WEBVTT - TechStuff's Predictions for 2012

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by the reinvented two thousand twelve Camray.

0:00:03.160 --> 0:00:08.920
<v Speaker 1>It's ready. Are you get in touch with technology? With

0:00:09.000 --> 0:00:17.680
<v Speaker 1>tech Stuff from how stuff works dot com. Hello there,

0:00:17.760 --> 0:00:20.240
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to tech Stuff. My name is Chris Poulette.

0:00:20.400 --> 0:00:22.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm an editor at how stuff works dot com and

0:00:22.239 --> 0:00:25.239
<v Speaker 1>sitting across from me, as always, or at least for

0:00:25.239 --> 0:00:29.720
<v Speaker 1>the last three years or so, senior writer Jonathan Strickland,

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:36.360
<v Speaker 1>don't stop thinking about tomorrow. Really, yeah, I think you

0:00:36.360 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 1>need to go part your Fleetwood Mac next to the

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:44.000
<v Speaker 1>at Uh. So, today we are going to do our

0:00:44.240 --> 0:00:51.120
<v Speaker 1>yearly exercise in futility and pain, which is our predictions

0:00:51.200 --> 0:00:54.560
<v Speaker 1>for what is going to happen in the year following.

0:00:54.640 --> 0:00:58.320
<v Speaker 1>And this being the year of eleven, we're looking ahead

0:00:58.320 --> 0:01:01.920
<v Speaker 1>to twelve and wondering how wrong we can be. Actually,

0:01:01.960 --> 0:01:05.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, our predictions for ended up being more right

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:07.480
<v Speaker 1>than not. As I recall, you got to say a

0:01:07.560 --> 0:01:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Dreamcast score and I got a World Pool tub. Yes,

0:01:10.680 --> 0:01:12.920
<v Speaker 1>so it was much better than my score for the

0:01:13.000 --> 0:01:15.440
<v Speaker 1>year previous. Yeah, I I see that those are both

0:01:15.440 --> 0:01:21.760
<v Speaker 1>perfectly cromulent scores. So we've we've done really well. Uh,

0:01:21.840 --> 0:01:23.600
<v Speaker 1>whether or not we will do as well for this

0:01:23.640 --> 0:01:26.520
<v Speaker 1>coming year remains to be seen. Yeah, if you are

0:01:26.560 --> 0:01:29.240
<v Speaker 1>a long term fan, especially, you know that we do

0:01:29.319 --> 0:01:31.480
<v Speaker 1>this every year, or at least Truff tried to do

0:01:31.520 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 1>this for the last two years. Uh and uh. Also

0:01:34.959 --> 0:01:37.880
<v Speaker 1>you probably listened to our recap of TN, which ended

0:01:37.959 --> 0:01:40.840
<v Speaker 1>up being epic because all the stuff we predicted was

0:01:40.880 --> 0:01:43.160
<v Speaker 1>merely the tip of the iceberg. We had so much

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:46.320
<v Speaker 1>incredible tech news that we never would have predicted. People

0:01:46.959 --> 0:01:51.280
<v Speaker 1>like Steve Jobs leaving us and the release of Google Plus,

0:01:51.480 --> 0:01:55.560
<v Speaker 1>earthquake in Japan, earthquake in Japan, um, all the all

0:01:55.600 --> 0:01:57.760
<v Speaker 1>these things are things that we never would have guests

0:01:58.320 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 1>would happen um when they did so. UM. Although my

0:02:02.560 --> 0:02:04.800
<v Speaker 1>first my first prediction does kind of fall into that

0:02:04.880 --> 0:02:09.040
<v Speaker 1>category stuff that we really you know, I mean, all

0:02:09.080 --> 0:02:11.919
<v Speaker 1>indicators point to this. It's just that we can't know

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:16.160
<v Speaker 1>right now exactly how big an impact it's going to make.

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:20.760
<v Speaker 1>But mine, my first prediction, is all about economic uncertainty,

0:02:21.440 --> 0:02:23.240
<v Speaker 1>So it was uncertain whether you were going to do

0:02:23.280 --> 0:02:25.960
<v Speaker 1>that or not. Economic markets around the world are in

0:02:26.720 --> 0:02:29.880
<v Speaker 1>trouble right right now. You've got you've got the situation

0:02:29.960 --> 0:02:33.080
<v Speaker 1>in Greece, which pretty much when about as bad as

0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:37.400
<v Speaker 1>it possibly can you have other situations in Italy there

0:02:37.440 --> 0:02:40.239
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of concern that the European market is

0:02:40.400 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 1>in major Uh, there's a major risk that it could

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:48.200
<v Speaker 1>it could falter and fall apart. Then there's the worry

0:02:48.200 --> 0:02:50.560
<v Speaker 1>about how that fallout would affect the rest of the world.

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:54.080
<v Speaker 1>So perhaps the United States, which already seems to be

0:02:54.160 --> 0:02:58.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of in its own funk economically speaking, could follow suit.

0:02:59.080 --> 0:03:00.760
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of worry abo what this could mean.

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:04.760
<v Speaker 1>And frankly, no matter how it turns out, whether it

0:03:04.919 --> 0:03:08.200
<v Speaker 1>ends up just being a small blip or a massive catastrophe,

0:03:08.440 --> 0:03:13.160
<v Speaker 1>it's going to affect technology because you know, technology runs

0:03:13.240 --> 0:03:17.200
<v Speaker 1>on not just electricity but money. And as the this

0:03:17.320 --> 0:03:21.800
<v Speaker 1>situation gets more and more complex and uncertain, I think

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:25.640
<v Speaker 1>we're going to see that kind of effect the moves

0:03:25.680 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 1>that companies are going to make in the technology space.

0:03:28.480 --> 0:03:32.400
<v Speaker 1>And that might mean that, uh, we'll see we may

0:03:32.400 --> 0:03:35.440
<v Speaker 1>see some companies go under. You know, companies that are

0:03:35.480 --> 0:03:40.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of on the brink already might might disappear, become

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 1>acquired for a song. Because this of this environment, we

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:49.080
<v Speaker 1>might see some scale back. We could see that scale

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:52.040
<v Speaker 1>back coming in the form of fewer products being released,

0:03:52.120 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 1>or perhaps even layoffs or restructuring. Uh. I really think

0:03:58.200 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 1>that because the there is such uncertainty that we're going

0:04:03.120 --> 0:04:06.200
<v Speaker 1>to see a lot of stories that in somewhere another

0:04:06.200 --> 0:04:09.400
<v Speaker 1>relate back to that. I know that's not very specific.

0:04:09.440 --> 0:04:11.640
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of a gimme prediction. It's not really a

0:04:11.640 --> 0:04:15.440
<v Speaker 1>specific prediction. But that's one of the reasons why some

0:04:15.520 --> 0:04:18.680
<v Speaker 1>of the other predictions I've made or thought about are

0:04:18.760 --> 0:04:22.279
<v Speaker 1>really tenuous, because the economic situation is so serious and

0:04:22.360 --> 0:04:26.920
<v Speaker 1>so unpredictable that a lot of them could hinge on

0:04:27.120 --> 0:04:30.120
<v Speaker 1>it going one way versus another. So that's also me

0:04:30.200 --> 0:04:33.440
<v Speaker 1>covering my butt for some of my other predictions I'll

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:36.360
<v Speaker 1>be making. All right, Well, I didn't write these down

0:04:37.160 --> 0:04:41.719
<v Speaker 1>in an order necessarily that I um, I want to

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:45.119
<v Speaker 1>release them, so I think I think I'm basing mine

0:04:45.160 --> 0:04:48.600
<v Speaker 1>on that. I think one of the first things that happened,

0:04:48.600 --> 0:04:50.400
<v Speaker 1>and it could very well happen by the end of

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 1>the year, is that Yahoo will get purchased by someone else. Um. There,

0:04:56.680 --> 0:04:59.719
<v Speaker 1>there's already talk right now. As of now, we're we

0:04:59.720 --> 0:05:02.240
<v Speaker 1>didn't mentioned more more recording. This recording us in at

0:05:02.240 --> 0:05:03.919
<v Speaker 1>the very end of the first week in December or

0:05:04.080 --> 0:05:07.640
<v Speaker 1>partial week actually the second second so and then this

0:05:07.680 --> 0:05:10.560
<v Speaker 1>has already been in the news, so the Chinese firm

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Ali Baba might some of these predictions may end up

0:05:14.120 --> 0:05:19.120
<v Speaker 1>being predictions for the last month of December or eleven

0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:22.560
<v Speaker 1>rather than uh than for twelve, because we frankly don't

0:05:22.600 --> 0:05:24.719
<v Speaker 1>know how it's gonna turn out. I have a similar

0:05:24.760 --> 0:05:27.880
<v Speaker 1>prediction to that, saying that yeah, who will either get

0:05:27.960 --> 0:05:31.640
<v Speaker 1>sold or will break up into various pieces that get

0:05:31.680 --> 0:05:33.880
<v Speaker 1>gobbled up by different companies. There are a lot of

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:38.040
<v Speaker 1>different properties in Yahoo that I think has still have value,

0:05:38.120 --> 0:05:40.680
<v Speaker 1>things like and also would make a big impact if

0:05:40.680 --> 0:05:42.800
<v Speaker 1>they were to go away, like yeah, who Mail? That

0:05:42.800 --> 0:05:47.560
<v Speaker 1>would be pretty catastrophic if that went away. So uh yeah,

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:50.880
<v Speaker 1>I think that something's yeah whom. If y'all who gets

0:05:50.880 --> 0:05:54.400
<v Speaker 1>spot by Ali Baba, that could means some pretty big

0:05:54.480 --> 0:06:01.400
<v Speaker 1>changes down the line. But yeah, this I think would

0:06:01.440 --> 0:06:04.160
<v Speaker 1>be the last year for Yahoo as the company that

0:06:04.160 --> 0:06:08.000
<v Speaker 1>we we know now. Maybe that whoever buys Yahoo, if

0:06:08.040 --> 0:06:10.600
<v Speaker 1>that does indeed happen, tries to keep it as its

0:06:10.600 --> 0:06:13.159
<v Speaker 1>own separate identity, but it's going to be a different animal,

0:06:13.440 --> 0:06:17.479
<v Speaker 1>right right. Another financial related one, I think the A

0:06:17.600 --> 0:06:22.560
<v Speaker 1>T and T and T Mobile USA merger is destined

0:06:22.640 --> 0:06:26.320
<v Speaker 1>to fail. Um. Again, this is a low hanging for eyah,

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 1>have some some gimmes. And I'm based on everything that's

0:06:29.800 --> 0:06:32.599
<v Speaker 1>come out in the news in the last uh month

0:06:32.680 --> 0:06:35.600
<v Speaker 1>or so, really the last two weeks. Um, A lot

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:39.040
<v Speaker 1>of people are concerned about the competition problems that will

0:06:39.080 --> 0:06:41.720
<v Speaker 1>cause here in the United States, and um, I just

0:06:41.760 --> 0:06:44.760
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's gonna go. Yeah. If it does happen,

