WEBVTT - Takeaways from Owners Meeting, First-Round Draft Choices | Bucs Insider 0:00:05.760 --> 0:00:09.639 Welcome into Buccaneers Insider Live, presented by Miller. Like Casey Phillips, 0:00:09.640 --> 0:00:12.600 here was senior writer and editor Scott Smith. And before 0:00:12.640 --> 0:00:14.800 we get to anything else, the most important thing to 0:00:14.880 --> 0:00:19.120 note today, it is Scott's thirtieth anniversary with the Buccaneers. 0:00:19.880 --> 0:00:22.120 I know that's the reason I surprised you with it 0:00:22.120 --> 0:00:23.759 is because I knew you would have all shucked it 0:00:23.800 --> 0:00:25.280 to where you would have wanted me to. But we 0:00:25.320 --> 0:00:29.120 have to celebrate that. Thirty years is incredible, So congratulations. 0:00:29.160 --> 0:00:31.360 I know everybody very much appreciates the work that you 0:00:31.360 --> 0:00:34.320 have done here for thirty incredible years. How does it 0:00:34.360 --> 0:00:36.919 How does it feel? Lucky? Yeah? Yeah, I never want 0:00:36.960 --> 0:00:39.120 to guess thirty years ago. Yeah. Two super Bowls and 0:00:39.159 --> 0:00:43.440 thirty years is not a bad Yeah, I'll stick around 0:00:43.440 --> 0:00:45.519 for fifteen more years. Gonna promised one more super Bowl? Yeah? 0:00:45.520 --> 0:00:46.640 I think so. I think that a lot of these 0:00:46.680 --> 0:00:48.879 people would promise just one more year that that that's 0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:50.519 what they'd be going for. So I think hopefully in 0:00:50.520 --> 0:00:53.120 fifteen they can make another one. All right? Well, next up, 0:00:53.159 --> 0:00:55.320 of we were at the owner's meetings, I know we 0:00:55.360 --> 0:00:57.560 originally thought we might still be there to do this show. 0:00:57.600 --> 0:00:59.440 But then the schedule got moved all around, so we 0:00:59.520 --> 0:01:01.560 ended up just being there for basically about twenty four 0:01:01.560 --> 0:01:03.720 hours and we got back last night. So we are 0:01:03.760 --> 0:01:05.399 back here. But what were some of the things that 0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:07.880 you felt like the takeaways of either new things that 0:01:07.920 --> 0:01:09.400 came out of the meetings or people that you got 0:01:09.480 --> 0:01:11.520 to hear from in terms of press scrums and meet 0:01:11.560 --> 0:01:14.000 and know Jason light and Joel Glazer both spoke, So 0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:15.520 what were some of the standout things for you on 0:01:15.640 --> 0:01:18.040 the bigger picture? I think the biggest topic that everybody 0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:20.280 was talking about going into the owners meetings that was 0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:22.839 going to be discussed was the possible rule change about 0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:26.280 overtime in the postseason, and heading into it, there was 0:01:26.319 --> 0:01:28.520 a lot of feeling that there was momentum for this, 0:01:28.600 --> 0:01:30.839 and of course the momentum really came from that Bill's 0:01:30.920 --> 0:01:33.320 Chiefs game in the playoffs last year. Whenever there's a 0:01:33.319 --> 0:01:35.760 big rule change like this, it usually comes from people 0:01:35.800 --> 0:01:38.839 feeling dissatisfied about some game, like when the Rams Saints 0:01:38.880 --> 0:01:42.600 game led to the brief dalliance with reviewable pass in 0:01:42.680 --> 0:01:44.959 affairs that didn't work out. I think this one is 0:01:45.200 --> 0:01:46.920 there was, like I said, there was a momentum that 0:01:46.920 --> 0:01:48.880 it would happen, but they weren't sure they had enough votes. 0:01:49.120 --> 0:01:52.000 Turns out they did, so the new rule for overtime 0:01:52.000 --> 0:01:54.680 in the postseason only is that each team is guaranteed 0:01:54.680 --> 0:01:57.800 a possession. That's it simple as that, which I I 0:01:57.920 --> 0:02:00.280 personally am a very big fan of. I don't know 0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:02.000 how you feel about that. I think that has become 0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:04.560 more fair now because, as as a lot of people 0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:06.960 have pointed out, since the last rules passed in two 0:02:07.640 --> 0:02:10.880 even just in the twelve years since then, offense has 0:02:10.880 --> 0:02:13.800 continued to explode. So you can have the person say, hey, 0:02:13.800 --> 0:02:15.440 if you don't like it with the one possession and 0:02:15.480 --> 0:02:18.280 the sudden death, then play defense. Well, you know it's 0:02:18.280 --> 0:02:19.880 harder to play defense now. And if you look at 0:02:19.919 --> 0:02:22.880 that chiefs um Bill's game in the playoffs last year, 0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:25.359 whichever team got the ball was probably gonna win that game. 0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:28.120 They scored on the previous five possessions. So um, I 0:02:28.160 --> 0:02:30.000 think I talked over the graphic that was up there 0:02:30.000 --> 0:02:31.399 for a while, but I was going to point out 0:02:31.560 --> 0:02:35.160 how since the that rule, the previous rule was made 0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:37.359 official for the post seat for the regular season in 0:02:37.400 --> 0:02:40.880 two thousand twelve, where it's no longer sudden death unless 0:02:40.919 --> 0:02:43.400 the team that gets the first possession scores a touchdown. 0:02:43.840 --> 0:02:46.600 Since that happened, the Bucks have had ten game overtime 0:02:46.600 --> 0:02:48.200 games that you can see. It's kind of been sort 0:02:48.200 --> 0:02:50.440 of a mixed bag. But only one time did that 0:02:50.520 --> 0:02:53.960 rule actually helped the buccaneer Buccaneers, and three times they 0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:56.200 lost when the other team won the coin toss and 0:02:56.200 --> 0:02:59.440 they scored on the opening possession touchdown. So right now, 0:02:59.480 --> 0:03:01.960 this new rule isn't for the regular season, but maybe 0:03:01.960 --> 0:03:03.799 that'll come along in a couple of years and probably 0:03:03.800 --> 0:03:06.359 the Buccaneers would like it because the old rule didn't 0:03:06.360 --> 0:03:08.240 didn't really work out there will for us. Uh. You 0:03:08.240 --> 0:03:10.600 could see the different outcomes that happened, including that one 0:03:10.639 --> 0:03:13.360 game that they didn't know the pick six fifth possession 0:03:13.440 --> 0:03:16.440 touchdown too. That was the that was the Raiders game, 0:03:16.480 --> 0:03:18.560 and that was one of the games that led to 0:03:18.639 --> 0:03:21.639 the rule of switching the overtime from fifteen minutes down 0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:24.680 to just ten because that that overtime period took almost 0:03:24.680 --> 0:03:26.760 the entire fifteen minutes and I think the Bucks maybe 0:03:26.760 --> 0:03:29.160 played a Thursday game after that and that just exhausted. 0:03:29.280 --> 0:03:30.960 So that was one of the games that was the 0:03:30.960 --> 0:03:33.920 impetus for changing it from fifteen two. Yeah, and that 0:03:33.919 --> 0:03:35.360 is such a great point about all the rules that 0:03:35.400 --> 0:03:37.840 have been put into place to help the offense, that 0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:40.480 they realized they want this to be an offensive game. Well, 0:03:40.520 --> 0:03:43.320 then it isn't exactly as even as you pointed, out 0:03:43.320 --> 0:03:45.800 of just one possession that we know that the league 0:03:45.800 --> 0:03:48.200 has really tried to favor the offense in some ways. 0:03:48.600 --> 0:03:50.400 And so that does seem like at least we should 0:03:50.400 --> 0:03:52.800 give both the chief That Chief's Bills game that went 0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:55.080 into overtime in the playoffs wasn't ten to seven, it 0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:58.280 was thirty six to thirty six. Because Patrick my Holmes 0:03:58.360 --> 0:04:01.200 and that offense and Josh Allen and that offense, we're 0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:03.560 putting on a show. And like I said, the five 0:04:03.600 --> 0:04:06.560 possessions combined between the two teams leaning up to overtime 0:04:06.760 --> 0:04:09.360 all ended in scores. So it's pretty easy to believe 0:04:09.360 --> 0:04:12.200 that whoever won the coin toss, Josh Allen and Patrick Mahomes, 0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:14.200 they had a very good chance of scoring in touchdown, 0:04:14.240 --> 0:04:16.800 which is exactly what happened. And so Josh Allen never 0:04:16.880 --> 0:04:20.200 saw the field after throwing the tying touchdown pass, his 0:04:20.279 --> 0:04:23.040 last touchdown pass in the game. Well, our next topics 0:04:23.080 --> 0:04:25.120 for the day. We sort of hinted it and a 0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:27.719 little bit talked about last week that Will Golston and 0:04:27.760 --> 0:04:30.520 Logan Ryan additions to the team. That we said there 0:04:30.560 --> 0:04:32.080 was going to be a press conference later that day, 0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:33.920 it had not been officials, so we had to tap 0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:35.719 dance around that a little bit. But now, of course 0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:38.039 we know their officials. So let's start with Will Golston 0:04:38.160 --> 0:04:40.520 returning to the team and what you think this means 0:04:40.560 --> 0:04:43.720 to the organization, to this defense, and basically just I 0:04:43.920 --> 0:04:47.520 feel like we should have some Will Goalston appreciation time. Yeah. 0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:49.960 I think Will Golston and the Buccaneers have proven to 0:04:50.000 --> 0:04:51.480 be a really good fit. And we're talking about a 0:04:51.480 --> 0:04:54.599 fourth round pick from two thousand thirteen basically heading into 0:04:54.640 --> 0:04:56.919 his ten season. That's that's a great career. And I 0:04:56.920 --> 0:04:59.039 think I threw it out there last year that other 0:04:59.080 --> 0:05:01.720 than Warren Stapped with the earned forty bill, Galston has 0:05:01.760 --> 0:05:04.120 started or played in more games for the Buccaneers has 0:05:04.120 --> 0:05:06.440 been any other defensive lineman. Born Stapp and he'll pass 0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:08.720 warn now that he's coming back, But I looked up 0:05:08.760 --> 0:05:12.279 some other stats about uh Will and he himself mentioned 0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:15.040 that he's been I don't remember the exact words he used, 0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:18.520 but he's basically been revitalized in Todd bowles Is defense. 0:05:18.560 --> 0:05:20.800 So Will has been a good role player for us 0:05:20.800 --> 0:05:23.400 throughout his career, but over the last three years, if 0:05:23.440 --> 0:05:25.720 you compare that to the three years before Todd Bowles 0:05:25.720 --> 0:05:28.039 got here, and then the last three years, you might 0:05:28.080 --> 0:05:30.360 think that since he's getting older, his production would go down, 0:05:30.560 --> 0:05:32.680 but look at that in most cases he's basically had 0:05:32.720 --> 0:05:35.120 double the production. The sacks are more than doubled, the 0:05:35.160 --> 0:05:37.960 quarterback hits are more than doubled. He's got more of 0:05:38.000 --> 0:05:39.960 everything in these past three years and Todd bowls of 0:05:39.960 --> 0:05:41.800 defense than he had in three years prior to that. 0:05:42.040 --> 0:05:44.000 And he's also not missed a single game when he 0:05:44.120 --> 0:05:46.800 had missed four in the previous three games. So everything 0:05:46.800 --> 0:05:49.520 about how he fits and Todd Bowles's defense has been 0:05:49.520 --> 0:05:51.520 a boon for Will, which in turn has been awesome 0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:53.839 for the Buccaneers. Obviously, Yeah, that's great to hear. And 0:05:53.880 --> 0:05:56.560 then also Logan Ryan Knew addition to the team. We 0:05:56.600 --> 0:05:59.479 focus so much these last two years on bringing people back, 0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:01.960 but now there are also a few new editions that 0:06:02.000 --> 0:06:03.880 I think that the team is very excited about and 0:06:04.200 --> 0:06:07.880 especially after losing Jordan Whitehead and free agency. So what 0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:10.040 have you learned from you know, since Logan Ryan did 0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:13.480 his UM press debut essentially with the Buccaneers, of what 0:06:13.520 --> 0:06:16.360 you think the team wants from him, is, you know, 0:06:16.480 --> 0:06:19.080 is he a true replacement for Jordan Whitehead? Could there 0:06:19.120 --> 0:06:20.640 be some other things he brings to the team that 0:06:20.680 --> 0:06:22.919 are a little bit different than what Jordan did And 0:06:22.920 --> 0:06:24.760 how do you see that working well? First of all, 0:06:24.839 --> 0:06:27.280 I think UM fans were really gonna like Logan Ryan 0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:29.120 because he was an entertaining guy up there at the 0:06:29.160 --> 0:06:31.080 table in the press conference, and I hear that's been 0:06:31.080 --> 0:06:33.479 the way he's been everywhere he's been. So But in 0:06:33.560 --> 0:06:36.240 terms of how he fits into the defense, he doesn't 0:06:36.240 --> 0:06:38.560 really know yet, not what they're gonna do with him, 0:06:38.560 --> 0:06:40.400 but I think it will probably kind of a versatile role. 0:06:40.440 --> 0:06:43.480 I don't think it's a one form replacement with Jordan Whitehead, 0:06:43.800 --> 0:06:46.560 but he could factor in safety, he could factor in 0:06:46.640 --> 0:06:48.760 someone in the slot. He's really a guy that's played 0:06:48.760 --> 0:06:51.160 all over And the other thing is he's been very productive. 0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:54.000 One thing that um he talked about was he really 0:06:54.040 --> 0:06:56.880 he's good friends with Randie Barber and He's sought Randie 0:06:56.920 --> 0:07:00.840 Barber's mentorship in some issues like longevity. But um he 0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:02.240 by the way, he made a big fan of me 0:07:02.279 --> 0:07:03.920 when he said Ronnie Barber should be a first Billot 0:07:03.960 --> 0:07:06.720 Hall of Famer. Yeah. The big thing about Rande's career 0:07:06.960 --> 0:07:08.760 was the incredible stat lines he put up. You're like, 0:07:10.480 --> 0:07:14.239 interceptions in sacks, the only Guyan team in NFL history, 0:07:14.240 --> 0:07:16.960 that kind of thing. Well, Logan Ryan's production across the 0:07:17.000 --> 0:07:19.200 board has been pretty impressive since he came into the 0:07:19.240 --> 0:07:21.880 league in two thurs and thirteen. He has, as you 0:07:21.920 --> 0:07:25.680 see here, eighteen interceptions, thirteen sacks, and fourteen forced fumbles 0:07:25.680 --> 0:07:29.120 in that fan Now, nobody else can match that, but 0:07:29.160 --> 0:07:31.400 it's kind of arbitrary eighteen, thirteen, and fourteen. So I 0:07:31.400 --> 0:07:33.680 took them all down to ten. And even with only 0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:36.120 ten as the number you're trying to to hit in 0:07:36.120 --> 0:07:37.960 those three categories, these are the only guys and you 0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:41.440 see David up there. Yeah, but that's to be able 0:07:41.480 --> 0:07:44.160 to fill across the stat line with interception, sacks, force 0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:45.760 fumbles and the number of other things that aren't on 0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:47.680 the screen there. It's just a picture of a very 0:07:47.720 --> 0:07:50.280 productive player throughout the years. That is incredible. I think 0:07:50.280 --> 0:07:51.880 that's amazing. All right, Well, we are also going to 0:07:51.960 --> 0:07:54.520 get to some of your Facebook questions as always, so 0:07:54.600 --> 0:07:57.160 you can submit those in the comments section underneath our 0:07:57.280 --> 0:08:01.040 live video on Facebook. And I know that our first one, Um, 0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:03.240 I've seen this. This is so great. So Rick had 0:08:03.240 --> 0:08:05.880 a two two part question because he's making you think 0:08:05.960 --> 0:08:07.800 there's there's a couple of sections of this. They're they're 0:08:07.800 --> 0:08:11.880 both draft related. The first one is where we're picking, 0:08:12.520 --> 0:08:14.280 what are the position groups that you think we have 0:08:14.360 --> 0:08:16.800 the best chance of getting one of the top guys 0:08:17.320 --> 0:08:19.560 at that spot. Because I know we talked about the 0:08:19.600 --> 0:08:22.240 idea of best overall or this and that. But where 0:08:22.280 --> 0:08:24.840 you're picking, are you getting the first of a position? 0:08:24.960 --> 0:08:27.400 Are there already three or four guys off the board 0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:29.920 at that position? So where we're picking that late in 0:08:29.920 --> 0:08:32.200 the first round, where are the places that we could 0:08:32.200 --> 0:08:34.680 get the highest of a position. That's a good question. 0:08:34.760 --> 0:08:39.400 And if anybody doesn't know we're picking, which is obviously 0:08:39.520 --> 0:08:41.400 very late in the in the draft, and honestly, there 0:08:41.440 --> 0:08:43.080 aren't a lot of positions where you're going to get 0:08:43.120 --> 0:08:45.480 the first guy off the board. And if you couple 0:08:45.600 --> 0:08:49.520 that with positions we'd actually be interested in probably, Um, 0:08:49.559 --> 0:08:52.319 there's probably only one, and that would be running back. 0:08:52.480 --> 0:08:53.840 I mean, yeah, you can get to the first kicker 0:08:53.920 --> 0:08:54.920 upon her, but you're not going to get in the 0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:57.320 first round. You could get the first tight end almost surely, 0:08:58.360 --> 0:09:00.280 but I don't think the Bucks would use their first 0:09:00.320 --> 0:09:03.280 round prismon tighten this year. I don't necessarily think that 0:09:03.320 --> 0:09:05.960 running back he's the most likely position, but you could 0:09:05.960 --> 0:09:07.840 say that the Buccaneers have some need. Their Leonard four 0:09:07.880 --> 0:09:09.600 Nette is back, which is great, and then you have 0:09:09.679 --> 0:09:11.360 Keyshan Vaughn. But you probably are at least going to 0:09:11.400 --> 0:09:13.480 add one more guy, and it would be cool if 0:09:13.480 --> 0:09:14.920 it was a you know, a dynamic guy that could 0:09:14.960 --> 0:09:17.120 be somebody that played, you know, played a bigger role 0:09:17.160 --> 0:09:19.160 in the future, but could also work in the offense 0:09:19.240 --> 0:09:21.120 right now. I think running back is the only position 0:09:21.120 --> 0:09:23.199 probably where the Buccaneers could get the first guy off 0:09:23.240 --> 0:09:26.000 the board and actually have him be of some use 0:09:26.040 --> 0:09:28.640 to the team this year. It wouldn't be defensive tackle, 0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:31.480 it wouldn't be ed rusher, wouldn't be cornerback. It wouldn't 0:09:31.520 --> 0:09:33.559 be safety because Kyle Hamilton's probably gonna be on the 0:09:33.600 --> 0:09:35.679 top five. It wouldn't be any of the offensive line 0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:39.960 positions except maybe center if Tyler Linderbaum easily considered the 0:09:39.960 --> 0:09:42.960 best center prospect, but I see him going in the 0:09:43.000 --> 0:09:44.400 first half of a lot of mock drafts, but I 0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:46.240 have seen him dropped to the near the bottom round 0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:47.920 in a few So you could possibly get the first center. 0:09:47.960 --> 0:09:51.920 But we just resigned Ryan Jensen's Yeah, probably only running back, Okay, 0:09:52.000 --> 0:09:54.680 And then the second part of his question was which 0:09:54.800 --> 0:09:57.400 position group do you think drafting there could have the 0:09:57.440 --> 0:09:59.800 most immediate impact? So when you know the team is 0:09:59.800 --> 0:10:02.760 so of all in on this next year and now 0:10:02.760 --> 0:10:05.320 that Tom Brady is back, so we hear about the 0:10:05.360 --> 0:10:09.800 idea of need versus best player available. Well, we know 0:10:09.840 --> 0:10:12.760 the Bucks aren't necessarily in a true need for a 0:10:12.760 --> 0:10:14.800 ton of places, But then also what if the best 0:10:14.800 --> 0:10:17.800 player available as a quarterback but you don't really need that. 0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:20.480 So the idea instead of who would maybe make the 0:10:20.520 --> 0:10:23.839 most immediate impact this next year and what position group 0:10:23.920 --> 0:10:26.160 might that be? Yeah, teams like to say best player available, 0:10:26.160 --> 0:10:27.920 but usually when it comes down to it, it's best 0:10:27.920 --> 0:10:31.400 player available at a position you really need. And even 0:10:31.520 --> 0:10:35.240 last year, when probably the most position the Bucks have 0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:37.520 ever been since I've been here, to actually take the 0:10:37.520 --> 0:10:40.160 best player available. No matter what, they still ended up 0:10:40.200 --> 0:10:42.480 taking an edge resher, which was what most people predicted. 0:10:42.880 --> 0:10:45.360 And I think that helps us answer this question too, 0:10:45.360 --> 0:10:48.240 because I think the most likely positions where you could 0:10:48.240 --> 0:10:50.280 get a player of need that can make an impact 0:10:50.320 --> 0:10:53.320 right away are the ones where, yes, you have starters, 0:10:53.360 --> 0:10:56.280 but usually work a rotation. So you could have said 0:10:56.280 --> 0:10:59.080 already that you have starters at the edge in um 0:10:59.120 --> 0:11:02.480 in shack Barrett, maybe Joe, tryan Shenka, but you could 0:11:02.559 --> 0:11:04.480 draft into the guy and he could still get plenty 0:11:04.480 --> 0:11:07.440 of snaps. Same thing. At defensive tackle. You've got Vida Vella, 0:11:07.760 --> 0:11:11.559 You've got Will Golston, you've got Nacho working on new roaches. 0:11:11.640 --> 0:11:13.600 Don't know if n Don mckensue is coming back yet, 0:11:13.720 --> 0:11:16.240 but even if he is, you take a young, dynamic 0:11:16.280 --> 0:11:18.600 defensive lineman you can get him in the game. So 0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:20.400 I think it's still this position. Like it wouldn't be 0:11:20.400 --> 0:11:23.480 inside linebacker because you only play two of those ever, 0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:26.040 and you're not taking Devin Wider or Lavante David off 0:11:26.080 --> 0:11:29.760 the field. It could be safety, it could be corner, 0:11:30.080 --> 0:11:32.120 but you do kind of have designated starters at all 0:11:32.120 --> 0:11:34.520 those positions, right now. So to me, it's the positions 0:11:34.559 --> 0:11:36.880 where you can get a rotation. So it wouldn't be 0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:39.679 offensive line, it wouldn't be a quarterback, but it could 0:11:39.679 --> 0:11:43.600 be running back, receiver, defensive line, or edge. Okay, alright, 0:11:43.600 --> 0:11:46.680 our next one, this is from Jonathan and he said, 0:11:46.720 --> 0:11:50.320 any news on the Gronk resigning? No, and um, you know, 0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:51.880 it's kind of feels like we're in a little bit 0:11:51.880 --> 0:11:54.559 of holding pattern, right, But he's made some hints. Jason 0:11:54.640 --> 0:11:57.400 Lighte was asked about that on Monday at the at 0:11:57.440 --> 0:12:00.199 the owners meetings, and he didn't really have any new 0:12:00.200 --> 0:12:03.120 information for us. So I think the Buccaneers are the 0:12:03.120 --> 0:12:05.959 ones that are waiting for for Rob to decide whether 0:12:05.960 --> 0:12:08.320 he really wants to come back or not. Okay, um, 0:12:08.360 --> 0:12:11.360 and then Willie wanted to know, are we still going 0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:13.240 to be after I don't know why didn't and he said, 0:12:13.240 --> 0:12:15.720 are we still after a great cornerback in the draft? 0:12:16.000 --> 0:12:19.000 Could be? Could be, And it could come down a 0:12:19.000 --> 0:12:20.480 little bit to how that's kind of related to the 0:12:20.520 --> 0:12:22.480 questions you were just asking me how they fall, you know, 0:12:22.520 --> 0:12:25.680 because I think there's probably and I am not privy 0:12:25.720 --> 0:12:28.480 to our exact cornerback boards, but there's probably areas where 0:12:28.800 --> 0:12:31.000 you know you got tears. We would spend a first 0:12:31.080 --> 0:12:32.760 round pick on these five guys, but after this it 0:12:32.760 --> 0:12:34.680 falls off a little bit that kind of thing. So 0:12:34.720 --> 0:12:36.840 would we do that in the first round probably depends 0:12:36.840 --> 0:12:39.160 on how much a run there is on it. But 0:12:39.240 --> 0:12:41.680 I do think cornerback is very much a possibility. And 0:12:41.679 --> 0:12:43.360 I'm not even gonna try out my usual line here 0:12:43.360 --> 0:12:45.360 about Okay, I guess I just did about how you 0:12:45.360 --> 0:12:48.280 can never have but just keep in mind that both 0:12:48.480 --> 0:12:51.120 we got Carlton back, but both Sean Murphy Bunting and 0:12:51.200 --> 0:12:54.960 Jamal Dean are due to become unrestricted free agents next year, 0:12:55.000 --> 0:12:56.600 and no matter how much you like them, we really 0:12:56.600 --> 0:12:58.520 love Jordan Whitehead, but we weren't able to keep him. 0:12:58.559 --> 0:13:01.160 So it's a possibility that one or both could leave, 0:13:01.240 --> 0:13:03.679 and then having another quarterback that you just drafted the 0:13:03.760 --> 0:13:05.440 year before would be a very nice thing to have. 0:13:05.480 --> 0:13:07.560 So I do think cornerback is very much in play 0:13:07.640 --> 0:13:09.679 for the Buccaneers. As much as obviously your career has 0:13:09.720 --> 0:13:11.520 worked out at the Buccaneers for thirty years, I think 0:13:11.520 --> 0:13:13.679 you should have been an agent for a corner that's 0:13:13.720 --> 0:13:17.720 just a represent cornerbacks, all right. Our next one is 0:13:17.800 --> 0:13:20.400 from Jose and he said who could be a backup 0:13:20.480 --> 0:13:22.679 to Lenny at running back? It's probably at this point 0:13:22.720 --> 0:13:25.199 it's obviously Keyshawn Vaughan. Um. The only other ones that 0:13:25.240 --> 0:13:27.320 we have on the roster right now are Keyshawan and 0:13:27.400 --> 0:13:30.480 Kenyan Barner, and Kenyan's mostly have been a kick returner. UM, 0:13:30.520 --> 0:13:33.400 and I think the Buccaneers think that Keyshan is ready 0:13:33.440 --> 0:13:37.080 to be a backup. I mean the backup for Leonard 0:13:37.160 --> 0:13:40.839 last year was Ronald Jones. And Ronald Jones obviously he 0:13:40.920 --> 0:13:42.440 is a good runner and coach would say that about 0:13:42.480 --> 0:13:43.840 him all the time, and he signed with the Chiefs 0:13:43.880 --> 0:13:47.120 by the way, Um, but he wasn't a guy that 0:13:47.200 --> 0:13:49.280 is necessarily trusted most of the time his career to 0:13:49.320 --> 0:13:51.640 be the past protection guy. He wasn't a guy that 0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:54.920 gave you a ton in the passing game. So it's 0:13:54.960 --> 0:13:57.400 not like that there's a huge bar that Keyshawn von 0:13:57.480 --> 0:13:59.880 is trying to clear here. Is he a dynamic runner 0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:01.800 and coach for Aaron says that about him all the time. 0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:03.880 He's like, there's no question that he's a good runner. 0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:05.920 We very much like his running ability. They just want 0:14:05.960 --> 0:14:07.880 to see the rest of his game. Developed, so if 0:14:08.000 --> 0:14:11.559 Ronald Jones could be your primary backup to Leonard last year, 0:14:11.559 --> 0:14:13.920 there's no reason Keyshon can't feel the same role. All right, Well, 0:14:13.920 --> 0:14:15.000 that is going to do it for us on this 0:14:15.160 --> 0:14:18.040 edition of Buccaneers Insider Live presented by Miller Lite. And 0:14:18.040 --> 0:14:20.440 again after this, we're gonna be recording a Road to 0:14:20.480 --> 0:14:22.760 the Draft, so you have have more draft questions, make 0:14:22.800 --> 0:14:24.920 sure you check out that video. Will be talking that 0:14:25.040 --> 0:14:27.640 every single week of all the different things affecting who 0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:29.840 the Buccaneers might draft, So stay tuned for that and 0:14:29.840 --> 0:14:34.920 we'll be back here next week.