WEBVTT - Is birth order important?

0:00:01.120 --> 0:00:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff You Should Know, a production of My

0:00:03.600 --> 0:00:12.719
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radios How Stuff Works. Hey, and welcome to the podcast.

0:00:12.800 --> 0:00:15.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm Josh Clark. There's Charles Duby, Choke Bryant, there's Jerry

0:00:15.720 --> 0:00:21.320
<v Speaker 1>over there, and this is Stuff You Should Know jerodcast. Jerry.

0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Were you a what was your birth order? Oh, Jerry's

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:30.720
<v Speaker 1>a middle child, two of two or two of more.

0:00:31.440 --> 0:00:36.440
<v Speaker 1>So you're the baby. You don't know this, did you? Sure? No?

0:00:36.800 --> 0:00:39.800
<v Speaker 1>I know Jerry for like thirteen years, so have I? Well,

0:00:39.840 --> 0:00:43.360
<v Speaker 1>not that long twelve years, So have I no comment?

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:49.519
<v Speaker 1>What am I? I don't know? That's right, I know what.

0:00:49.760 --> 0:00:52.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm the baby? You know that. Yeah, I didn't ask

0:00:52.120 --> 0:00:53.720
<v Speaker 1>what you were. I know you know what you are?

0:00:53.880 --> 0:00:55.960
<v Speaker 1>What am I? This isn't quits not You're not gonna

0:00:56.040 --> 0:01:00.960
<v Speaker 1>just yea. Yeah, I wasn't calling you out. I was

0:01:01.000 --> 0:01:03.400
<v Speaker 1>calling you out in a humorous way. And I called

0:01:03.400 --> 0:01:06.520
<v Speaker 1>you out. Um. It's hard not to look at this

0:01:06.560 --> 0:01:09.000
<v Speaker 1>stuff through your own lens though, of your own family.

0:01:09.120 --> 0:01:12.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, are you changing the subject? I don't know.

0:01:12.240 --> 0:01:15.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm getting on with it because as the youngest of three,

0:01:17.040 --> 0:01:19.240
<v Speaker 1>and all of us have three distinct personalities, it's hard

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:22.000
<v Speaker 1>not to kind of like think about birth order and

0:01:22.040 --> 0:01:24.399
<v Speaker 1>if that's a thing, and it may be and it

0:01:24.440 --> 0:01:29.319
<v Speaker 1>may not be. Yeah, depends on which scientists you're asking.

0:01:29.800 --> 0:01:33.760
<v Speaker 1>I tend to think like, there's just no way it

0:01:33.840 --> 0:01:36.680
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have any effect. Now there, I think it definitely

0:01:36.720 --> 0:01:39.920
<v Speaker 1>has an effect. But as we will see, it is

0:01:40.040 --> 0:01:46.360
<v Speaker 1>one part of a huge pie that uh that indicates

0:01:46.520 --> 0:01:49.000
<v Speaker 1>what kind of person and personality you might have. Well.

0:01:49.040 --> 0:01:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Plus also it's devilishly tricky to to analyze, to study

0:01:54.440 --> 0:01:57.120
<v Speaker 1>because of how big that pie is. Yeah, there's so

0:01:57.200 --> 0:02:01.160
<v Speaker 1>much going on with your personality that to just pinpoint

0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 1>one thing, even a big thing like that where you're

0:02:04.080 --> 0:02:07.480
<v Speaker 1>born in a family, um, it's just tough to pin down.

0:02:08.440 --> 0:02:13.079
<v Speaker 1>So you're the youngest, right, good yess? Yes I am.

0:02:13.120 --> 0:02:16.360
<v Speaker 1>I knew you were the youngest. I'm like, I wear

0:02:16.400 --> 0:02:19.320
<v Speaker 1>that on my sleeve. I feel like I kind of

0:02:19.320 --> 0:02:23.280
<v Speaker 1>do too a lot, I guess in some ways. But

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:26.360
<v Speaker 1>like I was reading this checklist for the youngest, Yeah,

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:29.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, yeah, I guess. So let's let's let's do

0:02:29.240 --> 0:02:32.080
<v Speaker 1>should we go over that that stuff first? Yeah? Totally

0:02:32.160 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 1>all right. So this is like the sort of macro

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 1>view of how a lot of people think of birth

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:45.080
<v Speaker 1>order pop psychology. Yeah, so if you were born into

0:02:45.120 --> 0:02:48.520
<v Speaker 1>a family, there's basically four ways that you can be

0:02:48.560 --> 0:02:51.320
<v Speaker 1>born in some sort of order. You can be the firstborn,

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:56.560
<v Speaker 1>you can be a middle child, or you can be

0:02:56.720 --> 0:03:01.040
<v Speaker 1>the last born. And then if you're real out fire. Okay,

0:03:01.080 --> 0:03:04.880
<v Speaker 1>you're right, So there's five oh god, don't even get

0:03:04.880 --> 0:03:10.080
<v Speaker 1>me started. Um, okay, a multi um or you can

0:03:10.120 --> 0:03:12.920
<v Speaker 1>be an only child too, and all of them have

0:03:13.080 --> 0:03:17.320
<v Speaker 1>distinct personalities. Again according to pop psychology, but also according

0:03:17.360 --> 0:03:20.440
<v Speaker 1>to every person who's ever been born into a family,

0:03:20.560 --> 0:03:24.360
<v Speaker 1>especially and so with the first born um, the whole

0:03:24.400 --> 0:03:27.799
<v Speaker 1>the whole theory of basically birth order, where where you're

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:30.720
<v Speaker 1>born into the family unit that you're born into, and

0:03:30.800 --> 0:03:33.919
<v Speaker 1>what effect that has on your personality and how it develops.

0:03:34.600 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 1>It all seems to come down to this idea that

0:03:37.880 --> 0:03:41.120
<v Speaker 1>you are born into a family where there is a

0:03:41.160 --> 0:03:45.400
<v Speaker 1>finite resource called parental attention, and then that is a

0:03:45.440 --> 0:03:49.280
<v Speaker 1>pie that gets increasingly divided up into smaller and smaller

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:52.400
<v Speaker 1>pieces the more and more children that are born, because

0:03:52.400 --> 0:03:56.480
<v Speaker 1>your parents can't possibly give five kids the same amount

0:03:56.480 --> 0:03:59.360
<v Speaker 1>of attention that they could give an only child. It's

0:03:59.400 --> 0:04:02.880
<v Speaker 1>just not possible. And so what dynamics are created in

0:04:02.920 --> 0:04:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the personality of the kids born into that family depending

0:04:06.120 --> 0:04:08.880
<v Speaker 1>on how many others are born and depending on where

0:04:08.920 --> 0:04:11.960
<v Speaker 1>they fall in that birth order. That's kind of the

0:04:11.960 --> 0:04:14.640
<v Speaker 1>premise of the whole thing. And over time people have said, well,

0:04:14.640 --> 0:04:16.159
<v Speaker 1>this is what the first point is like, this is

0:04:16.160 --> 0:04:18.800
<v Speaker 1>what the middle is like, this is what the baby's like. Yeah,

0:04:18.880 --> 0:04:20.600
<v Speaker 1>and there were I mean a lot of this are

0:04:20.800 --> 0:04:23.960
<v Speaker 1>these are generalizations, but they are generalizations. Like you said

0:04:24.000 --> 0:04:26.000
<v Speaker 1>that kind of everyone who's ever been in a family

0:04:26.440 --> 0:04:29.960
<v Speaker 1>can kind of say, yeah, that's kind of true. Um,

0:04:30.000 --> 0:04:33.200
<v Speaker 1>you know when you have an only or your first kid,

0:04:33.839 --> 0:04:37.440
<v Speaker 1>they this article references as that first sort of experiment.

0:04:38.080 --> 0:04:41.159
<v Speaker 1>You don't know what you're doing yet. Um, you're probably

0:04:41.160 --> 0:04:43.760
<v Speaker 1>going all in, depending on how lazy you are, how

0:04:43.800 --> 0:04:46.320
<v Speaker 1>motivated you are as a parent with this, you know,

0:04:47.040 --> 0:04:51.400
<v Speaker 1>being a super parent. And then if supposedly as you

0:04:51.440 --> 0:04:54.480
<v Speaker 1>have more children you get it's not only is your

0:04:54.560 --> 0:04:57.040
<v Speaker 1>is your attention divided? I think, but there's the notion

0:04:57.120 --> 0:05:00.320
<v Speaker 1>that you also are like, you know what, a probably

0:05:00.320 --> 0:05:03.040
<v Speaker 1>don't need to be as crazy with number two and

0:05:03.160 --> 0:05:07.279
<v Speaker 1>number three, Um, leave them to their own devices. As

0:05:07.279 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 1>a third kid, I'm not going to get into too

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:14.039
<v Speaker 1>many depressing details of my family growing up, but like

0:05:14.240 --> 0:05:18.560
<v Speaker 1>by the time I was ten and eleven and my

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:23.280
<v Speaker 1>parents had other things going on, and I wasn't fair

0:05:23.279 --> 0:05:28.640
<v Speaker 1>old kids on the side. Not exactly, Um, I wasn't

0:05:28.680 --> 0:05:31.680
<v Speaker 1>fair old by any means, but I was. I did

0:05:31.720 --> 0:05:33.719
<v Speaker 1>not have rules imposed on me like my brother and

0:05:33.760 --> 0:05:36.440
<v Speaker 1>sister did. I did not have I was allowed to

0:05:36.480 --> 0:05:38.960
<v Speaker 1>go to Panama City for spring break and they weren't.

0:05:39.000 --> 0:05:41.680
<v Speaker 1>I was allowed to kind of do my own thing,

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:44.480
<v Speaker 1>and I was trustworthy, So that probably had a lot

0:05:44.520 --> 0:05:45.960
<v Speaker 1>to do with it. If I would have been a

0:05:46.040 --> 0:05:47.880
<v Speaker 1>real problem, they might have clamped down a little more,

0:05:48.200 --> 0:05:51.040
<v Speaker 1>or maybe not. And they probably wouldn't have necessarily clamped down,

0:05:51.080 --> 0:05:53.240
<v Speaker 1>like we need to give Chuck Way more attention and

0:05:53.279 --> 0:05:56.279
<v Speaker 1>guidance than we have been. They would have probably been

0:05:56.320 --> 0:05:58.720
<v Speaker 1>like crime and punishment. They would have been, like we're saying,

0:05:58.720 --> 0:06:00.400
<v Speaker 1>in Chuck the rehab or whatever her you know what

0:06:00.480 --> 0:06:02.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Let rehab take care of our reform school

0:06:02.800 --> 0:06:05.720
<v Speaker 1>or something like that, because once you get X number

0:06:05.760 --> 0:06:09.680
<v Speaker 1>of kids in, you're just so tired, so tired, and

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:13.760
<v Speaker 1>you're older too, Like when you're chasing a little kid

0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:17.120
<v Speaker 1>around and like your forties or fifties. That's different than

0:06:17.160 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Speaker 1>when you're chasing a little kid around in your mid twenties.

0:06:19.680 --> 0:06:23.440
<v Speaker 1>I can't imagine a world of difference, you know. Um,

0:06:23.600 --> 0:06:26.360
<v Speaker 1>So there's there's there. There's a lot of resources, not

0:06:26.440 --> 0:06:30.800
<v Speaker 1>just you know, parents attention, but also their time, intellectual

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 1>attention that they'll give a kid like and say, um,

0:06:34.000 --> 0:06:36.320
<v Speaker 1>like hanging out, teaching the kid to read that kind

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:39.640
<v Speaker 1>of stuff. Um, and just attention in general, and also

0:06:39.880 --> 0:06:44.679
<v Speaker 1>financial resources the families. Resources in general are a pie

0:06:44.760 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 1>that must be divided among all financial, emotional, all that

0:06:47.800 --> 0:06:53.280
<v Speaker 1>stuff instructive. Uh. So, generally speaking, firstborn's, people say, tend

0:06:53.320 --> 0:06:58.400
<v Speaker 1>to be very conscientious and structured and reliable. Uh and

0:06:58.520 --> 0:07:04.279
<v Speaker 1>high achieve high achiever. Yeah, because their parents are focusing

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:07.799
<v Speaker 1>like a laser on them. They know everything that kids

0:07:07.839 --> 0:07:11.240
<v Speaker 1>got going on, maybe a little too much. Um. And

0:07:11.280 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 1>the kid is responding to this by basically becoming a

0:07:13.960 --> 0:07:19.080
<v Speaker 1>perfectionist and really wanting to be around their parents. Um

0:07:19.120 --> 0:07:23.400
<v Speaker 1>and and um. Their parents friends sure very much mature

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:25.640
<v Speaker 1>because they're all of the people are most of the

0:07:25.640 --> 0:07:29.720
<v Speaker 1>people are hanging out with our adults. Okay, so that's

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:33.720
<v Speaker 1>the firstborn typically, right, everybody knows it. Don't try to

0:07:33.760 --> 0:07:39.400
<v Speaker 1>deny middles in general are people pleasing? Which is so

0:07:39.480 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 1>my brother. Um, that's weird to me because when I

0:07:42.560 --> 0:07:44.800
<v Speaker 1>think of middle children, I think of jam Brady, and

0:07:44.880 --> 0:07:47.560
<v Speaker 1>jam Brady was not a people pleaser. She was just

0:07:47.680 --> 0:07:51.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, a lump, like a lump with a cloud overhead,

0:07:51.840 --> 0:07:54.960
<v Speaker 1>poor Jan. But that's true, Like I would not characterize

0:07:55.040 --> 0:07:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Jan Brady as a people pleaser, would you know? Like

0:07:58.960 --> 0:08:01.120
<v Speaker 1>she was gonna burn some thing down and eventually if

0:08:01.120 --> 0:08:03.360
<v Speaker 1>the Brady bunchet stayed on the air long enough. Was

0:08:03.400 --> 0:08:06.560
<v Speaker 1>also a blended family. So what was who was the

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:10.680
<v Speaker 1>It was Bobby and then Peter later, I guess you'd

0:08:10.720 --> 0:08:14.520
<v Speaker 1>call it was he was he a people pleaser or

0:08:14.560 --> 0:08:19.960
<v Speaker 1>just a Peter Jan more than Jan. But blended families

0:08:20.000 --> 0:08:22.800
<v Speaker 1>do confound things. We'll get into that for sure. Um.

0:08:22.840 --> 0:08:26.400
<v Speaker 1>But people pleasing, Uh, somewhat rebellious, which is not my

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:29.800
<v Speaker 1>brother at all. Um, large social circle, not really my

0:08:29.880 --> 0:08:33.360
<v Speaker 1>brother and a peacemaker, totally my brother. He's the best,

0:08:33.480 --> 0:08:37.560
<v Speaker 1>He's the best. Uh. And then the young things, younges,

0:08:37.920 --> 0:08:45.600
<v Speaker 1>young uns like us, Um, most free spirited, fun loving, uncomplicated, manipulative.

0:08:47.240 --> 0:08:50.640
<v Speaker 1>I've I've been called some of these things varying degrees,

0:08:51.040 --> 0:08:56.679
<v Speaker 1>self centered, attention seeking and outgoing check and check. But

0:08:56.920 --> 0:08:58.720
<v Speaker 1>on combined you and I and we're sort of like

0:08:58.760 --> 0:09:02.240
<v Speaker 1>the proto youngest complicated. Though I'm like, I don't get that.

0:09:02.360 --> 0:09:06.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm I'm exquisitely complicated on the surface. You wouldn't

0:09:06.760 --> 0:09:09.560
<v Speaker 1>think it, but I'm pretty complicated as we all know

0:09:09.640 --> 0:09:11.520
<v Speaker 1>in this room. But that's the only one that I'm

0:09:11.559 --> 0:09:15.719
<v Speaker 1>like that I question. Yeah. All the rest of them

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:18.280
<v Speaker 1>are like, yeah, that makes sense. Looks like the Chinese zodiac.

0:09:18.480 --> 0:09:20.640
<v Speaker 1>You look at that menu and you're like, um, total

0:09:20.679 --> 0:09:24.480
<v Speaker 1>dog yes, and movie guy pants sounds great right now.

0:09:25.000 --> 0:09:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Only these no siblings. You are what they call almost

0:09:30.000 --> 0:09:34.360
<v Speaker 1>like a super firstborn. All of the traits of the

0:09:34.440 --> 0:09:40.080
<v Speaker 1>firstborn on steroids, very much perfectionists, very much more mature

0:09:40.120 --> 0:09:45.040
<v Speaker 1>for your age, conscientious, diligent, prone to be leader, can

0:09:45.120 --> 0:09:49.679
<v Speaker 1>leap over tall buildings. Uh. And then this is where

0:09:49.679 --> 0:09:52.840
<v Speaker 1>it gets interesting, and this sort of starts to finally, everybody,

0:09:52.880 --> 0:09:54.800
<v Speaker 1>this is where it starts to get interested. Well, this

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:56.920
<v Speaker 1>is where it gets in a little bit like how

0:09:56.960 --> 0:09:59.880
<v Speaker 1>complicated it can get because there's so many factors that

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:04.720
<v Speaker 1>play like Um, what if you're in a blended family,

0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 1>because that kind of throws it all out of whack. Yeah,

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:13.120
<v Speaker 1>if you're born a firstborn and you your parents your

0:10:13.160 --> 0:10:15.120
<v Speaker 1>your parents get divorce and your you go with your

0:10:15.160 --> 0:10:19.000
<v Speaker 1>mom who gets remarried to a dude who has yes

0:10:19.120 --> 0:10:23.120
<v Speaker 1>to a smashing cool architect for sure. Um, and he

0:10:23.240 --> 0:10:27.720
<v Speaker 1>has a kid that's a little older than you. Greg's

0:10:27.760 --> 0:10:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the firstborn. You're not the firstborn anymore. The best you

0:10:31.040 --> 0:10:33.439
<v Speaker 1>can hope for is to form some sort of confederacy

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:36.199
<v Speaker 1>or alliance with Greg to rule the rest of the siblings.

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:38.760
<v Speaker 1>But you're not the head Hans show anymore. You're not

0:10:38.800 --> 0:10:42.120
<v Speaker 1>in charge. That's a big deal. I can't imagine many

0:10:42.160 --> 0:10:45.720
<v Speaker 1>more traumatic experiences, especially when that follows closely on the

0:10:45.760 --> 0:10:48.000
<v Speaker 1>heels of your parents divorced or the death of like

0:10:48.120 --> 0:10:51.199
<v Speaker 1>your other parents. Um, that's got to be one of

0:10:51.240 --> 0:10:53.560
<v Speaker 1>the most traumatic things that kid can go through is

0:10:53.600 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 1>to lose the they're identified perch in the family order. Yeah,

0:10:59.160 --> 0:11:01.720
<v Speaker 1>and that's you were we were talking about, like the firstborn,

0:11:01.960 --> 0:11:03.800
<v Speaker 1>like the baby of the family. If all of a

0:11:03.800 --> 0:11:07.760
<v Speaker 1>sudden there's a younger, no good like I remember my

0:11:07.880 --> 0:11:12.200
<v Speaker 1>parents for some reason talking about adopting a kid. I

0:11:12.240 --> 0:11:14.080
<v Speaker 1>can't remember how old I was. I must have been

0:11:14.120 --> 0:11:18.840
<v Speaker 1>about seven, and I remember breaking down and crying and

0:11:18.920 --> 0:11:22.200
<v Speaker 1>just being like, you can't do this. You cannot bring

0:11:22.240 --> 0:11:26.760
<v Speaker 1>in someone younger and cuter than me, And that happens.

0:11:27.040 --> 0:11:30.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm seven, blended family, all of a sudden, you'd be

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:34.600
<v Speaker 1>a younger or God forbid of baby. Just forget about it.

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:39.439
<v Speaker 1>Can't compete with that. You gotta kill that baby. Well,

0:11:39.480 --> 0:11:42.240
<v Speaker 1>that's what happened to when Brady Bunch started to lose ratings.

0:11:42.440 --> 0:11:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Apparently your family was losing ratings. They brought in cousin Oliver,

0:11:46.840 --> 0:11:48.800
<v Speaker 1>a new baby, and I don't think Bobby was very

0:11:48.800 --> 0:11:51.600
<v Speaker 1>happy about that either. No, but just think about Janet

0:11:51.679 --> 0:11:53.880
<v Speaker 1>all makes a little bit more sense. Like she was like,

0:11:54.040 --> 0:11:56.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm the middle child, and then they brought in three

0:11:56.040 --> 0:11:58.040
<v Speaker 1>more and she was like, I'm even more middle Yeah,

0:11:58.160 --> 0:12:01.280
<v Speaker 1>you're deluded. The middle child is deluded. And if you

0:12:01.280 --> 0:12:05.000
<v Speaker 1>have multiple middle children, forget about it. That's right. However,

0:12:05.160 --> 0:12:07.559
<v Speaker 1>here's the thing with blended families. They say by about

0:12:07.559 --> 0:12:10.320
<v Speaker 1>the age of five that a lot of your personality

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:13.400
<v Speaker 1>is set. So if you're older than five and all

0:12:13.440 --> 0:12:16.320
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden, your family is blended. They say, it

0:12:16.400 --> 0:12:19.440
<v Speaker 1>may not make that much of a difference. No, No No,

0:12:19.720 --> 0:12:22.800
<v Speaker 1>that's where it's trouble. If you're younger than five and

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:25.520
<v Speaker 1>your your personality a little more plastic. If you were

0:12:25.520 --> 0:12:29.560
<v Speaker 1>born a baby of the family and suddenly you're a firstborn,

0:12:29.640 --> 0:12:31.960
<v Speaker 1>or you're not the or you're a middle kid, you'll

0:12:32.000 --> 0:12:34.000
<v Speaker 1>adapt to that a lot better than you would if

0:12:34.040 --> 0:12:36.839
<v Speaker 1>you're like older and you're you're more solid in your

0:12:36.840 --> 0:12:40.040
<v Speaker 1>birth order. Yeah, I didn't mean not trouble. What I

0:12:40.080 --> 0:12:44.560
<v Speaker 1>meant was like, if you're uh like twelve years old

0:12:44.640 --> 0:12:48.520
<v Speaker 1>and the family blending happens, it's trouble, But it's it's

0:12:48.559 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 1>not like your personality is like, all of a sudden,

0:12:51.880 --> 0:12:55.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm the the youngest or you know what I mean. Like,

0:12:55.640 --> 0:12:58.040
<v Speaker 1>you don't all of a sudden swap to a different

0:12:58.360 --> 0:13:00.880
<v Speaker 1>birth order personality, I don't think, right. But if you're

0:13:00.920 --> 0:13:04.000
<v Speaker 1>younger and it happens, you do right under the age

0:13:04.000 --> 0:13:06.320
<v Speaker 1>of five, which goes to show that if this is

0:13:06.360 --> 0:13:08.240
<v Speaker 1>the thing, and we'll talk about whether it is or

0:13:08.240 --> 0:13:12.599
<v Speaker 1>not soon. Um, it has nothing to do with biology,

0:13:12.720 --> 0:13:16.120
<v Speaker 1>has everything to do with with nurture, not nature, because

0:13:16.440 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 1>a kid can adapt depending on When this happens, they

0:13:19.440 --> 0:13:22.120
<v Speaker 1>can adapt to a change in birth order if they're

0:13:22.160 --> 0:13:25.359
<v Speaker 1>young enough. That means it has nothing to do with biology.

0:13:25.400 --> 0:13:29.160
<v Speaker 1>It's all the environment you're raised in, which is the

0:13:29.240 --> 0:13:33.120
<v Speaker 1>most bone headedly obvious thing on the planet. And then

0:13:33.320 --> 0:13:35.760
<v Speaker 1>before we take a break, they are also gap children.

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Um supposedly, if there's at least a five year gap

0:13:38.880 --> 0:13:41.560
<v Speaker 1>between births, then it just sort of resets. That was

0:13:41.600 --> 0:13:43.920
<v Speaker 1>like me and my oldest sister. She was thirteen years

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:48.560
<v Speaker 1>older than me. She was just like this older, cool person,

0:13:48.720 --> 0:13:51.319
<v Speaker 1>but not like an old older sister, not at all

0:13:51.360 --> 0:13:55.880
<v Speaker 1>overbearing for me. I guess a little bit or like

0:13:55.920 --> 0:13:59.280
<v Speaker 1>a second mom kind of to an extent, because that

0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 1>does happen to if there's a big gap or a

0:14:01.800 --> 0:14:04.680
<v Speaker 1>big family. Like I dated a girl in New Jersey

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:06.920
<v Speaker 1>that had there was like six or seven of them,

0:14:07.040 --> 0:14:10.160
<v Speaker 1>and the by the time she came around, she was

0:14:10.480 --> 0:14:14.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of fully being raised by her siblings, right, So,

0:14:14.360 --> 0:14:16.520
<v Speaker 1>so what happens when there's enough of a gap a

0:14:16.640 --> 0:14:19.720
<v Speaker 1>new family birth order forms. So like if you have

0:14:19.800 --> 0:14:23.760
<v Speaker 1>an oldest and then there's multiple years, like say ten

0:14:23.840 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 1>years between your oldest and your middle and then two

0:14:26.920 --> 0:14:29.760
<v Speaker 1>years between your middle and your baby. The middle and

0:14:29.800 --> 0:14:32.160
<v Speaker 1>the baby are going to form a firstborn and a

0:14:32.280 --> 0:14:36.080
<v Speaker 1>last born type relationship. Yeah, the last born is always

0:14:36.120 --> 0:14:39.560
<v Speaker 1>going to be the last born, yes, regardless of gap.

0:14:39.880 --> 0:14:42.680
<v Speaker 1>But then twins, like you were saying, is one last

0:14:42.720 --> 0:14:49.160
<v Speaker 1>confounding thing. The twins or triplets multiples as you call them. Um, yeah,

0:14:49.200 --> 0:14:52.640
<v Speaker 1>I think so. Uh. They form their own family unit

0:14:52.720 --> 0:14:56.400
<v Speaker 1>within the family too, with each other. And apparently no

0:14:56.400 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 1>matter where they're born, twins never act like middle kids.

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:02.560
<v Speaker 1>They always act like the firstborn or the baby, but

0:15:02.720 --> 0:15:06.160
<v Speaker 1>to one another. Right, and I think they generally come

0:15:06.200 --> 0:15:09.520
<v Speaker 1>together to kill the parents basically, right, they hold hands,

0:15:09.520 --> 0:15:12.680
<v Speaker 1>it's like an elevator of blood washes around them. Uh.

0:15:12.720 --> 0:15:17.400
<v Speaker 1>And then finally with adoption, Um, they say that depending

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:19.880
<v Speaker 1>on when your child is adopted, the same kind of

0:15:20.080 --> 0:15:25.760
<v Speaker 1>scenario scenario happens as in like with gapped and blended families. Whereas,

0:15:25.760 --> 0:15:28.600
<v Speaker 1>if the kids young enough here so you will tailor

0:15:29.000 --> 0:15:32.640
<v Speaker 1>there um, their their birth order to the family that

0:15:32.680 --> 0:15:36.120
<v Speaker 1>they're adopted into. But if they're older, they'll be trouble.

0:15:36.720 --> 0:15:38.800
<v Speaker 1>All right, that's a good overview. I think I think

0:15:38.840 --> 0:15:41.920
<v Speaker 1>it was a great overview, Chuck, we're in front of it.

0:15:42.240 --> 0:15:47.400
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna you do have that overview glow. We're gonna

0:15:47.440 --> 0:15:51.000
<v Speaker 1>take a break and we're gonna talk about science right

0:15:51.000 --> 0:16:14.400
<v Speaker 1>after this. Alright, Chuck, as promised, we're gonna talk about

0:16:14.480 --> 0:16:18.240
<v Speaker 1>science because, like I said, this is so boneheaded and

0:16:18.280 --> 0:16:20.520
<v Speaker 1>obvious that every single person who's ever been born into

0:16:20.560 --> 0:16:25.160
<v Speaker 1>a family, everybody knows this stuff. But as far as

0:16:25.200 --> 0:16:29.400
<v Speaker 1>science is concerned, this is not proven that birth order

0:16:29.480 --> 0:16:33.440
<v Speaker 1>effects as they're called, actually exist. That science is saying,

0:16:34.040 --> 0:16:38.280
<v Speaker 1>hold your cell, your role, everybody. We can't actually prove

0:16:38.360 --> 0:16:42.800
<v Speaker 1>that what everybody knows is actually true. Um. Some some

0:16:42.880 --> 0:16:45.200
<v Speaker 1>studies show that, yes, there is such thing as birth

0:16:45.320 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 1>order effects. Other studies show that there is no birth

0:16:48.560 --> 0:16:53.000
<v Speaker 1>order effect whatsoever. And then some studies suggest that if

0:16:53.000 --> 0:16:56.480
<v Speaker 1>there are birth order effects, they're so small that they

0:16:56.560 --> 0:16:58.920
<v Speaker 1>are basically a blip on your personality. That all the

0:16:58.960 --> 0:17:03.400
<v Speaker 1>other factors that form your personality, things like the socioeconomic

0:17:03.480 --> 0:17:06.920
<v Speaker 1>status of the family you're born into, your racial background,

0:17:07.200 --> 0:17:11.919
<v Speaker 1>your um gender, all the other stuff. Um, that is

0:17:11.960 --> 0:17:15.720
<v Speaker 1>what really forms your personality, not the order you're born

0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:19.800
<v Speaker 1>into your family. That's kind of sciences position right now. Yeah,

0:17:19.840 --> 0:17:22.560
<v Speaker 1>But what they all agree on is that it is

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:27.040
<v Speaker 1>therapy cash cow right that that that yes, it's a

0:17:27.080 --> 0:17:30.560
<v Speaker 1>it's a good it's a useful framework to approach psychotherapy

0:17:30.640 --> 0:17:32.600
<v Speaker 1>from it. That's where I want to talk about it.

0:17:33.000 --> 0:17:35.640
<v Speaker 1>At the high hourly rates. See to me, I'm like,

0:17:35.920 --> 0:17:38.840
<v Speaker 1>this is sure, this is exactly what forms your personality.

0:17:38.920 --> 0:17:41.679
<v Speaker 1>But I get sciences position. I respect it. So if

0:17:41.720 --> 0:17:44.320
<v Speaker 1>we go back in time to the early nineteen hundreds,

0:17:44.320 --> 0:17:47.520
<v Speaker 1>there was a man named Alfred Adler. He was a

0:17:47.560 --> 0:17:50.480
<v Speaker 1>part of He was a contemporary of Freud, and this

0:17:50.520 --> 0:17:53.200
<v Speaker 1>is when all these dudes were getting together, uh to

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:55.800
<v Speaker 1>talk about all this stuff in this burgeoning science, and

0:17:56.160 --> 0:17:58.760
<v Speaker 1>they all thought they were so cool and important and

0:17:59.000 --> 0:18:04.919
<v Speaker 1>um he was one of the only ones among his

0:18:05.000 --> 0:18:07.960
<v Speaker 1>peers though at the time, that was talking about birth

0:18:08.080 --> 0:18:11.480
<v Speaker 1>order that early. And he went on to form what

0:18:11.520 --> 0:18:17.159
<v Speaker 1>we know is uh Adlerian psychology or individual psychology, and

0:18:17.200 --> 0:18:21.439
<v Speaker 1>it's basically a therapy based on um, how you perceive

0:18:21.520 --> 0:18:26.000
<v Speaker 1>your own level of power in your family, at your workplace,

0:18:26.000 --> 0:18:29.919
<v Speaker 1>in the world at large in general, like your perceived power,

0:18:30.080 --> 0:18:33.160
<v Speaker 1>place of position or status. Right, yeah, And if he

0:18:33.960 --> 0:18:38.040
<v Speaker 1>believed in birth order having a significant influence on your personality,

0:18:38.119 --> 0:18:40.879
<v Speaker 1>then that in turn would influence how powerful you may

0:18:40.920 --> 0:18:43.240
<v Speaker 1>or may not feel. Yeah, because the addler if if

0:18:43.680 --> 0:18:46.520
<v Speaker 1>how you perceived your own power, not necessarily how powerful

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:49.600
<v Speaker 1>you were, but your own perception of power was the

0:18:49.760 --> 0:18:52.800
<v Speaker 1>driving force of like what how you interact with the

0:18:52.840 --> 0:18:56.840
<v Speaker 1>world your personality. Um birth order would make total sense

0:18:56.880 --> 0:19:01.280
<v Speaker 1>because birth order, as everybody knows, is nothing but positions

0:19:01.280 --> 0:19:05.640
<v Speaker 1>of superiority or inferiority. And it's it's as simple as that.

0:19:05.840 --> 0:19:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Because when you're born and you're a little kid, and

0:19:08.280 --> 0:19:11.080
<v Speaker 1>you're born into a family with an older sibling, they

0:19:11.080 --> 0:19:13.160
<v Speaker 1>are a couple of steps ahead of you because they've

0:19:13.160 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 1>already been through a bunch of stuff, so they're inherently

0:19:16.040 --> 0:19:18.359
<v Speaker 1>superior to you. They can also beat you up on

0:19:18.359 --> 0:19:20.800
<v Speaker 1>a very basic level. They can twist your arm behind

0:19:20.800 --> 0:19:22.680
<v Speaker 1>your back until it feels like it's going to break,

0:19:22.680 --> 0:19:25.800
<v Speaker 1>and how many times you say uncle, uncle, uncle, they

0:19:25.800 --> 0:19:29.600
<v Speaker 1>won't stop until they're satisfied or protect you. Like my

0:19:29.800 --> 0:19:33.360
<v Speaker 1>big brother did from his friends that were jerks to me.

0:19:34.200 --> 0:19:37.160
<v Speaker 1>He wouldn't stand for it. No couples. We went at

0:19:37.160 --> 0:19:39.480
<v Speaker 1>it too, you know, we were brothers, but he never

0:19:39.520 --> 0:19:44.000
<v Speaker 1>picked on me. You know why, because you chuck and

0:19:44.080 --> 0:19:47.760
<v Speaker 1>he's Scott right. Uh. In the eighties is when I

0:19:47.800 --> 0:19:50.800
<v Speaker 1>mean there were always studies starting since Adler and freud Stein,

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:53.680
<v Speaker 1>but in the nineteen eighties is when it really blew up,

0:19:54.080 --> 0:19:59.120
<v Speaker 1>thanks to um, the Big and cocaine, the Big Five

0:19:59.160 --> 0:20:03.760
<v Speaker 1>personality trade the view of things, um, and that's when

0:20:03.800 --> 0:20:06.159
<v Speaker 1>things in the eighties, that's when everybody was just like

0:20:06.240 --> 0:20:08.560
<v Speaker 1>eating the stuff up. Yeah, because so the Big Five

0:20:08.640 --> 0:20:12.639
<v Speaker 1>Personality inventory is We've talked about it before, but basically

0:20:13.119 --> 0:20:17.639
<v Speaker 1>it is a a self reported measure that is actually valid.

0:20:17.680 --> 0:20:20.639
<v Speaker 1>It actually works, like you can say this person is

0:20:20.760 --> 0:20:25.440
<v Speaker 1>highly neurotic, or this person is extroverted, or um, well

0:20:25.720 --> 0:20:27.720
<v Speaker 1>three others that I can't bring to mind right now.

0:20:28.080 --> 0:20:30.800
<v Speaker 1>But these things are also kind of broken into subcategories,

0:20:30.840 --> 0:20:34.439
<v Speaker 1>like these are big umbrella terms have more specific subcategories.

0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:37.800
<v Speaker 1>But it's actually like valid, Like somebody who fills this

0:20:37.880 --> 0:20:40.760
<v Speaker 1>survey out, it's going to be an accurate assessment of

0:20:40.800 --> 0:20:45.520
<v Speaker 1>their personality. So if you have somebody's personality, that's huge, right.

0:20:45.600 --> 0:20:48.560
<v Speaker 1>You can say, all right, um, if this person is neurotic,

0:20:48.600 --> 0:20:51.199
<v Speaker 1>they're highly neurotic. Let's see what birth order they are, Oh,

0:20:51.200 --> 0:20:53.879
<v Speaker 1>they're a middle child. Let's compare them to other middle

0:20:53.960 --> 0:20:57.480
<v Speaker 1>children who filled out this personality survey scored high on neurosis,

0:20:57.520 --> 0:21:00.520
<v Speaker 1>and all of a sudden, we can show if you're

0:21:00.560 --> 0:21:04.359
<v Speaker 1>a middle child, you're far likelier to be highly neurotic

0:21:04.960 --> 0:21:08.840
<v Speaker 1>under the Big Five personality inventory than the first born

0:21:09.000 --> 0:21:12.600
<v Speaker 1>is right, boom bam, you just proved that birth order

0:21:12.600 --> 0:21:18.720
<v Speaker 1>effects exist? Or did you? Yeah, they're like we can

0:21:18.760 --> 0:21:22.640
<v Speaker 1>put people further into a box and label them um

0:21:22.760 --> 0:21:24.800
<v Speaker 1>or did you? Because that is sort of the paradox

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:28.280
<v Speaker 1>that arrived that we arrive at, which is you pointed

0:21:28.359 --> 0:21:30.639
<v Speaker 1>to it a little bit earlier. There are so many,

0:21:31.560 --> 0:21:37.960
<v Speaker 1>so many influences that go into what makes you you that. Uh,

0:21:38.119 --> 0:21:40.240
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to look at birth order as a mere

0:21:40.400 --> 0:21:43.160
<v Speaker 1>small part of that. Yeah, so so like you can't

0:21:43.160 --> 0:21:45.199
<v Speaker 1>account you can account for some of these and studying it.

0:21:46.280 --> 0:21:48.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's a lot of studies over the years

0:21:48.200 --> 0:21:50.840
<v Speaker 1>and they do their best, but you can't account for

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:53.200
<v Speaker 1>all of them. Well okay, so so we'll go back

0:21:53.240 --> 0:21:56.080
<v Speaker 1>to that example. So you've you've just gone to your

0:21:56.200 --> 0:22:00.240
<v Speaker 1>peers and said, look, I have just proven that idle

0:22:00.320 --> 0:22:04.639
<v Speaker 1>children are highly neurotic compared to other children in birth orders. Right,

0:22:05.119 --> 0:22:08.480
<v Speaker 1>then you're shaking your own fists around your your shoulders

0:22:08.480 --> 0:22:10.280
<v Speaker 1>in triumph. And they said, well, wait a minute, wait

0:22:10.280 --> 0:22:14.600
<v Speaker 1>a minute, um, did you control for socioeconomic background? And

0:22:14.640 --> 0:22:17.320
<v Speaker 1>you go, uh no, I didn't. Well wait did you

0:22:17.359 --> 0:22:21.000
<v Speaker 1>control for race? No? Did you control for gender? No?

0:22:21.440 --> 0:22:23.600
<v Speaker 1>And so all of a sudden you realize there's all

0:22:23.640 --> 0:22:28.360
<v Speaker 1>these different, um independent variables. What what what in this

0:22:28.400 --> 0:22:31.159
<v Speaker 1>case would be confounding variables that might actually be the

0:22:31.200 --> 0:22:34.080
<v Speaker 1>thing influencing it. It might be the fact that they

0:22:34.200 --> 0:22:40.520
<v Speaker 1>are um uh feet women born into families of a

0:22:40.600 --> 0:22:45.680
<v Speaker 1>low socioeconomic state that is driving neurosis, that that's actually

0:22:45.720 --> 0:22:47.760
<v Speaker 1>the thing that is driving it, rather than birth order

0:22:47.760 --> 0:22:49.560
<v Speaker 1>has nothing to do with being a middle child. That's

0:22:49.600 --> 0:22:52.760
<v Speaker 1>just a fluke of coincidence. And like you said, there's

0:22:52.800 --> 0:22:56.440
<v Speaker 1>so many confounding variables and so many things that make

0:22:56.440 --> 0:22:59.760
<v Speaker 1>our personalities who we are that some people who are

0:22:59.800 --> 0:23:02.960
<v Speaker 1>like birth order effects do not exist. Basically say that

0:23:03.160 --> 0:23:06.000
<v Speaker 1>any birth order study that shows that they do exist

0:23:06.320 --> 0:23:09.680
<v Speaker 1>has some confounding variable that that's the actual hidden thing

0:23:09.720 --> 0:23:13.320
<v Speaker 1>that's driving it that you can't possibly control for everything

0:23:13.480 --> 0:23:18.240
<v Speaker 1>to make a perfect, perfectly designed experiment too for birth order. Yeah,

0:23:18.240 --> 0:23:20.199
<v Speaker 1>like when you start to think about, like if you

0:23:20.240 --> 0:23:21.960
<v Speaker 1>were just to sit there and sort of jot down

0:23:21.960 --> 0:23:26.440
<v Speaker 1>things as non scientists, just regular schmos like us, uh,

0:23:26.480 --> 0:23:29.080
<v Speaker 1>and just jot down a list of what other factors

0:23:29.160 --> 0:23:31.359
<v Speaker 1>might be at play. We could probably come up with

0:23:31.400 --> 0:23:34.440
<v Speaker 1>a list of a hundred things between us. Let's start now.

0:23:35.760 --> 0:23:37.879
<v Speaker 1>But that would like if I was studying the stuff

0:23:37.920 --> 0:23:39.760
<v Speaker 1>and I started to make that list, I would just

0:23:39.800 --> 0:23:42.240
<v Speaker 1>walk away and go into another line of study. I

0:23:42.280 --> 0:23:44.600
<v Speaker 1>would be like, dude, I just you know where your

0:23:44.600 --> 0:23:47.080
<v Speaker 1>parents married, where they divorced, When did they get divorced?

0:23:47.080 --> 0:23:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Did you like hot dogs? You live with mom or dad?

0:23:48.920 --> 0:23:50.960
<v Speaker 1>How far apart did they live? What could do? Were

0:23:50.960 --> 0:23:53.480
<v Speaker 1>you suburban? Where you urban? Where did you live? In

0:23:53.520 --> 0:23:55.640
<v Speaker 1>an excerpt, did you go up in the woods? Did

0:23:55.640 --> 0:23:59.639
<v Speaker 1>you start work at twelve? Uh? For you like old timing,

0:24:00.520 --> 0:24:03.120
<v Speaker 1>I started work at twelve. I guess I did too.

0:24:03.119 --> 0:24:06.480
<v Speaker 1>I did a paper route. Yeah, how's a bus boy? Um?

0:24:06.480 --> 0:24:08.359
<v Speaker 1>Oh wait? Was that where the guy put his foot

0:24:08.400 --> 0:24:15.960
<v Speaker 1>into the what a criminal? I told you? That's a title? Max.

0:24:15.960 --> 0:24:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Now that restaurant drove but not too long ago. J

0:24:20.440 --> 0:24:23.920
<v Speaker 1>J's barbecue title Max. Now they're putting their foot on titles,

0:24:24.760 --> 0:24:28.240
<v Speaker 1>just stomping on them. They got your money, your money,

0:24:28.400 --> 0:24:31.880
<v Speaker 1>your real money. They're never gonna sponsor us. Now. Um,

0:24:31.920 --> 0:24:37.080
<v Speaker 1>another few things that can confound these studies, um are

0:24:37.160 --> 0:24:40.280
<v Speaker 1>things and and Ed helped us put this research together,

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:44.560
<v Speaker 1>things like demographic shifts. So he gave a great example

0:24:44.600 --> 0:24:46.679
<v Speaker 1>of like the baby boom, if there's a big population

0:24:46.720 --> 0:24:51.760
<v Speaker 1>bulge that also coincides with a lot of other stuff. Um.

0:24:51.840 --> 0:24:55.840
<v Speaker 1>And the example he's was prevalence of cigarette smoking. Uh,

0:24:55.880 --> 0:24:58.600
<v Speaker 1>there may be a false correlation there between being a

0:24:58.640 --> 0:25:02.600
<v Speaker 1>firstborn and smoking, whereas if you were second born twelve

0:25:02.680 --> 0:25:06.400
<v Speaker 1>years later. I guess that would fall outside that range

0:25:06.440 --> 0:25:10.000
<v Speaker 1>though of gap child. Um, But that's even more confounding.

0:25:10.040 --> 0:25:13.359
<v Speaker 1>The points still valid. Sure that, like there's just way

0:25:13.400 --> 0:25:17.359
<v Speaker 1>more firstborns who smoked than second borns, But that's because

0:25:17.760 --> 0:25:20.040
<v Speaker 1>smoking was more prevalent when there were a bunch of

0:25:20.119 --> 0:25:22.919
<v Speaker 1>kids born who were all of the same cohort and

0:25:22.960 --> 0:25:26.440
<v Speaker 1>all firstborns. Right, That's just one of the ways this

0:25:26.480 --> 0:25:29.680
<v Speaker 1>thing can be confounded. Yeah, this one really speaks to me.

0:25:29.760 --> 0:25:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Which is labeled as growth. When a birth order effect

0:25:33.600 --> 0:25:37.239
<v Speaker 1>does appear, it is strongest when they subject is with

0:25:37.359 --> 0:25:41.840
<v Speaker 1>their siblings, when you're a family reunion, it is so

0:25:42.240 --> 0:25:45.600
<v Speaker 1>funny how that happens. I see myself do it. Like

0:25:46.760 --> 0:25:50.720
<v Speaker 1>good example, I turned for a couple of weeks ago

0:25:51.440 --> 0:25:53.520
<v Speaker 1>my family and my sister and her husband happened to

0:25:53.560 --> 0:25:56.399
<v Speaker 1>be in town. Didn't come for that, but we were

0:25:56.440 --> 0:25:58.040
<v Speaker 1>texting and I was like, hey, let's all you know,

0:25:58.400 --> 0:26:00.840
<v Speaker 1>this is great, let's all go out to dinner. She's like, oh,

0:26:00.920 --> 0:26:02.919
<v Speaker 1>I didn't want to. I just figured you wouldn't want

0:26:02.960 --> 0:26:04.760
<v Speaker 1>to spend your birthday with your friend. You'd want to

0:26:04.760 --> 0:26:06.439
<v Speaker 1>spend your birthday with your friends and not your family.

0:26:07.000 --> 0:26:08.720
<v Speaker 1>And I saw Michelle when she got in town and

0:26:08.720 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 1>she said the same thing in person. I was like, dude,

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:13.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm forty eight. It's like I'm not twenty two year

0:26:13.440 --> 0:26:17.639
<v Speaker 1>old chuck burnout like I used to be. And she

0:26:17.760 --> 0:26:20.240
<v Speaker 1>just sort of laughed. But that's a perfect example of how, like,

0:26:21.119 --> 0:26:23.879
<v Speaker 1>no matter what happens in my life, I will always

0:26:23.920 --> 0:26:26.879
<v Speaker 1>be the baby, and she will probably feel like she

0:26:26.920 --> 0:26:30.680
<v Speaker 1>has to look out for me, which is a nice feeling. Um.

0:26:31.000 --> 0:26:35.360
<v Speaker 1>I see Emily fall into patterns with her family. Uh, well,

0:26:35.440 --> 0:26:39.920
<v Speaker 1>she is a She's an interesting case because she wasn't

0:26:39.960 --> 0:26:43.280
<v Speaker 1>only and then has a half brother and a half sister.

0:26:44.240 --> 0:26:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Her dad. Yeah, her dad went and had a son

0:26:47.520 --> 0:26:52.040
<v Speaker 1>with another woman, and then her mom got married to

0:26:52.720 --> 0:26:56.160
<v Speaker 1>her father in law, Steve, who already had a daughter. Um,

0:26:56.240 --> 0:26:58.239
<v Speaker 1>so it's a sort of a weird mix. But I

0:26:58.280 --> 0:27:00.919
<v Speaker 1>just mean in general, not even with siblings, you know,

0:27:01.000 --> 0:27:03.720
<v Speaker 1>just in how their family dynamic is She's a different

0:27:03.720 --> 0:27:06.600
<v Speaker 1>person when we go over there. Yeah, I think it happens.

0:27:06.640 --> 0:27:12.840
<v Speaker 1>I think everybody is around their family. It's so strange. Um.

0:27:12.880 --> 0:27:15.520
<v Speaker 1>So this is when it sort of started me down

0:27:15.560 --> 0:27:18.960
<v Speaker 1>the path of like what is personality? Is it a

0:27:19.840 --> 0:27:24.639
<v Speaker 1>is a personality trait? Is it this just? Is it

0:27:24.680 --> 0:27:28.720
<v Speaker 1>repeated behaviors? Is it a set of behaviors? Like? Is

0:27:28.760 --> 0:27:31.639
<v Speaker 1>that personality? Are you asking me? Yeah? I mean I

0:27:31.640 --> 0:27:33.960
<v Speaker 1>don't even know, Like what is personality? We should do

0:27:34.000 --> 0:27:35.920
<v Speaker 1>a show on that, Oh, we totally should. But from

0:27:35.920 --> 0:27:38.960
<v Speaker 1>what I understand, just kind of briefly put it, personality

0:27:39.000 --> 0:27:42.600
<v Speaker 1>is the kind of predictable way that you'll react to

0:27:42.680 --> 0:27:45.800
<v Speaker 1>the world. Right. Is it easy for somebody to press

0:27:45.800 --> 0:27:49.840
<v Speaker 1>your buttons? Um? Are you laid back? Are you? Like?

0:27:49.920 --> 0:27:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Could somebody? However, if somebody were presented with that, and

0:27:53.720 --> 0:27:58.320
<v Speaker 1>this is going terribly if somebody were presented with a uh,

0:27:58.640 --> 0:28:02.080
<v Speaker 1>like an event in life. Okay, you could say Josh

0:28:02.119 --> 0:28:06.400
<v Speaker 1>and probably respond to like that, that's a personality, right,

0:28:06.440 --> 0:28:09.840
<v Speaker 1>But is that something inherent or is it birth order?

0:28:10.760 --> 0:28:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Is it just a collection of learned behavior. I think

0:28:12.760 --> 0:28:15.840
<v Speaker 1>it's a collection of learned and reinforced behaviors too. If

0:28:15.840 --> 0:28:17.760
<v Speaker 1>you're told you're the baby of the family all the time,

0:28:17.880 --> 0:28:19.800
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna act like the baby of the family. You're

0:28:19.840 --> 0:28:23.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna act self centers, You're gonna act manipulative. It's reinforced.

0:28:23.359 --> 0:28:26.880
<v Speaker 1>If you're told, um, you uh, you can do anything.

0:28:28.000 --> 0:28:29.840
<v Speaker 1>You can you can go out and do anything. You

0:28:29.880 --> 0:28:32.240
<v Speaker 1>can literally walk through walls because someone told you to.

0:28:32.320 --> 0:28:35.520
<v Speaker 1>They reinforced that behavior. But I think that's a personality

0:28:35.520 --> 0:28:37.760
<v Speaker 1>is and this is just me talking. I also believe

0:28:37.800 --> 0:28:41.040
<v Speaker 1>in birth order effects, by the way, but I think

0:28:41.080 --> 0:28:45.840
<v Speaker 1>that that is it's it's learned and reinforced, which means

0:28:45.840 --> 0:28:50.920
<v Speaker 1>it can be unlearned. You can learn to be different. Yeah.

0:28:51.080 --> 0:28:53.120
<v Speaker 1>At that same birthday dinner, I picked up the check

0:28:53.160 --> 0:28:57.280
<v Speaker 1>for everyone and there was a bit of a not

0:28:57.320 --> 0:28:59.560
<v Speaker 1>an argument, let me struggle. My mom and I were,

0:28:59.800 --> 0:29:01.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of off to the side with the

0:29:01.480 --> 0:29:05.160
<v Speaker 1>people who worked there doing the credit card battle, and

0:29:05.320 --> 0:29:07.600
<v Speaker 1>she she wasn't super happy and I should have just

0:29:07.680 --> 0:29:10.920
<v Speaker 1>let her pay. But it's part of that thing, like

0:29:10.960 --> 0:29:13.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm the baby of the family and I kind of

0:29:13.040 --> 0:29:15.360
<v Speaker 1>just finally told a seck. Listen, mom, it's like it's

0:29:15.360 --> 0:29:18.760
<v Speaker 1>my turn to pay. You know, I'm not the baby anymore.

0:29:18.800 --> 0:29:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Like quit writing me a check for a hundred dollars

0:29:21.040 --> 0:29:25.080
<v Speaker 1>on my birthday? Do you do you catch this? I

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:27.760
<v Speaker 1>mean I generally just put it in my kid's bank account.

0:29:27.800 --> 0:29:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Oh that's a good thing. You know, we don't catch

0:29:30.200 --> 0:29:31.920
<v Speaker 1>because also don't want to take away the joy that

0:29:31.960 --> 0:29:35.480
<v Speaker 1>she gets from writing me that. That's not cool. It's

0:29:35.480 --> 0:29:37.040
<v Speaker 1>like I don't need that from her, but like that's

0:29:37.080 --> 0:29:41.560
<v Speaker 1>what brings her joy. Giving you money. It's complicated. So

0:29:41.680 --> 0:29:43.920
<v Speaker 1>let me teach you a little a little trick. Okay,

0:29:44.000 --> 0:29:45.560
<v Speaker 1>if you don't want to get into that tussle, if

0:29:45.600 --> 0:29:47.600
<v Speaker 1>you just wanted to be done, sorry, it's too late.

0:29:48.280 --> 0:29:50.840
<v Speaker 1>When you order, When you hand the menu back to

0:29:50.840 --> 0:29:53.880
<v Speaker 1>the server, just have beholding your credit card with your

0:29:53.920 --> 0:29:57.760
<v Speaker 1>thumb and give him a look. It's universal. They all know,

0:29:58.240 --> 0:30:00.400
<v Speaker 1>and they'll take it and be like, and you got

0:30:00.440 --> 0:30:03.040
<v Speaker 1>to first. Nobody else does that. They always wait and

0:30:03.080 --> 0:30:05.560
<v Speaker 1>they pretend to go to the bathroom, like after everybody's done.

0:30:05.560 --> 0:30:08.680
<v Speaker 1>It so obvious. You gotta start before the food even comes,

0:30:08.720 --> 0:30:10.600
<v Speaker 1>before the drinks even come. You know what I did

0:30:12.000 --> 0:30:15.120
<v Speaker 1>when we got to the restaurant. The very first thing

0:30:15.160 --> 0:30:17.680
<v Speaker 1>I did was go up to the manager while everyone

0:30:17.720 --> 0:30:20.600
<v Speaker 1>was being seated, said, listen, dude, my mom's going to

0:30:20.680 --> 0:30:23.000
<v Speaker 1>try and pay, or one of these other chumps in

0:30:23.040 --> 0:30:24.920
<v Speaker 1>my family is going to try and pay. It's like,

0:30:24.920 --> 0:30:27.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't want any of them paying. It's like twelve people.

0:30:27.480 --> 0:30:30.240
<v Speaker 1>I picked the place. I picked a nicer place. It's

0:30:30.280 --> 0:30:32.360
<v Speaker 1>like I don't want to do that. And I was like, so,

0:30:32.480 --> 0:30:35.600
<v Speaker 1>just here's my credit card. Please make sure that the

0:30:35.640 --> 0:30:38.880
<v Speaker 1>server there's no battle. They didn't follow your orders. No,

0:30:39.080 --> 0:30:44.080
<v Speaker 1>because my mom she tried to jump me later on

0:30:44.120 --> 0:30:46.720
<v Speaker 1>the side and didn't realize I had already jumped her.

0:30:46.840 --> 0:30:48.760
<v Speaker 1>So it should have been done, I know. But then

0:30:48.840 --> 0:30:51.760
<v Speaker 1>we went over there. He was like, listen, man, your

0:30:51.760 --> 0:30:54.320
<v Speaker 1>mom is over here now, like she's the mom. We

0:30:54.400 --> 0:30:57.480
<v Speaker 1>generally side with the parents on this stuff. What place

0:30:57.640 --> 0:31:01.080
<v Speaker 1>was this? It was just a restaurant. I demand to know.

0:31:01.360 --> 0:31:04.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm mad. My move should have just trumped all moves

0:31:04.520 --> 0:31:06.480
<v Speaker 1>because it was no, I agree, and that's what I

0:31:06.520 --> 0:31:08.960
<v Speaker 1>basically said. And I was like, listen, man, I was like,

0:31:09.000 --> 0:31:11.200
<v Speaker 1>there are factors at play here that I don't want

0:31:11.200 --> 0:31:14.320
<v Speaker 1>to talk about. It's like just please, And my mom

0:31:14.360 --> 0:31:17.440
<v Speaker 1>got a little mad and then that's I blame this manager.

0:31:18.280 --> 0:31:20.920
<v Speaker 1>I think you should expose them. Well, I'm glad it

0:31:20.960 --> 0:31:24.080
<v Speaker 1>all worked out in the end. Man, should we take

0:31:24.080 --> 0:31:28.880
<v Speaker 1>a break? I thought we were right now, all right,

0:31:28.920 --> 0:31:51.160
<v Speaker 1>we'll be back right after this. All right, we're back, Chuck.

0:31:51.800 --> 0:31:54.360
<v Speaker 1>And like we said, we showed science is kind of

0:31:54.400 --> 0:31:57.040
<v Speaker 1>like we're not quite sure about the birth order effect.

0:31:57.320 --> 0:32:01.600
<v Speaker 1>That hasn't kept like a whole cottage field of psychology

0:32:01.680 --> 0:32:04.960
<v Speaker 1>and continuing since the eighties basically NonStop. Like if you

0:32:05.000 --> 0:32:09.200
<v Speaker 1>go look at birth birth order effects, there's it's very rare.

0:32:09.200 --> 0:32:11.520
<v Speaker 1>You're going to run into anything that says like this

0:32:11.600 --> 0:32:13.920
<v Speaker 1>is all b s. Most of it's like, yeah, this

0:32:14.000 --> 0:32:17.200
<v Speaker 1>is true. Everybody knows it. Um. There have been some

0:32:17.320 --> 0:32:22.360
<v Speaker 1>like prominent people in favor of like like let's say, yes,

0:32:22.360 --> 0:32:24.400
<v Speaker 1>there is such thing as birth effects. And there was

0:32:24.440 --> 0:32:27.760
<v Speaker 1>one guy in particular, um who made a big splash

0:32:27.800 --> 0:32:33.600
<v Speaker 1>in with a book called Born to Rebel. Yeah, Frank Soloway,

0:32:33.760 --> 0:32:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Frank J. Soloway, if you want to be fancy about it.

0:32:36.640 --> 0:32:39.840
<v Speaker 1>And he got a MacArthur Genius grant to kind of

0:32:39.880 --> 0:32:42.000
<v Speaker 1>study this and write about it, and he did. He

0:32:42.000 --> 0:32:45.160
<v Speaker 1>wrote a book called Born to Rebel. It was about

0:32:45.160 --> 0:32:47.560
<v Speaker 1>birth order, and the whole premise of the book was

0:32:47.920 --> 0:32:52.280
<v Speaker 1>he looked at scientific revolutions throughout the ages. It's pretty interesting,

0:32:52.400 --> 0:32:57.160
<v Speaker 1>identified which scientists were on which side of it, either

0:32:57.440 --> 0:33:02.080
<v Speaker 1>in support of this revolutionary thinking or opposed to it,

0:33:02.160 --> 0:33:04.680
<v Speaker 1>meaning that they were in favor of keeping the status quo,

0:33:05.040 --> 0:33:07.920
<v Speaker 1>and then determined what birth order they had. And he

0:33:08.040 --> 0:33:12.240
<v Speaker 1>found after this study, which is really that's a that's

0:33:12.320 --> 0:33:14.520
<v Speaker 1>it was a big study he did. It was a

0:33:14.600 --> 0:33:17.560
<v Speaker 1>pretty a lot of legwork, in a lot of research. Um,

0:33:17.600 --> 0:33:21.320
<v Speaker 1>he determined that first borns are much more likely to

0:33:21.400 --> 0:33:25.560
<v Speaker 1>support the status quo, whereas second borns are later borns

0:33:25.560 --> 0:33:29.200
<v Speaker 1>he calls them are um much more likely to support

0:33:29.280 --> 0:33:33.160
<v Speaker 1>revolutionary thinking. Yeah. And just one example, as far as

0:33:33.320 --> 0:33:36.960
<v Speaker 1>uh he used Darwinism. He said later borns between eighteen

0:33:37.000 --> 0:33:40.520
<v Speaker 1>fifty nine and eighteen seventy five were four point six

0:33:40.560 --> 0:33:45.160
<v Speaker 1>times more likely than first borns two uh support Darwinism,

0:33:45.480 --> 0:33:49.320
<v Speaker 1>yeah thinking, Yeah, yeah, so yeah, and that was one

0:33:49.360 --> 0:33:52.160
<v Speaker 1>of many examples that I think there were um a

0:33:52.240 --> 0:33:57.480
<v Speaker 1>hundred and twenty one historical events with sixty individuals either

0:33:57.560 --> 0:33:59.600
<v Speaker 1>supporting or opposing him. So it was a big, big

0:33:59.640 --> 0:34:02.000
<v Speaker 1>work for sure. Yeah. And one of his uh, I

0:34:02.040 --> 0:34:04.240
<v Speaker 1>mean he he puts some reasoning behind it too, He's

0:34:04.360 --> 0:34:07.840
<v Speaker 1>he was like, uh, if you're later born, you might

0:34:08.320 --> 0:34:11.040
<v Speaker 1>have a hard time competing with your older who might

0:34:11.080 --> 0:34:13.239
<v Speaker 1>have a tighter bond with the parents, maybe, And so

0:34:13.400 --> 0:34:17.360
<v Speaker 1>that sort of symbolically forces you as to be almost

0:34:17.400 --> 0:34:19.840
<v Speaker 1>an outsider within your own family, so you may be

0:34:19.920 --> 0:34:24.040
<v Speaker 1>more prone to join up with an outsider opinion right

0:34:24.080 --> 0:34:26.839
<v Speaker 1>to go look outside of the family union and all

0:34:26.880 --> 0:34:29.840
<v Speaker 1>of the values and the ideas that it holds to

0:34:29.840 --> 0:34:32.719
<v Speaker 1>to make your own mark in order to get attention

0:34:32.800 --> 0:34:35.960
<v Speaker 1>or support or whatever from your parents. Whereas if you're firstborn,

0:34:36.280 --> 0:34:38.279
<v Speaker 1>you just got the the easiest thing to do is

0:34:38.320 --> 0:34:41.280
<v Speaker 1>to just fall in line with your parents and hence

0:34:41.440 --> 0:34:45.520
<v Speaker 1>support the status quo. It makes sense, but um, born

0:34:45.560 --> 0:34:49.359
<v Speaker 1>to a Belle was was torn apart by some scientists.

0:34:49.440 --> 0:34:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Sure it is like this is just pure pop psychology tripe. Um.

0:34:54.200 --> 0:34:56.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that's an unfair characterization of it like, the

0:34:56.640 --> 0:34:59.280
<v Speaker 1>guy worked for basically twenty something years on this stuff,

0:34:59.280 --> 0:35:02.279
<v Speaker 1>and in it was a very robust study. One of

0:35:02.320 --> 0:35:04.600
<v Speaker 1>the pitfalls that he seemed to have run into, though,

0:35:05.080 --> 0:35:11.160
<v Speaker 1>was he was analyzing historical figures um, which is really

0:35:11.280 --> 0:35:16.120
<v Speaker 1>sticky stuff like like this. You can't analyze people even

0:35:16.160 --> 0:35:19.640
<v Speaker 1>from afar, even if they're contemporary, let alone they've been

0:35:19.640 --> 0:35:22.360
<v Speaker 1>dead for a couple of hundred years, So to base

0:35:22.440 --> 0:35:24.640
<v Speaker 1>it on that is kind of is kind of difficult

0:35:24.640 --> 0:35:27.640
<v Speaker 1>and tricky. But I just want to say he worked

0:35:27.640 --> 0:35:31.840
<v Speaker 1>really hard on. Another part plucked from his research I

0:35:31.840 --> 0:35:34.799
<v Speaker 1>thought was pretty interesting was the idea that part of

0:35:34.840 --> 0:35:39.279
<v Speaker 1>this um less rebellious nature of a firstborn might be

0:35:39.360 --> 0:35:43.000
<v Speaker 1>due to the long standing but now sort of antiquated

0:35:43.040 --> 0:35:48.160
<v Speaker 1>practice of uh primogeniture, which is, the firstborn gets the inheritance,

0:35:48.520 --> 0:35:52.960
<v Speaker 1>so they're more likely, just through thousands of years of this,

0:35:53.520 --> 0:35:57.399
<v Speaker 1>more inclined to like not ruffle the feathers of the parents, right,

0:35:57.440 --> 0:36:00.480
<v Speaker 1>And then the later borns who are like, I've got

0:36:00.480 --> 0:36:03.760
<v Speaker 1>basically zero chance of inheriting the family titles in a state,

0:36:03.960 --> 0:36:05.600
<v Speaker 1>I'll just go do my own thing. I don't have

0:36:05.640 --> 0:36:07.680
<v Speaker 1>to fall in line. That makes sense as well, uh

0:36:07.719 --> 0:36:10.600
<v Speaker 1>And the other interesting thing with that is another factor

0:36:10.760 --> 0:36:13.680
<v Speaker 1>was the removal of a child from a family. He's

0:36:13.680 --> 0:36:16.680
<v Speaker 1>found that a later born who was removed from the

0:36:16.719 --> 0:36:19.880
<v Speaker 1>family and reared by a relative will end up behaving

0:36:19.920 --> 0:36:22.799
<v Speaker 1>like a typical firstborn. And again I'm assuming if that's

0:36:22.880 --> 0:36:25.080
<v Speaker 1>under the age of like five, but I wonder so

0:36:25.160 --> 0:36:28.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering if that just is supported by other research,

0:36:28.640 --> 0:36:33.080
<v Speaker 1>or if all of the parenting magazine articles that mentioned

0:36:33.600 --> 0:36:36.920
<v Speaker 1>that whole you know, the personality is tailored is really

0:36:36.960 --> 0:36:39.520
<v Speaker 1>just citing that work. Because that's one of the big

0:36:39.560 --> 0:36:43.319
<v Speaker 1>problems with pop psychology in general, is it's self reinforcing.

0:36:43.320 --> 0:36:45.640
<v Speaker 1>One person says one thing and it gets picked up

0:36:45.640 --> 0:36:47.400
<v Speaker 1>by a bunch of people and they're all pointing to

0:36:47.480 --> 0:36:50.520
<v Speaker 1>the same thing. But since so many of them are pointing,

0:36:51.080 --> 0:36:52.960
<v Speaker 1>there's so many of them out there doing the pointing,

0:36:53.239 --> 0:36:56.319
<v Speaker 1>it seems like it's a very robust and like um,

0:36:56.480 --> 0:36:59.120
<v Speaker 1>widespread body of work, when really it was just one

0:36:59.200 --> 0:37:02.319
<v Speaker 1>study that said one thing that everybody's sighting. Well. Yeah,

0:37:02.400 --> 0:37:05.240
<v Speaker 1>like in his case, he likes to site this Norwegian study.

0:37:05.920 --> 0:37:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Uh it found a difference of two point three i

0:37:07.920 --> 0:37:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Q points between first and second born children. UH sample

0:37:12.600 --> 0:37:16.640
<v Speaker 1>size of two one subjects, it is big, but then

0:37:16.800 --> 0:37:18.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, ed sort of brings up a good point

0:37:18.440 --> 0:37:21.320
<v Speaker 1>like okay, maybe, but like is the two point three

0:37:21.760 --> 0:37:25.799
<v Speaker 1>first of all i Q test or problematic for like

0:37:26.040 --> 0:37:30.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of reasons possibly bunk, But even if they're not,

0:37:30.800 --> 0:37:33.440
<v Speaker 1>is a two point three IQ point difference even meaningful

0:37:34.080 --> 0:37:38.160
<v Speaker 1>enough to be like, well look two points So no,

0:37:38.320 --> 0:37:42.080
<v Speaker 1>it's it's not meaningful in that, like you know, that

0:37:42.120 --> 0:37:45.000
<v Speaker 1>doesn't that's gonna lead to any like closed doors or

0:37:45.040 --> 0:37:47.760
<v Speaker 1>open doors or anything. That's just such a narrow difference.

0:37:48.200 --> 0:37:50.600
<v Speaker 1>But if that's like an average, and it's it is

0:37:50.680 --> 0:37:55.480
<v Speaker 1>found across you know, first borns and later boards like

0:37:55.480 --> 0:37:58.400
<v Speaker 1>like in a very large population like that, it is,

0:37:58.600 --> 0:38:00.520
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't make you wonder like what what would that

0:38:00.560 --> 0:38:03.279
<v Speaker 1>come from? It does raise more questions, you know what

0:38:03.320 --> 0:38:05.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean. So, yeah, it's an insignificant difference as far

0:38:05.680 --> 0:38:08.719
<v Speaker 1>as like actual intelligence goes, but it does suggest that

0:38:08.760 --> 0:38:11.520
<v Speaker 1>there's something weird going on there that does have to

0:38:11.560 --> 0:38:13.800
<v Speaker 1>do with birth order. Well, I guess that brings this

0:38:13.920 --> 0:38:17.600
<v Speaker 1>to this really interesting thing that I had never heard

0:38:17.640 --> 0:38:22.200
<v Speaker 1>of before. Had you heard of this fraternal birth order

0:38:22.320 --> 0:38:27.239
<v Speaker 1>effect um, which is basically the idea, and a lot

0:38:27.280 --> 0:38:31.760
<v Speaker 1>of studies have backed this up. Meta analysis of tons

0:38:31.760 --> 0:38:34.839
<v Speaker 1>of studies have backed this up. The idea is that

0:38:34.880 --> 0:38:41.560
<v Speaker 1>if you have multiple boys in your family, each successive

0:38:41.760 --> 0:38:45.440
<v Speaker 1>boy that's born, and this is if it's just boys,

0:38:46.080 --> 0:38:51.359
<v Speaker 1>has a higher chance of being gay. Right. I didn't

0:38:51.400 --> 0:38:52.920
<v Speaker 1>think And when I first saw that was like, that

0:38:52.960 --> 0:38:55.000
<v Speaker 1>can't be real, right, And then I did a lot

0:38:55.040 --> 0:38:57.000
<v Speaker 1>more poking around. I was like, Wow, it is real.

0:38:57.160 --> 0:38:59.239
<v Speaker 1>The statistics sort of bear it out. Yeah. If there's

0:38:59.320 --> 0:39:02.920
<v Speaker 1>if there's a big um disagreement about whether actual just

0:39:03.040 --> 0:39:07.520
<v Speaker 1>regular birth order effects exist, this one is much more

0:39:07.560 --> 0:39:11.400
<v Speaker 1>supported by the data. This the fraternal birth order effect,

0:39:11.960 --> 0:39:15.480
<v Speaker 1>and so much so that there is a sexologist, which

0:39:15.520 --> 0:39:17.239
<v Speaker 1>if that were my field of study, I'd be like,

0:39:17.360 --> 0:39:21.480
<v Speaker 1>call me sexologist Josh please. Um, I can't find his name?

0:39:21.560 --> 0:39:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Is Ray something he said and I'm not sure what

0:39:24.280 --> 0:39:27.040
<v Speaker 1>he was basing this on, but he said that, Um,

0:39:27.640 --> 0:39:32.600
<v Speaker 1>there is a increase of thirty three percent in likelihood

0:39:32.600 --> 0:39:36.200
<v Speaker 1>that you will be gay with each additional older brother

0:39:36.320 --> 0:39:39.160
<v Speaker 1>you have. Now, so that means if you are born

0:39:39.160 --> 0:39:41.520
<v Speaker 1>into a family and you're the youngest of four brothers,

0:39:41.760 --> 0:39:44.200
<v Speaker 1>did this math, what does that mean? Because I know

0:39:44.719 --> 0:39:49.080
<v Speaker 1>these people like family zero percent chance, I guess that

0:39:49.000 --> 0:39:53.360
<v Speaker 1>that you are going to be um hetero, That that

0:39:53.480 --> 0:39:56.800
<v Speaker 1>that you're a hundred percent chance going to be gay? Right, Well,

0:39:57.200 --> 0:39:59.600
<v Speaker 1>how many it could be a hundred and six? It

0:39:59.680 --> 0:40:02.560
<v Speaker 1>just going right, Yeah, I think that can't be right.

0:40:02.600 --> 0:40:04.799
<v Speaker 1>Eventually you become so gay you pop out the other

0:40:04.840 --> 0:40:09.560
<v Speaker 1>side and you're straight because you have like ten brothers. Well,

0:40:09.600 --> 0:40:13.360
<v Speaker 1>I did see that meta analysis of multiple multiple studies

0:40:13.360 --> 0:40:19.839
<v Speaker 1>indicated that between fifteen and of gay males oh their

0:40:19.880 --> 0:40:24.279
<v Speaker 1>sexual orientation to this effect supposedly, okay, so so, and

0:40:24.360 --> 0:40:26.319
<v Speaker 1>we should say there are some studies that have not

0:40:26.440 --> 0:40:28.400
<v Speaker 1>found this. There was a big one that had There

0:40:28.440 --> 0:40:31.680
<v Speaker 1>was like a survey of British young men that that

0:40:31.800 --> 0:40:34.239
<v Speaker 1>surveyed like eleven thousand of them or whatever and did

0:40:34.239 --> 0:40:37.400
<v Speaker 1>not find this. But so many studies have found it

0:40:37.920 --> 0:40:40.839
<v Speaker 1>that science is like this, this actually might be a thing,

0:40:40.840 --> 0:40:43.040
<v Speaker 1>and we're not quite sure what it is. And at

0:40:43.080 --> 0:40:48.320
<v Speaker 1>first they explained it that the the more boys there are,

0:40:49.080 --> 0:40:52.440
<v Speaker 1>the less social pressure there are for you to be

0:40:52.840 --> 0:40:57.799
<v Speaker 1>like hetero and um and responsible for carrying on the

0:40:57.800 --> 0:41:01.800
<v Speaker 1>family line, like after two three brothers, who are gonna

0:41:01.920 --> 0:41:04.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, carry on the family line, go go crazy,

0:41:04.080 --> 0:41:06.239
<v Speaker 1>go do what you want, and that that was the

0:41:06.280 --> 0:41:09.960
<v Speaker 1>idea behind why it became likelier that you would be

0:41:09.960 --> 0:41:12.600
<v Speaker 1>gay if you had more older brothers. There's a couple

0:41:12.600 --> 0:41:16.160
<v Speaker 1>of things with that kind of suggests that like um

0:41:16.200 --> 0:41:18.320
<v Speaker 1>being gay or not as a choice, or being straight

0:41:18.400 --> 0:41:22.440
<v Speaker 1>or not as a choice rather than something biological whatever,

0:41:23.440 --> 0:41:25.680
<v Speaker 1>that has kind of gone out the window. With another

0:41:25.800 --> 0:41:28.680
<v Speaker 1>really surprising finding that has to do with handedness that

0:41:29.000 --> 0:41:33.040
<v Speaker 1>really undermines that whole idea. Yeah, so this is so

0:41:33.920 --> 0:41:37.920
<v Speaker 1>just mind blowing and interesting. So the increase and probability

0:41:37.960 --> 0:41:41.920
<v Speaker 1>of a boy becoming gay is only only if that

0:41:41.960 --> 0:41:46.720
<v Speaker 1>boy is right handed handed. Yep, so if you're left handed.

0:41:46.760 --> 0:41:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Among left handed men, there was no statistical difference and

0:41:50.080 --> 0:41:53.799
<v Speaker 1>the incidents of homosexuality even if you've got a thousand brothers.

0:41:53.840 --> 0:41:56.840
<v Speaker 1>And the weird thing about that is that they've found

0:41:57.080 --> 0:41:59.680
<v Speaker 1>if you are taking birth order out of the equation,

0:42:00.160 --> 0:42:03.440
<v Speaker 1>if you are left handed, there's a slightly higher incidence

0:42:03.800 --> 0:42:08.239
<v Speaker 1>of um being gay, just period, Yes, for for being

0:42:08.280 --> 0:42:10.920
<v Speaker 1>left handed, and that's with um men and women apparently.

0:42:11.520 --> 0:42:15.040
<v Speaker 1>UM So the idea that that not only does it

0:42:15.120 --> 0:42:18.440
<v Speaker 1>not make you more likely to be gay, and as

0:42:18.480 --> 0:42:21.640
<v Speaker 1>far as fraternal birth order is concerned, it actually negates

0:42:21.680 --> 0:42:26.440
<v Speaker 1>the effects of fraternal birth order. It shows that that

0:42:26.440 --> 0:42:28.960
<v Speaker 1>that social pressure from brothers doesn't have anything to do

0:42:29.000 --> 0:42:31.919
<v Speaker 1>with it, because a right handed or a left handed

0:42:31.960 --> 0:42:33.520
<v Speaker 1>kid is not going to be under any more or

0:42:33.600 --> 0:42:37.160
<v Speaker 1>less social pressure from older brothers to be straight. Um,

0:42:38.160 --> 0:42:40.680
<v Speaker 1>that makes zero sense whatsoever. And that would also suggests

0:42:40.719 --> 0:42:43.280
<v Speaker 1>it's handedness that it has something to do with genetics too.

0:42:43.440 --> 0:42:47.960
<v Speaker 1>If you're ambidexterous or you bisexual, I guess, so, where's

0:42:47.960 --> 0:42:51.879
<v Speaker 1>that study that makes sense? So I did a little

0:42:51.880 --> 0:42:54.160
<v Speaker 1>more digging in this, but I don't understand it at all.

0:42:54.400 --> 0:42:57.520
<v Speaker 1>But more recently, as in just a couple of years ago,

0:42:57.600 --> 0:43:05.120
<v Speaker 1>they think they found an actual um physiological biological explanation

0:43:05.239 --> 0:43:07.960
<v Speaker 1>for that. If did you understand that? I don't know

0:43:08.000 --> 0:43:09.960
<v Speaker 1>if they found it or if somebody made it up.

0:43:10.000 --> 0:43:13.440
<v Speaker 1>And everybody's like I read a bunch of papers that

0:43:13.520 --> 0:43:16.320
<v Speaker 1>said that, you know, they think this, maybe it okay,

0:43:16.360 --> 0:43:19.319
<v Speaker 1>but I didn't get it. So what they what they

0:43:19.360 --> 0:43:23.439
<v Speaker 1>think is that when a UM mom, when a mom

0:43:23.520 --> 0:43:28.759
<v Speaker 1>carries a boy, her body has a reaction to the

0:43:29.000 --> 0:43:34.040
<v Speaker 1>male male proteins, the stuff that makes him a male

0:43:34.840 --> 0:43:37.759
<v Speaker 1>creates an allergic reaction of sorts in the mom, and

0:43:37.800 --> 0:43:41.399
<v Speaker 1>the mom produces anybody's The first time the mom's body

0:43:41.480 --> 0:43:44.200
<v Speaker 1>is totally caught off guard, has basically no effects whatsoever

0:43:44.680 --> 0:43:48.920
<v Speaker 1>on the boy's development as a boy. As more and

0:43:48.960 --> 0:43:52.239
<v Speaker 1>more boys are born, and just state in that same

0:43:52.280 --> 0:43:56.840
<v Speaker 1>poor mom um, the antibodies get better and better at

0:43:56.880 --> 0:43:59.399
<v Speaker 1>recognizing these proteins and can actually get to the point

0:43:59.480 --> 0:44:03.640
<v Speaker 1>where they affect the expression of these proteins. And so

0:44:03.960 --> 0:44:08.120
<v Speaker 1>what makes the boy straight from the basis of these

0:44:08.120 --> 0:44:11.239
<v Speaker 1>proteins is actually affected, and they developed differently starting in

0:44:11.280 --> 0:44:15.240
<v Speaker 1>the womb because the mom has developed anybody's too, basically

0:44:15.360 --> 0:44:20.000
<v Speaker 1>male nous, which is the most mind boggling, amazing idea

0:44:20.040 --> 0:44:22.520
<v Speaker 1>I've ever heard. That Glummery was so much better than

0:44:22.560 --> 0:44:25.360
<v Speaker 1>the scientific paper summaries that I read today. Thank you,

0:44:25.800 --> 0:44:28.680
<v Speaker 1>good John, Thank you you should do that. Thank I

0:44:28.760 --> 0:44:31.440
<v Speaker 1>do for a living. I just did. Well, that's a

0:44:31.440 --> 0:44:34.319
<v Speaker 1>good point. I thought this was interesting too. I mean,

0:44:34.320 --> 0:44:36.200
<v Speaker 1>we've kind of gone over most of these birth order

0:44:36.239 --> 0:44:39.319
<v Speaker 1>theories I think in general, but this one I don't

0:44:39.320 --> 0:44:42.720
<v Speaker 1>think we super touched on, and I think it's really interesting.

0:44:42.719 --> 0:44:46.560
<v Speaker 1>The confluence theory so This is sort of like resource

0:44:46.640 --> 0:44:49.879
<v Speaker 1>delution of parents that we were talking about, like only

0:44:49.920 --> 0:44:54.640
<v Speaker 1>so much emotional uh support or financial support to go around,

0:44:55.120 --> 0:44:58.080
<v Speaker 1>But this takes it down to the sibling level, and

0:44:58.120 --> 0:45:03.600
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of basically like if you were firstborn, uh,

0:45:03.920 --> 0:45:07.440
<v Speaker 1>you are then have a degraded emotional environment and intellectual

0:45:07.520 --> 0:45:10.560
<v Speaker 1>environment once you get a younger. So it's like playing

0:45:10.560 --> 0:45:15.279
<v Speaker 1>tennis against better or worse competition. If you're the better

0:45:15.280 --> 0:45:18.080
<v Speaker 1>tennis player, you're not gonna play as good against a

0:45:18.160 --> 0:45:20.880
<v Speaker 1>lesser tennis player. And they're saying that that kind of

0:45:20.920 --> 0:45:23.560
<v Speaker 1>happens with firstborns because they have to spend time with

0:45:23.560 --> 0:45:27.560
<v Speaker 1>this dumb kid, this dumb baby. But the dumb baby

0:45:27.560 --> 0:45:29.959
<v Speaker 1>gets a leg up exactly. That's when you play tennis

0:45:29.960 --> 0:45:33.160
<v Speaker 1>against someone better than you. Eventually, that's called the tutor effect.

0:45:33.320 --> 0:45:37.839
<v Speaker 1>They surpassed that firstborn, the student becomes the mass. That's right, exactly,

0:45:37.960 --> 0:45:43.479
<v Speaker 1>and your skin turns to alabaster. Really interesting, is that? Sting?

0:45:44.480 --> 0:45:49.239
<v Speaker 1>Well the police Okay, oh sure, I thought you were

0:45:49.320 --> 0:45:52.440
<v Speaker 1>like a dream of the blue turtle Sting. No, I'm

0:45:52.480 --> 0:45:57.560
<v Speaker 1>more of a nothing like the sun. Yes, synchronicity, that's

0:45:57.560 --> 0:45:59.840
<v Speaker 1>good too. I'm still mad at them for that reunion

0:45:59.880 --> 0:46:04.200
<v Speaker 1>to or oh yeah, they really phoned it in. You said, hey,

0:46:04.480 --> 0:46:07.200
<v Speaker 1>I saw for some so I just thought of the

0:46:07.239 --> 0:46:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Police and Stewart Copeland and which made me think of

0:46:10.719 --> 0:46:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Less Claypool. Re members in that band with Less Claypool

0:46:12.960 --> 0:46:17.719
<v Speaker 1>and Trey Anastasio. Yeah, it's called kill Me. No, it's

0:46:17.800 --> 0:46:20.480
<v Speaker 1>three talented individuals. But then they made me think of

0:46:20.560 --> 0:46:23.319
<v Speaker 1>Less Claypool, who was in a documentary I just saw

0:46:23.400 --> 0:46:27.040
<v Speaker 1>on The Residents have seen it? No, the Residents were

0:46:27.040 --> 0:46:29.160
<v Speaker 1>the mystery band right with that that, we're the big

0:46:31.760 --> 0:46:35.520
<v Speaker 1>still are a mystery band, still going really Yeah, they're good, Um,

0:46:35.800 --> 0:46:38.879
<v Speaker 1>but it's good. It's like it's it's an intellectual kind

0:46:38.880 --> 0:46:41.880
<v Speaker 1>of like examination of of their history and everything. But

0:46:41.920 --> 0:46:44.279
<v Speaker 1>it's really interesting. But Less Claypool's in it. Do you

0:46:44.320 --> 0:46:48.040
<v Speaker 1>think when Less Claypool, Uh, fish guy what's his name?

0:46:48.120 --> 0:46:51.719
<v Speaker 1>Trey and and Stewart Copeland and Stewart copelan you think

0:46:51.760 --> 0:46:54.120
<v Speaker 1>when they got together to form that band, all they

0:46:54.160 --> 0:46:57.200
<v Speaker 1>did was just sort of work out who's solos next.

0:46:58.320 --> 0:47:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Probably it's like, I want to do the based solo first,

0:47:01.080 --> 0:47:02.880
<v Speaker 1>and then we can go right into the guitar solo

0:47:03.239 --> 0:47:05.439
<v Speaker 1>and then the drum solo and then the song's over.

0:47:05.640 --> 0:47:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully the birth order of the three worked out so

0:47:08.080 --> 0:47:10.040
<v Speaker 1>that it all. They were like, yes, this all makes

0:47:10.080 --> 0:47:13.120
<v Speaker 1>sense to me. Man, there's nothing better than old videos

0:47:13.160 --> 0:47:16.400
<v Speaker 1>of Stewart Copeland pitching fits. Oh did he? I always

0:47:16.400 --> 0:47:18.840
<v Speaker 1>heard it was Sting that was the jerk to Stewart Copeland.

0:47:18.920 --> 0:47:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Was Stewart Copeland the jerk? Well, Stewart Copeland was a

0:47:21.640 --> 0:47:25.800
<v Speaker 1>hothead and Steyn was could poke his buttons. Oh yeah,

0:47:25.880 --> 0:47:28.880
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty fun. There's some Stewart. Don't feel bad for

0:47:28.920 --> 0:47:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Stuart Cope. Man, he might be. I think he might

0:47:31.200 --> 0:47:33.479
<v Speaker 1>be the best drummer I ever lived, everybody says Neil part.

0:47:33.640 --> 0:47:36.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, man, Stewart Copeland was pretty good. Oh yeah,

0:47:36.640 --> 0:47:40.719
<v Speaker 1>and like crazy, uh like um doing his own thing,

0:47:41.000 --> 0:47:45.920
<v Speaker 1>and he's from making what yeah, making Georgia, making Georgia. Wow,

0:47:47.440 --> 0:47:50.600
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know that. This concludes this episode of stuff

0:47:50.600 --> 0:47:53.439
<v Speaker 1>you should know. If you want the more about birth order,

0:47:53.600 --> 0:47:55.960
<v Speaker 1>go talk to your family. We don't care. Since I

0:47:55.960 --> 0:47:59.480
<v Speaker 1>said that's time for listener mail. Did you watch the

0:47:59.520 --> 0:48:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Motley Crew movie yet on Netflix? No? No, I didn't

0:48:02.080 --> 0:48:06.400
<v Speaker 1>know his out Yeah it's out good. Uh, no, but

0:48:06.640 --> 0:48:09.000
<v Speaker 1>based on that book, it's not good, but it's great,

0:48:09.120 --> 0:48:11.000
<v Speaker 1>you know what I mean? Oh yeah, it's based on

0:48:11.040 --> 0:48:13.279
<v Speaker 1>the book, but it's so I mean, it feels like

0:48:13.320 --> 0:48:15.239
<v Speaker 1>one of those v H one Are you literally making

0:48:15.280 --> 0:48:17.560
<v Speaker 1>a note? It's sort of like one of those VH

0:48:17.560 --> 0:48:21.359
<v Speaker 1>one movie music movies, like the Jackson's One. It's right,

0:48:21.400 --> 0:48:25.239
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's good. Okay, I'll check it out, all right?

0:48:25.680 --> 0:48:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Who plays Vince Neil? Um? They're all, you know, the

0:48:30.160 --> 0:48:32.239
<v Speaker 1>only one of the not the only thing. There's a

0:48:32.280 --> 0:48:34.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of distracting parts. But the guy who plays Vince

0:48:35.000 --> 0:48:39.280
<v Speaker 1>neil in his hair looks a lot like Garth, looks

0:48:39.320 --> 0:48:42.279
<v Speaker 1>not like Dana Carvey is card So it's kind of

0:48:42.280 --> 0:48:47.000
<v Speaker 1>hard to fully go there. The guy who played Tommy

0:48:47.040 --> 0:48:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Lee is pretty good, was it Christian Navarra? No? Did

0:48:50.520 --> 0:48:52.640
<v Speaker 1>he want to? He's he can't played Tommy Lee. He could,

0:48:52.960 --> 0:48:55.680
<v Speaker 1>he's like six five. That kid can play anybody. Well, no,

0:48:55.800 --> 0:48:58.799
<v Speaker 1>I agree. All right, it's time for listener, mail, I said,

0:48:58.840 --> 0:49:01.680
<v Speaker 1>chuck the bars more Mars guy. Okay, all right, here

0:49:01.760 --> 0:49:05.279
<v Speaker 1>we go. Is that from that? No? Mc marsh's Matiney group.

0:49:05.800 --> 0:49:10.879
<v Speaker 1>Who is that? He's a guitar player. Oh the old creep. Yeah, yeah, sure,

0:49:10.920 --> 0:49:12.239
<v Speaker 1>I know how you're talking about. I guess I never

0:49:12.280 --> 0:49:15.279
<v Speaker 1>knew his name by creep. He was a creep, he

0:49:15.400 --> 0:49:18.439
<v Speaker 1>was creepy. Sure, that's what I mean. All right, here

0:49:18.480 --> 0:49:21.640
<v Speaker 1>we go. This is from Sam and I'm just gonna

0:49:21.640 --> 0:49:24.759
<v Speaker 1>call this heartfelt. It's always nice to hear this. Hey, guys,

0:49:24.800 --> 0:49:27.000
<v Speaker 1>probably could have sent this a million times, but tonight

0:49:27.040 --> 0:49:29.080
<v Speaker 1>I really felt the need to. You were with me

0:49:29.239 --> 0:49:31.880
<v Speaker 1>was when I transitioned from high school to college. You

0:49:31.920 --> 0:49:33.959
<v Speaker 1>were there the night my dad died two years ago,

0:49:34.440 --> 0:49:36.040
<v Speaker 1>and now you're here as I'm in the process of

0:49:36.080 --> 0:49:38.160
<v Speaker 1>dealing with my girlfriend dumping me up to three years.

0:49:38.480 --> 0:49:40.920
<v Speaker 1>You're always there, guys. Sure you hear this all the time,

0:49:40.920 --> 0:49:43.320
<v Speaker 1>but I want to tell you that some tough days,

0:49:43.920 --> 0:49:47.040
<v Speaker 1>on tough days, you really helped keep me saying plain

0:49:47.239 --> 0:49:53.399
<v Speaker 1>and simple. Hopeim me saying not that we keep him

0:49:53.440 --> 0:49:56.200
<v Speaker 1>playing and simple. I read that wrong. It's like eat

0:49:56.200 --> 0:49:59.680
<v Speaker 1>shoots and leaves. That's right. I have depression and anxiety.

0:49:59.719 --> 0:50:02.080
<v Speaker 1>In the podcast is a huge help on nights like

0:50:02.160 --> 0:50:04.840
<v Speaker 1>this when nothing seems to help or was comforting. I

0:50:04.840 --> 0:50:07.759
<v Speaker 1>can tell if things get really bad, if even the

0:50:07.800 --> 0:50:11.399
<v Speaker 1>podcast doesn't help you. Guys have also been like role

0:50:11.440 --> 0:50:16.920
<v Speaker 1>models for me. So uh um, this is all just

0:50:16.960 --> 0:50:18.880
<v Speaker 1>to say thank you so much. Guys. Who knows how

0:50:18.960 --> 0:50:21.360
<v Speaker 1>much darker some spots in my life we've been without

0:50:21.400 --> 0:50:23.120
<v Speaker 1>you could say much more, but I think I got

0:50:23.120 --> 0:50:27.120
<v Speaker 1>the message across. That is from Sam and he says, PS,

0:50:28.000 --> 0:50:30.760
<v Speaker 1>I am a he him and I spank this email

0:50:30.760 --> 0:50:33.080
<v Speaker 1>on the bottom. Oh good, that's how we got here.

0:50:33.239 --> 0:50:36.600
<v Speaker 1>That's right. Nice work. Um. If you want to get

0:50:36.600 --> 0:50:38.799
<v Speaker 1>in touch with us like Sam did, thank you very much. Sam.

0:50:38.840 --> 0:50:40.279
<v Speaker 1>By the way, that was very sweet of you to

0:50:40.320 --> 0:50:42.799
<v Speaker 1>tell us all that. I hope you're pulling through. Yeah,

0:50:42.920 --> 0:50:45.840
<v Speaker 1>hanging there man. Um. You can get in touch with

0:50:45.880 --> 0:50:47.560
<v Speaker 1>us by going to Stuff you Should Know dot com

0:50:47.760 --> 0:50:50.760
<v Speaker 1>and clicking on our social links, and you can also

0:50:51.440 --> 0:50:53.520
<v Speaker 1>send us an email like Sam did. Don't forget to

0:50:53.520 --> 0:50:56.120
<v Speaker 1>spank it on the bottom to stuff podcast at i

0:50:56.280 --> 0:51:02.320
<v Speaker 1>heart radio dot com. Stuff you Should Know is a

0:51:02.360 --> 0:51:05.440
<v Speaker 1>production of iHeart Radio's How Stuff Works. For more podcasts

0:51:05.440 --> 0:51:08.360
<v Speaker 1>for my heart Radio, visit the iHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:51:08.400 --> 0:51:13.279
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows. H