WEBVTT - Markets Welcome Tariff Negotiations amid Uncertainty

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. This is the Bloomberg

0:00:13.840 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Surveillance Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at seven am Eastern

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 1>on Apple CarPlay or Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app.

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts, or watch

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 1>us live on YouTube.

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:30.479
<v Speaker 2>Joining us now with JP Morgan with his leadership and

0:00:30.520 --> 0:00:34.240
<v Speaker 2>fixed income is Bob Michael. Why is the bond market

0:00:34.400 --> 0:00:38.000
<v Speaker 2>so calm? I look at sofur swaps recovering. I look

0:00:38.000 --> 0:00:40.479
<v Speaker 2>at the ten year real yield really coming in in

0:00:40.520 --> 0:00:44.920
<v Speaker 2>a responsible way? Why is the world turned upside down?

0:00:45.320 --> 0:00:46.760
<v Speaker 2>Accepted at Piers bonds?

0:00:47.400 --> 0:00:49.800
<v Speaker 3>Before I answer that, Tom, I have a bone to

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:53.960
<v Speaker 3>pick with you. As a New Englander, you should know

0:00:54.440 --> 0:00:59.440
<v Speaker 3>that New Hampshire actually has the highest quality black flies.

0:00:59.640 --> 0:01:04.000
<v Speaker 3>They do the more temperate climate the lakes. Vacationers and

0:01:04.080 --> 0:01:06.240
<v Speaker 3>blackflies go there by choice and.

0:01:06.319 --> 0:01:10.280
<v Speaker 2>Now a surveillance audible as well. It is widely understood

0:01:10.480 --> 0:01:14.880
<v Speaker 2>the blackflies of Boden are far more vicious than what

0:01:15.000 --> 0:01:18.400
<v Speaker 2>you see in the burbs of Cold me. You know,

0:01:18.680 --> 0:01:21.280
<v Speaker 2>there's just no question about it. I was once in

0:01:21.319 --> 0:01:24.039
<v Speaker 2>a car. This is ancient history. I got out of

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 2>the car the flies were so bad we just got

0:01:27.120 --> 0:01:29.760
<v Speaker 2>back in the car and left. Thank you for that

0:01:29.880 --> 0:01:33.399
<v Speaker 2>vision of knowing. Michael. Why is there a Colm in

0:01:33.440 --> 0:01:34.440
<v Speaker 2>the market your world?

0:01:35.680 --> 0:01:38.360
<v Speaker 3>Because a couple of things have happened. The first thing

0:01:38.440 --> 0:01:43.200
<v Speaker 3>that happened is the deleveraging pass through the system, the

0:01:43.240 --> 0:01:47.880
<v Speaker 3>forcing of levered investors who had swap trades on who

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:51.680
<v Speaker 3>were short Europe along the US. All these other things

0:01:51.760 --> 0:01:55.400
<v Speaker 3>got squeezed out of the system. It took yields very high,

0:01:55.520 --> 0:01:58.640
<v Speaker 3>it's deep in the curve, and then it was done.

0:01:58.800 --> 0:02:01.960
<v Speaker 3>All the false narratives out there were proven to be false.

0:02:02.200 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 3>The thought that foreign official official institutions we're selling treasuries

0:02:07.480 --> 0:02:11.120
<v Speaker 3>was just nonsense. When you look at the Fed's custody data,

0:02:11.160 --> 0:02:15.399
<v Speaker 3>they actually increase their position. And then you had some blinking.

0:02:15.800 --> 0:02:19.079
<v Speaker 3>You've had a couple FED officials acknowledge that yes, they

0:02:19.160 --> 0:02:21.960
<v Speaker 3>have a dual mandate and if something happens in the

0:02:21.960 --> 0:02:25.120
<v Speaker 3>employment market, they'd be poised to step in. And you

0:02:25.160 --> 0:02:29.079
<v Speaker 3>had the administration coming out saying, hey, you know what,

0:02:29.280 --> 0:02:33.160
<v Speaker 3>we're open to talks and we're looking to negotiate. All

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:36.680
<v Speaker 3>those things created Colm and now have created a reversal

0:02:36.680 --> 0:02:37.560
<v Speaker 3>in the bond market.

0:02:38.360 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 4>What's the bond market saying about this US economy, Bob Azer,

0:02:42.400 --> 0:02:45.960
<v Speaker 4>I keep hearing strategies coming. Are economists raising their prospects

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:47.880
<v Speaker 4>and their odds for recession?

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:49.040
<v Speaker 5>What's the bond market telling you?

0:02:49.600 --> 0:02:54.840
<v Speaker 3>The bond market's telling us watch out as things stand.

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:57.880
<v Speaker 3>If the tariffs go through as they're currently spec out,

0:02:57.960 --> 0:03:02.760
<v Speaker 3>the ninety days passes and there's only some moderate compromise,

0:03:03.200 --> 0:03:06.520
<v Speaker 3>the US is going into recession. I think our economist

0:03:06.639 --> 0:03:09.400
<v Speaker 3>Mike Faroli has made that clear. He's got the back

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:13.240
<v Speaker 3>half of this year at minus half a percent real GDP.

0:03:13.800 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 3>When you look at things like tips break evens, they're

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:22.960
<v Speaker 3>down below or right around two percent. They're not at

0:03:23.040 --> 0:03:26.920
<v Speaker 3>the four percent that everyone's talking about where inflation is

0:03:26.960 --> 0:03:30.360
<v Speaker 3>going to be. The market realizes that a one time

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:35.160
<v Speaker 3>price reset and inflation will kill top line demand, aggregate

0:03:35.200 --> 0:03:39.280
<v Speaker 3>final demand, and will go barreling into recession, and then

0:03:39.400 --> 0:03:40.840
<v Speaker 3>all the pricing will fade.

0:03:41.560 --> 0:03:43.640
<v Speaker 5>So does that suggest in a fix and co market?

0:03:43.680 --> 0:03:46.400
<v Speaker 4>I really don't want to take much credit risk here today.

0:03:46.440 --> 0:03:49.480
<v Speaker 4>I want to stick to you, stick to the treasury

0:03:49.520 --> 0:03:50.560
<v Speaker 4>market and clip that coupon.

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:55.440
<v Speaker 3>You can take good quality credit risk. It doesn't I've

0:03:55.480 --> 0:03:57.840
<v Speaker 3>heard a lot of people come on and say, no,

0:03:57.960 --> 0:04:01.040
<v Speaker 3>you've got to be high quality. We're at the top

0:04:01.080 --> 0:04:03.960
<v Speaker 3>of the capital structure. If you own any equities, then

0:04:04.000 --> 0:04:06.400
<v Speaker 3>you should be owning the debt of the companies that

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:09.640
<v Speaker 3>you own, and a lot of them are below investment grade.

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:13.839
<v Speaker 3>The key is to find companies that can actually make

0:04:13.880 --> 0:04:18.599
<v Speaker 3>it through a period of taxation with higher prices on

0:04:18.680 --> 0:04:23.360
<v Speaker 3>their input costs and then some loss and demand destruction

0:04:23.680 --> 0:04:25.960
<v Speaker 3>in their sales. There are a lot of companies in

0:04:26.000 --> 0:04:28.240
<v Speaker 3>the investment grade space that will be fine. There's no

0:04:28.320 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 3>aherea there, and the majority of the high yield market,

0:04:32.000 --> 0:04:34.679
<v Speaker 3>you know, ninety seven plus percent of it will be fined.

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:36.760
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I'm going to go here because I know you're

0:04:36.760 --> 0:04:40.320
<v Speaker 2>a expert in it. Folks, they did mark to market

0:04:40.360 --> 0:04:43.120
<v Speaker 2>because that's what you did in the nineteenth century. And

0:04:43.200 --> 0:04:46.159
<v Speaker 2>they said FDR down in nineteen thirty eight and said

0:04:46.640 --> 0:04:51.560
<v Speaker 2>this ain't working out, and we changed measuring everything every day,

0:04:51.760 --> 0:04:55.559
<v Speaker 2>every Friday, every moment on Wall Street. It went away,

0:04:56.680 --> 0:04:58.760
<v Speaker 2>and then we brought it back, and we had the

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:02.680
<v Speaker 2>same challenges within the banking system. Should we be marketing

0:05:02.680 --> 0:05:07.240
<v Speaker 2>to market private equity and private credit or did they

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:09.320
<v Speaker 2>get a pass in the Bob Michael world.

0:05:11.000 --> 0:05:14.640
<v Speaker 3>I think there's a shadow system there that does mark

0:05:14.680 --> 0:05:17.599
<v Speaker 3>them to market. And I think this is going to

0:05:17.640 --> 0:05:22.240
<v Speaker 3>be highlighted this year because, as you well know, they're

0:05:22.240 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 3>an awful lot of plans who have expenses to pay.

0:05:26.120 --> 0:05:29.280
<v Speaker 3>Maybe you're a pension fund, you have retirey benefits, maybe

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:32.800
<v Speaker 3>you're insurance company, you have claims to pay. Maybe your

0:05:33.040 --> 0:05:35.960
<v Speaker 3>university endowment and you've got to run your school and

0:05:36.000 --> 0:05:40.240
<v Speaker 3>your funding's been pulled. And now you're looking at your portfolio.

0:05:40.839 --> 0:05:43.520
<v Speaker 3>What was in alt and a liquid seems not to

0:05:43.560 --> 0:05:46.320
<v Speaker 3>have moved in price, and everything in the public markets

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 3>at one point was down five to fifteen twenty percent,

0:05:50.600 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 3>but the only thing you could sell was what was down.

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:56.920
<v Speaker 3>I think you're going to see one some rebalancing and

0:05:57.040 --> 0:06:00.479
<v Speaker 3>two some calls about greater liquidity space.

0:06:00.640 --> 0:06:03.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, this is really important. And radio you don't see this,

0:06:03.360 --> 0:06:06.400
<v Speaker 2>but on YouTube cardinal rule of thumb, when a global

0:06:06.400 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 2>Wall Street leader puts their hands up and starts measuring things,

0:06:10.920 --> 0:06:13.800
<v Speaker 2>that's when you lean forward and really listen. How big

0:06:13.880 --> 0:06:19.200
<v Speaker 2>is the haircut? Can you estimate for US blended private equity,

0:06:19.440 --> 0:06:22.000
<v Speaker 2>given institution? How much? What's the hit going to be?

0:06:22.960 --> 0:06:24.480
<v Speaker 2>I haven't number in my head.

0:06:24.560 --> 0:06:27.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you know the numbers that have been thrown out

0:06:27.920 --> 0:06:32.720
<v Speaker 3>there are around fifteen percent. Yes, but but there is

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 3>an awful lot of capital that's forum that's gone into

0:06:36.040 --> 0:06:39.080
<v Speaker 3>the secondary space. So I don't think there's going to

0:06:39.120 --> 0:06:42.680
<v Speaker 3>be anything near that headcut, that haircut. I think a

0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:46.400
<v Speaker 3>lot of capital is there dry powder, It will absorb it.

0:06:46.480 --> 0:06:50.200
<v Speaker 3>I know in the private credit space, we look for

0:06:50.320 --> 0:06:53.360
<v Speaker 3>opportunities in secondaries and it's very competitive.

0:06:53.760 --> 0:06:57.640
<v Speaker 2>Well said, yeah, it's Friday, General counsel for JP. Morgan's

0:06:57.640 --> 0:06:58.200
<v Speaker 2>not listening.

0:06:58.240 --> 0:07:03.000
<v Speaker 5>No, that's good chilling out on a Friday. Yeah, getting ready.

