WEBVTT - The M&A Rush and Japan Weighs In on Chip Curbs

0:00:13.320 --> 0:00:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Caroline Hide of Bloomberg's World tad quarters in New York

0:00:16.160 --> 0:00:18.720
<v Speaker 1>and the Mad Ludlow in San Francisco. This is Bloomberg

0:00:18.800 --> 0:00:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Technology coming up in this our merger. Monday returns after

0:00:22.760 --> 0:00:24.560
<v Speaker 1>a quiet year for M and A in the US

0:00:24.760 --> 0:00:27.960
<v Speaker 1>dealmakers they raised to get tech transactions across the line.

0:00:28.160 --> 0:00:31.240
<v Speaker 1>We break them down and it could be a huge

0:00:31.280 --> 0:00:35.040
<v Speaker 1>win for the Biden Administration's pushed to loosen Beijing's access

0:00:35.240 --> 0:00:39.519
<v Speaker 1>to the semiconductor industry, as Japan weighs joining curbs on

0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 1>China and the well unorthodox management styles of Elon Musk

0:00:44.479 --> 0:00:47.040
<v Speaker 1>and Sam bagmun Freed Tech and Media founder and board

0:00:47.080 --> 0:00:52.440
<v Speaker 1>member Arianna Huffington's joins to explain why it's bad for business. First,

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 1>so many news headlines breaking when it comes to M

0:00:55.400 --> 0:00:57.160
<v Speaker 1>and A this Monday. I kind of keep track of them,

0:00:57.160 --> 0:00:59.720
<v Speaker 1>but luckily we know somebody they can Yeah, exactly not

0:00:59.840 --> 0:01:02.000
<v Speaker 1>a nine of course, Microsoft buying that steak in the

0:01:02.040 --> 0:01:05.040
<v Speaker 1>London Stock ex Change. It's been a whirlwind of well

0:01:05.080 --> 0:01:07.840
<v Speaker 1>getting into the week of M and A space. In fact,

0:01:07.920 --> 0:01:10.480
<v Speaker 1>I think it's been to seventy billion dollars of M

0:01:10.480 --> 0:01:12.960
<v Speaker 1>and A rush is coming before this holiday and that's

0:01:13.000 --> 0:01:15.280
<v Speaker 1>just from Sunday into Monday. Let's push it on with

0:01:15.360 --> 0:01:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloombergs Katie Ruth, who has been across several of these stories.

0:01:18.800 --> 0:01:21.479
<v Speaker 1>And Katie just talk us through some of the reasoning

0:01:21.560 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 1>behind the sudden florry of deals. Sure, great to be

0:01:25.600 --> 0:01:28.440
<v Speaker 1>with you. So we see a lot of deals happening

0:01:28.440 --> 0:01:30.960
<v Speaker 1>before the end of the year. Sometimes, um, there's an

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:34.560
<v Speaker 1>eagerness to wrap things up before the holidays, especially because

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:38.760
<v Speaker 1>people don't want deals to die before the holidays. So um,

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, we had been reporting on the Kopa situation

0:01:42.400 --> 0:01:45.280
<v Speaker 1>for a while. Our understanding is that there had been

0:01:45.319 --> 0:01:48.440
<v Speaker 1>talks for months. But yes, it finally got done. Although

0:01:48.520 --> 0:01:51.360
<v Speaker 1>with Kopa this was part of a wave of take

0:01:51.400 --> 0:01:55.680
<v Speaker 1>privates this year, in particular by Toma looking at enterprise software.

0:01:56.120 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 1>UM with with the emngine Horizon situation, there had been

0:01:59.880 --> 0:02:03.960
<v Speaker 1>a bidding war between them and Santa Fee, which backed

0:02:04.000 --> 0:02:06.840
<v Speaker 1>out yesterday and then late last night we broke the

0:02:06.880 --> 0:02:10.920
<v Speaker 1>story that Amin came through and made an offer. But yes,

0:02:11.040 --> 0:02:13.919
<v Speaker 1>this is quite the murger Monday. Uh you may imagtion

0:02:14.040 --> 0:02:17.120
<v Speaker 1>The Microsoft also took a stake in the London Stock Exchange.

0:02:18.280 --> 0:02:20.560
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting time a year for all of this to happen.

0:02:20.600 --> 0:02:23.040
<v Speaker 1>It was interesting as well the premium that Tomer Bravo

0:02:23.120 --> 0:02:25.440
<v Speaker 1>is willing to put on Cooper I think seventy seven

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:30.280
<v Speaker 1>premium over the closing price from the day that you

0:02:30.480 --> 0:02:33.639
<v Speaker 1>guys first reported that that Cooper was up for sales.

0:02:33.680 --> 0:02:37.000
<v Speaker 1>So it's kind of an interesting development. A lot happening

0:02:37.080 --> 0:02:39.760
<v Speaker 1>in four D eight hours. It's a sprint finish to

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:43.200
<v Speaker 1>end the year. How does that set us up for Katie,

0:02:43.200 --> 0:02:45.040
<v Speaker 1>because I know there are other deals that we're tracking

0:02:45.040 --> 0:02:49.160
<v Speaker 1>as we go forward. Absolutely, so we are expecting, at

0:02:49.240 --> 0:02:52.720
<v Speaker 1>least from what we hear from dealmakers, that will be

0:02:52.800 --> 0:02:55.720
<v Speaker 1>pretty active on the M and A front, particularly with

0:02:55.760 --> 0:02:58.360
<v Speaker 1>tech M and A. I mean, one thing that you know,

0:02:58.800 --> 0:03:00.840
<v Speaker 1>observers of the stock mark it have noticed is that

0:03:01.000 --> 0:03:04.200
<v Speaker 1>TEX stocks are down substantially and it took a while

0:03:04.400 --> 0:03:10.760
<v Speaker 1>for sellers and buyers to agree on price, especially with volatility,

0:03:10.960 --> 0:03:14.920
<v Speaker 1>and so people are expecting that at this point tech

0:03:14.919 --> 0:03:16.600
<v Speaker 1>companies are going to be less likely to be in

0:03:16.680 --> 0:03:19.799
<v Speaker 1>deni all about where they're worth in um. It makes

0:03:19.840 --> 0:03:22.200
<v Speaker 1>it a good time for for buyers to look and

0:03:22.240 --> 0:03:25.919
<v Speaker 1>buy things on the cheek. Bloomberg's Katie Ruth their care

0:03:26.040 --> 0:03:28.239
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you Katie is a jet setter. She's

0:03:28.240 --> 0:03:30.800
<v Speaker 1>on a plane, she's in cities all around the world

0:03:30.919 --> 0:03:33.960
<v Speaker 1>chasing these deals. She's never in one place. It's no

0:03:34.040 --> 0:03:37.000
<v Speaker 1>wonder she's able to keep it all in her mind.

0:03:37.120 --> 0:03:38.960
<v Speaker 1>We have a lot more discussed, Katie, Ruth, thank you

0:03:39.040 --> 0:03:42.080
<v Speaker 1>very much. Let's take into it more with Robert Profuset,

0:03:42.160 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 1>who chairs the Global m and a practice over at

0:03:45.000 --> 0:03:50.160
<v Speaker 1>law firm. Jones Day, December twelve, Merger Monday, Why why now?

0:03:52.280 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Well U two has been down compared to one, but

0:03:56.720 --> 0:04:02.440
<v Speaker 1>it's still was five trillion dollars. It was just fabulous.

0:04:02.480 --> 0:04:05.000
<v Speaker 1>And one of the things that always happens in a

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:08.720
<v Speaker 1>market correction is it takes Katie mentioned it, it takes

0:04:08.760 --> 0:04:12.680
<v Speaker 1>time for buyers and sellers to figure out, well, what's

0:04:12.720 --> 0:04:15.880
<v Speaker 1>the real number? UM? What am I really worth? UM?

0:04:16.400 --> 0:04:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Famous quote by build Parcelves was you are what your

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:24.159
<v Speaker 1>record says you are. In in Wall Street parlance, that

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:27.200
<v Speaker 1>means the market dictates what you're worth at that particular

0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:29.920
<v Speaker 1>important time. But it's very hard to adjust. I mean,

0:04:30.000 --> 0:04:34.279
<v Speaker 1>the m Gen deal was interesting, almost done at a

0:04:34.279 --> 0:04:38.599
<v Speaker 1>all time high. For the Target Horizon Tomo Bravo deal,

0:04:38.720 --> 0:04:40.839
<v Speaker 1>it's not surprising. It was difficult to get to a

0:04:40.880 --> 0:04:43.960
<v Speaker 1>deal it even though it's a huge premium to their market.

