WEBVTT - How Swearing Works

0:00:01.200 --> 0:00:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff you Should Know from House Stuff Works

0:00:04.680 --> 0:00:13.280
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Hey, I'm welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh

0:00:13.320 --> 0:00:17.079
<v Speaker 1>Clark with Charles W. Chuck Bryant, uh and Jerry's over there.

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:21.800
<v Speaker 1>So this is stuff you should know beep. Addition, are

0:00:21.800 --> 0:00:26.520
<v Speaker 1>we gonna beat No? I don't think so we're above that. Um.

0:00:26.560 --> 0:00:28.319
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you what. It was a joy to read

0:00:28.360 --> 0:00:33.760
<v Speaker 1>this Tracy V. Wilson article. Tracy stuff you missed in

0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:36.040
<v Speaker 1>history class. Used to do a lot of writing, and

0:00:36.080 --> 0:00:40.160
<v Speaker 1>her articles are always she leaves no stone unturned. Yeah,

0:00:40.159 --> 0:00:43.120
<v Speaker 1>the V. The V stands for very good article. It

0:00:43.240 --> 0:00:46.920
<v Speaker 1>really was good. Yeah, it was very good article, very good,

0:00:48.120 --> 0:00:53.360
<v Speaker 1>so very good. Did you did you notice her images

0:00:54.640 --> 0:00:57.920
<v Speaker 1>in the article on the site? No, oh they were

0:00:57.960 --> 0:01:05.520
<v Speaker 1>all like star Trek, Firefly, Harry Potter. What later in

0:01:05.520 --> 0:01:07.600
<v Speaker 1>the article? Or was that from that other thing you

0:01:07.640 --> 0:01:11.319
<v Speaker 1>sent me? Oh that was from another thing. Okay, No,

0:01:11.600 --> 0:01:13.240
<v Speaker 1>I kind of just put it all in together, so

0:01:13.360 --> 0:01:17.680
<v Speaker 1>I was like, man, Tracy really went for it. A

0:01:17.760 --> 0:01:21.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of bombs. That was not Tracy. That was well.

0:01:21.319 --> 0:01:23.000
<v Speaker 1>There are a couple of other articles I sent you.

0:01:23.040 --> 0:01:25.399
<v Speaker 1>One was James Harbick wrote a good one on the

0:01:25.400 --> 0:01:29.840
<v Speaker 1>BBC and another was from Rebecca roach On a On.

0:01:30.520 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Was that that swearing in other countries? Yeah, that was

0:01:32.520 --> 0:01:36.440
<v Speaker 1>really good. Um, I'm excited about this one because I

0:01:36.480 --> 0:01:40.800
<v Speaker 1>loved to curse and swear, and you folks don't know

0:01:40.840 --> 0:01:43.440
<v Speaker 1>that because we've always kept our show g rated. I know,

0:01:43.640 --> 0:01:46.160
<v Speaker 1>which is I'm glad we do that because I kind

0:01:46.160 --> 0:01:49.400
<v Speaker 1>of stand out these days among podcasts. Yeah, that's true.

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Plus it's kind of like, um, it just makes it

0:01:54.680 --> 0:01:56.400
<v Speaker 1>you have to get a little more creative when you

0:01:56.400 --> 0:01:59.440
<v Speaker 1>have limitations like that. I found like working within a

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:03.560
<v Speaker 1>structure or makes you think more rather than just like

0:02:03.720 --> 0:02:08.799
<v Speaker 1>letting it all hang out being loosey goosey lazy. Yeah,

0:02:08.840 --> 0:02:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm very lazy than in my regular life. Well, my

0:02:11.639 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 1>wife and I both have sailor mouth. Should we be

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:19.440
<v Speaker 1>telling people this? I don't think it's fine, Okay, because

0:02:19.440 --> 0:02:22.800
<v Speaker 1>this is a good lesson to kids that, um, you know,

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:26.320
<v Speaker 1>there are appropriate times to say certain things in inappropriate times,

0:02:27.080 --> 0:02:30.880
<v Speaker 1>and when you're podcasting, apparently it's inappropriate exactly at least

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:34.200
<v Speaker 1>with us. But chuck. Um. One thing you might be

0:02:34.240 --> 0:02:39.720
<v Speaker 1>happy to hear is that a longstanding myth called the

0:02:39.800 --> 0:02:44.079
<v Speaker 1>poverty of vocabulary hypothesis is not held to be correct

0:02:44.160 --> 0:02:47.880
<v Speaker 1>any longer. Well, what's the myth? The hypothesis was that

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:51.400
<v Speaker 1>people swore because they couldn't think of other words, and

0:02:51.400 --> 0:02:57.000
<v Speaker 1>that you were basically lower, lower class, poorly educated um

0:02:57.000 --> 0:03:00.520
<v Speaker 1>with a small vocabulary, which is why you cursed. And

0:03:00.600 --> 0:03:02.840
<v Speaker 1>up until fairly recently, I think it was a two

0:03:02.919 --> 0:03:07.359
<v Speaker 1>thousand sixteen maybe fifteen journal article that really put the

0:03:07.440 --> 0:03:10.239
<v Speaker 1>nail in the coffin and said, nope, we tested people.

0:03:10.600 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 1>The people who came up with the most swear words

0:03:12.720 --> 0:03:16.440
<v Speaker 1>were also the ones who had the most extensive vocabulary

0:03:16.600 --> 0:03:21.520
<v Speaker 1>elsewhere too. So the idea that you're just dumb if

0:03:21.560 --> 0:03:26.320
<v Speaker 1>you if you swear a lot normally gone. Yeah, But

0:03:26.400 --> 0:03:29.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean there, it spends on how you do it.

0:03:29.120 --> 0:03:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Like sometimes you can tell someone I can't think of

0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:35.520
<v Speaker 1>a better word, you know what I mean? And sometimes

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:38.920
<v Speaker 1>like I know some people that are just some of

0:03:38.920 --> 0:03:44.000
<v Speaker 1>the best swearers. Was most creative, intelligent swears And it's

0:03:44.040 --> 0:03:48.000
<v Speaker 1>like a music almost. I love it it is, and

0:03:48.040 --> 0:03:50.760
<v Speaker 1>it is a music. It's definitely not just words. As

0:03:50.800 --> 0:03:55.040
<v Speaker 1>we'll see, swearing is its own thing. It's kind of phenomenal. Actually,

0:03:55.320 --> 0:03:59.520
<v Speaker 1>there's a hypothesis that language came out of swears originally

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:03.080
<v Speaker 1>that the first took took, Yeah, it took took was

0:04:04.320 --> 0:04:06.640
<v Speaker 1>basically hit his thumb with a club against the rock,

0:04:07.280 --> 0:04:10.720
<v Speaker 1>shouted something, and that became the S word as we

0:04:10.800 --> 0:04:13.440
<v Speaker 1>know it today. Well, Tracy, one of the first things

0:04:13.440 --> 0:04:16.159
<v Speaker 1>she points out was a thought super interesting and that

0:04:16.279 --> 0:04:20.320
<v Speaker 1>it's a very paradoxic, paradoxical thing, and that they are

0:04:20.360 --> 0:04:23.239
<v Speaker 1>a taboo. But it's not a taboo that people avoid.

0:04:23.279 --> 0:04:27.360
<v Speaker 1>It's one of the few taboos like everybody, not everybody,

0:04:27.400 --> 0:04:30.000
<v Speaker 1>but many, many people in brace right, I think like

0:04:30.080 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 1>seventy eight percent of men. And we're talking for the

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:37.880
<v Speaker 1>most of this show about sort of Western countries except

0:04:38.120 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 1>at the end. But as far as we know, and

0:04:40.320 --> 0:04:45.360
<v Speaker 1>we being like humanity, uh, swearing is universal. Here we

0:04:45.400 --> 0:04:47.760
<v Speaker 1>go se of men and fifty eight percent of women

0:04:47.800 --> 0:04:54.760
<v Speaker 1>swearing in public. It's not even in their private life. Yeah, yeah,

0:04:55.040 --> 0:04:59.920
<v Speaker 1>you know. Yeah. And apparently that's a longstanding understanding of swearing,

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:03.080
<v Speaker 1>is that men do it more than women. And back

0:05:03.120 --> 0:05:06.240
<v Speaker 1>in the seventies there was a Berkeley linguistics researcher named

0:05:06.240 --> 0:05:12.359
<v Speaker 1>Rebecca lack Off, and um, she noticed that women tended

0:05:12.400 --> 0:05:15.320
<v Speaker 1>more to use what are called minced oaths, which is

0:05:15.320 --> 0:05:17.760
<v Speaker 1>saying like fiddle sticks instead of the F word, basically

0:05:17.760 --> 0:05:21.279
<v Speaker 1>talking like ned flanders in places where men would have

0:05:21.520 --> 0:05:25.719
<v Speaker 1>cursed otherwise um. And she surmised that it was because

0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:28.839
<v Speaker 1>women are taught from a young age to be polite

0:05:28.839 --> 0:05:32.640
<v Speaker 1>and preferential, um, whereas men are allowed to curse and

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:35.279
<v Speaker 1>kind of let it all hang out. But that just

0:05:35.400 --> 0:05:38.800
<v Speaker 1>put women in an awkward situation or damned if they do,

0:05:38.880 --> 0:05:42.520
<v Speaker 1>damned if they don't, uh situation. And that if they

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:47.760
<v Speaker 1>are polite and deferential, they're treated like a fractional person um.

0:05:47.960 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 1>But if they transgress and and curse, they they've broken taboos.

0:05:53.640 --> 0:05:56.240
<v Speaker 1>And like in Western society, it's way worse for a

0:05:56.279 --> 0:05:59.599
<v Speaker 1>woman to curse than a man, at least in public

0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:02.839
<v Speaker 1>or may be even private, which is a double standard

0:06:02.839 --> 0:06:05.440
<v Speaker 1>that we need to do away with. Agreed, because it's

0:06:05.520 --> 0:06:08.000
<v Speaker 1>much like the First Amendment episode where I got all

0:06:08.080 --> 0:06:11.400
<v Speaker 1>rile up against obscenity. The idea that some words can't

0:06:11.400 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 1>be said because it's taboo just irks me to no

0:06:14.800 --> 0:06:16.520
<v Speaker 1>end as well. I don't think it's a big deal,

0:06:16.680 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 1>but I do respect that others do, and I really

0:06:19.920 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 1>do try to curb my how loud I curse in public?

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Public in public's Um, I really do. I try to, like,

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:30.920
<v Speaker 1>and this isn't just since I've had kids. Have always

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:32.800
<v Speaker 1>just sort of tried to be aware. Maybe it was

0:06:32.839 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 1>my Baptist upbringing, but um, it's bad of a mouth.

0:06:36.000 --> 0:06:37.960
<v Speaker 1>As I have, I've always tried to just sort of

0:06:38.000 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 1>be aware of my surroundings because I never wanted to

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:43.720
<v Speaker 1>be that guy that was making someone else feel bad

0:06:43.920 --> 0:06:46.880
<v Speaker 1>or whose parents had to like shuffle their kids away

0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:51.480
<v Speaker 1>from me because of the language I was using. You know. Um,

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:54.920
<v Speaker 1>I've had a hard time with Emily. Yeah, yeah, she's

0:06:54.960 --> 0:07:00.279
<v Speaker 1>just she doesn't now she's louder and doesn't just she's

0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:01.920
<v Speaker 1>just not a She's in the moment, you know. She's

0:07:02.600 --> 0:07:04.919
<v Speaker 1>very free spirited, and I'm always like, oh, you know

0:07:04.960 --> 0:07:06.480
<v Speaker 1>there's kids right out there, can you keep it down.

0:07:07.000 --> 0:07:12.080
<v Speaker 1>She's like, if it f that kid, if that kid,

0:07:12.360 --> 0:07:15.440
<v Speaker 1>just it. Um. But Tracy just has a lot of

0:07:15.440 --> 0:07:17.400
<v Speaker 1>little tidbits here at the beginning. I think we should

0:07:17.680 --> 0:07:21.960
<v Speaker 1>mention because they're just interesting. One is that people, and

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:23.680
<v Speaker 1>I found this to be true when I worked in

0:07:23.760 --> 0:07:27.119
<v Speaker 1>at a Mexican restaurant. We all learned the curse words first,

0:07:27.600 --> 0:07:29.160
<v Speaker 1>and when you learn a new language, it's one of

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:31.680
<v Speaker 1>the first things you learn if you learn through immersion

0:07:32.320 --> 0:07:37.880
<v Speaker 1>rather than in a classroom, are colloquially colloquialisms and curse words,

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:41.760
<v Speaker 1>although she says curse words and swear words are different. Yeah,

0:07:41.800 --> 0:07:44.679
<v Speaker 1>so we should you want to say, with the differences, so, um,

0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:48.360
<v Speaker 1>most people use them interchangeably. But a curse word is

0:07:48.400 --> 0:07:54.240
<v Speaker 1>where you're basically hexing something. You're you're calling for someone

0:07:54.480 --> 0:07:59.040
<v Speaker 1>to be well damned, yeah, or anything good. Idea like

0:07:59.160 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 1>F this window that I can't get open, that's a

0:08:02.360 --> 0:08:06.320
<v Speaker 1>curse on that window, exactly, you're right, um. Whereas swearing

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 1>is kind of different. It's like by Odin's raiding, where

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:13.480
<v Speaker 1>you're invoking the name of like a deity or something

0:08:13.560 --> 0:08:16.560
<v Speaker 1>religious or whatever, and you're doing that to like give

0:08:16.680 --> 0:08:20.840
<v Speaker 1>weight to your your words, your or I swear to

0:08:20.920 --> 0:08:25.160
<v Speaker 1>God as a swear and technically, if you are a

0:08:26.280 --> 0:08:30.320
<v Speaker 1>if you're a pious type, swearing to God, it's going

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:33.319
<v Speaker 1>to be as bad as saying F that window, if

0:08:33.360 --> 0:08:36.200
<v Speaker 1>not worse. Actually the worst is you know, if you

0:08:36.240 --> 0:08:39.280
<v Speaker 1>say g D. I remember growing up and as a

0:08:39.360 --> 0:08:41.080
<v Speaker 1>church kid, that was that was the worst of all

0:08:41.120 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 1>swear words. Yeah, right, you know, taking the Lord's name

0:08:44.280 --> 0:08:47.680
<v Speaker 1>in vain? Yeah, and that can be and most basically

0:08:47.760 --> 0:08:51.760
<v Speaker 1>all words, will you swearing curse interchangeably like any normal

0:08:51.840 --> 0:08:56.120
<v Speaker 1>human being. But um, most most swear words are all

0:08:56.160 --> 0:08:59.040
<v Speaker 1>swear words I believe can be broken down into two

0:08:59.440 --> 0:09:03.520
<v Speaker 1>category and one of them is deistic, where it involves

0:09:04.080 --> 0:09:10.440
<v Speaker 1>a like a higher authority, God, religion, something about that, right,

0:09:11.120 --> 0:09:14.560
<v Speaker 1>and um. The other is visceral, and that is basically

0:09:14.640 --> 0:09:18.400
<v Speaker 1>everything else it involves body parts, body function. It's funny

0:09:18.440 --> 0:09:22.040
<v Speaker 1>they really do break down into this. Yeah, basically everything

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:25.600
<v Speaker 1>does it related to the body? Are related to God?

0:09:26.240 --> 0:09:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Pretty interesting? Yeah it is. And and again that seems

0:09:30.280 --> 0:09:34.440
<v Speaker 1>to be universal. But what one culture emphasizes another culture

0:09:34.520 --> 0:09:37.120
<v Speaker 1>might not. And even within the same culture over a

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:40.920
<v Speaker 1>period of time. Uh, words can change. Emphasis on words

0:09:40.920 --> 0:09:45.280
<v Speaker 1>can change. Like, for example, in the nineteenth century, you

0:09:45.360 --> 0:09:49.600
<v Speaker 1>did not say bull as in look at that bowl

0:09:49.640 --> 0:09:55.120
<v Speaker 1>over there, yes, because it was associated with sexual virility.

0:09:55.200 --> 0:10:00.000
<v Speaker 1>So you would say, look at that brute cow over there,

0:10:00.360 --> 0:10:04.079
<v Speaker 1>or look at that sea docks, anything but bull because

0:10:04.120 --> 0:10:06.440
<v Speaker 1>it was a bad word at the time. And then

0:10:06.480 --> 0:10:09.079
<v Speaker 1>now it's like someone would look at you like, what

0:10:09.080 --> 0:10:12.000
<v Speaker 1>what the Hell's the sea docks. Is that why bs

0:10:12.000 --> 0:10:14.200
<v Speaker 1>is has bull in front of it. I wonder if

0:10:14.240 --> 0:10:19.640
<v Speaker 1>it's like a particularly virulent type of of fallacy or lie,

0:10:19.679 --> 0:10:21.600
<v Speaker 1>because I don't see why else it would. That's what

0:10:21.640 --> 0:10:25.920
<v Speaker 1>I thought too. Tracy also says that UM, no one

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:28.760
<v Speaker 1>really knows because cursing came before writing what the first

0:10:28.760 --> 0:10:33.280
<v Speaker 1>swear words were UM, but researchers agree. And this I

0:10:33.280 --> 0:10:37.320
<v Speaker 1>thought was super interesting is that um they called it

0:10:37.360 --> 0:10:39.920
<v Speaker 1>word magic, early forms of word magic, or where they

0:10:39.960 --> 0:10:44.080
<v Speaker 1>came from, which um basically means, especially in cultures that

0:10:44.120 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 1>didn't have writing, they believe that words had a lot

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:49.559
<v Speaker 1>of power and you could curse something like we said,

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:51.560
<v Speaker 1>like words could be really good or words could be

0:10:51.600 --> 0:10:55.360
<v Speaker 1>really bad, and that swearing kind of evolved out of that, right,

0:10:56.400 --> 0:10:59.200
<v Speaker 1>which is just awesome. I love it. It is um

0:10:59.320 --> 0:11:02.880
<v Speaker 1>And there is a good example of this. Apparently. Our

0:11:02.960 --> 0:11:08.240
<v Speaker 1>word for bear here in English is rooted from the

0:11:08.360 --> 0:11:12.439
<v Speaker 1>Germanic word for brown, and it was based on the

0:11:12.480 --> 0:11:17.680
<v Speaker 1>pagan Germanic taboo against saying the name of a wild

0:11:17.720 --> 0:11:22.360
<v Speaker 1>animal because it might make that wild animal appear because

0:11:22.360 --> 0:11:25.280
<v Speaker 1>of word magic. So that's why we say bear today.

0:11:25.760 --> 0:11:28.920
<v Speaker 1>So interesting because something like ursa would have been. It

0:11:28.920 --> 0:11:31.280
<v Speaker 1>would have made the bear appear and killed everybody, and

0:11:31.280 --> 0:11:33.600
<v Speaker 1>it would have been your fault because you didn't say brown.

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:38.439
<v Speaker 1>He said, ursa. Did you ever hear the for unlawful

0:11:38.520 --> 0:11:44.280
<v Speaker 1>carnal knowledge acronym? That's completely not true. Um that the

0:11:44.960 --> 0:11:49.000
<v Speaker 1>F word is old, very old recording in English since

0:11:49.040 --> 0:11:52.120
<v Speaker 1>the fifteenth century, and they found some roots of it

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:54.560
<v Speaker 1>back in Middle Dutch f o k k e n

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:58.679
<v Speaker 1>was to thrust or copulate, Norwegian f u k k

0:11:58.880 --> 0:12:04.240
<v Speaker 1>a was copulate, and in Swedish f o uk meant

0:12:04.320 --> 0:12:07.640
<v Speaker 1>penis uh. And apparently even though it was around, it

0:12:07.679 --> 0:12:10.440
<v Speaker 1>wasn't really used in common speech though much It was

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:13.280
<v Speaker 1>like a word in English. Yeah, but it wasn't really

0:12:13.400 --> 0:12:15.640
<v Speaker 1>used as a curse word until much later on. Yeah,

0:12:15.880 --> 0:12:18.640
<v Speaker 1>like the I think the sixteenth centuries when it first

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:24.640
<v Speaker 1>appears in writing, and even then it seemed kind of casual. Yeah,

0:12:24.960 --> 0:12:29.400
<v Speaker 1>just a casual. I've got another one. You're ready. Zounds.

0:12:30.280 --> 0:12:34.800
<v Speaker 1>You know that word, uh, zounds? I think like Shaggy

0:12:34.880 --> 0:12:38.000
<v Speaker 1>used to say it a lot, He said, zinks. Yeah,

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:42.960
<v Speaker 1>somebody said zounds Encyclopedia Brown. I don't know, so zounds

0:12:43.440 --> 0:12:48.280
<v Speaker 1>sounds like that yeah. Is Um, it's related to God's wounds.

0:12:49.559 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 1>So you're saying God's wounds, Yeah, invoking a deity, So

0:12:53.520 --> 0:12:56.959
<v Speaker 1>that would be a deistic curse. Wow. I can't wait

0:12:57.000 --> 0:12:59.720
<v Speaker 1>till the end when we go around the world. Some

0:12:59.760 --> 0:13:04.080
<v Speaker 1>of those are really funny. Um, should we take a break, Yeah,

0:13:04.280 --> 0:13:06.440
<v Speaker 1>all right, we'll take a break and talk a little

0:13:06.440 --> 0:13:32.080
<v Speaker 1>bit about why people swears skulk Alright, So this makes

0:13:32.080 --> 0:13:33.959
<v Speaker 1>a lot of sense. There's a lot of there's a

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:40.000
<v Speaker 1>line of thought that says that swearing eventually it comes

0:13:40.040 --> 0:13:42.800
<v Speaker 1>to take the place of crying. Yeah. I thought this

0:13:42.920 --> 0:13:48.120
<v Speaker 1>was there's a lot of anecdotal evidence. It makes perfect sense,

0:13:48.200 --> 0:13:50.880
<v Speaker 1>makes total complete sense. Yeah, because when you're a kid,

0:13:50.960 --> 0:13:53.200
<v Speaker 1>you cry about things, and then when you grow up

0:13:53.400 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 1>here in the West, you're, for some reason taught not

0:13:56.880 --> 0:14:00.280
<v Speaker 1>to cry anymore, especially little boys, which is totally us,

0:14:00.440 --> 0:14:04.880
<v Speaker 1>says Rosie Greer. Yeah, I cry all the time. Uh,

0:14:04.960 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 1>And so that swearing becomes a what they call an

0:14:08.920 --> 0:14:12.480
<v Speaker 1>instinctive response for if you're upset, or if you're afraid,

0:14:12.720 --> 0:14:17.400
<v Speaker 1>or if something bad happens, if you're frustrated, and that

0:14:17.520 --> 0:14:19.880
<v Speaker 1>just kind of takes the place of crying. Yeah, which

0:14:20.000 --> 0:14:23.120
<v Speaker 1>again both makes it tremendous. Do you swear while you're crying?

0:14:23.120 --> 0:14:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Because no, I don't do the ugly cry. We should

0:14:28.400 --> 0:14:32.120
<v Speaker 1>probably get a judgment call from our legendary producer Jerry

0:14:32.320 --> 0:14:34.800
<v Speaker 1>about is it okay for us to say if it

0:14:35.560 --> 0:14:39.280
<v Speaker 1>in place of actual bad words here Jerry says, yes,

0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:43.560
<v Speaker 1>we need a ding ding ding. So Um, that makes

0:14:43.600 --> 0:14:46.320
<v Speaker 1>total sense to me that you learned to swear. And

0:14:46.360 --> 0:14:48.400
<v Speaker 1>one of the reasons why it makes total sense to

0:14:48.440 --> 0:14:53.840
<v Speaker 1>me is that swearing is a way of letting off

0:14:54.680 --> 0:15:00.880
<v Speaker 1>pressure valve suddenly and quickly, almost involuntarily, right, um. And

0:15:01.040 --> 0:15:02.680
<v Speaker 1>if you can do it out of anger, you can

0:15:02.680 --> 0:15:04.480
<v Speaker 1>do it out of frustration, you can do it out

0:15:04.520 --> 0:15:09.440
<v Speaker 1>of shock, surprise, pain, um. And yeah, and and at

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:11.840
<v Speaker 1>least in the context of our society, it would be

0:15:11.840 --> 0:15:13.920
<v Speaker 1>weird if you cried in all those situations of an

0:15:13.960 --> 0:15:16.120
<v Speaker 1>adult when you can get it over with just by

0:15:16.160 --> 0:15:18.480
<v Speaker 1>saying shouting the S word or the F word or

0:15:18.520 --> 0:15:21.720
<v Speaker 1>something like that. You know. Um. And Actually, there's a

0:15:21.800 --> 0:15:25.760
<v Speaker 1>linguist named Jeoffrey Nowmberg. I probably screwed up his name,

0:15:25.840 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 1>but he had this great description of swear words. He said,

0:15:29.040 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 1>swear words don't describe your feelings. They manifest them, which

0:15:33.480 --> 0:15:36.000
<v Speaker 1>is absolutely true. I've seen it put as like a

0:15:36.080 --> 0:15:41.240
<v Speaker 1>quick verbal hand grenade. Um. It encapsulates a feeling and

0:15:41.480 --> 0:15:46.080
<v Speaker 1>in in like a really potent condensed form. It's true.

0:15:46.120 --> 0:15:52.000
<v Speaker 1>So bam um. Another really cool um thing that that

0:15:52.040 --> 0:15:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Tracy wrote about was that um they do a lot too.

0:15:55.800 --> 0:15:58.800
<v Speaker 1>They can establish a group identity, They can make you

0:15:58.840 --> 0:16:01.920
<v Speaker 1>feel like a part of a group. UM. They can

0:16:01.960 --> 0:16:05.280
<v Speaker 1>express like intimacy or trust with someone. They aren't just

0:16:05.760 --> 0:16:09.920
<v Speaker 1>regular words beyond shock value and humor, which are all valid,

0:16:10.960 --> 0:16:14.800
<v Speaker 1>but beyond camouflaging your fears which is valid. They really

0:16:15.560 --> 0:16:18.240
<v Speaker 1>can Like I remember, I remember in our one of

0:16:18.240 --> 0:16:20.920
<v Speaker 1>our first editorial meetings and how stuff works years ago

0:16:21.400 --> 0:16:25.600
<v Speaker 1>when our former boss who gave us the the charge

0:16:25.680 --> 0:16:28.760
<v Speaker 1>to do stuff you should know, dropped f bombs in

0:16:28.800 --> 0:16:31.240
<v Speaker 1>the meeting. And and this was the first kind of

0:16:31.240 --> 0:16:37.200
<v Speaker 1>like my stupid chicken killer software job that I had.

0:16:37.440 --> 0:16:39.200
<v Speaker 1>I was like a frat house, so that didn't count.

0:16:39.560 --> 0:16:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Like the language and there was terrible, But this was

0:16:41.840 --> 0:16:44.960
<v Speaker 1>my first like real job where yeah, where I thought like,

0:16:45.000 --> 0:16:47.320
<v Speaker 1>all right, I'm in my first like meeting and he

0:16:47.360 --> 0:16:50.320
<v Speaker 1>starts dropping f bombs and I immediately felt a kinship

0:16:50.880 --> 0:16:53.640
<v Speaker 1>and I was like, all right, this guy is doing something.

0:16:54.080 --> 0:16:57.080
<v Speaker 1>He's laying this out to the room, and that means something.

0:16:57.400 --> 0:17:00.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, it wasn't a casual thing. If you drop

0:17:01.000 --> 0:17:03.360
<v Speaker 1>an F bomb in a meeting like that, you're you're

0:17:03.480 --> 0:17:06.280
<v Speaker 1>telling people something. Yeah, like it's okay to use that

0:17:06.359 --> 0:17:08.760
<v Speaker 1>language here, or this is what kind of person I am.

0:17:09.200 --> 0:17:11.480
<v Speaker 1>It really gives off a lot of social cues. Yeah,

0:17:11.640 --> 0:17:14.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, I've always loved them for it. It really does.

0:17:14.640 --> 0:17:20.280
<v Speaker 1>It's also um it also kind of presents the person

0:17:20.320 --> 0:17:24.159
<v Speaker 1>of higher authority on on your level. You know, it

0:17:24.240 --> 0:17:26.840
<v Speaker 1>can turn people off, though I did think about that, like, man,

0:17:26.880 --> 0:17:29.120
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if there's people in here that are offended

0:17:29.119 --> 0:17:31.920
<v Speaker 1>by this? Well it is, there's a real um. I mean,

0:17:32.920 --> 0:17:37.840
<v Speaker 1>foul language can be offensive, and the this really great

0:17:37.920 --> 0:17:41.520
<v Speaker 1>article by Rebecca roach On Aon basically posits that it's

0:17:41.560 --> 0:17:46.440
<v Speaker 1>offensive because when you are using foul language in front

0:17:46.440 --> 0:17:48.920
<v Speaker 1>of somebody, you know that there's a chance that it's

0:17:48.920 --> 0:17:52.840
<v Speaker 1>going to offend them, and you're doing it anyway. So basically,

0:17:52.920 --> 0:17:58.320
<v Speaker 1>purposefully creating an atmosphere where someone probably will be offended

0:17:59.359 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 1>is the whole reason why bad language is offensive. Yeah,

0:18:03.640 --> 0:18:07.280
<v Speaker 1>it's like it's agreed upon between the two parties, Like,

0:18:07.320 --> 0:18:09.520
<v Speaker 1>there are certain words that if I use in this conversation,

0:18:10.119 --> 0:18:14.160
<v Speaker 1>you might get offended or you might feel more included. Right,

0:18:14.720 --> 0:18:17.320
<v Speaker 1>And because I know that you might get offended, and

0:18:17.359 --> 0:18:20.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing it anyway, I'm saying to heck with your offense,

0:18:20.760 --> 0:18:25.800
<v Speaker 1>which again creates the offensiveness in the first place. It's

0:18:26.640 --> 0:18:32.200
<v Speaker 1>oh wow, what could you It's a dirty word. Um, well,

0:18:32.280 --> 0:18:34.359
<v Speaker 1>I guess we should talk about social response a little bit,

0:18:34.400 --> 0:18:37.840
<v Speaker 1>because that's kind of where we're headed. But um it

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:42.320
<v Speaker 1>didn't like obscenities and dirty words weren't even really looked

0:18:42.359 --> 0:18:45.080
<v Speaker 1>it that way until after the eighteen hundreds. Now, there

0:18:45.080 --> 0:18:49.040
<v Speaker 1>were taboo words for sure, but they weren't considered dirty.

0:18:49.080 --> 0:18:53.400
<v Speaker 1>It was just taboo like don't invoke Odin's raven right.

