1 00:00:02,520 --> 00:00:08,920 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news as sent to Washington. 2 00:00:09,039 --> 00:00:12,440 Speaker 2: President Trump reaching across the arm, asking Democratic Senator Elizabeth 3 00:00:12,440 --> 00:00:15,640 Speaker 2: Warren to support his effort to credit card interest rates 4 00:00:15,680 --> 00:00:18,840 Speaker 2: at ten percent after facing opposition from his own party. 5 00:00:19,079 --> 00:00:22,120 Speaker 2: The Republican Congressman French Hill, chairman of the House Financial 6 00:00:22,120 --> 00:00:24,720 Speaker 2: Service Committee, joins us now from Capitol Hill to respond 7 00:00:24,760 --> 00:00:27,160 Speaker 2: to that and a whole lot more. Congressman, it's good 8 00:00:27,200 --> 00:00:30,880 Speaker 2: to see history is littered with examples, full of examples 9 00:00:30,880 --> 00:00:33,960 Speaker 2: that when you introduce price controls, you end up with 10 00:00:34,080 --> 00:00:37,239 Speaker 2: restricted supply. Congressman, is this proposal going to end up 11 00:00:37,240 --> 00:00:37,839 Speaker 2: any differently? 12 00:00:40,120 --> 00:00:42,920 Speaker 3: Happy New year, Jonathan. Great to be with you. Congratulations 13 00:00:43,000 --> 00:00:47,200 Speaker 3: on becoming a dad. So happy for you and your family. Look, 14 00:00:47,720 --> 00:00:51,200 Speaker 3: this proposal is a price control, and I think I've 15 00:00:51,200 --> 00:00:55,160 Speaker 3: heard from Republicans and House that they have concerns about it. 16 00:00:55,760 --> 00:00:58,120 Speaker 3: What we are in agreement with President Trump on is 17 00:00:58,120 --> 00:01:02,320 Speaker 3: that we want to reverse the curse of the Biden 18 00:01:02,400 --> 00:01:09,360 Speaker 3: years and taxation, regulatory and government policies. So we want 19 00:01:09,400 --> 00:01:12,840 Speaker 3: to work to pass by twenty first Century Housing Act, 20 00:01:13,160 --> 00:01:16,120 Speaker 3: which would lower home construction costs. We want to pass 21 00:01:16,160 --> 00:01:20,760 Speaker 3: the Main Street Capital Access Act, which would lower compliance 22 00:01:20,840 --> 00:01:25,400 Speaker 3: cost and refocus the bank regulators on safety and soundness, 23 00:01:25,480 --> 00:01:29,480 Speaker 3: tailoring regulations to bank complexity. And when you think about 24 00:01:29,560 --> 00:01:32,920 Speaker 3: the regional banks you just talked about and the community banks, 25 00:01:33,000 --> 00:01:36,840 Speaker 3: particularly those banks under ten billion dollars, they make sixty 26 00:01:36,840 --> 00:01:39,160 Speaker 3: percent of the one to four family home loans in 27 00:01:39,200 --> 00:01:42,160 Speaker 3: this country. So we believe that with the tax benefits 28 00:01:42,200 --> 00:01:46,360 Speaker 3: from the one Big Beautiful Bill, lowering compliance costs, focusing 29 00:01:46,400 --> 00:01:52,560 Speaker 3: and tailoring regulations, and focusing on dropping the regulatory burdens, 30 00:01:52,600 --> 00:01:55,120 Speaker 3: and trying to build homes in this country, these are 31 00:01:55,120 --> 00:01:58,600 Speaker 3: bullish signs for the GDP for the nation. We don't 32 00:01:58,600 --> 00:02:02,040 Speaker 3: want to do anything that throws off that gross domestic product. 33 00:02:02,040 --> 00:02:04,840 Speaker 3: And one of the things I heard from colleagues is 34 00:02:04,880 --> 00:02:07,680 Speaker 3: two thirds of GDP and the US is consumption. And 35 00:02:07,720 --> 00:02:11,600 Speaker 3: so if credit availability is denied or reduced, that could 36 00:02:11,680 --> 00:02:13,839 Speaker 3: impact growth for twenty twenty six. 37 00:02:14,000 --> 00:02:16,200 Speaker 2: Congressman, do you think they proposal as it stands could 38 00:02:16,560 --> 00:02:18,239 Speaker 2: have a chilling effect on credit? 39 00:02:19,919 --> 00:02:22,280 Speaker 3: Well, I think this is what people that I've heard 40 00:02:22,320 --> 00:02:24,920 Speaker 3: from in the House Republican Conference have said to me, 41 00:02:25,120 --> 00:02:28,519 Speaker 3: is they think, gosh, this could mean that those Americans 42 00:02:28,520 --> 00:02:33,440 Speaker 3: with lower credit scores have their credit purtailed in some way, 43 00:02:33,800 --> 00:02:39,200 Speaker 3: even by temporary and proposal like this. And you know 44 00:02:39,240 --> 00:02:42,680 Speaker 3: we've campaigned against the government price controls in the twenty 45 00:02:42,680 --> 00:02:45,720 Speaker 3: twenty four election in Kamala Harris's efforts to put in 46 00:02:45,880 --> 00:02:49,160 Speaker 3: nationwide rent control, for example, Congressman. 47 00:02:49,200 --> 00:02:51,520 Speaker 4: Which is why it's so curious the President is getting 48 00:02:51,560 --> 00:02:53,840 Speaker 4: on the phone with the likes of Senator Elizabeth Warren 49 00:02:53,919 --> 00:02:57,560 Speaker 4: and continuously has this text exchange we've learned through axios 50 00:02:57,880 --> 00:03:01,720 Speaker 4: with Zorammom, Donnie, I think he is moving too far 51 00:03:01,800 --> 00:03:04,320 Speaker 4: to the left and almost out of where your party is. 52 00:03:05,919 --> 00:03:09,160 Speaker 3: Well. I just think that Republicans want to work with 53 00:03:09,240 --> 00:03:12,240 Speaker 3: President Trump to accomplish his goal reverse the curse of 54 00:03:12,280 --> 00:03:18,200 Speaker 3: the Biden policies and regulation, taxation, open up the economy. 55 00:03:18,320 --> 00:03:21,120 Speaker 3: Besides our tax policy and the big Beautiful bill, I 56 00:03:21,160 --> 00:03:25,320 Speaker 3: really believe that our mainstream Capital Access Act will make 57 00:03:25,400 --> 00:03:29,640 Speaker 3: capital more available for small businesses all across the nation, 58 00:03:29,960 --> 00:03:33,680 Speaker 3: produce economic growth, particularly in the home building area. Mike 59 00:03:33,760 --> 00:03:36,720 Speaker 3: Flood's twenty first century housing build that we put together 60 00:03:37,280 --> 00:03:42,120 Speaker 3: lowers regulatory costs on building new homes, opens up things 61 00:03:42,200 --> 00:03:46,320 Speaker 3: like the Home program and the CDBG program to private 62 00:03:46,400 --> 00:03:50,800 Speaker 3: sector partnerships to build more housing. We want more housing available, 63 00:03:50,840 --> 00:03:53,520 Speaker 3: we want better at better prices, and that's the tack 64 00:03:53,600 --> 00:03:55,680 Speaker 3: that we're taking. I think these are the priorities of 65 00:03:55,680 --> 00:03:56,240 Speaker 3: the President. 66 00:03:56,760 --> 00:03:59,520 Speaker 4: Congressman, as the chair of the Financial Services Committee, have 67 00:03:59,600 --> 00:04:03,200 Speaker 4: you spoken to Chair J. Powell since the subpoena was 68 00:04:03,240 --> 00:04:04,640 Speaker 4: delivered to him from the DOJ? 69 00:04:06,440 --> 00:04:08,720 Speaker 3: I have Chairman Powell called and told me that this 70 00:04:08,800 --> 00:04:11,160 Speaker 3: process was taking place. 71 00:04:11,640 --> 00:04:13,720 Speaker 4: And does he have plans to come to the Hill 72 00:04:13,760 --> 00:04:14,480 Speaker 4: to testify. 73 00:04:15,880 --> 00:04:19,360 Speaker 3: Well, we've invited the Chairman to testify for his semi 74 00:04:19,400 --> 00:04:22,799 Speaker 3: annual Humphrey Hawkins testimony and we're working out the date now. 75 00:04:23,360 --> 00:04:25,800 Speaker 3: We'll do that typically in coordination both with the FED 76 00:04:25,839 --> 00:04:27,800 Speaker 3: and with the Senate Banking Committee, so that we can 77 00:04:27,839 --> 00:04:32,240 Speaker 3: get the FED chairman up for his semi annual testimony 78 00:04:32,279 --> 00:04:32,680 Speaker 3: on the Hill. 79 00:04:33,000 --> 00:04:35,400 Speaker 1: Congressman, do you agree with the efforts put forward by 80 00:04:35,440 --> 00:04:40,240 Speaker 1: Senator Tillis talking about potentially stiming any of the candidates 81 00:04:40,560 --> 00:04:43,040 Speaker 1: that President Trump is putting forward or will put forward 82 00:04:43,160 --> 00:04:47,080 Speaker 1: for the Federal Reserve until the subpoena is removed or 83 00:04:47,120 --> 00:04:48,279 Speaker 1: this issue is resolved. 84 00:04:49,800 --> 00:04:52,840 Speaker 3: Well, you know, my attitude about this is really simple, 85 00:04:52,880 --> 00:04:56,880 Speaker 3: which is FED independence, doesn't mean the Fed's immune from 86 00:04:56,920 --> 00:05:00,560 Speaker 3: criticism or governors at the FED or immune from criticism. 87 00:05:00,839 --> 00:05:03,840 Speaker 3: And if people have questions and concerns about the construction 88 00:05:04,000 --> 00:05:07,159 Speaker 3: project down there, about how expensive it is to build 89 00:05:07,160 --> 00:05:09,920 Speaker 3: something in Washington, d C. How expensive it is to 90 00:05:09,920 --> 00:05:13,599 Speaker 3: build something after a forty year high in inflation from 91 00:05:13,600 --> 00:05:16,640 Speaker 3: the FED and fiscal policy mistakes made at the end 92 00:05:16,680 --> 00:05:20,200 Speaker 3: of the pandemic, those are legitimate questions. But to try 93 00:05:20,240 --> 00:05:24,400 Speaker 3: to criminalize it and threaten people with a grand jury 94 00:05:24,520 --> 00:05:29,080 Speaker 3: over disputes about that construction, I just I don't agree 95 00:05:29,120 --> 00:05:32,600 Speaker 3: with that, and I think the Congress can do oversight 96 00:05:32,640 --> 00:05:35,320 Speaker 3: about the construction project. And I think, as I said 97 00:05:35,360 --> 00:05:38,320 Speaker 3: in my statement, I think this is a distraction from 98 00:05:38,360 --> 00:05:42,120 Speaker 3: our partnership with President Trump in lowering cost of living 99 00:05:42,200 --> 00:05:46,440 Speaker 3: for our citizens through access to increasing access to capital, 100 00:05:46,680 --> 00:05:49,080 Speaker 3: lowering the cost of building a home in this country, 101 00:05:49,440 --> 00:05:53,440 Speaker 3: getting the economy growing along with all the improvements, the 102 00:05:53,520 --> 00:05:56,600 Speaker 3: tremendous improvements we've had for working families that we passed 103 00:05:56,680 --> 00:05:59,159 Speaker 3: in the One Big, Beautiful Bill last year. 104 00:06:00,000 --> 00:06:02,560 Speaker 1: It's actually illegitimate this particular subpoena. 105 00:06:04,520 --> 00:06:06,880 Speaker 3: Well, I don't know that it's illegitimate because I'm not 106 00:06:06,960 --> 00:06:09,880 Speaker 3: at the Justice Department, and I'm not the US attorney 107 00:06:09,920 --> 00:06:12,480 Speaker 3: for the District of Columbia. I'd say it is, in 108 00:06:12,560 --> 00:06:18,760 Speaker 3: my personal opinion, an overreaction to concerns about the construction 109 00:06:18,960 --> 00:06:21,400 Speaker 3: at the FED, and I don't agree with that approach. 110 00:06:21,720 --> 00:06:24,080 Speaker 4: You've been friends with him for decades. Do you think 111 00:06:24,120 --> 00:06:26,560 Speaker 4: he added to this distraction by coming out with a 112 00:06:26,640 --> 00:06:29,280 Speaker 4: rare video as the markets were opening up an Asia 113 00:06:29,279 --> 00:06:31,200 Speaker 4: instead of just replying to the subpoena. 114 00:06:33,320 --> 00:06:36,360 Speaker 3: Yeah, I think we'll always second guess whenever we make 115 00:06:36,400 --> 00:06:40,080 Speaker 3: a public statement as a public figure. I won't second 116 00:06:40,120 --> 00:06:44,880 Speaker 3: guess the decision that he took about that. I'll just 117 00:06:45,480 --> 00:06:47,200 Speaker 3: let it play out the way it is. But I 118 00:06:47,240 --> 00:06:51,279 Speaker 3: do believe that trying to criminalize that kind of behavior, 119 00:06:51,320 --> 00:06:52,320 Speaker 3: I just don't agree with that. 120 00:06:52,600 --> 00:06:55,840 Speaker 4: How delayed do you think this could make going through 121 00:06:55,880 --> 00:06:57,400 Speaker 4: the process of the next FED chair? 122 00:06:59,520 --> 00:07:01,280 Speaker 3: Well, I think it could throw it off track. I 123 00:07:01,320 --> 00:07:05,640 Speaker 3: think it's a distraction to Treasury Secretary Bessence very able 124 00:07:05,720 --> 00:07:09,960 Speaker 3: partnership with the President to identify a new FED chair, 125 00:07:10,120 --> 00:07:13,240 Speaker 3: something they've worked on for months, and the President has 126 00:07:13,320 --> 00:07:16,240 Speaker 3: had interviews consistently over the last few weeks, and he's 127 00:07:16,280 --> 00:07:20,720 Speaker 3: close to taking a decision, and that this decision. Whoever 128 00:07:20,760 --> 00:07:24,360 Speaker 3: made the recommendation to do this, I think was a 129 00:07:24,400 --> 00:07:26,960 Speaker 3: mistake because I think, as I've said, it distracts from 130 00:07:26,960 --> 00:07:30,560 Speaker 3: my economic agenda benefiting working families with lower cost and 131 00:07:30,640 --> 00:07:35,120 Speaker 3: more accessibility to capital and housing. And it's a distraction 132 00:07:35,320 --> 00:07:40,080 Speaker 3: to Treasury Secretary Vesset and President Trump's excellent work to 133 00:07:40,160 --> 00:07:42,840 Speaker 3: identify a new leader for the Federal Reserve, something that 134 00:07:42,880 --> 00:07:46,320 Speaker 3: we want and we want clarity on on Capitol Hills. 135 00:07:46,360 --> 00:07:48,800 Speaker 3: So that's why I think whoever made a recommendation like 136 00:07:48,840 --> 00:07:49,760 Speaker 3: this was not wise. 137 00:07:49,880 --> 00:07:52,320 Speaker 4: It hasn't been a distraction from markets, though they pretty 138 00:07:52,360 --> 00:07:55,080 Speaker 4: much shrugged it off. Do you think the markets don't 139 00:07:55,200 --> 00:07:57,360 Speaker 4: view this as real threat to independence? 140 00:08:00,000 --> 00:08:03,160 Speaker 3: Possible. I don't know that it's a threat to independence. 141 00:08:03,200 --> 00:08:05,880 Speaker 3: I think it's a distraction to the work we're trying 142 00:08:05,920 --> 00:08:09,520 Speaker 3: to do here to move the economy forward. To complement 143 00:08:10,080 --> 00:08:13,120 Speaker 3: the big tax changes we made to benefit working families 144 00:08:13,200 --> 00:08:15,160 Speaker 3: last year, we want to do the same thing this 145 00:08:15,320 --> 00:08:18,840 Speaker 3: year to open up regulatory policy, make it easy not 146 00:08:18,880 --> 00:08:21,920 Speaker 3: only just to permit the growth of the energy industry 147 00:08:21,960 --> 00:08:24,480 Speaker 3: in the country and critical minerals. These are goals of 148 00:08:24,520 --> 00:08:26,840 Speaker 3: the President, but we also want to reduce that regulatory 149 00:08:26,880 --> 00:08:30,480 Speaker 3: burden on how's it construction and capital access for the 150 00:08:30,520 --> 00:08:34,400 Speaker 3: American economy. And if we don't have a nominated and 151 00:08:34,520 --> 00:08:37,480 Speaker 3: confirmed Feeder Reserve chair, that's a distraction to getting that 152 00:08:37,559 --> 00:08:39,400 Speaker 3: done in the right way, and I think it throws 153 00:08:39,440 --> 00:08:42,640 Speaker 3: the President's mission off track. That's why I called it 154 00:08:42,720 --> 00:08:43,320 Speaker 3: a distraction. 155 00:08:43,480 --> 00:08:46,880 Speaker 2: I'm sticking with Congressmen. Always appreciate your time and thank 156 00:08:46,920 --> 00:08:49,720 Speaker 2: you for the congratulations. I promise you this. I'll introduce 157 00:08:49,760 --> 00:08:52,120 Speaker 2: a little guy to SEC football later this year. I 158 00:08:52,160 --> 00:08:53,560 Speaker 2: can't make a promise that he's going to be a 159 00:08:53,600 --> 00:08:56,320 Speaker 2: razorback fan, though, okay, there's going to be a winning. 160 00:08:56,120 --> 00:08:58,240 Speaker 3: See French So we got to talk about we'll. 161 00:08:58,040 --> 00:09:00,760 Speaker 2: Try and work it out. Congressman. Thank you. Congressman french 162 00:09:00,840 --> 00:09:02,080 Speaker 2: Hill with the latest