0:04:44.000 --> 0:04:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Before the story broke um, they were trading at four

0:04:47.360 --> 0:04:50.800
<v Speaker 1>or five times that value just eighteen months ago. So

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:52.919
<v Speaker 1>it's very hard that one of the big There are

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:56.000
<v Speaker 1>two issues that happen in these circumstances, and one of

0:04:56.000 --> 0:04:59.080
<v Speaker 1>them is this dislocation on value. What what is it

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:03.760
<v Speaker 1>really worth? So things are starting to settle out, maybe

0:05:04.000 --> 0:05:07.600
<v Speaker 1>in terms of what the equity markets say, bo, what

0:05:07.600 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 1>what do we really need with all your years of experience,

0:05:09.880 --> 0:05:11.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean one of the top M and a corporate

0:05:11.520 --> 0:05:14.120
<v Speaker 1>governance lawyers out there, And when you're talking to these businesses,

0:05:14.520 --> 0:05:16.600
<v Speaker 1>what from a macro perspective do they want to see?

0:05:16.760 --> 0:05:19.359
<v Speaker 1>Is it the federal reserve stopping on the hiking front.

0:05:19.680 --> 0:05:22.719
<v Speaker 1>Is it some sort of calmness when it comes to

0:05:22.920 --> 0:05:25.960
<v Speaker 1>overall volatility, Because what's interesting is, yes, we've had a

0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:28.520
<v Speaker 1>sell off overall in the market, but for example, the

0:05:28.560 --> 0:05:32.000
<v Speaker 1>fear gauge, the volatility index hasn't been a real at

0:05:32.000 --> 0:05:35.000
<v Speaker 1>a real elevated level from real perspective, in these discussions

0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:37.719
<v Speaker 1>you're having with people who want to use the huge

0:05:38.440 --> 0:05:40.359
<v Speaker 1>amounts of cash they got to put to work. What

0:05:40.360 --> 0:05:44.640
<v Speaker 1>do they want to see? Well, it's it is stability. Um.

0:05:44.880 --> 0:05:46.919
<v Speaker 1>One of the things about twenty this, this not just

0:05:47.760 --> 0:05:51.520
<v Speaker 1>this most recent period, is I can can more stuff

0:05:51.560 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 1>happen in a in a short period of time. And

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:56.760
<v Speaker 1>we've been through I mean, you know we as awesome messed.

0:05:56.760 --> 0:05:59.520
<v Speaker 1>I think ed mentioned it earlier. We went through twelve

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:03.880
<v Speaker 1>years of virtually of just quiet interest rates, nothing going

0:06:03.920 --> 0:06:05.840
<v Speaker 1>on in that environment, and all of a sudden, it's

0:06:05.839 --> 0:06:08.240
<v Speaker 1>a debate. Is a tenure going to five fifty or

0:06:08.240 --> 0:06:10.400
<v Speaker 1>six hundred? You know? I mean, how does that happen?

0:06:11.120 --> 0:06:13.040
<v Speaker 1>And then we've got we've got war, We've got all

0:06:13.080 --> 0:06:16.359
<v Speaker 1>this stuff. So part of it is just some stability um,

0:06:16.440 --> 0:06:18.520
<v Speaker 1>and businesses need to do that. But when you when

0:06:18.560 --> 0:06:21.320
<v Speaker 1>you think about it from m Gen's point of view, Um,

0:06:21.360 --> 0:06:24.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, horizon as I'm not an expert on this

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:26.920
<v Speaker 1>on this sort of stuff, but I understand they've got

0:06:26.960 --> 0:06:30.159
<v Speaker 1>some great drugs. Am Gen, like every other big farment,

0:06:30.200 --> 0:06:32.840
<v Speaker 1>has got stuff coming off patent. It's always got to

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:36.360
<v Speaker 1>replenish itself, and it's got a powerful balance sheet. I

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:39.240
<v Speaker 1>think it's a billion hundred fifty billion dollar market gap

0:06:39.279 --> 0:06:42.359
<v Speaker 1>come through something and they got They got a bridge

0:06:42.360 --> 0:06:46.400
<v Speaker 1>loan for the deal for twenty eight billion dollars. This

0:06:46.480 --> 0:06:48.360
<v Speaker 1>is in the same market where people say they can't

0:06:48.360 --> 0:06:52.359
<v Speaker 1>borrow money. Well, it's something everybody can have. Some people

0:06:52.360 --> 0:06:54.720
<v Speaker 1>can borrow money. It's just that everybody can't bought for

0:06:54.800 --> 0:06:59.160
<v Speaker 1>all money like they could. So it's a it's it's

0:06:59.160 --> 0:07:01.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna be it's gonna to be a more fundamental market

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:04.760
<v Speaker 1>rather than a financial market. And and the tomb of

0:07:04.800 --> 0:07:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Bravo deal is important too. For one other thing, there

0:07:07.200 --> 0:07:10.120
<v Speaker 1>is a tremendous amount of private equity that was that

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:13.880
<v Speaker 1>was raised in the last several years, trillions, literally trillions

0:07:13.880 --> 0:07:16.520
<v Speaker 1>of dollars that's got to be put to use because

0:07:16.520 --> 0:07:19.480
<v Speaker 1>of the way they're economics work. Not that they would

0:07:19.680 --> 0:07:21.680
<v Speaker 1>not that they do deals they think are good deals,

0:07:21.960 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 1>but there there's some pressure to get that money applied. Well,

0:07:25.360 --> 0:07:28.240
<v Speaker 1>there's some companies out there in the technology space, on

0:07:28.280 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 1>the biotech space that also have an awful lot of money.

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:34.960
<v Speaker 1>They're also keen to do deals. But the regulators we

0:07:34.960 --> 0:07:39.000
<v Speaker 1>were just talking last week the prolificence of the prominence

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:41.800
<v Speaker 1>of the FTC just everywhere, whether it's looking at what

0:07:41.960 --> 0:07:43.800
<v Speaker 1>meth has been doing in terms of money where it's

0:07:43.800 --> 0:07:46.120
<v Speaker 1>looking what Microsoft is buying in the gaming space, how

0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 1>much is regulation and way for the people you talk to.

0:07:50.040 --> 0:07:54.360
<v Speaker 1>It's a factor. Um. And certainly like the Microsoft Activision

0:07:54.640 --> 0:07:58.240
<v Speaker 1>deal and and even as Simon and Schuster, much smaller

0:07:58.280 --> 0:08:01.000
<v Speaker 1>deal but kind of important in some way in terms

0:08:01.040 --> 0:08:04.680
<v Speaker 1>of what it says that that deal was blown off

0:08:05.280 --> 0:08:08.400
<v Speaker 1>by any trust reasons. On the other hand, the government

0:08:08.440 --> 0:08:11.280
<v Speaker 1>has been their track record has not been too good

0:08:11.520 --> 0:08:17.000
<v Speaker 1>this last and most recent period, um, United uh, United Health, Alumina,

0:08:17.840 --> 0:08:20.960
<v Speaker 1>that Sugar deal, a lot of things. So just because

0:08:21.000 --> 0:08:23.200
<v Speaker 1>they moved to block a deal doesn't mean it will

0:08:23.240 --> 0:08:26.920
<v Speaker 1>be blocked. Um. But it's certainly a factor. And this

0:08:27.000 --> 0:08:32.880
<v Speaker 1>administration is taking an aggressive view of this, but in

0:08:33.000 --> 0:08:35.760
<v Speaker 1>all candor, I'm not sure it's all that more aggressive

0:08:35.800 --> 0:08:39.280
<v Speaker 1>than than the Trump administration on these things. It's just

0:08:39.360 --> 0:08:41.760
<v Speaker 1>a factor. And one of the realities is, you know,

0:08:41.800 --> 0:08:45.080
<v Speaker 1>the Microsoft deal. I know some people were acting like

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:47.720
<v Speaker 1>that was surprising. I would have been surprised if they

0:08:47.720 --> 0:08:51.560
<v Speaker 1>would have just said, Okay, it's Microsoft after all. I mean,

0:08:52.720 --> 0:08:54.800
<v Speaker 1>you have to take a look at it. Now, do

0:08:54.800 --> 0:08:56.600
<v Speaker 1>you have to sue I? I I don't know, so

0:08:56.760 --> 0:09:01.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's really changed. But they're like a

0:09:01.480 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of things in this world we're in there, there's

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:07.240
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more rhetoric. Hey, Bob, let's look at

0:09:07.240 --> 0:09:09.640
<v Speaker 1>this from a slightly different angle. Caroline is talking about

0:09:09.679 --> 0:09:11.320
<v Speaker 1>some of the big names out there that are going

0:09:11.360 --> 0:09:14.200
<v Speaker 1>shopping right because they had a strong balance sheet, because

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:17.000
<v Speaker 1>they see opportunity. The other side of the table, there

0:09:17.000 --> 0:09:20.400
<v Speaker 1>are those under duress, the four sellers. When we think

0:09:20.440 --> 0:09:24.800
<v Speaker 1>about the market right now, the market, what role does

0:09:24.880 --> 0:09:28.800
<v Speaker 1>the four seller play in global M and A activity?

