WEBVTT - Markets, Ukraine, Retail, And The Fed (Podcast)

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:23.800
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. Looking at the Bloomberg

0:00:24.640 --> 0:00:27.200
<v Speaker 1>let me call this here the Bloomberg US corporate total

0:00:27.280 --> 0:00:31.760
<v Speaker 1>return value year to date minus twelve point five per cent.

0:00:31.920 --> 0:00:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Haven't seen those types of performance numbers? A lot of

0:00:35.040 --> 0:00:37.640
<v Speaker 1>these credit folks taught me, Like ever, so what do

0:00:37.640 --> 0:00:39.880
<v Speaker 1>you do for the second half after that brutal first half?

0:00:40.240 --> 0:00:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Natalie Trevithick, head of investment grade credit Strategy Paid and Regal,

0:00:43.400 --> 0:00:46.320
<v Speaker 1>joins us. Natalie, I'm sure you and you're good folks

0:00:46.320 --> 0:00:49.720
<v Speaker 1>at Paid in the Regal again had experienced what was,

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:52.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, a brutal first half of the year. Put

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:54.600
<v Speaker 1>that in perspective for us and and kind of how

0:00:54.640 --> 0:00:58.840
<v Speaker 1>you're thinking about the second half. Sure, it was the

0:00:59.000 --> 0:01:01.520
<v Speaker 1>very shocking first up as we had to underlying interest

0:01:01.560 --> 0:01:04.200
<v Speaker 1>rates move up several percent as well extreads wide and

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:07.720
<v Speaker 1>by around fifty basis point, producing those first half negative

0:01:07.760 --> 0:01:11.000
<v Speaker 1>total returns who are actually closer to negative fourteen and

0:01:11.120 --> 0:01:13.760
<v Speaker 1>a half percent. As of the first half end of

0:01:13.880 --> 0:01:18.360
<v Speaker 1>June thirte we've actually seen a recovery with total positive

0:01:18.360 --> 0:01:21.240
<v Speaker 1>returns of two point two percent on that Bloomberg Corporate

0:01:21.240 --> 0:01:24.440
<v Speaker 1>indexed UH month to date. So what that means is

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:27.360
<v Speaker 1>yield are now much higher levels. The index is yielding

0:01:27.360 --> 0:01:29.760
<v Speaker 1>four and a half percent. You couldn't even get four

0:01:29.800 --> 0:01:31.559
<v Speaker 1>and a half percent on the law to high yield

0:01:31.560 --> 0:01:33.600
<v Speaker 1>bonds a year ago. So we think on a go

0:01:33.720 --> 0:01:36.280
<v Speaker 1>for basis is a pretty attractive time to be answering

0:01:36.319 --> 0:01:39.240
<v Speaker 1>credits at these much higher all in meals. Is there

0:01:39.240 --> 0:01:41.680
<v Speaker 1>any concern um that if we go into a deep

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:45.200
<v Speaker 1>percession some of those investment grade credits become do you

0:01:45.200 --> 0:01:49.680
<v Speaker 1>call them fallen angels? Fallen angels? Right, yeah, potentially, But

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:52.160
<v Speaker 1>companies are going to do whatever they can to maintain

0:01:52.200 --> 0:01:54.840
<v Speaker 1>their investment grade credit ratings. So they may not mind

0:01:54.880 --> 0:01:57.520
<v Speaker 1>following safe from single aid to triple B, but they're

0:01:57.520 --> 0:02:00.320
<v Speaker 1>going to protect themselves from going from triple B down

0:02:00.320 --> 0:02:02.760
<v Speaker 1>to a double be high yield status. And the good

0:02:02.840 --> 0:02:04.800
<v Speaker 1>thing is over the past couple of years where we've

0:02:04.800 --> 0:02:08.520
<v Speaker 1>had very cheap financing since the pandemic. A lot of

0:02:08.520 --> 0:02:11.560
<v Speaker 1>companies took advantage of that to prefund their maturities and

0:02:11.639 --> 0:02:15.560
<v Speaker 1>extend their that profile. So there's no looming maturity wall coming,

0:02:15.880 --> 0:02:17.400
<v Speaker 1>so we don't think there is going to be a

0:02:17.440 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 1>big wave of downgrades. Natalie, I gotta ask, because it's

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:23.280
<v Speaker 1>in your notes, why do you refer to these markets

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:27.720
<v Speaker 1>as Katie Perry markets. You know, they're hot when they're cold,

0:02:27.760 --> 0:02:29.560
<v Speaker 1>they're up and there, down there, yes and there, no.

0:02:29.840 --> 0:02:32.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's like each thing you's walk in and

0:02:32.720 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 1>you don't know what to expect. It's been a pretty

0:02:35.400 --> 0:02:38.680
<v Speaker 1>volatile relationship every day, so you don't know what you're getting.

0:02:39.000 --> 0:02:41.920
<v Speaker 1>A lot of time seems to be the opposite, despite

0:02:41.960 --> 0:02:44.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, expecting the FED to hikes seventy five basis

0:02:44.680 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 1>points tomorrow, we're seeing rates rally today with a ten

0:02:48.120 --> 0:02:51.079
<v Speaker 1>year down to two point seven five percent, twenty five

0:02:51.120 --> 0:02:54.079
<v Speaker 1>basis points in burden with the two year. So what

0:02:54.120 --> 0:02:57.280
<v Speaker 1>do you expect from the Fed? I mean tomorrow seventy

0:02:57.360 --> 0:03:00.120
<v Speaker 1>five basis points. I'm going to assume it's just locked in.

0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:04.360
<v Speaker 1>But what about the path forward? Yeah, the path forward

0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 1>I think we're expecting it to continue to be aggressive,

0:03:06.800 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 1>with potentially another seventy in September, but the data is

0:03:10.240 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 1>coming in much cooler the past few days. Just the

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Walmart profit warning, We're thinking the Fed may want to

0:03:15.720 --> 0:03:18.960
<v Speaker 1>talk back some of those uh rate hikes which have

0:03:19.200 --> 0:03:22.480
<v Speaker 1>already been priced into the market. Now, I mean, what

0:03:22.520 --> 0:03:24.880
<v Speaker 1>are some of the sectors. I mean again, given that

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:28.919
<v Speaker 1>really uh, you know, terrible first half of the year,

0:03:29.000 --> 0:03:31.560
<v Speaker 1>what are some of the sectors to the extent that

0:03:31.760 --> 0:03:34.840
<v Speaker 1>your pm is want to dip their toe in some

0:03:34.960 --> 0:03:37.880
<v Speaker 1>of these investment grade credit areas. What are some of

0:03:37.880 --> 0:03:41.160
<v Speaker 1>the sectors that you're suggesting they look at. Yeah, we

0:03:41.240 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 1>like some of the more defensive sectors right now. That's

0:03:43.960 --> 0:03:48.120
<v Speaker 1>going to be utilities, Healthcare still doing quite well. We

0:03:48.240 --> 0:03:51.480
<v Speaker 1>like the higher quality technology. Even though these higher rates,

0:03:51.520 --> 0:03:53.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, are really hitting some of these tech companies

0:03:53.680 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 1>earnings from a credit stand appoint these companies still have

0:03:57.160 --> 0:04:00.320
<v Speaker 1>very very solid balance sheets intended and tend to trade

0:04:00.320 --> 0:04:02.920
<v Speaker 1>at tight spread, so we don't expect them to widen

0:04:02.960 --> 0:04:06.000
<v Speaker 1>as much as some of the more consumer driven sector.

0:04:06.200 --> 0:04:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Some of the retailers were a little bit more cautious

0:04:08.600 --> 0:04:11.960
<v Speaker 1>on We continue to like the energy sector, but it's

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:14.120
<v Speaker 1>office peaks and we don't think it offers as much

0:04:14.200 --> 0:04:17.040
<v Speaker 1>value on to go forward DASA thanks of all to

0:04:17.200 --> 0:04:20.400
<v Speaker 1>issue forty five billions over the past couple of weeks,

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:23.800
<v Speaker 1>and we're seeing definite pressure on that sector. Um So,

0:04:23.839 --> 0:04:25.880
<v Speaker 1>While we like the US banks, we just think they're

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:29.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna be pretty volatile and to go forward data, but

0:04:29.839 --> 0:04:33.560
<v Speaker 1>um SO, bottom line is after the horrible first half,

0:04:33.760 --> 0:04:36.080
<v Speaker 1>now that yields are much higher, and the fact that

0:04:36.120 --> 0:04:39.840
<v Speaker 1>you don't expect many defaults, you like investment grade credits

0:04:40.240 --> 0:04:49.800
<v Speaker 1>um now despite the potential headwinds of recession, European crisis, etcetera. Yeah,

0:04:49.839 --> 0:04:51.719
<v Speaker 1>we think it could be a good entry point, but

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:54.120
<v Speaker 1>we particularly like the front end of the curve. So

0:04:54.240 --> 0:04:57.120
<v Speaker 1>more looking at the Bloomberg one to five year corporate

0:04:57.120 --> 0:04:59.560
<v Speaker 1>index because still you're yielding over four percent and you

0:04:59.560 --> 0:05:01.880
<v Speaker 1>don't go that much more for extending out to one

0:05:01.920 --> 0:05:04.320
<v Speaker 1>to thirty year credit and then you're taking on all

0:05:04.400 --> 0:05:07.800
<v Speaker 1>the spread duration list. If you keep your portfolio pretty short,

0:05:07.839 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, in that one to five year area, we

0:05:09.680 --> 0:05:12.800
<v Speaker 1>think you're poised to get positive total returns, even though

0:05:12.800 --> 0:05:14.640
<v Speaker 1>you may weather some you know, months and months and

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:18.880
<v Speaker 1>day to day volatility in pricing. Natalie Matt asked about,

0:05:18.960 --> 0:05:22.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, investment grade bonds being you know, downgraded to

0:05:22.760 --> 0:05:24.640
<v Speaker 1>junk does it? How often does it happen with a

0:05:25.120 --> 0:05:28.400
<v Speaker 1>junk borrower gets upgraded to investment grade and then it's

0:05:28.400 --> 0:05:31.799
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's something you can look at. Yeah, that's actually

0:05:31.960 --> 0:05:34.880
<v Speaker 1>pretty frequent. We've had. We expect actually a few hundred

0:05:34.880 --> 0:05:38.160
<v Speaker 1>billions to be upgraded from high yield to i G.

0:05:38.400 --> 0:05:42.000
<v Speaker 1>We're already seeing it in some issuers here to day. Uh,

0:05:42.120 --> 0:05:45.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, we saw Freeport, we saw Toll Brothers e QT.

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:48.520
<v Speaker 1>So we're seeing more upgrades from some of those names

0:05:48.640 --> 0:05:52.520
<v Speaker 1>which were downgraded during the pandemic. Also on the horizon,

0:05:52.600 --> 0:05:54.880
<v Speaker 1>a score that's probably not gonna get upgraded back to

0:05:54.920 --> 0:05:57.719
<v Speaker 1>i G until two thousand and twenty four, and Occidental

0:05:57.760 --> 0:06:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Petroleum is another one we're watching. It's interesting Ford being

0:06:01.520 --> 0:06:04.440
<v Speaker 1>upgraded back into investment grade. That would be a notable

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:07.600
<v Speaker 1>move in the credit markets. Natalie trevith Iik thanks so

0:06:07.680 --> 0:06:11.080
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us head of investment grade credit strategy

0:06:11.800 --> 0:06:18.919
<v Speaker 1>at Peyton and Regal Red headline crossing the Bloomberg Terminal.

0:06:19.040 --> 0:06:23.239
<v Speaker 1>European gas prices rise above two hundred euros per mega

0:06:23.279 --> 0:06:26.200
<v Speaker 1>watt for the first time since March nine, and that

0:06:26.360 --> 0:06:29.880
<v Speaker 1>is due in part to the ongoing war in Ukraine,

0:06:29.880 --> 0:06:32.920
<v Speaker 1>which is a good segue to our next guest. Valentine

0:06:33.160 --> 0:06:37.280
<v Speaker 1>now Yuchenko, member of the Ukrainian Parliament and ex head

0:06:37.320 --> 0:06:40.400
<v Speaker 1>of the Security Service of Ukraine, joins us. Mr Noliachenko,

0:06:40.480 --> 0:06:43.360
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us here. I would

0:06:43.400 --> 0:06:46.160
<v Speaker 1>love to just get you know, kind of your quick overview.

0:06:46.200 --> 0:06:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Awhere we are today, where you are today as a

0:06:51.040 --> 0:06:54.799
<v Speaker 1>country in your ongoing war with Russia. What's the latest?

0:06:57.200 --> 0:06:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Thank you the Lisa, but Dona to be with you

0:06:59.360 --> 0:07:02.120
<v Speaker 1>with the all the US. So from Ukraine. News are

0:07:02.160 --> 0:07:05.760
<v Speaker 1>still bad, still about war and this night and early

0:07:05.839 --> 0:07:09.400
<v Speaker 1>morning south of Ukraine and the Islamic life cities. Again

0:07:09.600 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 1>we're under the Russian missiles altogether eighteen Russian missiles world

0:07:15.520 --> 0:07:20.160
<v Speaker 1>launched against like peaceful cities of Ukraine in the south,

0:07:20.400 --> 0:07:25.920
<v Speaker 1>against civilians, against supports, so even a civilian infrastructure. As

0:07:25.960 --> 0:07:29.720
<v Speaker 1>from the beginning of this war, Russia is still destroying

0:07:29.800 --> 0:07:35.360
<v Speaker 1>and targeting intentionally these object objects and facilities. So that's

0:07:35.400 --> 0:07:40.280
<v Speaker 1>for us, like today's picture of war which Russia wages

0:07:41.000 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 1>against Iubraine, what is the latest in terms of your defense?

0:07:48.080 --> 0:07:52.200
<v Speaker 1>How how is the Ukrainian army doing in terms of

0:07:52.280 --> 0:07:58.800
<v Speaker 1>holding the Russian invaders off so far? Much improvements because

0:07:58.920 --> 0:08:03.680
<v Speaker 1>and thanks to the United States, Canada, United Kingdom, European

0:08:03.840 --> 0:08:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Union weaponry supplies. It increased a lot of capabilities of

0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:14.240
<v Speaker 1>our armed forces both in east and south of Ukraine.

0:08:14.800 --> 0:08:19.760
<v Speaker 1>And now our armed forces are capable to destroy Russian

0:08:20.880 --> 0:08:26.200
<v Speaker 1>command centers, Russian weaponry at the temporarily occupied territories to

0:08:26.400 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 1>hit in the response of their attacks on Ukrainians. So

0:08:31.720 --> 0:08:36.040
<v Speaker 1>that's where we are united, and that's where Ukraine feels

0:08:36.760 --> 0:08:42.000
<v Speaker 1>not alone alone against the Russian aggressor. That's, by the way,

0:08:42.200 --> 0:08:47.080
<v Speaker 1>very much inspiring our armed forces, our people here in Ukraine,

0:08:47.240 --> 0:08:50.880
<v Speaker 1>US members of parliament, and I think that's the strategy

0:08:50.920 --> 0:08:56.200
<v Speaker 1>to win the world, to win Russian aggression. What is

0:08:56.200 --> 0:09:00.440
<v Speaker 1>there a belief with in the leadership of Ukraine about

0:09:00.559 --> 0:09:04.520
<v Speaker 1>how this war may play out, what would be an

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:08.160
<v Speaker 1>end game and then also maybe the timing associated with

0:09:08.400 --> 0:09:13.640
<v Speaker 1>is there any growing consensus. Actually what we see is

0:09:13.720 --> 0:09:19.240
<v Speaker 1>that Russia himself, Kramblin put In, they try to as

0:09:19.320 --> 0:09:25.000
<v Speaker 1>much as they could use their forces efforts even waging

0:09:25.280 --> 0:09:29.760
<v Speaker 1>against war against Europe, to attack not only Ukraine but

0:09:29.880 --> 0:09:34.120
<v Speaker 1>the whole civilized war the world. That's so the Russian

0:09:34.160 --> 0:09:38.520
<v Speaker 1>strategy again to use for instance, energy supplies as a

0:09:38.559 --> 0:09:42.800
<v Speaker 1>weapon as a weapon against not only Ukraine, but European

0:09:42.920 --> 0:09:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Union member states as well. Plus what we see at

0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:51.280
<v Speaker 1>the temporal the occupied territories that Russia intentionally is destroying

0:09:52.280 --> 0:09:58.040
<v Speaker 1>medical facilities, schools, all social infrastructure. That looks like real

0:09:58.160 --> 0:10:04.439
<v Speaker 1>invasion with the very very one target to destroy normal life,

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:12.000
<v Speaker 1>to inflict terror on civilians, on Ukrainians, and even broader,

0:10:12.679 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 1>to inflict her terror on the whole Europe. We got

0:10:17.600 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 1>a headline a couple of I think a couple of

0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:24.880
<v Speaker 1>days ago last week that Russia is preparing elections I

0:10:24.880 --> 0:10:30.760
<v Speaker 1>think September fift um to basically annex parts of the

0:10:30.840 --> 0:10:34.959
<v Speaker 1>down Bass region. Does that to you set a date

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:40.840
<v Speaker 1>for when the war could possibly end? Actually the date,

0:10:41.080 --> 0:10:44.760
<v Speaker 1>what's a cain about dates? Or Russian's preliminary plans to

0:10:45.160 --> 0:10:50.280
<v Speaker 1>hold so called referendums illegal of course and with no

0:10:50.520 --> 0:10:54.200
<v Speaker 1>voters for June July. Now that it's at the end

0:10:54.280 --> 0:10:59.200
<v Speaker 1>of July, and we hear from our intelligence that again

0:10:59.480 --> 0:11:03.800
<v Speaker 1>again Gremlin NEPs. She has changed plans for August, maybe

0:11:03.840 --> 0:11:09.960
<v Speaker 1>even September. So this old referendum or voting stuff. Russians

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:13.600
<v Speaker 1>understand very well now that in her song, for instance,

0:11:13.679 --> 0:11:17.920
<v Speaker 1>in South Ukraine or other temporal occupied cities or like

0:11:18.120 --> 0:11:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Mariuple almost destroyed city in the south, or the Nascut

0:11:22.559 --> 0:11:26.120
<v Speaker 1>and Basque region of Ukraine, it's simply impossible even to

0:11:26.760 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 1>show a picture as the Russian propaganda used to do

0:11:29.960 --> 0:11:33.240
<v Speaker 1>it before in two thousands fourteen. It's impossible to show

0:11:33.320 --> 0:11:36.720
<v Speaker 1>even now the picture of referenda because no people know

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:41.520
<v Speaker 1>voters guests. Today we've seen from one of Russian TV

0:11:41.600 --> 0:11:46.320
<v Speaker 1>propaganda channel we they have collected up six people in

0:11:46.400 --> 0:11:51.520
<v Speaker 1>her Son to issue for them Russian passports. Six not

0:11:51.640 --> 0:11:54.920
<v Speaker 1>six hundred, not six thousand, but six people all together.

0:11:55.400 --> 0:12:01.160
<v Speaker 1>That how that explains how it looks at the field. Uh,

0:12:01.360 --> 0:12:06.120
<v Speaker 1>the real situation that all of Ukraine, I'm not willing

0:12:06.240 --> 0:12:10.800
<v Speaker 1>to buy any means be under the Russian imperim and

0:12:10.840 --> 0:12:14.840
<v Speaker 1>to live under the Russian founding. What amazes me beyond

0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 1>um the staunch defense that Ukraine has put up against

0:12:21.640 --> 0:12:25.839
<v Speaker 1>this Russian invasion is that in many parts of the country,

0:12:26.200 --> 0:12:32.600
<v Speaker 1>UM Ukrainian workers are still trying to produce products, um,

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, farmlands, export um things as if it's business

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:39.920
<v Speaker 1>as usual. I've talked to auto executives who say they're

0:12:39.920 --> 0:12:43.719
<v Speaker 1>still getting you know, um parts and wire harnesses out

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:46.160
<v Speaker 1>of Ukraine. And of course many much of the world

0:12:46.240 --> 0:12:50.640
<v Speaker 1>is still reliant on Ukrainian grains, especially when it comes

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:53.600
<v Speaker 1>to wheat and other grains. How are those exports going,

0:12:55.440 --> 0:12:58.720
<v Speaker 1>You're right, absolutely, like I'm confirmed that in South Ukraine

0:12:58.760 --> 0:13:02.559
<v Speaker 1>and Eastern and the harvest is going on this year,

0:13:02.640 --> 0:13:06.680
<v Speaker 1>harvest with a lot of wheat, corn and other products.

0:13:06.760 --> 0:13:12.800
<v Speaker 1>And our farmers are doing outstandable job. Even Russia's bombarding

0:13:13.000 --> 0:13:18.080
<v Speaker 1>or using artillery, but the farmers continues to actually to

0:13:18.120 --> 0:13:20.520
<v Speaker 1>pick up the harvest and it's not bad this year,

0:13:20.559 --> 0:13:24.360
<v Speaker 1>by the way. So talking about grain experts, of course

0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:27.840
<v Speaker 1>we Ukraine and again Parliament, government, the President of Ukraine,

0:13:27.920 --> 0:13:33.640
<v Speaker 1>we all listening together, united to do whatever is possible

0:13:33.720 --> 0:13:39.640
<v Speaker 1>to restart to resume grains experts from Ukrainian supports. And

0:13:39.760 --> 0:13:44.000
<v Speaker 1>this is up to all together twenty million tones of

0:13:44.160 --> 0:13:48.440
<v Speaker 1>grain ready to be exported to Africa, to other regions

0:13:48.480 --> 0:13:51.480
<v Speaker 1>of the world. Ukraine ready and would and would like

0:13:51.760 --> 0:13:56.760
<v Speaker 1>again to contribute to global food security by supplying as

0:13:56.840 --> 0:14:01.760
<v Speaker 1>much as we can grains, fertilizers and others. All right, Valentine,

0:14:01.800 --> 0:14:04.600
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for taking the time to share

0:14:04.679 --> 0:14:08.760
<v Speaker 1>the latest from Ukraine. To really appreciate your time. Valentine,

0:14:09.080 --> 0:14:13.520
<v Speaker 1>now Yuchenko, member of the Ukrainian Parliament, getting a fascinating,

0:14:13.679 --> 0:14:17.360
<v Speaker 1>uh real shot what is going on on the ground

0:14:17.960 --> 0:14:25.400
<v Speaker 1>in Ukraine. We appreciate his time. Walmart off eight point

0:14:25.520 --> 0:14:28.080
<v Speaker 1>eight percent today, folks, and that's a real market cap.

0:14:28.120 --> 0:14:30.080
<v Speaker 1>This thing started to day with a three sixty billion

0:14:30.080 --> 0:14:34.280
<v Speaker 1>dollar market cap, so that's real dollars being wiped out.

0:14:34.360 --> 0:14:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Let's check in with put Him Boyle, Senior Animals for

0:14:36.240 --> 0:14:40.360
<v Speaker 1>e Commerce at Leisure, off Price Retail for Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:14:40.360 --> 0:14:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Basically she covers all things retail and she spends her

0:14:42.640 --> 0:14:45.640
<v Speaker 1>life just walking around shopping malls. And that's kind of

0:14:45.640 --> 0:14:48.400
<v Speaker 1>how there is not true. That's what they do. They do.

0:14:48.480 --> 0:14:53.240
<v Speaker 1>They go and they check out, like what traffic and

0:14:53.280 --> 0:14:55.600
<v Speaker 1>all all says you basically go shopping for a living.

0:14:55.680 --> 0:14:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Is that true? Not for a living, but for definitely

0:14:59.480 --> 0:15:04.120
<v Speaker 1>part of my job. Absolutely? All right, So wal tell

0:15:04.160 --> 0:15:06.320
<v Speaker 1>us what's going on with Walmart here? You don't see

0:15:06.360 --> 0:15:08.800
<v Speaker 1>this kind of misery often from Walmart, and now it's

0:15:08.840 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 1>twice right, Yeah, exactly, Yeah, I think this is just

0:15:13.160 --> 0:15:15.560
<v Speaker 1>showing consumers trading down. If you think about the Walmart

0:15:15.640 --> 0:15:18.600
<v Speaker 1>quirk consumer, it is the low income shopper and they

0:15:18.600 --> 0:15:21.320
<v Speaker 1>are pinched by the inflationary pressures that we have been

0:15:21.360 --> 0:15:24.320
<v Speaker 1>seeing all year. So what you're seeing happen is them

0:15:24.400 --> 0:15:28.640
<v Speaker 1>trade into more essential items like food, which are lower margin,

0:15:29.120 --> 0:15:32.880
<v Speaker 1>and trading often away from more discretionary categories like apparel.

0:15:33.320 --> 0:15:36.800
<v Speaker 1>That means that you're going to have lower margins, lower profitability,

0:15:37.120 --> 0:15:39.720
<v Speaker 1>and that's why they're two key profit outlook mail calls

0:15:39.760 --> 0:15:43.120
<v Speaker 1>for thirteen to fourteen present drop in operating income. So

0:15:43.560 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 1>a concern previously for Walmart was that um, they had

0:15:47.800 --> 0:15:51.560
<v Speaker 1>too much stuff in their warehouses. I guess their whole

0:15:51.560 --> 0:15:55.200
<v Speaker 1>stores are warehouses, but that they have too much inventory

0:15:55.320 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 1>coming in UM over ordered and not selling enough. Now

0:16:00.000 --> 0:16:04.200
<v Speaker 1>out it seems that's still a problem. But also UM

0:16:04.240 --> 0:16:09.400
<v Speaker 1>consumers who are struggling to afford food and gas are

0:16:09.440 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 1>spending all their money on that stuff rather than the

0:16:12.440 --> 0:16:15.240
<v Speaker 1>other stuff that Walmart has too much of. Do they

0:16:15.240 --> 0:16:19.000
<v Speaker 1>get that right? Yeah, that's absolutely right. But Remember, as

0:16:19.040 --> 0:16:21.400
<v Speaker 1>they spend money on other stuff, they're not buying that

0:16:21.480 --> 0:16:24.440
<v Speaker 1>apparel that they had too much of anyways, So now

0:16:24.480 --> 0:16:27.360
<v Speaker 1>they have even more apparel to career. So the problem

0:16:27.440 --> 0:16:30.360
<v Speaker 1>hasn't gone away. And it's not a great time in

0:16:30.440 --> 0:16:33.080
<v Speaker 1>retail to have a lot of inventory because in just

0:16:33.200 --> 0:16:35.280
<v Speaker 1>a few months, retailers are going to be getting a

0:16:35.360 --> 0:16:38.000
<v Speaker 1>new holiday merchandise and they need to make room for

0:16:38.040 --> 0:16:43.080
<v Speaker 1>that promotions. This is maybe good news for the FED. Um,

0:16:43.200 --> 0:16:45.000
<v Speaker 1>does that mean that Walmart is going to have to

0:16:45.040 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 1>start cutting prices on that apparel? Absolutely? I mean they

0:16:49.240 --> 0:16:51.520
<v Speaker 1>have to get rid of that inventory, so prices will

0:16:51.600 --> 0:16:54.160
<v Speaker 1>drop on those items. So they'll have to promote clear

0:16:54.200 --> 0:16:56.600
<v Speaker 1>liquidate however to get them out all right. Put Um,

0:16:56.600 --> 0:16:59.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm not an expert in Walmart, but just as an outsider,

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:03.120
<v Speaker 1>I put a out of this on management. Management misgauged

0:17:03.560 --> 0:17:08.760
<v Speaker 1>their consumer, mis mismanaged, or misgauged their inventory needs. Is

0:17:08.800 --> 0:17:11.800
<v Speaker 1>that a fairer analysis? I mean yes and no. I

0:17:11.800 --> 0:17:13.800
<v Speaker 1>mean think about where we're coming off of right So

0:17:13.920 --> 0:17:17.600
<v Speaker 1>during the pandemic, we couldn't get the goods here so rightfully,

0:17:17.640 --> 0:17:20.679
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of companies ordered goods in advance because

0:17:20.680 --> 0:17:23.120
<v Speaker 1>they were sitting on ships or the factories weren't able

0:17:23.160 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 1>to produce them. Now all that inventory has come on

0:17:26.040 --> 0:17:28.800
<v Speaker 1>board and is getting off those ships. So yes, there

0:17:28.880 --> 0:17:32.160
<v Speaker 1>is you know, some of that. But then also um inflation.

0:17:32.440 --> 0:17:34.640
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't have guessed last year the gas prices would

0:17:34.640 --> 0:17:36.879
<v Speaker 1>be over five dollars a gallon. They were treated a little,

0:17:36.960 --> 0:17:39.080
<v Speaker 1>but you know, no one would have predicted that. So

0:17:39.200 --> 0:17:43.119
<v Speaker 1>some of this is just changing macro um variables that

0:17:43.200 --> 0:17:47.720
<v Speaker 1>you just can't really predict. Are they able, by the way,

0:17:47.760 --> 0:17:51.720
<v Speaker 1>to keep up um margins on the stuff that they

0:17:51.720 --> 0:17:54.439
<v Speaker 1>are selling a lot of where inflation still is a

0:17:54.480 --> 0:17:57.359
<v Speaker 1>problem food and does Walmart sell gas? They must have

0:17:57.400 --> 0:18:02.360
<v Speaker 1>gas stations and costco very few, very few, I see,

0:18:02.400 --> 0:18:05.320
<v Speaker 1>so they have some. But but food margins, are they

0:18:05.359 --> 0:18:07.399
<v Speaker 1>able to keep those high or do they have to

0:18:08.600 --> 0:18:12.919
<v Speaker 1>kind of eat some of those higher costs for their customers.

0:18:13.240 --> 0:18:16.120
<v Speaker 1>It's it's a mix, really, right. So food inflation had

0:18:16.160 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 1>been a top concern also earlier this year. Prices are

0:18:19.600 --> 0:18:21.639
<v Speaker 1>retreating a little, like if you look at the cost

0:18:21.680 --> 0:18:24.920
<v Speaker 1>of the it's come down, but um food inflations out

0:18:24.920 --> 0:18:27.679
<v Speaker 1>there and food prices are rising, and that's part of

0:18:27.680 --> 0:18:29.720
<v Speaker 1>the reason that you're seeing that low income shop, I

0:18:29.800 --> 0:18:32.680
<v Speaker 1>feel even more pinched because you're having to pay five

0:18:32.720 --> 0:18:34.760
<v Speaker 1>dollars for a gallon of milk, where last year you

0:18:34.760 --> 0:18:36.600
<v Speaker 1>may have paid for it dollars for that same gallon

0:18:36.640 --> 0:18:39.440
<v Speaker 1>of milk. And so there has been an increase. And

0:18:39.520 --> 0:18:42.040
<v Speaker 1>by the way, a lot of those low income shoppers

0:18:42.080 --> 0:18:46.240
<v Speaker 1>are also Walmart employees, right, are they demanding raises to

0:18:46.280 --> 0:18:50.000
<v Speaker 1>try and keep up with inflation? They have been getting raises, right.

0:18:50.040 --> 0:18:51.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the one thing that's been working well

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:54.480
<v Speaker 1>for the low income consumer is that minimum wage and

0:18:54.560 --> 0:18:57.199
<v Speaker 1>what companies are paying has actually risen. So if you

0:18:57.280 --> 0:19:00.680
<v Speaker 1>think about what Walmart workers are making three to five

0:19:00.760 --> 0:19:04.520
<v Speaker 1>years ago, they're making anywhere from thirty to more than that.

0:19:04.560 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 1>You can argue, I mean, you walk into any of

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:10.320
<v Speaker 1>these um stores and they're willing to pay you fifteen

0:19:10.320 --> 0:19:12.840
<v Speaker 1>dollars or more an hour. All right, put him it's

0:19:12.840 --> 0:19:15.399
<v Speaker 1>probably too early to ask. But here we are at

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:18.439
<v Speaker 1>the end of July. My son California actually goes to

0:19:18.480 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 1>school like an first week of August at California, so

0:19:22.040 --> 0:19:24.760
<v Speaker 1>it's not too early to talk about back to school.

0:19:24.840 --> 0:19:28.200
<v Speaker 1>And then the dreaded holidays. What is the outlook. I mean,

0:19:28.280 --> 0:19:31.400
<v Speaker 1>if I'm a Walmart any retail executive, I'm not sure

0:19:31.800 --> 0:19:35.080
<v Speaker 1>how to gauge any of that stuff. Yeah, we're back

0:19:35.080 --> 0:19:37.560
<v Speaker 1>to school. In all the retail data that we've seen

0:19:37.640 --> 0:19:40.879
<v Speaker 1>so far indicates that back to school selling had been strong.

0:19:41.160 --> 0:19:43.600
<v Speaker 1>The question is where are they spending Quebec to school?

0:19:43.640 --> 0:19:46.679
<v Speaker 1>Are they spending on apparel? Are they buying their laptops

0:19:46.680 --> 0:19:49.760
<v Speaker 1>and iPhones and just to supplies or are they spending

0:19:49.760 --> 0:19:52.480
<v Speaker 1>on home furnishing for their dorm rooms? So I think

0:19:52.600 --> 0:19:54.720
<v Speaker 1>I think most of them. You'll have to get your supplies.

0:19:54.760 --> 0:19:57.480
<v Speaker 1>You'll need your laptop for school. But where you could

0:19:57.480 --> 0:20:00.119
<v Speaker 1>pull back is on where you're buying your apparel. Do

0:20:00.160 --> 0:20:02.199
<v Speaker 1>you need five pairs of Denom jeans or can you

0:20:02.280 --> 0:20:04.400
<v Speaker 1>do it too? And I think that's where you could

0:20:04.440 --> 0:20:08.960
<v Speaker 1>see some softness as consumers um are challenged with inflation,

0:20:09.160 --> 0:20:11.720
<v Speaker 1>have to make trade offs. Are they Are they doing

0:20:11.720 --> 0:20:14.000
<v Speaker 1>well in their competition with Amazon? I mean, we don't

0:20:14.040 --> 0:20:16.720
<v Speaker 1>have a Walmart around here, but if we did, that

0:20:16.760 --> 0:20:20.720
<v Speaker 1>would be the other place I would shop besides Amazon. Yeah,

0:20:20.760 --> 0:20:23.040
<v Speaker 1>I think I think two different stories here. It really

0:20:23.119 --> 0:20:25.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, we saw the Amazon shares pulled back last

0:20:25.520 --> 0:20:27.960
<v Speaker 1>night after Wall March are coronets say, it's a little

0:20:27.960 --> 0:20:30.800
<v Speaker 1>different at Amazon. Amazon has its own problems, they have

0:20:30.840 --> 0:20:34.080
<v Speaker 1>too much warehousing space, but their customer is very different.

0:20:34.119 --> 0:20:36.400
<v Speaker 1>It's a more affluent customer base. And I don't think

0:20:36.440 --> 0:20:39.200
<v Speaker 1>that customer base is trading down. Yes yet. In fact,

0:20:39.240 --> 0:20:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Amazon had its time Day just a few weeks ago

0:20:42.000 --> 0:20:45.520
<v Speaker 1>and the sales were up nicely and people were out shopping.

0:20:45.560 --> 0:20:47.919
<v Speaker 1>They were looking for deals. So I think the focus

0:20:47.960 --> 0:20:51.480
<v Speaker 1>will be deal shopping as we move into even holiday,

0:20:51.600 --> 0:20:57.000
<v Speaker 1>and that's not good news for margins. Uh, luxury, how's

0:20:57.000 --> 0:21:00.480
<v Speaker 1>that doing? Buguri is doing great? I know what end

0:21:00.680 --> 0:21:04.440
<v Speaker 1>the high end consumer is sending. I mean talk about

0:21:04.440 --> 0:21:07.480
<v Speaker 1>the income inequality and the wealth inequality, and it's just

0:21:07.480 --> 0:21:11.320
<v Speaker 1>getting exacerbated by this pandemic, as a lot of folks said,

0:21:11.320 --> 0:21:14.600
<v Speaker 1>and you can see it in the numbers, as they say.

0:21:14.640 --> 0:21:16.040
<v Speaker 1>All right, put him Goyle, thank you so much for

0:21:16.119 --> 0:21:19.800
<v Speaker 1>joining us. Put them Oil covers all things retail for

0:21:19.880 --> 0:21:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence. And yes, part of her job is walking

0:21:24.080 --> 0:21:26.800
<v Speaker 1>around shopping malls and so particularly like that black we

0:21:26.840 --> 0:21:28.399
<v Speaker 1>had a Walmart around here. Why don't we have a

0:21:28.400 --> 0:21:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Walmart at the Jersey Dude, you guys, get off this island.

0:21:31.640 --> 0:21:34.760
<v Speaker 1>We got cracker barrel too, So you do the Walmart

0:21:34.840 --> 0:21:37.000
<v Speaker 1>and the cracker barrel and that is a big day.

0:21:37.280 --> 0:21:39.040
<v Speaker 1>I might even do that this weekend. Come and think

0:21:39.040 --> 0:21:44.600
<v Speaker 1>of it. Okay, I'm want to talk about small cap

0:21:44.600 --> 0:21:47.160
<v Speaker 1>stocks now because they've been hit harder than the SP

0:21:47.280 --> 0:21:49.360
<v Speaker 1>five hunter. When you look at the Russell two thousand,

0:21:49.680 --> 0:21:52.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of folks are saying there's opportunity in value stocks.

0:21:52.480 --> 0:21:56.200
<v Speaker 1>There's opportunity and small cap stocks. Brad Evans, he does

0:21:56.240 --> 0:21:58.840
<v Speaker 1>that for a living sup portfolio manager and senior VP

0:21:58.920 --> 0:22:02.600
<v Speaker 1>at heart Land Advisors. Brad, I'd love to get your

0:22:02.680 --> 0:22:05.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of thirty ft overview of kind of how this

0:22:05.880 --> 0:22:07.879
<v Speaker 1>first six seven months of the year have been for

0:22:08.160 --> 0:22:10.840
<v Speaker 1>the world where you live in small caps, value, that

0:22:10.880 --> 0:22:13.240
<v Speaker 1>type of thing, and kind of what's your outlook for

0:22:13.280 --> 0:22:16.560
<v Speaker 1>the remainder of the year heading into next Well, uh,

0:22:16.680 --> 0:22:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Matt and Paul, it's a pleasure to be with with you, guys,

0:22:18.440 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 1>say thanks again for having me back. Um, I won't

0:22:22.119 --> 0:22:24.600
<v Speaker 1>I won't really regurgitate what everybody knows. Value has had

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:27.280
<v Speaker 1>a good run in the first half versus growth, and

0:22:27.320 --> 0:22:28.879
<v Speaker 1>that's you know, a carry over from the end of

0:22:28.960 --> 0:22:31.680
<v Speaker 1>last year, and I think you know it's it's there's

0:22:31.680 --> 0:22:34.280
<v Speaker 1>an incredible amount of violatility in the marketplaces we all know.

0:22:34.400 --> 0:22:37.199
<v Speaker 1>And I think you know what makes the current environment

0:22:37.280 --> 0:22:40.960
<v Speaker 1>very unique is you know, every crisis that we've seen

0:22:41.040 --> 0:22:44.919
<v Speaker 1>since is kind of in play today. Um you know,

0:22:44.960 --> 0:22:49.520
<v Speaker 1>the Russian ruble default and the long term capital management crisis,

0:22:48.440 --> 0:22:52.399
<v Speaker 1>of the Asian currency crisis, of the tech bubble, of

0:22:52.440 --> 0:22:57.280
<v Speaker 1>OH one crisis, the global financial crisis, of the housing

0:22:57.280 --> 0:22:59.399
<v Speaker 1>bubble that burst, and oh seven o eight, the pigs

0:22:59.400 --> 0:23:02.320
<v Speaker 1>crisis and a live and and now the COVID black swan.

0:23:02.400 --> 0:23:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Of all those dynamics are actually in play today, which

0:23:06.000 --> 0:23:09.320
<v Speaker 1>makes the current environment particularly tricky when you when you

0:23:09.359 --> 0:23:12.520
<v Speaker 1>overlay it with um an environment where there's just a

0:23:12.520 --> 0:23:15.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of leverage in the system. So this is this

0:23:15.280 --> 0:23:18.600
<v Speaker 1>is an environment that that I think from a small

0:23:18.640 --> 0:23:22.040
<v Speaker 1>cap perspective, you know, should be good for an active

0:23:22.040 --> 0:23:26.080
<v Speaker 1>manager versus passives, and should be good versus for value

0:23:26.160 --> 0:23:28.520
<v Speaker 1>versus growth. But we are in a very very tricky

0:23:29.040 --> 0:23:31.359
<v Speaker 1>environment today where it takes a very surgical approach to

0:23:31.359 --> 0:23:33.160
<v Speaker 1>be able to navigate all the risks that are out there.

0:23:33.960 --> 0:23:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Um well, that's a bummer. I was hoping I could

0:23:36.320 --> 0:23:40.520
<v Speaker 1>just buy like a small cap value E T f

0:23:41.320 --> 0:23:44.240
<v Speaker 1>UM and and and not worry about it. Why do

0:23:44.320 --> 0:23:49.240
<v Speaker 1>we need to have you know, precision surgical active management.

0:23:50.480 --> 0:23:52.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, I like to call the small captain to

0:23:52.880 --> 0:23:55.199
<v Speaker 1>see is kind of the land of misfit toys. And

0:23:55.240 --> 0:23:56.960
<v Speaker 1>the reason I say that is because you know we

0:23:57.040 --> 0:23:59.720
<v Speaker 1>have we have, you know, the the arbiters of the benchmark.

0:24:00.280 --> 0:24:02.200
<v Speaker 1>The folks at Russell have created a kind of a

0:24:02.920 --> 0:24:05.919
<v Speaker 1>unique benchmark, especially in the value benchmark. You know we

0:24:05.960 --> 0:24:07.720
<v Speaker 1>have we have seven percent of the benchmark which is

0:24:07.720 --> 0:24:12.040
<v Speaker 1>in biotech, and almost a third of the induscry is unprofitable.

0:24:12.520 --> 0:24:14.680
<v Speaker 1>And you know, the the the there's a there's a

0:24:14.760 --> 0:24:18.440
<v Speaker 1>large negative survivor bias and the Russell indusease, especially value indusease.

0:24:18.480 --> 0:24:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Where when I say negative survivor bias, these are companies

0:24:21.440 --> 0:24:24.119
<v Speaker 1>that have not been acquired, They have not graduated, that

0:24:24.560 --> 0:24:28.080
<v Speaker 1>have not been acquired by a larger company or private equity.

0:24:28.119 --> 0:24:30.920
<v Speaker 1>They have not been they have not graduated or grown

0:24:30.920 --> 0:24:32.800
<v Speaker 1>it to be a mid cap stock. So these are

0:24:32.800 --> 0:24:35.399
<v Speaker 1>companies that have just have have become zombified. They just

0:24:35.440 --> 0:24:37.760
<v Speaker 1>sit in these small cap indusease for for long periods

0:24:37.800 --> 0:24:40.399
<v Speaker 1>of time. For that reason, if you were to attack

0:24:40.520 --> 0:24:43.720
<v Speaker 1>this asset class with a passive benchmark, you're buying a

0:24:43.760 --> 0:24:47.119
<v Speaker 1>lot of you're really subpart companies that I'll be polite

0:24:47.160 --> 0:24:49.320
<v Speaker 1>about it. And and for that reason, our job at

0:24:49.359 --> 0:24:53.359
<v Speaker 1>Heartland as a small cap equity boutique, UM, you know,

0:24:53.400 --> 0:24:56.240
<v Speaker 1>my my fund being a high quality small cap fund.

0:24:56.640 --> 0:24:58.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, our job is to find diamonds in the rough.

0:24:59.080 --> 0:25:01.600
<v Speaker 1>And that's our job to build a concentrated portfolio of

0:25:01.680 --> 0:25:05.600
<v Speaker 1>roughly fifty names of undervalued small companies with great balance sheets,

0:25:05.640 --> 0:25:07.840
<v Speaker 1>which pay dividends and basically have been fallen, you know,

0:25:08.000 --> 0:25:10.240
<v Speaker 1>fallen out of favor for reasons that we think are

0:25:10.280 --> 0:25:13.480
<v Speaker 1>our temporary brat How do you do that? Um? You know,

0:25:14.520 --> 0:25:18.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's a huge universe, and I guess you've

0:25:18.080 --> 0:25:19.800
<v Speaker 1>been at this a long time. The Wall Street Journal

0:25:19.880 --> 0:25:23.479
<v Speaker 1>recognized you as a category king in small caps. How

0:25:23.520 --> 0:25:26.359
<v Speaker 1>do you screen for socks? Do you have a whole team?

0:25:26.480 --> 0:25:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Do you have a special method? What is it? It's

0:25:30.960 --> 0:25:35.000
<v Speaker 1>it's just hard work. Actually, my partner Andy Fleming, and I, um,

0:25:35.040 --> 0:25:38.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, we we just we dig through earnings transcripts.

0:25:38.480 --> 0:25:41.040
<v Speaker 1>We we talked to a lot of management teams. It's UM,

0:25:41.040 --> 0:25:43.600
<v Speaker 1>it's it's really rolling up the sleeves UH doing our

0:25:43.640 --> 0:25:46.600
<v Speaker 1>own model building and just getting to know management teams

0:25:46.640 --> 0:25:50.760
<v Speaker 1>and understanding how they are intending to deploy capital. Because

0:25:50.800 --> 0:25:54.120
<v Speaker 1>in small caps, Paul and Matt, that's the biggest thing

0:25:54.200 --> 0:25:56.440
<v Speaker 1>that for us to understand is having a management that

0:25:56.560 --> 0:25:59.800
<v Speaker 1>understands the problems that the company is facing and under

0:26:00.080 --> 0:26:02.879
<v Speaker 1>ends the appropriate fix to get the company back to

0:26:03.160 --> 0:26:07.560
<v Speaker 1>UH it's operating to a normalized operating environment where they're earning,

0:26:07.680 --> 0:26:10.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, an acceptable return on capital. Oftentimes we find

0:26:10.920 --> 0:26:13.240
<v Speaker 1>in these in small companies, they think the path to

0:26:13.359 --> 0:26:16.560
<v Speaker 1>successes you know, M and A to grow in organically,

0:26:17.040 --> 0:26:19.199
<v Speaker 1>and that often leads to balance sheet leverage and that

0:26:19.320 --> 0:26:21.600
<v Speaker 1>usually ends in tears for shareholders. So we want we

0:26:21.640 --> 0:26:23.680
<v Speaker 1>want to find companies who are focused on self help,

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:27.840
<v Speaker 1>that are internally focused, have understand understand the problems they have,

0:26:27.920 --> 0:26:30.399
<v Speaker 1>and are going to deploy free cash flow UH to

0:26:31.080 --> 0:26:34.400
<v Speaker 1>too in directions that are very shareholder friendly, meaning pay

0:26:34.520 --> 0:26:37.760
<v Speaker 1>down debt, divesting non core assets they made that might

0:26:37.800 --> 0:26:39.879
<v Speaker 1>be a drag to their operations, and then returning to

0:26:39.880 --> 0:26:43.920
<v Speaker 1>capital shareholders through dividends and buy backs. All right, Brad,

0:26:43.960 --> 0:26:46.800
<v Speaker 1>good good stuff. We appreciate getting your perspective on a

0:26:46.840 --> 0:26:48.280
<v Speaker 1>part of the market. We should probably talk a little

0:26:48.320 --> 0:26:50.159
<v Speaker 1>bit more about kind of the small cap. Yeah, we

0:26:50.200 --> 0:26:52.399
<v Speaker 1>gotta get back on and get some picks. Yes, some

0:26:52.480 --> 0:26:55.639
<v Speaker 1>value stuff will through that He's based another. This is

0:26:55.680 --> 0:26:57.520
<v Speaker 1>the second guest I talked to you today from Milwaukee.

0:26:57.560 --> 0:26:59.320
<v Speaker 1>So I'm telling you this. Does it remind you of

0:26:59.480 --> 0:27:03.520
<v Speaker 1>the furniture? Is just me? But sure, who doesn't? I

0:27:03.520 --> 0:27:05.720
<v Speaker 1>mean when you think about Milwaukee. Brad Evan's portfolio manager

0:27:05.760 --> 0:27:12.240
<v Speaker 1>seen r VP Heartland Advisors. Brent Downley, president of Spectrum

0:27:12.280 --> 0:27:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Markets Joints, is here. Hey, brand, I got my federal

0:27:15.280 --> 0:27:18.040
<v Speaker 1>reserve tomorrow. It can be raising interest rates again. I

0:27:18.080 --> 0:27:20.439
<v Speaker 1>look at the d X Y dollar index. It's as

0:27:20.520 --> 0:27:23.560
<v Speaker 1>high as it's been for twenty years. Is there a

0:27:23.560 --> 0:27:27.679
<v Speaker 1>bear case for the dollar here at all? Well, the

0:27:27.720 --> 0:27:29.679
<v Speaker 1>markets tried it a few times, and I've tried it

0:27:29.680 --> 0:27:33.159
<v Speaker 1>a few times to no avail. The the issue with

0:27:33.240 --> 0:27:36.960
<v Speaker 1>the dollar right now is that it's really running from

0:27:37.000 --> 0:27:39.040
<v Speaker 1>one side of the dollar smile to the other. So

0:27:39.119 --> 0:27:42.280
<v Speaker 1>which means that when things are looking okay in the US,

0:27:42.320 --> 0:27:45.080
<v Speaker 1>which they were for a while, as really the sole

0:27:45.119 --> 0:27:48.679
<v Speaker 1>engine of growth. With China and Europe sputtering badly, the

0:27:48.720 --> 0:27:51.720
<v Speaker 1>dollar was doing well. But now as we're transitioning to

0:27:51.800 --> 0:27:55.639
<v Speaker 1>this growth fear in the US from Walmart, Snap, Twitter,

0:27:55.680 --> 0:27:59.120
<v Speaker 1>all that stuff, um, and also job cuts all over

0:27:59.160 --> 0:28:02.879
<v Speaker 1>the place. Now we're moving into a global recession fear trade,

0:28:02.920 --> 0:28:06.439
<v Speaker 1>which again is bullish dollar. And then on top of

0:28:06.440 --> 0:28:09.399
<v Speaker 1>that you have just this ongoing terms of trade gas

0:28:09.400 --> 0:28:13.360
<v Speaker 1>shock in Europe that means anytime you try to buy euros,

0:28:13.440 --> 0:28:15.639
<v Speaker 1>for example, when people tried to buy euros on the

0:28:15.640 --> 0:28:18.879
<v Speaker 1>fifty basis point hike from the ECB, it works for

0:28:18.880 --> 0:28:22.240
<v Speaker 1>about three hours and then the dollars comes raging back again.

0:28:22.800 --> 0:28:25.680
<v Speaker 1>I was wondering who was defending the euro at parody,

0:28:25.720 --> 0:28:28.000
<v Speaker 1>But it's been you know, it's held up, but it

0:28:28.040 --> 0:28:31.159
<v Speaker 1>only briefly went down through it. Do we do? We

0:28:31.200 --> 0:28:33.879
<v Speaker 1>see it, um, the euro going back below a dollar,

0:28:35.080 --> 0:28:38.600
<v Speaker 1>So I do for now. However, they're the reason that

0:28:38.640 --> 0:28:41.880
<v Speaker 1>it bounced so hard was that positioning kind of got

0:28:41.920 --> 0:28:44.440
<v Speaker 1>a little bit over at SKIS and there's a ton

0:28:44.680 --> 0:28:47.760
<v Speaker 1>of options expiries there. So if you look at it

0:28:47.800 --> 0:28:50.920
<v Speaker 1>the same way that people were looking at equity positioning,

0:28:51.640 --> 0:28:53.959
<v Speaker 1>they both kind of happened at the same time stocks

0:28:53.960 --> 0:28:56.080
<v Speaker 1>were at the lows and euro dollar was at the lows,

0:28:56.680 --> 0:28:59.160
<v Speaker 1>and then you had this squeeze. But it's been much

0:28:59.200 --> 0:29:03.280
<v Speaker 1>more of like a tactical short covering kind of squeeze.

0:29:03.400 --> 0:29:06.640
<v Speaker 1>And actually the data and the economic data has been

0:29:06.640 --> 0:29:10.160
<v Speaker 1>getting worse as stocks were going up there, and part

0:29:10.200 --> 0:29:12.640
<v Speaker 1>of that reflects there's a small contingent of people that

0:29:12.760 --> 0:29:16.280
<v Speaker 1>still think that bad news for the economy is good

0:29:16.320 --> 0:29:19.840
<v Speaker 1>news for stocks, and I very strongly disagree with that

0:29:19.920 --> 0:29:23.160
<v Speaker 1>given the framework um that the Fed's operating under now,

0:29:23.240 --> 0:29:27.240
<v Speaker 1>so that that was that was true from one very

0:29:27.240 --> 0:29:30.200
<v Speaker 1>often bad economic news was good for stocks because it

0:29:30.240 --> 0:29:33.480
<v Speaker 1>meant more easy. But the Fed just doesn't have room

0:29:33.520 --> 0:29:36.160
<v Speaker 1>to to even think about easing now. And that that's

0:29:36.160 --> 0:29:39.239
<v Speaker 1>what's interesting going into this fo MC meeting is that

0:29:39.320 --> 0:29:42.600
<v Speaker 1>we have a lot of cuts price now fore, and

0:29:42.680 --> 0:29:45.200
<v Speaker 1>to me, it's going to be very difficult for the

0:29:45.280 --> 0:29:48.520
<v Speaker 1>math on CPI to work out in a way that

0:29:48.600 --> 0:29:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the Fed will be able to cut early in simply

0:29:52.080 --> 0:29:56.280
<v Speaker 1>because CPI is a lagging indicator and home prices and

0:29:56.600 --> 0:30:01.160
<v Speaker 1>other past price rises are still going to pushing or

0:30:01.520 --> 0:30:05.000
<v Speaker 1>putting upward pressure on cp I even as commodities start

0:30:05.040 --> 0:30:07.320
<v Speaker 1>to put downward pressure on it. Yeah, that's kind of

0:30:07.320 --> 0:30:08.720
<v Speaker 1>where I wanted to go, is kind of get your

0:30:08.840 --> 0:30:11.680
<v Speaker 1>your inflation call here. The thing I look at almost

0:30:11.720 --> 0:30:14.640
<v Speaker 1>every day is to the gasoline price, and we're now down,

0:30:15.080 --> 0:30:18.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, all fifty sixty cents per gallon off off

0:30:18.040 --> 0:30:21.920
<v Speaker 1>of the peak here. Um. But you think this, this

0:30:22.040 --> 0:30:25.880
<v Speaker 1>inflation risk to the marketplaces maybe more persistent than the

0:30:25.880 --> 0:30:29.920
<v Speaker 1>market's discounting. I do, but I mean I could be wrong.

0:30:30.000 --> 0:30:34.040
<v Speaker 1>So one really interesting thing, really interesting dynamic is if

0:30:34.080 --> 0:30:37.800
<v Speaker 1>you look on Bloomberg and look at the median economist

0:30:37.880 --> 0:30:41.920
<v Speaker 1>forecast for U S c p I that comes in

0:30:41.960 --> 0:30:44.880
<v Speaker 1>around three point five percent right now. But if you

0:30:44.880 --> 0:30:48.280
<v Speaker 1>look at market pricing, because there's you can trade inflation

0:30:48.360 --> 0:30:52.400
<v Speaker 1>in the market, it's pricing something closer to one point

0:30:52.440 --> 0:30:54.720
<v Speaker 1>seven or two, depending on how you slice and dice

0:30:54.840 --> 0:30:58.160
<v Speaker 1>the data. So there's a really big divergence right now

0:30:58.240 --> 0:31:04.320
<v Speaker 1>between market pricing of future inflation and economist forecasts. Now,

0:31:05.160 --> 0:31:07.680
<v Speaker 1>it's very difficult to get to one point seven or

0:31:07.720 --> 0:31:13.560
<v Speaker 1>two quickly, just because of the housing pressure and and

0:31:13.720 --> 0:31:16.800
<v Speaker 1>other pressures that are still exerting some upward pressure on

0:31:16.840 --> 0:31:19.800
<v Speaker 1>the number. So I'm skeptical, but that that is what

0:31:19.880 --> 0:31:23.680
<v Speaker 1>the markets pricing. So the market has priced an incredibly

0:31:23.760 --> 0:31:28.959
<v Speaker 1>dubbish scenario for where CPI is below two and the

0:31:28.960 --> 0:31:33.719
<v Speaker 1>Fed is cutting as early as March or May. I

0:31:33.760 --> 0:31:36.880
<v Speaker 1>don't buy it. I think generally the FED has a

0:31:37.000 --> 0:31:40.160
<v Speaker 1>bias to fight the last war, and that's because the

0:31:40.200 --> 0:31:42.760
<v Speaker 1>politics drive a lot of what the FED does, and

0:31:42.800 --> 0:31:45.920
<v Speaker 1>the politics now are just so squarely in on the

0:31:46.000 --> 0:31:51.600
<v Speaker 1>side of fighting inflation because inflation affects everyone, and unemployment

0:31:51.680 --> 0:31:54.040
<v Speaker 1>right now is affecting three point six percent of people,

0:31:54.080 --> 0:31:59.440
<v Speaker 1>and inflations of affecting of people. Politics drive with the

0:31:59.560 --> 0:32:06.720
<v Speaker 1>independ pendant Federal Reserve. Does it hurts, but I feel

0:32:06.760 --> 0:32:09.520
<v Speaker 1>like such a dope, being such a sitting sarcasm is

0:32:09.520 --> 0:32:11.720
<v Speaker 1>the lowest form of wit. I gotta drop that part

0:32:11.760 --> 0:32:15.160
<v Speaker 1>of my personality. Yeah. All the institutions in the US

0:32:15.200 --> 0:32:17.440
<v Speaker 1>that are supposed to be independent are actually full of

0:32:17.480 --> 0:32:20.680
<v Speaker 1>nominees that are all political appointees. So make of that

0:32:20.800 --> 0:32:23.840
<v Speaker 1>what you will, all right, Bred good stuff as always.

0:32:23.880 --> 0:32:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Brent Dolly, president at Spectrum Markets. He's been in the

0:32:27.600 --> 0:32:31.760
<v Speaker 1>FX trading arena for a long time. Looking at his resume,

0:32:31.880 --> 0:32:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Marylynch City, I would say he's a category king as well. Yes,

0:32:36.840 --> 0:32:39.280
<v Speaker 1>he's a category king in the current sias. And again,

0:32:39.360 --> 0:32:41.480
<v Speaker 1>I I just don't see anybody given me a bear

0:32:41.560 --> 0:32:43.240
<v Speaker 1>case for the U. S. Dollar. I've been saying that

0:32:43.320 --> 0:32:45.480
<v Speaker 1>for a long time, and that seems to be the

0:32:45.520 --> 0:32:50.600
<v Speaker 1>case right now. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast.

0:32:50.960 --> 0:32:54.200
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe and listen to interviews with Apple Podcasts

0:32:54.320 --> 0:32:58.240
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm

0:32:58.240 --> 0:33:01.480
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Matt Miller and I teen seventy three

0:33:01.400 --> 0:33:03.840
<v Speaker 1>and I'm fall Sweeney. I'm on Twitter at pt sweeney.

0:33:03.920 --> 0:33:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Before the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide at

0:33:06.600 --> 0:33:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio.