Speaker 1: Hey, folks, it is Thursday, September the fourth, and Jeffrey
Speaker 1: Epstein's victims concede he did not have a list. So
Speaker 1: they have announced they are going to put their own
Speaker 1: list of Epstein clients together. However they might not ever
Speaker 1: let us see it. And with that, everybody, welcome to
Speaker 1: Amy and TJ presents the Epstein Victims Robes. This was
Speaker 1: an extraordinary showing outside the Capitol yesterday. Some of these
Speaker 1: Epstein victims. We had over ten, some of them we
Speaker 1: never heard from before, and a bombshell of sorts that
Speaker 1: kind of got lessened a bit. But that's no doubt
Speaker 1: a headline. They're saying they're gonna put together their own list.
Speaker 2: Yes, and they say that there are hundreds, if not
Speaker 2: thousands of Epstein victims, and yeah, they're going to try
Speaker 2: and together collectively come up with a list. And it
Speaker 2: wasn't as if they had to come up with it.
Speaker 2: They said very unequivocally that we know who's involved, we
Speaker 2: know who the perpetrators are, we know who abused some
Speaker 2: of us, but you're not ever possibly going to hear
Speaker 2: the names because we're afraid to tell you.
Speaker 1: So they got a lot of questions at the press
Speaker 1: conference which was organized by a couple of members of Congress,
Speaker 1: a Democrat and a Republican who are now putting together
Speaker 1: legislation and trying to get a vote forced in Congress
Speaker 1: about the Epstein files to release all Epstein files. Robes
Speaker 1: LUs stop there. I'm not sure what we're talking about
Speaker 1: anymore when we're talking about the Epstein files.
Speaker 3: I'm not sure either, TJ.
Speaker 2: Because yes, we heard directly from Congressman Rocanna, who actually
Speaker 2: made the statement that less than one percent of the
Speaker 2: Jeffrey Epstein files have been released. What that, to me
Speaker 2: was an incredibly confusing statement. I'm not saying it isn't true,
Speaker 2: but that's the first I've heard that number less than
Speaker 2: one percent of the Jeffrey Epstein files have been released.
Speaker 2: And yes, he said, they have all two hundred and
Speaker 2: twelve Democrats, and right now they have four Republicans who
Speaker 2: would force this vote. They need two more Republicans.
Speaker 1: Which Speaker Johnson said they will not get, so he
Speaker 1: doesn't believe that the vote is going to come up. Fine,
Speaker 1: But rote to your point, Congressman kNN of California, Democrat,
Speaker 1: why what does that? I don't have context for that. Statement.
Speaker 1: It could be accurate to a degree, but frankly, a
Speaker 1: lot of what are we seen lately is a lot
Speaker 1: of politicians play with these numbers and play with the
Speaker 1: and play these word games. It might be technically true,
Speaker 1: but not really true. I don't know what that means.
Speaker 1: I have not heard that somewhere.
Speaker 2: Could it involve all the redactions? And look, obviously we
Speaker 2: know there are other documents that those who have seen
Speaker 2: them claim. All they will do is put out names
Speaker 2: of innocent people. So just because someone had a business
Speaker 2: dealing with, or knew or was friendly with Jeffrey Epstein,
Speaker 2: or there was some sort of transaction financially, those all
Speaker 2: could have been very legal and on.
Speaker 3: The up sort of relationships.
Speaker 2: They don't mean that any of those people did anything wrong,
Speaker 2: or anything illegal, or anything immoral.
Speaker 3: So by releasing names.
Speaker 2: Of people who he worked alongside and perhaps traveled with
Speaker 2: and just consorted with, they'll do more harm than good
Speaker 2: putting these names out. That's the only thing that I
Speaker 2: know that has been deliberately withheld.
Speaker 1: Okay, so let's talk about how we got here. Yes,
Speaker 1: so they planned this press conference the congressman of the
Speaker 1: attorney for the women and really at least ten of
Speaker 1: them that were up there, and they all spoke. This
Speaker 1: conference went on for a couple of hours actually outside
Speaker 1: at the Capitol. Now several of them got up and
Speaker 1: they did they I think these women are to be
Speaker 1: believed right of what they experienced. Many of them absolutely
Speaker 1: have stories that I believe, generally speaking, the veracity of
Speaker 1: them has been accepted.
Speaker 2: And look, Brad Edwards is their attorney and absolutely interviewed him,
Speaker 2: worked with him. He has been working officially with Epstein
Speaker 2: victims for more than a decade. And most of these
Speaker 2: victims at the time were all Jane Doe one, Jamee
Speaker 2: Doe two, Jaane do three. They weren't putting their names
Speaker 2: to their stories. So it was a very big deal
Speaker 2: that there he was standing with a lot of these
Speaker 2: women who he has been representing, I don't want to
Speaker 2: say clandestinely, but certainly anonymously for more than a decade,
Speaker 2: actually stood out in front of reporters, in front of cameras,
Speaker 2: in front of the Capitol and told their story.
Speaker 3: That was a big deal.
Speaker 1: So Lisa Phillips is one robes that got a lot
Speaker 1: of attention. She is not one necessarily. It's been in
Speaker 1: the shadows, because she even has a podcast where she
Speaker 1: talks about people being groomed and what happened to her
Speaker 1: and Epstein victims. So she has been talking about there
Speaker 1: and been out there. But she told her story. She
Speaker 1: said she had been abused. She talked about trying to
Speaker 1: get away from Epstein, going to his island and having
Speaker 1: to be in the same circles with him and whatnot.
Speaker 1: But she I guess robe. She she only spoke for
Speaker 1: a couple of minutes, a short time, but in her
Speaker 1: prepared remarks she was the one that dropped a bombshell
Speaker 1: essentially that had newsrooms and certainly the reporters on the
Speaker 1: scene buzzin'.
Speaker 3: She did.
Speaker 2: She actually ended her statement by saying, I would like
Speaker 2: to announce here today, so now everybody's listening, all ears
Speaker 2: are perked up. She went on to say, us Epstein
Speaker 2: survivors have been discussing creating our own list. We know
Speaker 2: the names many of us were abused by them. Now
Speaker 2: together as survivors, we will confidentially compile the names we
Speaker 2: all know who regularly were in the Epstein world. And
Speaker 2: it will be done for survivors and buy survivors. No
Speaker 2: one else is involved, Stay tuned for more details.
Speaker 3: That was interesting.
Speaker 1: All right, let's just stop right there. There is more
Speaker 1: we're going to get into folks about her because she
Speaker 1: came up and followed up and that caused a little
Speaker 1: more what confusion and certainly dissatisfaction among some of the
Speaker 1: press corps. But take her at that statement. What was
Speaker 1: your reaction to first hearing that?
Speaker 2: Well, so I was a little confused, because, look, I
Speaker 2: understand that there is a fear of retribution in some way,
Speaker 2: but at this point, if they weren't heard, listened to,
Speaker 2: or believed, and they weren't for more than a decade,
Speaker 2: if you were ever going to say who is responsible
Speaker 2: and actually want justice, why wouldn't you say their names now?
Speaker 2: If there ever was a protection before, there would certainly
Speaker 2: be now because the world has been waiting and listening
Speaker 2: and really, I mean, I hate to you use this word,
Speaker 2: but hungry for.
Speaker 3: Names.
Speaker 2: This has been floated for so long. So if they
Speaker 2: are saying they know the rich and powerful people who
Speaker 2: exploited them and who abused them, why wouldn't they, in
Speaker 2: the name of justice give those names to the press
Speaker 2: right there with those microphones and the cameras rolling.
Speaker 3: Why not say them.
Speaker 1: Now, well, I get to you this point again. At
Speaker 1: this point in the press conference when she makes this announcement,
Speaker 1: she says, this is going to be an ongoing process
Speaker 1: of compiling the name. She didn't say necessarily they had
Speaker 1: them or complete lists that they're going to all agree
Speaker 1: to at some point, but just the idea that there's
Speaker 1: not a list, but one is going to be created.
Speaker 1: They are going to create, they are going to compile
Speaker 1: in secret, just them, nobody else involved. That guess they're
Speaker 1: trying to tell us that no politics is involved in that.
Speaker 1: This is just us, for us, by us. I thought
Speaker 1: when I've heard that, initially my eyes got big, well wow,
Speaker 1: and then I got concerned because now we got another
Speaker 1: list floating around that people are going there's going to
Speaker 1: be more conspiracy theorists about and more conjecture about who's
Speaker 1: on and who do It's just like, oh, this is
Speaker 1: going to cause another mess. But that was a bombshell
Speaker 1: announcement today that there will be a client list.
Speaker 3: That we may or may not ever hear.
Speaker 1: Well, I hadn't gotten to that just yet. There were
Speaker 1: several other people who did speak during the press conference today. Again,
Speaker 1: several of them got up and told their stories robes.
Speaker 1: I didn't recognize. I know some of them talked for
Speaker 1: the first time, but I didn't recognize a lot of
Speaker 1: these folks and a lot of these names. I guess
Speaker 1: Virginia Guphray was the one that most people do know.
Speaker 1: Obviously she died by suicide earlier this year. But a
Speaker 1: lot of these and I'm ask you as well, are
Speaker 1: these folks besides from the young lady who is has
Speaker 1: a podcastn't been out there? I did, I wasn't familiar
Speaker 1: with a lot of these names, and a lot of these.
Speaker 2: Folks they aren't household names, but they have been speaking
Speaker 2: again as like Jane do Number one, Jane Don't number
Speaker 2: two through court documents. Their stories have been told, but
Speaker 2: I had not seen names and faces attached to stories
Speaker 2: the way we did in.
Speaker 3: This press conference.
Speaker 2: And some of these women have spoken out in recent years,
Speaker 2: certainly following the death of Jeffrey Epstein, and some of
Speaker 2: these women testified in the Galaine Maxwell trial, so their
Speaker 2: identities would have been protected during that time.
Speaker 3: So yeah, this might be.
Speaker 2: The first time a lot of us have seen at
Speaker 2: least the faces go along with the stories and the names.
Speaker 1: Conte Davies one of them. I believe she did say
Speaker 1: she testified, yes, at one of the trials. She youngly
Speaker 1: told her story. She says she's been she's been a
Speaker 1: survivor of decades of trauma by Maxwell and Epstein. Look,
Speaker 1: this was two thousand and two, I think she said
Speaker 1: when she first got into that world. So if you
Speaker 1: think about that, No, she's not saying the abuse went
Speaker 1: on for twenty years. What she's saying is she's been
Speaker 1: dealing with this for decades and it hasn't necessarily gone away.
Speaker 1: I was interested Robes to hear her tell the story
Speaker 1: of how she got in the world. This was a
Speaker 1: young lady who was trying to be an actress. She
Speaker 1: was trying to advance her career in La met Glaine Maxwell,
Speaker 1: and this is how she put it. She was told
Speaker 1: by a person she trusted that asked her to meet
Speaker 1: a powerful woman who could help advance my career. That
Speaker 1: woman happened to be Glainne Maxwell. I was asked to
Speaker 1: give her a massage, though I had almost no experience,
Speaker 1: and when I did, she praised me and promised to
Speaker 1: introduce me to someone enormously powerful, someone who had changed
Speaker 1: the course of my life. That man was Jeffrey Epstein.
Speaker 1: Is this how it went? It was such a bizarre
Speaker 1: to hear her tell the tale. I know they've told
Speaker 1: their stories before, but she was a twenty twenty one
Speaker 1: to twenty two year old actress. You, a friend says,
Speaker 1: meet this lady, I know because she could help you
Speaker 1: with your career. And she asked for a masage, and
Speaker 1: the young lady complied. That is something I think a
Speaker 1: lot about this story that's hard to figure out. What
Speaker 1: was Glaine Maxwell, What were they thinking? And what were
Speaker 1: these well young ladies also possibly thinking.
Speaker 2: According to many of these young ladies, and some of
Speaker 2: them were wildly underage starting at the age of fourteen fifteen, sixteen,
Speaker 2: and their promised money in exchange for a massage, and
Speaker 2: in a classic grooming styling, each massage gets a little
Speaker 2: bit more sexual to the point where it ends up
Speaker 2: being full blown abuse. So I get that now when
Speaker 2: you are this seemed as though it was abuse via
Speaker 2: transaction almost and it wasn't exactly like Harvey Weinstein, because
Speaker 2: those stories were of forcible He was forcing himself on
Speaker 2: actresses who wanted roles in private hotel rooms. This was
Speaker 2: a little bit different, but they all did. Every story
Speaker 2: that I have heard so far involves these massages that
Speaker 2: turned sexual.
Speaker 3: But I do think it's also some of these stories.
Speaker 2: Some of these women who stood up today talked about
Speaker 2: them wanting something, and Jeffrey Epstein promising something basically a career,
Speaker 2: a modeling career, an acting career, and so he took
Speaker 2: advantage of young women who had goals and aspirations. I
Speaker 2: believe it was Lisa Phillips who said, I thought this
Speaker 2: was really interesting. She said, hundreds of ambitious young women
Speaker 2: in New York City were abused by Epstein. The victims
Speaker 2: were not just underaged girls in Florida. I don't even
Speaker 2: like the idea of pitting those two groups of victims
Speaker 2: against one another, but I did think it was interesting.
Speaker 2: She used hundreds of ambitious young women in New York City.
Speaker 2: So from her story and from the story of Chante,
Speaker 2: it did seem as though they wanted something from him. Connections, opportunities,
Speaker 2: doors opened, and in some cases those did happen. At
Speaker 2: least Lisa talk about being introduced and being able to
Speaker 2: meet the head of the Ford Agency Ford Modeling Agency,
Speaker 2: but Chants said very quickly that all of her his
Speaker 2: promises were empty or they all came with a catch,
Speaker 2: and that's the abuse that she's referencing. And she said,
Speaker 2: he told me to keep it a secret, Dad.
Speaker 1: But to hear her say, she meets a woman who
Speaker 1: immediately tells her to give her a massage, and the
Speaker 1: next thing you know, she says, she meets Epstein. I
Speaker 1: was an excited young woman on top of the world.
Speaker 1: He flew me to his private island and listened to
Speaker 1: my dreams, promised to help. Like you said, promise came
Speaker 1: with a catch. That's a to hear if this was
Speaker 1: the method, if this was their m it was just
Speaker 1: I didn't when you meet some what it's tough to understand.
Speaker 1: You meet a woman for the first time of the
Speaker 1: business tranks action helped me with my career. Give me
Speaker 1: a massage.
Speaker 2: That's just odd for yes, And I think a lot
Speaker 2: of people and you don't want to judge or victim
Speaker 2: shame in any way, but a lot of people are
Speaker 2: scratching their heads just thinking, what did you think this
Speaker 2: was going to lead to? If that was the entrance
Speaker 2: give this woman a massage. And then she said she
Speaker 2: complimented her on her massage abilities, even though she said
Speaker 2: she had never been trained. I just feel like, at
Speaker 2: least let this be a cautionary tale to any other
Speaker 2: young woman out there trying to make it in whatever industry.
Speaker 2: Someone says, yeah, meet me, but give me a massage,
Speaker 2: that's a really huge red flag.
Speaker 1: But that does not obviously you going to make sure
Speaker 1: this is not a victim blaming situation. But to hear
Speaker 1: how this was the first time I've heard a detail.
Speaker 1: She talked about liking massages herself all the time. Right.
Speaker 1: She says, she would go recruit, she would go to
Speaker 1: her own places to get massages at professional places, and
Speaker 1: she'd have a nice one. And then she said, oh,
Speaker 1: Epstein might like this person to think. You meet somebody
Speaker 1: for the first time who was an actress, and you
Speaker 1: ask her for a massage. What were these people maxwelling?
Speaker 1: What was she doing?
Speaker 2: They were capitalizing on the hopes and dreams and hunger
Speaker 2: of young women who wanted to make it, and they
Speaker 2: were taking that and using it for their advantage, and
Speaker 2: they didn't care what happened to these young women.
Speaker 1: She also went on, I think everybody's talking about you
Speaker 1: want to hear about big names. The only two I
Speaker 1: heard were Trump and Bill Clinton. Yes, she made a
Speaker 1: reference just to Chantay Davies, is that she was on
Speaker 1: a plane and flew to Africa with former President Bill
Speaker 1: Clinton and notable figures is all she said. Fine, but
Speaker 1: she slid his name in then, didn't I suggest he
Speaker 1: did anything wrong. And the other was Donald Trump said
Speaker 1: he bragged about his powerful friends, including Donald Trump said
Speaker 1: he kept at eight x ten picture framed of him
Speaker 1: on his desk.
Speaker 2: Yeah, she actually made a point to say it was
Speaker 2: his biggest brag actually, so she wanted to make that
Speaker 2: exceptionally clear that that's the person that Epstein claimed to
Speaker 2: be most proud of being friends with.
Speaker 1: So we hear folks say notable figures, we hear Clinton mentioned,
Speaker 1: we hear Trump mentioned, we hear Maxwell mentioned, we hear
Speaker 1: Epstein mentioned, And that's it. They go on and talk
Speaker 1: about this list, and this is going to get a
Speaker 1: lot of people's attention, because if they put a list together,
Speaker 1: and if they were to dare put it on a
Speaker 1: piece of paper or dare to put it on a computer,
Speaker 1: everybody's going to be after that thing. So I don't
Speaker 1: know how they're going to go about it, but folks
Speaker 1: even though they say they are putting a list together.
Speaker 1: They were asked on more than one occasion by these reporters,
Speaker 1: when can we see it? Will we see it? The
Speaker 1: answer so far is no.
Speaker 2: Welcome back to this edition of Amy and TJ. We
Speaker 2: are talking about this powerful and jaw dropping press conference
Speaker 2: held by several of the Jeffrey Epstein victims. They were
Speaker 2: flanked by several US congressmen and women in addition to
Speaker 2: their attorney, Brad Edwards, and they stood up one by
Speaker 2: one and told their story, but even more headline grabbing,
Speaker 2: and notably, they claimed that they were going to compile
Speaker 2: their own list, that they knew the names of these
Speaker 2: other powerful associates of Epstein who have so far been
Speaker 2: untouched or unnamed, and in the name of justice, they
Speaker 2: said they were going to collaborate and confidentially create a
Speaker 2: list of these men, maybe even women. We don't know
Speaker 2: that everyone has been clamoring for because how long have
Speaker 2: we been hearing about an Epstein client list? Where is
Speaker 2: the list? Where's the client list? What does Glene Maxwell know?
Speaker 2: What did Jeffrey Epstein take with him in his suicide?
Speaker 2: That will never find out? Well, these women claim that
Speaker 2: they no, how.
Speaker 1: Powerful is that if they came up today and say, hey,
Speaker 1: we have the list and we're gonna put it together.
Speaker 1: So when you hear that, the first thing I thought
Speaker 1: was my goodness, winner, we're going to see this thing.
Speaker 1: And then Lisa Phillips came back up to the podium
Speaker 1: after a question was asked at the end about the list,
Speaker 1: and this is how she responded to a question about
Speaker 1: the list. We're reaching out to survivors who are scared
Speaker 1: to come forward and that also know who they were
Speaker 1: trafficked to. And that's the list we're compiling. We're not
Speaker 1: quite sure how we're going to release it or even
Speaker 1: if we're going to. That was the record scratch moment
Speaker 1: you could tell for the reporters, like, WHOA, what do
Speaker 1: you mean You're gonna put it together and keep it secret.
Speaker 1: Isn't that exactly what the problem is right now in
Speaker 1: the controversy is that the government has the list and
Speaker 1: they're keeping a secret. So now we got two secret
Speaker 1: lists gonna be quoting.
Speaker 2: And then, as reporters often do, they asked a follow
Speaker 2: up question and it was the one that was in
Speaker 2: all of our heads.
Speaker 3: I was like, hell, yeah, that's the question I would
Speaker 3: have asked, why won't you say the names?
Speaker 2: Why won't you Lisa Phillips said back to that reporter,
Speaker 2: why do we have to say the names when the
Speaker 2: government knows the names? And then she also referenced the
Speaker 2: fact that they were scared to do so. They weren't
Speaker 2: listened to before, so why should they believe they would
Speaker 2: be listened to now.
Speaker 3: I have a really good answer for that.
Speaker 2: Everyone wants to hear what you have to say now,
Speaker 2: And yes, she's right, no one wanted to hear what
Speaker 2: they had to say a decade ago.
Speaker 3: That is absolutely true.
Speaker 2: And I understand how that might be scary, and there
Speaker 2: might be a lot of PTSD surrounding that, threats of lawsuits,
Speaker 2: threats of bodily harm. I get that, But there's never
Speaker 2: been a better or safer time now if they do
Speaker 2: have names of people who have abused women who might
Speaker 2: still be abusing women, if there was ever a time
Speaker 2: to do it, it would be now.
Speaker 3: I also want.
Speaker 2: Under why they've got this big press conference together. It's
Speaker 2: just interesting to me the reasoning behind announcing that you're
Speaker 2: going to create a list, but then saying you might
Speaker 2: not release it. Why not either just make a list
Speaker 2: and release it or not. I don't understand the purpose
Speaker 2: of saying you have one and that you know the names,
Speaker 2: but that you might not release them.
Speaker 1: Does it put anybody on notice? Does it put any
Speaker 1: pressure on the government.
Speaker 3: To do what?
Speaker 1: I don't know, release their list?
Speaker 3: Is it they claim there isn't one?
Speaker 1: There is not a list. So they're telling the government,
Speaker 1: we don't want to release ours, you release yours, is
Speaker 1: what she's saying. Now, we can't make sense. And look,
Speaker 1: these are victims of horror. So wherever their heads aren't
Speaker 1: what they decide to do. I don't know what threats
Speaker 1: they received and what their lives have been. Like, you
Speaker 1: do your thing, but today, as far as moving the
Speaker 1: story ahead, as far as getting answers to the public,
Speaker 1: this or at least that move robes put us in
Speaker 1: now another confusing situation of oh, so there are names,
Speaker 1: and they're standing in front of cameras yesterday saying the
Speaker 1: people you're looking at up here, we know the list,
Speaker 1: but we're not gonna tell you. That's that's gonna Yeah.
Speaker 1: I mean, they could do their thing, but I don't
Speaker 1: know what that created now.
Speaker 2: Well, it created more questions, It created more interest. It created,
Speaker 2: It created headlines, and maybe that's what they wanted to
Speaker 2: do and then maybe they'll release whatever they want to
Speaker 2: release in time. But they got our attention, and maybe
Speaker 2: that was just the whole purpose, not to do a
Speaker 2: big information dump, but to actually start to get people's attention,
Speaker 2: and then maybe they will start to reveal the names
Speaker 2: or the information want the public to know.
Speaker 1: You know, it's a good point. If they have said
Speaker 1: two names, that's all we would have been talking about today, right,
Speaker 1: we would have been talking about necessarily them being victimized.
Speaker 1: I guess focused on who these names are. But I
Speaker 1: don't know, are these people still out there victimizing.
Speaker 2: I mean, if they have stories, personal stories with their
Speaker 2: attacker or abuser's name that we haven't heard yet, those
Speaker 2: stories would be powerful and.
Speaker 3: They would be told, so, you know, I think.
Speaker 2: They will have to decide, and I don't know if
Speaker 2: this is I mean, they were very unified and they
Speaker 2: were cheering each other on and they were supporting one another,
Speaker 2: which was beautiful to see. But I'm not sure what
Speaker 2: the level of collaboration or agreement is as to what
Speaker 2: they should do or how they should do it. So
Speaker 2: maybe they just have to they want to stick together,
Speaker 2: and I understand that maybe no one woman wants to
Speaker 2: come out on her own and say something, so they
Speaker 2: need to all agree on it, on the timing and
Speaker 2: the purpose of what it is that they're doing.
Speaker 1: Okright, So we're going to wrap now, folks on two
Speaker 1: more very important and maybe the most key moment of
Speaker 1: the entire press conference in a lot of ways. But
Speaker 1: it's further the confusion robes because their attorning was up there.
Speaker 1: He made a couple of comments, made a comment that
Speaker 1: there is a list, that there's not a list, and
Speaker 1: that we're creating a list. So the first quote from
Speaker 1: him I'll share is that him saying that every one
Speaker 1: of these women was abused by Jeffrey Epstein, and his
Speaker 1: scheme was to personally abuse women when they reached a
Speaker 1: certain age. He did farm some of them out to
Speaker 1: some of his friends. He used that phrase farm than
Speaker 1: them out. He said, not all of his friends, but
Speaker 1: some of his friends he formed these people out to.
Speaker 1: And ending with this quote with that said, I'm more
Speaker 1: than happy to assist in creating the list behind the
Speaker 1: scenes and see what we do with it now. Previously,
Speaker 1: he also said talking about Epstein, nobody protected these women
Speaker 1: the first time. Is there a list? There is a list,
Speaker 1: That's what he said, but Ropes he completely threw that
Speaker 1: out to wind though with another comment.
Speaker 2: I think the distinction is my best assessment is that
Speaker 2: there is a list that the women are compiling, that
Speaker 2: the women have. But when the reporter followed up and said,
Speaker 2: do you believe that Jeffrey Epstein had a list, he said,
Speaker 2: there's not a list.
Speaker 3: And he said that.
Speaker 1: Very clearly, with the women behind him many nodding in agreement.
Speaker 2: Correct, because he said though, he was just basically saying
Speaker 2: that without the people who I guess would be on
Speaker 2: this list, he could not have done this. But the
Speaker 2: purpose was for him to personally abuse people. Again, he
Speaker 2: talked about some of his friends that he farmed out
Speaker 2: women to, but that wasn't the primary purpose of his scheme.
Speaker 2: He's saying, I don't think he wrote down the names
Speaker 2: of the people who he farmed out women to. Yes,
Speaker 2: there are names of people who he worked with and
Speaker 2: who helped him operate in his scheme, But he was
Speaker 2: basically saying it was a personal scheme for Jeffrey Epstein,
Speaker 2: not necessarily for the other people on the list, it is.
Speaker 1: Incredibly confusing, and he ended with that's just not how
Speaker 1: the organization worked. So I look, Rose, I'm glad. I
Speaker 1: think a lot of people are glad, And look, I'm
Speaker 1: happy they're having a moment. If they feel more comfortable
Speaker 1: as a unit to come out and to be public
Speaker 1: and to take back their lives their story in some
Speaker 1: ways even in the middle of the or even help
Speaker 1: the country in some way heal from all of this
Speaker 1: back and forth and to some kind of way find
Speaker 1: a lesson or some peace and all this, then that's great.
Speaker 1: And we are now standing by and waiting for another
Speaker 1: list to be compiled that maybe we will and maybe
Speaker 1: we won't see ropes.
Speaker 2: Yes, we will all have to stay tuned for more details,
Speaker 2: as Lisa Phillips told us in the press conference, and
Speaker 2: we will certainly do that and bring you any new
Speaker 2: developments as they become available.
Speaker 3: But for now I may be Robock alongside T. J. Holmes.
Speaker 2: Thanks as always for listening.