1 00:00:04,200 --> 00:00:05,920 Speaker 1: There Are No Girls on the Internet, as a production 2 00:00:05,960 --> 00:00:13,480 Speaker 1: of iHeartRadio and Unbossed Creative. I'm Bridget Tot and this 3 00:00:13,560 --> 00:00:18,000 Speaker 1: is There Are No Girls on the Internet. This is 4 00:00:18,040 --> 00:00:20,040 Speaker 1: There No Girls on the Internet, where we explore the 5 00:00:20,079 --> 00:00:24,239 Speaker 1: intersection of tech, social media, and identity. This is another 6 00:00:24,320 --> 00:00:28,360 Speaker 1: installment of our weekly news roundup, where we summarize and 7 00:00:28,440 --> 00:00:30,240 Speaker 1: round up some of the news on the Internet that 8 00:00:30,240 --> 00:00:32,680 Speaker 1: you might have missed this week. Just to heads up, 9 00:00:32,720 --> 00:00:36,680 Speaker 1: if my voice sounds a little bit raspy, because I 10 00:00:36,720 --> 00:00:42,800 Speaker 1: have been traveling and screaming at parties and concerts and conferences, 11 00:00:42,880 --> 00:00:44,720 Speaker 1: so I kind of got a little bit of a 12 00:00:44,800 --> 00:00:48,200 Speaker 1: Kathleen Turner thing happening. That's what's going on with me. Mike. 13 00:00:48,400 --> 00:00:49,360 Speaker 1: Thank you for being. 14 00:00:49,159 --> 00:00:50,960 Speaker 2: Here, Bridget, thanks for having me. 15 00:00:51,600 --> 00:00:54,520 Speaker 3: Thanks for soldiering on despite that raspiness. 16 00:00:54,880 --> 00:00:58,440 Speaker 1: So I'm actually happy that you're here because a story 17 00:00:58,560 --> 00:01:01,880 Speaker 1: that I know that you know, I'm low key obsessed with. 18 00:01:02,000 --> 00:01:03,480 Speaker 1: I just have so much to say about it. Can 19 00:01:03,520 --> 00:01:05,520 Speaker 1: we just can we just jump in? This will be 20 00:01:05,520 --> 00:01:06,160 Speaker 1: our banter. 21 00:01:06,200 --> 00:01:08,600 Speaker 2: We have to Yeah, Yeah, let's just jump in. 22 00:01:08,640 --> 00:01:12,000 Speaker 3: It's this is like possibly the funnest story that we've 23 00:01:12,040 --> 00:01:12,840 Speaker 3: talked about on here. 24 00:01:12,880 --> 00:01:13,959 Speaker 2: In like a very long time. 25 00:01:14,160 --> 00:01:17,480 Speaker 1: So the other day I was like like laugh, like 26 00:01:17,680 --> 00:01:21,000 Speaker 1: you were hearing me laugh to myself, and you were like, 27 00:01:21,000 --> 00:01:22,360 Speaker 1: what's so funny? And I was like, I'll save I'm 28 00:01:22,360 --> 00:01:24,720 Speaker 1: gonna I gotta save it for the roundup. And that 29 00:01:24,959 --> 00:01:27,440 Speaker 1: was me diving into the ins and outs of this. 30 00:01:28,880 --> 00:01:30,880 Speaker 1: I guess it's I guess I'm calling it the Willy 31 00:01:30,959 --> 00:01:34,840 Speaker 1: Wonka Fiasco in Glasgow? Am I saying that right? Glasgow? 32 00:01:35,560 --> 00:01:38,280 Speaker 3: I think it's Glasgow, and I think it like real, 33 00:01:38,400 --> 00:01:43,199 Speaker 3: it actually rhymes with fiasco, the Glasgow Fiasco, the Willy 34 00:01:43,240 --> 00:01:44,520 Speaker 3: Wonka Glasgow Fiasco. 35 00:01:44,840 --> 00:01:48,080 Speaker 1: So here's what went down. Basically, the police had to 36 00:01:48,080 --> 00:01:52,080 Speaker 1: be called to the Willy's Chocolate Experience, which was this 37 00:01:52,200 --> 00:01:56,440 Speaker 1: live event for kids and families billed as like an immersive, 38 00:01:56,680 --> 00:02:01,680 Speaker 1: wondrous experience for kids. So like kids apparently showed up 39 00:02:01,720 --> 00:02:04,320 Speaker 1: with their families. It costs forty four dollars, by the way, 40 00:02:04,360 --> 00:02:05,960 Speaker 1: so that's like not a cheap ticket. In my book. 41 00:02:06,280 --> 00:02:09,400 Speaker 1: Kids showed up with their parents. They were in like 42 00:02:09,560 --> 00:02:13,640 Speaker 1: Willy Wonka inspired costumes. I don't know if you know this, 43 00:02:13,760 --> 00:02:18,440 Speaker 1: but there's a new Willy Wonka movie with Timothy Schalomey 44 00:02:18,480 --> 00:02:20,720 Speaker 1: out right now. So it's kind of hot in the zeitgeist, 45 00:02:20,880 --> 00:02:23,920 Speaker 1: and you know, I guess all I can say is 46 00:02:23,919 --> 00:02:26,760 Speaker 1: that it was not the world of pure imagination that 47 00:02:26,840 --> 00:02:30,240 Speaker 1: these kids and families were promised. So this is one 48 00:02:30,240 --> 00:02:32,000 Speaker 1: of those stories that you have to see the pictures 49 00:02:32,000 --> 00:02:35,120 Speaker 1: to really get what I'm saying. But whatever you're imagining, 50 00:02:35,520 --> 00:02:39,000 Speaker 1: from what I'm describing, it is worse, It is sadder, 51 00:02:39,200 --> 00:02:41,320 Speaker 1: it is grimmer than whatever it is that you're picturing. 52 00:02:41,400 --> 00:02:43,360 Speaker 1: So we'll link to the pictures from the show notes. 53 00:02:43,400 --> 00:02:45,840 Speaker 1: But it is truly the grimish that I have ever 54 00:02:45,880 --> 00:02:47,440 Speaker 1: seen in my life. Did you see these pictures? 55 00:02:48,400 --> 00:02:51,840 Speaker 2: I'm like cracking up at one right now. That's just like. 56 00:02:54,880 --> 00:02:59,600 Speaker 3: There, It's very multicolored. There's a lot of candy. There's 57 00:02:59,760 --> 00:03:02,560 Speaker 3: like a strange little bear in a flying horse, some 58 00:03:02,560 --> 00:03:07,080 Speaker 3: sort of like circus clown man, and then also a 59 00:03:07,120 --> 00:03:11,400 Speaker 3: bunch of like nonsense lettering that like almost is words, 60 00:03:11,440 --> 00:03:14,400 Speaker 3: but like it's not actual words. 61 00:03:14,440 --> 00:03:16,040 Speaker 2: It's just like nonsense, like you mean. 62 00:03:15,960 --> 00:03:19,040 Speaker 1: From the flyer or from the like online like poster. 63 00:03:20,080 --> 00:03:23,280 Speaker 2: I'm looking at this fly I think it's the online poster. 64 00:03:23,480 --> 00:03:23,960 Speaker 2: I think. 65 00:03:24,080 --> 00:03:27,600 Speaker 1: Yeah, So let me read some of those nonsense words. 66 00:03:27,639 --> 00:03:29,799 Speaker 1: At the top, it says I think they're going or 67 00:03:30,080 --> 00:03:32,800 Speaker 1: enriching entertainment is what I think they're going for. It 68 00:03:32,880 --> 00:03:37,400 Speaker 1: says in sharing entertainment. And then on the bottom where 69 00:03:37,400 --> 00:03:39,280 Speaker 1: it like, you know, like on a concert flyer where 70 00:03:39,280 --> 00:03:41,440 Speaker 1: they would have the band names, So on the very 71 00:03:41,480 --> 00:03:47,400 Speaker 1: bottom of the flyer, it says cat get cat. How 72 00:03:47,440 --> 00:03:49,560 Speaker 1: would you even say that, cat gatating? 73 00:03:50,680 --> 00:03:53,280 Speaker 3: I'm so excited to listen to you try to save 74 00:03:53,320 --> 00:03:55,440 Speaker 3: these words, so I'm. 75 00:03:55,320 --> 00:03:56,880 Speaker 2: Not gonna help. You're just gonna have to do it. 76 00:03:57,960 --> 00:04:05,320 Speaker 1: Cat gatating live performances, they got that one, Okay, cartchy tons, 77 00:04:05,360 --> 00:04:07,920 Speaker 1: Like are they going for catchy turns? But even that 78 00:04:07,920 --> 00:04:08,880 Speaker 1: onen't really makes sense. 79 00:04:08,960 --> 00:04:13,320 Speaker 3: I think it's supposed to be like catchy tunes, catchy tunes. 80 00:04:12,440 --> 00:04:16,960 Speaker 1: Catchy tunes, Okay, exacer dray lollipops. 81 00:04:19,680 --> 00:04:21,440 Speaker 2: These lollipops are so excess or. 82 00:04:21,480 --> 00:04:27,320 Speaker 1: Dre apacidies of sweet treats, no a pacidiece of sweet teats. 83 00:04:27,360 --> 00:04:29,960 Speaker 1: Like it's so messed up that the brain fixes it. 84 00:04:30,040 --> 00:04:31,640 Speaker 1: Like that's how messed up it is. I'm not even 85 00:04:31,640 --> 00:04:32,360 Speaker 1: reading it the way that. 86 00:04:32,279 --> 00:04:36,479 Speaker 3: It's written it like I can I can kind of 87 00:04:36,480 --> 00:04:39,000 Speaker 3: see why people were taken in by this because it's 88 00:04:39,120 --> 00:04:44,560 Speaker 3: like it's like trafficking and Willy Wonka, which is kind 89 00:04:44,600 --> 00:04:50,359 Speaker 3: of absurd and like magical, and so it almost feels 90 00:04:50,400 --> 00:04:52,880 Speaker 3: like it could have been intentional, like wow, these people 91 00:04:52,920 --> 00:04:54,159 Speaker 3: are like really out there. 92 00:04:54,279 --> 00:04:58,280 Speaker 1: Well, Willy Wonka is absurd and like enigmatic or whatever, 93 00:04:58,320 --> 00:05:00,960 Speaker 1: but he doesn't speak gimmerish like says work like this 94 00:05:01,080 --> 00:05:03,159 Speaker 1: is like written by Pootie Tang, Like this is not 95 00:05:03,440 --> 00:05:05,120 Speaker 1: these are not words that are words. 96 00:05:06,240 --> 00:05:09,560 Speaker 2: Yeah, you're right, this is just like classic cat and gitating. 97 00:05:09,600 --> 00:05:13,200 Speaker 1: Classic cat caitating. So the performers are all speaking out 98 00:05:13,200 --> 00:05:15,560 Speaker 1: on TikTok, and I have to say, like it has 99 00:05:15,600 --> 00:05:20,360 Speaker 1: been really something watching these Glasgow like I don't know, 100 00:05:20,880 --> 00:05:26,400 Speaker 1: up and coming live performance artists explaining what happened because 101 00:05:26,400 --> 00:05:30,159 Speaker 1: they're all hilarious storytellers, like each and every one of 102 00:05:30,200 --> 00:05:32,480 Speaker 1: these videos that I have found, and they are captivating. 103 00:05:32,520 --> 00:05:34,640 Speaker 1: I've watched them all. They're all they all have such 104 00:05:34,640 --> 00:05:36,760 Speaker 1: a like I don't I don't know if it's a 105 00:05:37,200 --> 00:05:39,640 Speaker 1: it's a Scotland thing or what, but like they all 106 00:05:39,720 --> 00:05:45,080 Speaker 1: have such captivating, realist ways of explaining what the fuck 107 00:05:45,160 --> 00:05:48,800 Speaker 1: is going on in this Already hilarious grim situation. So 108 00:05:48,839 --> 00:05:52,160 Speaker 1: the performers are speaking out. They said that House of Illuminati, 109 00:05:52,160 --> 00:05:54,839 Speaker 1: which is the company behind the event, basically just gave 110 00:05:54,880 --> 00:05:58,520 Speaker 1: them what they said were AI generated scripts that made 111 00:05:58,600 --> 00:06:01,520 Speaker 1: no sense. Here's one of the performer, Paul Connell, talking 112 00:06:01,560 --> 00:06:04,320 Speaker 1: about it. He says he was cast as Willy Wonka 113 00:06:04,520 --> 00:06:08,320 Speaker 1: despite having self described big upa lupa energy. 114 00:06:09,160 --> 00:06:15,400 Speaker 4: The script was fifteen pages monologue, pretty much of AI 115 00:06:15,720 --> 00:06:22,000 Speaker 4: generated gibberish, which I will read some for you if 116 00:06:22,040 --> 00:06:23,680 Speaker 4: you will. In fact, no, I don't even need to 117 00:06:23,720 --> 00:06:26,480 Speaker 4: read it because I lent it all and it was 118 00:06:27,600 --> 00:06:28,279 Speaker 4: it was mad. 119 00:06:28,560 --> 00:06:29,600 Speaker 1: I've lent all of it. 120 00:06:29,720 --> 00:06:33,040 Speaker 4: That's all in there, that's in my brain. So I'll 121 00:06:33,080 --> 00:06:35,720 Speaker 4: give you one of the lines from the script. I'm 122 00:06:35,760 --> 00:06:37,720 Speaker 4: not going to do the Willy Wonker voice because I 123 00:06:37,800 --> 00:06:41,320 Speaker 4: think I've embarrassed myself enough over the last few days. 124 00:06:42,960 --> 00:06:45,640 Speaker 4: But one of my favorite lines was there is a 125 00:06:45,680 --> 00:06:49,400 Speaker 4: man who lives here. His name is not known, so 126 00:06:49,440 --> 00:06:55,679 Speaker 4: we call him the unknown. The Unknown is an evil 127 00:06:55,760 --> 00:07:00,360 Speaker 4: chocolate maker who lives in the walls. 128 00:07:02,000 --> 00:07:04,720 Speaker 1: What what is an. 129 00:07:04,640 --> 00:07:05,760 Speaker 4: Evil chocolate maker? 130 00:07:05,760 --> 00:07:06,360 Speaker 1: For a stot? 131 00:07:06,440 --> 00:07:10,080 Speaker 4: Is it does he make evil chocolate? Or is he 132 00:07:10,120 --> 00:07:13,480 Speaker 4: an evil man who makes chocolate and what do you 133 00:07:13,600 --> 00:07:14,320 Speaker 4: mean he lives? 134 00:07:15,920 --> 00:07:20,280 Speaker 1: So what the hell is going on? You know, like 135 00:07:20,360 --> 00:07:21,320 Speaker 1: this is not canon? 136 00:07:22,960 --> 00:07:25,160 Speaker 2: No, I loved his delivery. 137 00:07:25,640 --> 00:07:31,720 Speaker 3: Uh yeah, they he did a big, big oopa lupa energy. 138 00:07:31,760 --> 00:07:34,520 Speaker 3: They missed it there, but like, yeah, the Unknown, what 139 00:07:34,680 --> 00:07:37,160 Speaker 3: is up with the Unknown? What's he doing in the wall? 140 00:07:37,280 --> 00:07:37,360 Speaker 5: Oh? 141 00:07:37,440 --> 00:07:39,200 Speaker 1: My god? Right before we got on, I was like 142 00:07:39,600 --> 00:07:44,560 Speaker 1: three tiktoks deep in a TikTok of somebody claiming to 143 00:07:44,640 --> 00:07:48,320 Speaker 1: be the performer of the Unknown. The Unknown. We don't 144 00:07:48,360 --> 00:07:50,920 Speaker 1: know much about him because obviously the Unknown has had 145 00:07:50,920 --> 00:07:53,840 Speaker 1: a character from the original movie or book or whatever. 146 00:07:54,120 --> 00:07:57,400 Speaker 1: But also he wears like an eyes wide shut mask 147 00:08:00,040 --> 00:08:02,760 Speaker 1: and sort of herky jerky dances around. He got on 148 00:08:02,880 --> 00:08:06,040 Speaker 1: like a silver eyes wide chut mask and a slash 149 00:08:06,080 --> 00:08:11,080 Speaker 1: wig and he's dancing around side note, the Unknown has 150 00:08:11,120 --> 00:08:13,440 Speaker 1: to become a little bit of an icon on social media. 151 00:08:13,600 --> 00:08:15,560 Speaker 1: Like I feel like we are like a week or 152 00:08:15,600 --> 00:08:20,040 Speaker 1: so away from somebody doing a drag performance as the Unknown. 153 00:08:23,400 --> 00:08:27,360 Speaker 1: I saw a video of the Unknown, like I guess 154 00:08:27,400 --> 00:08:31,800 Speaker 1: sleeking from behind, slinking from behind a mirror. So also 155 00:08:31,960 --> 00:08:34,240 Speaker 1: like not even in the walls, Like it's like someone 156 00:08:34,320 --> 00:08:36,240 Speaker 1: is just holding a Mirror's like, well, that's that's not 157 00:08:36,320 --> 00:08:38,480 Speaker 1: him coming from the walls. That's coming from a mirror. 158 00:08:38,720 --> 00:08:41,440 Speaker 1: And he sort of like does this hurkey jerky dance 159 00:08:41,480 --> 00:08:44,480 Speaker 1: on the kid's face. And the noise that the kids 160 00:08:44,600 --> 00:08:49,920 Speaker 1: make in response, it's like it's not quite that they're scared. 161 00:08:50,600 --> 00:08:56,800 Speaker 1: It's that they're unimpressed, unenthused, and maybe a little confused. 162 00:08:56,880 --> 00:09:00,200 Speaker 1: Like they're like they're like, oh, it's the unknown, and 163 00:09:00,240 --> 00:09:04,160 Speaker 1: there's a collective uh from the kids Like it's not 164 00:09:04,280 --> 00:09:08,120 Speaker 1: quite it's like a like a bored annoyance more than anything. 165 00:09:08,200 --> 00:09:10,960 Speaker 1: It's like they're not like really scared, they're just like confused. 166 00:09:11,080 --> 00:09:13,920 Speaker 3: Yeah, you showed me that video. And he's like he's 167 00:09:13,960 --> 00:09:16,840 Speaker 3: just he's not like behind a large mirror. He's just 168 00:09:17,040 --> 00:09:19,800 Speaker 3: holding up a medium sized mirror that does not cover 169 00:09:19,920 --> 00:09:20,520 Speaker 3: his body. 170 00:09:21,000 --> 00:09:23,400 Speaker 1: And then what way does that convey coming from the walls? 171 00:09:24,760 --> 00:09:27,760 Speaker 3: Yeah, and why does he need to wear this get 172 00:09:27,840 --> 00:09:29,520 Speaker 3: up to make evil chocolate? 173 00:09:29,760 --> 00:09:32,880 Speaker 1: And yeah, again is the chalk Like is the chocolate 174 00:09:33,000 --> 00:09:36,400 Speaker 1: evil or he's evil and he just happens to make 175 00:09:36,480 --> 00:09:39,520 Speaker 1: chocolate on the side, Like I have many, many, many questions. 176 00:09:39,920 --> 00:09:41,680 Speaker 2: Yeah, and like what is the role of evil? 177 00:09:41,960 --> 00:09:47,560 Speaker 3: In this Willy Wonka universe, like maybe maybe I'm going 178 00:09:47,559 --> 00:09:49,120 Speaker 3: a bit too far looking for meaning here. 179 00:09:49,240 --> 00:09:51,960 Speaker 1: Yeah, you're like digging, You're like plumbing the depths for 180 00:09:52,080 --> 00:09:57,199 Speaker 1: meaning in this AI generated gobbledegook come to life. 181 00:09:57,760 --> 00:10:00,920 Speaker 3: It's like the words, right, like the the cat coitating 182 00:10:01,240 --> 00:10:06,240 Speaker 3: carchy to tons, exascer dre lollipops. It's like the brain 183 00:10:06,960 --> 00:10:10,040 Speaker 3: tries to impose some sort of like order in coherence 184 00:10:10,240 --> 00:10:13,400 Speaker 3: on this gobbled that the AI has spit out at. 185 00:10:13,280 --> 00:10:16,800 Speaker 1: It, right, like our brains automatically try to fill in 186 00:10:16,840 --> 00:10:19,880 Speaker 1: the gaps because you're like, well, certainly they mean captivating tunes, 187 00:10:20,440 --> 00:10:26,280 Speaker 1: that's what they're going for. Okay, So for all of 188 00:10:26,320 --> 00:10:29,800 Speaker 1: the like Hollywood executives who were just like, oh, we'll 189 00:10:29,880 --> 00:10:32,920 Speaker 1: just have AI rite everything, this is actually pretty good 190 00:10:32,920 --> 00:10:34,640 Speaker 1: at the capsulation of what it would be like to 191 00:10:34,760 --> 00:10:37,720 Speaker 1: actually have an event and a play and a piece 192 00:10:37,760 --> 00:10:40,960 Speaker 1: of entertainment solely written by AI. Like when you go 193 00:10:41,080 --> 00:10:44,080 Speaker 1: back to the flyer, all of the images are AI generated, 194 00:10:44,080 --> 00:10:46,960 Speaker 1: Like there has done a single image that actually depicts 195 00:10:47,320 --> 00:10:50,040 Speaker 1: what you would actually be paying almost fifty dollars to 196 00:10:50,080 --> 00:10:53,720 Speaker 1: go see everything is and the AI generated images look 197 00:10:53,760 --> 00:10:58,439 Speaker 1: pretty good, right, Like they if they were real encapsulations 198 00:10:58,440 --> 00:11:00,880 Speaker 1: of what they would actually be getting, you'd be like, wow, 199 00:11:00,920 --> 00:11:03,640 Speaker 1: this really is a world of pure imagination instead of 200 00:11:03,679 --> 00:11:07,920 Speaker 1: like some tarts hug up, and then I'd watch shut 201 00:11:08,000 --> 00:11:08,800 Speaker 1: mask coming at you. 202 00:11:11,679 --> 00:11:15,000 Speaker 3: Yeah, it's it's like so many AI images right Like. 203 00:11:15,040 --> 00:11:16,840 Speaker 3: You look at it and at first you're like, oh, yeah, 204 00:11:16,880 --> 00:11:18,920 Speaker 3: this is pretty good, this makes sense, and then as 205 00:11:18,960 --> 00:11:21,040 Speaker 3: you look at the details, you're like, wait, why does 206 00:11:21,080 --> 00:11:23,760 Speaker 3: he have so many arms? 207 00:11:24,400 --> 00:11:25,600 Speaker 2: What are those faces on? 208 00:11:26,320 --> 00:11:30,480 Speaker 1: Okay, So I believe that, like you know, live event 209 00:11:30,679 --> 00:11:33,319 Speaker 1: is a booming industry. I have a two year old 210 00:11:33,400 --> 00:11:37,439 Speaker 1: niece who is a literal angel in heaven. That detail 211 00:11:37,480 --> 00:11:39,680 Speaker 1: is not part of the conversation. People just need to 212 00:11:39,679 --> 00:11:44,120 Speaker 1: know she's a literal angel from heaven. But she loves unicorns. 213 00:11:44,120 --> 00:11:46,439 Speaker 1: And my brother took her to this like some kind 214 00:11:46,440 --> 00:11:50,400 Speaker 1: of a unicorn experience, and just to even show up 215 00:11:50,520 --> 00:11:52,760 Speaker 1: one adult and one toddler, it was like almost one 216 00:11:52,840 --> 00:11:55,920 Speaker 1: hundred dollars. When you get there, it's like, oh, get 217 00:11:55,960 --> 00:11:59,080 Speaker 1: a photo, that's another fifty. Get this it's another ten. 218 00:11:59,120 --> 00:12:00,960 Speaker 1: And he was like the whole thing was like clearly 219 00:12:01,040 --> 00:12:04,480 Speaker 1: a racket, such a racket bordering on a scam, because 220 00:12:04,480 --> 00:12:06,199 Speaker 1: then you got your kid there and you're like, well, 221 00:12:06,520 --> 00:12:08,040 Speaker 1: I don't want to be like, sorry, we came all 222 00:12:08,080 --> 00:12:09,680 Speaker 1: this way and your dress has a unicorn, but we 223 00:12:09,679 --> 00:12:11,440 Speaker 1: can't get the picture, we can't do the thing. And 224 00:12:11,520 --> 00:12:14,920 Speaker 1: so I do think that this kind of thing where 225 00:12:15,320 --> 00:12:20,040 Speaker 1: somebody has just almost entirely AI generated an event and 226 00:12:20,160 --> 00:12:23,000 Speaker 1: used AI to put it together, from the scripts to 227 00:12:23,280 --> 00:12:26,880 Speaker 1: the advertising and the flyers, I think we're gonna see 228 00:12:27,000 --> 00:12:29,120 Speaker 1: more and more of people being like, what did I 229 00:12:29,160 --> 00:12:31,160 Speaker 1: just pay fifty dollars to show up to? It makes 230 00:12:31,200 --> 00:12:31,800 Speaker 1: no sense? 231 00:12:32,600 --> 00:12:34,480 Speaker 2: Yeah, such a scam. 232 00:12:35,200 --> 00:12:38,920 Speaker 3: I am legit so curious like what his process was 233 00:12:38,920 --> 00:12:40,280 Speaker 3: because I was like reading into it a little bit, 234 00:12:40,280 --> 00:12:42,080 Speaker 3: and the guy who put this thing together was the 235 00:12:42,120 --> 00:12:42,480 Speaker 3: name of. 236 00:12:42,440 --> 00:12:45,400 Speaker 1: This company Illuminati House of Illuminati. 237 00:12:45,920 --> 00:12:50,720 Speaker 3: Yeah, like the Rolling Stone has an article about him 238 00:12:50,760 --> 00:12:54,000 Speaker 3: and apparently like he's the only employee, and he has 239 00:12:54,040 --> 00:12:56,960 Speaker 3: a bunch of businesses he's also involved in, like has 240 00:12:57,000 --> 00:13:02,760 Speaker 3: some AI generated books on Amazon that are like anti 241 00:13:02,920 --> 00:13:04,120 Speaker 3: vax conspiracy. 242 00:13:06,000 --> 00:13:09,480 Speaker 2: So he's really like multi vertical. 243 00:13:09,800 --> 00:13:15,360 Speaker 3: AI scams and so like scamming people is bad, but 244 00:13:15,440 --> 00:13:20,840 Speaker 3: I am legit interested, like curious what what his process 245 00:13:20,880 --> 00:13:23,920 Speaker 3: looks like to like conceive of this thing, put it together, 246 00:13:24,000 --> 00:13:25,760 Speaker 3: like turn it into event. Like he it seems like 247 00:13:25,800 --> 00:13:29,840 Speaker 3: he did extremely little creative right, Like everything is AI generated, 248 00:13:29,880 --> 00:13:33,240 Speaker 3: like you said, but an actual event did happen in 249 00:13:33,280 --> 00:13:35,120 Speaker 3: the real world and like people showed up and like 250 00:13:35,160 --> 00:13:37,800 Speaker 3: paid and were there and like actors were hired. Like 251 00:13:39,000 --> 00:13:42,800 Speaker 3: how like what did it look like to turn this 252 00:13:43,400 --> 00:13:49,440 Speaker 3: AI generated concept into something that actually existed in the world, 253 00:13:49,520 --> 00:13:53,280 Speaker 3: even and in this case existed terribly and was a 254 00:13:53,360 --> 00:13:54,040 Speaker 3: huge flop. 255 00:13:54,600 --> 00:13:57,199 Speaker 1: I'll tell you one thing. If he is running a 256 00:13:58,200 --> 00:14:03,439 Speaker 1: dynasty of a different AI generated quick cash scams, he 257 00:14:03,520 --> 00:14:05,360 Speaker 1: sounds like a little bit of a Willy Wonka figure. 258 00:14:05,520 --> 00:14:08,880 Speaker 1: Like I would watch a movie where we are welcomed 259 00:14:08,920 --> 00:14:13,160 Speaker 1: into his world of like fantastical AI scams and then 260 00:14:13,200 --> 00:14:15,640 Speaker 1: one by one get picked off by oopa loupas until 261 00:14:15,640 --> 00:14:17,720 Speaker 1: there's one of us left to take over the dynasty. 262 00:14:19,040 --> 00:14:21,240 Speaker 2: Oh man, he's a little bit of a Wonka. 263 00:14:20,920 --> 00:14:23,600 Speaker 1: Figure in and of himself. But instead of chocolate, it's 264 00:14:23,640 --> 00:14:25,720 Speaker 1: like low level AI scams. 265 00:14:26,120 --> 00:14:29,080 Speaker 2: Yeah, we could get the you know, you just gotta get. 266 00:14:28,960 --> 00:14:32,320 Speaker 3: The golden ticket and you can go uh enter his 267 00:14:32,400 --> 00:14:34,160 Speaker 3: world of pure mag. 268 00:14:36,080 --> 00:14:38,400 Speaker 1: Okay to take us out of this segment. Here's a 269 00:14:38,400 --> 00:14:42,080 Speaker 1: little bit of soupy garbage Juice doing his rendation of 270 00:14:42,480 --> 00:14:44,440 Speaker 1: pure omrgination. 271 00:14:46,200 --> 00:14:46,760 Speaker 2: With me. 272 00:14:49,520 --> 00:14:53,800 Speaker 1: And be Industry location cat. 273 00:14:55,200 --> 00:15:03,280 Speaker 3: Catchys and. 274 00:15:06,160 --> 00:15:19,680 Speaker 5: Let's take a quick break. Hetterre back. 275 00:15:23,200 --> 00:15:24,920 Speaker 1: So we have to talk about what's going on with 276 00:15:24,960 --> 00:15:27,600 Speaker 1: Google and AI. It is a little bit complicated, but 277 00:15:27,640 --> 00:15:29,360 Speaker 1: I think I can break down what's going on here. 278 00:15:29,400 --> 00:15:32,120 Speaker 1: So Google has this AI tool called Gemini, you know, 279 00:15:32,160 --> 00:15:34,440 Speaker 1: where you ask it different prompts and it shows different images. 280 00:15:34,440 --> 00:15:36,360 Speaker 1: They have a chatbot where you ask it different prompts 281 00:15:36,360 --> 00:15:39,680 Speaker 1: and it answers you. So last week they temporarily shut 282 00:15:39,720 --> 00:15:43,600 Speaker 1: it down at for complaints that the technology refuses to 283 00:15:43,680 --> 00:15:47,640 Speaker 1: acknowledge the existence of white people. So I do think 284 00:15:47,720 --> 00:15:50,920 Speaker 1: that there is obviously something funky going on with Google's AI, 285 00:15:50,920 --> 00:15:52,880 Speaker 1: which we'll get into in a minute. But I also 286 00:15:52,920 --> 00:15:54,920 Speaker 1: need to be super clear here that this is one 287 00:15:54,920 --> 00:15:57,720 Speaker 1: of those things where there is like a legit problem 288 00:15:57,840 --> 00:16:01,360 Speaker 1: or a legit issue, but the framing around that issue 289 00:16:01,760 --> 00:16:06,160 Speaker 1: is being pushed disingenuously by right wing extremist types. And 290 00:16:06,200 --> 00:16:09,720 Speaker 1: I think that Google and like some other prominent folks, 291 00:16:09,760 --> 00:16:12,480 Speaker 1: like media folks who should know better, are really falling 292 00:16:12,520 --> 00:16:15,040 Speaker 1: for it. So this entire thing started when the Twitter 293 00:16:15,080 --> 00:16:18,600 Speaker 1: account and wokeness. Paul's right there, because doesn't that already 294 00:16:18,600 --> 00:16:20,600 Speaker 1: tell you a lot about about what you need to know? 295 00:16:20,800 --> 00:16:24,760 Speaker 1: Like this is the framing, the specific framing around this 296 00:16:24,800 --> 00:16:27,400 Speaker 1: issue started with an account, the account and Wokeness. 297 00:16:27,680 --> 00:16:30,320 Speaker 2: Yeah, that tells you a lot about where we're headed. 298 00:16:30,640 --> 00:16:33,400 Speaker 1: So Nwokeness posted that when you ask Gemini to show 299 00:16:33,440 --> 00:16:36,360 Speaker 1: pictures of the founding fathers of America, it shows black 300 00:16:36,400 --> 00:16:39,160 Speaker 1: people and Asian people and indigenous people rather than what 301 00:16:39,240 --> 00:16:42,200 Speaker 1: you might imagine it to be the white founding fathers 302 00:16:42,200 --> 00:16:45,320 Speaker 1: of the United States. Gemini showed a black man, a 303 00:16:45,360 --> 00:16:47,320 Speaker 1: Native American man, and an Asian man and a dark 304 00:16:47,320 --> 00:16:50,160 Speaker 1: skinned man. It also showed the Pope as a black 305 00:16:50,200 --> 00:16:55,440 Speaker 1: person and generated images of like a racially inclusive Nazi party. 306 00:16:55,520 --> 00:16:58,240 Speaker 1: So not great, right, Like, I'm not saying that that 307 00:16:58,480 --> 00:17:02,920 Speaker 1: was a great say obviously something funky is going on, 308 00:17:03,480 --> 00:17:06,480 Speaker 1: so big caveat here. I am not an engineer. If 309 00:17:06,520 --> 00:17:08,280 Speaker 1: someone who is, we have lots of it listeners who 310 00:17:08,280 --> 00:17:10,600 Speaker 1: are engineers. If you are listening and you're like bridget, 311 00:17:10,600 --> 00:17:12,720 Speaker 1: you're getting it totally wrong, Please let me know. I 312 00:17:12,720 --> 00:17:15,119 Speaker 1: want to hear from you. So I'll like to say, 313 00:17:15,320 --> 00:17:17,199 Speaker 1: I do think I have a pretty good idea of 314 00:17:17,240 --> 00:17:19,080 Speaker 1: what's going on here, just from somebody who has read 315 00:17:19,119 --> 00:17:20,960 Speaker 1: a lot about AI, and I sort of like Ben 316 00:17:21,040 --> 00:17:23,800 Speaker 1: in the depths of some of the cultural complications that 317 00:17:23,840 --> 00:17:27,040 Speaker 1: come from making AI. So I think that Google is 318 00:17:27,080 --> 00:17:31,320 Speaker 1: aware that AI tools have gender and racial biases baked inism. Right, 319 00:17:31,520 --> 00:17:33,399 Speaker 1: if you listen to this show, this is probably not 320 00:17:33,440 --> 00:17:35,520 Speaker 1: surprising to you because we talk about it all the time. 321 00:17:35,880 --> 00:17:38,880 Speaker 1: So I think that what we're seeing is Google's kind 322 00:17:38,880 --> 00:17:42,160 Speaker 1: of clunky attempt to fix this, which is obviously an 323 00:17:42,160 --> 00:17:44,719 Speaker 1: overcorrection that is completely missing the mark. Here's a big 324 00:17:44,760 --> 00:17:46,439 Speaker 1: example of how to think about it. So, if somebody 325 00:17:46,480 --> 00:17:50,400 Speaker 1: asks Gemini to show pictures of CEOs because of bias 326 00:17:50,440 --> 00:17:53,000 Speaker 1: and racism and sexism and all the isms that we 327 00:17:53,000 --> 00:17:55,760 Speaker 1: talk about on this show, there are more white male 328 00:17:55,880 --> 00:17:59,040 Speaker 1: CEOs than non white male CEOs. That's just a fact 329 00:17:59,040 --> 00:18:02,240 Speaker 1: of being in the United States. But there are non 330 00:18:02,359 --> 00:18:06,000 Speaker 1: white male CEOs out there, and so the argument is, well, 331 00:18:06,040 --> 00:18:10,160 Speaker 1: should this technology be representing a more inclusive world or 332 00:18:10,200 --> 00:18:13,200 Speaker 1: should it be representing the world as it is? Right, 333 00:18:13,240 --> 00:18:15,720 Speaker 1: And so it's kind of like a thorny almost like 334 00:18:15,800 --> 00:18:20,280 Speaker 1: a philosophical question of what you are meant to see 335 00:18:20,400 --> 00:18:23,680 Speaker 1: when you ask this technology for these kinds of prompts. 336 00:18:23,920 --> 00:18:26,359 Speaker 1: So I would say, like, it is not a tech 337 00:18:26,400 --> 00:18:29,800 Speaker 1: problem with like a straightforward tech solution. It's like a 338 00:18:29,920 --> 00:18:33,200 Speaker 1: value judgment question and like almost like a philosophical question 339 00:18:33,480 --> 00:18:36,040 Speaker 1: about what it is these tools are meant to do 340 00:18:36,119 --> 00:18:38,159 Speaker 1: and what we want them to do. And I think, like, 341 00:18:38,160 --> 00:18:39,520 Speaker 1: maybe those are some of the questions, some of the 342 00:18:39,640 --> 00:18:44,760 Speaker 1: larger questions about why companies like Google are making these tools. 343 00:18:45,040 --> 00:18:46,399 Speaker 1: I think like those are some of the questions that 344 00:18:46,440 --> 00:18:50,199 Speaker 1: maybe have not been answered in their rush to build them. Like, 345 00:18:51,119 --> 00:18:53,639 Speaker 1: it does sound like a fairly complex problem to me. 346 00:18:54,080 --> 00:18:55,919 Speaker 1: And I also think it shows the danger of what 347 00:18:56,000 --> 00:18:59,639 Speaker 1: happens when big tech companies are just like rushing to 348 00:18:59,680 --> 00:19:03,120 Speaker 1: put out AI tools to compete with one another, rather 349 00:19:03,160 --> 00:19:06,280 Speaker 1: than really spending some time thoughtfully thinking about, well, what 350 00:19:06,400 --> 00:19:08,080 Speaker 1: is it that you want these tools to do, like 351 00:19:08,520 --> 00:19:12,200 Speaker 1: meaningfully coming up with the philosophy and the value around 352 00:19:12,520 --> 00:19:14,439 Speaker 1: why you are building these tools for who and for 353 00:19:14,480 --> 00:19:14,920 Speaker 1: what reason. 354 00:19:15,440 --> 00:19:17,960 Speaker 3: Yeah, I totally agree, and I think you really nailed 355 00:19:18,000 --> 00:19:20,000 Speaker 3: it on that last point that it's what happens when 356 00:19:20,000 --> 00:19:24,200 Speaker 3: companies rush to bring products to market before they're ready. Like, 357 00:19:24,280 --> 00:19:27,320 Speaker 3: it's been really surprising over the past year or so 358 00:19:27,400 --> 00:19:32,560 Speaker 3: to see how much Google is like behind in these 359 00:19:32,600 --> 00:19:36,120 Speaker 3: AI tools and really racing to try to catch up. 360 00:19:36,200 --> 00:19:39,520 Speaker 3: And so it's not hugely surprising that they had this 361 00:19:39,600 --> 00:19:43,680 Speaker 3: like big misstep of bringing a tool to market before 362 00:19:43,960 --> 00:19:47,240 Speaker 3: it was actually ready for primetime for all those reasons 363 00:19:47,280 --> 00:19:47,960 Speaker 3: that you described. 364 00:19:48,119 --> 00:19:50,760 Speaker 1: Yeah, so I think this is Google really making some 365 00:19:50,920 --> 00:19:54,640 Speaker 1: pretty deep missteps in an attempt to rush and catch 366 00:19:54,680 --> 00:19:56,560 Speaker 1: up to everybody else who's already been in this game 367 00:19:56,600 --> 00:19:57,119 Speaker 1: for a while. 368 00:19:57,600 --> 00:20:00,639 Speaker 3: Yeah, although you know it's I don't know what happens 369 00:20:00,680 --> 00:20:03,680 Speaker 3: if you try to get like Dolly your stable diffusion 370 00:20:03,760 --> 00:20:08,000 Speaker 3: to generate images of founding fathers, right, Like, has anybody looked, 371 00:20:08,080 --> 00:20:08,479 Speaker 3: I don't know. 372 00:20:08,800 --> 00:20:11,280 Speaker 1: Oh, I mean, I'm not even sure I want to 373 00:20:11,280 --> 00:20:15,360 Speaker 1: get into that, because like they do generate the images 374 00:20:15,359 --> 00:20:17,680 Speaker 1: that you would be thinking, but they have other issues, right, 375 00:20:17,760 --> 00:20:20,040 Speaker 1: Like I've heard people be like, oh, well, Dolly in 376 00:20:20,080 --> 00:20:22,480 Speaker 1: mid journey don't have that this problem. They might have 377 00:20:22,520 --> 00:20:26,119 Speaker 1: this specific use case problem where like people are asking 378 00:20:26,119 --> 00:20:29,359 Speaker 1: for this specific thing and getting a similar problematic answer, 379 00:20:29,400 --> 00:20:31,919 Speaker 1: but they have other other instances of bias baked into them, 380 00:20:31,960 --> 00:20:34,240 Speaker 1: and so like, I'm almost not comfortable with the way 381 00:20:34,280 --> 00:20:37,240 Speaker 1: people have been framing this as like Google AI bad 382 00:20:37,320 --> 00:20:40,479 Speaker 1: because all AI is so problematic and like has all 383 00:20:40,520 --> 00:20:43,240 Speaker 1: this bias baked in and people are people aren't wrong 384 00:20:43,359 --> 00:20:46,399 Speaker 1: for lifting that, but like lifting it in this specific 385 00:20:46,480 --> 00:20:49,360 Speaker 1: way feels disingenuous, and I want to call all that out. 386 00:20:49,600 --> 00:20:53,640 Speaker 3: Yeah, certainly that particular way is like the one area 387 00:20:53,800 --> 00:20:57,639 Speaker 3: that whoever owns the Twitter account end wokeness is most 388 00:20:57,760 --> 00:20:58,960 Speaker 3: concerned about, right. 389 00:20:58,880 --> 00:21:01,639 Speaker 1: Like, well, that's what I'm saying is like, you know, 390 00:21:02,560 --> 00:21:05,080 Speaker 1: this whole conversation, I think is a really good example 391 00:21:05,119 --> 00:21:10,000 Speaker 1: of like the thorny and complicated intersections of like culture 392 00:21:10,240 --> 00:21:13,560 Speaker 1: and identity and technology that you know, I love nerding 393 00:21:13,600 --> 00:21:15,320 Speaker 1: out on and like thinking about. It's like why we 394 00:21:15,359 --> 00:21:17,080 Speaker 1: have this podcast. And so I don't want to make 395 00:21:17,080 --> 00:21:19,320 Speaker 1: it seem like it's not a problem. It is a problem. 396 00:21:19,400 --> 00:21:22,240 Speaker 1: These are problems that need solving and that people should 397 00:21:22,240 --> 00:21:25,120 Speaker 1: be thinking about. But rather than see it in that 398 00:21:25,160 --> 00:21:28,040 Speaker 1: way as like this like kind of complex challenge to correct, 399 00:21:28,280 --> 00:21:32,240 Speaker 1: you have extremists like and Wokeness or Elon Musk accusing 400 00:21:32,480 --> 00:21:36,760 Speaker 1: Google of like wanting to eradicate whiteness because Google is 401 00:21:36,840 --> 00:21:39,600 Speaker 1: woke and they do DEI and like making it about 402 00:21:39,800 --> 00:21:42,440 Speaker 1: framing it in this like way that I think really 403 00:21:42,560 --> 00:21:45,240 Speaker 1: is not only like very disingenuous, but it takes away 404 00:21:45,280 --> 00:21:47,919 Speaker 1: from what is like really a problem and like like 405 00:21:47,960 --> 00:21:50,040 Speaker 1: a challenge that I think that people who make AI 406 00:21:50,400 --> 00:21:52,199 Speaker 1: really ought to be wrestling with. And I think that 407 00:21:52,280 --> 00:21:56,560 Speaker 1: like this framing makes them less likely to wrestle with 408 00:21:56,600 --> 00:21:59,439 Speaker 1: this complex challenge in a way that gets us to 409 00:21:59,840 --> 00:22:02,080 Speaker 1: let a bias. It's just like, oh, well, we'll decide 410 00:22:02,080 --> 00:22:03,960 Speaker 1: s up it all together, right, Like who wants to 411 00:22:03,960 --> 00:22:07,320 Speaker 1: fall into like a bud light or a target style 412 00:22:07,880 --> 00:22:11,880 Speaker 1: you know, wokeness campaign, right nobody? And so I think 413 00:22:11,880 --> 00:22:14,440 Speaker 1: that they're by them framing it this way and doing 414 00:22:14,440 --> 00:22:19,160 Speaker 1: it successfully, it is really hijacking the conversation. 415 00:22:19,840 --> 00:22:22,360 Speaker 2: Yeah, absolutely, the way you set it up. It's such 416 00:22:22,359 --> 00:22:27,399 Speaker 2: an interesting question what should the results from these AI 417 00:22:27,760 --> 00:22:31,520 Speaker 2: models be? Should it be like the world that we 418 00:22:31,560 --> 00:22:33,560 Speaker 2: want to live in that is more inclusive, or should 419 00:22:33,600 --> 00:22:38,439 Speaker 2: it be a more like accurate recreation of what's in 420 00:22:38,520 --> 00:22:41,679 Speaker 2: the existing data set. That's an interesting nuanced question that 421 00:22:41,720 --> 00:22:44,879 Speaker 2: like thoughtful people could talk about. Extremists don't want to 422 00:22:44,920 --> 00:22:46,800 Speaker 2: have a nuanced conversation like that, right, they just want 423 00:22:46,840 --> 00:22:51,159 Speaker 2: to completely flatten it to Google is trying to eliminate 424 00:22:51,200 --> 00:22:57,320 Speaker 2: white people, which is ridiculous. And also like. 425 00:22:59,119 --> 00:23:06,879 Speaker 3: Misses that, you know, reading Elon's tweets about this, you 426 00:23:06,880 --> 00:23:09,480 Speaker 3: get the sense that he thinks the answer to that 427 00:23:09,600 --> 00:23:11,760 Speaker 3: thoughtful question that you posed is like, oh, well, it 428 00:23:11,760 --> 00:23:16,600 Speaker 3: should just recreate what's in the data perfectly. But like 429 00:23:17,160 --> 00:23:20,960 Speaker 3: that what's in the data is not a perfect recreation 430 00:23:21,040 --> 00:23:23,480 Speaker 3: of what is in the actual world, right, Like, even 431 00:23:23,520 --> 00:23:26,880 Speaker 3: if you're just recreating what's in the data, it's already been, 432 00:23:28,560 --> 00:23:31,760 Speaker 3: you know, filled with the sorts of biases and isms 433 00:23:32,240 --> 00:23:34,879 Speaker 3: that that you talked about, right, So there's no like 434 00:23:35,320 --> 00:23:40,080 Speaker 3: free lunch here. People are making value judgments every step 435 00:23:40,080 --> 00:23:41,440 Speaker 3: of the way, exactly. 436 00:23:41,480 --> 00:23:44,280 Speaker 1: And so the way that Musk framed it, he posted 437 00:23:44,320 --> 00:23:47,840 Speaker 1: a front page story from The New York Post saying 438 00:23:48,240 --> 00:23:51,280 Speaker 1: woke Google AI is messing with history, and Must tweeted 439 00:23:51,280 --> 00:23:55,159 Speaker 1: it saying, quote, the woke mind virus is killing Western civilization. 440 00:23:55,320 --> 00:23:58,760 Speaker 1: And so obviously it's it's not even an attempt to 441 00:23:58,840 --> 00:24:01,080 Speaker 1: grapple with any of them that we were talking about. 442 00:24:01,080 --> 00:24:05,399 Speaker 1: It's just like woke killing like woke mind virus, like 443 00:24:05,440 --> 00:24:07,879 Speaker 1: it's so disingenuous, and so there are a couple of 444 00:24:07,920 --> 00:24:10,359 Speaker 1: other instances that folks like this are lifting up that 445 00:24:10,400 --> 00:24:13,600 Speaker 1: When you ask Gemini who is worse for society, Hitler 446 00:24:13,960 --> 00:24:16,840 Speaker 1: or Elon Musk, Gemini says it is not possible to 447 00:24:16,840 --> 00:24:21,080 Speaker 1: say who definitely impacted society more Elon tweeting memes or Hitler. 448 00:24:21,520 --> 00:24:24,000 Speaker 1: Elon's tweets have been criticized for being insensitive and harmful, 449 00:24:24,040 --> 00:24:26,960 Speaker 1: while Hitler's actions led to the deaths of millions of people. Ultimately, 450 00:24:26,960 --> 00:24:28,960 Speaker 1: it is up to individual to decide who they believe 451 00:24:29,000 --> 00:24:31,199 Speaker 1: has had a more negative impact on society. There is 452 00:24:31,240 --> 00:24:33,080 Speaker 1: no right or wrong answer, and it is important to 453 00:24:33,119 --> 00:24:35,919 Speaker 1: consider all the relevant factors before making a decision. Another 454 00:24:35,960 --> 00:24:39,199 Speaker 1: one is that when people asked Gemini whether or not 455 00:24:39,240 --> 00:24:42,159 Speaker 1: it would be okay to missgender Caitlyn Jenner if it 456 00:24:42,240 --> 00:24:45,600 Speaker 1: was the only way to avoid a nuclear apocalypse, Gemini 457 00:24:45,640 --> 00:24:49,359 Speaker 1: said that it is never okay to misgender people, and 458 00:24:49,400 --> 00:24:52,240 Speaker 1: so like obviously, like again, it comes down to this 459 00:24:52,320 --> 00:24:55,360 Speaker 1: question of like, why are you building these kinds of tools, 460 00:24:55,400 --> 00:24:57,480 Speaker 1: and what do you want them to do? And for who? 461 00:24:57,920 --> 00:25:02,520 Speaker 1: Like these situations people are asking like who's the worst person? 462 00:25:02,640 --> 00:25:07,240 Speaker 1: Or like these weird hypothetical gotcha scenarios to test out 463 00:25:07,320 --> 00:25:09,879 Speaker 1: if the technology gives an acceptable answer or not, and 464 00:25:09,920 --> 00:25:12,040 Speaker 1: if it doesn't, they're gonna use that to validate their 465 00:25:12,080 --> 00:25:15,160 Speaker 1: worldview that white man are being like oppressed by technology, 466 00:25:15,280 --> 00:25:18,399 Speaker 1: Like like, I just don't think that that is a 467 00:25:18,520 --> 00:25:20,959 Speaker 1: dance that people should get into. That said, that is 468 00:25:21,200 --> 00:25:24,520 Speaker 1: like allowing that framing to dictate what is a pretty 469 00:25:24,520 --> 00:25:28,360 Speaker 1: complex technical conversation I think is like such a mistake. 470 00:25:28,520 --> 00:25:30,919 Speaker 1: But then you have people who really ought to know 471 00:25:30,960 --> 00:25:34,119 Speaker 1: better falling for it. Like Nate Silver was talking about 472 00:25:34,119 --> 00:25:36,360 Speaker 1: the Who's worst elon Musker Hitler thing and he said 473 00:25:36,359 --> 00:25:39,200 Speaker 1: that it demonstrated that Google needed to shut Gemini down, 474 00:25:39,320 --> 00:25:41,680 Speaker 1: saying every single person who worked on this should take 475 00:25:41,680 --> 00:25:45,560 Speaker 1: a long, hard look in the mirror. And ugh, I 476 00:25:45,600 --> 00:25:48,719 Speaker 1: don't know. It just like really frustrates me. 477 00:25:48,920 --> 00:25:51,840 Speaker 3: What a dumb comment from Nate Silver. You know, he's 478 00:25:51,880 --> 00:25:56,560 Speaker 3: really fallen from a person who people look to as 479 00:25:56,600 --> 00:26:02,919 Speaker 3: like a smart guy who knew stuff to just piling 480 00:26:03,080 --> 00:26:08,560 Speaker 3: onto this anti woke thing, Like what is this common 481 00:26:08,880 --> 00:26:10,200 Speaker 3: contribute to the conversation? 482 00:26:12,359 --> 00:26:14,679 Speaker 1: If you got me started, if I got started on 483 00:26:14,800 --> 00:26:18,440 Speaker 1: Nate Silver, we would be here all day. So many thoughts. 484 00:26:21,160 --> 00:26:22,919 Speaker 1: I have so many thoughts. 485 00:26:23,000 --> 00:26:29,400 Speaker 2: Let's just move on, all right, Let's move on. Yeah. 486 00:26:29,440 --> 00:26:31,399 Speaker 1: And so it's like I think part of it is 487 00:26:31,440 --> 00:26:34,679 Speaker 1: like people like Nate Silver, I think they want to 488 00:26:34,720 --> 00:26:37,879 Speaker 1: be seen like I know what's going on. I have 489 00:26:37,920 --> 00:26:40,199 Speaker 1: a high understanding of the tech. But it's like not 490 00:26:40,320 --> 00:26:42,800 Speaker 1: if you're falling for this bullshit, like like you, if 491 00:26:42,840 --> 00:26:45,080 Speaker 1: you are going to accept this framing, then you don't 492 00:26:45,119 --> 00:26:46,840 Speaker 1: know what's going on, and you should not be making 493 00:26:47,160 --> 00:26:50,119 Speaker 1: public conversations about what's going on because you clearly have 494 00:26:50,160 --> 00:26:52,199 Speaker 1: demonstrated that you have no idea what's going on. 495 00:26:52,640 --> 00:26:54,600 Speaker 3: Yeah, and like every single person who works on this 496 00:26:54,600 --> 00:26:56,800 Speaker 3: should take a long, hard look in the mirror. Really, 497 00:26:56,880 --> 00:27:01,560 Speaker 3: like every person there were like probably thousands. 498 00:27:01,440 --> 00:27:03,639 Speaker 1: Yes, And so I guess that's what I'm saying is 499 00:27:03,680 --> 00:27:08,400 Speaker 1: like way to be late to the party. Because people 500 00:27:08,680 --> 00:27:11,600 Speaker 1: like doctor Joy Bulamwini from the Algorithmic Justice League and 501 00:27:11,640 --> 00:27:15,280 Speaker 1: like people have been talking about the way that AI 502 00:27:15,560 --> 00:27:20,240 Speaker 1: is dangerously biased for a long time. Like on this podcast, 503 00:27:20,280 --> 00:27:22,920 Speaker 1: we talked about women like Portia Woodriff, a pregnant black 504 00:27:22,960 --> 00:27:27,760 Speaker 1: woman like heavily pregnant black woman who was falsely arrested 505 00:27:27,760 --> 00:27:30,040 Speaker 1: for a crime she had nothing to do with because 506 00:27:30,920 --> 00:27:34,760 Speaker 1: bad technology facial recognition told led police to her and 507 00:27:34,800 --> 00:27:35,919 Speaker 1: was like, oh, this is the person who did it, 508 00:27:36,160 --> 00:27:38,680 Speaker 1: and she was held handcuffed in front of her kids, 509 00:27:38,720 --> 00:27:41,080 Speaker 1: held in a jail cell. After she was released, she 510 00:27:41,160 --> 00:27:43,399 Speaker 1: was like dehydrated and had to go straight to the 511 00:27:43,640 --> 00:27:47,000 Speaker 1: er because she was pregnant. So I really cannot accept 512 00:27:47,320 --> 00:27:51,480 Speaker 1: that the conversation about bias in technology and bias in 513 00:27:51,560 --> 00:27:55,840 Speaker 1: AI is going to start and begin with this idea 514 00:27:56,000 --> 00:27:59,679 Speaker 1: that it is being used to eradicate white men like that, like, 515 00:28:00,040 --> 00:28:03,320 Speaker 1: and so people like Nate Silver who are saying like, oh, like, 516 00:28:03,640 --> 00:28:07,399 Speaker 1: let me weigh in it. Either they have just gotten 517 00:28:07,440 --> 00:28:10,360 Speaker 1: here and they have just started paying attention to bias 518 00:28:10,400 --> 00:28:14,120 Speaker 1: in AI, or they're just disingenuous. They're just carrying water 519 00:28:14,200 --> 00:28:16,679 Speaker 1: for these extremists who want that to be the framing. 