0:06:44.920 --> 0:06:49.360
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be such a dramatic, uh departure from

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:51.919
<v Speaker 1>the original deal that it's going to look like something

0:06:51.960 --> 0:06:54.640
<v Speaker 1>different anyway. Like right now, a T and T is

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:58.640
<v Speaker 1>is suggesting it would sell off a large amount of

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:02.080
<v Speaker 1>T Mobiles assets to other companies in order to avoid

0:07:02.200 --> 0:07:07.320
<v Speaker 1>this UH antitrust issue. But whether or not that will

0:07:07.360 --> 0:07:10.320
<v Speaker 1>be enough for that deal to actually go through remains

0:07:10.320 --> 0:07:13.320
<v Speaker 1>to be seen. I'm I'm skeptical as well. Yeah. Now, UM,

0:07:13.800 --> 0:07:15.360
<v Speaker 1>I want to point out that one of the things

0:07:15.360 --> 0:07:19.040
<v Speaker 1>they're talking about is a joint venture between the two

0:07:19.080 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 1>if if the merger fails. Um, And I'm not counting

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 1>that as the merger going through. Um. So I mean

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm being literal when I say that. Well, and you know,

0:07:29.320 --> 0:07:32.080
<v Speaker 1>this is another time to point out that, uh that

0:07:33.600 --> 0:07:36.920
<v Speaker 1>if it weren't for other political issues that are going

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:41.600
<v Speaker 1>on right now, uh, this merger might not have been

0:07:41.720 --> 0:07:44.239
<v Speaker 1>such a big red flag. That was a red flag

0:07:44.280 --> 0:07:47.360
<v Speaker 1>for everyone in the tech industry who was worried that, uh,

0:07:47.440 --> 0:07:50.560
<v Speaker 1>the number one or number two and number four carriers

0:07:50.640 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 1>joining together could end up really reducing innovation and causing

0:07:55.680 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 1>a reduction and competition and just be bad for consumers overall.

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:02.960
<v Speaker 1>But now we also have political movements like the occupy movement,

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:08.720
<v Speaker 1>which are bringing more attention to the way governments treat

0:08:08.800 --> 0:08:12.720
<v Speaker 1>companies versus the way they treat individual citizens. And I

0:08:12.760 --> 0:08:16.560
<v Speaker 1>think that kind of focus has also really hurt the

0:08:16.680 --> 0:08:19.760
<v Speaker 1>chances for that merger going through because now everyone's feeling

0:08:19.840 --> 0:08:24.000
<v Speaker 1>much more cautious about this, because the uproar is getting

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:28.520
<v Speaker 1>louder and louder. Uh, let me do one, because I've

0:08:28.560 --> 0:08:33.640
<v Speaker 1>just commented on two of yours. Um, how about the

0:08:33.760 --> 0:08:39.680
<v Speaker 1>RIM is going to undergo an executive shuffle. I think

0:08:39.720 --> 0:08:43.240
<v Speaker 1>I think at some point in we're going to see

0:08:43.960 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 1>a shake up in RIM's executive ranks, whether or not

0:08:47.920 --> 0:08:50.640
<v Speaker 1>this finally means we'll get down to one CEO for

0:08:50.760 --> 0:08:52.559
<v Speaker 1>rem as opposed to the co C e O S.

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:55.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, but I think that shareholders are going

0:08:55.880 --> 0:08:58.360
<v Speaker 1>to demand. You know, REM has had a couple of

0:08:59.800 --> 0:09:02.160
<v Speaker 1>was a tough year for REM, and I think if

0:09:02.240 --> 0:09:06.960
<v Speaker 1>if they don't do something dramatic at the organizational level, uh,

0:09:07.080 --> 0:09:10.280
<v Speaker 1>shareholders are not going to continue supporting the company because

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 1>it's They're gonna be worried about the decisions being made there.

0:09:14.320 --> 0:09:17.480
<v Speaker 1>So I expect that sometime in twelve we're going to

0:09:17.520 --> 0:09:23.920
<v Speaker 1>see a big shake up in the executive structure. All right, Um,

0:09:23.960 --> 0:09:26.400
<v Speaker 1>I made considerably more predictions this year than I did

0:09:26.520 --> 0:09:28.720
<v Speaker 1>last year. So do you do you do you want

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:30.200
<v Speaker 1>to go again? Or you want me to know you

0:09:30.240 --> 0:09:34.480
<v Speaker 1>go ahead? Okay, all right? Um? Other financial stuff this

0:09:34.559 --> 0:09:37.080
<v Speaker 1>is this is another gimme. Although we've been talking about

0:09:37.080 --> 0:09:39.240
<v Speaker 1>it for years. I think Facebook is finally ready to

0:09:39.400 --> 0:09:42.280
<v Speaker 1>have an initial public offering of stock and I think

0:09:42.280 --> 0:09:44.520
<v Speaker 1>it's really gonna happen this time. I also think that

0:09:44.559 --> 0:09:46.880
<v Speaker 1>they're going to hit one billion users before the end

0:09:46.920 --> 0:09:51.560
<v Speaker 1>of which is the million now, so I think they'll

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:53.559
<v Speaker 1>hit a billion users before the end of the year.

0:09:53.640 --> 0:09:55.920
<v Speaker 1>And also, yeah, I think they will go public, So

0:09:55.960 --> 0:09:58.640
<v Speaker 1>I think they're gonna get that was it ten billion

0:09:58.720 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 1>that they're hoping for with an initial public offering, their

0:10:02.640 --> 0:10:05.440
<v Speaker 1>value that a hundred billion. I think it's a ten billion.

0:10:05.480 --> 0:10:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I p o that that at least that was the

0:10:07.120 --> 0:10:09.880
<v Speaker 1>most recent rumor I read. Um, I think that's gonna

0:10:09.880 --> 0:10:14.720
<v Speaker 1>happen too. I agree. Um, Here's okay, I have a

0:10:14.760 --> 0:10:17.240
<v Speaker 1>crazy one. This is one that I think. I don't

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:19.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't think this is really going to happen. I

0:10:19.480 --> 0:10:21.400
<v Speaker 1>really don't think it's gonna happen. But I wanted to

0:10:21.440 --> 0:10:25.800
<v Speaker 1>have a crazy prediction. So here's my crazy prediction. Google

0:10:26.600 --> 0:10:34.160
<v Speaker 1>purchases Twitter. Really Yeah, because Twitter, I mean really, Twitter

0:10:34.280 --> 0:10:36.920
<v Speaker 1>has been sticking around for ages and ages and ages,

0:10:37.000 --> 0:10:42.640
<v Speaker 1>and it uh somewhat defiantly because even now, even where

0:10:42.640 --> 0:10:47.000
<v Speaker 1>it has its limited advertisement model and and I just

0:10:47.000 --> 0:10:49.520
<v Speaker 1>can't imagine it's pulling in the revenue. It needs to

0:10:49.720 --> 0:10:53.360
<v Speaker 1>be a really viable business, right, I mean, it's mostly

0:10:53.400 --> 0:10:57.439
<v Speaker 1>still existing or it's it's been it's traditionally, it's it's

0:10:57.440 --> 0:11:01.760
<v Speaker 1>existed upon venture capitalists investing money into the company, and

0:11:01.840 --> 0:11:04.240
<v Speaker 1>I think, uh, you know, you can only keep that

0:11:04.360 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 1>up for so long before people just lose faith and

0:11:06.840 --> 0:11:09.160
<v Speaker 1>they won't pour money into it. No matter how important

0:11:09.200 --> 0:11:12.240
<v Speaker 1>that services. I think Google is the company that would,

0:11:13.040 --> 0:11:15.440
<v Speaker 1>just like Google did with YouTube, I think Google would

0:11:15.720 --> 0:11:18.360
<v Speaker 1>would take up the Twitter in that sense too, and

0:11:18.400 --> 0:11:20.720
<v Speaker 1>also say like, now we can treat you just like

0:11:20.720 --> 0:11:25.160
<v Speaker 1>we did Jaiku. So every and like and like in

0:11:25.280 --> 0:11:28.280
<v Speaker 1>like a year, it'll be gone. No. I think that

0:11:28.280 --> 0:11:32.000
<v Speaker 1>that's my crazy prediction. And again I don't really believe it,

0:11:32.040 --> 0:11:35.400
<v Speaker 1>but I wanted to predict it. Okay, all right, It's

0:11:35.400 --> 0:11:37.840
<v Speaker 1>funny because I keep looking for segways, and I keep

0:11:37.880 --> 0:11:41.000
<v Speaker 1>seeing multiple segways that I could take. I think I'll

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:43.719
<v Speaker 1>stick with the Google thing. I thought you're gonna make

0:11:43.720 --> 0:11:48.560
<v Speaker 1>a prediction about segways. No, not no actual segways, not

0:11:48.640 --> 0:11:54.200
<v Speaker 1>the segways. Um. I although people have been predicting it's demise,

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:57.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's I think it's crazy to predict

0:11:57.720 --> 0:12:00.840
<v Speaker 1>that Google Plus will will just die. I think Google

0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:03.959
<v Speaker 1>Plus will slowly increase its user base over the course

0:12:04.000 --> 0:12:08.400
<v Speaker 1>of and uh some modest gains. Yeah, I think it. Well,

0:12:08.440 --> 0:12:12.720
<v Speaker 1>it's funny because once people got let in, uh and

0:12:13.400 --> 0:12:17.600
<v Speaker 1>they started not using it in droves. I think people

0:12:18.040 --> 0:12:20.839
<v Speaker 1>really haven't given it as much of a shakedown as

0:12:20.840 --> 0:12:23.520
<v Speaker 1>they need to. And I think that, especially now that

0:12:23.559 --> 0:12:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Google is redesigning its user interface to promote Google Plus

0:12:26.920 --> 0:12:28.720
<v Speaker 1>more thoroughly and making it it's sort of a hub

0:12:28.760 --> 0:12:33.280
<v Speaker 1>for people's um attention. I think it will gradually. I

0:12:33.320 --> 0:12:36.040
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's gonna, you know, beat out Facebook next year,

0:12:36.360 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 1>but I do think that it's going to people are

0:12:38.120 --> 0:12:39.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna go, no, you know what, this is just not

0:12:40.080 --> 0:12:42.200
<v Speaker 1>so bad. I kind of like it. Unless they've been

0:12:42.200 --> 0:12:44.520
<v Speaker 1>adding functionality over the course of a few months, it's

0:12:44.520 --> 0:12:46.400
<v Speaker 1>been open to you. I think it'll grow. It looks

0:12:46.440 --> 0:12:49.600
<v Speaker 1>to me like Google Plus. His journey is very similar

0:12:49.640 --> 0:12:52.920
<v Speaker 1>to what I saw on Twitter, and that there was

0:12:53.080 --> 0:12:55.440
<v Speaker 1>a quick rush to kind of check out what this

0:12:55.480 --> 0:12:59.560
<v Speaker 1>new toy was, and then a very sharp drop off

0:12:59.679 --> 0:13:02.080
<v Speaker 1>as people thought this isn't what I wanted it to

0:13:02.120 --> 0:13:04.840
<v Speaker 1>be and they leave, and then just slow gains after

0:13:04.880 --> 0:13:06.800
<v Speaker 1>that until more and more people are using it. I mean,

0:13:06.840 --> 0:13:11.800
<v Speaker 1>I still have several thousand people following me on Google Plus,

0:13:11.920 --> 0:13:15.880
<v Speaker 1>and that's more than I have on Twitter. Um, and it's, uh,

0:13:16.080 --> 0:13:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's it's still a very good tool to

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:20.040
<v Speaker 1>engage people now. Granted, a lot of the people who

0:13:20.160 --> 0:13:23.280
<v Speaker 1>follow me end up looking like they are some sort

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:28.360
<v Speaker 1>of bought or something, or it's just a an account

0:13:28.400 --> 0:13:32.640
<v Speaker 1>that's made in order to repost other people's stuff that

0:13:32.720 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing original in there. You go and you look

0:13:35.040 --> 0:13:37.599
<v Speaker 1>at the uh the posts that the person made, and

0:13:37.640 --> 0:13:40.800
<v Speaker 1>they're all shares of some other person's posts, so they're

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:43.920
<v Speaker 1>not like anything original. A friend of mine complained about

0:13:43.920 --> 0:13:46.560
<v Speaker 1>that just yesterday, literally, and I think Google has been

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:49.720
<v Speaker 1>removing some of those two because my my follower numbers

0:13:49.760 --> 0:13:52.080
<v Speaker 1>have been fluctuing. Either that or I'm driving people away,

0:13:52.080 --> 0:13:54.520
<v Speaker 1>which is also possible. I'm not gonna I'm not gonna Yeah,

0:13:54.559 --> 0:13:57.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna negate that. Uh here's one of my

0:13:57.440 --> 0:14:02.120
<v Speaker 1>others guesses just a while us. Uh So in twelve,

0:14:02.200 --> 0:14:04.240
<v Speaker 1>I think it has to do this for this, for

0:14:04.240 --> 0:14:07.960
<v Speaker 1>for it to stay together. But Netflix gets its act together,

0:14:08.240 --> 0:14:16.840
<v Speaker 1>in which may possibly include letting read Hastings go. Might

0:14:16.960 --> 0:14:20.800
<v Speaker 1>include that because read Hastings I mean eleven was had

0:14:20.800 --> 0:14:25.320
<v Speaker 1>a series of missteps for Netflix, and Netflix lost a

0:14:25.400 --> 0:14:30.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of the support and uh an admiration in the

0:14:30.680 --> 0:14:34.040
<v Speaker 1>tech community starting in the summer of eleven when it

0:14:34.080 --> 0:14:38.120
<v Speaker 1>announced that it was changing the pricing plans for streaming

0:14:38.240 --> 0:14:42.760
<v Speaker 1>versus DVD plus streaming versus DVD only. And then then,

0:14:42.800 --> 0:14:45.600
<v Speaker 1>of course they alienated even more people when there was

0:14:45.600 --> 0:14:47.800
<v Speaker 1>the announcement that Netflix was going to split into two

0:14:47.800 --> 0:14:51.120
<v Speaker 1>different companies where one would just do DVD distribution and

0:14:51.200 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 1>the other one would do digital uh. And then when

0:14:55.000 --> 0:14:57.920
<v Speaker 1>they went back on that, they got even more derision,

0:14:58.040 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 1>mostly because they're like, well, if you're gonna make a stand,

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:03.400
<v Speaker 1>at least stick to it. You made a choice that

0:15:03.440 --> 0:15:05.040
<v Speaker 1>I hate, but then you went back to the choice

0:15:05.040 --> 0:15:07.560
<v Speaker 1>that I hated slightly less, so I hate you more

0:15:07.640 --> 0:15:10.880
<v Speaker 1>now I like, wait that what? So? Yeah, I think

0:15:10.920 --> 0:15:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Netflix has been battered around a lot. In some cases

0:15:13.440 --> 0:15:16.360
<v Speaker 1>it was you know, you understandable at least on the

0:15:16.400 --> 0:15:18.080
<v Speaker 1>part of the people who are upset, you can understand

0:15:18.120 --> 0:15:20.280
<v Speaker 1>why they're upset. In other cases, I think it might

0:15:20.280 --> 0:15:23.160
<v Speaker 1>be one of those like you just heap more and

0:15:23.200 --> 0:15:25.640
<v Speaker 1>more abuse on as it goes on. But I think

0:15:25.680 --> 0:15:28.320
<v Speaker 1>that the company has to do something in twelve to

0:15:28.400 --> 0:15:31.920
<v Speaker 1>recapture some of that good faith. That might mean Read

0:15:31.960 --> 0:15:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Hastings has to go. Although personally, you know, I have

0:15:36.160 --> 0:15:39.320
<v Speaker 1>no problem with the guy, so I don't. I don't know,

0:15:39.400 --> 0:15:41.120
<v Speaker 1>But I'm not a shareholder either. I'm not I'm not

0:15:41.160 --> 0:15:44.680
<v Speaker 1>a stakeholder in Netflix, so um, I'm not you know,

0:15:44.760 --> 0:15:46.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't have much to say about it on that sense,

0:15:46.800 --> 0:15:49.680
<v Speaker 1>so we'll see. Yeah. I think they actually made some

0:15:49.680 --> 0:15:52.520
<v Speaker 1>some decent decisions, but made them at a bad time.

0:15:52.560 --> 0:15:56.760
<v Speaker 1>They made drastic changes to the service when the public

0:15:56.840 --> 0:16:00.520
<v Speaker 1>was not ready to And Netflix is doing some stuff

0:16:00.640 --> 0:16:03.000
<v Speaker 1>that's similar to things we've seen Apple do in the past,

0:16:03.080 --> 0:16:06.000
<v Speaker 1>in the sense that in order to reach the world

0:16:06.360 --> 0:16:08.760
<v Speaker 1>that Netflix wants us to be in, that being a

0:16:08.760 --> 0:16:12.080
<v Speaker 1>world where digital distribution is the norm. In order to

0:16:12.120 --> 0:16:14.280
<v Speaker 1>reach that world, you have to make some pretty tough

0:16:14.400 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 1>sacrifices and force people's hands to adopt to the new model,

0:16:18.400 --> 0:16:21.160
<v Speaker 1>because if you don't know, everyone drags their feet and

0:16:21.200 --> 0:16:24.760
<v Speaker 1>progress is very slow. Apple does the same thing when

0:16:24.800 --> 0:16:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Apple sees the opportunity to support one future technology, but

0:16:29.040 --> 0:16:30.840
<v Speaker 1>it means that you have to wait for an older

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:34.680
<v Speaker 1>technology to die out. Apple just stop supporting the old technology,

0:16:34.800 --> 0:16:36.720
<v Speaker 1>and then they're like, well, here's the thing. We're forcing

0:16:36.760 --> 0:16:39.080
<v Speaker 1>you now to adopt this, and you might not like it,

0:16:39.160 --> 0:16:40.960
<v Speaker 1>you might kick and screen, but this, trust us, this

0:16:41.040 --> 0:16:45.000
<v Speaker 1>is better for you. And I think the problem is that, uh,

0:16:45.160 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Netflix did this and probably didn't do it as smoothly

0:16:48.560 --> 0:16:52.520
<v Speaker 1>as Apple did or as convincingly and so uh they

0:16:52.600 --> 0:16:56.720
<v Speaker 1>got a lot of of resistance. Plus Apple is a

0:16:56.760 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 1>smaller player in its own market for compute huoters anyway,

0:17:01.360 --> 0:17:05.959
<v Speaker 1>and uh, Netflix is the dominant um digital media digital

0:17:07.080 --> 0:17:09.760
<v Speaker 1>DVD really when you get down to it. Okay, next

0:17:09.760 --> 0:17:12.320
<v Speaker 1>one for you? Um, okay, I'll go with one of

0:17:12.320 --> 0:17:14.640
<v Speaker 1>my my vague ones. Actually this is probably my most

0:17:14.760 --> 0:17:19.560
<v Speaker 1>vague one. Um, Facebook will make some huge acquisition that

0:17:19.600 --> 0:17:24.960
<v Speaker 1>will all go huhh over. Um. I don't think it'll

0:17:24.960 --> 0:17:27.840
<v Speaker 1>be Yahoo, but it's gonna They're gonna acquire somebody and

0:17:27.880 --> 0:17:36.280
<v Speaker 1>you're going, but what what's that gonna do? Yeah, PepsiCo interesting?

0:17:38.560 --> 0:17:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Facebook the choice for the new generation. Can I get

0:17:40.720 --> 0:17:43.200
<v Speaker 1>a Facebook free? If you want a Facebook, you're gonna

0:17:43.200 --> 0:17:47.280
<v Speaker 1>have to pay for it? Facebook on my tab? Um,

0:17:47.440 --> 0:17:49.760
<v Speaker 1>So anyway, Yeah, I think I think they're gonna make

0:17:49.760 --> 0:17:52.199
<v Speaker 1>any I mean, it's not like, uh, you know, if

0:17:52.200 --> 0:17:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Google purchase Twitter, you go yeah, but I mean, you know,

0:17:55.640 --> 0:17:58.480
<v Speaker 1>social media and of course you know. But yeah, I

0:17:58.520 --> 0:18:01.399
<v Speaker 1>think Facebook's and it may not be somebody that's bad

0:18:01.840 --> 0:18:05.719
<v Speaker 1>for Facebook, but it's gonna be something that we're gonna go.

0:18:05.800 --> 0:18:08.879
<v Speaker 1>But why do you need that? Um, so you know

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a loose prediction. But you know, I wouldn't

0:18:11.320 --> 0:18:13.280
<v Speaker 1>have said if I had said Google would launch a

0:18:13.359 --> 0:18:17.000
<v Speaker 1>social network in I mean sort of along those lines,

0:18:17.080 --> 0:18:19.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like Facebook and Spotify, that was kind of surprising.

0:18:19.880 --> 0:18:22.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean you would imagine, like I mean, it wouldn't

0:18:22.040 --> 0:18:25.360
<v Speaker 1>have been hard to imagine Spotify incorporating the Facebook connect

0:18:25.440 --> 0:18:29.600
<v Speaker 1>as a way to connect to Spotify in the United States,

0:18:29.600 --> 0:18:32.639
<v Speaker 1>but to make it the way is kind of well,

0:18:32.680 --> 0:18:36.359
<v Speaker 1>that was unusual. Let's say, if if Facebook gobbled up Twitter,

0:18:36.560 --> 0:18:38.520
<v Speaker 1>that would be one thing. But I'm talking like Facebook

0:18:38.520 --> 0:18:42.600
<v Speaker 1>gobbles up Xerox? What why? Why on? Or how aboutould

0:18:42.640 --> 0:18:45.879
<v Speaker 1>you do that Facebook gobbles up like Hulu or something

0:18:46.000 --> 0:18:49.200
<v Speaker 1>something like that? Something unusual? It doesn't quite make sense,

0:18:49.359 --> 0:18:52.639
<v Speaker 1>all right? How about? Um, here's this one's kind of

0:18:52.640 --> 0:18:56.239
<v Speaker 1>a gimme in a way. This is the year is

0:18:56.280 --> 0:18:59.960
<v Speaker 1>the year at E three we will see the next

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:03.680
<v Speaker 1>generation consoles from Microsoft and Sonya. So we'll see the

0:19:04.320 --> 0:19:06.560
<v Speaker 1>predicted that two years ago and got my rear end

0:19:06.600 --> 0:19:09.200
<v Speaker 1>handed to me on a platter. Yeah, two years running. Actually,

0:19:10.040 --> 0:19:11.800
<v Speaker 1>because I think you I think you've predicted in two

0:19:11.800 --> 0:19:14.560
<v Speaker 1>thousand nine and in two thousand ten. I think two

0:19:14.600 --> 0:19:17.800
<v Speaker 1>thousand twelve is the year. Well, we've heard some rumors already.

0:19:18.240 --> 0:19:21.520
<v Speaker 1>We've heard rumors that the successor to the three sixty

0:19:21.600 --> 0:19:25.120
<v Speaker 1>will have connect like functionality built directly into the console,

0:19:25.520 --> 0:19:27.199
<v Speaker 1>and that it will be even more advanced to be

0:19:27.240 --> 0:19:29.560
<v Speaker 1>able to do things like to tell what mood you

0:19:29.600 --> 0:19:32.840
<v Speaker 1>are in, or even be able to read your lips. Yeah,

0:19:33.640 --> 0:19:35.960
<v Speaker 1>so there's that rumor. And I've also read rumors that

0:19:36.080 --> 0:19:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Sony's next UM console, the PlayStation four or whatever it

0:19:41.000 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 1>might be called, will also contain some sort of connect

0:19:43.840 --> 0:19:47.199
<v Speaker 1>functionality built into it. So there's a lot of a

0:19:47.240 --> 0:19:50.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of money being put towards this whole connect style

0:19:50.600 --> 0:19:55.000
<v Speaker 1>of gaming and interaction UH and and hopefully that will

0:19:55.160 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 1>mean that we're going to see even more UH innovative

0:19:58.080 --> 0:20:00.720
<v Speaker 1>games and gameplay modes. I think a lot of the

0:20:00.760 --> 0:20:03.399
<v Speaker 1>games that we've been seeing are just scratching the surface

0:20:03.440 --> 0:20:05.840
<v Speaker 1>because people are still figuring out how to best use

0:20:05.920 --> 0:20:08.960
<v Speaker 1>this interface, how to best leverage it. And that's that's

0:20:08.960 --> 0:20:12.879
<v Speaker 1>true whenever any new unit user interface comes out. You know,

0:20:12.960 --> 0:20:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the first few things that come out are kind of interesting,

0:20:15.800 --> 0:20:18.920
<v Speaker 1>but they're almost more like toys than anything really useful.

0:20:18.960 --> 0:20:22.240
<v Speaker 1>And then as the technology mature, as we start seeing

0:20:22.560 --> 0:20:27.680
<v Speaker 1>assuming that people adopted, we start seeing more compelling products.

0:20:27.760 --> 0:20:30.679
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I think at E three we're going to

0:20:30.720 --> 0:20:34.879
<v Speaker 1>see at least a preview of the next Microsoft console

0:20:34.920 --> 0:20:37.600
<v Speaker 1>and the next Sony console. It may may not come

0:20:37.640 --> 0:20:41.320
<v Speaker 1>out in twelve, but we'll at least get our first preview. Okay,

0:20:41.440 --> 0:20:46.280
<v Speaker 1>all right, Yeah, I have a several game uh predictions. Um,

0:20:46.320 --> 0:20:49.159
<v Speaker 1>I think the one that's closest to that, sticking with

0:20:49.200 --> 0:20:52.680
<v Speaker 1>my segway idea, would be the we u Um, which

0:20:52.760 --> 0:20:55.639
<v Speaker 1>is supposed to come out. Um, I think it's going

0:20:55.680 --> 0:20:58.160
<v Speaker 1>to be a minor hit. I don't think. I think

0:20:58.359 --> 0:21:00.440
<v Speaker 1>I think it will sell. The three DS is actually

0:21:00.480 --> 0:21:03.679
<v Speaker 1>their sales have been increasing recently, so that's started to

0:21:03.720 --> 0:21:06.160
<v Speaker 1>climb out of a slump. So maybe Nintendo is like

0:21:06.320 --> 0:21:09.679
<v Speaker 1>on the upswing of its dip. Yeah, because I'd say

0:21:09.680 --> 0:21:12.399
<v Speaker 1>in twenty eleven it did kind of start to falter

0:21:12.520 --> 0:21:16.199
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. Yeah, but but once Um Games for

0:21:16.240 --> 0:21:17.840
<v Speaker 1>the three D s Storty coming out, like the Mario

0:21:17.920 --> 0:21:20.159
<v Speaker 1>Games Story coming out for the three DS, the sales

0:21:20.200 --> 0:21:24.760
<v Speaker 1>started to improve. So again Nintendo banking on that intellectual

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:27.280
<v Speaker 1>property that has served them so well in the past.

0:21:27.680 --> 0:21:29.960
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, maybe that We You would also have an

0:21:29.960 --> 0:21:33.840
<v Speaker 1>initial success, especially if they're able to target not just

0:21:33.920 --> 0:21:38.760
<v Speaker 1>the casual gamers, but the loyal like hard more hardcore gamers,

0:21:38.800 --> 0:21:40.520
<v Speaker 1>not like hardcore in the sense of I need to

0:21:40.920 --> 0:21:43.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, there has to be body limbs flying all

0:21:43.080 --> 0:21:45.239
<v Speaker 1>over the screen for me to buy a game, but

0:21:45.320 --> 0:21:47.800
<v Speaker 1>that you know, they're the dedicated gamers, the people who

0:21:48.080 --> 0:21:50.520
<v Speaker 1>who will spend a lot of time and money that

0:21:50.560 --> 0:21:52.239
<v Speaker 1>will go out, they'll buy the latest games as they

0:21:52.240 --> 0:21:54.680
<v Speaker 1>come out. Yeah, I think I think the The We

0:21:54.880 --> 0:21:57.399
<v Speaker 1>You will be a hit among a lot of those people.

0:21:57.520 --> 0:22:00.480
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think it's gonna catch on as quickly

0:22:00.640 --> 0:22:03.240
<v Speaker 1>as The We itself did when it was released. I

0:22:03.280 --> 0:22:05.760
<v Speaker 1>don't think there's gonna be the same line. I think

0:22:05.800 --> 0:22:08.600
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be sort of a similar at adoption rate

0:22:09.080 --> 0:22:12.440
<v Speaker 1>as the three D S where people go, yeah, okay,

0:22:12.560 --> 0:22:14.639
<v Speaker 1>but it's we don't really have to have that, And

0:22:14.680 --> 0:22:17.640
<v Speaker 1>it's rumored to be more expensive than We was when

0:22:17.680 --> 0:22:21.320
<v Speaker 1>it launched. So that may also especially if if again,

0:22:21.359 --> 0:22:24.480
<v Speaker 1>if that economic uncertainty also means that there's a downturn

0:22:24.680 --> 0:22:27.280
<v Speaker 1>in general, then people may be more careful with their

0:22:27.280 --> 0:22:30.120
<v Speaker 1>money and there may be less consumer spending. And that's

0:22:30.119 --> 0:22:31.880
<v Speaker 1>why I'm saying a lot of the things I'm predicting

0:22:32.600 --> 0:22:37.080
<v Speaker 1>hinge on the economy because in some cases, companies may say,

0:22:37.080 --> 0:22:39.600
<v Speaker 1>you know what, We're gonna hold off introducing this product

0:22:39.600 --> 0:22:43.679
<v Speaker 1>line until and see if maybe the economic outlook is

0:22:43.720 --> 0:22:48.439
<v Speaker 1>better than that. That sometimes happens. Um. Okay, So sticking

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:54.879
<v Speaker 1>with Nintendo, here's another crazy prediction, this one. I I

0:22:55.000 --> 0:22:57.560
<v Speaker 1>go back and forth on this one. Okay, So Nintendo

0:22:57.640 --> 0:23:02.680
<v Speaker 1>begins to develop a smartphone. Wow. So the idea that

0:23:02.800 --> 0:23:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Nintendo decides to get into this, uh, take the next

0:23:06.480 --> 0:23:09.680
<v Speaker 1>plunge and go into the smartphone realm. Either they partner

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:13.439
<v Speaker 1>with someone where a very specific partner is going to

0:23:13.480 --> 0:23:18.880
<v Speaker 1>have access to some of Nintendo's intellectual properties, or they

0:23:18.880 --> 0:23:21.879
<v Speaker 1>specifically go into the business of developing a smartphone that

0:23:22.000 --> 0:23:25.880
<v Speaker 1>is branded with the Nintendo where you can buy Nintendo

0:23:25.960 --> 0:23:30.600
<v Speaker 1>games through the phone's ecosystem, and that it is essentially

0:23:30.600 --> 0:23:34.080
<v Speaker 1>the next step in their handheld gaming market, because that's

0:23:34.119 --> 0:23:37.080
<v Speaker 1>where handheld gaming is right now, is in the smartphone market.

0:23:37.119 --> 0:23:39.919
<v Speaker 1>And if you don't if you don't join that, then

0:23:39.920 --> 0:23:41.600
<v Speaker 1>you might as well just get out of that industry

0:23:42.160 --> 0:23:46.000
<v Speaker 1>the handheld gaming units are. It's harder and harder to

0:23:46.000 --> 0:23:49.680
<v Speaker 1>sell one of those that doesn't have a phone in it. Okay, well,

0:23:49.720 --> 0:23:52.920
<v Speaker 1>that's actually, uh in contrast with what you were saying

0:23:52.960 --> 0:23:55.360
<v Speaker 1>a moment ago, and but in more in line with that,

0:23:55.680 --> 0:23:58.000
<v Speaker 1>I had predicted that Nintendo is going to need to

0:23:58.040 --> 0:24:00.760
<v Speaker 1>reduce the price that the three D s again. And

0:24:00.800 --> 0:24:03.639
<v Speaker 1>it might. It might even. I mean, the sales that

0:24:03.720 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of bounced up might very well be like end

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:09.199
<v Speaker 1>of the year Christmas present kind of thing. Right, So

0:24:09.280 --> 0:24:11.359
<v Speaker 1>those sales figures I mean to say, not sales like

0:24:11.400 --> 0:24:14.560
<v Speaker 1>sales prices, but sales figures. Um, it may not be

0:24:14.880 --> 0:24:19.040
<v Speaker 1>that the three DS gets widespread adoption like the other

0:24:19.160 --> 0:24:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Nintendo handheld systems until we see at another price drop.