0:18:53.440 --> 0:18:55.680
<v Speaker 1>But like, the word profanity didn't come around till the

0:18:55.760 --> 0:18:58.919
<v Speaker 1>nineteenth century, which is really interesting. Yeah, you know, and

0:18:59.000 --> 0:19:03.680
<v Speaker 1>originally profan the and blasphemy meant the same thing. They

0:19:03.680 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 1>both had to do with basically insulting the sacred um,

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:10.080
<v Speaker 1>and then over time they started to diverge. Blasphemy for

0:19:10.240 --> 0:19:14.280
<v Speaker 1>me still means the same thing, whereas profanity now is

0:19:14.320 --> 0:19:17.520
<v Speaker 1>a general catch all for for what we would call

0:19:17.640 --> 0:19:21.400
<v Speaker 1>swear words or curse words are dirty words. Right, Even

0:19:21.440 --> 0:19:25.879
<v Speaker 1>though there's a in all cultures, there's a definite hierarchy. Yeah,

0:19:26.119 --> 0:19:30.199
<v Speaker 1>of you know, if your kid says d A M N,

0:19:31.320 --> 0:19:34.760
<v Speaker 1>not the biggest deal, No, just maybe to bed without

0:19:34.800 --> 0:19:37.119
<v Speaker 1>dinner for a few nights. And if your kid is

0:19:37.160 --> 0:19:41.439
<v Speaker 1>dropping F bombs, you know that it ranks or worse.

0:19:41.600 --> 0:19:43.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, some people think the F bomb is the

0:19:43.960 --> 0:19:48.679
<v Speaker 1>worst thing you can do. That there, Yes, that's just

0:19:48.720 --> 0:19:53.640
<v Speaker 1>playing wrong. I'm sorry, at least in this day and age. Yes, Um,

0:19:53.680 --> 0:19:57.399
<v Speaker 1>that hierarchy you talk about seems to fall into a

0:19:57.440 --> 0:20:01.359
<v Speaker 1>couple of categories. Even though have a hierarchy is universal,

0:20:01.800 --> 0:20:05.720
<v Speaker 1>what is at the top of the hierarchy is not. UM.

0:20:05.920 --> 0:20:08.040
<v Speaker 1>One of the things that frequently is found at the

0:20:08.080 --> 0:20:12.560
<v Speaker 1>top of the hierarchy around the world is UM, moms

0:20:13.000 --> 0:20:17.840
<v Speaker 1>your mother. There are plenty of very different cultures around

0:20:17.840 --> 0:20:22.960
<v Speaker 1>the world, UM where insulting your mother, particularly either a

0:20:23.000 --> 0:20:28.760
<v Speaker 1>sexual act with your mother or UM bringing up your

0:20:29.080 --> 0:20:34.040
<v Speaker 1>person's mother's genitalia UM is the is the worst. It's

0:20:34.080 --> 0:20:36.479
<v Speaker 1>the worst of the worst. Oh yeah, I remember, like

0:20:36.520 --> 0:20:39.040
<v Speaker 1>I said in college, when I worked at that Mexican place.

0:20:39.080 --> 0:20:42.080
<v Speaker 1>We learned all the course words first, and the guys

0:20:42.080 --> 0:20:43.880
<v Speaker 1>in the kitchen. I was like, man, you guys talk

0:20:43.920 --> 0:20:47.040
<v Speaker 1>about each other's mom more than anything I've ever heard

0:20:47.040 --> 0:20:50.800
<v Speaker 1>in my life. It was remarkable, and that must be

0:20:50.880 --> 0:20:53.800
<v Speaker 1>And I guess in Um, I guess, is Spain listed

0:20:53.880 --> 0:20:57.440
<v Speaker 1>or Spanish languages? Well, it's a it's Latin languages, Latin

0:20:57.480 --> 0:21:00.879
<v Speaker 1>based languages, so Spanish would definitely fall under that togory. Yeah,

0:21:00.920 --> 0:21:07.040
<v Speaker 1>but also um, I believe Mandarin, um Arabic, some Arabic

0:21:07.119 --> 0:21:12.840
<v Speaker 1>languages just languages around like like really disparate cultures have

0:21:13.040 --> 0:21:15.919
<v Speaker 1>said like leave the moms out of this. Well it

0:21:16.040 --> 0:21:18.240
<v Speaker 1>was also funny too because she followed up with um.

0:21:18.280 --> 0:21:23.199
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes in Bosnia it's uh, your father, it can be

0:21:23.200 --> 0:21:28.360
<v Speaker 1>a really big insult or grandfather, um in Albanian your family, Turkish,

0:21:28.359 --> 0:21:32.240
<v Speaker 1>your extended family. And finally Mandarin, which is your ancestors

0:21:32.280 --> 0:21:36.040
<v Speaker 1>to the eighteenth generation. There it is man that is

0:21:36.200 --> 0:21:42.520
<v Speaker 1>the best swear on the planet. F your ancestors to

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:45.399
<v Speaker 1>the eighteenth generation. I wish I knew how to pronounce this.

0:21:46.320 --> 0:21:50.000
<v Speaker 1>It's just that's as good as it gets. Cow needs

0:21:50.040 --> 0:21:53.600
<v Speaker 1>a zong sheba dae oh you know we this is

0:21:53.640 --> 0:21:57.280
<v Speaker 1>available in China. Yeah good, I'm gonna learn how to

0:21:57.320 --> 0:22:01.680
<v Speaker 1>say that, like for real, little kids in China listen

0:22:01.720 --> 0:22:05.240
<v Speaker 1>to this. The whole classics point. I need to learn

0:22:05.240 --> 0:22:08.400
<v Speaker 1>how to say very sorry. Then gasping is universal too.

0:22:09.720 --> 0:22:13.439
<v Speaker 1>But speaking of swearing at work, um, supposedly swearing at

0:22:13.440 --> 0:22:18.280
<v Speaker 1>work makes up three of the conversation. That's what it said.

0:22:18.359 --> 0:22:20.359
<v Speaker 1>That sounds low to me. I saw a two thousand

0:22:20.320 --> 0:22:24.320
<v Speaker 1>and sixteen study that found that women curse more than

0:22:24.400 --> 0:22:28.200
<v Speaker 1>men at work. More women admit to cursing at work

0:22:28.240 --> 0:22:33.120
<v Speaker 1>then man, but frequency wise, men curse more. So if

0:22:33.160 --> 0:22:37.280
<v Speaker 1>the average man who curses at work is placed beside

0:22:37.320 --> 0:22:39.680
<v Speaker 1>the average woman who curses at work, the man's gonna

0:22:39.720 --> 0:22:42.600
<v Speaker 1>curse more frequently. But if you fill the room with

0:22:42.680 --> 0:22:44.840
<v Speaker 1>the women who curse at work and the man who

0:22:44.840 --> 0:22:49.120
<v Speaker 1>curse at work, there'll be more women. Does that for explained?

0:22:49.200 --> 0:22:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Really confused? Well? And then apparently among millennials, sixty six

0:22:54.200 --> 0:22:57.640
<v Speaker 1>percent of millennials say they curse at work, and then

0:22:58.800 --> 0:23:02.920
<v Speaker 1>of baby boomers curse at work, which if you put

0:23:02.960 --> 0:23:06.200
<v Speaker 1>that together, comes out to be a hundred and twenty.

0:23:06.680 --> 0:23:14.280
<v Speaker 1>So that makes like zero sense. If you fooled me. Um,

0:23:14.520 --> 0:23:17.280
<v Speaker 1>if you're talking about the law. Depending on where you are,

0:23:17.400 --> 0:23:20.399
<v Speaker 1>there may be some arcane laws on the books that

0:23:20.560 --> 0:23:24.320
<v Speaker 1>prevent you from cursing in public. Um, but it's definitely

0:23:24.359 --> 0:23:26.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, we did one on free speech recently. It

0:23:26.200 --> 0:23:30.480
<v Speaker 1>definitely does not qualify as protected speech. It depends what

0:23:30.640 --> 0:23:33.600
<v Speaker 1>can Yeah, alright, So like if you're just walking down

0:23:33.600 --> 0:23:36.920
<v Speaker 1>the street and you say, if you pig to a cop,

0:23:37.680 --> 0:23:40.400
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna get arrested, but there's a pretty good chance

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 1>that your case is going to get ultimately thrown out

0:23:45.200 --> 0:23:49.160
<v Speaker 1>if you, Um, if you were in Pennsylvania, you are

0:23:49.240 --> 0:23:52.880
<v Speaker 1>going to well, depending on the town, and you curse

0:23:52.960 --> 0:23:55.760
<v Speaker 1>in public, you say, f the Steelers, Oh man, you

0:23:56.680 --> 0:23:58.960
<v Speaker 1>made you you you should count your lucky stars if

0:23:58.960 --> 0:24:01.639
<v Speaker 1>you make it safely to jail, unless you're in Philadelphia,

0:24:02.080 --> 0:24:05.400
<v Speaker 1>well there you go. Um. Apparently in Pennsylvania they were

0:24:05.520 --> 0:24:10.200
<v Speaker 1>arresting people left and right for um, well citing them,

0:24:10.240 --> 0:24:14.199
<v Speaker 1>giving them citations for cursing in public, and UM, it

0:24:14.320 --> 0:24:16.080
<v Speaker 1>finally got to the point where the A c L

0:24:16.160 --> 0:24:18.199
<v Speaker 1>You got involved and said, what are you doing. You

0:24:18.240 --> 0:24:21.240
<v Speaker 1>can't do this. This is protected speech. This is curse

0:24:21.320 --> 0:24:24.960
<v Speaker 1>in public, and it's a. It's a gray area. Actually,

0:24:25.040 --> 0:24:27.199
<v Speaker 1>like states, there are states, like you said, that have

0:24:27.400 --> 0:24:30.520
<v Speaker 1>some laws on the books, and apparently one of them

0:24:30.560 --> 0:24:32.520
<v Speaker 1>is Pennsylvania, and they were enforcing it, and I don't

0:24:32.520 --> 0:24:35.240
<v Speaker 1>know if they still are or not, but pretty recently

0:24:35.280 --> 0:24:38.439
<v Speaker 1>they were, um, they were giving people citations for it.

0:24:39.560 --> 0:24:43.680
<v Speaker 1>And in Michigan they had a law overturned as recently

0:24:43.720 --> 0:24:47.639
<v Speaker 1>as two thousand two where it was illegal to cuss

0:24:47.680 --> 0:24:52.119
<v Speaker 1>in front of women and children. And some guy was

0:24:52.200 --> 0:24:55.719
<v Speaker 1>canoeing down the Rifle River. His canoe was overturned. He

0:24:55.760 --> 0:24:59.600
<v Speaker 1>was in the water cursing up storm and there were women, children,

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:05.919
<v Speaker 1>elderly there. He he was arrested and um taken to jail,

0:25:06.840 --> 0:25:11.680
<v Speaker 1>and the Michigan Court of Appeals said, no, this is

0:25:11.680 --> 0:25:14.040
<v Speaker 1>a hundred year old law. While and the guy overturned

0:25:14.040 --> 0:25:16.440
<v Speaker 1>his cannete like give him a break, right exactly, give

0:25:16.440 --> 0:25:19.480
<v Speaker 1>the guy a break, and he um he got off.

0:25:19.520 --> 0:25:22.080
<v Speaker 1>His case was thrown out and they said, we're this

0:25:22.200 --> 0:25:25.280
<v Speaker 1>law of null and void. By the way, so there

0:25:25.400 --> 0:25:28.240
<v Speaker 1>is speech protection and it is taken to extend to

0:25:28.280 --> 0:25:30.840
<v Speaker 1>the state level. But again it's a gray area because

0:25:30.960 --> 0:25:33.439
<v Speaker 1>if you did that on TV, you could certainly be

0:25:33.480 --> 0:25:36.440
<v Speaker 1>fined and that would be upheld because we've long agreed

0:25:36.520 --> 0:25:41.399
<v Speaker 1>that there are certain situations where you shouldn't curse because

0:25:41.520 --> 0:25:43.720
<v Speaker 1>kids might hear it. But what's the difference of doing

0:25:43.720 --> 0:25:45.800
<v Speaker 1>it on TV and doing it in front of a kid?

0:25:46.640 --> 0:25:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Only the courts can say, well, yeah, and that's an

0:25:48.920 --> 0:25:51.439
<v Speaker 1>FCC thing. And there are certain words, like you know

0:25:51.480 --> 0:25:56.320
<v Speaker 1>George Carlin's famous words you can't say on television. Um,

0:25:57.080 --> 0:26:01.439
<v Speaker 1>but those are rules more than laws, aren't they Or

0:26:01.840 --> 0:26:05.280
<v Speaker 1>I guess yeah, I guess they are rules, rules and regulations. Yeah,

0:26:05.320 --> 0:26:09.280
<v Speaker 1>but but they are upheld. Yeah. But like private organizations

0:26:09.320 --> 0:26:12.240
<v Speaker 1>and like if you're in a store or a movie

0:26:12.280 --> 0:26:14.919
<v Speaker 1>theater or at work, like they can they can prevent

0:26:14.960 --> 0:26:17.240
<v Speaker 1>you from doing that stuff. Can you can be asked

0:26:17.240 --> 0:26:20.320
<v Speaker 1>to leave? Um, you can be asked off a plane,

0:26:21.080 --> 0:26:24.400
<v Speaker 1>you know stuff hopefully while it's on the ground. Yeah. Yeah,

0:26:24.480 --> 0:26:28.000
<v Speaker 1>if you're if you're a company, you can. Yeah. It's

0:26:28.040 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 1>like in the mall episode, I think we talked about

0:26:30.080 --> 0:26:33.640
<v Speaker 1>where First Amendment protection doesn't extend to private area. Yeah,

0:26:33.680 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 1>you can have a policy, um yeah, and it can

0:26:38.600 --> 0:26:42.320
<v Speaker 1>be like some people can consider that a hostile work environment. Yeah,

0:26:42.440 --> 0:26:45.000
<v Speaker 1>if you have you know, a real potty mouth boss.

0:26:45.600 --> 0:26:48.760
<v Speaker 1>It makes everybody feel uncomfortable because cursing can go. You know,

0:26:48.800 --> 0:26:51.639
<v Speaker 1>it's one thing to say you know bs or F this,

0:26:51.880 --> 0:26:55.320
<v Speaker 1>but if you like get really creative with your curse words. Well,

0:26:55.359 --> 0:26:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Plus there's a difference between F this and F you,

0:26:58.480 --> 0:27:01.560
<v Speaker 1>especially coming from a boss. Sure, so yeah, you can

0:27:01.800 --> 0:27:07.080
<v Speaker 1>switch it really is. It's the best. Um, all right,

0:27:07.119 --> 0:27:08.720
<v Speaker 1>should we take a break and talk about the brain?

0:27:09.560 --> 0:27:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Yess sk sk So we're back, ready to talk about

0:27:34.240 --> 0:27:37.360
<v Speaker 1>the brain. Got the top of my skull removed and

0:27:37.440 --> 0:27:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Chuck has finger in the ventral dorsal interior postulate. If

0:27:44.400 --> 0:27:46.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm not mistaken, I thought this is where it got

0:27:46.520 --> 0:27:50.600
<v Speaker 1>really interesting. Yeah, because it supports all that anecdotal evidence,

0:27:50.600 --> 0:27:55.679
<v Speaker 1>all of it. Yeah, alright, so the parts of the brain, um,

0:27:55.960 --> 0:28:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the cerebral cortex. I guess we should go through all this. Huh.

0:28:01.160 --> 0:28:03.800
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna break it down to the big line

0:28:03.840 --> 0:28:06.000
<v Speaker 1>at the end, but we'll go through it all. Yeah,

0:28:06.080 --> 0:28:08.320
<v Speaker 1>you gotta build it up where showman. If anything that

0:28:08.440 --> 0:28:11.399
<v Speaker 1>the cerebral cortex has pre motor and motor areas. They

0:28:11.440 --> 0:28:13.320
<v Speaker 1>control the speech and writing. It's kind of like the

0:28:13.400 --> 0:28:19.480
<v Speaker 1>higher function. And then we talked before about Wernike's area. Um, jeez,

0:28:19.480 --> 0:28:21.160
<v Speaker 1>we talked about that a bunch. I feel like, well,

0:28:21.200 --> 0:28:24.480
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty interesting it is, uh. And they recognize and

0:28:24.520 --> 0:28:29.080
<v Speaker 1>process words spoken words, and then you have your prefrontal cortex,

0:28:29.119 --> 0:28:33.560
<v Speaker 1>which like helps regulate your what's your social behaviors and stuff.

0:28:33.600 --> 0:28:36.600
<v Speaker 1>It's a higher, higher function. It's all these things. Was

0:28:36.600 --> 0:28:38.240
<v Speaker 1>about to say, you're working together, but they're kind of

0:28:38.280 --> 0:28:41.200
<v Speaker 1>not when it comes to cursing, right when it comes

0:28:41.240 --> 0:28:44.280
<v Speaker 1>to language, they're all working together, but like we said before,

0:28:44.360 --> 0:28:47.920
<v Speaker 1>swears there something different. They're separate, yes, and scientifically in

0:28:47.960 --> 0:28:51.440
<v Speaker 1>fact they are. Yeah. So they they involve different parts

0:28:51.560 --> 0:28:56.680
<v Speaker 1>of the brain than language processing. UM. The limbic system,

0:28:56.720 --> 0:28:59.360
<v Speaker 1>which is part of your reward system or the basis

0:28:59.400 --> 0:29:01.959
<v Speaker 1>of your word system, but also has to do with

0:29:02.000 --> 0:29:07.960
<v Speaker 1>housing memory UM, has to do with regulating emotion, basic behaviors. UM.

0:29:08.040 --> 0:29:11.200
<v Speaker 1>And apparently they think that in primates and some animals,

0:29:11.520 --> 0:29:15.400
<v Speaker 1>vocalization is based in the Olympic system, just like like

0:29:15.480 --> 0:29:18.600
<v Speaker 1>that thing that Tim Allen does that would be limbic

0:29:18.680 --> 0:29:24.040
<v Speaker 1>system based, weird, like oinking bark he does. I've literally

0:29:24.080 --> 0:29:26.440
<v Speaker 1>never seen anything, Tim Allen. I'm not about to do it.

0:29:26.560 --> 0:29:29.600
<v Speaker 1>So you're gonna have to go look it up on YouTube. Uh.

0:29:29.680 --> 0:29:34.200
<v Speaker 1>And then the basil ganglia, which is motor motor function, yeah,

0:29:34.200 --> 0:29:38.240
<v Speaker 1>and impulse control. Those two things which have basically nothing

0:29:38.280 --> 0:29:42.920
<v Speaker 1>to do with language processing, higher processing and humans are

0:29:42.960 --> 0:29:46.920
<v Speaker 1>what governed swear words. Yeah, Like Tracy says that they're

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:51.480
<v Speaker 1>the scientists think that it all takes place in those

0:29:51.520 --> 0:29:54.560
<v Speaker 1>lower regions. It's all emotion and instinct, and that the

0:29:54.600 --> 0:29:57.440
<v Speaker 1>brain doesn't even process a swear word like a word

0:29:57.840 --> 0:30:01.880
<v Speaker 1>like as what are they called phone ms phonemes, Yeah, phonemes,

0:30:02.000 --> 0:30:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Like the parts that make up the word. The curse

0:30:05.280 --> 0:30:07.600
<v Speaker 1>word is just the word as a whole as far

0:30:07.640 --> 0:30:09.320
<v Speaker 1>as the brain is concerned. Like when you hear the

0:30:09.360 --> 0:30:12.240
<v Speaker 1>word articulation, there's a part of your brain in the

0:30:12.360 --> 0:30:17.560
<v Speaker 1>left hemisphere. The region is going to work taking articulation

0:30:18.080 --> 0:30:21.280
<v Speaker 1>emphasis you put on it, putting it together, running it

0:30:21.320 --> 0:30:25.040
<v Speaker 1>against your memory banks or context or whatever, and saying, oh,

0:30:25.080 --> 0:30:27.440
<v Speaker 1>I know what you just said. But if somebody shouts

0:30:27.480 --> 0:30:30.320
<v Speaker 1>the S word, those parts of your brain are not

0:30:31.120 --> 0:30:34.120
<v Speaker 1>springing into action. It's the parts of your brain that

0:30:34.160 --> 0:30:39.640
<v Speaker 1>are involved in experiencing, in recognizing emotions, The very very

0:30:39.680 --> 0:30:42.560
<v Speaker 1>ancient parts of your brain that are involved in which

0:30:42.600 --> 0:30:48.840
<v Speaker 1>gives credence to that hypothesis that language evolved out of expletives. Well,

0:30:48.880 --> 0:30:50.960
<v Speaker 1>and also in that one article you sent the theory

0:30:51.040 --> 0:30:53.720
<v Speaker 1>that it's not even a theory, just kind of the

0:30:53.720 --> 0:30:56.240
<v Speaker 1>thought that a curse word isn't even a word so

0:30:56.320 --> 0:30:58.640
<v Speaker 1>much as it is like a yell yes, I mean,

0:30:58.680 --> 0:31:01.320
<v Speaker 1>it could might as well just be yeah. It's just

0:31:01.600 --> 0:31:03.920
<v Speaker 1>you've got four letters, and if you think about it,

0:31:03.920 --> 0:31:07.400
<v Speaker 1>it makes uttering complete sense, like even the worst of

0:31:07.440 --> 0:31:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the worst, you know, where you're involving somebody's mom in

0:31:11.240 --> 0:31:15.520
<v Speaker 1>the worst possible way. You're when somebody says that, even

0:31:15.560 --> 0:31:18.520
<v Speaker 1>when they're especially I should say, when they're saying it

0:31:18.560 --> 0:31:25.120
<v Speaker 1>to insult you specifically, your brain doesn't dial up that image.

0:31:25.200 --> 0:31:28.479
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't have to know. You're not thinking about the

0:31:28.520 --> 0:31:31.880
<v Speaker 1>actual meaning of the word. You're responding to the emotional

0:31:32.000 --> 0:31:34.760
<v Speaker 1>punch and the gut you just took from that word,

0:31:34.800 --> 0:31:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Like you know what that word means. I mean, the

0:31:37.560 --> 0:31:41.040
<v Speaker 1>thing they mean on a on a very emotional level,

0:31:41.280 --> 0:31:43.720
<v Speaker 1>like you have it stored away in that sense. Yeah,

0:31:43.760 --> 0:31:47.600
<v Speaker 1>because most times curse words almost always there aren't to

0:31:47.640 --> 0:31:51.000
<v Speaker 1>be taken literally, right like when uh in the one

0:31:51.080 --> 0:31:53.400
<v Speaker 1>who was the guy who wrote that one, Uh, that

0:31:53.400 --> 0:31:57.120
<v Speaker 1>that you sent from the BBC James Harbick. Yeah, like

0:31:57.360 --> 0:31:59.920
<v Speaker 1>talking about the F word, they're like ten different ways

0:32:00.000 --> 0:32:02.120
<v Speaker 1>you can use it. Well, that was Stephen Pinker. He

0:32:02.200 --> 0:32:04.720
<v Speaker 1>was refrained, Okay, yeah, and none of them are you

0:32:04.760 --> 0:32:07.640
<v Speaker 1>should take literally, and no one does take them literally.

0:32:07.680 --> 0:32:09.320
<v Speaker 1>You just know what it means if you say it

0:32:09.680 --> 0:32:12.880
<v Speaker 1>or F or F you you're not literally saying engage

0:32:12.880 --> 0:32:15.680
<v Speaker 1>in sex with this thing, you know. Yeah, and you

0:32:15.840 --> 0:32:18.239
<v Speaker 1>think the person was a weirdo who just topped you

0:32:18.320 --> 0:32:20.840
<v Speaker 1>if they did at your command. Well, which is another

0:32:20.880 --> 0:32:23.840
<v Speaker 1>reason why we let people that are just learning to

0:32:23.920 --> 0:32:26.840
<v Speaker 1>speak English off the hook when they say curse words,

0:32:26.880 --> 0:32:32.840
<v Speaker 1>because they don't understand the difference between the literal meaning

0:32:33.000 --> 0:32:37.000
<v Speaker 1>and the expression, right, So no offense is intended, right, right,

0:32:37.040 --> 0:32:40.960
<v Speaker 1>so that social contract is not there yet exactly. It's

0:32:41.000 --> 0:32:44.280
<v Speaker 1>just hilarious when they do it accidentally. It really is. Yeah,

0:32:44.800 --> 0:32:50.280
<v Speaker 1>was it? What was it? Stripes to speak English? You know.

0:32:50.680 --> 0:32:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Framus is teaching them very good stuff. Uh. And so

0:32:54.760 --> 0:32:57.120
<v Speaker 1>they've done f m r I studies to that show

0:32:57.200 --> 0:33:04.600
<v Speaker 1>that functional magnetic resonance imaging tests uh, to show that

0:33:04.680 --> 0:33:06.480
<v Speaker 1>higher and lower parts of the brain can struggle with

0:33:06.520 --> 0:33:09.360
<v Speaker 1>each other when they swear. And apparently the people who

0:33:09.720 --> 0:33:13.800
<v Speaker 1>really pride themselves and being super educated and very literate people, uh,

0:33:13.880 --> 0:33:18.000
<v Speaker 1>they respond to slang and illiterate quote, illiterate phrases the

0:33:18.040 --> 0:33:20.760
<v Speaker 1>same as they do swear words. And this one is

0:33:20.800 --> 0:33:24.160
<v Speaker 1>weird to me. Um. They've done studies where you identify

0:33:24.240 --> 0:33:26.720
<v Speaker 1>the color or word is written in, not the word,

0:33:26.800 --> 0:33:30.000
<v Speaker 1>but the color, and the swear word distracts them from

0:33:30.000 --> 0:33:34.840
<v Speaker 1>the color of that word. This's is crazy. They literally

0:33:34.880 --> 0:33:37.400
<v Speaker 1>exist in their own space. Yeah, they are their own

0:33:37.440 --> 0:33:41.480
<v Speaker 1>thing for sure, you know. Yeah, and you remember them

0:33:41.880 --> 0:33:45.120
<v Speaker 1>supposedly you remember swear words four times better than other words.

0:33:46.280 --> 0:33:49.440
<v Speaker 1>It's nuts. But what makes it, I think what's super

0:33:49.480 --> 0:33:54.760
<v Speaker 1>interesting to me is that there's their universal and there's distinctions,

0:33:54.800 --> 0:33:57.600
<v Speaker 1>but they're also you know, you can divide most things

0:33:57.640 --> 0:34:00.360
<v Speaker 1>in most swear words into just a couple of different

0:34:00.360 --> 0:34:04.680
<v Speaker 1>categories across the board, you know, but there they're not

0:34:04.920 --> 0:34:08.040
<v Speaker 1>given thought, but they're based on things that you learn.

0:34:08.960 --> 0:34:11.480
<v Speaker 1>So for example, chuck starting to go around the world,

0:34:11.480 --> 0:34:16.800
<v Speaker 1>shall we alright, are we there yet? So? In uh

0:34:17.000 --> 0:34:24.960
<v Speaker 1>French Quebec, it's an extraordinarily catholic Um society and basically

0:34:25.000 --> 0:34:26.960
<v Speaker 1>all of their swear words have to do with the

0:34:27.000 --> 0:34:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Catholic Mass, like the chalice, the tabernacle, the host um,

0:34:32.800 --> 0:34:37.440
<v Speaker 1>the these literally these words like you say tabernacle and

0:34:37.480 --> 0:34:40.840
<v Speaker 1>it's that's bad man, that's a really bad, bad word.

0:34:41.560 --> 0:34:44.080
<v Speaker 1>And it has to do with the idea that you're

0:34:44.200 --> 0:34:49.560
<v Speaker 1>bringing the sacred into um. You're basically blaspheming and it's

0:34:49.600 --> 0:34:52.960
<v Speaker 1>a it's a big time taboo. But the idea that

0:34:52.960 --> 0:34:56.200
<v Speaker 1>that's a learned like you have to, like you don't

0:34:56.239 --> 0:35:00.960
<v Speaker 1>look at a a tabernacle and a true church as

0:35:01.000 --> 0:35:03.200
<v Speaker 1>a kid without being you know, the first time you

0:35:03.200 --> 0:35:06.400
<v Speaker 1>were walking to a church and say that's the holiest

0:35:06.440 --> 0:35:08.600
<v Speaker 1>thing there is. I understand everything there is to know

0:35:08.640 --> 0:35:10.520
<v Speaker 1>about it so much so that I can break a

0:35:10.560 --> 0:35:13.680
<v Speaker 1>taboo by saying that word. You have to learn that.

0:35:14.000 --> 0:35:17.120
<v Speaker 1>But the idea that that when you do learn it,

0:35:17.120 --> 0:35:20.880
<v Speaker 1>it's stored as an emotion in your brain, as a

0:35:20.920 --> 0:35:24.680
<v Speaker 1>motor function, rather than as a word that your higher

0:35:24.920 --> 0:35:29.920
<v Speaker 1>cognition refers to or brings forth. It's just astounding to me.

0:35:30.239 --> 0:35:37.040
<v Speaker 1>It is it's like a parallel process to learning language. Absolutely, um,

0:35:37.080 --> 0:35:41.480
<v Speaker 1>there are languages where uh like it's different in a

0:35:41.480 --> 0:35:43.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of countries, but it's also the same. Like when

0:35:43.719 --> 0:35:46.520
<v Speaker 1>you talk about like the feces. Uh, there are many

0:35:46.560 --> 0:35:50.800
<v Speaker 1>different languages that use the word feces there whatever word

0:35:50.840 --> 0:35:58.520
<v Speaker 1>for it as a swear word. Um, including English of course, UM, French, German, um,

0:35:58.560 --> 0:36:04.719
<v Speaker 1>they all have Albania, They all have words for feces

0:36:04.760 --> 0:36:08.279
<v Speaker 1>that are curse words. But then it's not arbitrary. I

0:36:08.280 --> 0:36:10.640
<v Speaker 1>guess it just spends on how it, you know, came

0:36:10.680 --> 0:36:13.239
<v Speaker 1>to be in that country. But in Sweden, which is

0:36:13.400 --> 0:36:16.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, in that neighborhood, Uh, you can say skit

0:36:17.080 --> 0:36:20.239
<v Speaker 1>when you're annoyed, but it doesn't count as a curse word, right,

0:36:20.920 --> 0:36:22.239
<v Speaker 1>like you could They said you could say to run

0:36:22.320 --> 0:36:26.360
<v Speaker 1>a grandmother. Yeah, so so it's a curse word. But

0:36:26.440 --> 0:36:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the the importance, the emphasis that of a taboo that

0:36:31.560 --> 0:36:35.160
<v Speaker 1>it breaks depends on the culture. Yeah, or like another

0:36:35.239 --> 0:36:40.399
<v Speaker 1>kind of like in Polish they'll use cholera, and other

0:36:40.440 --> 0:36:44.680
<v Speaker 1>countries use types of disease like canker in in the Dutch. Yeah,

0:36:44.680 --> 0:36:48.520
<v Speaker 1>isn't that crazy, Yeah, the canker meaning cancer, So you

0:36:48.520 --> 0:36:51.719
<v Speaker 1>you are basically wishing cancer on somebody, which is pretty awful. Yeah,

0:36:51.760 --> 0:36:54.080
<v Speaker 1>that would be a curse that's not done here, But

0:36:54.120 --> 0:36:57.280
<v Speaker 1>if you did do it in in you know, normal

0:36:57.440 --> 0:37:01.880
<v Speaker 1>discussion or even an argument here in the West, there'd

0:37:01.880 --> 0:37:05.080
<v Speaker 1>be like a record scratch, a needle scratching off a record,

0:37:05.160 --> 0:37:07.239
<v Speaker 1>be like, what did you just say? That was the

0:37:07.280 --> 0:37:10.160
<v Speaker 1>worst thing that's been said to me in months? But

0:37:10.239 --> 0:37:12.680
<v Speaker 1>you just have a word for it. Yeah, I never

0:37:12.680 --> 0:37:14.279
<v Speaker 1>really thought about that. That That would be terrible thing to

0:37:14.320 --> 0:37:16.760
<v Speaker 1>say it if you said that just in a sentence

0:37:16.800 --> 0:37:19.520
<v Speaker 1>to someone in English, especially if you were like jabbing

0:37:19.520 --> 0:37:21.759
<v Speaker 1>your finger in their chest while you're saying it. You know,

0:37:22.120 --> 0:37:24.040
<v Speaker 1>that's right. I know. We have a lot of listeners

0:37:24.040 --> 0:37:30.239
<v Speaker 1>in Sweden, uh, Swedish um people apparently the same with

0:37:30.360 --> 0:37:34.480
<v Speaker 1>finn Finland and uh, Norway and Denmark. They put a

0:37:34.480 --> 0:37:37.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of emphasis on the devil. Oh yeah, so like

0:37:37.480 --> 0:37:42.240
<v Speaker 1>some of their worst swear words are um based on satan,

0:37:42.440 --> 0:37:47.319
<v Speaker 1>hell um, the devil, that kind of thing. Yeah, so

0:37:47.360 --> 0:37:49.080
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to you don't want to bring that up,

0:37:49.880 --> 0:37:53.600
<v Speaker 1>or else you might offend your hosts in Sweden. Prostitution

0:37:54.400 --> 0:37:59.120
<v Speaker 1>apparently a lot of cultures. Uh. And this this theory

0:37:59.160 --> 0:38:02.680
<v Speaker 1>makes sense. Process it's defire wife's exclusivity in a man's ownership,

0:38:03.280 --> 0:38:06.160
<v Speaker 1>which is why a lot of words people will use

0:38:06.239 --> 0:38:09.480
<v Speaker 1>for prostitute can be a swear word against somebody. Yeah,

0:38:09.480 --> 0:38:14.359
<v Speaker 1>and apparently cultures that where bringing someone's mother into it

0:38:14.400 --> 0:38:17.839
<v Speaker 1>is is the is the top of the hierarchy will

0:38:17.880 --> 0:38:22.600
<v Speaker 1>also have um words for prostitutes, like plenty of words

0:38:22.640 --> 0:38:25.359
<v Speaker 1>for prostitutes, and those will be extremely bad words as well.

0:38:25.680 --> 0:38:28.800
<v Speaker 1>So it's like those things kind of go hand in hand, yeah,

0:38:28.880 --> 0:38:31.400
<v Speaker 1>which from what I've seen, has to do with the

0:38:31.440 --> 0:38:36.239
<v Speaker 1>patriarchy creating the moral hierarchy, right, because it's such a

0:38:36.280 --> 0:38:39.920
<v Speaker 1>male view of things, like you're my mom, so you're

0:38:39.960 --> 0:38:42.399
<v Speaker 1>the most sacred thing around, and you're a prostitute, which

0:38:42.440 --> 0:38:45.719
<v Speaker 1>means I can't control you. So invoking those things are

0:38:45.760 --> 0:38:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the two worst things you can talk about. And then

0:38:49.239 --> 0:38:53.520
<v Speaker 1>our last step to me chuck in Japan, yes, bacca

0:38:53.960 --> 0:38:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Bacca means basically idiot, but it you don't call people that,

0:38:58.760 --> 0:39:01.280
<v Speaker 1>it's a really bad word, which I think is so sweet.

0:39:02.160 --> 0:39:07.840
<v Speaker 1>I love that country. Idiot that's bad, yeah, and I

0:39:07.880 --> 0:39:10.280
<v Speaker 1>think about how much how often we call people idiots

0:39:10.280 --> 0:39:12.600
<v Speaker 1>here in the US. Yeah, but that's bad though. I

0:39:12.600 --> 0:39:14.719
<v Speaker 1>remember my mom team like, don't don't say that. Word.

0:39:14.800 --> 0:39:18.239
<v Speaker 1>Oh she was right. Yeah. Still she's not even Japanese,

0:39:19.040 --> 0:39:21.640
<v Speaker 1>she's some Tennessee a little Japanese in it, maybe so

0:39:21.840 --> 0:39:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Japanese streak. UM. So I guess we will finish up

0:39:25.480 --> 0:39:29.520
<v Speaker 1>here with a little bit on um. What can happen

0:39:29.560 --> 0:39:32.480
<v Speaker 1>when your brain is damaged. And we've talked about a

0:39:32.520 --> 0:39:34.560
<v Speaker 1>little bit of this stuff before, but there's some pretty

0:39:34.600 --> 0:39:39.359
<v Speaker 1>interesting things uh. In terms of brain injury UM. Something

0:39:39.400 --> 0:39:43.759
<v Speaker 1>called aphasia UH is a condition where you can lose

0:39:43.760 --> 0:39:46.920
<v Speaker 1>your ability to speak or pronounce words because of disease

0:39:47.000 --> 0:39:54.160
<v Speaker 1>or brain damage. But UM A phase A, PHASEX have

0:39:54.200 --> 0:39:56.400
<v Speaker 1>an interesting thing. They can return to their ability of

0:39:56.400 --> 0:39:59.680
<v Speaker 1>automatic speech, which is just like saying things like um

0:39:59.760 --> 0:40:03.200
<v Speaker 1>and uh uh. But the other thing that comes back,

0:40:03.280 --> 0:40:06.160
<v Speaker 1>or swear words, which ties all back into the thing,

0:40:06.239 --> 0:40:08.640
<v Speaker 1>is they exist as their own in their own category,

0:40:09.040 --> 0:40:12.319
<v Speaker 1>almost like non speech exactly. So that's one of the

0:40:12.320 --> 0:40:15.600
<v Speaker 1>first things that can come back um or never go away,

0:40:15.880 --> 0:40:19.359
<v Speaker 1>yeah or never go away. And when they um, their

0:40:19.400 --> 0:40:23.160
<v Speaker 1>ability pronounced words can evolve while they're recovering, but the

0:40:23.200 --> 0:40:26.560
<v Speaker 1>swear words stay the same. Right Like apparently you can

0:40:26.600 --> 0:40:31.080
<v Speaker 1>have a hemispherictomy on the left of the left lobe

0:40:31.480 --> 0:40:35.120
<v Speaker 1>where a substantial part of the left lobe goes away

0:40:35.400 --> 0:40:38.000
<v Speaker 1>and you can't talk any longer, but you can say, yes,

0:40:38.000 --> 0:40:44.879
<v Speaker 1>we're just fine. That must be startling, I'm sure you know. Yeah. Uh,

0:40:44.920 --> 0:40:48.120
<v Speaker 1>and we did. We did a great episode on Tourette

0:40:48.160 --> 0:40:52.320
<v Speaker 1>syndrome quite a while back, and we talked about corporalia

0:40:53.080 --> 0:40:55.520
<v Speaker 1>and that is um. I think a lot of people

0:40:55.600 --> 0:40:58.319
<v Speaker 1>have this image of someone with turette, you know, just

0:40:58.400 --> 0:41:02.200
<v Speaker 1>constantly screaming swear words. And it's actually a very small

0:41:02.280 --> 0:41:05.400
<v Speaker 1>number and it's that's actually called copper laia, not turette,

0:41:05.760 --> 0:41:08.520
<v Speaker 1>and um, a very small number of people with GTS

0:41:08.920 --> 0:41:13.160
<v Speaker 1>exhibit copper lawya, right, very very very small. Yeah, and

0:41:13.200 --> 0:41:15.359
<v Speaker 1>it's I think it even I think you even grow

0:41:15.400 --> 0:41:18.600
<v Speaker 1>out of it in most cases too. Right. Apparently younger

0:41:18.640 --> 0:41:21.359
<v Speaker 1>males are the ones who are more likely to have

0:41:21.520 --> 0:41:25.160
<v Speaker 1>that as a tick with Tourette syndrome. But it also

0:41:25.200 --> 0:41:28.400
<v Speaker 1>makes sense in that um swearing can be viewed as

0:41:28.440 --> 0:41:32.799
<v Speaker 1>a motor function with a motion attached, right, Yeah, And

0:41:33.360 --> 0:41:36.320
<v Speaker 1>a tick is a has to do with the motor function,

0:41:36.360 --> 0:41:40.040
<v Speaker 1>whether it's your head twitching or shouting the S word

0:41:40.040 --> 0:41:43.879
<v Speaker 1>a few times. Yeah, still a tick, um My last

0:41:43.880 --> 0:41:47.239
<v Speaker 1>thing here is I think Pinker, I think it was

0:41:47.280 --> 0:41:49.719
<v Speaker 1>really interesting and that he noted that swear words were

0:41:49.800 --> 0:41:55.719
<v Speaker 1>often most often just very uh just the sound itself,

0:41:56.160 --> 0:42:01.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, being real, just harsh, and that that contributes

0:42:01.120 --> 0:42:04.719
<v Speaker 1>a lot to their function, like when you get hurt

0:42:05.080 --> 0:42:08.080
<v Speaker 1>or when you're just trying to exclaim something loudly, like

0:42:08.200 --> 0:42:10.480
<v Speaker 1>the F word, it's as that very sharp k at

0:42:10.480 --> 0:42:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the end um. And if you expressed anger using gentler

0:42:14.160 --> 0:42:20.520
<v Speaker 1>sounds like he says wiffy and slush, it's just he

0:42:20.560 --> 0:42:22.160
<v Speaker 1>compares it. What do you say, It's like slamming a

0:42:22.200 --> 0:42:24.839
<v Speaker 1>door fitted with a compressed air hinge. It's just not

0:42:24.880 --> 0:42:27.800
<v Speaker 1>the same thing, right, There's something about those sharp quick

0:42:27.840 --> 0:42:31.239
<v Speaker 1>words ends and kay's and teas, you know that our

0:42:31.440 --> 0:42:36.760
<v Speaker 1>staccato that just sort of provide that visceral you know release. Yeah,

0:42:36.840 --> 0:42:39.239
<v Speaker 1>I think yeah that was Rebecca Roach who use the

0:42:39.320 --> 0:42:46.399
<v Speaker 1>analogy with the hydraulic which is perfect its wify door. Yeah. Um,

0:42:46.480 --> 0:42:51.920
<v Speaker 1>But but we should finish on Pinker's um seven functions

0:42:51.960 --> 0:42:55.480
<v Speaker 1>of swearing. All right? What are they? They? So? I

0:42:55.480 --> 0:42:58.799
<v Speaker 1>swear word? No, I'm sorry. Five functions that we could

0:42:58.800 --> 0:43:04.280
<v Speaker 1>make up another two swear words. They can be used descriptively. Uh,

0:43:04.320 --> 0:43:07.680
<v Speaker 1>I can't give an example of that one. Idiomatically. Okay,

0:43:07.880 --> 0:43:14.319
<v Speaker 1>it's ft up abusively f you Yeah, emphatically, this is

0:43:14.600 --> 0:43:20.839
<v Speaker 1>an amazing yeah. Um and cathartically, which is f right,

0:43:22.040 --> 0:43:27.000
<v Speaker 1>which it makes swears pretty interesting things. Yeah, and um,

0:43:27.040 --> 0:43:28.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean Tracy puts some tips in there for when

0:43:28.719 --> 0:43:33.360
<v Speaker 1>you have children on how to regulate that and explain things.

0:43:33.400 --> 0:43:36.680
<v Speaker 1>But um, you know, just a parent the way you

0:43:36.680 --> 0:43:39.000
<v Speaker 1>want a parent apparently though you're not supposed to laugh,

0:43:39.440 --> 0:43:43.359
<v Speaker 1>that's impossible. Yeah, laugh and clap and pat him on

0:43:43.400 --> 0:43:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the head. Yeah, by my toy. Yeah, my kids at

0:43:46.960 --> 0:43:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the age where she repeats everything. And I hurt myself

0:43:50.239 --> 0:43:52.360
<v Speaker 1>the other day and let out an F bomb and

0:43:52.400 --> 0:43:55.080
<v Speaker 1>she said it right after me. And there's nothing funnier. Wow.

0:43:55.880 --> 0:43:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Do you have it on tape? No? Um, But she

0:43:59.120 --> 0:44:02.440
<v Speaker 1>does say the word fox, the animal fox. Um, she

0:44:02.480 --> 0:44:04.759
<v Speaker 1>says that as the other word, and we do have

0:44:04.800 --> 0:44:07.680
<v Speaker 1>that on tape. It's funny. I'd like to see that. Yeah,

0:44:07.760 --> 0:44:10.120
<v Speaker 1>I'll show it to you. It's um, it's good. And

0:44:10.160 --> 0:44:12.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's just a reality that we curse in

0:44:12.600 --> 0:44:15.600
<v Speaker 1>my household. And you know, my kids probably gonna be

0:44:15.640 --> 0:44:18.080
<v Speaker 1>one of those kids that curses earlier than other kids.

0:44:18.120 --> 0:44:21.000
<v Speaker 1>But I'm hoping to kind of cross that bridge and

0:44:21.040 --> 0:44:23.520
<v Speaker 1>be like, hey, listen, can't say these things in school.

0:44:23.680 --> 0:44:26.520
<v Speaker 1>You can't say him in front of teachers. I remember

0:44:26.520 --> 0:44:30.719
<v Speaker 1>when a teacher would curse, how like no shocking that was.

0:44:30.840 --> 0:44:34.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I ever experienced no like the teacher

0:44:34.560 --> 0:44:36.560
<v Speaker 1>on a bad day that the class is just pushed

0:44:36.600 --> 0:44:38.359
<v Speaker 1>and they would just break down and scream a curse

0:44:38.400 --> 0:44:41.160
<v Speaker 1>word that never happened. Oh man, I had. It happened

0:44:41.160 --> 0:44:43.080
<v Speaker 1>a couple of times, and it is talk about like

0:44:43.480 --> 0:44:46.680
<v Speaker 1>the social contract. Nothing will make a bunch of kids

0:44:46.719 --> 0:44:49.279
<v Speaker 1>like straighten up faster than hearing you. They're just like,

0:44:49.320 --> 0:44:53.000
<v Speaker 1>oh man, like Mrs So and so, has we've pushed

0:44:53.000 --> 0:44:55.800
<v Speaker 1>her too far? Or when a kid curses at a teacher,

0:44:56.239 --> 0:44:59.800
<v Speaker 1>there was also that like oh boy, yeah, that's huge,

0:44:59.840 --> 0:45:03.000
<v Speaker 1>like trouble. Yeah. So yeah, I'm hoping to teach my

0:45:03.080 --> 0:45:06.920
<v Speaker 1>daughter it's too pick and choose. Yeah, maybe she'll grow

0:45:07.000 --> 0:45:09.440
<v Speaker 1>up to be like Red Fox make money off of

0:45:09.480 --> 0:45:12.960
<v Speaker 1>the cursing. Maybe so or Sarah Silverman, Yeah, who's like

0:45:13.480 --> 0:45:16.040
<v Speaker 1>the modern Red Fox. Well, she definitely has made a

0:45:16.080 --> 0:45:21.080
<v Speaker 1>career out of breaking taboos with language for shock shock value.

0:45:21.160 --> 0:45:23.799
<v Speaker 1>She's great. Yep yea. So it's Red Fox so too

0:45:24.239 --> 0:45:28.399
<v Speaker 1>r I p uh red Fox not Sarah Silverman's. If

0:45:28.440 --> 0:45:31.160
<v Speaker 1>you want to know more about Red Fox there Silverman swearing.

0:45:31.200 --> 0:45:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Any of that stuff. You can type those words in

0:45:33.520 --> 0:45:35.640
<v Speaker 1>the search part how stuff works dot com. And since

0:45:35.680 --> 0:45:40.799
<v Speaker 1>I said search parts, time for listener mail. I'm gonna

0:45:40.800 --> 0:45:44.320
<v Speaker 1>call this notable Canadian filibuster. You folks may have noticed

0:45:44.360 --> 0:45:48.560
<v Speaker 1>we had a Saturday episode on filibusters. And that's a

0:45:48.560 --> 0:45:51.760
<v Speaker 1>new thing we're doing called s Y s K selects,

0:45:51.840 --> 0:45:55.000
<v Speaker 1>where we we republished a Saturday episode that we think

0:45:55.080 --> 0:45:58.120
<v Speaker 1>was great or relevant. Um, in case you missed it.

0:45:58.680 --> 0:46:03.640
<v Speaker 1>And um, thanks for the support on those apparently support

0:46:03.920 --> 0:46:09.640
<v Speaker 1>we mean thanks for listening, right yeah, yeah, they're still free. Um.

0:46:09.680 --> 0:46:11.919
<v Speaker 1>So Blake listened to the filibuster one and he wrote

0:46:11.920 --> 0:46:14.960
<v Speaker 1>in about a Canadian filibuster. Hey, guys quite enjoyed the

0:46:15.000 --> 0:46:18.040
<v Speaker 1>episode about filibusters. Although I've worked for several years at

0:46:18.080 --> 0:46:21.040
<v Speaker 1>various legislatures throughout Canada can tell you that filibustering is

0:46:21.120 --> 0:46:23.760
<v Speaker 1>not unique to the U. S. Senate. My favorite example

0:46:23.800 --> 0:46:27.240
<v Speaker 1>of the filibuster took place in the Canadian Senate. Parliamentary

0:46:27.320 --> 0:46:30.760
<v Speaker 1>proceedings in Canada are recorded and published verbatim and hands

0:46:30.760 --> 0:46:34.160
<v Speaker 1>aard uh. Canada being a bilingual country means that the

0:46:34.160 --> 0:46:37.280
<v Speaker 1>hands are hands. Art is available in both English and French,

0:46:37.400 --> 0:46:40.479
<v Speaker 1>meaning that staff not only have to transcribe everything said,

0:46:40.800 --> 0:46:43.600
<v Speaker 1>but translators also need to translate English speeches into French

0:46:43.640 --> 0:46:48.120
<v Speaker 1>and vice versa for official publicity. I'm sorry, publicly available record.

0:46:48.680 --> 0:46:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Why is this topical because during one particularly contentious filibuster

0:46:52.080 --> 0:46:56.240
<v Speaker 1>believe related to trade agreement in the late eight nineteen eighties,

0:46:56.280 --> 0:46:59.760
<v Speaker 1>one senator stood and read the entirety of his autobiography

0:47:00.000 --> 0:47:02.520
<v Speaker 1>into the record. As you can expect, this took quite

0:47:02.520 --> 0:47:04.880
<v Speaker 1>a bit of time. That not only did it delay

0:47:04.880 --> 0:47:07.560
<v Speaker 1>passage of the bill, the common mythology to the senator

0:47:07.600 --> 0:47:09.400
<v Speaker 1>also to this in order to get a free, professional

0:47:09.440 --> 0:47:15.680
<v Speaker 1>quality translation of his autobiography, which was subsequently published in French. Wow,

0:47:15.920 --> 0:47:18.360
<v Speaker 1>that's from Blake Evans. That's that's a good one, Blake.

0:47:18.480 --> 0:47:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for the Canadian history lesson. We don't get

0:47:21.120 --> 0:47:24.400
<v Speaker 1>enough of that down here. Um. I have one. I

0:47:24.400 --> 0:47:27.319
<v Speaker 1>have a call out for Canadians. I've always just made

0:47:27.320 --> 0:47:30.400
<v Speaker 1>fun of it as fake Thanksgiving, but I realized I

0:47:30.480 --> 0:47:35.160
<v Speaker 1>never have figured out why Thanksgiving as celebrated a month

0:47:35.239 --> 0:47:39.240
<v Speaker 1>or so early, well early compared to the US in Canada,

0:47:39.719 --> 0:47:42.480
<v Speaker 1>so let us know exactly that's a different way of

0:47:42.520 --> 0:47:45.560
<v Speaker 1>looking at it. Yes, okay, So if you want to

0:47:45.560 --> 0:47:46.840
<v Speaker 1>get in touch with us so let us know, you

0:47:46.880 --> 0:47:48.880
<v Speaker 1>can tweet to us at s Y s K podcast

0:47:49.400 --> 0:47:53.640
<v Speaker 1>or join me josh Um clark Um. You can join

0:47:53.719 --> 0:47:57.080
<v Speaker 1>and Chuck on Facebook at Charles W. Chuck Bryant, or

0:47:57.200 --> 0:47:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Facebook dot com slash stuff you Should Know, send us

0:47:59.600 --> 0:48:01.719
<v Speaker 1>an email of the Stuff podcast at how stuff Works

0:48:01.760 --> 0:48:03.799
<v Speaker 1>dot com and has always joined us at home on

0:48:03.840 --> 0:48:10.919
<v Speaker 1>the web Stuff you should Know dot com for more

0:48:10.920 --> 0:48:13.239
<v Speaker 1>on this and thousands of other topics because at how

0:48:13.280 --> 0:48:24.719
<v Speaker 1>stuff Works dot com