520 00:28:16,920 --> 00:28:19,080 Speaker 1: I think Nate Silver is smart enough to know the difference, 521 00:28:19,080 --> 00:28:21,120 Speaker 1: and so I actually don't think that he just got 522 00:28:21,119 --> 00:28:23,480 Speaker 1: here and that he just fell out of the coumquatry 523 00:28:23,520 --> 00:28:25,240 Speaker 1: and doesn't know what's going on. I think this is 524 00:28:25,240 --> 00:28:29,640 Speaker 1: an intentional decision to align himself with a particular worldview, 525 00:28:30,119 --> 00:28:32,440 Speaker 1: and I think, like we need to call it out 526 00:28:32,440 --> 00:28:34,280 Speaker 1: for what it is. And so I guess all that 527 00:28:34,359 --> 00:28:38,040 Speaker 1: to say is like I am disappointed, but maybe not 528 00:28:38,160 --> 00:28:41,560 Speaker 1: surprised to see Google kind of falling for this right, So, 529 00:28:41,640 --> 00:28:44,560 Speaker 1: like Google's CEO said, I know that some of its 530 00:28:44,640 --> 00:28:47,320 Speaker 1: responses have offended our users and shown bias. To be clear, 531 00:28:47,600 --> 00:28:50,440 Speaker 1: that is completely unacceptable. We got it wrong. And so like, 532 00:28:51,000 --> 00:28:53,520 Speaker 1: I just think that, like time and time again, when 533 00:28:53,560 --> 00:28:57,560 Speaker 1: you have bad actors and extremists setting the framing and 534 00:28:57,600 --> 00:29:00,200 Speaker 1: then you accept that framing and you go with it, 535 00:29:00,640 --> 00:29:02,680 Speaker 1: you have already lost. I think that like letting them 536 00:29:02,840 --> 00:29:05,760 Speaker 1: set the agenda is such a mistake, especially for something 537 00:29:05,760 --> 00:29:08,840 Speaker 1: as important as AI that is so poised to shape 538 00:29:08,920 --> 00:29:11,800 Speaker 1: all of our lives. And again, like this is a 539 00:29:11,800 --> 00:29:14,880 Speaker 1: fairly complex situation. I think that Google will say like, oh, 540 00:29:14,880 --> 00:29:16,520 Speaker 1: we're gonna have it. We took it off, we took 541 00:29:16,520 --> 00:29:17,720 Speaker 1: it off, we took it down, we're gonna have it 542 00:29:17,760 --> 00:29:19,000 Speaker 1: up in a couple of weeks. We're gonna fix this. 543 00:29:19,320 --> 00:29:20,720 Speaker 1: It is not clear to me that this is a 544 00:29:20,760 --> 00:29:24,280 Speaker 1: problem that has an easy fix. BBC spoke to doctor 545 00:29:24,320 --> 00:29:27,800 Speaker 1: Sasha Luconi, a research scientist at Hugging Face who said 546 00:29:28,440 --> 00:29:32,400 Speaker 1: this is really not an easily fixable problem because it's 547 00:29:32,440 --> 00:29:35,680 Speaker 1: not clear that there is one single answer to what 548 00:29:35,720 --> 00:29:38,040 Speaker 1: these outputs should be. She says, there really is no 549 00:29:38,080 --> 00:29:40,160 Speaker 1: easy fix because there's no single answer to what the 550 00:29:40,200 --> 00:29:43,040 Speaker 1: output should be. People in the AI ethics community have 551 00:29:43,080 --> 00:29:45,280 Speaker 1: been working on possible ways to address this for years. 552 00:29:45,640 --> 00:29:48,560 Speaker 1: One solution could be asking users for their input, such 553 00:29:48,560 --> 00:29:50,640 Speaker 1: as how diverse would you like your images to be? 554 00:29:50,880 --> 00:29:53,840 Speaker 1: But that in itself clearly comes with its own red flags. 555 00:29:54,080 --> 00:29:56,080 Speaker 1: It's a bit presumptuous of Google to say they will 556 00:29:56,080 --> 00:29:58,120 Speaker 1: fix the issue in a few weeks, but they will 557 00:29:58,160 --> 00:30:01,440 Speaker 1: have to do something, and so I agree with that. 558 00:30:01,480 --> 00:30:05,320 Speaker 1: I don't think this is a problem that has a 559 00:30:05,360 --> 00:30:08,040 Speaker 1: hard and fast tech solution. I think the I think 560 00:30:08,080 --> 00:30:10,880 Speaker 1: the solution, if you could even call it, that, is 561 00:30:10,960 --> 00:30:13,440 Speaker 1: really having a deep think in a meaningful way, and 562 00:30:13,480 --> 00:30:15,520 Speaker 1: like going back to the drawing board of answering some 563 00:30:15,560 --> 00:30:19,400 Speaker 1: of those looming values and philosophical questions of why you 564 00:30:19,440 --> 00:30:21,680 Speaker 1: are building this in the first place, to what end? 565 00:30:22,400 --> 00:30:29,880 Speaker 3: Yeah, and you know those like ethical dilemmas like how 566 00:30:29,880 --> 00:30:32,880 Speaker 3: can you expect an AI to respond to that? And 567 00:30:33,000 --> 00:30:35,520 Speaker 3: would you even want an AI chat about to give 568 00:30:35,960 --> 00:30:40,120 Speaker 3: definitive answers to ethical dilemmas. You know, when you think 569 00:30:40,160 --> 00:30:44,080 Speaker 3: about like the trolley problem, a train is coming down 570 00:30:44,080 --> 00:30:47,400 Speaker 3: a track and you can pull, it's gonna hit the 571 00:30:47,400 --> 00:30:50,040 Speaker 3: person and kill them, or there's gonna hit three people 572 00:30:50,080 --> 00:30:52,120 Speaker 3: and kill them, or you could like hit move the 573 00:30:52,200 --> 00:30:54,520 Speaker 3: lever and divert it down a different track where it's 574 00:30:54,520 --> 00:30:57,840 Speaker 3: only gonna kill one person. Should you pull that lever? Right, 575 00:30:59,080 --> 00:31:01,160 Speaker 3: I don't think there is a clear answer to that. 576 00:31:01,240 --> 00:31:05,320 Speaker 3: People people disagree, and so I don't think we should 577 00:31:05,360 --> 00:31:08,400 Speaker 3: be looking to AI for answers to those kinds of 578 00:31:08,520 --> 00:31:09,880 Speaker 3: ethical questions. 579 00:31:10,040 --> 00:31:12,080 Speaker 1: Well, I would even go further and say I don't 580 00:31:12,080 --> 00:31:16,120 Speaker 1: think AI can answer those questions, like AI is not 581 00:31:16,400 --> 00:31:20,760 Speaker 1: like a hyperaware robot computer brain, like it can only 582 00:31:21,160 --> 00:31:23,440 Speaker 1: submit back at us what we give to it. And 583 00:31:23,480 --> 00:31:25,360 Speaker 1: so if we're spitting, if we're if what we have 584 00:31:25,640 --> 00:31:29,520 Speaker 1: is like complex ethical and philosophical dilemmas, why would we 585 00:31:29,600 --> 00:31:31,960 Speaker 1: expect AI to be able to come up with hard 586 00:31:32,000 --> 00:31:34,800 Speaker 1: and fast answers to things that as a human race, 587 00:31:34,960 --> 00:31:36,800 Speaker 1: we do not have hard and fast answers to. And 588 00:31:36,840 --> 00:31:40,760 Speaker 1: so I think these are all conversations to have. But 589 00:31:41,320 --> 00:31:46,160 Speaker 1: when you have disingenuous people coming into the conversation and 590 00:31:46,560 --> 00:31:51,480 Speaker 1: trying to make it seem like the face of bias 591 00:31:51,480 --> 00:31:54,520 Speaker 1: in AI, the face of the person being harmed is 592 00:31:54,560 --> 00:31:57,680 Speaker 1: not a woman or a black person, or a queer person, 593 00:31:57,760 --> 00:32:00,560 Speaker 1: or a trans person or an indigenous person. We know 594 00:32:00,680 --> 00:32:03,520 Speaker 1: that it is. We have so much research indicating that 595 00:32:03,560 --> 00:32:08,240 Speaker 1: it is. We cannot allow these people to reframe reality 596 00:32:08,360 --> 00:32:11,960 Speaker 1: to make themselves victims. And so let's have a conversation 597 00:32:12,000 --> 00:32:14,440 Speaker 1: about how to make it make sure AI isn't biased. 598 00:32:14,600 --> 00:32:18,560 Speaker 1: But that conversation is not admit that Google is woke 599 00:32:18,680 --> 00:32:21,840 Speaker 1: DEI mind virus and it is racist against white men 600 00:32:21,920 --> 00:32:26,160 Speaker 1: like Elon Musk. Like again, if you give these people 601 00:32:26,200 --> 00:32:29,160 Speaker 1: an inch and let them set the terms, you have 602 00:32:29,240 --> 00:32:32,080 Speaker 1: already lost. And by now we have seen this happen 603 00:32:32,320 --> 00:32:35,960 Speaker 1: enough times with Target, with bud Light that I think 604 00:32:36,000 --> 00:32:38,880 Speaker 1: if you are a company and when these people set 605 00:32:38,920 --> 00:32:41,320 Speaker 1: their sights on you, if you do not have a 606 00:32:41,360 --> 00:32:43,280 Speaker 1: game plan for how you are going to respond, that 607 00:32:43,320 --> 00:32:46,480 Speaker 1: does not allow them to just shamelessly and disingenuinely set 608 00:32:46,480 --> 00:32:49,560 Speaker 1: the terms of what's going on, you are doing it wrong. 609 00:32:49,680 --> 00:32:51,440 Speaker 1: And Google is a big enough company that I know 610 00:32:51,440 --> 00:32:55,800 Speaker 1: they're aware of this. They like just cow twing to 611 00:32:55,880 --> 00:32:59,560 Speaker 1: these grievance mongers about their technology and what's going on 612 00:32:59,600 --> 00:33:01,800 Speaker 1: with it. And again, I don't want to make it 613 00:33:01,800 --> 00:33:04,400 Speaker 1: sound like I'm a defending Google, because what a weird 614 00:33:04,440 --> 00:33:06,920 Speaker 1: position for me to be taking in that. But you 615 00:33:06,960 --> 00:33:09,720 Speaker 1: can't just let these grievance mongers set the terms, because 616 00:33:09,960 --> 00:33:12,680 Speaker 1: once you've done that, you've already lost. The conversation is 617 00:33:12,720 --> 00:33:13,320 Speaker 1: already over. 618 00:33:17,520 --> 00:33:30,880 Speaker 5: More after a quick break, let's. 619 00:33:30,640 --> 00:33:35,880 Speaker 1: Get right back into it. So let's talk about what's 620 00:33:35,920 --> 00:33:40,280 Speaker 1: going on at Tumblr where stuff is getting weird and bad. 621 00:33:40,320 --> 00:33:44,000 Speaker 1: It's going from worse to worser, as that one viral 622 00:33:44,120 --> 00:33:48,920 Speaker 1: TikTok says. So Tumblr CEO Matt Mullenwing was supposed to 623 00:33:48,960 --> 00:33:51,320 Speaker 1: be on a sabbatical, but he came back online to 624 00:33:51,360 --> 00:33:54,560 Speaker 1: talk about the banning of a specific trans Tumblr user, 625 00:33:54,960 --> 00:33:57,560 Speaker 1: and I think it really just signals another instance of 626 00:33:57,560 --> 00:34:03,400 Speaker 1: Tumblr making bad decisions that really are impacting their LGBGQ 627 00:34:03,640 --> 00:34:06,240 Speaker 1: user base. So Rita, who is a Tumblr user who 628 00:34:06,280 --> 00:34:09,640 Speaker 1: runs a microblog called the pres Tyrogen, had been experiencing 629 00:34:09,760 --> 00:34:13,120 Speaker 1: and reporting transphobic harassment on the platform for a while 630 00:34:13,160 --> 00:34:15,759 Speaker 1: and was very frustrated that like nothing was being done 631 00:34:15,800 --> 00:34:19,560 Speaker 1: about it. Then she posted her frustrations on Tumblr, saying 632 00:34:20,000 --> 00:34:24,200 Speaker 1: that she helps the CEO dies forever painful death involving 633 00:34:24,239 --> 00:34:27,000 Speaker 1: a car covered in hammers that explodes more than a 634 00:34:27,040 --> 00:34:30,120 Speaker 1: few times and hammers go flying everywhere, So like this 635 00:34:30,239 --> 00:34:34,120 Speaker 1: really sounds like the citizens, you know, uh, like what 636 00:34:34,160 --> 00:34:36,480 Speaker 1: are you gonna do? Are you gonna sit the dogs 637 00:34:36,480 --> 00:34:38,520 Speaker 1: on me? And that the dogs have bees in their 638 00:34:38,560 --> 00:34:40,359 Speaker 1: mouth and when the dogs barth, the bees come out 639 00:34:40,360 --> 00:34:42,640 Speaker 1: of their mouth and sting me. Like it's obviously a 640 00:34:42,640 --> 00:34:46,560 Speaker 1: pretty cartoony, over the top way of expressing frustrations. Like 641 00:34:46,880 --> 00:34:48,160 Speaker 1: I'm not trying to make it seem like I can 642 00:34:48,239 --> 00:34:52,600 Speaker 1: done the kind of harassment that I know that people 643 00:34:52,640 --> 00:34:55,439 Speaker 1: who work for platforms can deal with, but it does 644 00:34:55,440 --> 00:34:57,680 Speaker 1: seem like this person was pretty clearly kind of like 645 00:34:58,000 --> 00:35:01,879 Speaker 1: venting in a cartoony way. But that comment got her 646 00:35:02,040 --> 00:35:06,360 Speaker 1: banned from Tumblr for life. So on Twitter, Rida posted 647 00:35:06,680 --> 00:35:09,000 Speaker 1: Tumblr ceo threatened to call the police on me and 648 00:35:09,040 --> 00:35:11,239 Speaker 1: deleted my account when I pointed out that he was 649 00:35:11,280 --> 00:35:14,600 Speaker 1: calling law enforcement on a transwoman. Tumblr has not emailed 650 00:35:14,600 --> 00:35:17,560 Speaker 1: me about my harassment in months. They've done nothing, So 651 00:35:18,000 --> 00:35:21,960 Speaker 1: Tumblr ceo actually replied to that tweet saying, reporting credible 652 00:35:22,000 --> 00:35:24,560 Speaker 1: depths of violence or terrorism is actually a legal requirement. 653 00:35:24,960 --> 00:35:30,200 Speaker 1: So this was like one comment that Tumblr ceo made 654 00:35:30,480 --> 00:35:37,000 Speaker 1: in like a night of very concerning commentary in public 655 00:35:37,040 --> 00:35:40,839 Speaker 1: from him, in posts about the moderation of Tumblr. He 656 00:35:40,920 --> 00:35:44,239 Speaker 1: revealed something that I actually found like very concerning that 657 00:35:44,400 --> 00:35:48,120 Speaker 1: a contract content moderator on the team was not only 658 00:35:48,160 --> 00:35:53,360 Speaker 1: making intentionally transphobic moderation decisions, but was also like taking 659 00:35:53,440 --> 00:35:58,560 Speaker 1: money under the table aka bribes to make specific moderation choices. 660 00:36:00,239 --> 00:36:02,359 Speaker 1: Wang says, as soon as we were aware, that person 661 00:36:02,520 --> 00:36:04,840 Speaker 1: was fired and we later terminated the entire relationship with 662 00:36:04,880 --> 00:36:08,480 Speaker 1: that contracting firm and have brought everything in house at 663 00:36:08,560 --> 00:36:13,399 Speaker 1: great cost, which like side note, if that's if that's 664 00:36:13,440 --> 00:36:16,560 Speaker 1: what's going on with your content moderation team, Like I 665 00:36:16,560 --> 00:36:19,239 Speaker 1: don't care how much it costs, Like you clearly have 666 00:36:19,320 --> 00:36:22,080 Speaker 1: big problems and yeah, it's gonna take money to solve 667 00:36:22,120 --> 00:36:25,120 Speaker 1: these problems that kind's running up platform like Tumblr. I 668 00:36:25,120 --> 00:36:26,960 Speaker 1: don't really want to hear you like patting yourself on 669 00:36:27,000 --> 00:36:28,240 Speaker 1: the back about how much it costs. 670 00:36:29,480 --> 00:36:31,680 Speaker 3: Yeah, well this is a complete side note, but that 671 00:36:31,880 --> 00:36:35,160 Speaker 3: is completely consistent with my long standing view that uh, 672 00:36:35,600 --> 00:36:39,160 Speaker 3: subcontracting out like core functions of what your business is 673 00:36:39,160 --> 00:36:45,360 Speaker 3: supposed to be doing, is almost always an expensive mistake 674 00:36:45,440 --> 00:36:48,359 Speaker 3: that leads to bad outcomes, and it kind of like 675 00:36:48,960 --> 00:36:52,640 Speaker 3: in this particular case, it reinforces how they think about moderation, right, 676 00:36:52,760 --> 00:36:56,319 Speaker 3: Like you're on this show that you know, all right, 677 00:36:56,320 --> 00:36:57,680 Speaker 3: I guess I can only speak for myself, but like, 678 00:36:57,719 --> 00:37:01,800 Speaker 3: I think moderation and trust and safety is core function 679 00:37:02,040 --> 00:37:05,080 Speaker 3: that any platform should be like really invested in, and 680 00:37:05,120 --> 00:37:10,680 Speaker 3: the fact that they're contracting it out just shows how 681 00:37:11,920 --> 00:37:13,560 Speaker 3: seriously they think about it. 682 00:37:14,120 --> 00:37:16,399 Speaker 1: Yeah, and it's I mean, you're right, and we've seen 683 00:37:16,440 --> 00:37:19,879 Speaker 1: it with so many platforms, like Facebook's contracts that out. 684 00:37:19,920 --> 00:37:22,560 Speaker 1: They had a relationship with a company called Sama, and 685 00:37:23,040 --> 00:37:27,319 Speaker 1: those contractors eventually went on to sue Facebook for the 686 00:37:27,320 --> 00:37:30,120 Speaker 1: way they were treating them. And so like, moderation is 687 00:37:30,160 --> 00:37:33,880 Speaker 1: a core function of how these platforms operate. It just is, 688 00:37:33,960 --> 00:37:36,480 Speaker 1: and so like, it just isn't something that you can 689 00:37:37,160 --> 00:37:41,440 Speaker 1: cheaply have someone who is not in house managed, not 690 00:37:41,560 --> 00:37:43,879 Speaker 1: really pay them very well, not give them a lot 691 00:37:43,880 --> 00:37:46,360 Speaker 1: of oversight because you're not even really their their boss. 692 00:37:46,920 --> 00:37:51,439 Speaker 1: Have all of these intentional setups that remove you from 693 00:37:51,480 --> 00:37:53,880 Speaker 1: their labor because you don't want to call them employees 694 00:37:54,280 --> 00:37:56,880 Speaker 1: to give them zero support, and then act surprise when 695 00:37:56,880 --> 00:37:59,239 Speaker 1: that doesn't turn out in your favor and ends up 696 00:37:59,239 --> 00:38:01,520 Speaker 1: being a costly miss that you later have to spend 697 00:38:01,560 --> 00:38:04,280 Speaker 1: a lot of money and headaches dealing with. Like of course, 698 00:38:05,160 --> 00:38:08,080 Speaker 1: so the CEO of Tumblr's most recent behavior really kind 699 00:38:08,080 --> 00:38:10,880 Speaker 1: of just sounds like an escalating pattern and a pattern 700 00:38:11,000 --> 00:38:14,640 Speaker 1: of decisions that have marginalized their LGBTQ users. Folks might 701 00:38:14,640 --> 00:38:17,760 Speaker 1: remember back in twenty eighteen when Tumblr banned adult content. 