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Usually it's when it bought things bottom it's the four

0:09:34.559 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 1>sellers that at start the level of activity. Usually it's

0:09:39.280 --> 0:09:41.240
<v Speaker 1>because of over leverage. That's not going to be the

0:09:41.280 --> 0:09:44.800
<v Speaker 1>case this time. It's it's just a it's just a

0:09:44.840 --> 0:09:46.679
<v Speaker 1>function of the world we've just lived in. In the

0:09:46.760 --> 0:09:50.080
<v Speaker 1>last several years. I mean, there was equity available at

0:09:50.400 --> 0:09:55.199
<v Speaker 1>very aggressive prices for all sorts of ideas, whether they

0:09:55.200 --> 0:09:58.240
<v Speaker 1>were in the e V space or biotech or unime,

0:09:58.760 --> 0:10:02.280
<v Speaker 1>equity was there that those markets are closed. Um, the

0:10:03.760 --> 0:10:06.480
<v Speaker 1>public markets are absolutely close for that sort of stuff,

0:10:06.720 --> 0:10:09.880
<v Speaker 1>and the private markets are very difficult, not like they were,

0:10:10.679 --> 0:10:14.480
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of businesses were were financed based on

0:10:14.520 --> 0:10:17.240
<v Speaker 1>the assumption that equity could be there. Well, it's not

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:19.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be there, and they can't borrow money when

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 1>they're in the startup mode. Um, So there's gonna be

0:10:23.040 --> 0:10:25.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of merging um. And I think firms like

0:10:26.440 --> 0:10:28.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, I talking about tom of Brabo, they're in

0:10:28.440 --> 0:10:32.240
<v Speaker 1>the news, they're perfectly well situated for this sort of thing.

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:34.760
<v Speaker 1>There's just going to have to be a lot of

0:10:34.800 --> 0:10:37.959
<v Speaker 1>activity because some companies are frankly going to get close

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 1>to running out of money. They don't have revenue or

0:10:41.080 --> 0:10:44.080
<v Speaker 1>very much and they got to pay the bills. We

0:10:44.160 --> 0:10:47.040
<v Speaker 1>will see if and when that happens. Bob Profuse at

0:10:47.080 --> 0:10:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Global m H at Giants Day, Thank you very much.

0:10:50.880 --> 0:10:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Now coming up a potential win for the US and

0:10:53.520 --> 0:10:57.319
<v Speaker 1>it's quest to loosen China's access to chip making technology

0:10:57.360 --> 0:11:00.760
<v Speaker 1>is Japan considers similar clubs to the by An administration.

0:11:00.960 --> 0:11:13.559
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Bloomberg's learned that Japan and the Netherlands

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:16.439
<v Speaker 1>have agreed in principle to join the US in tightening

0:11:16.559 --> 0:11:20.320
<v Speaker 1>chip making machinery exports to China. That according to sources,

0:11:20.400 --> 0:11:23.880
<v Speaker 1>that is a potential blow to Beijing's technology ambitions. The

0:11:23.920 --> 0:11:26.480
<v Speaker 1>two countries are likely to announce soon that there will

0:11:26.480 --> 0:11:29.520
<v Speaker 1>adopt at least some of the measures the US rolled

0:11:29.520 --> 0:11:33.920
<v Speaker 1>out in October. Stacy razgone Bernstein, Managing director and Senior

0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:38.760
<v Speaker 1>analyst of US Semiconductors SO Stacy Bloomberg. Sources say that

0:11:38.840 --> 0:11:43.600
<v Speaker 1>these two governments are considering curbs on chip making equipment

0:11:43.679 --> 0:11:48.120
<v Speaker 1>for fourteen nanometer or more advanced chips. And I want

0:11:48.160 --> 0:11:50.360
<v Speaker 1>to get straight to you on whether that actually has

0:11:50.480 --> 0:11:54.440
<v Speaker 1>any result or helps the US reach the result that

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:57.760
<v Speaker 1>it's aiming for, which is too It's stated aim to

0:11:58.040 --> 0:12:01.680
<v Speaker 1>stop the Chinese government having access to technology that could

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:04.200
<v Speaker 1>be used for military uses. My understanding, and I know

0:12:04.280 --> 0:12:06.520
<v Speaker 1>that you know this face inside and out, is that

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:10.480
<v Speaker 1>even with twenty eight nanometer, you can use some of

0:12:10.520 --> 0:12:13.559
<v Speaker 1>those chips in military function. So does this actually get

0:12:13.600 --> 0:12:16.440
<v Speaker 1>the result that the US is pushing for this coalition on.

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:19.439
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it depends on what you're doing. Of course,

0:12:19.480 --> 0:12:23.520
<v Speaker 1>there are military applications that use older generation chips, and

0:12:23.559 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 1>in fact, many of these applications use all kinds of

0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:30.199
<v Speaker 1>chips from from many types of generations. Um By limiting

0:12:30.320 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the access to portune nanimators and below, though, you're going

0:12:33.040 --> 0:12:37.440
<v Speaker 1>to limit access to anything that that's really higher performance,

0:12:37.520 --> 0:12:40.360
<v Speaker 1>especially around the compute side of things. That's where you're

0:12:40.360 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 1>going to see more of that advanced logic. And so

0:12:42.640 --> 0:12:47.199
<v Speaker 1>this will prevent those sorts of chips from from this

0:12:47.440 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 1>principle from getting into into military hands in China. Stacy meanwhile,

0:12:51.880 --> 0:12:54.640
<v Speaker 1>China as well to dispute over the USX for controls

0:12:54.640 --> 0:12:58.200
<v Speaker 1>with the w t O. Ultimately, how damaging is this

0:12:58.480 --> 0:13:02.920
<v Speaker 1>to China, to Beijing and production chips, it's damaging. I

0:13:02.960 --> 0:13:06.760
<v Speaker 1>mean it stops them. If it holds, it stops them

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:12.080
<v Speaker 1>from developing their own local ecosystem to design, manufacture and

0:13:12.120 --> 0:13:16.960
<v Speaker 1>build leading edge semiconductors. And they are not prevented from

0:13:17.000 --> 0:13:20.120
<v Speaker 1>developing the CAPE further developing the capability to build older

0:13:20.120 --> 0:13:23.440
<v Speaker 1>generation parts. They can do that, but anything that is

0:13:23.920 --> 0:13:27.280
<v Speaker 1>to be used for advanced computing UM, either from a

0:13:27.320 --> 0:13:30.200
<v Speaker 1>design side or from a manufacturing side, we want to

0:13:30.200 --> 0:13:33.160
<v Speaker 1>stop them, and that is something that's gonna be very difficult,

0:13:33.160 --> 0:13:36.120
<v Speaker 1>if not impossible, for them to build up from a

0:13:36.240 --> 0:13:40.280
<v Speaker 1>from a local standpoint. And now with these new blockades

0:13:40.440 --> 0:13:44.240
<v Speaker 1>from the Netherlands and from Japan UM, this may finally

0:13:44.240 --> 0:13:46.959
<v Speaker 1>close the window on it UM. If if if all

0:13:46.960 --> 0:13:49.240
<v Speaker 1>of this kind of comes together with the US, there's

0:13:49.240 --> 0:13:51.640
<v Speaker 1>not a whole lot that China can do from a

0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:54.320
<v Speaker 1>local standpoint to build that stuff up on their own.

0:13:55.360 --> 0:13:59.080
<v Speaker 1>The reason we're tracking these three companies stacy, three countries,

0:13:59.080 --> 0:14:01.840
<v Speaker 1>sorryes because of the companies. You know that this small

0:14:01.880 --> 0:14:05.760
<v Speaker 1>group of key players land Research, k l A A

0:14:06.200 --> 0:14:09.439
<v Speaker 1>s mL. What is your assessment of what these cubs

0:14:09.480 --> 0:14:13.120
<v Speaker 1>and the plan cubs are doing to impact those companies

0:14:13.120 --> 0:14:16.560
<v Speaker 1>top and bottom lines? So it's important to remember like

0:14:16.559 --> 0:14:18.200
<v Speaker 1>why are they doing this? Why do we care about

0:14:18.200 --> 0:14:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the Netherlands? In Japan? So China already cannot make the

0:14:21.320 --> 0:14:24.800
<v Speaker 1>most bleeding edge semiconductors That requires a tool set that

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:27.760
<v Speaker 1>has already been banned. UM. However, if you're going to

0:14:27.880 --> 0:14:30.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of like a couple of generations back but still

0:14:30.320 --> 0:14:33.720
<v Speaker 1>pretty advanced, like fourteen nanometers, they're all are There are

0:14:33.760 --> 0:14:36.480
<v Speaker 1>alternatives to the U S companies. UM. You can get

0:14:36.520 --> 0:14:40.400
<v Speaker 1>alternative to to what sm L cells from companies like

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Nikon in Japan. You can get alternatives to what companies

0:14:43.920 --> 0:14:46.880
<v Speaker 1>like a MAP and land cell from companies like Tokyo Electron.

0:14:47.160 --> 0:14:49.040
<v Speaker 1>So there are alternatives, and that's why it's important. I

0:14:49.040 --> 0:14:51.400
<v Speaker 1>think you get everybody on the same page here. Um.

0:14:51.440 --> 0:14:53.840
<v Speaker 1>In terms of the impact on the company's balancies, at

0:14:53.880 --> 0:14:55.560
<v Speaker 1>least to the US ends, they've kind of sized this

0:14:56.360 --> 0:14:58.240
<v Speaker 1>um and there's actually only a few of them that

0:14:58.280 --> 0:15:01.400
<v Speaker 1>are impacted in video. On the ex side, although they've

0:15:01.400 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 1>been able to develop alternative products that they're selling instead,

0:15:04.080 --> 0:15:06.160
<v Speaker 1>and for now that's closing the gap. And on the

0:15:06.200 --> 0:15:08.520
<v Speaker 1>semi cap side, there was some impact, Lamb said, I

0:15:08.560 --> 0:15:10.320
<v Speaker 1>think it was somewhere between two and a half two

0:15:10.320 --> 0:15:12.680
<v Speaker 1>and two and a half billion dollars a year. Aim

0:15:12.680 --> 0:15:15.080
<v Speaker 1>At was similar, although they think that they can bring

0:15:15.120 --> 0:15:17.040
<v Speaker 1>that down to more like the billion to a billion

0:15:17.080 --> 0:15:20.560
<v Speaker 1>and a half. I think kind of kind of range. Um.

0:15:20.600 --> 0:15:23.640
<v Speaker 1>It's also important to remember though from a from an

0:15:23.640 --> 0:15:26.480
<v Speaker 1>equipment side, it may get less over time because you

0:15:26.520 --> 0:15:30.840
<v Speaker 1>figure if the capacity is needed and it is not

0:15:31.000 --> 0:15:34.600
<v Speaker 1>being built in China, eventually it may be built somewhere else.

0:15:35.200 --> 0:15:37.360
<v Speaker 1>So from the equipment players, this may turn out to

0:15:37.400 --> 0:15:40.360
<v Speaker 1>be somewhat temporary. We may find that all of this

0:15:40.480 --> 0:15:43.800
<v Speaker 1>capacity is not permanently lost, but it will take some

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:47.160
<v Speaker 1>time and some rejiggering of the supply chains to to

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:49.480
<v Speaker 1>get it delta elsewhere. Or if it's not built in China.

0:15:50.440 --> 0:15:53.440
<v Speaker 1>You're right about Land Research is an example. I think

0:15:53.440 --> 0:15:55.200
<v Speaker 1>they did say it would impact to the tune of

0:15:55.240 --> 0:15:57.960
<v Speaker 1>two half billion dollars. Caroline and I had Doug Passenger

0:15:58.000 --> 0:16:00.200
<v Speaker 1>on the show actually a couple of weeks ago. He

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:05.440
<v Speaker 1>did points out that their workarounds essentially UM in terms

0:16:05.440 --> 0:16:10.120
<v Speaker 1>of licensing or alternative products. Is China going to have

0:16:10.160 --> 0:16:14.200
<v Speaker 1>success they're pushing those alternatives. You know that the sanctions

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 1>themselves are fairly targeted about what is and what is

0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:20.120
<v Speaker 1>not banned UM and and the issue is like some

0:16:20.200 --> 0:16:24.080
<v Speaker 1>of the equipment I mean, I mean land Max catchers say,

0:16:24.120 --> 0:16:25.720
<v Speaker 1>and I may be using an atcher or to make

0:16:25.760 --> 0:16:27.880
<v Speaker 1>fortune animator chips and maybe using the same atuer to

0:16:27.920 --> 0:16:30.360
<v Speaker 1>do twenty eight man in your chips. So there's a

0:16:30.400 --> 0:16:32.240
<v Speaker 1>bit of a judgment call, I think in terms of

0:16:32.520 --> 0:16:35.640
<v Speaker 1>how this stuff actually will get to get UM applied.

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:38.160
<v Speaker 1>But the general characteristics of what is banned and what

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:41.240
<v Speaker 1>is not are fairly got and dried. I mean, LAMB

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:44.640
<v Speaker 1>presumably can contrive to develop alternative products. Whether or not

0:16:45.000 --> 0:16:47.720
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be a viable path that I don't know. UM.

0:16:47.800 --> 0:16:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Some of the product companies, at least like an nvidio

0:16:49.920 --> 0:16:52.800
<v Speaker 1>for example. It's not equipment, it's actual chips that have

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:56.440
<v Speaker 1>been done. They've actually been able to develop alternative products

0:16:56.440 --> 0:16:59.280
<v Speaker 1>that come in sort of just below the threshold, and

0:16:59.320 --> 0:17:01.720
<v Speaker 1>so right now they can sell those. The issue with

0:17:01.760 --> 0:17:04.080
<v Speaker 1>that those of specials you're never going to rise. So

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:07.439
<v Speaker 1>the gap between what is legal and available to Southern

0:17:07.520 --> 0:17:09.679
<v Speaker 1>China and what is available in the rest of the

0:17:09.680 --> 0:17:11.679
<v Speaker 1>world over time is going to get bigger and bigger

0:17:11.720 --> 0:17:14.439
<v Speaker 1>and bigger, and so eventually, you know, these sort of

0:17:14.440 --> 0:17:17.800
<v Speaker 1>substances may may no longer be suitable for what they're replacing.

0:17:18.240 --> 0:17:20.959
<v Speaker 1>Geer political macro to the micro of how effects all

0:17:20.960 --> 0:17:23.639
<v Speaker 1>these companies you watch. We thank you always on these stories.

0:17:23.680 --> 0:17:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Beency Managing director and senior analyst Stacy Baskin. Ticket Master

0:17:35.920 --> 0:17:40.680
<v Speaker 1>apologizes again, this time involves bad funny. The Wall Street

0:17:40.720 --> 0:17:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Journal reports hundreds of fans who bought tickets were turned

0:17:43.520 --> 0:17:46.800
<v Speaker 1>away from the Artists concert in Mexico City on Friday

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:51.200
<v Speaker 1>because security officers fought their tickets were Carrol fake. This

0:17:51.359 --> 0:17:54.240
<v Speaker 1>after ticket Master said it's system had been overwhelmed with

0:17:54.280 --> 0:17:58.000
<v Speaker 1>an unprecedented number of people with fake tickets. Mexico's Office

0:17:58.040 --> 0:18:00.800
<v Speaker 1>of the Federal Prosecutor for the Consumer said over the

0:18:00.880 --> 0:18:04.240
<v Speaker 1>weekend that fans with legitimate tickets would be refunded, and

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:07.760
<v Speaker 1>then it asked ticket Master for a report explaining what

0:18:07.880 --> 0:18:09.320
<v Speaker 1>had happened in a little bit of d h r

0:18:09.400 --> 0:18:12.240
<v Speaker 1>V there, Yeah, a little bit. And I mean talking

0:18:12.280 --> 0:18:15.800
<v Speaker 1>of apologies, I mean some people call some ma'men freed, right,

0:18:15.920 --> 0:18:18.000
<v Speaker 1>he's still on his apology tour as many and dobing

0:18:18.000 --> 0:18:21.119
<v Speaker 1>it at the moment. And it's across well media outlets

0:18:21.160 --> 0:18:24.399
<v Speaker 1>such as ours, it's across social media, particularly such as Twitter,

0:18:24.520 --> 0:18:28.600
<v Speaker 1>and it's actually a pretty heated spaces debate. And you

0:18:28.680 --> 0:18:30.800
<v Speaker 1>and I ed we're testing out spaces as a way

0:18:30.800 --> 0:18:33.480
<v Speaker 1>in which we want to conduct our conversations bringing our audience.

0:18:33.720 --> 0:18:35.480
<v Speaker 1>But I think what stood out for me, and we're

0:18:35.480 --> 0:18:38.119
<v Speaker 1>gonna discuss much more about whether or not sp is

0:18:38.160 --> 0:18:39.920
<v Speaker 1>going to be at the Senate hearing or indeed the

0:18:40.000 --> 0:18:42.600
<v Speaker 1>House hearing, but the fact that we are getting our

0:18:42.680 --> 0:18:47.000
<v Speaker 1>news from Twitter spaces, that this idea of citizen journalism

0:18:47.040 --> 0:18:48.920
<v Speaker 1>it's really coming to a fault, and in large part

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:52.160
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of spirited by crypto. Yeah, then you asked

0:18:52.160 --> 0:18:54.639
<v Speaker 1>the question about SPF or why is he going to

0:18:54.680 --> 0:18:57.800
<v Speaker 1>go or not go as a case byb before Congress

0:18:57.840 --> 0:18:59.600
<v Speaker 1>and Clappers or Hill, when you can get all the

0:18:59.640 --> 0:19:01.960
<v Speaker 1>information you need from him live on any given social

0:19:01.960 --> 0:19:04.720
<v Speaker 1>media platform. I think that's the frustration of these lawmakers

0:19:04.720 --> 0:19:07.560
<v Speaker 1>have as well. Yeah, and in some part though, I mean,

0:19:07.600 --> 0:19:10.160
<v Speaker 1>I know people have been very critical of lawmakers when

0:19:10.160 --> 0:19:14.399
<v Speaker 1>it comes to their real understanding acute technological understanding of

0:19:14.480 --> 0:19:17.280
<v Speaker 1>social media, for example, And we've had Mark Zuckerberg and

0:19:17.280 --> 0:19:19.240
<v Speaker 1>the likes dragged up in front of them. What about

0:19:19.240 --> 0:19:22.040
<v Speaker 1>the will understanding in crypto two? And what about the

0:19:22.040 --> 0:19:24.440
<v Speaker 1>people that are actually asking questions on these Twitter spaces.

0:19:32.880 --> 0:19:35.399
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to Bloomberg Technology. I'm Karine Hide in New

0:19:35.440 --> 0:19:38.040
<v Speaker 1>York with Eddudlow in San Francisco, and there's a day

0:19:38.040 --> 0:19:41.320
<v Speaker 1>where tech stalks we're actually pushing higher like that. That's ed.

0:19:41.400 --> 0:19:43.640
<v Speaker 1>But let's talk about one name that's kind of languishing

0:19:43.640 --> 0:19:46.440
<v Speaker 1>at the moment. Yeah, and it's Tesla. And it's really

0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:49.760
<v Speaker 1>hard to understand why there's no specific news drive and

0:19:49.800 --> 0:19:51.800
<v Speaker 1>not at least this Monday, the stock down more than

0:19:51.880 --> 0:19:54.959
<v Speaker 1>six percent, trading at a three week low. Yes, there

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:56.960
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of headlines over the aggregate of a

0:19:57.000 --> 0:20:00.760
<v Speaker 1>week right, we talked all about the pullbacking production in Shanghai.

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:04.240
<v Speaker 1>We talked about the Bloomberg News report that Elon Musk

0:20:04.359 --> 0:20:07.520
<v Speaker 1>is considering switching some of the unsecured debt for margin

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:10.560
<v Speaker 1>loans in his financing of the Twitter deal, which would

0:20:10.560 --> 0:20:13.000
<v Speaker 1>be backed by Tesla stock. That could be bringing some

0:20:13.080 --> 0:20:16.280
<v Speaker 1>downward pressure. Then there's also Elon Musk himself, what he's

0:20:16.280 --> 0:20:19.320
<v Speaker 1>saying on Twitter, his actions over the weekend, which I

0:20:19.359 --> 0:20:20.399
<v Speaker 1>know we're going to go into. I just want to

0:20:20.440 --> 0:20:22.919
<v Speaker 1>bring up this chart really quickly and get into some technicals.

0:20:23.080 --> 0:20:26.120
<v Speaker 1>We don't often do this, but it's interesting. From its

0:20:26.800 --> 0:20:30.800
<v Speaker 1>one high, there's this sort of clear downward channel trend

0:20:30.840 --> 0:20:34.600
<v Speaker 1>for Tesla stock, where on multiple occasions it's tested key

0:20:34.680 --> 0:20:38.000
<v Speaker 1>levels of support, key levels of resistance, but it's still

0:20:38.040 --> 0:20:42.280
<v Speaker 1>continues this downward slide. And it's really hard to pick

0:20:42.320 --> 0:20:45.520
<v Speaker 1>out why a lot of analysts don't necessarily agree on

0:20:45.560 --> 0:20:49.240
<v Speaker 1>what is supporting or not supporting the stock as the case.

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you know, when we've reported about questions on demand

0:20:52.480 --> 0:20:55.159
<v Speaker 1>from China, a lot of the Tesla retail investors and

0:20:55.160 --> 0:20:57.119
<v Speaker 1>fans pushed back and say that can't be the case.

0:20:57.400 --> 0:21:00.320
<v Speaker 1>But we've also reported that Tesla's cut prices. So question

0:21:00.400 --> 0:21:01.520
<v Speaker 1>I have, and I know we're going to get into

0:21:01.560 --> 0:21:03.320
<v Speaker 1>this with our guests in the moment, is how much

0:21:03.440 --> 0:21:05.480
<v Speaker 1>is it just Elon Musk? Right? Is there a key

0:21:05.480 --> 0:21:09.199
<v Speaker 1>man risk element? Is there a distraction element? Retail investors

0:21:09.240 --> 0:21:11.440
<v Speaker 1>have been worried about that head and yeah, we want

0:21:11.440 --> 0:21:13.560
<v Speaker 1>to dig into it. Want to dig into Elon Musk's management.

0:21:13.600 --> 0:21:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Start a little bit more with someone who has built businesses,

0:21:16.640 --> 0:21:19.000
<v Speaker 1>helped steer them on boards, and now is focused on

0:21:19.080 --> 0:21:22.640
<v Speaker 1>behavioral change and sign them to about Arianna Hufington's She says,

0:21:22.680 --> 0:21:24.600
<v Speaker 1>in fact that Elon Musk's management style there is an

0:21:24.640 --> 0:21:27.600
<v Speaker 1>example of poor business strategy after he told employees to

0:21:27.640 --> 0:21:30.720
<v Speaker 1>embrace hardcore work experience at Twitter. In an op ed

0:21:30.800 --> 0:21:33.720
<v Speaker 1>for The Information, Havington writes that worker mental health is

0:21:33.720 --> 0:21:36.640
<v Speaker 1>more important than ever as an essential part of business strategy,

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:40.960
<v Speaker 1>proving not only employee productivity, but also recruitment and retention.

0:21:41.080 --> 0:21:45.280
<v Speaker 1>She labels Musk burnout denier. Of course, it's Huvington has

0:21:45.320 --> 0:21:48.760
<v Speaker 1>focused on building healthier corporate environments through her Thrive Global campaign,

0:21:48.920 --> 0:21:50.960
<v Speaker 1>In fact, signed by more than a hundred leading companies.

0:21:51.160 --> 0:21:54.919
<v Speaker 1>Ariana Huvington's found a CEO Thrive Global is with us Now, Arianna,

0:21:55.440 --> 0:21:58.159
<v Speaker 1>you write in an op ed and on LinkedIn that

0:21:58.640 --> 0:22:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Mask is kind of a count a case study for leadership.

0:22:01.880 --> 0:22:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Just talk us about why is such a powerful counter

0:22:04.240 --> 0:22:07.320
<v Speaker 1>case study. But Caroline, at the very moment when you

0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:12.879
<v Speaker 1>have major multinational companies like Fiser, Accentual, Sales Force, Walmart

0:22:13.320 --> 0:22:18.560
<v Speaker 1>investing into their employees well being, mental health and seeing

0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the business results in terms of recruitment, retention, productivity, we

0:22:23.920 --> 0:22:26.560
<v Speaker 1>have Ellen Mask, whi is a genius when it comes

0:22:26.600 --> 0:22:32.919
<v Speaker 1>to understanding energy in cars, clearly not understanding human energy

0:22:33.520 --> 0:22:37.320
<v Speaker 1>and acting and expecting his employees to act as though

0:22:38.000 --> 0:22:42.560
<v Speaker 1>and work fueled by burnout leads to pick performance and

0:22:42.760 --> 0:22:46.280
<v Speaker 1>great business results, and we see that it doesn't. We

0:22:46.440 --> 0:22:52.439
<v Speaker 1>see a chaotic process of decision making which clearly is

0:22:52.480 --> 0:22:58.960
<v Speaker 1>not benefiting Twitter, and it's obviously not benefiting Tesla because

0:22:59.040 --> 0:23:02.480
<v Speaker 1>to adds points about why is There'sla stock down? There's

0:23:02.520 --> 0:23:07.080
<v Speaker 1>no question that Ellen Mask is the genius behind Tesla.

0:23:07.480 --> 0:23:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Who when that genius is distracted by auctioning espresso machines

0:23:11.800 --> 0:23:16.520
<v Speaker 1>from Twitter and moving beds into conference rooms and traveling

0:23:16.560 --> 0:23:21.359
<v Speaker 1>fauci on Twitter, if our investor in Tesla. I would

0:23:21.359 --> 0:23:25.480
<v Speaker 1>be worried about why isn't he focusing on Tesla, especially

0:23:25.560 --> 0:23:29.440
<v Speaker 1>during a time of growing competition. What's interesting is this

0:23:29.560 --> 0:23:34.119
<v Speaker 1>sort of hero status of sleeping in the office of

0:23:34.280 --> 0:23:36.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean San Batman Freed, who were about to talk

0:23:36.200 --> 0:23:38.439
<v Speaker 1>about much more in terms of the crypto world, falling

0:23:38.440 --> 0:23:42.000
<v Speaker 1>asleep on bean bags and almost its being something that

0:23:42.040 --> 0:23:44.960
<v Speaker 1>they wanted to show the vcs and the potential investors. Look,

0:23:45.000 --> 0:23:48.080
<v Speaker 1>how then dynamic and and focuses he is the minute

0:23:48.080 --> 0:23:49.760
<v Speaker 1>he wakes up and comes to give you a pitch.

0:23:50.160 --> 0:23:52.439
<v Speaker 1>When can we stop having this sort of idea of

0:23:52.720 --> 0:23:56.199
<v Speaker 1>cultish fanaticism around certain people and an ability to do

0:23:56.240 --> 0:23:58.439
<v Speaker 1>it all at about to our sleep. Well, actually the

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:01.960
<v Speaker 1>majority of the world has opted. That's what it's so fascinating,

0:24:02.800 --> 0:24:07.680
<v Speaker 1>especially because of the pandemic. We went from sleep deprivation, exhaustion,

0:24:07.960 --> 0:24:11.399
<v Speaker 1>bre not fuel at work being a badge of honor

0:24:11.560 --> 0:24:15.320
<v Speaker 1>and celebrated to the opposite. I mean, we have major

0:24:15.400 --> 0:24:20.399
<v Speaker 1>CEOs now, including Satya Natella and Jeff Bezos. When he

0:24:20.440 --> 0:24:23.480
<v Speaker 1>would say of Amazon talking about getting eight hours of sleep.

0:24:23.960 --> 0:24:28.280
<v Speaker 1>We have major elite athletes like Lebron James and Tom

0:24:28.320 --> 0:24:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Brady and Roger Federer talking about the importance of recovery

0:24:33.640 --> 0:24:38.040
<v Speaker 1>four peak performance and all these people are very hard working, Carol,

0:24:38.080 --> 0:24:39.800
<v Speaker 1>and I wanted to say, this is not about not

0:24:39.960 --> 0:24:43.800
<v Speaker 1>working hard. This is about working smart and not having

0:24:43.840 --> 0:24:48.320
<v Speaker 1>the diminishing returns we've all experienced when we were exhausted

0:24:48.359 --> 0:24:51.399
<v Speaker 1>and burned out and running on empty And so the

0:24:51.640 --> 0:24:55.600
<v Speaker 1>science and the data are so unequivocal. And that's what

0:24:55.680 --> 0:24:58.760
<v Speaker 1>I find fascinating because I'm a big admirer of Villain Masks.

0:24:59.320 --> 0:25:03.520
<v Speaker 1>He's unqu tronably a genius. So somebody who understands so

0:25:03.720 --> 0:25:10.080
<v Speaker 1>perfectly energy renewable energy when it comes to cars is

0:25:10.160 --> 0:25:15.959
<v Speaker 1>missing out, is actually using incredibly outdated modes of human

0:25:16.119 --> 0:25:18.880
<v Speaker 1>energy when it comes to how he wants to run

0:25:19.000 --> 0:25:24.480
<v Speaker 1>his businesses Ariana is Elon Must not just going back

0:25:24.520 --> 0:25:27.000
<v Speaker 1>to his playbook. I want to bring up something you

0:25:27.080 --> 0:25:30.160
<v Speaker 1>said in your op ed that he's showing the downsides

0:25:30.200 --> 0:25:34.119
<v Speaker 1>of a model fueled by burnout and lack of sleep

0:25:34.200 --> 0:25:36.560
<v Speaker 1>in his own decision making. And that made me think

0:25:36.560 --> 0:25:40.080
<v Speaker 1>about the reporting from twenty eighteen when Must said he

0:25:40.160 --> 0:25:43.600
<v Speaker 1>was sleeping on the production line with his engineers. You know,

0:25:43.720 --> 0:25:47.560
<v Speaker 1>he does have a good track record of getting these

0:25:47.600 --> 0:25:52.000
<v Speaker 1>companies be a Tesla, be it SpaceX through moments of duress.

0:25:52.359 --> 0:25:54.440
<v Speaker 1>And you look at those two companies now, they are

0:25:54.440 --> 0:26:00.440
<v Speaker 1>the clear market incumbents for both electric vehicles and commercial

0:26:00.480 --> 0:26:05.080
<v Speaker 1>space launch. Absolutely, And I think two things have happened. One,

0:26:05.200 --> 0:26:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the culture has moved on, and the pandemic has dramatically

0:26:09.600 --> 0:26:15.720
<v Speaker 1>accelerated the cultural shift away from celebrating as Caroline was saying,

0:26:16.240 --> 0:26:20.800
<v Speaker 1>burnout and wearing it as a badge of success. When

0:26:21.880 --> 0:26:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk asked his Twitter employees to commit to a hardcore,

0:26:27.800 --> 0:26:31.680
<v Speaker 1>intense way of working, twelve hundred of them resigned. That

0:26:31.800 --> 0:26:35.879
<v Speaker 1>would not have happened in What happened with the pandemic

0:26:36.000 --> 0:26:39.000
<v Speaker 1>is that people looked at their lives and what do

0:26:39.119 --> 0:26:43.840
<v Speaker 1>they value, And millions of people said, we value hard work,

0:26:43.920 --> 0:26:47.399
<v Speaker 1>we value being completely engaged by our work, but we

0:26:47.480 --> 0:26:50.560
<v Speaker 1>also don't want to be defined by our work, and

0:26:50.640 --> 0:26:53.720
<v Speaker 1>we want to be able to also prioritize our own

0:26:53.760 --> 0:26:57.199
<v Speaker 1>health and well being. So that's the moment we're in

0:26:57.359 --> 0:27:01.280
<v Speaker 1>right now. And I have no doubt that Evillen mask

0:27:01.880 --> 0:27:08.760
<v Speaker 1>started applying that scientific, clear data point around how to

0:27:08.880 --> 0:27:12.200
<v Speaker 1>best work and achieve business results. He would be even

0:27:12.240 --> 0:27:17.560
<v Speaker 1>more phenomenally amazing across all his companies. Arianna, you've been

0:27:17.600 --> 0:27:21.080
<v Speaker 1>a board member and an executive, a leader at a

0:27:21.200 --> 0:27:25.080
<v Speaker 1>number of companies technology sector in the media. Give me

0:27:25.160 --> 0:27:29.120
<v Speaker 1>some concrete proposals that you think Elon Musk should put

0:27:29.119 --> 0:27:33.320
<v Speaker 1>into play to fix the situation at Twitter, to improve

0:27:33.400 --> 0:27:36.000
<v Speaker 1>performance of Tesla. What advice would you give him then

0:27:36.480 --> 0:27:40.960
<v Speaker 1>to change what has been the case so far? Well,

0:27:41.080 --> 0:27:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the first thing is along the lines of what we're discussing,

0:27:44.200 --> 0:27:47.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of recognizing that he is going to make better

0:27:47.280 --> 0:27:51.439
<v Speaker 1>decisions when he's not running on empty, when he's not

0:27:51.640 --> 0:27:54.760
<v Speaker 1>exhausted to get a good night's sleep, in other words,

0:27:55.080 --> 0:27:58.240
<v Speaker 1>get a good night's sleep, but recharge, work hard. He's

0:27:58.280 --> 0:28:01.160
<v Speaker 1>always going to work hard. You work our Caroline works hard,

0:28:01.200 --> 0:28:04.520
<v Speaker 1>and work hard. That's kind of table stakes. But we

0:28:04.600 --> 0:28:09.080
<v Speaker 1>all know also that our work depends on judgment, and

0:28:09.240 --> 0:28:12.920
<v Speaker 1>his work and his achievements and what he does for

0:28:13.040 --> 0:28:16.719
<v Speaker 1>his companies depends on the quality of his decisions. And

0:28:16.760 --> 0:28:20.440
<v Speaker 1>look at the quality of his decision has not been good.

0:28:20.560 --> 0:28:24.000
<v Speaker 1>There have been so many reversals, and there's been kind

0:28:24.000 --> 0:28:29.439
<v Speaker 1>of so much trolling of figures, the Twitter files and

0:28:29.480 --> 0:28:33.399
<v Speaker 1>all that, and that's all a huge distraction, and that

0:28:33.640 --> 0:28:39.280
<v Speaker 1>really is my big hop that he recognizes how much

0:28:40.200 --> 0:28:43.400
<v Speaker 1>more effective he would be as a leader and how

0:28:43.480 --> 0:28:47.200
<v Speaker 1>much better the business results would be if he looked

0:28:47.200 --> 0:28:51.400
<v Speaker 1>at the science and data of pig performance. I mean,

0:28:51.480 --> 0:28:54.239
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting, is it mentions that your expertise having been

0:28:54.280 --> 0:28:58.120
<v Speaker 1>a board member of Uber, for example, and holding executives

0:28:58.120 --> 0:29:00.520
<v Speaker 1>to account, making sure that there is the right governance

0:29:00.520 --> 0:29:02.840
<v Speaker 1>in place. Many might look at two of these two

0:29:02.920 --> 0:29:06.640
<v Speaker 1>leaders to single out Elon Masks. Some magnnfried that they

0:29:06.680 --> 0:29:09.240
<v Speaker 1>either have people on their boards who perhaps yes people,

0:29:09.480 --> 0:29:11.080
<v Speaker 1>or they don't really have much of a board at all.

0:29:11.440 --> 0:29:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Do you think as we had to some sort of

0:29:13.080 --> 0:29:16.000
<v Speaker 1>economic slowdown in the downtown, people will put more focus

0:29:16.400 --> 0:29:20.440
<v Speaker 1>on corporate governance? Oh? Absolutely. I mean it's actually stunning

0:29:20.600 --> 0:29:24.080
<v Speaker 1>that fd X did not have a board. Isn't it

0:29:24.160 --> 0:29:29.000
<v Speaker 1>stunning that um, you know, major vcs invested in a

0:29:29.000 --> 0:29:32.160
<v Speaker 1>company without a board? I mean, and of Adober Actually

0:29:32.200 --> 0:29:37.240
<v Speaker 1>I saw firsthand the dangers are burnout and the decisions

0:29:37.320 --> 0:29:42.120
<v Speaker 1>it led to that almost brought down the company. And

0:29:42.200 --> 0:29:44.880
<v Speaker 1>we saw what happened with the FDx. So we have

0:29:45.000 --> 0:29:50.080
<v Speaker 1>so many examples that is now time to stop celebrating

0:29:50.120 --> 0:29:53.600
<v Speaker 1>an outmoderate way of working. Actually, Caroline, I've looked at

0:29:53.640 --> 0:29:57.000
<v Speaker 1>where they started. It goes back to the Industrial Revolution

0:29:57.840 --> 0:30:00.920
<v Speaker 1>when we're kind of really started revering machines. And the

0:30:01.000 --> 0:30:04.280
<v Speaker 1>gold with machines is to minimize downtime. And that's the

0:30:04.360 --> 0:30:08.160
<v Speaker 1>same goal with software. But for the human operating system,

0:30:08.440 --> 0:30:12.360
<v Speaker 1>downtime is not a bug, it's a feature. And once

0:30:12.400 --> 0:30:15.520
<v Speaker 1>we accept that, it changes the way we around businesses.

0:30:15.760 --> 0:30:17.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, gonn as we structure our Monday to Friday

0:30:17.760 --> 0:30:20.280
<v Speaker 1>almost in a way that was when Henry Ford first

0:30:20.360 --> 0:30:23.360
<v Speaker 1>was pioneering. It is in many ways back dated. I'm

0:30:23.400 --> 0:30:26.480
<v Speaker 1>interested in your expertise, not only the common governance in

0:30:26.520 --> 0:30:28.520
<v Speaker 1>your experience, but also as a woman who led the

0:30:28.560 --> 0:30:31.560
<v Speaker 1>charge in a in a new form of media. You

0:30:31.640 --> 0:30:34.600
<v Speaker 1>must be fascinated to watch what which was doing as

0:30:34.600 --> 0:30:36.920
<v Speaker 1>a new form of media in a way citizen journalism,

0:30:36.920 --> 0:30:39.000
<v Speaker 1>we all call it. How are you seeing? How do

0:30:39.040 --> 0:30:42.280
<v Speaker 1>you think that landscape will evolve? Well, what is amazing

0:30:42.320 --> 0:30:44.640
<v Speaker 1>now is that when I launched the Huffington Past two

0:30:44.680 --> 0:30:48.240
<v Speaker 1>thousand five before you were born, Caroline, and you know,

0:30:48.440 --> 0:30:53.800
<v Speaker 1>we the farcus and the vision was to democratize media

0:30:54.320 --> 0:30:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Now we've seen, you know, the democratization of media, and

0:30:57.800 --> 0:31:00.680
<v Speaker 1>there is a lot of great stuff about it, but

0:31:00.720 --> 0:31:07.000
<v Speaker 1>I've also seen how people gathering around just what they believe.

0:31:07.160 --> 0:31:12.000
<v Speaker 1>The hot danger of confirmation bias and only reading things

0:31:12.040 --> 0:31:16.440
<v Speaker 1>that you agree with is a tremendous danger for democracy

0:31:16.720 --> 0:31:19.800
<v Speaker 1>and for the truth. I still find Twitter to be

0:31:20.760 --> 0:31:24.160
<v Speaker 1>a chaotic experience. You know, when I use the platform,

0:31:24.240 --> 0:31:26.959
<v Speaker 1>I can't tell if it's improved or if it's got worse.

0:31:27.320 --> 0:31:31.160
<v Speaker 1>It's certainly changing. What is your kind of view on

0:31:31.360 --> 0:31:35.120
<v Speaker 1>the platform itself, the content that gets generated from it,

0:31:35.200 --> 0:31:39.720
<v Speaker 1>the news that spreads through it, well, it's definitely changing,

0:31:39.880 --> 0:31:42.959
<v Speaker 1>but and you don't know how far it will change.

0:31:43.800 --> 0:31:48.840
<v Speaker 1>I think it's interesting that the Eleen mask still agrees

0:31:49.000 --> 0:31:52.200
<v Speaker 1>that some people should be banned. It's just that he

0:31:52.320 --> 0:31:55.360
<v Speaker 1>may think that people he would ran are different maybe

0:31:55.360 --> 0:31:57.600
<v Speaker 1>than the people you would run or I would ran.

0:31:58.120 --> 0:32:02.960
<v Speaker 1>But the principle that free speech doesn't mean that you

0:32:03.080 --> 0:32:07.080
<v Speaker 1>can cry fire in a crowded theater is still prevailing,

0:32:07.160 --> 0:32:11.400
<v Speaker 1>which is very interesting. All Right, Five Holdings founder and

0:32:11.520 --> 0:32:14.200
<v Speaker 1>CEO Arena Huffington's thank you so much for sharing some

0:32:14.240 --> 0:32:17.360
<v Speaker 1>of your time with Caroline, and I thank you coming up,

0:32:17.760 --> 0:32:21.160
<v Speaker 1>we'll discuss what to watch for in Sam Bankman Freed's

0:32:21.240 --> 0:32:24.800
<v Speaker 1>house hearing on Tuesday, that and much more. Of course,

0:32:24.920 --> 0:32:44.720
<v Speaker 1>this is Bloomberg now. Of course, all eyes are still

0:32:45.160 --> 0:32:48.040
<v Speaker 1>on the ft x is founder CEO Sam Bankman Freed,

0:32:48.080 --> 0:32:50.760
<v Speaker 1>as he is expected to testify just virtually on Tuesday

0:32:50.840 --> 0:32:53.400
<v Speaker 1>in front of the House Financial Services Committee over in

0:32:53.440 --> 0:32:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Capitol Hill in peace to say our own Snai Bassa

0:32:56.520 --> 0:32:59.760
<v Speaker 1>is headed to DC in real life right after the show.

0:33:00.000 --> 0:33:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Thank you sticking around with us, and look, what are

0:33:02.720 --> 0:33:05.560
<v Speaker 1>we anticipating for him to say that knew that we

0:33:05.640 --> 0:33:08.360
<v Speaker 1>haven't already heard in some form of apology tour already.

0:33:08.520 --> 0:33:10.680
<v Speaker 1>One thing that's interesting is you have the new CEO,

0:33:11.000 --> 0:33:14.360
<v Speaker 1>John Ray speaking first, and then Sam Bateman Freed speaking

0:33:14.400 --> 0:33:16.320
<v Speaker 1>after we hear according to sources, that will be in

0:33:16.360 --> 0:33:19.000
<v Speaker 1>the afternoon, and so there's a bit of time in between.

0:33:19.040 --> 0:33:21.239
<v Speaker 1>And to what extent does he start to answer some

0:33:21.280 --> 0:33:23.520
<v Speaker 1>of the things we know that John Ray has not

0:33:23.560 --> 0:33:25.440
<v Speaker 1>only put in the bankruptcy filing but also in his

0:33:25.480 --> 0:33:28.880
<v Speaker 1>own testimony that is posted on the House Financial Services

0:33:28.880 --> 0:33:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Committee website right now. Those allegations include combing going of

0:33:31.920 --> 0:33:35.800
<v Speaker 1>funds as well as a failure to implement visually any

0:33:35.840 --> 0:33:39.600
<v Speaker 1>systems or controls necessary for a company to be entrusted

0:33:39.640 --> 0:33:41.840
<v Speaker 1>with other people's money. Now we know that tam bang

0:33:41.840 --> 0:33:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Bean Freed has spoken a lot, including today on a

0:33:44.320 --> 0:33:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Twitter spaces as well, and it's worth taking a look

0:33:46.880 --> 0:33:49.440
<v Speaker 1>at what he said, and we can expect him to

0:33:49.600 --> 0:33:52.480
<v Speaker 1>reiterate some of this tomorrow. And it's that right now

0:33:52.520 --> 0:33:55.760
<v Speaker 1>he has no data about anything, so that all he

0:33:55.800 --> 0:33:58.080
<v Speaker 1>can go off of is his memory. Remember, he's no

0:33:58.200 --> 0:34:00.240
<v Speaker 1>longer the sea of the company, so there is certain

0:34:00.240 --> 0:34:02.200
<v Speaker 1>amount of data that he's no longer proven to. But

0:34:02.280 --> 0:34:04.800
<v Speaker 1>with that said, he was in charge from the beginning

0:34:04.800 --> 0:34:07.920
<v Speaker 1>of f t X, and he also said that he

0:34:08.000 --> 0:34:10.480
<v Speaker 1>bared responsibility for making sure he did the right things

0:34:10.480 --> 0:34:13.239
<v Speaker 1>as a company, and he had a massive failure there

0:34:13.280 --> 0:34:15.520
<v Speaker 1>no matter what. So we've known over time that he's

0:34:15.520 --> 0:34:18.040
<v Speaker 1>taken some responsibility for some things. But at the end

0:34:18.080 --> 0:34:20.920
<v Speaker 1>of the day, he has been a very very careful

0:34:21.040 --> 0:34:25.040
<v Speaker 1>to really recuse himself and distance himself from the idea

0:34:25.239 --> 0:34:28.719
<v Speaker 1>of ft X investing customer assets to his knowledge and

0:34:28.800 --> 0:34:32.400
<v Speaker 1>commingling to his knowledge. You're right that we get a

0:34:32.480 --> 0:34:35.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of Acts one and then Act two with John

0:34:35.680 --> 0:34:38.479
<v Speaker 1>Ray the third, who's the current f t X CEO

0:34:38.600 --> 0:34:41.920
<v Speaker 1>or administrator testifying. It's not as if though they're gonna

0:34:42.080 --> 0:34:44.200
<v Speaker 1>bump into each other in the hallway and have an

0:34:44.200 --> 0:34:49.960
<v Speaker 1>awkward hug or something. Is an SPF testifying from elsewhere?

0:34:50.960 --> 0:34:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Uh yeah, not a lot of hugging these days, for sure. Ed. So, yes,

0:34:54.680 --> 0:34:59.040
<v Speaker 1>he's testifying virtually, and remember he is testifying tomorrow, he's

0:34:59.040 --> 0:35:01.680
<v Speaker 1>slated to testify. But we also have to talk about

0:35:01.760 --> 0:35:04.520
<v Speaker 1>the idea here that the Senate has already said, and

0:35:04.600 --> 0:35:06.960
<v Speaker 1>this is shared Brown and Pat Toomey had said in

0:35:07.000 --> 0:35:10.800
<v Speaker 1>a statement that they are unwilling Sam big Befrieen's council

0:35:10.840 --> 0:35:14.200
<v Speaker 1>has said that they're unwilling to accept service of a subpoena.

0:35:14.440 --> 0:35:17.759
<v Speaker 1>And so why he's testifying at a one branch here

0:35:17.800 --> 0:35:20.000
<v Speaker 1>and not the other is or one chamber rather than

0:35:20.040 --> 0:35:22.800
<v Speaker 1>the other, is an interesting question. What he said earlier

0:35:22.880 --> 0:35:26.160
<v Speaker 1>today on this podcast is that he wants to be

0:35:26.200 --> 0:35:27.960
<v Speaker 1>able to make sure that he's able to give a

0:35:28.000 --> 0:35:33.680
<v Speaker 1>full account rather than uh, you know, and incomplete account here.

0:35:33.880 --> 0:35:35.920
<v Speaker 1>But you know, the point that we've been making all

0:35:36.000 --> 0:35:37.799
<v Speaker 1>day here is why is he willing to give those

0:35:37.800 --> 0:35:40.840
<v Speaker 1>in complete accounts? To the media, but not not the

0:35:40.920 --> 0:35:44.240
<v Speaker 1>lawmakers here who are responsible for constituents and have also,

0:35:44.280 --> 0:35:47.000
<v Speaker 1>by the way, in large part taken money from him

0:35:47.000 --> 0:35:49.880
<v Speaker 1>in the form of political donations as well. Just talking

0:35:49.880 --> 0:35:55.040
<v Speaker 1>about media, this piece run by the Australian Financial Review

0:35:55.600 --> 0:35:59.680
<v Speaker 1>about an inn a circle powerhouse at FTC ft X

0:35:59.760 --> 0:36:02.800
<v Speaker 1>the using I think it was telegram. Was it forms

0:36:02.840 --> 0:36:08.319
<v Speaker 1>of me of signication? Signals similar idea? Cool? What did

0:36:08.320 --> 0:36:10.560
<v Speaker 1>they call the name of the chat and how are

0:36:10.520 --> 0:36:13.520
<v Speaker 1>we seeing him respond to it? Allegedly wire fraud was

0:36:13.560 --> 0:36:15.640
<v Speaker 1>the name of the chat with his inner circle, and

0:36:15.800 --> 0:36:18.719
<v Speaker 1>he did respond immediately on Twitter and said if this

0:36:18.800 --> 0:36:21.040
<v Speaker 1>is true, then I wasn't a member of that inner circle.

0:36:21.200 --> 0:36:23.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm quite sure it's just false. I've never heard of

0:36:23.360 --> 0:36:25.640
<v Speaker 1>such a group. But it's something he may be asked

0:36:25.640 --> 0:36:27.680
<v Speaker 1>about again in the series of many things he may

0:36:27.719 --> 0:36:30.160
<v Speaker 1>be asked about. I would say also in the Unusual

0:36:30.200 --> 0:36:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Whales podcast, the last question was kind of interesting. They

0:36:33.200 --> 0:36:37.279
<v Speaker 1>asked him about that that the money he gave to

0:36:37.600 --> 0:36:41.480
<v Speaker 1>the Block executive, and that is something that he did

0:36:41.520 --> 0:36:43.920
<v Speaker 1>not answer and hopped off the podcast at that point.

0:36:44.080 --> 0:36:46.960
<v Speaker 1>For so between the lawmakers that he had given money

0:36:47.000 --> 0:36:49.480
<v Speaker 1>to as well as the media organizations, he might get

0:36:49.520 --> 0:36:51.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of questions about the type of influence he

0:36:51.600 --> 0:36:55.319
<v Speaker 1>was trying to wield and why I know what the

0:36:55.360 --> 0:36:57.480
<v Speaker 1>three of us are going to be doing on Tuesday

0:36:57.560 --> 0:37:09.279
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Sinnali Basset, thank you very much, noise by the

0:37:09.400 --> 0:37:32.760
<v Speaker 1>rich world were expecting. So today's going viral is Elon

0:37:32.840 --> 0:37:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Musk's own appearance and a Dave Chappelle and Chris Rock

0:37:35.719 --> 0:37:38.239
<v Speaker 1>show in San Francisco. Now the billionaire was brought on

0:37:38.360 --> 0:37:41.560
<v Speaker 1>stage wearing an I Love Twitter t shirt to some

0:37:41.680 --> 0:37:44.680
<v Speaker 1>pretty mixed applause. As you heard, they're actually it was

0:37:44.719 --> 0:37:47.400
<v Speaker 1>booze that generally took over. Must didn't have a chance

0:37:47.440 --> 0:37:49.239
<v Speaker 1>to speak. It was practically bood off stage, and the

0:37:49.360 --> 0:37:51.479
<v Speaker 1>video was taken by someone who snuck in a camera

0:37:51.520 --> 0:37:54.560
<v Speaker 1>to the event, posted on Twitter before the account suddenly

0:37:54.560 --> 0:37:57.720
<v Speaker 1>got deleted because Mono reported Matt Novac posted it on YouTube,

0:37:57.719 --> 0:38:01.319
<v Speaker 1>and in a tweet, Must wrote, technically years and ten

0:38:01.320 --> 0:38:04.840
<v Speaker 1>percent booze except during quiet periods, but still that's a

0:38:04.880 --> 0:38:07.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of booze, which is the first for me in

0:38:07.239 --> 0:38:10.839
<v Speaker 1>real life. Frequently, in case our audience Karro couldn't hear,

0:38:10.880 --> 0:38:12.359
<v Speaker 1>I just want to point out very quick that Dave

0:38:12.440 --> 0:38:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Chappelle was saying that some of the people booing were

0:38:15.160 --> 0:38:17.560
<v Speaker 1>perhaps those that Musk had fired from Twitter. That was

0:38:17.760 --> 0:38:22.560
<v Speaker 1>what he was saying on stage. I mean, it's comedy

0:38:22.640 --> 0:38:24.799
<v Speaker 1>is always very edgy and close to the line, isn't

0:38:24.800 --> 0:38:26.319
<v Speaker 1>it end? But I have to say it felt like

0:38:26.360 --> 0:38:27.440
<v Speaker 1>that perhaps has a bit of a come up and

0:38:27.480 --> 0:38:31.000
<v Speaker 1>spree lunch. Yeah. I mean it's hard to know what

0:38:31.080 --> 0:38:33.799
<v Speaker 1>to say is funny or not funny, but clearly there

0:38:33.840 --> 0:38:36.600
<v Speaker 1>was a strong reaction there. Well, that does it for

0:38:36.600 --> 0:38:39.440
<v Speaker 1>this addition of Bloomberg Technology, tell us your thoughts on Twitter.

0:38:39.640 --> 0:38:42.839
<v Speaker 1>But tomorrow we have Parallel Alter Network CEO. This has

0:38:42.840 --> 0:38:43.279
<v Speaker 1>boom there