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:06.719
<v Speaker 2>I want you to talk, Bob. And certainly every report

0:07:06.760 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 2>we've had a surveillance is liquidity's in order, the plumbings

0:07:10.960 --> 0:07:15.160
<v Speaker 2>in order within the American financial system. Where's the leverage?

0:07:15.280 --> 0:07:19.440
<v Speaker 2>The shadow of leverage out there? It amends every ten

0:07:19.560 --> 0:07:23.200
<v Speaker 2>every fifteen years we move to a new leverage. What's

0:07:23.240 --> 0:07:25.400
<v Speaker 2>the new new leverage out there you worry about?

0:07:26.440 --> 0:07:31.240
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think where some of the marginal funding has

0:07:31.480 --> 0:07:35.880
<v Speaker 3>aggregated is clearly in private credit. If you go back

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:39.200
<v Speaker 3>to two thousand and seven, I don't really recall much

0:07:39.320 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 3>in the way of private credit except if there was

0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:45.280
<v Speaker 3>some sort of debt exchange or something like that. And

0:07:45.320 --> 0:07:50.160
<v Speaker 3>today estimates are about two trillion dollars, So it's come

0:07:50.280 --> 0:07:52.920
<v Speaker 3>from nowhere to something big. When we look at the

0:07:52.960 --> 0:07:57.400
<v Speaker 3>size of the entire US banking system, the commercial and

0:07:57.480 --> 0:08:00.600
<v Speaker 3>industrial loan book, Paul, you will be able to us

0:08:00.680 --> 0:08:04.280
<v Speaker 3>on that, but that actually is it's three trillion. So

0:08:04.520 --> 0:08:08.640
<v Speaker 3>that's two trillion in borrowing that might have historically gone

0:08:08.960 --> 0:08:12.880
<v Speaker 3>to the public high yield market, the broadly syndicated loan market,

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:17.120
<v Speaker 3>or two banks. When we look at the public high

0:08:17.160 --> 0:08:21.040
<v Speaker 3>yield market, it looks very clean, even in a fairly

0:08:21.200 --> 0:08:24.840
<v Speaker 3>meaningful recession, thing greater than the Ferole minus half a

0:08:24.920 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 3>percent for a couple quarters, something closer to one percent.

0:08:28.320 --> 0:08:31.080
<v Speaker 3>We can only get the fault rates up to about

0:08:31.080 --> 0:08:34.320
<v Speaker 3>three percent in the public high yield market, and we

0:08:34.360 --> 0:08:36.760
<v Speaker 3>know there will be more pain. We think that gets

0:08:36.760 --> 0:08:37.840
<v Speaker 3>felt in private credit.

0:08:37.920 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:08:38.400 --> 0:08:40.760
<v Speaker 3>It remains to be seen whether that can all be

0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 3>dealt with behind the scenes, but it feels like we're

0:08:44.320 --> 0:08:47.040
<v Speaker 3>about to approach the long way to shake out there.

0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:49.640
<v Speaker 4>Hey, Bob, we were, Tom and I were just talking

0:08:49.640 --> 0:08:52.800
<v Speaker 4>to Megan Graper earlier this morning. She runs Deck Capital

0:08:52.800 --> 0:08:54.880
<v Speaker 4>Markets at Barkley's. If she called you up today and

0:08:54.920 --> 0:08:57.160
<v Speaker 4>she had a new issue in the investment grade market.

0:08:57.960 --> 0:09:00.199
<v Speaker 5>Would you buy that? Are you open to that? In

0:09:00.280 --> 0:09:02.079
<v Speaker 5>all the craziness that's going out there in the world.

0:09:02.920 --> 0:09:10.000
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, one hundred percent nice because because don't worry. I'm

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:14.160
<v Speaker 3>sure they have. Yes, Corporate America is going into this

0:09:14.360 --> 0:09:20.120
<v Speaker 3>in really good shape. Profit margins are very compelling. Actually,

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:23.280
<v Speaker 3>consumer balance sheets are in pretty good shape too, So

0:09:23.480 --> 0:09:28.320
<v Speaker 3>businesses and households can withstand some level of pain on

0:09:28.480 --> 0:09:33.120
<v Speaker 3>taris and investment. Great companies were not all that that

0:09:33.240 --> 0:09:36.720
<v Speaker 3>worried about, and generally they these new deals come with

0:09:36.800 --> 0:09:39.520
<v Speaker 3>a bit of a concession. We have to know what

0:09:39.600 --> 0:09:43.240
<v Speaker 3>the company is, you know what what their industry looks like.

0:09:43.280 --> 0:09:46.320
<v Speaker 3>Where are they issuing all the usual credit research things.

0:09:46.320 --> 0:09:47.160
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, we're buying.

0:09:47.280 --> 0:09:50.400
<v Speaker 2>The president just making comments. These are tape comments, folks

0:09:50.400 --> 0:09:53.240
<v Speaker 2>in Oregona's way to roam in the funeral of the

0:09:53.280 --> 0:10:00.960
<v Speaker 2>Pope gave us presidential statements on negotiations. Everything's wonderful, full everything.

0:10:01.160 --> 0:10:02.840
<v Speaker 2>I think he literally said, it's going to be a

0:10:02.880 --> 0:10:06.400
<v Speaker 2>wealthier nation. The rest of them. America's turned upside down

0:10:06.400 --> 0:10:11.880
<v Speaker 2>here worrying about shipping arrivals in Los Angeles, and that

0:10:12.400 --> 0:10:15.320
<v Speaker 2>if we almost on a Hyagen basis, if we clear

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:18.920
<v Speaker 2>the market, Bob Michael, is it just like it used

0:10:18.960 --> 0:10:22.600
<v Speaker 2>to be? Do we go to something new here within

0:10:22.760 --> 0:10:26.560
<v Speaker 2>American Wall Street? Or do we if we clear all

0:10:26.600 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 2>these troubles, do we go back to what we knew?

0:10:29.040 --> 0:10:30.800
<v Speaker 2>What would Paul deep into January?

0:10:31.040 --> 0:10:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Yes?

0:10:31.480 --> 0:10:34.079
<v Speaker 2>I mean do we just revert back to what we knew?

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:39.480
<v Speaker 3>So we're in an interesting couple months here. As I

0:10:39.640 --> 0:10:43.600
<v Speaker 3>was listening to Lisa talk about the bottom of the

0:10:43.640 --> 0:10:47.120
<v Speaker 3>capital structure, I think they're called equities. I'm not entirely

0:10:47.200 --> 0:10:52.200
<v Speaker 3>sure shape something. One of those markets was up a

0:10:52.200 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 3>couple tents. I think the NASDAC, you know, the specious companies.

0:10:57.520 --> 0:11:00.400
<v Speaker 3>We're in a period of a couple months where we

0:11:00.440 --> 0:11:04.960
<v Speaker 3>should see good news. Where we're in that ninety day

0:11:05.040 --> 0:11:09.400
<v Speaker 3>delay on tariffs, that pause, You've already had the administration

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:13.200
<v Speaker 3>come out and tell us good things. Negotiations are underway,

0:11:13.240 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 3>there are paths to compromise, we're working things out. You've

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:20.080
<v Speaker 3>got the Federal Reserve out there telling us, yeah, we're

0:11:20.120 --> 0:11:22.920
<v Speaker 3>keeping an eye on the labor market, and you've got

0:11:23.120 --> 0:11:26.400
<v Speaker 3>Secretary Besson out there saying we've got this. There are

0:11:26.400 --> 0:11:29.200
<v Speaker 3>a lot of things we can do in the treasury market.

0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:33.079
<v Speaker 3>So all of those things are calm, which didn't exist

0:11:33.559 --> 0:11:36.320
<v Speaker 3>a couple of weeks ago. The second thing is it's

0:11:36.360 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 3>too early for the hard data to turn, and we

0:11:40.080 --> 0:11:44.840
<v Speaker 3>fully expect unless there's a meaningful roll back on the

0:11:44.920 --> 0:11:48.440
<v Speaker 3>TWERF policy as it sits now, then the hard data

0:11:48.520 --> 0:11:51.079
<v Speaker 3>will turn. But for now the next couple months, everything

0:11:51.120 --> 0:11:54.040
<v Speaker 3>looks to be smooth selling. I think you could retrace

0:11:54.160 --> 0:11:57.199
<v Speaker 3>all of the selloff of thank you, of March April

0:11:57.280 --> 0:11:57.520
<v Speaker 3>thank you.

0:11:57.520 --> 0:11:59.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm letting on a Friday, we got to I think

0:11:59.200 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 2>I can get through the week.

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:02.720
<v Speaker 3>One time I didn't expect to be positive myself.

0:12:02.840 --> 0:12:07.000
<v Speaker 2>One final question, I am so honored to ask you this.

0:12:07.600 --> 0:12:14.400
<v Speaker 2>With Pennsylvania classics including COLSD one four Roman America, we

0:12:14.480 --> 0:12:17.160
<v Speaker 2>will have a funeral this weekend in Rome. I have

0:12:17.320 --> 0:12:22.600
<v Speaker 2>stood in Santa Pudenziana Church three point thirteen AD, built

0:12:22.600 --> 0:12:25.960
<v Speaker 2>on Roman ruins, and it was literally where the Pope

0:12:26.080 --> 0:12:29.800
<v Speaker 2>slept before they built two or three churches before Saint

0:12:29.800 --> 0:12:33.880
<v Speaker 2>Peter's link in this thing that we have within the

0:12:33.960 --> 0:12:39.160
<v Speaker 2>Catholic Church back to biblical times, back to Roman times.

0:12:39.360 --> 0:12:42.480
<v Speaker 2>How do you perceive the Catholic Church back to what

0:12:42.600 --> 0:12:44.080
<v Speaker 2>you studied at Pennsylvania.

0:12:45.080 --> 0:12:47.640
<v Speaker 3>Well, that's way outside of my level of ex perceise.

0:12:47.720 --> 0:12:50.360
<v Speaker 3>I will tell you I've been to the Vatican a

0:12:50.400 --> 0:12:54.400
<v Speaker 3>couple of times, and I'm always impressed. And I do

0:12:54.520 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 3>see the classics everywhere. I see the Romans laboring away

0:12:59.080 --> 0:13:01.559
<v Speaker 3>constructing a city. It's just spectacular.

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:03.640
<v Speaker 2>Bob Michael, thank you so much. What he really is

0:13:03.679 --> 0:13:05.079
<v Speaker 2>going to say is we're going to get a fifty

0:13:05.120 --> 0:13:08.079
<v Speaker 2>eight page and a report letter from the new Pope,

0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:11.000
<v Speaker 2>just like we get from mister Diamond. Mister Michael is

0:13:11.040 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 2>a JP Morgan.

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:21.480
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Catch us live

0:13:21.520 --> 0:13:24.680
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern. Listen on

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Applecarplay and Android Otto with the Bloomberg Business app, or

0:13:28.600 --> 0:13:30.080
<v Speaker 1>watch us live on YouTube.

0:13:30.120 --> 0:13:34.000
<v Speaker 2>Without question, the most important conversation of the day for

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:37.520
<v Speaker 2>Global Wall Street. Let me describe mister Adams to you

0:13:37.640 --> 0:13:41.160
<v Speaker 2>as we talk of this moment in American history. He

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:44.240
<v Speaker 2>is a student of American history out of the University

0:13:44.240 --> 0:13:48.720
<v Speaker 2>of Kentucky. His public service to Bush Senior, his many

0:13:48.760 --> 0:13:53.840
<v Speaker 2>public services to Bush Junior into a legitimate lobbying effort

0:13:53.920 --> 0:13:59.280
<v Speaker 2>in Washington, and he is the banker's lobbyist in Washington,

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:03.400
<v Speaker 2>President the chief executive officer of what is called THEIF.