0:24:23.040 --> 0:24:26.120
<v Speaker 1>It was dramatic to see a price drop happened within

0:24:26.160 --> 0:24:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the first half year of the three ys being on

0:24:28.880 --> 0:24:31.640
<v Speaker 1>the shelves. I have another one of those coming up

0:24:31.760 --> 0:24:33.960
<v Speaker 1>that's very similar to that. Okay, well, I have one

0:24:34.000 --> 0:24:36.560
<v Speaker 1>that this is a question really not so much a prediction,

0:24:36.600 --> 0:24:39.000
<v Speaker 1>because there's actually a rumor out right now as we

0:24:39.040 --> 0:24:43.320
<v Speaker 1>record this, which is again early December. There's a rumor

0:24:43.600 --> 0:24:46.040
<v Speaker 1>and it's been going around for a while, but I've

0:24:46.080 --> 0:24:49.920
<v Speaker 1>just seen it get traction recently that the iPad three

0:24:50.560 --> 0:24:52.919
<v Speaker 1>or the successor to the iPad two, whatever it might

0:24:52.920 --> 0:24:55.720
<v Speaker 1>be called, if it's had two plus or whatever two

0:24:55.960 --> 0:25:00.600
<v Speaker 1>s that it will have a three D screen so

0:25:00.640 --> 0:25:02.440
<v Speaker 1>that you'll be able to look at stuff in three D.

0:25:02.880 --> 0:25:06.400
<v Speaker 1>That is the rumor. Here's my prediction. I don't think

0:25:06.400 --> 0:25:10.600
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna happen. And here's here's my reasoning why I

0:25:10.600 --> 0:25:13.960
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's gonna happen. Uh, it's it's actually got

0:25:14.000 --> 0:25:18.520
<v Speaker 1>multiple levels to it. One is that the three D thing,

0:25:18.680 --> 0:25:23.320
<v Speaker 1>it's an experience that doesn't it's not universal, okay, Like

0:25:23.400 --> 0:25:26.120
<v Speaker 1>there are people who have vision issues or whatever who

0:25:26.240 --> 0:25:30.119
<v Speaker 1>cannot see the three D images. Uh, it's very easy

0:25:30.160 --> 0:25:32.840
<v Speaker 1>to get it wrong so that you might you know,

0:25:32.920 --> 0:25:35.000
<v Speaker 1>you if you have to design a screen for someone

0:25:35.040 --> 0:25:36.520
<v Speaker 1>and you have to make it adjustable, because if you

0:25:36.560 --> 0:25:38.520
<v Speaker 1>don't make it adjustable, if you make it try and

0:25:38.560 --> 0:25:40.080
<v Speaker 1>make it one size fits all, they're gonna be a

0:25:40.119 --> 0:25:42.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of people where it's not going to be the

0:25:42.800 --> 0:25:45.800
<v Speaker 1>best effects because our eyes are space differently, you know,

0:25:46.440 --> 0:25:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Like my eyes are not as far apart as someone

0:25:49.080 --> 0:25:52.920
<v Speaker 1>else's eyes, and someone else's eyes might be um closer

0:25:52.920 --> 0:25:55.679
<v Speaker 1>together than my eyes are, and that affects how we

0:25:55.720 --> 0:25:58.280
<v Speaker 1>would see a screen that has three D projection in

0:25:58.320 --> 0:26:01.679
<v Speaker 1>it um. So because of that, Apple would have to

0:26:01.680 --> 0:26:05.679
<v Speaker 1>design some sort of of ability to like the three ds,

0:26:05.760 --> 0:26:08.120
<v Speaker 1>to adjust the level of three D, which you could

0:26:08.119 --> 0:26:10.879
<v Speaker 1>get it just right without giving yourself a migraine trying

0:26:10.880 --> 0:26:13.840
<v Speaker 1>to stare at this thing. But ultimately, the number one

0:26:13.920 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 1>thing that I think suggests that a three D screen

0:26:16.880 --> 0:26:20.240
<v Speaker 1>is not a good idea for an iPad is the interface.

0:26:20.880 --> 0:26:24.159
<v Speaker 1>The interface is a touch screen interface. Why would you

0:26:24.200 --> 0:26:28.280
<v Speaker 1>create a that's a two dimensional interface? Right, Yeah, that's true.

0:26:28.280 --> 0:26:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Why would you have a two dimensional interface to interact

0:26:30.520 --> 0:26:34.159
<v Speaker 1>with a three dimensional screen? Yeah, you would need like

0:26:34.200 --> 0:26:37.080
<v Speaker 1>an iPad cube. Yeah, it doesn't make any sense. Even

0:26:37.119 --> 0:26:39.040
<v Speaker 1>if you were to include the camera so that the

0:26:39.080 --> 0:26:41.800
<v Speaker 1>camera sees you, you would have to figure out how

0:26:41.840 --> 0:26:45.520
<v Speaker 1>to teach the processor to understand depth, and you would

0:26:45.520 --> 0:26:47.639
<v Speaker 1>have to learn the depth. So like, if I have

0:26:47.720 --> 0:26:52.359
<v Speaker 1>a three dimensional virtual environment, then that means I can

0:26:52.480 --> 0:26:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I can stack data in lots of different ways. But

0:26:56.560 --> 0:26:58.840
<v Speaker 1>if my interface is still a touch screen, I can

0:26:58.880 --> 0:27:01.719
<v Speaker 1>effectively only put it horizontally in vertically. I can't go

0:27:01.880 --> 0:27:04.560
<v Speaker 1>deep because there's no way to select that data. I

0:27:04.600 --> 0:27:07.120
<v Speaker 1>always se like something that's in the background versus the foreground.

0:27:07.160 --> 0:27:10.280
<v Speaker 1>In that case, UM, I think it's just too clunky.

0:27:10.320 --> 0:27:13.080
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't make sense. The only way it would make

0:27:13.119 --> 0:27:16.080
<v Speaker 1>sense is if you were just doing it for the

0:27:16.119 --> 0:27:19.240
<v Speaker 1>effect of watching media. So if you wanted to watch

0:27:19.280 --> 0:27:22.160
<v Speaker 1>a three D movie on your iPad, I think that

0:27:22.160 --> 0:27:26.240
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't make sense financially to put that kind of

0:27:26.640 --> 0:27:31.720
<v Speaker 1>uh investment in for something that's so limited and functionality.

0:27:32.359 --> 0:27:34.880
<v Speaker 1>So it may very well turn out that I'm wrong,

0:27:34.920 --> 0:27:37.200
<v Speaker 1>and maybe an Apple, of course is very good at

0:27:37.280 --> 0:27:40.240
<v Speaker 1>at designing things that that work in ways I did

0:27:40.280 --> 0:27:43.800
<v Speaker 1>not anticipate. I mean, the iPad is the perfect example

0:27:43.840 --> 0:27:47.199
<v Speaker 1>of that. But based upon what I know about three

0:27:47.280 --> 0:27:50.600
<v Speaker 1>D tech, and especially glasses free three D tech, and

0:27:50.760 --> 0:27:54.320
<v Speaker 1>based upon the interface that the iPad uses, I just

0:27:54.359 --> 0:27:58.200
<v Speaker 1>don't see it being a thing. So I'm gonna say

0:27:58.200 --> 0:28:00.560
<v Speaker 1>that the iPad three or two S or whatever it's

0:28:00.560 --> 0:28:03.640
<v Speaker 1>going to be called will not have a glasses free

0:28:03.680 --> 0:28:07.919
<v Speaker 1>three D screen included. Yeah. Now, I have seen additional

0:28:08.000 --> 0:28:14.920
<v Speaker 1>rumors that the screen will have a higher resolution display.

0:28:15.080 --> 0:28:17.679
<v Speaker 1>It's sort of a gimme, I think, um people have

0:28:17.760 --> 0:28:20.159
<v Speaker 1>been wanting that since the first iPad. As soon as

0:28:20.200 --> 0:28:22.520
<v Speaker 1>I Pad iPhone four came out with the retina display,

0:28:22.560 --> 0:28:24.760
<v Speaker 1>people were hoping that the iPad two would support the

0:28:24.760 --> 0:28:27.200
<v Speaker 1>same thing. Now, of course it did not, but now

0:28:27.240 --> 0:28:29.840
<v Speaker 1>there are hopes that the next generation iPad will have

0:28:29.880 --> 0:28:33.640
<v Speaker 1>a retina display. Now, over the past couple of years,

0:28:33.720 --> 0:28:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Jonavan has made a couple of predictions that you know

0:28:36.760 --> 0:28:38.560
<v Speaker 1>where he was really going out on a limb and

0:28:38.880 --> 0:28:42.120
<v Speaker 1>and uh turn out, you know, remember the iPad, the

0:28:42.200 --> 0:28:45.640
<v Speaker 1>big failure. It was going to be uh so, so anyway,

0:28:46.040 --> 0:28:48.480
<v Speaker 1>so anyway, I decided to go ahead and and and

0:28:48.640 --> 0:28:52.800
<v Speaker 1>do one of my own where this this I could

0:28:52.920 --> 0:28:55.560
<v Speaker 1>very easily get t boned on this one. There have

0:28:55.560 --> 0:28:59.600
<v Speaker 1>been rumors that Apple is coming out with televisions, and

0:29:00.400 --> 0:29:02.440
<v Speaker 1>I think I do think that's eventually going to happen.

0:29:02.720 --> 0:29:05.840
<v Speaker 1>I think they're moving into compete with people like Sony

0:29:05.880 --> 0:29:08.680
<v Speaker 1>and Samsung and LG. But I don't think you're gonna

0:29:08.720 --> 0:29:12.760
<v Speaker 1>see the first ones come out in Okay, I disagree. Yeah,

0:29:13.120 --> 0:29:14.960
<v Speaker 1>he's going to come out with its first Apple TV

0:29:15.040 --> 0:29:18.320
<v Speaker 1>in twelve. Yeah, a real Apple TV, an Apple TV,

0:29:18.400 --> 0:29:21.320
<v Speaker 1>which not exists. But it's not an actual television with

0:29:21.400 --> 0:29:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Apple functionality built into it, not a set top box,

0:29:24.840 --> 0:29:27.720
<v Speaker 1>It's built into the television unit itself. So I say

0:29:27.960 --> 0:29:31.320
<v Speaker 1>that comes out. That was one of my predictions. Awesome.

0:29:31.440 --> 0:29:34.280
<v Speaker 1>So uh, we very rarely do that, since we work

0:29:34.320 --> 0:29:38.640
<v Speaker 1>independently on I don't necessarily feel strongly about it. Again,

0:29:38.760 --> 0:29:42.040
<v Speaker 1>but I'm willing. I'm I'm willing to put my neck

0:29:42.040 --> 0:29:44.680
<v Speaker 1>out on that one. So uh yeah, one of us

0:29:44.680 --> 0:29:46.160
<v Speaker 1>will be right, one of us will be wrong, which

0:29:46.160 --> 0:29:48.080
<v Speaker 1>means that one of us will get a blender and

0:29:48.080 --> 0:29:53.680
<v Speaker 1>the other one will get a puppy. All right? Then? Yeah, um,

0:29:53.720 --> 0:29:58.000
<v Speaker 1>so was that was that your prediction there? Or well,

0:29:58.000 --> 0:30:00.560
<v Speaker 1>how many more do you have left? U don't I

0:30:00.640 --> 0:30:02.520
<v Speaker 1>have a handful. I've got a few as well, so

0:30:02.560 --> 0:30:04.160
<v Speaker 1>we can we can keep going back and forth. Sort

0:30:04.160 --> 0:30:07.360
<v Speaker 1>of a related thing. Um, I I predict that new

0:30:07.440 --> 0:30:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Google TV products will be coming out and no one

0:30:11.840 --> 0:30:16.600
<v Speaker 1>will care. Yeah, I I have no disagreement there. I

0:30:16.600 --> 0:30:20.440
<v Speaker 1>think Google TV. I think it launched too early. It

0:30:20.560 --> 0:30:23.160
<v Speaker 1>launched too early with not enough features, and so it

0:30:23.240 --> 0:30:26.000
<v Speaker 1>got a very kind of lackluster response and it's going

0:30:26.040 --> 0:30:30.840
<v Speaker 1>to be really difficult to fight that off. Even if

0:30:30.840 --> 0:30:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Google comes out with a truly compelling product to fight

0:30:33.960 --> 0:30:37.240
<v Speaker 1>off the first impression people had that Google Television was

0:30:37.320 --> 0:30:41.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of a well, this isn't what I was expecting.

0:30:41.360 --> 0:30:44.320
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't feel like it's what I was promised. I

0:30:44.360 --> 0:30:47.000
<v Speaker 1>think even if Google comes out with the perfect product now,

0:30:47.040 --> 0:30:49.520
<v Speaker 1>it would be an uphill battle because people already have

0:30:49.600 --> 0:30:52.760
<v Speaker 1>that impression that's just not what they want. And I

0:30:52.800 --> 0:30:55.760
<v Speaker 1>think I think these products also are sort of like DVRs.

0:30:55.920 --> 0:30:59.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, people never really rushed out to buy themselves

0:30:59.320 --> 0:31:01.440
<v Speaker 1>a TVO or other stuff, but I mean people have

0:31:01.480 --> 0:31:04.160
<v Speaker 1>been adopting them, but it's sort of that under their radar.

0:31:04.840 --> 0:31:07.320
<v Speaker 1>It's definitely like the perfect example of the long tail.

0:31:07.840 --> 0:31:09.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's really a long tail product where you'd

0:31:09.800 --> 0:31:12.680
<v Speaker 1>have a few early adopters and their word of mouth

0:31:12.760 --> 0:31:16.760
<v Speaker 1>was enough to perpetuate sales, but the sales weren't huge

0:31:16.880 --> 0:31:19.520
<v Speaker 1>all in a and they weren't front loaded. They were

0:31:19.520 --> 0:31:22.640
<v Speaker 1>just kind of spread out. Um, all right, well here's

0:31:22.640 --> 0:31:26.640
<v Speaker 1>one for me. At least one of the big daily

0:31:26.800 --> 0:31:30.600
<v Speaker 1>deal sites will go under at least one. So these

0:31:30.600 --> 0:31:34.440
<v Speaker 1>are things like living social group on scout Bob. Google

0:31:34.480 --> 0:31:38.400
<v Speaker 1>has its own version Google deals, you know, so we're

0:31:38.400 --> 0:31:42.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna I think at least one of those is gonna

0:31:42.440 --> 0:31:45.840
<v Speaker 1>collapse because there's so the markets flooded, there's so many

0:31:45.920 --> 0:31:49.000
<v Speaker 1>of them that I don't think it can sustain all

0:31:49.040 --> 0:31:56.040
<v Speaker 1>of them together. Okay, UM, I have one. Apple will

0:31:56.160 --> 0:32:01.080
<v Speaker 1>not announce NFC for an iPhone. We won't have near

0:32:01.120 --> 0:32:04.280
<v Speaker 1>field communications. I think I think it's probable that Google

0:32:04.320 --> 0:32:07.240
<v Speaker 1>wallet will slowly grow sort of the same thing. Is

0:32:07.280 --> 0:32:08.960
<v Speaker 1>that what we were just talking about. I just don't

0:32:09.000 --> 0:32:12.200
<v Speaker 1>think people care right now here in the United States

0:32:12.240 --> 0:32:15.040
<v Speaker 1>about near field communication, and I don't think the iPhone.

0:32:15.120 --> 0:32:16.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't think Apple is going to rush out to

0:32:16.800 --> 0:32:20.080
<v Speaker 1>UH to meet Google on that field of battle. Yet.

0:32:20.240 --> 0:32:22.440
<v Speaker 1>I think part of it is that more and more

0:32:23.680 --> 0:32:26.440
<v Speaker 1>UH emphasis in the tech world anyway, not necessarily on

0:32:26.480 --> 0:32:29.160
<v Speaker 1>the individual consumer, but in the tech world is on

0:32:30.200 --> 0:32:34.360
<v Speaker 1>UH distribution centers like Amazon. So it's going further away

0:32:34.400 --> 0:32:37.360
<v Speaker 1>from the point of sale retail shops in the first place.

0:32:37.400 --> 0:32:41.320
<v Speaker 1>So making that point of sale thing easier doesn't really

0:32:42.080 --> 0:32:44.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people that there's no validity to that

0:32:44.200 --> 0:32:46.600
<v Speaker 1>because that's not their shopping experience, or at least in

0:32:46.640 --> 0:32:49.360
<v Speaker 1>the tech world, that's how it seems now like again

0:32:49.600 --> 0:32:52.240
<v Speaker 1>from the average consumer who is going out and shopping

0:32:52.240 --> 0:32:54.560
<v Speaker 1>for Christmas presents, Maybe that's not the case. Maybe there

0:32:54.560 --> 0:32:56.600
<v Speaker 1>are the person who hits those brick and border stores

0:32:56.600 --> 0:32:58.560
<v Speaker 1>over and over again, in which case they might really

0:32:58.600 --> 0:33:04.640
<v Speaker 1>welcome near field community patients solutions. How about Microsoft Windows

0:33:04.680 --> 0:33:09.720
<v Speaker 1>tablets will debut to modest results, like they're not gonna

0:33:09.880 --> 0:33:11.560
<v Speaker 1>They're not gonna take a big chunk out of the

0:33:11.600 --> 0:33:17.520
<v Speaker 1>tablet market. I think I think I the the iPad

0:33:17.560 --> 0:33:20.560
<v Speaker 1>will still be firmly in the lead. I think Android

0:33:20.600 --> 0:33:25.120
<v Speaker 1>will be in second and Windows might take third. They

0:33:25.160 --> 0:33:27.600
<v Speaker 1>might actually overtake all those touch pads that were sold

0:33:29.520 --> 0:33:35.280
<v Speaker 1>in late yea. Um. Actually I had written this down

0:33:35.360 --> 0:33:37.680
<v Speaker 1>on the Predictions episode and I didn't move it over

0:33:37.720 --> 0:33:41.680
<v Speaker 1>to my predictions list for I think HP is going

0:33:41.840 --> 0:33:44.520
<v Speaker 1>to do something useful with web os. I think it

0:33:44.640 --> 0:33:47.080
<v Speaker 1>may actually even hang onto it. So you think they're

0:33:47.120 --> 0:33:52.360
<v Speaker 1>reversing what uh Leo said back in uh the former

0:33:52.440 --> 0:33:55.840
<v Speaker 1>CEO of HP said back in the summer of eleven,

0:33:55.920 --> 0:33:58.920
<v Speaker 1>where HP was supposedly going to get out of the

0:33:58.920 --> 0:34:04.280
<v Speaker 1>consumer computer business as well as halt developing webOS. And

0:34:04.360 --> 0:34:09.680
<v Speaker 1>now both of those statements seem to be Um, well,

0:34:09.680 --> 0:34:11.560
<v Speaker 1>it seemed to be in question. Yeah, now that the

0:34:11.560 --> 0:34:16.040
<v Speaker 1>announcement may come by the end of but I think

0:34:16.080 --> 0:34:17.759
<v Speaker 1>I think they're going to real Well, a lot of

0:34:17.760 --> 0:34:21.600
<v Speaker 1>people said what are you doing? Why are you doing that? Um?

0:34:21.640 --> 0:34:24.359
<v Speaker 1>And I do think although the tablets weren't selling before

0:34:24.360 --> 0:34:27.759
<v Speaker 1>the discounts, um, I think the price had more to

0:34:27.800 --> 0:34:31.120
<v Speaker 1>do that with that than the webOS part. Okay, So

0:34:31.280 --> 0:34:35.600
<v Speaker 1>I think is going to be the swan song for

0:34:35.719 --> 0:34:39.880
<v Speaker 1>the compact disc mhm. I think that we're going to

0:34:39.960 --> 0:34:45.280
<v Speaker 1>see lots of companies cut way back on manufacturing discs

0:34:45.320 --> 0:34:49.239
<v Speaker 1>and start to rely more on digital distribution as their

0:34:49.320 --> 0:34:53.400
<v Speaker 1>primary means of getting music out to customers for DVDs

0:34:53.520 --> 0:34:56.680
<v Speaker 1>or just CDs. CDs. I think DVD still have a

0:34:56.719 --> 0:35:00.640
<v Speaker 1>little way to go, mostly because, um, it's a lot

0:35:00.760 --> 0:35:03.160
<v Speaker 1>It's still easier for someone to download a CD than

0:35:03.200 --> 0:35:06.000
<v Speaker 1>it is for them to You can stream movies pretty easily.

0:35:06.640 --> 0:35:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Downloading a film the requires that you have more space

0:35:10.200 --> 0:35:12.640
<v Speaker 1>and a faster connection to do it in a way

0:35:12.680 --> 0:35:15.040
<v Speaker 1>that has a good experience for the consumers. So I

0:35:15.040 --> 0:35:17.440
<v Speaker 1>think I think we're not quite there yet. I mean,

0:35:17.520 --> 0:35:20.319
<v Speaker 1>most most of our listeners are probably there, like most

0:35:20.320 --> 0:35:22.479
<v Speaker 1>of our listeners are probably in the group of people

0:35:22.520 --> 0:35:26.760
<v Speaker 1>who have the kind of connections and and equipment where

0:35:27.080 --> 0:35:29.480
<v Speaker 1>downloading a film wouldn't be a huge deal. But for

0:35:29.880 --> 0:35:33.640
<v Speaker 1>the vast majority of people out there, the big audience

0:35:33.640 --> 0:35:35.200
<v Speaker 1>that you have to aim for because that's where your

0:35:35.200 --> 0:35:37.200
<v Speaker 1>money is going to be. I don't think they're there yet,

0:35:37.239 --> 0:35:39.319
<v Speaker 1>but they are there as far as CD sales go,

0:35:39.480 --> 0:35:43.640
<v Speaker 1>So I think CDs aren't going to disappear, but I

0:35:43.640 --> 0:35:47.120
<v Speaker 1>think they're going to be more rare, and that you'll

0:35:47.280 --> 0:35:50.120
<v Speaker 1>more likely have to buy things through some sort of

0:35:50.160 --> 0:35:54.680
<v Speaker 1>digital distribution, either iTunes or Amazon or directly from whatever

0:35:54.719 --> 0:35:57.800
<v Speaker 1>the music label is, or even the band in some cases,

0:35:57.840 --> 0:36:00.279
<v Speaker 1>because we may we may. This may be the getting

0:36:00.280 --> 0:36:04.319
<v Speaker 1>of the end for the major labels as we recognize

0:36:04.360 --> 0:36:07.840
<v Speaker 1>them now. They'll still, I think, be around. I just

0:36:07.880 --> 0:36:12.640
<v Speaker 1>don't think that they'll be as big a power player

0:36:12.800 --> 0:36:18.640
<v Speaker 1>as they were in the decades past. Um. Since this

0:36:18.719 --> 0:36:21.040
<v Speaker 1>is I don't really have a good segue for this one,

0:36:21.080 --> 0:36:25.080
<v Speaker 1>so I'll throw out my left field thing. I think

0:36:25.200 --> 0:36:30.120
<v Speaker 1>that Canonical, the manufacturers of uh several different flavors of

0:36:30.239 --> 0:36:34.640
<v Speaker 1>lenox um, will ditch Unity as the main interface for

0:36:34.680 --> 0:36:38.760
<v Speaker 1>a Buntu because it has gone over like the biggest

0:36:38.800 --> 0:36:42.279
<v Speaker 1>lead balloon of all lead balloons. Yeah, uh yeah, there's

0:36:42.280 --> 0:36:44.520
<v Speaker 1>not a lot of love for it. I think they

0:36:44.560 --> 0:36:47.080
<v Speaker 1>may try to refurbish it, but I think they may

0:36:47.880 --> 0:36:52.560
<v Speaker 1>go back to gnome as the main gnome and clature

0:36:52.640 --> 0:36:55.600
<v Speaker 1>for for it. Um. Of course, it's easy. It's easy

0:36:55.680 --> 0:36:58.239
<v Speaker 1>enough to to choose it. And that's something that I

0:36:58.280 --> 0:37:02.480
<v Speaker 1>read recently in a in a critique of the new interface. Um.

0:37:02.520 --> 0:37:05.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's it's not like anybody has to stick

0:37:05.760 --> 0:37:08.520
<v Speaker 1>with Unity. You can go with any number of other

0:37:08.840 --> 0:37:12.680
<v Speaker 1>interfaces pretty easily. Um. But yeah, there's there's been so

0:37:12.800 --> 0:37:15.799
<v Speaker 1>much uh complaint about it. I think that they're gonna

0:37:15.880 --> 0:37:18.680
<v Speaker 1>go with something else or or come, you know, maybe

0:37:18.680 --> 0:37:22.160
<v Speaker 1>completely overhaul. But I'm gonna say for the official prediction

0:37:22.160 --> 0:37:25.440
<v Speaker 1>that they're gonna ditch it. Um. So what's next? I

0:37:25.520 --> 0:37:28.960
<v Speaker 1>only have one left out of my official predictions unless

0:37:29.000 --> 0:37:32.799
<v Speaker 1>I think of some while we're talking, um, and this one. Uh,

0:37:33.040 --> 0:37:35.239
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's such a lame one. I don't know

0:37:35.280 --> 0:37:37.719
<v Speaker 1>why it chose this as the last one. Uh. But

0:37:38.160 --> 0:37:42.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, we've got another election year coming up. I

0:37:42.440 --> 0:37:45.239
<v Speaker 1>think that tech is going to play the biggest role

0:37:45.400 --> 0:37:49.600
<v Speaker 1>ever in election history this year I want to give

0:37:49.880 --> 0:37:51.799
<v Speaker 1>I know, that's what I said. It was lame. I

0:37:51.880 --> 0:37:53.439
<v Speaker 1>was like, you know, the more I wrote this down,

0:37:53.440 --> 0:37:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the more I'm like, and water is wet, so it

0:37:57.120 --> 0:37:59.440
<v Speaker 1>already has. So you know what, I'm not gonna I'm

0:37:59.480 --> 0:38:01.520
<v Speaker 1>not gonna really even next year, I'm not going to

0:38:01.719 --> 0:38:03.920
<v Speaker 1>count that. I mean, normally I would win at least

0:38:03.920 --> 0:38:05.920
<v Speaker 1>a donkey or an elephant out of that one. But

0:38:06.120 --> 0:38:08.719
<v Speaker 1>I think, uh, I think that one is such a

0:38:08.760 --> 0:38:12.520
<v Speaker 1>GIMMI that you know, people who people who would be

0:38:12.640 --> 0:38:15.399
<v Speaker 1>visiting our planet for the first time would be able

0:38:15.440 --> 0:38:18.240
<v Speaker 1>to tell you that within five minutes of note looking around.

0:38:18.320 --> 0:38:22.759
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, okay, I have well I have several, but

0:38:22.880 --> 0:38:25.759
<v Speaker 1>a couple of them I'm just gonna ditch. Um. I

0:38:25.840 --> 0:38:28.560
<v Speaker 1>have four left. I think that um that I want

0:38:28.560 --> 0:38:31.520
<v Speaker 1>to keep going with. One is that now, keeping in

0:38:31.560 --> 0:38:33.400
<v Speaker 1>mind this, it's been out for a short time. So

0:38:33.440 --> 0:38:36.120
<v Speaker 1>even though it released in I'm gonna say that in

0:38:36.800 --> 0:38:39.680
<v Speaker 1>the kindle fire will be a hit. I think it's

0:38:39.719 --> 0:38:42.239
<v Speaker 1>I think it's gonna do really well over the next year.

0:38:42.600 --> 0:38:45.840
<v Speaker 1>So you're you're calling it like a true success, Like

0:38:45.880 --> 0:38:49.640
<v Speaker 1>a true success, I think it might be the first. Um,

0:38:50.040 --> 0:38:51.680
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you. I think it might be the

0:38:51.760 --> 0:38:56.640
<v Speaker 1>first non iPad to truly succeed in the market. I mean,

0:38:56.640 --> 0:38:59.120
<v Speaker 1>we've got lots of other non iPad tablets out there,

0:38:59.120 --> 0:39:03.280
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think any of them have been hailed

0:39:03.320 --> 0:39:11.520
<v Speaker 1>as a true success. And HPS touchpad did. Okay, I

0:39:11.560 --> 0:39:13.879
<v Speaker 1>don't count. You don't count that that's a fluke because

0:39:13.920 --> 0:39:17.200
<v Speaker 1>of the pricing. That doesn't mean people would have bought

0:39:17.200 --> 0:39:19.480
<v Speaker 1>anything and a hundred dollars if it were in a

0:39:19.480 --> 0:39:21.239
<v Speaker 1>tablet for probably like you know, if it was a

0:39:21.280 --> 0:39:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Window seven tablet for a hundred bucks, that probably would

0:39:24.560 --> 0:39:28.360
<v Speaker 1>have gone out and rushed out and bought those. Um.

0:39:28.719 --> 0:39:31.200
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I think that the the the Kindle Fire

0:39:31.280 --> 0:39:35.320
<v Speaker 1>has the potential to be the the number two tablet.

0:39:35.920 --> 0:39:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Like if you're talking about specific models, uh, because again,

0:39:39.400 --> 0:39:43.359
<v Speaker 1>the Android tablet space is so diverse that it's hard

0:39:43.400 --> 0:39:46.720
<v Speaker 1>for any one kind of tablet to get true success

0:39:46.719 --> 0:39:48.560
<v Speaker 1>in that field because there's just so many different ones,

0:39:48.880 --> 0:39:51.759
<v Speaker 1>and you know, it requires that the consumer be informed

0:39:51.800 --> 0:39:54.399
<v Speaker 1>about his or her choice. You know, when you go

0:39:55.200 --> 0:39:57.400
<v Speaker 1>if you just know what a tablet is and you

0:39:57.400 --> 0:39:59.600
<v Speaker 1>know what Android is, but you don't know anything Beyond that,

0:39:59.680 --> 0:40:02.160
<v Speaker 1>going into a store and shopping for Android tablets is

0:40:02.320 --> 0:40:05.600
<v Speaker 1>maddening because there's so many different kinds and you don't

0:40:05.600 --> 0:40:10.200
<v Speaker 1>necessarily know which ones are really gonna be good versus um,

0:40:10.280 --> 0:40:12.640
<v Speaker 1>some that are just going to be slow and unresponsive

0:40:12.680 --> 0:40:16.680
<v Speaker 1>and and maybe running Android one point six, you know,

0:40:17.719 --> 0:40:21.840
<v Speaker 1>so um And related to that, I say that, and

0:40:21.880 --> 0:40:24.960
<v Speaker 1>there's been speculation that the Kindle fire will cause Apple

0:40:25.239 --> 0:40:28.560
<v Speaker 1>to lower prices at the iPad. I say, no, I

0:40:28.560 --> 0:40:30.040
<v Speaker 1>don't think. I don't think they're gonna do it now.

0:40:30.120 --> 0:40:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Apple is has traditionally been sort of that premium kind

0:40:36.120 --> 0:40:40.560
<v Speaker 1>of uh product, especially since Steve Jobs came back. Yeah,

0:40:40.680 --> 0:40:43.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean there's aimed for that niche. Yeah, that was

0:40:43.200 --> 0:40:46.200
<v Speaker 1>that was what. That's kind of their corporate identity. They're

0:40:46.200 --> 0:40:50.160
<v Speaker 1>not known for marking down prices in the face of competition.

0:40:50.200 --> 0:40:53.879
<v Speaker 1>They're they're known for just pouring even more effort into

0:40:53.920 --> 0:40:57.840
<v Speaker 1>innovation and marketing and convincing people that whatever it is

0:40:57.880 --> 0:40:59.799
<v Speaker 1>they're coming out with is what you have to have.

0:41:00.480 --> 0:41:03.439
<v Speaker 1>I can't you know, I've heard people talk about how

0:41:04.200 --> 0:41:07.959
<v Speaker 1>the market forces like netbooks were supposed to bring down

0:41:08.239 --> 0:41:10.759
<v Speaker 1>Mac prices. You know, that was the big thing they

0:41:10.760 --> 0:41:13.399
<v Speaker 1>didn't really do that either. Now, granted, you could also

0:41:13.480 --> 0:41:16.480
<v Speaker 1>say that, well, Apple keeps coming out with more advanced

0:41:16.520 --> 0:41:19.200
<v Speaker 1>hardware and then marketing it for the same price as

0:41:19.239 --> 0:41:23.239
<v Speaker 1>the previous generation hardware, so in a way, prices are

0:41:23.400 --> 0:41:31.799
<v Speaker 1>kind of falling sort of, but not in the traditional sense. Yeah. Yeah, um,

0:41:31.880 --> 0:41:35.240
<v Speaker 1>And then let's see I said that Windows will release

0:41:35.400 --> 0:41:41.400
<v Speaker 1>two sort of lackluster adoption. Um, and that's twofold. I

0:41:41.400 --> 0:41:44.680
<v Speaker 1>think it suffers from the same problem that Lion does

0:41:44.800 --> 0:41:47.759
<v Speaker 1>for for the macOS, and that it's got a very

0:41:47.760 --> 0:41:50.920
<v Speaker 1>different interface. And yes, before you write me, I know

0:41:51.040 --> 0:41:54.759
<v Speaker 1>you can change its metro. Yeah, it's going to the

0:41:54.800 --> 0:41:57.520
<v Speaker 1>metro interface. For those of you who don't know, is

0:41:57.600 --> 0:42:01.239
<v Speaker 1>the interface for the Windows eight porta bowl devices and

0:42:01.280 --> 0:42:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Windows seven portable stuff that's out there now you see

0:42:04.040 --> 0:42:06.600
<v Speaker 1>on there if you've seen commercials with a little colorful

0:42:06.719 --> 0:42:09.960
<v Speaker 1>boxes on the phones, that's what the Windows eight you

0:42:10.160 --> 0:42:13.120
<v Speaker 1>user interface is supposed to look like for computers, Yeah,

0:42:13.160 --> 0:42:15.400
<v Speaker 1>which which would work be great if you have a

0:42:15.440 --> 0:42:18.399
<v Speaker 1>touch screen monitor, but if you don't have a touch

0:42:18.440 --> 0:42:21.799
<v Speaker 1>screen monitor. There's some people who suggest that that particular

0:42:22.400 --> 0:42:27.240
<v Speaker 1>way of organizing data is not really that intuitive because

0:42:27.320 --> 0:42:31.680
<v Speaker 1>you can't navigate through it as as easily. That's one

0:42:31.719 --> 0:42:33.880
<v Speaker 1>of the big things that we've talked about with that.

0:42:33.960 --> 0:42:37.279
<v Speaker 1>We're plan on doing a user interface podcast at some point.

0:42:37.320 --> 0:42:39.480
<v Speaker 1>We're talk about the design of a user interface and

0:42:39.560 --> 0:42:42.480
<v Speaker 1>what goes into that, because there's so much more beyond

0:42:42.600 --> 0:42:47.040
<v Speaker 1>just technical uh sex. But you know, we've seen like

0:42:47.280 --> 0:42:50.680
<v Speaker 1>kids pick up an iPad and that just they learn

0:42:50.760 --> 0:42:55.359
<v Speaker 1>how to navigate that iPad really quickly. You know. It's

0:42:55.440 --> 0:42:57.640
<v Speaker 1>it's one of those things that's just very intuitive. Yeah,

0:42:57.960 --> 0:43:01.160
<v Speaker 1>So kids intuitively can figure out how to navigate these things.

0:43:01.480 --> 0:43:06.280
<v Speaker 1>So there is a, uh, there is a an urge

0:43:06.320 --> 0:43:09.080
<v Speaker 1>to move toward that because everyone's like, well, this, this

0:43:09.160 --> 0:43:12.840
<v Speaker 1>is there's something here. It's just it's it's almost magical,

0:43:13.239 --> 0:43:16.480
<v Speaker 1>like to to use an Apple type phrase. But when

0:43:16.480 --> 0:43:19.080
<v Speaker 1>you get it to a desktop modality where there's no

0:43:19.760 --> 0:43:22.160
<v Speaker 1>there's not necessarily a touch screen part of the interface,

0:43:22.560 --> 0:43:25.160
<v Speaker 1>it's not nearly as intuitive because you're navigating you're not

0:43:25.280 --> 0:43:27.600
<v Speaker 1>navigating it the same way you would if you were,

0:43:28.040 --> 0:43:31.120
<v Speaker 1>say a touch screen tablet. Yeah, and and and here's

0:43:31.120 --> 0:43:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the thing. I mean, yes, you can you can operate

0:43:33.560 --> 0:43:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Windows eight in that mode or in a more traditional

0:43:36.360 --> 0:43:40.560
<v Speaker 1>mode but they've been marketing it at using the the

0:43:40.600 --> 0:43:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Metro stuff on that initial thing. Look what you can

0:43:43.200 --> 0:43:46.880
<v Speaker 1>do here. Um. I think if they continue marketing Metro

0:43:47.040 --> 0:43:49.040
<v Speaker 1>as the primary interface, people are going to be a

0:43:49.080 --> 0:43:51.880
<v Speaker 1>little put off by that and they suffer from another problem.

0:43:52.080 --> 0:43:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Windows seven it's really good, um, and people have been

0:43:56.480 --> 0:43:59.719
<v Speaker 1>adopting it now. It's it's you know, surpassed Vista in

0:43:59.719 --> 0:44:02.879
<v Speaker 1>a option at this point. UM. And I think now

0:44:02.920 --> 0:44:04.800
<v Speaker 1>that XP is going out, I think people are just

0:44:04.800 --> 0:44:07.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna go with Windows seven unless you know, Microsoft completely

0:44:07.719 --> 0:44:09.920
<v Speaker 1>makes it unavailable. This is kind of crazy because when

0:44:10.000 --> 0:44:13.719
<v Speaker 1>you think about think about how long XP stuck around, Yeah,

0:44:13.760 --> 0:44:17.760
<v Speaker 1>ten years, ten years of XP and then because it works,

0:44:17.920 --> 0:44:20.360
<v Speaker 1>and then what happened was people did not like Vista,

0:44:20.880 --> 0:44:23.560
<v Speaker 1>or enough people did not like Vista for it to

0:44:23.600 --> 0:44:27.160
<v Speaker 1>be a problem, and uh, and then Windows seven came

0:44:27.200 --> 0:44:29.919
<v Speaker 1>around it seemed to be a big improvement. It does

0:44:30.000 --> 0:44:32.839
<v Speaker 1>seem weird to go from Windows seven to Windows eight

0:44:32.960 --> 0:44:36.680
<v Speaker 1>so relatively quickly when you look at how long there

0:44:36.840 --> 0:44:42.200
<v Speaker 1>was a a pause from Windows XP to Windows Vista.

0:44:42.360 --> 0:44:44.680
<v Speaker 1>And yes there were other versions of Windows that came

0:44:44.680 --> 0:44:47.680
<v Speaker 1>out between those, but we're talking about mass adoption here. Yeah,

0:44:48.200 --> 0:44:50.920
<v Speaker 1>so I think and mass adoption and and actual like

0:44:51.000 --> 0:44:54.040
<v Speaker 1>personal computers as opposed to web servers and things like that.

0:44:54.200 --> 0:44:55.680
<v Speaker 1>So I just don't think it's going to take off.

0:44:57.000 --> 0:44:58.759
<v Speaker 1>And my my last one, I'm gonna go with my

0:44:58.800 --> 0:45:02.640
<v Speaker 1>gimme for the last one. Blizzard will release Diablo three

0:45:02.760 --> 0:45:09.120
<v Speaker 1>and it will become a massive hit. Wow, I gotta

0:45:09.120 --> 0:45:11.279
<v Speaker 1>get it. I gotta get a demon or something out

0:45:11.320 --> 0:45:16.120
<v Speaker 1>of that. I would predict that there will be uh

0:45:17.320 --> 0:45:22.680
<v Speaker 1>a dramatic increase in people complaining about right index finger pain.

0:45:23.320 --> 0:45:28.000
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly possible directly as a result of blizzards of

0:45:28.040 --> 0:45:32.719
<v Speaker 1>blizzards Diablo three releasing. It's going to be a hit. Yeah.

0:45:32.719 --> 0:45:34.959
<v Speaker 1>I didn't make any other predictions about any other game

0:45:35.000 --> 0:45:37.000
<v Speaker 1>titles that I think might come out and next year

0:45:37.040 --> 0:45:40.040
<v Speaker 1>because that that's what Grand Theft All five comes out.

0:45:41.160 --> 0:45:43.120
<v Speaker 1>That'll be excited to see. I think that will be

0:45:43.160 --> 0:45:46.520
<v Speaker 1>a big success. That's also another gimming people have been

0:45:46.520 --> 0:45:49.320
<v Speaker 1>eager for that. But U okay, so here's my final

0:45:49.400 --> 0:45:51.920
<v Speaker 1>final prediction. So you came up with it. Last prediction

0:45:52.239 --> 0:45:55.680
<v Speaker 1>has nothing to do with tech. I'm done. I predict

0:45:55.719 --> 0:45:58.480
<v Speaker 1>this time next year we will be making a prediction

0:45:58.480 --> 0:46:03.439
<v Speaker 1>show and we will ignore the fact that the Mayan

0:46:03.560 --> 0:46:06.520
<v Speaker 1>calendar is coming at an end, and that we will

0:46:06.600 --> 0:46:10.399
<v Speaker 1>just assume that the world will continue going on and

0:46:10.440 --> 0:46:14.839
<v Speaker 1>that we will have to predict stuff to happen. All right,

0:46:16.000 --> 0:46:19.759
<v Speaker 1>So um yeah for those of you who were you know,

0:46:19.960 --> 0:46:22.640
<v Speaker 1>playing on just living it up in twelve because it

0:46:22.680 --> 0:46:26.520
<v Speaker 1>was gonna be the final year. Ever, I don't think so.

0:46:26.520 --> 0:46:30.479
<v Speaker 1>So alright, alright, well let's wrap this up that those

0:46:30.520 --> 0:46:34.400
<v Speaker 1>are our predictions for twenty twelve in the world of technology.

0:46:34.760 --> 0:46:36.480
<v Speaker 1>If you guys have any of your own predictions you

0:46:36.520 --> 0:46:38.840
<v Speaker 1>would like to share, or you have any other questions

0:46:38.920 --> 0:46:40.799
<v Speaker 1>or suggestions for topics you would like us to cover

0:46:40.840 --> 0:46:43.560
<v Speaker 1>in future episodes, let us know. So there's an email

0:46:43.719 --> 0:46:46.680
<v Speaker 1>that addresses tech Stuff at how stuff works dot com,

0:46:46.840 --> 0:46:49.720
<v Speaker 1>or drop us a line on Facebook or Twitter. Are handled.

0:46:49.760 --> 0:46:52.000
<v Speaker 1>There is tech stuff hs W and Chris and I

0:46:52.000 --> 0:46:59.880
<v Speaker 1>will talk to you again in the future. Be shorted.

0:47:00.040 --> 0:47:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Check out our new video podcast, Stuff from the Future.

0:47:03.040 --> 0:47:05.359
<v Speaker 1>Join How Stuff Work staff as we explore the most

0:47:05.360 --> 0:47:10.240
<v Speaker 1>promising and perplexing possibilities of tomorrow. The House Stuff Works

0:47:10.239 --> 0:47:18.279
<v Speaker 1>iPhone app has arrived. Download it today on iTunes. Brought

0:47:18.320 --> 0:47:21.520
<v Speaker 1>to you by the reinvented two thousand twelve camera. It's ready,

0:47:21.680 --> 0:47:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Are you