Valley Bank, there was sort of a

0:05:34.320 --> 0:05:36.960
<v Speaker 1>slow draw down of the cash in these accounts that

0:05:37.320 --> 0:05:40.720
<v Speaker 1>startups were burning through cash really and the assumption was

0:05:40.800 --> 0:05:43.480
<v Speaker 1>that okay, maybe you got that first round of investment,

0:05:43.560 --> 0:05:46.880
<v Speaker 1>second round, that that was starting to dry up. And

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:50.760
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if that's accelerating the problem. Obviously, I would

0:05:50.800 --> 0:05:53.719
<v Speaker 1>assume this failure is accelerating that problem. But what sort

0:05:53.720 --> 0:05:56.279
<v Speaker 1>of the climate there is there, especially for someone who

0:05:56.480 --> 0:05:59.680
<v Speaker 1>invests late stage. I mean, if not, you're fun. But

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:03.880
<v Speaker 1>is there this major risk of just the purse strings

0:06:03.880 --> 0:06:08.159
<v Speaker 1>being completely tightened among VC firms right now, especially if

0:06:08.160 --> 0:06:10.479
<v Speaker 1>the IPO market two isn't there for an exit. Yeah,

0:06:10.680 --> 0:06:13.640
<v Speaker 1>So so here's the concern. So just keep in mind

0:06:13.920 --> 0:06:17.760
<v Speaker 1>in the VC space, they there is a statistic I

0:06:17.760 --> 0:06:21.040
<v Speaker 1>think they have roughly close to six hundred billion of

0:06:21.320 --> 0:06:25.880
<v Speaker 1>dry powder that they've raised, and so there's a lot

0:06:25.920 --> 0:06:28.559
<v Speaker 1>of that. There's a lot of capital available to fund

0:06:28.640 --> 0:06:31.360
<v Speaker 1>very early stage companies, and you're absolutely right, Mike. So

0:06:31.960 --> 0:06:35.000
<v Speaker 1>now we're focused on these later stage companies or growth

0:06:35.040 --> 0:06:38.280
<v Speaker 1>companies that are sort of maybe on their Series d

0:06:38.680 --> 0:06:42.560
<v Speaker 1>ef rounds, and with the IPO markets closed most a

0:06:42.600 --> 0:06:45.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of the companies that we're focused on are really

0:06:45.640 --> 0:06:48.719
<v Speaker 1>twelve to thirty six months prior to IPO and with

0:06:48.760 --> 0:06:52.560
<v Speaker 1>that market closed, and also with the lack of I

0:06:52.560 --> 0:06:56.360
<v Speaker 1>guess cheap funding right because interest rates have now gone up,

0:06:56.720 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 1>what we're finding is that companies have had to re

0:06:59.040 --> 0:07:02.520
<v Speaker 1>orient a bit more from growth at all costs, more

0:07:02.600 --> 0:07:07.240
<v Speaker 1>towards profitability and showing that they can reduce their cash

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 1>burn in order to be public public public companies. And

0:07:10.960 --> 0:07:14.840
<v Speaker 1>so you're right, there's been a it's been a slow

0:07:14.920 --> 0:07:19.720
<v Speaker 1>and steady move towards i think trying to essentially conserve cash,

0:07:19.720 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 1>and so they have drawn more on the bank lines

0:07:23.320 --> 0:07:25.680
<v Speaker 1>than they had in the past. The real question will

0:07:25.720 --> 0:07:29.120
<v Speaker 1>be is there is there enough of a correction in

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:35.520
<v Speaker 1>valuations on these companies to create really interesting investment opportunities

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:37.880
<v Speaker 1>so that people come in. Right now, there's a bit

0:07:37.880 --> 0:07:42.040
<v Speaker 1>of a bid ask spread between where company valuations have

0:07:42.880 --> 0:07:47.360
<v Speaker 1>to date and where people see, you know, fair value

0:07:47.600 --> 0:07:50.080
<v Speaker 1>as as being um and as that gap starts to

0:07:50.200 --> 0:07:53.000
<v Speaker 1>adminish a bit more, we do anticipate that money will

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 1>come back in on the onder side. Frankly, that's what

0:07:55.240 --> 0:07:57.600
<v Speaker 1>we're also looking for. We have we have a wish

0:07:57.640 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 1>list of companies that we find really attractive and interests,

0:08:00.680 --> 0:08:03.560
<v Speaker 1>and so we do think that with a little bit more,

0:08:04.600 --> 0:08:08.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe a little bit less exuberance in valuations, that will

0:08:08.800 --> 0:08:11.280
<v Speaker 1>present a lot of very interesting opportunities. When you talk

0:08:11.280 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 1>about valuations, we've just got about thirty seconds. Are you

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:18.640
<v Speaker 1>talking about a ten percent twenty percent pull in on

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:21.520
<v Speaker 1>It depends on the company. Okay, so it all depends

0:08:21.520 --> 0:08:24.119
<v Speaker 1>on where the last round is, and it's uberance. You're saying,

0:08:24.720 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 1>we're up there. Yeah, we have it, And then we

0:08:26.880 --> 0:08:28.760
<v Speaker 1>had to start to see a lot of correction actually

0:08:28.800 --> 0:08:31.160
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning of this year. Now, I think the

0:08:31.200 --> 0:08:33.240
<v Speaker 1>concern is people are so frozen they don't no one

0:08:33.240 --> 0:08:36.640
<v Speaker 1>wants to catch that proverbial falling knife. And so in

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:39.880
<v Speaker 1>some cases maybe it is only ten percent. In other

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:41.680
<v Speaker 1>cases it could be a lot more than that. It

0:08:41.720 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 1>could be, you know, north to thirty percent. Do you

0:08:43.480 --> 0:08:45.680
<v Speaker 1>think the IPO market at all picks up later on?

0:08:45.679 --> 0:08:47.839
<v Speaker 1>This year just got about ten seconds, So I think

0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:50.920
<v Speaker 1>the answer is it's anyone's bet. But I think the

0:08:50.920 --> 0:08:53.400
<v Speaker 1>wishful thinking is that we hope, so we really do.

0:08:53.600 --> 0:08:56.280
<v Speaker 1>We could use that reply to so many different That

0:08:56.400 --> 0:08:59.080
<v Speaker 1>is such a great way of like our environment. Kathy Park,

0:08:59.120 --> 0:09:01.440
<v Speaker 1>come back soon. This is really great. Thanks really appreciate

0:09:01.440 --> 0:09:03.680
<v Speaker 1>for having me. Kathy Park. She's partner at Andre Capital,

0:09:03.760 --> 0:09:05.840
<v Speaker 1>joining us here in our interactive broker studio.