WEBVTT - Election and Big Tech Impacting Markets

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. This is the Bloomberg

0:00:13.240 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Surveillance Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at seven am Eastern

0:00:17.680 --> 0:00:21.880
<v Speaker 1>on Applecarplayer, Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen

0:00:21.920 --> 0:00:25.000
<v Speaker 1>on demand wherever you get your podcasts, or watch us

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:26.239
<v Speaker 1>live on YouTube.

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:27.280
<v Speaker 2>This is a join.

0:00:27.360 --> 0:00:30.520
<v Speaker 3>Nick Kolis joins us right now, thrilled that it could

0:00:30.560 --> 0:00:31.760
<v Speaker 3>be with us. First of all, let me tell you

0:00:31.800 --> 0:00:34.040
<v Speaker 3>about the jobs report coming up on Friday. It's at

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:36.680
<v Speaker 3>eight thirty, and that means here at a thirty on

0:00:36.720 --> 0:00:39.920
<v Speaker 3>our economic indicators. They're brought to you by Commonwealth Join.

0:00:40.000 --> 0:00:44.159
<v Speaker 3>Over two thousand independent financial advisors are taking control of

0:00:44.200 --> 0:00:48.800
<v Speaker 3>their growth with advisor centric support, future ready technologies. Grow

0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 3>on your own terms with a partner dedicated to your success.

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:56.920
<v Speaker 3>Go to Commonwealth dot com to learn how we got

0:00:56.960 --> 0:00:59.120
<v Speaker 3>to cover up something first. I mean people go to

0:00:59.160 --> 0:01:02.800
<v Speaker 3>way to school and you know, they, you know, like

0:01:02.800 --> 0:01:05.960
<v Speaker 3>they they're like it's good when there's other schools around.

0:01:06.640 --> 0:01:09.560
<v Speaker 3>So if you go to Haverford like you did, and

0:01:09.600 --> 0:01:15.800
<v Speaker 3>you're studying absolutely bizarre majors like Nick Coolis, did you

0:01:16.040 --> 0:01:19.959
<v Speaker 3>end up You're walking the two miles Turnbridge Road to

0:01:20.000 --> 0:01:23.679
<v Speaker 3>College Avenue to Haverford Road. You're going north, deep north

0:01:23.720 --> 0:01:26.800
<v Speaker 3>to Brynmar to studies. Did you do most of you

0:01:26.880 --> 0:01:30.000
<v Speaker 3>studying at Brynmar? Yes, that was where I majored Seven

0:01:30.120 --> 0:01:30.839
<v Speaker 3>Sisters School.

0:01:31.000 --> 0:01:34.280
<v Speaker 4>They had the best archaeology undergrad program in the country

0:01:34.319 --> 0:01:36.440
<v Speaker 4>when I was applying the schools, and so I studied

0:01:36.440 --> 0:01:39.080
<v Speaker 4>with the very best people in the field for four years.

0:01:39.080 --> 0:01:41.960
<v Speaker 5>It was awesome women there, it is there.

0:01:42.240 --> 0:01:45.280
<v Speaker 4>Yes, Haverford had gone co ed three years before I

0:01:45.280 --> 0:01:47.360
<v Speaker 4>got there. I saw the last all male class graduates,

0:01:47.920 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 4>and then Brynmar was was single sex obviously, and so

0:01:51.880 --> 0:01:53.320
<v Speaker 4>it was an interesting dynamic.

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:55.680
<v Speaker 3>I'll see what you did there, Okay, I mean it's

0:01:55.360 --> 0:01:58.800
<v Speaker 3>a it's a plethora of people. You're Jody Lurie. You

0:01:58.840 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 3>know Britmar Grey shows off sometimes without the horse.

0:02:02.440 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 2>Yep. But this is a Philadelphia thing.

0:02:04.720 --> 0:02:08.639
<v Speaker 3>Do you have any perspective on the Pennsylvania vote coming up?

0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:12.120
<v Speaker 3>The axis of Philadelphia out to Pittsburgh havn't been a

0:02:12.160 --> 0:02:14.280
<v Speaker 3>mainline academic.

0:02:14.240 --> 0:02:17.000
<v Speaker 4>Mainline is sort of like Manhattan. It is its own

0:02:17.080 --> 0:02:18.359
<v Speaker 4>little isolated world.

0:02:18.480 --> 0:02:22.680
<v Speaker 3>So no, do you think it's definitive within the election.

0:02:22.840 --> 0:02:24.840
<v Speaker 3>I don't hear a lot of people talking about it.

0:02:25.120 --> 0:02:28.360
<v Speaker 2>No, no, it's okay. Let's go to your research on

0:02:28.400 --> 0:02:28.919
<v Speaker 2>Nick Coolas.

0:02:28.919 --> 0:02:31.040
<v Speaker 3>Of course, we protect the copyright of all I guess

0:02:31.080 --> 0:02:34.160
<v Speaker 3>get it from Nick Colis at Data Trek Research. You

0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:39.680
<v Speaker 3>have a stunning industry sector chart that in red shows

0:02:39.720 --> 0:02:44.160
<v Speaker 3>you the max overweight of technology. What does Nick Colis

0:02:44.160 --> 0:02:47.800
<v Speaker 3>do with the reality of a persistent tech overweight.

0:02:48.240 --> 0:02:50.560
<v Speaker 4>Yes, it is dramatic, and it's obviously we're talking about

0:02:50.560 --> 0:02:53.160
<v Speaker 4>the SP five hundred versus anything else, any other index

0:02:53.200 --> 0:02:57.760
<v Speaker 4>anywhere in the world, MSCI Europe, Japan, Emerging Markets, everything.

0:02:58.800 --> 0:03:01.839
<v Speaker 4>Tech is a heavyweight in the US more than anyplace else.

0:03:01.880 --> 0:03:03.760
<v Speaker 4>And the bottom line is you have to live with it.

0:03:04.120 --> 0:03:06.680
<v Speaker 4>And there's a reason why these companies have gotten so big.

0:03:06.760 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 4>They are disruptive innovators at scale, and they own most

0:03:10.720 --> 0:03:13.400
<v Speaker 4>of the Internet, and it's really hard to back away

0:03:13.400 --> 0:03:15.720
<v Speaker 4>from that. Here in the US we talk about it

0:03:15.720 --> 0:03:17.760
<v Speaker 4>a lot as a negative. When I visit clients in Europe,

0:03:17.880 --> 0:03:21.080
<v Speaker 4>everybody resolutely thinks it's a positive, and they think, thank

0:03:21.120 --> 0:03:23.400
<v Speaker 4>God for US equities, because if there weren't for the

0:03:23.480 --> 0:03:26.400
<v Speaker 4>s people five hundred, I'd be stuck owning MSCI Europe

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:29.720
<v Speaker 4>earning five to eight percent instead of owning the US,

0:03:29.760 --> 0:03:32.560
<v Speaker 4>which is compounding at thirteen. So we think of it

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 4>as a problem here, nobody else sins it's a problem.

0:03:35.000 --> 0:03:37.600
<v Speaker 5>And it's funny because my personal opinion is one of

0:03:37.600 --> 0:03:39.600
<v Speaker 5>the reasons we have such a robust tech business is

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 5>because of the government. The government has historically taken a

0:03:43.120 --> 0:03:46.640
<v Speaker 5>light touch to regulating technology, which I in my opinion,

0:03:46.640 --> 0:03:49.840
<v Speaker 5>has allowed silicon value to become Silicon Valley, whereas in Europe,

0:03:49.920 --> 0:03:53.160
<v Speaker 5>I've got SAP, I've got ASML, and I think that's

0:03:53.360 --> 0:03:59.600
<v Speaker 5>kind of it. Okay, So we'll see how that plays

0:03:59.600 --> 0:04:01.880
<v Speaker 5>out going for You've got something in your note which

0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:05.400
<v Speaker 5>Tom reference offshore gambling odds on the presidential elections.

0:04:06.040 --> 0:04:06.880
<v Speaker 2>Are they important?

0:04:07.080 --> 0:04:08.200
<v Speaker 5>Are they impacting the market?

0:04:08.480 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 2>It's funny.

0:04:08.960 --> 0:04:12.160
<v Speaker 4>I've followed prediction markets for years back to predict it,

0:04:12.280 --> 0:04:16.240
<v Speaker 4>some of the Iowa original Iowa analysis, and I've never

0:04:16.279 --> 0:04:18.599
<v Speaker 4>seen as much interest in this as right now in

0:04:18.640 --> 0:04:21.640
<v Speaker 4>this election. The prediction markets, the bank markets are really

0:04:21.680 --> 0:04:25.640
<v Speaker 4>blown up, and I wonder how isolated or insulated they

0:04:25.640 --> 0:04:28.200
<v Speaker 4>are from influence from people who know that they are

0:04:28.200 --> 0:04:29.560
<v Speaker 4>now affecting capital markets.

0:04:29.640 --> 0:04:32.680
<v Speaker 3>Well, there's people putting gazillions of dollar trades into one

0:04:32.720 --> 0:04:35.359
<v Speaker 3>of the predicted markets, Nick Coleas, is it you?

0:04:36.480 --> 0:04:40.040
<v Speaker 4>Sadly it is not me. Polymarket is the big market

0:04:40.080 --> 0:04:42.440
<v Speaker 4>for that. And I think there's been reports of a

0:04:42.480 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 4>whale buying between thirty and forty million dollars or Trump trades.

0:04:46.360 --> 0:04:50.400
<v Speaker 4>And evidently he's a sophisticated French investor, French trader. And

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:52.960
<v Speaker 4>I've wondered, and I've written this, I wonder how much

0:04:53.040 --> 0:04:57.120
<v Speaker 4>perhaps people are influencing the Trump contract because they know

0:04:57.120 --> 0:04:59.920
<v Speaker 4>it spills over and to pay so and bank stock

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:02.640
<v Speaker 4>and the Yell curve and the Lolong end of the

0:05:02.680 --> 0:05:05.719
<v Speaker 4>Yuell curve. I wonder how accurate prediction markets will be

0:05:05.800 --> 0:05:06.920
<v Speaker 4>now that they're hooked up to the rest of the

0:05:06.920 --> 0:05:07.640
<v Speaker 4>financial system.

0:05:07.760 --> 0:05:08.159
<v Speaker 2>Interesting.

0:05:08.200 --> 0:05:12.160
<v Speaker 5>So, I mean, as an investor, how do you think

0:05:12.200 --> 0:05:15.560
<v Speaker 5>about this US election? It feels kind of binary a

0:05:15.600 --> 0:05:18.080
<v Speaker 5>little bit. There's I mean, depending on who wins the election,

0:05:18.920 --> 0:05:22.000
<v Speaker 5>there's different policies there. And is that factoring into your

0:05:22.000 --> 0:05:23.120
<v Speaker 5>investment outlook, the.

0:05:23.040 --> 0:05:25.159
<v Speaker 4>Way we described as the clients was there's a very

0:05:25.200 --> 0:05:27.920
<v Speaker 4>clear set of Trump trades because we saw what happened

0:05:27.920 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 4>in the market after he won in twenty sixteen. Yell

0:05:30.560 --> 0:05:34.440
<v Speaker 4>curve backed up, financials ripped energy ripped. It's a very

0:05:34.440 --> 0:05:37.000
<v Speaker 4>clear trade, and it's kind of happening right now. There's

0:05:37.080 --> 0:05:40.960
<v Speaker 4>not as clear a Harris or Biden trade because when

0:05:41.040 --> 0:05:42.840
<v Speaker 4>Biden was elected in twenty twenty, we're in the middle

0:05:42.839 --> 0:05:45.320
<v Speaker 4>of the pandemic. The vaccines were rolling out in between

0:05:45.360 --> 0:05:47.680
<v Speaker 4>election day and the rest of the year. There's no

0:05:47.800 --> 0:05:50.560
<v Speaker 4>clear Harris trade, right but there is a clear Trump trade,

0:05:50.560 --> 0:05:53.359
<v Speaker 4>which I think has forced people to say, Okay, at

0:05:53.440 --> 0:05:55.520
<v Speaker 4>least we know what to do if he wins. And

0:05:55.560 --> 0:05:57.719
<v Speaker 4>that's why they've been working at Trump trade because there's

0:05:57.720 --> 0:05:59.760
<v Speaker 4>some clarity there versus no clarity of Harris.

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:00.920
<v Speaker 2>What are you doing?

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:06.160
<v Speaker 3>What is the Nick Cholis action to invest new money

0:06:06.320 --> 0:06:09.440
<v Speaker 3>in the stock market? Looking out six months, looking out

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:09.920
<v Speaker 3>a year.

0:06:09.880 --> 0:06:10.400
<v Speaker 2>Two years.

0:06:10.560 --> 0:06:12.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, the way we're looking at it is, let's sort

0:06:12.240 --> 0:06:14.160
<v Speaker 4>of get past the election. So we're talking about, like

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:16.400
<v Speaker 4>I said, a one to two year timeframe, and there

0:06:16.440 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 4>the playbook is pretty straightforward.

0:06:18.000 --> 0:06:18.440
<v Speaker 2>For US.

0:06:18.680 --> 0:06:22.200
<v Speaker 4>It's long US equities, it's small caps for a trade,

0:06:22.520 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 4>it's financials, it's industrials. But really be very careful with Europe, Japan,

0:06:28.160 --> 0:06:30.359
<v Speaker 4>and em because aside from China, there's not a lot

0:06:30.440 --> 0:06:31.120
<v Speaker 4>good going on there.

0:06:31.400 --> 0:06:31.800
<v Speaker 2>Nick you.

0:06:31.800 --> 0:06:33.760
<v Speaker 3>You and I have talked about this before. They're the

0:06:33.839 --> 0:06:38.159
<v Speaker 3>brats out in Silicon Valley. Everything's great. They got ping pong.

0:06:38.480 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 2>You know what are the football They.

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:43.719
<v Speaker 3>Got foosball machines in the lobby. Data Truk doesn't have that, folks.

0:06:43.800 --> 0:06:45.800
<v Speaker 3>And all of a sudden they've grown up. Thank you,

0:06:45.880 --> 0:06:50.920
<v Speaker 3>mister Zuckerberg. And we saw yesterday with Google margins coming

0:06:50.960 --> 0:06:55.039
<v Speaker 3>in count excuse me, folks, and gasp went off. The

0:06:55.040 --> 0:06:58.440
<v Speaker 3>plague headcount coming in as well. There's a new sobriety

0:06:58.520 --> 0:07:00.920
<v Speaker 3>in tech. Can you invest in that new sobriety?

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:03.480
<v Speaker 4>I think it is certainly helpful and improved return on capital,

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:05.960
<v Speaker 4>It improves margins, It shows that there's some grown ups

0:07:06.000 --> 0:07:08.280
<v Speaker 4>in the room with some discipline, and that's great. But

0:07:08.360 --> 0:07:11.600
<v Speaker 4>ultimately you're buying tech for jen Ai and for the

0:07:11.640 --> 0:07:14.320
<v Speaker 4>next level of autonomous driving and a whole bunch of

0:07:14.320 --> 0:07:17.920
<v Speaker 4>other things. The only thing the market consistently gets wrong

0:07:18.480 --> 0:07:21.600
<v Speaker 4>in any sector is in technology because it's so hard

0:07:21.640 --> 0:07:24.000
<v Speaker 4>to predict the future of technology. So if you look

0:07:24.000 --> 0:07:26.960
<v Speaker 4>at ten year returns, tech has it over everything by

0:07:27.000 --> 0:07:30.120
<v Speaker 4>a wide margin because the market doesn't know what's coming next,

0:07:30.120 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 4>and every other sector it's a lot harder.

0:07:32.560 --> 0:07:34.840
<v Speaker 5>I've got a FED that's cutting rates. They cut initially

0:07:34.920 --> 0:07:38.160
<v Speaker 5>by fifty basis points. Yet my two year treasury in

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:40.240
<v Speaker 5>four point one four percent. What happened there? I mean,

0:07:40.280 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 5>I'm an equity guy, so I have no idea what's

0:07:41.960 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 5>going on?

0:07:42.640 --> 0:07:45.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, the issue is economic growth picked up and it

0:07:45.960 --> 0:07:48.040
<v Speaker 4>still remains strong. We see what with the ADP numbers.

0:07:48.040 --> 0:07:50.640
<v Speaker 4>We see it with the GDP numbers, even though they're

0:07:50.640 --> 0:07:53.040
<v Speaker 4>a little bit light versus expectations are still very robust.

0:07:53.480 --> 0:07:57.080
<v Speaker 3>Let's review that three percent two point nine percent was

0:07:57.120 --> 0:07:59.760
<v Speaker 3>a survey. It comes in two point eight percent, and

0:07:59.760 --> 0:08:01.680
<v Speaker 3>I'm looking at Paul. It's like a big red light

0:08:01.720 --> 0:08:07.840
<v Speaker 3>going on personal consumption three point seven percent most in

0:08:07.840 --> 0:08:10.320
<v Speaker 3>the old days, that's a boom and Coonamy Right, Nick.

0:08:10.360 --> 0:08:12.320
<v Speaker 4>Yes, I mean this is one of those what else

0:08:12.360 --> 0:08:14.960
<v Speaker 4>do you need to know? Kind of reports. You look

0:08:15.000 --> 0:08:16.880
<v Speaker 4>at this and say, fine, I know everything I need

0:08:16.920 --> 0:08:18.119
<v Speaker 4>to know for the next ninety days.

0:08:18.960 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 5>So what are you doing. I guess in the near

0:08:21.640 --> 0:08:24.680
<v Speaker 5>for the next week, or you're telling clients just de

0:08:24.880 --> 0:08:26.480
<v Speaker 5>risk to the extent you can de risk until we

0:08:26.520 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 5>figure out what's going to happen in a week.

0:08:28.240 --> 0:08:29.960
<v Speaker 4>We try very hard not to play the game that

0:08:30.000 --> 0:08:33.560
<v Speaker 4>way because some of our clients are traders. My background

0:08:33.600 --> 0:08:36.280
<v Speaker 4>is some degree in trading, so we are telling them, okay,

0:08:36.320 --> 0:08:38.320
<v Speaker 4>this is why yields it backed up, and the financials

0:08:38.320 --> 0:08:39.880
<v Speaker 4>have worked, that energy has worked. So if you're along

0:08:39.960 --> 0:08:42.880
<v Speaker 4>those trades lightened up because who knows. But aside from that,

0:08:42.880 --> 0:08:45.000
<v Speaker 4>we try very hard to say, look, ultimately, like the

0:08:45.080 --> 0:08:48.280
<v Speaker 4>Larry Summers quote is right, Europe's and museum Japan's are

0:08:48.320 --> 0:08:52.000
<v Speaker 4>nursing home, China is a prison, and the US he

0:08:52.040 --> 0:08:54.280
<v Speaker 4>didn't say this, but this is my addendum. The US

0:08:54.320 --> 0:09:01.960
<v Speaker 4>is a business. Larry Summers, Europe, muse, Japan's a nursing home,

0:09:02.320 --> 0:09:06.000
<v Speaker 4>China's a prison. And my addendum to it is America

0:09:06.120 --> 0:09:09.040
<v Speaker 4>is a business. And the reason that American markets work

0:09:09.080 --> 0:09:12.560
<v Speaker 4>better than others is simply because they overwhelm the political side.

0:09:12.720 --> 0:09:17.400
<v Speaker 3>Twenty seconds near Eastern archaeology, can there be a new Syria?

0:09:18.800 --> 0:09:19.439
<v Speaker 6>Ooh?

0:09:20.160 --> 0:09:22.280
<v Speaker 4>I think what archaeologies haven't win anything else is that

0:09:22.360 --> 0:09:25.320
<v Speaker 4>empires rise and fall, but they're very unpredictable, and you

0:09:25.360 --> 0:09:27.800
<v Speaker 4>can have empires that go two thousand years, like Egypt.

0:09:28.320 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 4>So it's fascile to say, Okay, the Rooman empire only

0:09:30.840 --> 0:09:33.360
<v Speaker 4>lasts a couple hundred years. There are examples of things

0:09:33.440 --> 0:09:35.040
<v Speaker 4>lasting a really long time.

0:09:35.240 --> 0:09:39.160
<v Speaker 3>Nick Cools, including Bloomberg Surveillance. Nick Cools, thank you so much.

0:09:39.559 --> 0:09:41.600
<v Speaker 2>Data tech research just really really important.

0:09:41.640 --> 0:09:48.520
<v Speaker 3>We'll feature him in single Best Idea our podcasts out today.

0:09:50.800 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Catch us Live

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:58.080
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am. Easter Listen on

0:09:58.120 --> 0:10:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Apple car Play and Androt Auto with a Bloomberg business app,

0:10:01.480 --> 0:10:03.280
<v Speaker 1>or what's just live on YouTube.

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:08.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm looking at Google pre pandemic thirty one billion in

0:10:08.640 --> 0:10:11.520
<v Speaker 3>free cash flow. We got a model here many if

0:10:11.600 --> 0:10:14.320
<v Speaker 3>Singh's got a model of seventy six billion, it's like

0:10:14.360 --> 0:10:17.400
<v Speaker 3>a double plus yea coming out of the pandemic. Are

0:10:17.400 --> 0:10:20.679
<v Speaker 3>they hiding how successful they are? Is the bottom line?

0:10:20.760 --> 0:10:23.719
<v Speaker 3>We're gonna see it with Microsoft today, Apple tomorrow. They

0:10:23.760 --> 0:10:28.200
<v Speaker 3>really don't want Washington to know how big and how

0:10:28.240 --> 0:10:29.600
<v Speaker 3>fast they're growing, do they?

0:10:29.880 --> 0:10:30.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:10:30.120 --> 0:10:32.679
<v Speaker 7>And they know how to turn on the dials when

0:10:32.720 --> 0:10:34.960
<v Speaker 7>it comes to top line or free cash flow. And

0:10:35.000 --> 0:10:37.520
<v Speaker 7>that's what they showed last night is the.

0:10:37.559 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 3>Merging build out versus employee headcout was an active.

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:43.600
<v Speaker 7>Gay, Yeah, I mean all the new In fact, twenty

0:10:43.640 --> 0:10:47.000
<v Speaker 7>five percent of new code is written by AI. For

0:10:47.120 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 7>a company of Google scale to say, twenty five percent

0:10:50.520 --> 0:10:53.520
<v Speaker 7>of new code is written by AI. That just goes

0:10:53.559 --> 0:10:56.480
<v Speaker 7>to show how far ahead they are when it comes

0:10:56.480 --> 0:10:59.640
<v Speaker 7>to deploying these technologies, and then what it means for

0:10:59.679 --> 0:11:03.120
<v Speaker 7>the head count going forward. I mean, these companies will

0:11:03.200 --> 0:11:05.840
<v Speaker 7>not grow headcount at least in the next two three.

0:11:05.720 --> 0:11:08.240
<v Speaker 3>So you know, we hear anecdotally. Paul and I read

0:11:08.320 --> 0:11:09.959
<v Speaker 3>on the weekend. Paul's at the beach, He's got a

0:11:10.120 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 3>vest bice're having the morning coffee and we're reading the

0:11:13.400 --> 0:11:16.160
<v Speaker 3>tech and software engineers or having trouble getting jobs.

0:11:16.480 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 2>Can you say it's because of AI?

0:11:18.640 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 7>They will certainly be more efficient and there won't be

0:11:21.600 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 7>as many jobs at the same time. I think what

0:11:24.600 --> 0:11:27.720
<v Speaker 7>he called that was everyone is more productive when it

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:31.120
<v Speaker 7>comes to writing code as a result of this, And yes,

0:11:31.240 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 7>that translates into some jobs changing because of you know,

0:11:35.559 --> 0:11:38.880
<v Speaker 7>the dynamic that code can be completed by AI system.

0:11:39.520 --> 0:11:43.920
<v Speaker 5>I think code can do like newscasts John Tucker's jobs AI.

0:11:45.320 --> 0:11:46.600
<v Speaker 4>We tried that in the.

0:11:46.559 --> 0:11:48.680
<v Speaker 2>Old building or some version of it, and it was

0:11:48.720 --> 0:11:49.800
<v Speaker 2>just as a disaster.

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:53.600
<v Speaker 5>Man, we talked about Alphabet. It's still the search business.

0:11:53.760 --> 0:11:56.360
<v Speaker 5>And I think I'm looking at the stock it's only

0:11:56.440 --> 0:11:58.360
<v Speaker 5>up twenty percent year to date because I think some

0:11:58.400 --> 0:12:02.000
<v Speaker 5>investors are concerned about the core search business and the

0:12:02.040 --> 0:12:04.559
<v Speaker 5>threat from AI. What did you hear last night from

0:12:04.559 --> 0:12:05.840
<v Speaker 5>the company about that issue?

0:12:05.960 --> 0:12:09.120
<v Speaker 7>I mean for business. So for two hundred billion dollar

0:12:09.200 --> 0:12:12.079
<v Speaker 7>run rate growing double digits, that just goes to show

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:15.520
<v Speaker 7>that that threat was just a narrative. It's really not

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:19.199
<v Speaker 7>translating into any AD dollars going away. And what they

0:12:19.240 --> 0:12:22.600
<v Speaker 7>call that was the lengthening of engagement when it comes

0:12:22.600 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 7>to search. Typically, with the traditional search, you would see

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:27.840
<v Speaker 7>the blue links, they'll show you an AD, you will

0:12:27.880 --> 0:12:31.480
<v Speaker 7>go to the publisher website. Now people are engaging in

0:12:31.520 --> 0:12:34.200
<v Speaker 7>a more complex way. That's what they said, that the

0:12:34.320 --> 0:12:39.000
<v Speaker 7>time spent in searching, the complexity of queries is getting bigger,

0:12:39.240 --> 0:12:42.480
<v Speaker 7>and that is what's helping their AD loads when it

0:12:42.520 --> 0:12:44.600
<v Speaker 7>comes to you know, the overall at revenue.

0:12:44.679 --> 0:12:46.520
<v Speaker 3>Man, if we don't care, the only reason you're here

0:12:46.679 --> 0:12:50.680
<v Speaker 3>is Paul in my in John Tucker's entire future is

0:12:50.760 --> 0:12:53.199
<v Speaker 3>based on this bet on YouTube. We said good morning,

0:12:53.240 --> 0:12:58.320
<v Speaker 3>and we value everyone. Yeah, subscribing to Bloomberg podcasts on YouTube.

0:12:58.320 --> 0:13:01.800
<v Speaker 3>Michael Nathans suggests YouTube swings to profit this year. Was

0:13:01.840 --> 0:13:06.199
<v Speaker 3>there evidence there that John Tucker's making profit YouTube?

0:13:06.400 --> 0:13:10.320
<v Speaker 7>Yes. In fact, along with the cloud acceleration from twenty

0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:14.680
<v Speaker 7>nine to thirty five percent, this quarter, YouTube subscriptions grew

0:13:14.760 --> 0:13:17.920
<v Speaker 7>twenty eight percent. Just think about it. It's a fifteen

0:13:17.960 --> 0:13:21.600
<v Speaker 7>billion dollar plus run rate business. Just a subscriptions piece.

0:13:21.640 --> 0:13:24.400
<v Speaker 7>I'm taking out the YouTube ads, which is another forty

0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:29.440
<v Speaker 7>billion dollars. Subscriptions piece grew twenty eight percent. Now compare

0:13:29.480 --> 0:13:32.680
<v Speaker 7>that to Netflix. I mean, it's growing midteens, fifteen percent

0:13:33.040 --> 0:13:35.920
<v Speaker 7>higher run rate, but still that just goes to show

0:13:36.000 --> 0:13:39.680
<v Speaker 7>how much traction they have with YouTube. So clearly that's working.

0:13:39.880 --> 0:13:40.240
<v Speaker 4>All right.

0:13:40.240 --> 0:13:42.000
<v Speaker 5>I was using Google Search last night. I'm trying to

0:13:42.000 --> 0:13:46.160
<v Speaker 5>figure out something. What is AI overviews that's coming in?

0:13:46.440 --> 0:13:47.640
<v Speaker 5>I don't know what that is? What is that?

0:13:47.840 --> 0:13:51.280
<v Speaker 7>So basically what they've changed is the search page will

0:13:51.280 --> 0:13:55.120
<v Speaker 7>have a summary of you know, whatever query you have.

0:13:55.240 --> 0:13:57.720
<v Speaker 7>The prompt can be any length, and they show you

0:13:57.800 --> 0:14:00.679
<v Speaker 7>an overview of all the blue line that they are

0:14:00.720 --> 0:14:05.560
<v Speaker 7>showing you underneath that. So they have basically combined generative

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 7>AI along with their traditional search and then that JENNYI

0:14:09.080 --> 0:14:10.800
<v Speaker 7>overview is the generative AI.

0:14:11.240 --> 0:14:13.720
<v Speaker 5>No way, John Tucker's using generative AI. I can just

0:14:13.720 --> 0:14:15.760
<v Speaker 5>tell you that right now, what do you think?

0:14:17.200 --> 0:14:20.360
<v Speaker 7>Maybe I am and I don't know exactly I would

0:14:20.440 --> 0:14:21.120
<v Speaker 7>concur with that.

0:14:21.320 --> 0:14:25.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Microsoft today, what is I mean, it's off your.

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:27.200
<v Speaker 2>Remit right, you're not following Microsoft.

0:14:27.440 --> 0:14:30.320
<v Speaker 7>I mean, if you're looking at cloud, you have to

0:14:30.600 --> 0:14:31.560
<v Speaker 7>look at Microsoft.

0:14:31.760 --> 0:14:33.840
<v Speaker 2>So what are you looking at here? At four fifteen?

0:14:33.960 --> 0:14:37.400
<v Speaker 7>The Azure growth and the bogie is higher than what

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:40.360
<v Speaker 7>consensus numbers are, which is thirty one percent growth for

0:14:40.600 --> 0:14:43.640
<v Speaker 7>eighty billion dollars rundread business. I think the bogie is

0:14:43.680 --> 0:14:48.160
<v Speaker 7>thirty four percent because alphabet Google's cloud business grew thirty

0:14:48.160 --> 0:14:51.080
<v Speaker 7>five percent last night. So anything less than that would

0:14:51.080 --> 0:14:53.360
<v Speaker 7>be perceived as somewhat of a share shift.

0:14:53.520 --> 0:14:55.320
<v Speaker 2>So translate this back he's talking to.

0:14:58.240 --> 0:15:01.840
<v Speaker 3>They need to get thirty five percent growth in what part.

0:15:01.640 --> 0:15:04.040
<v Speaker 2>Of my Azure cloud business?

0:15:04.040 --> 0:15:07.960
<v Speaker 7>Azure Azure Okay, yes, and that's a much so think

0:15:08.000 --> 0:15:11.680
<v Speaker 7>of Google Cloud as a forty five billion dollar rundred business.

0:15:12.320 --> 0:15:15.840
<v Speaker 7>Azure Cloud is an eighty billion dollar rundred business, and

0:15:15.920 --> 0:15:19.040
<v Speaker 7>Amazon Awls is one hundred and five billion dollar runder.

0:15:19.160 --> 0:15:22.400
<v Speaker 5>The regulators have no idea what's going on. There's no

0:15:22.560 --> 0:15:24.000
<v Speaker 5>way to put this genius.

0:15:24.280 --> 0:15:26.960
<v Speaker 7>That's the big risk when it comes to alphabet So

0:15:26.960 --> 0:15:30.160
<v Speaker 7>sounder pitch I last night did call out that risk

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:33.080
<v Speaker 7>off you know, the DOJA cases and what it could

0:15:33.120 --> 0:15:35.120
<v Speaker 7>mean for the company, and that is the big risk.

0:15:35.520 --> 0:15:38.080
<v Speaker 3>One hundred billion to eighty billion, I think you said

0:15:38.160 --> 0:15:41.600
<v Speaker 3>forty billion, Yeah, added up, and all this stuff we're

0:15:41.640 --> 0:15:45.360
<v Speaker 3>talking about runs on electricity, I believe. I mean, we're

0:15:45.360 --> 0:15:48.720
<v Speaker 3>directly LinkedIn near at our world headquarters folks to Staten Island.

0:15:48.960 --> 0:15:51.160
<v Speaker 3>When mister Bloomberg turns on the lights in the morning,

0:15:51.200 --> 0:15:54.840
<v Speaker 3>Staten Island dims, I get it. Where's all the electrical

0:15:54.880 --> 0:15:57.760
<v Speaker 3>generation for the one hundred and eighty two hundred and

0:15:57.760 --> 0:16:00.600
<v Speaker 3>twenty billion dollars of business talking.

0:16:00.400 --> 0:16:03.080
<v Speaker 7>About I mean the in fact, Google did mention last

0:16:03.120 --> 0:16:06.800
<v Speaker 7>night they are investing in nuclear reactors or some of their.

0:16:06.840 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 2>User referbed like three Mile Island.

0:16:09.160 --> 0:16:11.880
<v Speaker 7>I mean, these are and they're doing it in partnership.

0:16:12.000 --> 0:16:14.960
<v Speaker 7>So it's not all Google, but clearly that's part of

0:16:15.000 --> 0:16:18.200
<v Speaker 7>the capex, the thirteen billion dollars in capex they invent.

0:16:19.320 --> 0:16:22.000
<v Speaker 7>Some of it is going towards building new data centers

0:16:22.080 --> 0:16:22.960
<v Speaker 7>and adding new and.

0:16:22.960 --> 0:16:24.840
<v Speaker 3>They need water to cool, so they're going to go

0:16:24.880 --> 0:16:27.760
<v Speaker 3>between John Tucker's house and the restaurant right at the ferry.

0:16:28.640 --> 0:16:30.040
<v Speaker 3>I mean, is that where the is that where the

0:16:30.040 --> 0:16:30.680
<v Speaker 3>plant's going?

0:16:31.560 --> 0:16:33.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, right in my backyard.

0:16:34.080 --> 0:16:37.160
<v Speaker 5>The S and P five hundred utilities index this year,

0:16:37.440 --> 0:16:37.800
<v Speaker 5>that's up.

0:16:38.680 --> 0:16:42.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, utility, it's amazing. Plus the dividend, and I feel

0:16:42.480 --> 0:16:46.280
<v Speaker 2>we haven't covered it. Can Eric, can you make a note?

0:16:46.280 --> 0:16:48.640
<v Speaker 3>We got to get a bunch of utility animals in

0:16:48.680 --> 0:16:51.320
<v Speaker 3>here to talk about man deeps world.

0:16:51.520 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 2>This is exciting. Did you expect this five years ago?

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 7>Mandeep, We're talking about one gigawatt data center. I mean

0:16:58.480 --> 0:17:02.040
<v Speaker 7>just think about it. Right now, we're at twenty megawatts,

0:17:02.320 --> 0:17:06.040
<v Speaker 7>one gigawak data center. Yes, I did not expect this

0:17:06.160 --> 0:17:07.119
<v Speaker 7>coming back quickly.

0:17:07.280 --> 0:17:11.720
<v Speaker 2>So a gigawat, yeah, okay, that's a lot.

0:17:11.760 --> 0:17:15.480
<v Speaker 3>One point two one gigawatts can power more than ten

0:17:15.560 --> 0:17:20.320
<v Speaker 3>million light bulbs and they're all burntout in jud Tucker's basement.

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:23.240
<v Speaker 7>It can probably power the entire New York City if

0:17:23.280 --> 0:17:24.400
<v Speaker 7>you think about it, you know.

0:17:24.520 --> 0:17:25.280
<v Speaker 2>A gigaway.

0:17:25.440 --> 0:17:28.960
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it's like physics with Mandy coming out of Silicon

0:17:29.040 --> 0:17:30.000
<v Speaker 5>down Gerarm.

0:17:29.680 --> 0:17:31.720
<v Speaker 8>Okay, you get wet to give you an email coming

0:17:31.760 --> 0:17:34.160
<v Speaker 8>in here. They're worried about it getting back. You're gonna

0:17:34.160 --> 0:17:36.640
<v Speaker 8>be ready for Wimbledon. You're going to be ready for Wimbledon.

0:17:37.400 --> 0:17:39.880
<v Speaker 8>We'll talk. We gets a free time your way.

0:17:40.040 --> 0:17:41.320
<v Speaker 3>I want to talk to you about I had the

0:17:41.440 --> 0:17:45.639
<v Speaker 3>honor of seeing vj Armatrov with Borg. It is peak

0:17:45.680 --> 0:17:48.320
<v Speaker 3>at Forest Hills, and I really want to get time

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:51.240
<v Speaker 3>to talk to you about that man deep sing there

0:17:51.240 --> 0:17:52.840
<v Speaker 3>in the middle earning season this.

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Here's the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Listen live each weekday starting

0:17:57.520 --> 0:18:00.840
<v Speaker 1>at seven am Eastern on Apple car Playrod Auto with

0:18:00.880 --> 0:18:03.840
<v Speaker 1>a Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen live on

0:18:03.920 --> 0:18:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station, Just Say

0:18:07.280 --> 0:18:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:18:09.680 --> 0:18:10.159
<v Speaker 2>When I was in.

0:18:10.240 --> 0:18:14.800
<v Speaker 3>Rome recently, this was really front in center, the international

0:18:14.880 --> 0:18:19.280
<v Speaker 3>view of a America's fractured politics, whatever your belief. Lindsay

0:18:19.359 --> 0:18:22.360
<v Speaker 3>Newman working with Ian Bremer over at G zero, over

0:18:22.400 --> 0:18:24.240
<v Speaker 3>at Eurasia Group. We're thrilled she could.

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:26.080
<v Speaker 2>Join us right now, doctor Newman.

0:18:26.119 --> 0:18:29.760
<v Speaker 3>The view from sixty thousand feet, What does the first

0:18:29.880 --> 0:18:34.639
<v Speaker 3>G seven meeting look like, daresay russia'sttens G eight. What

0:18:34.720 --> 0:18:37.800
<v Speaker 3>does the first G seven meeting look like for President

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:39.720
<v Speaker 3>Trump or President Harris?

0:18:41.240 --> 0:18:44.040
<v Speaker 9>Well, as you know, John, we're just a few days

0:18:44.080 --> 0:18:46.720
<v Speaker 9>af from his election, and it has been a turbulent,

0:18:46.840 --> 0:18:51.840
<v Speaker 9>tumultuous one. We've had Donald Trump, former President Trump suggesting

0:18:51.880 --> 0:18:55.320
<v Speaker 9>that should he win this election on Tuesday, which remains

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:58.280
<v Speaker 9>a dead heat in anyone's game, that he would immediately

0:18:58.400 --> 0:19:01.399
<v Speaker 9>begin the process of bringing the parties together in the

0:19:01.520 --> 0:19:04.680
<v Speaker 9>Ukraine Russia conflict and seeing if he could bring a

0:19:04.720 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 9>resolution to it. He says, the US is on the

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:10.040
<v Speaker 9>brink of World War three. Those are the stakes as

0:19:10.080 --> 0:19:12.320
<v Speaker 9>he sees them, So we would have to expect a

0:19:12.400 --> 0:19:13.800
<v Speaker 9>lively G seven G eight.

0:19:13.920 --> 0:19:15.960
<v Speaker 10>As you say, should it.

0:19:15.880 --> 0:19:19.280
<v Speaker 9>Be Trump Harris, you know, as you know, the big

0:19:19.320 --> 0:19:22.280
<v Speaker 9>threadline and I feel it too, is that it's a

0:19:22.280 --> 0:19:26.080
<v Speaker 9>bit of an unknown. She has tried to associate herself

0:19:26.119 --> 0:19:30.359
<v Speaker 9>with Biden administration's successes, perceive successes. She has tried to

0:19:30.400 --> 0:19:33.240
<v Speaker 9>distance herself from those areas where it may have fallen short.

0:19:33.280 --> 0:19:36.000
<v Speaker 9>Of course, Trump is always talking about Afghanistan, and Afghanistan

0:19:36.080 --> 0:19:39.320
<v Speaker 9>is a key sticking point on US foreign policy. But

0:19:39.400 --> 0:19:41.600
<v Speaker 9>there's a lot of unknown there on what a Harris

0:19:41.680 --> 0:19:44.159
<v Speaker 9>presidency would mean on foreign policy, and we have to

0:19:44.200 --> 0:19:46.240
<v Speaker 9>expect it would look a lot like what we've seen

0:19:46.280 --> 0:19:49.439
<v Speaker 9>before from the Democrats. So those allies in the G

0:19:49.560 --> 0:19:52.639
<v Speaker 9>seven would be the important partners for the US.

0:19:52.400 --> 0:19:55.280
<v Speaker 5>Doctor Newman, are we going to know at nine or

0:19:55.280 --> 0:19:58.919
<v Speaker 5>ten o'clock at night on November fifth who our president is?

0:19:59.480 --> 0:20:01.240
<v Speaker 5>If not, how long do we have to wait?

0:20:02.760 --> 0:20:03.520
<v Speaker 10>It's a great question.

0:20:03.560 --> 0:20:05.119
<v Speaker 9>I mean nine o'clock at night for me sitting here

0:20:05.119 --> 0:20:07.520
<v Speaker 9>in London, absolutely, not night o'clock at night for you

0:20:07.640 --> 0:20:10.800
<v Speaker 9>sitting over there. I think the answer is still no.

0:20:11.720 --> 0:20:14.080
<v Speaker 9>You know, this race is a toss up at the

0:20:14.160 --> 0:20:18.000
<v Speaker 9>national level. Trump has now erased Harris's lead that she's

0:20:18.000 --> 0:20:20.879
<v Speaker 9>held essentially since building her case in the race in

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:23.560
<v Speaker 9>when she entered in July. We know that each one

0:20:23.560 --> 0:20:25.639
<v Speaker 9>of these swing states is also a toss up and

0:20:25.680 --> 0:20:28.159
<v Speaker 9>have traded back and forth. So if anyone tells you

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:31.120
<v Speaker 9>they know where this race stands today, you know, either

0:20:31.200 --> 0:20:33.920
<v Speaker 9>back away and close the door or run towards them perhaps.

0:20:34.119 --> 0:20:35.600
<v Speaker 9>But what I would just say, there are a couple

0:20:35.680 --> 0:20:38.120
<v Speaker 9>of signals we can be watching. There's the momentum, which

0:20:38.119 --> 0:20:41.600
<v Speaker 9>I've already talked about. There's this anti incommency sentiment that

0:20:41.640 --> 0:20:44.320
<v Speaker 9>has circled the world. Right, we've all been saying, oh,

0:20:44.359 --> 0:20:45.960
<v Speaker 9>this is the year of elections. A half of the

0:20:46.000 --> 0:20:49.360
<v Speaker 9>world's population, we'll be voting. Harris may very well get

0:20:49.359 --> 0:20:51.600
<v Speaker 9>caught up in that, because voters may want change, they

0:20:51.640 --> 0:20:54.480
<v Speaker 9>feeling their pocketbooks are lighter. And then the early voting

0:20:54.480 --> 0:20:57.240
<v Speaker 9>signals that we're already seeing are interesting. Fifty three million

0:20:57.320 --> 0:21:01.280
<v Speaker 9>have already voted. There is some indication that perhaps Democrats

0:21:01.320 --> 0:21:04.800
<v Speaker 9>are ahead on that have had more votes casts, and

0:21:05.000 --> 0:21:08.600
<v Speaker 9>interestingly enough, women may have voted more so already than

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:11.199
<v Speaker 9>Democrats feel that that gender gap is going to.

0:21:11.200 --> 0:21:13.320
<v Speaker 10>Be critical for them. But I think the short answer

0:21:13.359 --> 0:21:15.000
<v Speaker 10>out of my lung is no, we're not going to

0:21:15.000 --> 0:21:15.960
<v Speaker 10>know at nine o'clock at night.

0:21:16.480 --> 0:21:20.960
<v Speaker 3>For Trump's supporters and frankly Harris supporters as well, there

0:21:21.000 --> 0:21:25.200
<v Speaker 3>seems to be a primal scream to find a Harris

0:21:25.480 --> 0:21:30.800
<v Speaker 3>foreign policy that is distinctive and differenced or nuanced from

0:21:30.800 --> 0:21:33.159
<v Speaker 3>a Biden foreign policy.

0:21:33.320 --> 0:21:34.359
<v Speaker 2>Is it out there?

0:21:34.560 --> 0:21:38.600
<v Speaker 3>Does it exist, this distinction of a new change in

0:21:38.680 --> 0:21:40.399
<v Speaker 3>foreign policy.

0:21:41.240 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 9>I think you're absolutely right that there is a desire

0:21:43.680 --> 0:21:46.480
<v Speaker 9>for change in foreign policy. I think it is not

0:21:46.600 --> 0:21:49.880
<v Speaker 9>out there yet. But one point that I always come

0:21:49.920 --> 0:21:53.280
<v Speaker 9>back to is personnel. We are not going to have

0:21:53.320 --> 0:21:55.440
<v Speaker 9>the same personnel around Harris.

0:21:55.680 --> 0:21:57.560
<v Speaker 10>Should she win the presidency.

0:21:57.119 --> 0:21:58.439
<v Speaker 2>She will read hire for Lincoln.

0:21:58.560 --> 0:22:01.479
<v Speaker 9>Foreign policy is not going to I think it's very

0:22:01.520 --> 0:22:04.080
<v Speaker 9>unlikely that shor we hire Blncoln. I think Burns is

0:22:04.119 --> 0:22:06.160
<v Speaker 9>a likely familiar face that we'll see again.

0:22:06.720 --> 0:22:08.560
<v Speaker 10>But it's not going to be Jake Sullivan. It's not

0:22:08.560 --> 0:22:09.800
<v Speaker 10>going to be Anthony Blincoln.

0:22:10.320 --> 0:22:12.719
<v Speaker 9>It will be a new cast of characters, some who

0:22:12.800 --> 0:22:15.320
<v Speaker 9>have had ties to the say the Obama administration. But

0:22:15.359 --> 0:22:18.000
<v Speaker 9>the personnel is personal, and I think it will shape

0:22:18.000 --> 0:22:18.640
<v Speaker 9>form policy.

0:22:19.480 --> 0:22:22.399
<v Speaker 5>So how about down ballot voting? What do we know

0:22:22.440 --> 0:22:24.640
<v Speaker 5>about that these days? Because I mean, we need to

0:22:24.680 --> 0:22:27.680
<v Speaker 5>be able to call Congress at some point next week.

0:22:28.000 --> 0:22:28.720
<v Speaker 5>How is that looking?

0:22:30.119 --> 0:22:32.320
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I mean, look, it's also been very close.

0:22:32.600 --> 0:22:34.600
<v Speaker 9>I think the expectation there is that we're going to

0:22:34.640 --> 0:22:37.520
<v Speaker 9>see some split in the in the you know, in

0:22:37.560 --> 0:22:40.520
<v Speaker 9>the two houses, and that is going to affect whoever

0:22:40.600 --> 0:22:43.080
<v Speaker 9>holds you know, whoever holds the White House. And we

0:22:43.200 --> 0:22:46.480
<v Speaker 9>know that, you know, last night Harris was talking at

0:22:46.520 --> 0:22:49.520
<v Speaker 9>that very stunning event at the Ellipse, you know, brought

0:22:49.520 --> 0:22:53.040
<v Speaker 9>seventy five thousand people out, got under Donald Trump's fingernails

0:22:53.640 --> 0:22:56.119
<v Speaker 9>with all those people. But she was talking about national

0:22:56.160 --> 0:23:00.680
<v Speaker 9>security and the way forward. But you know she's talking

0:23:00.720 --> 0:23:03.639
<v Speaker 9>about immigration reform. How is she going to get immigration reform?

0:23:03.680 --> 0:23:05.440
<v Speaker 9>You know, no president has been able to get say,

0:23:05.440 --> 0:23:09.320
<v Speaker 9>massive immigration reform through the Houses because of these divisions

0:23:09.320 --> 0:23:11.560
<v Speaker 9>that we see both within the Houses and across the houses.

0:23:11.840 --> 0:23:15.760
<v Speaker 3>Does foreign policy matter inside the voting booth, sitting at

0:23:15.800 --> 0:23:18.719
<v Speaker 3>your kitchen table writing in the ballot?

0:23:18.800 --> 0:23:19.359
<v Speaker 2>Is there any.

0:23:19.280 --> 0:23:22.800
<v Speaker 3>Evidence of foreign policy matters? Or it does all domestic

0:23:22.880 --> 0:23:23.680
<v Speaker 3>at the end of the day.

0:23:24.840 --> 0:23:26.960
<v Speaker 9>We've all seen, I mean, there's been a million articles

0:23:27.000 --> 0:23:29.479
<v Speaker 9>that we've seen about how foreign policy never matters. How

0:23:29.480 --> 0:23:31.200
<v Speaker 9>it does matter this time around. I promise you it

0:23:31.240 --> 0:23:32.199
<v Speaker 9>matters this time around.

0:23:32.520 --> 0:23:33.480
<v Speaker 10>You know, Donald.

0:23:33.160 --> 0:23:36.359
<v Speaker 9>Trump this weekend, speaking at Madison Square Garden said he

0:23:36.440 --> 0:23:38.760
<v Speaker 9>opened with this question, are you better off today than

0:23:38.800 --> 0:23:39.680
<v Speaker 9>you were four years ago?

0:23:40.200 --> 0:23:41.760
<v Speaker 10>That is what matters to voters the selection.

0:23:43.000 --> 0:23:44.760
<v Speaker 9>You know the fact that he thinks that they might

0:23:44.800 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 9>be on the brink of World War two, that's of interest.

0:23:46.960 --> 0:23:49.000
<v Speaker 9>But we know the top issues here, the top issues

0:23:49.040 --> 0:23:52.560
<v Speaker 9>for voters are the economy, inflation, immigration. If you call

0:23:52.600 --> 0:23:55.840
<v Speaker 9>immigration form policy, then maybe you've got a slight asterisk there.

0:23:56.440 --> 0:23:58.679
<v Speaker 9>But what matters to people is how they're feeling in

0:23:58.720 --> 0:24:02.520
<v Speaker 9>their pocketbooks, in their teching accounts, when they look around

0:24:02.560 --> 0:24:03.480
<v Speaker 9>their friends and family.

0:24:04.440 --> 0:24:07.199
<v Speaker 5>Are we now at a new normal, lindsay is to

0:24:07.320 --> 0:24:12.040
<v Speaker 5>the electorate? Is it split fifty to fifty just now?

0:24:12.080 --> 0:24:14.119
<v Speaker 5>Going forward? I mean, it doesn't seem It seems like

0:24:14.160 --> 0:24:17.840
<v Speaker 5>the lines are so drawn and so set that I'm

0:24:17.880 --> 0:24:21.200
<v Speaker 5>not sure how that changes in you know, cycles going forward.

0:24:22.520 --> 0:24:23.760
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, it's a great point, Paul.

0:24:23.800 --> 0:24:25.640
<v Speaker 9>I mean, I've been writing a lot about what I

0:24:25.680 --> 0:24:29.440
<v Speaker 9>was calling radicalization, which is just this idea that American

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:32.119
<v Speaker 9>voters are moving towards the polls and not towards the center.

0:24:32.160 --> 0:24:34.840
<v Speaker 9>We know that Democrats and Republicans don't share facts. We

0:24:34.960 --> 0:24:36.840
<v Speaker 9>know that they don't have a lot of love loss

0:24:36.840 --> 0:24:39.680
<v Speaker 9>between them. We are at a hyperpolarized moment. I think

0:24:39.680 --> 0:24:43.760
<v Speaker 9>it's a generational hyperpolarized moment. Generations get me long, And

0:24:43.880 --> 0:24:46.120
<v Speaker 9>it's distinctly possible that this is just where we are

0:24:46.160 --> 0:24:48.560
<v Speaker 9>for the next couple of cycles. Because we're not seeing

0:24:48.640 --> 0:24:50.960
<v Speaker 9>you know, we're not seeing a retrenchment back towards the center.

0:24:51.000 --> 0:24:54.160
<v Speaker 9>We're not seeing a big poll in either parties towards

0:24:54.240 --> 0:24:55.880
<v Speaker 9>the middle. That's just not the trend line.

0:24:56.680 --> 0:24:59.200
<v Speaker 3>I was talking to the Roman is one of my

0:24:59.240 --> 0:25:01.879
<v Speaker 3>great editorials advisors. Roman and I were going back and

0:25:01.920 --> 0:25:04.879
<v Speaker 3>forth on the David Brooks essay that was out a

0:25:04.920 --> 0:25:07.520
<v Speaker 3>week and a half ago, ten days ago, on just

0:25:07.560 --> 0:25:10.520
<v Speaker 3>what you're talking about, doctor Newman, which is a polarization,

0:25:11.240 --> 0:25:14.760
<v Speaker 3>and yet, like Reagan and Ford, Ron Reagan to get

0:25:14.760 --> 0:25:17.840
<v Speaker 3>elected move to the middle in the next six days.

0:25:17.880 --> 0:25:19.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the President Trump's got.

0:25:19.320 --> 0:25:23.960
<v Speaker 3>A method, let's be honest. Vice President Harris is or

0:25:24.080 --> 0:25:26.879
<v Speaker 3>any tendency to move to the middle.

0:25:28.640 --> 0:25:31.600
<v Speaker 9>I think what Vice President Harris's campaign has tried to

0:25:31.640 --> 0:25:35.040
<v Speaker 9>do is to leave it open to interpretation that she

0:25:35.160 --> 0:25:38.480
<v Speaker 9>wants you to see yourself in her candidacy. That's why

0:25:38.520 --> 0:25:41.560
<v Speaker 9>we don't see her drilling down on policy, you know,

0:25:41.680 --> 0:25:45.480
<v Speaker 9>despite the efforts to probe, despite the interest in understanding.

0:25:45.520 --> 0:25:47.719
<v Speaker 9>As you asked me earlier, you know what really is

0:25:47.800 --> 0:25:50.840
<v Speaker 9>the what is that they're there on foreign policy? And

0:25:50.880 --> 0:25:54.159
<v Speaker 9>I think it's because we are going She's going to

0:25:54.160 --> 0:25:56.399
<v Speaker 9>craft it as she goes Once if she if she

0:25:56.480 --> 0:25:59.640
<v Speaker 9>wins this election. I don't expect us to see more

0:25:59.640 --> 0:26:02.639
<v Speaker 9>of the filled in though on policy, either domestic or

0:26:02.680 --> 0:26:04.000
<v Speaker 9>foreign policy in the days ahead.

0:26:04.000 --> 0:26:05.600
<v Speaker 2>From her son, don't be a stranger.

0:26:05.680 --> 0:26:07.840
<v Speaker 3>Bring the Bremmer guy along with the next time. Lindsay

0:26:07.880 --> 0:26:10.960
<v Speaker 3>Newman with your raising group A gzero media from London

0:26:11.320 --> 0:26:16.000
<v Speaker 3>this morning. Really informative there, whatever your politics.

0:26:22.200 --> 0:26:26.520
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Listen live each weekday

0:26:26.600 --> 0:26:30.119
<v Speaker 1>starting at seven am Eastern on Applecarplay and Android Auto

0:26:30.200 --> 0:26:33.000
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also watch us

0:26:33.080 --> 0:26:37.080
<v Speaker 1>live every weekday on YouTube and always on the Bloomberg terminal.

0:26:37.359 --> 0:26:40.600
<v Speaker 3>This is what surveillance is about, folks. We've codified this

0:26:41.320 --> 0:26:46.080
<v Speaker 3>decades ago. I can't say enough about We move when

0:26:46.119 --> 0:26:47.280
<v Speaker 3>the story moves.

0:26:47.400 --> 0:26:48.040
<v Speaker 2>Joining us.

0:26:48.119 --> 0:26:51.199
<v Speaker 3>In fourteen minutes, Woo Jin Hoe will join us. He

0:26:51.280 --> 0:26:56.240
<v Speaker 3>is expert on super micro computer with Bloomberg Intelligence. Are

0:26:56.320 --> 0:26:58.560
<v Speaker 3>thrilled he's freed up as schedule to speak to us. Paul,

0:26:58.600 --> 0:27:01.280
<v Speaker 3>why don't you bring a guest in here? On the

0:27:01.320 --> 0:27:03.920
<v Speaker 3>shadows of private credit.

0:27:03.880 --> 0:27:05.960
<v Speaker 5>I tell you this is again. I've kind of been

0:27:05.960 --> 0:27:07.960
<v Speaker 5>in this investment game for thirty five years. One of

0:27:07.960 --> 0:27:10.919
<v Speaker 5>the most amazing developments to me, has been in addition

0:27:11.000 --> 0:27:14.159
<v Speaker 5>to ETFs, this private credit business all grew up with

0:27:14.240 --> 0:27:17.800
<v Speaker 5>private equity, but private credit has become just an extraordinary

0:27:17.880 --> 0:27:21.520
<v Speaker 5>alternative investment opportunity for a lot of investors, particularly after

0:27:21.560 --> 0:27:23.600
<v Speaker 5>the Great Financial Crisis when some of the banks were

0:27:23.600 --> 0:27:25.639
<v Speaker 5>pulling back on their lending. And kind of what I

0:27:25.680 --> 0:27:27.320
<v Speaker 5>know about this business I learned from our next guest,

0:27:27.400 --> 0:27:31.520
<v Speaker 5>Randy Schumer, vice Chairman, Investor Solutions Group, Churchill Asset Management,

0:27:31.640 --> 0:27:36.440
<v Speaker 5>most notably from the JP Morgan Chase corporate banking business

0:27:36.520 --> 0:27:37.800
<v Speaker 5>and loan syndication business.

0:27:37.800 --> 0:27:39.640
<v Speaker 6>That's a long time ago, Paul.

0:27:39.720 --> 0:27:41.720
<v Speaker 5>That's where you learn credit, and that's where I learned

0:27:41.720 --> 0:27:45.119
<v Speaker 5>my credit chops there at Chase Manhattan Bank, Randy. We

0:27:45.200 --> 0:27:48.119
<v Speaker 5>got interest rates coming down, although they old curve is steepening,

0:27:48.200 --> 0:27:50.879
<v Speaker 5>but interest rates generally coming down the Feds lowering rates.

0:27:51.200 --> 0:27:54.080
<v Speaker 5>What does that mean for the private credit business?

0:27:54.160 --> 0:27:56.480
<v Speaker 6>By the way, a shout out to James Crombie and

0:27:56.800 --> 0:27:59.520
<v Speaker 6>your Credit Edge podcast. I'll be if you want sixty

0:27:59.520 --> 0:28:02.480
<v Speaker 6>minutes of Me and private Credit to tune in tomorrow

0:28:02.480 --> 0:28:07.840
<v Speaker 6>for that. So, yeah, rates are probably coming down spreads

0:28:07.840 --> 0:28:11.560
<v Speaker 6>across this credit spectrum. As you guys have reported are tightening.

0:28:12.080 --> 0:28:16.439
<v Speaker 6>The Bloomberg High Yield spread index is below three percent.

0:28:16.720 --> 0:28:19.200
<v Speaker 6>I mean, that's a little bit nutty when you look

0:28:19.240 --> 0:28:22.120
<v Speaker 6>at what you know, the potential risks over the next

0:28:22.160 --> 0:28:26.000
<v Speaker 6>six months are. But really, capital markets are wide open,

0:28:26.520 --> 0:28:29.560
<v Speaker 6>and in the midst of all this, private credit is

0:28:29.640 --> 0:28:33.359
<v Speaker 6>actually according to JP Morrigan report that they put out

0:28:33.760 --> 0:28:36.879
<v Speaker 6>a couple of days ago, credit spreads in private credit

0:28:36.920 --> 0:28:40.000
<v Speaker 6>have actually increased by twenty five basis points. Now, let's

0:28:40.000 --> 0:28:42.160
<v Speaker 6>think about that in the context of everything going on.

0:28:42.880 --> 0:28:46.480
<v Speaker 6>Part of what's going on is that the broadly syndicated market,

0:28:46.520 --> 0:28:50.520
<v Speaker 6>which we know has been more active this year than ever,

0:28:51.080 --> 0:28:54.000
<v Speaker 6>has been able to affect the large cap market, the

0:28:54.080 --> 0:28:56.960
<v Speaker 6>large mintal market deals. But in the traditional middle market,

0:28:56.960 --> 0:28:59.800
<v Speaker 6>in the in the direct lending market that we churchills

0:28:59.840 --> 0:29:02.800
<v Speaker 6>in spreads have actually gone up a little bit. Why

0:29:02.920 --> 0:29:05.240
<v Speaker 6>is that deal flow is starting to come back? I

0:29:05.240 --> 0:29:08.760
<v Speaker 6>always like bringing stats into you guys. Every month, Global

0:29:08.880 --> 0:29:11.600
<v Speaker 6>m and A up quarter over quarter by nine percent

0:29:11.640 --> 0:29:15.560
<v Speaker 6>according to S and P year over year twenty three percent.

0:29:15.640 --> 0:29:19.360
<v Speaker 6>So as deal flow increases, people can be more picky,

0:29:19.520 --> 0:29:21.880
<v Speaker 6>so they like us say, he you know, I'd rather

0:29:21.920 --> 0:29:25.160
<v Speaker 6>take something a little more spread, A little more protections

0:29:25.160 --> 0:29:28.720
<v Speaker 6>for our investors, So spreads are actually coming up. The

0:29:28.760 --> 0:29:31.560
<v Speaker 6>other thing that's going on is the ill liquidity premium

0:29:31.600 --> 0:29:36.320
<v Speaker 6>between liquid markets. The Brothers indicate loan market private credit

0:29:36.600 --> 0:29:39.440
<v Speaker 6>is actually widened to a five month high, so very

0:29:39.480 --> 0:29:41.160
<v Speaker 6>attractive for investors right now, right where.

0:29:41.040 --> 0:29:43.360
<v Speaker 3>I want to go to. I want to explain, Randy,

0:29:43.360 --> 0:29:47.440
<v Speaker 3>you're the best to do this. Everybody's concerned, even people

0:29:47.680 --> 0:29:53.000
<v Speaker 3>supporting private equity private credit. We intuitively get in private equity,

0:29:53.160 --> 0:29:56.040
<v Speaker 3>you buy something, it's locked up for seven years whatever,

0:29:56.920 --> 0:29:58.600
<v Speaker 3>you got to wait to get out. Then when you

0:29:58.640 --> 0:30:02.160
<v Speaker 3>get out, you can't get out. It's intuitive inequity, it's

0:30:02.240 --> 0:30:05.640
<v Speaker 3>not in your world. Now you just discovered that what

0:30:05.760 --> 0:30:08.920
<v Speaker 3>is the lock up in private credit that needs to

0:30:08.960 --> 0:30:13.360
<v Speaker 3>be analyzed, studied, calmed, or concerned about.

0:30:13.520 --> 0:30:15.960
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, so you're pointing to the issue of liquidity, right,

0:30:16.000 --> 0:30:20.719
<v Speaker 6>and illiquidity which has tended to be viewed as a

0:30:20.800 --> 0:30:24.800
<v Speaker 6>negative in markets that are very correlated, and we saw

0:30:24.840 --> 0:30:26.800
<v Speaker 6>that in spades, you know twenty two and a little

0:30:26.840 --> 0:30:28.880
<v Speaker 6>bit in twenty three. Tends to be a negative for

0:30:28.920 --> 0:30:32.440
<v Speaker 6>investors because they don't they want something that's an alternative

0:30:32.480 --> 0:30:35.560
<v Speaker 6>to the correlated assets of public equities and fixed income,

0:30:35.600 --> 0:30:39.040
<v Speaker 6>and so they seek alternatives, including private capital, to get

0:30:39.200 --> 0:30:42.800
<v Speaker 6>a little bit more calm during periods of stress and turmoil.

0:30:43.040 --> 0:30:47.240
<v Speaker 6>So what's happening for private credit investors is that the

0:30:47.680 --> 0:30:51.160
<v Speaker 6>valuations associated with our loans tend to be a lot

0:30:51.200 --> 0:30:55.480
<v Speaker 6>more stable during periods of volatility. And so what they're

0:30:55.560 --> 0:30:58.080
<v Speaker 6>trading for in terms of lack of being able to

0:30:58.120 --> 0:31:02.200
<v Speaker 6>trade on demand is the ability that during a crisis

0:31:02.600 --> 0:31:06.720
<v Speaker 6>they don't see the kinds of moves and prices. Oh yeah,

0:31:06.800 --> 0:31:09.840
<v Speaker 6>all of our loans are valued by third party agencies,

0:31:10.600 --> 0:31:13.240
<v Speaker 6>you know, and and so it's not just us value,

0:31:13.360 --> 0:31:16.200
<v Speaker 6>but they're they're valued by by others as well as

0:31:16.200 --> 0:31:19.000
<v Speaker 6>the fundamentals of these companies. It's not they're not traded

0:31:19.040 --> 0:31:21.080
<v Speaker 6>the way that you know, the broadly syndicated loans are.

0:31:21.400 --> 0:31:23.840
<v Speaker 6>But the fundamental difference I think now is that with

0:31:23.920 --> 0:31:26.840
<v Speaker 6>the m and a market opening up, these loans are

0:31:27.040 --> 0:31:29.360
<v Speaker 6>going to start to trade more often in the sense

0:31:29.400 --> 0:31:31.040
<v Speaker 6>that deals are going to start to get done and

0:31:31.560 --> 0:31:35.400
<v Speaker 6>refinanced private equity, which has been stalled to your point

0:31:36.120 --> 0:31:38.880
<v Speaker 6>because capital has been locked in with these deals where

0:31:39.640 --> 0:31:43.360
<v Speaker 6>LPs are stuck because they haven't seen realizations. Now those

0:31:43.400 --> 0:31:45.520
<v Speaker 6>realizations are going to start to come and I think

0:31:45.520 --> 0:31:47.000
<v Speaker 6>we're going to see more of that next year.

0:31:47.240 --> 0:31:49.400
<v Speaker 5>You guys get a gajillion pitch books coming through your

0:31:49.440 --> 0:31:52.880
<v Speaker 5>door every year. How do you screen them?

0:31:52.880 --> 0:31:53.960
<v Speaker 2>What?

0:31:53.960 --> 0:31:55.080
<v Speaker 5>What do you like these days?

0:31:55.320 --> 0:31:59.040
<v Speaker 6>Well, we get about a thousand deals a year coming

0:31:59.040 --> 0:32:01.720
<v Speaker 6>from our private equity friends. Where As I've told you before,

0:32:01.720 --> 0:32:03.720
<v Speaker 6>we're an investor in their funds. So these are kind

0:32:03.720 --> 0:32:07.920
<v Speaker 6>of pre screen transactions. We could probably do all of

0:32:07.920 --> 0:32:10.200
<v Speaker 6>them and be fine, but some of them fit better

0:32:10.200 --> 0:32:15.000
<v Speaker 6>into our credit book, right So some are more equity

0:32:15.200 --> 0:32:18.160
<v Speaker 6>like high growth, and in the credit world, as you know,

0:32:18.240 --> 0:32:20.280
<v Speaker 6>you're getting paid principal and interest, so you just want

0:32:20.280 --> 0:32:22.680
<v Speaker 6>to be you know, it's not being first or second,

0:32:22.720 --> 0:32:26.120
<v Speaker 6>it's finishing the race. What we're looking for is kind

0:32:26.120 --> 0:32:28.680
<v Speaker 6>of what we've been looking for, which is defensive industries,

0:32:29.360 --> 0:32:33.920
<v Speaker 6>sectors such as you mentioned, accounting firms, accounting firms, regional firms.

0:32:34.520 --> 0:32:37.600
<v Speaker 6>In this business we're going around right now very steady atty.

0:32:38.040 --> 0:32:40.360
<v Speaker 6>Doesn't matter what the tax rates or taraffs are, you

0:32:40.440 --> 0:32:43.040
<v Speaker 6>still need five fall and life al So I think

0:32:43.080 --> 0:32:45.880
<v Speaker 6>that business services are really good right right now in

0:32:46.000 --> 0:32:47.320
<v Speaker 6>terms of what we're seeing.

0:32:47.200 --> 0:32:49.680
<v Speaker 2>With Churchill asset management or industry. We're with us right now.

0:32:49.720 --> 0:32:52.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm looking to Google up ten dollars to a one

0:32:52.440 --> 0:32:55.680
<v Speaker 3>seventy nine and off the trading range, going back to Midsummer,

0:32:55.760 --> 0:32:58.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to call it that was where Sweeney took three.

0:32:58.480 --> 0:33:01.280
<v Speaker 2>Fridays in a row off back then.

0:33:01.560 --> 0:33:05.240
<v Speaker 3>There are three point eight standard deviations. I think we

0:33:05.320 --> 0:33:07.600
<v Speaker 3>can say surge is appropriate.

0:33:07.680 --> 0:33:10.360
<v Speaker 5>Yes, surge is appropriate. Rannie, talk to us about the

0:33:10.400 --> 0:33:12.240
<v Speaker 5>private equity world. What are you seeing from your private

0:33:12.240 --> 0:33:15.040
<v Speaker 5>equity clients in terms of deal flow. When we hear

0:33:15.240 --> 0:33:18.000
<v Speaker 5>Jamie Diamond and Brian moynihanda the big you know Wall

0:33:18.040 --> 0:33:21.000
<v Speaker 5>Street banks thing, you know, activities picking up, they feel

0:33:21.080 --> 0:33:22.320
<v Speaker 5>more bullish about activity.

0:33:22.360 --> 0:33:22.840
<v Speaker 2>Are you seeing that?

0:33:23.200 --> 0:33:23.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:33:23.520 --> 0:33:27.000
<v Speaker 6>So our platform, so we do private credit. We have

0:33:27.200 --> 0:33:30.400
<v Speaker 6>a junior capital co invest and fund to fund business.

0:33:30.400 --> 0:33:32.920
<v Speaker 6>We also have a secondary's business which is actually one

0:33:32.960 --> 0:33:34.959
<v Speaker 6>of our fastest growing And going to the point that

0:33:35.000 --> 0:33:38.400
<v Speaker 6>Tom mentioned about liquidity when these investors and some of

0:33:38.440 --> 0:33:42.200
<v Speaker 6>the gps are stuck, the secondary's market has been one

0:33:42.240 --> 0:33:45.440
<v Speaker 6>of the fastest growing in the private equity space because

0:33:45.520 --> 0:33:48.200
<v Speaker 6>realizations are slow and so if you're an investor in

0:33:48.240 --> 0:33:50.960
<v Speaker 6>a fund or if you're a GP with a sponsor,

0:33:51.240 --> 0:33:53.160
<v Speaker 6>you're kind of looking for ways out, and you can

0:33:53.200 --> 0:33:56.000
<v Speaker 6>create liquidity through the investments that you have and the

0:33:56.040 --> 0:34:00.280
<v Speaker 6>portfolios that you created, because the enterprise value that's there

0:34:00.800 --> 0:34:03.640
<v Speaker 6>is being tapped by firms like Churchill to be able

0:34:03.640 --> 0:34:07.120
<v Speaker 6>to help them access liquidity when otherwise they couldn't. So

0:34:07.160 --> 0:34:11.200
<v Speaker 6>the sophistication and technology in private equity now has changed

0:34:11.239 --> 0:34:13.680
<v Speaker 6>so much since the old days when you basically had

0:34:13.680 --> 0:34:16.040
<v Speaker 6>a portfolio company. If it's stuck and you can't sell it,

0:34:16.120 --> 0:34:19.959
<v Speaker 6>that's it. But today you can actually transfer value into,

0:34:20.000 --> 0:34:23.719
<v Speaker 6>for example, another fund that you control. So these co

0:34:23.800 --> 0:34:25.279
<v Speaker 6>invest vehicles are read.

0:34:26.040 --> 0:34:28.279
<v Speaker 3>Give us a comparison yield. I think it's something I'm

0:34:28.320 --> 0:34:32.920
<v Speaker 3>ignorant about. What's a blended yield of a private credit

0:34:33.000 --> 0:34:38.400
<v Speaker 3>Churchill transaction versus high yield versus four point x percent

0:34:38.440 --> 0:34:38.879
<v Speaker 3>ten years?

0:34:39.040 --> 0:34:41.600
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, so I mentioned I mentioned the illiquidity premium. So

0:34:41.640 --> 0:34:45.760
<v Speaker 6>you're about two hundred basis points differential in private credit

0:34:45.800 --> 0:34:49.880
<v Speaker 6>relative to liquid loans number one, So you're probably another

0:34:49.960 --> 0:34:53.120
<v Speaker 6>fifty one hundred basis points above the high yield bond market. Okay,

0:34:53.160 --> 0:34:56.399
<v Speaker 6>because think about where your high Bloomberg spreads are, right

0:34:56.440 --> 0:34:59.840
<v Speaker 6>now and then if you look at private equity, depending

0:34:59.880 --> 0:35:03.160
<v Speaker 6>on you know, and we're sort of a top tier

0:35:03.200 --> 0:35:06.240
<v Speaker 6>investor focusing on top tier firms, you're looking at twenty

0:35:06.400 --> 0:35:09.359
<v Speaker 6>plus percent returns for the best private equity sponsor. So

0:35:09.800 --> 0:35:12.440
<v Speaker 6>you have the ability as an investor to choose with

0:35:12.920 --> 0:35:17.200
<v Speaker 6>our platform, you know, stream of income that's safe because

0:35:17.239 --> 0:35:20.000
<v Speaker 6>you're top of the capital structure, secured by all the

0:35:20.040 --> 0:35:23.040
<v Speaker 6>assets senior credit. But then you can migrate up the

0:35:23.120 --> 0:35:26.319
<v Speaker 6>risk spectrum to get more yield. And what investors are

0:35:26.320 --> 0:35:29.120
<v Speaker 6>looking now for is how do you adapt in the

0:35:29.120 --> 0:35:31.800
<v Speaker 6>current climate. How do you adapt when things are uncertain?

0:35:31.800 --> 0:35:34.560
<v Speaker 6>How do you adapt when markets can be volatile? And

0:35:34.920 --> 0:35:37.120
<v Speaker 6>there's a safe harbor that's been created and that's why

0:35:37.120 --> 0:35:39.560
<v Speaker 6>you're seeing the growth that you're doing real quick.

0:35:39.960 --> 0:35:42.759
<v Speaker 5>One of things regulations I see the FTC and the

0:35:42.840 --> 0:35:44.840
<v Speaker 5>DJ blocking a lot of the big deals. Are you

0:35:44.840 --> 0:35:45.960
<v Speaker 5>seeing that as a headwind?

0:35:46.440 --> 0:35:48.480
<v Speaker 6>Well, again, you know, private credit tends to be a

0:35:48.520 --> 0:35:52.279
<v Speaker 6>little bit of a different environment because these companies are

0:35:52.280 --> 0:35:55.200
<v Speaker 6>privately held, they're not raided, they're not traded, and private

0:35:55.200 --> 0:35:58.160
<v Speaker 6>acty sponsors have been looking at industries that they like

0:35:58.960 --> 0:36:02.000
<v Speaker 6>for like a decade that are smaller these and medium

0:36:02.040 --> 0:36:05.719
<v Speaker 6>sized companies. These are companies are small. Yeah, exactly, that

0:36:05.760 --> 0:36:06.160
<v Speaker 6>makes sense.

0:36:06.280 --> 0:36:07.960
<v Speaker 2>You're doing the James Cromby.

0:36:07.840 --> 0:36:09.520
<v Speaker 6>Yeah Podcast tomorrow. Check it out.

0:36:09.800 --> 0:36:11.600
<v Speaker 2>Check it out, folks. This is Cromby is like the

0:36:11.640 --> 0:36:12.879
<v Speaker 2>real deal. Credit Edge.

0:36:12.920 --> 0:36:15.759
<v Speaker 3>I'm taking notes from from Credit Edge. I'm taking notes

0:36:15.800 --> 0:36:17.400
<v Speaker 3>from from James Crimby.

0:36:17.840 --> 0:36:19.520
<v Speaker 2>That's really special for Global Wall Street.

0:36:19.560 --> 0:36:22.319
<v Speaker 3>Randa Schummer, Churchill, Will James Crabby look for that of

0:36:22.320 --> 0:36:24.520
<v Speaker 3>course at Bloomberg Podcast.

0:36:25.320 --> 0:36:29.799
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:36:29.960 --> 0:36:34.080
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each weekday,

0:36:34.160 --> 0:36:37.239
<v Speaker 1>seven to ten am Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com, the

0:36:37.360 --> 0:36:41.120
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app. You

0:36:41.160 --> 0:36:44.480
<v Speaker 1>can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube and

0:36:44.600 --> 0:36:46.200
<v Speaker 1>always on the Bloomberg terminal.