WEBVTT - Rep. French Hill Talks Fed Subpoenas

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news as sent to Washington.

0:00:09.039 --> 0:00:12.440
<v Speaker 2>President Trump reaching across the arm, asking Democratic Senator Elizabeth

0:00:12.440 --> 0:00:15.640
<v Speaker 2>Warren to support his effort to credit card interest rates

0:00:15.680 --> 0:00:18.840
<v Speaker 2>at ten percent after facing opposition from his own party.

0:00:19.079 --> 0:00:22.120
<v Speaker 2>The Republican Congressman French Hill, chairman of the House Financial

0:00:22.120 --> 0:00:24.720
<v Speaker 2>Service Committee, joins us now from Capitol Hill to respond

0:00:24.760 --> 0:00:27.160
<v Speaker 2>to that and a whole lot more. Congressman, it's good

0:00:27.200 --> 0:00:30.880
<v Speaker 2>to see history is littered with examples, full of examples

0:00:30.880 --> 0:00:33.960
<v Speaker 2>that when you introduce price controls, you end up with

0:00:34.080 --> 0:00:37.239
<v Speaker 2>restricted supply. Congressman, is this proposal going to end up

0:00:37.240 --> 0:00:37.839
<v Speaker 2>any differently?

0:00:40.120 --> 0:00:42.920
<v Speaker 3>Happy New year, Jonathan. Great to be with you. Congratulations

0:00:43.000 --> 0:00:47.200
<v Speaker 3>on becoming a dad. So happy for you and your family. Look,

0:00:47.720 --> 0:00:51.200
<v Speaker 3>this proposal is a price control, and I think I've

0:00:51.200 --> 0:00:55.160
<v Speaker 3>heard from Republicans and House that they have concerns about it.

0:00:55.760 --> 0:00:58.120
<v Speaker 3>What we are in agreement with President Trump on is

0:00:58.120 --> 0:01:02.320
<v Speaker 3>that we want to reverse the curse of the Biden

0:01:02.400 --> 0:01:09.360
<v Speaker 3>years and taxation, regulatory and government policies. So we want

0:01:09.400 --> 0:01:12.840
<v Speaker 3>to work to pass by twenty first Century Housing Act,

0:01:13.160 --> 0:01:16.120
<v Speaker 3>which would lower home construction costs. We want to pass

0:01:16.160 --> 0:01:20.760
<v Speaker 3>the Main Street Capital Access Act, which would lower compliance

0:01:20.840 --> 0:01:25.400
<v Speaker 3>cost and refocus the bank regulators on safety and soundness,

0:01:25.480 --> 0:01:29.480
<v Speaker 3>tailoring regulations to bank complexity. And when you think about

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:32.920
<v Speaker 3>the regional banks you just talked about and the community banks,

0:01:33.000 --> 0:01:36.840
<v Speaker 3>particularly those banks under ten billion dollars, they make sixty

0:01:36.840 --> 0:01:39.160
<v Speaker 3>percent of the one to four family home loans in

0:01:39.200 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 3>this country. So we believe that with the tax benefits

0:01:42.200 --> 0:01:46.360
<v Speaker 3>from the one Big Beautiful Bill, lowering compliance costs, focusing

0:01:46.400 --> 0:01:52.560
<v Speaker 3>and tailoring regulations, and focusing on dropping the regulatory burdens,

0:01:52.600 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 3>and trying to build homes in this country, these are

0:01:55.120 --> 0:01:58.600
<v Speaker 3>bullish signs for the GDP for the nation. We don't

0:01:58.600 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 3>want to do anything that throws off that gross domestic product.

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:04.840
<v Speaker 3>And one of the things I heard from colleagues is

0:02:04.880 --> 0:02:07.680
<v Speaker 3>two thirds of GDP and the US is consumption. And

0:02:07.720 --> 0:02:11.600
<v Speaker 3>so if credit availability is denied or reduced, that could

0:02:11.680 --> 0:02:13.839
<v Speaker 3>impact growth for twenty twenty six.

0:02:14.000 --> 0:02:16.200
<v Speaker 2>Congressman, do you think they proposal as it stands could

0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:18.239
<v Speaker 2>have a chilling effect on credit?

0:02:19.919 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think this is what people that I've heard

0:02:22.320 --> 0:02:24.920
<v Speaker 3>from in the House Republican Conference have said to me,

0:02:25.120 --> 0:02:28.519
<v Speaker 3>is they think, gosh, this could mean that those Americans

0:02:28.520 --> 0:02:33.440
<v Speaker 3>with lower credit scores have their credit purtailed in some way,

0:02:33.800 --> 0:02:39.200
<v Speaker 3>even by temporary and proposal like this. And you know

0:02:39.240 --> 0:02:42.680
<v Speaker 3>we've campaigned against the government price controls in the twenty

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:45.720
<v Speaker 3>twenty four election in Kamala Harris's efforts to put in

0:02:45.880 --> 0:02:49.160
<v Speaker 3>nationwide rent control, for example, Congressman.

0:02:49.200 --> 0:02:51.520
<v Speaker 4>Which is why it's so curious the President is getting

0:02:51.560 --> 0:02:53.840
<v Speaker 4>on the phone with the likes of Senator Elizabeth Warren

0:02:53.919 --> 0:02:57.560
<v Speaker 4>and continuously has this text exchange we've learned through axios

0:02:57.880 --> 0:03:01.720
<v Speaker 4>with Zorammom, Donnie, I think he is moving too far

0:03:01.800 --> 0:03:04.320
<v Speaker 4>to the left and almost out of where your party is.

0:03:05.919 --> 0:03:09.160
<v Speaker 3>Well. I just think that Republicans want to work with

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:12.240
<v Speaker 3>President Trump to accomplish his goal reverse the curse of

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:18.200
<v Speaker 3>the Biden policies and regulation, taxation, open up the economy.

0:03:18.320 --> 0:03:21.120
<v Speaker 3>Besides our tax policy and the big Beautiful bill, I

0:03:21.160 --> 0:03:25.320
<v Speaker 3>really believe that our mainstream Capital Access Act will make

0:03:25.400 --> 0:03:29.640
<v Speaker 3>capital more available for small businesses all across the nation,

0:03:29.960 --> 0:03:33.680
<v Speaker 3>produce economic growth, particularly in the home building area. Mike

0:03:33.760 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 3>Flood's twenty first century housing build that we put together

0:03:37.280 --> 0:03:42.120
<v Speaker 3>lowers regulatory costs on building new homes, opens up things

0:03:42.200 --> 0:03:46.320
<v Speaker 3>like the Home program and the CDBG program to private

0:03:46.400 --> 0:03:50.800
<v Speaker 3>sector partnerships to build more housing. We want more housing available,

0:03:50.840 --> 0:03:53.520
<v Speaker 3>we want better at better prices, and that's the tack

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:55.680
<v Speaker 3>that we're taking. I think these are the priorities of

0:03:55.680 --> 0:03:56.240
<v Speaker 3>the President.

0:03:56.760 --> 0:03:59.520
<v Speaker 4>Congressman, as the chair of the Financial Services Committee, have

0:03:59.600 --> 0:04:03.200
<v Speaker 4>you spoken to Chair J. Powell since the subpoena was

0:04:03.240 --> 0:04:04.640
<v Speaker 4>delivered to him from the DOJ?

0:04:06.440 --> 0:04:08.720
<v Speaker 3>I have Chairman Powell called and told me that this

0:04:08.800 --> 0:04:11.160
<v Speaker 3>process was taking place.

0:04:11.640 --> 0:04:13.720
<v Speaker 4>And does he have plans to come to the Hill

0:04:13.760 --> 0:04:14.480
<v Speaker 4>to testify.

0:04:15.880 --> 0:04:19.360
<v Speaker 3>Well, we've invited the Chairman to testify for his semi

0:04:19.400 --> 0:04:22.799
<v Speaker 3>annual Humphrey Hawkins testimony and we're working out the date now.

0:04:23.360 --> 0:04:25.800
<v Speaker 3>We'll do that typically in coordination both with the FED

0:04:25.839 --> 0:04:27.800
<v Speaker 3>and with the Senate Banking Committee, so that we can

0:04:27.839 --> 0:04:32.240
<v Speaker 3>get the FED chairman up for his semi annual testimony

0:04:32.279 --> 0:04:32.680
<v Speaker 3>on the Hill.

0:04:33.000 --> 0:04:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Congressman, do you agree with the efforts put forward by

0:04:35.440 --> 0:04:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Senator Tillis talking about potentially stiming any of the candidates

0:04:40.560 --> 0:04:43.040
<v Speaker 1>that President Trump is putting forward or will put forward

0:04:43.160 --> 0:04:47.080
<v Speaker 1>for the Federal Reserve until the subpoena is removed or

0:04:47.120 --> 0:04:48.279
<v Speaker 1>this issue is resolved.

0:04:49.800 --> 0:04:52.840
<v Speaker 3>Well, you know, my attitude about this is really simple,

0:04:52.880 --> 0:04:56.880
<v Speaker 3>which is FED independence, doesn't mean the Fed's immune from

0:04:56.920 --> 0:05:00.560
<v Speaker 3>criticism or governors at the FED or immune from criticism.

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:03.840
<v Speaker 3>And if people have questions and concerns about the construction

0:05:04.000 --> 0:05:07.159
<v Speaker 3>project down there, about how expensive it is to build

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:09.920
<v Speaker 3>something in Washington, d C. How expensive it is to

0:05:09.920 --> 0:05:13.599
<v Speaker 3>build something after a forty year high in inflation from

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:16.640
<v Speaker 3>the FED and fiscal policy mistakes made at the end

0:05:16.680 --> 0:05:20.200
<v Speaker 3>of the pandemic, those are legitimate questions. But to try

0:05:20.240 --> 0:05:24.400
<v Speaker 3>to criminalize it and threaten people with a grand jury

0:05:24.520 --> 0:05:29.080
<v Speaker 3>over disputes about that construction, I just I don't agree

0:05:29.120 --> 0:05:32.600
<v Speaker 3>with that, and I think the Congress can do oversight

0:05:32.640 --> 0:05:35.320
<v Speaker 3>about the construction project. And I think, as I said

0:05:35.360 --> 0:05:38.320
<v Speaker 3>in my statement, I think this is a distraction from

0:05:38.360 --> 0:05:42.120
<v Speaker 3>our partnership with President Trump in lowering cost of living

0:05:42.200 --> 0:05:46.440
<v Speaker 3>for our citizens through access to increasing access to capital,

0:05:46.680 --> 0:05:49.080
<v Speaker 3>lowering the cost of building a home in this country,

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:53.440
<v Speaker 3>getting the economy growing along with all the improvements, the

0:05:53.520 --> 0:05:56.600
<v Speaker 3>tremendous improvements we've had for working families that we passed

0:05:56.680 --> 0:05:59.159
<v Speaker 3>in the One Big, Beautiful Bill last year.

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:02.560
<v Speaker 1>It's actually illegitimate this particular subpoena.

0:06:04.520 --> 0:06:06.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, I don't know that it's illegitimate because I'm not

0:06:06.960 --> 0:06:09.880
<v Speaker 3>at the Justice Department, and I'm not the US attorney

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:12.480
<v Speaker 3>for the District of Columbia. I'd say it is, in

0:06:12.560 --> 0:06:18.760
<v Speaker 3>my personal opinion, an overreaction to concerns about the construction

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 3>at the FED, and I don't agree with that approach.

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:24.080
<v Speaker 4>You've been friends with him for decades. Do you think

0:06:24.120 --> 0:06:26.560
<v Speaker 4>he added to this distraction by coming out with a

0:06:26.640 --> 0:06:29.280
<v Speaker 4>rare video as the markets were opening up an Asia

0:06:29.279 --> 0:06:31.200
<v Speaker 4>instead of just replying to the subpoena.

0:06:33.320 --> 0:06:36.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think we'll always second guess whenever we make

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 3>a public statement as a public figure. I won't second

0:06:40.120 --> 0:06:44.880
<v Speaker 3>guess the decision that he took about that. I'll just

0:06:45.480 --> 0:06:47.200
<v Speaker 3>let it play out the way it is. But I

0:06:47.240 --> 0:06:51.279
<v Speaker 3>do believe that trying to criminalize that kind of behavior,

0:06:51.320 --> 0:06:52.320
<v Speaker 3>I just don't agree with that.

0:06:52.600 --> 0:06:55.840
<v Speaker 4>How delayed do you think this could make going through

0:06:55.880 --> 0:06:57.400
<v Speaker 4>the process of the next FED chair?

0:06:59.520 --> 0:07:01.280
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think it could throw it off track. I

0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:05.640
<v Speaker 3>think it's a distraction to Treasury Secretary Bessence very able

0:07:05.720 --> 0:07:09.960
<v Speaker 3>partnership with the President to identify a new FED chair,

0:07:10.120 --> 0:07:13.240
<v Speaker 3>something they've worked on for months, and the President has

0:07:13.320 --> 0:07:16.240
<v Speaker 3>had interviews consistently over the last few weeks, and he's

0:07:16.280 --> 0:07:20.720
<v Speaker 3>close to taking a decision, and that this decision. Whoever

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:24.360
<v Speaker 3>made the recommendation to do this, I think was a

0:07:24.400 --> 0:07:26.960
<v Speaker 3>mistake because I think, as I've said, it distracts from

0:07:26.960 --> 0:07:30.560
<v Speaker 3>my economic agenda benefiting working families with lower cost and

0:07:30.640 --> 0:07:35.120
<v Speaker 3>more accessibility to capital and housing. And it's a distraction

0:07:35.320 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 3>to Treasury Secretary Vesset and President Trump's excellent work to

0:07:40.160 --> 0:07:42.840
<v Speaker 3>identify a new leader for the Federal Reserve, something that

0:07:42.880 --> 0:07:46.320
<v Speaker 3>we want and we want clarity on on Capitol Hills.

0:07:46.360 --> 0:07:48.800
<v Speaker 3>So that's why I think whoever made a recommendation like

0:07:48.840 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 3>this was not wise.

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:52.320
<v Speaker 4>It hasn't been a distraction from markets, though they pretty

0:07:52.360 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 4>much shrugged it off. Do you think the markets don't

0:07:55.200 --> 0:07:57.360
<v Speaker 4>view this as real threat to independence?

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:03.160
<v Speaker 3>Possible. I don't know that it's a threat to independence.

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:05.880
<v Speaker 3>I think it's a distraction to the work we're trying

0:08:05.920 --> 0:08:09.520
<v Speaker 3>to do here to move the economy forward. To complement

0:08:10.080 --> 0:08:13.120
<v Speaker 3>the big tax changes we made to benefit working families

0:08:13.200 --> 0:08:15.160
<v Speaker 3>last year, we want to do the same thing this

0:08:15.320 --> 0:08:18.840
<v Speaker 3>year to open up regulatory policy, make it easy not

0:08:18.880 --> 0:08:21.920
<v Speaker 3>only just to permit the growth of the energy industry

0:08:21.960 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 3>in the country and critical minerals. These are goals of

0:08:24.520 --> 0:08:26.840
<v Speaker 3>the President, but we also want to reduce that regulatory

0:08:26.880 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 3>burden on how's it construction and capital access for the

0:08:30.520 --> 0:08:34.400
<v Speaker 3>American economy. And if we don't have a nominated and

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:37.480
<v Speaker 3>confirmed Feeder Reserve chair, that's a distraction to getting that

0:08:37.559 --> 0:08:39.400
<v Speaker 3>done in the right way, and I think it throws

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:42.640
<v Speaker 3>the President's mission off track. That's why I called it

0:08:42.720 --> 0:08:43.320
<v Speaker 3>a distraction.

0:08:43.480 --> 0:08:46.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm sticking with Congressmen. Always appreciate your time and thank

0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:49.720
<v Speaker 2>you for the congratulations. I promise you this. I'll introduce

0:08:49.760 --> 0:08:52.120
<v Speaker 2>a little guy to SEC football later this year. I

0:08:52.160 --> 0:08:53.560
<v Speaker 2>can't make a promise that he's going to be a

0:08:53.600 --> 0:08:56.320
<v Speaker 2>razorback fan, though, okay, there's going to be a winning.

0:08:56.120 --> 0:08:58.240
<v Speaker 3>See French So we got to talk about we'll.

0:08:58.040 --> 0:09:00.760
<v Speaker 2>Try and work it out. Congressman. Thank you. Congressman french

0:09:00.840 --> 0:09:02.080
<v Speaker 2>Hill with the latest