WEBVTT - Netflix's Earnings and Ramp's Fundraise

0:00:01.960 --> 0:00:06.279
<v Speaker 1>From Mahard where Innovation, money and power Collie in Silicon

0:00:06.360 --> 0:00:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Vallet NBN. This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde.

0:00:10.720 --> 0:00:11.640
<v Speaker 2>And Ed Ludlow.

0:00:25.920 --> 0:00:29.040
<v Speaker 3>I met Ludlow in San Francisco. Caroline Hyde is off today.

0:00:29.160 --> 0:00:31.920
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Technology coming up. We have full market

0:00:31.920 --> 0:00:36.600
<v Speaker 3>coverage ahead as investors scale back on geopolitical concerns, with

0:00:36.720 --> 0:00:38.120
<v Speaker 3>stocks bouncing off their lows.

0:00:38.120 --> 0:00:39.640
<v Speaker 4>Plus Netflix shares.

0:00:39.360 --> 0:00:42.760
<v Speaker 3>Full after a disappointing revenue outlook and plans to stop

0:00:42.800 --> 0:00:47.159
<v Speaker 3>reporting its subscriber numbers. Details to come, and financial services

0:00:47.200 --> 0:00:50.640
<v Speaker 3>platform Ramp raises an additional one hundred and fifty million

0:00:50.680 --> 0:00:53.840
<v Speaker 3>dollars to reach a seven point six billion dollar valuation

0:00:54.200 --> 0:00:57.640
<v Speaker 3>with new backup coastal adventures. We sit down exclusively with

0:00:57.760 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 3>CEO Eric Lyman later this hour.

0:01:00.360 --> 0:01:02.760
<v Speaker 4>Let's get to those markets. We know the themes.

0:01:03.360 --> 0:01:08.199
<v Speaker 3>Geopolitical concern kind of some caution, if not risk off

0:01:08.240 --> 0:01:13.720
<v Speaker 3>mentality Israel with a muted retaliatory strike against Iran.

0:01:13.760 --> 0:01:16.240
<v Speaker 4>We will go to DC in just a moment and.

0:01:16.200 --> 0:01:19.920
<v Speaker 3>Discuss the politics of it and operationally what's happening nas

0:01:19.959 --> 0:01:22.840
<v Speaker 3>that one hundred is down a full percentage point. Tech

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:25.720
<v Speaker 3>is actually where there is the most downward pressure right now.

0:01:25.760 --> 0:01:27.039
<v Speaker 4>There are other stories.

0:01:26.640 --> 0:01:28.959
<v Speaker 3>Within that, and on the board you'll see names like

0:01:29.000 --> 0:01:32.160
<v Speaker 3>Tesla and Netflix. Tesla with a cybertruck recor I'll give

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:34.840
<v Speaker 3>you the details later in the program. Netflix had a

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:38.200
<v Speaker 3>mega start to the year, but the investor base is

0:01:38.240 --> 0:01:41.360
<v Speaker 3>spooked by its outlook for the future and how it

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:42.320
<v Speaker 3>plans to communicate.

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:44.040
<v Speaker 4>I'm also looking at crude.

0:01:44.080 --> 0:01:47.800
<v Speaker 3>We did see oil move higher based on what happened

0:01:48.000 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 3>in the Middle East. That's not hugely a surprise. Let's

0:01:50.960 --> 0:01:54.160
<v Speaker 3>get to the top story. Israel launched a retaliatory strike

0:01:54.240 --> 0:01:57.320
<v Speaker 3>on Iran less than a week after Tehran's rocket and

0:01:57.400 --> 0:02:02.080
<v Speaker 3>drone barrage. Iranian media appeared to downplay the incident in

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:05.720
<v Speaker 3>the hours that followed the initial reports. For more, let's

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:09.160
<v Speaker 3>get out to Washington, DC and Bloomberg Balance of Power

0:02:09.200 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 3>host Kaylee Liones.

0:02:11.280 --> 0:02:12.280
<v Speaker 4>This is the framing.

0:02:12.360 --> 0:02:16.400
<v Speaker 3>It is a retaliation that muted and seems to be

0:02:16.600 --> 0:02:20.480
<v Speaker 3>that Israel listened to the United States who were urging

0:02:20.520 --> 0:02:23.040
<v Speaker 3>them to show restraint.

0:02:23.360 --> 0:02:25.880
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, not just the United States, but other allies and

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:28.440
<v Speaker 5>partners as well, including officials from the UK and Germany,

0:02:28.440 --> 0:02:31.000
<v Speaker 5>which actually made a trip to Israel earlier this week.

0:02:31.040 --> 0:02:34.200
<v Speaker 5>To encourage Prime Minister Netanyahu to have restraint here in

0:02:34.240 --> 0:02:37.520
<v Speaker 5>the response to that unprecedented attack we saw Aron conducting

0:02:37.560 --> 0:02:39.359
<v Speaker 5>over last weekend. More, of course, the more than three

0:02:39.440 --> 0:02:42.679
<v Speaker 5>hundred missiles and drones sent Israel's way were largely intercepted

0:02:42.880 --> 0:02:45.920
<v Speaker 5>by air defenses by not just Israel and other allies.

0:02:45.919 --> 0:02:48.120
<v Speaker 5>Now RNY and media have confirmed that there was a

0:02:48.200 --> 0:02:53.720
<v Speaker 5>drone attack in in Safon, where there was a military operation. However,

0:02:54.200 --> 0:02:57.480
<v Speaker 5>it did not actually hit any nuclear facilities, according to

0:02:57.520 --> 0:02:59.679
<v Speaker 5>our understanding at the moment, and that perhaps could have

0:02:59.720 --> 0:03:01.560
<v Speaker 5>been one of the most escalatory things of all. It

0:03:01.600 --> 0:03:03.519
<v Speaker 5>does not seem that that happened. Instead that this was

0:03:03.560 --> 0:03:07.080
<v Speaker 5>relatively a limited strike with very little damage that seems

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:11.560
<v Speaker 5>to have resulted from it. US officials have confirmed to

0:03:11.560 --> 0:03:14.840
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg that Israel was behind this attack. Israel, as is

0:03:14.880 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 5>typical in military operations relating to Iran, has not confirmed

0:03:18.760 --> 0:03:21.280
<v Speaker 5>or denied it, not commenting at all. In the US

0:03:21.360 --> 0:03:23.840
<v Speaker 5>Secretary of State Anthony Blincoln, also who was at a

0:03:23.840 --> 0:03:27.680
<v Speaker 5>G seven meeting in Italy, didn't directly comment on this attack,

0:03:27.760 --> 0:03:29.520
<v Speaker 5>but did go out of his way to say that

0:03:29.560 --> 0:03:32.680
<v Speaker 5>the US has not been involved and any offensive operations

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:36.480
<v Speaker 5>and remains committed to de escalation between Israel and Iran,

0:03:36.640 --> 0:03:39.640
<v Speaker 5>knowing of course that the US is primary objective throughout

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:42.880
<v Speaker 5>this entire saga that really has taken place, not just

0:03:43.000 --> 0:03:46.400
<v Speaker 5>in the most immediate past, but since October seventh, when

0:03:46.400 --> 0:03:49.240
<v Speaker 5>Hama's first attacked Israel. Is to have this not spread

0:03:49.520 --> 0:03:52.200
<v Speaker 5>into a wider conflict. Right now, the signal from both

0:03:52.280 --> 0:03:54.320
<v Speaker 5>Israel and Iran does not seem to be that there

0:03:54.400 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 5>is interested in escalating this further. The sign seems to

0:03:58.160 --> 0:04:00.680
<v Speaker 5>be that Iran is not immediately in flying to launch

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 5>another counter strike against Israel for this, as the Ranian

0:04:03.760 --> 0:04:06.320
<v Speaker 5>media saying largely the strike was unsuccessful.

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:08.920
<v Speaker 4>I'm just passing over the markets.

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:10.760
<v Speaker 3>Later in the program, Paily, we're going to do a

0:04:10.760 --> 0:04:13.760
<v Speaker 3>deep dive on bitcoin, and I thought that actually the

0:04:14.160 --> 0:04:17.040
<v Speaker 3>reaction over is sort of twenty four hour time period

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:18.960
<v Speaker 3>was interesting, kind of came down. I think we're back

0:04:19.040 --> 0:04:21.640
<v Speaker 3>up in the session that the Nasdaq one hundred. On

0:04:21.680 --> 0:04:24.599
<v Speaker 3>the equity side, it is the kind of megacat tech

0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:27.239
<v Speaker 3>names that are pushing lower and points basis they're.

0:04:27.040 --> 0:04:28.279
<v Speaker 4>A big drag on the index.

0:04:28.480 --> 0:04:31.040
<v Speaker 3>My point being markets are trying to work out how

0:04:31.080 --> 0:04:34.839
<v Speaker 3>serious this is operationally. The only kind of update that

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:39.640
<v Speaker 3>I've seen is from Secretary Blincoln, who in summary, basically said,

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:42.719
<v Speaker 3>you know, the United States did not participate, but do

0:04:42.800 --> 0:04:45.720
<v Speaker 3>we have any sense of strategy here on the US side,

0:04:46.080 --> 0:04:51.440
<v Speaker 3>given how they've operated in a basically advisory capacity in

0:04:51.520 --> 0:04:52.719
<v Speaker 3>this situation so far?

0:04:54.040 --> 0:04:56.719
<v Speaker 5>Well, the US has been quite clear that they will

0:04:56.760 --> 0:04:59.320
<v Speaker 5>stand by their Iron Cloud commitment to Israel as an

0:04:59.320 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 5>ally and a in Israel's defense, as we saw last

0:05:02.400 --> 0:05:05.039
<v Speaker 5>weekend when it was US Air Defense that also contributed,

0:05:05.040 --> 0:05:07.440
<v Speaker 5>alongside the UK and Jordan to making sure that the

0:05:07.520 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 5>vast majority of those drones and missiles did not actually

0:05:10.080 --> 0:05:12.920
<v Speaker 5>end up in Israeli airspace. But that is really where

0:05:13.000 --> 0:05:14.640
<v Speaker 5>the US seems to have drawn the line. Yes, we

0:05:14.680 --> 0:05:16.880
<v Speaker 5>will help defend you, However, we will not join you

0:05:17.160 --> 0:05:20.200
<v Speaker 5>and any offensive operations. It was widely reported that when

0:05:20.400 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 5>President Biden spoke to Netanyahu after last weekend's attack, he

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:26.800
<v Speaker 5>suggested that he should take the win essentially not go

0:05:26.839 --> 0:05:28.920
<v Speaker 5>any further in that the US would not be joining

0:05:28.960 --> 0:05:32.599
<v Speaker 5>them if the Israelis decided to counter attack against Iran again.

0:05:32.640 --> 0:05:34.680
<v Speaker 5>It seems that Israel has decided to do so, but

0:05:34.760 --> 0:05:37.240
<v Speaker 5>in a limited fashion, and it has done very clear

0:05:37.240 --> 0:05:39.360
<v Speaker 5>messaging from the Secretary of State that the US was

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:43.760
<v Speaker 5>not involved in any particular offensive attack, including this one.

0:05:43.880 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 6>Ed.

0:05:45.080 --> 0:05:48.360
<v Speaker 3>There is a lot happening in DC at the moment,

0:05:48.440 --> 0:05:50.160
<v Speaker 3>and in the coming week we're going to be talking

0:05:50.160 --> 0:05:53.040
<v Speaker 3>a lot about TikTok. How much of the focus has

0:05:53.080 --> 0:05:56.080
<v Speaker 3>been captured by the situation in the lease, both at

0:05:56.120 --> 0:05:58.960
<v Speaker 3>the sort of federal level in the White House and

0:05:59.000 --> 0:06:01.520
<v Speaker 3>through Congress as well well.

0:06:01.520 --> 0:06:04.520
<v Speaker 5>A great deal at especially considering that Congress as we

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:08.080
<v Speaker 5>speak is getting ready to advance supplemental aid for other

0:06:08.120 --> 0:06:11.560
<v Speaker 5>allies too, including Ukraine and Taiwan, but billions of dollars

0:06:11.560 --> 0:06:13.800
<v Speaker 5>in aid for Israel. It's working its way through the House.

0:06:13.880 --> 0:06:16.880
<v Speaker 5>We expect a procedural vote will tappen on the House

0:06:16.920 --> 0:06:20.400
<v Speaker 5>floor today to advance that for a full floor vote tomorrow,

0:06:20.480 --> 0:06:22.800
<v Speaker 5>either in the late afternoon or evening, which would then

0:06:22.839 --> 0:06:25.200
<v Speaker 5>go on to the Senate and presumably be signed by

0:06:25.200 --> 0:06:27.320
<v Speaker 5>President Biden in the not so distant future. So the

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:30.039
<v Speaker 5>US is actively thinking about the military support that it

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:32.560
<v Speaker 5>is providing allies. This has been a bit of a

0:06:32.600 --> 0:06:36.400
<v Speaker 5>difficult journey, especially because the Ukraine aid itself has been

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:39.160
<v Speaker 5>complicated but I would just note that there's other political

0:06:39.200 --> 0:06:42.680
<v Speaker 5>factors specifically with the Middle East here, including very high

0:06:42.720 --> 0:06:46.080
<v Speaker 5>domestic pressure on President Biden from within the progressives in

0:06:46.120 --> 0:06:48.840
<v Speaker 5>his own party, who also are not very supportive of

0:06:48.880 --> 0:06:51.679
<v Speaker 5>the Israeli operation that we have seen in Gaza, given

0:06:51.720 --> 0:06:54.880
<v Speaker 5>the high death toll of Palestinians, which authorities in Gaza

0:06:54.920 --> 0:06:58.640
<v Speaker 5>say has now surpassed thirty four thousand. So at the

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:00.320
<v Speaker 5>same time that the US has been come to the

0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:02.320
<v Speaker 5>defense of Israel in the case of Iran wants to

0:07:02.320 --> 0:07:04.239
<v Speaker 5>make sure Israel is secure, it also has been putting

0:07:04.279 --> 0:07:06.680
<v Speaker 5>a lot of pressure on the net Yahoo government to

0:07:06.800 --> 0:07:10.000
<v Speaker 5>take higher account of the civilian toll of this war

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 5>to make more easier to get humanitarian aid. In has

0:07:13.840 --> 0:07:16.440
<v Speaker 5>been encouraging them not to conduct an operation in the

0:07:16.480 --> 0:07:19.400
<v Speaker 5>city of Ratha, where there are remaining Hamas battalions, until

0:07:19.440 --> 0:07:23.240
<v Speaker 5>they can safely evacuate the more than a Thousandtinian civilians

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:25.600
<v Speaker 5>that are there. So it's been a very difficult dance

0:07:25.680 --> 0:07:28.040
<v Speaker 5>for the US to still be supportive of Israel, stand

0:07:28.040 --> 0:07:30.240
<v Speaker 5>behind it as an ally, but also try to exercise

0:07:30.280 --> 0:07:34.680
<v Speaker 5>some leverage to change Israeli policy, perhaps in regard to

0:07:34.800 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 5>its ongoing war with.

0:07:35.720 --> 0:07:39.360
<v Speaker 3>Hamas Bloombas k Lines in DC. Just terrific and deep

0:07:39.360 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 3>reporting on what is a geopolitical situation, but just looking

0:07:42.400 --> 0:07:44.960
<v Speaker 3>purely at the index level, and as that one hundred

0:07:45.080 --> 0:07:48.120
<v Speaker 3>super tech heavy it's the megacat tech names that are

0:07:48.160 --> 0:07:52.440
<v Speaker 3>dragging us down and they're really underperforming the benchmarkt S

0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:54.360
<v Speaker 3>and P five hundred and the TAO is actually in

0:07:54.440 --> 0:07:57.400
<v Speaker 3>positive territory. That's why we're focused there. The reaction in

0:07:57.440 --> 0:07:59.480
<v Speaker 3>the markets is being felt in tech right now.

0:08:07.800 --> 0:08:11.559
<v Speaker 7>This remotely operated vehicle offers a glimpse into what lies

0:08:11.640 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 7>of thousands of meters underwater. It's one of several deep

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:19.640
<v Speaker 7>sea vehicles on board this repurposed ship from Ray Dalio's

0:08:19.680 --> 0:08:24.119
<v Speaker 7>philanthropic venture. The Ocean Explorer behind me that's currently dogged

0:08:24.160 --> 0:08:27.000
<v Speaker 7>in Singapore, will set off on its mission very soon

0:08:27.280 --> 0:08:31.800
<v Speaker 7>to explore the deep waters of Southeast Asia. There's lots

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:36.320
<v Speaker 7>of advanced tech at creatre like this remotely controlled underwater.

0:08:36.000 --> 0:08:39.040
<v Speaker 8>Vehicle that can go six thousand meters deep.

0:08:39.080 --> 0:08:43.559
<v Speaker 7>To collect data any summer siples that contee passengers as

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:47.640
<v Speaker 7>deep as one thousand meters underwater. The vessel was once

0:08:47.760 --> 0:08:50.680
<v Speaker 7>used in the oil and gas sector, but the revamped

0:08:50.840 --> 0:08:54.880
<v Speaker 7>diesel electric ship now travels around the world, collaborating with

0:08:55.000 --> 0:08:58.960
<v Speaker 7>governments and working with local scientists. It's in Southeast Asia

0:08:59.000 --> 0:09:02.199
<v Speaker 7>to study the region's marine environment in an attempt to

0:09:02.240 --> 0:09:05.240
<v Speaker 7>protect the oceans from the effects of climate change.

0:09:07.640 --> 0:09:11.720
<v Speaker 3>Just such deep reporting on marine propulsion navigation. Bloomberg's Ainsley

0:09:12.040 --> 0:09:13.959
<v Speaker 3>as a can with that report. Okay, let's get to

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:17.560
<v Speaker 3>talking tech and in the news, Apple is pulling metas

0:09:17.640 --> 0:09:21.400
<v Speaker 3>WhatsApp from its app store in China amid orders from

0:09:21.480 --> 0:09:25.280
<v Speaker 3>Beijing to close more loopholes in the country's long standing

0:09:25.360 --> 0:09:29.559
<v Speaker 3>Internet firewall. The iPhone maker also removed the messaging services

0:09:29.600 --> 0:09:34.160
<v Speaker 3>Telegram and Signal, according to consultants who are tracking that space.

0:09:34.360 --> 0:09:37.320
<v Speaker 3>Plus sticking with Meta, the social giant has unveiled a

0:09:37.360 --> 0:09:41.480
<v Speaker 3>new version of its powerful Lama artificial intelligence model. LAMA

0:09:41.559 --> 0:09:44.560
<v Speaker 3>three is an upgrade from an AI model that Meta

0:09:44.640 --> 0:09:48.160
<v Speaker 3>released last summer, and it's the latest effort to keep

0:09:48.160 --> 0:09:53.000
<v Speaker 3>pace with similar technologies from companies like Open Ai and Google.

0:09:53.120 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 3>And finally, Apollo and Sony are considering a joint offer

0:09:56.800 --> 0:10:00.160
<v Speaker 3>for Paramount Global. According to sources, the two firms have

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:03.400
<v Speaker 3>held discussions about teaming up on and offer, but have

0:10:03.559 --> 0:10:07.320
<v Speaker 3>not yet submitted an official proposal. Sony and Apollo's entry

0:10:07.360 --> 0:10:09.640
<v Speaker 3>would complicate a deal that's already in the works for

0:10:09.720 --> 0:10:14.760
<v Speaker 3>the studio, which is currently holding exclusive talks with Skuidance Media.

0:10:14.840 --> 0:10:20.440
<v Speaker 3>Stick with Media digging into Netflix shares falling after earnings.

0:10:20.320 --> 0:10:21.600
<v Speaker 4>But need them and Co.

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:25.720
<v Speaker 3>Actually upgrading Netflix today to buy from hold with an

0:10:25.800 --> 0:10:31.120
<v Speaker 3>updated price target seven hundred US dollars. Laura Martin, senior

0:10:31.240 --> 0:10:34.160
<v Speaker 3>entertainment and Internet analysts over at Needham and Co, is

0:10:34.240 --> 0:10:38.720
<v Speaker 3>here with us live Bloomberg Technology. I really enjoyed your note. Hello,

0:10:38.760 --> 0:10:43.080
<v Speaker 3>good morning, Happy Friday. Not so happy based on Netflix

0:10:43.080 --> 0:10:47.240
<v Speaker 3>share response. The anxiety I think is the idea that

0:10:47.280 --> 0:10:51.120
<v Speaker 3>they just won't report monthly subscriber gains or losses.

0:10:52.040 --> 0:10:54.760
<v Speaker 4>Why so, I think.

0:10:54.720 --> 0:10:55.640
<v Speaker 2>It's a great point.

0:10:55.720 --> 0:10:56.960
<v Speaker 9>I mean, first of all, they're not going to do

0:10:57.000 --> 0:10:59.439
<v Speaker 9>it until the first quarter of twenty five, so all

0:10:59.480 --> 0:11:02.080
<v Speaker 9>of this year are sort of safe. Second, I'm really

0:11:02.120 --> 0:11:05.800
<v Speaker 9>skeptical they can do this because, other than Apple, which

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:08.800
<v Speaker 9>I do not think Netflix is Apple, every company that

0:11:08.840 --> 0:11:13.080
<v Speaker 9>has a subscriber driven business reports subscribers because we calculate

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:15.760
<v Speaker 9>value on a per subscriber basis. So I don't know

0:11:15.800 --> 0:11:17.520
<v Speaker 9>if they'll actually do away with it, even though they've

0:11:17.559 --> 0:11:19.760
<v Speaker 9>said they will. They're pretty good about listening to feedback,

0:11:19.760 --> 0:11:22.600
<v Speaker 9>and Wall Street's feedback is pretty negative about this, like

0:11:23.120 --> 0:11:26.920
<v Speaker 9>opaqueness that they're adding to the fundamentals. So but anyway,

0:11:26.920 --> 0:11:29.400
<v Speaker 9>it's not an issue until the first quarter of twenty

0:11:29.440 --> 0:11:32.760
<v Speaker 9>five at the earliest. I also think people are having

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:37.000
<v Speaker 9>issues with sort of below like a negative sub ad

0:11:37.080 --> 0:11:38.360
<v Speaker 9>number compared to first quarter.

0:11:38.440 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 2>They don't like that.

0:11:39.120 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 9>And also the guidance for Q two is a little

0:11:41.960 --> 0:11:44.880
<v Speaker 9>light compared to consensussessments. So I think people are worried

0:11:44.880 --> 0:11:46.520
<v Speaker 9>about a slow down in revenue growth.

0:11:47.520 --> 0:11:51.600
<v Speaker 3>I like the phrasing opaque. I mean Netflix managements thing

0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 3>has always been like judge USh on these traditional financial metrics,

0:11:56.160 --> 0:11:59.360
<v Speaker 3>you know, profit. Basically, what I found interesting if you

0:11:59.360 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 3>look at the nine point three to three million customers

0:12:01.960 --> 0:12:05.120
<v Speaker 3>added in the first quarter, that there's a story behind it, right,

0:12:05.160 --> 0:12:09.360
<v Speaker 3>which is that the password crackdown seemed to bring to

0:12:09.400 --> 0:12:11.080
<v Speaker 3>them people that were forced to sign up for their

0:12:11.120 --> 0:12:13.880
<v Speaker 3>own account and they were willing to do that. What

0:12:13.960 --> 0:12:16.520
<v Speaker 3>was your interpretation of that number in the moment.

0:12:17.040 --> 0:12:19.760
<v Speaker 9>So I also think that what's happening is when someone

0:12:19.800 --> 0:12:22.640
<v Speaker 9>calls to disconnect because they're angry that they're going to

0:12:22.720 --> 0:12:25.120
<v Speaker 9>have to buy, you know, buy a whole another subscription,

0:12:25.360 --> 0:12:27.560
<v Speaker 9>or that the price is going up with the ad

0:12:27.600 --> 0:12:32.040
<v Speaker 9>driven tier. Instead of canceling your fifteen dollars subscription that's

0:12:32.080 --> 0:12:33.719
<v Speaker 9>on its way to twenty dollars, you can go to

0:12:33.760 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 9>a seven dollars per month heer.

0:12:35.880 --> 0:12:37.000
<v Speaker 2>You just have to take ads.

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:40.840
<v Speaker 9>But right now they tell us it Netflix if they

0:12:40.840 --> 0:12:42.880
<v Speaker 9>don't have that many ads, that they have way more

0:12:42.880 --> 0:12:45.320
<v Speaker 9>supply of AD units available to sell than they do

0:12:45.400 --> 0:12:48.160
<v Speaker 9>have demand for AD units, which means the AD loads

0:12:48.200 --> 0:12:51.880
<v Speaker 9>here are very minimal, like one or two ads an hour.

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:54.400
<v Speaker 9>So that's a pretty good deal for consumers right now

0:12:54.400 --> 0:12:57.200
<v Speaker 9>because you can pay seven dollars a month and get

0:12:57.240 --> 0:13:00.200
<v Speaker 9>almost no ads in what's called the AD tier. So

0:13:00.280 --> 0:13:02.800
<v Speaker 9>three years from now there'll be five minutes of AD loads,

0:13:02.840 --> 0:13:04.880
<v Speaker 9>but today there's like one minute of AD loads and

0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:07.559
<v Speaker 9>you're paying seven dollars. I think that is helping their

0:13:07.559 --> 0:13:11.319
<v Speaker 9>reported sub number, although it's hurting the art what they

0:13:11.320 --> 0:13:13.800
<v Speaker 9>call arm what the rest of the world caused arpoo

0:13:13.920 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 9>because the average the subscriber that used to disconnect and

0:13:17.360 --> 0:13:19.560
<v Speaker 9>go to zero is now going to seven dollars, So

0:13:19.600 --> 0:13:23.440
<v Speaker 9>it's pulling down the average revenue per subscriber as people

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:25.319
<v Speaker 9>sign up for these ad driven tears.

0:13:25.800 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 3>Just a quick update for our Bloomberg Technology audience, laur

0:13:28.600 --> 0:13:30.440
<v Speaker 3>I just wanted to talk about the shares really quickly.

0:13:30.640 --> 0:13:33.320
<v Speaker 3>We're down more than eight percent off session lows that

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:35.960
<v Speaker 3>at one point that the stock was on track for

0:13:36.000 --> 0:13:39.839
<v Speaker 3>its biggest drop since April of twenty twenty two. Let's

0:13:39.840 --> 0:13:41.400
<v Speaker 3>see where we end up at the end of the day.

0:13:42.800 --> 0:13:44.760
<v Speaker 3>I don't understand why we don't talk a little bit

0:13:44.800 --> 0:13:48.280
<v Speaker 3>more about the strength of the content slate. I have

0:13:48.400 --> 0:13:52.120
<v Speaker 3>just finished watching The Gentleman, for example, the TV or

0:13:52.200 --> 0:13:56.160
<v Speaker 3>series adaptation of the Guy Richie film. Thought it was

0:13:56.200 --> 0:14:00.600
<v Speaker 3>good for what it's worth, content wise, continuity wise, Netflix

0:14:00.880 --> 0:14:02.000
<v Speaker 3>seems to be okay.

0:14:03.400 --> 0:14:05.080
<v Speaker 4>Why are we not discussing that more.

0:14:05.440 --> 0:14:08.000
<v Speaker 9>I think because Wall Street sort of feels that's the

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:11.120
<v Speaker 9>that's their They make widgets, right, their widget happens to

0:14:11.120 --> 0:14:13.000
<v Speaker 9>be content. We assume they're going to do a good

0:14:13.040 --> 0:14:15.760
<v Speaker 9>job of that. With the seventeen billion dollars a year

0:14:16.120 --> 0:14:19.720
<v Speaker 9>that public shareholders give them, we expect them to maximize

0:14:20.160 --> 0:14:22.880
<v Speaker 9>the quality of that seventeen billion of content.

0:14:22.960 --> 0:14:24.480
<v Speaker 2>We sort of think that's their core business.

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:27.920
<v Speaker 9>Like just because Apple makes great phones like that, you

0:14:27.960 --> 0:14:29.920
<v Speaker 9>don't give them kudos for that, Like they better make

0:14:29.920 --> 0:14:32.160
<v Speaker 9>great phones otherwise people aren't going to keep the service.

0:14:32.240 --> 0:14:35.120
<v Speaker 9>So I think that's their core business. And I also

0:14:35.160 --> 0:14:38.520
<v Speaker 9>think Wall Street is skeptical of hit driven businesses because

0:14:38.600 --> 0:14:40.720
<v Speaker 9>you may love The Gentleman, which I also thought was

0:14:40.760 --> 0:14:44.760
<v Speaker 9>excellent content, but somebody else wants to watch the Kardashians

0:14:44.800 --> 0:14:47.680
<v Speaker 9>on a different service. Like you know, what quality content

0:14:47.840 --> 0:14:51.600
<v Speaker 9>is to different people is different, and so you know,

0:14:51.640 --> 0:14:53.880
<v Speaker 9>what we care about on Wall Street is what is

0:14:54.000 --> 0:14:56.800
<v Speaker 9>what's happening with the return on investment for the seventeen

0:14:56.840 --> 0:14:57.480
<v Speaker 9>billion of content.

0:14:57.520 --> 0:14:59.479
<v Speaker 2>And I will tell you sports.

0:14:59.120 --> 0:15:01.000
<v Speaker 9>Is really important to Wall Street, and I think it's

0:15:01.000 --> 0:15:02.720
<v Speaker 9>really important to these streaming services.

0:15:03.040 --> 0:15:04.400
<v Speaker 2>So they are doing more with sports.

0:15:04.480 --> 0:15:06.000
<v Speaker 9>As you saw on the car, there's a lot of

0:15:06.040 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 9>talk about this big fight that's coming up. They've now

0:15:08.600 --> 0:15:11.640
<v Speaker 9>signed up WWE to do live sports let's call it

0:15:11.760 --> 0:15:13.239
<v Speaker 9>entertainment sports, yes.

0:15:13.000 --> 0:15:15.000
<v Speaker 2>Every week for next year. That's a big deal.

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:18.320
<v Speaker 9>They are softening on sports, but they also said they

0:15:18.320 --> 0:15:20.640
<v Speaker 9>are not going to spend any more money on sports.

0:15:20.680 --> 0:15:22.800
<v Speaker 9>They're going to have to the sports fees will have

0:15:22.800 --> 0:15:25.200
<v Speaker 9>to come out of the seventeen billion in total content cast.

0:15:25.400 --> 0:15:27.960
<v Speaker 2>That's really important. I think there need to be in news.

0:15:27.680 --> 0:15:29.760
<v Speaker 3>Also, Laura, we got to go with some breaking news,

0:15:29.800 --> 0:15:31.600
<v Speaker 3>but we'll have you back to talk Jenai and the

0:15:31.640 --> 0:15:32.600
<v Speaker 3>context of Netflix.

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:34.360
<v Speaker 4>Thank you. This is the breaking news.

0:15:34.400 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 3>First of all, in the House, the Ukraine Aid and

0:15:37.000 --> 0:15:40.520
<v Speaker 3>TikTok bills have cleared the procedural hurdle in.

0:15:40.440 --> 0:15:41.960
<v Speaker 4>The House that we were waiting for.

0:15:42.720 --> 0:15:46.640
<v Speaker 3>Separately, on the Senate floor, Majority Leader Chuck Schumer is

0:15:46.680 --> 0:15:50.040
<v Speaker 3>speaking and saying that lawmakers should plan to work this

0:15:50.160 --> 0:15:52.760
<v Speaker 3>weekend to take up the Ukraine Aid bill quickly, and

0:15:52.800 --> 0:15:55.320
<v Speaker 3>we'll keep an eye on TikTok. Those are stories we're

0:15:55.320 --> 0:15:58.240
<v Speaker 3>tracking here on Bloomberg Technology. We'll be right back. This

0:15:58.480 --> 0:16:00.400
<v Speaker 3>is Bloomberg takelogy.

0:16:15.240 --> 0:16:15.840
<v Speaker 4>Let's go back to.

0:16:15.800 --> 0:16:18.560
<v Speaker 3>Those breaking news headlines out of Washington, d C. In

0:16:18.640 --> 0:16:21.840
<v Speaker 3>the House, the Ukraine Aid and TikTok bills have cleared

0:16:21.880 --> 0:16:23.240
<v Speaker 3>a key procedural hurdle.

0:16:23.520 --> 0:16:24.680
<v Speaker 4>Separately out of the.

0:16:24.640 --> 0:16:30.240
<v Speaker 3>Senate, Majority Leader Chuck Schumer speaking saying that lawmakers should

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:34.080
<v Speaker 3>plan to work this weekend in the context of the

0:16:34.120 --> 0:16:38.040
<v Speaker 3>TikTok bill, the divest or ban bill. That's one that

0:16:38.080 --> 0:16:40.960
<v Speaker 3>we've been tracking on this program because we're trying to

0:16:41.080 --> 0:16:45.320
<v Speaker 3>understand the cadence of how quickly that could be ratified,

0:16:45.720 --> 0:16:47.920
<v Speaker 3>if at all. I think my colleague and friend Bluembos

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 3>Kylee Lines hosts a balance of power.

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:51.880
<v Speaker 4>Is good and joins us from Washington, d C.

0:16:52.440 --> 0:16:55.120
<v Speaker 3>I was trying to pass two things happening in parallel, Kayley,

0:16:55.400 --> 0:16:56.680
<v Speaker 3>from the House and the Senate.

0:16:57.040 --> 0:16:57.760
<v Speaker 4>What are you seeing?

0:16:58.040 --> 0:17:00.400
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, well, a this was a massive vip artis and

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:04.320
<v Speaker 5>majority that this procedural vote advanced under. It was more

0:17:04.359 --> 0:17:06.280
<v Speaker 5>than three hundred members of the House to be exact,

0:17:06.320 --> 0:17:09.200
<v Speaker 5>three hundred and sixteen who voted for passage of the rule,

0:17:09.240 --> 0:17:11.680
<v Speaker 5>which will clear the way tomorrow for them to pass

0:17:11.800 --> 0:17:14.400
<v Speaker 5>one by one this series of bills. It will likely

0:17:14.400 --> 0:17:17.080
<v Speaker 5>happen over the course of Saturday afternoon to evening. One

0:17:17.119 --> 0:17:19.600
<v Speaker 5>bill that will have more than sixty billion dollars in

0:17:19.640 --> 0:17:22.560
<v Speaker 5>military aid for Ukraine billions more, and a separate bill

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:25.240
<v Speaker 5>for Israel, and then a separate one for the Indo Pacific.

0:17:25.280 --> 0:17:27.720
<v Speaker 5>And that will be a fourth bill as well, which

0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:30.359
<v Speaker 5>we are calling the sidecar here in Washington, that includes

0:17:30.400 --> 0:17:33.199
<v Speaker 5>a variety of other measures including that divestiture bill relating

0:17:33.600 --> 0:17:35.920
<v Speaker 5>to TikTok At, as well as others like the Repo Act,

0:17:35.920 --> 0:17:38.600
<v Speaker 5>which will allow for the seizure of frozen frozen Russian

0:17:38.600 --> 0:17:42.040
<v Speaker 5>assets that could be used to pay for Ukraine's war effort. So,

0:17:42.080 --> 0:17:44.600
<v Speaker 5>once all of this passes the House, presumably there's going

0:17:44.680 --> 0:17:47.080
<v Speaker 5>to be two quick key questions. One is how quickly

0:17:47.080 --> 0:17:49.240
<v Speaker 5>can it be repackaged together to be sent to the

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:51.600
<v Speaker 5>Senate for passage to get to the desk of President

0:17:51.640 --> 0:17:54.359
<v Speaker 5>Biden for a signature, and also what will happen to

0:17:54.400 --> 0:17:57.080
<v Speaker 5>the House Speaker Mike Johnson. As a result of this,

0:17:57.160 --> 0:17:59.320
<v Speaker 5>he has been under tremendous pressure from a few members

0:17:59.359 --> 0:18:02.160
<v Speaker 5>of his republic conference who do not want to see

0:18:02.200 --> 0:18:04.880
<v Speaker 5>Ukraine Aid go to the floor of the.

0:18:04.840 --> 0:18:05.680
<v Speaker 4>House for a vote.

0:18:05.680 --> 0:18:09.120
<v Speaker 5>One of the most outspoken has been Congressman Marjorie Taylor Green,

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:11.879
<v Speaker 5>who has filed a motion to vacate, which is what

0:18:11.960 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 5>Oust Speaker Kevin McCarthy just months ago. Has not yet

0:18:15.080 --> 0:18:17.800
<v Speaker 5>acted on it, but has long signals she could if

0:18:17.840 --> 0:18:20.200
<v Speaker 5>indeed he put Ukraine Aid on the floor. So we're

0:18:20.240 --> 0:18:22.439
<v Speaker 5>going to wait to see for action on that. Other members,

0:18:22.440 --> 0:18:25.880
<v Speaker 5>including Republican Congressman Tom Massey have suggested they will join

0:18:25.920 --> 0:18:28.280
<v Speaker 5>her in that effort, however, ed and this is where

0:18:28.320 --> 0:18:31.359
<v Speaker 5>it gets really interesting. It took Democrats to get this

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:33.280
<v Speaker 5>rule pass, to get it over the finish line now,

0:18:33.320 --> 0:18:35.760
<v Speaker 5>and it does seem that Democrats may step in to

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:39.800
<v Speaker 5>help save the gavel of Speaker Johnson if it proves necessary.

0:18:39.840 --> 0:18:41.520
<v Speaker 5>There's been a lot of talk here in Washington this

0:18:41.600 --> 0:18:45.000
<v Speaker 5>morning about this kind of being like a coalition government

0:18:45.040 --> 0:18:47.600
<v Speaker 5>because Mike Johnson is relying on the other party to

0:18:47.640 --> 0:18:50.439
<v Speaker 5>basically get everything over the line, and potentially might be

0:18:50.520 --> 0:18:52.200
<v Speaker 5>relying on them to help him keep his job.

0:18:53.080 --> 0:18:55.600
<v Speaker 3>That's kind of focused on the House level. Let's take

0:18:55.640 --> 0:18:57.600
<v Speaker 3>a moment here. There's a lot happening, and there are

0:18:57.640 --> 0:19:01.080
<v Speaker 3>a lot of headlines in parallel. Chuck Schumer in the

0:19:01.080 --> 0:19:04.800
<v Speaker 3>Senate is saying that lawmakers should plan to work this

0:19:04.920 --> 0:19:08.119
<v Speaker 3>weekend is needed. You know, there will be audience members

0:19:08.160 --> 0:19:10.320
<v Speaker 3>around the world, but particularly around the country in the

0:19:10.400 --> 0:19:13.639
<v Speaker 3>United States, saying why are they working through the weekend

0:19:13.680 --> 0:19:15.160
<v Speaker 3>on this Why is it so important?

0:19:15.520 --> 0:19:18.160
<v Speaker 5>Well, because this aid is desperately needed. If you listen

0:19:18.200 --> 0:19:20.520
<v Speaker 5>to US intelligence officials that I was speaking with the

0:19:20.600 --> 0:19:23.240
<v Speaker 5>chair of the House Intelligence Committee, Congressman Mike Turner just

0:19:23.320 --> 0:19:25.520
<v Speaker 5>last night, who was suggesting that it needed to pass

0:19:25.880 --> 0:19:28.040
<v Speaker 5>this week based on the intel they are getting on

0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:30.680
<v Speaker 5>the ground in Ukraine. Just procedurally because of the way

0:19:30.680 --> 0:19:32.919
<v Speaker 5>the House works and the requirement that members have to

0:19:32.920 --> 0:19:35.280
<v Speaker 5>have seventy two hours to read the bill. Because of

0:19:35.320 --> 0:19:37.560
<v Speaker 5>when the text is released, they can't actually have the

0:19:37.640 --> 0:19:40.679
<v Speaker 5>vote until Saturday night. Now, the Senate is going to

0:19:40.800 --> 0:19:42.760
<v Speaker 5>very want to quickly take this up, which could mean

0:19:42.800 --> 0:19:44.800
<v Speaker 5>that they take it right as soon as the House

0:19:44.840 --> 0:19:47.480
<v Speaker 5>passage passes it and begin to do the procedural work

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:49.320
<v Speaker 5>in the Senate to get this over the finish line,

0:19:49.320 --> 0:19:51.399
<v Speaker 5>which maybe why they end up staying the weekend. I

0:19:51.400 --> 0:19:53.879
<v Speaker 5>would also point out that the Senate tonight is facing

0:19:53.920 --> 0:19:56.440
<v Speaker 5>a midnight dadlight of the expiration of FISA. The Foreign

0:19:56.520 --> 0:19:58.920
<v Speaker 5>Surveillance Act, which of course has been passed in the House,

0:19:58.960 --> 0:20:01.480
<v Speaker 5>has been running into some her in the Senate as well,

0:20:01.480 --> 0:20:04.280
<v Speaker 5>and that could potentially lapse for a bit at midnight

0:20:04.280 --> 0:20:05.720
<v Speaker 5>if they can't figure out a way to get the

0:20:05.800 --> 0:20:08.119
<v Speaker 5>unanimous consent needed to advance that. So it could be

0:20:08.200 --> 0:20:10.760
<v Speaker 5>a working weekend for everyone, which is probably not going

0:20:10.760 --> 0:20:13.560
<v Speaker 5>over well for some considering they were supposed to leave

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:16.119
<v Speaker 5>on recess beginning today. There were a number of members

0:20:16.160 --> 0:20:18.760
<v Speaker 5>who were scheduled to be on congressional delegations to a

0:20:18.840 --> 0:20:21.800
<v Speaker 5>number of different localities, and instead they may stay here

0:20:22.040 --> 0:20:22.960
<v Speaker 5>to get this work done.

0:20:23.119 --> 0:20:26.119
<v Speaker 3>Ed Okay, So it sounds like we're in for a

0:20:26.160 --> 0:20:29.600
<v Speaker 3>busy weekend, probably you more so than I out here

0:20:29.640 --> 0:20:32.080
<v Speaker 3>in San Francisco. Is there anything we should be watching

0:20:32.080 --> 0:20:33.280
<v Speaker 3>for this Friday afternoon?

0:20:33.560 --> 0:20:35.320
<v Speaker 5>Well, I would watch what happens in the Senate related

0:20:35.359 --> 0:20:37.760
<v Speaker 5>to Faiza, in particular whether they can reach some kind

0:20:37.800 --> 0:20:40.520
<v Speaker 5>of agreement on amendment votes or things of that nature

0:20:40.560 --> 0:20:42.240
<v Speaker 5>to make sure that this can indeed get over the

0:20:42.280 --> 0:20:45.040
<v Speaker 5>finish line by the deadline. But really watch what happens

0:20:45.040 --> 0:20:46.879
<v Speaker 5>in the House now that this rule has advanced, to

0:20:46.920 --> 0:20:49.720
<v Speaker 5>see if we actually see any action for Marjorie Taylor Green,

0:20:49.760 --> 0:20:53.320
<v Speaker 5>for example, to launch the process to vacate the speaker,

0:20:53.359 --> 0:20:56.119
<v Speaker 5>and what could unfold from there. Also, given that there

0:20:56.160 --> 0:20:58.280
<v Speaker 5>are so many things attached to this that including the

0:20:58.320 --> 0:21:01.760
<v Speaker 5>TikTok bill, which did pass, why bipartisan majority in the

0:21:01.760 --> 0:21:05.160
<v Speaker 5>House originally now has a revision that would allow byte

0:21:05.240 --> 0:21:08.160
<v Speaker 5>dance longer than six months to divest it potentially up

0:21:08.280 --> 0:21:10.439
<v Speaker 5>to a full year, which may make it easier to

0:21:10.520 --> 0:21:13.800
<v Speaker 5>digest in the Senate, where many had issue with the

0:21:13.840 --> 0:21:16.119
<v Speaker 5>original bill. But just look to see now that the

0:21:16.119 --> 0:21:20.119
<v Speaker 5>TikTok measure does appear to be on track for a

0:21:20.160 --> 0:21:22.679
<v Speaker 5>passage in the House, whether there or anyone is vocal

0:21:22.680 --> 0:21:24.760
<v Speaker 5>in the Senate suggesting that they don't like the fact

0:21:25.000 --> 0:21:27.000
<v Speaker 5>that this is attached to the package. So it'll kind

0:21:27.000 --> 0:21:29.320
<v Speaker 5>of be just digging into the nuances of who may

0:21:29.359 --> 0:21:33.520
<v Speaker 5>be upset here, even as vast bipartisan majorities seem to

0:21:33.520 --> 0:21:35.280
<v Speaker 5>be liking what they're seeing and looking.

0:21:35.040 --> 0:21:35.560
<v Speaker 4>To advance this.

0:21:35.720 --> 0:21:39.320
<v Speaker 3>At Bloomberg's Kadi Alliance, thank you, aid and TikTok bills,

0:21:39.400 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 3>will keep a close eye on. Welcome back to Bloomberg Technology,

0:21:50.600 --> 0:21:53.920
<v Speaker 3>im Ed Ludlow in San Francisco. We should talk about bitcoin,

0:21:54.000 --> 0:21:57.240
<v Speaker 3>and it's interesting because bitcoin has its own story in

0:21:57.280 --> 0:21:59.359
<v Speaker 3>the markets, which is the harving, and we will have

0:21:59.400 --> 0:22:01.879
<v Speaker 3>a deep disc about that in just a moment. But

0:22:01.960 --> 0:22:05.639
<v Speaker 3>if you look at the trading of bitcoin, which trades

0:22:05.680 --> 0:22:08.159
<v Speaker 3>twenty four to seven over the last twenty four hours,

0:22:08.200 --> 0:22:11.679
<v Speaker 3>it tells you an interesting story about that asset in

0:22:11.720 --> 0:22:16.440
<v Speaker 3>the context of geopolitics and volatility in markets. So when

0:22:16.440 --> 0:22:19.480
<v Speaker 3>the headlines first started to come out Thursday evening US

0:22:19.600 --> 0:22:24.480
<v Speaker 3>time about a Israel retaliation in Iran, there was this

0:22:24.600 --> 0:22:27.360
<v Speaker 3>clear downward move on Bitcoin. Actually in the session we're

0:22:27.359 --> 0:22:29.679
<v Speaker 3>now up higher and on a two day basis up

0:22:29.760 --> 0:22:33.600
<v Speaker 3>six percent. All told, Bitcoin just south of sixty five

0:22:33.640 --> 0:22:37.600
<v Speaker 3>thousand US dollars per token. Then there's the other big story,

0:22:37.600 --> 0:22:41.840
<v Speaker 3>the hotly anticipated bitcoin harving is approaching. Here's what our

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:44.080
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg guests have had to say about the event.

0:22:45.440 --> 0:22:47.879
<v Speaker 1>Every time we'd come up to one of these having events.

0:22:48.119 --> 0:22:50.919
<v Speaker 1>It really does come back to the fundamentals of supply

0:22:51.000 --> 0:22:51.720
<v Speaker 1>and near the.

0:22:51.640 --> 0:22:54.800
<v Speaker 8>Cripple industry gust cycle is to be expected. That's going

0:22:54.880 --> 0:22:58.680
<v Speaker 8>to be market volatility. It doesn't only impact the set Frank,

0:22:58.800 --> 0:23:02.479
<v Speaker 8>I mean, given jee political tension, given the interest rate

0:23:02.720 --> 0:23:05.480
<v Speaker 8>environment that you're seeing, the inflation are environment.

0:23:05.640 --> 0:23:10.560
<v Speaker 10>Obviously Bitcoin and crypto in general is out of the

0:23:11.119 --> 0:23:14.920
<v Speaker 10>global financial system, so we are not completely disconnected from

0:23:14.920 --> 0:23:19.240
<v Speaker 10>what's happening in equities, for example, and what's happening with

0:23:19.320 --> 0:23:23.679
<v Speaker 10>monetary policy, or with what's happening in the geo political environment.

0:23:23.840 --> 0:23:25.280
<v Speaker 4>We've been preparing for many years.

0:23:25.320 --> 0:23:28.320
<v Speaker 11>You know, our business is one that requires long term planning,

0:23:28.720 --> 0:23:32.280
<v Speaker 11>and these havings are known events, and so the evolution

0:23:32.359 --> 0:23:35.440
<v Speaker 11>of mining has really changed since previous havings where we

0:23:35.480 --> 0:23:37.000
<v Speaker 11>had a really fragmented market.

0:23:37.040 --> 0:23:39.680
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of investors are eagerly anticipating to

0:23:39.720 --> 0:23:41.119
<v Speaker 1>see what the market reaction will be.

0:23:41.800 --> 0:23:45.800
<v Speaker 3>Joining us now is Cavita Gupta Delta Blockchain Fund general partner,

0:23:46.359 --> 0:23:50.760
<v Speaker 3>just deep expertise in the underlying technology that supports digital assets,

0:23:51.359 --> 0:23:54.240
<v Speaker 3>also some pretty strong awareness of what's happening in markets.

0:23:54.480 --> 0:23:56.320
<v Speaker 4>Covi, just forgive me. I'm going to go back to

0:23:56.359 --> 0:23:57.080
<v Speaker 4>basics here.

0:23:57.280 --> 0:23:59.439
<v Speaker 3>I've said the word harving, some people call it a

0:23:59.480 --> 0:24:02.640
<v Speaker 3>halve then many times, and I'm going to cheat. I'm

0:24:02.680 --> 0:24:05.159
<v Speaker 3>just going to read the Bloomberg definition of what it is,

0:24:05.440 --> 0:24:07.439
<v Speaker 3>and then you can tell me whether it's important or not.

0:24:07.680 --> 0:24:10.240
<v Speaker 3>A harving, sometimes referred to as a harvening, is a

0:24:10.280 --> 0:24:14.920
<v Speaker 3>planned reduction in the rewards miners receive. Halving's happen once

0:24:14.960 --> 0:24:17.840
<v Speaker 3>every four years, or every two hundred and ten thousand blocks.

0:24:18.240 --> 0:24:21.760
<v Speaker 3>Just for awareness out there, are you really excited about this, Kavita?

0:24:22.280 --> 0:24:26.080
<v Speaker 12>I think excitement may not be the word I would

0:24:26.119 --> 0:24:29.719
<v Speaker 12>be using. What does bitcoin happening really means? It just

0:24:29.800 --> 0:24:33.240
<v Speaker 12>means that it makes it more difficult for the miners

0:24:33.280 --> 0:24:38.600
<v Speaker 12>to have the rewards associated with mining, and also definitely

0:24:38.680 --> 0:24:41.800
<v Speaker 12>that results in having mining difficulties. Basically you have to

0:24:41.880 --> 0:24:46.000
<v Speaker 12>put more energy, more complicated theorems out there, and it

0:24:46.119 --> 0:24:49.639
<v Speaker 12>basically ultimately increase the cost of mining. That's what we

0:24:49.680 --> 0:24:53.200
<v Speaker 12>are looking at. It is important because it makes sure

0:24:53.320 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 12>that it is much more secure. Mining is secure.

0:24:56.320 --> 0:24:57.719
<v Speaker 2>All the bitcoin layer is secure.

0:24:58.200 --> 0:25:01.879
<v Speaker 12>Now this definitely gets it's a lot of attention because

0:25:01.920 --> 0:25:04.919
<v Speaker 12>of the price movement, the expected especially now with the

0:25:04.960 --> 0:25:09.520
<v Speaker 12>expected the DF which has already happened. Now for the

0:25:09.560 --> 0:25:12.080
<v Speaker 12>first time, we're going to expect a new price curve

0:25:12.160 --> 0:25:15.359
<v Speaker 12>because the supply and the demand curve for bitcoin has

0:25:15.400 --> 0:25:18.560
<v Speaker 12>been very unique this time. The supply has been huge.

0:25:18.960 --> 0:25:22.200
<v Speaker 12>Usually what we see that before bitcoin having and around

0:25:22.240 --> 0:25:25.479
<v Speaker 12>bitcoin having a lot of people start putting bitcoins out,

0:25:25.760 --> 0:25:28.760
<v Speaker 12>So the supply has been there, but the demand has

0:25:28.800 --> 0:25:31.600
<v Speaker 12>been so high that we see volatility instead of the

0:25:31.640 --> 0:25:34.840
<v Speaker 12>straight curves down or up. So it is exciting in

0:25:34.880 --> 0:25:35.280
<v Speaker 12>that way.

0:25:36.040 --> 0:25:38.320
<v Speaker 3>You make a really interesting point, which is basically one

0:25:38.320 --> 0:25:42.000
<v Speaker 3>of liquidity. It's quite a liquid market and the counter

0:25:42.200 --> 0:25:45.000
<v Speaker 3>argument is that there will always be a finite supply

0:25:45.640 --> 0:25:49.159
<v Speaker 3>of bitcoin a definitive number, and that is largely what

0:25:49.280 --> 0:25:52.280
<v Speaker 3>those that build a thesis of bitcoin reaching a much

0:25:52.359 --> 0:25:56.200
<v Speaker 3>higher number in the long term rely on. Are those

0:25:56.320 --> 0:25:58.080
<v Speaker 3>people in that camp, correct.

0:25:59.119 --> 0:26:02.199
<v Speaker 12>I absolutely believe that at the end of the day,

0:26:02.240 --> 0:26:05.480
<v Speaker 12>bitcoin has a lot of value and even though it

0:26:05.560 --> 0:26:07.960
<v Speaker 12>is more difficult to not produce and the supply is

0:26:08.000 --> 0:26:10.639
<v Speaker 12>going to be more and more limited. But that's what

0:26:10.680 --> 0:26:13.240
<v Speaker 12>we see with most of the commodities, whether it's cold,

0:26:13.240 --> 0:26:16.960
<v Speaker 12>whether it's platinum, silicon, anything which has limited supply, but

0:26:17.040 --> 0:26:20.080
<v Speaker 12>a lot of value long run, especially storage value like

0:26:20.080 --> 0:26:24.000
<v Speaker 12>bitcoin has been considered. Now it's just going to increase

0:26:24.040 --> 0:26:26.400
<v Speaker 12>the price. You will see volatility, which you still see

0:26:26.440 --> 0:26:30.800
<v Speaker 12>in gold today, but the value is just in finite

0:26:30.960 --> 0:26:32.720
<v Speaker 12>and for a very long period of time.

0:26:33.119 --> 0:26:36.200
<v Speaker 3>Calvi to good to Delta Blockchain Fund general partner someone

0:26:36.240 --> 0:26:40.880
<v Speaker 3>investing at the technology level. But I just really appreciate

0:26:40.880 --> 0:26:41.879
<v Speaker 3>your market insights.

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:42.679
<v Speaker 4>Thank you.

0:26:43.119 --> 0:26:45.080
<v Speaker 3>There's another big story out there today in the world

0:26:45.080 --> 0:26:47.280
<v Speaker 3>of ev and I want to talk about Tesla. The

0:26:47.280 --> 0:26:51.320
<v Speaker 3>TV maker recalled over thirty eight hundred cyber trucks to

0:26:51.480 --> 0:26:56.200
<v Speaker 3>rework or replace accelerator pedals that can dislodge and cause

0:26:56.200 --> 0:26:59.800
<v Speaker 3>the vehicle to unintentionally accelerate, which increases the risk of

0:26:59.800 --> 0:27:03.840
<v Speaker 3>a Tesla received notice of two customer claims related to

0:27:03.880 --> 0:27:06.800
<v Speaker 3>that issue, and that's all. According to a recall report

0:27:06.920 --> 0:27:11.000
<v Speaker 3>submitted to the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration or NITZER.

0:27:11.320 --> 0:27:14.120
<v Speaker 3>The company said that when high force is applied to

0:27:14.200 --> 0:27:17.920
<v Speaker 3>the cyber trucks accelerator, the pedal may dislodge and become

0:27:18.080 --> 0:27:21.480
<v Speaker 3>trapped by the interior trim. Tesla is going to fix

0:27:21.520 --> 0:27:24.280
<v Speaker 3>the acce rat of pedals free of charge for me.

0:27:24.359 --> 0:27:25.040
<v Speaker 4>The other big thing.

0:27:24.960 --> 0:27:27.679
<v Speaker 3>About this story is we now know how many cyber

0:27:27.720 --> 0:27:29.760
<v Speaker 3>trucks are out there in the wild and how many

0:27:29.760 --> 0:27:32.399
<v Speaker 3>have been delivered to customers, which is quite interesting. Tesla

0:27:32.440 --> 0:27:35.800
<v Speaker 3>shares basically flat, all right. Coming up on Bloomberg Technology,

0:27:36.000 --> 0:27:38.760
<v Speaker 3>we're going to be joined by RAMP CEO Eric Glyman

0:27:38.840 --> 0:27:40.560
<v Speaker 3>to discuss their new fundraise.

0:27:40.800 --> 0:27:42.400
<v Speaker 4>There are some big numbers.

0:27:42.240 --> 0:28:01.640
<v Speaker 3>And there's an interesting conversation ahead. This is Bloomberg Technology, Okay,

0:28:01.680 --> 0:28:04.600
<v Speaker 3>a lot of people talking about this one financial services platform.

0:28:04.760 --> 0:28:07.960
<v Speaker 3>RAMP just raise an additional one hundred and fifty million

0:28:08.040 --> 0:28:12.360
<v Speaker 3>dollars for its Series D Round Part two at evaluation

0:28:12.640 --> 0:28:15.480
<v Speaker 3>of around seven point six billion dollars with a new backup.

0:28:15.800 --> 0:28:19.200
<v Speaker 3>Coast of Adventures delighted to bring in RAMP CEO Eric

0:28:19.280 --> 0:28:21.760
<v Speaker 3>Lyman out in New York, and this is a really

0:28:21.800 --> 0:28:26.040
<v Speaker 3>interesting round. The venture firm leading it was Coast of Adventures,

0:28:26.040 --> 0:28:30.160
<v Speaker 3>but Keith Raboy, who recently rejoined Coastler on the East Coast,

0:28:30.480 --> 0:28:34.040
<v Speaker 3>kind of spearheaded this. Just explain the rationale behind doing

0:28:34.080 --> 0:28:34.480
<v Speaker 3>the round.

0:28:35.280 --> 0:28:37.280
<v Speaker 6>I mean, there's a couple of things that and by

0:28:37.280 --> 0:28:39.720
<v Speaker 6>the way, thank you so much for having me first.

0:28:39.920 --> 0:28:42.600
<v Speaker 6>The rationale is the company is growing and we aim

0:28:42.680 --> 0:28:44.640
<v Speaker 6>to accelerate it. Not only is Ramp one of the

0:28:44.640 --> 0:28:48.720
<v Speaker 6>fastest growing businesses in US history, but investors were deeply

0:28:48.760 --> 0:28:51.760
<v Speaker 6>exciting Keith the most who's one of our board members,

0:28:51.760 --> 0:28:55.160
<v Speaker 6>who saw the business at its large scale accelerating and growth.

0:28:55.160 --> 0:28:58.080
<v Speaker 6>So typically they tend to slow down as they grow.

0:28:58.680 --> 0:29:01.400
<v Speaker 6>The rationale is to increase the pace of customers that

0:29:01.440 --> 0:29:04.880
<v Speaker 6>we serve. We power over approximately one percent of all

0:29:04.880 --> 0:29:07.840
<v Speaker 6>corporate card transactions in America. We want to serve the

0:29:07.880 --> 0:29:10.560
<v Speaker 6>next ninety nine percent. But more than that, it's a

0:29:10.600 --> 0:29:14.360
<v Speaker 6>high conviction bet both by investors in by Ramp to

0:29:14.400 --> 0:29:18.040
<v Speaker 6>transform the way finance is done from highly manual, very

0:29:18.120 --> 0:29:22.040
<v Speaker 6>tedious to increasingly automated and leveraging the potential of AI

0:29:22.240 --> 0:29:23.959
<v Speaker 6>to bring it to the average business.

0:29:25.040 --> 0:29:28.040
<v Speaker 3>Eric, you previously came on the show when you guys

0:29:28.080 --> 0:29:30.640
<v Speaker 3>had done a down round and you were really honest

0:29:30.760 --> 0:29:34.280
<v Speaker 3>about the willingness to do a down round. This is

0:29:34.320 --> 0:29:37.760
<v Speaker 3>an up round, and I just wondered, how you think

0:29:37.800 --> 0:29:39.600
<v Speaker 3>about the dynamic this time around.

0:29:40.120 --> 0:29:42.080
<v Speaker 6>I mean for sure, I mean, look, I think that

0:29:42.920 --> 0:29:46.360
<v Speaker 6>for all companies, being valued mark to market is a

0:29:46.480 --> 0:29:49.800
<v Speaker 6>very good thing. Over the last summer, part of what

0:29:49.840 --> 0:29:53.560
<v Speaker 6>we recognized is that it was really the fastest interest

0:29:53.640 --> 0:29:57.000
<v Speaker 6>rate rise in really a forty year period. And so

0:29:57.120 --> 0:29:59.480
<v Speaker 6>even though RAMP had at that time grown by leaps

0:29:59.520 --> 0:30:01.880
<v Speaker 6>and downs brounds, I think between rounds that had grown

0:30:01.920 --> 0:30:05.600
<v Speaker 6>by seven times over a year and a half period,

0:30:06.160 --> 0:30:09.760
<v Speaker 6>we wanted to be valued fairly. Fast forward to now,

0:30:10.440 --> 0:30:14.640
<v Speaker 6>just months later, Ramp's business has grown dramatically, an investor

0:30:14.720 --> 0:30:17.880
<v Speaker 6>conviction has increased, and so we're thrilled that some of

0:30:17.920 --> 0:30:20.560
<v Speaker 6>the best investors in the world, from public markets investors

0:30:20.600 --> 0:30:25.520
<v Speaker 6>to extraordinary privates like Coastala Ventures founder's fund, Sequoya Graylock

0:30:25.560 --> 0:30:26.960
<v Speaker 6>and others joining for the first time.

0:30:27.440 --> 0:30:28.280
<v Speaker 4>They're thrilled for.

0:30:28.440 --> 0:30:30.800
<v Speaker 6>RAMP is but I think to invest at this valuation

0:30:31.200 --> 0:30:33.600
<v Speaker 6>for the first time, at this juncture, there is a

0:30:33.640 --> 0:30:36.640
<v Speaker 6>high conviction belief that there is not just a fifteen

0:30:36.680 --> 0:30:39.560
<v Speaker 6>percent plus growth per year ahead of RAMP, but there's

0:30:39.640 --> 0:30:42.040
<v Speaker 6>ten x plus more ahead. And so we're thrilled.

0:30:43.240 --> 0:30:46.800
<v Speaker 3>Eric to the Bloomberg Technology audience member, that's less financially

0:30:46.880 --> 0:30:50.640
<v Speaker 3>inclined marked market, meaning the method of getting fair value

0:30:50.760 --> 0:30:57.720
<v Speaker 3>by benchmarking contemporaneously against similar companies. So I noticed on

0:30:57.760 --> 0:30:59.960
<v Speaker 3>social media a lot of people were talking about your round,

0:31:00.040 --> 0:31:01.520
<v Speaker 3>and so I went on social media and said you

0:31:01.520 --> 0:31:04.360
<v Speaker 3>were coming on the show, and our audience something about

0:31:04.400 --> 0:31:07.600
<v Speaker 3>technology actually had some pretty good and straightforward questions. One

0:31:07.640 --> 0:31:10.479
<v Speaker 3>of them was, Eric, can you just simply explain what

0:31:10.600 --> 0:31:12.880
<v Speaker 3>rampays and what it does? Which I thought was a

0:31:12.880 --> 0:31:14.200
<v Speaker 3>pretty good starting point.

0:31:14.600 --> 0:31:16.760
<v Speaker 6>Of course, so the way to think about it, we

0:31:16.800 --> 0:31:20.479
<v Speaker 6>built a command and control system for companies finances. What

0:31:20.560 --> 0:31:23.440
<v Speaker 6>this means is from a single place company finance teams,

0:31:23.560 --> 0:31:27.560
<v Speaker 6>business owners can issue cards, make payments of all kinds,

0:31:28.640 --> 0:31:32.920
<v Speaker 6>manage approvals, and even automate accounting to close their books.

0:31:33.320 --> 0:31:35.640
<v Speaker 6>And so this means that some of the tedious aspects,

0:31:35.680 --> 0:31:40.360
<v Speaker 6>things like collecting receipts, tagging transactions properly is done automatically

0:31:40.400 --> 0:31:43.960
<v Speaker 6>for you. We surface up data in ways for companies

0:31:44.040 --> 0:31:47.840
<v Speaker 6>to spend less, and the upshot is that the average

0:31:47.880 --> 0:31:51.000
<v Speaker 6>company using RAMP is able to reduce their expenses by

0:31:51.080 --> 0:31:55.200
<v Speaker 6>five percent per year, whether that's a publicly traded scale

0:31:55.240 --> 0:31:59.240
<v Speaker 6>like a Shopify to earlier stage to even nonprofits like

0:31:59.280 --> 0:32:01.640
<v Speaker 6>the Boys and Girls CBS of America. And I think

0:32:01.680 --> 0:32:04.000
<v Speaker 6>really what's different and interesting about RAMP is it's not

0:32:04.040 --> 0:32:07.120
<v Speaker 6>only the tools and bones to make payments, but it

0:32:07.200 --> 0:32:09.880
<v Speaker 6>is focused on how can you make people more productive

0:32:09.920 --> 0:32:12.640
<v Speaker 6>with their time. Instead of having expense reports take you

0:32:12.760 --> 0:32:14.160
<v Speaker 6>an hour at the end of the month, have it

0:32:14.160 --> 0:32:17.080
<v Speaker 6>be done for you and get your time back to

0:32:17.080 --> 0:32:18.040
<v Speaker 6>focus on your core business.

0:32:18.080 --> 0:32:19.240
<v Speaker 4>So that's how we think about it.

0:32:20.360 --> 0:32:20.560
<v Speaker 2>Eric.

0:32:20.600 --> 0:32:24.320
<v Speaker 3>The other audience question I got for you was about you.

0:32:24.320 --> 0:32:28.080
<v Speaker 3>You are generally regarded as a very nice person. I

0:32:28.120 --> 0:32:30.680
<v Speaker 3>hear that a lot in my circles, at least out

0:32:30.680 --> 0:32:33.440
<v Speaker 3>West as well. But the question from the audience was

0:32:34.360 --> 0:32:36.720
<v Speaker 3>are you needing to be a bit more roothless at

0:32:36.720 --> 0:32:39.719
<v Speaker 3>this stage of the company's growth as a founder CEO

0:32:40.160 --> 0:32:43.080
<v Speaker 3>that's now playing at a pretty high level valuation wise

0:32:43.080 --> 0:32:44.040
<v Speaker 3>and scale wise.

0:32:44.640 --> 0:32:46.200
<v Speaker 4>It you know, for us.

0:32:47.080 --> 0:32:49.640
<v Speaker 6>Look, the broader backdrop is I actually think the US

0:32:49.720 --> 0:32:52.800
<v Speaker 6>business environment has gotten much more mean and nasty for

0:32:52.840 --> 0:32:57.560
<v Speaker 6>the average business owner. Most companies are reducing their investment

0:32:57.600 --> 0:33:01.040
<v Speaker 6>in their products. They're hiking the prices, the value they're

0:33:01.040 --> 0:33:04.360
<v Speaker 6>offering in the service level is going down. We want

0:33:04.400 --> 0:33:06.960
<v Speaker 6>to lean in and doing the right thing. Having more

0:33:07.040 --> 0:33:10.200
<v Speaker 6>capital allows us to not just be nice, but frankly

0:33:10.240 --> 0:33:12.520
<v Speaker 6>offer better service. In the last time Ed we were

0:33:12.520 --> 0:33:14.760
<v Speaker 6>on the show, we were saving the average company on

0:33:14.840 --> 0:33:17.400
<v Speaker 6>the order to three to four percent per year. We

0:33:17.440 --> 0:33:19.600
<v Speaker 6>want to extend that idea of maybe, as you put it,

0:33:19.800 --> 0:33:22.160
<v Speaker 6>being nice, we want the average company to save five

0:33:22.160 --> 0:33:25.400
<v Speaker 6>percent to be more productive. And we think over time,

0:33:25.600 --> 0:33:29.080
<v Speaker 6>doing right by customers is what creates long lasting and

0:33:29.240 --> 0:33:32.280
<v Speaker 6>enduring businesses. And so it's not just a personality. We

0:33:32.320 --> 0:33:33.840
<v Speaker 6>think it's a good way of doing business.

0:33:34.640 --> 0:33:34.840
<v Speaker 4>Well.

0:33:34.880 --> 0:33:36.760
<v Speaker 3>You also now have a couple more investors that you'll

0:33:36.800 --> 0:33:38.640
<v Speaker 3>have to account to along the way as well. RAMP

0:33:38.720 --> 0:33:40.600
<v Speaker 3>CEO Eric Glyman, it's great to catch up and have

0:33:40.640 --> 0:33:41.600
<v Speaker 3>you back on the program.

0:33:41.680 --> 0:33:42.080
<v Speaker 4>Thank you.

0:33:42.440 --> 0:33:44.600
<v Speaker 3>Let's stick with the world of venture in startups may

0:33:44.640 --> 0:33:47.280
<v Speaker 3>have in Venture, as a seed stage venture firm investing

0:33:47.520 --> 0:33:50.920
<v Speaker 3>in consumer tech companies, announced sixty million dollars in new

0:33:50.920 --> 0:33:53.480
<v Speaker 3>capital for its latest fun It brings the firm's total

0:33:53.520 --> 0:33:57.760
<v Speaker 3>assets to two hundred million dollars. Let's bring in Sarah Dishpande,

0:33:58.120 --> 0:34:01.400
<v Speaker 3>general partner at may Have in Ventures, in today's VC Spotlight.

0:34:01.760 --> 0:34:06.040
<v Speaker 3>This was interesting, a sizable seed fund coming together. Was

0:34:06.040 --> 0:34:07.040
<v Speaker 3>it a smooth process?

0:34:07.080 --> 0:34:10.279
<v Speaker 13>Sarah, First of all, thank you so much for having me.

0:34:10.840 --> 0:34:13.520
<v Speaker 13>It's great to be here today. You know, we're really

0:34:13.520 --> 0:34:15.440
<v Speaker 13>excited to bring this new seed fund to the world.

0:34:15.600 --> 0:34:18.720
<v Speaker 13>MAB Inventors is best known for investing in tech companies

0:34:18.760 --> 0:34:22.200
<v Speaker 13>that are addressing emerging consumer trends, and consumer trends never

0:34:22.239 --> 0:34:24.600
<v Speaker 13>go away, so that's an area that we've continued to

0:34:24.600 --> 0:34:27.040
<v Speaker 13>be excited about. And you know, I won't lie. This

0:34:27.120 --> 0:34:30.520
<v Speaker 13>has been the hardest funding market for startups and vnor

0:34:30.560 --> 0:34:34.160
<v Speaker 13>capital firms alike. So to be able to close a

0:34:34.239 --> 0:34:36.760
<v Speaker 13>sixty million dollar vehicle if our fourth and latest fund,

0:34:36.800 --> 0:34:39.200
<v Speaker 13>we think is really a testament to our strategy to

0:34:39.239 --> 0:34:42.000
<v Speaker 13>the market opportunity. And we're grateful to our founders and

0:34:42.120 --> 0:34:44.279
<v Speaker 13>LPs for continuing to have their trust in us.

0:34:45.280 --> 0:34:45.640
<v Speaker 4>Sarah.

0:34:46.080 --> 0:34:49.680
<v Speaker 3>It's so hard because if you just split technology into

0:34:49.880 --> 0:34:53.320
<v Speaker 3>hardware and software, you know, the companies that are working

0:34:53.360 --> 0:34:57.919
<v Speaker 3>on consumer facing application in both domains are giant. You're

0:34:58.000 --> 0:35:01.160
<v Speaker 3>trying to get the disruption at the earliest possible stage.

0:35:01.600 --> 0:35:03.000
<v Speaker 4>How do you make it worthwhile?

0:35:03.600 --> 0:35:07.800
<v Speaker 13>We really look at emerging consumer trends and technology companies

0:35:07.920 --> 0:35:10.520
<v Speaker 13>that are fueled by those big consumer trends, and so

0:35:10.560 --> 0:35:13.399
<v Speaker 13>that's what we're looking for, especially in today's universe where

0:35:13.440 --> 0:35:16.440
<v Speaker 13>you see the bloom of AI technology. There have been

0:35:16.640 --> 0:35:20.800
<v Speaker 13>so many companies invested in in B to B and infrastructure,

0:35:20.880 --> 0:35:24.000
<v Speaker 13>in foundational models of AI that we think now is

0:35:24.040 --> 0:35:27.200
<v Speaker 13>the time for those consumer opportunities to bloom. We also

0:35:27.280 --> 0:35:31.000
<v Speaker 13>take a really wide lens of what means consumer to us.

0:35:31.160 --> 0:35:33.319
<v Speaker 13>You know, we were known for our early investment in

0:35:33.480 --> 0:35:36.640
<v Speaker 13>Zoom and no company was a more consumer company than

0:35:36.719 --> 0:35:39.000
<v Speaker 13>Zoom in the year of twenty twenty. So for us,

0:35:39.080 --> 0:35:41.960
<v Speaker 13>we're looking at what are these new points of technology,

0:35:42.080 --> 0:35:44.399
<v Speaker 13>what are these new emerging trends, and can we find

0:35:44.440 --> 0:35:48.239
<v Speaker 13>and partner with visionary bold founders that we think we

0:35:48.280 --> 0:35:51.200
<v Speaker 13>can help to unlock their potential to bring these iconic

0:35:51.239 --> 0:35:53.720
<v Speaker 13>companies to the world so that consumer lens is actually

0:35:53.800 --> 0:35:55.120
<v Speaker 13>for us quite broad.

0:35:55.280 --> 0:35:59.080
<v Speaker 3>Sarah, what is the number one emerging consumer trend?

0:35:59.360 --> 0:36:02.759
<v Speaker 13>The number one consumer trend right now is consumer applications

0:36:02.760 --> 0:36:06.600
<v Speaker 13>of AI. Where do we think AI can actually deliver

0:36:06.760 --> 0:36:10.040
<v Speaker 13>on the grand dream of doing something for a consumer

0:36:10.400 --> 0:36:13.759
<v Speaker 13>of you know, making something of value for consumers that

0:36:13.880 --> 0:36:16.560
<v Speaker 13>actually bring something positive to their lives. So that's the

0:36:16.560 --> 0:36:19.080
<v Speaker 13>biggest area we're looking at. But it applies across so

0:36:19.200 --> 0:36:23.360
<v Speaker 13>many sectors. It can apply across, you know, technology for families,

0:36:23.440 --> 0:36:26.360
<v Speaker 13>can apply across you know, search, it can apply across

0:36:26.480 --> 0:36:29.920
<v Speaker 13>anything that might plan or book something on your behalf.

0:36:29.960 --> 0:36:32.800
<v Speaker 13>So there's a pretty wide range of sectors that consumer

0:36:32.800 --> 0:36:35.239
<v Speaker 13>AI touches, and that's where we're spending our time right now.

0:36:35.360 --> 0:36:37.520
<v Speaker 3>I think that you saying AI was not a huge

0:36:37.560 --> 0:36:40.800
<v Speaker 3>surprise to many people, Sarah Deshfondi General partner.

0:36:40.840 --> 0:36:42.160
<v Speaker 4>It may even bene his great to have you on

0:36:42.200 --> 0:36:43.040
<v Speaker 4>the show. Thank you.

0:36:51.120 --> 0:36:54.839
<v Speaker 14>It's not the legislation that we would write if Republicans

0:36:54.840 --> 0:36:56.279
<v Speaker 14>were in charge of both the House and send it

0:36:56.320 --> 0:36:59.000
<v Speaker 14>in the White House. This is the best possible product

0:36:59.040 --> 0:37:02.160
<v Speaker 14>that we can get the circumstances to take care of

0:37:02.200 --> 0:37:03.520
<v Speaker 14>these really important.

0:37:03.120 --> 0:37:08.759
<v Speaker 3>Obligations US House Speaker Johnson has just been talking about

0:37:08.840 --> 0:37:11.680
<v Speaker 3>votes some foreign aid bills. Bloomberg's Katie Lines is back

0:37:11.760 --> 0:37:15.400
<v Speaker 3>in DC, and I think it is around US Speaker

0:37:15.440 --> 0:37:17.720
<v Speaker 3>Johnson that the latest headlines involve.

0:37:19.040 --> 0:37:19.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:37:19.280 --> 0:37:21.480
<v Speaker 5>Of course, what we saw happen on the House floor today,

0:37:21.600 --> 0:37:24.279
<v Speaker 5>ed was a procedural vote advancing that will pave the

0:37:24.280 --> 0:37:26.960
<v Speaker 5>way for funding for US allies to pass the House

0:37:27.320 --> 0:37:31.000
<v Speaker 5>later Saturday. These are four separate bills, one for Ukraine, Israel,

0:37:31.040 --> 0:37:33.279
<v Speaker 5>the Indo Pacific, and a so called sidecar which is

0:37:33.320 --> 0:37:37.040
<v Speaker 5>attaching other measures, including the TikTok divestiture Bill, all of

0:37:37.040 --> 0:37:39.280
<v Speaker 5>the same to getting more than ninety five billion dollars

0:37:39.280 --> 0:37:41.759
<v Speaker 5>in aid two US allies. However, it does seem that

0:37:41.800 --> 0:37:44.040
<v Speaker 5>the House Speaker could face a threat to his job

0:37:44.080 --> 0:37:46.560
<v Speaker 5>as a result. This has long been threatened by Congressman

0:37:46.800 --> 0:37:49.239
<v Speaker 5>Marjorie Taylor Green, who had suggested if Johnson were to

0:37:49.239 --> 0:37:51.160
<v Speaker 5>put Ukraine eight on the floor for a vote, she

0:37:51.200 --> 0:37:54.040
<v Speaker 5>would act on her motion to vacate, essentially trying to

0:37:54.160 --> 0:37:56.400
<v Speaker 5>kick him out of the job. Already, one other member,

0:37:56.560 --> 0:37:59.680
<v Speaker 5>Republican Congressman Tom Massey, had joined her in that effort,

0:37:59.719 --> 0:38:05.200
<v Speaker 5>and now, according to a statement from Congressman Paul Gosar Arizona,

0:38:05.239 --> 0:38:07.680
<v Speaker 5>he too has added his name in support of the

0:38:07.680 --> 0:38:09.680
<v Speaker 5>motion to bay Kate. So now that's three members of

0:38:09.719 --> 0:38:13.760
<v Speaker 5>the Republican Conference. We're working to identify that Ghostsar statement

0:38:13.840 --> 0:38:16.359
<v Speaker 5>or verify it independently, as this has been reported by

0:38:16.400 --> 0:38:19.360
<v Speaker 5>other outlets. But of course this suggests because of the

0:38:19.360 --> 0:38:21.040
<v Speaker 5>way the math works in the House at and how

0:38:21.080 --> 0:38:24.319
<v Speaker 5>tight the margin is, that it will require Democrats to

0:38:24.440 --> 0:38:27.160
<v Speaker 5>show up and support the speaker so that he is

0:38:27.200 --> 0:38:29.239
<v Speaker 5>able to keep hold of the gavel. Whether or not

0:38:29.320 --> 0:38:31.640
<v Speaker 5>that's just not showing up to a new speak an

0:38:31.680 --> 0:38:34.440
<v Speaker 5>ouster vote, whether that is actually outright voting for him.

0:38:34.480 --> 0:38:36.600
<v Speaker 5>Will see what form it takes, but it will require

0:38:36.600 --> 0:38:39.160
<v Speaker 5>help from Democrats to save his job, just as it

0:38:39.200 --> 0:38:42.680
<v Speaker 5>took massive Democratic support to get this procedural vote over

0:38:42.719 --> 0:38:43.040
<v Speaker 5>the line.

0:38:43.080 --> 0:38:46.600
<v Speaker 3>Today, there is math on the votes and the bills,

0:38:46.600 --> 0:38:49.720
<v Speaker 3>and then there's procedure, which you explained really well. Earlier

0:38:49.719 --> 0:38:53.120
<v Speaker 3>in the show, we were talking about how Majority Leader

0:38:53.160 --> 0:38:56.480
<v Speaker 3>Schumer in the Senate had put lawmakers on notice to

0:38:56.560 --> 0:39:00.360
<v Speaker 3>be working this weekend. Just explain why the press to

0:39:00.400 --> 0:39:02.760
<v Speaker 3>work through the weekend on these bills.

0:39:03.520 --> 0:39:05.520
<v Speaker 5>Well, the Senate won't have a chance to act on

0:39:05.600 --> 0:39:08.520
<v Speaker 5>these bills until the House passes all of them, repackages

0:39:08.840 --> 0:39:11.520
<v Speaker 5>them together, and sends them to the Senate for a vote.

0:39:11.520 --> 0:39:13.520
<v Speaker 5>And the way the rules in the House are structured,

0:39:13.560 --> 0:39:16.600
<v Speaker 5>and what was agreed to when Kevin McCarthy was Speaker

0:39:16.960 --> 0:39:19.920
<v Speaker 5>all those months ago, was that members had to have

0:39:20.000 --> 0:39:22.080
<v Speaker 5>seventy two hours to read the text of a bill

0:39:22.120 --> 0:39:24.160
<v Speaker 5>before a vote, And because the text of this bill

0:39:24.960 --> 0:39:28.000
<v Speaker 5>was released less than seventy two hours ago, it cannot

0:39:28.080 --> 0:39:30.759
<v Speaker 5>be voted on until Saturday. So even though that we've

0:39:30.800 --> 0:39:33.120
<v Speaker 5>seen the rule vote today, which essentially just sets the

0:39:33.120 --> 0:39:35.759
<v Speaker 5>procedure for how this ultimately will pass when it comes

0:39:35.800 --> 0:39:37.879
<v Speaker 5>to final package, the House isn't going to be able

0:39:37.880 --> 0:39:41.240
<v Speaker 5>to clear all of this until Saturday afternoon, perhaps evening,

0:39:41.239 --> 0:39:43.080
<v Speaker 5>and then the Senate would be able to act after

0:39:43.120 --> 0:39:45.359
<v Speaker 5>the Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer has said they will

0:39:45.360 --> 0:39:47.560
<v Speaker 5>do so quickly, which is why they may be staying

0:39:47.560 --> 0:39:49.840
<v Speaker 5>in town. This maybe a Sunday vote or later. And

0:39:49.840 --> 0:39:51.839
<v Speaker 5>of course, keep in mind ed that in the US Senate,

0:39:51.840 --> 0:39:55.240
<v Speaker 5>where it is required to do anything quickly is unanimous consent.

0:39:55.360 --> 0:39:58.240
<v Speaker 5>Any One Senator, should they so choose, has the ability

0:39:58.440 --> 0:40:01.080
<v Speaker 5>to slow down the process. One like Senator Ran Paul,

0:40:01.120 --> 0:40:04.000
<v Speaker 5>for example, if he takes issue with this bill, could

0:40:04.200 --> 0:40:06.520
<v Speaker 5>refuse to accelerate the process until he has an a

0:40:06.600 --> 0:40:09.359
<v Speaker 5>vote on an amendment or something like that. So it'll

0:40:09.360 --> 0:40:11.520
<v Speaker 5>be a matter of how quickly the Senate can get

0:40:11.560 --> 0:40:14.280
<v Speaker 5>this done after the House completes its work this weekend.

0:40:14.719 --> 0:40:16.080
<v Speaker 4>Okayley, just very quickly.

0:40:16.400 --> 0:40:19.480
<v Speaker 3>The situation in the Middle East is that impacting the

0:40:19.520 --> 0:40:20.960
<v Speaker 3>passage of any of these bills.

0:40:22.120 --> 0:40:25.640
<v Speaker 5>It is when you first saw the Iranian attack against Israel,

0:40:25.680 --> 0:40:27.440
<v Speaker 5>the more than three hundred missiles and drones that were

0:40:27.480 --> 0:40:30.680
<v Speaker 5>sent toward Israel last weekend, you heard an outcry that

0:40:30.800 --> 0:40:33.160
<v Speaker 5>this underscored the need to get aid for Israel out

0:40:33.160 --> 0:40:35.520
<v Speaker 5>the door quickly. Of course, that has been attached in

0:40:35.640 --> 0:40:38.000
<v Speaker 5>large part to aid for other allies, including Ukraine, which

0:40:38.000 --> 0:40:40.560
<v Speaker 5>has been a much more difficult endeavor. But there also

0:40:40.560 --> 0:40:42.600
<v Speaker 5>had been growing calls to make sure that you aid

0:40:42.600 --> 0:40:45.279
<v Speaker 5>for Ukraine comes so quickly as intelligence was suggesting that

0:40:45.320 --> 0:40:48.440
<v Speaker 5>it was desperately needed in immediate fashion. So certainly the

0:40:48.440 --> 0:40:50.239
<v Speaker 5>hot wars we are seeing not just in the Middle

0:40:50.239 --> 0:40:52.600
<v Speaker 5>East but also on the continent of Europe have really

0:40:52.880 --> 0:40:54.759
<v Speaker 5>provided a lot of impotence to get this done. The

0:40:54.800 --> 0:40:58.240
<v Speaker 5>House Speaker himself said, the intelligence he had seen recently

0:40:58.280 --> 0:41:00.759
<v Speaker 5>really underscored to him that this was the right thing

0:41:00.800 --> 0:41:02.800
<v Speaker 5>to do, that this aid did indeed need to be passed.

0:41:02.800 --> 0:41:04.799
<v Speaker 5>And of course it's a decision that Johnson had to make.

0:41:05.000 --> 0:41:07.560
<v Speaker 5>Decide to do the right thing, even if you potentially

0:41:07.640 --> 0:41:09.719
<v Speaker 5>might lose your job as a result. That, of course,

0:41:09.840 --> 0:41:10.719
<v Speaker 5>ed will remain to be.

0:41:10.680 --> 0:41:14.640
<v Speaker 3>Seen Bloombo's Katie Lines and tune into Balance Power later

0:41:14.680 --> 0:41:15.920
<v Speaker 3>in the day for more updates.

0:41:15.920 --> 0:41:16.279
<v Speaker 4>Thank you.

0:41:17.400 --> 0:41:21.120
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Now, you'll never believe who is going viral. That's right,

0:41:21.400 --> 0:41:26.360
<v Speaker 3>it's Taylor Swift. Swifties worldwide are gushing about the singer's

0:41:26.400 --> 0:41:31.320
<v Speaker 3>new album, The Tortured Poets Department. The sixteen song record

0:41:31.400 --> 0:41:35.319
<v Speaker 3>dropped at midnight Eastern Time on Friday. The singer then

0:41:35.360 --> 0:41:39.120
<v Speaker 3>announced a surprise two hours later at two am. She'd

0:41:39.160 --> 0:41:43.920
<v Speaker 3>actually written a double album titled The Tortured Poets Department

0:41:44.040 --> 0:41:49.480
<v Speaker 3>The Anthology, with fifteen additional songs. So there I am

0:41:49.920 --> 0:41:52.920
<v Speaker 3>in my vehicle on my way to do Bloomberg Technology,

0:41:53.400 --> 0:41:57.319
<v Speaker 3>and I got through the first ten. I'm not going

0:41:57.360 --> 0:41:59.839
<v Speaker 3>to give my favorites just now, but check out social

0:42:00.480 --> 0:42:02.360
<v Speaker 3>There are some interesting titles in there.

0:42:04.000 --> 0:42:05.040
<v Speaker 4>Let's keep talking about it.

0:42:05.320 --> 0:42:08.719
<v Speaker 3>That does it for this edition of Bloomberg Technology. A

0:42:08.719 --> 0:42:10.759
<v Speaker 3>lot of headlines out of Washington, d C.

0:42:10.920 --> 0:42:11.520
<v Speaker 4>The Middle East.

0:42:11.520 --> 0:42:14.240
<v Speaker 3>We are paying attention to the passage of the TikTok

0:42:14.320 --> 0:42:15.840
<v Speaker 3>divestor Band bill as well.

0:42:16.280 --> 0:42:17.239
<v Speaker 4>Recap on the pod.

0:42:17.320 --> 0:42:19.600
<v Speaker 3>Listen is what Kaylie had to say about the process

0:42:19.920 --> 0:42:22.200
<v Speaker 3>in the coming forty eight hours in Washington, d C.

0:42:22.400 --> 0:42:25.400
<v Speaker 3>Check out the pod on Apple, Spotify, iHeart, and of

0:42:25.440 --> 0:42:28.200
<v Speaker 3>course we published all the Bloomberg platforms. It's been a

0:42:28.239 --> 0:42:30.920
<v Speaker 3>week in the world of technology. Thanks for watching. This

0:42:31.080 --> 0:42:34.440
<v Speaker 3>is Bloomberg Technology.