WEBVTT - Elon Fights for His Pay Package… and With Altman... And Cook

0:00:03.120 --> 0:00:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:14.240 --> 0:00:17.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, Elon Musk gives now the richest person on the planet.

0:00:17.480 --> 0:00:20.319
<v Speaker 1>More than half the satellites in space are owned and

0:00:20.440 --> 0:00:22.160
<v Speaker 1>controlled by one man.

0:00:22.760 --> 0:00:25.759
<v Speaker 3>Well, he's a legitimate, super genius, legitimate.

0:00:25.960 --> 0:00:28.600
<v Speaker 4>He says, He's always voted for Democrats, but this year

0:00:28.640 --> 0:00:29.400
<v Speaker 4>it will be different.

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:30.400
<v Speaker 5>He'll vote Republican.

0:00:30.680 --> 0:00:33.159
<v Speaker 3>There is a reason the US government is so reliant

0:00:33.159 --> 0:00:35.720
<v Speaker 3>on him. Alon Musk is a scam artist and he's

0:00:35.760 --> 0:00:36.440
<v Speaker 3>done nothing.

0:00:38.000 --> 0:00:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Anything he does, he's fascinating the people.

0:00:50.680 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 4>Welcome to elan Ink, Bloomberg's weekly podcast about Elon Musk.

0:00:54.440 --> 0:01:00.480
<v Speaker 4>It's Tuesday, June eleventh. I'm your host, David Popodopolis. We

0:01:00.520 --> 0:01:05.840
<v Speaker 4>are talking Tesla, specifically about the upcoming shareholder meeting to determine,

0:01:06.000 --> 0:01:10.560
<v Speaker 4>among other things, Elon Musk's pay package. It's a controversial

0:01:10.600 --> 0:01:13.920
<v Speaker 4>topic as a Delaware judge throughout his previous fifty six

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:18.640
<v Speaker 4>billion dollar compensation, and there are people campaigning loudly on

0:01:18.680 --> 0:01:21.080
<v Speaker 4>both sides. We're gonna hear from some of them and

0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:26.360
<v Speaker 4>also consider the current comatose state of Tesla stock. Ultimately,

0:01:26.520 --> 0:01:29.679
<v Speaker 4>the question is how much does this vote matter?

0:01:30.440 --> 0:01:30.880
<v Speaker 3>A lot?

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:34.200
<v Speaker 4>It turns out to Elon, but probably much less to

0:01:34.240 --> 0:01:37.679
<v Speaker 4>the woman who holds his fate in her hands. Lastly,

0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:41.880
<v Speaker 4>we'll dissect a sudden and explosive feud with not one,

0:01:42.120 --> 0:01:47.319
<v Speaker 4>but two two of Elon's rivals talk about all these things.

0:01:47.360 --> 0:01:50.720
<v Speaker 4>We are joined by our all star panel, Max Chafkin,

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:54.800
<v Speaker 4>senior writer at Bloomberg Business Week, Colomax Hey, David Hey,

0:01:55.440 --> 0:02:00.200
<v Speaker 4>and Dana hall our Ace Elon Musk reporter Dana Welcome Hey.

0:02:00.720 --> 0:02:03.320
<v Speaker 4>Later on, Esha Day, a senior reporter with the Market's

0:02:03.320 --> 0:02:06.040
<v Speaker 4>team who focuses on evs, will join us to talk

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:11.360
<v Speaker 4>Tesla stock. But Dana, let's jump right into it. The

0:02:12.200 --> 0:02:16.520
<v Speaker 4>vote on Elon's pay package, among other votes, will happen

0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:19.880
<v Speaker 4>on Thursday, But just remind us of what happened back

0:02:19.880 --> 0:02:22.800
<v Speaker 4>in the courtroom in January and what's occurred in the

0:02:22.840 --> 0:02:23.400
<v Speaker 4>month since.

0:02:24.320 --> 0:02:26.000
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, So, to back up for a little bit, in

0:02:26.080 --> 0:02:31.680
<v Speaker 6>twenty eighteen, shareholders overwhelmingly approve this kind of crazy like

0:02:31.880 --> 0:02:36.440
<v Speaker 6>staggering moonshot pay package that was supposed to incentivize Elon

0:02:36.520 --> 0:02:39.920
<v Speaker 6>Musk to stay focused on Tesla. At the time, everybody

0:02:39.960 --> 0:02:41.720
<v Speaker 6>thought it was crazy, but he hit all of the

0:02:41.720 --> 0:02:44.320
<v Speaker 6>milestones and became the richest man in the world. In

0:02:44.360 --> 0:02:48.800
<v Speaker 6>the process. The problem is that Tesla's board is filled

0:02:48.800 --> 0:02:52.480
<v Speaker 6>with his people, like his brother Kimball and his friends

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:54.880
<v Speaker 6>and in you know, many critics would say that it's

0:02:54.880 --> 0:02:59.399
<v Speaker 6>a captive board, and a shareholder sued over these issues,

0:02:59.560 --> 0:03:02.720
<v Speaker 6>and litigation went on for years. I flew to Delaware

0:03:02.760 --> 0:03:06.519
<v Speaker 6>to watch Elon Musk and former board member Antonio Gracias

0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:10.240
<v Speaker 6>testify in court, and then in January, the judge in

0:03:10.320 --> 0:03:13.720
<v Speaker 6>Delaware basically came out and sided with the shareholder and said,

0:03:13.800 --> 0:03:16.520
<v Speaker 6>you know, this board is like captive and rife with

0:03:16.600 --> 0:03:19.920
<v Speaker 6>conflicts of interest, and the board really didn't negotiate this

0:03:19.960 --> 0:03:23.880
<v Speaker 6>pay package and this is hugely problematic. So she voided

0:03:23.919 --> 0:03:28.600
<v Speaker 6>the deal. Elon got furious and now to sort of

0:03:28.639 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 6>remedy all of the faults that she found with the

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:35.080
<v Speaker 6>twenty eighteen package. Tesla is doing this kind of weird,

0:03:35.880 --> 0:03:39.560
<v Speaker 6>risky novel legal strategy where they're bringing the same package

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 6>before shareholders again six years later, in the hopes that

0:03:43.560 --> 0:03:46.480
<v Speaker 6>like having a revote, will somehow convince the Delaware court

0:03:46.520 --> 0:03:49.839
<v Speaker 6>system that everything is now fine okay.

0:03:49.600 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 4>And that's where we stand out now, Max and Dee,

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:54.320
<v Speaker 4>this is a pretty unusual pay package. I feel like

0:03:54.360 --> 0:03:56.880
<v Speaker 4>when you talk about CEOs of big companies here in

0:03:56.920 --> 0:04:00.240
<v Speaker 4>the US, you talk about millions with an M, I

0:04:00.240 --> 0:04:04.120
<v Speaker 4>mean billions with the bee as part of you know,

0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:08.080
<v Speaker 4>bonus included and all that is is almost unheard of.

0:04:08.240 --> 0:04:10.840
<v Speaker 2>Right when you see big numbers like this in the billions,

0:04:10.880 --> 0:04:13.680
<v Speaker 2>it's almost always like a huge amount of stock, which

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:14.760
<v Speaker 2>is which is what this was.

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:16.440
<v Speaker 3>This was not a cash compensation.

0:04:16.520 --> 0:04:18.840
<v Speaker 2>This was the board giving him a huge number of

0:04:19.120 --> 0:04:22.640
<v Speaker 2>stock options, which is kind of normal in the world

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:25.960
<v Speaker 2>of startups, you know, much smaller companies, but is and

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:28.919
<v Speaker 2>even the kind of structure of this and the upside

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:30.400
<v Speaker 2>and all that, it would be kind of normal if

0:04:30.440 --> 0:04:33.239
<v Speaker 2>this were a much much smaller company with a few

0:04:33.480 --> 0:04:34.799
<v Speaker 2>venture capital investors.

0:04:35.000 --> 0:04:36.120
<v Speaker 3>Very unusual in this case.

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:38.680
<v Speaker 2>Of course, Elon has always kind of wanted to run

0:04:38.720 --> 0:04:42.839
<v Speaker 2>Tesla as his as if he were running a private company,

0:04:43.080 --> 0:04:46.080
<v Speaker 2>which you know, creates it creates certain opportunities.

0:04:46.080 --> 0:04:49.080
<v Speaker 4>I mean, he's even said he's flirted recently with the

0:04:49.120 --> 0:04:51.520
<v Speaker 4>idea of taking Keesla private again, right right.

0:04:51.440 --> 0:04:53.159
<v Speaker 2>And he of course we all know he did the

0:04:53.160 --> 0:04:56.880
<v Speaker 2>funding secured thing. He's he's done this multiple times. I mean,

0:04:56.880 --> 0:04:59.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, it has it creates certain things that I

0:04:59.680 --> 0:05:02.960
<v Speaker 2>think work really well for Tesla, and we're but we're

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:06.839
<v Speaker 2>running into a situation where, yeah, it seems like maybe

0:05:06.880 --> 0:05:10.480
<v Speaker 2>there's some fundamental problems with how Elon thinks of himself

0:05:10.520 --> 0:05:12.640
<v Speaker 2>and his role within the company, you know, vis a

0:05:12.720 --> 0:05:16.880
<v Speaker 2>vis the American legal system in the Delaware courts and

0:05:16.880 --> 0:05:17.200
<v Speaker 2>so on.

0:05:17.360 --> 0:05:19.799
<v Speaker 4>All Right, so I want to listen for a second

0:05:19.880 --> 0:05:23.320
<v Speaker 4>to the yes case and the no case, i e.

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:27.520
<v Speaker 4>Those who are arguing that yes, we the shareholders of

0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:32.440
<v Speaker 4>Tesla should give Elon his pay package, or no we shouldn't.

0:05:32.560 --> 0:05:34.720
<v Speaker 4>We're going to listen to the yes case first, as

0:05:34.760 --> 0:05:37.640
<v Speaker 4>expressed by Ron Baron, who's a big Tesla shareholder, and

0:05:37.680 --> 0:05:40.200
<v Speaker 4>he said this on CNBC the other.

0:05:40.120 --> 0:05:42.599
<v Speaker 7>Day, I think in the next ten years we'll probably

0:05:42.680 --> 0:05:45.760
<v Speaker 7>make four or five times our money again in Tesla.

0:05:45.880 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 7>So so he's created tremendous wealth for people, and he

0:05:49.120 --> 0:05:52.160
<v Speaker 7>was paid. If his contract is enforced, which I think

0:05:52.200 --> 0:05:55.440
<v Speaker 7>it should be, he's paid fifty six billion dollars. So

0:05:55.440 --> 0:05:57.680
<v Speaker 7>it's like winning the lottery. You know, if you and

0:05:57.880 --> 0:05:59.400
<v Speaker 7>Joe was talking about it before he win the lottery,

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:01.680
<v Speaker 7>you don't tell someone I'm sorry you won so much money.

0:06:01.680 --> 0:06:02.240
<v Speaker 7>You have to give it.

0:06:02.440 --> 0:06:04.240
<v Speaker 3>I remember think that's the yes case.

0:06:04.720 --> 0:06:08.760
<v Speaker 4>The no case we get from Earl Fronk puppy banning.

0:06:09.120 --> 0:06:09.600
<v Speaker 7>I think the.

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:13.480
<v Speaker 5>Court rightfully pointed out some significant problems with the initial

0:06:13.520 --> 0:06:19.920
<v Speaker 5>disclosure of the compackage. Also, the court ruling has pointed

0:06:19.960 --> 0:06:23.640
<v Speaker 5>out obvious problems with the general governance of Tesla, which

0:06:23.640 --> 0:06:29.200
<v Speaker 5>would become so profound over time as you watch elon

0:06:29.360 --> 0:06:33.200
<v Speaker 5>by a social media company and tarnish the brand and

0:06:33.440 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 5>seem to be a part time CEO. This no vote

0:06:37.480 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 5>is an opportunity for shareholders to speak up about these

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:45.280
<v Speaker 5>issues and hopefully bring some rational governance back to Tesla.

0:06:45.400 --> 0:06:48.720
<v Speaker 4>Thank you now, Dan, What's up with this frunk puppy name?

0:06:49.000 --> 0:06:49.120
<v Speaker 3>So.

0:06:49.279 --> 0:06:51.960
<v Speaker 6>Earl is a fascinating guy. I've known him for a

0:06:52.000 --> 0:06:55.320
<v Speaker 6>long time. He is a big Tesla fan, and he's

0:06:55.400 --> 0:06:58.600
<v Speaker 6>very active on x for really known as Twitter, and

0:06:59.000 --> 0:07:01.840
<v Speaker 6>he's very funny. He's got a great meme game. He's

0:07:01.920 --> 0:07:04.880
<v Speaker 6>been like one of these longtime retail shareholders who is

0:07:05.000 --> 0:07:08.360
<v Speaker 6>very active in the in the Tesla community as it is,

0:07:08.760 --> 0:07:12.040
<v Speaker 6>and the fact that Earl is voting no is significant

0:07:12.080 --> 0:07:16.320
<v Speaker 6>because Tesla has been actively courting retail investors that the

0:07:16.400 --> 0:07:19.200
<v Speaker 6>dynamic here of the before the vote on Thursday is

0:07:19.240 --> 0:07:23.800
<v Speaker 6>that large institutional investors, including mostly pension funds, as well

0:07:23.840 --> 0:07:27.040
<v Speaker 6>as proxy advisors Iss and Glass Lewis, are very much

0:07:27.040 --> 0:07:29.760
<v Speaker 6>against the ratification of the pay package. They're very worried

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:34.400
<v Speaker 6>about further dilution, and so Tesla is actively courting its

0:07:34.440 --> 0:07:37.880
<v Speaker 6>you know, loyal retail base to vote yes, and Earl

0:07:38.360 --> 0:07:40.040
<v Speaker 6>is kind of like a prime example of one of

0:07:40.040 --> 0:07:43.320
<v Speaker 6>the retail shareholders who is very vocally voting no.

0:07:44.120 --> 0:07:47.520
<v Speaker 4>Right, And so the fronk puppy isn't happy. So but

0:07:47.560 --> 0:07:50.600
<v Speaker 4>that gets at something that I really want to lean

0:07:50.640 --> 0:07:52.880
<v Speaker 4>into for a second here. So we know, Dana that

0:07:52.960 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 4>last time back in eighteen, the vote was pretty much

0:07:56.520 --> 0:08:00.200
<v Speaker 4>a landslide for Elon right the board.

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 6>Seventy three percent of the vote's cast were for Elon.

0:08:05.800 --> 0:08:09.800
<v Speaker 6>And at the time, you know, Tesla's investor relations department

0:08:09.880 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 6>did a real vigorous job of kind of selling this

0:08:13.640 --> 0:08:17.720
<v Speaker 6>this you know, unprecedented compensation plan to its largest investors.

0:08:17.760 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 6>But a lot has changed since twenty eighteen. Tesla is

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:22.720
<v Speaker 6>now in the S and P five hundred, which means

0:08:22.720 --> 0:08:26.320
<v Speaker 6>that there's more index funds and more passive investing Elon

0:08:26.520 --> 0:08:29.840
<v Speaker 6>bought x or, bought Twitter and renamed it x Elon

0:08:29.960 --> 0:08:33.240
<v Speaker 6>started another company. The stock is tanking, so like it

0:08:33.280 --> 0:08:36.160
<v Speaker 6>is a very different dynamic. The shareholder base has shifted,

0:08:36.760 --> 0:08:39.600
<v Speaker 6>just the whole perception of Elon as a CEO has shifted.

0:08:40.080 --> 0:08:43.080
<v Speaker 6>And to me, what's very funny is that the whole

0:08:43.080 --> 0:08:45.360
<v Speaker 6>point of the twenty eighteen package was to keep Elon

0:08:45.480 --> 0:08:48.520
<v Speaker 6>focused on Tesla. You could argue that that has not worked.

0:08:48.679 --> 0:08:50.640
<v Speaker 4>I would say yeah, I would say not. I think

0:08:50.679 --> 0:08:53.800
<v Speaker 4>he probably founded like three additional companies in the time

0:08:53.840 --> 0:08:55.760
<v Speaker 4>since I mean obviously the stock for the most part

0:08:55.800 --> 0:08:57.280
<v Speaker 4>did quite well until it didn't.

0:08:57.280 --> 0:09:01.280
<v Speaker 3>But just imagine how many companies he would he had.

0:09:01.679 --> 0:09:05.280
<v Speaker 4>You'd have seventy companies right now. Had not give him

0:09:05.280 --> 0:09:05.559
<v Speaker 4>that much.

0:09:05.559 --> 0:09:08.520
<v Speaker 2>You know, the pitch back then, even if you were

0:09:08.520 --> 0:09:10.880
<v Speaker 2>a skeptic, I think was a little if, even if

0:09:10.880 --> 0:09:13.360
<v Speaker 2>you were thinking the way Frank Puppy is thinking, was

0:09:13.360 --> 0:09:15.839
<v Speaker 2>a little easier to swallow because it was sort of like, yes,

0:09:16.200 --> 0:09:18.760
<v Speaker 2>this is an insane amount of money, but he only

0:09:18.800 --> 0:09:21.920
<v Speaker 2>gets it if our market cap goes up like tenfold,

0:09:22.040 --> 0:09:24.240
<v Speaker 2>So like, you know, it's it's sort of like a

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:26.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, win win. What's what's difficult here is it's

0:09:26.920 --> 0:09:29.760
<v Speaker 2>now backward looking. I mean, the market cap is what

0:09:29.800 --> 0:09:32.319
<v Speaker 2>it is, it's actually slightly it's fallen a little bit,

0:09:32.520 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, of course over the last you know, year

0:09:35.640 --> 0:09:38.640
<v Speaker 2>or so. But it's but but the thing is, it's

0:09:38.679 --> 0:09:41.160
<v Speaker 2>sort of like Tesla's in the position of saying, well,

0:09:41.280 --> 0:09:44.320
<v Speaker 2>we have to honor the deal, and you know, and

0:09:44.360 --> 0:09:48.600
<v Speaker 2>some Tesla shareholders, I think understandably, especially given how much

0:09:48.600 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 2>how Elon Musk is behaving, especially given all the sort

0:09:52.480 --> 0:09:55.360
<v Speaker 2>of big questions about his focus, are sort of I

0:09:55.360 --> 0:09:57.920
<v Speaker 2>think thinking it'd be nice to get out of it, right.

0:09:57.960 --> 0:10:00.320
<v Speaker 4>I mean, the thing at the time and a teen

0:10:00.600 --> 0:10:04.560
<v Speaker 4>was I'm handing you these options to get you to

0:10:04.679 --> 0:10:07.640
<v Speaker 4>focus and drive the company forward and turn it into

0:10:07.760 --> 0:10:13.280
<v Speaker 4>this enormously valuable company, which he did once that struck down, Okay,

0:10:13.320 --> 0:10:16.360
<v Speaker 4>and now he doesn't have it. Well the sort of

0:10:16.400 --> 0:10:18.160
<v Speaker 4>the max to your point, right, the value now is

0:10:18.200 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 4>the value? Why do I I don't know, if I'm

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:21.480
<v Speaker 4>a shareholder, why do I need to give you that

0:10:21.600 --> 0:10:22.920
<v Speaker 4>money for past performance?

0:10:23.040 --> 0:10:23.199
<v Speaker 5>Right?

0:10:23.320 --> 0:10:25.280
<v Speaker 6>I think the idea is that, like the guy does

0:10:25.400 --> 0:10:27.240
<v Speaker 6>need to get paid. I mean, at some point they're

0:10:27.280 --> 0:10:29.320
<v Speaker 6>going to have to figure out how to compensate him

0:10:29.440 --> 0:10:32.040
<v Speaker 6>for his work over the past six years. And that's

0:10:32.080 --> 0:10:34.959
<v Speaker 6>certainly the argument that like Robin Denholm, the chair of

0:10:35.000 --> 0:10:36.959
<v Speaker 6>the Tessel board, and all of the bulls are making

0:10:37.000 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 6>like a deal is a deal, like pay the man

0:10:39.320 --> 0:10:42.160
<v Speaker 6>like he does need to be compensated in some way.

0:10:43.000 --> 0:10:46.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Dan, Actually we have a clip of Robin pitching

0:10:47.360 --> 0:10:49.200
<v Speaker 4>the yes vote, and here it is.

0:10:49.320 --> 0:10:52.760
<v Speaker 8>The Tesler of today is utterly transformed from the Tesler

0:10:52.840 --> 0:10:56.400
<v Speaker 8>it was in twenty eighteen. Thanks in large part to

0:10:56.480 --> 0:11:00.800
<v Speaker 8>Elon's leadyship and vision, we are on the of our

0:11:00.880 --> 0:11:04.679
<v Speaker 8>next great growth waves. You have seen for yourself what

0:11:04.880 --> 0:11:09.560
<v Speaker 8>five years under the leadership of an incentivized Elon can,

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:13.840
<v Speaker 8>due to the value of your investment, protect that same

0:11:14.000 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 8>value creation potential for the future.

0:11:17.559 --> 0:11:19.440
<v Speaker 4>Man, that's a very good accent. It almost makes me

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:22.880
<v Speaker 4>want to vote yes myself. But I wonder, Dana, if

0:11:23.000 --> 0:11:26.240
<v Speaker 4>Elon or perhaps Robin would probably say, hey, no, nobody

0:11:26.240 --> 0:11:29.040
<v Speaker 4>put me up to this. But it seems like internally

0:11:29.080 --> 0:11:32.479
<v Speaker 4>within the company there are a lot of Tesla employees,

0:11:32.760 --> 0:11:35.920
<v Speaker 4>high ranking employees, getting out pushing the yes case. Perhaps

0:11:35.920 --> 0:11:38.200
<v Speaker 4>speaks to a bit of the sense of urgency inside

0:11:38.360 --> 0:11:40.560
<v Speaker 4>team Elon, Oh for sure.

0:11:40.600 --> 0:11:42.679
<v Speaker 6>I mean they have a sense of the vote count, right,

0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:46.120
<v Speaker 6>and they know what percentage of retail investors have voted,

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:49.120
<v Speaker 6>and they are actively talking to their largest holders and

0:11:49.160 --> 0:11:50.679
<v Speaker 6>they know where they stand. I mean, just over the

0:11:50.720 --> 0:11:54.120
<v Speaker 6>weekend we saw Norway's Sovereign Wealth Fund, which is a

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:56.480
<v Speaker 6>top ten holder, come out and say that they're are no.

0:11:56.679 --> 0:11:58.079
<v Speaker 6>I mean, the way to think about this is, this

0:11:58.120 --> 0:12:02.000
<v Speaker 6>is a political campaign. Is the candidate, his pay package,

0:12:02.240 --> 0:12:06.280
<v Speaker 6>is the platform, and you've got surrogates from the board,

0:12:06.520 --> 0:12:10.599
<v Speaker 6>Ron Barron, Kathy Wood like coming out on CNBC and elsewhere,

0:12:10.640 --> 0:12:13.160
<v Speaker 6>like talking about the s case. So it's like this

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:15.120
<v Speaker 6>is a campaign with like a lot of surrogates. But

0:12:15.800 --> 0:12:18.560
<v Speaker 6>they wouldn't be running such a hard campaign if they

0:12:18.600 --> 0:12:20.480
<v Speaker 6>had the votes. Like, this is going to be a

0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:25.120
<v Speaker 6>very close vote, and I personally think that it will pass,

0:12:25.280 --> 0:12:27.480
<v Speaker 6>but it's not going to pass by the margin that

0:12:27.520 --> 0:12:30.520
<v Speaker 6>it did in twenty eighteen because it's just a very

0:12:30.520 --> 0:12:31.560
<v Speaker 6>different company.

0:12:31.240 --> 0:12:33.839
<v Speaker 4>Now, it's a different Yeah, it's a different company in

0:12:33.880 --> 0:12:34.400
<v Speaker 4>a different time.

0:12:39.000 --> 0:12:39.600
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Max.

0:12:39.640 --> 0:12:42.840
<v Speaker 4>Now, even if the vote is yes in the end,

0:12:42.960 --> 0:12:45.800
<v Speaker 4>which as Dana is telling us, is the base case here,

0:12:46.280 --> 0:12:50.920
<v Speaker 4>does it actually even matter is it binding here? I mean,

0:12:51.040 --> 0:12:53.520
<v Speaker 4>the reality is the judge doesn't have to take this

0:12:53.600 --> 0:12:55.240
<v Speaker 4>vote into account if she doesn't want to.

0:12:55.360 --> 0:12:56.040
<v Speaker 3>No.

0:12:56.040 --> 0:12:58.679
<v Speaker 2>No, Dana is comparing to a political campaign, which I

0:12:58.679 --> 0:13:02.800
<v Speaker 2>think is right in this that like perceptions and spin

0:13:02.880 --> 0:13:05.479
<v Speaker 2>are going to be really important in kind of evaluating

0:13:05.559 --> 0:13:07.839
<v Speaker 2>the result of this thing. But it's more like it's

0:13:07.880 --> 0:13:11.000
<v Speaker 2>not like a presidential general election. It's more like a

0:13:11.000 --> 0:13:13.920
<v Speaker 2>primary in a state that doesn't really matter on its own.

0:13:14.000 --> 0:13:15.960
<v Speaker 3>Like think like the Iowa.

0:13:15.600 --> 0:13:19.280
<v Speaker 2>Caucus, right, the Iowa Caucus doesn't decide the IO any Yeah, exactly,

0:13:19.280 --> 0:13:21.360
<v Speaker 2>but it isn't It isn't binding in the sense that

0:13:21.400 --> 0:13:23.520
<v Speaker 2>it's not going to decide the election, but it is

0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:27.160
<v Speaker 2>gonna shape what happens next. And I do think here,

0:13:28.440 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 2>if it passes, it seems like the path is pretty clear. Right,

0:13:32.200 --> 0:13:35.320
<v Speaker 2>They're going to appeel the Delaware Court decision. They're going

0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:37.840
<v Speaker 2>to say, look like, we disclosed all this stuff to

0:13:37.880 --> 0:13:38.480
<v Speaker 2>our shareholders.

0:13:38.480 --> 0:13:39.240
<v Speaker 3>They're still for.

0:13:39.200 --> 0:13:40.080
<v Speaker 4>It, dear Judge.

0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:43.880
<v Speaker 2>Mind now, But if it fails, or if it passes

0:13:44.120 --> 0:13:46.920
<v Speaker 2>very narrowly, I think it's pretty bad. And it's and

0:13:47.000 --> 0:13:50.199
<v Speaker 2>I think it's especially bad if it fails because then

0:13:50.440 --> 0:13:52.800
<v Speaker 2>all of a sudden like I don't know, like they're

0:13:52.880 --> 0:13:55.440
<v Speaker 2>legal strategies out the window. They're gonna be They're gonna

0:13:55.440 --> 0:13:57.160
<v Speaker 2>be kind of back where they started, and I think

0:13:57.160 --> 0:14:00.160
<v Speaker 2>they're gonna have to start to think about renegotiating and

0:14:00.520 --> 0:14:02.559
<v Speaker 2>pay at a lower level, which is gonna send Elon.

0:14:02.760 --> 0:14:05.960
<v Speaker 4>It's gonna send him ballistic. I mean I would think

0:14:06.000 --> 0:14:08.800
<v Speaker 4>that to a certain degree. If it is a no vote,

0:14:09.080 --> 0:14:12.679
<v Speaker 4>given Elon has publicly threatened to take his toys and

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:17.440
<v Speaker 4>leave Tesla, it would essentially be the shareholders calling his bluff,

0:14:17.800 --> 0:14:22.040
<v Speaker 4>like dude, go, there's the door, and then the question is,

0:14:22.280 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 4>Dana does he go?

0:14:24.560 --> 0:14:26.680
<v Speaker 6>I think it depends on how much of a narcissistic

0:14:26.800 --> 0:14:29.480
<v Speaker 6>injury a no vote would be to him. Because he

0:14:29.600 --> 0:14:32.920
<v Speaker 6>is still like the largest shareholder in the company. He's

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:36.920
<v Speaker 6>got thirteen percent. It is hard to imagine him being

0:14:37.000 --> 0:14:41.800
<v Speaker 6>so upset that he would just quit. But he's an unpredictable,

0:14:42.160 --> 0:14:46.520
<v Speaker 6>very emotional person, and you have to kind of wargame

0:14:46.560 --> 0:14:49.720
<v Speaker 6>for every scenario. It's just funny, like an autopileo engineer

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:52.400
<v Speaker 6>will like be on X saying, oh my Elon's so great,

0:14:52.440 --> 0:14:53.920
<v Speaker 6>I've learned so much from him, and then you hear,

0:14:54.000 --> 0:14:57.640
<v Speaker 6>then Elon will respond like much appreciated. It's like how

0:14:58.080 --> 0:15:00.960
<v Speaker 6>It's like how grassroots is this CA campaign? And then

0:15:01.360 --> 0:15:04.640
<v Speaker 6>on the other side, you know Norway's sovereign wealth fund.

0:15:04.960 --> 0:15:08.520
<v Speaker 6>You know some pension fund trunk puppy. Here's amalgamated back

0:15:08.920 --> 0:15:12.400
<v Speaker 6>frunk pugpy. Another big shareholder is this guy Leo who

0:15:12.480 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 6>is in Singapore. He's like one of the largest retail shareholders.

0:15:16.960 --> 0:15:20.200
<v Speaker 6>He's absolutely a no. And uh, I think it's just

0:15:20.240 --> 0:15:21.800
<v Speaker 6>going to be super close. I would love to be

0:15:21.800 --> 0:15:24.200
<v Speaker 6>able to figure out the title vote telle. I'm like

0:15:24.240 --> 0:15:26.440
<v Speaker 6>a Senate majority leader. I've got this like whip list

0:15:26.520 --> 0:15:29.080
<v Speaker 6>in my head, Like every day it shifts a little bit,

0:15:29.080 --> 0:15:31.400
<v Speaker 6>and I have to tell you, Like Tesla employees are

0:15:31.400 --> 0:15:33.920
<v Speaker 6>telling me that they're getting phone calls like asking them

0:15:33.960 --> 0:15:36.280
<v Speaker 6>have you voted? And if someone says no, they're like, oh,

0:15:36.560 --> 0:15:38.600
<v Speaker 6>would you want to vote right now? Like they are

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:42.760
<v Speaker 6>really pushing retail. They're calling people, They're emailing people like

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:44.400
<v Speaker 6>shareholders have gotten voicemails.

0:15:44.480 --> 0:15:45.440
<v Speaker 3>Why wait wait wait wait wait.

0:15:45.440 --> 0:15:48.640
<v Speaker 4>But so they're calling their own employees who own the

0:15:48.680 --> 0:15:52.280
<v Speaker 4>stock and they're saying, dear sir, have you big brother?

0:15:52.360 --> 0:15:54.600
<v Speaker 4>Oh you haven't, big Brother would like you to vote.

0:15:54.640 --> 0:15:57.640
<v Speaker 6>Now, well, they really want you to vote, I mean,

0:15:57.720 --> 0:16:00.800
<v Speaker 6>and there is a website called vote Tesla com Tesla's

0:16:00.880 --> 0:16:01.600
<v Speaker 6>running ads.

0:16:02.000 --> 0:16:04.720
<v Speaker 2>There's a video on the Tesla website and you know,

0:16:04.760 --> 0:16:08.360
<v Speaker 2>being distributed on social media that we're optimists. The robot

0:16:08.520 --> 0:16:11.360
<v Speaker 2>that Elon Musk has said will be the greatest consumer

0:16:11.360 --> 0:16:13.520
<v Speaker 2>product of all time. You know it's gonna be worth

0:16:13.520 --> 0:16:16.560
<v Speaker 2>many trillions of dollars is also pitching the vote.

0:16:16.640 --> 0:16:17.480
<v Speaker 3>It's talking.

0:16:17.600 --> 0:16:19.720
<v Speaker 2>Oh really, it's talking to you and telling you the

0:16:19.720 --> 0:16:21.160
<v Speaker 2>Tesla shareholder.

0:16:21.000 --> 0:16:22.640
<v Speaker 4>As convincingly as Robin Dennie.

0:16:22.920 --> 0:16:25.360
<v Speaker 2>They're pulling Yeah, they're pulling out all the stops.

0:16:25.800 --> 0:16:27.840
<v Speaker 7>Your vote decides the future of Tesla.

0:16:28.360 --> 0:16:30.440
<v Speaker 1>We made it easy to cast your vote any of

0:16:30.520 --> 0:16:34.440
<v Speaker 1>three ways, online, by QR code, or by phone.

0:16:35.320 --> 0:16:37.560
<v Speaker 4>All right, the the bots pushing me, all right, Dana,

0:16:37.600 --> 0:16:39.880
<v Speaker 4>before we move on. Of course, the pay package isn't

0:16:39.880 --> 0:16:42.480
<v Speaker 4>the only thing being voted on on Thursday. Any other

0:16:42.560 --> 0:16:45.240
<v Speaker 4>highlights that will come up in terms of votes at

0:16:45.280 --> 0:16:46.200
<v Speaker 4>the shareholder meeting.

0:16:47.080 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, so there are twelve resolutions. I'm sure that every

0:16:49.840 --> 0:16:53.400
<v Speaker 6>listener of the Elon podcast has carefully read the very

0:16:53.440 --> 0:16:56.840
<v Speaker 6>long single one of them proxy, every single word of

0:16:56.840 --> 0:17:00.240
<v Speaker 6>the proxy. But there's twelve resolutions. I think you know

0:17:00.240 --> 0:17:02.480
<v Speaker 6>at the very beginning we're going to hear so two

0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:06.880
<v Speaker 6>board members are up for reelection, James Murdoch and Kimball Musk,

0:17:06.960 --> 0:17:09.360
<v Speaker 6>Elon's younger brother. That's going to be key to watch.

0:17:09.440 --> 0:17:11.919
<v Speaker 6>There could be like a revolt against those two. And

0:17:11.960 --> 0:17:15.920
<v Speaker 6>then proposal three is you know, moving the company's legal

0:17:15.960 --> 0:17:19.560
<v Speaker 6>headquarters from Delaware to Texas. And then proposal four is

0:17:19.600 --> 0:17:21.320
<v Speaker 6>the pay and then there's other things about like the

0:17:21.400 --> 0:17:24.480
<v Speaker 6>right to unionize. So the pay package is the big one,

0:17:24.480 --> 0:17:26.399
<v Speaker 6>but we've got to pay attention to the other ones

0:17:26.440 --> 0:17:28.760
<v Speaker 6>as well, And we could have a split scenario where

0:17:28.800 --> 0:17:32.600
<v Speaker 6>like maybe shareholders say yes on Texas but no on pay.

0:17:33.080 --> 0:17:36.040
<v Speaker 6>Maybe maybe it's yes on James Murdoch, no on Kimball.

0:17:36.040 --> 0:17:38.200
<v Speaker 6>Like it could go many different ways.

0:17:38.640 --> 0:17:40.960
<v Speaker 4>Okay, all right, So we'll see what the vote is

0:17:40.960 --> 0:17:44.879
<v Speaker 4>on Thursday, and if there's some big shocker, perhaps elon

0:17:44.960 --> 0:17:47.639
<v Speaker 4>Inkle listeners, we will be in your feed that evening

0:17:47.720 --> 0:17:50.880
<v Speaker 4>or the following morning. We're gonna go on to talk

0:17:50.880 --> 0:17:53.800
<v Speaker 4>about Keesslas Stock and to do so, we're bringing in

0:17:53.960 --> 0:17:59.120
<v Speaker 4>Esha Day, Senior Reporter, and the market's team Air Bloomberg. Welcome, Mesha. Hello,

0:17:59.600 --> 0:18:03.720
<v Speaker 4>So the last time you were on, you told us

0:18:03.240 --> 0:18:08.880
<v Speaker 4>in our vast audience that Tesla is a wildly volatile stock,

0:18:09.000 --> 0:18:11.560
<v Speaker 4>perhaps the most vowatile in all of the s and P.

0:18:11.640 --> 0:18:14.320
<v Speaker 4>Five hundred and I am as I look at the

0:18:14.320 --> 0:18:18.600
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg terminal, I see a stock that is comatosed, flatline,

0:18:18.880 --> 0:18:22.359
<v Speaker 4>boring as hell? What is going on, Esha?

0:18:22.440 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I like that word boring And who would think of,

0:18:25.480 --> 0:18:28.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, using that word along with Tesla or elon

0:18:28.119 --> 0:18:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Moscow that matter?

0:18:28.960 --> 0:18:29.120
<v Speaker 7>Right?

0:18:29.240 --> 0:18:32.919
<v Speaker 1>But sure, if you look at Tesla shares over the

0:18:32.920 --> 0:18:35.520
<v Speaker 1>past month or so, the stock has been trading between

0:18:35.680 --> 0:18:39.920
<v Speaker 1>a very very tight range about like ten twelve dollars usually,

0:18:40.359 --> 0:18:43.159
<v Speaker 1>and that is not typical of the Tesla stock.

0:18:43.320 --> 0:18:43.520
<v Speaker 7>Right.

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:46.119
<v Speaker 1>Let's take a look at some of the measures that

0:18:46.200 --> 0:18:50.360
<v Speaker 1>traders usually look at, For example, historical volatility. It's basically

0:18:50.440 --> 0:18:52.680
<v Speaker 1>a measure to kind of get a sense of how

0:18:52.720 --> 0:18:55.840
<v Speaker 1>the stock price has been fluctuating in over a certain

0:18:55.840 --> 0:19:00.480
<v Speaker 1>period of time. So Tesla shares historical volatility over ten

0:19:00.560 --> 0:19:03.359
<v Speaker 1>day period last week, I think last Friday will be

0:19:03.400 --> 0:19:07.800
<v Speaker 1>precise drop to its lowest since October of twenty twenty one.

0:19:08.680 --> 0:19:10.919
<v Speaker 1>So that tells you that this is a typical of

0:19:11.119 --> 0:19:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Tesla's stock, But at the same time, this is rather

0:19:14.080 --> 0:19:17.399
<v Speaker 1>typical of a stock that is kind of expecting a

0:19:17.440 --> 0:19:21.520
<v Speaker 1>milestone event that could lead to further volatility in the future.

0:19:21.880 --> 0:19:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Whenever I see a stock behaving this way, beat Tesla

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:28.600
<v Speaker 1>or any other name, what it tells me is that

0:19:28.680 --> 0:19:32.920
<v Speaker 1>investors are moving to the sidelines, and that that is understandable.

0:19:32.960 --> 0:19:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Investors try to move to the sideline and kind of

0:19:36.119 --> 0:19:38.919
<v Speaker 1>hunker down when they think that there will be a

0:19:38.920 --> 0:19:41.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of volatility in the recent time, right.

0:19:41.920 --> 0:19:46.280
<v Speaker 4>So the milestone event, the breakout essentially that they're waiting

0:19:46.280 --> 0:19:48.840
<v Speaker 4>for higher or lower is do we is our sense

0:19:48.840 --> 0:19:51.520
<v Speaker 4>that it's tied to the pay package vote.

0:19:51.240 --> 0:19:55.080
<v Speaker 1>One hundred percent. So a lot of the conversation, I

0:19:55.080 --> 0:19:57.240
<v Speaker 1>would say, most of the conversations I've been having with

0:19:57.320 --> 0:20:00.880
<v Speaker 1>investors and market watchers and just like broadly stock watches

0:20:00.920 --> 0:20:03.960
<v Speaker 1>and pundits, it has been that this is a near

0:20:04.080 --> 0:20:08.040
<v Speaker 1>term risk event for the stock, and that really is

0:20:08.640 --> 0:20:11.800
<v Speaker 1>why we're seeing kind of this very little movement in

0:20:12.160 --> 0:20:16.080
<v Speaker 1>the stock in the recent times. But then uncertainty is

0:20:16.240 --> 0:20:19.280
<v Speaker 1>not just about the musk Bee package at this point, right,

0:20:19.600 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 1>everything about Tesla is kind of shrouded in a lot

0:20:22.320 --> 0:20:24.600
<v Speaker 1>of confusion and uncertain that at this point.

0:20:25.000 --> 0:20:28.280
<v Speaker 4>Just to pause there for a second. So the concern

0:20:28.320 --> 0:20:31.520
<v Speaker 4>again is that because if he wins the vote, I

0:20:31.520 --> 0:20:34.399
<v Speaker 4>suppose maybe the stock whatever ticks up a bit higher.

0:20:34.800 --> 0:20:37.639
<v Speaker 4>But the concern is lo and behold, he loses the vote,

0:20:38.320 --> 0:20:41.399
<v Speaker 4>and as Dana was saying earlier, he potentially gets so

0:20:41.600 --> 0:20:44.160
<v Speaker 4>ticked off he just says, screw you all, I'm maddy

0:20:44.200 --> 0:20:47.280
<v Speaker 4>here he walks, and then all of a sudden, the

0:20:47.320 --> 0:20:51.200
<v Speaker 4>bottom falls out of the stock. No, I just made

0:20:51.200 --> 0:20:51.600
<v Speaker 4>all that up.

0:20:51.760 --> 0:20:54.280
<v Speaker 1>No, it's not supposed to be that big of a

0:20:54.359 --> 0:20:58.040
<v Speaker 1>risk event. People are waiting on the sidelines and trying

0:20:58.040 --> 0:21:00.720
<v Speaker 1>to understand what exactly comes out of this vote. But

0:21:00.800 --> 0:21:03.280
<v Speaker 1>it's expected to be a near term risk event, is

0:21:03.320 --> 0:21:07.280
<v Speaker 1>what everybody's telling me. In the longer term, nobody thinks

0:21:07.400 --> 0:21:10.760
<v Speaker 1>that even if it's a negative vote, Elon Musk is

0:21:10.760 --> 0:21:13.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be ticked off enough that he would completely

0:21:13.720 --> 0:21:16.119
<v Speaker 1>as you said, like, maybe shareholders will call his bluff,

0:21:16.119 --> 0:21:17.800
<v Speaker 1>but it will be a bluff. It will be proven

0:21:17.840 --> 0:21:21.199
<v Speaker 1>to be a bluff. So but then there are other risks.

0:21:21.440 --> 0:21:23.520
<v Speaker 1>This is not the only risk, but Tesla at this point,

0:21:23.640 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 1>there's also the risk about is this like going to

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:29.119
<v Speaker 1>be an AI company at all? You know, the entire

0:21:29.240 --> 0:21:33.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of pivot that Musk tried to pull about Tesla

0:21:33.680 --> 0:21:35.600
<v Speaker 1>not being an EV company anymore, it's going to be

0:21:35.640 --> 0:21:38.640
<v Speaker 1>an AI company. That's an uncertainty. There's also the elections

0:21:38.680 --> 0:21:40.960
<v Speaker 1>later this year, and a lot of people are worried

0:21:40.960 --> 0:21:44.840
<v Speaker 1>about what a potential Trump win could mean for electric

0:21:44.880 --> 0:21:47.320
<v Speaker 1>vehicle sales in this country in the at the time.

0:21:47.400 --> 0:21:48.639
<v Speaker 7>And since they're already.

0:21:48.400 --> 0:21:50.800
<v Speaker 4>Slow, they're slowly, they've slowed quite a bit. Now, Max,

0:21:50.800 --> 0:21:53.520
<v Speaker 4>we're talking about a stock that is stabilized, and one

0:21:53.560 --> 0:21:55.600
<v Speaker 4>of the reasons why I wanted to talk about the

0:21:55.640 --> 0:21:59.840
<v Speaker 4>stock is, yeah, this is a rare patch of apps

0:22:00.280 --> 0:22:04.080
<v Speaker 4>tranquility in the stock, but after it absolutely collapsed at

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:04.919
<v Speaker 4>the beginning of the year.

0:22:04.880 --> 0:22:07.600
<v Speaker 2>Right, Yeah, Yeah, I mean it's been really bad. I

0:22:07.600 --> 0:22:10.080
<v Speaker 2>think what's calm things down? As Elon Musk said, you know,

0:22:10.359 --> 0:22:13.359
<v Speaker 2>as Esha's hinting at, you know, we're gonna pivot towards robotaxis,

0:22:13.359 --> 0:22:15.439
<v Speaker 2>and everyone's kind of you know, who knows, maybe that

0:22:15.680 --> 0:22:18.280
<v Speaker 2>looks better than I guess a lot of people think

0:22:18.359 --> 0:22:22.000
<v Speaker 2>maybe they lift the curtain or the sheet off of

0:22:22.040 --> 0:22:26.360
<v Speaker 2>the new Robotaxi model in August as as many people expect,

0:22:26.560 --> 0:22:30.160
<v Speaker 2>and it is, it is something that feels more immediate

0:22:30.200 --> 0:22:32.600
<v Speaker 2>than I'd say most people who follow this this technology

0:22:32.640 --> 0:22:34.920
<v Speaker 2>would expect. So like, there's sort of possible upsides, but

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:37.000
<v Speaker 2>they're all you kind of really have to squint for

0:22:37.040 --> 0:22:39.600
<v Speaker 2>a lot of them. You know, maybe Trump and Elon

0:22:39.680 --> 0:22:41.840
<v Speaker 2>get really close and he gets selected and somehow that

0:22:42.119 --> 0:22:44.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the one thing I'll say is people who

0:22:44.480 --> 0:22:49.120
<v Speaker 2>are really worried about Tesla about Elon Musk also tend

0:22:49.160 --> 0:22:52.040
<v Speaker 2>to be people who think that Tesla could do okay

0:22:52.480 --> 0:22:56.400
<v Speaker 2>without him. And I think there's been a there's sort

0:22:56.400 --> 0:22:59.359
<v Speaker 2>of an evolution happening, and this conversation around pay shows

0:22:59.359 --> 0:23:01.720
<v Speaker 2>it where for a long time, I think if you

0:23:01.800 --> 0:23:04.800
<v Speaker 2>pull Tesla investors, they would all say that basically the

0:23:04.880 --> 0:23:09.720
<v Speaker 2>company is worthless, pointless, give up whatever without Elon Musk.

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:11.879
<v Speaker 2>And I think the fact that some people are voting

0:23:12.000 --> 0:23:14.600
<v Speaker 2>against this and that more people are coming around to

0:23:14.680 --> 0:23:17.120
<v Speaker 2>it suggests that there is a feeling that maybe Tesla

0:23:17.400 --> 0:23:20.440
<v Speaker 2>without Elon Musk is more okay than we realized before.

0:23:20.720 --> 0:23:24.439
<v Speaker 4>Dan in conversations you have with your sources, does a

0:23:24.600 --> 0:23:29.439
<v Speaker 4>post Elon Musk Tesla come up more now than before?

0:23:30.359 --> 0:23:32.840
<v Speaker 6>I mean, Elon Musk has been the CEO of Tesla

0:23:32.920 --> 0:23:36.720
<v Speaker 6>since two thousand and eight. He's like the longest running

0:23:36.840 --> 0:23:40.720
<v Speaker 6>CEO of any car company ever. Like it's just like this,

0:23:41.080 --> 0:23:43.400
<v Speaker 6>it's just been this incredible run. But I do think

0:23:43.400 --> 0:23:46.320
<v Speaker 6>that like there is a scenario where like Tesla just

0:23:46.320 --> 0:23:48.800
<v Speaker 6>becomes a car company and someone else runs it and

0:23:48.840 --> 0:23:50.719
<v Speaker 6>they just make cars and they like forget about all

0:23:50.720 --> 0:23:53.159
<v Speaker 6>this robotaxi stuff. That's kind of hard for me to

0:23:53.240 --> 0:23:56.359
<v Speaker 6>envision because the brand is so intertwined with him and

0:23:56.480 --> 0:23:57.320
<v Speaker 6>always has been.

0:23:57.640 --> 0:24:01.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so esha on that where you have have indeed

0:24:01.119 --> 0:24:05.120
<v Speaker 4>some shareholders, some investors arguing that at this point, as

0:24:05.160 --> 0:24:09.359
<v Speaker 4>improbable as it sounds, Elon is hurting the company in

0:24:09.400 --> 0:24:12.399
<v Speaker 4>the stock more than he's helping it. But you're telling

0:24:12.480 --> 0:24:16.560
<v Speaker 4>us that absolutely positively. If it's a no vote that

0:24:16.800 --> 0:24:22.720
<v Speaker 4>causes these will Elon leave questions the stock tanks, you say, no,

0:24:23.000 --> 0:24:25.800
<v Speaker 4>I no, no, I haven't gotten a single thing, right.

0:24:29.119 --> 0:24:32.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't think anybody's expecting this to be a big

0:24:33.040 --> 0:24:36.399
<v Speaker 1>selling event, And I think I can kind of agree

0:24:36.440 --> 0:24:40.240
<v Speaker 1>with Dan I hear Tesla is still very Tesla is

0:24:40.240 --> 0:24:43.679
<v Speaker 1>still very synonymous with Elon Musk. So people think that

0:24:43.720 --> 0:24:47.960
<v Speaker 1>if Tesla, if Tesla wants to be just an EV company, yes,

0:24:47.960 --> 0:24:50.680
<v Speaker 1>it can probably do without Musk. But if Tesla has

0:24:50.720 --> 0:24:54.959
<v Speaker 1>to justify those insane valuations of its stock, then it

0:24:55.000 --> 0:24:57.920
<v Speaker 1>has to become an AI company, and nobody thinks Tesla

0:24:57.960 --> 0:25:01.240
<v Speaker 1>can really do it without Musk. So the idea is,

0:25:01.440 --> 0:25:04.400
<v Speaker 1>even if the vote is a non it could be

0:25:04.680 --> 0:25:07.640
<v Speaker 1>some weakness in the stock, which has anyway not been

0:25:07.680 --> 0:25:11.160
<v Speaker 1>the most exciting stock in the market for some time now.

0:25:11.480 --> 0:25:14.119
<v Speaker 1>But at any point, especially in August, if there's a

0:25:14.760 --> 0:25:18.320
<v Speaker 1>very exciting unveiling happening of the robotaxi, this can you know,

0:25:18.359 --> 0:25:19.000
<v Speaker 1>sky's the limit?

0:25:19.160 --> 0:25:23.119
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, esha. And perhaps when that exciting unveiling of the

0:25:23.200 --> 0:25:25.480
<v Speaker 4>Robotaxi happens, we'll have you back on when you are that.

0:25:25.720 --> 0:25:27.920
<v Speaker 4>Don't bring us boring again, You're better than that, bring

0:25:28.000 --> 0:25:29.840
<v Speaker 4>us wild surprising news.

0:25:29.960 --> 0:25:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Tell the stock.

0:25:30.880 --> 0:25:32.240
<v Speaker 3>Okay, but thank.

0:25:32.160 --> 0:25:32.920
<v Speaker 4>You for joining us.

0:25:33.200 --> 0:25:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Thank you.

0:25:38.280 --> 0:25:41.720
<v Speaker 4>Okay, Max, I feel like we had no feud last week,

0:25:41.840 --> 0:25:46.679
<v Speaker 4>but we're back with a big time oh man.

0:25:46.119 --> 0:25:49.280
<v Speaker 2>Huge, this is you know, this is a big breaking breaking.

0:25:49.960 --> 0:25:52.480
<v Speaker 2>This is high both on the feud board in terms

0:25:52.480 --> 0:25:54.440
<v Speaker 2>of the ranking of the feud, but also high because

0:25:54.440 --> 0:25:58.760
<v Speaker 2>we're talking about some of the most important executives in

0:25:58.800 --> 0:26:01.120
<v Speaker 2>the business world, some of them powerful people on Earth,

0:26:01.280 --> 0:26:05.119
<v Speaker 2>and they are feuding, which I love. Yesterday, Tim Cook

0:26:05.640 --> 0:26:08.640
<v Speaker 2>and a bunch of Apple executives went through a huge

0:26:08.760 --> 0:26:10.320
<v Speaker 2>sort of developer conference.

0:26:10.640 --> 0:26:12.000
<v Speaker 3>You know, this is one of their regular events.

0:26:12.040 --> 0:26:14.960
<v Speaker 2>It's one of the event where they talk about software updates,

0:26:15.200 --> 0:26:17.919
<v Speaker 2>and it was all about AI. And there were a

0:26:17.920 --> 0:26:20.120
<v Speaker 2>bunch of little things, you know, the iPad. I don't

0:26:20.119 --> 0:26:21.560
<v Speaker 2>know if you knew this, David. The iPad has a

0:26:21.600 --> 0:26:25.679
<v Speaker 2>calculator now. But the sort of most significant announcement was

0:26:25.760 --> 0:26:28.160
<v Speaker 2>that there is going to be an integration with open

0:26:28.200 --> 0:26:32.240
<v Speaker 2>Ai inside of iPhones and I believe eventually, you know,

0:26:32.359 --> 0:26:35.879
<v Speaker 2>other Apple products, so you can essentially ask Siri to

0:26:35.920 --> 0:26:38.680
<v Speaker 2>ask open Ai something. And while this was going on,

0:26:38.840 --> 0:26:42.040
<v Speaker 2>Elon Musk, as he often does, picks up his phone

0:26:42.320 --> 0:26:45.359
<v Speaker 2>and starts sending messages and the nature of the messages

0:26:45.560 --> 0:26:47.360
<v Speaker 2>are Apple is terrible.

0:26:47.800 --> 0:26:50.320
<v Speaker 3>This AI thing is an affront of privacy.

0:26:50.760 --> 0:26:54.760
<v Speaker 2>If if this happens, I will ban Tesla employees from

0:26:54.800 --> 0:26:58.120
<v Speaker 2>bringing their iPhones even proposed a sort of solution. He's

0:26:58.119 --> 0:27:02.080
<v Speaker 2>going to have little Faraday cages, that's a little metal boxes.

0:27:02.400 --> 0:27:04.359
<v Speaker 2>Employees will have to put their iPhones in on the

0:27:04.359 --> 0:27:08.399
<v Speaker 2>way into the office to sort of keep Tesla and

0:27:08.480 --> 0:27:13.119
<v Speaker 2>his other companies pure of this nefarious influence of this

0:27:13.240 --> 0:27:14.560
<v Speaker 2>AI company that he doesn't like.

0:27:14.840 --> 0:27:16.359
<v Speaker 3>And of course this is a this is a.

0:27:16.600 --> 0:27:20.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, So it is he's rekindling simultaneously too few Exactly.

0:27:20.840 --> 0:27:23.440
<v Speaker 2>This is Elon Musk versus Tim Cook, which we saw

0:27:23.480 --> 0:27:26.919
<v Speaker 2>playing out during the sort of conversation of advertising on

0:27:27.119 --> 0:27:29.920
<v Speaker 2>X last year, and this is Elon Musk for Sam Altman.

0:27:30.200 --> 0:27:33.560
<v Speaker 2>So essentially Elon Musk, I think, in addition to kind

0:27:33.600 --> 0:27:38.240
<v Speaker 2>of expressing his continued distrust, distaste and so on for

0:27:38.280 --> 0:27:40.920
<v Speaker 2>Open Ai, also kind of, you know, as he does,

0:27:41.560 --> 0:27:44.520
<v Speaker 2>maybe watching a lot of people talking about Apple's new

0:27:44.560 --> 0:27:47.800
<v Speaker 2>calculator and talking about Apples and new AI features and.

0:27:48.080 --> 0:27:49.800
<v Speaker 3>You know, sort of missing the spot.

0:27:49.880 --> 0:27:52.440
<v Speaker 6>Still ranting. This morning he woke up to it. It

0:27:52.480 --> 0:27:56.120
<v Speaker 6>was like, the truth is that handing your data over

0:27:56.200 --> 0:28:00.359
<v Speaker 6>to digital superintelligence that Apple themselves cannot even build or

0:28:00.520 --> 0:28:05.040
<v Speaker 6>understand at the operating system level is insane. So he's

0:28:05.080 --> 0:28:08.520
<v Speaker 6>kind of like It's like this two part thing where

0:28:08.520 --> 0:28:11.560
<v Speaker 6>like I'm worried about your privacy and you should be too,

0:28:11.720 --> 0:28:15.160
<v Speaker 6>but also like Apple can't even build AI on our own. Yeah,

0:28:15.320 --> 0:28:17.040
<v Speaker 6>it's like a feud within a feud. It's like a

0:28:17.280 --> 0:28:18.040
<v Speaker 6>nesting feud.

0:28:18.359 --> 0:28:18.520
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:28:18.560 --> 0:28:21.600
<v Speaker 2>I think, you know, Elon Musk is probably right to say, hey,

0:28:21.640 --> 0:28:25.160
<v Speaker 2>we should be skeptical of what a giant company says

0:28:25.200 --> 0:28:28.200
<v Speaker 2>about privacy, especially when we're talking about AI. But there

0:28:28.280 --> 0:28:31.359
<v Speaker 2>is some irony, maybe even a little hypocrisy here, given

0:28:31.359 --> 0:28:35.040
<v Speaker 2>that Elon Musk has his own competing AI thing, and

0:28:35.080 --> 0:28:37.800
<v Speaker 2>even amid all these tweets, is threatening to you know,

0:28:37.920 --> 0:28:40.440
<v Speaker 2>form a partnership with Samsung and create.

0:28:40.200 --> 0:28:42.080
<v Speaker 3>His own like a groc phone or something.

0:28:42.440 --> 0:28:45.120
<v Speaker 2>So I'm not sure how much of this is just,

0:28:45.400 --> 0:28:47.360
<v Speaker 2>like I said, competitive, maybe.

0:28:47.720 --> 0:28:49.760
<v Speaker 4>Jealous, a little bit of jealousy, all right, But let's

0:28:49.800 --> 0:28:52.600
<v Speaker 4>break this down though for a second, because it seems

0:28:52.600 --> 0:28:54.160
<v Speaker 4>to be setting up like there's like a two one

0:28:54.320 --> 0:29:00.000
<v Speaker 4>one cage match Altman and Cook versus Elon is essentially

0:29:00.240 --> 0:29:02.680
<v Speaker 4>would just come down to Cook, who I believe is

0:29:02.680 --> 0:29:03.240
<v Speaker 4>pretty fit.

0:29:03.640 --> 0:29:06.040
<v Speaker 2>Cook is fit, but he strikes me as a pretty

0:29:06.520 --> 0:29:08.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, he's like a pretty laid back guy.

0:29:08.480 --> 0:29:09.800
<v Speaker 3>You know, he's very California.

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:14.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't killer instinct, and of course Musk as we know,

0:29:15.000 --> 0:29:17.640
<v Speaker 2>he's trained on the streets of hard knocks and he

0:29:17.720 --> 0:29:20.000
<v Speaker 2>knows all the judo tricks. We've talked about this at

0:29:20.080 --> 0:29:21.400
<v Speaker 2>length of the podcast, so I'm a.

0:29:21.320 --> 0:29:23.040
<v Speaker 4>Little concerned you could take the two of them out.

0:29:23.120 --> 0:29:23.239
<v Speaker 7>Now.

0:29:23.360 --> 0:29:25.040
<v Speaker 3>The question is are we talking about a tag team

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:25.840
<v Speaker 3>or a two on one.

0:29:26.000 --> 0:29:31.920
<v Speaker 6>Sam is also younger, but like birthday coming up, they're

0:29:31.960 --> 0:29:34.200
<v Speaker 6>both got a little bit of an age different.

0:29:34.680 --> 0:29:36.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, does he have the girth though?

0:29:36.680 --> 0:29:37.040
<v Speaker 8>To man?

0:29:38.160 --> 0:29:42.160
<v Speaker 4>Okay, before we move off the feud, beyond all the

0:29:42.280 --> 0:29:45.760
<v Speaker 4>oddity of it and the surrealness of it, is there

0:29:46.080 --> 0:29:48.400
<v Speaker 4>at the end of the day, anything actually serious about it,

0:29:48.440 --> 0:29:52.200
<v Speaker 4>Like could if he really bans these products from from

0:29:52.400 --> 0:29:54.560
<v Speaker 4>integrating with his own products?

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:56.440
<v Speaker 3>No, I mean I don't think.

0:29:57.720 --> 0:30:00.200
<v Speaker 2>I don't think he's going to ban iPhones for from

0:30:00.520 --> 0:30:04.920
<v Speaker 2>Tesla headquarters. I do think like the thing that I started,

0:30:05.160 --> 0:30:07.440
<v Speaker 2>because yesterday I was pretty dismissive of this. It just

0:30:07.480 --> 0:30:09.520
<v Speaker 2>looked like a guy with main character syndrome, you know,

0:30:09.600 --> 0:30:13.360
<v Speaker 2>wanting to be the main character. But today there are

0:30:13.360 --> 0:30:15.720
<v Speaker 2>a couple of tweets he was responding to talking about

0:30:15.720 --> 0:30:18.360
<v Speaker 2>the prospect, like I said of a partnership with another

0:30:18.440 --> 0:30:21.640
<v Speaker 2>phone company, a groc phone, and that if I were

0:30:21.640 --> 0:30:25.040
<v Speaker 2>a Tesla shareholder, I would be that would give me

0:30:25.080 --> 0:30:28.120
<v Speaker 2>a little pause, because like if Elon Musk starts a

0:30:28.160 --> 0:30:31.280
<v Speaker 2>phone company that's another you know that or like company

0:30:31.920 --> 0:30:33.840
<v Speaker 2>you know and it just starts to make you think like, okay,

0:30:33.920 --> 0:30:36.320
<v Speaker 2>like maybe he's really serious, Like maybe he really does

0:30:36.400 --> 0:30:40.600
<v Speaker 2>intend to take his AI talents to the handset rather

0:30:40.600 --> 0:30:41.640
<v Speaker 2>than building him in the court.

0:30:41.680 --> 0:30:44.360
<v Speaker 4>Well, you gotta say this, whether the product's any good

0:30:44.440 --> 0:30:47.720
<v Speaker 4>or not, the groc phone sounds pretty damn cool.

0:30:48.120 --> 0:30:50.360
<v Speaker 2>It's just it's so funny that he's like, you can't

0:30:50.400 --> 0:30:53.920
<v Speaker 2>trust open the eye. What we need is a chatbot

0:30:53.960 --> 0:30:56.760
<v Speaker 2>that is cooler and that's gonna, you know, solve all

0:30:56.760 --> 0:30:57.440
<v Speaker 2>our problems.

0:30:57.720 --> 0:31:01.440
<v Speaker 4>Max Dana, thank you very much, Thank you great to

0:31:01.480 --> 0:31:11.920
<v Speaker 4>be here. This episode was produced by Stacy Wong. Naomi

0:31:11.960 --> 0:31:16.040
<v Speaker 4>Shaven and Rayhan Harmans are senior editors. The idea for

0:31:16.120 --> 0:31:20.960
<v Speaker 4>this very show also came from Rayhan Blake Maples handles engineering,

0:31:20.960 --> 0:31:24.240
<v Speaker 4>and we get special editing assistants from Jeff Crocott, Antonio

0:31:24.320 --> 0:31:30.000
<v Speaker 4>Muffarech and Arafat Jalasho Perry. Our supervising producer is Magnus Hendrickson.

0:31:30.480 --> 0:31:33.760
<v Speaker 4>The Elon Inc. Theme is written and performed by Taka

0:31:33.800 --> 0:31:39.400
<v Speaker 4>Yasuzawa and Alex Subiira. Brendan Francis Newnham is our executive producer,

0:31:39.520 --> 0:31:43.080
<v Speaker 4>and Sage Bauman is the head of Bloomberg Podcasts. I'm

0:31:43.160 --> 0:31:46.360
<v Speaker 4>David Papadoppolis. If you have a minute, rate and review

0:31:46.400 --> 0:31:49.720
<v Speaker 4>our show, it'll help other listeners find us. See you

0:31:49.800 --> 0:31:50.320
<v Speaker 4>next week.