WEBVTT - Bloomberg Surveillance TV: December 17th, 2025

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:11.680 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Jonathan Ferrow, along

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:18.720
<v Speaker 2>with Lisa Bromwitz and Amerie Hordern. Join us each day

0:00:18.760 --> 0:00:22.320
<v Speaker 2>for insight from the best in markets, economics, and geopolitics

0:00:22.440 --> 0:00:24.880
<v Speaker 2>from our global headquarters in New York City. We are

0:00:24.960 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 2>live on Bloomberg Television weekday mornings from six to nine

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:31.319
<v Speaker 2>am Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify or

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:33.960
<v Speaker 2>anywhere else you listen, and as always on the Bloomberg

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:35.880
<v Speaker 2>Terminal and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:00:36.400 --> 0:00:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Turning to airlines, spirit renewing discussions to merge with Frontier

0:00:40.320 --> 0:00:43.600
<v Speaker 1>as a deep discount, airlines struggles to compete. I spoke

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:46.960
<v Speaker 1>with Jeff Blue CEO Joanna Garrity yesterday about the hurdles

0:00:47.080 --> 0:00:49.040
<v Speaker 1>facing smaller airlines. Take a listen.

0:00:50.880 --> 0:00:53.400
<v Speaker 3>Smaller carriers really need to be given a fair shot

0:00:53.440 --> 0:00:56.320
<v Speaker 3>to win in this environment, and that's not happening right now.

0:00:56.400 --> 0:00:58.800
<v Speaker 3>So we're focus on what we can control. We're focus

0:00:58.880 --> 0:01:01.560
<v Speaker 3>on a whole series of initiative under our Jet Foward program.

0:01:01.600 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 3>We do need the government to kind of make that

0:01:04.120 --> 0:01:06.400
<v Speaker 3>a more level playing fields so smaller carriers can more

0:01:06.400 --> 0:01:08.840
<v Speaker 3>effectively compete. Twenty twenty six really is the year that

0:01:08.840 --> 0:01:11.600
<v Speaker 3>we should reap the benefits of all these initiatives that

0:01:11.600 --> 0:01:13.039
<v Speaker 3>we put into place in twenty twenty five.

0:01:13.240 --> 0:01:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Chili Kayalu of Jeffries joins us now for more And

0:01:16.680 --> 0:01:20.200
<v Speaker 1>as we talk about mergers once again in the airline space,

0:01:20.240 --> 0:01:23.800
<v Speaker 1>aside from the Big three, how difficult is it for

0:01:23.920 --> 0:01:27.640
<v Speaker 1>companies that are not Delta United or American to survive

0:01:27.800 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 1>in the current landscape of airlines.

0:01:29.800 --> 0:01:32.479
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it seems this seems to be more defensive move

0:01:32.920 --> 0:01:35.400
<v Speaker 4>on the part of the airlines right. Consolidation is driven

0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 4>by defensive tactics, and airlines in general are a very

0:01:38.440 --> 0:01:41.200
<v Speaker 4>tough business. That's why they trade at sixty percent discount

0:01:41.280 --> 0:01:45.080
<v Speaker 4>to the market. Airplanes are expensive. Boeing knows that costs

0:01:45.120 --> 0:01:47.800
<v Speaker 4>are expensive. Thirty percent is jet fuel, thirty percent is

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:50.920
<v Speaker 4>labor labor. And when your revenues are growing three percent

0:01:50.960 --> 0:01:53.240
<v Speaker 4>because your pricing is down and your costs are up

0:01:53.280 --> 0:01:55.960
<v Speaker 4>five it creates a very difficult environment for airlines to

0:01:56.040 --> 0:01:58.920
<v Speaker 4>thrive in. Whether that's gate costs like Jet Blue mentioned

0:01:59.000 --> 0:02:02.200
<v Speaker 4>or additional fees. It makes it hard for airlines, so

0:02:02.240 --> 0:02:04.320
<v Speaker 4>they have to consolidate or they have to price down

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:06.000
<v Speaker 4>to take market share, or.

0:02:05.920 --> 0:02:08.519
<v Speaker 1>They have to become other industries like credit card companies

0:02:08.760 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 1>or luxury experience providers. I mean, how much is that

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:14.880
<v Speaker 1>the saving grace, the idea that you could get some

0:02:14.919 --> 0:02:19.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of additional premium customer that people are leaning into experiences.

0:02:18.960 --> 0:02:19.960
<v Speaker 5>Willing to pay for it.

0:02:20.600 --> 0:02:24.079
<v Speaker 1>How much is that, really, truthfully the model going forward?

0:02:24.200 --> 0:02:26.720
<v Speaker 5>That's always been the bookcase on airlines.

0:02:26.800 --> 0:02:31.000
<v Speaker 4>You value Delta sky miles on a credit card multiple.

0:02:31.080 --> 0:02:33.840
<v Speaker 4>You value their MRO business on an aftermarket multiple of

0:02:33.840 --> 0:02:36.600
<v Speaker 4>twenty five times. Ziebada a novel. All of a sudden,

0:02:36.600 --> 0:02:40.040
<v Speaker 4>you're getting an airline for free, essentially. So that's been

0:02:40.080 --> 0:02:43.880
<v Speaker 4>the bookcase. But the separation of those assets is likely hard,

0:02:43.919 --> 0:02:45.120
<v Speaker 4>and we haven't seen that happen.

0:02:45.320 --> 0:02:46.840
<v Speaker 6>Che I know you and the team of Jeffries are

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:48.920
<v Speaker 6>bullish on United. But I'd like to talk about American

0:02:48.960 --> 0:02:51.639
<v Speaker 6>Airlines and some of the management decisions which has put

0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:54.200
<v Speaker 6>the company in place where it is today. I'm talking

0:02:54.280 --> 0:02:57.280
<v Speaker 6>about Seattle, I'm talking about routing, I'm talking about choice

0:02:57.320 --> 0:03:00.800
<v Speaker 6>of which airplanes to retire. You know, what will it

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:03.600
<v Speaker 6>take for American Airlines to write the ship here?

0:03:04.360 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 5>I think the airline set up into twenty six.

0:03:06.960 --> 0:03:09.440
<v Speaker 4>And I say this every January and then I regret

0:03:09.480 --> 0:03:11.000
<v Speaker 4>it in February.

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:12.840
<v Speaker 5>Because I say the setup is positive.

0:03:12.440 --> 0:03:16.000
<v Speaker 4>For airlines, and I retract those comments pretty quickly, and

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:17.880
<v Speaker 4>we've done that for America in the last two years.

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:19.840
<v Speaker 4>But I do think the setup is positive and that

0:03:19.880 --> 0:03:23.600
<v Speaker 4>capacity going into twenty six is fairly tight. That goes

0:03:23.639 --> 0:03:26.200
<v Speaker 4>across the board for the airlines, and American in particular

0:03:26.639 --> 0:03:30.000
<v Speaker 4>has very easy comps. Recall a year and a half

0:03:30.040 --> 0:03:33.200
<v Speaker 4>ago they had a snap foo with their corporate relationship,

0:03:33.280 --> 0:03:36.680
<v Speaker 4>so their corporate is just getting back to twenty twenty

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:39.119
<v Speaker 4>four levels, so they're about a year behind. And if

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:41.240
<v Speaker 4>that's where we've seen a lot of the premium growth

0:03:41.280 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 4>is on that corporate so that could be a huge

0:03:43.440 --> 0:03:47.840
<v Speaker 4>upside driver for them if they take back their share

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:49.760
<v Speaker 4>and then some, which they seem to do.

0:03:49.800 --> 0:03:50.280
<v Speaker 3>So they have the.

0:03:50.240 --> 0:03:53.440
<v Speaker 4>Easiest comp set, and airlines in general have an easy

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:56.000
<v Speaker 4>comp set with the shutdown with the tariff impact in

0:03:56.120 --> 0:03:58.840
<v Speaker 4>Q one, so essentially Q one and Q four are

0:03:58.920 --> 0:04:01.640
<v Speaker 4>easy comps for them twenty six, but we'll see. I

0:04:01.720 --> 0:04:05.720
<v Speaker 4>think a rerating takes discipline, capacity in the market and

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:09.320
<v Speaker 4>pricing for the main cabin to really improve at least

0:04:09.400 --> 0:04:10.240
<v Speaker 4>two flat.

0:04:10.560 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 6>Well, let's shift gears to the manufacturers. Let's talk about

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 6>Airbus and Boeing. Right, let's talk about how the market's

0:04:15.680 --> 0:04:20.120
<v Speaker 6>coping with these supply chain bottlenecks. I'm talking about forgings, Castings, Interiors.

0:04:20.360 --> 0:04:20.880
<v Speaker 5>Talk to us a.

0:04:20.839 --> 0:04:22.920
<v Speaker 6>Little bit about what your projections for those two companies

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 6>are in the new year.

0:04:23.640 --> 0:04:26.640
<v Speaker 4>Sure, So, I actually had one of my favorite days

0:04:26.680 --> 0:04:28.680
<v Speaker 4>of my career last week. I went up to Seattle

0:04:29.440 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 4>by myself and got to spend ten hours in rent

0:04:31.520 --> 0:04:34.120
<v Speaker 4>In and Ever and it was the most fun I've

0:04:34.200 --> 0:04:36.920
<v Speaker 4>had in that I saw the Boeing rent In line,

0:04:36.960 --> 0:04:39.719
<v Speaker 4>which creates the seven thirty seven that's about fifty percent

0:04:39.720 --> 0:04:42.160
<v Speaker 4>of their sales of buzzing, for the first time. It

0:04:42.240 --> 0:04:44.480
<v Speaker 4>was really neat to see the three lines cycling at

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:47.440
<v Speaker 4>forty two. This is a manufacturer that was doing twenty

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:50.560
<v Speaker 4>five a month in twenty four so did double production

0:04:50.800 --> 0:04:54.080
<v Speaker 4>at the end of this year, and the employment base

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:55.480
<v Speaker 4>was invigorated.

0:04:55.839 --> 0:04:56.560
<v Speaker 5>They were happy.

0:04:56.720 --> 0:04:58.880
<v Speaker 4>And I think the new CEO, Kelly Orperg who's been

0:04:58.920 --> 0:05:01.799
<v Speaker 4>there for eighteen months, is certainly making that change happen.

0:05:01.839 --> 0:05:04.159
<v Speaker 4>He's changed about forty percent of the leadership in order

0:05:04.200 --> 0:05:06.520
<v Speaker 4>to do that. So really good news on the three

0:05:06.640 --> 0:05:09.400
<v Speaker 4>seven front and that the production rate is actually going up.

0:05:09.760 --> 0:05:13.280
<v Speaker 4>Airlines will have planes, and it's a matter of certification

0:05:13.480 --> 0:05:16.120
<v Speaker 4>on large programs like the Triple seven X they have,

0:05:16.279 --> 0:05:18.719
<v Speaker 4>which they took a big charge for in Q three.

0:05:18.960 --> 0:05:21.360
<v Speaker 5>So will that be certified at the end of next year.

0:05:21.520 --> 0:05:24.040
<v Speaker 1>It sounds like all of the airline and airplane related

0:05:24.040 --> 0:05:26.280
<v Speaker 1>executives saying twenty twenty six will be our year. Twenty

0:05:26.279 --> 0:05:28.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty five wasn't exactly it due to all of the

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:33.240
<v Speaker 1>machinations throughout the throughout this year. I do want to

0:05:33.279 --> 0:05:35.000
<v Speaker 1>end with Frontier and Spirit. I know you can't talk

0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:37.120
<v Speaker 1>to these specific names. I do want to get a

0:05:37.200 --> 0:05:40.400
<v Speaker 1>general sense though, about whether the feeling right now in

0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:42.600
<v Speaker 1>the c suite is that this administration will be more

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:45.880
<v Speaker 1>amenable to some of these tie ups and be more

0:05:46.040 --> 0:05:49.560
<v Speaker 1>open on a regulatory front than they have been. It's

0:05:49.560 --> 0:05:51.600
<v Speaker 1>been a mess every single time that companies have been

0:05:51.600 --> 0:05:53.280
<v Speaker 1>trying to that have tried to tie up.

0:05:53.440 --> 0:05:55.280
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, this is clearly a defensive move.

0:05:55.320 --> 0:05:57.839
<v Speaker 4>It'll take about five percent of capacity out of the market.

0:05:58.120 --> 0:06:01.560
<v Speaker 4>It'll help remove capacity to strain markets where you're seeing

0:06:01.600 --> 0:06:05.080
<v Speaker 4>pricing down, So you know, I think airline consolidation is

0:06:05.120 --> 0:06:06.599
<v Speaker 4>something we haven't seen a lot.

0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:08.039
<v Speaker 5>Of in aerospace on the hand.

0:06:08.040 --> 0:06:10.080
<v Speaker 4>On the other hand, going back a dal a day,

0:06:10.080 --> 0:06:15.680
<v Speaker 4>in aerospace and defense tech, it's been very prolific for

0:06:15.800 --> 0:06:19.559
<v Speaker 4>transactions in that market, whether it's manufacturers or defense tech,

0:06:19.600 --> 0:06:22.800
<v Speaker 4>with the administration really supporting growth in the industry.

0:06:22.839 --> 0:06:24.200
<v Speaker 5>So that's been a positive.

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:26.920
<v Speaker 2>Stay with US multiple IMPEG Savanance coming up.

0:06:27.080 --> 0:06:27.600
<v Speaker 7>Off to this.

0:06:37.080 --> 0:06:38.160
<v Speaker 5>Joining us now for more.

0:06:38.200 --> 0:06:40.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm so pleased to say, as Republican Congressman French Hill

0:06:41.000 --> 0:06:44.080
<v Speaker 1>of Arkansas congressman, thank you so much for being with us.

0:06:44.120 --> 0:06:47.440
<v Speaker 1>I want to start with this disagreement in Congress about

0:06:47.480 --> 0:06:49.400
<v Speaker 1>even being able to vote.

0:06:49.080 --> 0:06:50.440
<v Speaker 5>On these subsidies.

0:06:50.800 --> 0:06:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Have you ever seen Congress Republicans in general more divided

0:06:55.640 --> 0:06:57.400
<v Speaker 1>over this issue than they are right now?

0:06:58.600 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 7>Well, Lisa, it's good to be with you.

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:03.360
<v Speaker 8>Merry Christmas, Eppie, Hanika to all your viewers and everybody

0:07:03.440 --> 0:07:08.719
<v Speaker 8>at Bloomberg. Well, first, let's be clear the tax credits

0:07:08.760 --> 0:07:12.840
<v Speaker 8>for Obamacare policies are not expiring, the ones that were

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:17.360
<v Speaker 8>expanded by Joe Biden during the COVID nineteen pandemic. Are expiring,

0:07:17.680 --> 0:07:20.640
<v Speaker 8>but that base tax credit that dates back to the

0:07:20.680 --> 0:07:25.440
<v Speaker 8>beginning of Obamacare for moderate income families with children is

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 8>still in place, So let's be clear about that. And

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:30.800
<v Speaker 8>I'm not sure I agree with the estimate that was cited.

0:07:31.120 --> 0:07:34.440
<v Speaker 8>What Republicans are trying to do are side with American

0:07:34.480 --> 0:07:37.600
<v Speaker 8>families across the board and lower premiums across the board,

0:07:37.640 --> 0:07:41.120
<v Speaker 8>and we consistently brought bills to the House floor to

0:07:41.160 --> 0:07:44.600
<v Speaker 8>do that, and we've had Democrats reject them. Last week,

0:07:44.640 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 8>the Senate could not find a consensus on this, and

0:07:47.760 --> 0:07:50.720
<v Speaker 8>that's the definitive place. That was the commitment made during

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:55.280
<v Speaker 8>the spending votes. So I think everybody, Democrats, independence, Republicans

0:07:55.600 --> 0:08:00.240
<v Speaker 8>all are suffering from the cost of living burden to

0:08:00.360 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 8>us by the nine percent inflation from the Biden administration.

0:08:04.160 --> 0:08:05.040
<v Speaker 7>That's coming down.

0:08:05.160 --> 0:08:07.760
<v Speaker 8>But there's much more work to do, and that includes

0:08:07.800 --> 0:08:11.560
<v Speaker 8>on passing bills that will actually lower premiums for all

0:08:11.560 --> 0:08:12.960
<v Speaker 8>Americans across the board.

0:08:13.360 --> 0:08:15.200
<v Speaker 6>Congressman Hile, I'm wondering if you could talk to us

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:17.640
<v Speaker 6>a little bit about the Housing for twenty first Century Act,

0:08:17.680 --> 0:08:21.200
<v Speaker 6>the act that's expected to streamline housing development provide incentives

0:08:21.200 --> 0:08:23.880
<v Speaker 6>for builders just exactly what is the act and how

0:08:23.960 --> 0:08:25.800
<v Speaker 6>is it going to alleviate the lack of supplying the

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:26.680
<v Speaker 6>US housing market.

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:29.000
<v Speaker 7>You bet, thanks David. It's such a big issue.

0:08:29.000 --> 0:08:31.920
<v Speaker 8>We have so many people and so many markets that

0:08:32.000 --> 0:08:35.440
<v Speaker 8>have experienced a run up in house prices during the

0:08:35.480 --> 0:08:38.240
<v Speaker 8>past five years and certainly a run up in mortgage

0:08:38.320 --> 0:08:42.000
<v Speaker 8>rates due to the FED fighting the Biden inflation from

0:08:42.040 --> 0:08:45.680
<v Speaker 8>twenty one and twenty two, and that's really caused a

0:08:45.679 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 8>lot of people to not have access to the house

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:50.520
<v Speaker 8>that they want. So what we're doing today is we're

0:08:50.520 --> 0:08:53.720
<v Speaker 8>marking up bills that will reduce regulatory costs to building

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:59.240
<v Speaker 8>new houses, improve zoning to encourage better density, more different

0:08:59.320 --> 0:09:03.360
<v Speaker 8>kinds of unit across different cities in the US. We're

0:09:03.400 --> 0:09:07.360
<v Speaker 8>talking about improving opportunities for rural housing development, make it

0:09:07.440 --> 0:09:10.320
<v Speaker 8>easier for a veteran to get a veteran's loan, and

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:13.280
<v Speaker 8>hold HUT accountable on what I think is a deplorable

0:09:13.400 --> 0:09:16.199
<v Speaker 8>job that they've done over the past decade or so

0:09:16.400 --> 0:09:20.320
<v Speaker 8>in managing public housing for our neediest citizens across the

0:09:20.320 --> 0:09:23.600
<v Speaker 8>country who I think have poor many poor conditions, and

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:27.040
<v Speaker 8>HUT is not holding either private landlords or their own

0:09:27.600 --> 0:09:29.200
<v Speaker 8>housing authorities accountable.

0:09:29.679 --> 0:09:32.360
<v Speaker 6>Congressman Hill us housing affordability as we know as at

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:34.960
<v Speaker 6>an all time loan. I'm wondering, what is the act

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:37.640
<v Speaker 6>or the bill, the proposal. How does it address home

0:09:37.640 --> 0:09:41.079
<v Speaker 6>owner expenses, utilities, insurance. I mean, we know that you

0:09:41.160 --> 0:09:45.160
<v Speaker 6>know op X has really risen over the past few years.

0:09:45.480 --> 0:09:47.880
<v Speaker 6>Does it do anything to alleviate the stress on homeowners?

0:09:49.679 --> 0:09:53.480
<v Speaker 8>Well on homeowners again, eighty percent of the cost that

0:09:53.559 --> 0:09:57.679
<v Speaker 8>goes into a house or local zoning, local code decisions,

0:09:57.760 --> 0:10:01.559
<v Speaker 8>local development fees that are charged urged on building new houses.

0:10:02.040 --> 0:10:03.800
<v Speaker 7>If you want to bring down.

0:10:03.760 --> 0:10:07.800
<v Speaker 8>The cost of the mortgage or the cost of property

0:10:07.800 --> 0:10:11.040
<v Speaker 8>and casualty insurance, you need to confront inflation. Which is

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:14.200
<v Speaker 8>why I believe the Fed's primary focus is price stability.

0:10:14.559 --> 0:10:17.439
<v Speaker 8>And we've made progress from the nine percent we experienced

0:10:17.480 --> 0:10:21.680
<v Speaker 8>under Joe Biden's fiscal mismanagement and the Fed's mismanagement coming

0:10:21.679 --> 0:10:25.760
<v Speaker 8>out of the pandemic, and there's a sustained pressure there

0:10:25.800 --> 0:10:29.439
<v Speaker 8>to bring down costs and that will in turn bring

0:10:29.480 --> 0:10:32.160
<v Speaker 8>down property and casually insurances that will bring down the

0:10:32.160 --> 0:10:35.199
<v Speaker 8>cost of financing. This is a prime goal for the administration.

0:10:35.640 --> 0:10:38.240
<v Speaker 8>But what this bill focuses on is lowering the cost

0:10:38.679 --> 0:10:43.000
<v Speaker 8>to manage housing, lower the cost to build housing, and

0:10:43.040 --> 0:10:46.280
<v Speaker 8>that's something I think will increase supply, and increase supply

0:10:46.400 --> 0:10:50.240
<v Speaker 8>will lower prices. We've already seen a modest break in

0:10:50.320 --> 0:10:54.719
<v Speaker 8>that five year high in price appreciation. About eleven top

0:10:54.760 --> 0:10:58.120
<v Speaker 8>twenty five markets are seeing some easing off on pricing.

0:10:58.440 --> 0:11:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Congress Fan, one thing that we keep talking about is

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:05.480
<v Speaker 1>the affordability crisis. And you've talked about President Biden several times.

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:07.920
<v Speaker 1>At what point do you think the President Trump needs

0:11:07.960 --> 0:11:11.520
<v Speaker 1>to also, though, take some responsibility for the idea that

0:11:11.640 --> 0:11:14.360
<v Speaker 1>inflation still is above its two percent target. He's talking

0:11:14.360 --> 0:11:18.480
<v Speaker 1>about keeping rates even lower at the same time that

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 1>he's been talking about the affordability crisis as a hoax.

0:11:23.800 --> 0:11:26.800
<v Speaker 8>Well, look, the affordability crisis is not a hoax. I

0:11:26.800 --> 0:11:29.040
<v Speaker 8>mean we see it in the grocery store when we shop.

0:11:29.080 --> 0:11:32.320
<v Speaker 8>We've seen it in the price level that increased as

0:11:32.360 --> 0:11:35.040
<v Speaker 8>a result. As I said of the Biden inflation, that

0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:38.200
<v Speaker 8>will come down over time. There's work to be done.

0:11:38.400 --> 0:11:40.719
<v Speaker 8>I think the President's put his attention on doing that

0:11:40.800 --> 0:11:44.680
<v Speaker 8>by lowering long term energy prices, by increasing We're going

0:11:44.720 --> 0:11:47.840
<v Speaker 8>to vote this week to increase permitting on federal lands,

0:11:47.840 --> 0:11:51.360
<v Speaker 8>which will open up future development for oil on gas production.

0:11:51.600 --> 0:11:52.160
<v Speaker 7>That's good.

0:11:52.520 --> 0:11:55.600
<v Speaker 8>Encouraging production across the country will bring down gas prices

0:11:55.640 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 8>over the next few years.

0:11:57.120 --> 0:11:59.600
<v Speaker 7>And patrollum goes into everything that we make.

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:02.400
<v Speaker 8>So that will bring down prices as well as some

0:12:02.440 --> 0:12:06.720
<v Speaker 8>of the things we're tackling on deregulation and financing. I've

0:12:06.720 --> 0:12:09.480
<v Speaker 8>worked hard in my committee to bring down the cost

0:12:09.520 --> 0:12:13.360
<v Speaker 8>of financing by making our banks of all sizes more competitive,

0:12:13.360 --> 0:12:16.679
<v Speaker 8>to have more capital to lend to people who are

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:19.720
<v Speaker 8>building houses or wanting to have a mortgage on their

0:12:19.760 --> 0:12:20.200
<v Speaker 8>first house.

0:12:20.480 --> 0:12:21.680
<v Speaker 5>It's been just about a minute left.

0:12:21.720 --> 0:12:24.920
<v Speaker 1>But how much will further FED rate cuts actually help

0:12:24.960 --> 0:12:28.360
<v Speaker 1>with the affordability crisis? If price stability is you said,

0:12:28.559 --> 0:12:29.920
<v Speaker 1>is their pre eminent mandate.

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:32.840
<v Speaker 8>Well, look, this is why the FED has a tough

0:12:32.920 --> 0:12:36.000
<v Speaker 8>job to determine what the right price level is, what

0:12:36.040 --> 0:12:39.800
<v Speaker 8>the right level of ample reserves are. And prices have

0:12:39.920 --> 0:12:44.040
<v Speaker 8>been coming down, they just have gotten sticky right above

0:12:44.160 --> 0:12:47.120
<v Speaker 8>the Fed's target. So I just simply say that the

0:12:47.160 --> 0:12:50.280
<v Speaker 8>biggest tax on the American people is inflation, and we've

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:52.720
<v Speaker 8>witnessed a forty year high of it due to the

0:12:52.760 --> 0:12:55.280
<v Speaker 8>mistakes made by the FED coming out of the pandemic,

0:12:55.640 --> 0:12:59.000
<v Speaker 8>and Joe Biden's decision to spend six trillion dollars more

0:12:59.520 --> 0:13:02.240
<v Speaker 8>borrowed in the markets that I think was not the

0:13:02.320 --> 0:13:05.040
<v Speaker 8>right decision to take, and we got inflation as a

0:13:05.120 --> 0:13:08.600
<v Speaker 8>result of too many dollars chasing too few goods for

0:13:08.679 --> 0:13:09.480
<v Speaker 8>those two years.

0:13:09.559 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 2>Stay with us mulplindex Savana's coming up off to this.

0:13:22.480 --> 0:13:24.880
<v Speaker 1>One thing that has been really strong this year has

0:13:24.880 --> 0:13:27.200
<v Speaker 1>been discussions around trade. The White House keeping on the

0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:30.840
<v Speaker 1>pressure on China, Treasure Secretary Scott Best and telling media

0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:34.960
<v Speaker 1>the country's one trillion dollar trade surplus is unsustainable. Joining

0:13:35.040 --> 0:13:38.160
<v Speaker 1>us now as Elizabeth Economy Senior Fellow at the Hoover

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Institution and one of the stalwart experts and scholars of

0:13:42.200 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese economy. Elizabeth, thank you so much for being

0:13:44.960 --> 0:13:47.320
<v Speaker 1>with us. I want to start with your take on

0:13:47.360 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 1>the trade war so far this year.

0:13:49.720 --> 0:13:50.880
<v Speaker 5>Is there a clear winner?

0:13:51.000 --> 0:13:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Has there been any progress? Has it reshaped the relationship

0:13:54.080 --> 0:13:55.360
<v Speaker 1>between the US and China?

0:13:56.559 --> 0:13:56.839
<v Speaker 9>Sure?

0:13:56.920 --> 0:13:59.120
<v Speaker 10>Lots of questions wrapped up into that.

0:14:00.160 --> 0:14:00.360
<v Speaker 8>You know.

0:14:00.400 --> 0:14:03.840
<v Speaker 10>Look, I think the good news is the Bussan summit

0:14:03.920 --> 0:14:08.720
<v Speaker 10>between Presidency and Trump really did establish a new equilibrium

0:14:09.200 --> 0:14:12.400
<v Speaker 10>between the two countries that really you know, we took

0:14:12.440 --> 0:14:16.080
<v Speaker 10>back some of the moves we'd made on export controls

0:14:16.120 --> 0:14:18.680
<v Speaker 10>both sides. That was really important, especially for the United

0:14:18.760 --> 0:14:21.720
<v Speaker 10>States because of China's hold on the you know, critical

0:14:21.720 --> 0:14:23.200
<v Speaker 10>minerals and rare earth elements.

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:24.600
<v Speaker 9>We took back.

0:14:24.400 --> 0:14:28.680
<v Speaker 10>The shipping port dot fees, you know, so, and we

0:14:28.920 --> 0:14:31.280
<v Speaker 10>took off ten percent off the tariffs that we had

0:14:31.360 --> 0:14:33.480
<v Speaker 10>on China, you know, so from fifty seven down to

0:14:33.520 --> 0:14:36.720
<v Speaker 10>forty seven percent. So I think a new equilibrium. But

0:14:36.760 --> 0:14:38.280
<v Speaker 10>that's not to say that there aren't going to be

0:14:38.360 --> 0:14:42.400
<v Speaker 10>perturbations to the system. And we've already seen just over

0:14:42.440 --> 0:14:45.320
<v Speaker 10>the past week with the announcement out of the State

0:14:45.360 --> 0:14:49.560
<v Speaker 10>Department of pax Silica this you know, new arrangement between

0:14:49.600 --> 0:14:52.640
<v Speaker 10>the United States and eight other countries to try to

0:14:52.680 --> 0:14:56.680
<v Speaker 10>develop really a trusted supply chain from you know, Ai

0:14:56.840 --> 0:14:59.760
<v Speaker 10>for the AI semiconductor supply chain all the way from

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:03.600
<v Speaker 10>you know investments in Australia in rare earth elements and

0:15:03.600 --> 0:15:07.600
<v Speaker 10>critical minerals all the way through the UAE, with you know,

0:15:07.680 --> 0:15:10.600
<v Speaker 10>providing financing. And then of course Taiwan is a special

0:15:10.640 --> 0:15:13.400
<v Speaker 10>partner to the group because of course, you know, ninety

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:16.120
<v Speaker 10>percent of there are more of this advanced semiconductors that

0:15:16.240 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 10>certainly the US relies on come from Taiwan. So you know,

0:15:19.480 --> 0:15:21.600
<v Speaker 10>we took that action, and then the Chinese, you know,

0:15:21.880 --> 0:15:25.040
<v Speaker 10>put back on some export controls around gallium and germanium

0:15:25.080 --> 0:15:28.160
<v Speaker 10>and graphite, and put some companies that are involved in

0:15:28.200 --> 0:15:31.880
<v Speaker 10>this new pack silica on their Unreliable Entities list, and

0:15:31.920 --> 0:15:34.240
<v Speaker 10>so you know they're going to be these kind of

0:15:34.280 --> 0:15:37.880
<v Speaker 10>tit for tat moves. Clearly, you know, the administration is

0:15:37.920 --> 0:15:40.520
<v Speaker 10>not stomping in terms of what it wants to see

0:15:41.160 --> 0:15:43.920
<v Speaker 10>in the tech competition space. It's going to do what

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:46.320
<v Speaker 10>it wants to do, and Shine is going to respond

0:15:46.360 --> 0:15:46.840
<v Speaker 10>in kind.

0:15:47.360 --> 0:15:48.480
<v Speaker 5>You know, hopefully we don't.

0:15:48.280 --> 0:15:50.080
<v Speaker 10>Go into a free fall, we don't end up back

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:51.760
<v Speaker 10>at the you know, one hundred and fifty one hundred

0:15:51.760 --> 0:15:55.320
<v Speaker 10>and seventy five percent caraff level. But I don't think

0:15:55.360 --> 0:15:56.560
<v Speaker 10>it's going to be smooth sailing.

0:15:57.040 --> 0:15:59.680
<v Speaker 1>There has been this bigger question about which economy is

0:15:59.720 --> 0:16:03.400
<v Speaker 1>strong and better to withstand some of this volatility. Over

0:16:03.400 --> 0:16:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the past couple of days, we've gotten data out of

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:09.640
<v Speaker 1>China signifying that there has been an ongoing decline, weakening

0:16:09.760 --> 0:16:13.720
<v Speaker 1>and consumer appetite this concern about prices that are falling

0:16:14.040 --> 0:16:16.440
<v Speaker 1>too rapidly. Do you think that this is laying the

0:16:16.440 --> 0:16:20.080
<v Speaker 1>groundwork for some sort of stimulus to support the economy

0:16:20.200 --> 0:16:23.400
<v Speaker 1>during this prolonged tip for tag I.

0:16:23.320 --> 0:16:26.880
<v Speaker 10>Mean, look that Chinese you know playbook is basically, you know,

0:16:27.040 --> 0:16:30.520
<v Speaker 10>more investment, and you know, over the past couple of years,

0:16:30.560 --> 0:16:33.000
<v Speaker 10>that investment has moved away from the property sector, which

0:16:33.000 --> 0:16:35.560
<v Speaker 10>has been in a prolonged slump, to the tech sector,

0:16:36.040 --> 0:16:39.600
<v Speaker 10>you know, clean tech, legacy semiconductors, the whole array of

0:16:39.880 --> 0:16:43.760
<v Speaker 10>made in China, twenty twenty five technologies, you know, where

0:16:43.840 --> 0:16:46.680
<v Speaker 10>China wants to dominate, Chinese companies to dominate at home

0:16:46.680 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 10>and then become global champions. So that includes new materials

0:16:49.840 --> 0:16:53.200
<v Speaker 10>and evs and AI, all these you know, important cutting

0:16:53.320 --> 0:16:56.240
<v Speaker 10>edge technologies. That is the playbook, and that is what

0:16:56.280 --> 0:16:59.760
<v Speaker 10>they've been doing. But I think that's running its course.

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:03.080
<v Speaker 10>Local governments have you been building up their you know debt.

0:17:03.080 --> 0:17:06.200
<v Speaker 10>The property sector is still slumping, There's no consumer confidence.

0:17:06.240 --> 0:17:08.960
<v Speaker 10>The country has done very little to reshape the social

0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:12.840
<v Speaker 10>welfare net to make people feel confident right that they're

0:17:12.840 --> 0:17:14.639
<v Speaker 10>not going to have to spend their savings on some

0:17:14.720 --> 0:17:19.160
<v Speaker 10>healthcare emergency or on their children's education. So the pension

0:17:19.240 --> 0:17:22.920
<v Speaker 10>system is you know, basically broken in about a third

0:17:22.960 --> 0:17:26.600
<v Speaker 10>of the provinces. So they have to do more to

0:17:26.640 --> 0:17:30.439
<v Speaker 10>boost consumer confidence. They've been reluctant to do that and

0:17:30.520 --> 0:17:32.840
<v Speaker 10>people are not and that's why they're not buying. And

0:17:32.960 --> 0:17:36.440
<v Speaker 10>you know, as an aside, you know, also the birth

0:17:36.520 --> 0:17:41.119
<v Speaker 10>rate continues to fall, and birth rate tracks with consumer confidence.

0:17:41.119 --> 0:17:43.720
<v Speaker 10>So if they want to begin to address their demographic challenges,

0:17:43.720 --> 0:17:46.959
<v Speaker 10>which are also enormous, they need to do more to

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:48.480
<v Speaker 10>address their consumer confidence.

0:17:48.680 --> 0:17:51.720
<v Speaker 6>That's right, Elizabeth, demographic challenges, it's real estate crisis is

0:17:51.840 --> 0:17:54.399
<v Speaker 6>entering it's fifth year in a row. Yet insiders are

0:17:54.480 --> 0:17:57.640
<v Speaker 6>calling for a stronger you on despite the fact that

0:17:57.960 --> 0:18:00.640
<v Speaker 6>it's an exportlet economy. I mean, I think sports rose

0:18:00.680 --> 0:18:02.600
<v Speaker 6>above one trillion dollars for the first time on record

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:05.439
<v Speaker 6>last month. To talk to us about you know why,

0:18:05.560 --> 0:18:08.479
<v Speaker 6>our insiders, why is China looking for the you want

0:18:08.560 --> 0:18:11.680
<v Speaker 6>to appreciate in twenty twenty six, Well, I.

0:18:11.640 --> 0:18:15.000
<v Speaker 10>Think it reflects a policy debate within China, and you know,

0:18:15.200 --> 0:18:18.560
<v Speaker 10>a strong view one would encourage you know, consumers to

0:18:18.600 --> 0:18:21.520
<v Speaker 10>buy more. It would give China greater credibility on the

0:18:21.640 --> 0:18:25.359
<v Speaker 10>international stage in terms of you know, saying that It's

0:18:25.600 --> 0:18:28.440
<v Speaker 10>currency should be the you know, should become a real

0:18:28.520 --> 0:18:31.600
<v Speaker 10>reserve currency in the future as it pushes to dedollarize

0:18:31.600 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 10>the global economy, and it would relieve some of the

0:18:34.840 --> 0:18:38.000
<v Speaker 10>pressure that it's beginning to face from the international community

0:18:38.040 --> 0:18:41.080
<v Speaker 10>now in terms of all those exports, right, because it's

0:18:41.119 --> 0:18:44.439
<v Speaker 10>not just the United States that is calling out China

0:18:44.560 --> 0:18:48.040
<v Speaker 10>for its you know, export of its over capacity and

0:18:48.119 --> 0:18:51.040
<v Speaker 10>all those you know, evs and batteries, et cetera. It's

0:18:51.080 --> 0:18:54.480
<v Speaker 10>now it's Europe, it's Mexico for example. It's threatening I think,

0:18:54.520 --> 0:18:58.119
<v Speaker 10>fifty percent tariffs on Chinese goods. So I think China

0:18:58.200 --> 0:19:01.679
<v Speaker 10>has a problem again not only with the United States

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:03.920
<v Speaker 10>and some of the advanced economies, but also with middle

0:19:03.960 --> 0:19:07.439
<v Speaker 10>income and increasingly emerging economies that are seeing you know,

0:19:07.480 --> 0:19:10.639
<v Speaker 10>their markets flooded with these Chinese goods, and their nascent

0:19:10.720 --> 0:19:12.720
<v Speaker 10>industries are never going to be never going to have

0:19:12.760 --> 0:19:15.399
<v Speaker 10>a chance to compete. So I think that would be

0:19:15.440 --> 0:19:17.359
<v Speaker 10>those would be some of the reasons that the Chinese

0:19:17.400 --> 0:19:20.200
<v Speaker 10>government might make a move toward appreciating.

0:19:19.600 --> 0:19:22.719
<v Speaker 6>The Yan Yeah, I mean, Elizabeth, Chinese equities are up

0:19:22.720 --> 0:19:24.800
<v Speaker 6>I think one point eight two percent overnight following that

0:19:24.840 --> 0:19:27.919
<v Speaker 6>successful IPO of Meta X. I think the Chinese equity

0:19:27.920 --> 0:19:29.360
<v Speaker 6>markets up sixteen seventeen.

0:19:29.080 --> 0:19:29.760
<v Speaker 7>Percent year to date.

0:19:30.400 --> 0:19:33.160
<v Speaker 6>Talk to us about foreign interest in Chinese equities. I mean,

0:19:33.359 --> 0:19:35.720
<v Speaker 6>for me, I mean I look at the variable interest

0:19:35.800 --> 0:19:38.679
<v Speaker 6>and toity structure as a putoff, right, I mean, you

0:19:38.680 --> 0:19:41.200
<v Speaker 6>don't own anything really. You're owning a hold co in

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:43.239
<v Speaker 6>the Caymans. You're not really owning an op goo.

0:19:43.600 --> 0:19:44.679
<v Speaker 5>Talk to us about how.

0:19:44.960 --> 0:19:47.479
<v Speaker 6>An investor, a foreign investor here in the US, can

0:19:47.480 --> 0:19:49.520
<v Speaker 6>get comfortable owning Chinese shares.

0:19:50.400 --> 0:19:53.399
<v Speaker 10>Okay, so you're pushing me past what I, you know,

0:19:53.680 --> 0:19:54.840
<v Speaker 10>actually focus on.

0:19:54.920 --> 0:19:57.480
<v Speaker 9>So I don't want to be giving investment advice to

0:19:57.560 --> 0:20:00.960
<v Speaker 9>of course, Well let me to say, I think, you know,

0:20:01.000 --> 0:20:04.000
<v Speaker 9>the Chinese stark stock market, you know, has been compared

0:20:04.000 --> 0:20:07.920
<v Speaker 9>to a casino you know, and gambling by you know.

0:20:08.000 --> 0:20:11.320
<v Speaker 10>Some of China's most prominent economists. So you know, I

0:20:11.320 --> 0:20:15.320
<v Speaker 10>would always just say fire beware. But you know, I

0:20:15.359 --> 0:20:17.280
<v Speaker 10>am not in a position to be giving advice in

0:20:17.320 --> 0:20:17.840
<v Speaker 10>this space.

0:20:18.480 --> 0:20:20.080
<v Speaker 1>You are in a position to be getting advice to

0:20:20.119 --> 0:20:22.600
<v Speaker 1>policymakers who'll be listening closely. Elizabeth Economy and for the

0:20:22.640 --> 0:20:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Hoover institution. Thank you so much for being with us.

0:20:25.520 --> 0:20:27.800
<v Speaker 1>This is one of the key stories that we've been

0:20:27.800 --> 0:20:31.840
<v Speaker 1>focusing on, just how intertwined are these economies and who

0:20:31.880 --> 0:20:34.920
<v Speaker 1>is going to win ultimately at a time when investors

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:37.439
<v Speaker 1>aren't sure yet, they're both voting with their feet on

0:20:37.520 --> 0:20:38.439
<v Speaker 1>both fronts well.

0:20:38.480 --> 0:20:41.320
<v Speaker 6>Affordability issues in China, I mean, the real estate crisis.

0:20:41.320 --> 0:20:44.000
<v Speaker 6>It's fifth year in a row China. Vanke, a state

0:20:44.000 --> 0:20:46.480
<v Speaker 6>owned developer, is probably been the fault this week. I mean,

0:20:46.480 --> 0:20:49.119
<v Speaker 6>it's just things run mess domestically, and the fact that

0:20:49.160 --> 0:20:51.280
<v Speaker 6>they're going to make exports that much more competitive by

0:20:51.280 --> 0:20:53.320
<v Speaker 6>trying to appreciate the you on just doesn't make.

0:20:53.240 --> 0:20:53.800
<v Speaker 5>Much sense to me.

0:20:54.480 --> 0:20:58.040
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg's Events podcast, bringing you the best

0:20:58.080 --> 0:21:01.119
<v Speaker 2>in markets, economics, an gie policy. You can watch the

0:21:01.160 --> 0:21:04.160
<v Speaker 2>show live on Bloomberg TV weekday mornings from six am

0:21:04.320 --> 0:21:07.439
<v Speaker 2>to nine am Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple,

0:21:07.760 --> 0:21:10.600
<v Speaker 2>Spotify or anywhere else you listen, and as always on

0:21:10.600 --> 0:21:13.080
<v Speaker 2>the Bloomberg Terminal and the Bloomberg Business app.