0:14:04.320 --> 0:14:07.240
<v Speaker 2>And the other day he had a modest conversation with

0:14:07.320 --> 0:14:11.960
<v Speaker 2>the Secretary of Treasury Tim just as a general thrilled

0:14:11.960 --> 0:14:14.680
<v Speaker 2>you with us today from the meetings in Washington is

0:14:14.720 --> 0:14:19.880
<v Speaker 2>a general statement, how scared is Global Wall Street? How

0:14:19.960 --> 0:14:25.080
<v Speaker 2>scared is Manhattan Wall Street of this moment in banking? Yeah?

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:27.520
<v Speaker 6>Sure, Tom, thank you for the intro. It's the best

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:29.360
<v Speaker 6>intro I've had in a long time. It's such an

0:14:29.400 --> 0:14:32.240
<v Speaker 6>honorary back on your show. I listened to you every day. Look,

0:14:32.560 --> 0:14:35.440
<v Speaker 6>people are worried because of just the enormous uncertainty and

0:14:35.480 --> 0:14:39.320
<v Speaker 6>the daily changes that are coming out of Washington. Although

0:14:39.320 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 6>I will say this week was a breakout week for

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:43.520
<v Speaker 6>Secretary Best, and I think he really established himself as

0:14:43.520 --> 0:14:46.280
<v Speaker 6>the anchor voice in this administration, a sober voice or reason.

0:14:46.640 --> 0:14:48.920
<v Speaker 6>And I think the time that the industry spent within

0:14:49.040 --> 0:14:52.120
<v Speaker 6>this week was a calming experience. And I think if

0:14:52.160 --> 0:14:54.880
<v Speaker 6>the administration in the White House will let Scott Secretary

0:14:54.920 --> 0:14:56.960
<v Speaker 6>Best and get out on the front more often, I

0:14:56.960 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 6>think that would help our industry, and I think it

0:14:58.760 --> 0:14:59.480
<v Speaker 6>would help markets.

0:14:59.520 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I'll go with you there. But basically what they

0:15:02.120 --> 0:15:05.000
<v Speaker 2>did they put a cork in the mouth of selected

0:15:05.120 --> 0:15:08.480
<v Speaker 2>other Trump bites. Let's say we continue with the cork

0:15:08.560 --> 0:15:11.720
<v Speaker 2>in the mouth. That's great. Besson asks to talk to

0:15:11.800 --> 0:15:15.840
<v Speaker 2>Trump about what this nation needs first, sing Paul Sweeney

0:15:15.920 --> 0:15:19.440
<v Speaker 2>said this morning, mister Adams is shipping in Los Angeles

0:15:19.760 --> 0:15:22.640
<v Speaker 2>is off a cliff. How far off a cliff do

0:15:22.720 --> 0:15:25.480
<v Speaker 2>your bankers see the American economy?

0:15:26.120 --> 0:15:29.840
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, they're very worried. Obviously, the soft indicators of what

0:15:29.840 --> 0:15:32.680
<v Speaker 6>we've seen initially. I think about Q three, Q four,

0:15:32.720 --> 0:15:35.840
<v Speaker 6>you're going to see real indicators show that the real

0:15:35.840 --> 0:15:39.080
<v Speaker 6>economy is beginning slow. The workers that this administrations say

0:15:39.120 --> 0:15:42.800
<v Speaker 6>they want to help manufacturing factory workers are going to

0:15:42.800 --> 0:15:45.440
<v Speaker 6>get hurt. It doesn't need to happen. I think Secretary

0:15:45.520 --> 0:15:48.680
<v Speaker 6>Bessence again, sober voice or reason. I think if the

0:15:48.680 --> 0:15:51.560
<v Speaker 6>President would listen more to Scott and let him lead

0:15:51.600 --> 0:15:55.240
<v Speaker 6>on these discussions and really put in place a thoughtful policy,

0:15:55.440 --> 0:15:57.560
<v Speaker 6>I think we can avoid the worst. But right now

0:15:57.560 --> 0:15:58.520
<v Speaker 6>it hangs in the balance.

0:15:59.320 --> 0:16:02.400
<v Speaker 5>Jimmy, you're down in our Washington, DC Bureau.

0:16:02.400 --> 0:16:05.200
<v Speaker 4>As we speak, you've been in meeting with some of

0:16:05.240 --> 0:16:08.080
<v Speaker 4>the folks in the IMF, which has been in Washington

0:16:08.160 --> 0:16:08.560
<v Speaker 4>this week.

0:16:08.800 --> 0:16:11.720
<v Speaker 5>What are our global trading partners what are they telling

0:16:11.800 --> 0:16:13.360
<v Speaker 5>you these days?

0:16:14.360 --> 0:16:16.480
<v Speaker 6>Well, first, there was a sigh relief this week when

0:16:16.760 --> 0:16:20.840
<v Speaker 6>the United States and articularly about Secretary Vestent, agreed to

0:16:20.840 --> 0:16:24.280
<v Speaker 6>stay in a leadership role in the Brightwoods Institution, the IMF,

0:16:24.280 --> 0:16:26.880
<v Speaker 6>the World Bank, and other iffies. I think there was

0:16:26.920 --> 0:16:29.160
<v Speaker 6>some concern that the US was going to pull back

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:32.400
<v Speaker 6>or downsize or try to undermine these institutions. But what

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:35.280
<v Speaker 6>we heard from the Secretary was a reaffirmation of not

0:16:35.320 --> 0:16:38.280
<v Speaker 6>only the US a belief in these institutions, but they

0:16:38.280 --> 0:16:40.040
<v Speaker 6>want to play a leadership role. They want to get

0:16:40.080 --> 0:16:42.920
<v Speaker 6>back to factory settings. I get that. I actually agree

0:16:42.920 --> 0:16:45.280
<v Speaker 6>with it, so I think a reaffirmation. The second is

0:16:45.320 --> 0:16:48.040
<v Speaker 6>just the uncertainty over trade in tariffs, and that's really

0:16:48.080 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 6>creating turmoil around the world and enormous uncertainty about the

0:16:50.960 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 6>trajectory of growth.

0:16:52.720 --> 0:16:55.960
<v Speaker 4>Tim Again, when you talk to your counterparts in DC

0:16:56.160 --> 0:16:59.000
<v Speaker 4>and then the IMF and all our global trading partners,

0:16:59.320 --> 0:17:03.040
<v Speaker 4>is there since that globalization as kind of we've grown

0:17:03.120 --> 0:17:06.000
<v Speaker 4>up with the last I don't know, thirty forty fifty

0:17:06.040 --> 0:17:07.200
<v Speaker 4>sixty years.

0:17:07.640 --> 0:17:10.920
<v Speaker 6>Is that over Well, it certainly feels like we're moving

0:17:10.920 --> 0:17:13.960
<v Speaker 6>into a new chapter. I actually think globalization of the

0:17:14.040 --> 0:17:17.720
<v Speaker 6>last forty fifty years improved a lot of tens of millions,

0:17:17.760 --> 0:17:19.840
<v Speaker 6>if not hundreds of millions of people globally, and actually

0:17:19.840 --> 0:17:21.920
<v Speaker 6>think it was good for the US economy. But they

0:17:21.920 --> 0:17:24.240
<v Speaker 6>had that discussion the last election. Let's move on to

0:17:24.240 --> 0:17:26.359
<v Speaker 6>figure out what what does the next chapter look like?

0:17:26.600 --> 0:17:29.320
<v Speaker 6>And I think we want an outcome that works for

0:17:29.320 --> 0:17:32.280
<v Speaker 6>the United States and works for others. Alliances and trades

0:17:32.359 --> 0:17:34.800
<v Speaker 6>still mattered, David Ricardo Toad is that two hundred and

0:17:34.800 --> 0:17:37.000
<v Speaker 6>fifty years ago. We just need to stay true to

0:17:37.000 --> 0:17:40.320
<v Speaker 6>the lessons we've learned over time. But I understand that

0:17:40.680 --> 0:17:43.440
<v Speaker 6>the US wants a better deal from some countries, including China.

0:17:43.480 --> 0:17:45.840
<v Speaker 6>I get that. Let's move on to that, resolve that

0:17:45.960 --> 0:17:48.360
<v Speaker 6>dispute and then get back to basics.

0:17:48.960 --> 0:17:51.600
<v Speaker 4>Tim, you mentioned China, and obviously that's a huge trading

0:17:51.640 --> 0:17:54.240
<v Speaker 4>partner with the United States.

0:17:54.640 --> 0:17:55.400
<v Speaker 5>Any sense of.

0:17:55.400 --> 0:17:59.880
<v Speaker 4>Kind of what the administration's strategy is as it relates.

0:17:59.840 --> 0:18:01.520
<v Speaker 5>To China at this point.

0:18:02.040 --> 0:18:05.520
<v Speaker 6>Well, so far it's been to try to isolate and

0:18:05.880 --> 0:18:08.720
<v Speaker 6>bludge in a bit. You know, I've been going to

0:18:08.760 --> 0:18:10.760
<v Speaker 6>China for thirty years. I don't know that that's going

0:18:10.840 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 6>to work. I understand that the President believes in his strategy.

0:18:14.280 --> 0:18:17.960
<v Speaker 6>He's certainly a you know a history of negotiations. So

0:18:18.000 --> 0:18:19.480
<v Speaker 6>we'll see if it works. I think you've got to

0:18:19.520 --> 0:18:22.480
<v Speaker 6>find characteristics. I think that you've got to build an alliance,

0:18:22.720 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 6>and I think you've got to treat China with respect.

0:18:25.680 --> 0:18:27.399
<v Speaker 6>Trying to bludge in them to come to the table

0:18:27.600 --> 0:18:29.240
<v Speaker 6>hasn't worked in the past. I don't think it's going

0:18:29.280 --> 0:18:29.960
<v Speaker 6>to work this time.

0:18:30.200 --> 0:18:33.399
<v Speaker 2>Tim Adams with us the IF after his conversation with

0:18:33.440 --> 0:18:38.080
<v Speaker 2>the Secretary of Treasury, just a terrific perspective not only

0:18:38.160 --> 0:18:41.159
<v Speaker 2>on our banking industry and the people he represents with

0:18:41.280 --> 0:18:44.399
<v Speaker 2>the IIF, but also of course with his Kentucky and

0:18:44.440 --> 0:18:47.359
<v Speaker 2>the Republican Party. Tim Adams, let me shift gears with

0:18:47.440 --> 0:18:50.040
<v Speaker 2>you right now, and this is going to go out

0:18:50.080 --> 0:18:53.240
<v Speaker 2>of your sense of Kentucky. Kessius Marcellus Clay started a

0:18:53.280 --> 0:18:57.720
<v Speaker 2>Republican Party a few years ago in Kentucky out of

0:18:57.760 --> 0:19:00.359
<v Speaker 2>the Civil War, and you know, it was an old

0:19:00.400 --> 0:19:03.480
<v Speaker 2>style Kentucky party, and then it goes on to what

0:19:03.600 --> 0:19:06.640
<v Speaker 2>you lived with a Bush family. There was a certain

0:19:06.840 --> 0:19:12.119
<v Speaker 2>character to a Republican Party at Walker's Point in Kennebunkport

0:19:12.800 --> 0:19:16.760
<v Speaker 2>that's been blown up. Just look at the Oval office

0:19:16.800 --> 0:19:19.080
<v Speaker 2>with the gold and then you know, I probably think

0:19:19.080 --> 0:19:21.960
<v Speaker 2>got Tim adams portrait up there and all the rest

0:19:22.280 --> 0:19:26.560
<v Speaker 2>Tim Adams. What does the old Republican Party do? Do

0:19:26.640 --> 0:19:30.119
<v Speaker 2>they vote Democrat? Is there a third party here? What

0:19:30.680 --> 0:19:34.879
<v Speaker 2>does your Republican Party do in the next four years?

0:19:35.960 --> 0:19:38.200
<v Speaker 6>Well, if you remember Bush forty one, who I worked

0:19:38.200 --> 0:19:40.600
<v Speaker 6>for as a young White House staffer, talked about a kinder,

0:19:40.720 --> 0:19:42.719
<v Speaker 6>gentler country, and I think that's true. And I had

0:19:42.720 --> 0:19:44.919
<v Speaker 6>the honor working for Bush forty three as well, and

0:19:44.960 --> 0:19:48.520
<v Speaker 6>they believed in real decorum. Look, I think there are

0:19:48.520 --> 0:19:50.240
<v Speaker 6>a lot of people across the country trying to figure

0:19:50.240 --> 0:19:52.239
<v Speaker 6>out which of the two boxes they fit in. I

0:19:52.280 --> 0:19:54.399
<v Speaker 6>just would like to find a party that wants to

0:19:54.440 --> 0:19:58.160
<v Speaker 6>be pro growth, pro business, pro capital formation, pro risk taking,

0:19:58.320 --> 0:20:00.640
<v Speaker 6>that believes in trade. As I said about two hundred

0:20:00.640 --> 0:20:04.239
<v Speaker 6>fifty years of experience, that trade actually makes us wealthier. Right,

0:20:04.440 --> 0:20:06.800
<v Speaker 6>So that's what I'm looking for. And you know, there's

0:20:06.800 --> 0:20:09.199
<v Speaker 6>no reason why the Republican Party can't offer that or

0:20:09.200 --> 0:20:11.480
<v Speaker 6>the Democratic Party right now. I think the Democratic Party

0:20:11.520 --> 0:20:14.639
<v Speaker 6>is a bit lost, but there's an opportunity to reinvent themselves.

0:20:15.560 --> 0:20:18.879
<v Speaker 2>Avestant of the Treasury worked for sous years ago. He

0:20:18.920 --> 0:20:22.480
<v Speaker 2>seems to be able to work with everyone. Marco Rubio,

0:20:22.520 --> 0:20:25.359
<v Speaker 2>I would suggest Tim Adams as someone iif and the

0:20:25.400 --> 0:20:28.840
<v Speaker 2>bankers can deal with. These are more traditional Republican in

0:20:28.920 --> 0:20:31.480
<v Speaker 2>this Donning Brook around. Look at the economists covered this

0:20:31.560 --> 0:20:34.879
<v Speaker 2>week of the Bandaged Eagle. Tim Adams, are you looking

0:20:34.880 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 2>to Secretary Rubio and bestent for leadership to help the

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:42.640
<v Speaker 2>president get back to where we were? Yes?

0:20:42.960 --> 0:20:45.840
<v Speaker 6>Absolutely, And look you've got great leadership on the Capitol Hill.

0:20:46.840 --> 0:20:49.760
<v Speaker 6>Chairman of Finished Services Committee, French Hill I spoke with

0:20:49.800 --> 0:20:52.040
<v Speaker 6>this week, known him for thirty years. Also that way,

0:20:52.640 --> 0:20:55.840
<v Speaker 6>Bill Haggerty, Dave McCormick. There are people on Capitol Hill.

0:20:55.840 --> 0:20:58.359
<v Speaker 6>They're Senators and House members that I think also believe

0:20:58.400 --> 0:21:02.920
<v Speaker 6>in engagement, free trade and just cap aformation and growth.

0:21:02.960 --> 0:21:04.440
<v Speaker 6>We need a pro growth strategy.

0:21:05.160 --> 0:21:09.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm Paul, I got eight more quests jump exactly,

0:21:09.880 --> 0:21:11.520
<v Speaker 2>Tim and I are going to start talking about Henry

0:21:11.560 --> 0:21:12.240
<v Speaker 2>Clay in a moment.

0:21:12.640 --> 0:21:15.520
<v Speaker 4>All save this, Hey, Tim, talk to us about regulatory

0:21:15.560 --> 0:21:18.280
<v Speaker 4>policy here. How do you think this administration is kind

0:21:18.280 --> 0:21:22.560
<v Speaker 4>of just viewing how they want to regulate US commerce.

0:21:22.600 --> 0:21:24.200
<v Speaker 4>I mean, there was a belief at the election that

0:21:24.480 --> 0:21:27.760
<v Speaker 4>this is going to be a pro growth administration, maybe

0:21:27.800 --> 0:21:31.160
<v Speaker 4>a little bit light handed as it relates to regulation.

0:21:31.440 --> 0:21:32.840
<v Speaker 5>How do you think that's developing here?

0:21:33.680 --> 0:21:36.480
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I think they do. I think philosophically that's exactly

0:21:36.520 --> 0:21:37.760
<v Speaker 6>where they want to go. Now you have to do

0:21:37.800 --> 0:21:39.720
<v Speaker 6>on a sector best sector basis, and we're seeing in

0:21:39.720 --> 0:21:43.280
<v Speaker 6>the energy sector a real push as he said, you know, drill, baby, drill,

0:21:43.359 --> 0:21:46.760
<v Speaker 6>let's find ways to increase oil and gas production on

0:21:46.800 --> 0:21:49.280
<v Speaker 6>top of the US being already the largest oil producer

0:21:49.280 --> 0:21:51.600
<v Speaker 6>at thirteen point two million barrels a day. So I

0:21:51.640 --> 0:21:54.400
<v Speaker 6>think that's true. On financial services, they're finding their way through.

0:21:54.600 --> 0:21:56.600
<v Speaker 6>I think we'll get to a good point. It really

0:21:56.600 --> 0:21:59.040
<v Speaker 6>depends on the sector. I do think they do want

0:21:59.040 --> 0:21:59.959
<v Speaker 6>to focus on the regulation.

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:04.560
<v Speaker 2>Tim Adams is the new method of communication for bankers,

0:22:05.119 --> 0:22:08.679
<v Speaker 2>not through Tim Adams if but they have to appear

0:22:08.720 --> 0:22:11.760
<v Speaker 2>on Fox TV because that's what the president watches, is

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:12.879
<v Speaker 2>that what we've become.

0:22:14.160 --> 0:22:17.040
<v Speaker 6>Well, Jamie is a unique individual and he's a larger

0:22:17.080 --> 0:22:18.679
<v Speaker 6>life figure, and I think he's a great voice and

0:22:18.720 --> 0:22:21.479
<v Speaker 6>a great face for not only the financial service industry,

0:22:21.520 --> 0:22:24.120
<v Speaker 6>but for industry generally. I think it was a brilliant

0:22:24.200 --> 0:22:27.359
<v Speaker 6>move of him to go where he knew the president

0:22:27.400 --> 0:22:30.200
<v Speaker 6>would be watching. And so I'm a big Jamie fan.

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:32.399
<v Speaker 6>I think we, all of us, all of our voices

0:22:32.440 --> 0:22:34.520
<v Speaker 6>need to be heard in all variety of places. In

0:22:34.600 --> 0:22:39.000
<v Speaker 6>Gleen Bloomberg. You are such an important medium. So we're

0:22:39.040 --> 0:22:40.160
<v Speaker 6>all out there every day.

0:22:40.400 --> 0:22:44.080
<v Speaker 2>He's just looking for Red Sox tickets, Tim, Tim, I

0:22:44.160 --> 0:22:47.160
<v Speaker 2>look at this and again there's the international component. Please

0:22:47.200 --> 0:22:51.600
<v Speaker 2>tell me what the European bankers through the if what

0:22:51.720 --> 0:22:53.400
<v Speaker 2>they observe in Washington.

0:22:54.560 --> 0:22:56.960
<v Speaker 6>Well, look, they want to know where financial regulation is going.

0:22:57.880 --> 0:23:00.960
<v Speaker 6>The Basle process, the Bazle three we've been working on

0:23:01.040 --> 0:23:04.119
<v Speaker 6>for fifteen years. Is there some resolution, is it coming?

0:23:04.119 --> 0:23:05.760
<v Speaker 6>What does it mean? And what does that mean for Europe.

0:23:05.800 --> 0:23:08.040
<v Speaker 6>But I'll tell you this Trump shock I think has

0:23:08.119 --> 0:23:10.000
<v Speaker 6>been a wake up call for Europe. I actually think

0:23:10.000 --> 0:23:12.560
<v Speaker 6>there's an opportunity for Europe to seize the moment and

0:23:12.600 --> 0:23:16.120
<v Speaker 6>put in place policies they will create capital formation, job creation,

0:23:16.359 --> 0:23:20.360
<v Speaker 6>and they can grow. They certainly need a defense industrial base,

0:23:20.400 --> 0:23:24.080
<v Speaker 6>a security industrial base. Europe's moment is here. Can they

0:23:24.080 --> 0:23:26.000
<v Speaker 6>seize it? I don't know, but what I heard this

0:23:26.080 --> 0:23:28.879
<v Speaker 6>week from European officials they know it and there are

0:23:28.880 --> 0:23:31.320
<v Speaker 6>some here that want to move forward.

0:23:31.200 --> 0:23:34.040
<v Speaker 4>And tim I mean along those lines, you know, I

0:23:34.040 --> 0:23:36.400
<v Speaker 4>think a lot of folks feel like, Okay, Germany can

0:23:36.480 --> 0:23:38.800
<v Speaker 4>certainly step up and make those types of investments.

0:23:38.840 --> 0:23:40.720
<v Speaker 5>Maybe even Poland, I've heard.

0:23:40.640 --> 0:23:43.920
<v Speaker 4>Because just given their geography relative visa the Russia.

0:23:44.480 --> 0:23:45.639
<v Speaker 5>But how about the rest of Europe.

0:23:45.680 --> 0:23:48.720
<v Speaker 4>I'm thinking, you know, Italy, Spain, Portugal, I mean, what

0:23:48.760 --> 0:23:53.560
<v Speaker 4>can they realistically do in terms of, you know, investment

0:23:53.600 --> 0:23:55.640
<v Speaker 4>in their infrastructure, in their defense.

0:23:56.480 --> 0:24:00.080
<v Speaker 6>Well, you're right, Germany, after decades of a dorm and

0:24:00.119 --> 0:24:02.840
<v Speaker 6>see in terms of a new investment, is ready to spend.

0:24:02.920 --> 0:24:05.840
<v Speaker 6>I think the Chancellor Mertz will take over May seventh.

0:24:06.000 --> 0:24:08.320
<v Speaker 6>He's got a great, great vision. I was in Warsaw

0:24:08.440 --> 0:24:11.240
<v Speaker 6>two weeks ago. As you said, Poland is really a

0:24:11.240 --> 0:24:15.119
<v Speaker 6>great intellectual leader in terms of growth and capitalism, the

0:24:15.160 --> 0:24:19.320
<v Speaker 6>Baltic States, the Nordics. I met with Spanish officials yesterday.

0:24:19.359 --> 0:24:21.720
<v Speaker 6>I think Spain has an enormous story to tell. Rapid

0:24:21.760 --> 0:24:24.719
<v Speaker 6>economic growth in Spain, and so there is some upside.

0:24:24.880 --> 0:24:27.000
<v Speaker 6>Many of them have physical challenges, they have large debt

0:24:27.040 --> 0:24:29.320
<v Speaker 6>to GDP, they have large deficits, so they've got to

0:24:29.320 --> 0:24:31.800
<v Speaker 6>work through fiscal But I think there's an option for

0:24:31.840 --> 0:24:34.679
<v Speaker 6>a mindset that the private sector, not the public sector,

0:24:34.680 --> 0:24:37.600
<v Speaker 6>the private sector can play a growth leading role.

0:24:37.880 --> 0:24:42.040
<v Speaker 2>Tim Adams Kentucky rebuild to beat Paul Sweeney's Duke. I mean,

0:24:42.119 --> 0:24:44.639
<v Speaker 2>can Mark quote, can Mark Pope get it done at

0:24:44.680 --> 0:24:47.160
<v Speaker 2>Kentucky's So they finally walloped Duke?

0:24:48.200 --> 0:24:50.199
<v Speaker 6>Well, you know, we beat Duke this year in the

0:24:50.240 --> 0:24:53.240
<v Speaker 6>regular season. It was a big win for Mark Pope.

0:24:53.240 --> 0:24:54.800
<v Speaker 6>I think he's got a great team he's gonna put

0:24:54.800 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 6>on the floor next year. I like him. I think

0:24:56.320 --> 0:24:58.600
<v Speaker 6>he's a real deal, and the players like him as well.

0:24:58.840 --> 0:25:01.119
<v Speaker 2>Tim Adams generous of to spend this time with us

0:25:01.160 --> 0:25:04.440
<v Speaker 2>this morning with the IF, and of course that really

0:25:04.480 --> 0:25:08.680
<v Speaker 2>important interview conversation with Secretary Bessett here a few days

0:25:08.680 --> 0:25:11.359
<v Speaker 2>ago which truly moved the markets.

0:25:11.440 --> 0:25:15.320
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Listen live each weekday

0:25:15.359 --> 0:25:18.680
<v Speaker 1>starting at seven am Eastern on Applecarplay and Android Auto

0:25:18.800 --> 0:25:21.760
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen live

0:25:21.840 --> 0:25:25.439
<v Speaker 1>on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station. Just

0:25:25.480 --> 0:25:28.280
<v Speaker 1>say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:25:28.440 --> 0:25:33.440
<v Speaker 2>Filmmakers in the Full Frame Documentary Film Festival. That's a

0:25:33.600 --> 0:25:34.320
<v Speaker 2>course at.

0:25:34.240 --> 0:25:36.919
<v Speaker 5>Duke at Duke and parents paid good tition.

0:25:36.800 --> 0:25:39.280
<v Speaker 2>That pays you to study duration and convexity.

0:25:39.359 --> 0:25:41.800
<v Speaker 5>But somehow she's made a good career. I don't know

0:25:41.840 --> 0:25:42.280
<v Speaker 5>how she did it.

0:25:42.320 --> 0:25:45.240
<v Speaker 4>Meghan Graper joins, she really appreciate you coming into our studio.

0:25:45.359 --> 0:25:48.320
<v Speaker 4>Here's global head of Debt capital Markets at Barkley's.

0:25:48.320 --> 0:25:50.480
<v Speaker 5>Meghan, thank you so much for joining us here.

0:25:51.080 --> 0:25:54.800
<v Speaker 4>If I want to fund a leverage buyout in the

0:25:54.880 --> 0:25:57.840
<v Speaker 4>debt capital markets, can you do that for me?

0:25:58.440 --> 0:25:59.440
<v Speaker 5>We can? We can.

0:25:59.560 --> 0:26:01.879
<v Speaker 7>In fact, I think there are signs of life in

0:26:02.320 --> 0:26:05.399
<v Speaker 7>the investment grade world, in particular a market that seems

0:26:05.480 --> 0:26:08.600
<v Speaker 7>reasonably unshaken relative to what we're seeing play out and

0:26:08.640 --> 0:26:11.760
<v Speaker 7>other asset classes. And part of this is tied to

0:26:12.560 --> 0:26:14.760
<v Speaker 7>I think, you know, a reopening of the market. You

0:26:14.800 --> 0:26:17.520
<v Speaker 7>need to see supply to beget supply, and there is

0:26:17.600 --> 0:26:20.760
<v Speaker 7>confidence in cash to be deployed, and so the you know,

0:26:20.840 --> 0:26:23.040
<v Speaker 7>supply demand and balance. I think helping drive.

0:26:22.800 --> 0:26:24.960
<v Speaker 2>That let me get to the soap opera right now

0:26:24.960 --> 0:26:27.560
<v Speaker 2>in Rubinstein You know, do I mean there's no selling

0:26:27.600 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 2>in private equity private debt? I mean they can cool

0:26:30.119 --> 0:26:37.320
<v Speaker 2>concollect it. Other institutions are selling private equity. Now discuss

0:26:37.520 --> 0:26:39.119
<v Speaker 2>what's it mean from your desk?

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:43.879
<v Speaker 7>It means a cash rotation and so there's ample liquidity.

0:26:43.880 --> 0:26:45.360
<v Speaker 7>You can see it in the order books we had

0:26:45.359 --> 0:26:48.080
<v Speaker 7>this week, So we've had a functional new issue market.

0:26:48.320 --> 0:26:51.040
<v Speaker 7>You sawt you know Kender Morgan deal with seventeen billion

0:26:51.080 --> 0:26:54.480
<v Speaker 7>of demand this week, Walmart topping twenty one billion. We

0:26:54.560 --> 0:26:56.760
<v Speaker 7>did a deal for the Republic of Austria and Europe

0:26:57.119 --> 0:27:00.440
<v Speaker 7>sixty three billion in demand for seven billion dollar trans

0:27:00.440 --> 0:27:02.800
<v Speaker 7>So cash is gravitating to save havens.

0:27:03.000 --> 0:27:05.880
<v Speaker 2>I hate you. She doesn't know. I bought the Austria

0:27:05.960 --> 0:27:08.560
<v Speaker 2>in one hundred year at the top of the market.

0:27:08.600 --> 0:27:10.080
<v Speaker 2>It went down seventy four percent.

0:27:11.480 --> 0:27:13.600
<v Speaker 4>What are your clients telling you these days, Megan? When

0:27:13.640 --> 0:27:15.240
<v Speaker 4>you talk to them, if you bring a new issue

0:27:15.320 --> 0:27:18.000
<v Speaker 4>to the market, how do they feel about Are they

0:27:18.080 --> 0:27:20.680
<v Speaker 4>asking for more return or are they asking for tougher covenants?

0:27:20.720 --> 0:27:23.520
<v Speaker 4>Are they concerned about just the world in general, or

0:27:24.240 --> 0:27:25.960
<v Speaker 4>is there so much money on the sidelines so they're

0:27:25.960 --> 0:27:27.560
<v Speaker 4>just throwing it at your issuers.

0:27:27.640 --> 0:27:29.440
<v Speaker 7>You know, I've yet to see an investor that would

0:27:29.440 --> 0:27:31.760
<v Speaker 7>say they're bullish here, So that is the challenge.

0:27:31.800 --> 0:27:32.120
<v Speaker 5>I think.

0:27:32.320 --> 0:27:36.040
<v Speaker 7>You know, ultimately there there is a amount of cash

0:27:36.080 --> 0:27:39.040
<v Speaker 7>coming into investors' hands that needs to be redeployed, and

0:27:39.080 --> 0:27:42.520
<v Speaker 7>they are looking for safe harbors. Investment grade is proving

0:27:42.520 --> 0:27:45.600
<v Speaker 7>to be that. You've got four hundred billion in coupon

0:27:45.680 --> 0:27:49.240
<v Speaker 7>income and the wall of COVID debt maturing. So even

0:27:49.240 --> 0:27:53.240
<v Speaker 7>as we keep monitoring these lipper data outflows, which certainly

0:27:53.280 --> 0:27:55.840
<v Speaker 7>need to be scrutinized, I think they're indicative of sort

0:27:55.880 --> 0:28:00.000
<v Speaker 7>of psychology of market and sentiment. There is a willing

0:28:00.240 --> 0:28:03.720
<v Speaker 7>and there is opportunity that volatility is presenting in the

0:28:03.760 --> 0:28:06.000
<v Speaker 7>long end of the curve. And with yields that are

0:28:06.040 --> 0:28:08.679
<v Speaker 7>now you know, upwards of six percent without having to

0:28:08.680 --> 0:28:09.840
<v Speaker 7>take a lot of credit.

0:28:09.640 --> 0:28:13.119
<v Speaker 4>Risk, I guess your world has kind of readjusted to

0:28:13.840 --> 0:28:16.440
<v Speaker 4>you know, a ten year at four thirty that type

0:28:16.440 --> 0:28:19.159
<v Speaker 4>of thing, as opposed to years for fifteen years we

0:28:19.200 --> 0:28:24.000
<v Speaker 4>had no interest rates has had issuers and investors kind

0:28:24.000 --> 0:28:26.720
<v Speaker 4>of said, Okay, this is the new normal. Now, this

0:28:26.840 --> 0:28:29.760
<v Speaker 4>is actually what a normal capital markets and the debt

0:28:29.800 --> 0:28:31.679
<v Speaker 4>side looks like, yeah, it's.

0:28:31.520 --> 0:28:33.480
<v Speaker 7>Picking and choosing your spots on the curve, so that

0:28:33.600 --> 0:28:36.920
<v Speaker 7>is certainly a choice. I think for investors, the underlying

0:28:36.960 --> 0:28:39.760
<v Speaker 7>yield is what's fueling the bid. So you're talking about,

0:28:39.760 --> 0:28:41.800
<v Speaker 7>you know, some of the highest all in yields that

0:28:41.840 --> 0:28:43.560
<v Speaker 7>you could achieve in the long end of the curve,

0:28:44.360 --> 0:28:47.560
<v Speaker 7>upwards of six percent for a single a long piece

0:28:48.040 --> 0:28:50.880
<v Speaker 7>data debt, and in triple bs is closer to six

0:28:50.960 --> 0:28:53.760
<v Speaker 7>point three. So but on the issuer side, they're looking

0:28:53.760 --> 0:28:56.440
<v Speaker 7>at spreads, they're still at all time tights. So we've

0:28:56.440 --> 0:28:59.480
<v Speaker 7>seen a ten basis point retlacement and credit spreads this week,

0:28:59.760 --> 0:29:02.120
<v Speaker 7>which just tells you that you know, there is money

0:29:02.320 --> 0:29:05.239
<v Speaker 7>pulling in at a time where yes, credit spreads are

0:29:05.240 --> 0:29:08.520
<v Speaker 7>twenty five wider on the year, but underlying rates in

0:29:08.520 --> 0:29:10.840
<v Speaker 7>the front end of the curve are forty to fifty lower,

0:29:10.880 --> 0:29:13.560
<v Speaker 7>So you're all in cost of funding Actually isn't materially

0:29:13.680 --> 0:29:15.240
<v Speaker 7>worse than you were at the start.

0:29:15.440 --> 0:29:18.720
<v Speaker 2>You're too young. But did your dad or grandpa did

0:29:18.720 --> 0:29:20.680
<v Speaker 2>they show you the SMP blue Book.

0:29:21.240 --> 0:29:23.640
<v Speaker 7>We were a medical family. I was standing over my

0:29:23.760 --> 0:29:27.280
<v Speaker 7>dad in an o R doing cardiac surgery procedures so

0:29:27.720 --> 0:29:32.680
<v Speaker 7>finance was another world from that medical Listen.

0:29:33.000 --> 0:29:36.480
<v Speaker 2>Ten, you're attained, Mimosa. Maybe get Megan Raper through this.

0:29:36.640 --> 0:29:39.080
<v Speaker 2>Megan Draper with us here in your community, rascin nation.

0:29:39.600 --> 0:29:42.959
<v Speaker 2>Good morning worldwide and particularly to the continent of Europe.

0:29:43.200 --> 0:29:47.240
<v Speaker 2>In your afternoon on YouTube, subscribe to Bloomberg Podcasts. Okay,

0:29:47.240 --> 0:29:52.680
<v Speaker 2>any equity zeitgeist right now. Institutions not Barclay's total panic.

0:29:53.280 --> 0:29:56.240
<v Speaker 2>Everybody's doing this, doing that in retails by the dip,

0:29:56.640 --> 0:30:01.160
<v Speaker 2>keep it going. Is it the same retail institution dichotomy

0:30:01.560 --> 0:30:02.440
<v Speaker 2>in fixed income?

0:30:02.920 --> 0:30:05.600
<v Speaker 7>Well, the one thing we've been monitoring is that twenty

0:30:05.600 --> 0:30:08.600
<v Speaker 7>two percent of investment grade credit is owned by non

0:30:08.720 --> 0:30:11.560
<v Speaker 7>US investors. And so the fear factor, particularly as we

0:30:11.600 --> 0:30:13.360
<v Speaker 7>looked at some of the moves in the bond market,

0:30:13.480 --> 0:30:16.480
<v Speaker 7>and you know, the the you know, suggestion was that

0:30:16.520 --> 0:30:19.360
<v Speaker 7>maybe we were seeing investors hair back. That's in fact

0:30:19.400 --> 0:30:19.920
<v Speaker 7>not the case.

0:30:20.240 --> 0:30:22.120
<v Speaker 2>We look, it's not happening.

0:30:22.200 --> 0:30:24.120
<v Speaker 7>It's not happening. You can see it in the raid auctions.

0:30:24.160 --> 0:30:28.240
<v Speaker 7>We just got the allotment data for the April auctions,

0:30:28.240 --> 0:30:30.600
<v Speaker 7>So tens and thirties actually saw a month of a

0:30:30.640 --> 0:30:33.640
<v Speaker 7>month increase in terms of foreign participation. That's true in

0:30:33.680 --> 0:30:35.800
<v Speaker 7>these new issue order books as well. So we are

0:30:35.840 --> 0:30:39.160
<v Speaker 7>bringing deals to market that twenty two percent holding is

0:30:39.200 --> 0:30:41.640
<v Speaker 7>still you know, there's no shortage of demand from Asia,

0:30:41.680 --> 0:30:44.440
<v Speaker 7>from the Middle East and from Europe helping to underpin

0:30:44.560 --> 0:30:46.400
<v Speaker 7>some of these functional markets.

0:30:46.920 --> 0:30:49.120
<v Speaker 4>How do you compete against private credit or how has

0:30:49.160 --> 0:30:51.440
<v Speaker 4>the private credit market impacted your business?

0:30:52.280 --> 0:30:54.400
<v Speaker 7>I mean private credit is a bit more opaque and

0:30:54.440 --> 0:30:57.280
<v Speaker 7>it does feel like more of a bespoke market. And

0:30:57.320 --> 0:30:59.320
<v Speaker 7>so if you're an investor in this day and age,

0:30:59.360 --> 0:31:02.080
<v Speaker 7>what's what's differ in the secondary market. Why everyone takes

0:31:02.120 --> 0:31:04.920
<v Speaker 7>their lead from the primary is you're in good company.

0:31:05.040 --> 0:31:07.080
<v Speaker 7>If you're in the new issue market, you're not a

0:31:07.120 --> 0:31:10.360
<v Speaker 7>singular investor making a singular decision. A lot of private

0:31:10.400 --> 0:31:13.200
<v Speaker 7>credit is actually more finite number of players helping to

0:31:13.320 --> 0:31:14.440
<v Speaker 7>drive activity.

0:31:14.600 --> 0:31:15.520
<v Speaker 2>If you're alongside one.

0:31:15.480 --> 0:31:18.120
<v Speaker 7>Hundred and fifty other accounts in a twenty billion dollar

0:31:18.280 --> 0:31:20.800
<v Speaker 7>order book, you're feeling more confident that at a market

0:31:20.880 --> 0:31:24.000
<v Speaker 7>that's difficult to think about where is fair value, If

0:31:24.040 --> 0:31:27.640
<v Speaker 7>you're alongside of a multitude of other savvy investors, you're

0:31:27.640 --> 0:31:30.080
<v Speaker 7>feeling greater conviction about fair value.

0:31:30.160 --> 0:31:33.640
<v Speaker 2>David from Camden Yard's emails and I'm kidding folks, But

0:31:33.720 --> 0:31:36.040
<v Speaker 2>if you were to talk to mister Rubinstein right now,

0:31:36.680 --> 0:31:42.360
<v Speaker 2>are the endowments to locked up an alternative investments? Esoteric alternatives?

0:31:42.560 --> 0:31:45.920
<v Speaker 2>Should they be looking at the joyous liquidity of Meghan

0:31:46.000 --> 0:31:47.120
<v Speaker 2>Draper at Arclay's.

0:31:47.720 --> 0:31:49.840
<v Speaker 7>I think we're seeing that rotation happen. So if you're

0:31:49.840 --> 0:31:52.600
<v Speaker 7>looking for safe have in trades, particularly in the front

0:31:52.680 --> 0:31:54.720
<v Speaker 7>end of the curve, it's an easy place to find

0:31:54.720 --> 0:31:58.480
<v Speaker 7>a cash surrogate and wait for more sustained stability because

0:31:58.640 --> 0:32:01.040
<v Speaker 7>you know, even if there's a criminal dealmaking out there,

0:32:01.400 --> 0:32:04.520
<v Speaker 7>the risk is that this growth landscape is going to contract,

0:32:04.680 --> 0:32:07.560
<v Speaker 7>particularly as you move into the second half. So it's

0:32:07.600 --> 0:32:09.720
<v Speaker 7>a good place to sort of part cash and wait

0:32:09.760 --> 0:32:13.240
<v Speaker 7>things out and still without taking much credit risk pick

0:32:13.320 --> 0:32:14.280
<v Speaker 7>up in criminal yield.

0:32:14.920 --> 0:32:18.600
<v Speaker 2>The movie of my childhood was David Lean Lawrence of Arabia.

0:32:18.800 --> 0:32:22.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean it was just it was jaw dropping as

0:32:22.080 --> 0:32:25.000
<v Speaker 2>a kid. What was the movie of your childhood that

0:32:25.120 --> 0:32:26.280
<v Speaker 2>made you do film it?

0:32:26.360 --> 0:32:27.480
<v Speaker 6>Do well?

0:32:27.520 --> 0:32:29.800
<v Speaker 7>I started out as a documentary filmmaker, and so it

0:32:29.840 --> 0:32:34.720
<v Speaker 7>was really more evaluating and critiquing different personality types, which

0:32:34.760 --> 0:32:37.640
<v Speaker 7>is actually somewhat apropos as you think about trying to

0:32:37.680 --> 0:32:40.960
<v Speaker 7>evaluate different investors and issuers and how they're approaching markets.

0:32:41.360 --> 0:32:41.640
<v Speaker 8>C Z.

0:32:41.920 --> 0:32:42.800
<v Speaker 2>The Greek movie.

0:32:43.600 --> 0:32:44.880
<v Speaker 5>You got to see that? What is that?

0:32:45.480 --> 0:32:48.960
<v Speaker 2>The one every Academy award, like nineteen seventy seventy one.

0:32:49.000 --> 0:32:52.960
<v Speaker 2>It was this incredibly it was before documentary. It's this

0:32:53.120 --> 0:32:56.800
<v Speaker 2>incredibly violent movie about one of the Greek revolutions.

0:32:57.040 --> 0:32:57.720
<v Speaker 9>All Right, I'm on it.

0:32:57.840 --> 0:32:58.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, very cool Z.

0:32:59.600 --> 0:33:02.920
<v Speaker 5>Just a that's like a John Tucker reference. Lisa comes

0:33:02.960 --> 0:33:03.520
<v Speaker 5>out of nowhere.

0:33:04.040 --> 0:33:05.720
<v Speaker 7>Something to watch on an international sign.

0:33:06.320 --> 0:33:08.360
<v Speaker 2>Are you based in New York or does Barkleys have

0:33:08.440 --> 0:33:09.880
<v Speaker 2>you with a British accent in London?

0:33:09.920 --> 0:33:11.920
<v Speaker 7>No, I'm based in New York, but I'm all over

0:33:11.920 --> 0:33:14.000
<v Speaker 7>the globe. I was in Texas yesterday. I'm flying to

0:33:14.000 --> 0:33:15.240
<v Speaker 7>Switzer on Sunday.

0:33:16.880 --> 0:33:18.520
<v Speaker 2>You talked to Michael They're going to move to New

0:33:18.600 --> 0:33:20.200
<v Speaker 2>York Stock Exchange to Texas.

0:33:20.640 --> 0:33:23.000
<v Speaker 7>There's a there's a you know, decent amount of conviction

0:33:23.160 --> 0:33:26.480
<v Speaker 7>that there's sort of ample, ample opportunities for you know,

0:33:26.600 --> 0:33:29.240
<v Speaker 7>high quality names where our fundamentals are in good shape

0:33:30.000 --> 0:33:32.640
<v Speaker 7>and where they have access to markets. So it's a

0:33:32.640 --> 0:33:35.160
<v Speaker 7>tale of two cities. There's definitely you know, issuers that

0:33:35.200 --> 0:33:37.080
<v Speaker 7>are cash rich and happy to sit this out for

0:33:37.160 --> 0:33:39.440
<v Speaker 7>a period of times. With some of our pipeline has

0:33:39.520 --> 0:33:42.440
<v Speaker 7>moved to late q Q two Q three, there are

0:33:42.440 --> 0:33:45.040
<v Speaker 7>others though there's a thirty five billion dollars backlog slated

0:33:45.040 --> 0:33:46.880
<v Speaker 7>for next week. So we're going to build on the

0:33:46.880 --> 0:33:49.600
<v Speaker 7>momentum we saw this week with twenty five billion getting done,

0:33:49.720 --> 0:33:52.160
<v Speaker 7>twenty five billion getting done at new issue concessions that

0:33:52.200 --> 0:33:55.040
<v Speaker 7>are three bases points, with over subscriptions that are upwards

0:33:55.040 --> 0:33:55.720
<v Speaker 7>of five times.

0:33:55.880 --> 0:33:59.240
<v Speaker 2>Megan, Thank you, Megan Graper with Barkley's driving all their

0:34:00.120 --> 0:34:00.920
<v Speaker 2>at market work.

0:34:06.400 --> 0:34:10.280
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Listen live each weekday

0:34:10.320 --> 0:34:13.320
<v Speaker 1>starting at seven am Eastern on Apple Corplay and Android

0:34:13.360 --> 0:34:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also watch

0:34:16.440 --> 0:34:19.400
<v Speaker 1>us live every weekday on YouTube and always on the

0:34:19.400 --> 0:34:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg terminal.

0:34:20.480 --> 0:34:24.160
<v Speaker 2>This is like, you know, Leslie's in and we're going

0:34:24.239 --> 0:34:28.920
<v Speaker 2>to talk about liquefied natural gas, and all of a sudden,

0:34:29.040 --> 0:34:31.319
<v Speaker 2>you know, it's like, okay, we'll do it, and it's

0:34:31.480 --> 0:34:35.560
<v Speaker 2>interesting and all that. She's with Energy Vista and we're

0:34:35.560 --> 0:34:40.560
<v Speaker 2>gonna look at liquefied natural gas and it liquefies. It

0:34:40.920 --> 0:34:45.920
<v Speaker 2>negative two hundred and thirty degrees Fahrenheite, and the the

0:34:46.200 --> 0:34:50.000
<v Speaker 2>equation is C two h six or something. I flunked

0:34:50.040 --> 0:34:53.480
<v Speaker 2>it in chemistry. I'm sorry, except you're the most important

0:34:53.480 --> 0:34:54.439
<v Speaker 2>interview of the day.

0:34:55.080 --> 0:34:55.480
<v Speaker 5>Good time.

0:34:55.560 --> 0:35:00.319
<v Speaker 2>All of a sudden, your world is front and center

0:35:00.560 --> 0:35:05.240
<v Speaker 2>with US, China, US Europe. So the boats go to China,

0:35:05.719 --> 0:35:08.880
<v Speaker 2>but your boats with LNG may turn around and go

0:35:08.960 --> 0:35:10.640
<v Speaker 2>to Europe. Do I have that right?

0:35:11.120 --> 0:35:14.960
<v Speaker 8>So they already stopped flowing to China since February, actually,

0:35:15.719 --> 0:35:19.080
<v Speaker 8>both for economic reasons and the fifteen tariffs that happened

0:35:19.080 --> 0:35:22.839
<v Speaker 8>at that time. But we've seen that China has used

0:35:22.840 --> 0:35:27.160
<v Speaker 8>its retaliation from the beginning. It's geopolitical lever that it

0:35:27.239 --> 0:35:32.959
<v Speaker 8>has on US energy from the beginning, same as last time,

0:35:33.080 --> 0:35:36.680
<v Speaker 8>like the first trade war, China has stopped importing US

0:35:36.800 --> 0:35:40.240
<v Speaker 8>lergy for a couple of months until the trade deal happened,

0:35:40.640 --> 0:35:43.880
<v Speaker 8>and then despite their imports of US elergy. So I

0:35:43.920 --> 0:35:49.439
<v Speaker 8>think that China is using its coercive diplomacy retaliation right now.

0:35:49.480 --> 0:35:50.600
<v Speaker 8>But the deal is still on the.

0:35:50.600 --> 0:35:53.360
<v Speaker 2>Table, I should say, Leslie Poultic, Goesman, I didn't energy

0:35:53.400 --> 0:35:56.680
<v Speaker 2>so correctly, Paul put me in the timeout chair. Leslie

0:35:56.680 --> 0:36:02.440
<v Speaker 2>Poultic Gosman with US from energy. Big deal. So it is.

0:36:02.480 --> 0:36:05.480
<v Speaker 5>And how do you think when you think about the global.

0:36:05.160 --> 0:36:08.880
<v Speaker 4>Trade here we're talking about tariffs with so many different

0:36:08.880 --> 0:36:11.440
<v Speaker 4>countries and so many different products and services. How do

0:36:11.440 --> 0:36:17.280
<v Speaker 4>you see energy industry think about a world where free

0:36:17.320 --> 0:36:18.640
<v Speaker 4>trade maybe on the decline.

0:36:19.880 --> 0:36:22.960
<v Speaker 8>So, Paul, let me ask you a question. What's in

0:36:23.040 --> 0:36:28.760
<v Speaker 8>common between Alaska and shipping? So they were both mentioned

0:36:28.760 --> 0:36:31.160
<v Speaker 8>in the Speech of the State of the Union earlier

0:36:31.200 --> 0:36:34.480
<v Speaker 8>this year. And this is the card that South Korea

0:36:34.520 --> 0:36:36.920
<v Speaker 8>can play. So all the countries right now they are

0:36:36.960 --> 0:36:40.799
<v Speaker 8>looking at all cross agencies, cross sectors, what they can

0:36:40.880 --> 0:36:44.840
<v Speaker 8>come to the table with the US and infrastructure. Shipping

0:36:44.920 --> 0:36:46.399
<v Speaker 8>is going to be big on the table in South

0:36:46.440 --> 0:36:49.280
<v Speaker 8>Korea has a competitive advantage here and they can bring

0:36:49.400 --> 0:36:52.239
<v Speaker 8>they can buy also more US energy imports and potentially

0:36:52.320 --> 0:36:55.160
<v Speaker 8>from the Alaska project that everybody is talking about.

0:36:55.040 --> 0:36:58.040
<v Speaker 2>Basic one, an allergy ship that's not going to China.

0:36:58.120 --> 0:37:00.719
<v Speaker 2>Can it go through the Paramat Canal? They fit through

0:37:00.719 --> 0:37:01.960
<v Speaker 2>the Panama Canal.

0:37:01.960 --> 0:37:05.520
<v Speaker 8>Yes they can. But all twenty twenty four, most of

0:37:05.560 --> 0:37:08.320
<v Speaker 8>the LNG tankers from the US have avoided the Panama

0:37:08.360 --> 0:37:11.879
<v Speaker 8>Canal because of the bottleneck re rooted around the Cape

0:37:11.880 --> 0:37:16.919
<v Speaker 8>of Good Hope, but it made more sense anyway economically

0:37:17.160 --> 0:37:19.560
<v Speaker 8>to send it to Europe, and Europe was the largest

0:37:20.000 --> 0:37:21.280
<v Speaker 8>market for US O engerins.

0:37:21.280 --> 0:37:23.120
<v Speaker 2>Where does it come out of the East Coast is

0:37:23.120 --> 0:37:27.920
<v Speaker 2>a golf American excuse Gulf of America. Sorry, where's the

0:37:28.320 --> 0:37:32.920
<v Speaker 2>major LNG depot in Texas, Louisiana?

0:37:33.560 --> 0:37:35.040
<v Speaker 8>All around the US golf.

0:37:34.800 --> 0:37:37.360
<v Speaker 2>Coast Rotterdam or do they go to France?

0:37:37.400 --> 0:37:42.359
<v Speaker 8>From they go to France, Belgium, the UK, Turkeys like

0:37:42.400 --> 0:37:46.320
<v Speaker 8>the all along the Mediterranean, the Netherlands, Germany.

0:37:46.400 --> 0:37:48.560
<v Speaker 2>What Secretary was going to do with this?

0:37:48.760 --> 0:37:52.719
<v Speaker 8>With your world of lerg So I think that it's

0:37:52.760 --> 0:37:56.040
<v Speaker 8>a logical avenue to play this card because the US

0:37:56.080 --> 0:37:58.800
<v Speaker 8>wants to sell more of it, unleash the American gold,

0:37:59.400 --> 0:38:01.799
<v Speaker 8>and Europe needs it right now to keep Russia and

0:38:01.920 --> 0:38:05.600
<v Speaker 8>gas and energy at bay. And so there is a

0:38:05.640 --> 0:38:10.799
<v Speaker 8>common ground of understanding here and US Energy. Yes, the

0:38:10.880 --> 0:38:15.960
<v Speaker 8>permitting barrier has been removed, but US energy still needs

0:38:16.000 --> 0:38:18.279
<v Speaker 8>to be built if new projects come along, and the

0:38:18.360 --> 0:38:24.080
<v Speaker 8>financing is really challenging for this new project, and the

0:38:24.200 --> 0:38:26.560
<v Speaker 8>US needs to sell if there is no market, you know,

0:38:26.600 --> 0:38:27.879
<v Speaker 8>there is no exports, but.

0:38:27.880 --> 0:38:31.239
<v Speaker 4>Don't we I think that liquified natural gas. I came

0:38:31.280 --> 0:38:34.320
<v Speaker 4>to understand the importance of it during when Russia invaded

0:38:34.440 --> 0:38:37.680
<v Speaker 4>Ukraine and that shut off a source of energy for

0:38:37.880 --> 0:38:41.560
<v Speaker 4>Europe and so our the US. Liquified natural gas became

0:38:41.640 --> 0:38:44.080
<v Speaker 4>so much more valuable and so much more important. But

0:38:44.200 --> 0:38:45.880
<v Speaker 4>isn't the problem in the US is we don't have

0:38:45.960 --> 0:38:49.560
<v Speaker 4>necessarily the pipelines to get it to the ports in

0:38:49.640 --> 0:38:51.120
<v Speaker 4>Galveston or wherever we.

0:38:51.120 --> 0:38:51.719
<v Speaker 5>Need to get it to.

0:38:51.960 --> 0:38:54.880
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, so you're you're you know, you're raising an important

0:38:56.080 --> 0:38:59.400
<v Speaker 8>part of the equation that infrastructure in the US. More

0:38:59.440 --> 0:39:02.640
<v Speaker 8>infrastructure needs to be built on the pipeline side. So

0:39:02.719 --> 0:39:04.840
<v Speaker 8>it all depends what is the source of the gas

0:39:04.840 --> 0:39:08.239
<v Speaker 8>for this energy? Is it associated gas from you know,

0:39:08.360 --> 0:39:12.600
<v Speaker 8>oil production, or it's dry gas? So that will be

0:39:12.600 --> 0:39:13.560
<v Speaker 8>important in the future.

0:39:13.640 --> 0:39:16.279
<v Speaker 2>Well, I had twenty seconds Michael Barr's trumpet at the

0:39:16.280 --> 0:39:20.080
<v Speaker 2>BIT as clearly as I can. An energy tanker is

0:39:20.120 --> 0:39:23.760
<v Speaker 2>two football fields and there's only twenty five people on board.

0:39:24.840 --> 0:39:27.960
<v Speaker 8>No, I don't even know exactly what's the crew. But

0:39:28.120 --> 0:39:31.360
<v Speaker 8>I can give you another data points. Please, how many

0:39:31.560 --> 0:39:33.080
<v Speaker 8>US flagships do we have?

0:39:34.200 --> 0:39:37.319
<v Speaker 5>Like almost none? Right, exactly exactly.

0:39:37.000 --> 0:39:40.320
<v Speaker 8>I think we have only one new one that recently

0:39:40.360 --> 0:39:43.359
<v Speaker 8>dropped a cargo in Puerto Rico that was like the

0:39:43.360 --> 0:39:48.000
<v Speaker 8>only recent ones that we had. And globally speaking, eighty

0:39:48.040 --> 0:39:51.759
<v Speaker 8>percent of the trade is on the ocean. How many

0:39:51.840 --> 0:39:55.359
<v Speaker 8>US ships all together that we have only eighty yep

0:39:55.520 --> 0:39:56.800
<v Speaker 8>that can do global trade.

0:39:56.880 --> 0:40:01.240
<v Speaker 2>This is great. Yeah, so I've more seven minutes with Leslie,

0:40:01.280 --> 0:40:04.479
<v Speaker 2>Paul and the whole thing. Can you come back?

0:40:04.640 --> 0:40:05.279
<v Speaker 5>I can come back.

0:40:05.320 --> 0:40:07.600
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, Thank you for having me. Less Paul goes

0:40:07.640 --> 0:40:08.560
<v Speaker 2>with Ergie Vista.

0:40:08.920 --> 0:40:12.840
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Listen live each weekday

0:40:12.880 --> 0:40:15.880
<v Speaker 1>starting at seven am Eastern on Apple Corplay and Android

0:40:15.920 --> 0:40:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen

0:40:19.040 --> 0:40:22.280
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station,

0:40:22.840 --> 0:40:26.399
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty perfect for my.

0:40:26.440 --> 0:40:29.160
<v Speaker 2>Beverage of choice. Lisa was out on YouTube on the

0:40:29.200 --> 0:40:32.759
<v Speaker 2>live chat. She want selling the newspapers. Oh something that

0:40:32.760 --> 0:40:34.960
<v Speaker 2>we're going to get to it, not now, but something

0:40:35.000 --> 0:40:36.440
<v Speaker 2>about ice cubes.

0:40:37.120 --> 0:40:37.600
<v Speaker 6>And I love that.

0:40:37.719 --> 0:40:39.479
<v Speaker 9>Okay, First, I want to start with We've been talking

0:40:39.480 --> 0:40:42.480
<v Speaker 9>about so many companies, right industries being affected by China tariffs.

0:40:42.480 --> 0:40:45.160
<v Speaker 9>The Wall Street Journal is pointing to another one. Baby

0:40:45.160 --> 0:40:47.719
<v Speaker 9>strollers and baby products.

0:40:47.680 --> 0:40:48.399
<v Speaker 5>Not on the market.

0:40:48.600 --> 0:40:52.080
<v Speaker 9>Sorry, producer Eric, I know he's definitely in the market.

0:40:52.960 --> 0:40:56.600
<v Speaker 9>The problem is that there are strict product safety standards

0:40:56.920 --> 0:41:00.200
<v Speaker 9>with US that the US government requires, So products like

0:41:00.200 --> 0:41:03.040
<v Speaker 9>shoes and clothing they're not regulated as closely as the

0:41:03.040 --> 0:41:06.640
<v Speaker 9>baby products. So you have companies that are looking for

0:41:06.840 --> 0:41:09.200
<v Speaker 9>places where they can get one the products, but to

0:41:09.480 --> 0:41:11.640
<v Speaker 9>also meet those regulations. So that's why a lot of

0:41:11.680 --> 0:41:13.960
<v Speaker 9>them returned to China. So to give you an idea

0:41:13.960 --> 0:41:17.600
<v Speaker 9>of the impact today, ninety five percent of imported strollers

0:41:17.680 --> 0:41:21.280
<v Speaker 9>come from China. I did not realize that three quarters

0:41:21.280 --> 0:41:24.400
<v Speaker 9>of toys and infant furniture like cribs come from China.

0:41:24.960 --> 0:41:26.160
<v Speaker 2>Why is this a surprise?

0:41:26.280 --> 0:41:26.879
<v Speaker 3>We know this.

0:41:27.239 --> 0:41:31.239
<v Speaker 9>I did not realize it was ninety five percent. So

0:41:31.520 --> 0:41:33.239
<v Speaker 9>the question is, right, how much more is it going

0:41:33.320 --> 0:41:35.040
<v Speaker 9>to cost me? So you have these strollers that are

0:41:35.080 --> 0:41:39.080
<v Speaker 9>like nine hundred dollars so you could tackle stop stop.

0:41:39.719 --> 0:41:44.480
<v Speaker 2>Giuseppe has the fancy one. Giuseppe has a door best

0:41:44.560 --> 0:41:49.000
<v Speaker 2>in it and stroller combo which is seven thousand dollars.

0:41:49.320 --> 0:41:50.279
<v Speaker 5>All we'll suspension.

0:41:50.520 --> 0:41:52.279
<v Speaker 2>That's all. One of the in laws bought it. I

0:41:52.280 --> 0:41:54.240
<v Speaker 2>think it was her in law. You know her parents

0:41:54.280 --> 0:41:56.399
<v Speaker 2>bought it. What a racket they.

0:41:56.280 --> 0:41:58.399
<v Speaker 5>Could close four hundred dollars more.

0:41:58.480 --> 0:42:00.960
<v Speaker 2>Can you imagine back in the old strollers you picked

0:42:01.000 --> 0:42:02.879
<v Speaker 2>them up at Walmart for forty nine bucks.

0:42:02.960 --> 0:42:07.200
<v Speaker 5>Act, we have the twin strollers for their twins.

0:42:07.239 --> 0:42:09.879
<v Speaker 4>Okay, we had the side by side and the front

0:42:09.880 --> 0:42:12.560
<v Speaker 4>and back depending that's a big investment.

0:42:12.640 --> 0:42:12.759
<v Speaker 2>Yes.

0:42:15.320 --> 0:42:16.520
<v Speaker 6>Next, please.

0:42:17.920 --> 0:42:20.160
<v Speaker 9>Have either of you is used chat jept?

0:42:20.360 --> 0:42:20.960
<v Speaker 5>Have you used it?

0:42:21.239 --> 0:42:22.480
<v Speaker 9>Engaged with it at all?

0:42:23.040 --> 0:42:23.279
<v Speaker 2>Seen?

0:42:24.600 --> 0:42:26.680
<v Speaker 5>Okay? Well, if you do.

0:42:26.760 --> 0:42:28.960
<v Speaker 9>The question is do you put prompts in there like

0:42:29.000 --> 0:42:32.040
<v Speaker 9>please and thank you to chat chept? So if you do,

0:42:32.120 --> 0:42:34.760
<v Speaker 9>it's like an etiquette question, but it's also a money

0:42:34.840 --> 0:42:38.120
<v Speaker 9>question because apparently it costs money just for that little

0:42:38.160 --> 0:42:42.000
<v Speaker 9>extra prompt. Sam Haltman, he's the CEO of open AI.

0:42:42.120 --> 0:42:44.680
<v Speaker 9>He talked about it because someone asked him on X

0:42:45.000 --> 0:42:47.359
<v Speaker 9>you know how much money is open ai losing an

0:42:47.400 --> 0:42:51.359
<v Speaker 9>electricity costs from people adding just an extra pleaser thank you,

0:42:51.440 --> 0:42:54.680
<v Speaker 9>and he responded, tens of millions of dollars well spent,

0:42:54.800 --> 0:42:58.480
<v Speaker 9>though he said, you never know. So the reason and

0:42:58.520 --> 0:43:00.359
<v Speaker 9>this is really what because New York Time they spoke

0:43:00.400 --> 0:43:03.560
<v Speaker 9>to experts. They say every additional word and ask increases

0:43:03.600 --> 0:43:04.480
<v Speaker 9>the cost.

0:43:04.400 --> 0:43:05.120
<v Speaker 5>For a server.

0:43:05.480 --> 0:43:08.920
<v Speaker 9>So it involves like electrons moving through transitions very you

0:43:08.920 --> 0:43:11.359
<v Speaker 9>know deep, and that needs energy. So that's the whole thing.

0:43:11.400 --> 0:43:13.399
<v Speaker 9>So if you add an extra thank you, it tacks

0:43:13.480 --> 0:43:16.680
<v Speaker 9>on extra money, but you're also being kind at the

0:43:16.680 --> 0:43:17.160
<v Speaker 9>same time.

0:43:17.280 --> 0:43:20.880
<v Speaker 2>So I think when I was in college is closer

0:43:21.000 --> 0:43:24.360
<v Speaker 2>to Benjamin Franklin, yes, than it is now. I remember

0:43:24.400 --> 0:43:27.480
<v Speaker 2>the stacks and you couldn't stand You talked about Boulder

0:43:27.520 --> 0:43:31.279
<v Speaker 2>earlier in the in the Colorado Stacks. I think it

0:43:31.280 --> 0:43:34.520
<v Speaker 2>was Baker. I can't remember. You couldn't stand up, you know,

0:43:34.600 --> 0:43:37.799
<v Speaker 2>the floors, and it was musty and shaper and incense

0:43:37.920 --> 0:43:39.920
<v Speaker 2>and other things besides in.

0:43:40.600 --> 0:43:44.560
<v Speaker 9>Google, can I stop there, I'll give you you can

0:43:44.800 --> 0:43:45.399
<v Speaker 9>mast up there.

0:43:45.440 --> 0:43:45.760
<v Speaker 5>Okay.

0:43:45.920 --> 0:43:48.440
<v Speaker 9>So, if you're enjoying a fancy cocktail somewhere, maybe on

0:43:48.480 --> 0:43:50.640
<v Speaker 9>the Jersey Shore, maybe in Rome, maybe you're.

0:43:50.560 --> 0:43:54.800
<v Speaker 5>Enjoining the squad taverns, would.

0:43:54.680 --> 0:43:56.920
<v Speaker 9>You here's the question, though, would you pay an extra

0:43:57.080 --> 0:44:01.759
<v Speaker 9>seventeen dollars for an ice cube from Greenland? Because a

0:44:01.840 --> 0:44:05.600
<v Speaker 9>lot of people are doing it, Okay, entrepreneurs, they're heading

0:44:05.600 --> 0:44:07.920
<v Speaker 9>to Greenland, they're harvesting all the ice.

0:44:07.840 --> 0:44:10.919
<v Speaker 5>Is because the Trump he sees.

0:44:11.680 --> 0:44:11.759
<v Speaker 2>It.

0:44:11.800 --> 0:44:13.359
<v Speaker 5>There you go, right, Okay, I get it now.

0:44:13.480 --> 0:44:16.640
<v Speaker 9>It's they're marketing and they're saying it's cleaner, it's denser

0:44:17.520 --> 0:44:19.839
<v Speaker 9>because it's been compressing the glacier for like one hundred

0:44:19.880 --> 0:44:20.600
<v Speaker 9>thousand years.

0:44:21.239 --> 0:44:23.440
<v Speaker 5>Weather science back set up. It's up for debate.

0:44:23.640 --> 0:44:26.200
<v Speaker 9>But people are paying one hundred dollars for six ice cubes.

0:44:26.480 --> 0:44:27.040
<v Speaker 5>It's crazy.

0:44:27.080 --> 0:44:30.759
<v Speaker 9>There's also vodka being made with glacial melt water on

0:44:30.840 --> 0:44:33.640
<v Speaker 9>top of it, so it's growing. You have the government

0:44:33.760 --> 0:44:36.960
<v Speaker 9>kind of approving about thirteen licenses to certain companies to

0:44:37.040 --> 0:44:38.239
<v Speaker 9>do this, to harvest it.

0:44:38.320 --> 0:44:40.960
<v Speaker 2>Let's cut to the chase. Yes, we go to surveillance.

0:44:41.040 --> 0:44:44.719
<v Speaker 2>Tito's expert Paul Sweeney and those sugar in Tito's right,

0:44:45.040 --> 0:44:45.440
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:44:45.480 --> 0:44:46.880
<v Speaker 5>It's Austin, Texas.

0:44:47.239 --> 0:44:49.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, how kind do you want to kid? Come up

0:44:49.160 --> 0:44:50.800
<v Speaker 2>with a tequila like George?

0:44:51.000 --> 0:44:53.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, exacting that I'm not saying a hundred bucks for

0:44:54.120 --> 0:44:54.680
<v Speaker 4>an ice crea.

0:44:55.200 --> 0:44:58.000
<v Speaker 2>Lisa Materio, thank you so much. Just find yourself. I

0:44:58.000 --> 0:44:59.120
<v Speaker 2>don't know today.

0:44:59.360 --> 0:45:04.200
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:45:04.320 --> 0:45:08.080
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each

0:45:08.120 --> 0:45:11.920
<v Speaker 1>weekday seven to ten am Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:45:12.120 --> 0:45:15.920
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:45:16.200 --> 0:45:19.320
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:45:19.600 --> 0:45:21.640
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal