WEBVTT - Free Picks for EVERY Week 4 NFL Game (Ep. 344)

0:00:01.040 --> 0:00:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in everybody to Betting Pros. It's time to place

0:00:03.320 --> 0:00:05.720
<v Speaker 1>your bets. So this is meet Joey Paid Joe Pisapia.

0:00:06.080 --> 0:00:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Week three is just about concluded. A few games left

0:00:08.840 --> 0:00:11.200
<v Speaker 1>here a Monday night. You can catch us by PM

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Eastern every single Monday live on the YouTube channel breaking

0:00:13.800 --> 0:00:15.960
<v Speaker 1>those games down on Monday and Thursday night myself at

0:00:16.000 --> 0:00:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Scott Bogman. But this year this is about looking ahead.

0:00:19.360 --> 0:00:21.880
<v Speaker 1>And man, oh man, I'm depressed. It was a bad

0:00:21.920 --> 0:00:24.799
<v Speaker 1>week for me. I is terrible this week. I'm gonna

0:00:24.800 --> 0:00:27.320
<v Speaker 1>take all the l's here because I thought there was

0:00:27.360 --> 0:00:29.800
<v Speaker 1>some really good things here. I was very happy about

0:00:29.800 --> 0:00:32.239
<v Speaker 1>outside the Chiefs. That's like the only thing that went

0:00:32.320 --> 0:00:35.160
<v Speaker 1>right for me. God bless you Taylor Swift for making

0:00:35.159 --> 0:00:38.320
<v Speaker 1>sure that you had Travis Kelsey and Patrick Mahomes motivated.

0:00:38.560 --> 0:00:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully these two gentlemen had better weeks than I do.

0:00:40.760 --> 0:00:42.959
<v Speaker 1>We could take it through a good week four. As

0:00:43.000 --> 0:00:45.360
<v Speaker 1>we continue on, Pat fitz Morris joins us, Sam Hoppin

0:00:45.440 --> 0:00:47.280
<v Speaker 1>joins is. Of course you could check out all our

0:00:47.320 --> 0:00:50.840
<v Speaker 1>amazing content at Betting Pros. Sammy Boy repping the Green

0:00:50.880 --> 0:00:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Bay Packers gear. Feeling pretty good about that Jordan Love Homecoming.

0:00:54.720 --> 0:00:56.880
<v Speaker 1>So I think you were in a good spot here

0:00:56.920 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 1>to win this division because it ain't gonna be the

0:00:59.800 --> 0:01:01.960
<v Speaker 1>bet and it certainly doesn't feel like the Vikings can

0:01:02.000 --> 0:01:03.160
<v Speaker 1>win anything Zam.

0:01:03.600 --> 0:01:05.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we were talking about this pre show.

0:01:05.520 --> 0:01:07.560
<v Speaker 3>I do think the Vikings still do have a chance

0:01:07.600 --> 0:01:11.200
<v Speaker 3>because they haven't played anyone in the division yet. They

0:01:11.280 --> 0:01:15.080
<v Speaker 3>have some opportunities to make up some ground with those games,

0:01:15.120 --> 0:01:18.080
<v Speaker 3>and they've just gotten terribly unlucky. I'll talk about it

0:01:18.080 --> 0:01:20.280
<v Speaker 3>a little bit later, but with the turnovers, it's just

0:01:21.000 --> 0:01:24.640
<v Speaker 3>been bad and you would expect some of that to

0:01:24.680 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 3>regress a little bit in season, even though everyone's talking

0:01:27.560 --> 0:01:30.640
<v Speaker 3>about how well they did on one side in one

0:01:30.680 --> 0:01:35.520
<v Speaker 3>score games last year versus this year. So certainly looking

0:01:35.520 --> 0:01:37.440
<v Speaker 3>good for our Green Bay Packers though.

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that under came in on that Charger game with

0:01:42.200 --> 0:01:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the Minnesota Vikings. One under that did not come in

0:01:46.000 --> 0:01:47.360
<v Speaker 1>was the Miami Dolphins.

0:01:47.360 --> 0:01:47.640
<v Speaker 2>Fits.

0:01:47.720 --> 0:01:51.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they scored enough points here for several games

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 1>like you're gonna took the Jets game, combined it with

0:01:53.200 --> 0:01:56.160
<v Speaker 1>another game and still probably not caught up to the

0:01:56.440 --> 0:01:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Miami Dolphins. I can't imagine going forward. I think it's

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:01.960
<v Speaker 1>going to be a real Dolle year. This offense could

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:04.760
<v Speaker 1>continue to just take off and be something very special.

0:02:04.800 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 1>But that was a show of shows, bad showing for

0:02:07.440 --> 0:02:10.160
<v Speaker 1>the Denver Broncos. But I think the big takeaway is

0:02:10.560 --> 0:02:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Miami's offense without Jaalen Waddle even was stunningly good yesterday

0:02:15.160 --> 0:02:16.720
<v Speaker 1>fits historically.

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:19.359
<v Speaker 4>So it was Joe, And credit to you. I think

0:02:19.480 --> 0:02:22.600
<v Speaker 4>you were on the Dolphins last week on this show.

0:02:22.880 --> 0:02:26.080
<v Speaker 4>I believe you like them, and I just I wasn't

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:28.240
<v Speaker 4>really interested in that game at all, and I just

0:02:28.400 --> 0:02:32.120
<v Speaker 4>like this. This Broncos defense was actually good last year.

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:33.880
<v Speaker 5>Or like a bump the march at least.

0:02:33.960 --> 0:02:37.239
<v Speaker 4>So it's hard to understand what exactly has happened here.

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:40.960
<v Speaker 4>But it's going to be a test of the you know,

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:45.560
<v Speaker 4>mediocre offense versus the mediocre defense when the Bears and

0:02:45.919 --> 0:02:48.919
<v Speaker 4>Broncos get together this week, and mediocre is really being

0:02:49.000 --> 0:02:52.440
<v Speaker 4>kind quite frankly, I mean, this is yeah, So it

0:02:52.880 --> 0:02:55.720
<v Speaker 4>will be interesting to see what gives in that game.

0:02:56.160 --> 0:02:58.120
<v Speaker 1>The Denver Broncos the first team in NFL history to

0:02:58.120 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 1>give up three hundred and fifty yards in the air

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:03.320
<v Speaker 1>and on the ground. Congratulations Bronco. I mean, somebody's got

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:04.840
<v Speaker 1>to get fired today for something. I don't know who

0:03:04.919 --> 0:03:08.160
<v Speaker 1>it is, but you know this is usually when heads roll.

0:03:08.200 --> 0:03:11.239
<v Speaker 1>But look, before we get going, don't forget everybody. We've

0:03:11.280 --> 0:03:13.160
<v Speaker 1>got free stuff for you here Petting Pros So if

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:15.239
<v Speaker 1>you haven't already, make sure you subscribe to the channel.

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Drop a comment below, give us your favorite picks of

0:03:18.000 --> 0:03:20.040
<v Speaker 1>week four that you like in the early look ahead,

0:03:20.440 --> 0:03:22.760
<v Speaker 1>and you just might win a James Cook autograph jersey.

0:03:22.760 --> 0:03:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Thanks to us here Petting pro So. Again, subscribe, drop

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 1>the comment and click that belt to it goes Dings.

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:29.400
<v Speaker 1>You know if you're the winner of the big James

0:03:29.480 --> 0:03:33.359
<v Speaker 1>Cook Jersey. Let's move on here to Thursday night football.

0:03:33.440 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Your Green Bay Packers gentlemen are going to host the

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Detroit Lions. Speaking of Indivision matchups, this one is real spicy.

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:43.080
<v Speaker 1>You've got the Green Bay Packers two point home underdogs.

0:03:43.320 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Forty five and a half is the number at Sugarhouse

0:03:45.400 --> 0:03:47.560
<v Speaker 1>right now. Forty four and a half. You can get

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:50.640
<v Speaker 1>that over on Caesars. And if you like the Packers

0:03:50.680 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 1>to win at home in that dog situation, on the

0:03:53.360 --> 0:03:55.680
<v Speaker 1>money line right now, FanDuel's got the best number plus

0:03:55.680 --> 0:03:58.320
<v Speaker 1>one oh six. So let's take us through here. In

0:03:58.360 --> 0:04:01.800
<v Speaker 1>your opinion, Fits, is this line correct number one and

0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:03.960
<v Speaker 1>number two? Do you see any early value?

0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:06.560
<v Speaker 4>I do think the line is correct, Joe. And this

0:04:06.640 --> 0:04:09.320
<v Speaker 4>does feel like a battle for NFC North supremacy. We

0:04:09.360 --> 0:04:12.200
<v Speaker 4>know the Bears aren't going to be battling for anything,

0:04:12.320 --> 0:04:14.720
<v Speaker 4>and the Vikings, Yeah, maybe they've had some bad luck,

0:04:14.760 --> 0:04:17.919
<v Speaker 4>but that defense is pretty legitimately terrible.

0:04:18.040 --> 0:04:20.800
<v Speaker 5>So this is also a Packers.

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 4>Revenge game after the Lions knocked them out of the

0:04:23.920 --> 0:04:26.440
<v Speaker 4>playoffs in the final game of the twenty twenty two

0:04:26.480 --> 0:04:30.960
<v Speaker 4>regular season. So Jared Goff has made four starts against

0:04:31.000 --> 0:04:33.839
<v Speaker 4>the Packers since joining the Lions. Lost his first one,

0:04:33.880 --> 0:04:37.200
<v Speaker 4>has won the last three. I don't know that I

0:04:37.400 --> 0:04:40.320
<v Speaker 4>like either side here, Joe, but I sort of like

0:04:40.400 --> 0:04:44.920
<v Speaker 4>the under Both Lions Packers games played under last season,

0:04:45.000 --> 0:04:48.960
<v Speaker 4>and the Packers continue to be very slow paced offensively

0:04:49.000 --> 0:04:49.840
<v Speaker 4>under Matt Lafleur.

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, especially with the Thursday night game. I kind of

0:04:53.160 --> 0:04:54.800
<v Speaker 1>lean where you are right now in this one of

0:04:54.920 --> 0:04:57.479
<v Speaker 1>the under Sam. What's your early instinct of any on

0:04:57.560 --> 0:04:58.440
<v Speaker 1>this line.

0:04:58.839 --> 0:05:01.760
<v Speaker 3>I actually took the Packers money line this morning. I

0:05:01.800 --> 0:05:03.839
<v Speaker 3>do think there is a little bit of value. I

0:05:03.880 --> 0:05:08.960
<v Speaker 3>don't think that Detroit is three points better than green

0:05:09.000 --> 0:05:11.920
<v Speaker 3>Bay on a neutral field, which is what this line

0:05:11.960 --> 0:05:14.600
<v Speaker 3>is indicating. The Packers are dealing with a ton of

0:05:14.640 --> 0:05:20.280
<v Speaker 3>health concerns. Jayira Alexander was out yesterday. Defandre Campbell left early.

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:23.560
<v Speaker 3>The left side of the offensive line is nowhere to

0:05:23.600 --> 0:05:26.359
<v Speaker 3>be seen right now. But they've still allowed just a

0:05:26.440 --> 0:05:29.080
<v Speaker 3>twenty one and a half percent pressure rate, which is great.

0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:32.000
<v Speaker 3>It's second in the league. Green Bay still doesn't have

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:35.480
<v Speaker 3>a game with all of Baktyari, Aaron Jones, and Christian

0:05:35.520 --> 0:05:40.320
<v Speaker 3>Watson playing together this year, and I do think that

0:05:40.480 --> 0:05:42.760
<v Speaker 3>they might have held some of those guys out on

0:05:43.320 --> 0:05:46.520
<v Speaker 3>Sunday knowing that they had the Thursday night game against

0:05:46.560 --> 0:05:50.680
<v Speaker 3>a divisional opponent at home, and so I think at

0:05:50.800 --> 0:05:53.600
<v Speaker 3>least two of those three guys will be active on

0:05:53.760 --> 0:05:57.040
<v Speaker 3>Thursday night. Green Bay's been sort of living off of

0:05:57.360 --> 0:06:00.640
<v Speaker 3>explosive plays so far this year. They have a pretty

0:06:00.680 --> 0:06:04.279
<v Speaker 3>low success rate but a fairly high EPA per play.

0:06:04.360 --> 0:06:08.919
<v Speaker 3>But Detroit allows the sixth highest rate of explosive pass

0:06:08.960 --> 0:06:12.320
<v Speaker 3>plays on defense, so I think this is another opportunity

0:06:12.360 --> 0:06:16.240
<v Speaker 3>for green Bay to steal another victory on Thursday Night.

0:06:17.400 --> 0:06:19.800
<v Speaker 1>It's a great point about Watson and Aaron Jones too.

0:06:19.839 --> 0:06:21.480
<v Speaker 1>If they are active, this is the time to jump

0:06:21.480 --> 0:06:24.560
<v Speaker 1>on that money line number right now, because that could

0:06:24.680 --> 0:06:26.039
<v Speaker 1>very well be the case of why they were just

0:06:26.040 --> 0:06:28.359
<v Speaker 1>holding them a little bit longer. Because this is the

0:06:28.400 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 1>game you have to win. This is the indivision contest

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:33.800
<v Speaker 1>that means the most in the standings anyway. So let's

0:06:33.839 --> 0:06:36.680
<v Speaker 1>get to the next one here. Jacksonville Jaguars stick a

0:06:36.680 --> 0:06:40.839
<v Speaker 1>big fat l against the Houston Texans. Ooh wee at

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:44.520
<v Speaker 1>home they are now one and two. Atlanta Falcons Cinderella

0:06:44.720 --> 0:06:47.839
<v Speaker 1>is finally got lost themselves. So both these teams coming

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:50.360
<v Speaker 1>off losses a week three. Right now, we got Jacksonville

0:06:50.400 --> 0:06:53.560
<v Speaker 1>your standard minus three right now at home. That feels

0:06:53.560 --> 0:06:55.679
<v Speaker 1>about right as we're trying to figure out the identity

0:06:55.680 --> 0:06:57.919
<v Speaker 1>of these two teams. Forty five and a half is

0:06:57.960 --> 0:06:59.840
<v Speaker 1>the number four The under here at Bette Rivers forty

0:06:59.839 --> 0:07:02.520
<v Speaker 1>five Arena Hafock, FanDuel. If you like the over, and

0:07:02.600 --> 0:07:05.160
<v Speaker 1>then if you like the money line, bet three sixty five.

0:07:05.200 --> 0:07:07.559
<v Speaker 1>As the Falcons who went outright at plus one forty five.

0:07:07.880 --> 0:07:10.280
<v Speaker 1>When you look at this line, Sam, what do you see?

0:07:11.040 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 3>I see the line giving you an opportunity to buy

0:07:16.200 --> 0:07:18.960
<v Speaker 3>Trevor Lawrence at his lowest. I mean, he has not

0:07:19.200 --> 0:07:22.600
<v Speaker 3>played exceptionally the first three weeks of the season. Played

0:07:22.600 --> 0:07:29.040
<v Speaker 3>okay against Houston in Week one, not Houston, Indianapolis, excuse me,

0:07:30.040 --> 0:07:33.600
<v Speaker 3>and then didn't fare farewell against the Chiefs, and then

0:07:34.040 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 3>didn't play well this past week either, And I think

0:07:37.520 --> 0:07:40.480
<v Speaker 3>they're sort of realizing that they can't just throw the

0:07:40.480 --> 0:07:43.440
<v Speaker 3>ball at Calvin Ridley twelve plus times a game and

0:07:43.720 --> 0:07:46.080
<v Speaker 3>win that way. They need to get some of these

0:07:46.120 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 3>other playmakers involved. But Trevor Lawrence is still a much

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 3>better quarterback than Desmond Rheder. He Ritter had a negative

0:07:54.200 --> 0:07:58.600
<v Speaker 3>fourteen point two percent completion percentage over expectation last week,

0:07:58.640 --> 0:08:03.080
<v Speaker 3>which is not especially against Detroit defense that again we

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:06.800
<v Speaker 3>just talked about hasn't been great defending the pass, and

0:08:07.720 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 3>it currently looks like this.

0:08:09.640 --> 0:08:11.520
<v Speaker 2>Is shaded towards Atlanta.

0:08:11.560 --> 0:08:14.200
<v Speaker 3>I wonder if we see this get down to two

0:08:14.280 --> 0:08:16.960
<v Speaker 3>and a half, Jacksonville in their home away from home,

0:08:17.000 --> 0:08:21.080
<v Speaker 3>playing in London, so they have that bit of familiarity

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:25.280
<v Speaker 3>as well, So I'd be taking Jacksonville with the points here.

0:08:27.000 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Pat Sam makes a good point here. This is the

0:08:28.840 --> 0:08:30.960
<v Speaker 1>way to buy Trevor Lawrence at the lowest point. Are

0:08:30.960 --> 0:08:32.839
<v Speaker 1>you buying him at this lowest point here this week?

0:08:33.360 --> 0:08:36.760
<v Speaker 4>I'm really not, Joe. Yes, the Jaguars have a big

0:08:36.840 --> 0:08:40.440
<v Speaker 4>quarterback advantage here, but the Falcons and Arthur Smith generally

0:08:40.480 --> 0:08:43.520
<v Speaker 4>do a pretty good job of hiding Desmond Ridder in

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:46.280
<v Speaker 4>that offense, and at least that's certainly what they're trying

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:47.520
<v Speaker 4>to do each and every week.

0:08:48.440 --> 0:08:50.200
<v Speaker 5>Like I see these two teams.

0:08:49.840 --> 0:08:53.119
<v Speaker 4>Of roughly equal caliber, and I was kind of surprised

0:08:53.160 --> 0:08:56.720
<v Speaker 4>to see the Jaguars favored by what three points in

0:08:56.760 --> 0:08:59.480
<v Speaker 4>this one? Let me ask you, guys, what do you

0:08:59.559 --> 0:09:02.600
<v Speaker 4>think we know that Jaguars don't have a standard home

0:09:02.600 --> 0:09:04.440
<v Speaker 4>field advantage in this one, with the game being in

0:09:04.480 --> 0:09:08.920
<v Speaker 4>Wembley Stadium, what would you say their advantage is as

0:09:08.920 --> 0:09:11.880
<v Speaker 4>far as an operational advantage? So far, they played nine

0:09:12.440 --> 0:09:14.559
<v Speaker 4>London games, this will be their tenth. They're four and

0:09:14.679 --> 0:09:17.440
<v Speaker 4>five so far. It's got to be worth something, but

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:21.239
<v Speaker 4>probably not worth the standard two points for home field advantage.

0:09:22.400 --> 0:09:24.200
<v Speaker 1>That's a really good question, Pat, I mean, I think

0:09:24.240 --> 0:09:27.200
<v Speaker 1>it's worth a little bit. That being said, Sam, do

0:09:27.280 --> 0:09:29.320
<v Speaker 1>you see any advantage of the fact that they have

0:09:29.480 --> 0:09:32.840
<v Speaker 1>been sort of like the default London team these last

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:33.720
<v Speaker 1>five six years.

0:09:33.960 --> 0:09:37.080
<v Speaker 3>I certainly think so. I don't think it's as big

0:09:37.440 --> 0:09:41.640
<v Speaker 3>of an advantage as people might think it is, because

0:09:42.000 --> 0:09:45.520
<v Speaker 3>there's so much science around. You know, when to sleep,

0:09:45.600 --> 0:09:48.440
<v Speaker 3>how to you know, recover from jet lag. And these

0:09:48.480 --> 0:09:50.800
<v Speaker 3>are the best of the best athletes who know how

0:09:50.800 --> 0:09:53.480
<v Speaker 3>to do all of this sort of stuff. And it's

0:09:53.520 --> 0:09:57.680
<v Speaker 3>not like nobody in Atlanta is, you know, just not

0:09:57.800 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 3>familiar with traveling overseas. I do think there is a little.

0:10:02.320 --> 0:10:02.839
<v Speaker 2>Bit to it.

0:10:02.960 --> 0:10:05.800
<v Speaker 3>I mean I would make it, you know, maybe close

0:10:05.840 --> 0:10:09.680
<v Speaker 3>to half a point if that it right now, But

0:10:10.280 --> 0:10:13.480
<v Speaker 3>it's I think I still think Jacksonville is going to

0:10:13.480 --> 0:10:15.600
<v Speaker 3>get to win here, all right.

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:17.559
<v Speaker 1>Moving on to the next game here on the slate

0:10:17.600 --> 0:10:20.040
<v Speaker 1>two for a time, we've got Pittsburgh and Houston. Now,

0:10:20.080 --> 0:10:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Houston coming off their first victory.

0:10:22.240 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 2>CJ.

0:10:22.600 --> 0:10:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Stroud looking good, the passing game looking good, and Eco

0:10:24.720 --> 0:10:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Collins tanked out. We just talked about all those guys

0:10:26.920 --> 0:10:29.520
<v Speaker 1>in the Waiver Wire podcast on Fantasy pro fits. So

0:10:30.000 --> 0:10:32.760
<v Speaker 1>forty one is the number one FanDuel. Houston, of course

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:35.000
<v Speaker 1>is a four point underdog at home, which makes sense

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:37.719
<v Speaker 1>now Pittsburgh minus three on DK's what you can get

0:10:37.760 --> 0:10:41.520
<v Speaker 1>right now. But you know that Pittsburgh secondary patt has

0:10:41.559 --> 0:10:43.040
<v Speaker 1>not played well this year. I think we can all

0:10:43.040 --> 0:10:45.400
<v Speaker 1>agree on that. Yes, second, after the quarterback, that is

0:10:45.440 --> 0:10:49.160
<v Speaker 1>their saving grace on defense and offensively. I still work

0:10:49.200 --> 0:10:51.480
<v Speaker 1>in progress, I mean still trying to figure out their identity.

0:10:51.480 --> 0:10:53.840
<v Speaker 1>They had some moments, they had enough moments where they

0:10:53.840 --> 0:10:56.240
<v Speaker 1>squeaked by last night. But what is your takeaway of

0:10:56.360 --> 0:10:59.080
<v Speaker 1>any from last night, what we saw from the Pittsburgh

0:10:59.080 --> 0:11:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Steelers and what you see in this early line here.

0:11:02.080 --> 0:11:03.360
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, if you can keep TJ.

0:11:03.520 --> 0:11:06.520
<v Speaker 4>Watt and his friends off your quarterback, you can do

0:11:06.600 --> 0:11:09.640
<v Speaker 4>business against this Pittsburgh secondary. And I think the Texans

0:11:09.760 --> 0:11:13.040
<v Speaker 4>passing game has been much more advanced than we thought

0:11:13.040 --> 0:11:13.600
<v Speaker 4>it was gonna be.

0:11:13.640 --> 0:11:13.920
<v Speaker 2>C J.

0:11:14.000 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 4>Stroud has been pretty pretty terrific so far. The Steelers

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:19.800
<v Speaker 4>might not be one of the powers of the AFC,

0:11:19.960 --> 0:11:22.640
<v Speaker 4>but they have picked themselves up off the deck pretty

0:11:22.679 --> 0:11:25.120
<v Speaker 4>nicely after that embarrassing home loss to the forty nine

0:11:25.200 --> 0:11:30.120
<v Speaker 4>Ers in Week one. And the Texans they're not pushovers.

0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:33.120
<v Speaker 4>I think this line is about right. I generally love

0:11:33.240 --> 0:11:35.680
<v Speaker 4>home dogs, but I'm not sure I can get behind

0:11:35.720 --> 0:11:38.000
<v Speaker 4>the Texans as a home dog against the Steelers.

0:11:38.880 --> 0:11:41.640
<v Speaker 1>All right, Sam, taking a look at this line here

0:11:41.640 --> 0:11:44.959
<v Speaker 1>for you. Fitz mentioned keeping Watt off of you is important,

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:46.920
<v Speaker 1>but this offensive line has had a lot of injury

0:11:46.960 --> 0:11:48.640
<v Speaker 1>issues here to open the season. Do you think the

0:11:48.679 --> 0:11:52.040
<v Speaker 1>health and talented the offensive line can keep Watt all

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:53.640
<v Speaker 1>of ce J Stroud?

0:11:54.000 --> 0:11:56.319
<v Speaker 2>I think so. I think Houston is for real. I

0:11:56.360 --> 0:11:56.800
<v Speaker 2>mean c J.

0:11:56.960 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 3>Strout is making throws that make it seem like he

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:02.400
<v Speaker 3>should have been the number one overall pick in the

0:12:02.520 --> 0:12:05.800
<v Speaker 3>draft this past year. I mean, he's playing phenomenally.

0:12:06.000 --> 0:12:06.240
<v Speaker 2>Again.

0:12:06.280 --> 0:12:10.360
<v Speaker 3>You mentioned the playmakers that they have, you know, on

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:14.320
<v Speaker 3>the Pittsburgh offense side, it's just gruesome. I mean, I

0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:18.400
<v Speaker 3>know that they played San Francisco and Cleveland, but they

0:12:18.520 --> 0:12:23.760
<v Speaker 3>are just down bad historically in EPAPRI plays, success rate,

0:12:24.080 --> 0:12:28.720
<v Speaker 3>you know, all of these advanced metrics, and I just

0:12:28.880 --> 0:12:32.520
<v Speaker 3>don't think that giving Naj Harris the ball is really

0:12:32.600 --> 0:12:36.480
<v Speaker 3>an effective strategy, even against Houston. So I think you're

0:12:36.520 --> 0:12:40.120
<v Speaker 3>getting the better quarterback with the points here at home

0:12:40.200 --> 0:12:44.880
<v Speaker 3>for Houston again, a defense that has been able to

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:49.600
<v Speaker 3>stifle some pretty good offenses so far this year. So

0:12:50.360 --> 0:12:53.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm taking Houston with the points especially. I think I

0:12:53.320 --> 0:12:55.280
<v Speaker 3>got him at plus three and a half this morning,

0:12:55.320 --> 0:12:58.120
<v Speaker 3>which if you can get it on that side of three,

0:12:58.280 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 3>is huge for me.

0:13:00.800 --> 0:13:03.000
<v Speaker 1>The Los Angeles Rams are going to travel to Indianapolis.

0:13:03.040 --> 0:13:06.360
<v Speaker 1>We'll see how the Rams perform tonight, but in the meantime,

0:13:06.440 --> 0:13:08.800
<v Speaker 1>we hope that we're getting Anthony Richardson back here for

0:13:08.800 --> 0:13:12.319
<v Speaker 1>the Colts. The Colts stole a victory away from the

0:13:12.400 --> 0:13:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore Ravens on the road, a huge win for this team.

0:13:14.679 --> 0:13:16.439
<v Speaker 1>They are now two and one. Forty five and a

0:13:16.480 --> 0:13:20.000
<v Speaker 1>half is the number on this one. Obviously, it's practically

0:13:20.040 --> 0:13:22.360
<v Speaker 1>a pick him, and understandably why I guess a lot

0:13:22.400 --> 0:13:23.920
<v Speaker 1>of us to do whether or not you think Richardson

0:13:23.920 --> 0:13:26.000
<v Speaker 1>plays and how big of an impact he makes. Right now,

0:13:26.040 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 1>plus one and a half is where the Colts are

0:13:28.640 --> 0:13:31.680
<v Speaker 1>at home. Sam, do you want to bet this line

0:13:31.720 --> 0:13:33.439
<v Speaker 1>now or do you want to wait for more clarity

0:13:33.480 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to the quarterback situation.

0:13:35.960 --> 0:13:38.520
<v Speaker 3>Definitely want to wait. These are two teams that I

0:13:38.600 --> 0:13:41.080
<v Speaker 3>just like can't get a read on so far. It's

0:13:41.160 --> 0:13:44.520
<v Speaker 3>because they were expected to be pretty bad going into

0:13:44.520 --> 0:13:48.559
<v Speaker 3>the season, and they've played competent, above average football at

0:13:48.600 --> 0:13:52.480
<v Speaker 3>certain points so far this season. I do think you

0:13:52.520 --> 0:13:55.959
<v Speaker 3>know that Gardner Minshew didn't play half bad this past

0:13:56.000 --> 0:14:00.839
<v Speaker 3>week against a pretty good Ravens defense. So I don't

0:14:00.920 --> 0:14:05.560
<v Speaker 3>think the line really changes a ton whether it's Minshew

0:14:05.720 --> 0:14:10.240
<v Speaker 3>or Richardson. But I do think that there's some more

0:14:10.360 --> 0:14:13.720
<v Speaker 3>variability you're going to get with Richardson under center that

0:14:13.800 --> 0:14:17.120
<v Speaker 3>could lead me to wanting the Rams in this situation.

0:14:17.720 --> 0:14:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Pat, the forty five at DK right now you're getting

0:14:20.440 --> 0:14:23.200
<v Speaker 1>is intriguing to me because if Richardson plays the explosiveness

0:14:23.240 --> 0:14:25.080
<v Speaker 1>he carries, I think the over is something you can

0:14:25.120 --> 0:14:26.120
<v Speaker 1>actually look for in this game.

0:14:26.160 --> 0:14:27.880
<v Speaker 4>What do you think That's what I want to play.

0:14:27.880 --> 0:14:29.440
<v Speaker 4>I don't want to play either side. I mean, we

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:32.480
<v Speaker 4>get this fun matchup of two teams, so we thought

0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:34.360
<v Speaker 4>we're going to be lousy, but have turned out to

0:14:34.360 --> 0:14:38.240
<v Speaker 4>be like plucky and very entertaining to watch unexpectedly.

0:14:39.040 --> 0:14:41.040
<v Speaker 5>But yeah, I like the over a lot. Here. We've

0:14:41.080 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 5>seen the Colts play.

0:14:42.360 --> 0:14:46.040
<v Speaker 4>At a breakneck offensive pace under Shane Steichen, Like that

0:14:46.200 --> 0:14:48.920
<v Speaker 4>is how they want to play. That's going to be

0:14:49.200 --> 0:14:52.600
<v Speaker 4>very friendly to overs, I think. And the Colts they

0:14:52.600 --> 0:14:55.600
<v Speaker 4>have a veteran slot corner in Kenny Moore, but their

0:14:55.640 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 4>outside cornerbacks are very inexperienced, and I think Matthew Stafford

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:01.760
<v Speaker 4>might be able to take advantage of that. I think

0:15:01.760 --> 0:15:02.800
<v Speaker 4>there are gonna be points.

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:05.320
<v Speaker 2>In this game. Joe, Yeah, I tend to agree with that.

0:15:05.360 --> 0:15:09.640
<v Speaker 2>Good Joe. You mentioned the explosive nature of Anthony Richardson.

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:13.440
<v Speaker 2>I believe, if I remember correctly, he only has two

0:15:13.720 --> 0:15:17.920
<v Speaker 2>pass attempts more than twenty yards downfield so far this season,

0:15:18.000 --> 0:15:21.520
<v Speaker 2>which is kind of different than people would have expected

0:15:21.560 --> 0:15:24.640
<v Speaker 2>coming into this season given how how much he was

0:15:24.720 --> 0:15:27.920
<v Speaker 2>launching the ball at Florida. But I do think Stiken

0:15:28.000 --> 0:15:31.400
<v Speaker 2>has been setting him up to get some easy completions

0:15:31.560 --> 0:15:33.000
<v Speaker 2>and build is confident.

0:15:34.320 --> 0:15:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think the I think you're one hundred percent right,

0:15:36.320 --> 0:15:38.200
<v Speaker 1>and Stiken's a great offensivend I think we've already seen

0:15:38.200 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 1>that in Philly for those last few years, and it's

0:15:40.800 --> 0:15:42.600
<v Speaker 1>also well known around the league. A lot of league

0:15:42.600 --> 0:15:45.080
<v Speaker 1>people talk about, like Stichen's that guy that people are

0:15:45.160 --> 0:15:47.320
<v Speaker 1>very excited to see get that head coaching job and

0:15:47.320 --> 0:15:49.600
<v Speaker 1>what he can do with Richardson. But Richardson's ability to

0:15:49.720 --> 0:15:52.600
<v Speaker 1>make plays with his legs, those are the ones that really,

0:15:52.600 --> 0:15:54.440
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, you know you got somebody you

0:15:54.440 --> 0:15:57.120
<v Speaker 1>know you're in the red zone. It's third and eight,

0:15:57.200 --> 0:15:59.000
<v Speaker 1>and next thing you know, he runs for a touchdown

0:15:59.400 --> 0:16:02.480
<v Speaker 1>from the eighteen yard line like like that. That's the

0:16:02.560 --> 0:16:04.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of stuff and you saw it before he had

0:16:04.040 --> 0:16:07.840
<v Speaker 1>the concussion. That's backbreaking stuff for the opposing defenses, but

0:16:07.920 --> 0:16:11.360
<v Speaker 1>also for totals, because that's stuff that just should not happen,

0:16:11.720 --> 0:16:14.040
<v Speaker 1>but it does when you have guys like Anthony Richardson

0:16:14.040 --> 0:16:16.120
<v Speaker 1>with a ball in their hands. So I'm kind of where.

0:16:16.000 --> 0:16:16.440
<v Speaker 2>Bad is too.

0:16:16.480 --> 0:16:18.680
<v Speaker 1>I think you leave this one to the coin flip.

0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:20.840
<v Speaker 1>It is speaking of bad teams though, by the way,

0:16:20.840 --> 0:16:22.280
<v Speaker 1>you kind of mentioned teams that we don't know who

0:16:22.280 --> 0:16:24.760
<v Speaker 1>they are, haven't played. Well, how about the Minnesota Vikings

0:16:24.800 --> 0:16:29.080
<v Speaker 1>and the Carolina Panthers, everybody. How about the winless ball here? Now,

0:16:29.120 --> 0:16:31.560
<v Speaker 1>somebody theoretically has to win. I guess they could tie,

0:16:31.680 --> 0:16:33.640
<v Speaker 1>but we're going to get the red rifle again this week.

0:16:33.840 --> 0:16:37.120
<v Speaker 1>So Caroline, of course, three point underdogs at home, as

0:16:37.120 --> 0:16:39.840
<v Speaker 1>we would expect them to be, Minnesota's defense, not getting

0:16:39.840 --> 0:16:42.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of credit as they should not. Forty four

0:16:42.480 --> 0:16:43.840
<v Speaker 1>and a half is the number for this one. If

0:16:43.840 --> 0:16:45.920
<v Speaker 1>you like the Panthers to get their first victory, well,

0:16:46.320 --> 0:16:49.160
<v Speaker 1>you can get it plus one forty at Caesars Fits.

0:16:49.680 --> 0:16:53.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, the Vikings were handed many opportunities. They could

0:16:53.760 --> 0:16:56.960
<v Speaker 1>not cash in on those opportunities. The defense is dreadful.

0:16:57.000 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 1>I know Caroline is not a good football team. Theoretically

0:16:59.720 --> 0:17:02.880
<v Speaker 1>on pay, Minnesota should handle them, but they're only getting

0:17:02.880 --> 0:17:05.880
<v Speaker 1>the three points here. Do you think that Minnesota can

0:17:06.000 --> 0:17:09.879
<v Speaker 1>finally pull themselves up by the haunches and do something

0:17:09.920 --> 0:17:12.760
<v Speaker 1>here and win this game decisively by more than three points?

0:17:13.160 --> 0:17:15.520
<v Speaker 4>They can, But I do like a money line bat

0:17:15.600 --> 0:17:19.120
<v Speaker 4>on Carolina at plus one, you know, a home under,

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:23.920
<v Speaker 4>especially if Andy Dalton plays like with Andy Dalton starting, Yes,

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:26.520
<v Speaker 4>I mean we saw Andy Dalton complete thirty four or

0:17:26.520 --> 0:17:30.040
<v Speaker 4>fifty eight passes. They turn Andy Dalton loose against a

0:17:30.080 --> 0:17:33.959
<v Speaker 4>bad Seattle defense that was missing Tarik Woollen, and now

0:17:34.640 --> 0:17:36.879
<v Speaker 4>he's going to be turned loose against a very bad

0:17:36.960 --> 0:17:41.400
<v Speaker 4>Minnesota defense. I like the Panthers in the money line,

0:17:41.440 --> 0:17:43.760
<v Speaker 4>and I like the over here, like I think we're

0:17:43.760 --> 0:17:46.040
<v Speaker 4>going to see a lot of offense. The Minnesota defense

0:17:46.119 --> 0:17:49.160
<v Speaker 4>is not good, but Minnesota's offense is very good. They're

0:17:49.160 --> 0:17:50.600
<v Speaker 4>gonna put points up themselves.

0:17:51.680 --> 0:17:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Sam I was very much on Minnesota this past week

0:17:54.160 --> 0:17:55.639
<v Speaker 1>I did not think they were the team that was

0:17:55.640 --> 0:17:59.479
<v Speaker 1>gonna come out winless. They did. I don't know if

0:17:59.520 --> 0:18:01.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm ready to learned to love again in week four.

0:18:01.359 --> 0:18:04.680
<v Speaker 1>This game, to me right now is terrifying, but Pat

0:18:04.680 --> 0:18:08.040
<v Speaker 1>seem very confident Carolina's abilities to maybe pull one out

0:18:08.040 --> 0:18:10.320
<v Speaker 1>of the hat. Do you see that same path to

0:18:10.400 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 1>victory for the Panthers.

0:18:12.320 --> 0:18:15.520
<v Speaker 3>I am once again on the other side of fits here.

0:18:15.720 --> 0:18:17.520
<v Speaker 2>I mentioned at.

0:18:17.400 --> 0:18:20.600
<v Speaker 3>The top of the show that Minnesota has just been

0:18:20.640 --> 0:18:24.000
<v Speaker 3>snake bitten by turnovers. Nearly a quarter of their offensive

0:18:24.080 --> 0:18:27.480
<v Speaker 3>drives have ended in turnovers. They have nine total turnovers

0:18:27.520 --> 0:18:31.520
<v Speaker 3>this season. Carolina defense could be without Frankie Louvu and

0:18:31.680 --> 0:18:35.720
<v Speaker 3>Xavier Woods, who both left the game early on Sunday.

0:18:36.560 --> 0:18:40.119
<v Speaker 3>Minnesota's offense is still exceptionally good. I mean, they have

0:18:40.320 --> 0:18:44.440
<v Speaker 3>Justin Jefferson, they have Jordan Addison, they have TJ. Hockinson.

0:18:44.520 --> 0:18:48.359
<v Speaker 3>Like this offense is exceptional. They have a ten point

0:18:48.359 --> 0:18:52.000
<v Speaker 3>eight percent explosive passwraight at second in the league. I

0:18:52.040 --> 0:18:54.399
<v Speaker 3>already took the over in this game as well. I

0:18:54.440 --> 0:18:57.320
<v Speaker 3>think this could be a shootout. So I'm on the

0:18:57.359 --> 0:19:00.200
<v Speaker 3>same side as fits there. But I just I think

0:19:00.280 --> 0:19:02.840
<v Speaker 3>these teams can can score a bunch of points and

0:19:02.880 --> 0:19:05.880
<v Speaker 3>their defenses aren't going to be doing much to get

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:06.600
<v Speaker 3>in the way of that.

0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:11.080
<v Speaker 1>All right, some quarterback updates still yet to come in

0:19:11.119 --> 0:19:13.280
<v Speaker 1>this next game, because we have the New Orleans Saints

0:19:13.320 --> 0:19:16.240
<v Speaker 1>with Derek Carr. They are two to one now. They

0:19:16.320 --> 0:19:18.760
<v Speaker 1>did lose that game to the Green Bay Packers, so

0:19:18.840 --> 0:19:21.200
<v Speaker 1>much of the happiness of my co hosts here now.

0:19:21.240 --> 0:19:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Derek Carr came away with a sprain day seed joints,

0:19:23.160 --> 0:19:24.760
<v Speaker 1>so he's probably gonna miss a few weeks. I've had

0:19:24.760 --> 0:19:26.880
<v Speaker 1>that injury myself. It's it'll take a couple of weeks

0:19:26.920 --> 0:19:28.120
<v Speaker 1>for him to get back, but he should be able

0:19:28.200 --> 0:19:30.359
<v Speaker 1>to play again this season, which means is probably gonna

0:19:30.359 --> 0:19:33.200
<v Speaker 1>be Jameis Winston. Now, the Saints are three point favorites

0:19:33.240 --> 0:19:36.440
<v Speaker 1>at home to Tampa Bay. Tampa Bay obviously you get

0:19:36.480 --> 0:19:38.719
<v Speaker 1>to play this evening against the Philadelphia Eagles, so we'll

0:19:38.720 --> 0:19:40.920
<v Speaker 1>see what comes out of that game. But forty one

0:19:41.119 --> 0:19:42.960
<v Speaker 1>is the number you're getting at Sugarhouse, forty and a

0:19:43.000 --> 0:19:45.160
<v Speaker 1>half at DK, so we're kind of in that same vein.

0:19:45.600 --> 0:19:47.800
<v Speaker 1>If you like Tampa for the upset plus one forty five,

0:19:47.840 --> 0:19:50.600
<v Speaker 1>you can get that over at Sugarhouse, Sam, when you're

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:53.359
<v Speaker 1>looking at this one, and I mean, I feel like

0:19:53.400 --> 0:19:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Winston's been inept. I think that's the best way to

0:19:55.480 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 1>put it this point. Like, you know, New Orleans had

0:19:58.040 --> 0:20:00.280
<v Speaker 1>that game basically in the third quarter that injury happened

0:20:00.280 --> 0:20:03.280
<v Speaker 1>and all just fell apart for them. They should theoretically

0:20:03.280 --> 0:20:05.120
<v Speaker 1>win this football game, but Tampa has shown that they've

0:20:05.119 --> 0:20:07.199
<v Speaker 1>been a little pluckier than we think they would be.

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:09.679
<v Speaker 1>Do you think this is a perfect trap game for

0:20:09.720 --> 0:20:10.480
<v Speaker 1>the Saints.

0:20:10.920 --> 0:20:13.120
<v Speaker 3>I think this is going to be an extremely low

0:20:13.160 --> 0:20:17.080
<v Speaker 3>scoring game. Both defenses are currently top eight in EPA

0:20:17.160 --> 0:20:21.400
<v Speaker 3>per play it allowed early down success rate, passing success rate,

0:20:21.520 --> 0:20:24.280
<v Speaker 3>So I think these teams are going to struggle to

0:20:24.640 --> 0:20:28.600
<v Speaker 3>move the ball again with two quarterbacks that we both

0:20:28.800 --> 0:20:31.520
<v Speaker 3>I think we all see as below average in Baker

0:20:31.560 --> 0:20:37.080
<v Speaker 3>Mayfield and Jamis Winston. So I'd be looking to take

0:20:37.359 --> 0:20:39.800
<v Speaker 3>Tampa Bay with the points because again, in these low

0:20:39.840 --> 0:20:43.120
<v Speaker 3>scoring games, it's going to be a lot closer and

0:20:43.480 --> 0:20:46.639
<v Speaker 3>getting potentially three three and a half points, I think

0:20:46.920 --> 0:20:50.640
<v Speaker 3>Tampa Bay's offense has been good enough to keep them

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:51.840
<v Speaker 3>in their games.

0:20:52.680 --> 0:20:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Pat your thoughts here on the Buccaneers, So I'd say,

0:20:54.840 --> 0:20:58.200
<v Speaker 1>of so far played well above my expectations. We'll see

0:20:58.200 --> 0:21:00.560
<v Speaker 1>what happens against a real football team in the tonight.

0:21:00.960 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 1>So now we have a little perspective. Maybe beating the

0:21:02.880 --> 0:21:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Vikings opening week wasn't as oppressive as we thought it was.

0:21:05.640 --> 0:21:09.840
<v Speaker 1>So Tampa is the underdog year. But with the backup quarterback,

0:21:10.240 --> 0:21:12.400
<v Speaker 1>is this game a little closer? Maybe? Perhaps in your mind.

0:21:13.640 --> 0:21:17.240
<v Speaker 4>I don't know what to make of the Buccaneers offense yet, Joe.

0:21:17.240 --> 0:21:21.760
<v Speaker 4>With Baker Mayfield doing well against the Vikings and Bears, like,

0:21:21.800 --> 0:21:25.040
<v Speaker 4>we can't consider that as counting for much. It'll be

0:21:25.080 --> 0:21:28.160
<v Speaker 4>interesting to see how he does against an Eagles defense

0:21:28.160 --> 0:21:30.600
<v Speaker 4>that allowed I think like one hundred and seventy nine

0:21:30.680 --> 0:21:33.639
<v Speaker 4>passing yards per game on average in twenty twenty two.

0:21:33.760 --> 0:21:37.600
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, this game is really a hard one to peg.

0:21:37.760 --> 0:21:39.640
<v Speaker 4>I mean, we had the Adam Thielen ball. Now we've

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:43.160
<v Speaker 4>got the Jamis Winston ball. And Winston adds this air

0:21:43.240 --> 0:21:46.040
<v Speaker 4>of unpredictability to this game. I mean, this is the

0:21:46.160 --> 0:21:49.440
<v Speaker 4>guy who was a thirty to thirty quarterback the last

0:21:49.440 --> 0:21:51.560
<v Speaker 4>time we saw him as a full time starter thirty

0:21:51.600 --> 0:21:56.120
<v Speaker 4>three touchdowns in twenty nineteen with the Buccaneers thirty interceptions.

0:21:56.800 --> 0:22:00.520
<v Speaker 4>I mean he could go nuclear and torch the Buccaneers defense.

0:22:00.600 --> 0:22:05.639
<v Speaker 4>He could commit five turnovers. We don't know. Like Sam,

0:22:05.640 --> 0:22:07.400
<v Speaker 4>if you forced me to play it, I'd probably play

0:22:07.400 --> 0:22:09.560
<v Speaker 4>the under. But I it's a pretty low number, So

0:22:09.560 --> 0:22:11.000
<v Speaker 4>I don't think I'm gonna play that either.

0:22:11.200 --> 0:22:12.399
<v Speaker 5>I'm just gonna stay away.

0:22:13.640 --> 0:22:16.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that that might be a good a good

0:22:16.840 --> 0:22:19.520
<v Speaker 1>practice there. But you know that total, that forty one,

0:22:20.440 --> 0:22:21.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that is a low number here. You know,

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:24.600
<v Speaker 1>when you start scratching the surface of that the thirties,

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:26.439
<v Speaker 1>that's when you know that Vegas is saying, hey, this

0:22:26.480 --> 0:22:27.880
<v Speaker 1>is not gonna be a fun game for the daily

0:22:27.920 --> 0:22:29.920
<v Speaker 1>fantasy or for some other things too. And I don't

0:22:29.920 --> 0:22:31.840
<v Speaker 1>want to hear about Winston revenge games because he's been

0:22:31.840 --> 0:22:34.600
<v Speaker 1>in that division forever now, so he's in a backup

0:22:34.640 --> 0:22:37.160
<v Speaker 1>there for the Saints or a starter at times when

0:22:37.200 --> 0:22:39.800
<v Speaker 1>called upon. The Philadelphia Eagles are going to host the

0:22:39.920 --> 0:22:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Washington Commanders. This Indivision matchup will take place in Philadelphia.

0:22:43.880 --> 0:22:46.720
<v Speaker 1>The Eagles are seven point favorites as of now over

0:22:46.800 --> 0:22:49.800
<v Speaker 1>on DraftKings. If you like the upset here of the

0:22:49.920 --> 0:22:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Washington Commanders, it's plus two to seventy five. The number here,

0:22:53.359 --> 0:22:56.040
<v Speaker 1>the total is forty four and a half fits when

0:22:56.080 --> 0:22:58.240
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at this one here, this feels like your

0:22:58.320 --> 0:23:01.919
<v Speaker 1>normal sort of situation line here. If the Eagles go

0:23:01.960 --> 0:23:04.880
<v Speaker 1>out and Monday night and smash here, do you think

0:23:04.880 --> 0:23:06.040
<v Speaker 1>this line moves any bit?

0:23:06.560 --> 0:23:09.280
<v Speaker 4>I do, which is why I've already grabbed the Eagles

0:23:09.320 --> 0:23:14.040
<v Speaker 4>and locked them in at seven points. I'm betting them confidently,

0:23:14.119 --> 0:23:17.200
<v Speaker 4>even on the short week of rest. Sam Howell turned

0:23:17.240 --> 0:23:20.880
<v Speaker 4>to absolute jelly against a good Buffalo Bell's pass defense,

0:23:20.960 --> 0:23:23.200
<v Speaker 4>and the Eagles have a good pass defense as well.

0:23:24.440 --> 0:23:27.000
<v Speaker 4>This spread feels way too small to me, and I

0:23:27.080 --> 0:23:29.240
<v Speaker 4>think we're going to see it go up. You know,

0:23:29.320 --> 0:23:31.040
<v Speaker 4>I do think the Eagles are going to beat the

0:23:31.040 --> 0:23:33.520
<v Speaker 4>Buccaneers tonight and that's going to move this line.

0:23:33.920 --> 0:23:38.000
<v Speaker 1>That feels right to me. Sam, your friend and name

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:41.399
<v Speaker 1>Sam Howell made some bad decisions on Sunday. Can't make

0:23:41.440 --> 0:23:43.280
<v Speaker 1>those decisions against the Eagles. They're really going to put

0:23:43.280 --> 0:23:45.000
<v Speaker 1>you in a bad spot, just like the Buffalo Bills did.

0:23:45.280 --> 0:23:46.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm kind of where Pad is on this one. If

0:23:46.720 --> 0:23:48.359
<v Speaker 1>you like the Eagles, you want to bet this one now,

0:23:48.720 --> 0:23:51.239
<v Speaker 1>because the more time I think goes by the more

0:23:51.280 --> 0:23:54.640
<v Speaker 1>people will continue to grow confident in that Eagle's home

0:23:54.680 --> 0:23:58.280
<v Speaker 1>field advantage and the Commander is still relatively although they

0:23:58.280 --> 0:24:00.320
<v Speaker 1>were impressed in the first couple of weeks. You know,

0:24:00.320 --> 0:24:02.439
<v Speaker 1>when you start playing better football teams, this is what happens.

0:24:02.440 --> 0:24:04.640
<v Speaker 1>So what are your thoughts on this early line.

0:24:04.920 --> 0:24:08.520
<v Speaker 3>Washington got drag back down to earth after their fans

0:24:08.520 --> 0:24:11.800
<v Speaker 3>were very optimistic and I think rightfully so through the

0:24:11.800 --> 0:24:15.159
<v Speaker 3>first two weeks. But I think Philadelphia should have no

0:24:15.280 --> 0:24:19.640
<v Speaker 3>trouble just running all over this Commander's defense. Philadelphia ranks

0:24:19.640 --> 0:24:22.600
<v Speaker 3>fourth in rushing EPA per play and first in rushing

0:24:22.640 --> 0:24:25.000
<v Speaker 3>success rate. I don't think it really matters who they

0:24:25.000 --> 0:24:28.040
<v Speaker 3>have in the backfield, whether it's DeAndre Swift, Kenneth Gainwell,

0:24:28.080 --> 0:24:31.199
<v Speaker 3>Boston Scott, all of these guys should be able to

0:24:31.720 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 3>have some success. So I think this is a game

0:24:35.160 --> 0:24:38.840
<v Speaker 3>where Philadelphia goes in, even on a short week, and

0:24:39.040 --> 0:24:44.280
<v Speaker 3>just handles their business in at Philadelphia, all right.

0:24:44.200 --> 0:24:45.959
<v Speaker 1>This one could be the game of the week here.

0:24:46.080 --> 0:24:48.080
<v Speaker 1>The Buffalo Bills, two and a half point favorites at

0:24:48.119 --> 0:24:50.560
<v Speaker 1>home against the Miami Dolphins, are still favorites at home

0:24:50.920 --> 0:24:55.080
<v Speaker 1>after Miami put up seventy points on the Denver Broncos.

0:24:55.080 --> 0:24:57.320
<v Speaker 1>But regardless the number on the over, if you like

0:24:57.359 --> 0:25:00.359
<v Speaker 1>it minus one twelve fifty one at Sugarhouse three and

0:25:00.359 --> 0:25:02.639
<v Speaker 1>a half minus one ten a DK. If you like

0:25:02.640 --> 0:25:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Miami to win outright at plus one thirty five, that's

0:25:06.320 --> 0:25:08.159
<v Speaker 1>the number you're getting a Sugarhouse right now in the

0:25:08.160 --> 0:25:10.720
<v Speaker 1>early line. Now, Sam, this is a fascinating one because

0:25:10.960 --> 0:25:13.239
<v Speaker 1>the recency bias here. People are gonna run to this

0:25:13.280 --> 0:25:16.159
<v Speaker 1>total and bet the over. But it is an indivision matchup.

0:25:16.160 --> 0:25:17.800
<v Speaker 1>These teams do know each other very well. There's a

0:25:17.800 --> 0:25:20.119
<v Speaker 1>familiarity there as opposed to the teams you're playing out

0:25:20.160 --> 0:25:23.080
<v Speaker 1>of division or even out of conference. Do you think

0:25:23.119 --> 0:25:25.320
<v Speaker 1>that's a mistake to people running to this line and

0:25:25.359 --> 0:25:26.320
<v Speaker 1>going over right away?

0:25:27.640 --> 0:25:32.080
<v Speaker 3>I do think so. We saw in the Chargers Vikings

0:25:32.200 --> 0:25:37.320
<v Speaker 3>game this past week with a similar total line that

0:25:38.320 --> 0:25:41.840
<v Speaker 3>you need pretty much everything to go right for a

0:25:41.920 --> 0:25:44.480
<v Speaker 3>game with that high of a total to go over.

0:25:44.840 --> 0:25:48.840
<v Speaker 3>There were red zone turnovers in that game that forced

0:25:48.880 --> 0:25:53.480
<v Speaker 3>them not to score and lengthen the game. And I

0:25:53.480 --> 0:25:56.359
<v Speaker 3>don't know, I've been going back and forth all morning

0:25:56.640 --> 0:25:59.119
<v Speaker 3>around which team I think is going to win. I

0:25:59.160 --> 0:26:02.919
<v Speaker 3>think I take Miami with the points right now.

0:26:03.200 --> 0:26:04.760
<v Speaker 2>But I I'm.

0:26:04.520 --> 0:26:06.760
<v Speaker 3>Just gonna sit back and enjoy this game without any

0:26:06.800 --> 0:26:08.080
<v Speaker 3>betting leans for right now.

0:26:09.320 --> 0:26:11.000
<v Speaker 1>To tell you the truth, Pat, I think the best

0:26:11.040 --> 0:26:14.720
<v Speaker 1>number on this board is probably the under of fifty

0:26:14.760 --> 0:26:17.359
<v Speaker 1>three and a half on DK because that is inching

0:26:17.440 --> 0:26:20.440
<v Speaker 1>to where you know that threshold of team's really got

0:26:20.440 --> 0:26:23.080
<v Speaker 1>everyone's got to put it together. And I know, I

0:26:23.119 --> 0:26:24.320
<v Speaker 1>feel like a lot of money is going to come

0:26:24.320 --> 0:26:26.879
<v Speaker 1>in on the over, so maybe this number even pushes higher.

0:26:27.200 --> 0:26:29.240
<v Speaker 1>So maybe you wait if you like the over under.

0:26:29.400 --> 0:26:31.160
<v Speaker 1>But I like Miami on the money line plus one

0:26:31.200 --> 0:26:35.000
<v Speaker 1>thirty five here. I'm I'm believing in what Mike McDaniel's

0:26:35.040 --> 0:26:36.040
<v Speaker 1>doing here with this offense.

0:26:36.040 --> 0:26:38.920
<v Speaker 5>What do you think, Joe, We're very like minded this week.

0:26:39.359 --> 0:26:42.399
<v Speaker 1>I know it's not always the same, I hope so

0:26:42.520 --> 0:26:45.240
<v Speaker 1>because last week I was on an island and it

0:26:45.320 --> 0:26:47.399
<v Speaker 1>did not work out. I drowned. I drowned trying to

0:26:47.400 --> 0:26:48.840
<v Speaker 1>swim off the island on Sunday night.

0:26:49.400 --> 0:26:51.600
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, you mentioned the totals already up to fifty

0:26:51.600 --> 0:26:53.679
<v Speaker 4>three and a half on Draft Kings, and I do

0:26:53.720 --> 0:26:56.120
<v Speaker 4>think it's going to climb even higher, like we saw

0:26:56.160 --> 0:27:00.520
<v Speaker 4>these teams combine for over one hundred points of offense

0:27:00.680 --> 0:27:01.440
<v Speaker 4>in Week three.

0:27:01.640 --> 0:27:03.640
<v Speaker 5>So and if it.

0:27:03.560 --> 0:27:05.879
<v Speaker 4>Does get up to fifty four higher, I will be

0:27:05.880 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 4>betting the under two because, as Andrew Erickson pointed out

0:27:10.040 --> 0:27:14.080
<v Speaker 4>in the Betting Pros Betting primer, which you should be reading,

0:27:14.119 --> 0:27:16.240
<v Speaker 4>by the way, because then you'd see things like Ericson's

0:27:16.240 --> 0:27:20.400
<v Speaker 4>recommendation to bet Donald Parum for a first TD scorer

0:27:20.760 --> 0:27:23.560
<v Speaker 4>at thirty to one, which came in and made people

0:27:23.600 --> 0:27:25.760
<v Speaker 4>a lot of money. But so if it does get

0:27:25.800 --> 0:27:29.400
<v Speaker 4>to fifty four, as Ericson pointed out, we have now

0:27:29.480 --> 0:27:32.919
<v Speaker 4>seen it was four last season. In this season and

0:27:32.960 --> 0:27:35.640
<v Speaker 4>now it's five because we saw the Chargers Vikings game

0:27:36.000 --> 0:27:38.560
<v Speaker 4>close at fifty four. Games that close at fifty four

0:27:38.600 --> 0:27:41.040
<v Speaker 4>points or higher, we've had five of them now since

0:27:41.080 --> 0:27:43.920
<v Speaker 4>the start of twenty twenty two, all five of stayed under.

0:27:44.520 --> 0:27:46.400
<v Speaker 4>And so you know, I think we're going to see

0:27:46.400 --> 0:27:48.520
<v Speaker 4>that trend continue if this gets up to fifty four.

0:27:48.800 --> 0:27:51.200
<v Speaker 4>I also like the Dolphins. I mean I think they

0:27:51.280 --> 0:27:54.640
<v Speaker 4>are the equal of the Buffalo Bills. Home field advantage

0:27:54.640 --> 0:27:57.320
<v Speaker 4>is worth about two points. If I'm getting the Dolphins

0:27:57.320 --> 0:28:01.560
<v Speaker 4>in three, especially like with that field goal number, I

0:28:01.600 --> 0:28:04.520
<v Speaker 4>think we're getting like a point of value, So I

0:28:04.520 --> 0:28:05.200
<v Speaker 4>don't know whether.

0:28:05.160 --> 0:28:08.200
<v Speaker 1>They can get Jalen Wattle back too. Theoretically, yeah, that's

0:28:08.200 --> 0:28:08.960
<v Speaker 1>what we're expecting.

0:28:09.600 --> 0:28:11.560
<v Speaker 4>I'm just not sure whether to get it at three

0:28:12.200 --> 0:28:14.240
<v Speaker 4>wait and hope it goes up to three and a half,

0:28:14.359 --> 0:28:16.240
<v Speaker 4>or you know, like it could go down to two

0:28:16.280 --> 0:28:18.840
<v Speaker 4>and a half and I can't figure out which way

0:28:18.880 --> 0:28:21.080
<v Speaker 4>the line would be more likely to move.

0:28:21.680 --> 0:28:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Well, what you got to do then, is set your

0:28:24.320 --> 0:28:26.840
<v Speaker 1>notifications for the game notification and the Betting Pros app

0:28:26.920 --> 0:28:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the line alerts. That's what it's there for. See you

0:28:29.119 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 1>look at that perfect segue. So if you haven't already

0:28:31.640 --> 0:28:33.840
<v Speaker 1>download the Betting Pros apps, think all your sportsbook, but

0:28:34.040 --> 0:28:36.320
<v Speaker 1>use the game notification. So you could basically say, I

0:28:36.359 --> 0:28:38.280
<v Speaker 1>want to keep an eye on this line here, does

0:28:38.280 --> 0:28:40.040
<v Speaker 1>it go to fifty four? Does go to fifty four

0:28:40.040 --> 0:28:42.120
<v Speaker 1>and a half? I want to be this is the

0:28:42.160 --> 0:28:44.640
<v Speaker 1>perfect example of how to use the line alerts or

0:28:44.680 --> 0:28:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the game notification because I'm waiting for this one to grow,

0:28:46.800 --> 0:28:49.120
<v Speaker 1>because I think it will. People are gonna keep talking

0:28:49.160 --> 0:28:51.560
<v Speaker 1>in the media about the seventy. They're gonna be talking

0:28:51.560 --> 0:28:54.240
<v Speaker 1>all about the Dolphins, and they should. They earnt that right,

0:28:54.760 --> 0:28:57.000
<v Speaker 1>But I think it's going to inflate this number even

0:28:57.080 --> 0:28:59.160
<v Speaker 1>more so the number I'm waiting on. But I like

0:28:59.240 --> 0:29:01.440
<v Speaker 1>the Dolphins here plus one thirty five. But check out

0:29:01.440 --> 0:29:03.800
<v Speaker 1>the line alerts and set those game notifications so you

0:29:03.840 --> 0:29:05.560
<v Speaker 1>know when the lines move, then you can pounce on it.

0:29:05.560 --> 0:29:08.080
<v Speaker 1>All right, Let's get to the next game here, maybe

0:29:08.160 --> 0:29:11.040
<v Speaker 1>not quite as exciting as the last one. Cincinnati Bengals

0:29:11.040 --> 0:29:13.200
<v Speaker 1>to the Tennessee Titans. Again, a lot of uncertainty here,

0:29:13.560 --> 0:29:16.200
<v Speaker 1>man FITZI. I thought that that plus four that I

0:29:16.200 --> 0:29:18.000
<v Speaker 1>got on the Titans was such a good number. I

0:29:18.040 --> 0:29:19.960
<v Speaker 1>got that one early last week, right after the show.

0:29:20.000 --> 0:29:22.520
<v Speaker 1>I locked that bad boy in. It did not matter.

0:29:22.800 --> 0:29:26.440
<v Speaker 1>The Titans were terrible. The offensive line just laid down

0:29:26.440 --> 0:29:29.080
<v Speaker 1>for Miles Garrett as I would too. I don't blame them,

0:29:29.480 --> 0:29:32.840
<v Speaker 1>but they are right now. You can get the Tennessee

0:29:32.840 --> 0:29:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Titans at plus one and a half at Sugarhouse. You

0:29:34.880 --> 0:29:37.240
<v Speaker 1>get Cincinnati at plus two and a half at Caesars.

0:29:37.520 --> 0:29:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Nobody knows what to do with this game. You get

0:29:39.640 --> 0:29:41.680
<v Speaker 1>forty one and a half on FanDuel, but forty four

0:29:41.760 --> 0:29:43.760
<v Speaker 1>on the under on Sugarhouse if you like that one,

0:29:44.080 --> 0:29:46.000
<v Speaker 1>and then it's even money for the Titans plus one

0:29:46.080 --> 0:29:49.360
<v Speaker 1>fifteen at Caesars. This is your classic. You go choose

0:29:49.400 --> 0:29:51.760
<v Speaker 1>your own adventure situation. But I guess a lot of

0:29:51.800 --> 0:29:53.760
<v Speaker 1>it has to do with the health of Joe Burrow.

0:29:53.960 --> 0:29:55.840
<v Speaker 1>So if you think Joe Burrow sits this week, comes

0:29:55.880 --> 0:29:58.360
<v Speaker 1>back healthy next week and has himself a game, well,

0:29:58.400 --> 0:30:00.680
<v Speaker 1>then this is the time to go bat Cincinnati. But

0:30:00.960 --> 0:30:02.360
<v Speaker 1>that's a big question mark, isn't.

0:30:02.200 --> 0:30:05.800
<v Speaker 4>If it Bengals are going to shut down Joe Burrow

0:30:06.120 --> 0:30:08.960
<v Speaker 4>just for the long term good, which makes me want

0:30:09.000 --> 0:30:11.520
<v Speaker 4>to bet the under here now to lock it in

0:30:11.560 --> 0:30:14.080
<v Speaker 4>at forty two and a half on DraftKings as of

0:30:14.120 --> 0:30:17.240
<v Speaker 4>this morning. I also want to do something with the Titans,

0:30:17.240 --> 0:30:19.520
<v Speaker 4>and maybe, like you, Joe, I'm guilty of giving too

0:30:19.600 --> 0:30:21.920
<v Speaker 4>much credit to Mike Frable sometimes and it's kind of

0:30:21.920 --> 0:30:24.840
<v Speaker 4>burned me. It burned me too last week. I thought

0:30:24.840 --> 0:30:27.000
<v Speaker 4>they were gonna, you know, turn it into like a

0:30:27.120 --> 0:30:29.280
<v Speaker 4>rock fight with the Browns and keep it close.

0:30:29.360 --> 0:30:29.960
<v Speaker 5>Didn't happen.

0:30:31.080 --> 0:30:33.920
<v Speaker 4>But so rather than take the Titans like on the

0:30:33.960 --> 0:30:36.520
<v Speaker 4>money line or you know, just a point and a half,

0:30:36.720 --> 0:30:41.840
<v Speaker 4>I might try to tease the put the Titans in

0:30:41.920 --> 0:30:45.120
<v Speaker 4>some sort of teaser where I'm getting more than a

0:30:45.160 --> 0:30:48.440
<v Speaker 4>field goal with them that I kind of like. I

0:30:48.480 --> 0:30:51.800
<v Speaker 4>think if we get no Joe Burrow, the Titans do

0:30:52.000 --> 0:30:54.920
<v Speaker 4>no worse than lose by a field goal or less.

0:30:55.880 --> 0:30:58.360
<v Speaker 1>Sam. This one's really dangerous for me because I feel

0:30:58.400 --> 0:31:02.000
<v Speaker 1>like I'm overreacting to my disdain of what happened this week,

0:31:02.040 --> 0:31:04.880
<v Speaker 1>and the Titans will do exactly what Fitz said, turn

0:31:04.960 --> 0:31:06.680
<v Speaker 1>this one into the rock fight, and then this one

0:31:06.680 --> 0:31:08.240
<v Speaker 1>will be a low total, and then this one will

0:31:08.240 --> 0:31:10.880
<v Speaker 1>be a Tennessee Titans victory when maybe they shouldn't win.

0:31:11.440 --> 0:31:13.160
<v Speaker 1>What do you think though about the Titans because this

0:31:13.200 --> 0:31:14.880
<v Speaker 1>is a really tough game on the schedule.

0:31:16.000 --> 0:31:20.360
<v Speaker 3>It is, but Tennessee's defense just made Deshaun Watson look

0:31:20.560 --> 0:31:23.280
<v Speaker 3>exceptionally good. He had I think, his best game as

0:31:23.320 --> 0:31:26.760
<v Speaker 3>a Brown. So if Joe Burrow comes out of the

0:31:26.760 --> 0:31:31.320
<v Speaker 3>game tonight without any setbacks, then I'm going probably pretty

0:31:31.360 --> 0:31:36.680
<v Speaker 3>heavy on the Bengals. Tennessee has a pass funnel defense.

0:31:36.800 --> 0:31:41.080
<v Speaker 3>They're rushing defense is top five in EPA per plays

0:31:41.120 --> 0:31:44.719
<v Speaker 3>success rate and explosive rush rate, but their bottom might

0:31:44.920 --> 0:31:48.280
<v Speaker 3>in passing EPA per play and passing success rates. So

0:31:49.040 --> 0:31:52.880
<v Speaker 3>the way that Cincinnati is going to be able to

0:31:52.880 --> 0:31:55.880
<v Speaker 3>move the ball is through the air, and I think

0:31:55.960 --> 0:31:59.080
<v Speaker 3>even with Joe Burrow at less than one hundred percent,

0:31:59.120 --> 0:32:01.760
<v Speaker 3>he'll be able to get it, you know, Jamar Chase

0:32:01.800 --> 0:32:04.760
<v Speaker 3>T Higgins, Tyler Boyd the ball in space and be

0:32:04.800 --> 0:32:09.040
<v Speaker 3>able to carve up this Tennessee defense. So I'm waiting

0:32:09.160 --> 0:32:13.560
<v Speaker 3>until the game tonight is over to make sure that

0:32:13.560 --> 0:32:17.920
<v Speaker 3>that Joe Burrow is still intact. But if he is

0:32:18.120 --> 0:32:22.040
<v Speaker 3>then and this line stays with Cincinnati as the underdog,

0:32:22.080 --> 0:32:23.120
<v Speaker 3>then I'll be taking.

0:32:22.880 --> 0:32:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Them Another Indivision matchup, this one AFC North Baltimore Ravens

0:32:28.240 --> 0:32:31.320
<v Speaker 1>two and one. They are plus two right now in Sugarhouse,

0:32:31.680 --> 0:32:33.760
<v Speaker 1>traveling to Cleveland, which you can get a plus one

0:32:33.880 --> 0:32:36.760
<v Speaker 1>and a half over at bet Rivers. Again, everyone's trying

0:32:36.760 --> 0:32:39.040
<v Speaker 1>to figure this out here. I don't think anybody has

0:32:39.080 --> 0:32:41.719
<v Speaker 1>a good beat on how good or bad the Ravens

0:32:41.720 --> 0:32:44.120
<v Speaker 1>really are, or really how good or bad Deshaun Watson

0:32:44.120 --> 0:32:46.880
<v Speaker 1>the Cleveland Browns are, especially without Chubb. Forty four and

0:32:46.880 --> 0:32:48.240
<v Speaker 1>a half is the best number you can get for

0:32:48.280 --> 0:32:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the under forty two and a half, the best numbered

0:32:50.040 --> 0:32:51.800
<v Speaker 1>FanDuel you can get, by the way, for the over

0:32:52.080 --> 0:32:53.480
<v Speaker 1>plus one oh five on the money line. If you

0:32:53.600 --> 0:32:56.400
<v Speaker 1>like Baltimore to win outright, Sam, do you see any

0:32:56.720 --> 0:32:59.280
<v Speaker 1>early value in this contest between the Browns and.

0:32:59.320 --> 0:33:03.200
<v Speaker 3>The Ravens Getting forty four and a half, I'm going

0:33:03.600 --> 0:33:07.560
<v Speaker 3>under easily. I mean, you know you mentioned Miles Garrett

0:33:07.600 --> 0:33:09.920
<v Speaker 3>in the previous game. I don't know if he saw

0:33:09.960 --> 0:33:13.560
<v Speaker 3>the clip of him motioning to one side of the field,

0:33:13.600 --> 0:33:16.920
<v Speaker 3>Tennessee shifting two guys towards him, him going back to

0:33:16.920 --> 0:33:19.120
<v Speaker 3>the other side, and them shifting those to same two

0:33:19.160 --> 0:33:21.880
<v Speaker 3>guys over to block him. I mean, he's a force

0:33:21.960 --> 0:33:26.480
<v Speaker 3>to be reckoned with this Brown's defense is through three

0:33:26.560 --> 0:33:32.200
<v Speaker 3>games setting some historical rates right now. The Ravens offense

0:33:32.280 --> 0:33:35.560
<v Speaker 3>still looks a little out of sorts with this new

0:33:35.600 --> 0:33:41.680
<v Speaker 3>Todd Monkin offense, and the Ravens are just dealing with

0:33:41.720 --> 0:33:46.120
<v Speaker 3>a ton of injuries to Ronnie Stanley and Todd Linderbaum

0:33:46.240 --> 0:33:49.240
<v Speaker 3>were both out for the second straight week again. David

0:33:49.240 --> 0:33:52.800
<v Speaker 3>Ajabo left early on Sunday, while A dafe Owi and

0:33:52.880 --> 0:33:57.000
<v Speaker 3>Marcus Williams who were both out too. So I just

0:33:57.080 --> 0:33:59.600
<v Speaker 3>think this game is going to go way under that

0:33:59.640 --> 0:34:02.720
<v Speaker 3>forty four and a half going to be one of

0:34:02.720 --> 0:34:07.880
<v Speaker 3>those classic AFC North slugfests. That we typically see in

0:34:07.880 --> 0:34:11.280
<v Speaker 3>in December, but get a little taste of in early

0:34:11.320 --> 0:34:12.280
<v Speaker 3>October here.

0:34:13.320 --> 0:34:14.799
<v Speaker 1>All right, you want to get any taste of this

0:34:14.880 --> 0:34:18.120
<v Speaker 1>early line when it comes to Baltimore and Cleveland, pet Yeah, I.

0:34:18.080 --> 0:34:21.720
<v Speaker 4>Mean it's gonna be, as Sam said, a classic KFC

0:34:21.760 --> 0:34:26.480
<v Speaker 4>North Slugfest, low scoring close. If I can get the

0:34:26.520 --> 0:34:29.520
<v Speaker 4>total at anything forty two or higher, yeah, sign me

0:34:29.600 --> 0:34:32.480
<v Speaker 4>up for the under. I saw forty one and a

0:34:32.520 --> 0:34:36.840
<v Speaker 4>half on DraftKings this morning, so I'm eager to watch

0:34:36.880 --> 0:34:37.319
<v Speaker 4>this game.

0:34:37.400 --> 0:34:39.120
<v Speaker 5>I'm not so eager to bet forty four.

0:34:39.200 --> 0:34:40.719
<v Speaker 1>You can get that under at bet rivers right now.

0:34:40.719 --> 0:34:43.040
<v Speaker 1>That's why I use betting Pros sink all your sportsbooks.

0:34:43.080 --> 0:34:45.279
<v Speaker 1>And again you can follow the guys too bettingpros dot

0:34:45.320 --> 0:34:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Com slash Sam, slash fits, slash Joe. But not last week.

0:34:49.480 --> 0:34:51.120
<v Speaker 1>You shouldn't have followed me last week. This week will

0:34:51.160 --> 0:34:53.040
<v Speaker 1>be better. But again I win with you, I lose

0:34:53.080 --> 0:34:54.400
<v Speaker 1>with you. That's what we do here. And if you

0:34:54.400 --> 0:34:57.040
<v Speaker 1>want to make your picks count, make sure you go

0:34:57.080 --> 0:35:00.319
<v Speaker 1>and join our NFL contest too. Just go download the app,

0:35:00.320 --> 0:35:03.160
<v Speaker 1>go to the community tab, click on the NFL Contest

0:35:03.239 --> 0:35:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Join or go to Betting Pros dot Com slash NFL Contest.

0:35:07.480 --> 0:35:09.719
<v Speaker 1>It's free to join. All you gotta do is make

0:35:09.760 --> 0:35:12.280
<v Speaker 1>five picks every week, one hundred picks throughout the NFL season.

0:35:12.640 --> 0:35:15.799
<v Speaker 1>That's it, and the winners going to get an absolute

0:35:15.880 --> 0:35:19.120
<v Speaker 1>stunning JSN Jackson Smith and Jig but Autograph Jersey. We're

0:35:19.120 --> 0:35:22.680
<v Speaker 1>also giving away monthly prizes, weekly prizes. Upgrade to Fantasy

0:35:22.680 --> 0:35:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Pros and Betting Pros Premium. You're gonna get swag from

0:35:25.440 --> 0:35:27.600
<v Speaker 1>our shops at Fantasy Pros and Betting Pros. So join

0:35:27.640 --> 0:35:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the NFL Contest Bettingpros dot Com slash NFL Contest today.

0:35:31.600 --> 0:35:34.880
<v Speaker 1>It's free, it's fun. Everybody likes free stuff. Now somebody's

0:35:34.880 --> 0:35:36.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna come out with a free victory. Here is the

0:35:36.400 --> 0:35:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Chicago Bears, now you know, winless, going to face the

0:35:40.719 --> 0:35:44.560
<v Speaker 1>winless Denver Broncos. Now the Broncos on paper they look

0:35:44.680 --> 0:35:49.000
<v Speaker 1>like the better team. Theoretically they are two point favorites

0:35:49.080 --> 0:35:51.560
<v Speaker 1>on the road at Sugar House. Forty four and a

0:35:51.600 --> 0:35:53.200
<v Speaker 1>half is the number. You can get it forty five

0:35:53.200 --> 0:35:54.880
<v Speaker 1>and a half on FanDuel if you like the under

0:35:55.840 --> 0:35:57.400
<v Speaker 1>and then you get plus one twenty five. You think

0:35:57.440 --> 0:35:59.400
<v Speaker 1>the Bears can actually get themselves together and win a

0:35:59.400 --> 0:36:03.200
<v Speaker 1>football game. I know you are keen on the Denver

0:36:03.239 --> 0:36:07.919
<v Speaker 1>Broncos defense bouncing back after being grossly all time embarrassed.

0:36:08.880 --> 0:36:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Can they bounce back after what happened? And can the

0:36:12.520 --> 0:36:15.399
<v Speaker 1>Denver Broncos finally get a victory in the Sean Payton era?

0:36:16.239 --> 0:36:19.040
<v Speaker 4>Joe and I am going to bet them. Both of

0:36:19.040 --> 0:36:22.880
<v Speaker 4>these teams are having major issues obviously, but I think

0:36:23.040 --> 0:36:27.480
<v Speaker 4>the Bears issues are irreparable. Like that team is so

0:36:28.160 --> 0:36:33.040
<v Speaker 4>beyond dysfunctional. It's like I could not have seen this coming.

0:36:33.040 --> 0:36:35.120
<v Speaker 4>And the Bears are just a train wreck right now.

0:36:35.120 --> 0:36:36.640
<v Speaker 4>They're completely off the rails.

0:36:37.239 --> 0:36:37.440
<v Speaker 5>You know.

0:36:38.000 --> 0:36:40.439
<v Speaker 4>I know the Broncos have problems of their own, And man,

0:36:40.480 --> 0:36:42.839
<v Speaker 4>I wanted to give Garrett Balls a hug after hearing

0:36:42.920 --> 0:36:45.560
<v Speaker 4>his postgame comments about how like he's been there for

0:36:45.600 --> 0:36:47.920
<v Speaker 4>seven years and all he's ever done is lost, and like,

0:36:47.960 --> 0:36:50.279
<v Speaker 4>I felt so bad for the guy. But I do

0:36:50.360 --> 0:36:53.640
<v Speaker 4>think the Broncos can get it together. They played a

0:36:53.680 --> 0:36:55.600
<v Speaker 4>close game and lost to the Raiders at home in

0:36:55.640 --> 0:36:58.640
<v Speaker 4>Week one. They should not have let one slip away

0:36:58.680 --> 0:37:02.080
<v Speaker 4>against the Commanders in Week two. Yes, things totally fell

0:37:02.120 --> 0:37:04.560
<v Speaker 4>apart against the Dolphins in Week three, but I think

0:37:04.600 --> 0:37:07.239
<v Speaker 4>they can get it back together against a team that

0:37:07.320 --> 0:37:09.720
<v Speaker 4>I don't think can get it back together, the Bears.

0:37:09.760 --> 0:37:13.239
<v Speaker 4>I'm taking the Dolphs the Broncos, and I'd lay more

0:37:13.239 --> 0:37:14.960
<v Speaker 4>than three and a half points. Like if this went

0:37:15.040 --> 0:37:16.560
<v Speaker 4>up to five and a half, I think i'd still

0:37:16.560 --> 0:37:17.360
<v Speaker 4>bet the Broncos.

0:37:17.840 --> 0:37:20.919
<v Speaker 1>All right, Sam, your feelings about these two teams both

0:37:20.920 --> 0:37:24.279
<v Speaker 1>headed towards the downward trajectory, But somebody's got to come out.

0:37:24.320 --> 0:37:26.200
<v Speaker 1>So who comes out of this one with a W.

0:37:27.320 --> 0:37:28.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm with Fits.

0:37:28.360 --> 0:37:31.359
<v Speaker 3>We've reached the thirty seven minute mark in the pod,

0:37:31.400 --> 0:37:32.680
<v Speaker 3>and I think this is the first.

0:37:32.400 --> 0:37:34.760
<v Speaker 2>Time I have with him on his side.

0:37:34.880 --> 0:37:40.160
<v Speaker 3>But both of these teams were just embarrassed on Sunday

0:37:39.840 --> 0:37:44.799
<v Speaker 3>in different ways, and I think I give Denver a

0:37:44.920 --> 0:37:47.560
<v Speaker 3>much better chance to bounce back low Ki. I don't

0:37:47.600 --> 0:37:52.720
<v Speaker 3>think their offense in Denver is that bad. They've had

0:37:52.760 --> 0:37:55.680
<v Speaker 3>some success. They're in the half of the league in

0:37:56.120 --> 0:37:59.520
<v Speaker 3>a lot of efficiency metrics. They're not blowing anyone away.

0:37:59.719 --> 0:38:05.120
<v Speaker 3>But against a devastatingly bad Bears defense, I think they

0:38:05.160 --> 0:38:09.000
<v Speaker 3>come away with an easy victory here. I like some

0:38:09.640 --> 0:38:14.759
<v Speaker 3>alternate spreads on Denver in this game, to you know,

0:38:14.880 --> 0:38:17.240
<v Speaker 3>just really put it to the Chicago Bears.

0:38:17.520 --> 0:38:19.799
<v Speaker 1>All right, the Las Vegas Raiders are going to go

0:38:19.920 --> 0:38:22.439
<v Speaker 1>to LA to play the Chargers. The Chargers are four

0:38:22.440 --> 0:38:24.160
<v Speaker 1>point favorites at home, fifty and a half as the

0:38:24.239 --> 0:38:27.000
<v Speaker 1>number Jimmy Garoppolo should play in this one plus one

0:38:27.040 --> 0:38:29.640
<v Speaker 1>seventy five like the upset, Sam, your thoughts on this

0:38:29.719 --> 0:38:32.080
<v Speaker 1>contest here with Vegas and the Chargers.

0:38:32.880 --> 0:38:36.160
<v Speaker 3>The Chargers are clearly the better team. Their offense is

0:38:36.200 --> 0:38:39.640
<v Speaker 3>firing on all cylinders. If not for Tua, I think,

0:38:39.719 --> 0:38:42.720
<v Speaker 3>and you know, being one and two, I think Herbert

0:38:42.760 --> 0:38:46.879
<v Speaker 3>would easily be in the MVP discussion. He has been

0:38:46.920 --> 0:38:51.440
<v Speaker 3>playing exceptionally well this year. I think, you know, obviously

0:38:51.480 --> 0:38:56.240
<v Speaker 3>the Chargers defense isn't that great, but the Raiders defense

0:38:56.280 --> 0:38:59.319
<v Speaker 3>can't really make a stop to save its life. They

0:38:59.440 --> 0:39:05.680
<v Speaker 3>just allowed the Pittsburgh offense to look good. So I'm

0:39:05.760 --> 0:39:08.239
<v Speaker 3>I'm laying the points with Los Angeles here.

0:39:08.719 --> 0:39:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Mike Williams out for the year torn a cl We

0:39:10.920 --> 0:39:13.080
<v Speaker 1>just got that news breaking while we were recording the show.

0:39:13.160 --> 0:39:15.719
<v Speaker 1>Fits impact here at all in this line for you

0:39:15.800 --> 0:39:17.480
<v Speaker 1>with Mike Williams done and then having to move to

0:39:17.560 --> 0:39:20.440
<v Speaker 1>QJ and maybe you know some more Palmer in this

0:39:20.520 --> 0:39:21.080
<v Speaker 1>lineup too.

0:39:21.080 --> 0:39:23.480
<v Speaker 4>With this over at fifty, maybe I'm going to get

0:39:23.480 --> 0:39:26.520
<v Speaker 4>Brandon Staleid here and the Chargers head coach is going

0:39:26.560 --> 0:39:28.920
<v Speaker 4>to make some sort of terrible decision that costs me

0:39:29.040 --> 0:39:31.200
<v Speaker 4>my wager here. But I'm going to continue my full

0:39:31.360 --> 0:39:34.920
<v Speaker 4>season fade of Josh McDaniels. I've bet against him every

0:39:34.960 --> 0:39:38.080
<v Speaker 4>week so far. I'm going to keep betting against McDaniels

0:39:38.120 --> 0:39:38.800
<v Speaker 4>and the Raiders.

0:39:38.840 --> 0:39:40.279
<v Speaker 5>And you know, all.

0:39:40.280 --> 0:39:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Right, Fitz, Dallas Cowboys suffered their first loss. They are

0:39:43.200 --> 0:39:45.120
<v Speaker 1>now two and one Arizona Cardinals. They are still six

0:39:45.200 --> 0:39:48.160
<v Speaker 1>and a half point favorites hosting New England this week.

0:39:48.200 --> 0:39:50.399
<v Speaker 1>Forty two is the number sometimes forty two and a half.

0:39:50.400 --> 0:39:52.920
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna get Sugarhouse forty two over a FanDuel if

0:39:52.960 --> 0:39:54.879
<v Speaker 1>you think New England will win, it's plus two eighty

0:39:54.920 --> 0:39:56.799
<v Speaker 1>on the money line. I do not. I don't think

0:39:56.840 --> 0:39:59.600
<v Speaker 1>this offense is good enough. The defense is respectable, that's

0:39:59.600 --> 0:40:03.160
<v Speaker 1>for sure, but still, look, Dallas, I expected to bounce

0:40:03.200 --> 0:40:05.279
<v Speaker 1>back this week. The question is is this too big

0:40:05.280 --> 0:40:07.000
<v Speaker 1>of a number here? Too much credit for the Cowboys

0:40:07.000 --> 0:40:08.319
<v Speaker 1>at six and a half fits?

0:40:08.520 --> 0:40:10.960
<v Speaker 4>You know, I want to believe the Cowboys are going

0:40:11.040 --> 0:40:14.760
<v Speaker 4>to be out for vengeance after that toast stubbing in Arizona.

0:40:14.800 --> 0:40:18.480
<v Speaker 4>But I do wonder if the loss of Trayvon Diggs,

0:40:18.840 --> 0:40:21.959
<v Speaker 4>oh I change something like, yeah, that's a big deal,

0:40:23.120 --> 0:40:25.640
<v Speaker 4>Like I don't know if mac Jones can capitalize on it.

0:40:26.000 --> 0:40:28.520
<v Speaker 4>And we know that the Cowboys can still get after

0:40:28.560 --> 0:40:32.719
<v Speaker 4>the quarterback, certainly with Micah Parsons. So yeah, I just

0:40:32.920 --> 0:40:35.000
<v Speaker 4>like I think the lines are the line in the

0:40:35.040 --> 0:40:36.759
<v Speaker 4>total are both spot on here.

0:40:36.800 --> 0:40:37.759
<v Speaker 5>I just don't want to beat this.

0:40:38.280 --> 0:40:40.759
<v Speaker 1>Well, speaking of Jones as too, the secondary for the

0:40:40.800 --> 0:40:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Newland Patriots was missing all their Joneses, all three of

0:40:43.120 --> 0:40:45.480
<v Speaker 1>them for this past matchup, so that's also a problem

0:40:45.520 --> 0:40:48.120
<v Speaker 1>on the other side here for the newle Patriots. Do

0:40:48.160 --> 0:40:51.239
<v Speaker 1>you see any value here? Sam early on on this

0:40:51.320 --> 0:40:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys six and a half number.

0:40:53.640 --> 0:40:55.919
<v Speaker 3>To I agree with fits Again, I think all these

0:40:55.960 --> 0:40:59.360
<v Speaker 3>lines are are spot on. I think people will overreact

0:40:59.400 --> 0:41:02.239
<v Speaker 3>a little bit to Dallas losing this past week, and

0:41:02.360 --> 0:41:04.279
<v Speaker 3>I'll talk about that in a minute. Here with our

0:41:04.320 --> 0:41:05.040
<v Speaker 3>next game.

0:41:05.160 --> 0:41:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, let's talk about San Francisco, who is undefeated, looks great,

0:41:08.440 --> 0:41:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Arizona has look for all this crap we gave the

0:41:12.000 --> 0:41:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Arizona Cardinals organization. They have been competitive on the field.

0:41:15.560 --> 0:41:17.880
<v Speaker 1>They're showing up for every game, even when they shouldn't

0:41:17.920 --> 0:41:20.759
<v Speaker 1>be showing up for some of these games. Forty nine Ers, though,

0:41:20.760 --> 0:41:23.200
<v Speaker 1>are still fourteen point favorites at home fourteen and a

0:41:23.280 --> 0:41:26.400
<v Speaker 1>half on the plus side for Arizona, get Sugarhouse fourteen

0:41:26.440 --> 0:41:29.040
<v Speaker 1>at FanDuel forty one to forty two. That's about the

0:41:29.080 --> 0:41:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Ranger getting this number. Arizona, there will be an epic

0:41:31.719 --> 0:41:34.840
<v Speaker 1>upset for them at plus six fifty Sam fourteen is

0:41:34.880 --> 0:41:36.960
<v Speaker 1>a big number. Can the forty nine ers cover it?

0:41:37.440 --> 0:41:40.960
<v Speaker 3>I make this San Francisco by thirteen, So I'd probably

0:41:41.000 --> 0:41:44.840
<v Speaker 3>take Arizona. Their offense has not been a bismol to

0:41:44.920 --> 0:41:47.560
<v Speaker 3>your points. Their fifth and early down EPA per play

0:41:47.600 --> 0:41:52.120
<v Speaker 3>and success rate. They've played against Washington, the Giants, and Dallas,

0:41:52.200 --> 0:41:56.000
<v Speaker 3>who are all not terrible defenses. In Dallas is a

0:41:56.080 --> 0:41:58.919
<v Speaker 3>great defense, so I think they're going to be able

0:41:58.960 --> 0:42:02.200
<v Speaker 3>to have some six sess. I'm not betting this because

0:42:02.200 --> 0:42:05.200
<v Speaker 3>I still do worry that Arizona comes back down to earth,

0:42:05.280 --> 0:42:08.319
<v Speaker 3>but there's a real scenario where our Cardinals could have

0:42:08.320 --> 0:42:10.000
<v Speaker 3>been three and oh so far this season.

0:42:11.000 --> 0:42:13.640
<v Speaker 1>You're right, I think the one thing I take away,

0:42:13.640 --> 0:42:16.680
<v Speaker 1>though pit fits is the you know, because they beat

0:42:16.719 --> 0:42:20.000
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys yesterday. I do think San Francisco goes Okay,

0:42:20.080 --> 0:42:21.759
<v Speaker 1>we got to take this game very seriously. It's in

0:42:21.800 --> 0:42:24.640
<v Speaker 1>our division, you know, like we better put a pounding

0:42:24.640 --> 0:42:26.719
<v Speaker 1>on the Arizona Cardinals because this team's going to show up.

0:42:26.800 --> 0:42:29.680
<v Speaker 1>So in some ways, I feel like that victory is

0:42:29.719 --> 0:42:31.360
<v Speaker 1>almost like a wake up call without a wake up

0:42:31.400 --> 0:42:33.000
<v Speaker 1>call for San fran who, by the way, also has

0:42:33.040 --> 0:42:35.279
<v Speaker 1>extra rest for this game play.

0:42:35.360 --> 0:42:37.080
<v Speaker 4>Joe, I'm want to grab the forty nine Ers while

0:42:37.120 --> 0:42:39.880
<v Speaker 4>I can at only two touchdowns. I mean, look at

0:42:39.920 --> 0:42:41.920
<v Speaker 4>how they just squeeze the life out of the New

0:42:42.000 --> 0:42:45.080
<v Speaker 4>York Giants in Week three, and now they do get

0:42:45.080 --> 0:42:47.960
<v Speaker 4>that extra rest as you pointed out. And look, the

0:42:48.000 --> 0:42:50.840
<v Speaker 4>Cardinals are already messing up this whole tanking thing. I

0:42:50.840 --> 0:42:52.560
<v Speaker 4>think they need to come to their senses and get

0:42:52.600 --> 0:42:56.239
<v Speaker 4>back to the business of losing, which behooves the franchise

0:42:56.280 --> 0:42:59.160
<v Speaker 4>long term. Yes, they beat the Cowboys, but the forty

0:42:59.239 --> 0:43:02.000
<v Speaker 4>nine Ers have shown they know how to handle an

0:43:02.000 --> 0:43:06.720
<v Speaker 4>overmatched opponent, like even a you know, fairly closely matched opponent.

0:43:06.760 --> 0:43:08.279
<v Speaker 5>They just crushed the.

0:43:08.239 --> 0:43:11.279
<v Speaker 4>Steelers in Week one like I think this line should

0:43:11.320 --> 0:43:13.520
<v Speaker 4>be at least like fifteen and a half.

0:43:13.640 --> 0:43:14.480
<v Speaker 5>I want to get it now.

0:43:14.920 --> 0:43:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Kansaity Chiefs are going to travel to New York. They

0:43:16.960 --> 0:43:19.840
<v Speaker 1>are eight and a half point favorites. Plus nine you

0:43:19.840 --> 0:43:22.200
<v Speaker 1>can get at Sugarhouse on the Jets forty three to

0:43:22.239 --> 0:43:23.520
<v Speaker 1>forty three and a half. That's kind of the range

0:43:23.560 --> 0:43:25.480
<v Speaker 1>right now. You're seeing on the line plus three fifty

0:43:25.480 --> 0:43:27.400
<v Speaker 1>if you think the Jets can win, and I don't.

0:43:28.400 --> 0:43:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about this one FITZI here. I mean, Zach

0:43:30.520 --> 0:43:33.279
<v Speaker 1>Wilson has been historically bad. Let's just lay it out there.

0:43:33.360 --> 0:43:36.520
<v Speaker 1>That's how it's been. The numbers bared out. It's period,

0:43:36.600 --> 0:43:39.279
<v Speaker 1>end of story. But the defense still very good year

0:43:39.320 --> 0:43:41.160
<v Speaker 1>for the Jets. Can the defense keep this eight and

0:43:41.200 --> 0:43:42.880
<v Speaker 1>a half in check? Yeah?

0:43:42.920 --> 0:43:46.360
<v Speaker 4>Boy, Patrick Mahomes versus Zach Wilson, talk about, you know,

0:43:46.520 --> 0:43:49.160
<v Speaker 4>David versus Goliath type of matchup.

0:43:49.400 --> 0:43:52.160
<v Speaker 1>I like want Shaquille O'Neil playing one on one basketball.

0:43:52.239 --> 0:43:55.440
<v Speaker 4>That's pretty much I want to lay the points here

0:43:55.440 --> 0:43:57.960
<v Speaker 4>when I look at that quarterback matchup. But I do

0:43:58.120 --> 0:44:01.480
<v Speaker 4>still have the utmost respect for the Jets defense, and

0:44:01.520 --> 0:44:03.680
<v Speaker 4>they are not The Jets aren't going to roll over

0:44:03.800 --> 0:44:06.840
<v Speaker 4>like the Chicago Bears did for the Kansas City Chiefs

0:44:07.200 --> 0:44:07.879
<v Speaker 4>in Week four.

0:44:08.040 --> 0:44:10.240
<v Speaker 5>So I don't think I'm going to play this one.

0:44:11.160 --> 0:44:13.279
<v Speaker 1>Sam, your thoughts on this one.

0:44:13.520 --> 0:44:16.920
<v Speaker 3>I'm playing it. Give me Patrick Mahomes and the points

0:44:16.960 --> 0:44:20.040
<v Speaker 3>in the defense is really good. I do like the

0:44:20.120 --> 0:44:24.279
<v Speaker 3>Jets defense, But yeah, Zach Wilson is just so bad,

0:44:24.320 --> 0:44:26.879
<v Speaker 3>and I think Kansas City will be able to make

0:44:26.920 --> 0:44:29.920
<v Speaker 3>his days as bad as it has been so far

0:44:30.040 --> 0:44:30.480
<v Speaker 3>this season.

0:44:30.640 --> 0:44:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I agree that pass rushes back with Chris Jones

0:44:33.960 --> 0:44:35.640
<v Speaker 1>to eight and a half is Actually this is one

0:44:35.640 --> 0:44:36.960
<v Speaker 1>of the numbers I like a lot. I want to

0:44:36.960 --> 0:44:38.840
<v Speaker 1>get this locked in now before it grows, because it

0:44:38.880 --> 0:44:42.560
<v Speaker 1>will next year. In final the New York Giants at home.

0:44:42.560 --> 0:44:44.560
<v Speaker 1>We don't have clarity about Saquon I would expect him

0:44:44.560 --> 0:44:46.880
<v Speaker 1>not to play. Considering all the information Doctor Chow gave

0:44:46.960 --> 0:44:49.400
<v Speaker 1>us on the podcast last week on Fantasy Pros, it

0:44:49.400 --> 0:44:50.840
<v Speaker 1>seems like he's gonna be a couple weeks with the

0:44:50.920 --> 0:44:53.040
<v Speaker 1>high ankle. Plus one and a half is what you're

0:44:53.040 --> 0:44:56.080
<v Speaker 1>getting here. The Seattle Seahawks one and a half point favorites.

0:44:56.520 --> 0:44:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Forty four and a half is the number of sometimes

0:44:58.640 --> 0:45:00.920
<v Speaker 1>forty five like over on fans and then plus one

0:45:01.000 --> 0:45:04.399
<v Speaker 1>eighteen like the Giants who went home outright, Sam, let's

0:45:04.400 --> 0:45:07.160
<v Speaker 1>lock this one up. Giants Seattle any early value here

0:45:07.160 --> 0:45:07.640
<v Speaker 1>in we four.

0:45:08.360 --> 0:45:12.279
<v Speaker 3>I think their offense, after stumbling a bit Week one

0:45:12.320 --> 0:45:15.120
<v Speaker 3>against the Rams, has has come back and had two

0:45:15.560 --> 0:45:18.040
<v Speaker 3>great showings. G you know, Smith is looking a little

0:45:18.080 --> 0:45:21.520
<v Speaker 3>bit better. Kenneth Walker and Zach Sharpenay are a great

0:45:21.560 --> 0:45:26.400
<v Speaker 3>one two punch in that backfield defense hasn't been stellar

0:45:26.480 --> 0:45:30.200
<v Speaker 3>by any means, But I don't think Daniel Jones is

0:45:30.320 --> 0:45:33.280
<v Speaker 3>that big of a threat to to put the pressure

0:45:33.400 --> 0:45:35.960
<v Speaker 3>on Seattle. So give me Seattle with the points.

0:45:36.960 --> 0:45:39.040
<v Speaker 1>I agree. I'm with Sam minus one and a half

0:45:39.200 --> 0:45:41.279
<v Speaker 1>minus one oh nine. You're getting on that one, Fitz,

0:45:41.320 --> 0:45:42.880
<v Speaker 1>are you three for three on this one?

0:45:43.280 --> 0:45:45.719
<v Speaker 5>Heck no, let me close the show with some disagreement.

0:45:45.800 --> 0:45:50.440
<v Speaker 4>I'm KII give me the home dog on nine days rest,

0:45:51.200 --> 0:45:53.839
<v Speaker 4>and like, I feel like the Seattle defense could be

0:45:53.880 --> 0:45:56.680
<v Speaker 4>the get well card that the Giants offense really needs

0:45:56.719 --> 0:45:59.200
<v Speaker 4>at this point. I like the over here. I think

0:45:59.200 --> 0:46:02.200
<v Speaker 4>this game has sneak shootout potential. As bad as these

0:46:02.239 --> 0:46:04.319
<v Speaker 4>two defenses are, I think it's gonna be a fun

0:46:04.360 --> 0:46:06.400
<v Speaker 4>way to wrap up Week four, but yeah, I like

0:46:06.440 --> 0:46:06.960
<v Speaker 4>the home dog.

0:46:07.000 --> 0:46:08.279
<v Speaker 5>Give me the giants, all right?

0:46:08.400 --> 0:46:09.920
<v Speaker 1>We want to hear from you, guys. What are your

0:46:09.920 --> 0:46:12.640
<v Speaker 1>favorite picks for Week four? Early and off and drop

0:46:12.640 --> 0:46:15.040
<v Speaker 1>them in the comments below. Subscribe to the channel, click

0:46:15.080 --> 0:46:16.719
<v Speaker 1>the belt likos ding and you just might win a

0:46:16.800 --> 0:46:20.319
<v Speaker 1>James Cook autograph Jersey. Join our NFL contest too at

0:46:20.320 --> 0:46:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Bettingpros dot com slash NFL Contest and download the Betting

0:46:23.520 --> 0:46:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Pros app so you can get all the best lines

0:46:25.520 --> 0:46:27.279
<v Speaker 1>and make the best decisions and turn on those line

0:46:27.320 --> 0:46:30.560
<v Speaker 1>alerts to as these lines are gonna move throughout the week.

0:46:30.760 --> 0:46:32.200
<v Speaker 1>That'll do it for us, but the story of the

0:46:32.239 --> 0:46:34.560
<v Speaker 1>game goes on for Sam and Pat. I'm Joey P.

0:46:35.160 --> 0:46:36.120
<v Speaker 1>We'll see you next time.

0:46:36.200 --> 0:46:36.520
<v Speaker 2>Kids.

0:46:37.000 --> 0:46:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Betting Pros podcast. Follow us

0:46:39.880 --> 0:46:42.839
<v Speaker 1>on x and TikTok at Betting Pros and Instagram at

0:46:42.840 --> 0:46:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Betting Pros NFL.

0:46:44.360 --> 0:46:45.400
<v Speaker 2>Also subscribe to our

0:46:45.440 --> 0:46:48.320
<v Speaker 4>YouTube channel at YouTube dot com slash Betting Pros