WEBVTT - Surveillance: EM Valuations Are Very Cheap, Memani Says

0:00:09.880 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane Jay Lee.

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course on the Bloomberg My

0:00:29.320 --> 0:00:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Book of the Summer. His name is Robin Roger. If

0:00:31.760 --> 0:00:33.920
<v Speaker 1>you do not know him, he is a Nodding acquaintance

0:00:34.440 --> 0:00:38.199
<v Speaker 1>with India as a former RBI governor, but also a

0:00:38.360 --> 0:00:41.120
<v Speaker 1>dynamo at the University of Chicago. And I can't say

0:00:41.200 --> 0:00:45.199
<v Speaker 1>enough about the Third Pillar. It's March and it's already

0:00:45.240 --> 0:00:48.880
<v Speaker 1>my book of the summer. Rockgoo, congratulations on the third Pillar.

0:00:48.960 --> 0:00:53.680
<v Speaker 1>And throughout your book on community as a discussion of education,

0:00:53.840 --> 0:00:57.920
<v Speaker 1>seamlessly throughout four hundred pages. Let me cut to the chase.

0:00:58.160 --> 0:01:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Your Chicago is so lead. These parents out on the

0:01:01.680 --> 0:01:04.960
<v Speaker 1>West Coast weren't even trying to get their kids and

0:01:05.080 --> 0:01:08.200
<v Speaker 1>the professor Roger and Chicago. They were looking at other

0:01:08.280 --> 0:01:12.600
<v Speaker 1>lower schools like that one in Cambridge in Massachusetts as well.

0:01:12.840 --> 0:01:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Ruggle just simply your thoughts on the desperation to buy

0:01:17.480 --> 0:01:23.360
<v Speaker 1>academics in America. Well, this is very worrisome, right because

0:01:23.760 --> 0:01:27.320
<v Speaker 1>on the one hand, we already have isquing of opportunities.

0:01:27.600 --> 0:01:29.800
<v Speaker 1>You have to go to the elite schools to get

0:01:29.840 --> 0:01:34.680
<v Speaker 1>those elite jobs and and then you get you know, zillions,

0:01:34.720 --> 0:01:37.880
<v Speaker 1>But for most of us out there, it's very hard

0:01:37.959 --> 0:01:40.600
<v Speaker 1>to even take the first step. And then you read

0:01:40.720 --> 0:01:43.920
<v Speaker 1>that it's not just about legacies, it's not just about

0:01:43.959 --> 0:01:48.200
<v Speaker 1>preparation schools, which helps you prepare your applications, but it's

0:01:48.240 --> 0:01:52.960
<v Speaker 1>about buying your way in illegally through corruption. That that

0:01:52.960 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 1>that's really a blow to the system and we need

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:59.080
<v Speaker 1>to clean this up as quickly as possible. It's not

0:01:59.160 --> 0:02:01.600
<v Speaker 1>happening you for us. Are you had the most interesting

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:03.880
<v Speaker 1>childhood in India. I won't go into it all, but

0:02:04.200 --> 0:02:06.560
<v Speaker 1>like many others, you traveled around the world with your

0:02:06.560 --> 0:02:11.000
<v Speaker 1>father and diplomacy and enforcement for India as well, and

0:02:11.040 --> 0:02:13.639
<v Speaker 1>you are acculiar ware of the path for you through

0:02:13.760 --> 0:02:17.919
<v Speaker 1>university in India and then onto your acclaimed world excellence.

0:02:18.480 --> 0:02:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Is the place those students took. Is it a place

0:02:22.400 --> 0:02:25.240
<v Speaker 1>from someone in the middle class or is it a

0:02:25.320 --> 0:02:28.560
<v Speaker 1>place of someone who just went below that level of

0:02:28.800 --> 0:02:32.040
<v Speaker 1>whatever school and they just eaked out not going to

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:36.400
<v Speaker 1>that fancy school. Well, I think it is a concern

0:02:36.600 --> 0:02:40.639
<v Speaker 1>that so many people don't get a chance to really

0:02:40.680 --> 0:02:43.600
<v Speaker 1>get into these school schools. First, you need a level

0:02:43.760 --> 0:02:47.280
<v Speaker 1>of ambition in some of these schools outside the big cities,

0:02:47.320 --> 0:02:50.640
<v Speaker 1>which tells you really the way to progress is to

0:02:50.720 --> 0:02:54.120
<v Speaker 1>go to these high these ivy League schools, and from

0:02:54.200 --> 0:02:56.960
<v Speaker 1>there get those wonderful jobs. Many students don't even have

0:02:57.080 --> 0:03:00.920
<v Speaker 1>the ambition because they don't have access to good college

0:03:00.960 --> 0:03:04.200
<v Speaker 1>counselors who tell them that's out there waiting for you.

0:03:04.480 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 1>There are lots of scholarships, please do apply. And even

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:11.519
<v Speaker 1>if they they do, hear that the next step of

0:03:11.560 --> 0:03:15.800
<v Speaker 1>doing the college tests, of writing the good applications, of

0:03:16.040 --> 0:03:20.040
<v Speaker 1>getting past those hurdles is very difficult. So when you

0:03:20.160 --> 0:03:23.800
<v Speaker 1>hear that there are separate tracks here, I think it

0:03:23.840 --> 0:03:27.960
<v Speaker 1>creates a whole lot of new anxiety over and above

0:03:28.000 --> 0:03:33.200
<v Speaker 1>what we already have. Professor, Does this feed populism? Do

0:03:33.320 --> 0:03:36.680
<v Speaker 1>these kind of scandals the idea that actually the elite

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:39.280
<v Speaker 1>and the rich and get whatever they want will lead

0:03:39.480 --> 0:03:44.200
<v Speaker 1>to people voting to more extreme parties, of course, because

0:03:44.600 --> 0:03:47.760
<v Speaker 1>I think the sense that the system is cued, even

0:03:47.840 --> 0:03:50.960
<v Speaker 1>before you add on corruption to it, is already there

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:55.600
<v Speaker 1>that the elite look after themselves. I call it the UH.

0:03:56.080 --> 0:04:00.760
<v Speaker 1>We have a meritocracy, but it's a hereditary meritocracy. Only

0:04:00.840 --> 0:04:03.680
<v Speaker 1>the children of the successful get a chance at being

0:04:03.720 --> 0:04:08.840
<v Speaker 1>successful because of the extreme importance of a really good education.

0:04:09.320 --> 0:04:12.760
<v Speaker 1>So given that, when you add on to that corruption

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:16.599
<v Speaker 1>and after all, what is populism, it's ultimately the corruption

0:04:16.600 --> 0:04:19.440
<v Speaker 1>of the elite. They're not working for us, they're working

0:04:19.440 --> 0:04:23.080
<v Speaker 1>for themselves. It leads to a significant amount of distrust

0:04:23.080 --> 0:04:26.320
<v Speaker 1>in the system. So my sense is this is one

0:04:26.360 --> 0:04:29.359
<v Speaker 1>of those scandals which is which has to be cleaned

0:04:29.400 --> 0:04:35.600
<v Speaker 1>up very very quickly. Professor, again, congratulations on your book,

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:39.320
<v Speaker 1>which is fantastic, which is both tom and ized book

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:42.119
<v Speaker 1>of the year. When you look actually at central banks,

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:43.760
<v Speaker 1>and you said this in the past that you don't

0:04:43.760 --> 0:04:46.760
<v Speaker 1>believe central banks should do any more, Quei if there

0:04:46.839 --> 0:04:49.440
<v Speaker 1>was a downturn around the corner, what do you think

0:04:49.440 --> 0:04:54.800
<v Speaker 1>they should do instead? Well, certainly the the US Central Bank,

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:58.440
<v Speaker 1>the FED, and UH and and China still have some

0:04:58.520 --> 0:05:02.039
<v Speaker 1>room to cut interest rates. I think part of the

0:05:02.080 --> 0:05:05.640
<v Speaker 1>normalization was in a sense to create some of that buffer.

0:05:06.200 --> 0:05:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Of course, the problem with both the CB and the

0:05:09.080 --> 0:05:11.919
<v Speaker 1>Bank of Japan, is they already into negative interest rates.

0:05:12.440 --> 0:05:15.479
<v Speaker 1>As far as Quee goes, They've pretty much done what

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:18.800
<v Speaker 1>they could and whatever modest effect is that it has had,

0:05:19.080 --> 0:05:22.480
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty much out there. There's very little more ammunition

0:05:22.520 --> 0:05:25.480
<v Speaker 1>in the central bank tank, and so my guess is

0:05:25.600 --> 0:05:27.839
<v Speaker 1>we have to look for other instruments in those countries.

0:05:27.920 --> 0:05:30.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Professor, this is extraordinary. If you look at

0:05:30.440 --> 0:05:34.040
<v Speaker 1>a college like Carleton College in Minnesota, this is an

0:05:34.080 --> 0:05:37.520
<v Speaker 1>acclaim liberal arts institution of the Midwest, just like you're

0:05:37.839 --> 0:05:54.440
<v Speaker 1>in Chicago. Brian Levitt joins us in the early morning

0:05:54.480 --> 0:05:58.080
<v Speaker 1>down here Oppenheimer Severia investment strategies. Brian, let's start that

0:05:58.120 --> 0:06:02.279
<v Speaker 1>which treasuries, Yeldner, it's an nineteen loves. What's driving things,

0:06:02.520 --> 0:06:04.840
<v Speaker 1>what's driving the lower rates is just to slow down

0:06:04.839 --> 0:06:08.440
<v Speaker 1>in global economic activity. Um, you know this was sort

0:06:08.480 --> 0:06:11.600
<v Speaker 1>of we preordain, We sort of expected this. I mean,

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:13.880
<v Speaker 1>you had a lot of stimulus last year, drove rates

0:06:13.920 --> 0:06:17.120
<v Speaker 1>to three five, FED raised rates a couple of times,

0:06:17.160 --> 0:06:19.680
<v Speaker 1>and that starts to slow down economic activity. You see

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:22.000
<v Speaker 1>rates back down. We've been in the low for long

0:06:22.120 --> 0:06:24.280
<v Speaker 1>camp for a while now. We believe interest rates are

0:06:24.279 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 1>going to remain low. For a very long period of time.

0:06:26.960 --> 0:06:29.680
<v Speaker 1>That's what happens in a world where there were just

0:06:29.720 --> 0:06:33.480
<v Speaker 1>growth stars. So so does equities dovetail in the lower

0:06:33.560 --> 0:06:36.160
<v Speaker 1>rates or does a dovetail into slow g d P,

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:40.400
<v Speaker 1>which means lousy earnings. So earnings are likely to be

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:43.080
<v Speaker 1>good enough. UM growth is likely to be good enough

0:06:43.160 --> 0:06:45.560
<v Speaker 1>to support corporate earnings. But we're still in an environment

0:06:45.560 --> 0:06:47.560
<v Speaker 1>where rates are so low that stocks are very cheap

0:06:47.560 --> 0:06:50.960
<v Speaker 1>to bonds, and I expect that with modest earnings growth,

0:06:51.120 --> 0:06:54.040
<v Speaker 1>some multiple expansion equity market should continue to do. This

0:06:54.080 --> 0:06:56.400
<v Speaker 1>is really important, fo Brian, you and I've done this before.

0:06:56.480 --> 0:06:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Let's walk to it again. When a process stocks are

0:06:59.360 --> 0:07:03.160
<v Speaker 1>cheap to bonds, what does that mean on dividend versus

0:07:03.279 --> 0:07:06.640
<v Speaker 1>yield on PE multiple? I mean take that right back

0:07:06.640 --> 0:07:08.640
<v Speaker 1>to Lewis Ruth Kaiser one oh one. I think an

0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 1>easy way to do it is to just flip the

0:07:10.640 --> 0:07:14.040
<v Speaker 1>price earnings ratio over and look at the earnings. He

0:07:14.080 --> 0:07:16.040
<v Speaker 1>has a price to earnings ratio of ten using a

0:07:16.160 --> 0:07:19.560
<v Speaker 1>round number ten divided by one. Right, flip it one

0:07:19.600 --> 0:07:22.800
<v Speaker 1>divided by ten compared to a two, and so one

0:07:22.800 --> 0:07:24.640
<v Speaker 1>divided by ten compared to a two and a half

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:28.040
<v Speaker 1>percent treasury rate and you're gonna you're gonna look pretty attractive.

0:07:28.080 --> 0:07:31.120
<v Speaker 1>So the SMP earnings gilts probably close to around five

0:07:31.160 --> 0:07:34.880
<v Speaker 1>percent compared to two six to seven on treasuries. Was

0:07:34.920 --> 0:07:36.880
<v Speaker 1>that too much math now thought that was? That was

0:07:36.880 --> 0:07:43.320
<v Speaker 1>a great stop. Let's let Tom enjoy his food. I

0:07:43.360 --> 0:07:45.520
<v Speaker 1>think there's something that front strates a lot of people

0:07:45.800 --> 0:07:47.760
<v Speaker 1>on Wall straights when people turn around and say, the

0:07:47.800 --> 0:07:50.679
<v Speaker 1>bond market is telling me something. Is there a sinister

0:07:50.720 --> 0:07:52.960
<v Speaker 1>message in the bond market the equity market doesn't know about.

0:07:53.000 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Can we just clear that up right now? Well, the

0:07:54.840 --> 0:07:57.320
<v Speaker 1>bond market is telling you that we're going back to

0:07:57.400 --> 0:08:01.560
<v Speaker 1>an environment of very modest growth but modest inflation, and

0:08:01.600 --> 0:08:05.000
<v Speaker 1>we see that in the inflation numbers, and paradoxically, that's

0:08:05.040 --> 0:08:07.640
<v Speaker 1>actually in a better environment for equity. Jonathan. If you

0:08:07.680 --> 0:08:11.000
<v Speaker 1>remember last year, very good growth, but what we would

0:08:11.040 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 1>call bad policy, federal reserve raising interest rates, the administration

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:19.440
<v Speaker 1>fighting a trade war. This year, what the market is

0:08:19.440 --> 0:08:22.680
<v Speaker 1>focused on is slower growth, but better policy. The federal

0:08:22.720 --> 0:08:25.640
<v Speaker 1>reserve is backed off, We're hoping to get some clarity

0:08:25.680 --> 0:08:27.880
<v Speaker 1>on trade, and the market is enthused by that. This

0:08:27.920 --> 0:08:30.520
<v Speaker 1>is a theme for Oppenheimer coming into I've heard it

0:08:30.560 --> 0:08:32.199
<v Speaker 1>from you, I've heard it from Christian and multiple times,

0:08:32.200 --> 0:08:33.719
<v Speaker 1>and I've had it now for several months. What I

0:08:33.760 --> 0:08:36.920
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen yet is the better policy for the markets

0:08:36.960 --> 0:08:39.040
<v Speaker 1>at least work for the economy. I haven't seen the

0:08:39.040 --> 0:08:41.760
<v Speaker 1>bottoming bottom AUP process come through in China in a

0:08:41.800 --> 0:08:44.520
<v Speaker 1>clear weight right yet. Do you see it? Well, you're

0:08:44.520 --> 0:08:47.360
<v Speaker 1>starting to see stabilization in Chinese growth, so you're starting

0:08:47.400 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 1>to see some credit growth. You have a purchasing manager's

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:52.880
<v Speaker 1>index that's hovering around forty nine and a half, so

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 1>we're getting closer to that expansion territory perhaps of recent

0:08:57.000 --> 0:08:59.840
<v Speaker 1>turn and industrial production. So it looks like we're getting

0:08:59.840 --> 0:09:02.720
<v Speaker 1>to stabilization and Chinese growth back to my trend level.

0:09:02.840 --> 0:09:05.800
<v Speaker 1>But remember policy moves take some time to work through

0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the economy, so we would expect to see that second half.

0:09:09.120 --> 0:09:11.199
<v Speaker 1>This is why, quite frankly, the US is slowing. We

0:09:11.360 --> 0:09:13.640
<v Speaker 1>raised rates and that's working its way through the system.

0:09:13.800 --> 0:09:16.160
<v Speaker 1>When John trades, it's like a three day trade as

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:19.560
<v Speaker 1>a long term trade, and I would suggest here Lappenheimer funds,

0:09:20.080 --> 0:09:22.120
<v Speaker 1>you know a long term trade is like five years

0:09:22.200 --> 0:09:24.960
<v Speaker 1>or even ten years. In two months we're up eleven

0:09:25.000 --> 0:09:29.000
<v Speaker 1>point four s. How do you Christian and the rest

0:09:29.000 --> 0:09:32.160
<v Speaker 1>of your team, how do you answer the question? Wait

0:09:32.160 --> 0:09:35.720
<v Speaker 1>a minute, I'm up double digit go to cash? Well, look,

0:09:35.800 --> 0:09:38.960
<v Speaker 1>first of all, we had a very difficult fall in winter,

0:09:39.160 --> 0:09:41.720
<v Speaker 1>so we've been recovering ground from what was a pretty

0:09:41.800 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 1>nasty correction. You're gonna take to do your compare and

0:09:44.960 --> 0:09:48.319
<v Speaker 1>contress well, right, And the reality is, I mean, investors

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:51.679
<v Speaker 1>can try and trade, they can try to move into cash,

0:09:51.720 --> 0:09:53.959
<v Speaker 1>but they've got to make multiple decisions, right, They've got

0:09:53.960 --> 0:09:55.839
<v Speaker 1>to know when to get into cash. They got to

0:09:55.880 --> 0:09:57.920
<v Speaker 1>know when to get out of cash. The realities, I

0:09:57.960 --> 0:10:00.320
<v Speaker 1>believe we're in a secular bowl market. I've I've been

0:10:00.360 --> 0:10:03.200
<v Speaker 1>told you get three secular bull markets in your life.

0:10:03.200 --> 0:10:09.040
<v Speaker 1>The first one I was too young, the next one

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:11.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm likely to be. I'm just saying we've got a

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:13.320
<v Speaker 1>live audience here, and everyone's face is just We're like,

0:10:13.400 --> 0:10:17.119
<v Speaker 1>what is he talking about? It's sort of like imus,

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:19.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's like it's a hotel full of people

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:22.000
<v Speaker 1>here right now. It's a beautiful thing. It's it's just

0:10:23.080 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm happy to have it. Car. Does that make me Bernard? Yes?

0:10:27.040 --> 0:10:30.080
<v Speaker 1>So so anyway, um, this is the one. This is

0:10:30.120 --> 0:10:32.840
<v Speaker 1>the middle secular bull market in my life, at least

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:35.760
<v Speaker 1>as I view it. And you know, secular bull markets

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:38.280
<v Speaker 1>are ultimately going to end with either extreme excess in

0:10:38.280 --> 0:10:42.439
<v Speaker 1>the system, valuations that are incredibly excessive, or a policy mistake,

0:10:42.480 --> 0:10:44.320
<v Speaker 1>and none of those seem apparent. Let's talk about your

0:10:44.320 --> 0:10:46.640
<v Speaker 1>regional bus right now. What would it be? Well, I

0:10:46.640 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 1>would favor in the United States, I would favor true growth.

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:54.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm favoring Cleveland this morning. Can we can we wait?

0:10:54.440 --> 0:10:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Can we wait? Region? Because let's just wait. We've got

0:10:59.040 --> 0:11:01.440
<v Speaker 1>a bit of time later today this Can I just

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:09.240
<v Speaker 1>say that my eleven year old daughter that Mr what's

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:13.040
<v Speaker 1>his name? Beckham Beckham jam Jr. Not the soccer player

0:11:13.120 --> 0:11:17.160
<v Speaker 1>football moved from Giants to Brown's. Everyone is shocked, continued

0:11:17.200 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 1>his daughter devastated. But Jabrill Peppers, Michigan guy coming in

0:11:20.840 --> 0:11:23.280
<v Speaker 1>New York. So she gonna change her Giants tattoo to

0:11:23.280 --> 0:11:26.679
<v Speaker 1>a Brown's tattoo. She did ask for Beckham Brown's jersey

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:28.600
<v Speaker 1>for a birthday. What did the Giants get in return?

0:11:30.080 --> 0:11:33.560
<v Speaker 1>What did they get? Mr? Mannigan returned? So they get

0:11:33.559 --> 0:11:36.800
<v Speaker 1>the number seventeen pick in this draft, The number pick

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 1>in this draft and Jabrill Peppers, the safety who came

0:11:39.800 --> 0:11:43.320
<v Speaker 1>out of Michigan Patterson Catholic High School. But it's interesting,

0:11:43.360 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 1>and is it really would you suggest that, folks, this

0:11:45.320 --> 0:11:47.559
<v Speaker 1>really goes to all the sports, including John we'll talk

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 1>about Juventus, Juve, Juventus, we'll talk about there when yesterday.

0:11:52.520 --> 0:11:55.200
<v Speaker 1>But Brian, it goes to the management trying to call

0:11:55.240 --> 0:11:57.600
<v Speaker 1>a locker room and they think they're gonna do that

0:11:57.679 --> 0:12:01.200
<v Speaker 1>by moving this gifted wide receiver. Well, I suspect that's

0:12:01.280 --> 0:12:07.080
<v Speaker 1>that's what they're thinking. Um, it's also a check on

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:09.880
<v Speaker 1>the surveillance locker room. I suppose it's a team that

0:12:09.920 --> 0:12:12.680
<v Speaker 1>thinks they need to rebuild, and so that's this is

0:12:13.000 --> 0:12:17.200
<v Speaker 1>talking about Blimberg surveillance giants. I'm just trying to work

0:12:17.240 --> 0:12:19.560
<v Speaker 1>that we talk about a real sport. Can we talk

0:12:19.600 --> 0:12:24.120
<v Speaker 1>about Uventus a real sport. Christian Christiano Ronaldo needs to

0:12:24.160 --> 0:12:27.360
<v Speaker 1>score three goals. That's exactly what he does. Juventus wins.

0:12:27.400 --> 0:12:31.480
<v Speaker 1>They can to score three goals and win three nil.

0:12:31.559 --> 0:12:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Ronaldo scores all three stunning comeback over in Turin in Italy.

0:12:35.679 --> 0:12:40.719
<v Speaker 1>The stock this morning Juventus up sixteen percent, just up

0:12:40.760 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 1>sixteen percent, just off that win. And the market can

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:46.600
<v Speaker 1>move off the back of it the equivalent of two

0:12:46.640 --> 0:12:49.640
<v Speaker 1>times what the club paid for him. Two times what

0:12:49.679 --> 0:12:51.240
<v Speaker 1>the club paid for him, We're up about two d

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:55.160
<v Speaker 1>forty million euros in market cap on the day. Does

0:12:55.240 --> 0:12:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Manchester City have the same dynamics with a year they're

0:12:57.880 --> 0:12:59.920
<v Speaker 1>having so Manchester City and events, I think probably the

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:01.880
<v Speaker 1>vor it's for the for the tournament. Now an outside

0:13:01.960 --> 0:13:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Barcelona like to Cleveland Browns. What can I tell you

0:13:05.080 --> 0:13:09.560
<v Speaker 1>my regional view? Now? Can you seconds? Thirty seconds? Week?

0:13:09.920 --> 0:13:12.640
<v Speaker 1>We're very favorable on the emerging markets. Last year was

0:13:12.679 --> 0:13:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the US above trend, China below, China stabilizing US slowing

0:13:17.320 --> 0:13:20.679
<v Speaker 1>policy accommodative around the world. That should be supportive for Nocoba.

0:13:20.880 --> 0:13:22.800
<v Speaker 1>This is really important. We'll come back and talk about

0:13:22.800 --> 0:13:26.960
<v Speaker 1>the international expertise of Oppenheimer Funds and Brian Levitt's view

0:13:27.040 --> 0:13:42.400
<v Speaker 1>on emerging markets as well. It is a joy to

0:13:42.440 --> 0:13:46.640
<v Speaker 1>be at Oppenheimer Funds with our expertise in the international investment.

0:13:46.640 --> 0:13:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Of course, those of us have a certain vintage. Remember

0:13:49.440 --> 0:13:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Oppenheimer Funds from a few years ago with definitive equity

0:13:54.080 --> 0:13:57.640
<v Speaker 1>and particularly growth equity at work as well and hosting

0:13:57.720 --> 0:14:01.280
<v Speaker 1>is today Christian MoManI, head of the shop here. Wonderful

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:05.080
<v Speaker 1>day have you here, and you get surveillance yeoman's duty today.

0:14:05.120 --> 0:14:07.880
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna give that to Francis like wa freezing on

0:14:07.920 --> 0:14:11.280
<v Speaker 1>the green at Westminster. I think for our audience we

0:14:11.360 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of perceive New York to Istanbul, which is not

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:18.280
<v Speaker 1>quite as far as New York to Buenos series. You

0:14:18.400 --> 0:14:21.880
<v Speaker 1>just flew in from Argentina and you had a brilliant insight.

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Christians always their bankrupt pastos at forty two and the

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:30.080
<v Speaker 1>hotels are packed. How can that be? Well? So, I

0:14:30.520 --> 0:14:34.560
<v Speaker 1>think that's very interesting. That is they have a crisis,

0:14:34.680 --> 0:14:37.880
<v Speaker 1>and it was a crisis created by the Machrie government

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:41.760
<v Speaker 1>by depending too much to fund the fiscal deficit from

0:14:41.760 --> 0:14:46.640
<v Speaker 1>external sources. Beyond that, I think there is the draw

0:14:46.680 --> 0:14:50.640
<v Speaker 1>down in the economy is relatively modest. If Makri can

0:14:50.720 --> 0:14:54.240
<v Speaker 1>win the win the election, and there's decent chance for

0:14:54.400 --> 0:14:57.800
<v Speaker 1>that despite the economic debacco, he can implement lots of

0:14:57.800 --> 0:15:01.960
<v Speaker 1>structural changes. The most in instinct thing that I observed

0:15:01.960 --> 0:15:08.600
<v Speaker 1>there is Argentina uses Venezuela more than anybody else. I

0:15:08.880 --> 0:15:12.840
<v Speaker 1>think that is one of the REASONSOS know what they're

0:15:12.880 --> 0:15:18.080
<v Speaker 1>saying is well, if Christina comes back, Kush Nurse come back,

0:15:18.880 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 1>then we will be another Venezuela as well. So that

0:15:23.880 --> 0:15:27.320
<v Speaker 1>is a that is a good election platform. Bottom line is,

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:29.960
<v Speaker 1>you know the country is going through an adjustment. They

0:15:29.960 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 1>are in a sort of a recession. But I don't

0:15:32.160 --> 0:15:34.920
<v Speaker 1>think the recession is as deep as people suspect. Is

0:15:34.960 --> 0:15:38.560
<v Speaker 1>there opportunity there for traditional investors or is it the

0:15:38.600 --> 0:15:42.360
<v Speaker 1>prevailance a fancy alternative fund people that know more than

0:15:42.400 --> 0:15:45.560
<v Speaker 1>I do. No. I think the companies are dirt cheap.

0:15:45.640 --> 0:15:49.840
<v Speaker 1>If we've met an agricum company and they generated almost

0:15:49.920 --> 0:15:52.960
<v Speaker 1>ninety million dollars in free cash flow in dollar terms,

0:15:53.000 --> 0:15:56.640
<v Speaker 1>because they exports its dollars trading at seven hundred seven

0:15:56.680 --> 0:16:00.320
<v Speaker 1>hundred seventy million dollars in market cap, that's a ashaan

0:16:00.440 --> 0:16:05.280
<v Speaker 1>cash yield, which is significantly, significantly cheaper than anywhere else

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:06.760
<v Speaker 1>in the world. So how do you think about Latin

0:16:06.800 --> 0:16:08.720
<v Speaker 1>American in general? I mean, do you really need to

0:16:08.760 --> 0:16:12.480
<v Speaker 1>break it down country by country, company by company, or

0:16:12.520 --> 0:16:14.280
<v Speaker 1>do you have a macro view of Latin America that

0:16:14.320 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 1>you need to be longer or unexposed. I think the

0:16:17.560 --> 0:16:21.640
<v Speaker 1>thing in Latin America is important, but the larger context

0:16:21.760 --> 0:16:26.200
<v Speaker 1>is emerging markets. Valuations in emerging markets, as Argentina and

0:16:26.240 --> 0:16:30.240
<v Speaker 1>other places show valuations and emerging markets are very cheap

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:33.480
<v Speaker 1>relative to the developed work, especially the US, and that's

0:16:33.520 --> 0:16:37.200
<v Speaker 1>the primary reason why we want to be in in

0:16:37.240 --> 0:16:40.880
<v Speaker 1>emerging markets. And as as the company that I was

0:16:40.920 --> 0:16:44.480
<v Speaker 1>talking about, it's really not about Argentina as much as

0:16:44.520 --> 0:16:48.680
<v Speaker 1>it is about a dollar exporter in Argentina who has

0:16:49.000 --> 0:16:53.840
<v Speaker 1>significant cost advantages. So emerging market investing for US has

0:16:53.880 --> 0:16:58.080
<v Speaker 1>always been about companies rather than geographies or countries. How

0:16:58.080 --> 0:17:00.840
<v Speaker 1>about also in the context of your emerging mark CA thesis,

0:17:01.000 --> 0:17:03.240
<v Speaker 1>as you just stated, how concern are you bout just

0:17:03.280 --> 0:17:07.159
<v Speaker 1>slowing global economy something specifically China, and then also you

0:17:07.200 --> 0:17:10.200
<v Speaker 1>know Europe as well, Um, how is that impacting kind

0:17:10.200 --> 0:17:13.640
<v Speaker 1>of your view of emerging markets. Well, so global economy

0:17:13.720 --> 0:17:16.760
<v Speaker 1>is slowing down for sure, I mean US is slowing down,

0:17:16.880 --> 0:17:20.760
<v Speaker 1>China will slow down, Europe has definitely slowed down. Having

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:25.480
<v Speaker 1>said that, the slowdown is not catastrophic, So China is

0:17:25.520 --> 0:17:27.720
<v Speaker 1>not going to go to four percent, It's gonna be

0:17:28.320 --> 0:17:32.160
<v Speaker 1>still be higher than six percent, and Europe hopefully stabilizes

0:17:32.200 --> 0:17:35.320
<v Speaker 1>around you know, for the whole year around one percent

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:38.600
<v Speaker 1>US probably too. So the global economy is slowing down,

0:17:38.640 --> 0:17:42.399
<v Speaker 1>but it is not slowing down catastrophically. Policy, on the

0:17:42.400 --> 0:17:46.399
<v Speaker 1>other hand, is going to be meaningfully more supportive in

0:17:46.440 --> 0:17:49.160
<v Speaker 1>two thousand nineteen than it had it was in two

0:17:49.200 --> 0:17:52.000
<v Speaker 1>thousand and eighteen, and that's what gets the markets higher

0:17:52.200 --> 0:17:54.679
<v Speaker 1>very quickly. My idea of international investment used to be

0:17:54.720 --> 0:17:57.800
<v Speaker 1>to buy a case of Molson Golden Nail out of Canada.

0:17:57.960 --> 0:18:01.080
<v Speaker 1>It's changed a little bit. Christian say the least, do

0:18:01.200 --> 0:18:03.840
<v Speaker 1>you just go into e M now and let you

0:18:03.880 --> 0:18:07.040
<v Speaker 1>guys allocate, or you have to be supple and go

0:18:07.160 --> 0:18:10.040
<v Speaker 1>in and out. So you missed two thousand eighteen and

0:18:10.080 --> 0:18:12.960
<v Speaker 1>try to get two thou well. So I think if

0:18:13.000 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 1>you are a long term investor and you're looking for

0:18:15.960 --> 0:18:19.160
<v Speaker 1>growth in your portfolio for the next two or three decades,

0:18:19.200 --> 0:18:22.879
<v Speaker 1>which is a lot of people need, the real growth

0:18:22.920 --> 0:18:25.560
<v Speaker 1>in the world is only going to come from emerging market.

0:18:26.840 --> 0:18:28.440
<v Speaker 1>You just have to lean and say, you know, you'll

0:18:28.480 --> 0:18:31.320
<v Speaker 1>have the five year period that we have had over

0:18:31.359 --> 0:18:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the last five years, it's been a very subpar, but

0:18:34.880 --> 0:18:37.399
<v Speaker 1>that's not the context. The context is you want to

0:18:37.440 --> 0:18:39.480
<v Speaker 1>be in this market for the long term growth we're

0:18:39.520 --> 0:18:41.959
<v Speaker 1>gonna come back. He's got so many frequent flyer miles

0:18:41.960 --> 0:18:45.159
<v Speaker 1>on the surveillance credit card that we're gonna bring Christian

0:18:45.200 --> 0:18:50.080
<v Speaker 1>money back just in fluent from Buenos Aires. That doesn't

0:18:51.080 --> 0:19:07.399
<v Speaker 1>doesn't failed at that, you know, House Democrats. Uh, Now

0:19:07.440 --> 0:19:09.680
<v Speaker 1>they're obviously back in control of the House, and they're

0:19:09.680 --> 0:19:15.440
<v Speaker 1>actually taking another stab at legislation protecting young undocumented immigrants,

0:19:15.440 --> 0:19:17.960
<v Speaker 1>while at the same time expending those protections to immigrants

0:19:17.960 --> 0:19:20.840
<v Speaker 1>that are covered by other programs. To help us kind

0:19:20.880 --> 0:19:24.359
<v Speaker 1>of breakdown this story, we're joined by Laura Francis, Laura's

0:19:24.359 --> 0:19:28.679
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Law senior legal editor. Laura, thanks so much for

0:19:28.760 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 1>joining us. Um What is the status of this latest

0:19:32.560 --> 0:19:37.440
<v Speaker 1>iteration of immigration legislation. So it was just introduced yesterday,

0:19:37.560 --> 0:19:40.760
<v Speaker 1>there was a lot of fanfare by the Democrats, so

0:19:40.800 --> 0:19:42.600
<v Speaker 1>we'll have to see kind of where it's going to

0:19:42.720 --> 0:19:45.520
<v Speaker 1>go from here. I would imagine that with the Democrats

0:19:45.520 --> 0:19:47.400
<v Speaker 1>and control of the House, they're really going to make

0:19:47.400 --> 0:19:50.760
<v Speaker 1>a push to get this bill through committee and onto

0:19:50.760 --> 0:19:54.919
<v Speaker 1>the House floor. Is there any Republican support either in

0:19:55.000 --> 0:19:58.399
<v Speaker 1>the House or the Senate for this There has not

0:19:58.600 --> 0:20:02.400
<v Speaker 1>been vocalized publican support. I think there are some Republicans

0:20:02.440 --> 0:20:07.119
<v Speaker 1>who are willing to work with the Democrats to expand

0:20:07.160 --> 0:20:10.399
<v Speaker 1>this bill and kind of add some provisions that maybe

0:20:10.440 --> 0:20:14.920
<v Speaker 1>include border security, interior enforcement, that kind of thing. They're

0:20:14.920 --> 0:20:18.040
<v Speaker 1>not willing to throw it out, but I don't think

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:20.399
<v Speaker 1>they want to see it pass in its current form.

0:20:20.640 --> 0:20:23.919
<v Speaker 1>But but okay, I get that. But essentially anything the

0:20:23.960 --> 0:20:26.840
<v Speaker 1>House proposes is dead on a rival, right, I mean,

0:20:27.000 --> 0:20:30.560
<v Speaker 1>this is the definition of grid luck. It can be

0:20:30.680 --> 0:20:35.840
<v Speaker 1>especially with immigration. Any immigration bill introduced by either party

0:20:35.920 --> 0:20:39.679
<v Speaker 1>and either side of Congress, it faces an uphill battle.

0:20:40.160 --> 0:20:42.159
<v Speaker 1>So how do you handle that every day? Do you

0:20:42.200 --> 0:20:45.199
<v Speaker 1>medicate every morning before you go into the land of

0:20:45.240 --> 0:20:51.520
<v Speaker 1>grid luck? I can't speak from members of Congress, UM,

0:20:51.880 --> 0:20:56.679
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a perpetual challenge with any immigration legislation UM,

0:20:56.720 --> 0:21:01.240
<v Speaker 1>because immigration bills have not moved in Congress in so

0:21:01.280 --> 0:21:05.800
<v Speaker 1>many years. Anything that gets introduced is mired in all

0:21:05.800 --> 0:21:09.439
<v Speaker 1>these complicated factors. Is the bill going to be too small?

0:21:09.600 --> 0:21:12.919
<v Speaker 1>Is the bill going to be too big? And it

0:21:13.160 --> 0:21:16.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of puts everyone at a standstill until something finally

0:21:16.840 --> 0:21:20.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of breaks that political logjam. So so, Laura, is

0:21:20.720 --> 0:21:23.479
<v Speaker 1>is there some middle road here where we could uh

0:21:23.960 --> 0:21:27.240
<v Speaker 1>or the Congress kid bringing some you know, some money, uh,

0:21:27.320 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 1>some language about border security, about a wall or just

0:21:30.640 --> 0:21:34.080
<v Speaker 1>border security broadly defined, to help push this legislation through.

0:21:34.119 --> 0:21:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Is there any middle ground there? I think there could

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:42.160
<v Speaker 1>be this time around. In past congresses, Republicans have insisted

0:21:42.280 --> 0:21:46.000
<v Speaker 1>on we need enforcement first before we provide any kind

0:21:46.000 --> 0:21:51.280
<v Speaker 1>of legalization to undocumented immigrants. This time there they change

0:21:51.280 --> 0:21:53.240
<v Speaker 1>your tune a little bit where they're saying, we still

0:21:53.280 --> 0:21:56.520
<v Speaker 1>need that enforcement, but we are willing to attach it

0:21:56.560 --> 0:21:59.240
<v Speaker 1>to legalization. So I think that may be a ground

0:21:59.280 --> 0:22:03.240
<v Speaker 1>for them to work together on, not this exact bill,

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:06.200
<v Speaker 1>but maybe using this as a jumping point to something

0:22:06.240 --> 0:22:09.240
<v Speaker 1>more comprehensive. To a grizzled pro like you. When you

0:22:09.280 --> 0:22:12.639
<v Speaker 1>see a new number eight point six jillion dollars to

0:22:12.720 --> 0:22:16.359
<v Speaker 1>build another X feed of wall, translate that for the

0:22:16.480 --> 0:22:20.560
<v Speaker 1>jaded on Capitol Hill, what does that actually mean? So,

0:22:21.400 --> 0:22:24.680
<v Speaker 1>what what you're seeing is the president's budget proposal, and

0:22:25.200 --> 0:22:28.159
<v Speaker 1>that's really just kind of his wish list for what

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:32.880
<v Speaker 1>he wants to see happen. It's very rare that Congress

0:22:32.960 --> 0:22:36.360
<v Speaker 1>gives him anything that close to what he's asking for,

0:22:36.440 --> 0:22:39.119
<v Speaker 1>and especially with the wall, which has already been the

0:22:39.160 --> 0:22:44.000
<v Speaker 1>subject of so much contention. Um, it's it's highly unlikely

0:22:44.080 --> 0:22:46.760
<v Speaker 1>that that's actually going to pass through Congress. Laura Francis,

0:22:46.760 --> 0:22:49.879
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much, greatly appreciate the budget wish list

0:22:50.480 --> 0:23:10.440
<v Speaker 1>conversation in Washington. Paul Swunian, time king with Oppenheimer Funds.

0:23:10.440 --> 0:23:12.400
<v Speaker 1>We do this once a year and it is spectacular.

0:23:12.520 --> 0:23:16.960
<v Speaker 1>We thank them for their hospitality and a good food.

0:23:17.160 --> 0:23:19.680
<v Speaker 1>To say the least. I'm a little shaky right now, Paul,

0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:23.120
<v Speaker 1>after the avocado toast, I mean, after the second tray

0:23:23.160 --> 0:23:25.560
<v Speaker 1>of it. I think this is the interview of the

0:23:25.600 --> 0:23:29.000
<v Speaker 1>day for about all this investment stuff. Christina Boris with

0:23:29.160 --> 0:23:32.600
<v Speaker 1>this head of client research at Oppenheimer Funds, which means

0:23:33.560 --> 0:23:37.040
<v Speaker 1>know your client, which is actually go out and talk

0:23:37.200 --> 0:23:41.800
<v Speaker 1>to people about their fears. Now, we could rip up

0:23:41.800 --> 0:23:45.720
<v Speaker 1>the script and spend the entire uh interview talking about

0:23:45.760 --> 0:23:47.960
<v Speaker 1>how to get into college. But that'll be a theme

0:23:48.359 --> 0:23:51.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe for another time with you. I'm sure people walking

0:23:51.080 --> 0:23:53.240
<v Speaker 1>to go I gotta get my kid into slippery rocket?

0:23:53.280 --> 0:23:56.240
<v Speaker 1>What do I do? But forget about that. What's the

0:23:56.320 --> 0:24:03.200
<v Speaker 1>biggest fear right now of high net worth people? Okay, fear, um,

0:24:03.240 --> 0:24:07.280
<v Speaker 1>I would say, just uncertainty. About the current political environment.

0:24:07.440 --> 0:24:11.680
<v Speaker 1>That's something we actually asked about last year. And yes,

0:24:11.920 --> 0:24:14.439
<v Speaker 1>what about the idea of I've got you mean the

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:16.359
<v Speaker 1>masks says I've got to put this amount of money

0:24:16.400 --> 0:24:19.000
<v Speaker 1>on because I mean, Paul's too young to remember this,

0:24:19.040 --> 0:24:21.840
<v Speaker 1>But there's the idea of if I don't make I

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:24.280
<v Speaker 1>can't get it forward and the hurdle rates come down

0:24:24.320 --> 0:24:28.320
<v Speaker 1>and return over the years. Is there a panic among

0:24:28.880 --> 0:24:32.840
<v Speaker 1>the people you interview in sight, a true panic that

0:24:32.840 --> 0:24:35.040
<v Speaker 1>that we're in an area where we've got to put

0:24:35.080 --> 0:24:37.199
<v Speaker 1>aside a lot more money than we ever thought we

0:24:37.240 --> 0:24:40.560
<v Speaker 1>had to. Well not. In terms of the latest survey results,

0:24:40.560 --> 0:24:43.040
<v Speaker 1>which we just wrapped up last month. UM, what we

0:24:43.160 --> 0:24:46.320
<v Speaker 1>found is that high net worth investors are really focused

0:24:46.359 --> 0:24:48.959
<v Speaker 1>on the long term. Even in the week of the

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:53.960
<v Speaker 1>recent market volatility in the back half of many investors

0:24:53.960 --> 0:24:56.640
<v Speaker 1>said they actually didn't do anything. They didn't make any

0:24:56.720 --> 0:25:00.560
<v Speaker 1>changes to their investment portfolios. They stay, they kept calm

0:25:00.640 --> 0:25:04.679
<v Speaker 1>and carried on. That seems to be the Yeah, I

0:25:04.680 --> 0:25:07.880
<v Speaker 1>was whipping a portfolio trying to catch the last So

0:25:08.080 --> 0:25:11.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's it's interesting. What we've heard from UM

0:25:11.440 --> 0:25:14.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of asset managers is that their clients, are

0:25:14.520 --> 0:25:16.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, asking more about E s G and which

0:25:16.840 --> 0:25:19.720
<v Speaker 1>is environmental sustainability and governance? I guess and those are

0:25:19.760 --> 0:25:22.320
<v Speaker 1>becoming more important issues. Is that we find in your

0:25:22.320 --> 0:25:25.000
<v Speaker 1>survey work as well. Yes, absolutely, we do ask that

0:25:25.119 --> 0:25:27.040
<v Speaker 1>in the survey, and we do see that E s

0:25:27.080 --> 0:25:29.440
<v Speaker 1>G investing is on the rise with high net worth

0:25:29.480 --> 0:25:33.400
<v Speaker 1>investors UM. As of this latest survey, almost of those

0:25:33.440 --> 0:25:36.360
<v Speaker 1>who are invested in sustainable and E s G UM,

0:25:36.440 --> 0:25:40.040
<v Speaker 1>almost half of their portfolio is made up of those

0:25:40.040 --> 0:25:43.359
<v Speaker 1>types of investments. And what we're also seeing is that

0:25:43.400 --> 0:25:46.880
<v Speaker 1>there's an opportunity for advisors to really help their clients

0:25:46.920 --> 0:25:50.080
<v Speaker 1>design their portfolios around the causes that are near and

0:25:50.119 --> 0:25:52.119
<v Speaker 1>dear to. Okay, fine, I mean I I get the

0:25:52.160 --> 0:25:55.200
<v Speaker 1>immediacy of the causes in E s G. What percentage

0:25:55.240 --> 0:25:58.920
<v Speaker 1>of stocks are precluded from E s G. If I

0:25:58.920 --> 0:26:01.240
<v Speaker 1>if I walk in and say I want to do

0:26:01.320 --> 0:26:02.879
<v Speaker 1>E s G with OT, but I'm er funds or

0:26:02.920 --> 0:26:06.480
<v Speaker 1>any other major institutional house, what percent of the market

0:26:06.480 --> 0:26:09.520
<v Speaker 1>am I walking away from by doing E s G.

0:26:10.960 --> 0:26:13.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm not really an expert on that. I'm not sure

0:26:13.440 --> 0:26:16.280
<v Speaker 1>you could pretend to be it all the time. We

0:26:16.320 --> 0:26:18.320
<v Speaker 1>do it all the time. If you don't know the answers,

0:26:18.359 --> 0:26:22.399
<v Speaker 1>just bluff your way through. It'll be great. Okay, you

0:26:22.440 --> 0:26:25.159
<v Speaker 1>don't you don't know, okay the answers, Paul, I'm going

0:26:25.200 --> 0:26:27.560
<v Speaker 1>to take a reach here. Philip Morris isn't on the

0:26:28.080 --> 0:26:30.359
<v Speaker 1>exactly exactly. I'm a good stray with that anyway. So

0:26:30.400 --> 0:26:31.720
<v Speaker 1>but when I go into when I think about a

0:26:31.720 --> 0:26:34.320
<v Speaker 1>financial advisor, you know, and I'm selecting a financial advisor,

0:26:34.359 --> 0:26:36.440
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, all I really care

0:26:36.480 --> 0:26:41.040
<v Speaker 1>about is performance? UM is that changing? Not really for

0:26:41.080 --> 0:26:43.119
<v Speaker 1>the high net worth investor? We ask that. So we

0:26:43.200 --> 0:26:45.720
<v Speaker 1>ask you know, when you're looking to work with an advisor,

0:26:45.800 --> 0:26:49.160
<v Speaker 1>what are the top qualities that you're seeking? And by

0:26:49.200 --> 0:26:54.520
<v Speaker 1>far and away, UM good absolute performance, absolute performance and

0:26:55.119 --> 0:26:58.359
<v Speaker 1>working with an advisor who really understands their long term goals,

0:26:58.680 --> 0:27:01.040
<v Speaker 1>meaning like what they ultimately we want to achieve with

0:27:01.080 --> 0:27:03.240
<v Speaker 1>their wealth and their money are the top two things

0:27:03.280 --> 0:27:06.080
<v Speaker 1>that investors are looking for. And that hasn't changed here

0:27:06.080 --> 0:27:08.480
<v Speaker 1>over year. What does give us an example of E

0:27:08.680 --> 0:27:11.320
<v Speaker 1>S G investment? I mean I think of like somebody

0:27:11.359 --> 0:27:13.320
<v Speaker 1>comes in and says, I don't want any dairy products,

0:27:13.320 --> 0:27:16.080
<v Speaker 1>I only want almond milk. Let's go right, that's not

0:27:16.119 --> 0:27:19.080
<v Speaker 1>what it is, right, right, right. So we in the survey,

0:27:19.440 --> 0:27:21.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, we ask first of all, are you UM

0:27:21.680 --> 0:27:24.080
<v Speaker 1>investing in E s G type investments? And if they

0:27:24.080 --> 0:27:25.800
<v Speaker 1>say yes, then we give them a whole list of

0:27:25.800 --> 0:27:31.960
<v Speaker 1>different categories like clean energy, clean technology, gender equity, UM

0:27:32.000 --> 0:27:35.520
<v Speaker 1>and you know, healthcare, pharmaceuticals, and we asked them to

0:27:35.560 --> 0:27:39.320
<v Speaker 1>select which categories subcategories they're invested in, and we also

0:27:39.359 --> 0:27:41.240
<v Speaker 1>ask them which ones they're interested in, so that we

0:27:41.280 --> 0:27:44.160
<v Speaker 1>can kind of get a read on maybe future investment

0:27:44.200 --> 0:27:47.000
<v Speaker 1>in different areas. It's interesting E s G you know,

0:27:47.400 --> 0:27:49.480
<v Speaker 1>just you know, on the Bloomberg terminal, there's more and

0:27:49.560 --> 0:27:51.920
<v Speaker 1>more E s G data being put on the Bloomberg terminal,

0:27:51.960 --> 0:27:54.520
<v Speaker 1>more and more because our Bloomberg customers are asking for there,

0:27:54.640 --> 0:27:56.679
<v Speaker 1>they're they're demanding it. So that's kind of reflective of

0:27:56.720 --> 0:27:59.200
<v Speaker 1>what you're seeing. Is there a sense of how E

0:27:59.400 --> 0:28:01.240
<v Speaker 1>s G. If I'm I don't know, if I'm do

0:28:01.320 --> 0:28:03.000
<v Speaker 1>I go in and say I'm overweight s G or

0:28:03.040 --> 0:28:05.760
<v Speaker 1>if I just want to representative percentage of my portfolio

0:28:05.760 --> 0:28:08.520
<v Speaker 1>and s G type investments, how's the performance of those

0:28:08.560 --> 0:28:12.760
<v Speaker 1>types of investments you get? What's the Appenheimer data show UM. Well,

0:28:13.600 --> 0:28:15.359
<v Speaker 1>the e t F that we the E s G

0:28:15.480 --> 0:28:17.800
<v Speaker 1>E t F that we have UM. The way we

0:28:17.880 --> 0:28:20.520
<v Speaker 1>look at it is we want to invest in companies

0:28:20.560 --> 0:28:25.360
<v Speaker 1>that have exceptional and UM environmental, social and governance standards

0:28:26.040 --> 0:28:29.320
<v Speaker 1>UM and our E t F fund actually UM invest

0:28:29.359 --> 0:28:34.560
<v Speaker 1>in companies that have superior scores as described or defined

0:28:34.560 --> 0:28:37.200
<v Speaker 1>by sustain analytics. So that's one way that we look

0:28:37.240 --> 0:28:39.520
<v Speaker 1>at it. You also deal with I would guess something.

0:28:39.600 --> 0:28:42.080
<v Speaker 1>You get to these high net worth families and there's

0:28:43.320 --> 0:28:45.680
<v Speaker 1>personal issues. I mean, the advisors have to deal with

0:28:45.680 --> 0:28:48.320
<v Speaker 1>all of that stuff when in addition to just putting

0:28:48.400 --> 0:28:52.160
<v Speaker 1>up good performance. Yes, well, we do ask about money

0:28:52.200 --> 0:28:55.080
<v Speaker 1>related conflicts in the family, just trying to understand, like

0:28:55.200 --> 0:28:59.040
<v Speaker 1>what are the biggest conflicts that families are dealing with

0:28:59.080 --> 0:29:01.880
<v Speaker 1>around money and to advisors. So it's like a high

0:29:01.920 --> 0:29:03.840
<v Speaker 1>net worth question, would we do I need the third

0:29:03.920 --> 0:29:09.880
<v Speaker 1>lacrosse stick? Is that like part Well, what we found

0:29:09.920 --> 0:29:12.840
<v Speaker 1>this year is that discretionary spending has bubbled up to

0:29:12.880 --> 0:29:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the top. Is the top money related conflicts? Break? This

0:29:17.640 --> 0:29:20.800
<v Speaker 1>is too important? So how do you respond to the

0:29:20.640 --> 0:29:23.240
<v Speaker 1>the afterthought that says I need a third lacrosse tack.

0:29:23.320 --> 0:29:26.160
<v Speaker 1>What do you say a Appenheimer, Well, I mean it's difficult.

0:29:26.200 --> 0:29:29.000
<v Speaker 1>I guess it just depends on how, um, you know,

0:29:29.040 --> 0:29:32.000
<v Speaker 1>how the family is feeling, you know, especially with you know,

0:29:32.000 --> 0:29:35.160
<v Speaker 1>if you're seeing losses in your investment portfolio and you's

0:29:35.240 --> 0:29:38.120
<v Speaker 1>learned about the economy, maybe you know, I think investors

0:29:38.160 --> 0:29:43.920
<v Speaker 1>might be thinking about pulling back a little bit on spending.

0:29:44.240 --> 0:29:46.400
<v Speaker 1>You know. Les dot Com was laughing at me as

0:29:46.440 --> 0:29:49.360
<v Speaker 1>I bought the next Brian I think it was under

0:29:49.400 --> 0:29:52.120
<v Speaker 1>what's it called from Baltimore under Armour? Under Armour brought

0:29:52.120 --> 0:29:54.640
<v Speaker 1>an under Armour lacrosse stick in yellow. There you go.

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Yellow was a key thing and he probably did you

0:29:56.800 --> 0:29:58.800
<v Speaker 1>bite on Amazon have delivered an hour. You had to

0:29:58.800 --> 0:30:00.920
<v Speaker 1>go to a specialist like cross Place so that you

0:30:00.920 --> 0:30:03.920
<v Speaker 1>can kill me on the shipp Okay, that's the kind

0:30:03.960 --> 0:30:06.160
<v Speaker 1>of thing you do. This has been wonderful Christina Boors,

0:30:06.440 --> 0:30:09.800
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much, greatly appreciate it with really important research.

0:30:10.680 --> 0:30:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and

0:30:14.960 --> 0:30:20.280
<v Speaker 1>listen to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast

0:30:20.320 --> 0:30:24.560
<v Speaker 1>platform you prefer. I'm on Twitter at Tom Keane. Before

0:30:24.560 --> 0:30:28.800
<v Speaker 1>the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio.