1 00:00:04,760 --> 00:00:08,080 Speaker 1: Welcome to the Bloomberg P and L Podcast. I'm Pim Fox. 2 00:00:08,119 --> 00:00:11,159 Speaker 1: Along with my co host Lisa Abramowitz. Each day we 3 00:00:11,280 --> 00:00:14,480 Speaker 1: bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for 4 00:00:14,520 --> 00:00:16,880 Speaker 1: you and your money, whether at the grocery store or 5 00:00:16,920 --> 00:00:20,680 Speaker 1: the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg P L Podcast on iTunes, 6 00:00:20,840 --> 00:00:29,880 Speaker 1: SoundCloud and at Bloomberg dot com. Well, let's talk about 7 00:00:29,920 --> 00:00:32,599 Speaker 1: what's going on in currency markets right now with Douglas 8 00:00:32,600 --> 00:00:35,080 Speaker 1: both work. He is Managing director, head of FX at 9 00:00:35,159 --> 00:00:39,160 Speaker 1: Chapter Lane and Company. Doug Borthwick always a pleasure dollar 10 00:00:39,280 --> 00:00:42,760 Speaker 1: Euro one oh seven. The Federal Reserve raises rates, but 11 00:00:42,880 --> 00:00:46,600 Speaker 1: the dollar weekends tell us. I think that the Federal 12 00:00:46,640 --> 00:00:49,400 Speaker 1: Reserve raising rates priced in pretty much over the last 13 00:00:49,680 --> 00:00:52,680 Speaker 1: three or four weeks, and so there's an expectation that 14 00:00:52,840 --> 00:00:55,400 Speaker 1: was already there. What people are really looking at is 15 00:00:55,440 --> 00:00:58,560 Speaker 1: the statements on the comments that came out from the Fed, 16 00:00:59,120 --> 00:01:01,520 Speaker 1: and I think there are nota in that. People realize 17 00:01:01,560 --> 00:01:04,280 Speaker 1: that the Fed raised rates even though growth is still 18 00:01:04,360 --> 00:01:07,840 Speaker 1: not where it should be, and so there's an expectation 19 00:01:07,880 --> 00:01:10,479 Speaker 1: that rather than having more rate rises going forward, there 20 00:01:10,480 --> 00:01:12,720 Speaker 1: may be less. I think on top of that, though 21 00:01:12,760 --> 00:01:16,280 Speaker 1: you've got this overall layering that comes from the Trump administration, 22 00:01:16,360 --> 00:01:18,200 Speaker 1: where they're out there talking about how they want a 23 00:01:18,240 --> 00:01:21,080 Speaker 1: weaker dollar. And I think that what you're seeing this 24 00:01:21,120 --> 00:01:23,000 Speaker 1: week is you've seen the Secretary of State go out 25 00:01:23,040 --> 00:01:25,039 Speaker 1: to Asia talk to them, and since she's been out there, 26 00:01:25,040 --> 00:01:27,640 Speaker 1: you've seen Dolly and start to come off considerably. You've 27 00:01:27,640 --> 00:01:30,760 Speaker 1: seen in Europe, you've seen the German Deputy financements are 28 00:01:30,760 --> 00:01:33,160 Speaker 1: talking about how to higher euro isn't that bad and 29 00:01:33,160 --> 00:01:35,399 Speaker 1: they'd like to see higher rates in Europe. And so 30 00:01:35,440 --> 00:01:37,240 Speaker 1: there's a little bit of a change here in terms 31 00:01:37,240 --> 00:01:39,959 Speaker 1: of both interest rates but also where people think currency 32 00:01:40,040 --> 00:01:42,839 Speaker 1: should be. Certainly, with the Fed raised rates by twenty 33 00:01:42,880 --> 00:01:45,120 Speaker 1: five basis points, but now Europe is talking about maybe 34 00:01:45,240 --> 00:01:47,520 Speaker 1: ending their chewi and raising their rates as well, so 35 00:01:47,600 --> 00:01:51,000 Speaker 1: that cancels some of the effects. But also if the Fed, 36 00:01:51,240 --> 00:01:54,080 Speaker 1: if the US administration was to look for a weaker dollar, 37 00:01:54,720 --> 00:01:57,000 Speaker 1: they'll be looking forward against the currencies that they have 38 00:01:57,320 --> 00:01:59,960 Speaker 1: obviously the largest deficits against. You've seen Dollar Mexico come 39 00:02:00,080 --> 00:02:03,440 Speaker 1: done considerably, You've seen Dolla Enne come off, and you're 40 00:02:03,440 --> 00:02:06,080 Speaker 1: also seeing the Euro start to rally. On Our belief 41 00:02:06,160 --> 00:02:08,040 Speaker 1: is that you're going to see at the G twenty 42 00:02:08,120 --> 00:02:11,240 Speaker 1: meeting this weekend, there's going to be considerable discussion about 43 00:02:11,280 --> 00:02:15,240 Speaker 1: currencies pressed forward by the new Treasury Secretary, and that's 44 00:02:15,280 --> 00:02:18,959 Speaker 1: going to cause some movement in that they're going to 45 00:02:19,040 --> 00:02:23,240 Speaker 1: be no longer approving countries going out there and weakening 46 00:02:23,280 --> 00:02:26,560 Speaker 1: their currency for the for the pure sense of to 47 00:02:26,600 --> 00:02:29,120 Speaker 1: get more trade. If that happens, you'll see Dolly inn 48 00:02:29,160 --> 00:02:31,480 Speaker 1: come off. You expected the eurogo bid, You just actually 49 00:02:31,760 --> 00:02:34,480 Speaker 1: Dolla Mexico go lower. And I think that what they're 50 00:02:34,520 --> 00:02:36,760 Speaker 1: doing is they're setting the table for a Plaza cord 51 00:02:36,800 --> 00:02:40,520 Speaker 1: two point oh perhaps at Mara Lago next week, sorry, 52 00:02:40,560 --> 00:02:43,960 Speaker 1: next month, when the Chinese premier is coming over. Doug, 53 00:02:44,040 --> 00:02:46,240 Speaker 1: I want to pass through some of the things you 54 00:02:46,280 --> 00:02:48,680 Speaker 1: were saying, because you made a lot of fascinating points. 55 00:02:48,760 --> 00:02:51,840 Speaker 1: Number one, perhaps the feed is taking a backseat to 56 00:02:52,400 --> 00:02:55,440 Speaker 1: the policies of President Trump. The fact that Rex Tillerson 57 00:02:55,480 --> 00:02:58,440 Speaker 1: has been going around and meeting with UH foreign officials. 58 00:02:58,480 --> 00:03:00,840 Speaker 1: We are looking at the end strength and against the dollar. 59 00:03:01,480 --> 00:03:03,960 Speaker 1: The pound is strengthening a lot against the dollar, and 60 00:03:04,000 --> 00:03:06,600 Speaker 1: I'm wondering if the pound is not probably the target 61 00:03:06,639 --> 00:03:11,760 Speaker 1: here but UH in Asia, how exactly would conversations with 62 00:03:11,840 --> 00:03:14,679 Speaker 1: Rex Tillerson and some of the leaders of those countries 63 00:03:15,000 --> 00:03:19,000 Speaker 1: directly and immediately trickle out into currency movements. Well, I 64 00:03:19,040 --> 00:03:21,640 Speaker 1: think it's a quick pro quo in that, you know, 65 00:03:21,919 --> 00:03:24,520 Speaker 1: when the Trump administration came in, they struck a very 66 00:03:24,560 --> 00:03:26,440 Speaker 1: hard line, they said, you know, why should we be 67 00:03:26,480 --> 00:03:29,360 Speaker 1: out there policing your waters And since then they've managed 68 00:03:29,400 --> 00:03:31,720 Speaker 1: to clock it back somewhat. But I think that by 69 00:03:31,760 --> 00:03:34,320 Speaker 1: having that fear out there allows these negotiating room, which 70 00:03:34,320 --> 00:03:37,400 Speaker 1: is suddenly the President Trump obviously likes. By negotiating room, 71 00:03:37,440 --> 00:03:38,640 Speaker 1: you say to them, look, we don't want you to 72 00:03:38,640 --> 00:03:41,840 Speaker 1: stop interviewing in your currency markets. In return, will end 73 00:03:41,880 --> 00:03:44,120 Speaker 1: up being your policeman and continued to pay for our 74 00:03:44,120 --> 00:03:46,240 Speaker 1: bases out there and to look after you and protect 75 00:03:46,280 --> 00:03:48,600 Speaker 1: you from North Korea, for example. And so I think 76 00:03:48,600 --> 00:03:51,640 Speaker 1: that there is there's a direct correlation there between you know, 77 00:03:51,840 --> 00:03:54,240 Speaker 1: USUS essentially using the big stick in one hand, but 78 00:03:54,320 --> 00:03:57,360 Speaker 1: then speaking softly in the other. The softly speaking is 79 00:03:57,600 --> 00:03:59,960 Speaker 1: right now in the currency market, spend the big swift 80 00:04:00,040 --> 00:04:04,119 Speaker 1: and is thus sending out carriers out to that region. Douglas, 81 00:04:04,160 --> 00:04:05,680 Speaker 1: I wonder if you could just talk a little bit 82 00:04:05,680 --> 00:04:11,520 Speaker 1: about Italy and the sort of contradiction between how Italian 83 00:04:11,560 --> 00:04:14,320 Speaker 1: seemed to view using the Euro and perhaps the French 84 00:04:14,440 --> 00:04:17,440 Speaker 1: or other members of the European Union, and maybe just 85 00:04:17,440 --> 00:04:20,840 Speaker 1: put it in the context of the Dutch elections. Well, 86 00:04:20,880 --> 00:04:24,120 Speaker 1: I think that everyone uses for for someone like Italy 87 00:04:24,160 --> 00:04:26,760 Speaker 1: that's more in the fringe in terms of normally if 88 00:04:26,760 --> 00:04:28,599 Speaker 1: they didn't have the Euro, that have much much higher 89 00:04:28,600 --> 00:04:31,000 Speaker 1: interest rates than they do right now. I think France 90 00:04:31,080 --> 00:04:33,599 Speaker 1: is closer to the center and closer to where Germany is, 91 00:04:33,640 --> 00:04:35,920 Speaker 1: and the administration would be high, but maybe not quite 92 00:04:35,960 --> 00:04:38,440 Speaker 1: as low as they are right now. But certainly all 93 00:04:38,560 --> 00:04:41,360 Speaker 1: countries in Europe benefit from being part of the Euro 94 00:04:41,480 --> 00:04:44,240 Speaker 1: because they get that Germany part which lies them to 95 00:04:44,279 --> 00:04:46,960 Speaker 1: have much much lower rates. But now that can be 96 00:04:47,000 --> 00:04:49,600 Speaker 1: constrictive at times as well, which the UK certainly, though 97 00:04:49,640 --> 00:04:51,800 Speaker 1: not part of the Euro, is noting as part of 98 00:04:51,839 --> 00:04:53,840 Speaker 1: the EU, and that it means you give up a 99 00:04:53,880 --> 00:04:56,520 Speaker 1: lot of sovereignty. And I think that the Italians probably 100 00:04:56,640 --> 00:04:58,640 Speaker 1: rather a little bit more sovereignty these days. If they 101 00:04:58,640 --> 00:05:01,160 Speaker 1: want to get the industry going, they probably rather much 102 00:05:01,200 --> 00:05:04,160 Speaker 1: weaker currency, so they could sort of rev up their um, 103 00:05:04,320 --> 00:05:07,200 Speaker 1: their their their economies. But you also have you know, 104 00:05:07,320 --> 00:05:10,159 Speaker 1: lots of different sex coming out. There are are are facts, 105 00:05:10,680 --> 00:05:13,480 Speaker 1: are a new positions, are are in each of the 106 00:05:13,520 --> 00:05:15,720 Speaker 1: markets that are moving towards more of a nationalist state. 107 00:05:16,160 --> 00:05:17,839 Speaker 1: They look at what Trump's done in the United States 108 00:05:17,880 --> 00:05:19,720 Speaker 1: and they think maybe this is our turn, you know. 109 00:05:19,760 --> 00:05:21,440 Speaker 1: They look at the UK leaving the EU and they 110 00:05:21,440 --> 00:05:24,120 Speaker 1: think maybe this is our turn. They point to immigration, 111 00:05:24,160 --> 00:05:26,200 Speaker 1: they say, maybe this is our turn. But then you 112 00:05:26,240 --> 00:05:28,760 Speaker 1: get the election, you know, last night, and obviously and 113 00:05:28,839 --> 00:05:31,040 Speaker 1: it came out and maybe they know that the right 114 00:05:31,080 --> 00:05:33,840 Speaker 1: wing side didn't get in quite as many votes as 115 00:05:33,839 --> 00:05:36,159 Speaker 1: they expected to, and so it seem as a little 116 00:05:36,160 --> 00:05:38,080 Speaker 1: bit of a fizzle, which obviously helps the euro to 117 00:05:38,160 --> 00:05:41,320 Speaker 1: rally by its dirty pips since that dnaiment came out. 118 00:05:41,760 --> 00:05:43,560 Speaker 1: So and then there's a lot of there's a lot 119 00:05:43,560 --> 00:05:45,919 Speaker 1: of different things, you know. Scotland also as part of 120 00:05:45,920 --> 00:05:48,320 Speaker 1: this whole discussion, Scotland then turns round and says we'd 121 00:05:48,360 --> 00:05:51,120 Speaker 1: like to leave the UK, but at the same time 122 00:05:51,160 --> 00:05:53,160 Speaker 1: we'd like to be part of the EU. Well, it's 123 00:05:53,200 --> 00:05:54,760 Speaker 1: not going to be allowed by a lot of countries 124 00:05:54,839 --> 00:05:58,320 Speaker 1: in in Europe because they don't want different areas within 125 00:05:58,360 --> 00:06:00,360 Speaker 1: their countries to splinter r and say we want to 126 00:06:00,440 --> 00:06:04,320 Speaker 1: do the same thing real quick thirty seconds. Doug, out 127 00:06:04,320 --> 00:06:06,480 Speaker 1: of all of this uncertainty, what's the one currency that 128 00:06:06,520 --> 00:06:07,839 Speaker 1: you think is going to move the most in the 129 00:06:07,880 --> 00:06:10,640 Speaker 1: next six months. I think that everyone believes the Chinese 130 00:06:10,640 --> 00:06:12,000 Speaker 1: currency is going to weaken. I think it's going to 131 00:06:12,040 --> 00:06:14,960 Speaker 1: strengthen considerably. I think it's going to strengthen consivably because 132 00:06:14,960 --> 00:06:16,719 Speaker 1: I think you're gonna see the Euro move higher, dollar 133 00:06:16,800 --> 00:06:19,000 Speaker 1: yen move a lot lower. I think that on the 134 00:06:19,040 --> 00:06:20,919 Speaker 1: back of that, because the Chinese currency is based on 135 00:06:20,960 --> 00:06:23,880 Speaker 1: a basket, yourency the Chinese currency strengthened, especially given that 136 00:06:23,960 --> 00:06:26,520 Speaker 1: there's a lot of positioning out there right now that 137 00:06:26,560 --> 00:06:30,160 Speaker 1: has short China as opposed to along China. Fascinating. Thank 138 00:06:30,200 --> 00:06:32,599 Speaker 1: you so much for joining us, Doug Barthwick with a 139 00:06:32,640 --> 00:06:37,120 Speaker 1: contrarian call for a strengthening Chinese currency. He's managing director 140 00:06:37,160 --> 00:06:40,000 Speaker 1: and head of f X at Chapter Lane and Company. 141 00:06:40,360 --> 00:06:42,880 Speaker 1: UH and we're looking at a dollar that is weakening 142 00:06:42,920 --> 00:06:47,440 Speaker 1: against most other currencies from Asia to Europe. After the 143 00:06:47,440 --> 00:06:50,760 Speaker 1: Federal Reserve spoken as the u AS goes out and 144 00:06:50,800 --> 00:06:53,359 Speaker 1: tries to sort of change the conversation with respect to 145 00:06:53,760 --> 00:07:09,640 Speaker 1: currency manipulation. The ticker for the Bank of America, Mary 146 00:07:09,760 --> 00:07:14,640 Speaker 1: lynch U s issuers of high yield retail bonds is 147 00:07:14,840 --> 00:07:18,200 Speaker 1: really apropos. It's hurt h u r T and it 148 00:07:18,280 --> 00:07:21,520 Speaker 1: works very well because these bonds have been in a 149 00:07:21,560 --> 00:07:24,040 Speaker 1: world of hurt so far this year. They are the 150 00:07:24,040 --> 00:07:27,080 Speaker 1: worst performing bonds in the high old bond market. And 151 00:07:27,080 --> 00:07:29,080 Speaker 1: I want to bring in someone who knows a lot 152 00:07:29,080 --> 00:07:30,920 Speaker 1: more about this, Jenna g. N Nelly. She is a 153 00:07:30,960 --> 00:07:34,600 Speaker 1: high yield analyst and also focuses on retail and gaming 154 00:07:35,040 --> 00:07:37,000 Speaker 1: at City Group, and she joins us here in our 155 00:07:37,000 --> 00:07:40,559 Speaker 1: Bloombrig eleven three oh student studio. Jenna, We're so glad 156 00:07:40,600 --> 00:07:42,200 Speaker 1: you could be here, And I want to start with 157 00:07:42,240 --> 00:07:45,840 Speaker 1: the idea, uh that we've seen all of these losses, 158 00:07:45,880 --> 00:07:50,160 Speaker 1: we've seen mounting bankruptcies and the expectation of more Where 159 00:07:50,200 --> 00:07:53,360 Speaker 1: are we in this cycle? How much more pain are 160 00:07:53,400 --> 00:07:56,880 Speaker 1: we going to see in retailers? Hi, Lisa, thanks so 161 00:07:56,960 --> 00:07:59,320 Speaker 1: much for having me in today. Um having to be here, 162 00:07:59,680 --> 00:08:01,680 Speaker 1: you know, I I think that's you know, a great question, 163 00:08:01,720 --> 00:08:03,800 Speaker 1: and I would say that although there are a lot 164 00:08:03,840 --> 00:08:06,240 Speaker 1: of investors out there that are thinking this might be 165 00:08:06,280 --> 00:08:08,440 Speaker 1: the opportunity and the time to jump in. And I 166 00:08:08,480 --> 00:08:10,520 Speaker 1: do still think that there is more pain to be had. 167 00:08:10,760 --> 00:08:13,600 Speaker 1: I mean, we remain underweight the sector. UM. And I 168 00:08:13,640 --> 00:08:15,320 Speaker 1: think that when you look at a lot of the 169 00:08:15,440 --> 00:08:19,160 Speaker 1: issues that investors are concerned about right now, especially for 170 00:08:19,240 --> 00:08:22,320 Speaker 1: some of these larger LBO candidates, about potential for you know, 171 00:08:22,360 --> 00:08:25,840 Speaker 1: moving assets, looking at loose covenants. UM. You know, more 172 00:08:25,880 --> 00:08:30,200 Speaker 1: macro issues like border adjustment, taxes, arising cost environment UM, 173 00:08:30,240 --> 00:08:32,240 Speaker 1: and really some of the bigger secular issues that we're 174 00:08:32,240 --> 00:08:37,600 Speaker 1: facing like increasing online print penetration, changing consumer preferences. UM. 175 00:08:37,640 --> 00:08:39,800 Speaker 1: There's a whole host of things center investors, you know, 176 00:08:39,880 --> 00:08:41,679 Speaker 1: need to be worried about. It's coming out them from 177 00:08:41,679 --> 00:08:44,000 Speaker 1: every angle. So I think we're still going to continue 178 00:08:44,000 --> 00:08:45,880 Speaker 1: to see these play out in two thousands seventeen. And 179 00:08:45,920 --> 00:08:49,000 Speaker 1: some of the LBO companies that you're talking about, even 180 00:08:49,040 --> 00:08:53,559 Speaker 1: Marcus Jake, Crude Toys, r Us Claire's, Jimberry, many more. Uh, 181 00:08:53,720 --> 00:08:55,520 Speaker 1: how many of these do you expect to go bankrupt? 182 00:08:56,000 --> 00:08:58,120 Speaker 1: Oh that's a good question. I mean, look, the reality 183 00:08:58,160 --> 00:09:00,120 Speaker 1: has a lot of them don't actually have liquid the 184 00:09:00,200 --> 00:09:02,600 Speaker 1: issues as it stands right now. UM. You know, when 185 00:09:02,600 --> 00:09:05,400 Speaker 1: you think about Nieman, UM, you know, even if Claire's 186 00:09:05,440 --> 00:09:07,720 Speaker 1: has some time left, Jimbury, you know, could be a 187 00:09:07,760 --> 00:09:10,440 Speaker 1: two thousand and seventeen event, but they do still have 188 00:09:10,520 --> 00:09:13,120 Speaker 1: liquidity and you know a lot of the maturity runways 189 00:09:13,160 --> 00:09:15,080 Speaker 1: for at least the next one to two years. Um, 190 00:09:15,160 --> 00:09:17,040 Speaker 1: So I think we'll see restructuring. I mean a lot 191 00:09:17,080 --> 00:09:18,960 Speaker 1: of them, you still have you look at the sponsors. 192 00:09:19,000 --> 00:09:20,679 Speaker 1: They haven't taken a lot of money out of these 193 00:09:20,760 --> 00:09:22,439 Speaker 1: l b o s, right, so they're gonna do everything 194 00:09:22,440 --> 00:09:24,440 Speaker 1: that they can kind of kick the can down the 195 00:09:24,520 --> 00:09:26,439 Speaker 1: road and do some sort of an exchange with the 196 00:09:26,480 --> 00:09:29,080 Speaker 1: bond holders to really do everything they possibly can to 197 00:09:29,080 --> 00:09:32,000 Speaker 1: avoid bankruptcy and preserve their equity cushion. So I don't 198 00:09:32,040 --> 00:09:33,640 Speaker 1: think we're actually going to see a ton for some 199 00:09:33,679 --> 00:09:36,120 Speaker 1: of these bigger names in two thousand and seventeen. Maybe 200 00:09:36,120 --> 00:09:38,640 Speaker 1: down the road, um, but we have some time. But 201 00:09:38,720 --> 00:09:41,000 Speaker 1: so if that's the case, they're basically going to squeeze 202 00:09:41,000 --> 00:09:44,200 Speaker 1: everything out of everywhere but the equity holders, which means 203 00:09:44,520 --> 00:09:47,520 Speaker 1: the bond holders will be potentially really bad for all 204 00:09:47,559 --> 00:09:50,480 Speaker 1: of the debt owners in these companies. That's the fear. 205 00:09:50,640 --> 00:09:52,280 Speaker 1: That is the fear, and that has been you know, 206 00:09:52,320 --> 00:09:54,560 Speaker 1: I'd say, the one of the big topics so far 207 00:09:54,679 --> 00:09:58,120 Speaker 1: here to date is you know, covenants, covenants, covenants, um 208 00:09:58,160 --> 00:10:00,880 Speaker 1: everyone I think you know, it started with Player's last summer, 209 00:10:00,880 --> 00:10:04,320 Speaker 1: I mean, and and then J Crew um with with um, 210 00:10:04,440 --> 00:10:08,079 Speaker 1: you know, the moving of IP assets where everyone's exploring 211 00:10:08,080 --> 00:10:10,559 Speaker 1: it now as a possibility for all these companies, UM, 212 00:10:10,600 --> 00:10:13,160 Speaker 1: you know Nemon Marcus looking at their covenants and saying 213 00:10:13,200 --> 00:10:15,040 Speaker 1: what assets could they move? They just you know, announced 214 00:10:15,080 --> 00:10:17,600 Speaker 1: the other day that they are doing something of this nature, 215 00:10:17,640 --> 00:10:20,880 Speaker 1: moving assets into an unrestricted subsidiary for the purpose of 216 00:10:20,880 --> 00:10:23,920 Speaker 1: of dealing with bond holders. So, UM, we're seeing loans, 217 00:10:24,000 --> 00:10:27,240 Speaker 1: especially in retail, you know, under some pressure. Uh. And 218 00:10:27,240 --> 00:10:30,079 Speaker 1: and there's a concern that look there in these documents 219 00:10:30,120 --> 00:10:32,800 Speaker 1: there are um, I don't want to say, not loopholes, 220 00:10:32,800 --> 00:10:36,880 Speaker 1: but certainly flexibility to um you know, to to move 221 00:10:36,920 --> 00:10:38,920 Speaker 1: assets out to the detriment of the creditors. So we're 222 00:10:38,920 --> 00:10:40,680 Speaker 1: seeing that in levels. And it's one of the biggest 223 00:10:40,679 --> 00:10:45,000 Speaker 1: concerns on investor's mind right now. It's the supply available 224 00:10:45,040 --> 00:10:47,800 Speaker 1: for the kind of investor that you are dealing with, 225 00:10:47,920 --> 00:10:51,880 Speaker 1: because you know, supply begets demand in many cases in 226 00:10:52,000 --> 00:10:55,120 Speaker 1: terms of yes, I mean I think look generally, um, 227 00:10:55,200 --> 00:10:57,160 Speaker 1: you know, the supply of of bonds out there. I mean, 228 00:10:57,320 --> 00:11:01,560 Speaker 1: we've definitely seen more sellers than buyers in retail, especially 229 00:11:01,559 --> 00:11:03,360 Speaker 1: in most real money accounts. And you think about it, 230 00:11:03,400 --> 00:11:07,360 Speaker 1: more traditional investors versus hedge funds. Traditional guys have been 231 00:11:07,559 --> 00:11:10,400 Speaker 1: um largely underweight for most of two thousand and sixteen, 232 00:11:10,400 --> 00:11:12,880 Speaker 1: and then even into two thousand and seventeen, we've had 233 00:11:12,920 --> 00:11:15,080 Speaker 1: a lot of hedge funds and more distress players I'd 234 00:11:15,120 --> 00:11:20,080 Speaker 1: say hovering but not quite stepping in pulling the trigger. 235 00:11:20,360 --> 00:11:22,400 Speaker 1: No one, no one pulling the trigger, but some are 236 00:11:22,520 --> 00:11:24,880 Speaker 1: increasingly pulling the trigger on the opposite bet. I mean, 237 00:11:25,240 --> 00:11:28,280 Speaker 1: you're talking Genna about how it's very common discussion about 238 00:11:28,280 --> 00:11:30,280 Speaker 1: how much pain has been in the retailers. And there 239 00:11:30,320 --> 00:11:32,680 Speaker 1: was a story on the Bloomberg just a few days 240 00:11:32,679 --> 00:11:35,000 Speaker 1: ago about how the big short now is in commercial 241 00:11:35,000 --> 00:11:39,120 Speaker 1: mortgage backed securities that are tied to retail properties. Also, 242 00:11:39,160 --> 00:11:41,959 Speaker 1: we're seeing short interest on retail reads rise to the 243 00:11:42,040 --> 00:11:46,319 Speaker 1: highest level in more than two years. Is now the time? 244 00:11:46,480 --> 00:11:48,080 Speaker 1: Is this the big short? Is now the time to 245 00:11:48,400 --> 00:11:50,480 Speaker 1: short sell this stuff? Well, you know, I think it's 246 00:11:50,520 --> 00:11:52,880 Speaker 1: the first time that we've ever had actually heard any 247 00:11:52,920 --> 00:11:56,200 Speaker 1: commentary from the retailers where they're staying there starting to 248 00:11:56,200 --> 00:11:58,880 Speaker 1: see rent relief. Right, We've been everyone's been asking about 249 00:11:58,880 --> 00:12:00,839 Speaker 1: this trade probably for the last two or three years. 250 00:12:00,920 --> 00:12:02,520 Speaker 1: How could the rots be doing so well and the 251 00:12:02,559 --> 00:12:04,840 Speaker 1: retailers be doing so poorly. It doesn't make any sense. 252 00:12:04,880 --> 00:12:07,400 Speaker 1: And for the first time we're hearing the retailers say, look, 253 00:12:07,400 --> 00:12:09,520 Speaker 1: we are starting to get some relief. We're starting to 254 00:12:09,559 --> 00:12:13,199 Speaker 1: see more favorable clauses when we are extending their leases. 255 00:12:13,280 --> 00:12:16,160 Speaker 1: But that being said, um, you know, the average lease life, 256 00:12:16,200 --> 00:12:17,920 Speaker 1: you know, you're still looking at five to ten years 257 00:12:17,920 --> 00:12:19,920 Speaker 1: for a lot of these guys, and so it's going 258 00:12:19,960 --> 00:12:22,680 Speaker 1: to be measured in terms of the timing of the closures. 259 00:12:22,920 --> 00:12:25,280 Speaker 1: It's going to be more concentrated in the lower end malls. 260 00:12:25,280 --> 00:12:26,959 Speaker 1: When you think about the dispersion of A, B and 261 00:12:27,000 --> 00:12:28,960 Speaker 1: C malls, the C malls are really there are a 262 00:12:29,000 --> 00:12:30,680 Speaker 1: third of the malls in this country, right, and so 263 00:12:30,720 --> 00:12:33,640 Speaker 1: it's gonna definitely be more concentrated towards those. When you 264 00:12:33,640 --> 00:12:35,320 Speaker 1: think about the closures that we're going to be seeing 265 00:12:35,320 --> 00:12:37,960 Speaker 1: a Macy's in J. C. Penny. That's where these you know, 266 00:12:38,000 --> 00:12:40,680 Speaker 1: the anchor stores are going to be concentrated again, it's 267 00:12:40,679 --> 00:12:43,319 Speaker 1: going to take time to play out. Um, And you know, 268 00:12:43,320 --> 00:12:44,880 Speaker 1: I don't want to say it's a crowded trade, but 269 00:12:45,080 --> 00:12:47,719 Speaker 1: I don't. But um, it's certainly been a popular one 270 00:12:47,800 --> 00:12:49,199 Speaker 1: and one that you know, I think a lot of 271 00:12:49,240 --> 00:12:51,280 Speaker 1: investors have tried to express a view. And you don't 272 00:12:51,280 --> 00:12:53,520 Speaker 1: have to say it's so popular. It's not crowded, it's 273 00:12:53,559 --> 00:12:56,360 Speaker 1: just popular. But gently just to be clear, so SEA 274 00:12:56,400 --> 00:12:58,280 Speaker 1: malls are the ones that are sort of lower tier 275 00:12:58,320 --> 00:13:00,720 Speaker 1: and lower end and A or this, yeah, more luxury, 276 00:13:00,760 --> 00:13:02,680 Speaker 1: and B is in the middle exactly. I think the 277 00:13:02,720 --> 00:13:06,120 Speaker 1: perception is that traffic has been um just week across 278 00:13:06,160 --> 00:13:09,040 Speaker 1: the board, but when you look at the dispersion, UM, 279 00:13:09,080 --> 00:13:11,360 Speaker 1: A malls have really held up pretty well, I would say, 280 00:13:11,360 --> 00:13:14,520 Speaker 1: I mean, occupancy rates are still very strong. Um, you know, 281 00:13:14,559 --> 00:13:17,720 Speaker 1: the traffic to those malls is still reasonable, maybe flat 282 00:13:17,720 --> 00:13:20,920 Speaker 1: to download single digit. It's definitely been more concentrated in 283 00:13:20,960 --> 00:13:24,679 Speaker 1: the lower end where you're seeing um, you know, occupancies 284 00:13:24,760 --> 00:13:28,200 Speaker 1: decline and um the traffic you know, um, you know, 285 00:13:28,280 --> 00:13:29,559 Speaker 1: you know week or we've we've heard from a few 286 00:13:29,559 --> 00:13:31,959 Speaker 1: different retailers that when you think about the dispersion of comps, 287 00:13:32,360 --> 00:13:34,880 Speaker 1: um it could be anywhere from two to three percentage 288 00:13:34,880 --> 00:13:37,040 Speaker 1: points for an A versus B versus C mall. So 289 00:13:37,080 --> 00:13:38,920 Speaker 1: if you're a mall, you're down to you you're down 290 00:13:38,920 --> 00:13:40,880 Speaker 1: for in your be mall, and you're you know you're 291 00:13:40,880 --> 00:13:43,040 Speaker 1: down six and your semall just I mean, it's not 292 00:13:43,160 --> 00:13:45,040 Speaker 1: a perfect rule of thumb, but we've heard to that 293 00:13:45,120 --> 00:13:47,439 Speaker 1: you know that degree for different retailers, which is why 294 00:13:47,440 --> 00:13:49,760 Speaker 1: you're seeing such negative comps for a lot of these guys. 295 00:13:50,200 --> 00:13:52,040 Speaker 1: Thank you very much for coming in and spending time 296 00:13:52,040 --> 00:13:53,680 Speaker 1: with us. We look forward to having you again in 297 00:13:53,679 --> 00:13:57,240 Speaker 1: the future. Jenner Gnelli is the high Yield Analysts for 298 00:13:57,360 --> 00:14:13,319 Speaker 1: retail and gaming from City Group. Thank you very much well. 299 00:14:13,360 --> 00:14:16,679 Speaker 1: The Bank of England today held its benchmark interest rates steady, 300 00:14:16,880 --> 00:14:20,840 Speaker 1: but signaled that an increase may not be far off. Indeed, 301 00:14:20,880 --> 00:14:25,160 Speaker 1: one official dissenting in favor of higher borrowing costs, and 302 00:14:25,240 --> 00:14:28,440 Speaker 1: others saying that it might not be long before they 303 00:14:28,520 --> 00:14:31,160 Speaker 1: do the same. Here to tell us more about the 304 00:14:31,280 --> 00:14:34,880 Speaker 1: decision and also a look at European politics and economy 305 00:14:34,960 --> 00:14:38,640 Speaker 1: is Jamie Murray. He is chief European, Middle East and 306 00:14:39,000 --> 00:14:42,920 Speaker 1: Africa economist for Bloomberg Intelligence, and he joins us from 307 00:14:42,960 --> 00:14:45,760 Speaker 1: our London studio, Jamie, thanks very much for being with us. 308 00:14:45,760 --> 00:14:48,800 Speaker 1: Tell us about the Bank of England rate decision, well, 309 00:14:49,040 --> 00:14:52,440 Speaker 1: I think the markets have probably correctly interpreted it as 310 00:14:52,520 --> 00:14:56,240 Speaker 1: more hawkish than previous statements, and it took most people 311 00:14:56,240 --> 00:15:00,120 Speaker 1: by surprise. One thing I would say is that this 312 00:15:00,240 --> 00:15:04,600 Speaker 1: may not last that long because the member that elected 313 00:15:04,600 --> 00:15:07,000 Speaker 1: to lift rates is only going to be on the 314 00:15:07,040 --> 00:15:10,920 Speaker 1: Monitary Policy Committee until June before she is replaced. And 315 00:15:11,160 --> 00:15:14,560 Speaker 1: we expressed in Forbes that's right, yes, so we expect 316 00:15:14,640 --> 00:15:16,520 Speaker 1: the one. We don't know who's going to replace it. 317 00:15:16,600 --> 00:15:19,000 Speaker 1: It could be could be anyone um. And the other 318 00:15:19,040 --> 00:15:21,320 Speaker 1: thing to bear in mind is that the Bank of 319 00:15:21,320 --> 00:15:24,160 Speaker 1: England is making this contingent on what happens to the 320 00:15:24,240 --> 00:15:27,280 Speaker 1: data now. So far the data is surprised. On the upside, 321 00:15:27,320 --> 00:15:30,280 Speaker 1: growth has been stronger, inflation has been roughly where most 322 00:15:30,320 --> 00:15:33,800 Speaker 1: people expected it to be given what's happened to Sterling. Now, 323 00:15:33,880 --> 00:15:36,200 Speaker 1: if that continues, then yes we could be in for 324 00:15:36,960 --> 00:15:40,320 Speaker 1: earlier rate hike. But our view is that the economy, 325 00:15:40,440 --> 00:15:42,320 Speaker 1: or at least the data will begin to sour little 326 00:15:42,320 --> 00:15:45,760 Speaker 1: bits GDP growth will slow as that exchange rate effect 327 00:15:45,800 --> 00:15:50,400 Speaker 1: starts to squeeze real incomes and lift inflation. Well, Jamie, 328 00:15:50,600 --> 00:15:52,280 Speaker 1: when you talk about the border market and how it 329 00:15:52,280 --> 00:15:55,000 Speaker 1: responded him in two year yields in the UK more 330 00:15:55,080 --> 00:15:59,000 Speaker 1: than doubled in response to the Bank of England's decision 331 00:15:59,480 --> 00:16:02,240 Speaker 1: UM to not do anything but sort of the hawk 332 00:16:02,320 --> 00:16:05,880 Speaker 1: ish tone, and Paul Dobson, Bloomberg team leader here noted 333 00:16:06,000 --> 00:16:09,400 Speaker 1: on the Market's live blog that the smoking gun from 334 00:16:09,400 --> 00:16:11,800 Speaker 1: the BOE minutes that made the market sit up and 335 00:16:11,840 --> 00:16:15,120 Speaker 1: pay attention was with inflation rising sharply and only mixed 336 00:16:15,160 --> 00:16:19,240 Speaker 1: evidence and slowing activity domestically. Some members noted that would 337 00:16:19,240 --> 00:16:22,360 Speaker 1: take relatively little further upside news on the prospects for 338 00:16:22,400 --> 00:16:24,800 Speaker 1: activity or inflation for them to consider that a more 339 00:16:24,840 --> 00:16:28,360 Speaker 1: immediate reduction and policy support might be warranted. In other words, uh, 340 00:16:28,400 --> 00:16:31,000 Speaker 1: they would be more willing to go ahead and hike 341 00:16:31,120 --> 00:16:34,400 Speaker 1: rates faster with just a little bit more news that 342 00:16:34,440 --> 00:16:36,640 Speaker 1: would that would that would edify this sense of of 343 00:16:36,800 --> 00:16:40,720 Speaker 1: inflation rising. Yes, so I completely agree with Paul's assessment there. 344 00:16:40,920 --> 00:16:43,760 Speaker 1: The thing is that we I'm not expecting the data 345 00:16:43,800 --> 00:16:47,320 Speaker 1: to show that source of improvement. The wages data came 346 00:16:47,360 --> 00:16:52,280 Speaker 1: in remarkably weak just this week. UM. The and despite 347 00:16:52,320 --> 00:16:55,080 Speaker 1: the fact that unemployment is falling to very low levels, 348 00:16:55,200 --> 00:16:59,960 Speaker 1: so there's no evidence whatsoever that domestically generated inflation is rising. 349 00:17:00,040 --> 00:17:01,440 Speaker 1: And that's what the Bank of England needs to be 350 00:17:01,440 --> 00:17:04,000 Speaker 1: looking at. Well, if that's what they need to be 351 00:17:04,160 --> 00:17:06,040 Speaker 1: looking at, I wonder if you could provide a little 352 00:17:06,040 --> 00:17:10,560 Speaker 1: bit of context for Brexit, the ongoing negotiations and then 353 00:17:10,720 --> 00:17:14,240 Speaker 1: dive into Dutch politics. For us, well, we're up to 354 00:17:14,280 --> 00:17:18,200 Speaker 1: with Brexit is that that's the Article fifty is likely 355 00:17:18,240 --> 00:17:21,120 Speaker 1: to be triggered towards the end of this month. It's 356 00:17:21,160 --> 00:17:24,640 Speaker 1: been delayed slightly by some adjustments to the bill going 357 00:17:24,640 --> 00:17:28,479 Speaker 1: through the House of Lords, and this means that Britain 358 00:17:28,600 --> 00:17:31,639 Speaker 1: will be on an official exit path from the EU 359 00:17:31,800 --> 00:17:33,840 Speaker 1: and will have two years from the end of this 360 00:17:33,880 --> 00:17:37,400 Speaker 1: March to reach an agreement with the rest of the EU. 361 00:17:37,480 --> 00:17:42,280 Speaker 1: If it doesn't, then all likelihood Britain will default sort 362 00:17:42,280 --> 00:17:45,159 Speaker 1: of World Trade Organization rules, which should mark a very 363 00:17:45,200 --> 00:17:47,800 Speaker 1: sharp increase in tariffs and a lot of goods being 364 00:17:47,960 --> 00:17:51,600 Speaker 1: bought and sold between US and the UK and the EU. 365 00:17:52,520 --> 00:17:56,399 Speaker 1: So that's we're up to with Brexits. My feeling is 366 00:17:56,480 --> 00:17:58,919 Speaker 1: that I think it's most people's feeling is that the 367 00:17:58,920 --> 00:18:02,080 Speaker 1: negotiations are going to be incredibly challenging. There's not a 368 00:18:02,160 --> 00:18:06,680 Speaker 1: loss of There's not a lot of things going for 369 00:18:06,760 --> 00:18:09,439 Speaker 1: Britain in this respect. Goodwill could we say not a 370 00:18:09,440 --> 00:18:13,439 Speaker 1: lot of good will between Europe. That's exactly the word 371 00:18:13,920 --> 00:18:16,720 Speaker 1: escapes me a couple of moments ago. So yeah, there 372 00:18:16,760 --> 00:18:19,439 Speaker 1: is not much good will. Um So, my my feeling 373 00:18:19,480 --> 00:18:22,240 Speaker 1: is that the rest of the U has no incentive 374 00:18:22,359 --> 00:18:25,480 Speaker 1: to show goodwill to Britain because the more it does that, 375 00:18:25,640 --> 00:18:29,359 Speaker 1: the lower the hurdle of other countries to leave. Is 376 00:18:29,359 --> 00:18:32,320 Speaker 1: it encouraging to the outcome of the Dutch elections, the 377 00:18:32,320 --> 00:18:36,520 Speaker 1: fact that the liberal candidate one and the sort of 378 00:18:36,600 --> 00:18:41,160 Speaker 1: populist anti Islam candidate was pushed aside? Does this sort 379 00:18:41,200 --> 00:18:44,480 Speaker 1: of give people a stronger feeling of less political risk 380 00:18:44,800 --> 00:18:48,040 Speaker 1: right now in European markets? I think in markets it 381 00:18:48,280 --> 00:18:50,840 Speaker 1: probably is having that effects. I'm not sure whether that's 382 00:18:50,960 --> 00:18:55,320 Speaker 1: the right interpretation of it. Though the Dutch election was 383 00:18:55,680 --> 00:19:00,840 Speaker 1: quite unique in that had had the extremest party one 384 00:19:01,440 --> 00:19:04,960 Speaker 1: the the they had no chance of governing. Really that 385 00:19:05,080 --> 00:19:07,840 Speaker 1: is not the case so much in other places in 386 00:19:08,000 --> 00:19:11,160 Speaker 1: the Eurozone. Now, what I would say is that each 387 00:19:11,160 --> 00:19:13,560 Speaker 1: of these countries is remarkably different, and it's very easy 388 00:19:13,600 --> 00:19:15,720 Speaker 1: to lump them all together. So it's easy to imagine. 389 00:19:16,040 --> 00:19:19,040 Speaker 1: The typical distinction is core versus Prephery. So you have 390 00:19:19,400 --> 00:19:22,040 Speaker 1: the Netherlands, France and Germany and one group and then 391 00:19:22,119 --> 00:19:25,480 Speaker 1: you have the Italy, the Spains, the Greases and the other. Now, 392 00:19:25,800 --> 00:19:29,639 Speaker 1: actually there's significant differences even within those categories. So in 393 00:19:30,000 --> 00:19:33,240 Speaker 1: let's take in the Netherlands. In the Netherlands, only five 394 00:19:34,160 --> 00:19:39,080 Speaker 1: of under thirty five's voted for the extremest party. In France, however, 395 00:19:39,240 --> 00:19:41,960 Speaker 1: one third looked like they're going to vote for Le Pen. 396 00:19:42,440 --> 00:19:45,879 Speaker 1: Now this is this is a real difference in the 397 00:19:45,640 --> 00:19:49,480 Speaker 1: in not in demographic makeup, in among those groups who 398 00:19:49,560 --> 00:19:52,960 Speaker 1: is voting that it's completely upside down for between France 399 00:19:53,000 --> 00:19:55,080 Speaker 1: and the Netherlands. Does it get you frustrated when you 400 00:19:55,200 --> 00:19:58,320 Speaker 1: hear people like us in the United States talk about 401 00:19:58,359 --> 00:20:00,360 Speaker 1: Europe and it's like, oh, the populous way of going 402 00:20:00,400 --> 00:20:02,359 Speaker 1: through Europe and all of these elections and sort of 403 00:20:02,400 --> 00:20:05,399 Speaker 1: lumping them together. Um, is it? Is it just or 404 00:20:05,560 --> 00:20:08,280 Speaker 1: you know, in Europe our market players really making the 405 00:20:08,320 --> 00:20:11,280 Speaker 1: distinctions that you're talking about, or even in Europe, is 406 00:20:11,280 --> 00:20:13,800 Speaker 1: this sort of there are a lumping together kind of 407 00:20:14,600 --> 00:20:18,280 Speaker 1: that might lead to unwarranted conclusions. Well, I think it's 408 00:20:18,280 --> 00:20:21,560 Speaker 1: no no worse than how we'd we describe the US 409 00:20:21,640 --> 00:20:24,840 Speaker 1: over here. Um. So I think the there is a 410 00:20:24,880 --> 00:20:28,440 Speaker 1: tendency to lump these economies together and treat their politics 411 00:20:28,560 --> 00:20:31,520 Speaker 1: is the same. And one distinction, which I think is 412 00:20:31,560 --> 00:20:34,920 Speaker 1: probably the most important thing for a U S audience 413 00:20:34,920 --> 00:20:38,760 Speaker 1: to recognize, is that the Euro is remarkably popular across 414 00:20:38,840 --> 00:20:43,199 Speaker 1: most of the Eurozone, including France, where it isn't popular. However, 415 00:20:43,359 --> 00:20:46,080 Speaker 1: is Italy and that really singles out. And that's so 416 00:20:46,119 --> 00:20:47,600 Speaker 1: if you really want a place to look, you think, 417 00:20:47,640 --> 00:20:49,720 Speaker 1: if you're worried about risk of the Eurozone, Italy is 418 00:20:50,000 --> 00:20:52,480 Speaker 1: that place fascinating. Thank you so much for joining us. 419 00:20:52,560 --> 00:20:57,120 Speaker 1: Jamie Murray chief E m E a economist for Bloomberg Intelligence. 420 00:21:09,320 --> 00:21:13,040 Speaker 1: Day after a federate hike, and you can't find much 421 00:21:13,080 --> 00:21:17,400 Speaker 1: concern in risk your assets. You've got stocks gaining, you've 422 00:21:17,440 --> 00:21:20,720 Speaker 1: got junk bonds gaining. Uh. And there was a story 423 00:21:20,760 --> 00:21:23,840 Speaker 1: on the terminal that Kredent sweets and UBS analysts are 424 00:21:23,880 --> 00:21:27,479 Speaker 1: telling their wealthy clients it's not too late to buy equities. Well, 425 00:21:27,480 --> 00:21:30,680 Speaker 1: we're gonna talk with somebody to find out whether he agrees. 426 00:21:30,800 --> 00:21:34,760 Speaker 1: Hugh Johnson, chairman and chief investment officer at Hugh Johnson Advisors, 427 00:21:34,760 --> 00:21:38,080 Speaker 1: which overseas about one point two billion dollars, and he 428 00:21:38,119 --> 00:21:41,639 Speaker 1: speaks with us now from Albany, New York. Que. Do 429 00:21:41,680 --> 00:21:43,840 Speaker 1: you agree. Are you telling your clients to don't worry, 430 00:21:43,840 --> 00:21:47,600 Speaker 1: go ahead buy stocks? It's not too late from one 431 00:21:47,640 --> 00:21:50,760 Speaker 1: point of view, Lisa, Yes, I think that's a good idea. 432 00:21:50,840 --> 00:21:53,639 Speaker 1: You have to have some stocks in your portfolio. The 433 00:21:53,760 --> 00:21:56,760 Speaker 1: simple reason for that is that when they asked the question, 434 00:21:56,800 --> 00:22:00,200 Speaker 1: which I think is the key question now is are 435 00:22:00,200 --> 00:22:03,399 Speaker 1: we at or even near the end of the current 436 00:22:03,560 --> 00:22:07,360 Speaker 1: stock market economic interest rate cycle. The answer to that, 437 00:22:07,400 --> 00:22:10,720 Speaker 1: based on the performance of the markets and the performance 438 00:22:10,760 --> 00:22:14,520 Speaker 1: of important economic variables, is clearly no. So you need 439 00:22:14,600 --> 00:22:18,920 Speaker 1: to have a meaningful allocation to equities. That's the first 440 00:22:18,960 --> 00:22:21,520 Speaker 1: part of the equation. The second part of the equation 441 00:22:22,160 --> 00:22:25,879 Speaker 1: is what about valuation or current valuation? And if you 442 00:22:25,920 --> 00:22:29,040 Speaker 1: were to ask me, and everybody answers the question differently, 443 00:22:29,520 --> 00:22:32,359 Speaker 1: if you were to ask me, are we undervalued, fairly 444 00:22:32,440 --> 00:22:34,800 Speaker 1: valued or overvalued? I'd say we're a little bit ahead 445 00:22:34,800 --> 00:22:37,200 Speaker 1: of ourselves, you know, we've had a big run since 446 00:22:37,240 --> 00:22:39,919 Speaker 1: the election, and so common sense alone says that it 447 00:22:40,040 --> 00:22:42,720 Speaker 1: might have be a little bit pricier overvalued. And I 448 00:22:42,800 --> 00:22:46,800 Speaker 1: would say that the upside potential between right now and 449 00:22:46,880 --> 00:22:51,240 Speaker 1: the end of two thousand and eighteen is about one 450 00:22:51,359 --> 00:22:55,000 Speaker 1: percent at the best. And so the most important thing 451 00:22:55,080 --> 00:22:59,119 Speaker 1: is yes, meaningful allocation to stocks. But if you're going 452 00:22:59,160 --> 00:23:02,040 Speaker 1: to add to your portfolio of the equities in your portfolio, 453 00:23:02,680 --> 00:23:04,919 Speaker 1: wait for a good entry point. This is not a 454 00:23:04,960 --> 00:23:07,960 Speaker 1: good entry point. You need a lower level to be 455 00:23:08,320 --> 00:23:12,240 Speaker 1: buying stocks. That's in my view. Hugh Johnson, Perhaps you 456 00:23:12,320 --> 00:23:14,919 Speaker 1: know an investor that would like to take some profits, 457 00:23:15,040 --> 00:23:19,560 Speaker 1: what would you recommend they sell? Uh, that's a really 458 00:23:19,600 --> 00:23:23,440 Speaker 1: great question because I get that question almost every day. 459 00:23:23,560 --> 00:23:27,320 Speaker 1: There are folks that obviously feel very uncomfortable with the 460 00:23:27,400 --> 00:23:30,399 Speaker 1: kind of move we've seen up in stock prices. Me, 461 00:23:31,320 --> 00:23:33,520 Speaker 1: do you I don't mean that they have to be uncomfortable. 462 00:23:33,560 --> 00:23:36,000 Speaker 1: They can even be gratified and say maybe they just 463 00:23:36,040 --> 00:23:38,600 Speaker 1: want to sell half a position. But I'm wondering, what 464 00:23:38,600 --> 00:23:41,160 Speaker 1: would you sell if you just want to Yeah, I'll 465 00:23:41,200 --> 00:23:44,760 Speaker 1: be honest. With the three sectors which have had the 466 00:23:44,840 --> 00:23:48,200 Speaker 1: big move uh since the election and of course, they're 467 00:23:48,240 --> 00:23:51,000 Speaker 1: right at the top of the list, are the financials. 468 00:23:51,760 --> 00:23:55,040 Speaker 1: The second second too, that I would mention is first 469 00:23:55,040 --> 00:23:57,800 Speaker 1: of all technology, which has had a big move to 470 00:23:57,880 --> 00:24:00,720 Speaker 1: the upside. And then I would take a very hard 471 00:24:00,760 --> 00:24:03,679 Speaker 1: look at the healthcare stocks because there's a lot of 472 00:24:03,720 --> 00:24:07,159 Speaker 1: fundamental problems. There also some industrials that have had a 473 00:24:07,160 --> 00:24:09,840 Speaker 1: big move to the upside. The real issue is is 474 00:24:09,880 --> 00:24:11,879 Speaker 1: if you've had a big move up and some of 475 00:24:11,880 --> 00:24:16,120 Speaker 1: the stocks in your portfolio, particularly the financials, you might 476 00:24:16,160 --> 00:24:18,200 Speaker 1: want to take and it's a great question, you might 477 00:24:18,240 --> 00:24:21,200 Speaker 1: want to take some of that position, shall we say 478 00:24:21,200 --> 00:24:23,640 Speaker 1: off the table or sell it? Well, I just want 479 00:24:23,640 --> 00:24:25,480 Speaker 1: to give you the credit where credit is due, because 480 00:24:25,560 --> 00:24:29,000 Speaker 1: I remember back in August of last year, you were 481 00:24:29,000 --> 00:24:31,920 Speaker 1: pounding the table on financial stocks when no one else 482 00:24:32,040 --> 00:24:34,520 Speaker 1: was really going out on a limb like that. Yeah, 483 00:24:34,600 --> 00:24:37,199 Speaker 1: that was probably as good a guess as any. I 484 00:24:37,240 --> 00:24:41,439 Speaker 1: didn't expect, obviously that Trump would win the election. I didn't, 485 00:24:41,960 --> 00:24:44,680 Speaker 1: I I thought at the time. But I really thought 486 00:24:44,720 --> 00:24:47,640 Speaker 1: after the election of Trump that, of course, with deregulation, 487 00:24:47,760 --> 00:24:52,240 Speaker 1: with dot Frank maybe being under under the gun, obviously, 488 00:24:52,320 --> 00:24:56,480 Speaker 1: with the better outlook for the economy based on the 489 00:24:56,560 --> 00:25:00,199 Speaker 1: so called Trump bump or the Trump stimulus plan that 490 00:25:00,280 --> 00:25:03,240 Speaker 1: we might be talking about higher interest rates, were talking 491 00:25:03,240 --> 00:25:06,399 Speaker 1: about higher interest rates would accrue to the benefit of, obviously, 492 00:25:06,520 --> 00:25:10,639 Speaker 1: the the profits of the commercial banking part of the 493 00:25:10,680 --> 00:25:14,560 Speaker 1: financial sector. So you know, um, yeah, it looked good 494 00:25:14,600 --> 00:25:17,919 Speaker 1: in August. Uh, and it looked particularly good when Trump 495 00:25:18,000 --> 00:25:20,840 Speaker 1: got elected. But the move up in the fourth quarter 496 00:25:20,920 --> 00:25:25,240 Speaker 1: of in one sector alone, that's that's quite a bit. 497 00:25:25,280 --> 00:25:27,920 Speaker 1: And and there again common sense says you might want 498 00:25:27,920 --> 00:25:30,160 Speaker 1: to take some off the table. Okay, So, Hugh, let's 499 00:25:30,160 --> 00:25:34,000 Speaker 1: say somebody does sell some of their financial holdings. Uh, 500 00:25:34,040 --> 00:25:37,479 Speaker 1: they sell around the edges to get prepared for perhaps 501 00:25:37,480 --> 00:25:39,840 Speaker 1: a better entry point. What should they do with the 502 00:25:39,880 --> 00:25:42,919 Speaker 1: proceeds from those sales. Should they keep it in cash? 503 00:25:42,960 --> 00:25:47,680 Speaker 1: Should they go into bonds? Well, you know, Lisa, I 504 00:25:47,720 --> 00:25:51,000 Speaker 1: as I say, I think I'm worried be concerned about valuation. 505 00:25:51,480 --> 00:25:54,359 Speaker 1: So when I'm concerned about valuation, would would be one 506 00:25:54,400 --> 00:25:56,880 Speaker 1: of the reasons why I would sell some financials, maybe 507 00:25:56,960 --> 00:26:01,160 Speaker 1: technology industrials, maybe some healthcare stock. I might go into 508 00:26:01,200 --> 00:26:03,119 Speaker 1: cash for the time being, and again look for a 509 00:26:03,160 --> 00:26:06,080 Speaker 1: better entry point. If someone were to press me and 510 00:26:06,119 --> 00:26:09,080 Speaker 1: ask me, what's a good entry point, I would say, look, 511 00:26:09,119 --> 00:26:12,639 Speaker 1: it's got to be five percent below current levels, because 512 00:26:12,720 --> 00:26:15,880 Speaker 1: unless we go down five from current levels and even 513 00:26:15,920 --> 00:26:19,520 Speaker 1: a little bit more, um, you know, in my judgment, 514 00:26:19,600 --> 00:26:24,399 Speaker 1: the upside potential between the current level and the end 515 00:26:24,440 --> 00:26:28,199 Speaker 1: of two thousand eighteen would certainly not be that attractive. So, 516 00:26:28,320 --> 00:26:32,040 Speaker 1: just from a big picture portfolio management point of view, 517 00:26:32,080 --> 00:26:35,760 Speaker 1: you've got a sharp decline in stock prices before I 518 00:26:35,800 --> 00:26:38,480 Speaker 1: would use that cash. Cash is not a bad thing 519 00:26:38,520 --> 00:26:41,520 Speaker 1: to have right now. I'm not barished by a long shot, 520 00:26:41,600 --> 00:26:43,600 Speaker 1: but I'm just saying from a timing point of view, 521 00:26:43,920 --> 00:26:48,320 Speaker 1: valuation point of view, I have my concerns how much 522 00:26:48,359 --> 00:26:51,639 Speaker 1: in your ideal portfolio, how much would be in cash 523 00:26:51,760 --> 00:26:55,439 Speaker 1: right now compared with say at the end of last year. Yeah, what, 524 00:26:55,640 --> 00:26:58,280 Speaker 1: we we've worked pretty much. We've been pretty bullish. And 525 00:26:58,359 --> 00:27:01,520 Speaker 1: so if a and said to us, look, I have 526 00:27:01,560 --> 00:27:05,240 Speaker 1: got a target for equities and fixed income of fifty 527 00:27:05,600 --> 00:27:09,800 Speaker 1: and equities, I'll let you, folks go to sixty of 528 00:27:09,880 --> 00:27:12,800 Speaker 1: the portfolio and equities when you think conditions are times 529 00:27:12,800 --> 00:27:15,520 Speaker 1: are good, and be down at thirty five percent when 530 00:27:15,560 --> 00:27:18,879 Speaker 1: you think times are bad right now, and quite frankly, 531 00:27:18,920 --> 00:27:22,000 Speaker 1: the end of last year we've been at six and 532 00:27:22,080 --> 00:27:24,920 Speaker 1: that's where we're going to stay. But um as far 533 00:27:25,000 --> 00:27:27,240 Speaker 1: as adding to positions, and we're not going to change 534 00:27:27,280 --> 00:27:31,760 Speaker 1: that adding to positions, we'd wait for that decline in 535 00:27:31,880 --> 00:27:35,360 Speaker 1: stock prices before we would add to positions. If somebody 536 00:27:35,440 --> 00:27:37,760 Speaker 1: said to me, if somebody said to me, look, I'm 537 00:27:37,840 --> 00:27:41,040 Speaker 1: really concerned about the current stock market, I would ask 538 00:27:41,040 --> 00:27:43,880 Speaker 1: them the question, Look, you've got a fifty percent target 539 00:27:43,960 --> 00:27:47,200 Speaker 1: with a little bit of leeway both sides. Maybe what 540 00:27:47,280 --> 00:27:50,200 Speaker 1: you want to do is to reduce that target from 541 00:27:50,240 --> 00:27:53,840 Speaker 1: fifty down to or to what we would call a 542 00:27:54,000 --> 00:27:57,440 Speaker 1: sleep at night level. Uh, that would be the decision 543 00:27:57,520 --> 00:27:59,639 Speaker 1: of the of the client. But right now we have 544 00:28:00,240 --> 00:28:03,439 Speaker 1: over fifty percent allocation to equities, and that's based on 545 00:28:03,480 --> 00:28:05,320 Speaker 1: the fact that we think equities are the place to 546 00:28:05,359 --> 00:28:08,600 Speaker 1: be for the time being. Thanks very much for joining us. 547 00:28:08,640 --> 00:28:11,080 Speaker 1: Hugh Johnson, as always, he is the chairman and the 548 00:28:11,119 --> 00:28:16,640 Speaker 1: chief investment Officer of Hugh Johnson Advisers, joining us from Albany, 549 00:28:16,680 --> 00:28:19,679 Speaker 1: New York, where he helps to manage over one point 550 00:28:19,760 --> 00:28:29,680 Speaker 1: two billion dollars of customer assets. Thanks for listening to 551 00:28:29,720 --> 00:28:32,760 Speaker 1: the Bloomberg P and L podcast. You can subscribe and 552 00:28:32,800 --> 00:28:37,760 Speaker 1: listen to interviews at iTunes, SoundCloud, or whatever podcast platform 553 00:28:37,920 --> 00:28:40,640 Speaker 1: you prefer. I'm pim Fox. I'm out there on Twitter 554 00:28:40,800 --> 00:28:44,480 Speaker 1: at pim Fox. I'm out there on Twitter at Lisa Abramo. 555 00:28:44,560 --> 00:28:47,000 Speaker 1: It's one before the podcast. You can always a catch 556 00:28:47,080 --> 00:28:48,840 Speaker 1: us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio