WEBVTT - Warner Bros. Investors Approve $110 Billion Paramount Deal 

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:10.640 --> 0:00:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:14.640 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Business App. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts,

0:00:21.400 --> 0:00:23.640
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:23.680 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 2>Warner Brothers investors approved one hundred and ten billion dollars

0:00:27.040 --> 0:00:30.720
<v Speaker 2>sale to Paramount. I also note, since I know David

0:00:30.720 --> 0:00:33.879
<v Speaker 2>saslof that investors reject CEO compensation package.

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:34.760
<v Speaker 3>That's interesting.

0:00:34.840 --> 0:00:35.960
<v Speaker 4>I know, is that binding?

0:00:36.320 --> 0:00:36.800
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:00:36.920 --> 0:00:38.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't know how lot works. But our next guest,

0:00:38.479 --> 0:00:40.640
<v Speaker 2>I think probably has some good reporting there, Chris Pomary.

0:00:40.840 --> 0:00:43.440
<v Speaker 2>He covers all the entertainment companies out there in Los

0:00:43.479 --> 0:00:45.920
<v Speaker 2>Angeles for Bloomberg News. Chris, what are you making the

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:48.080
<v Speaker 2>news here today? I guess it's fairly well expected that

0:00:48.120 --> 0:00:53.040
<v Speaker 2>the shareholders would approve this sale to Paramount Sky Sky Dance. Paramount.

0:00:53.360 --> 0:00:55.880
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, they showed them the money and they said yes,

0:00:56.600 --> 0:00:58.920
<v Speaker 5>thirty one dollars this year, one hundred and ten billion

0:00:59.000 --> 0:01:04.840
<v Speaker 5>dollars total. The pay package vote is not binding, you know.

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:07.520
<v Speaker 5>It's one of those say on paced things that companies

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:10.400
<v Speaker 5>are required to do. If this company were continuing as

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:12.920
<v Speaker 5>a public company, then you know, the board would take

0:01:13.000 --> 0:01:16.440
<v Speaker 5>the you know that into consideration and next year's pay.

0:01:16.520 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 5>But this this go round doesn't matter. They'll be gone

0:01:19.800 --> 0:01:22.279
<v Speaker 5>and David Satisov will have his money.

0:01:22.520 --> 0:01:26.200
<v Speaker 6>Right, We're looking at accelerating equity awards valued at more

0:01:26.240 --> 0:01:29.520
<v Speaker 6>than five hundred million and three hundred and thirty five

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:32.200
<v Speaker 6>million dollars in potential tax reimbursements.

0:01:32.280 --> 0:01:35.760
<v Speaker 4>So he makes out pretty well, so he always does.

0:01:36.000 --> 0:01:41.800
<v Speaker 6>Chris, what does this mean for the thousands of Hollywood actors, screenwriters, directors,

0:01:42.000 --> 0:01:45.280
<v Speaker 6>and other workers in the industry who have come together

0:01:45.319 --> 0:01:50.680
<v Speaker 6>to oppose this merger? They were appealing to regulators, to policymakers.

0:01:50.880 --> 0:01:53.680
<v Speaker 6>I mean, do they still continue to try to press

0:01:53.680 --> 0:01:55.680
<v Speaker 6>state attorneys general to do something about this?

0:01:56.440 --> 0:02:00.200
<v Speaker 5>They can, and they will. It's you know, it's not

0:02:00.480 --> 0:02:04.000
<v Speaker 5>a done deal overall. Certainly it is from the shareholders standpoint.

0:02:04.000 --> 0:02:07.920
<v Speaker 5>It's a milestone in that regard, but there's still regulatory

0:02:07.920 --> 0:02:11.000
<v Speaker 5>approvals that have to be done, and everyone's sort of

0:02:11.040 --> 0:02:15.000
<v Speaker 5>anticipating lawsuits similar to what we've seen in a live

0:02:15.080 --> 0:02:18.320
<v Speaker 5>nation and other cases sort of opposing this deal. So yeah,

0:02:18.400 --> 0:02:19.560
<v Speaker 5>quite still.

0:02:19.120 --> 0:02:21.000
<v Speaker 4>Now on the federal government level, right.

0:02:21.320 --> 0:02:23.760
<v Speaker 5>It doesn't appear that that's the case. I mean, there's

0:02:23.760 --> 0:02:27.520
<v Speaker 5>been no official sign off. You know, the Paramount will

0:02:27.560 --> 0:02:30.400
<v Speaker 5>say that they've gotten clear into essentially from the DJ,

0:02:30.560 --> 0:02:33.080
<v Speaker 5>but there's really been no official sign off in Washington.

0:02:33.840 --> 0:02:36.040
<v Speaker 2>You know, the deal price is thirty one dollars a share.

0:02:36.440 --> 0:02:38.959
<v Speaker 2>Stocks trading at twenty seven dollars and thirty cents here.

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:41.800
<v Speaker 2>That feels like a big discount to me from an

0:02:41.880 --> 0:02:44.880
<v Speaker 2>arbitrage perspective, given this deal is going to presumably closed

0:02:44.880 --> 0:02:47.480
<v Speaker 2>in a couple of months. So I guess what do

0:02:47.480 --> 0:02:49.000
<v Speaker 2>you think that uncertainty might be out there.

0:02:48.960 --> 0:02:49.520
<v Speaker 3>In the marketplace?

0:02:49.600 --> 0:02:52.080
<v Speaker 2>Chris? Is it regulatory? We need to get a sign

0:02:52.080 --> 0:02:54.160
<v Speaker 2>off from President Trump and that can always be a risk.

0:02:54.560 --> 0:02:57.760
<v Speaker 2>Is it some legal maybe lawsuits or something.

0:02:57.760 --> 0:02:59.240
<v Speaker 3>What do you think is there und?

0:02:59.480 --> 0:03:01.880
<v Speaker 5>I think all of above. I mean, really when we've

0:03:01.919 --> 0:03:04.360
<v Speaker 5>really just seen a steady drum beat. I mean, the

0:03:04.560 --> 0:03:06.800
<v Speaker 5>Hollywood community has sort of been against it, but you know,

0:03:06.840 --> 0:03:09.080
<v Speaker 5>they had to shift, they had to go. They were

0:03:09.160 --> 0:03:12.160
<v Speaker 5>posted to Netflix and then they sort of regather and

0:03:11.840 --> 0:03:16.080
<v Speaker 5>now now they're opposed to Paramount. And so but we've seen,

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:19.320
<v Speaker 5>you know, the list of celebrities signing a petition against this,

0:03:19.480 --> 0:03:22.800
<v Speaker 5>growing the number of events, people like Corey Booker, the

0:03:22.840 --> 0:03:25.639
<v Speaker 5>Senator from New Jersey, of hell to sort of examine

0:03:25.639 --> 0:03:28.640
<v Speaker 5>this deal and criticize this deal. So whether all enough

0:03:29.240 --> 0:03:32.679
<v Speaker 5>mounts to something that will stop the deal still big

0:03:32.760 --> 0:03:36.120
<v Speaker 5>question mark there, but they're certainly sort of growing opposition.

0:03:36.960 --> 0:03:42.560
<v Speaker 6>So when does the companies Paramount, Warner Brothers Discovery, When

0:03:42.560 --> 0:03:44.320
<v Speaker 6>do they start doing some of the hard work of

0:03:44.320 --> 0:03:46.840
<v Speaker 6>integrating or is that something they cannot do until the

0:03:46.920 --> 0:03:49.840
<v Speaker 6>regulators have made clear that they're not opposing.

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:54.720
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, they really have to wait to close. We saw

0:03:54.760 --> 0:03:57.240
<v Speaker 5>in that next Star Techner deal where they jumped as

0:03:57.240 --> 0:04:00.840
<v Speaker 5>soon as they got a clearance in Washington, and then

0:04:00.840 --> 0:04:03.520
<v Speaker 5>the lawsuit happens and now they're actually barred from integrating.

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:06.960
<v Speaker 5>So very awkward situation. I imagine the Warner by the Paramount

0:04:07.120 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 5>folks are looking at that and saying, all right, well,

0:04:09.480 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 5>we should probably make sure we're in the clear before

0:04:12.480 --> 0:04:13.640
<v Speaker 5>we actually close this.

0:04:14.320 --> 0:04:16.279
<v Speaker 2>Chris, you're based in LA I'm sure you know a

0:04:16.279 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 2>lot of these folks that work at these entertainment companies.

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:24.000
<v Speaker 2>How concerned are they just about La as a creative community,

0:04:24.040 --> 0:04:27.400
<v Speaker 2>as a Hollywood community? Because here in New Jersey, Netflix

0:04:27.440 --> 0:04:31.760
<v Speaker 2>is building a huge production complex in down A Fort Mammoth,

0:04:31.760 --> 0:04:34.800
<v Speaker 2>the old army base. Tore down everything at this huge

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:37.039
<v Speaker 2>army base and are building this is a gajillion dollar

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:41.440
<v Speaker 2>production facility. I mean, there's Vancouver, there's South Carolina. There's

0:04:41.440 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 2>lots of places that are taking business away. What's the

0:04:43.920 --> 0:04:44.680
<v Speaker 2>mood in LA.

0:04:44.720 --> 0:04:48.400
<v Speaker 4>Creatively, particularly gloomy.

0:04:49.000 --> 0:04:51.600
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, and you know it's been that way. We've written

0:04:51.640 --> 0:04:54.279
<v Speaker 5>about this for a couple of years now. You've had,

0:04:54.440 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 5>you know, the flight to other locations to shoot. There's

0:04:57.520 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 5>a big part of it. There's overall cutbacks and spend

0:05:00.200 --> 0:05:03.520
<v Speaker 5>among big companies, and the globalization of the business has

0:05:03.520 --> 0:05:06.920
<v Speaker 5>really changed things. And then you know we've got AI

0:05:07.040 --> 0:05:12.800
<v Speaker 5>as a threat. So jobs are definitely weak, particularly here

0:05:12.839 --> 0:05:16.320
<v Speaker 5>in the capital of entertainment. And so the idea of

0:05:16.360 --> 0:05:20.440
<v Speaker 5>this big merger. While David Ellison, the CEO of Paramount,

0:05:20.520 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 5>promises they'll be growth, everyone anticipates that it's going to

0:05:25.000 --> 0:05:25.800
<v Speaker 5>be very difficult in.

0:05:25.760 --> 0:05:26.440
<v Speaker 3>The labor market.

0:05:26.839 --> 0:05:29.720
<v Speaker 4>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this.

0:05:33.360 --> 0:05:37.080
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:05:37.160 --> 0:05:40.239
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple Cocklay and Android

0:05:40.279 --> 0:05:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:49.000
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on Youtube'll.

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:49.800
<v Speaker 2>Talk about the railroad stocks, one of my favorite sectors.

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:51.839
<v Speaker 2>I used to cover this group back in the eighties.

0:05:52.160 --> 0:05:54.320
<v Speaker 2>I have all my earnings and models for the railroad

0:05:54.360 --> 0:05:57.039
<v Speaker 2>and trucking companies, but they're on floppy disc so I

0:05:57.040 --> 0:06:00.200
<v Speaker 2>don't think I can really access them anymore. But I'm

0:06:00.200 --> 0:06:03.479
<v Speaker 2>sure they're still killer. Lee Classical Senior Transport, Logistics and

0:06:03.520 --> 0:06:05.880
<v Speaker 2>Shipping analys fro Bloomberg Intelligence. He's got some pretty good

0:06:05.880 --> 0:06:10.279
<v Speaker 2>earnings models to here. So Union Pacific stocks up about

0:06:10.360 --> 0:06:12.720
<v Speaker 2>seven percent here today, up fifteen percent year today. How

0:06:12.720 --> 0:06:13.480
<v Speaker 2>are their earnings lead?

0:06:14.560 --> 0:06:17.320
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, their earnings were pretty good. They beat this morning

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:19.240
<v Speaker 7>on the first quarter, and it really was driven on

0:06:19.480 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 7>productivity gains and pricing. The company was able to show

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 7>that it's able to operate a better network, a more

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:30.120
<v Speaker 7>efficient network, despite the fact that volumes were slightly softer

0:06:30.240 --> 0:06:31.480
<v Speaker 7>than most expected.

0:06:31.480 --> 0:06:33.279
<v Speaker 3>They were down about one percent.

0:06:34.000 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 7>The company really does appear focused that it can continue

0:06:38.520 --> 0:06:41.840
<v Speaker 7>to get that productivity. Productivity could be more difficult if

0:06:41.920 --> 0:06:45.760
<v Speaker 7>volumes do increase. Their outlook on the volumes, I would

0:06:45.800 --> 0:06:48.719
<v Speaker 7>say was cautiously optimistic. There are some pluses and minuses.

0:06:49.000 --> 0:06:51.599
<v Speaker 7>They were positive on their bulk commodities like coal and

0:06:51.680 --> 0:06:56.880
<v Speaker 7>grain and also some domestic intermodal, while a little negative

0:06:56.880 --> 0:06:59.839
<v Speaker 7>on their outlook as it relates to housing for as

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:04.880
<v Speaker 7>products that go into housing, automotives or international intermodals. So

0:07:04.960 --> 0:07:07.200
<v Speaker 7>I think the outlook was a mixed bag. But the

0:07:07.200 --> 0:07:10.679
<v Speaker 7>company is definitely executing on its plan, and it used

0:07:10.720 --> 0:07:14.920
<v Speaker 7>the earnings call it's an opportunity to kind of plug

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:20.160
<v Speaker 7>the merits of its proposed merger with Norfolk Southern and folks.

0:07:20.200 --> 0:07:23.160
<v Speaker 2>Just for rail geeks like Lee and I, this is

0:07:23.240 --> 0:07:24.400
<v Speaker 2>a seismic transaction.

0:07:24.440 --> 0:07:25.720
<v Speaker 3>The railroad business would.

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:28.640
<v Speaker 2>Create the first truly coast to coast to east west

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 2>rail system in the US.

0:07:31.760 --> 0:07:31.920
<v Speaker 8>LEE.

0:07:32.560 --> 0:07:34.600
<v Speaker 2>But of course, the big, big, big issue is will

0:07:34.640 --> 0:07:37.280
<v Speaker 2>the regulators allow. What's the feeling here?

0:07:38.440 --> 0:07:42.520
<v Speaker 7>You know, the feeling is really mixed amongst participants, obviously

0:07:42.880 --> 0:07:44.480
<v Speaker 7>Union Pacific and Northern Southern.

0:07:44.640 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 3>You really think the deal is going to get done.

0:07:46.480 --> 0:07:49.320
<v Speaker 7>If you're the other railroads or maybe some trucking companies,

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:52.760
<v Speaker 7>you might be hoping that it doesn't. It is a

0:07:52.840 --> 0:07:55.800
<v Speaker 7>high regulatory hurdle that it has to meet. It has

0:07:55.840 --> 0:07:58.960
<v Speaker 7>to meet that it enhances competition, it's in the public interest.

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 7>Along time time ago, I think it was two thousand

0:08:01.320 --> 0:08:03.360
<v Speaker 7>and one, they changed the rules for mergers at the

0:08:03.480 --> 0:08:06.880
<v Speaker 7>STB and they wanted to kind of stop the consolidation

0:08:06.960 --> 0:08:09.560
<v Speaker 7>that was happening in the marketplace, and it was kind

0:08:09.560 --> 0:08:11.200
<v Speaker 7>of designed to stop a deal like this.

0:08:11.600 --> 0:08:12.920
<v Speaker 3>The reality is that if.

0:08:12.760 --> 0:08:16.840
<v Speaker 7>It does happen, it will create a truly transcontinental network.

0:08:17.440 --> 0:08:20.160
<v Speaker 7>That will mean that railcars will be touched less. And

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:22.800
<v Speaker 7>if they're touched less, you would assume that hopefully they

0:08:22.840 --> 0:08:26.080
<v Speaker 7>can get better service and that could benefit from the

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:29.200
<v Speaker 7>customers that are on it. They are, you know, full

0:08:29.240 --> 0:08:32.080
<v Speaker 7>press lobbying to try to get the deal done. They

0:08:32.120 --> 0:08:37.240
<v Speaker 7>recently announced a new locomotive, a new locomotive that commences

0:08:37.800 --> 0:08:41.360
<v Speaker 7>that commemorates, excuse me, the two hundred and fifty year

0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:45.160
<v Speaker 7>anniversary of the US And it also has Donald Trump's

0:08:45.200 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 7>name on the side. So it looks like they're they're

0:08:48.360 --> 0:08:52.199
<v Speaker 7>looking everywhere they can to get some help from the administration.

0:08:52.440 --> 0:08:53.080
<v Speaker 3>That's a good move.

0:08:54.000 --> 0:08:56.920
<v Speaker 2>How about if i'm CSX here, I noticed CSX stock

0:08:57.720 --> 0:08:58.040
<v Speaker 2>is at.

0:08:57.960 --> 0:09:00.760
<v Speaker 3>An all time high. I pump CSX.

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 2>Do I feel the need to maybe reach out to

0:09:04.559 --> 0:09:08.680
<v Speaker 2>Union Pacific or maybe the other Western railroad there and

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:11.720
<v Speaker 2>figure out that we need to do a deal as well.

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, so if the deal does happen, you would assume that,

0:09:14.360 --> 0:09:17.000
<v Speaker 7>you know, more mergers will come, whether that's a Burlington

0:09:17.040 --> 0:09:21.320
<v Speaker 7>Northern merger with CSX. Burlington Northern is owned by Berkshire

0:09:21.320 --> 0:09:24.920
<v Speaker 7>Hathaway and so obviously Berkshire Hathway has some deep pockets

0:09:24.920 --> 0:09:27.880
<v Speaker 7>to pay for CSX if it wanted to. Also could

0:09:27.880 --> 0:09:32.600
<v Speaker 7>make sense of CSX one with one of the Canadian competitors,

0:09:32.640 --> 0:09:36.040
<v Speaker 7>like a Canadian Pacific Kansas City, that could be an

0:09:36.080 --> 0:09:36.920
<v Speaker 7>option as well.

0:09:37.000 --> 0:09:40.319
<v Speaker 3>So if it does happen, and again it's a high.

0:09:40.280 --> 0:09:43.680
<v Speaker 7>Regulatory hurdle and we probably won't find out until late

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:47.040
<v Speaker 7>next year, early twenty twenty eight whether the deal gets done.

0:09:47.400 --> 0:09:48.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's going to take some time.

0:09:48.640 --> 0:09:51.640
<v Speaker 7>They have to refile with the STB because their initial

0:09:51.679 --> 0:09:55.800
<v Speaker 7>filing did not cut the mustard with the regulators, so

0:09:55.840 --> 0:09:59.600
<v Speaker 7>they wanted them to refile and that should happen probably

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:03.000
<v Speaker 7>in the next thirty to sixty days. And so it

0:10:03.080 --> 0:10:05.440
<v Speaker 7>just takes time because this is a huge transaction that

0:10:05.520 --> 0:10:08.160
<v Speaker 7>the STB has Tom all over But yeah, I.

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:10.160
<v Speaker 3>Mean just answer your question.

0:10:10.320 --> 0:10:13.400
<v Speaker 7>Yes, it could, you know, the announcement of the deal

0:10:13.400 --> 0:10:16.040
<v Speaker 7>because the two companies, N Pacific Norfolk Southern really can't

0:10:16.080 --> 0:10:18.880
<v Speaker 7>do anything together until they get approval. So it's been

0:10:18.920 --> 0:10:21.599
<v Speaker 7>an opportunity for other rails to work together.

0:10:21.800 --> 0:10:23.240
<v Speaker 3>And create new services.

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:25.920
<v Speaker 7>And you've seen some share shift away from Norfolk Southern

0:10:25.960 --> 0:10:29.960
<v Speaker 7>to CSX on the intermodal side, which has been pretty

0:10:29.960 --> 0:10:30.840
<v Speaker 7>interesting to watch.

0:10:31.559 --> 0:10:31.719
<v Speaker 3>Lee.

0:10:31.800 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 2>What are your transport that you cover everything in the trucks,

0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:38.199
<v Speaker 2>the rails, the air freight, all that kind of stuff.

0:10:38.240 --> 0:10:42.079
<v Speaker 2>The big ocean shipping companies. What's been the collective I

0:10:42.080 --> 0:10:44.640
<v Speaker 2>don't know response to this war in Iran. Is it

0:10:44.720 --> 0:10:46.559
<v Speaker 2>localized just to that part of the world or is

0:10:46.600 --> 0:10:48.920
<v Speaker 2>it having wider ripple effects.

0:10:49.400 --> 0:10:53.280
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, obviously it's impacting, you know, the shipping industry. It's

0:10:53.360 --> 0:10:57.640
<v Speaker 7>keeping container rates artificially high just because it's tying up

0:10:57.679 --> 0:11:01.319
<v Speaker 7>capacity and also assuming if there's a lasting piece, a

0:11:01.400 --> 0:11:04.120
<v Speaker 7>sus canal can open up and that would make shipping

0:11:04.160 --> 0:11:05.560
<v Speaker 7>rates come down considerably.

0:11:06.000 --> 0:11:06.160
<v Speaker 5>You know.

0:11:06.200 --> 0:11:09.240
<v Speaker 7>The biggest thing is it's pushing energy prices higher, diesel

0:11:09.280 --> 0:11:12.520
<v Speaker 7>prices higher. That's a huge input for trucking rails. You know,

0:11:12.559 --> 0:11:17.800
<v Speaker 7>they do have mechanics to offset that through fuel search charges,

0:11:18.440 --> 0:11:19.959
<v Speaker 7>you know, just to pivot a little bit on the

0:11:20.000 --> 0:11:24.040
<v Speaker 7>truckload side. Night Swift reported earnings last night. Their reportings,

0:11:24.040 --> 0:11:25.719
<v Speaker 7>they pre announced and we knew it was gonna be

0:11:25.760 --> 0:11:29.120
<v Speaker 7>a great quarter, which it wasn't, but their outlook really improved.

0:11:29.120 --> 0:11:31.680
<v Speaker 7>So they expect rates to increase by high single digits,

0:11:31.679 --> 0:11:34.920
<v Speaker 7>to load double digits, and that's up from low to

0:11:35.320 --> 0:11:38.439
<v Speaker 7>mid single digits. So they're really seeing their rate recovery happening,

0:11:38.600 --> 0:11:40.800
<v Speaker 7>and that's really being driven on the supply side, supply

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:41.840
<v Speaker 7>coming out of the market.

0:11:41.960 --> 0:11:42.560
<v Speaker 4>Stay with us.

0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:45.120
<v Speaker 3>More from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this.

0:11:48.960 --> 0:11:52.640
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:11:52.720 --> 0:11:56.080
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Applecarplay and Android Auto

0:11:56.200 --> 0:11:59.280
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever you

0:11:59.320 --> 0:12:02.320
<v Speaker 1>get your podcast, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:12:03.000 --> 0:12:07.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, Blackstone, the world's largest alternative asset manager, reported a

0:12:07.640 --> 0:12:10.840
<v Speaker 2>larger than expect to jump in distributable earnings in the

0:12:10.920 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 2>first quarter, boosted by a robust start to the year

0:12:13.559 --> 0:12:14.520
<v Speaker 2>for deal making.

0:12:14.720 --> 0:12:15.679
<v Speaker 3>Let's break down further.

0:12:15.920 --> 0:12:19.520
<v Speaker 2>We're joined by Paul Goldberg, senior equity analysts for Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:12:19.760 --> 0:12:21.880
<v Speaker 2>Paul talks us about Blackstone. What did you learn from

0:12:21.880 --> 0:12:24.640
<v Speaker 2>their earnings and their call about their business?

0:12:25.000 --> 0:12:27.959
<v Speaker 9>I think the biggest thing for Blackstone is their size

0:12:28.040 --> 0:12:31.640
<v Speaker 9>and diversification. As they did see some outflows from the

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:35.480
<v Speaker 9>retail fund the B credit in particular, they did get

0:12:35.520 --> 0:12:38.560
<v Speaker 9>a lot of inflows across the company, so almost seventy

0:12:38.600 --> 0:12:41.760
<v Speaker 9>billion dollars worth of inflows. So a lot of the

0:12:41.920 --> 0:12:46.080
<v Speaker 9>fundraising and a lot of the activity is still holding

0:12:46.200 --> 0:12:49.439
<v Speaker 9>up despite some of the pressure and the software pocket

0:12:49.559 --> 0:12:52.040
<v Speaker 9>and the retail and the credit side.

0:12:52.240 --> 0:12:56.520
<v Speaker 6>John Gray talked about AI infrastructure is driving Blackstone's performance.

0:12:56.559 --> 0:12:57.400
<v Speaker 4>What does that mean?

0:12:57.600 --> 0:13:00.959
<v Speaker 9>So they're invested in data centers, they invested in infrastructure

0:13:01.000 --> 0:13:05.319
<v Speaker 9>that supports the AI expansion. They talked about one hundred

0:13:05.360 --> 0:13:10.000
<v Speaker 9>and fifty billion dollars of assets across that kind of

0:13:10.720 --> 0:13:16.600
<v Speaker 9>size that of businesses. That's over ten percent of their

0:13:16.679 --> 0:13:20.440
<v Speaker 9>overall assets under management. And they also talked about even

0:13:20.520 --> 0:13:23.880
<v Speaker 9>slightly larger amount of the similar kind of deals in

0:13:23.920 --> 0:13:27.200
<v Speaker 9>the pipeline to expand in that space. So they're really

0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:28.439
<v Speaker 9>supporting that growth.

0:13:28.960 --> 0:13:32.400
<v Speaker 2>Paul, what's the story for black Zone and raising capital.

0:13:32.440 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 2>Do they have all the capital they need or is

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:36.120
<v Speaker 2>this one of those Are they always in the market

0:13:36.280 --> 0:13:36.920
<v Speaker 2>raising capital.

0:13:37.320 --> 0:13:39.559
<v Speaker 9>I think they're always in the market. It really depends

0:13:39.559 --> 0:13:42.280
<v Speaker 9>on what kind of vehicles. Sometimes there's a flegship fond,

0:13:42.400 --> 0:13:45.440
<v Speaker 9>sometimes there's a new products, but given their size, they're

0:13:45.440 --> 0:13:48.880
<v Speaker 9>really usually in the market with both types of products. So,

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:51.520
<v Speaker 9>for example, if you look at the b CRAD, it

0:13:51.600 --> 0:13:54.280
<v Speaker 9>did get some inflows, but obviously because of the redemption,

0:13:54.400 --> 0:13:57.960
<v Speaker 9>they got some outflows, but credit was credited. Insurance was

0:13:57.960 --> 0:14:00.680
<v Speaker 9>still the biggest segment of their growth in terms of

0:14:00.720 --> 0:14:04.400
<v Speaker 9>the inflows. They raised a ten billion dollar opportunistic credit

0:14:04.440 --> 0:14:07.120
<v Speaker 9>fond during the quarter they closed it, So there's a

0:14:07.120 --> 0:14:10.880
<v Speaker 9>lot of activity going on outside of the risk back

0:14:10.960 --> 0:14:12.400
<v Speaker 9>pockets that we hear about.

0:14:12.640 --> 0:14:14.760
<v Speaker 6>Is there a weakling here in these results? I know

0:14:14.800 --> 0:14:17.280
<v Speaker 6>you mentioned the credit and insurance arm and how that

0:14:17.679 --> 0:14:21.680
<v Speaker 6>still drew inflows, but earnings in that business dropped twenty

0:14:21.680 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 6>six percent.

0:14:23.680 --> 0:14:27.200
<v Speaker 9>They did, but I don't think necessarily it's a weakling.

0:14:27.360 --> 0:14:29.920
<v Speaker 9>So there's still some of that is driven by performance

0:14:30.000 --> 0:14:33.400
<v Speaker 9>piece they did have to and they didn't. We're very

0:14:33.440 --> 0:14:36.640
<v Speaker 9>explicit about it because people are always concerned about valuations.

0:14:36.680 --> 0:14:40.160
<v Speaker 9>They did mention that they were lowered the valuations in

0:14:40.200 --> 0:14:43.360
<v Speaker 9>some liquid credit that had a negative return during the quarter.

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:46.640
<v Speaker 9>So that's more normal in terms of what we see

0:14:46.640 --> 0:14:49.320
<v Speaker 9>in the public markets, and they're responding to it. Probably

0:14:49.360 --> 0:14:52.600
<v Speaker 9>not at that scale that we've see in the public markets,

0:14:53.040 --> 0:14:57.840
<v Speaker 9>but it's there. So there is some pressure, but overall

0:14:57.920 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 9>there's still a reasonable growth.

0:15:00.600 --> 0:15:04.000
<v Speaker 2>Stockdown four percent today, down about twenty percent year to date.

0:15:04.480 --> 0:15:07.240
<v Speaker 2>Is Blackstone getting caught up in just the overall market

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:08.920
<v Speaker 2>concern as it relates to private credit?

0:15:09.920 --> 0:15:10.400
<v Speaker 8>I think so.

0:15:10.560 --> 0:15:14.440
<v Speaker 9>I think it's a matter of convincing the investors about

0:15:14.520 --> 0:15:17.200
<v Speaker 9>the breadth and all the other businesses that are working,

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:20.920
<v Speaker 9>and the fact that the credit quality generally is holding

0:15:21.000 --> 0:15:24.040
<v Speaker 9>up reasonably well. The companies that they're invested in and

0:15:24.400 --> 0:15:28.840
<v Speaker 9>including the software partner businesses, they do it okay, So

0:15:29.240 --> 0:15:31.800
<v Speaker 9>it will take a few quarters to convince the market

0:15:31.840 --> 0:15:34.120
<v Speaker 9>to come around. So if we'll look at the be Read,

0:15:34.280 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 9>there are the retail funds that they manage, a large

0:15:37.560 --> 0:15:41.480
<v Speaker 9>fund going back several years. It took them a few

0:15:41.560 --> 0:15:44.720
<v Speaker 9>quarters to work through those concerns. So we might see

0:15:44.720 --> 0:15:48.080
<v Speaker 9>some more pressure coming into view even later on possibly,

0:15:48.760 --> 0:15:52.040
<v Speaker 9>but the investors will come to realize the bigger picture.

0:15:52.560 --> 0:15:55.320
<v Speaker 4>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this.

0:15:58.760 --> 0:16:02.440
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the bloom Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:16:02.520 --> 0:16:05.640
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android

0:16:05.640 --> 0:16:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Blueberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever

0:16:09.000 --> 0:16:12.520
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:16:13.080 --> 0:16:15.120
<v Speaker 6>Jet fuel prices have been rising and it's been really

0:16:15.120 --> 0:16:18.120
<v Speaker 6>bad for these airlines, which as far as I know,

0:16:18.320 --> 0:16:19.120
<v Speaker 6>don't hedge.

0:16:19.160 --> 0:16:20.840
<v Speaker 4>There are oil costs at all.

0:16:20.880 --> 0:16:23.320
<v Speaker 6>They used to, right, but they don't anymore unless you

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:24.680
<v Speaker 6>have a refinery, right.

0:16:24.760 --> 0:16:25.640
<v Speaker 4>Delta has that, right.

0:16:25.640 --> 0:16:26.320
<v Speaker 3>That's pretty cool.

0:16:26.360 --> 0:16:27.800
<v Speaker 4>All right, Let's bring in George Ferguson.

0:16:27.840 --> 0:16:30.440
<v Speaker 6>He is our senior aerospace defense and an airlines analyst,

0:16:31.880 --> 0:16:34.880
<v Speaker 6>and George American Airlines just reported. But I mean, for

0:16:34.960 --> 0:16:37.760
<v Speaker 6>all these airlines, the story is the fuel bill. The

0:16:37.800 --> 0:16:39.440
<v Speaker 6>fuel bill is surging.

0:16:39.080 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 4>For them and it is having an impact on their

0:16:41.280 --> 0:16:42.040
<v Speaker 4>bottom line.

0:16:42.680 --> 0:16:43.840
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, definitely. Right.

0:16:43.880 --> 0:16:46.720
<v Speaker 10>The name of the game right now in airline land

0:16:47.080 --> 0:16:51.640
<v Speaker 10>is I need to increase fares. I think it's you know,

0:16:51.680 --> 0:16:53.280
<v Speaker 10>they're roughly going to have to get up into the

0:16:54.200 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 10>high teens to twenty percent rise in order to cover

0:16:58.440 --> 0:17:01.960
<v Speaker 10>my increased fuel prices. Is one of the big challenges too,

0:17:02.080 --> 0:17:04.920
<v Speaker 10>is as they you know, they need fares to rise,

0:17:05.000 --> 0:17:07.879
<v Speaker 10>so they have to start to cut some capacity so

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:10.800
<v Speaker 10>they can they can get supply and demand back in balance.

0:17:11.320 --> 0:17:15.240
<v Speaker 10>As they cut capacity, their costs go up, right, because

0:17:15.240 --> 0:17:18.680
<v Speaker 10>there's a there's economies to scale, and so they start

0:17:18.680 --> 0:17:22.120
<v Speaker 10>to get mid single digit and higher increases in cost

0:17:22.160 --> 0:17:25.480
<v Speaker 10>per available seat mile as they trim their capacity growth.

0:17:25.600 --> 0:17:28.960
<v Speaker 10>So it's a it's a real push pull kind of

0:17:29.040 --> 0:17:31.480
<v Speaker 10>challenge here, and American came out and they hit it

0:17:31.520 --> 0:17:34.400
<v Speaker 10>squarely with hey, we're not really going to adjust capacity

0:17:34.520 --> 0:17:37.400
<v Speaker 10>very much in two Q, and we think we can

0:17:37.440 --> 0:17:40.480
<v Speaker 10>get fair increases to compensate for a lot of it,

0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:41.280
<v Speaker 10>but not all of it.

0:17:42.600 --> 0:17:45.199
<v Speaker 2>What are the airlines saying about demand here? I mean,

0:17:45.320 --> 0:17:48.120
<v Speaker 2>because I think airlines have some pretty good visibility people

0:17:48.200 --> 0:17:50.800
<v Speaker 2>booking trips into the summer, maybe even longer, more longer

0:17:50.880 --> 0:17:52.760
<v Speaker 2>term than that. How are they seen demand?

0:17:53.640 --> 0:17:56.880
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, so, I mean I would say that across the board,

0:17:58.280 --> 0:18:00.280
<v Speaker 10>you know, they've all sort of said demand was was

0:18:00.880 --> 0:18:02.680
<v Speaker 10>very strong going into.

0:18:04.040 --> 0:18:06.280
<v Speaker 8>You know, sort of the end of one Q into

0:18:06.320 --> 0:18:08.960
<v Speaker 8>the summer travel season this year. So it sounds like

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:10.520
<v Speaker 8>the setup had been pretty good.

0:18:11.040 --> 0:18:14.600
<v Speaker 10>And again now it's a function of the demand looks

0:18:14.640 --> 0:18:18.679
<v Speaker 10>like it's still largely there, although they clearly wouldn't be

0:18:18.680 --> 0:18:21.800
<v Speaker 10>cutting capacity if it was there and just would take

0:18:21.840 --> 0:18:26.040
<v Speaker 10>a big price increase in fares. So a lot of

0:18:26.080 --> 0:18:29.200
<v Speaker 10>them are and I shouldn't say cutting capacity, they're trimming

0:18:29.320 --> 0:18:34.080
<v Speaker 10>growth plans, especially the big full service carriers, because I mean,

0:18:34.119 --> 0:18:37.439
<v Speaker 10>to me, that tells me that they can't get they

0:18:37.480 --> 0:18:41.159
<v Speaker 10>can't push through the full price increase they need. And

0:18:41.240 --> 0:18:44.000
<v Speaker 10>a lot of them are talking about the cadence of

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:48.639
<v Speaker 10>getting that full recovery in fares to compensate for higher

0:18:48.640 --> 0:18:52.040
<v Speaker 10>fuel prices, and they're kind of telling us that. You know,

0:18:52.080 --> 0:18:54.160
<v Speaker 10>we heard from United that by the end of the year,

0:18:54.200 --> 0:18:57.400
<v Speaker 10>by four Q they thought they'd be fully compensated. American

0:18:57.480 --> 0:19:00.000
<v Speaker 10>told us they thought they would almost be fully competent

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 10>stated by the end of four Q.

0:19:02.480 --> 0:19:03.760
<v Speaker 8>So you can see a cadence here.

0:19:03.760 --> 0:19:05.280
<v Speaker 10>Where's going to take them a bunch of the year

0:19:05.800 --> 0:19:09.320
<v Speaker 10>to really drive through that those higher ticket prices and

0:19:09.440 --> 0:19:12.400
<v Speaker 10>get back the increased fuel prices if they stay here.

0:19:13.040 --> 0:19:14.440
<v Speaker 10>If fuel prices stay here.

0:19:14.359 --> 0:19:16.959
<v Speaker 6>Well, we know demand also looks very good because consumers

0:19:17.000 --> 0:19:19.240
<v Speaker 6>are booking their flights for this summer and maybe for

0:19:19.320 --> 0:19:21.960
<v Speaker 6>the holidays that they know they're going to be going away,

0:19:22.160 --> 0:19:24.320
<v Speaker 6>knowing full well that fares are going up, up, up.

0:19:24.400 --> 0:19:26.320
<v Speaker 6>I mean, that's been kind of a steady drumbeat of

0:19:26.359 --> 0:19:31.639
<v Speaker 6>the newsflow for companies sending employees to go do business

0:19:31.680 --> 0:19:34.200
<v Speaker 6>in other parts of the world and country that kind

0:19:34.200 --> 0:19:37.600
<v Speaker 6>of ends up being something you book maybe a month out.

0:19:37.760 --> 0:19:40.200
<v Speaker 4>What does corporate travel look like? What do we learn

0:19:40.240 --> 0:19:41.280
<v Speaker 4>from the airlines about that?

0:19:42.000 --> 0:19:44.880
<v Speaker 10>Again, the commentary we're hearing right now is that corporate

0:19:44.920 --> 0:19:49.280
<v Speaker 10>travel is continuing to recover, it was doing well, is

0:19:49.359 --> 0:19:54.480
<v Speaker 10>doing well, you know, and so from a demand perspective,

0:19:54.480 --> 0:19:57.120
<v Speaker 10>we're hearing good things. But agree with you on that,

0:19:57.480 --> 0:19:59.720
<v Speaker 10>Scarlett that I think that you know you're going to

0:19:59.800 --> 0:20:02.000
<v Speaker 10>have to some degree that people that absolutely want to

0:20:02.040 --> 0:20:06.400
<v Speaker 10>go or have to go, rushing to book here. Right,

0:20:06.440 --> 0:20:09.440
<v Speaker 10>we know the airlines haven't booked out their entire schedule

0:20:09.480 --> 0:20:13.200
<v Speaker 10>for the summer and into the fall. Against summer, we're

0:20:13.200 --> 0:20:17.560
<v Speaker 10>coming into vacation season. It's traditionally a very leisure focused

0:20:17.600 --> 0:20:22.120
<v Speaker 10>season and again one of their strongest. So this fuel

0:20:22.160 --> 0:20:25.240
<v Speaker 10>spike comes at a good time for them to pass

0:20:25.320 --> 0:20:28.080
<v Speaker 10>through some of those increases It's going to be more

0:20:28.119 --> 0:20:30.600
<v Speaker 10>interesting to see what happens as we get into four

0:20:30.680 --> 0:20:33.720
<v Speaker 10>Q and one queue of next year if these fuel

0:20:33.760 --> 0:20:35.920
<v Speaker 10>prices remain high. And yeah, I don't think we have

0:20:35.960 --> 0:20:37.720
<v Speaker 10>the full story of corporate, but they're telling us in

0:20:37.800 --> 0:20:42.040
<v Speaker 10>earnings corporate looks good, but like you said, it's a

0:20:42.040 --> 0:20:43.680
<v Speaker 10>shorter booking window on corporate.

0:20:43.760 --> 0:20:48.439
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:20:48.600 --> 0:20:52.560
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each weekday,

0:20:52.800 --> 0:20:56.080
<v Speaker 1>ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com, the

0:20:56.160 --> 0:21:00.080
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app. You

0:21:00.119 --> 0:21:03.359
<v Speaker 1>can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube and

0:21:03.560 --> 0:21:05.520
<v Speaker 1>always on the Bloomberg terminal