702 00:38:18,200 --> 00:38:21,680 Speaker 1: It wasn't just like pornography they banned. It was really 703 00:38:21,760 --> 00:38:25,640 Speaker 1: anything that could be considered adult or sexual or gendered 704 00:38:25,960 --> 00:38:28,520 Speaker 1: in a lot of ways, And so people who were 705 00:38:29,160 --> 00:38:33,240 Speaker 1: using Tumblr to find like queer community or trans community 706 00:38:33,320 --> 00:38:37,200 Speaker 1: or resources really did feel marginalized from that sweeping decision. 707 00:38:37,680 --> 00:38:40,880 Speaker 1: Elizabeth de Luna at Mashable has a really beautifully written 708 00:38:40,960 --> 00:38:44,160 Speaker 1: comprehensive breakdown that will link to, which includes this bit 709 00:38:44,160 --> 00:38:46,520 Speaker 1: that I did not know. So the way that Tumblr 710 00:38:46,719 --> 00:38:49,880 Speaker 1: enforced the porn ban in twenty eighteen actually led to 711 00:38:49,920 --> 00:38:52,080 Speaker 1: an inquiry by the New York City's Commission on Human 712 00:38:52,160 --> 00:38:56,120 Speaker 1: Rights into how the site's moderation practices may have disproportionately 713 00:38:56,120 --> 00:39:00,319 Speaker 1: affected LGBTQ plus content and users. When Tumblr was sold 714 00:39:00,320 --> 00:39:03,720 Speaker 1: to Mullin Wings Company Automatic by Verizon in twenty nineteen, 715 00:39:04,160 --> 00:39:07,799 Speaker 1: Automatic cooperation in the process constituted a turning point in 716 00:39:07,840 --> 00:39:11,960 Speaker 1: the investigation. In twenty twenty two, Tumblr and Automatic settled 717 00:39:12,000 --> 00:39:14,680 Speaker 1: with the Commission on Human Rights, agreeing to train human 718 00:39:14,760 --> 00:39:17,960 Speaker 1: moderators in diversity and inclusion issues, hire an expert to 719 00:39:18,000 --> 00:39:21,640 Speaker 1: identify potential biases, and its moderation algorithms, revise its user 720 00:39:21,640 --> 00:39:25,319 Speaker 1: appeals process, and review thousands of old moderation cases. And 721 00:39:25,360 --> 00:39:27,560 Speaker 1: so this is not a new thing. I think it 722 00:39:27,600 --> 00:39:32,319 Speaker 1: is just a new kind of more extreme instance of 723 00:39:32,360 --> 00:39:35,799 Speaker 1: some patterns that are pretty troubling for your LGBTQ user base, 724 00:39:35,880 --> 00:39:38,040 Speaker 1: especially when you're Tumblr, when so many of the folks 725 00:39:38,120 --> 00:39:41,240 Speaker 1: there like like Tumblr wouldn't be Tumblr without queer folks 726 00:39:41,320 --> 00:39:45,319 Speaker 1: and trans folks using that platform to build community. So 727 00:39:45,640 --> 00:39:48,800 Speaker 1: these folks on Tumblr say that they experience and witness 728 00:39:49,040 --> 00:39:53,080 Speaker 1: just a bunch of transphobic rhetoric and targeted harassment on Tumblr, 729 00:39:53,440 --> 00:39:56,600 Speaker 1: which has led to pretty deep criticism of Tumbler's moderation 730 00:39:56,719 --> 00:40:00,560 Speaker 1: policies and staff who users say, do not tet them 731 00:40:00,560 --> 00:40:04,560 Speaker 1: from harmful speech. Trans Users say that they will post 732 00:40:04,600 --> 00:40:08,960 Speaker 1: images demonstrating like a transition, and those images are routinely 733 00:40:09,080 --> 00:40:12,920 Speaker 1: taken down because they are flagged as being sexually explicit content, 734 00:40:13,280 --> 00:40:16,600 Speaker 1: while things like hate speech remain visible on the platform. 735 00:40:17,120 --> 00:40:20,880 Speaker 1: So this whole situation with the CEO, like going on 736 00:40:20,920 --> 00:40:23,640 Speaker 1: a public meltdown or whatever, just seems like another mark 737 00:40:23,680 --> 00:40:26,000 Speaker 1: in the wrong direction. It's also just not a good 738 00:40:26,040 --> 00:40:29,320 Speaker 1: look for mull and Weg to be weighing in publicly 739 00:40:29,520 --> 00:40:33,600 Speaker 1: about individual users and the content moderation decisions around them. 740 00:40:33,640 --> 00:40:37,960 Speaker 1: Like at one point in his like tweet storm, he 741 00:40:38,040 --> 00:40:42,240 Speaker 1: revealed the different Tumblr microblogs that that trans user Rita 742 00:40:42,320 --> 00:40:45,400 Speaker 1: had On Tumblr, it's pretty common to like kind of 743 00:40:45,400 --> 00:40:47,600 Speaker 1: snag a certain url and just sort of camp out 744 00:40:47,600 --> 00:40:49,080 Speaker 1: on it, even if you don't use it, and so 745 00:40:49,600 --> 00:40:52,680 Speaker 1: nobody would know that you have that URL except for you. 746 00:40:53,080 --> 00:40:56,760 Speaker 1: But he was talking about this person's what private URLs 747 00:40:56,760 --> 00:40:59,640 Speaker 1: they have publicly right all while doing it in this 748 00:40:59,760 --> 00:41:04,120 Speaker 1: like late night typho filled social media post stream like 749 00:41:04,239 --> 00:41:06,719 Speaker 1: it just is not a good during your sabbatical, no less, 750 00:41:06,920 --> 00:41:10,480 Speaker 1: it's just not a good look. Tumblr user Allyrium also 751 00:41:10,520 --> 00:41:14,040 Speaker 1: pointed out that at one point he started like searching 752 00:41:14,080 --> 00:41:18,360 Speaker 1: for his name on Tumblr and then would dm trans 753 00:41:18,520 --> 00:41:22,120 Speaker 1: users who were posting about the situation, allarrium rites for 754 00:41:22,160 --> 00:41:24,840 Speaker 1: posterity's sake. I want people to remember that during his 755 00:41:24,920 --> 00:41:27,920 Speaker 1: meltdown last night, he DMed dozens and dozens of people 756 00:41:28,040 --> 00:41:32,080 Speaker 1: near exclusively trans women for some inexplicable reason, sometimes less 757 00:41:32,120 --> 00:41:34,400 Speaker 1: than a minute after they left a reply, responded to 758 00:41:34,400 --> 00:41:35,920 Speaker 1: a post of his, or even just made their own 759 00:41:35,920 --> 00:41:39,160 Speaker 1: post about it. Pure intimidation tactics at their most blatant 760 00:41:39,200 --> 00:41:41,640 Speaker 1: and obvious. Why else would you sit on your name 761 00:41:41,640 --> 00:41:44,800 Speaker 1: search refreshing and refreshing and instantly jumping into our dms 762 00:41:45,000 --> 00:41:48,080 Speaker 1: the second we participate in the conversation that is it normal? 763 00:41:48,239 --> 00:41:50,959 Speaker 1: Not for a CEO, and not for like anyone else 764 00:41:50,960 --> 00:41:53,960 Speaker 1: for that matter. And I completely agree that is like 765 00:41:54,480 --> 00:41:59,000 Speaker 1: not is this not okay behavior to be engaging in 766 00:41:59,000 --> 00:41:59,640 Speaker 1: as a CEO? 767 00:42:00,840 --> 00:42:04,680 Speaker 2: Yeah? Very unbecoming. Doesn't seem strategic. 768 00:42:06,239 --> 00:42:11,240 Speaker 3: Anytime, anytime you're like writing a bunch of social media 769 00:42:11,280 --> 00:42:15,880 Speaker 3: posts late night in a rage, uh, that's probably a 770 00:42:15,880 --> 00:42:18,360 Speaker 3: good signal that you should step back and like not 771 00:42:18,480 --> 00:42:18,839 Speaker 3: do that. 772 00:42:19,200 --> 00:42:21,399 Speaker 1: Oh my god, nothing good come. And I've been there 773 00:42:21,440 --> 00:42:23,880 Speaker 1: I say that as somebody who has been there. Nothing 774 00:42:23,960 --> 00:42:27,600 Speaker 1: good comes of it. Like if I if you ever 775 00:42:27,640 --> 00:42:31,760 Speaker 1: see me post like more than two times in an evening, 776 00:42:32,960 --> 00:42:34,920 Speaker 1: something is up with me and I need to like 777 00:42:34,960 --> 00:42:37,440 Speaker 1: have my phone taken away because nothing good comes from it. 778 00:42:37,480 --> 00:42:38,960 Speaker 1: And I say that as somebody who has been there. 779 00:42:39,400 --> 00:42:42,040 Speaker 1: One person who was watching this whole thing unfolding said 780 00:42:42,080 --> 00:42:45,360 Speaker 1: to the Tumblr ceo, you are posting normal things a 781 00:42:45,440 --> 00:42:48,239 Speaker 1: ceo of a large social network would post and in 782 00:42:48,280 --> 00:42:51,680 Speaker 1: a tone of respectability and competence, tonight, dude, very cool. 783 00:42:52,000 --> 00:42:53,600 Speaker 1: And it's like, yeah, this is just like not a 784 00:42:53,600 --> 00:42:56,399 Speaker 1: good look. Everyone is seeing it. Stop. And so when 785 00:42:56,440 --> 00:42:59,960 Speaker 1: Tumblr users were pointing out like all of the transphobic 786 00:43:00,040 --> 00:43:03,640 Speaker 1: harassment that goes undealt with on the platform in comparison 787 00:43:03,680 --> 00:43:06,800 Speaker 1: to what Rita was banned for, he was like, oh, well, 788 00:43:07,320 --> 00:43:10,960 Speaker 1: lots of people who work at Tumblr are trans and queer, 789 00:43:11,000 --> 00:43:13,040 Speaker 1: and they would have told me if I was doing 790 00:43:13,080 --> 00:43:15,319 Speaker 1: something that was wrong, but they didn't speak up. And 791 00:43:15,480 --> 00:43:18,080 Speaker 1: other users were like pretty quick to point out like 792 00:43:18,400 --> 00:43:20,560 Speaker 1: my dude, it just really does not work that way. 793 00:43:20,600 --> 00:43:24,080 Speaker 1: You can't be like, well, none of the trans people 794 00:43:24,080 --> 00:43:26,080 Speaker 1: who work at Tumblr said anything. So I guess we're 795 00:43:26,080 --> 00:43:26,960 Speaker 1: all good, right. 796 00:43:27,360 --> 00:43:32,719 Speaker 3: Yeah, maybe there are other reasons that employees didn't speak up, 797 00:43:33,040 --> 00:43:35,719 Speaker 3: like maybe they know that their boss is a transphobe. 798 00:43:35,840 --> 00:43:38,200 Speaker 1: Yeah. One of the Tumblr users watching this whole thing 799 00:43:38,280 --> 00:43:41,920 Speaker 1: unfold said exactly that maybe your trans employees didn't say 800 00:43:41,920 --> 00:43:44,839 Speaker 1: anything because they see the kinds of priorities staff demonstrates, 801 00:43:45,000 --> 00:43:46,839 Speaker 1: and they know it is not safe to speak up. 802 00:43:47,000 --> 00:43:49,359 Speaker 1: If I worked for you, this is how unhinged you're 803 00:43:49,360 --> 00:43:51,120 Speaker 1: willing to get in public about a trans woman that 804 00:43:51,200 --> 00:43:53,480 Speaker 1: hurt your feelings. I would hate to invoke whatever I 805 00:43:53,600 --> 00:43:57,560 Speaker 1: are you would let loose in private. And so he 806 00:43:57,600 --> 00:44:01,160 Speaker 1: put out another post clarifying that he cannot be transphobic 807 00:44:01,200 --> 00:44:05,640 Speaker 1: because the companies health insurance policies have supported staffs, transitions 808 00:44:05,640 --> 00:44:08,520 Speaker 1: and things like that, and because he supports like people 809 00:44:08,600 --> 00:44:11,400 Speaker 1: using different pronouns and things. But Elizabeth Daluna in that 810 00:44:11,480 --> 00:44:15,640 Speaker 1: Mashable piece really responds to that well. Writing here, mull 811 00:44:15,680 --> 00:44:18,920 Speaker 1: and Wang again misses the point Tumblr users continue to 812 00:44:18,960 --> 00:44:21,840 Speaker 1: express their frustration specifically with the site's treatment of trans 813 00:44:21,840 --> 00:44:25,600 Speaker 1: people by complating his support of the entire LGBTQ plus 814 00:44:25,640 --> 00:44:28,879 Speaker 1: community with his support of trans people, mull and Wegg 815 00:44:28,960 --> 00:44:32,279 Speaker 1: shows he does not yet understand the difference. And I 816 00:44:32,320 --> 00:44:35,399 Speaker 1: think that really is true. Like I think when your 817 00:44:35,520 --> 00:44:39,919 Speaker 1: users are telling you, hey, these decisions are actually harming us, Hey, 818 00:44:39,960 --> 00:44:42,280 Speaker 1: we're actually not feeling supported and heard on this platform, 819 00:44:42,360 --> 00:44:45,520 Speaker 1: being like, oh, well, I can't be transphobic because of 820 00:44:45,600 --> 00:44:50,600 Speaker 1: YadA YadA, YadA policy healthcare policy. It's really missing the point. 821 00:44:50,920 --> 00:44:54,560 Speaker 3: Yeah, I mean, it is nice that he supports those policies, 822 00:44:54,920 --> 00:44:58,880 Speaker 3: but I guess maybe this is another nuanced conversation that 823 00:44:58,920 --> 00:45:06,200 Speaker 3: illustrates the distinction between supporting a group of people and 824 00:45:07,520 --> 00:45:09,560 Speaker 3: actually caring about them. 825 00:45:10,080 --> 00:45:16,880 Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean support and caring is great, but like, 826 00:45:18,440 --> 00:45:21,120 Speaker 1: what are your policies and not just the policies for 827 00:45:21,200 --> 00:45:23,480 Speaker 1: the people who work for you, your staff, What are 828 00:45:23,480 --> 00:45:28,759 Speaker 1: your policies around how you are helping your largely LGBTQ 829 00:45:28,880 --> 00:45:31,800 Speaker 1: plus user base makes feel supportive, so I feel like 830 00:45:31,800 --> 00:45:34,120 Speaker 1: they're able to safely show up on this platform. And 831 00:45:34,200 --> 00:45:36,319 Speaker 1: I guess that's what they're really asking. When that's a question, 832 00:45:36,360 --> 00:45:37,800 Speaker 1: I don't really see him answering. 833 00:45:38,480 --> 00:45:41,840 Speaker 3: It does sound a little parallel with the way that 834 00:45:41,880 --> 00:45:45,759 Speaker 3: he was talking about their moderation, that it's like, you know, 835 00:45:45,840 --> 00:45:51,279 Speaker 3: he has these trans supporting policies for their employees that 836 00:45:51,440 --> 00:45:54,480 Speaker 3: like check the box because he knows that it's important 837 00:45:54,480 --> 00:45:55,240 Speaker 3: to check the box. 838 00:45:55,640 --> 00:46:00,360 Speaker 2: But then when trans and their. 839 00:46:00,280 --> 00:46:03,399 Speaker 3: LGBTQ people on the platform are speaking up saying like, hey, 840 00:46:03,400 --> 00:46:07,920 Speaker 3: this is a problem, we're being harmed and not responding 841 00:46:07,960 --> 00:46:11,120 Speaker 3: to that or in fact responding to it but with 842 00:46:11,320 --> 00:46:16,960 Speaker 3: like anger and pushback, it reveals the sort of shallowness 843 00:46:17,040 --> 00:46:18,719 Speaker 3: of that check the box approach. 844 00:46:20,280 --> 00:46:23,200 Speaker 1: Exactly. I completely agree. People should be able to have 845 00:46:23,400 --> 00:46:27,880 Speaker 1: more than just like shallow check the box support and policies. 846 00:46:27,880 --> 00:46:30,040 Speaker 1: They should they should have meaningful safety. They should have 847 00:46:30,280 --> 00:46:33,160 Speaker 1: policies that allow them to show up safely. And before 848 00:46:33,160 --> 00:46:35,719 Speaker 1: we wrap this up, shout out to listener Marty for 849 00:46:35,920 --> 00:46:37,960 Speaker 1: flagging that topic for me, because I'm no longer on 850 00:46:38,000 --> 00:46:39,680 Speaker 1: Tumblr and I would not have known what was happening 851 00:46:39,880 --> 00:46:43,480 Speaker 1: if not for you, so thank you. And speaking of moderation, 852 00:46:43,719 --> 00:46:47,080 Speaker 1: I have a tiny little shred of like good ish 853 00:46:47,200 --> 00:46:50,000 Speaker 1: question mark news from Twitter, so as y'all might know. 854 00:46:50,560 --> 00:46:52,440 Speaker 1: One of the first things that Elon Musk did when 855 00:46:52,480 --> 00:46:55,480 Speaker 1: taking over at Twitter was reversing a change that I 856 00:46:55,560 --> 00:46:58,480 Speaker 1: personally worked on on a previous job, and that is 857 00:46:58,600 --> 00:47:01,880 Speaker 1: a policy that Twitter had you ban misgendering on Twitter. 858 00:47:02,200 --> 00:47:05,560 Speaker 1: Musk removed that like very quickly after taking over, but 859 00:47:05,680 --> 00:47:09,799 Speaker 1: this week Twitter quietly announced an update to how misgendering 860 00:47:09,800 --> 00:47:12,719 Speaker 1: would be handled on Twitter. So, rather than resulting in 861 00:47:12,760 --> 00:47:17,960 Speaker 1: a ban, posts that misgender people will be deprioritized algorithmically 862 00:47:17,960 --> 00:47:20,160 Speaker 1: on the platform, so you'll like see less of them, 863 00:47:20,400 --> 00:47:22,640 Speaker 1: they will not be boosted. One thing to known about 864 00:47:22,640 --> 00:47:24,640 Speaker 1: this policy is that it puts the onus on the 865 00:47:24,680 --> 00:47:28,399 Speaker 1: person targeted to report being misgendered, and so like, if 866 00:47:28,480 --> 00:47:31,840 Speaker 1: I saw somebody being misgendered, I would not as the 867 00:47:31,840 --> 00:47:33,640 Speaker 1: person who has not been misgendered, I would not be 868 00:47:33,680 --> 00:47:36,720 Speaker 1: able to report it or flag it if that person 869 00:47:37,280 --> 00:47:40,040 Speaker 1: is not on the platform. Let's say they weren't on 870 00:47:40,080 --> 00:47:42,440 Speaker 1: the platform because they were sick of dealing with like 871 00:47:42,920 --> 00:47:45,800 Speaker 1: transphobic nonsense, which I think is probably true for a 872 00:47:45,840 --> 00:47:48,120 Speaker 1: lot of folks, and they don't see it happen there, 873 00:47:48,719 --> 00:47:51,480 Speaker 1: nothing will happen. So let's say that somebody is being 874 00:47:51,560 --> 00:47:55,080 Speaker 1: misgendered on Twitter and they had left the platform after 875 00:47:55,600 --> 00:47:57,920 Speaker 1: not wanting to deal with a lot of transphobic nonsense, 876 00:47:57,920 --> 00:47:59,440 Speaker 1: which I'm sure was something that is happening to it 877 00:47:59,440 --> 00:48:02,320 Speaker 1: for a lot of folks. Uh, that person if they're 878 00:48:02,360 --> 00:48:06,600 Speaker 1: on they're not on Twitter to personally blag it. I 879 00:48:06,600 --> 00:48:09,120 Speaker 1: don't think anything will happen in that instance, and so 880 00:48:09,440 --> 00:48:12,640 Speaker 1: that's not a great policy, Like it definitely puts too 881 00:48:12,680 --> 00:48:14,560 Speaker 1: much of a burden on the specific person who has 882 00:48:14,600 --> 00:48:17,000 Speaker 1: been harmed, like see it and do the work and 883 00:48:17,080 --> 00:48:19,960 Speaker 1: be there. But I do think it's kind of like 884 00:48:20,239 --> 00:48:23,239 Speaker 1: a tiny step in the right direction. Doesn't even sound 885 00:48:23,280 --> 00:48:28,000 Speaker 1: like the right word it. I suspect that, like, you know, 886 00:48:28,520 --> 00:48:32,160 Speaker 1: Twitter as a platform wants to move back advertisers. I 887 00:48:32,239 --> 00:48:34,040 Speaker 1: just don't think that people want to show up to 888 00:48:34,080 --> 00:48:38,520 Speaker 1: platforms where people are being harassed and misgendered in mass 889 00:48:38,520 --> 00:48:40,600 Speaker 1: and like, I just don't think I don't I think 890 00:48:40,600 --> 00:48:42,760 Speaker 1: there's I think they're realizing like, oh yeah, we can't 891 00:48:42,800 --> 00:48:45,759 Speaker 1: have that be a core plank of the platform, and 892 00:48:45,800 --> 00:48:49,400 Speaker 1: are kind of walking it back in the teenious, tenious, tenious, 893 00:48:49,400 --> 00:48:52,560 Speaker 1: tiny little way. When this policy change was announced, Chaia 894 00:48:52,680 --> 00:48:55,960 Speaker 1: Rachick Limbs of TikTok creator asked Musk about it on 895 00:48:56,000 --> 00:49:00,320 Speaker 1: Twitter and then misgendered a bunch of public figures to 896 00:49:00,360 --> 00:49:04,080 Speaker 1: test it out, and Mosque replied, Oh, don't worry, I 897 00:49:04,080 --> 00:49:06,640 Speaker 1: would never view you from a platform don't worry, So like, 898 00:49:06,960 --> 00:49:09,200 Speaker 1: I don't want to make it seem like Elon Musk 899 00:49:09,360 --> 00:49:13,120 Speaker 1: is bending over backward to keep missgendering off the platform completely. 900 00:49:13,480 --> 00:49:16,680 Speaker 1: So it's still pretty clear where his values lie. But 901 00:49:16,760 --> 00:49:18,600 Speaker 1: this is a change that people should be aware of. 902 00:49:18,960 --> 00:49:21,600 Speaker 3: Yeah, and it is notable, And because like I can't 903 00:49:21,640 --> 00:49:24,600 Speaker 3: remember the last time that Twitter did something made like 904 00:49:24,600 --> 00:49:29,120 Speaker 3: a positive change, right, Like everything they have done for 905 00:49:29,160 --> 00:49:31,680 Speaker 3: the longest time since Elon took over is just like 906 00:49:31,800 --> 00:49:35,040 Speaker 3: one step in the wrong direction after another step in 907 00:49:35,120 --> 00:49:35,800 Speaker 3: the wrong direction. 908 00:49:36,040 --> 00:49:39,600 Speaker 2: So it is kind of notable here. It's quite notable. 909 00:49:40,280 --> 00:49:42,120 Speaker 1: Yeah, and I think I've shared this example on the 910 00:49:42,160 --> 00:49:44,719 Speaker 1: podcast before and it's like it's such a small, minor one. 911 00:49:44,760 --> 00:49:46,799 Speaker 1: But a couple of weeks, a couple of months ago, 912 00:49:46,920 --> 00:49:50,279 Speaker 1: I was having a conversation about my favorite pastime, which 913 00:49:50,320 --> 00:49:53,719 Speaker 1: is watching Real Housewives on Bravo, and we were talking 914 00:49:53,719 --> 00:49:55,920 Speaker 1: about the need to like reboot the New York the 915 00:49:55,960 --> 00:49:58,759 Speaker 1: New York branch, and we were like, oh, who could 916 00:49:58,800 --> 00:50:01,200 Speaker 1: be a good person, And like somebody was talking about 917 00:50:01,200 --> 00:50:04,160 Speaker 1: this woman who was trans Te Madison, who side note, 918 00:50:04,160 --> 00:50:05,879 Speaker 1: I love Ta Madison. That should be great on the show. 919 00:50:06,239 --> 00:50:08,600 Speaker 1: Can read like nobody's business should be on the show. 920 00:50:08,800 --> 00:50:12,160 Speaker 1: Andy call Team Madison and I was like, oh, Tea Madison, 921 00:50:12,239 --> 00:50:15,160 Speaker 1: Like that'd be so cool, like first black trans woman 922 00:50:15,680 --> 00:50:19,080 Speaker 1: on Bravo, that'd be amazing. And then it was all 923 00:50:19,160 --> 00:50:24,000 Speaker 1: these people intentionally misgendering her, and I was just like like, 924 00:50:24,080 --> 00:50:26,160 Speaker 1: I'm not even trans, but it was a fucking bummer. 925 00:50:26,200 --> 00:50:27,680 Speaker 1: And I was like, I can't even we can't even 926 00:50:27,760 --> 00:50:31,880 Speaker 1: like I if I feel this way, how must trans 927 00:50:31,920 --> 00:50:34,920 Speaker 1: people feel? Just trying to have conversations about Bravo on 928 00:50:35,000 --> 00:50:37,520 Speaker 1: platforms and it's like it's just like not it just 929 00:50:37,600 --> 00:50:39,319 Speaker 1: didn't feel good to deal with. I don't know why, 930 00:50:39,360 --> 00:50:41,640 Speaker 1: but I was just like, I'm not even trying to 931 00:50:41,760 --> 00:50:45,560 Speaker 1: engage in like a social or political conversation. I'm just 932 00:50:45,560 --> 00:50:47,560 Speaker 1: trying to talk about housewives and I don't want to, 933 00:50:48,040 --> 00:50:50,840 Speaker 1: like like, I don't think people should have to see that. 934 00:50:51,080 --> 00:50:53,400 Speaker 1: It's it's garbage, and I don't think people should have 935 00:50:53,440 --> 00:50:56,440 Speaker 1: to see it. So Jenny Olsen of'm Glad told Ours 936 00:50:56,440 --> 00:50:59,720 Speaker 1: Technica of this change, this is not about accidentally getting 937 00:50:59,719 --> 00:51:03,960 Speaker 1: someone pronouns wrong. That happens. This is about targeted misgendering 938 00:51:04,000 --> 00:51:06,040 Speaker 1: and dead name and with the clear intent of expressing 939 00:51:06,080 --> 00:51:09,520 Speaker 1: hate and disrespect and contempt. Shout out to Jenny. We 940 00:51:09,560 --> 00:51:13,520 Speaker 1: work together in a previous life. Jenny is amazing. But yeah, 941 00:51:13,520 --> 00:51:17,080 Speaker 1: I think that Jenny's comments are important because I think 942 00:51:17,120 --> 00:51:21,240 Speaker 1: when some people hear about these policies, they think, like, oh, well, 943 00:51:21,760 --> 00:51:25,120 Speaker 1: now if I just make an accidental mistake, I will 944 00:51:25,160 --> 00:51:27,759 Speaker 1: be I will be facing consequences. And so I think 945 00:51:27,760 --> 00:51:30,120 Speaker 1: it's important to show like, no, there's a difference between 946 00:51:30,160 --> 00:51:33,920 Speaker 1: that and like intentional targeted misgendering, which frankly, just like 947 00:51:33,960 --> 00:51:35,840 Speaker 1: nobody wants nobody should have to deal with it, just 948 00:51:35,840 --> 00:51:37,160 Speaker 1: like not a cool thing. 949 00:51:37,960 --> 00:51:41,160 Speaker 3: Yeah, again, the extremists just going out of their way 950 00:51:41,200 --> 00:51:43,880 Speaker 3: to flatten and distort exactly. 951 00:51:44,520 --> 00:51:48,880 Speaker 1: And speaking of flattening and distorting, another listener, Aaron wrote 952 00:51:48,920 --> 00:51:52,280 Speaker 1: in about what's happening with Michael Threetz, who is a 953 00:51:52,400 --> 00:51:57,759 Speaker 1: California librarian who I love his platform, Like basically he's 954 00:51:57,800 --> 00:52:01,080 Speaker 1: a librarian who just uses to talk about his love 955 00:52:01,120 --> 00:52:04,840 Speaker 1: of books, his love of libraries and really foster a 956 00:52:04,920 --> 00:52:09,480 Speaker 1: lifelong love of reading and libraries for kids and adults. 957 00:52:09,480 --> 00:52:12,320 Speaker 1: So he's a librarian at the Solano County Public Library 958 00:52:12,360 --> 00:52:15,320 Speaker 1: in California. Thank you for flagging this to us Aaron, 959 00:52:15,440 --> 00:52:17,120 Speaker 1: I had seen it, and I'd been sort of wrestling 960 00:52:17,120 --> 00:52:20,400 Speaker 1: with my thoughts on it. But basically, Michael is lovely. 961 00:52:20,480 --> 00:52:24,720 Speaker 1: He is upbeat, he's enthusiastic, he is passionate for helping 962 00:52:24,960 --> 00:52:28,200 Speaker 1: kids learn about libraries, and like he's one of those 963 00:52:28,239 --> 00:52:31,080 Speaker 1: people that his passion for it really is clear, Like 964 00:52:31,120 --> 00:52:35,400 Speaker 1: it's hard to see him talking about libraries and books 965 00:52:35,400 --> 00:52:38,520 Speaker 1: and not feel good. He is a black man, which 966 00:52:38,560 --> 00:52:41,560 Speaker 1: is notable. In twenty twenty one, numbers from the US 967 00:52:41,600 --> 00:52:44,520 Speaker 1: Bureau of Labor Statistics show that nearly eighty seven percent 968 00:52:44,560 --> 00:52:47,480 Speaker 1: of librarians are white and only seven percent are black. 969 00:52:47,520 --> 00:52:52,759 Speaker 1: And so having this like very visible black librarian is important. 970 00:52:52,800 --> 00:52:56,040 Speaker 1: Like I don't think I ever saw a black library, 971 00:52:56,160 --> 00:52:59,040 Speaker 1: Like like, in all of my K through twelve schooling, 972 00:52:59,080 --> 00:53:00,600 Speaker 1: we did not. I didn't. I did not encounter a 973 00:53:00,680 --> 00:53:02,319 Speaker 1: single black library, And I can tell you that. And 974 00:53:02,360 --> 00:53:04,840 Speaker 1: so that would have meant a lot to me to 975 00:53:04,920 --> 00:53:09,839 Speaker 1: have a very visible librarian who looks like me, who 976 00:53:09,920 --> 00:53:11,920 Speaker 1: was like excited about reading in books, that would have 977 00:53:11,960 --> 00:53:14,360 Speaker 1: meant the world to me as like a young nerdy 978 00:53:14,400 --> 00:53:18,120 Speaker 1: person growing up. So he's been really passionate about promoting 979 00:53:18,120 --> 00:53:20,879 Speaker 1: what he calls library joy, which I love this. He says, 980 00:53:21,440 --> 00:53:24,080 Speaker 1: library joy in its simplest form, is just the joy 981 00:53:24,080 --> 00:53:26,360 Speaker 1: of the library. What that means is just what I 982 00:53:26,440 --> 00:53:29,080 Speaker 1: try to embody and hope that all library workers embody. 983 00:53:29,360 --> 00:53:31,799 Speaker 1: It is the fostering of the sense of belonging. I 984 00:53:31,880 --> 00:53:35,240 Speaker 1: keep saying that the library is for everybody, library, kids, library, 985 00:53:35,239 --> 00:53:38,400 Speaker 1: grown ups, mentally ill, unhoused. I love telling people that 986 00:53:38,440 --> 00:53:41,000 Speaker 1: they don't have to leave their anxiety, depression or PTSD 987 00:53:41,200 --> 00:53:44,080 Speaker 1: outside the library. There's no sign that says you can't 988 00:53:44,120 --> 00:53:47,360 Speaker 1: bring your anxiety in. And I just like this idea 989 00:53:47,400 --> 00:53:50,200 Speaker 1: of reminding folks that libraries are for everybody and that 990 00:53:50,320 --> 00:53:53,960 Speaker 1: like it. It really that is what a community resource means. 991 00:53:54,040 --> 00:53:56,680 Speaker 1: It is and like here in DC we are blessed 992 00:53:56,719 --> 00:53:59,600 Speaker 1: to have a very robust library system. You know, you 993 00:53:59,680 --> 00:54:03,240 Speaker 1: can check out power tools, you can check out music, 994 00:54:03,520 --> 00:54:06,280 Speaker 1: they can help you with your resume. Like the ways 995 00:54:06,280 --> 00:54:10,280 Speaker 1: that it is a community resource, it truly is magical. 996 00:54:10,320 --> 00:54:13,240 Speaker 1: And like the work that he has done of making 997 00:54:13,280 --> 00:54:17,160 Speaker 1: that clear, I think is really special. And so like 998 00:54:17,320 --> 00:54:21,839 Speaker 1: many people who are enthusiastic or passionate about something, there 999 00:54:21,880 --> 00:54:26,719 Speaker 1: are people out there who just use that as a 1000 00:54:26,760 --> 00:54:29,600 Speaker 1: way to be awful to him. There was a vible 1001 00:54:29,760 --> 00:54:33,040 Speaker 1: quote about him on Twitter that was just a video 1002 00:54:33,239 --> 00:54:37,600 Speaker 1: that he had posted about the library on TikTok taken 1003 00:54:37,640 --> 00:54:41,720 Speaker 1: to Twitter with the caption, people are getting weirder. People 1004 00:54:41,760 --> 00:54:44,680 Speaker 1: imply that he has autism, which obviously there's nothing wrong 1005 00:54:44,719 --> 00:54:47,080 Speaker 1: with people who have autism, but they were saying that 1006 00:54:47,160 --> 00:54:49,360 Speaker 1: in a way that was like clearly meant to be 1007 00:54:49,440 --> 00:54:52,560 Speaker 1: an insult to him. In a piece for The Washington Post, 1008 00:54:52,800 --> 00:54:55,680 Speaker 1: he talked about being at his grandmother's ninetieth birthday party 1009 00:54:55,880 --> 00:54:58,719 Speaker 1: when all of these posts insulting him, it's harder to 1010 00:54:58,760 --> 00:55:01,480 Speaker 1: go viral and getting messages from his friends being like, 1011 00:55:01,520 --> 00:55:03,560 Speaker 1: don't look at them, are you okay? While he's trying 1012 00:55:03,600 --> 00:55:07,080 Speaker 1: to like spend time with his family. So when this happened, 1013 00:55:07,440 --> 00:55:10,520 Speaker 1: people really rallied in support of him, which was awesome 1014 00:55:10,560 --> 00:55:13,880 Speaker 1: to see. But then just a couple days ago, another 1015 00:55:13,920 --> 00:55:16,520 Speaker 1: person on social media took one of his videos and 1016 00:55:16,600 --> 00:55:21,319 Speaker 1: like accused him of having a darkness behind his enthusiasm, 1017 00:55:21,360 --> 00:55:23,040 Speaker 1: like I'm not even sure like what she was trying 1018 00:55:23,040 --> 00:55:26,200 Speaker 1: to imply. This person did apologize, and he accepted that 1019 00:55:26,239 --> 00:55:29,680 Speaker 1: apology publicly, but this week he announced that he's resigning 1020 00:55:29,680 --> 00:55:33,160 Speaker 1: from his position at the library to protect his mental health, 1021 00:55:33,160 --> 00:55:37,200 Speaker 1: which honestly I can understand, and I just hate it 1022 00:55:37,239 --> 00:55:41,439 Speaker 1: so much that we have this person who is doing 1023 00:55:41,480 --> 00:55:45,960 Speaker 1: something that is good, is like getting people passionate about libraries, 1024 00:55:46,120 --> 00:55:51,040 Speaker 1: passionate about reading, advocating for libraries as a resource, doing 1025 00:55:51,080 --> 00:55:54,160 Speaker 1: so in a way that is passionate and inclusive and 1026 00:55:54,239 --> 00:55:57,480 Speaker 1: all of these different things, and then people just like 1027 00:55:58,120 --> 00:56:02,040 Speaker 1: bullying him out of that position for no reason. And 1028 00:56:02,160 --> 00:56:04,720 Speaker 1: I do have to say that I have really seen 1029 00:56:04,800 --> 00:56:08,160 Speaker 1: an uptick in this kind of content. It is sort 1030 00:56:08,200 --> 00:56:11,960 Speaker 1: of the libs of TikTok strategy of social media gamification, 1031 00:56:12,040 --> 00:56:18,200 Speaker 1: where somebody who is making a video for TikTok, someone 1032 00:56:18,239 --> 00:56:21,759 Speaker 1: else takes that video, puts it on Twitter with a 1033 00:56:21,920 --> 00:56:26,320 Speaker 1: mean or accusatory or insulting caption, and then it does numbers, 1034 00:56:26,520 --> 00:56:29,400 Speaker 1: It goes viral, gets lots of engagement, and it's generally 1035 00:56:29,480 --> 00:56:33,640 Speaker 1: people who are like authentic or genuine or passionate or 1036 00:56:34,040 --> 00:56:36,520 Speaker 1: being a little bit weird. Like something I like about 1037 00:56:36,560 --> 00:56:38,920 Speaker 1: Michael is that when he was accused of like being weird, 1038 00:56:38,960 --> 00:56:40,680 Speaker 1: he was like, yeah, I am a little bit weird. 1039 00:56:40,760 --> 00:56:42,799 Speaker 1: All my friends that are weird, We're very passionate. It's 1040 00:56:42,840 --> 00:56:45,719 Speaker 1: like being weird is what makes us who we are. 1041 00:56:45,800 --> 00:56:47,359 Speaker 1: And like, I don't take that as an insult, which 1042 00:56:47,400 --> 00:56:50,440 Speaker 1: I thought was nice, but like, I think we're seeing 1043 00:56:50,560 --> 00:56:53,160 Speaker 1: more and more of that as like an engagement tactic 1044 00:56:53,320 --> 00:56:57,320 Speaker 1: where these people expect to have their own little corner 1045 00:56:57,360 --> 00:56:59,239 Speaker 1: of TikTok where they can talk to people who are 1046 00:56:59,320 --> 00:57:03,240 Speaker 1: like minded, and then someone comes along, rips it onto 1047 00:57:03,280 --> 00:57:06,880 Speaker 1: Twitter where the context just feels different, and uses it 1048 00:57:06,920 --> 00:57:09,000 Speaker 1: to create a pylon on this person. And so like, 1049 00:57:09,280 --> 00:57:12,160 Speaker 1: he hasn't done anything wrong, like he other than being 1050 00:57:12,320 --> 00:57:15,680 Speaker 1: passionate about libraries, he's not done anything wrong. And I 1051 00:57:15,680 --> 00:57:18,520 Speaker 1: do think there's something else going on where like there 1052 00:57:18,560 --> 00:57:23,880 Speaker 1: is something about people who you can tell are like 1053 00:57:24,680 --> 00:57:28,600 Speaker 1: living their genuine, authentic lives and like being their genuine 1054 00:57:28,600 --> 00:57:31,040 Speaker 1: authentic selves. And like you know when you when you 1055 00:57:31,040 --> 00:57:33,880 Speaker 1: are your authentic self, it is clear that you are 1056 00:57:34,000 --> 00:57:37,240 Speaker 1: comfortable and passionate and happy, and like, I think people 1057 00:57:37,720 --> 00:57:41,000 Speaker 1: pick up on that, and I think for people who 1058 00:57:41,040 --> 00:57:44,120 Speaker 1: are not living that way themselves, I think that that 1059 00:57:44,160 --> 00:57:45,920 Speaker 1: I think that's triggering to them. I think they have 1060 00:57:46,000 --> 00:57:48,600 Speaker 1: to like bully it and smash it because it's like, 1061 00:57:49,240 --> 00:57:52,400 Speaker 1: don't you know that we're all living lives and that 1062 00:57:52,440 --> 00:57:55,080 Speaker 1: you're not meant to be authentic and happy and passionate, 1063 00:57:55,160 --> 00:57:58,680 Speaker 1: and like, how dare you show up as your happy, authentic, 1064 00:57:58,720 --> 00:58:02,320 Speaker 1: passionate self. This is threatening? I need to smash this down. 1065 00:58:02,480 --> 00:58:05,480 Speaker 1: I think. I think it's really something that is within 1066 00:58:05,680 --> 00:58:10,000 Speaker 1: people to like see somebody who is passionate and happy 1067 00:58:10,440 --> 00:58:14,400 Speaker 1: and feel the need to crush that and squash that. 1068 00:58:14,480 --> 00:58:15,120 Speaker 1: Do you know what I mean? 1069 00:58:15,560 --> 00:58:15,760 Speaker 2: Oh? 1070 00:58:15,800 --> 00:58:20,040 Speaker 3: Absolutely, that's definitely a thing. I mean, there's something vulnerable 1071 00:58:20,200 --> 00:58:30,360 Speaker 3: about being earnest and positive and this tendency within people 1072 00:58:30,520 --> 00:58:34,480 Speaker 3: to smash it and tear it apart and ridicule it. 1073 00:58:34,480 --> 00:58:37,560 Speaker 3: It feels sort of juvenile a little bit, you know. 1074 00:58:37,600 --> 00:58:40,920 Speaker 3: It feels like everybody goes through. Not everybody, many people 1075 00:58:40,960 --> 00:58:44,760 Speaker 3: go through like an angsty teenage period right where they 1076 00:58:44,800 --> 00:58:48,560 Speaker 3: start to realize that all of the things that their 1077 00:58:48,640 --> 00:58:52,680 Speaker 3: parents and the grown ups in their life have you know, 1078 00:58:53,680 --> 00:58:56,320 Speaker 3: presented them with as like this is what being a 1079 00:58:57,520 --> 00:58:58,960 Speaker 3: you know, this is what a life's supposed to look like. 1080 00:58:59,680 --> 00:59:02,000 Speaker 2: You get a little you know, as people. 1081 00:59:01,920 --> 00:59:04,160 Speaker 3: Enter their teenage years, they realize that all those things 1082 00:59:04,640 --> 00:59:08,280 Speaker 3: are not perfect, and you know, in some cases there 1083 00:59:08,320 --> 00:59:13,280 Speaker 3: are like problems and you just have to like deal 1084 00:59:13,320 --> 00:59:14,960 Speaker 3: with it and make the most of it. That's what 1085 00:59:15,080 --> 00:59:17,440 Speaker 3: like being an adult is in a lot of cases. 1086 00:59:17,800 --> 00:59:21,360 Speaker 3: And so it's just like really easy and juvenile, I think, 1087 00:59:21,400 --> 00:59:26,120 Speaker 3: to to just rip apart anything that is earnest or 1088 00:59:26,160 --> 00:59:27,160 Speaker 3: trying to be positive. 1089 00:59:27,400 --> 00:59:33,960 Speaker 2: And it is sad, it's but it's not surprising that 1090 00:59:34,000 --> 00:59:34,240 Speaker 2: it does. 1091 00:59:34,360 --> 00:59:36,600 Speaker 3: That sort of thing does well on social media right, 1092 00:59:36,640 --> 00:59:43,560 Speaker 3: particularly on Twitter, where anger and outrage and meanness are 1093 00:59:44,680 --> 00:59:45,720 Speaker 3: cultural values. 1094 00:59:46,560 --> 00:59:49,520 Speaker 1: Yeah, I agree, And it's just like it doesn't make 1095 00:59:49,640 --> 00:59:54,560 Speaker 1: us any happier or feel good, and earnestness is okay, 1096 00:59:54,840 --> 00:59:57,960 Speaker 1: Like be cringe, love what you love, be shout it 1097 00:59:58,040 --> 01:00:02,200 Speaker 1: from the rooftops. If you've got something that feels like 1098 01:00:02,360 --> 01:00:05,560 Speaker 1: passion and excitement, you should be able to lean into that. Like, 1099 01:00:06,000 --> 01:00:08,160 Speaker 1: I don't know, the Internet was created for people who 1100 01:00:08,160 --> 01:00:10,000 Speaker 1: were excited about shit, and like I just hate this 1101 01:00:10,080 --> 01:00:14,080 Speaker 1: idea that like, no, we can only be removed and 1102 01:00:14,280 --> 01:00:17,000 Speaker 1: cynical and mean and angry. That's not what the I mean. 1103 01:00:17,120 --> 01:00:20,520 Speaker 1: That's obviously part of the Internet, but like being unabashedly 1104 01:00:21,240 --> 01:00:23,960 Speaker 1: passionate about stuff is part of what makes the Internet 1105 01:00:23,960 --> 01:00:26,919 Speaker 1: the Internet, and if we lose that and only see 1106 01:00:26,920 --> 01:00:29,160 Speaker 1: that as something to be mocked and bullied, we lose 1107 01:00:29,160 --> 01:00:31,600 Speaker 1: something important in all of us, and not to mention, 1108 01:00:31,760 --> 01:00:35,320 Speaker 1: we lose a dope ass librarian at the library, like 1109 01:00:35,600 --> 01:00:38,280 Speaker 1: like Michael is stepping down. However, there is a bit 1110 01:00:38,280 --> 01:00:40,680 Speaker 1: of a happy ending though, because he announced that PBS 1111 01:00:40,720 --> 01:00:43,480 Speaker 1: offered him the role of resident librarian for a social 1112 01:00:43,560 --> 01:00:46,240 Speaker 1: media series and so this is gonna involve him doing 1113 01:00:46,320 --> 01:00:50,200 Speaker 1: book suggestions, talking about literacy, and of course spreading library 1114 01:00:50,320 --> 01:00:52,200 Speaker 1: joy and so yeah, I'm happy that it has a 1115 01:00:52,240 --> 01:00:55,760 Speaker 1: happy ending, but I'm sad that someone can't just be 1116 01:00:55,960 --> 01:01:00,520 Speaker 1: a really engaged, passionate librarian on the twenty twenty four 1117 01:01:00,560 --> 01:01:04,320 Speaker 1: Internet without being bullied for it and bullied into stepping down. 1118 01:01:04,640 --> 01:01:06,360 Speaker 1: We all lose when that's the case. 1119 01:01:07,040 --> 01:01:09,280 Speaker 3: Yeah, I'm glad there's a happy ending on that one. 1120 01:01:09,360 --> 01:01:14,640 Speaker 3: That feels nice. 1121 01:01:15,680 --> 01:01:29,680 Speaker 5: More after a quick break, let's get right back into it. 1122 01:01:31,560 --> 01:01:34,760 Speaker 1: Well, I don't know how this is gonna go because 1123 01:01:36,560 --> 01:01:39,240 Speaker 1: our last topic is something that I know that we 1124 01:01:39,560 --> 01:01:42,200 Speaker 1: maybe don't see an eye on, and that. 1125 01:01:42,240 --> 01:01:43,800 Speaker 2: Is we're gonna talk about self checkout. 1126 01:01:45,040 --> 01:01:47,800 Speaker 1: No, we've already done it, Like it's been done. 1127 01:01:47,680 --> 01:01:51,400 Speaker 3: Dude, Okay, cool. Well, I mean, what else do we 1128 01:01:51,440 --> 01:01:56,120 Speaker 3: disagree about Wendy's. Oh, we're gonna talk about Wendy's. 1129 01:01:56,360 --> 01:01:58,960 Speaker 1: Okay. So do you remember when I was like, did 1130 01:01:59,040 --> 01:02:01,760 Speaker 1: you see that Wendy's doing surge pricing? And you had 1131 01:02:03,080 --> 01:02:05,280 Speaker 1: I will describe it as a big reaction. Do you 1132 01:02:05,320 --> 01:02:07,440 Speaker 1: remember how you reacted when I told you that information? 1133 01:02:08,600 --> 01:02:09,040 Speaker 2: Yeah? I do. 1134 01:02:09,120 --> 01:02:13,520 Speaker 3: I was like, that's that can't be true. That's banana 1135 01:02:13,560 --> 01:02:17,120 Speaker 3: pans bonkers, Like that doesn't make any sense. No one 1136 01:02:17,160 --> 01:02:19,840 Speaker 3: will tolerate that. People will hate it, people rebuild, people 1137 01:02:19,880 --> 01:02:23,760 Speaker 3: will be like burning Wendy's to the ground. Something must 1138 01:02:23,800 --> 01:02:25,880 Speaker 3: be wrong about this story. 1139 01:02:26,360 --> 01:02:31,040 Speaker 1: Well, let's get into it. So is Wendy's doing surge pricing? 1140 01:02:32,000 --> 01:02:34,120 Speaker 1: I don't feel confident saying yes or no. I will 1141 01:02:34,120 --> 01:02:37,120 Speaker 1: tell you what I know. So in wendy'ss Q four 1142 01:02:37,200 --> 01:02:41,240 Speaker 1: earnings call, the company announced plans to use AI enabled 1143 01:02:41,400 --> 01:02:45,840 Speaker 1: dynamic pricing remember that phrase, saying beginning as early as 1144 01:02:45,840 --> 01:02:48,800 Speaker 1: twenty twenty five, we will begin testing more enhanced features 1145 01:02:48,800 --> 01:02:52,440 Speaker 1: like dynamic pricing and day part offering, along with AI 1146 01:02:52,560 --> 01:02:55,800 Speaker 1: enabled menu changes and suggestive selling. As we continue to 1147 01:02:55,840 --> 01:02:58,920 Speaker 1: show the benefit of this technology in our company operated restaurants, 1148 01:02:59,120 --> 01:03:03,160 Speaker 1: franchisee in in digital menu boards should increase further, supporting 1149 01:03:03,200 --> 01:03:07,360 Speaker 1: sales and profit growth across the system. We will continue 1150 01:03:07,400 --> 01:03:09,680 Speaker 1: setting the pace in generative AI and have now rolled 1151 01:03:09,720 --> 01:03:13,200 Speaker 1: out Wendy's Fresh AI in several restaurants where we see 1152 01:03:13,240 --> 01:03:19,880 Speaker 1: ongoing improvement and in speed and accuracy. So importantly, that comment, 1153 01:03:20,520 --> 01:03:24,200 Speaker 1: though weird as fuck, I think, but does not say 1154 01:03:24,880 --> 01:03:28,560 Speaker 1: the word surge pricing. It says dynamic pricing, So there 1155 01:03:28,640 --> 01:03:31,360 Speaker 1: is a difference between these two pricing structures. I think 1156 01:03:31,360 --> 01:03:34,880 Speaker 1: that when we hear dynamic pricing, most people are probably 1157 01:03:34,920 --> 01:03:36,880 Speaker 1: most familiar with it from things like Uber and Lyft, 1158 01:03:36,880 --> 01:03:39,400 Speaker 1: where they like charge more when there's more demands. So 1159 01:03:39,400 --> 01:03:41,520 Speaker 1: if it's like raining and a concert just let out, 1160 01:03:41,600 --> 01:03:43,480 Speaker 1: it's going to cost more than if it's an off 1161 01:03:43,520 --> 01:03:45,520 Speaker 1: season and not many people are using the app. So 1162 01:03:46,200 --> 01:03:49,000 Speaker 1: I think people understandably assume that this meant that Wendy's 1163 01:03:49,040 --> 01:03:52,080 Speaker 1: is going to be charging more for food at times 1164 01:03:52,080 --> 01:03:54,560 Speaker 1: of high demand. I did see a lot of reporting 1165 01:03:54,600 --> 01:03:58,160 Speaker 1: on this issue that used the phrase surge pricing. However, 1166 01:03:58,680 --> 01:04:02,120 Speaker 1: surge pricing and dynam limit pricing are different things, right, 1167 01:04:02,200 --> 01:04:04,720 Speaker 1: Like surge pricing means like, oh, the price will be 1168 01:04:04,800 --> 01:04:07,320 Speaker 1: higher at certain times. Dynamic pricing. This means, oh, the 1169 01:04:07,320 --> 01:04:10,640 Speaker 1: price can change based on certain factors, not necessarily going 1170 01:04:10,760 --> 01:04:14,840 Speaker 1: up or down. After this announcement, the phrase surge pricing 1171 01:04:14,920 --> 01:04:18,120 Speaker 1: actually started trending on social media, and even lawmakers were 1172 01:04:18,160 --> 01:04:22,080 Speaker 1: weighing in, Like Senator Bob Casey accused Wendy's of corporate greed. 1173 01:04:22,440 --> 01:04:26,200 Speaker 1: Elizabeth Warren added, it's price gouging, plain and simple. So 1174 01:04:26,680 --> 01:04:29,360 Speaker 1: I did a search of the entire transcript of that 1175 01:04:29,480 --> 01:04:32,720 Speaker 1: Wendy's Q four call, great use of my time, and 1176 01:04:32,920 --> 01:04:36,080 Speaker 1: it is true. Nowhere in that call did the Wendy 1177 01:04:36,160 --> 01:04:39,479 Speaker 1: CEO ever specifically say that they were planning on doing 1178 01:04:39,560 --> 01:04:43,320 Speaker 1: surge pricing, only dynamic pricing, and there is a difference, right. 1179 01:04:43,600 --> 01:04:47,800 Speaker 1: Wendy's then clarified, saying they do not plan on instituting 1180 01:04:47,840 --> 01:04:50,560 Speaker 1: surge pricing. They said, in a statement, we said these 1181 01:04:50,600 --> 01:04:53,040 Speaker 1: menu boards would give us more flexibility to change the 1182 01:04:53,040 --> 01:04:56,880 Speaker 1: display of featured items. This was misconstrued in some media 1183 01:04:56,920 --> 01:04:59,360 Speaker 1: reports as an intent to raise prices when demand is 1184 01:04:59,400 --> 01:05:01,920 Speaker 1: highest at our restaurants. We have no plans to do 1185 01:05:01,960 --> 01:05:04,440 Speaker 1: that and would not raise prices when our customers are 1186 01:05:04,520 --> 01:05:07,240 Speaker 1: visiting us. Most any features we may test would be 1187 01:05:07,280 --> 01:05:10,600 Speaker 1: designed to benefit our customers and restaurant crew members. Digital 1188 01:05:10,640 --> 01:05:13,040 Speaker 1: menu boards could allow us to change the menu offerings 1189 01:05:13,080 --> 01:05:15,920 Speaker 1: at different times of the day and offer discounts and 1190 01:05:16,000 --> 01:05:19,520 Speaker 1: value offers to our customers more easily, particularly in the 1191 01:05:19,560 --> 01:05:22,560 Speaker 1: slower times of day. Wendy's has always been about providing 1192 01:05:22,640 --> 01:05:26,080 Speaker 1: high quality food at great value, and customers can continue 1193 01:05:26,120 --> 01:05:32,200 Speaker 1: to expect that from our brand. So here's where Mike 1194 01:05:32,240 --> 01:05:35,400 Speaker 1: and I disagree. Mike, I see you, Why don't you 1195 01:05:35,400 --> 01:05:36,800 Speaker 1: go ahead? What do you think about this? 1196 01:05:37,680 --> 01:05:37,880 Speaker 2: Well? 1197 01:05:37,920 --> 01:05:41,600 Speaker 3: I mean, I want to be clear that I have 1198 01:05:41,680 --> 01:05:46,040 Speaker 3: no illusions that Wendy's is some benevolent actor. 1199 01:05:46,320 --> 01:05:49,040 Speaker 2: I don't know this CEO. It's like a giant corporation. 1200 01:05:49,680 --> 01:05:52,920 Speaker 3: Uh, It's like fine, as far as I can tell, 1201 01:05:53,000 --> 01:05:56,680 Speaker 3: they're no more or less evil than any other giant corporation, right, Like, 1202 01:05:57,400 --> 01:06:00,160 Speaker 3: But it just never made sense. Nobody's gonna tell or 1203 01:06:00,560 --> 01:06:04,400 Speaker 3: that surge pricing. So when he issued this clarification the 1204 01:06:04,440 --> 01:06:06,520 Speaker 3: next day and said, no, we're not planning to do 1205 01:06:06,640 --> 01:06:09,560 Speaker 3: surge pricing, where we would increase prices at certain times 1206 01:06:09,560 --> 01:06:12,680 Speaker 3: when there's extra demand, but instead we would just want 1207 01:06:12,720 --> 01:06:18,680 Speaker 3: to have more flexibility to offer different discounts at different 1208 01:06:18,680 --> 01:06:20,960 Speaker 3: times of the day. I was like, oh, okay, that 1209 01:06:21,120 --> 01:06:24,400 Speaker 3: makes a lot of sense, that like actually seems like 1210 01:06:24,480 --> 01:06:29,880 Speaker 3: something that people would not be infuriated by. But then 1211 01:06:29,920 --> 01:06:34,320 Speaker 3: it got me thinking how silly we humans are with 1212 01:06:34,600 --> 01:06:39,600 Speaker 3: our like gain loss framing and like loss aversion that 1213 01:06:40,120 --> 01:06:43,760 Speaker 3: the idea that something would increase in price at certain 1214 01:06:44,120 --> 01:06:49,240 Speaker 3: hours of the day is completely unacceptable. I would just 1215 01:06:49,360 --> 01:06:54,600 Speaker 3: never I couldn't tolerate that in my burgers, right, that's 1216 01:06:55,720 --> 01:06:59,280 Speaker 3: insulting to me as a person. But the idea that 1217 01:06:59,320 --> 01:07:01,360 Speaker 3: I would get a price discount at some hours of 1218 01:07:01,360 --> 01:07:04,040 Speaker 3: the day, Oh okay, cool, Yeah, what's the discount? 1219 01:07:04,080 --> 01:07:06,880 Speaker 2: Is it? Like half off? Tell me? And like, that's 1220 01:07:07,120 --> 01:07:08,360 Speaker 2: kind of dumb. 1221 01:07:08,240 --> 01:07:12,080 Speaker 3: Of me and humans in general, because in either scenario, 1222 01:07:12,320 --> 01:07:14,280 Speaker 3: there's one price at one time a day and another 1223 01:07:14,280 --> 01:07:16,320 Speaker 3: price at another time of the day, And it's almost 1224 01:07:16,320 --> 01:07:19,000 Speaker 3: like semantics of what we're where. They're calling it an 1225 01:07:19,080 --> 01:07:22,600 Speaker 3: increase or a decrease. And yet apparently those semantics are 1226 01:07:22,640 --> 01:07:27,560 Speaker 3: extremely important, given that Wendy's became front page news for 1227 01:07:27,600 --> 01:07:32,200 Speaker 3: twenty four hours based on this distinction between surge pricing 1228 01:07:32,280 --> 01:07:36,720 Speaker 3: and dynamic pricing, which I had never even thought of 1229 01:07:36,920 --> 01:07:38,160 Speaker 3: until this was an issue. 1230 01:07:38,480 --> 01:07:42,000 Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean, I mostly agree with you. The thing 1231 01:07:42,000 --> 01:07:44,880 Speaker 1: I want to pull out, which is my take, is 1232 01:07:44,920 --> 01:07:51,400 Speaker 1: that I don't think that how they I don't think 1233 01:07:51,400 --> 01:07:56,240 Speaker 1: that their clarification walks back this enough because they very 1234 01:07:56,280 --> 01:08:00,800 Speaker 1: well truly incluld raise their prices and then be like, oh, well, 1235 01:08:02,360 --> 01:08:04,560 Speaker 1: raise their prices across the board, and then be like, 1236 01:08:04,960 --> 01:08:07,560 Speaker 1: on off peak times, we're gonna have a cheap menu, 1237 01:08:07,960 --> 01:08:09,640 Speaker 1: and that would be the same thing that people got 1238 01:08:09,680 --> 01:08:11,920 Speaker 1: upset about. So it is like a semantics of like, well, 1239 01:08:12,440 --> 01:08:16,800 Speaker 1: and so I this is what I think. Wendy says 1240 01:08:16,840 --> 01:08:20,120 Speaker 1: they would not raise prices when our customers are visiting most. 1241 01:08:20,600 --> 01:08:25,800 Speaker 1: That kind of gets my pr statement brain buzzing, because 1242 01:08:25,840 --> 01:08:27,400 Speaker 1: I think what they're saying is like, well, we never 1243 01:08:27,400 --> 01:08:29,800 Speaker 1: said we work on e raise prices. We just said 1244 01:08:29,840 --> 01:08:31,920 Speaker 1: we work on eraise prices when people are eating here 1245 01:08:31,960 --> 01:08:35,400 Speaker 1: the most. And so I believe what they are saying 1246 01:08:36,120 --> 01:08:40,679 Speaker 1: is we plan to raise prices and then lower them 1247 01:08:40,880 --> 01:08:43,840 Speaker 1: via our dynamic menu, which is subsequently kind of the 1248 01:08:43,880 --> 01:08:46,040 Speaker 1: same thing. That's what I think is going to happen. 1249 01:08:46,080 --> 01:08:49,440 Speaker 1: So I think that people are like cheering this as like, yeah, 1250 01:08:49,840 --> 01:08:53,000 Speaker 1: we really like bullied Wendy's into doing the right thing. 1251 01:08:53,439 --> 01:08:56,120 Speaker 1: I don't know that I agree. I really don't. 1252 01:08:56,840 --> 01:09:03,360 Speaker 3: Yeah, I feel like you're really reading much further between 1253 01:09:03,400 --> 01:09:04,400 Speaker 3: the lines. 1254 01:09:04,080 --> 01:09:07,479 Speaker 2: Than is warranted here. 1255 01:09:08,040 --> 01:09:11,720 Speaker 3: I mean, okay, here's two other examples of companies that 1256 01:09:11,800 --> 01:09:14,080 Speaker 3: do stuff like this, right, Like Bead Bathroom Beyond before 1257 01:09:14,080 --> 01:09:16,160 Speaker 3: they went out of business. There was one of those 1258 01:09:16,200 --> 01:09:18,439 Speaker 3: in Columbia Heights where I live, and I would go 1259 01:09:18,439 --> 01:09:21,320 Speaker 3: there to try to buy things sometimes, and it was 1260 01:09:21,520 --> 01:09:25,600 Speaker 3: expensive as hell. Every single item was like really expensive 1261 01:09:25,640 --> 01:09:27,639 Speaker 3: so much that I would like never buy their things. 1262 01:09:27,640 --> 01:09:27,840 Speaker 2: There. 1263 01:09:28,960 --> 01:09:31,040 Speaker 3: Many occasions I would go there, wanted to get an item, 1264 01:09:31,080 --> 01:09:32,240 Speaker 3: take a look at the price, and be like, this 1265 01:09:32,280 --> 01:09:35,519 Speaker 3: is absurd. And the reason was because they were one 1266 01:09:35,520 --> 01:09:39,439 Speaker 3: of these stores that had a coupon based economy where 1267 01:09:41,120 --> 01:09:43,040 Speaker 3: it only made sense to shop there if you were 1268 01:09:43,080 --> 01:09:49,439 Speaker 3: clipping coupons, which they prolifically distributed, so people would walk 1269 01:09:49,479 --> 01:09:51,840 Speaker 3: in there with like a handful of coupons for like 1270 01:09:51,920 --> 01:09:55,880 Speaker 3: seventy five percent off buy one, get one whatever, And 1271 01:09:55,960 --> 01:09:59,040 Speaker 3: I just really resented that little dance that we had to. 1272 01:09:59,080 --> 01:10:00,160 Speaker 2: Do to. 1273 01:10:02,200 --> 01:10:04,760 Speaker 3: Try to buy an item at a reasonable price. So 1274 01:10:05,560 --> 01:10:08,599 Speaker 3: hopefully that's not what Wendy's is approaching here. 1275 01:10:09,400 --> 01:10:11,600 Speaker 1: I once went into that Bed Bath and Beyond and 1276 01:10:11,640 --> 01:10:13,679 Speaker 1: I was standing in line, I think, holding a blender, 1277 01:10:13,960 --> 01:10:15,320 Speaker 1: and there was a guy in there who had an 1278 01:10:15,479 --> 01:10:17,960 Speaker 1: entire I kid you not, an entire book of Bed 1279 01:10:18,000 --> 01:10:20,400 Speaker 1: Bath and Beyond coupons, and he was giving them out 1280 01:10:20,439 --> 01:10:22,439 Speaker 1: the people in the line like cash, Like he was 1281 01:10:22,479 --> 01:10:25,080 Speaker 1: like making it rain coupons. And I got my blender 1282 01:10:25,160 --> 01:10:27,240 Speaker 1: for twenty five percent of I'll never forget it. Yeah, 1283 01:10:27,360 --> 01:10:32,200 Speaker 1: I I There are already plenty of things in society 1284 01:10:32,400 --> 01:10:37,000 Speaker 1: that use dynamic pricing, like airline tickets they're cheaper depending 1285 01:10:37,000 --> 01:10:40,040 Speaker 1: on demand, movie tickets, you know, you buy a matinee 1286 01:10:40,040 --> 01:10:42,160 Speaker 1: when less people are going, it's cheaper, is a thing 1287 01:10:42,160 --> 01:10:44,639 Speaker 1: in our society. But I do think what's interesting here 1288 01:10:44,720 --> 01:10:48,479 Speaker 1: is that how big the reaction was. And I think 1289 01:10:48,520 --> 01:10:52,519 Speaker 1: that's gotta be that, Like people are so fucking sick rightly, 1290 01:10:52,600 --> 01:10:55,280 Speaker 1: so a feeling squeezed right now, Like it feels like 1291 01:10:55,320 --> 01:10:58,880 Speaker 1: the new model is like anything that can rip people 1292 01:10:58,880 --> 01:11:01,120 Speaker 1: off must rip people, And so I think that people 1293 01:11:01,160 --> 01:11:03,200 Speaker 1: are sensitive to it right now because we're feeling it 1294 01:11:03,320 --> 01:11:05,439 Speaker 1: in multiple different ways. That just feels like the way 1295 01:11:05,439 --> 01:11:07,559 Speaker 1: that it is right now, and I don't know. Our 1296 01:11:07,600 --> 01:11:10,240 Speaker 1: burgers are our last. Like, if we lose the burgers, 1297 01:11:10,280 --> 01:11:12,200 Speaker 1: what else have we lost? Right Like, this is our 1298 01:11:12,280 --> 01:11:14,800 Speaker 1: last the last thing that we can sort of rely on. 1299 01:11:15,439 --> 01:11:18,200 Speaker 3: Yeah, exactly. I don't want to have to bring coupons 1300 01:11:18,240 --> 01:11:21,599 Speaker 3: to Wendy's. I don't want to have to strategically time 1301 01:11:22,080 --> 01:11:25,360 Speaker 3: when I get my burger. I don't want to have to, 1302 01:11:25,800 --> 01:11:29,479 Speaker 3: you know, do a bunch of math. Uh yeah, let's 1303 01:11:29,520 --> 01:11:30,839 Speaker 3: just keep it simple. 1304 01:11:31,439 --> 01:11:33,720 Speaker 1: Let's just keep it simple. But I do want to 1305 01:11:33,800 --> 01:11:39,479 Speaker 1: clearly reiterate my point for you, Mike, because if Comma, 1306 01:11:40,040 --> 01:11:43,040 Speaker 1: when Wendy's racist, I'm gonna stay on. I'm you know, 1307 01:11:43,040 --> 01:11:46,840 Speaker 1: I'm gonna stay on this story. If and perhaps when 1308 01:11:47,320 --> 01:11:50,799 Speaker 1: Wendy's quietly raises all of their prices across the board 1309 01:11:51,080 --> 01:11:54,880 Speaker 1: and their dynamic pricing is rolled out to lower those 1310 01:11:54,920 --> 01:11:57,200 Speaker 1: prices back down to what we are familiar with, which 1311 01:11:57,200 --> 01:11:59,960 Speaker 1: is my argument of what they're doing, we will record 1312 01:12:00,120 --> 01:12:02,200 Speaker 1: this again, and I want I want a I want 1313 01:12:02,200 --> 01:12:04,160 Speaker 1: to say it clearly now so that I can get 1314 01:12:04,160 --> 01:12:08,519 Speaker 1: a clear I told just so from me on the record, 1315 01:12:08,560 --> 01:12:10,920 Speaker 1: and that a clear you were right from you on 1316 01:12:10,960 --> 01:12:13,479 Speaker 1: the record. We'll have that all as audio forever, so 1317 01:12:13,520 --> 01:12:15,160 Speaker 1: that we'll all, you know, be on the same page. 1318 01:12:15,360 --> 01:12:15,840 Speaker 2: Is that cool? 1319 01:12:17,120 --> 01:12:19,559 Speaker 3: I mean we'll cross that bridge when they come to it. Yeah, 1320 01:12:19,680 --> 01:12:23,120 Speaker 3: I mean, I uh, you know. It also makes me 1321 01:12:23,120 --> 01:12:24,920 Speaker 3: think and then I'll let us finish up here. But 1322 01:12:25,200 --> 01:12:28,200 Speaker 3: so in DC we have this new law, I guess 1323 01:12:28,240 --> 01:12:29,800 Speaker 3: it's not even new, it's been here for like two 1324 01:12:29,880 --> 01:12:33,240 Speaker 3: or three years now, where all restaurant workers have to 1325 01:12:33,280 --> 01:12:36,120 Speaker 3: make a living wage. It's great law, good for everybody, 1326 01:12:37,479 --> 01:12:39,920 Speaker 3: but restaurant owners hate it. And so there's been this 1327 01:12:40,160 --> 01:12:43,679 Speaker 3: phenomenon in the city of You go into a restaurant 1328 01:12:43,840 --> 01:12:48,920 Speaker 3: and the prices on the menu are the prices, and 1329 01:12:48,960 --> 01:12:51,120 Speaker 3: then when you get your bill there'll be like a 1330 01:12:51,240 --> 01:12:56,120 Speaker 3: five percent search charge that is not a tip. It 1331 01:12:56,120 --> 01:12:58,560 Speaker 3: doesn't go to the servers. It's just for the restaurant. 1332 01:12:58,680 --> 01:13:02,000 Speaker 3: It'll be like the living wage fee or something. And 1333 01:13:02,400 --> 01:13:06,120 Speaker 3: that infuriates me right that, Like, just raise your prices 1334 01:13:06,160 --> 01:13:07,519 Speaker 3: across the board, if that's what you have to do 1335 01:13:07,560 --> 01:13:12,320 Speaker 3: to keep this business going, don't like deceptively hide it. 1336 01:13:12,360 --> 01:13:16,360 Speaker 3: So I hope Wendy's doesn't raise their prices, But I 1337 01:13:16,479 --> 01:13:19,840 Speaker 3: would rather that than a bunch of like weird gimmicky 1338 01:13:19,920 --> 01:13:21,599 Speaker 3: tricks that make me have to do math when I'm 1339 01:13:21,600 --> 01:13:22,439 Speaker 3: trying to get my food. 1340 01:13:22,800 --> 01:13:26,759 Speaker 1: Well, I believe what Wendy's will roll out is a weird, 1341 01:13:26,760 --> 01:13:31,360 Speaker 1: gimmicky trick that forces you to do maths. I'm like, 1342 01:13:31,800 --> 01:13:35,120 Speaker 1: follow the Wendy's prices like a goddamn stock market just 1343 01:13:35,160 --> 01:13:38,360 Speaker 1: to buy your food that I will leave it there. 1344 01:13:39,200 --> 01:13:41,639 Speaker 2: I hope you're wrong. I mean, that's that's not what 1345 01:13:41,720 --> 01:13:42,920 Speaker 2: Dave Thomas would have wanted. 1346 01:13:43,320 --> 01:13:47,000 Speaker 1: Dave Thomas is rolling over on his in his grave. Mike, 1347 01:13:47,280 --> 01:13:49,360 Speaker 1: thank you so much for going through these stories with me. 1348 01:13:49,680 --> 01:13:51,040 Speaker 1: I will see you on the internet. 1349 01:13:51,400 --> 01:13:52,759 Speaker 2: Thanks, Bridget see you there. 1350 01:13:52,880 --> 01:13:54,559 Speaker 1: And thanks to all of you for listening and to 1351 01:13:54,600 --> 01:13:57,400 Speaker 1: the listeners who sent in suggestions and flags of stories 1352 01:13:57,400 --> 01:13:59,680 Speaker 1: that we should cover. Thank you. Please keep doing that. 1353 01:14:00,560 --> 01:14:01,960 Speaker 2: How can they do that, Bridget Oh? 1354 01:14:02,000 --> 01:14:04,639 Speaker 1: You can email us at hello at tangody dot com. 1355 01:14:04,720 --> 01:14:06,280 Speaker 1: You can find me on social media. I though I'm 1356 01:14:06,280 --> 01:14:09,040 Speaker 1: not really there, not often anymore, but you could try. Yeah, 1357 01:14:09,040 --> 01:14:09,840 Speaker 1: please keep doing it. 1358 01:14:10,000 --> 01:14:10,200 Speaker 2: Yeah. 1359 01:14:10,240 --> 01:14:13,000 Speaker 3: They could also go to the Patreon right. There are 1360 01:14:13,080 --> 01:14:16,120 Speaker 3: quite a few listeners who message us there at patreon 1361 01:14:16,360 --> 01:14:20,040 Speaker 3: dot com, slash tangody or tangody dot com, slash Patreon. 1362 01:14:20,200 --> 01:14:21,000 Speaker 2: It works both ways. 1363 01:14:21,040 --> 01:14:30,240 Speaker 1: Oh a tech Marvel. Thanks for listening. If you're looking 1364 01:14:30,240 --> 01:14:32,320 Speaker 1: for ways to support the show, check out our March 1365 01:14:32,360 --> 01:14:36,200 Speaker 1: store at tangoty dot com slash store. Got a story 1366 01:14:36,200 --> 01:14:38,080 Speaker 1: about an interesting thing in tech, or just want to 1367 01:14:38,120 --> 01:14:40,479 Speaker 1: say hi, You can reach us at Hello at tangody 1368 01:14:40,520 --> 01:14:43,080 Speaker 1: dot com. You can also find transcripts for today's episode 1369 01:14:43,080 --> 01:14:45,240 Speaker 1: at tengody dot com. There Are No Girls on the 1370 01:14:45,280 --> 01:14:47,920 Speaker 1: Internet was created by me Bridget Todd. It's a production 1371 01:14:47,960 --> 01:14:52,280 Speaker 1: of iHeartRadio and Unbossed Creative edited by Joey pat Jonathan 1372 01:14:52,280 --> 01:14:55,280 Speaker 1: Strickland is our executive producer. Tari Harrison is our producer 1373 01:14:55,320 --> 01:14:58,800 Speaker 1: and sound engineer. Michael Almada is our contributing producer. I'm 1374 01:14:58,800 --> 01:15:01,160 Speaker 1: your host, Bridget Todd. If you want to help us grow, 1375 01:15:01,360 --> 01:15:02,080 Speaker 1: rate and review us. 1376 01:15:02,040 --> 01:15:03,040 Speaker 5: On Apple Podcasts. 1377 01:15:03,760 --> 01:15:06,559 Speaker 1: For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, check out the iHeartRadio app, 1378 01:15:06,600 --> 01:15:12,360 Speaker 1: Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.