WEBVTT - Market Reaction to Trump Indictment

0:00:01.280 --> 0:00:05.600
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg business Week Inside from the reporters and

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:09.360
<v Speaker 1>editors who bring you America's most trusted business magazine, plus

0:00:09.480 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>global business finance and tech news. The Bloomberg Business Week

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Podcast with Carol Masser and Tim Stenebec from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:20.239 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 1>This is Jess witten Back with John Tucker, and we

0:00:23.360 --> 0:00:27.360
<v Speaker 1>have in our interactive broker studio June Grasso, Bloomberg News

0:00:27.760 --> 0:00:31.280
<v Speaker 1>legal analyst and host of Bloomberg Law here, and we're

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:34.600
<v Speaker 1>also going to bring in our star equities reporter Bailey Lipscholtz.

0:00:34.760 --> 0:00:37.800
<v Speaker 1>He's here in Actually he's in Zooming News. Say where

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:41.000
<v Speaker 1>is he? He's not here. It's he's always here though,

0:00:41.040 --> 0:00:44.880
<v Speaker 1>So it's fine. I don't think it's a star reporter.

0:00:45.960 --> 0:00:50.519
<v Speaker 1>He's working from home. Hey, it's at And we're going

0:00:50.600 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 1>to talk about the next legal steps in the criminal

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:55.800
<v Speaker 1>case against former President Donald Trump. Also how these Trump

0:00:55.840 --> 0:00:58.720
<v Speaker 1>leaks fact that you were talking about John earlier have

0:00:58.840 --> 0:01:01.200
<v Speaker 1>been reacting this. So June, I'm going to start off

0:01:01.200 --> 0:01:04.080
<v Speaker 1>with you, can you set the scene to just run

0:01:04.120 --> 0:01:07.120
<v Speaker 1>down what's happened and what is ahead for this as

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:09.240
<v Speaker 1>far as when we're going into next week. So do

0:01:09.319 --> 0:01:15.520
<v Speaker 1>you have a half hour. Oh you do, Okay, that's good.

0:01:15.800 --> 0:01:20.240
<v Speaker 1>So the main thing is that we don't know what

0:01:20.240 --> 0:01:22.920
<v Speaker 1>the charges are because it's under sealed, so we won't

0:01:23.000 --> 0:01:26.720
<v Speaker 1>find out what the charges actually are, perhaps until the

0:01:26.840 --> 0:01:31.280
<v Speaker 1>arrayment itself happens on Tuesday. So but what we suspect,

0:01:31.360 --> 0:01:34.920
<v Speaker 1>and what's been reported and reported and reported, as John

0:01:34.959 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Tucker knows, is that it's supposed to be a falsifying

0:01:39.640 --> 0:01:44.160
<v Speaker 1>business records charge, which is a misdemeanor, and in order

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:47.680
<v Speaker 1>to take that up to a felony, the prosecutors will

0:01:47.680 --> 0:01:51.280
<v Speaker 1>have to prove that Trump falsified records to cover up

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:55.080
<v Speaker 1>a second crime, such as violating federal campaign finance law.

0:01:55.440 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 1>So that's what we suspect it is. That's a novel

0:01:58.360 --> 0:02:02.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of theory. New York secutors have never tried that before.

0:02:03.280 --> 0:02:07.160
<v Speaker 1>And as far as the arraignment, which comes next, is

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:11.880
<v Speaker 1>that he's going to be here downtown at this is

0:02:11.960 --> 0:02:14.680
<v Speaker 1>New York Criminal Court. If you've ever been to arrayments,

0:02:14.800 --> 0:02:18.080
<v Speaker 1>and I've been to any, not me, but watching others

0:02:18.160 --> 0:02:21.200
<v Speaker 1>being array it's like it's an assistant district attorney who's

0:02:21.200 --> 0:02:23.919
<v Speaker 1>like twenty five years old, and they power through it

0:02:24.000 --> 0:02:27.919
<v Speaker 1>like your arraynment if you're just a typical Joe or Jane,

0:02:28.240 --> 0:02:31.919
<v Speaker 1>takes about twenty seconds. So I suspect probably will be different. Yeah,

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:35.959
<v Speaker 1>especially if they read the thirty count what CNN's reporting

0:02:36.040 --> 0:02:39.360
<v Speaker 1>is a thirty count indictment, it will be longer. And

0:02:39.480 --> 0:02:41.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it. I don't know for sure, but

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:44.440
<v Speaker 1>I think it might not be the twenty five year

0:02:44.480 --> 0:02:48.240
<v Speaker 1>old assistant you know, oh you think. No, I don't

0:02:48.320 --> 0:02:50.120
<v Speaker 1>know that is going to do it. But I think

0:02:50.160 --> 0:02:52.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe one of the attorneys that's been working on this

0:02:52.560 --> 0:02:56.440
<v Speaker 1>case might do it. So just for you know, so

0:02:56.800 --> 0:02:59.760
<v Speaker 1>we actually, I mean, we might actually get a shot

0:02:59.800 --> 0:03:03.320
<v Speaker 1>of Donald Trump in the hallway. They sometimes allow cameras

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:05.480
<v Speaker 1>in the hallway, so if he's walked into the courtroom

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:08.240
<v Speaker 1>through the hallway, we might actually see him. That'll account for.

0:03:08.560 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 1>That'll be the purp walk we usually yeah, but not

0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:13.680
<v Speaker 1>but not. I don't think he'll be in handcuffs unless

0:03:13.680 --> 0:03:16.119
<v Speaker 1>he wants to be. He has said there's been talk

0:03:16.160 --> 0:03:20.440
<v Speaker 1>apparently about him wanting to have a perp walk with

0:03:20.560 --> 0:03:23.359
<v Speaker 1>handcuffs on. But so he'll be and you won't see

0:03:23.400 --> 0:03:27.079
<v Speaker 1>he'll be booked in the DA's office. He'll be fingerprinted,

0:03:27.360 --> 0:03:30.040
<v Speaker 1>the mug shot will be taken, maybe a DNA swap,

0:03:30.040 --> 0:03:32.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure about that. And we won't see those

0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:36.840
<v Speaker 1>mug shops most likely unless some news organization says we

0:03:36.960 --> 0:03:39.520
<v Speaker 1>need to see them under First Amendment grounds for some reason,

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:42.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what. So that's what will happen, and

0:03:42.560 --> 0:03:45.200
<v Speaker 1>then the charges will be read and he'll plead not guilty,

0:03:45.280 --> 0:03:47.400
<v Speaker 1>and he'll get to go home to Florida, okay with

0:03:47.480 --> 0:03:49.920
<v Speaker 1>your Bankran, And I have to point out to everybody

0:03:50.000 --> 0:03:52.800
<v Speaker 1>we are talking to a Harvard Law school graduate who's

0:03:52.920 --> 0:03:59.200
<v Speaker 1>got extensive experience. Is this case flimsy? I can't see.

0:03:59.200 --> 0:04:02.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I can't trade because I haven't seen the charges.

0:04:02.920 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean everyone is waiting, every lawyer is waiting to

0:04:06.000 --> 0:04:09.400
<v Speaker 1>see what the charges are. You know, once that indictment

0:04:09.480 --> 0:04:12.119
<v Speaker 1>is unsealed, to see if maybe there's more there than

0:04:12.160 --> 0:04:14.800
<v Speaker 1>we thought. But let me just say this, I don't

0:04:14.840 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 1>think that Alvin Bragg, who's a cautious kind of man,

0:04:18.760 --> 0:04:23.200
<v Speaker 1>would indict a former president if he couldn't, if you

0:04:23.200 --> 0:04:26.040
<v Speaker 1>didn't think he could. I remember talking to the chief

0:04:26.160 --> 0:04:28.320
<v Speaker 1>judge of New Yor Sault Walkler, and he told me

0:04:28.920 --> 0:04:30.960
<v Speaker 1>in New York you can indict a ham sand yes,

0:04:31.000 --> 0:04:34.360
<v Speaker 1>but years later No. But this is not a hand

0:04:34.600 --> 0:04:37.040
<v Speaker 1>sandwich that we're indicting. This is a former president, and

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:39.480
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to indict him just because you can

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:42.560
<v Speaker 1>indict him and so, and also, look look at what

0:04:42.560 --> 0:04:44.839
<v Speaker 1>he went through with the grand jury. I mean he

0:04:45.000 --> 0:04:48.320
<v Speaker 1>called witness after witness, he called witnesses for the defense

0:04:48.360 --> 0:04:51.280
<v Speaker 1>to the grand jury. Then he called rebuttal witnesses. So

0:04:51.360 --> 0:04:53.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think there might be more there. Let's

0:04:53.880 --> 0:04:57.000
<v Speaker 1>bring in Bailey to get the take happening with these

0:04:57.040 --> 0:05:00.960
<v Speaker 1>SPACs that have been linked to Donald Trump? What's happening today?

0:05:00.960 --> 0:05:03.359
<v Speaker 1>How have they've been before being Yeah? Right now we

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:06.720
<v Speaker 1>have Digital World, which is the spack working to take

0:05:06.960 --> 0:05:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Trump media group. Public is up about eight percent, so

0:05:10.160 --> 0:05:13.520
<v Speaker 1>trading around fourteen dollars. Remember SPACs typically go public around

0:05:13.520 --> 0:05:15.320
<v Speaker 1>ten dollars. This one has a little bit more than

0:05:15.360 --> 0:05:19.080
<v Speaker 1>ten dollars per share in cash value, so still trading

0:05:19.080 --> 0:05:22.479
<v Speaker 1>at a thirty percent premium. Thirty percent and change premium

0:05:22.560 --> 0:05:25.400
<v Speaker 1>to what it would be worth if this deal fell apart.

0:05:25.760 --> 0:05:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Really is just a gauge or a proxy of how

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:31.279
<v Speaker 1>much news is around Trump and how much excitement could

0:05:31.279 --> 0:05:33.240
<v Speaker 1>be around it. So you see digital world trading higher.

0:05:33.279 --> 0:05:37.200
<v Speaker 1>You see Rumble, which is the conservative alternative to YouTube,

0:05:37.400 --> 0:05:40.760
<v Speaker 1>actually reported earnings and goes up double digits. Funware as

0:05:40.800 --> 0:05:43.839
<v Speaker 1>a penny stock that's tied to Trump, also rallying, but

0:05:44.000 --> 0:05:46.800
<v Speaker 1>still really down sharply over the past years. So those

0:05:46.800 --> 0:05:49.680
<v Speaker 1>are the big three proxies that pretty much get a bid,

0:05:49.920 --> 0:05:52.440
<v Speaker 1>whether it's good news or bad news, or really any

0:05:52.480 --> 0:05:55.400
<v Speaker 1>news as it relates to the former president. We typically

0:05:55.440 --> 0:05:58.080
<v Speaker 1>see these stocks really moving tandem. So what's the ideas

0:05:58.200 --> 0:06:01.160
<v Speaker 1>everybody's going to be watching these outlets? I don't even

0:06:01.160 --> 0:06:05.960
<v Speaker 1>know what to qualum because well, yeah, twenty four hours now,

0:06:06.839 --> 0:06:10.760
<v Speaker 1>that's the view it. Trump Media owns truth Social, so

0:06:10.839 --> 0:06:13.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of his ripoff of Twitter, which is where he

0:06:13.720 --> 0:06:17.840
<v Speaker 1>typically posts. So we've seen engagement pretty strong numbers relatively

0:06:17.920 --> 0:06:20.080
<v Speaker 1>from there. So that's kind of part of the optimism

0:06:20.480 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 1>is that if Trump is making headlines, and if you

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:25.680
<v Speaker 1>are a follower or just interested in what he's doing,

0:06:25.720 --> 0:06:28.679
<v Speaker 1>you're going to be spending more time on truth Social,

0:06:28.720 --> 0:06:31.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe going on to Rumble, to hear Russell Grand or

0:06:31.880 --> 0:06:35.160
<v Speaker 1>some other commentators who have been booted or banned from

0:06:35.240 --> 0:06:38.680
<v Speaker 1>various platforms. Kind of laying out their expectations Rumble as

0:06:38.680 --> 0:06:43.040
<v Speaker 1>a company that really wants to be uncancellable is the

0:06:43.080 --> 0:06:45.920
<v Speaker 1>way they phrase it. So those are kind of areas

0:06:45.960 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 1>that at least the perception is that if you're not

0:06:49.320 --> 0:06:54.440
<v Speaker 1>wanting to listen to Bloomberg Radio or other traditional media outlets,

0:06:54.480 --> 0:06:58.640
<v Speaker 1>that's where you'll kind of go for your entertainment engagement

0:06:59.040 --> 0:07:02.880
<v Speaker 1>sounding boards. Bailey, you cover all things spacks. What's next

0:07:03.000 --> 0:07:07.279
<v Speaker 1>for this Trump tied spack moving forward? They've been working

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:09.120
<v Speaker 1>to get this deal done. This was a deal announced

0:07:09.120 --> 0:07:13.120
<v Speaker 1>back in October twenty twenty one. They've really done everything

0:07:13.160 --> 0:07:16.120
<v Speaker 1>they can to get extensions. So right now their drop

0:07:16.160 --> 0:07:18.760
<v Speaker 1>dead date is in September, so that means they can

0:07:18.840 --> 0:07:22.200
<v Speaker 1>continue to work on getting the sign off from the

0:07:22.240 --> 0:07:24.640
<v Speaker 1>likes of the Justice Department, the SEC who have been

0:07:24.800 --> 0:07:27.680
<v Speaker 1>helping hold up this deal. So all eyes are on

0:07:27.760 --> 0:07:30.559
<v Speaker 1>what could move forward. One thing that's interesting to note though,

0:07:30.680 --> 0:07:33.360
<v Speaker 1>a few weeks ago, their CEO actually was booted from

0:07:33.400 --> 0:07:36.760
<v Speaker 1>his role of Patrick Orlando, who had brought public a

0:07:36.800 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 1>handful of spacks and was really a big fan of

0:07:40.120 --> 0:07:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump. So the shaking up at Digital World with

0:07:43.320 --> 0:07:47.160
<v Speaker 1>their new CEO, Eric Swiders, stepping into that role could

0:07:47.200 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 1>be a cause for optimism that this deal will eventually

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:51.200
<v Speaker 1>get done. But I talked to a lot of people

0:07:51.240 --> 0:07:53.800
<v Speaker 1>in this back industry and they still really see this

0:07:53.960 --> 0:07:57.400
<v Speaker 1>as something that probably does not actually cross the finished line,

0:07:57.480 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 1>which would mean the investors who bought it at fourteen

0:07:59.680 --> 0:08:02.120
<v Speaker 1>dollars today or one hundred and seventy five back in

0:08:02.160 --> 0:08:05.280
<v Speaker 1>October twenty twenty one will be left with about ten

0:08:05.320 --> 0:08:07.680
<v Speaker 1>dollars and thirty five cents. I've been. I've been this

0:08:07.720 --> 0:08:10.080
<v Speaker 1>is unfair because I haven't seen the financials any of

0:08:10.080 --> 0:08:14.640
<v Speaker 1>these companies. I mean, are they really viable. There's a

0:08:14.640 --> 0:08:18.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of the beauty and curse of SPACs is that

0:08:18.800 --> 0:08:22.000
<v Speaker 1>we don't really know much about what Trump Media wants

0:08:22.040 --> 0:08:24.600
<v Speaker 1>to be or what it plans to be. Rumble. Uh

0:08:25.080 --> 0:08:27.840
<v Speaker 1>valuation is really the big thing that an analysts are

0:08:27.880 --> 0:08:30.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of skittish of. But they have seen an ability

0:08:30.720 --> 0:08:34.240
<v Speaker 1>to court some of these uh call them talent or

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:37.920
<v Speaker 1>influencers to their platform. So I think that Rumble it

0:08:38.040 --> 0:08:41.560
<v Speaker 1>seems like, at least looking at the fundamentals, could serve

0:08:41.640 --> 0:08:44.439
<v Speaker 1>as an alternative video platform. But there's a lot of

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:47.320
<v Speaker 1>gray area around the valuation of Trump media and actually

0:08:47.360 --> 0:08:49.400
<v Speaker 1>what it would look like and whether it could ever

0:08:49.440 --> 0:08:51.880
<v Speaker 1>turn a profit. In June, before you go, since you're

0:08:51.880 --> 0:08:57.359
<v Speaker 1>still building us, we're what are your billable hours anyway,

0:08:59.360 --> 0:09:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Tuesday wednes Tuesday, it's supposed to be Tuesday, we're hearing

0:09:02.400 --> 0:09:06.840
<v Speaker 1>two fifteen. Oh okay, we're hearing from home. Well that's

0:09:06.840 --> 0:09:10.840
<v Speaker 1>your sort. The general. The General, it's out there. His

0:09:10.920 --> 0:09:14.160
<v Speaker 1>attorneys have been talking and so he's supposedly coming in

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:15.760
<v Speaker 1>on Monday nine. If you want to go to Trump

0:09:15.840 --> 0:09:20.319
<v Speaker 1>Tower to greet him, John, and then Tuesday he'll be

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:24.880
<v Speaker 1>down of the Criminal Courthouse. Excellent, and you'll be there too,

0:09:24.920 --> 0:09:30.000
<v Speaker 1>I suspect. Thank you, June Grasso. It's great having you

0:09:30.080 --> 0:09:33.320
<v Speaker 1>both here. June Grasso, Bloomberg New's legal analyst and Bailey

0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:36.440
<v Speaker 1>lipshoal to US equities reporter for Bloomberg. You're listening to

0:09:36.480 --> 0:09:40.640
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us live weekday afternoons

0:09:40.720 --> 0:09:43.880
<v Speaker 1>from three to six Eastern Listen on Bloomberg dot com,

0:09:43.920 --> 0:09:47.360
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, and the Bloomberg Business app, or watch

0:09:47.440 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 1>us live on YouTube. Andy Purty with Huawei USA. He's

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:55.400
<v Speaker 1>the chief security officer. We're going to help us detail

0:09:55.480 --> 0:09:58.880
<v Speaker 1>some of the Companies twenty twenty two financial reports. Some

0:09:58.920 --> 0:10:01.720
<v Speaker 1>of the particulars there, Andy, thanks for being on the program.

0:10:02.120 --> 0:10:05.480
<v Speaker 1>You're in Washington. Give us some of the highlights of

0:10:06.640 --> 0:10:11.360
<v Speaker 1>what the report says. Well, we have been in a

0:10:11.440 --> 0:10:14.960
<v Speaker 1>difficult situation for a couple of years, and we're pleased

0:10:15.000 --> 0:10:20.200
<v Speaker 1>that our business has stabilized and we are in a

0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:26.040
<v Speaker 1>position to move forward. We are finding tremendous success in

0:10:26.080 --> 0:10:30.280
<v Speaker 1>our five G to be business and we're investing historic

0:10:30.480 --> 0:10:33.439
<v Speaker 1>amounts of money in this case twenty five point one

0:10:33.480 --> 0:10:35.920
<v Speaker 1>percent of our revenue over twenty three billion dollars in

0:10:36.080 --> 0:10:38.520
<v Speaker 1>R and D to help us deal with the recent

0:10:38.600 --> 0:10:41.920
<v Speaker 1>unpleasantries and to help us find working with partners, the

0:10:42.640 --> 0:10:46.440
<v Speaker 1>path forward to help grow our business. Hey, Andy, unpack

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:51.480
<v Speaker 1>this latest report for us. Where were the biggest takeaways? Well,

0:10:51.520 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 1>the overall revenue increased slightly, Our carrier business had a

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:59.000
<v Speaker 1>slight increase. Our enterprise business to tremendous up thirty percent.

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:03.640
<v Speaker 1>That's really around our five G to be our digitalization

0:11:04.440 --> 0:11:08.040
<v Speaker 1>right now, we're we work with seven hundred cities in

0:11:08.040 --> 0:11:10.480
<v Speaker 1>the world two hundred and sixty seven the Fortune Global

0:11:10.520 --> 0:11:14.120
<v Speaker 1>five hundred companies under under digital strategy we've got nine

0:11:14.120 --> 0:11:19.000
<v Speaker 1>million developers and forty thousand ecosystent partners, and we're also

0:11:19.800 --> 0:11:25.240
<v Speaker 1>announcing results of individual additional units, for example in digital

0:11:25.240 --> 0:11:29.120
<v Speaker 1>power and cloud. Those are important areas for us that

0:11:29.840 --> 0:11:33.120
<v Speaker 1>we look forward to driving some real progress in the

0:11:33.200 --> 0:11:38.120
<v Speaker 1>years ahead. Hey, you're a subsidiary of Wawei Technologies, which

0:11:38.200 --> 0:11:41.880
<v Speaker 1>we all know is the largest maker of telecom equipment.

0:11:43.480 --> 0:11:46.440
<v Speaker 1>The launch of sort of a new social control era

0:11:46.559 --> 0:11:52.120
<v Speaker 1>in China focuses on technology, tracking technology, whatever you want

0:11:52.480 --> 0:11:56.960
<v Speaker 1>to call at this point, and you have been scrutinized

0:11:57.000 --> 0:12:00.640
<v Speaker 1>on Capitol Hill, not unlike what we saw with TikTok.

0:12:00.880 --> 0:12:03.080
<v Speaker 1>What is happening on that front. When it comes to

0:12:04.040 --> 0:12:08.680
<v Speaker 1>the regulatory capacity in Congress, well, the two major areas.

0:12:08.760 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 1>One has to do the ability to do business in

0:12:11.040 --> 0:12:13.719
<v Speaker 1>the United States, and it's clear the United States is

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:16.800
<v Speaker 1>not interested in allowing us to do business in the

0:12:16.880 --> 0:12:19.199
<v Speaker 1>United States. So that's a reality. We're not going to

0:12:19.240 --> 0:12:21.800
<v Speaker 1>complain about it. We're going to move forward. The other

0:12:21.920 --> 0:12:24.920
<v Speaker 1>is the question of trade restrictions, the ability of American

0:12:24.920 --> 0:12:28.480
<v Speaker 1>companies to sell nonsensitive technologies to US. And while I

0:12:28.800 --> 0:12:31.440
<v Speaker 1>applaud the efforts under the Chips Act, to bring a

0:12:31.440 --> 0:12:35.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of jobs to America. You know, the fact is

0:12:35.320 --> 0:12:38.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm concerned about American jobs and the semiconductor industry their

0:12:38.760 --> 0:12:42.960
<v Speaker 1>ability to sell nonsensitive technologies to US. I think it

0:12:43.040 --> 0:12:45.920
<v Speaker 1>could be a difficult future and I hope there might

0:12:45.960 --> 0:12:48.880
<v Speaker 1>be a way to allow the sale of such nonsensitive

0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:52.240
<v Speaker 1>technologies to US. And when it comes to these security issues,

0:12:52.520 --> 0:12:57.720
<v Speaker 1>what did you find had the most red flags? Well,

0:12:57.960 --> 0:13:02.360
<v Speaker 1>the issues over and number of years, and there really

0:13:02.400 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 1>has not been anything specific. Obviously, there have been some

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:09.240
<v Speaker 1>geopolitical concerns, and so what we have tried to do

0:13:09.559 --> 0:13:13.920
<v Speaker 1>around the world, in European Union, in Germany and all

0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:18.040
<v Speaker 1>around the world is we try to develop and maintain

0:13:18.520 --> 0:13:20.440
<v Speaker 1>the trust of our customers and the trust of the

0:13:20.480 --> 0:13:23.080
<v Speaker 1>folks they have to be or their particular governments. We're

0:13:23.080 --> 0:13:25.320
<v Speaker 1>a supplier or they're an operator, and so we have

0:13:25.360 --> 0:13:28.720
<v Speaker 1>worked very hard on our global Cybersecurity and Privacy Insurance program,

0:13:29.520 --> 0:13:33.480
<v Speaker 1>on partnering with standers bodies, on parting, for example, the

0:13:33.480 --> 0:13:37.520
<v Speaker 1>telecom equipment effort that the standers bodies form to create

0:13:37.559 --> 0:13:43.000
<v Speaker 1>specific requirements for telecom companies, specific testing requirements and accountability requirements.

0:13:43.320 --> 0:13:46.520
<v Speaker 1>All those things we find gives the ability for most

0:13:46.559 --> 0:13:48.160
<v Speaker 1>of the countries in the world to be able to

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:50.440
<v Speaker 1>push back and say no, there isn't a problem with

0:13:50.480 --> 0:13:55.079
<v Speaker 1>while we take we take cybersecurity seriously, we take privacy seriously.

0:13:55.120 --> 0:13:58.360
<v Speaker 1>And frankly, as I hear all this commotion, I hope

0:13:58.400 --> 0:14:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the United States is going to take privacy production a

0:14:00.559 --> 0:14:02.760
<v Speaker 1>whole lot more seriously than than we have in the past.

0:14:03.000 --> 0:14:05.520
<v Speaker 1>National privacy legislation will be good. That's not going to

0:14:05.520 --> 0:14:08.360
<v Speaker 1>be good enough to help address the risk involving, for example,

0:14:08.400 --> 0:14:11.600
<v Speaker 1>social media companies. Well, how much of what Huawei does

0:14:11.679 --> 0:14:17.840
<v Speaker 1>around the world relates to governments keeping tabs under people? Well,

0:14:17.960 --> 0:14:21.640
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't. I mean, the issue of surveillance is not

0:14:21.760 --> 0:14:25.160
<v Speaker 1>something that we do. You know, there's I mean supplying

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:31.400
<v Speaker 1>that the components to enable that. Well, the issues about

0:14:31.400 --> 0:14:33.920
<v Speaker 1>what products you sell that could be misused and throw

0:14:33.960 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 1>a very rough analogy, the idea of a hammer can

0:14:37.120 --> 0:14:38.640
<v Speaker 1>be used for good, it can be used for bad.

0:14:39.080 --> 0:14:44.240
<v Speaker 1>We don't help governments create special algorithms or special technologies

0:14:44.240 --> 0:14:48.920
<v Speaker 1>that they can use to abuse people. And we are

0:14:49.040 --> 0:14:53.560
<v Speaker 1>working globally to participate in the development of ethical principles

0:14:54.000 --> 0:14:56.240
<v Speaker 1>for some of these things that go beyond the issue

0:14:56.280 --> 0:15:00.680
<v Speaker 1>of complying with the individual requirements in individual country. And

0:15:01.440 --> 0:15:03.440
<v Speaker 1>we think those kinds of efforts are what's going to

0:15:03.440 --> 0:15:07.560
<v Speaker 1>be necessary to help address the risk of misuse by governments.

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:10.040
<v Speaker 1>And there's definitely a risk there is there a path

0:15:10.160 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 1>back into the United States. There is so much business

0:15:14.560 --> 0:15:17.600
<v Speaker 1>to do around the world, so many places where people

0:15:18.000 --> 0:15:20.480
<v Speaker 1>right now are anxious for us to do business, so

0:15:21.000 --> 0:15:23.520
<v Speaker 1>we are not really pursuing the possibility of doing business

0:15:23.560 --> 0:15:25.360
<v Speaker 1>in the United States. And frankly, I'm glad that at

0:15:25.440 --> 0:15:27.760
<v Speaker 1>least we can share some of the lessons we're learning

0:15:28.040 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 1>about how countries and companies, how governments can benefit from

0:15:32.200 --> 0:15:35.240
<v Speaker 1>the new technology, so that hopefully the United States, not

0:15:35.400 --> 0:15:37.880
<v Speaker 1>with us, but hopefully the United States can ramp up

0:15:37.920 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 1>their efforts to get the benefits of these technologies and

0:15:40.800 --> 0:15:43.480
<v Speaker 1>to grow the competitiveness of America. And one of the

0:15:43.560 --> 0:15:46.320
<v Speaker 1>great shortcomings has to do with our talent, our workforce,

0:15:46.320 --> 0:15:49.080
<v Speaker 1>because we're really not stepping up for the future. Andy,

0:15:49.120 --> 0:15:51.760
<v Speaker 1>you brought up government and legislation earlier. What do you

0:15:51.800 --> 0:15:57.120
<v Speaker 1>think specifically needs to be in that with regards to privacy, Well,

0:15:58.960 --> 0:16:01.360
<v Speaker 1>I think we've seen some examples of what shouldn't be

0:16:01.400 --> 0:16:06.080
<v Speaker 1>in there. And I defer to the privacy experts as

0:16:06.080 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 1>to what and the industry experts as to what should

0:16:08.920 --> 0:16:11.520
<v Speaker 1>be in privacy legislation. But I think there need to

0:16:11.520 --> 0:16:14.800
<v Speaker 1>be more than those kinds of requirements because the minimal

0:16:14.880 --> 0:16:17.480
<v Speaker 1>requirements that you can get legislatures to agree on are

0:16:17.520 --> 0:16:21.360
<v Speaker 1>not going to be good enough given the risk. One

0:16:21.360 --> 0:16:23.400
<v Speaker 1>of the lessons we learned two years ago these major

0:16:23.440 --> 0:16:26.680
<v Speaker 1>cyber attacks on trusted American companies Solar Winds of Microsoft

0:16:26.720 --> 0:16:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Exchange Forever, proved there's no such thing as trusted suppliers.

0:16:29.760 --> 0:16:32.320
<v Speaker 1>They're trusted, but the bad guys can hack into them.

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:35.480
<v Speaker 1>So whoever's got data, whoever has important functions. And as

0:16:35.520 --> 0:16:41.359
<v Speaker 1>we move into five genable technologies automation, machine, the machine, communication,

0:16:41.720 --> 0:16:44.400
<v Speaker 1>sensor to machine, we have to make sure that those

0:16:44.400 --> 0:16:46.400
<v Speaker 1>systems are going to be running. So we have to

0:16:46.440 --> 0:16:48.680
<v Speaker 1>make sure that no matter who the supplier is, they're

0:16:48.720 --> 0:16:52.560
<v Speaker 1>objective and transparent basis for knowing whether those products and services,

0:16:52.600 --> 0:16:55.000
<v Speaker 1>whether those data are protected. And I think the leaders

0:16:55.040 --> 0:16:57.760
<v Speaker 1>of cybersecurity United States are moving in the right direction,

0:16:57.920 --> 0:17:00.160
<v Speaker 1>but we've got to really ramp up those efforts to

0:17:00.200 --> 0:17:05.359
<v Speaker 1>promote assurance transparency and accountability. What is the future hold

0:17:05.359 --> 0:17:09.520
<v Speaker 1>for your company in terms of technology, Well, right now,

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:14.880
<v Speaker 1>the proofcase of the five G to business, the digitalization

0:17:15.600 --> 0:17:20.560
<v Speaker 1>of industries and sub industries is so exciting, and the

0:17:20.600 --> 0:17:24.919
<v Speaker 1>benefits of smart mining and ports and manufacturing, the efforts

0:17:25.040 --> 0:17:27.320
<v Speaker 1>we're working with the major carriers in the world to

0:17:27.359 --> 0:17:29.640
<v Speaker 1>help produce the carbon footprint to help meet the UN

0:17:29.760 --> 0:17:33.639
<v Speaker 1>goals we are actively participating, and how to generate green energy,

0:17:33.840 --> 0:17:36.439
<v Speaker 1>how to transport it, how to save it, how to

0:17:37.200 --> 0:17:41.240
<v Speaker 1>increase the efficiency of everything that's done, and find ways

0:17:41.280 --> 0:17:44.399
<v Speaker 1>to use more green energy. And so the future is

0:17:44.680 --> 0:17:47.480
<v Speaker 1>very very bright, particularly with the strong partners that we

0:17:47.520 --> 0:17:50.520
<v Speaker 1>have around the world. And you're talking about green energy,

0:17:50.720 --> 0:17:53.560
<v Speaker 1>what specifically are those strategies Whenever you were talking to

0:17:53.640 --> 0:17:58.080
<v Speaker 1>how to improve all of this, Well, you have some

0:17:58.520 --> 0:18:01.000
<v Speaker 1>existing technology that you them to be more efficient. So

0:18:01.040 --> 0:18:06.360
<v Speaker 1>for example, in the carrier networks, data centers and base

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:09.600
<v Speaker 1>stations that kind of like antennas use up a lot

0:18:09.640 --> 0:18:13.680
<v Speaker 1>of energy. So using technology sometimes with algorithms to try

0:18:13.720 --> 0:18:16.879
<v Speaker 1>to take advantage of when they're not being used to

0:18:17.000 --> 0:18:19.960
<v Speaker 1>reduce the power consumption. And in terms of whether they're

0:18:19.960 --> 0:18:22.000
<v Speaker 1>stored outside or inside, where you have to use the

0:18:22.000 --> 0:18:27.560
<v Speaker 1>air conditioning. Those kinds of techniques can increase efficiency and

0:18:28.240 --> 0:18:33.879
<v Speaker 1>can promote a reduction in the carbon footprint. And the

0:18:35.119 --> 0:18:38.520
<v Speaker 1>fact is that hardcore research and development, working with our

0:18:38.560 --> 0:18:41.399
<v Speaker 1>partners to try to develop green energy and how to

0:18:41.400 --> 0:18:45.400
<v Speaker 1>bring it forward, how to find ways to deliver power

0:18:45.880 --> 0:18:49.159
<v Speaker 1>that's based on green energy is something that we're working

0:18:49.200 --> 0:18:51.480
<v Speaker 1>hard on and we're making substantial progress on. It's it's

0:18:51.480 --> 0:18:54.000
<v Speaker 1>exciting to be part of that. You mentioned smart mining

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:56.679
<v Speaker 1>would give me the dummies definition me being the dummy

0:18:56.720 --> 0:19:01.080
<v Speaker 1>for smart training. So for example, you know how drone

0:19:01.080 --> 0:19:04.640
<v Speaker 1>pilots can don't have to be on the battlefield. So increasingly,

0:19:04.800 --> 0:19:07.520
<v Speaker 1>and we've got a number of examples in Africa and

0:19:07.600 --> 0:19:11.760
<v Speaker 1>shine on other places where you create special five G

0:19:11.960 --> 0:19:15.120
<v Speaker 1>special power requirements that can be five G underground, so

0:19:15.200 --> 0:19:17.199
<v Speaker 1>you can you can have the sensor, you can have

0:19:17.240 --> 0:19:19.840
<v Speaker 1>the machines so that they can control the equipment without

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:21.680
<v Speaker 1>going down in the mines. There's one mind of my

0:19:21.760 --> 0:19:24.600
<v Speaker 1>colleague told me about he visited that's three thousand meters

0:19:24.680 --> 0:19:30.320
<v Speaker 1>underground and the working shift for the workers is four weeks.

0:19:30.880 --> 0:19:32.879
<v Speaker 1>They have to go down there for four weeks. So

0:19:32.960 --> 0:19:36.640
<v Speaker 1>the idea of having this technology that can allow not

0:19:36.720 --> 0:19:39.840
<v Speaker 1>only the operations, but the monitor of safety. So you

0:19:40.280 --> 0:19:44.040
<v Speaker 1>have like at thirty meter giant machine, it's it's it's

0:19:44.240 --> 0:19:47.439
<v Speaker 1>it's doing the mining, and you have multiple cameras to monitor.

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:50.199
<v Speaker 1>So you use an AI algorithm to stitch together the

0:19:50.320 --> 0:19:53.440
<v Speaker 1>videos along that thirty meter strip so that the operator

0:19:53.720 --> 0:19:57.280
<v Speaker 1>can monitor it and you can have a and those

0:19:57.320 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 1>who are providing oversight for safety and control and resilience

0:20:00.320 --> 0:20:03.560
<v Speaker 1>they can monitor it. Also. It's the same thing with reports.

0:20:03.600 --> 0:20:08.720
<v Speaker 1>The ability to have automation can increase efficiency and help

0:20:08.800 --> 0:20:11.240
<v Speaker 1>cut down on some of the supply chain bottle next

0:20:11.320 --> 0:20:15.840
<v Speaker 1>or there and manufacturing. Generally, the greater efficiency the manufacturing

0:20:15.880 --> 0:20:18.760
<v Speaker 1>process is going to save money and reduce energy consumption.

0:20:18.800 --> 0:20:21.520
<v Speaker 1>And this stuff is all very exciting. Andy, thanks a lot,

0:20:21.560 --> 0:20:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Andy purty Uahwei's USA Chief security officer detail like some

0:20:26.760 --> 0:20:32.160
<v Speaker 1>of the financial report of the company's twenty two financial results.

0:20:32.480 --> 0:20:36.520
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week right here on Bloomberg Radio.

0:20:37.520 --> 0:20:41.120
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us

0:20:41.160 --> 0:20:45.200
<v Speaker 1>live weekday afternoons from three to six eastre on Bloomberg Radio,

0:20:45.359 --> 0:20:48.639
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Business app and YouTube You can also listen

0:20:48.760 --> 0:20:51.919
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station.

0:20:52.200 --> 0:20:57.679
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty. So we've got

0:20:57.720 --> 0:21:01.120
<v Speaker 1>another great guest in our lineups of Cappy Cranning Ger

0:21:01.720 --> 0:21:06.280
<v Speaker 1>and she's the former director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau,

0:21:06.480 --> 0:21:10.200
<v Speaker 1>also vice president of regulatory Affairs at solid Labs. She's

0:21:10.240 --> 0:21:14.280
<v Speaker 1>on Zoom from Washington, DC. And so solid or solid

0:21:14.359 --> 0:21:21.240
<v Speaker 1>saw do you pronounce that? Solidust correct? Solidists excuse me, solidusta, sorry,

0:21:21.359 --> 0:21:25.800
<v Speaker 1>butcher that but we corrected it. So Solidust Labs. So,

0:21:25.960 --> 0:21:28.240
<v Speaker 1>to give some context to our listeners, it's a crypto

0:21:28.280 --> 0:21:31.960
<v Speaker 1>market surveillance firm that works with exchanges, regulators and investment

0:21:32.000 --> 0:21:36.159
<v Speaker 1>firms to flag market manipulation and other risk issues. And so, Kathy,

0:21:36.200 --> 0:21:38.639
<v Speaker 1>I want you to break this down for us because

0:21:38.640 --> 0:21:42.360
<v Speaker 1>obviously we've had the wake of multiple bank collapses. We've

0:21:42.400 --> 0:21:45.399
<v Speaker 1>also had FTX in recent months. What happened with that

0:21:45.440 --> 0:21:49.440
<v Speaker 1>situation is still ongoing obviously, right, But then how exactly

0:21:49.520 --> 0:21:52.920
<v Speaker 1>has all this ended up impacting the crypto market specifically,

0:21:54.400 --> 0:21:58.080
<v Speaker 1>and it has a dramatic impact. Look, I believe in

0:21:58.760 --> 0:22:01.440
<v Speaker 1>the future of the digital asset space. I think it's

0:22:01.480 --> 0:22:04.240
<v Speaker 1>the future of the Internet. That's why I joined this industry,

0:22:04.280 --> 0:22:07.240
<v Speaker 1>and I'm excited to be, you know, wearing a white

0:22:07.240 --> 0:22:10.560
<v Speaker 1>hat at Solidus Labs, which as you noted, you know,

0:22:10.640 --> 0:22:13.439
<v Speaker 1>looks for manipulation and seeks to root out fraud in

0:22:13.480 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 1>this space. But the news of FTX, the tentacles that

0:22:18.720 --> 0:22:22.800
<v Speaker 1>FTX had across the globe, to regulators, to policy makers,

0:22:23.440 --> 0:22:25.399
<v Speaker 1>it was looked at as a as a leader in

0:22:25.440 --> 0:22:29.160
<v Speaker 1>some respects in the conversation around what regulation and what

0:22:29.200 --> 0:22:32.840
<v Speaker 1>responsible market participants should do. And you see that it

0:22:32.920 --> 0:22:36.959
<v Speaker 1>was a big scam, and as you noted, additional charges

0:22:37.000 --> 0:22:40.080
<v Speaker 1>were brought this week and more keeps coming on that.

0:22:40.960 --> 0:22:44.840
<v Speaker 1>But look, fraud is not new and certainly digital asset

0:22:44.920 --> 0:22:48.960
<v Speaker 1>markets did not invent it. You see this in traditional finance.

0:22:49.320 --> 0:22:53.480
<v Speaker 1>There are regular enforcement actions against the biggest banks and

0:22:53.520 --> 0:23:00.000
<v Speaker 1>institutions you know, in financial services on a not infrequent basis.

0:23:00.119 --> 0:23:03.320
<v Speaker 1>And also there are scammers who are always going to

0:23:03.400 --> 0:23:06.840
<v Speaker 1>seek to take advantage of people unfairly, and the hope

0:23:06.920 --> 0:23:10.280
<v Speaker 1>is that prosecutors go after them and to the fullest

0:23:10.320 --> 0:23:13.400
<v Speaker 1>extent of the law. They managed to claw back funds

0:23:13.440 --> 0:23:17.480
<v Speaker 1>and make people who are hurt whole in the cryptospace,

0:23:17.960 --> 0:23:21.000
<v Speaker 1>is am I correct to say, it's the platforms where

0:23:21.040 --> 0:23:25.200
<v Speaker 1>all the who can this has been taken place, Like,

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:29.119
<v Speaker 1>the platforms perform an important role to the extent that

0:23:29.240 --> 0:23:32.560
<v Speaker 1>you've got intermediaries in the space. Of course, one of

0:23:32.560 --> 0:23:37.080
<v Speaker 1>the promises and directions of digital asset markets is decentralization,

0:23:37.560 --> 0:23:41.120
<v Speaker 1>so you don't always necessarily have to have that intermediary

0:23:41.160 --> 0:23:43.320
<v Speaker 1>in the middle. But but look, many of us don't

0:23:43.359 --> 0:23:47.919
<v Speaker 1>want to manage our own wallets individually and understand, you know,

0:23:48.000 --> 0:23:50.560
<v Speaker 1>the details of the security that would be needed to

0:23:51.080 --> 0:23:53.639
<v Speaker 1>engage directly in the space. So you're going to have

0:23:53.680 --> 0:23:57.280
<v Speaker 1>platforms in the future, and some of the core issues

0:23:57.320 --> 0:24:02.159
<v Speaker 1>are really around what these underlying sets are and then

0:24:02.200 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 1>therefore which regulatory structure UM you know is required of them. Um,

0:24:08.160 --> 0:24:12.480
<v Speaker 1>there is still a requirement around transparency and fairness and disclosure,

0:24:12.880 --> 0:24:16.080
<v Speaker 1>and many of the good market participants in this space

0:24:16.400 --> 0:24:19.440
<v Speaker 1>are doing that to the best of their ability, complying

0:24:19.480 --> 0:24:23.439
<v Speaker 1>with the law that you applies to them, using capabilities

0:24:23.440 --> 0:24:27.480
<v Speaker 1>like we provide a solid as labs UM. But there

0:24:27.480 --> 0:24:29.680
<v Speaker 1>are also those that are not doing that, And I

0:24:29.760 --> 0:24:32.480
<v Speaker 1>got to ask the obligatory question is is this a

0:24:32.560 --> 0:24:36.639
<v Speaker 1>currency or a commodity. I mean, who who's the regulator.

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:40.560
<v Speaker 1>You're getting to the heart of the matter. That is

0:24:40.600 --> 0:24:43.680
<v Speaker 1>part of the challenge. I do fundamentally believe the digital

0:24:43.720 --> 0:24:47.760
<v Speaker 1>assets are not just a one nature. It's not one

0:24:47.920 --> 0:24:51.399
<v Speaker 1>type of asset. And so the question of you know

0:24:51.440 --> 0:24:54.679
<v Speaker 1>what is it is, you know, an asset by asset

0:24:54.680 --> 0:24:59.080
<v Speaker 1>assessment that is not you know, foreign to lawyers who

0:24:59.160 --> 0:25:01.840
<v Speaker 1>are looking at those things. That are you know, instruments

0:25:01.840 --> 0:25:07.160
<v Speaker 1>in traditional finance, and there are clear rules around securities.

0:25:07.200 --> 0:25:08.879
<v Speaker 1>We talk a lot about the Howie test and the

0:25:08.920 --> 0:25:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Reeves test, but those need to be applied, and the

0:25:12.119 --> 0:25:15.719
<v Speaker 1>platforms are saying we're applying those tests, and Chairman Gensler

0:25:15.800 --> 0:25:18.040
<v Speaker 1>is saying, um, you know, I don't think so. So

0:25:18.400 --> 0:25:20.520
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot to be worked out definitely in the

0:25:20.560 --> 0:25:24.600
<v Speaker 1>courts on that front that is completely separate from you know,

0:25:24.680 --> 0:25:27.560
<v Speaker 1>fraud and bad actors. Wanted to make sure I said

0:25:27.600 --> 0:25:30.760
<v Speaker 1>that pretty clearly. And what are your thoughts on Senator

0:25:30.800 --> 0:25:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Elizabeth Warren in her position on crypto Because I know

0:25:35.040 --> 0:25:37.960
<v Speaker 1>that the Senate obviously has a particular stance on the

0:25:38.000 --> 0:25:41.240
<v Speaker 1>market regulation, but what's going on there and how do

0:25:41.280 --> 0:25:45.800
<v Speaker 1>you see all that playing out? Like I think Congress

0:25:45.880 --> 0:25:50.159
<v Speaker 1>needs to engage in this space, and members need to

0:25:50.200 --> 0:25:54.399
<v Speaker 1>be educated and understand the technology, think through the best

0:25:54.440 --> 0:25:59.080
<v Speaker 1>way to put a specific regulatory framework into place. I'm

0:25:59.080 --> 0:26:01.320
<v Speaker 1>one of the people that leaves Congress needs to act

0:26:01.400 --> 0:26:05.280
<v Speaker 1>on that front. And so you have members that are

0:26:05.280 --> 0:26:08.640
<v Speaker 1>really engaged and have spent the time you know Senator's

0:26:08.680 --> 0:26:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Lummis and Jillibrand at a bipartisan bill they issued last year.

0:26:13.200 --> 0:26:15.639
<v Speaker 1>They're working on it again and going to reissue that

0:26:15.720 --> 0:26:19.440
<v Speaker 1>this year. You have leadership on the House Financial Services

0:26:19.440 --> 0:26:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Committee two that is excited about well trying to tackle

0:26:24.240 --> 0:26:28.640
<v Speaker 1>the issues around stable coins and market structure. The Agriculture

0:26:28.680 --> 0:26:32.160
<v Speaker 1>committees in the House and the Senate to really engaging

0:26:32.160 --> 0:26:34.240
<v Speaker 1>in this space. So there are going to be a

0:26:34.240 --> 0:26:38.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of different perspectives, and I just fundamentally believe, as

0:26:38.800 --> 0:26:41.199
<v Speaker 1>I said, that the future of the Internet, in the

0:26:41.240 --> 0:26:44.360
<v Speaker 1>future of so many things about how our economy can operate,

0:26:44.400 --> 0:26:48.440
<v Speaker 1>innovate and be accessible for the future is in this technology.

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:51.920
<v Speaker 1>But there are risks and those need to be weighed,

0:26:51.960 --> 0:26:55.200
<v Speaker 1>as does the right regulatory regime. Where are we in

0:26:55.240 --> 0:27:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the regulatory front, I mean, in a nutshell, is it happening? Uh?

0:27:00.840 --> 0:27:05.240
<v Speaker 1>It's happening through the courts. That's likely. Let's not really regulations.

0:27:05.640 --> 0:27:10.320
<v Speaker 1>That's more like you've got to do this, guys. Yeah,

0:27:10.400 --> 0:27:13.520
<v Speaker 1>that's that's that's the unfortunate part about this. You're seeing

0:27:13.560 --> 0:27:17.760
<v Speaker 1>it through enforcement actions from the SEC and the cftc um,

0:27:18.000 --> 0:27:21.199
<v Speaker 1>some of them clearly designed to try to put the

0:27:21.240 --> 0:27:26.240
<v Speaker 1>bounds around around crypto assets and define them as securities

0:27:26.320 --> 0:27:29.000
<v Speaker 1>or commodities, but not in a direct way, not by

0:27:29.040 --> 0:27:32.520
<v Speaker 1>issuing notice in common regulation um. And that's where you

0:27:32.560 --> 0:27:35.280
<v Speaker 1>get to Congress too, because in some respects Congress needs

0:27:35.280 --> 0:27:37.960
<v Speaker 1>to solve some of these issues. But you do also

0:27:38.000 --> 0:27:43.399
<v Speaker 1>have the sec issuing regulations around custody that encompass certainly

0:27:43.440 --> 0:27:47.880
<v Speaker 1>many aspects of traditional finance, but also encompass crypto assets.

0:27:48.000 --> 0:27:50.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, does the is the industry welcoming all this?

0:27:50.440 --> 0:27:52.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean they were obviously, you know, one of the

0:27:52.800 --> 0:27:55.560
<v Speaker 1>reasons for being is to avoid that or not be

0:27:55.720 --> 0:27:58.639
<v Speaker 1>regulated or whatever. Do they now welcome it or what?

0:27:59.840 --> 0:28:02.800
<v Speaker 1>The industry has been pretty consistent, although it is hard

0:28:02.840 --> 0:28:05.600
<v Speaker 1>with the centralization to talk about it as one industry.

0:28:05.720 --> 0:28:08.439
<v Speaker 1>But to be clear, those who are the platforms that

0:28:08.520 --> 0:28:12.840
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned earlier, John, and those that are in intermediaries

0:28:12.840 --> 0:28:16.280
<v Speaker 1>in the space. They know they have regulatory responsibilities under

0:28:16.280 --> 0:28:20.040
<v Speaker 1>current law. They know there are regulatory responsibilities that need

0:28:20.119 --> 0:28:23.840
<v Speaker 1>to be shaped and take into account the differences with

0:28:23.880 --> 0:28:27.480
<v Speaker 1>these assets and the differences with these markets. And so

0:28:27.720 --> 0:28:32.000
<v Speaker 1>that's something that you know, we've put forth as the industry,

0:28:32.000 --> 0:28:34.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of different ideas around this, and do want

0:28:35.000 --> 0:28:37.639
<v Speaker 1>to see Congress act and do want to see the

0:28:37.760 --> 0:28:41.560
<v Speaker 1>SEC and the CFTC engage. What do you think is

0:28:41.600 --> 0:28:45.080
<v Speaker 1>the most realistic way to try to address fraud because

0:28:45.080 --> 0:28:48.280
<v Speaker 1>we've seen so many instances and scandals, as you know,

0:28:48.480 --> 0:28:53.960
<v Speaker 1>especially even in recent months in the crypto world. It

0:28:54.080 --> 0:28:57.959
<v Speaker 1>is incredibly disheartening. There's no other way to say it.

0:28:58.520 --> 0:29:02.880
<v Speaker 1>And some of it is just you know, unfortunately the

0:29:02.960 --> 0:29:05.680
<v Speaker 1>nature of anything that's new. You know, you noted I

0:29:05.760 --> 0:29:08.920
<v Speaker 1>was the director of the CFPB. The types of scams

0:29:08.920 --> 0:29:13.320
<v Speaker 1>and frauds that you know, really go after vulnerable populations.

0:29:13.600 --> 0:29:16.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, they're they're constant, so they're not unique to

0:29:16.320 --> 0:29:20.040
<v Speaker 1>digital assets. But I see an opportunity, and we see

0:29:20.080 --> 0:29:23.560
<v Speaker 1>it in our ability at SOLIDUS to identify RUG polls.

0:29:24.480 --> 0:29:30.040
<v Speaker 1>We can preclude those bad actors from at all benefiting

0:29:30.160 --> 0:29:33.360
<v Speaker 1>from and getting the funds off ramped out of the

0:29:33.360 --> 0:29:40.000
<v Speaker 1>blockchain ecosystem, so therefore completely disincentivizing deploying the scam to

0:29:40.040 --> 0:29:42.840
<v Speaker 1>begin with. And so those are some of the things

0:29:42.880 --> 0:29:46.000
<v Speaker 1>that the technology can really facilitate. You know, they they

0:29:46.040 --> 0:29:49.600
<v Speaker 1>they deploy a token you can only buy, you can't

0:29:49.600 --> 0:29:52.800
<v Speaker 1>actually sell, you can't get out of it. And then

0:29:53.080 --> 0:29:56.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, the person who actually deployed that does a

0:29:56.840 --> 0:29:59.480
<v Speaker 1>rug pole, pulls all the funds and it escapes with

0:29:59.520 --> 0:30:02.960
<v Speaker 1>those funds. If you can identify that as a run

0:30:03.040 --> 0:30:06.200
<v Speaker 1>poll and stop them from escaping with the funds, there's

0:30:06.240 --> 0:30:08.600
<v Speaker 1>no benefit then in deploying the scams to begin with.

0:30:08.920 --> 0:30:12.840
<v Speaker 1>And that's something this technology facilitates. I have a reverse barometer.

0:30:14.480 --> 0:30:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Whenever people talk about it at the barbershop, I've run

0:30:18.320 --> 0:30:20.880
<v Speaker 1>and that's all they were talking about it a few

0:30:20.960 --> 0:30:23.520
<v Speaker 1>years ago. Crypt Though, Kathy, thanks a lot. I appreciate it.

0:30:23.560 --> 0:30:27.960
<v Speaker 1>That was interesting. Kathy Craniger the vice president of regulatory

0:30:28.200 --> 0:30:33.440
<v Speaker 1>regulatory Affairs at Solidust Laboratories. They worked with the exchanges

0:30:34.480 --> 0:30:38.720
<v Speaker 1>and presumably on the regulatory front as well. You are

0:30:38.800 --> 0:30:42.120
<v Speaker 1>listening the Bloomberg Radio, you know what, JT. I'm very

0:30:42.160 --> 0:30:45.360
<v Speaker 1>excited about our next guest because this is a company

0:30:45.440 --> 0:30:49.480
<v Speaker 1>that's female run by their strategy. So we have Stephanie Blake,

0:30:49.600 --> 0:30:55.400
<v Speaker 1>the chief executive officer Highlights Studios on Zoom California. No,

0:30:55.560 --> 0:30:57.960
<v Speaker 1>you're still invited. We're not going to kick you out JT.

0:30:58.560 --> 0:31:02.880
<v Speaker 1>And So Stephanie, I hear you're taking old iconic buildings

0:31:02.920 --> 0:31:05.640
<v Speaker 1>and turning them into something cool. Tell us about what

0:31:05.800 --> 0:31:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Skylight Studio is in what you do. Hi. Yeah, So

0:31:10.920 --> 0:31:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Skylight we are placemaking and Venny development of management firm,

0:31:14.400 --> 0:31:17.280
<v Speaker 1>and we focus on adaptive reuse. We were founded actually

0:31:17.360 --> 0:31:20.240
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and eight, so similar times, if not

0:31:20.280 --> 0:31:23.240
<v Speaker 1>potentially worse for commercial real estate, but for us, we

0:31:23.360 --> 0:31:26.680
<v Speaker 1>drive creative revenue streams and new uses too often historic

0:31:26.760 --> 0:31:29.920
<v Speaker 1>or underutilized properties by bringing in brands Fortune one hundred

0:31:29.960 --> 0:31:33.440
<v Speaker 1>companies to do experiences, to foster sort of a new

0:31:33.480 --> 0:31:35.720
<v Speaker 1>way of gathering and entertainment. And we've been doing it

0:31:35.760 --> 0:31:38.760
<v Speaker 1>for the last fifteen years, looking from the Highline to

0:31:38.880 --> 0:31:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Moningham Station, the Ferry Building in San Francisco, Gardli Square, Detroit.

0:31:44.880 --> 0:31:46.960
<v Speaker 1>So that is that is what we've been doing. And

0:31:47.000 --> 0:31:50.320
<v Speaker 1>I think see a ton of opportunity right now. Oh, Stephanie,

0:31:50.400 --> 0:31:52.400
<v Speaker 1>let me paint the picture for you. Where are we

0:31:52.480 --> 0:31:57.880
<v Speaker 1>fifty eighth and Okay, so I don't know where I am.

0:31:58.720 --> 0:32:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Look out the window, Well, look downstairs. There used to

0:32:01.280 --> 0:32:03.560
<v Speaker 1>be Starbucks. Remember in this build there was an H

0:32:03.600 --> 0:32:06.440
<v Speaker 1>and M on the first floor. Gone. The container store

0:32:06.480 --> 0:32:09.960
<v Speaker 1>has gone. Victoria Store there now instead of the start. Well,

0:32:10.000 --> 0:32:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Matt Miller thinks it's a front for something out. There's

0:32:12.000 --> 0:32:15.160
<v Speaker 1>a Victoria's Secret that's gone. What is the state of

0:32:15.200 --> 0:32:18.960
<v Speaker 1>commercial real estate? From where you sit? Yeah, from where

0:32:19.000 --> 0:32:21.200
<v Speaker 1>we said, I think that there's often a trend. You know,

0:32:21.240 --> 0:32:23.400
<v Speaker 1>I think what was it now as of ten years

0:32:23.400 --> 0:32:26.520
<v Speaker 1>and change ago? Retail was in question? What is the future?

0:32:26.640 --> 0:32:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Was the future of the ground floor? I think right now,

0:32:29.640 --> 0:32:32.560
<v Speaker 1>with you know, COVID having accelerated the question mark of

0:32:32.560 --> 0:32:35.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these traditional uses. What gets you out

0:32:35.120 --> 0:32:37.200
<v Speaker 1>the door? What is the use of the built environment?

0:32:37.240 --> 0:32:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Do you need to go to work? I think that's

0:32:39.640 --> 0:32:41.600
<v Speaker 1>the question mark that's happening. And I think a lot

0:32:41.640 --> 0:32:44.480
<v Speaker 1>of the transactions that have sort of been the foundation

0:32:44.480 --> 0:32:47.520
<v Speaker 1>of commercial real estate with fortune one hundred tens expecting

0:32:47.520 --> 0:32:50.719
<v Speaker 1>them to continue, where office was not a question. Everyone

0:32:50.720 --> 0:32:52.240
<v Speaker 1>needs to go to work, Everyone needs a place to

0:32:52.280 --> 0:32:55.440
<v Speaker 1>go with that in question and combination with how retail

0:32:55.480 --> 0:32:59.960
<v Speaker 1>has continued to evolve, I think that there's an opportunity

0:33:00.200 --> 0:33:03.239
<v Speaker 1>now to really rethink how people are using space, how

0:33:03.320 --> 0:33:07.560
<v Speaker 1>people come and interact and why. And I think that's

0:33:07.600 --> 0:33:10.440
<v Speaker 1>where we're seeing this conversience of a venue being the

0:33:10.440 --> 0:33:13.240
<v Speaker 1>new anchor of development where you can put F and

0:33:13.280 --> 0:33:15.719
<v Speaker 1>B that rotates. It can enable you to welcome the

0:33:15.760 --> 0:33:19.440
<v Speaker 1>future by thinking about how, you know, an entertainment concept

0:33:19.520 --> 0:33:23.480
<v Speaker 1>might be paired with a retail concept paired with culinary

0:33:23.800 --> 0:33:26.600
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's the future. Is this collaborative approach

0:33:26.720 --> 0:33:32.960
<v Speaker 1>to space? Tell us more about how you're working with landlords? Yeah,

0:33:33.000 --> 0:33:38.160
<v Speaker 1>so we work with landlords in many different ways. Our

0:33:38.200 --> 0:33:42.600
<v Speaker 1>partnerships with landlords often look like they have space and

0:33:42.640 --> 0:33:47.880
<v Speaker 1>they're not sure exactly how to create dynamic and vibrant

0:33:48.040 --> 0:33:51.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of differentiators. So I think the same way that

0:33:51.200 --> 0:33:54.280
<v Speaker 1>it was always was at fitness, food amenity, space was

0:33:54.320 --> 0:33:57.360
<v Speaker 1>what was driving office and tenants back and in the building,

0:33:57.440 --> 0:34:00.720
<v Speaker 1>and it was of an important sort of intersect for

0:34:00.800 --> 0:34:02.680
<v Speaker 1>us when we work with landlords. Now we come to

0:34:02.720 --> 0:34:05.120
<v Speaker 1>the table with how do you think about a venue?

0:34:05.160 --> 0:34:07.280
<v Speaker 1>How do you think about the negative space in your building,

0:34:07.280 --> 0:34:10.600
<v Speaker 1>in your corridors, in your outdoor spaces, and what is

0:34:10.600 --> 0:34:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the programming that's going to not just be a beautifully

0:34:14.560 --> 0:34:18.040
<v Speaker 1>designed space or have the right food, but how are

0:34:18.040 --> 0:34:22.400
<v Speaker 1>you going to encourage interaction and encourage sort of using

0:34:22.880 --> 0:34:27.120
<v Speaker 1>programming and experiences and events to help encourage people to

0:34:27.280 --> 0:34:30.080
<v Speaker 1>interact and use the space. There's so many amenity spaces

0:34:30.120 --> 0:34:34.480
<v Speaker 1>now that are being built still and are not being used.

0:34:34.520 --> 0:34:36.680
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's where we've actually partnered a lot

0:34:36.719 --> 0:34:42.080
<v Speaker 1>with architects alongside landlords to provide the heartbeat against the design.

0:34:42.440 --> 0:34:45.359
<v Speaker 1>And I think that in the challenges where everybody wants

0:34:45.400 --> 0:34:47.600
<v Speaker 1>to work from home nowaday, I mean, it's got to

0:34:47.640 --> 0:34:51.600
<v Speaker 1>be incredibly challenging for you. Do people come to you, landlords,

0:34:52.040 --> 0:34:55.280
<v Speaker 1>businesses and say I want my people back in the office.

0:34:55.440 --> 0:34:57.560
<v Speaker 1>They don't want to come back, but if you give

0:34:57.560 --> 0:35:01.399
<v Speaker 1>me some ideas, maybe we can change that. I personally are, yeah,

0:35:01.600 --> 0:35:05.880
<v Speaker 1>you're on tap. But and I think I mean my

0:35:05.960 --> 0:35:12.399
<v Speaker 1>early days, I grew up at Google in my yea, um,

0:35:12.760 --> 0:35:15.240
<v Speaker 1>but I will say yes. So that is one challenge

0:35:15.280 --> 0:35:17.200
<v Speaker 1>absolutely that we're brought to all the time. How do

0:35:17.200 --> 0:35:19.239
<v Speaker 1>we get tenants back, how do we do you know

0:35:19.719 --> 0:35:21.600
<v Speaker 1>is it food? Is it? What is the thing? And

0:35:21.640 --> 0:35:23.200
<v Speaker 1>I think people have hung their hat on its food

0:35:23.200 --> 0:35:26.080
<v Speaker 1>and fitness. I think the other challenge, or the other

0:35:26.120 --> 0:35:28.360
<v Speaker 1>way in which we're a solution is if you design

0:35:28.360 --> 0:35:31.600
<v Speaker 1>a venue that's used by tenants. Example, you know what

0:35:31.640 --> 0:35:33.840
<v Speaker 1>we're doing right now at Penn District in the middle

0:35:33.840 --> 0:35:37.560
<v Speaker 1>of midtown or in San Francisco with the auditorium at

0:35:37.600 --> 0:35:41.279
<v Speaker 1>three four five Montgomery Um. There's an opportunity to think

0:35:41.320 --> 0:35:43.920
<v Speaker 1>about a lot of companies who are not coming in daily,

0:35:44.400 --> 0:35:46.480
<v Speaker 1>when do they come together? They want to come together,

0:35:46.480 --> 0:35:49.000
<v Speaker 1>when they're bringing various departments together, when they have meetings,

0:35:49.000 --> 0:35:51.719
<v Speaker 1>when they have announcements. And it's interesting because we were

0:35:51.800 --> 0:35:53.799
<v Speaker 1>for a very long time the types of assets we

0:35:53.880 --> 0:35:56.840
<v Speaker 1>had when we created a venue was often for external purposes.

0:35:56.880 --> 0:35:58.680
<v Speaker 1>How do we wow our clients, how do we share

0:35:58.719 --> 0:36:01.040
<v Speaker 1>a product launch? Now it's how do we actually bring

0:36:01.120 --> 0:36:05.719
<v Speaker 1>our employees together and be able to show them why

0:36:05.800 --> 0:36:07.560
<v Speaker 1>do you need to be together? What is the value

0:36:07.600 --> 0:36:10.200
<v Speaker 1>being together? And how do we create a meaningful experience?

0:36:10.600 --> 0:36:14.080
<v Speaker 1>And so there's an opportunity for some of these buildings

0:36:14.120 --> 0:36:16.279
<v Speaker 1>to be used not just by the tenants having the

0:36:16.280 --> 0:36:18.640
<v Speaker 1>amenity where you can bring people together, whether it's a

0:36:18.680 --> 0:36:21.800
<v Speaker 1>beautiful auditorium, you have programming, that's an option that can

0:36:21.840 --> 0:36:24.200
<v Speaker 1>create different ideas and experiences. But also how do you

0:36:24.200 --> 0:36:26.400
<v Speaker 1>bring an outside tenants to use the space as well?

0:36:26.719 --> 0:36:29.160
<v Speaker 1>And I think there's an intersection now where meetings have

0:36:29.360 --> 0:36:32.440
<v Speaker 1>risen exponentially. Today. I think it's a two hundred and

0:36:32.480 --> 0:36:36.280
<v Speaker 1>sixty billion dollar market. By twenty twenty six, it's predicted

0:36:36.320 --> 0:36:39.200
<v Speaker 1>to be a five hundred plus billion dollar market. And

0:36:39.280 --> 0:36:43.480
<v Speaker 1>so people are spending to bring their employees together, whether

0:36:43.520 --> 0:36:46.359
<v Speaker 1>it's in the office or another space. And I think

0:36:46.440 --> 0:36:49.400
<v Speaker 1>that's that's the value that you can bring. It's deepanie

0:36:49.960 --> 0:36:53.839
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to higher interest rates, how has that

0:36:53.920 --> 0:36:58.319
<v Speaker 1>been impacting the rulant state environment in your view? Yeah,

0:36:58.320 --> 0:37:00.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean where do you get thirty seconds to say

0:37:01.719 --> 0:37:04.000
<v Speaker 1>where we fit? You know, we've been able to come

0:37:04.000 --> 0:37:06.680
<v Speaker 1>to deals to sort of derisk the opportunity from whether

0:37:06.719 --> 0:37:10.320
<v Speaker 1>it's an investment or landlord perspective or a buyer's perspective. Obviously,

0:37:10.320 --> 0:37:13.520
<v Speaker 1>interest rates will decrease transactions, which is again where you

0:37:13.560 --> 0:37:14.920
<v Speaker 1>want to be able to bring in the best of

0:37:14.920 --> 0:37:17.640
<v Speaker 1>many industries to use a space. It cannot just be

0:37:17.760 --> 0:37:19.879
<v Speaker 1>office and expecting these tenants to come back and sign

0:37:19.880 --> 0:37:23.080
<v Speaker 1>the twenty year leases. By creating venues, it enables you

0:37:23.360 --> 0:37:25.359
<v Speaker 1>to use the best of these markets and the best

0:37:25.400 --> 0:37:28.080
<v Speaker 1>of these industries to come together for meeting space as

0:37:28.080 --> 0:37:31.040
<v Speaker 1>a catalyst to then enable other tenants to come in

0:37:31.080 --> 0:37:33.239
<v Speaker 1>and share that space. And I think there's a lot

0:37:33.239 --> 0:37:38.120
<v Speaker 1>of value in how that can be created. Did you

0:37:38.400 --> 0:37:40.839
<v Speaker 1>get the lunch today upstairs? I did not have time.

0:37:40.880 --> 0:37:44.319
<v Speaker 1>I was you didn't have time. You let that go away.

0:37:44.360 --> 0:37:47.040
<v Speaker 1>It was tuna. It was like a tuna, So it

0:37:47.080 --> 0:37:49.759
<v Speaker 1>was all right, Stephanie Blake, I can't look at gift

0:37:49.800 --> 0:37:53.640
<v Speaker 1>tuna in the mouth, CEO. It's Skylight Studios, some unique

0:37:53.640 --> 0:37:57.399
<v Speaker 1>real estate venue development. Stephanie, thanks a lot. We appreciate it.

0:37:57.600 --> 0:38:00.440
<v Speaker 1>And you are listening to Bloomberg Radio. Sounds like a

0:38:00.520 --> 0:38:07.799
<v Speaker 1>jazz station. Now you're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast.

0:38:08.040 --> 0:38:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Catch us live weekday afternoons from three to six eastre

0:38:11.400 --> 0:38:15.200
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio, the Bloomberg Business app and YouTube. You

0:38:15.239 --> 0:38:18.480
<v Speaker 1>can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship

0:38:18.520 --> 0:38:22.799
<v Speaker 1>New York station Just Say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:38:24.320 --> 0:38:31.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking I gradual queezing bed. We're talking Basall Grew

0:38:31.600 --> 0:38:38.200
<v Speaker 1>and gay Lord Perrot see the DOMI I think we're

0:38:38.200 --> 0:38:41.480
<v Speaker 1>switching gears now too. We are. I'm guessing baseball we are.

0:38:41.520 --> 0:38:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Why don't you pick it up for its we have.

0:38:44.360 --> 0:38:46.520
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna have Juel Weber here. He's the editor of

0:38:46.600 --> 0:38:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg business Week here in the Interest in the studio.

0:38:49.960 --> 0:38:52.239
<v Speaker 1>He's not working from home. No, he's gonna right here

0:38:52.280 --> 0:38:54.840
<v Speaker 1>with us, right here. We're also are gonna have Jerry Smith.

0:38:54.840 --> 0:38:57.160
<v Speaker 1>He's a media reporter for Bloomberg News on the phone

0:38:57.560 --> 0:38:59.839
<v Speaker 1>in New York City. So they're gonna talk to us

0:39:00.080 --> 0:39:05.000
<v Speaker 1>about Jerry's latest Bloomberg BusinessWeek story. Watching your favorite team

0:39:05.280 --> 0:39:09.160
<v Speaker 1>could cost you more than Netflix. So this is really interesting.

0:39:09.560 --> 0:39:13.120
<v Speaker 1>And I can start off with Jerry first breakdown and

0:39:13.200 --> 0:39:15.919
<v Speaker 1>just set the scene for this story for us, because

0:39:15.960 --> 0:39:17.879
<v Speaker 1>I know there's so many people that are interested in

0:39:17.920 --> 0:39:22.880
<v Speaker 1>this right now. Sure, Yeah, especially with opening Day in

0:39:22.960 --> 0:39:26.759
<v Speaker 1>the baseball right yesterday, we're seeing more and more of

0:39:26.760 --> 0:39:31.680
<v Speaker 1>these local sports channels that are trying to reach the

0:39:31.760 --> 0:39:34.759
<v Speaker 1>cord cutters, the people who've canceled their cable subscription. So

0:39:35.280 --> 0:39:42.040
<v Speaker 1>they are introducing online services that where you can watch baseball, basketball,

0:39:42.239 --> 0:39:46.200
<v Speaker 1>and hockey in your local market without a cable subscription.

0:39:47.120 --> 0:39:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Now I go back. I'm going to date myself what

0:39:49.760 --> 0:39:52.280
<v Speaker 1>you guys probably do too. But I used to watch

0:39:52.280 --> 0:39:55.040
<v Speaker 1>on Picks Channel eleven locally. I was expecting you to

0:39:55.080 --> 0:39:58.279
<v Speaker 1>say radio, Well, you can hear it on radio too,

0:39:58.360 --> 0:40:01.960
<v Speaker 1>but no, I would watch Phil Rossotto, Scooter and Bill

0:40:02.040 --> 0:40:04.600
<v Speaker 1>White with the Yankee games. Those days are over, I

0:40:04.600 --> 0:40:08.319
<v Speaker 1>guess right. So the money around rights is really what

0:40:08.400 --> 0:40:10.520
<v Speaker 1>this comes down to a feeling. This is Joel buzz Away,

0:40:10.719 --> 0:40:14.960
<v Speaker 1>thank you. There we go. So the tensions here are

0:40:15.040 --> 0:40:20.920
<v Speaker 1>between the owners who own the teams and can decide

0:40:20.920 --> 0:40:26.080
<v Speaker 1>who gets to distribute it. Um, So what's the model

0:40:26.120 --> 0:40:28.560
<v Speaker 1>when this works? What does it look like? Because what

0:40:29.080 --> 0:40:32.040
<v Speaker 1>ultimately we're describing here is something that the burdens being

0:40:32.080 --> 0:40:34.960
<v Speaker 1>put on the fans. But when when? What is everybody

0:40:35.080 --> 0:40:37.240
<v Speaker 1>vuying for here? In terms of what the business model

0:40:37.320 --> 0:40:40.480
<v Speaker 1>can look like? Okay, so I have to pay ten

0:40:40.480 --> 0:40:43.920
<v Speaker 1>dollars for a hot dog, fifteen dollars for a beer,

0:40:43.960 --> 0:40:45.960
<v Speaker 1>and now if I want to watch it, yea for day,

0:40:46.160 --> 0:40:48.640
<v Speaker 1>pay up for that. Okay, But Jerry, who's doing it? Right?

0:40:50.120 --> 0:40:52.120
<v Speaker 1>I think we don't know yet I think this is

0:40:52.160 --> 0:40:55.000
<v Speaker 1>all pretty early. I mean, these local sports channels are

0:40:55.280 --> 0:40:58.040
<v Speaker 1>really way behind in terms of streaming. If you think

0:40:58.040 --> 0:41:00.920
<v Speaker 1>about Netflix, they started streaming two thousand and seven, and

0:41:01.280 --> 0:41:04.439
<v Speaker 1>sixteen years later, Um, you know, the Yes network which

0:41:04.440 --> 0:41:08.480
<v Speaker 1>broadcasts the Yankees, finally introduced the streaming service. You know,

0:41:08.520 --> 0:41:10.319
<v Speaker 1>these are channels that made a ton of money in

0:41:10.360 --> 0:41:14.200
<v Speaker 1>the old cable business model. Um, everybody paid for cable.

0:41:14.280 --> 0:41:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Everybody paid for these channels, even if they never watched

0:41:16.680 --> 0:41:19.520
<v Speaker 1>a game. Um. And now these channels are trying to

0:41:19.640 --> 0:41:23.320
<v Speaker 1>build a business outside that cable model, and they're charging

0:41:23.360 --> 0:41:26.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty or thirty dollars a month in some cases for

0:41:26.440 --> 0:41:30.320
<v Speaker 1>the service. And really, these are channels, these are online

0:41:30.400 --> 0:41:33.239
<v Speaker 1>channels that are meant to protect the old business. Uh,

0:41:33.320 --> 0:41:36.440
<v Speaker 1>they're meant to you know, they're not going to charge

0:41:36.440 --> 0:41:38.200
<v Speaker 1>five or six dollars a month because then they're going

0:41:38.239 --> 0:41:40.840
<v Speaker 1>to upset their distributors, the direct TVs and the copy

0:41:40.960 --> 0:41:43.719
<v Speaker 1>But the fans, it's like, I'm not paying this and

0:41:43.800 --> 0:41:45.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm just not going to watch the game. Are though?

0:41:45.800 --> 0:41:48.319
<v Speaker 1>Oh they are. We think maybe I'm not a very

0:41:48.360 --> 0:41:52.000
<v Speaker 1>good chan Then I think if you're a real sports fan,

0:41:52.080 --> 0:41:54.680
<v Speaker 1>you're you're still subscribing to cable. I mean that the

0:41:54.680 --> 0:41:57.560
<v Speaker 1>people who still have cable, they get it for sports,

0:41:57.680 --> 0:42:00.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe for news. Um, you know. I think this is

0:42:00.960 --> 0:42:04.320
<v Speaker 1>something for the future where these channels think that there's

0:42:04.560 --> 0:42:06.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, core cutters out there that they can bring

0:42:06.800 --> 0:42:09.440
<v Speaker 1>back into the fold. But I think that most of

0:42:09.440 --> 0:42:12.279
<v Speaker 1>the people who want to watch their local sports game

0:42:12.320 --> 0:42:16.000
<v Speaker 1>are probably already subscribing to cable and continuing to do so.

0:42:16.000 --> 0:42:18.960
<v Speaker 1>So the thing with this streaming effort is that it

0:42:19.080 --> 0:42:22.080
<v Speaker 1>actually is like pretty difficult to get the quality right.

0:42:22.120 --> 0:42:24.640
<v Speaker 1>What are some of the customers saying about what the

0:42:24.680 --> 0:42:28.840
<v Speaker 1>experience has been like so far. Yeah, this is it's

0:42:28.840 --> 0:42:33.080
<v Speaker 1>a very different challenge than putting a movie or a

0:42:33.120 --> 0:42:36.920
<v Speaker 1>TV show on a streaming service. Live sports, it's just

0:42:37.120 --> 0:42:40.200
<v Speaker 1>technically more difficult. You see a lot of examples of

0:42:40.600 --> 0:42:43.680
<v Speaker 1>streaming services where it'll be the last couple of minutes

0:42:43.680 --> 0:42:48.359
<v Speaker 1>of a game and it'll buffer, or if you're going

0:42:48.360 --> 0:42:50.360
<v Speaker 1>to do it, do it right then. Yeah. So I

0:42:50.400 --> 0:42:53.480
<v Speaker 1>gotta pay for this and it doesn't work, Yeah, pay

0:42:53.520 --> 0:42:56.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot. Yeah, I mean these are yeah, these are

0:42:56.400 --> 0:42:59.239
<v Speaker 1>cable channels that it's not in their DNA too. They

0:42:59.239 --> 0:43:02.600
<v Speaker 1>don't have technology people in house they have to outsource

0:43:02.680 --> 0:43:05.200
<v Speaker 1>to work on this. They you know, they're not like

0:43:05.280 --> 0:43:08.759
<v Speaker 1>Netflix with an army of engineers who can figure out

0:43:08.760 --> 0:43:10.839
<v Speaker 1>how to make the stream perfect. So yeah, we've seen

0:43:10.880 --> 0:43:14.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of examples. So when I call customer service

0:43:14.360 --> 0:43:16.560
<v Speaker 1>at their channel or whatever, they're going to pick up

0:43:16.560 --> 0:43:19.799
<v Speaker 1>the phone seem sorry, sir, we'll refund you. Or there

0:43:19.840 --> 0:43:23.839
<v Speaker 1>is at outsource that part too, but yeah, yeah, yeah, sorry, Jerry,

0:43:23.880 --> 0:43:27.720
<v Speaker 1>we're having too much fun. No, no, it's I would

0:43:27.719 --> 0:43:29.560
<v Speaker 1>love to hear what happens when you actually call a

0:43:29.600 --> 0:43:32.640
<v Speaker 1>customer service at any of these streaming services. That's assuming

0:43:32.680 --> 0:43:35.640
<v Speaker 1>they have customers. So one of the ones that caught

0:43:35.640 --> 0:43:38.320
<v Speaker 1>my attention was the Diamonds Sports Group, which is actually

0:43:38.320 --> 0:43:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the largest US owner of local sports channel but even

0:43:42.560 --> 0:43:46.640
<v Speaker 1>just this month they filed for bankruptcy. So what happened,

0:43:46.680 --> 0:43:50.320
<v Speaker 1>what happened there, and what's the aftermath going to look? Claim? Yeah,

0:43:50.360 --> 0:43:53.200
<v Speaker 1>so this is um I mean, they are sort of

0:43:53.280 --> 0:43:57.480
<v Speaker 1>unique because this was a four years ago. Their owner

0:43:57.640 --> 0:44:02.000
<v Speaker 1>bought these nineteen sports channels and took on a huge

0:44:02.000 --> 0:44:04.600
<v Speaker 1>amount of debt, over eight billion dollars a debt, and

0:44:04.800 --> 0:44:08.440
<v Speaker 1>did so at probably the worst possible time, Because this

0:44:08.520 --> 0:44:11.840
<v Speaker 1>is when cord cutting was really starting to accelerate. So

0:44:12.120 --> 0:44:14.640
<v Speaker 1>you combine having a huge amount of debts with a

0:44:14.719 --> 0:44:18.480
<v Speaker 1>business that's shrinking pretty quickly, and you know, they filed

0:44:18.480 --> 0:44:21.960
<v Speaker 1>for bankruptcy protection a few weeks ago. And it's a

0:44:22.000 --> 0:44:25.640
<v Speaker 1>really huge story in the sports world because, you know,

0:44:25.960 --> 0:44:30.080
<v Speaker 1>teams and the players are affected by this. The team

0:44:30.200 --> 0:44:33.560
<v Speaker 1>owners get a lot of revenue from these these local

0:44:33.600 --> 0:44:37.120
<v Speaker 1>sports rights and that goes to payroll paying. Yeah, those

0:44:37.239 --> 0:44:39.960
<v Speaker 1>my next question how much of these exorbitant salaries that

0:44:40.000 --> 0:44:43.800
<v Speaker 1>the players get. But how does it fold into the

0:44:43.840 --> 0:44:47.160
<v Speaker 1>mix there? Yeah, I think that's something to watch. Probably

0:44:47.400 --> 0:44:51.440
<v Speaker 1>not something we'll see affecting player salaries tomorrow, but in

0:44:51.480 --> 0:44:53.880
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years. It's these channels and a lot

0:44:53.920 --> 0:44:56.600
<v Speaker 1>of people don't think these teams are ever going to

0:44:56.680 --> 0:44:59.640
<v Speaker 1>get the kind of money from the sports channels that

0:44:59.680 --> 0:45:02.560
<v Speaker 1>they did when the cable business was much healthier. So

0:45:02.640 --> 0:45:05.560
<v Speaker 1>you could see a situation where some of these smaller

0:45:05.600 --> 0:45:08.120
<v Speaker 1>market teams and there's it's really the smaller market teams

0:45:08.120 --> 0:45:11.000
<v Speaker 1>that are getting pinched by this. Um they could um,

0:45:11.160 --> 0:45:13.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, have trouble paying for the best players. And

0:45:13.920 --> 0:45:16.520
<v Speaker 1>then you look at um, you know, major League Baseball

0:45:16.560 --> 0:45:18.399
<v Speaker 1>and the haves and the have not sort of get

0:45:18.400 --> 0:45:21.759
<v Speaker 1>wider and wider apart because of it. So, Jerry, we

0:45:21.800 --> 0:45:24.319
<v Speaker 1>only have about forty seconds left. But where does it

0:45:24.320 --> 0:45:28.840
<v Speaker 1>go from here? Yeah, I mean, I think in the

0:45:28.960 --> 0:45:32.439
<v Speaker 1>streaming services it remains to be seen how many people

0:45:32.440 --> 0:45:36.160
<v Speaker 1>are willing to pay between twenty and thirty dollars a month. Um,

0:45:36.360 --> 0:45:38.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean one of the things to think about is

0:45:38.280 --> 0:45:40.520
<v Speaker 1>how good are the teams on the field. Um. You

0:45:40.560 --> 0:45:44.200
<v Speaker 1>know what, when when your team really stunk, it was

0:45:44.280 --> 0:45:47.560
<v Speaker 1>still very annoying to call your cable company and cancel. Now,

0:45:47.600 --> 0:45:49.719
<v Speaker 1>when the team that you're paying thirty dollars a month

0:45:49.800 --> 0:45:52.480
<v Speaker 1>to stream if they have a bad season, you can

0:45:52.560 --> 0:46:01.239
<v Speaker 1>cancel that streaming service in two seconds. And great Friday story,

0:46:01.239 --> 0:46:03.600
<v Speaker 1>by the way, Bloomberg Business Week editor Joel Webber and

0:46:03.760 --> 0:46:08.319
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News Media reporter Jerry Smith watching your favorite team

0:46:08.560 --> 0:46:12.400
<v Speaker 1>could quest you more than Netflix and our as engineer

0:46:12.520 --> 0:46:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Sebastian reminds me that yes, Yankees, yes network does have

0:46:16.600 --> 0:46:20.240
<v Speaker 1>their own streaming So okay, all right, have to sneak

0:46:20.280 --> 0:46:23.600
<v Speaker 1>that in there you go, you're listening to Bloomberg Radio,

0:46:23.640 --> 0:46:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week. In fact, you're listening to the Bloomberg

0:46:28.400 --> 0:46:32.319
<v Speaker 1>Business Week podcast. Catch us live weekday afternoons from three

0:46:32.320 --> 0:46:35.640
<v Speaker 1>to six Eastern Listen on Bloomberg dot com, the iHeart

0:46:35.760 --> 0:46:38.719
<v Speaker 1>Radio app and the Bloomberg Business App, or watch us

0:46:38.760 --> 0:46:48.200
<v Speaker 1>live on YouTube. I'm Rocael, Oh Journal, how about you

0:46:48.280 --> 0:46:52.960
<v Speaker 1>let me drive? Oh? No, no, no no, no, who's going home? Honey? Please?

0:46:53.040 --> 0:46:56.319
<v Speaker 1>I'll do the bridey Rebels. I don't want to drive.

0:46:56.320 --> 0:47:05.120
<v Speaker 1>It's good question. This is the drive to the globe.

0:47:05.200 --> 0:47:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Just that funkimmu thing. Well, driver up to go down

0:47:08.440 --> 0:47:12.319
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio. All right, this is Jessminton back with

0:47:12.960 --> 0:47:16.239
<v Speaker 1>John Tucker, and I'm excited to speak with our next guest,

0:47:16.320 --> 0:47:19.480
<v Speaker 1>jt So we have David Dietz, who's managing principal and

0:47:19.600 --> 0:47:23.880
<v Speaker 1>senior investment strategist at Pepack Private Wealth Management. He's on

0:47:23.920 --> 0:47:26.640
<v Speaker 1>the phone from Summit, New Jersey, and David, I'm glad

0:47:26.640 --> 0:47:28.920
<v Speaker 1>you're here with us, because, as you know, this is

0:47:29.000 --> 0:47:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the end of what's been a gangbuster first quarter, especially

0:47:32.200 --> 0:47:34.160
<v Speaker 1>when you're looking at the NASTAC one hundred on pace

0:47:34.400 --> 0:47:37.040
<v Speaker 1>for its best quarterly gain since twenty twenty and the

0:47:37.120 --> 0:47:39.880
<v Speaker 1>second best in the past decade. So I want you

0:47:39.960 --> 0:47:42.319
<v Speaker 1>to unpack this for us and wrap it up as

0:47:42.320 --> 0:47:45.400
<v Speaker 1>far as how have you been positioning in the past

0:47:45.440 --> 0:47:49.200
<v Speaker 1>quarter and what have you been potentially buying the dip on. Yeah,

0:47:49.239 --> 0:47:52.319
<v Speaker 1>absolutely pleasure to be with you guys this afternoon. So

0:47:52.440 --> 0:47:56.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Q one basically what was pounded last

0:47:57.000 --> 0:48:00.680
<v Speaker 1>year did spectacularly wellness first quarter. So we know that

0:48:00.800 --> 0:48:05.160
<v Speaker 1>ASDAK was down thirty five percent last year, it's led

0:48:05.200 --> 0:48:08.400
<v Speaker 1>the indexes this year up about twenty percent. As an

0:48:08.520 --> 0:48:10.960
<v Speaker 1>accelerates here at the end of the day, Well, the DAW,

0:48:11.080 --> 0:48:13.319
<v Speaker 1>which is the best of the three indexes last year

0:48:13.400 --> 0:48:15.880
<v Speaker 1>middlely down but down less than ten percent, is the

0:48:15.960 --> 0:48:18.960
<v Speaker 1>lagrin in the group. It may end up perhaps one percent.

0:48:19.440 --> 0:48:22.080
<v Speaker 1>So that's one theme. The other theme, of course, is

0:48:22.080 --> 0:48:25.320
<v Speaker 1>when you start looking at you know what sectors did best,

0:48:25.400 --> 0:48:31.279
<v Speaker 1>it is those NASDAC sectors, the information technology, the communications

0:48:32.560 --> 0:48:35.600
<v Speaker 1>group up you know, about ten percent just this month

0:48:35.600 --> 0:48:40.240
<v Speaker 1>of March, about twenty percent for the year. Those sectors

0:48:40.239 --> 0:48:43.640
<v Speaker 1>were given up for dead and now you know they're

0:48:43.719 --> 0:48:47.000
<v Speaker 1>they're off to the races again. Those sectors that did

0:48:47.040 --> 0:48:50.080
<v Speaker 1>a little bit better last year relative to the overall

0:48:50.160 --> 0:48:54.560
<v Speaker 1>market really didn't do well, and that may be the opportunity.

0:48:54.560 --> 0:48:56.680
<v Speaker 1>We'll see. But you know, the financials are down about

0:48:56.680 --> 0:49:00.279
<v Speaker 1>seven percent, and then you got the energy untill these

0:49:00.360 --> 0:49:04.080
<v Speaker 1>real estate and is surprisingly healthcare also are down negative.

0:49:04.320 --> 0:49:07.759
<v Speaker 1>Right you mention financials, have you been buying the dip

0:49:08.120 --> 0:49:10.440
<v Speaker 1>that we've seen so far the past couple weeks with

0:49:10.520 --> 0:49:14.760
<v Speaker 1>a pullback in bankstocks. So it's a very controversial area.

0:49:14.880 --> 0:49:17.239
<v Speaker 1>We just don't know what people are thinking, you know,

0:49:17.280 --> 0:49:21.279
<v Speaker 1>deposits moving in, deposits moving out. But if I had

0:49:21.320 --> 0:49:24.520
<v Speaker 1>to make one call here, it would be the group

0:49:24.680 --> 0:49:29.080
<v Speaker 1>of regional banks, any one bank. They're very opaque, is

0:49:29.200 --> 0:49:31.640
<v Speaker 1>very hard to figure out how those deposit flows are going.

0:49:31.880 --> 0:49:34.160
<v Speaker 1>But I think one thing that investors need to keep

0:49:34.160 --> 0:49:37.080
<v Speaker 1>in mind, it's not just a financial issue with those

0:49:37.120 --> 0:49:40.880
<v Speaker 1>regional banks. It's a political issue. And here's why. You know,

0:49:41.000 --> 0:49:44.840
<v Speaker 1>you've got politicos and places like South Carolina and Iowa

0:49:44.840 --> 0:49:48.000
<v Speaker 1>and Ohio. The last thing, ultimately, they want to tell

0:49:48.040 --> 0:49:50.600
<v Speaker 1>their up and coming businesses. If you want to loan,

0:49:50.800 --> 0:49:53.279
<v Speaker 1>put your tie on and grovel to the big Wall

0:49:53.280 --> 0:49:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Street banks and hope they hand you some money and

0:49:55.480 --> 0:49:58.319
<v Speaker 1>spend some time with you. That's not going to work politically,

0:49:58.520 --> 0:50:01.400
<v Speaker 1>they want too big to fail in each of their stage, Right,

0:50:01.880 --> 0:50:05.040
<v Speaker 1>So how are you advising clients to position with all

0:50:05.080 --> 0:50:09.040
<v Speaker 1>of that going on? There are no there are no

0:50:09.040 --> 0:50:12.680
<v Speaker 1>no brainers in this business. But certainly one way to

0:50:12.760 --> 0:50:16.720
<v Speaker 1>play it is to get an etf of regional banks

0:50:16.719 --> 0:50:21.680
<v Speaker 1>a package. The idea is this asset class isn't going away.

0:50:22.560 --> 0:50:25.239
<v Speaker 1>Any One bank might have a misstep, You're not quite

0:50:25.239 --> 0:50:27.440
<v Speaker 1>sure what's in their portfolio, but there's a group they

0:50:27.440 --> 0:50:31.480
<v Speaker 1>cannot go away. I'm looking here just the worst twenty

0:50:31.560 --> 0:50:36.160
<v Speaker 1>performers in the SMP five hundred for March. Eighteen of

0:50:36.200 --> 0:50:39.520
<v Speaker 1>them are banks, and all but one are trading now

0:50:39.560 --> 0:50:44.040
<v Speaker 1>at single digit price earnings ratio when that overall mark

0:50:44.080 --> 0:50:46.960
<v Speaker 1>has moved up from seventeen to eighteen. So you know

0:50:47.239 --> 0:50:49.640
<v Speaker 1>will happen in the next couple of weeks? Who knows?

0:50:49.760 --> 0:50:52.720
<v Speaker 1>But you know why wouldn't over the next few years

0:50:53.080 --> 0:50:56.000
<v Speaker 1>they double or triple. I hate to be nervous Nelly here,

0:50:56.239 --> 0:50:59.400
<v Speaker 1>but I will point out some of the major average,

0:50:59.440 --> 0:51:02.560
<v Speaker 1>well particular the SP five hundred, being driven by kind

0:51:02.600 --> 0:51:05.400
<v Speaker 1>of a narrow band of stocks, right, David, Should I

0:51:05.440 --> 0:51:10.839
<v Speaker 1>be nervous? Certainly? I think some of the upside has

0:51:10.920 --> 0:51:15.160
<v Speaker 1>been taken away So, for example, the Information Technology Group

0:51:15.239 --> 0:51:17.800
<v Speaker 1>was trading at a twenty pe at the start of

0:51:17.800 --> 0:51:20.839
<v Speaker 1>the quarter. Now it's done so well that price ranst

0:51:20.920 --> 0:51:24.440
<v Speaker 1>rations at twenty four. Now could it go higher? Sure,

0:51:24.480 --> 0:51:26.680
<v Speaker 1>at the start of last year it was twenty eight.

0:51:26.960 --> 0:51:29.239
<v Speaker 1>But here's the problem for the bulls and that in

0:51:29.280 --> 0:51:31.719
<v Speaker 1>that type of a bet. Last year, the two year

0:51:31.800 --> 0:51:34.799
<v Speaker 1>treasury in the beginning of the year was just three

0:51:34.880 --> 0:51:39.040
<v Speaker 1>quarters of one percent. Today is over four percent, almost

0:51:39.040 --> 0:51:41.400
<v Speaker 1>seven times more. And the fact of the matter is

0:51:41.600 --> 0:51:45.239
<v Speaker 1>you have to moderate your pees once the competing investments

0:51:45.360 --> 0:51:48.600
<v Speaker 1>like bonds, interest rates keep going up. So I don't

0:51:48.600 --> 0:51:50.040
<v Speaker 1>think it's going to go up to twenty eight. So

0:51:50.080 --> 0:51:52.520
<v Speaker 1>I think it's brought forward some of the games for

0:51:52.560 --> 0:51:55.319
<v Speaker 1>the year. And heck, if you could close the year

0:51:55.360 --> 0:51:58.200
<v Speaker 1>at fifteen percent sixty percent of NAZAC, why wouldn't you

0:51:58.239 --> 0:52:01.160
<v Speaker 1>do that? So I probably would be taking some profits

0:52:01.200 --> 0:52:05.040
<v Speaker 1>from that area and rotating into the healthcare, real estate,

0:52:05.160 --> 0:52:08.040
<v Speaker 1>financial services area. Okay, Now, how much of the rise

0:52:08.120 --> 0:52:11.080
<v Speaker 1>do you suppose is predicated on the idea that we're

0:52:11.120 --> 0:52:12.960
<v Speaker 1>going to see cuts later this year from the FED

0:52:14.760 --> 0:52:19.040
<v Speaker 1>A lot. You know, it all starts with inflation, and

0:52:19.360 --> 0:52:21.920
<v Speaker 1>although part of the reason February were so bad, as

0:52:21.920 --> 0:52:24.279
<v Speaker 1>we got a very hot number for January. We just

0:52:24.320 --> 0:52:30.239
<v Speaker 1>saw this morning a softer than expected PC deflator inflation number,

0:52:30.239 --> 0:52:33.600
<v Speaker 1>which apparently is the one that defed prefers. So we

0:52:33.640 --> 0:52:38.080
<v Speaker 1>are gradually seeing a rolling over in Inflation certainly is

0:52:38.200 --> 0:52:40.720
<v Speaker 1>much less hot than it was for example last summer.

0:52:41.080 --> 0:52:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Is not going to go in any one direction in

0:52:42.880 --> 0:52:45.279
<v Speaker 1>a straight line, but it seems to be receiving and

0:52:45.400 --> 0:52:50.200
<v Speaker 1>that makes interesting commodities down. Obviously, with the higher interest rates,

0:52:50.560 --> 0:52:53.200
<v Speaker 1>real estate is under pressure, auto sales are under pressure,

0:52:53.239 --> 0:52:56.560
<v Speaker 1>so the economy is cooling. That will allow interest rates

0:52:56.600 --> 0:52:58.440
<v Speaker 1>to come back down. I mean, at one point the

0:52:58.480 --> 0:53:01.800
<v Speaker 1>two year was over five, now just over four. That helps,

0:53:01.960 --> 0:53:06.040
<v Speaker 1>and ultimately, you know, the markets dictate to the Fed

0:53:06.080 --> 0:53:08.399
<v Speaker 1>what they're going to do. Ultimately, it's not the Fed

0:53:08.440 --> 0:53:11.200
<v Speaker 1>to tell the markets's what's going to happen. And I

0:53:11.200 --> 0:53:13.560
<v Speaker 1>think ultimately, and we're seeing some signs in the last

0:53:13.560 --> 0:53:15.600
<v Speaker 1>pressure that to maybe only be one more rate hike,

0:53:15.880 --> 0:53:18.080
<v Speaker 1>the Fed will be less of a headwind than it

0:53:18.160 --> 0:53:21.399
<v Speaker 1>was last year. And that's great. David, What about tech

0:53:21.520 --> 0:53:23.919
<v Speaker 1>stocks that have been on such a tear this year?

0:53:24.040 --> 0:53:26.200
<v Speaker 1>How are you positioning in that corner of the market.

0:53:26.800 --> 0:53:29.279
<v Speaker 1>So you know, I think you want to be a

0:53:29.320 --> 0:53:33.920
<v Speaker 1>little bit more selective because those valuations have been have

0:53:34.120 --> 0:53:37.919
<v Speaker 1>moved up. But but some may offer still some good opportunities.

0:53:37.920 --> 0:53:41.719
<v Speaker 1>So for example, Meta was one of the meta platforms,

0:53:42.040 --> 0:53:45.000
<v Speaker 1>was one of the best performers, up about seventy percent

0:53:45.200 --> 0:53:47.839
<v Speaker 1>in the first quarter, but it's price to earnings face

0:53:47.880 --> 0:53:51.719
<v Speaker 1>show is still under twenty. And of course, you know

0:53:51.960 --> 0:53:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Zuckerberg's on a tear. This is the years of efficiency,

0:53:54.719 --> 0:53:58.360
<v Speaker 1>so he's cutting out all sorts of excess costs, reducing

0:53:58.719 --> 0:54:02.319
<v Speaker 1>Catholic expenditures into met A, moving into AI, and of

0:54:02.360 --> 0:54:05.720
<v Speaker 1>course it's a unique property which billions of people tuning

0:54:05.760 --> 0:54:09.640
<v Speaker 1>into their social media platforms every day. And if the

0:54:09.680 --> 0:54:13.200
<v Speaker 1>economy doesn't go into a hard recession, that social media

0:54:13.239 --> 0:54:15.560
<v Speaker 1>advertising is going to pick up. That may be something

0:54:15.560 --> 0:54:17.680
<v Speaker 1>that you want to continue to play, even though it's

0:54:17.680 --> 0:54:20.520
<v Speaker 1>done so well so far this year. David from the

0:54:20.560 --> 0:54:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Great State of New Jersey? How your property taxes? David?

0:54:26.480 --> 0:54:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Oh source subject. You know, I love New Jersey because

0:54:31.560 --> 0:54:34.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm so close to the arching you guys, I should

0:54:34.800 --> 0:54:37.240
<v Speaker 1>point well, I'm done at the shore. So um. Anyway,

0:54:37.360 --> 0:54:40.399
<v Speaker 1>Consumer discretionary stuts. I should point out just I don't

0:54:40.400 --> 0:54:45.000
<v Speaker 1>have any discretion anymore when it comes to dim so anyway,

0:54:45.000 --> 0:54:50.320
<v Speaker 1>that's the best performance. David Dates were managing principal and

0:54:50.480 --> 0:54:55.600
<v Speaker 1>senior investment Strategies at Private Wealth Managements on the phone

0:54:55.640 --> 0:54:59.880
<v Speaker 1>from Son of New Jerseys. These is the Bloombird Business

0:55:00.040 --> 0:55:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Week podcast, available on Apple, Spotify, and anywhere else you

0:55:04.080 --> 0:55:08.040
<v Speaker 1>get your podcasts. Listen live weekday afternoons from three to

0:55:08.120 --> 0:55:12.239
<v Speaker 1>six Easterning on Bloomberg dot Com, the iHeartRadio app, tune In,

0:55:12.320 --> 0:55:14.920
<v Speaker 1>and the Bloomberg Business App. You can also watch us

0:55:14.960 --> 0:55:18.560
<v Speaker 1>live every weekday on YouTube and always on the Bloomberg

0:55:18.600 --> 0:55:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Journal