1 00:00:10,560 --> 00:00:14,480 Speaker 1: Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots Podcast. 2 00:00:14,520 --> 00:00:19,200 Speaker 1: I'm Joe Wisenthal and I'm Tracy Hallaway, so tricy. You know, 3 00:00:19,520 --> 00:00:22,360 Speaker 1: we talk a lot about some of the big trends 4 00:00:22,440 --> 00:00:27,200 Speaker 1: of the last year, talk about housing, talk about various 5 00:00:27,280 --> 00:00:30,479 Speaker 1: commodities there that are a short supply. We've talked a 6 00:00:30,480 --> 00:00:33,839 Speaker 1: lot lately about cryptocurrencies. But the other big theme of 7 00:00:33,880 --> 00:00:37,560 Speaker 1: the last year was just like the incredible power performance 8 00:00:37,680 --> 00:00:41,400 Speaker 1: of big tech and defined broadly, I mean, it's just 9 00:00:41,400 --> 00:00:45,880 Speaker 1: an incredible year for huge tech companies in e commerce. Absolutely. 10 00:00:45,960 --> 00:00:48,600 Speaker 1: It's kind of weird because I'm thinking back to and 11 00:00:48,680 --> 00:00:51,199 Speaker 1: this was the big story in markets. It was the 12 00:00:51,240 --> 00:00:55,240 Speaker 1: sort of outperformance of the thing stocks and how everything 13 00:00:55,360 --> 00:00:58,560 Speaker 1: had just rotated back into these big tech companies. You know, 14 00:00:58,640 --> 00:01:02,160 Speaker 1: Netflix was doing incredibly well because everyone was sat at 15 00:01:02,200 --> 00:01:06,160 Speaker 1: home watching movies. There's all this talk about how the 16 00:01:06,200 --> 00:01:10,080 Speaker 1: COVID crisis had basically re oriented our lives even more 17 00:01:10,720 --> 00:01:14,119 Speaker 1: towards tech, and now we've come out the other side 18 00:01:14,160 --> 00:01:17,200 Speaker 1: of it, and there was some talk about the rotation 19 00:01:17,280 --> 00:01:20,480 Speaker 1: and too value things like that, but I think in general, 20 00:01:21,280 --> 00:01:25,680 Speaker 1: the big tech stocks have held up remarkably well. Right, Yeah, 21 00:01:25,720 --> 00:01:28,560 Speaker 1: they're doing really well. I mean the stocks, you know, 22 00:01:28,640 --> 00:01:31,160 Speaker 1: they maybe they weren't as hot as they were a 23 00:01:31,280 --> 00:01:33,479 Speaker 1: year ago at the time, but the companies are still 24 00:01:33,520 --> 00:01:36,440 Speaker 1: doing very well. So, you know, I think even with 25 00:01:36,520 --> 00:01:41,039 Speaker 1: the quote normalization unquote of the economy, it does not 26 00:01:41,280 --> 00:01:44,080 Speaker 1: seem like there's some sort of like shift away from tech. 27 00:01:44,120 --> 00:01:45,880 Speaker 1: And I think there's kind of like two things going on. 28 00:01:45,920 --> 00:01:49,960 Speaker 1: I mean, one is covid Um, you know, obviously forced 29 00:01:50,200 --> 00:01:53,360 Speaker 1: certain economic behaviors to go more online, and so you think, okay, 30 00:01:53,440 --> 00:01:56,240 Speaker 1: Zoom Video a company like that that obviously placed a 31 00:01:56,240 --> 00:01:59,360 Speaker 1: lot of in person activity. We're talking over Zoom right now. 32 00:01:59,480 --> 00:02:02,520 Speaker 1: And then the other of thing is, of course this 33 00:02:02,800 --> 00:02:06,560 Speaker 1: other theme, which is like the sort of great acceleration thesis, 34 00:02:07,080 --> 00:02:09,760 Speaker 1: which is that all the trends going into the crisis 35 00:02:09,800 --> 00:02:12,720 Speaker 1: seemed to have just gotten like magnified in five years, 36 00:02:12,720 --> 00:02:17,440 Speaker 1: got condensed until one year. Yeah, and I think that's 37 00:02:17,639 --> 00:02:21,120 Speaker 1: probably what we're seeing right now with tech. I mean, 38 00:02:21,160 --> 00:02:23,800 Speaker 1: this idea that we're all going to go into remote working. Okay, 39 00:02:23,919 --> 00:02:25,960 Speaker 1: maybe we're not all going to work from home forever, 40 00:02:26,080 --> 00:02:28,400 Speaker 1: but there might be some sort of hybrid model. We've 41 00:02:28,440 --> 00:02:31,200 Speaker 1: all gotten very used to ordering stuff off of Amazon. 42 00:02:31,880 --> 00:02:34,880 Speaker 1: But that said, even though we talk a lot about 43 00:02:34,919 --> 00:02:39,000 Speaker 1: the acceleration of trends that may be beneficial to tech, 44 00:02:39,080 --> 00:02:44,320 Speaker 1: there are some things coming up that could potentially be challenging. 45 00:02:44,440 --> 00:02:47,320 Speaker 1: So you know, for instance, we talk about the bottlenecks, 46 00:02:47,360 --> 00:02:50,880 Speaker 1: the shortages, what others actually mean for I don't know 47 00:02:50,919 --> 00:02:53,040 Speaker 1: a company like Uber, right, is it going to be 48 00:02:53,040 --> 00:02:56,120 Speaker 1: able to get enough drivers? Are we going to see 49 00:02:56,120 --> 00:03:00,200 Speaker 1: that backlash against big tech from d C. There are 50 00:03:00,480 --> 00:03:05,639 Speaker 1: certain things coming up that could be problematic exactly right, Well, anyway, 51 00:03:05,639 --> 00:03:08,200 Speaker 1: I'm very excited about speaking with our guests. We're gonna 52 00:03:08,200 --> 00:03:12,560 Speaker 1: be speaking with an investor in techs uh, very sort 53 00:03:12,560 --> 00:03:17,480 Speaker 1: of big picture focused, big ideas, concentrated bets in the space, 54 00:03:17,560 --> 00:03:20,400 Speaker 1: someone who really sort of like thinks deeply about where 55 00:03:20,440 --> 00:03:24,200 Speaker 1: it's all going, had some major winners. I'm excited to 56 00:03:24,240 --> 00:03:28,560 Speaker 1: welcome to odd Lots Ramparts and he is the founder 57 00:03:28,600 --> 00:03:32,880 Speaker 1: and c i O of Octahedron Capital. Rom thank you 58 00:03:32,960 --> 00:03:35,640 Speaker 1: so much for joining us. Well, Joe and Tracy, thank 59 00:03:35,640 --> 00:03:38,040 Speaker 1: you for having me. It's a real pleasure. Yeah, this 60 00:03:38,080 --> 00:03:40,640 Speaker 1: is super exciting, very excited to talk to you. What 61 00:03:40,720 --> 00:03:43,480 Speaker 1: do you describe Octahedron because I don't think it's not 62 00:03:43,600 --> 00:03:46,160 Speaker 1: like the typical fund. I know you have like very 63 00:03:46,320 --> 00:03:50,440 Speaker 1: big handful of concentrated bets, but what do you describe 64 00:03:50,440 --> 00:03:52,960 Speaker 1: exactly what is the structure of the fund and your 65 00:03:53,000 --> 00:03:55,800 Speaker 1: general approach to investing. Thank you Joe for having me. 66 00:03:55,880 --> 00:03:57,800 Speaker 1: So let me start with a very big picture of 67 00:03:57,800 --> 00:04:01,000 Speaker 1: the top down, which is, you know what our shitness. So, 68 00:04:01,040 --> 00:04:04,000 Speaker 1: our our mission is very simple and we simply want 69 00:04:04,000 --> 00:04:07,560 Speaker 1: to be the absolute best partner for the world's Internet 70 00:04:07,600 --> 00:04:11,600 Speaker 1: scale businesses. So so what does that mean? So I've 71 00:04:11,600 --> 00:04:14,160 Speaker 1: been obsessed with this idea of inner scale for almost 72 00:04:14,160 --> 00:04:17,640 Speaker 1: a decade since I started working after business school at 73 00:04:17,640 --> 00:04:21,440 Speaker 1: Sanford Bernstein, where my boss and I co founded the 74 00:04:21,480 --> 00:04:24,279 Speaker 1: Internet team there, and we were quite well known on 75 00:04:24,320 --> 00:04:27,440 Speaker 1: Wall Street for a couple of years because of very 76 00:04:27,480 --> 00:04:30,279 Speaker 1: distinctive work on Amazon where we where. We kind of 77 00:04:30,320 --> 00:04:33,560 Speaker 1: discovered through math in a bunch of our other analysis 78 00:04:33,600 --> 00:04:36,679 Speaker 1: that hiding inside a five or six percent retail margin 79 00:04:36,760 --> 00:04:40,760 Speaker 1: business was a thirty percent margin cloud business. We helped 80 00:04:40,760 --> 00:04:44,359 Speaker 1: defend Google to the transition from desktop to mobile, And 81 00:04:44,400 --> 00:04:48,400 Speaker 1: what I started realizing was, you know, when when investors 82 00:04:48,520 --> 00:04:53,960 Speaker 1: started thinking about the traditional offline market, we just have 83 00:04:54,080 --> 00:04:58,000 Speaker 1: a very narrow definition of TAM, which I have made 84 00:04:58,120 --> 00:05:00,839 Speaker 1: so many mistakes off in the past, and in fact, 85 00:05:00,880 --> 00:05:03,280 Speaker 1: one of my biggest mistakes in life is to having 86 00:05:03,400 --> 00:05:07,480 Speaker 1: narrow definitions. That's number one. Number two is I've started 87 00:05:07,520 --> 00:05:11,200 Speaker 1: realizing and learning over the last decade that these companies 88 00:05:11,240 --> 00:05:15,000 Speaker 1: not only get bigger and better over scale, but then 89 00:05:15,040 --> 00:05:18,240 Speaker 1: they become these humongous they put these humongous revenue scale 90 00:05:18,320 --> 00:05:22,520 Speaker 1: numbers that an early investor cannot comprehend. And number three, 91 00:05:23,040 --> 00:05:26,359 Speaker 1: there are niches that are richest in niches that I 92 00:05:26,400 --> 00:05:29,400 Speaker 1: did not expect. If you think about the Internet being 93 00:05:29,440 --> 00:05:33,719 Speaker 1: thirty years old, if you think about what is what 94 00:05:33,839 --> 00:05:37,080 Speaker 1: actually flows through the Internet, even think about net income 95 00:05:37,279 --> 00:05:40,360 Speaker 1: on Internet companies as a percentage of total global net income, 96 00:05:41,120 --> 00:05:43,559 Speaker 1: or even you think about what's the total market cap 97 00:05:43,600 --> 00:05:49,000 Speaker 1: excluding Apple across total global market cap by almost always, 98 00:05:49,360 --> 00:05:51,760 Speaker 1: you know, we size it to be less than ten percent. 99 00:05:51,839 --> 00:05:54,279 Speaker 1: And let that sink in for a second. The Internet 100 00:05:54,360 --> 00:05:57,640 Speaker 1: is ubiquitous, but in almost every way you think about 101 00:05:57,640 --> 00:06:01,480 Speaker 1: the Internet, less than ten percent of total global value 102 00:06:01,839 --> 00:06:04,919 Speaker 1: gets accrued to the Internet. So over the next twenty 103 00:06:05,000 --> 00:06:08,520 Speaker 1: or thirty years, our bet is that whether it's Internet 104 00:06:08,600 --> 00:06:14,320 Speaker 1: companies so traditional content marketplaces, on demand businesses, or whether 105 00:06:14,400 --> 00:06:16,880 Speaker 1: it's the stuff that lubricates Internet, which happens to be 106 00:06:16,920 --> 00:06:20,599 Speaker 1: payments companies and and certain software companies. You know, we 107 00:06:20,720 --> 00:06:25,680 Speaker 1: think that this convergence of obviously ubiquitous computing, ubiquitous connectivity, 108 00:06:26,160 --> 00:06:31,520 Speaker 1: now ubiquitous democratization of knowledge, and now post COVID ubiquitous location, 109 00:06:32,240 --> 00:06:34,600 Speaker 1: we'll get us from that ten to twelve percent range 110 00:06:34,640 --> 00:06:37,640 Speaker 1: to fifty to sixty in our lifetimes. So the mission is, 111 00:06:37,839 --> 00:06:40,400 Speaker 1: let's be the best part note of these Internet scale companies, 112 00:06:40,520 --> 00:06:43,800 Speaker 1: and that's what we do. So I have a lot 113 00:06:43,800 --> 00:06:46,440 Speaker 1: of questions already, but just on this idea of being 114 00:06:46,440 --> 00:06:51,440 Speaker 1: the best partner to Internet scale company is possible. My impression, 115 00:06:51,480 --> 00:06:53,320 Speaker 1: I think a lot of people's impressions of the space 116 00:06:53,400 --> 00:06:57,560 Speaker 1: is that there is a lot of competition to give 117 00:06:57,640 --> 00:07:01,279 Speaker 1: capital to the next big thing. So, you know, obviously 118 00:07:01,320 --> 00:07:03,360 Speaker 1: on the West Coast there's a bunch of people in 119 00:07:03,440 --> 00:07:08,040 Speaker 1: venture capital who are fighting to find companies to up 120 00:07:08,040 --> 00:07:12,120 Speaker 1: and coming companies to invest in. How competitive is the 121 00:07:12,200 --> 00:07:14,720 Speaker 1: space in your mind, and how do you go about 122 00:07:14,800 --> 00:07:20,720 Speaker 1: differentiating yourself from everyone else? Right, It's it's indeed competitive, 123 00:07:20,920 --> 00:07:25,480 Speaker 1: and it's just gotten more competitive historically. But this is 124 00:07:25,480 --> 00:07:29,360 Speaker 1: the way we distinguish ourselves. So number one, you know, 125 00:07:29,480 --> 00:07:31,720 Speaker 1: Joe mentioned a very important point in the beginning, which 126 00:07:31,760 --> 00:07:34,920 Speaker 1: is concentration. So as a fund, you know, we believe 127 00:07:34,960 --> 00:07:38,560 Speaker 1: in essentialism. We try to constantly rank order the best 128 00:07:38,640 --> 00:07:42,640 Speaker 1: ideas on our risk reward basis publicly and privately, so 129 00:07:43,000 --> 00:07:46,800 Speaker 1: that forcing function does not allow us to spray and pray. 130 00:07:47,120 --> 00:07:50,240 Speaker 1: The impact on the private markets is that on average 131 00:07:50,320 --> 00:07:54,200 Speaker 1: per year, Octahedron makes between i'd say it in two 132 00:07:54,200 --> 00:07:59,320 Speaker 1: and four investments totally in the private markets. Right. Number two, 133 00:07:59,600 --> 00:08:02,840 Speaker 1: we are not vcs. We don't take boat seats. We 134 00:08:02,960 --> 00:08:05,520 Speaker 1: actually co opt with some of the best vcs in 135 00:08:05,560 --> 00:08:07,760 Speaker 1: the world, who are all many of them whom are 136 00:08:07,800 --> 00:08:11,480 Speaker 1: investors in Octahedred. And the value that both companies see 137 00:08:11,560 --> 00:08:14,720 Speaker 1: from a firm like us, which is true native crossover, 138 00:08:15,320 --> 00:08:17,880 Speaker 1: is that one we don't have twenty different companies to 139 00:08:17,920 --> 00:08:21,280 Speaker 1: look after. We today we have six private companies. We 140 00:08:21,400 --> 00:08:25,000 Speaker 1: recently just today invested in a company called Fair whose 141 00:08:25,040 --> 00:08:28,040 Speaker 1: announcement went out today. What that does for us is 142 00:08:28,080 --> 00:08:30,720 Speaker 1: we can for every company is very important to us. 143 00:08:31,040 --> 00:08:34,000 Speaker 1: So what we can do is our emission is to 144 00:08:34,040 --> 00:08:37,840 Speaker 1: not only help those companies scale into the public markets 145 00:08:37,920 --> 00:08:39,560 Speaker 1: over the next two to three years, which is kind 146 00:08:39,559 --> 00:08:41,920 Speaker 1: of our sweet spot. We don't do early state stuff. 147 00:08:41,920 --> 00:08:44,840 Speaker 1: That's for other vcs and and other board members. But 148 00:08:44,920 --> 00:08:48,160 Speaker 1: then how do you also stay public or stay successful 149 00:08:48,160 --> 00:08:51,120 Speaker 1: in the public market. And the average other fund that's 150 00:08:51,120 --> 00:08:54,319 Speaker 1: competing for capital in the late stage, they are typically 151 00:08:54,320 --> 00:08:57,559 Speaker 1: trying to build an index of everything going public. So 152 00:08:57,640 --> 00:09:00,280 Speaker 1: it's what I would categorize a spray and pray approach. 153 00:09:00,559 --> 00:09:02,800 Speaker 1: And so I would say that just the craft we 154 00:09:02,920 --> 00:09:05,760 Speaker 1: create around do a few things, do it really well, 155 00:09:05,920 --> 00:09:09,160 Speaker 1: go really deep, take care of every management team because 156 00:09:09,280 --> 00:09:12,079 Speaker 1: it is a really important part of a portfolio. Is 157 00:09:12,160 --> 00:09:16,000 Speaker 1: I think what distinguishes us from from other capital out there, 158 00:09:16,200 --> 00:09:18,320 Speaker 1: and there are some fantastic companies that are involved in 159 00:09:18,320 --> 00:09:21,800 Speaker 1: the private markets. But again, you know what I've learned 160 00:09:21,800 --> 00:09:23,840 Speaker 1: over time is this is not a zero sum game. 161 00:09:24,360 --> 00:09:27,800 Speaker 1: It's so infinitely large, and it's so infinitely big. There's 162 00:09:27,880 --> 00:09:31,200 Speaker 1: so many opportunities for everybody. So we're in the business 163 00:09:31,200 --> 00:09:33,920 Speaker 1: of effectively playing non zero sum games. It's not us 164 00:09:33,920 --> 00:09:37,880 Speaker 1: worth somebody else, it's us and everybody else. From we 165 00:09:38,000 --> 00:09:42,440 Speaker 1: talked about this idea of like obviously the last year 166 00:09:42,480 --> 00:09:46,600 Speaker 1: has been particularly extraordinary, and you put out these presentations 167 00:09:46,720 --> 00:09:50,240 Speaker 1: of like things you've learned, and you know, I'm curious 168 00:09:50,240 --> 00:09:53,720 Speaker 1: of what your takeaway for tech is from the last year, 169 00:09:53,760 --> 00:09:56,960 Speaker 1: Like was last year a period of which our lives 170 00:09:57,000 --> 00:10:01,520 Speaker 1: temporarily changed? Are their permanent ranges? Like what is what 171 00:10:01,640 --> 00:10:04,080 Speaker 1: did you think about tech going into the last year, 172 00:10:04,120 --> 00:10:06,160 Speaker 1: and sort of like what's you what have you learned? Yeah? 173 00:10:06,160 --> 00:10:08,439 Speaker 1: What have you learned? Yeah? You know, I think this 174 00:10:08,480 --> 00:10:11,840 Speaker 1: is probably the most tumultus event we've all faced in 175 00:10:11,840 --> 00:10:15,680 Speaker 1: our lifetimes. And I don't think anybody you know, I 176 00:10:15,760 --> 00:10:20,479 Speaker 1: launched this fund in April and it was so confusing 177 00:10:20,600 --> 00:10:23,240 Speaker 1: and dark and that we don't know we were flying blind. Now, 178 00:10:23,440 --> 00:10:25,199 Speaker 1: I'll be honest that we did not know what was 179 00:10:25,240 --> 00:10:27,640 Speaker 1: going to happen. In fact, the deck you were referencing 180 00:10:27,679 --> 00:10:31,199 Speaker 1: called a few things we learned came out of that confusion, 181 00:10:31,360 --> 00:10:33,640 Speaker 1: because when I started this fund with one analyst in 182 00:10:33,720 --> 00:10:35,760 Speaker 1: ten million in a u M and we're obviously much 183 00:10:35,800 --> 00:10:39,480 Speaker 1: bigger now, we were completely confused, like what just happened? 184 00:10:39,520 --> 00:10:41,640 Speaker 1: And what do we make of this? And you know, 185 00:10:41,679 --> 00:10:43,840 Speaker 1: all the credit card panel data we buy and the 186 00:10:44,040 --> 00:10:48,160 Speaker 1: tracking we do of absence downloads and scale. It all went, 187 00:10:48,400 --> 00:10:50,800 Speaker 1: you know, haywire, right, the numbers are all over the place. 188 00:10:50,840 --> 00:10:53,280 Speaker 1: We weren't quite sure, and that's how you put it. 189 00:10:53,360 --> 00:10:55,079 Speaker 1: Put the deck we read, we said, listen, we read 190 00:10:55,120 --> 00:10:57,240 Speaker 1: a hundred transcripts, so let's put it all together in 191 00:10:57,280 --> 00:10:59,480 Speaker 1: a format. And the format we just gave it to 192 00:10:59,520 --> 00:11:01,880 Speaker 1: the world because we figured that if we're facing, if 193 00:11:01,920 --> 00:11:04,280 Speaker 1: we're so confused, a lot of other people are confused 194 00:11:04,280 --> 00:11:07,080 Speaker 1: as well. So that's a interesting side note on this. 195 00:11:07,200 --> 00:11:10,080 Speaker 1: This debt did not happen. It happened completely by by 196 00:11:10,240 --> 00:11:14,080 Speaker 1: by mistake. So what do we learned? Number one is 197 00:11:14,679 --> 00:11:18,000 Speaker 1: fully convinced that the world has changed forever in almost 198 00:11:18,000 --> 00:11:21,280 Speaker 1: every single way. But within that there are nuances, and 199 00:11:21,480 --> 00:11:23,440 Speaker 1: it will be interesting to see what happens in the 200 00:11:23,480 --> 00:11:27,080 Speaker 1: next three months when we normalize very difficult calms from 201 00:11:27,160 --> 00:11:30,400 Speaker 1: last year. Let's talk about the top, which is digital advertising. 202 00:11:31,000 --> 00:11:35,520 Speaker 1: Digital advertising is now the only way by which retailers 203 00:11:35,640 --> 00:11:38,920 Speaker 1: and businesses can get ahold of consumers, which is why 204 00:11:39,040 --> 00:11:42,679 Speaker 1: if you think about twenty one, the numbers have been 205 00:11:42,720 --> 00:11:45,560 Speaker 1: off the charts, whether it's Google or Amazon, or Facebook 206 00:11:45,640 --> 00:11:48,760 Speaker 1: or Snapchat or Twitter, or by dance in China. The 207 00:11:48,840 --> 00:11:51,800 Speaker 1: numbers are just off the charts because how else now 208 00:11:51,840 --> 00:11:54,600 Speaker 1: people have been quarantined and quiet and staying you know, 209 00:11:54,840 --> 00:11:57,640 Speaker 1: basically stayed low for an ear, how are you going 210 00:11:57,720 --> 00:12:00,199 Speaker 1: to acquire and re engage all these buil and some 211 00:12:00,320 --> 00:12:03,200 Speaker 1: consumers who are not going to be out traveling and 212 00:12:03,440 --> 00:12:06,280 Speaker 1: partying and eating out and just going about their normal 213 00:12:06,320 --> 00:12:09,760 Speaker 1: lives and probably having revenged spending over the next you know, 214 00:12:09,840 --> 00:12:14,360 Speaker 1: twelve months. Well, an obvious winner is digital advertising, and 215 00:12:14,440 --> 00:12:18,240 Speaker 1: the scale and engagement and tools and the importance to 216 00:12:18,320 --> 00:12:23,280 Speaker 1: the economy cannot be should not be underestimated. That's number one. 217 00:12:24,120 --> 00:12:27,760 Speaker 1: Number two the world of SMBs. You know, for the 218 00:12:27,840 --> 00:12:30,120 Speaker 1: longest time, we've had a thesis. In fact, when we 219 00:12:30,160 --> 00:12:33,880 Speaker 1: think about investing in Internet scale software, SMB software is 220 00:12:34,000 --> 00:12:35,920 Speaker 1: right in the bank, in the middle of our wheelhouse. 221 00:12:36,440 --> 00:12:38,880 Speaker 1: And for the longest time, it was just difficult to 222 00:12:38,960 --> 00:12:42,720 Speaker 1: invest in SMB in the SMB space, mostly because the mortality, 223 00:12:43,400 --> 00:12:46,960 Speaker 1: you know, over the last year, it's taken a life 224 00:12:46,960 --> 00:12:50,439 Speaker 1: of its own. And if you basically break up SMBs 225 00:12:50,480 --> 00:12:54,120 Speaker 1: by services and non services or retailer or people that 226 00:12:54,160 --> 00:12:58,720 Speaker 1: sell stuff, we've just seen this explosion of one big 227 00:12:58,760 --> 00:13:03,000 Speaker 1: picture laws of entrepreneurs and lots of companies being built. Right, 228 00:13:03,120 --> 00:13:07,400 Speaker 1: the pace of new business formations has been unprecedented, and 229 00:13:07,800 --> 00:13:12,160 Speaker 1: therefore the use of software, whether it's payment systems like Brecks, 230 00:13:12,280 --> 00:13:15,360 Speaker 1: or whether it's um you know, supply chain solutions like 231 00:13:15,440 --> 00:13:20,880 Speaker 1: fair Are, the use of payroll systems like Gusto and Rippling, 232 00:13:21,640 --> 00:13:27,120 Speaker 1: or you look at software that digitizes retailers like Shopify, 233 00:13:27,200 --> 00:13:30,440 Speaker 1: has been unprecedented, right because you've got all these companies 234 00:13:30,480 --> 00:13:33,360 Speaker 1: turning on and they've all been given the same tools 235 00:13:33,400 --> 00:13:36,520 Speaker 1: that allows them to compete on the same with the 236 00:13:36,600 --> 00:13:40,000 Speaker 1: same tools and services and products that the largest retailers 237 00:13:40,000 --> 00:13:44,239 Speaker 1: in the world have. And even better, because digital advertising 238 00:13:44,640 --> 00:13:47,400 Speaker 1: gets you out of billions of consumers, they have a 239 00:13:47,520 --> 00:13:50,640 Speaker 1: shot at advertising and getting the consumers with the same 240 00:13:50,800 --> 00:13:54,280 Speaker 1: level playing field the largest companies in the world have had, 241 00:13:54,559 --> 00:13:58,200 Speaker 1: which means that this COVID crisis has created this sort 242 00:13:58,240 --> 00:14:03,240 Speaker 1: of weird equalization mechan some for smb s. Now, it 243 00:14:03,280 --> 00:14:06,040 Speaker 1: doesn't mean the big companies have been left behind in retail. 244 00:14:06,559 --> 00:14:09,560 Speaker 1: What we've seen is whether it's Walmart or Target, and 245 00:14:09,559 --> 00:14:12,960 Speaker 1: there's a really interesting have and have not scenario here. 246 00:14:13,640 --> 00:14:16,800 Speaker 1: The Walmart's the targets in the world. The Williams Sonomas, 247 00:14:16,880 --> 00:14:20,320 Speaker 1: the Nikes in the world have taken this crisis and 248 00:14:20,360 --> 00:14:24,400 Speaker 1: they now have significant material portions of their revenues being 249 00:14:24,440 --> 00:14:29,240 Speaker 1: implemented via e commerce and all the investments they made 250 00:14:29,360 --> 00:14:33,960 Speaker 1: historically nique commerce, including innovations and buy online, pickup at shop, 251 00:14:34,040 --> 00:14:37,920 Speaker 1: curbside pickup, you know, directly integrating with API s like 252 00:14:38,040 --> 00:14:41,720 Speaker 1: door Dash, bringing on Instacot for local delivery. They just 253 00:14:41,840 --> 00:14:44,760 Speaker 1: turned everything on a scale and it's just worked wonderfully 254 00:14:44,800 --> 00:14:46,600 Speaker 1: for them. So you see this have and have not 255 00:14:46,880 --> 00:14:50,400 Speaker 1: behavior and moving down the stack a little bit with 256 00:14:50,560 --> 00:14:54,040 Speaker 1: an e commerce again because everyone has focused at time online, 257 00:14:54,360 --> 00:14:58,880 Speaker 1: we've seen this explosion of alternative shopping mechanisms because I 258 00:14:58,880 --> 00:15:01,520 Speaker 1: know you mentioned Amazon and the beginning. Amazon is now 259 00:15:01,560 --> 00:15:04,320 Speaker 1: not the only game in town, and everybody in some 260 00:15:04,480 --> 00:15:08,160 Speaker 1: ways are gunning for Amazon's market sad now, Amazon itself 261 00:15:08,200 --> 00:15:11,080 Speaker 1: is doing really well, as you've seen from the numbers, 262 00:15:11,120 --> 00:15:14,760 Speaker 1: but everyone is gunning for some version of Amazon. So 263 00:15:14,800 --> 00:15:18,280 Speaker 1: what have we seen. You know, niche vertical marketplaces just 264 00:15:18,320 --> 00:15:20,880 Speaker 1: scale and do really well and come to a point 265 00:15:20,880 --> 00:15:24,200 Speaker 1: that Amazon can't really touch them anymore. These are examples 266 00:15:24,240 --> 00:15:27,800 Speaker 1: are wayfair for example. EXE is a second example, but 267 00:15:27,880 --> 00:15:30,400 Speaker 1: if you look at the private companies, two companies have 268 00:15:30,520 --> 00:15:32,800 Speaker 1: been really I've been really intrigued by and I met 269 00:15:32,800 --> 00:15:36,040 Speaker 1: the management teams last week. It's a company called Curated, 270 00:15:36,600 --> 00:15:40,960 Speaker 1: and Curated allows you to go and buy higher value 271 00:15:40,960 --> 00:15:45,080 Speaker 1: items like skis and camping gear and cycles, the stuff 272 00:15:45,080 --> 00:15:47,480 Speaker 1: you would go to an r I you spend an 273 00:15:47,480 --> 00:15:49,760 Speaker 1: hother there you have pressure to go buy a bike 274 00:15:49,840 --> 00:15:52,440 Speaker 1: for yourself. You've probably got twenty bikes on on the 275 00:15:52,520 --> 00:15:54,840 Speaker 1: rack to choose from, and you've got to go pick 276 00:15:54,880 --> 00:15:56,680 Speaker 1: it up, pack it and go home, which is kind 277 00:15:56,720 --> 00:15:59,920 Speaker 1: of a difficult experience. Curated brings that online and I 278 00:16:00,000 --> 00:16:01,840 Speaker 1: actually used in My wife and I used it last 279 00:16:01,880 --> 00:16:05,200 Speaker 1: week and it was just a wonderful experience. The other 280 00:16:05,280 --> 00:16:07,920 Speaker 1: product we the other kind of like niche we see 281 00:16:08,480 --> 00:16:11,360 Speaker 1: is all sorts of video based shopping, And of course 282 00:16:11,360 --> 00:16:13,880 Speaker 1: this is a trend that started in China and it's 283 00:16:13,960 --> 00:16:17,040 Speaker 1: very popular then. But I suspect that lots of video 284 00:16:17,120 --> 00:16:20,440 Speaker 1: improvements and more more like experiences within apps are going 285 00:16:20,520 --> 00:16:22,800 Speaker 1: to come to the four and take us away from 286 00:16:22,840 --> 00:16:26,239 Speaker 1: the boring Amazon experience to a more kind of interactive, 287 00:16:26,240 --> 00:16:30,000 Speaker 1: fun experience. So a lot of changes happening. And then 288 00:16:30,040 --> 00:16:31,720 Speaker 1: one last area I want to I want to touch 289 00:16:31,800 --> 00:16:35,000 Speaker 1: upon is is just on demand and and this is 290 00:16:35,080 --> 00:16:38,160 Speaker 1: you know, Tracy, you alluded to Uber earlier in the conversation. 291 00:16:38,600 --> 00:16:41,200 Speaker 1: Will come to that in a bit between Uber and 292 00:16:41,320 --> 00:16:44,040 Speaker 1: door Dash and possibly to a lower exit instacrat in 293 00:16:44,040 --> 00:16:46,400 Speaker 1: the US and almost every single company in other parts 294 00:16:46,400 --> 00:16:48,840 Speaker 1: of the world. I mean, we've these have now become 295 00:16:48,880 --> 00:16:52,360 Speaker 1: indispensable for many for many people's lives, right. So if 296 00:16:52,360 --> 00:16:55,320 Speaker 1: you take door Dash for example, theyme just had an 297 00:16:55,400 --> 00:17:00,480 Speaker 1: unprecedented kind of explosion in their overall bise this over 298 00:17:00,480 --> 00:17:03,040 Speaker 1: the last twelve months. And what's funny is we tracked 299 00:17:03,080 --> 00:17:06,840 Speaker 1: the data every week and shockingly it sees there's no 300 00:17:07,200 --> 00:17:10,480 Speaker 1: evidence of slowdown. Now we do see some slowdown in 301 00:17:10,600 --> 00:17:13,360 Speaker 1: Uber Eats for example, in a bunch of deeper slowdown 302 00:17:13,359 --> 00:17:16,960 Speaker 1: and Postmates and a pretty drastic slowdown in in instacast 303 00:17:17,000 --> 00:17:19,679 Speaker 1: for example. And I can explain that away by a 304 00:17:19,720 --> 00:17:23,000 Speaker 1: few mechanics. But you know, door Dash by layering on 305 00:17:23,080 --> 00:17:27,200 Speaker 1: products first, delivering you know, food to you, now, delivering 306 00:17:27,440 --> 00:17:30,199 Speaker 1: convenience products to you, now, bring on a marketplace with 307 00:17:30,280 --> 00:17:33,320 Speaker 1: groceries and safely coming on board, they've done a really 308 00:17:33,359 --> 00:17:36,679 Speaker 1: good job layering on products in the overall ecosystem. But 309 00:17:36,760 --> 00:17:39,680 Speaker 1: this is a worldwide phenomenon, right whether you see Rappi 310 00:17:39,760 --> 00:17:43,199 Speaker 1: in Latin America, or Grab in Indonesia and and and 311 00:17:43,320 --> 00:17:47,760 Speaker 1: Southeast Asia, or Kupang in Korea, on demand systems are 312 00:17:47,800 --> 00:17:49,960 Speaker 1: here to stay. And and and the reason I bring up 313 00:17:49,960 --> 00:17:53,960 Speaker 1: on demand is Amazon built this humongous business still growing 314 00:17:54,000 --> 00:17:59,160 Speaker 1: at unprecedented rates by price selection and convenience, and all 315 00:17:59,200 --> 00:18:02,280 Speaker 1: these on demand companies are gunning for that convenience part, 316 00:18:02,400 --> 00:18:04,840 Speaker 1: and Amazon, I think, over the next two to four years, 317 00:18:05,200 --> 00:18:08,399 Speaker 1: needs to really figure out how they bring that convenience 318 00:18:08,440 --> 00:18:26,720 Speaker 1: factor down from one day to a few hours. I 319 00:18:26,720 --> 00:18:28,960 Speaker 1: want to dig into a lot of these different business models. 320 00:18:28,960 --> 00:18:31,400 Speaker 1: But there's one thing that you said it caught my attention, 321 00:18:31,440 --> 00:18:33,920 Speaker 1: which is that you launched the new fund in April 322 00:18:34,080 --> 00:18:39,399 Speaker 1: of last year. Given how you're making concentrated bets, I 323 00:18:39,440 --> 00:18:43,080 Speaker 1: guess I'm just curious what it was like actually launching 324 00:18:43,080 --> 00:18:47,040 Speaker 1: the fund at that time period and whether or not 325 00:18:48,560 --> 00:18:50,240 Speaker 1: I'm not sure how to phrase this, but you know, 326 00:18:50,280 --> 00:18:54,240 Speaker 1: if you're only investing in six companies, it feels like 327 00:18:54,280 --> 00:18:57,679 Speaker 1: a lot of pressure, particularly at a time when people 328 00:18:57,680 --> 00:19:01,040 Speaker 1: were talking about how this was an un precedented crisis. 329 00:19:01,080 --> 00:19:03,200 Speaker 1: No one really knew what was going to happen. There 330 00:19:03,240 --> 00:19:06,080 Speaker 1: was a lot of uncertainty about the future. How did 331 00:19:06,080 --> 00:19:10,080 Speaker 1: you actually go about doing that and deciding on where 332 00:19:10,080 --> 00:19:13,479 Speaker 1: to place the new money? Yeah, so there were so 333 00:19:13,680 --> 00:19:17,400 Speaker 1: just to be clear, remember we made six private investments 334 00:19:17,440 --> 00:19:19,840 Speaker 1: over the last year, So the sixth number was the 335 00:19:19,960 --> 00:19:23,000 Speaker 1: number of private investments over the last fourteen months. We 336 00:19:23,200 --> 00:19:26,040 Speaker 1: you know, on the public side, we typically invest between 337 00:19:26,119 --> 00:19:29,080 Speaker 1: eight and twelve companies at a point in time, and 338 00:19:29,160 --> 00:19:31,919 Speaker 1: everything is all it's all about risker moorday, point in 339 00:19:31,960 --> 00:19:34,639 Speaker 1: time and the specific companies. Our business model, Tracy, is 340 00:19:34,960 --> 00:19:38,040 Speaker 1: very different compared to the average fund where in the 341 00:19:38,080 --> 00:19:41,240 Speaker 1: average one I worked in, so the average one I 342 00:19:41,280 --> 00:19:43,280 Speaker 1: know of, you tend to become what I got an 343 00:19:43,280 --> 00:19:45,359 Speaker 1: analyst of the week. So you've got to pitch ideas 344 00:19:45,400 --> 00:19:47,200 Speaker 1: every couple of weeks and then you pitch it to 345 00:19:47,240 --> 00:19:49,679 Speaker 1: your PM and hopefully goes to your book. We have 346 00:19:49,760 --> 00:19:51,840 Speaker 1: a we have taken the opposite business model is something 347 00:19:51,880 --> 00:19:54,760 Speaker 1: I've learned that ultimate where I lost prior to this. 348 00:19:55,240 --> 00:19:58,120 Speaker 1: As a firm, we only cover between forty and sixties 349 00:19:58,160 --> 00:20:00,119 Speaker 1: stocks and I have an analyst team of four or 350 00:20:00,160 --> 00:20:03,760 Speaker 1: people now and every analyst covers between twelve, let's saving 351 00:20:03,840 --> 00:20:06,000 Speaker 1: ten and twelve stocks. How do we pick these stocks? 352 00:20:06,040 --> 00:20:08,879 Speaker 1: Because that's a collective knowledge of you know, four or 353 00:20:08,880 --> 00:20:10,760 Speaker 1: five of us who between us have you know, fourty 354 00:20:10,800 --> 00:20:13,080 Speaker 1: years of thirty years of experience, right, so we kind 355 00:20:13,119 --> 00:20:15,919 Speaker 1: of know where the world is going to and the 356 00:20:15,960 --> 00:20:19,080 Speaker 1: expectation per analysts is to become amongst the world's best 357 00:20:19,080 --> 00:20:21,840 Speaker 1: analysts in those ten or twelve stocks. And we have 358 00:20:21,880 --> 00:20:24,040 Speaker 1: a very kind of like common format and the way 359 00:20:24,080 --> 00:20:26,920 Speaker 1: we we we we think about our driver trees, the 360 00:20:26,960 --> 00:20:28,800 Speaker 1: way we build our models that we we think about 361 00:20:28,880 --> 00:20:31,960 Speaker 1: valuation and so as the PM my analyst team makes 362 00:20:31,960 --> 00:20:34,800 Speaker 1: it really easy for me to pick and choose between 363 00:20:34,880 --> 00:20:37,800 Speaker 1: companies based on the risk reward at a point in time. 364 00:20:38,600 --> 00:20:41,720 Speaker 1: But I'll tell you last year in April was a 365 00:20:41,760 --> 00:20:44,080 Speaker 1: difficult time, and it was very difficult, mostly because that 366 00:20:44,200 --> 00:20:47,439 Speaker 1: markets have I remember trufed on March twenty three, and 367 00:20:47,480 --> 00:20:49,640 Speaker 1: by the time we got dollars in our TB account 368 00:20:49,640 --> 00:20:53,360 Speaker 1: on April fifteen, the markets had rallied almost thty one 369 00:20:53,760 --> 00:20:56,760 Speaker 1: if I'm not mistaken. It was just tough, guys, because 370 00:20:57,119 --> 00:21:01,119 Speaker 1: you know, that my favorite companies were ten by the 371 00:21:01,119 --> 00:21:04,400 Speaker 1: time I even got my first dollar. So luckily for us, 372 00:21:04,520 --> 00:21:07,600 Speaker 1: there was no pressure from our LPs who to go 373 00:21:07,760 --> 00:21:11,679 Speaker 1: deploy capital immediately, so we could take almost a month 374 00:21:11,760 --> 00:21:14,640 Speaker 1: to slowly deploy dollars one, you know, one by one 375 00:21:14,680 --> 00:21:16,760 Speaker 1: by one. There was no reason to go put all 376 00:21:16,800 --> 00:21:19,760 Speaker 1: our money, you know, at one goal into the market, 377 00:21:20,119 --> 00:21:22,640 Speaker 1: so we took our time and I think we kind 378 00:21:22,680 --> 00:21:26,080 Speaker 1: of like led our way in over almost two months, 379 00:21:26,440 --> 00:21:28,720 Speaker 1: and then by June, when we got so much more 380 00:21:28,760 --> 00:21:32,000 Speaker 1: clarity about the world, we were able to kind of, um, 381 00:21:32,480 --> 00:21:35,280 Speaker 1: you know, be fully invested. Of course, this is not 382 00:21:35,359 --> 00:21:37,640 Speaker 1: a static game because you know, we we we raised 383 00:21:37,680 --> 00:21:41,040 Speaker 1: money pretty rapidly through the crisis, and today we're you know, 384 00:21:41,040 --> 00:21:44,040 Speaker 1: we're getting close to two million dollars in a u M. 385 00:21:44,080 --> 00:21:45,760 Speaker 1: So the hard part is, you know, how do you 386 00:21:45,840 --> 00:21:48,240 Speaker 1: keep up? Right? So there were the challenges were Number one, 387 00:21:49,080 --> 00:21:51,639 Speaker 1: there were three or four moving parts. One is the 388 00:21:51,680 --> 00:21:54,760 Speaker 1: markets were moving and there was no way any of 389 00:21:54,880 --> 00:21:58,879 Speaker 1: us could have even anticipated the multiple expression that happened 390 00:21:58,960 --> 00:22:02,640 Speaker 1: last year. Right, these companies were just beating numbers by 391 00:22:02,720 --> 00:22:05,840 Speaker 1: epic proportions, like the world changed so rapidly. Even they 392 00:22:05,880 --> 00:22:07,879 Speaker 1: were not able to keep up. And you mentioned a 393 00:22:07,920 --> 00:22:10,640 Speaker 1: little about you know, the you know, the the challenges 394 00:22:10,720 --> 00:22:13,240 Speaker 1: with acquiring supply for Uber, but all that was true. 395 00:22:13,240 --> 00:22:15,199 Speaker 1: So Uber had a demand problem first. Now we have 396 00:22:15,200 --> 00:22:17,639 Speaker 1: a supply problem, but it will all eventually, you know, 397 00:22:17,720 --> 00:22:19,560 Speaker 1: be good for them. And once once the demand and 398 00:22:19,560 --> 00:22:22,119 Speaker 1: supply work, Uber is gonna be an explosive stock in 399 00:22:22,119 --> 00:22:25,719 Speaker 1: my opinion. But number three, you know, we were raising capital, 400 00:22:25,920 --> 00:22:27,960 Speaker 1: so each time money came maybe we were like, man, 401 00:22:28,040 --> 00:22:29,639 Speaker 1: we have all those new capital, what do we do 402 00:22:29,720 --> 00:22:32,200 Speaker 1: with it? So it wasn't easy. You know, anybody who 403 00:22:32,200 --> 00:22:35,600 Speaker 1: tells you starting a fund as easy as obviously you know, 404 00:22:36,280 --> 00:22:39,200 Speaker 1: it's too optimistic in life. But we had it particularly hard. 405 00:22:39,240 --> 00:22:41,000 Speaker 1: So I'm actually quite grateful that we kind of made 406 00:22:41,000 --> 00:22:43,160 Speaker 1: our way through the process. But by June and July 407 00:22:43,280 --> 00:22:45,840 Speaker 1: and we finally got up footing when we knew what 408 00:22:45,880 --> 00:22:48,439 Speaker 1: we wanted to own, we kind of realized that the 409 00:22:48,560 --> 00:22:50,480 Speaker 1: numbers were going to be much bigger than what we 410 00:22:50,520 --> 00:22:52,760 Speaker 1: originally modeled, you know, three or four months ago when 411 00:22:52,800 --> 00:22:55,080 Speaker 1: we they were in a free launch phase, we were 412 00:22:55,119 --> 00:22:57,439 Speaker 1: able to play the game better. And then of course 413 00:22:57,480 --> 00:22:59,600 Speaker 1: the hot part last year was I think in the 414 00:22:59,600 --> 00:23:02,879 Speaker 1: month of November, the month of August, we had, you know, 415 00:23:02,920 --> 00:23:06,080 Speaker 1: pretty gnarly corrections and the NAZA because that happens in 416 00:23:06,080 --> 00:23:08,440 Speaker 1: a bullmarket as well, you know. But you know, nine 417 00:23:08,480 --> 00:23:10,120 Speaker 1: months in, you know, by the end of the year, 418 00:23:10,200 --> 00:23:12,240 Speaker 1: I felt like we were we were in a good 419 00:23:12,280 --> 00:23:13,919 Speaker 1: place and we kind of knew we were seeing the 420 00:23:13,960 --> 00:23:16,680 Speaker 1: ball big and we were able to take some big 421 00:23:16,680 --> 00:23:21,000 Speaker 1: bet So, you know, between legging in, being slow, being careful, 422 00:23:21,240 --> 00:23:24,640 Speaker 1: not being greedy immediately, and frankly just not getting formed out, 423 00:23:24,960 --> 00:23:27,520 Speaker 1: I think that's how we survived the year one. So 424 00:23:27,640 --> 00:23:30,679 Speaker 1: from you mentioned high valuations there, and this is the 425 00:23:30,720 --> 00:23:34,159 Speaker 1: thing that comes up consistently with tech investments. You know, 426 00:23:34,240 --> 00:23:37,400 Speaker 1: people like Amazon, people like Uber, but maybe they don't 427 00:23:37,440 --> 00:23:40,720 Speaker 1: like it at the current multiples. How do you get 428 00:23:40,760 --> 00:23:44,320 Speaker 1: comfortable with those in the tech world and how are 429 00:23:44,320 --> 00:23:47,680 Speaker 1: you thinking about them? Yeah, so you know, every quarter 430 00:23:47,760 --> 00:23:49,879 Speaker 1: we put up we have an Internal Growth Index of 431 00:23:49,960 --> 00:23:52,680 Speaker 1: Software and Internal Growth Index of of Internet, which we 432 00:23:52,760 --> 00:23:56,760 Speaker 1: published a few days ago. So number one, I would 433 00:23:56,760 --> 00:23:59,840 Speaker 1: actually argue that companies like Uber and Amazon are actually 434 00:24:00,040 --> 00:24:03,360 Speaker 1: sold really cheap. They're actually very cheap. This is good, 435 00:24:03,359 --> 00:24:07,280 Speaker 1: I want to hear, yes, So so let me broadly 436 00:24:07,280 --> 00:24:10,080 Speaker 1: break it up right now, so so ignore the peaks. 437 00:24:10,080 --> 00:24:12,000 Speaker 1: So so first of all, right, next level set here. 438 00:24:12,440 --> 00:24:16,840 Speaker 1: Stocks in general are very expensive, right, there's no easy 439 00:24:16,960 --> 00:24:19,440 Speaker 1: deal available in the market right now. But I think 440 00:24:19,560 --> 00:24:23,040 Speaker 1: some stocks are incredibly cheap, but not everything is expensive. 441 00:24:23,040 --> 00:24:24,720 Speaker 1: So let's just break it because LPs asked me this 442 00:24:24,760 --> 00:24:28,600 Speaker 1: all the time. So number one, let's talk about software today. 443 00:24:29,000 --> 00:24:32,000 Speaker 1: Software today, you know high growth software our index and 444 00:24:32,040 --> 00:24:34,159 Speaker 1: you know trust me on our index, but you know 445 00:24:34,200 --> 00:24:37,160 Speaker 1: it trades at twenty times revenues, right, and the historical 446 00:24:37,280 --> 00:24:40,440 Speaker 1: five year mein was was eleven times, and the pre 447 00:24:40,560 --> 00:24:44,720 Speaker 1: COVID number was like fifteen times. So it's even though 448 00:24:44,760 --> 00:24:47,960 Speaker 1: we've had a software correction, the reality is that there 449 00:24:48,000 --> 00:24:50,240 Speaker 1: are great companies like slow Flake out that in great 450 00:24:50,240 --> 00:24:53,320 Speaker 1: companies like CrowdStrike. But it's very hard to underwrite companies 451 00:24:53,359 --> 00:24:55,439 Speaker 1: to fifty times for revenues. You have to take a 452 00:24:55,560 --> 00:24:58,399 Speaker 1: very very long view. So there are still some companies 453 00:24:58,440 --> 00:25:02,040 Speaker 1: that's que the average a pretty epic fashion. But it's 454 00:25:02,080 --> 00:25:04,360 Speaker 1: software is not cheap by any definition. And now we're 455 00:25:04,359 --> 00:25:07,840 Speaker 1: actually quite nervous on software. We only own two software stocks, 456 00:25:07,840 --> 00:25:12,639 Speaker 1: but generally software is really expensive. Then second, we have 457 00:25:12,720 --> 00:25:16,600 Speaker 1: payments payments, same story there. Payments is a new software 458 00:25:16,680 --> 00:25:19,439 Speaker 1: and in fact that there's probably even higher kind of 459 00:25:19,480 --> 00:25:23,320 Speaker 1: like crazy evaluations happening in payments market. I just went 460 00:25:23,359 --> 00:25:26,040 Speaker 1: out a couple of days ago and that was most bleed, 461 00:25:26,119 --> 00:25:28,360 Speaker 1: and and the local went out a few days ago 462 00:25:28,440 --> 00:25:31,480 Speaker 1: and that was expensive. But they're all phenomenal companies, and 463 00:25:31,560 --> 00:25:34,200 Speaker 1: the Local especially as I think, doing an exceptional job. 464 00:25:34,680 --> 00:25:37,360 Speaker 1: So those are the two. So again, within software and payments, 465 00:25:37,359 --> 00:25:41,280 Speaker 1: we're very careful. We only own Zoom and Twilio in 466 00:25:41,280 --> 00:25:43,119 Speaker 1: in in software and we can talk a little bit 467 00:25:43,119 --> 00:25:46,560 Speaker 1: more about that, but in and in payments we own 468 00:25:46,600 --> 00:25:49,719 Speaker 1: smaller positions. But when it comes to Internet, you know 469 00:25:49,920 --> 00:25:52,840 Speaker 1: I want to I'm gonna push back on valuation. So 470 00:25:52,920 --> 00:25:55,879 Speaker 1: first of all, right, you talk about software being valued 471 00:25:55,920 --> 00:25:59,520 Speaker 1: on a net revenue basis, you know Internet. Our framework 472 00:25:59,600 --> 00:26:02,000 Speaker 1: is we we for every company we cover, we have 473 00:26:02,160 --> 00:26:05,479 Speaker 1: a view on what we think long term EBITDA looks like, 474 00:26:05,840 --> 00:26:08,720 Speaker 1: and we build an index around it. It turns out 475 00:26:08,720 --> 00:26:12,120 Speaker 1: that you know, at thirty one times long term EBITDA 476 00:26:12,200 --> 00:26:15,240 Speaker 1: and our index, it's it's it's expensive compared to the 477 00:26:15,280 --> 00:26:17,760 Speaker 1: five year medium, but the five year median for that 478 00:26:17,920 --> 00:26:20,760 Speaker 1: was twenty three, so you're eight or nine terms about 479 00:26:20,840 --> 00:26:23,000 Speaker 1: what that is. But that is cute by companies like 480 00:26:23,000 --> 00:26:26,560 Speaker 1: like Airbnb, for example. But if you take internet companies 481 00:26:27,520 --> 00:26:31,280 Speaker 1: at the very bottom, the megacaps, whether it's Facebook, whether 482 00:26:31,320 --> 00:26:34,560 Speaker 1: it's Google, whether it's Ali Baba and Amazon, they're not 483 00:26:34,640 --> 00:26:38,600 Speaker 1: just cheap. In some cases, they are ridiculously cheap. And 484 00:26:38,640 --> 00:26:41,240 Speaker 1: all Chinese companies are cheap right now. So China is 485 00:26:41,280 --> 00:26:43,919 Speaker 1: a big focus for us. We own both shares and 486 00:26:44,040 --> 00:26:47,200 Speaker 1: buy Dance and shares in Bindodo and shares in ali 487 00:26:47,240 --> 00:26:50,879 Speaker 1: Baba in size because those stocks have beaten down not 488 00:26:51,000 --> 00:26:54,640 Speaker 1: on fundamentals but on overall you know, worries on regulation. 489 00:26:55,359 --> 00:26:57,560 Speaker 1: You take the next leg up, which is the large 490 00:26:57,560 --> 00:27:02,240 Speaker 1: and megacap internet companies face a Google, Amazon, Those companies 491 00:27:02,240 --> 00:27:04,760 Speaker 1: are going to grow, not at twenty percent for a 492 00:27:04,880 --> 00:27:08,120 Speaker 1: very long time, and this year it's gonna be it's 493 00:27:08,119 --> 00:27:11,439 Speaker 1: probably the best year for advertising in the history of 494 00:27:11,480 --> 00:27:14,720 Speaker 1: me covering these stalks. Why because the entire world is 495 00:27:14,760 --> 00:27:17,360 Speaker 1: coming online again and they have to go and acquire 496 00:27:17,400 --> 00:27:20,760 Speaker 1: customers on Facebook and Google and Snapchat and Twitter. There's 497 00:27:20,760 --> 00:27:23,159 Speaker 1: no other choice. Right where else do you go? So 498 00:27:23,240 --> 00:27:26,800 Speaker 1: those stalks look extraordinarily cheap and and Google. You know, 499 00:27:26,800 --> 00:27:28,919 Speaker 1: we own a pretty large position in Google, and the 500 00:27:28,920 --> 00:27:31,800 Speaker 1: reason for that is because they have multiple ways to win, 501 00:27:31,880 --> 00:27:35,560 Speaker 1: including search, which is doing really well, turning on ads 502 00:27:35,560 --> 00:27:39,520 Speaker 1: and maps, YouTube is absolutely killing numbers. And oh, by 503 00:27:39,560 --> 00:27:42,920 Speaker 1: the way, after Thomas Curran took over Google Cloud two 504 00:27:43,000 --> 00:27:46,760 Speaker 1: years ago, he's done an a plus job in restructuring 505 00:27:46,800 --> 00:27:49,320 Speaker 1: the cloud business and go to market and sales. So 506 00:27:49,359 --> 00:27:53,080 Speaker 1: we're seeing evidence of real sales, motion, and and wins 507 00:27:53,119 --> 00:27:55,800 Speaker 1: in the cloud business. So many ways to win at Google, 508 00:27:55,880 --> 00:27:59,000 Speaker 1: especially the third stack on top of that is you know, 509 00:27:59,160 --> 00:28:03,520 Speaker 1: single name Internet companies or those are expensive, so we 510 00:28:03,560 --> 00:28:06,800 Speaker 1: own smaller positions in those like for example, you take 511 00:28:06,800 --> 00:28:11,240 Speaker 1: a company like Carvana, phenomenal acid slightly expensive, will grow 512 00:28:11,320 --> 00:28:15,040 Speaker 1: fast this year, probably beat numbers. But within this category 513 00:28:15,080 --> 00:28:17,480 Speaker 1: you've got some very cheap companies. And one of our 514 00:28:17,520 --> 00:28:22,200 Speaker 1: biggest positions is Peloton. Right, So the opportunity in Internet 515 00:28:22,480 --> 00:28:25,159 Speaker 1: is very simple to me, just like zoom in the 516 00:28:25,200 --> 00:28:28,520 Speaker 1: public markets in software, where people have basically assume that 517 00:28:28,640 --> 00:28:32,399 Speaker 1: once COVID goes away, we'll all return to normal. People 518 00:28:32,440 --> 00:28:35,160 Speaker 1: have beaten down the stalks of Peloton because hey, you'll 519 00:28:35,160 --> 00:28:37,320 Speaker 1: all go back to the gym, and people have beaten 520 00:28:37,359 --> 00:28:40,000 Speaker 1: down the stalks of others because any think the world 521 00:28:40,040 --> 00:28:42,200 Speaker 1: will recover and nobody's going to go and buy stuff 522 00:28:42,200 --> 00:28:45,440 Speaker 1: on Amazon anymore. That does not make sense. And so 523 00:28:45,520 --> 00:28:47,160 Speaker 1: my point is, as you go up the staff to 524 00:28:47,240 --> 00:28:50,880 Speaker 1: smaller companies, there are pockets of overvaluation for sure, and 525 00:28:50,920 --> 00:28:54,520 Speaker 1: some some companies are not cheap, like Airbnb, for example, 526 00:28:55,000 --> 00:28:58,040 Speaker 1: But in almost every other case, Internet stocks have real 527 00:28:58,200 --> 00:29:01,680 Speaker 1: value today. So let me stop there. I'm curious like 528 00:29:02,000 --> 00:29:04,000 Speaker 1: time frame. I mean, you know, you mentioned that there 529 00:29:04,000 --> 00:29:07,240 Speaker 1: were a few tech draw downs over the last year. 530 00:29:08,520 --> 00:29:11,360 Speaker 1: Uh for several months several parts of this year, there 531 00:29:11,400 --> 00:29:15,120 Speaker 1: did seem to be some sort of compression in some 532 00:29:15,200 --> 00:29:18,760 Speaker 1: of the tech valuations. Is the reopening happened? What do 533 00:29:18,800 --> 00:29:23,320 Speaker 1: you do you think about sort of like macro conditions 534 00:29:23,400 --> 00:29:26,040 Speaker 1: that will cause either people to rotate in or out 535 00:29:26,080 --> 00:29:28,479 Speaker 1: of tech or is it still just you're focused on 536 00:29:28,520 --> 00:29:31,040 Speaker 1: tech and you can't do anything about the sort of 537 00:29:31,080 --> 00:29:34,720 Speaker 1: the broader macro. So listen, I mean, I'm not a 538 00:29:34,800 --> 00:29:38,360 Speaker 1: macro person, but you know, it's foolish to say that 539 00:29:38,400 --> 00:29:43,120 Speaker 1: we are not keenly aware and keenly understand. You know, 540 00:29:43,240 --> 00:29:47,040 Speaker 1: macro that could hurt our companies, right, So we keep 541 00:29:47,080 --> 00:29:50,000 Speaker 1: an eye on Macro, but we don't treat other companies 542 00:29:50,000 --> 00:29:53,120 Speaker 1: on the back of Macro. The reality is that these 543 00:29:53,160 --> 00:29:57,000 Speaker 1: companies will grow earnings between twenty and twenty five maybe 544 00:29:58,160 --> 00:30:01,120 Speaker 1: for the next decade. Right. So on the one hand, 545 00:30:01,440 --> 00:30:03,680 Speaker 1: we can kind of sleep well by the fact that 546 00:30:03,720 --> 00:30:06,200 Speaker 1: if we just went on vacation for two years and 547 00:30:06,320 --> 00:30:10,120 Speaker 1: all this Macro and this long shot term correction went away, 548 00:30:10,520 --> 00:30:12,840 Speaker 1: we'd come back and these companies would be, you know, 549 00:30:13,200 --> 00:30:15,360 Speaker 1: two times the size that they were we left them, right, 550 00:30:15,800 --> 00:30:18,680 Speaker 1: So we can, luckily, you know, when you invest in 551 00:30:18,720 --> 00:30:21,840 Speaker 1: and the only invest in secular growth businesses, we kind 552 00:30:21,840 --> 00:30:24,920 Speaker 1: of have that real deep safety net that if we 553 00:30:24,960 --> 00:30:27,000 Speaker 1: did nothing and we were just foolish, right and we 554 00:30:27,120 --> 00:30:29,760 Speaker 1: just invested, you know, you know, two or three years out, 555 00:30:29,800 --> 00:30:32,120 Speaker 1: these companies are going to be far larger business than 556 00:30:32,400 --> 00:30:34,840 Speaker 1: than they are today. The only thing we don't we 557 00:30:34,840 --> 00:30:37,200 Speaker 1: should not do and be careful of, is we should 558 00:30:37,200 --> 00:30:41,040 Speaker 1: not be greedy and get overly fue mode to chase 559 00:30:41,120 --> 00:30:45,080 Speaker 1: momentum and pay any price. But when you pay and 560 00:30:45,080 --> 00:30:47,640 Speaker 1: and we're very lucky at this point in time thanks 561 00:30:47,640 --> 00:30:49,800 Speaker 1: to the correction in January, and then the correction in 562 00:30:49,880 --> 00:30:52,480 Speaker 1: March and the deep correction in May, and I'm sure 563 00:30:52,480 --> 00:30:55,280 Speaker 1: our correction is going to happen again sometime soon. All 564 00:30:55,360 --> 00:30:57,040 Speaker 1: we have to do is make sure that we served 565 00:30:57,080 --> 00:31:00,480 Speaker 1: the way reasonably well and use these pockets of pain 566 00:31:01,000 --> 00:31:04,840 Speaker 1: to um you know, start keep collecting our favorite assets, 567 00:31:05,240 --> 00:31:08,000 Speaker 1: and also make sure that when we have short term 568 00:31:08,000 --> 00:31:10,800 Speaker 1: euphoric moments like we had got two weeks ago, and 569 00:31:10,840 --> 00:31:13,040 Speaker 1: then you know, in the month of February, we are 570 00:31:13,120 --> 00:31:17,480 Speaker 1: appropriately sober. So there are two the worlds of thought here. 571 00:31:17,880 --> 00:31:19,920 Speaker 1: The one world of thought is just put money to 572 00:31:19,960 --> 00:31:22,200 Speaker 1: work and we'll all be fine on the long term. 573 00:31:22,600 --> 00:31:25,640 Speaker 1: The second worldview is, you know, because we do such 574 00:31:25,680 --> 00:31:27,760 Speaker 1: few things and we're actually quite good at these stalks, 575 00:31:28,160 --> 00:31:30,680 Speaker 1: we should be able to do risk management on a 576 00:31:30,760 --> 00:31:35,320 Speaker 1: purst talk basis better than most people. So our strategy 577 00:31:35,320 --> 00:31:39,320 Speaker 1: and philosophy is when stocks are getting paid two or 578 00:31:39,360 --> 00:31:42,040 Speaker 1: three years in advance, we should not be greedy. We 579 00:31:42,080 --> 00:31:44,920 Speaker 1: should take some risk of the table because the market 580 00:31:45,040 --> 00:31:47,800 Speaker 1: we're actually very happy. So I'll tell you a dirty secret. 581 00:31:48,080 --> 00:31:50,280 Speaker 1: Last year was a phenomenal year for us, and we're 582 00:31:50,360 --> 00:31:53,840 Speaker 1: very lucky. We launched in despite a difficult start. The 583 00:31:53,920 --> 00:31:57,960 Speaker 1: reality is, all through last year, I was struggling, and 584 00:31:58,000 --> 00:32:00,160 Speaker 1: I was struggling because each time I thought something was 585 00:32:00,200 --> 00:32:02,760 Speaker 1: too expensive, it kept going ahead of me. So we 586 00:32:02,800 --> 00:32:05,760 Speaker 1: were constantly felt prefer to tase momentum and we did not. 587 00:32:05,880 --> 00:32:08,280 Speaker 1: But there was always the spain that man, we just 588 00:32:08,320 --> 00:32:12,600 Speaker 1: missed it again. This year, while obviously we're still you know, 589 00:32:12,400 --> 00:32:14,320 Speaker 1: you know, thankfully we're doing quite well for the year, 590 00:32:15,280 --> 00:32:19,200 Speaker 1: the reality is this feels like more of a normal year, 591 00:32:19,240 --> 00:32:21,000 Speaker 1: but with more punches in your face, if you know 592 00:32:21,040 --> 00:32:24,720 Speaker 1: what I mean. So at least this year, we we 593 00:32:24,800 --> 00:32:27,760 Speaker 1: have shots to take to buy good assets at at 594 00:32:27,840 --> 00:32:31,480 Speaker 1: the risk prices number one, if you believe it again, 595 00:32:31,520 --> 00:32:33,800 Speaker 1: all our stocks we have a variant perception on our 596 00:32:33,880 --> 00:32:36,560 Speaker 1: numbers looking out three years and for the quarter and 597 00:32:36,640 --> 00:32:39,800 Speaker 1: for the year. But on the other hand, you know, 598 00:32:39,880 --> 00:32:42,000 Speaker 1: we have shots to take risk of the table. So 599 00:32:42,320 --> 00:32:44,080 Speaker 1: this is going to be an ear where I think 600 00:32:44,120 --> 00:32:48,080 Speaker 1: we served the wave versus trying to be heroes. So 601 00:32:48,160 --> 00:32:50,479 Speaker 1: I would say that coming out and I think the 602 00:32:50,520 --> 00:32:52,719 Speaker 1: next three months Joe and Tracy are going to be 603 00:32:53,360 --> 00:32:57,480 Speaker 1: particularly hard because we are going into high inflation months 604 00:32:57,520 --> 00:33:00,320 Speaker 1: with easy calms over the last last year, and we 605 00:33:00,360 --> 00:33:02,440 Speaker 1: are going into the peak of there's will be a 606 00:33:02,480 --> 00:33:05,840 Speaker 1: lot of tension about Hey, you know, yes we believe 607 00:33:05,920 --> 00:33:08,160 Speaker 1: so the world still thinks many of these companies are 608 00:33:08,200 --> 00:33:10,880 Speaker 1: screwed completely because we're all going to go back to 609 00:33:10,880 --> 00:33:13,880 Speaker 1: our normal lives. We have a view that these are 610 00:33:14,080 --> 00:33:17,400 Speaker 1: far more durable than the market expects. But this is 611 00:33:17,400 --> 00:33:19,440 Speaker 1: going to be the quarter, maybe the next six months 612 00:33:19,440 --> 00:33:23,520 Speaker 1: where companies have to prove themselves. And when you have this, uh, 613 00:33:23,600 --> 00:33:26,280 Speaker 1: this tension, it's going to be tough for growth stocks, 614 00:33:26,280 --> 00:33:43,479 Speaker 1: and we are very much prepared for it. So you 615 00:33:43,520 --> 00:33:45,880 Speaker 1: mentioned earlier this idea that one of the things that 616 00:33:45,920 --> 00:33:49,480 Speaker 1: happened over the past year is a bunch of companies 617 00:33:49,560 --> 00:33:53,800 Speaker 1: sort of upped their technological game. I guess you mentioned, 618 00:33:53,880 --> 00:33:56,240 Speaker 1: you know, the example of Nike and some other retailers 619 00:33:56,360 --> 00:33:59,560 Speaker 1: who are now much more savvy about the way they're 620 00:33:59,560 --> 00:34:02,520 Speaker 1: selling on the internet and how they're advertising and things 621 00:34:02,560 --> 00:34:06,960 Speaker 1: like that. How do you differentiate between a pure tech 622 00:34:07,080 --> 00:34:12,759 Speaker 1: company versus a retailer who happens to do tech well, 623 00:34:13,520 --> 00:34:16,759 Speaker 1: and is there room in your fund for both of 624 00:34:16,800 --> 00:34:20,200 Speaker 1: those or do you try to identify pure tech companies 625 00:34:20,280 --> 00:34:23,080 Speaker 1: who are able to leverage off of the way the 626 00:34:23,120 --> 00:34:27,640 Speaker 1: broader market or the broader business world is actually deploying technology. 627 00:34:27,680 --> 00:34:30,680 Speaker 1: If that makes sense. You know, we are I would 628 00:34:30,680 --> 00:34:34,520 Speaker 1: call myself on ourselves, we're very focused on technology, but 629 00:34:34,560 --> 00:34:37,000 Speaker 1: I wouldn't say that we we don't have this narrow minded, 630 00:34:37,080 --> 00:34:41,480 Speaker 1: arrogant view that brands and distribution don't make sense. Like 631 00:34:41,600 --> 00:34:45,560 Speaker 1: Nike is a phenomenal asset, right and they have been 632 00:34:45,600 --> 00:34:50,640 Speaker 1: able to pivot into a technologically superior focused way, And 633 00:34:50,840 --> 00:34:53,680 Speaker 1: companies and and and consumers love buying stuff on Nike 634 00:34:53,800 --> 00:34:56,640 Speaker 1: dot com. The same thing is through for Williams Sonoma, 635 00:34:56,680 --> 00:34:59,880 Speaker 1: for example. So you know this is a constantential should 636 00:34:59,880 --> 00:35:04,239 Speaker 1: be increase our coverage to encompase those companies. So for now, 637 00:35:04,280 --> 00:35:06,200 Speaker 1: what we're doing is, again we are a young firm. 638 00:35:06,480 --> 00:35:09,600 Speaker 1: We keep an eye. But if for example, e commerce 639 00:35:09,600 --> 00:35:13,040 Speaker 1: becomes thirty or forty percent of total Nike sales or 640 00:35:13,080 --> 00:35:15,879 Speaker 1: seventy percent of Nike sales over time, once we get 641 00:35:15,880 --> 00:35:19,080 Speaker 1: to that, you know, high thirties, high forties levels, you 642 00:35:19,120 --> 00:35:21,400 Speaker 1: can be pretty sure we'll be covering those assets. Because 643 00:35:21,680 --> 00:35:25,240 Speaker 1: when it comes to e commerce in in particular, there's 644 00:35:25,280 --> 00:35:29,560 Speaker 1: nothing called an e commerce company anymore. Everything will become 645 00:35:29,680 --> 00:35:33,400 Speaker 1: a form of omni channel, right. So who would have 646 00:35:33,400 --> 00:35:35,800 Speaker 1: thought that Amazon bought Whole Foods and then Whole Foods 647 00:35:35,800 --> 00:35:39,600 Speaker 1: makes it an omnichannel retailer, right, and so on and 648 00:35:39,640 --> 00:35:42,600 Speaker 1: so for the wayfarn has opened up stores, Peloton is 649 00:35:42,640 --> 00:35:46,040 Speaker 1: omnichannel from the get go. Apple is omnichannel from the 650 00:35:46,080 --> 00:35:48,759 Speaker 1: get go. They've got stores all over the world. And 651 00:35:48,840 --> 00:35:53,680 Speaker 1: so this idea of a pure play internet commerce company 652 00:35:53,800 --> 00:35:56,520 Speaker 1: in the in the next decade may not necessarily be 653 00:35:56,520 --> 00:35:58,960 Speaker 1: true because at the end they're selling to humans and 654 00:35:59,080 --> 00:36:02,960 Speaker 1: humans want it from experiences. Now, the trend that is 655 00:36:03,000 --> 00:36:06,000 Speaker 1: I'm super excited about is the point you alluded to. 656 00:36:06,480 --> 00:36:08,839 Speaker 1: You have a company like Nike, which is I think 657 00:36:08,880 --> 00:36:12,080 Speaker 1: best to breed very forward looking, great technology team. They 658 00:36:12,120 --> 00:36:15,600 Speaker 1: may not be able to compete with Amazon on tech 659 00:36:15,719 --> 00:36:19,160 Speaker 1: per se, but what we have is a bunch of 660 00:36:19,200 --> 00:36:24,000 Speaker 1: software companies that are building the intelligence components that enable 661 00:36:24,160 --> 00:36:27,920 Speaker 1: the real world American international economy to compete with the 662 00:36:27,960 --> 00:36:30,640 Speaker 1: tech giants. And one of those companies, for example, is 663 00:36:30,719 --> 00:36:35,080 Speaker 1: data Bricks right. Data Bricks provides a machine learning components 664 00:36:35,080 --> 00:36:39,480 Speaker 1: and machine learning intelligence previously the purview only of Facebook 665 00:36:39,520 --> 00:36:42,880 Speaker 1: and Google and Amazon and Uber and bringing it to 666 00:36:42,920 --> 00:36:47,040 Speaker 1: the mass market, and so under underneath the surface of 667 00:36:47,040 --> 00:36:49,520 Speaker 1: these companies, as long as they have the will to 668 00:36:49,600 --> 00:36:53,520 Speaker 1: become online first or our our online becoming an important component. 669 00:36:53,840 --> 00:36:57,280 Speaker 1: There are so many digital tools and software that provide 670 00:36:57,320 --> 00:37:01,120 Speaker 1: these companies the tool kit and the libraries and the 671 00:37:01,200 --> 00:37:06,879 Speaker 1: lego building blocks to potentially compete with their online first contemporaries. 672 00:37:07,360 --> 00:37:10,000 Speaker 1: So this gets to a question, and you know, Tracy 673 00:37:10,080 --> 00:37:14,799 Speaker 1: said at the beginning, you know there's always um concerns 674 00:37:14,880 --> 00:37:21,440 Speaker 1: antitrust regulation. What is your view on setting aside the 675 00:37:21,440 --> 00:37:25,960 Speaker 1: regulatory concerns per se, Like, how guaranteed is it that 676 00:37:26,080 --> 00:37:29,239 Speaker 1: the Facebook's amazons and alphabets of the world will still 677 00:37:29,280 --> 00:37:32,160 Speaker 1: be the most dominant companies in the world, didn't say 678 00:37:32,160 --> 00:37:34,919 Speaker 1: five or ten years? Or could it be that over 679 00:37:35,040 --> 00:37:37,880 Speaker 1: time some of the expertise they have does get distributed 680 00:37:37,960 --> 00:37:42,600 Speaker 1: like you described, and that that mode that they have, however, 681 00:37:42,640 --> 00:37:47,440 Speaker 1: it is, starts to meaningfully get eroded. So every company, 682 00:37:47,560 --> 00:37:50,239 Speaker 1: whether it's big or small, should and thus live in 683 00:37:50,239 --> 00:37:53,160 Speaker 1: a healthy state of paranoia. Now, so again, there are 684 00:37:53,160 --> 00:37:56,080 Speaker 1: many ways to answer this question. Number one is, let's 685 00:37:56,080 --> 00:38:00,759 Speaker 1: take Google. I think Google is you know, it's just 686 00:38:01,480 --> 00:38:04,920 Speaker 1: inconquerable in many ways. It's impossible. It's it's gonna be 687 00:38:05,120 --> 00:38:08,640 Speaker 1: very very hard to get a replacement for traditional search. 688 00:38:08,719 --> 00:38:12,520 Speaker 1: So I think core search and core YouTube has just 689 00:38:12,719 --> 00:38:15,040 Speaker 1: under the twenty years to go, and I don't see 690 00:38:15,040 --> 00:38:19,319 Speaker 1: how there's any replacement for it anytime soon. Okay, and 691 00:38:19,400 --> 00:38:22,920 Speaker 1: maybe YouTube has replacements with TikTok and Facebook videos and 692 00:38:22,960 --> 00:38:27,040 Speaker 1: other things, but very hard to replace it. Amazon was 693 00:38:27,080 --> 00:38:29,600 Speaker 1: never going to be a monopoly anyway, So this idea 694 00:38:29,680 --> 00:38:33,040 Speaker 1: of monopolies winning to the one true monopoly I think 695 00:38:33,120 --> 00:38:36,719 Speaker 1: is Google and potentially Facebook, But which so which is 696 00:38:36,719 --> 00:38:40,320 Speaker 1: why they are always the cross as of antitrust. Amazon 697 00:38:40,800 --> 00:38:43,800 Speaker 1: was never a monopoly right even today, if you compare 698 00:38:43,840 --> 00:38:46,600 Speaker 1: it to the total overall retail market, there's still a 699 00:38:46,640 --> 00:38:50,120 Speaker 1: small fraction and there are many people attacking their lunch. 700 00:38:50,120 --> 00:38:54,360 Speaker 1: So I think Amazon it's not vulnerable, But the reality 701 00:38:54,480 --> 00:38:57,080 Speaker 1: is that everyone will start shipping away at pieces. But 702 00:38:57,120 --> 00:38:58,960 Speaker 1: again this goes back to my point at the beginning. 703 00:38:59,280 --> 00:39:01,800 Speaker 1: If you think of the world or the Internet world, 704 00:39:01,840 --> 00:39:05,839 Speaker 1: I say zero sum game with market share fights, then 705 00:39:05,840 --> 00:39:08,600 Speaker 1: of course Amazon on the threat. In fact, I would 706 00:39:08,640 --> 00:39:11,000 Speaker 1: argue that take any company in the world, the market 707 00:39:11,000 --> 00:39:14,480 Speaker 1: share dominant company, the market share always goes down. Amazon's 708 00:39:14,480 --> 00:39:17,280 Speaker 1: market share will go down because Wayfare is growing faster 709 00:39:17,320 --> 00:39:21,000 Speaker 1: than Amazon, but Amazon itself will keep growing. It's it's 710 00:39:21,040 --> 00:39:24,040 Speaker 1: fair share because the overall pie is growing, right, So 711 00:39:24,880 --> 00:39:27,720 Speaker 1: we're just gonna have different people trying to compete different 712 00:39:27,719 --> 00:39:30,080 Speaker 1: slivers of Amazon because you know, it's a big company, 713 00:39:30,120 --> 00:39:33,560 Speaker 1: and that makes sense. Facebook is very different Facebook. It 714 00:39:33,680 --> 00:39:37,040 Speaker 1: is impossible to have to kind of replicate the impact 715 00:39:37,280 --> 00:39:40,680 Speaker 1: that it has on small businesses around the world, either Instagram, 716 00:39:40,760 --> 00:39:44,640 Speaker 1: author Facebook, or blue App. And so again, disrupting Facebook, 717 00:39:44,680 --> 00:39:46,440 Speaker 1: I think it's going to be very, very hard. And 718 00:39:46,440 --> 00:39:50,080 Speaker 1: I hear this constant refrain that says, oh, who uses 719 00:39:50,080 --> 00:39:53,040 Speaker 1: Facebook anymore? Yeah, maybe you don't, but to use Instagram, 720 00:39:53,480 --> 00:39:56,200 Speaker 1: use WhatsApp, you know, moms use and you know, my 721 00:39:56,239 --> 00:39:58,960 Speaker 1: wife and you know, we use Facebook groups. The people 722 00:39:59,040 --> 00:40:02,399 Speaker 1: have stopped using Facebook for their friends and they're now 723 00:40:02,600 --> 00:40:05,239 Speaker 1: finding groups for themselves. So my wife and you know, 724 00:40:05,360 --> 00:40:07,920 Speaker 1: found a a tide pool group for my six year 725 00:40:07,920 --> 00:40:11,640 Speaker 1: old son, who who loves tipples. Right, Facebook is morphing yourself. 726 00:40:11,640 --> 00:40:14,080 Speaker 1: And guess what what is Facebook doing? They're taking those 727 00:40:14,280 --> 00:40:17,400 Speaker 1: dozens of billions of m of R and D spend 728 00:40:17,440 --> 00:40:20,920 Speaker 1: every year and they're saying, listen, we cannot be completely 729 00:40:21,000 --> 00:40:23,319 Speaker 1: dependent on Apple for distribution. We have to build our 730 00:40:23,320 --> 00:40:27,240 Speaker 1: own platform. Because Apple itself realizes that that services business 731 00:40:27,680 --> 00:40:30,040 Speaker 1: is a very lucrative business and they want to get 732 00:40:30,040 --> 00:40:33,000 Speaker 1: a piece of that, and so hiding behind the guys 733 00:40:33,080 --> 00:40:36,400 Speaker 1: of privacy, they are trying to build an entire at stack. 734 00:40:36,719 --> 00:40:39,520 Speaker 1: And so you're seeing Apple and Facebook going against each other. 735 00:40:40,000 --> 00:40:43,640 Speaker 1: There are plenty of self enforced errors that these companies 736 00:40:44,000 --> 00:40:48,160 Speaker 1: do on themselves versus just competition, and looking ten years up, 737 00:40:48,880 --> 00:40:51,520 Speaker 1: I don't think anything. So on a ten year basis, 738 00:40:51,560 --> 00:40:54,520 Speaker 1: I don't think anything happens to either Facebook or Apple, 739 00:40:54,920 --> 00:40:58,640 Speaker 1: or Microsoft or Google or Amazon. Nothing happened. So maybe 740 00:40:58,719 --> 00:41:02,399 Speaker 1: regulatory iybe there's stress on regulatory reap of view, maybe 741 00:41:02,400 --> 00:41:06,640 Speaker 1: there's antitrust tension. But the reality is that if you 742 00:41:06,719 --> 00:41:09,000 Speaker 1: break up Facebook or Google, the some of the parts 743 00:41:09,040 --> 00:41:12,120 Speaker 1: is bigger than the whole, and so it's hard to 744 00:41:12,160 --> 00:41:15,400 Speaker 1: see in the next five or ten years anything happening 745 00:41:15,440 --> 00:41:18,480 Speaker 1: to these companies. Wait, can I just press you on 746 00:41:18,480 --> 00:41:21,520 Speaker 1: that regulatory point, because you know, I'm over here in 747 00:41:21,640 --> 00:41:24,920 Speaker 1: Hong Kong and it's kind of striking to me that 748 00:41:25,040 --> 00:41:28,560 Speaker 1: the only thing that the you know, politicians of the 749 00:41:28,600 --> 00:41:31,400 Speaker 1: world or the authorities of the world seem to agree 750 00:41:31,440 --> 00:41:34,760 Speaker 1: on is that they need to be limiting big text 751 00:41:34,800 --> 00:41:37,839 Speaker 1: power in some ways. So in Europe, the US, and 752 00:41:38,400 --> 00:41:42,000 Speaker 1: in um China there's this agreement that they need to 753 00:41:42,000 --> 00:41:46,879 Speaker 1: do something about tech. Why, like, why aren't you more 754 00:41:46,920 --> 00:41:50,160 Speaker 1: worried about it? Or how realistic do you think that 755 00:41:50,280 --> 00:41:54,440 Speaker 1: breakup risk might actually be? So, first of all, the 756 00:41:54,520 --> 00:41:57,960 Speaker 1: worries and the tension around something bad happening to big 757 00:41:58,000 --> 00:42:01,560 Speaker 1: tech in quotes, it's all already embedded in their multiples. 758 00:42:01,600 --> 00:42:04,560 Speaker 1: And that is why Ali Baba rates at fourteen times. 759 00:42:04,640 --> 00:42:06,960 Speaker 1: And that is why Facebook crates that I think, you know, 760 00:42:07,000 --> 00:42:09,239 Speaker 1: twenty times or twenty two times. And that's why these 761 00:42:09,320 --> 00:42:12,799 Speaker 1: multiples by Amazon rates at sixteen times. That is why 762 00:42:12,840 --> 00:42:16,240 Speaker 1: their multiples are so cheap. There's a reason why Amazon 763 00:42:16,320 --> 00:42:19,399 Speaker 1: stock hasn't moved in nine months, right, it's just it's 764 00:42:19,400 --> 00:42:22,600 Speaker 1: a flat line. Right. There's a lot of tension, right, 765 00:42:22,640 --> 00:42:25,800 Speaker 1: and that's somewhat embedded in multiple So I'm not intelligent 766 00:42:25,920 --> 00:42:29,040 Speaker 1: enough to go and predict, you know, the binomial tree 767 00:42:29,239 --> 00:42:32,640 Speaker 1: of decision making in different governments. But so our framework 768 00:42:32,680 --> 00:42:36,480 Speaker 1: is simple. The threat of regulation is here to stay, 769 00:42:37,400 --> 00:42:42,400 Speaker 1: and the threat of regulation is real depending on country. 770 00:42:42,600 --> 00:42:45,960 Speaker 1: In Europe it's very real, right, they've been finding American 771 00:42:46,000 --> 00:42:49,439 Speaker 1: companies for a long time. In China, it's very very real, 772 00:42:49,600 --> 00:42:52,920 Speaker 1: as we've seen over the last six months, right, and 773 00:42:53,040 --> 00:42:57,320 Speaker 1: everyone is now in regulatory huddle down mood. In the US, 774 00:42:57,440 --> 00:43:01,040 Speaker 1: we we hear news of regulation, and we we hear 775 00:43:01,080 --> 00:43:04,839 Speaker 1: senators you know, you know, talking to these CEOs in 776 00:43:04,880 --> 00:43:08,000 Speaker 1: these in these meetings, and you know, it's not clear 777 00:43:08,040 --> 00:43:09,480 Speaker 1: to me what's going to come out of it. There's 778 00:43:09,520 --> 00:43:12,920 Speaker 1: there's some there's some tension for sure. And so what 779 00:43:12,960 --> 00:43:15,160 Speaker 1: we do is we say, let's take a very sober 780 00:43:15,200 --> 00:43:17,880 Speaker 1: view of this. The only thing we can control in 781 00:43:17,880 --> 00:43:22,040 Speaker 1: our hands is our view on where the business grows, 782 00:43:22,080 --> 00:43:24,480 Speaker 1: because we are business analysts first, and therefore where the 783 00:43:24,560 --> 00:43:27,240 Speaker 1: revenues grow, where is free cash flow grow, whereas ebada 784 00:43:27,360 --> 00:43:32,040 Speaker 1: grow over time? And then let us put suitably sober 785 00:43:32,120 --> 00:43:35,440 Speaker 1: and and low multiples have needed on these stocks and 786 00:43:35,520 --> 00:43:38,719 Speaker 1: still see if we can make a real return of 787 00:43:38,760 --> 00:43:41,360 Speaker 1: not which is kind of what we aspire to me 788 00:43:42,280 --> 00:43:44,560 Speaker 1: and everything else for us is gravy on the cake. 789 00:43:44,800 --> 00:43:47,400 Speaker 1: It's it's just all gravy. Like pick everything else the 790 00:43:47,440 --> 00:43:50,080 Speaker 1: upside optionality for us, And so I think we just 791 00:43:50,120 --> 00:43:52,760 Speaker 1: have to take that very sober view on what happens 792 00:43:52,800 --> 00:43:55,719 Speaker 1: to the world. But the real the reality is do 793 00:43:55,760 --> 00:43:59,480 Speaker 1: you take China as a case study the Chinese government 794 00:43:59,560 --> 00:44:02,880 Speaker 1: when you October, there's all this news about and Financial 795 00:44:02,920 --> 00:44:06,400 Speaker 1: So Ali Baba being unfairly targeted. First of all, that 796 00:44:06,560 --> 00:44:10,920 Speaker 1: is completely wrong. They were targeting everybody. It just so 797 00:44:11,040 --> 00:44:13,480 Speaker 1: happened that at a point in time, after one of 798 00:44:13,480 --> 00:44:17,040 Speaker 1: the founders comments, it gave them the reason to go 799 00:44:17,160 --> 00:44:20,399 Speaker 1: behind Ali Baba. And as a result of that, it 800 00:44:20,560 --> 00:44:23,520 Speaker 1: was they cracked on and Financial the I p O, 801 00:44:23,560 --> 00:44:26,080 Speaker 1: which is the right thing to do, because you cannot 802 00:44:26,120 --> 00:44:28,719 Speaker 1: have a consumer lending business in a country as big 803 00:44:28,719 --> 00:44:33,120 Speaker 1: as and Financial correct that creates systematic risk to the 804 00:44:33,200 --> 00:44:36,360 Speaker 1: Chinese financial system. So I would argue they did the 805 00:44:36,480 --> 00:44:40,560 Speaker 1: right thing early on by slowing it down completely. So actually, 806 00:44:40,640 --> 00:44:43,120 Speaker 1: kudos to those regulators. You can't have a lending business 807 00:44:43,120 --> 00:44:45,239 Speaker 1: growing as fast as they were growing. Last number one 808 00:44:46,040 --> 00:44:50,640 Speaker 1: now number two is Ali Baba historically was the propagator 809 00:44:50,800 --> 00:44:54,680 Speaker 1: of certain anti monopoly practices. But it wasn't that they 810 00:44:54,719 --> 00:44:57,319 Speaker 1: cracked on Ali Baba alone. First of all, they were 811 00:44:57,320 --> 00:45:00,160 Speaker 1: cracking on Alibaba for three years task to pressure from 812 00:45:00,200 --> 00:45:02,239 Speaker 1: Pindo though, which is which is the right thing to do. 813 00:45:02,760 --> 00:45:05,759 Speaker 1: But now Pindo though and made Toun themselves are in 814 00:45:05,800 --> 00:45:09,000 Speaker 1: the regularly crosshairs because they are being quite aggressive in 815 00:45:09,080 --> 00:45:12,520 Speaker 1: growing a specific form of grocery called community group buying. 816 00:45:12,800 --> 00:45:15,000 Speaker 1: So what happens to you know, all the you know 817 00:45:15,000 --> 00:45:17,560 Speaker 1: people in the wet markets in China. I would argue 818 00:45:17,600 --> 00:45:21,560 Speaker 1: that I think the Chinese regulatory strategy is the right thing, 819 00:45:21,600 --> 00:45:26,000 Speaker 1: because things in China get incredibly aggressively competitive and then 820 00:45:26,040 --> 00:45:28,080 Speaker 1: creates a lot of you know, second order effects that 821 00:45:28,120 --> 00:45:32,239 Speaker 1: nobody wants. I don't think the regulatory authorities there want 822 00:45:32,280 --> 00:45:35,600 Speaker 1: to destroy their local champions. So the reason why we're 823 00:45:35,600 --> 00:45:38,719 Speaker 1: actually quite confident about investing in China is we've been 824 00:45:38,719 --> 00:45:41,160 Speaker 1: through the Spain a few times in the past. We've 825 00:45:41,160 --> 00:45:43,799 Speaker 1: seen this post Ali Baba Ipo. We've see this in 826 00:45:43,840 --> 00:45:46,839 Speaker 1: two thousand and fifteen, in August fifteen. So we've seen 827 00:45:46,880 --> 00:45:50,080 Speaker 1: these pockets of six months to one year where things 828 00:45:50,120 --> 00:45:53,560 Speaker 1: get really bad. But if you look beyond that one, 829 00:45:53,560 --> 00:45:55,440 Speaker 1: they're and luckily for us, we have you know, three 830 00:45:55,520 --> 00:45:58,439 Speaker 1: year locked in capital, we have the we're lucky enough 831 00:45:58,480 --> 00:46:00,880 Speaker 1: to have the place to look out one to two 832 00:46:00,960 --> 00:46:03,880 Speaker 1: years and then think about what those companies could look like, 833 00:46:04,160 --> 00:46:06,120 Speaker 1: which is why China is such a great place to 834 00:46:06,200 --> 00:46:09,160 Speaker 1: invest right now in my opinion. Now let's move to 835 00:46:09,200 --> 00:46:13,560 Speaker 1: the US. In the US, I hope that we don't 836 00:46:13,560 --> 00:46:17,080 Speaker 1: shoot our national champions in the foot. Now, as you know, 837 00:46:17,120 --> 00:46:20,279 Speaker 1: as an American resident like I, I just find it. 838 00:46:21,400 --> 00:46:23,680 Speaker 1: I'm stressed out when I when I look at the 839 00:46:23,840 --> 00:46:27,360 Speaker 1: CEO is being interrogated in the Senate, and for right reasons. 840 00:46:27,400 --> 00:46:30,360 Speaker 1: I get why they are, but I feel like we 841 00:46:30,400 --> 00:46:33,360 Speaker 1: are behind the curve in our sophistication and understanding of 842 00:46:33,400 --> 00:46:37,760 Speaker 1: what these companies do. But my views, okay, the worst 843 00:46:37,760 --> 00:46:41,480 Speaker 1: case outcome is that these companies get regulated, and what 844 00:46:41,640 --> 00:46:44,840 Speaker 1: is the ultimate impact regulation they break up these companies. 845 00:46:45,480 --> 00:46:47,560 Speaker 1: The way I'm at peace about this is that will 846 00:46:47,560 --> 00:46:49,560 Speaker 1: create a lot of tension in these companies. And the 847 00:46:49,640 --> 00:46:51,839 Speaker 1: multiples are low, so maybe they even go low up. 848 00:46:52,120 --> 00:46:54,600 Speaker 1: And I actually argue that on a longer term basis, 849 00:46:54,719 --> 00:46:57,400 Speaker 1: if Google got broken up, or Amazon got broken up, 850 00:46:57,560 --> 00:47:00,640 Speaker 1: or or our Facebook or group broken up, it would 851 00:47:00,640 --> 00:47:03,480 Speaker 1: actually create a couple of incremental trillion dollars and equity value, 852 00:47:03,560 --> 00:47:05,840 Speaker 1: because if you think about Amazon today, there's a trillion 853 00:47:05,840 --> 00:47:09,040 Speaker 1: dollars embedded today in the cloud business. Out three years, 854 00:47:09,480 --> 00:47:12,719 Speaker 1: you add international retail, that's a few hundred billion dollars 855 00:47:12,960 --> 00:47:15,960 Speaker 1: effectively today at Amazon stock at close to three dollars 856 00:47:15,960 --> 00:47:18,319 Speaker 1: a share, I'm going to argue that you get the 857 00:47:18,560 --> 00:47:22,680 Speaker 1: entire US business and the ads business for free. And 858 00:47:22,719 --> 00:47:25,279 Speaker 1: that's the beauty. We did the Anazon Ali Baba in 859 00:47:25,320 --> 00:47:28,000 Speaker 1: Ali Baba's case and here and this is this is 860 00:47:28,000 --> 00:47:31,520 Speaker 1: super interesting. It's such a cheap stock right now that 861 00:47:31,840 --> 00:47:34,520 Speaker 1: in three years under our estimates, if you strip out 862 00:47:34,560 --> 00:47:37,920 Speaker 1: the value of Ali Cloud and give it a low multiple, 863 00:47:37,960 --> 00:47:40,319 Speaker 1: strip out the value of and financials, give it a 864 00:47:40,400 --> 00:47:44,400 Speaker 1: sober multiple, sober equity value. Give some credit for their 865 00:47:44,440 --> 00:47:47,319 Speaker 1: on demands. This is in some some value for their 866 00:47:47,800 --> 00:47:51,480 Speaker 1: non retailed businesses, sorry that their retail offline businesses. You 867 00:47:51,560 --> 00:47:54,719 Speaker 1: buy the core business Coal, Bow and Team all which 868 00:47:54,760 --> 00:47:56,680 Speaker 1: by the way, were the hottest things back in the 869 00:47:56,719 --> 00:48:00,480 Speaker 1: day in China, still growing gm V between well and 870 00:48:00,560 --> 00:48:03,200 Speaker 1: seventeen percent for as far as the eye can see. 871 00:48:03,640 --> 00:48:08,040 Speaker 1: And remember they're still undemonetized, so monetization probably grows eighteen 872 00:48:08,800 --> 00:48:11,120 Speaker 1: for as long as the eye can see if you 873 00:48:11,200 --> 00:48:13,520 Speaker 1: do the math there, you get that business growing at 874 00:48:13,600 --> 00:48:17,800 Speaker 1: high tails to low twenties for four times EBITDA looking 875 00:48:17,800 --> 00:48:21,840 Speaker 1: out three years and negative EBADA looking out five years. Negative. 876 00:48:21,880 --> 00:48:24,880 Speaker 1: You actually get paid to own those businesses. And again 877 00:48:24,920 --> 00:48:27,960 Speaker 1: when you when you think about all the drivers of 878 00:48:28,000 --> 00:48:30,319 Speaker 1: what these companies are doing, the same thing with Peloton, right, 879 00:48:30,760 --> 00:48:35,600 Speaker 1: the company is such an incredible machine of hardware and 880 00:48:35,680 --> 00:48:39,800 Speaker 1: software well verticalized, and you strip out the hardware business, 881 00:48:40,200 --> 00:48:43,799 Speaker 1: you get paid to own the entire subscription business, which 882 00:48:43,840 --> 00:48:46,200 Speaker 1: is the Peloton app and what you pay forty bucks 883 00:48:46,400 --> 00:48:49,239 Speaker 1: forty bucks a month for. So there's just so much 884 00:48:49,280 --> 00:48:53,040 Speaker 1: tremendous value hidden that is not captured in the headline 885 00:48:53,040 --> 00:48:56,480 Speaker 1: EPs earnings of the headline ebadwarn nest. I guess that 886 00:48:56,600 --> 00:48:59,719 Speaker 1: real quickly and and just real briefly. I mean, what 887 00:48:59,760 --> 00:49:02,840 Speaker 1: would you say was the biggest surprise, uh for you? 888 00:49:02,960 --> 00:49:05,439 Speaker 1: Like what actually was there anything in the last year 889 00:49:05,520 --> 00:49:09,680 Speaker 1: either in the real economy or market they genuinely sort 890 00:49:09,680 --> 00:49:13,920 Speaker 1: of like went against your intuitions or assumption. Honestly, the 891 00:49:14,080 --> 00:49:17,319 Speaker 1: entire ear last year, Joe went again, I guess that's 892 00:49:17,320 --> 00:49:20,160 Speaker 1: a pretty good answer. The entire year it was a surprise, 893 00:49:20,239 --> 00:49:22,400 Speaker 1: and so I would argue that you know, you know, 894 00:49:22,520 --> 00:49:25,240 Speaker 1: we've been constantly humbled in this business. You get humbled 895 00:49:25,280 --> 00:49:27,879 Speaker 1: all the time, and last year was a humbling ear. 896 00:49:27,960 --> 00:49:30,520 Speaker 1: Even though we did well, it was a humbling ear 897 00:49:30,719 --> 00:49:34,480 Speaker 1: and lots of new learnings and you know, hopefully it 898 00:49:34,520 --> 00:49:38,200 Speaker 1: sets us up for a great next many years. Well, 899 00:49:38,239 --> 00:49:41,240 Speaker 1: good luck and Realm, thank you so much for coming 900 00:49:41,239 --> 00:49:44,200 Speaker 1: on a lot. I so appreciated, Tracy and Joe, thank 901 00:49:44,239 --> 00:50:01,240 Speaker 1: you for having me. Thanks. That was really good, Tracy, 902 00:50:01,280 --> 00:50:02,799 Speaker 1: I really like that one. You know, if they're all 903 00:50:02,880 --> 00:50:06,000 Speaker 1: like the sort of like lumber and housing and crypto one. 904 00:50:06,320 --> 00:50:08,759 Speaker 1: It was nice to hear like here's a let's talk 905 00:50:08,800 --> 00:50:11,880 Speaker 1: some tech stocks talk about tech stocks. Yeah, it was 906 00:50:12,000 --> 00:50:14,719 Speaker 1: very comforting. I do think though, I mean I do 907 00:50:14,840 --> 00:50:19,800 Speaker 1: think directionally, I agree with rom just this idea that 908 00:50:20,280 --> 00:50:22,480 Speaker 1: the world is going to go back to normal and 909 00:50:22,719 --> 00:50:25,400 Speaker 1: all these people who have been buying stuff off Amazon 910 00:50:25,719 --> 00:50:28,040 Speaker 1: or you know, watching things on Netflix and doing meetings 911 00:50:28,040 --> 00:50:31,160 Speaker 1: on zoom um are all going to stop doing that. 912 00:50:31,280 --> 00:50:34,880 Speaker 1: Like that seems wrong to me. And you know the 913 00:50:34,920 --> 00:50:37,680 Speaker 1: fact that we are doing this podcast over zoom um 914 00:50:37,719 --> 00:50:40,160 Speaker 1: and I'm about to order something off of Amazon like 915 00:50:40,640 --> 00:50:42,480 Speaker 1: you know, you can see it in your day to 916 00:50:42,520 --> 00:50:45,279 Speaker 1: day life. Yeah, no, exactly right, And I kind of 917 00:50:45,320 --> 00:50:48,000 Speaker 1: got this appression that I mean, the way I was like, 918 00:50:48,719 --> 00:50:50,920 Speaker 1: we're I think they sort of like go back to 919 00:50:51,080 --> 00:50:55,640 Speaker 1: normal is like a bad frame. I mean, yes, like 920 00:50:55,680 --> 00:50:57,960 Speaker 1: we're going outside board. People are going to go back 921 00:50:58,000 --> 00:51:00,839 Speaker 1: to the offices. But his point was, well, okay, like 922 00:51:01,440 --> 00:51:04,360 Speaker 1: that's still gonna mean that businesses. It's doesn't mean that 923 00:51:04,400 --> 00:51:08,319 Speaker 1: businesses aren't going to use Facebook or Instagram for advertising. 924 00:51:08,320 --> 00:51:10,480 Speaker 1: And I thought it was that was an interesting point, 925 00:51:11,080 --> 00:51:13,120 Speaker 1: which is that like, look, a lot of people are 926 00:51:13,120 --> 00:51:14,920 Speaker 1: gonna do a lot of spending. We're gonna travel more 927 00:51:14,960 --> 00:51:16,600 Speaker 1: this year than we did last year. We're gonna go 928 00:51:16,640 --> 00:51:19,600 Speaker 1: to restaurants more than we did last year. Well, that 929 00:51:19,719 --> 00:51:22,319 Speaker 1: creates a lot of demand for advertising in the place 930 00:51:22,360 --> 00:51:26,160 Speaker 1: people advertising is online, and so this idea of like 931 00:51:26,600 --> 00:51:29,160 Speaker 1: a shift offline in some ways it is true, but 932 00:51:29,320 --> 00:51:33,800 Speaker 1: in some ways it just means more digital business. Yeah. 933 00:51:34,040 --> 00:51:35,920 Speaker 1: I think that's right. No, you know, it's just like 934 00:51:36,040 --> 00:51:39,200 Speaker 1: another thing that I thought about is this, like you know, 935 00:51:39,480 --> 00:51:42,279 Speaker 1: people for years of like text dogs are expensive, right, 936 00:51:42,360 --> 00:51:45,000 Speaker 1: Like at any time we could have recorded this podcast 937 00:51:45,000 --> 00:51:46,839 Speaker 1: in the last decade and someone would have said tech 938 00:51:46,840 --> 00:51:50,640 Speaker 1: stocks are expensive, but clearly and like in retrospect, they weren't. Right. 939 00:51:51,080 --> 00:51:53,759 Speaker 1: Like in retrospect, not only did the stocks go up 940 00:51:53,760 --> 00:51:55,880 Speaker 1: a lot more, but also like they crushed. You know, 941 00:51:55,920 --> 00:51:59,040 Speaker 1: if you look at say Amazon's earnings today, I'm certain 942 00:51:59,719 --> 00:52:02,319 Speaker 1: it's higher than it was. It's higher than what people 943 00:52:02,320 --> 00:52:07,279 Speaker 1: would have predicted. And so I think, like one way 944 00:52:07,320 --> 00:52:10,880 Speaker 1: to interpret his thesis is just like all these companies 945 00:52:10,920 --> 00:52:15,160 Speaker 1: have been underestimated for years, and there's no reason to 946 00:52:15,200 --> 00:52:18,919 Speaker 1: think that they're not still underestimated even after they've done 947 00:52:18,960 --> 00:52:23,000 Speaker 1: so well well. This is the one thing that I 948 00:52:23,040 --> 00:52:25,879 Speaker 1: was thinking about, which is how much of that success 949 00:52:26,040 --> 00:52:29,520 Speaker 1: is fundamentals versus how much of it is flow and 950 00:52:29,640 --> 00:52:32,640 Speaker 1: the idea of you know, if you're Amazon, you're consistently 951 00:52:32,800 --> 00:52:35,239 Speaker 1: a winner, and you just sort of attract more and 952 00:52:35,280 --> 00:52:37,920 Speaker 1: more money and eventually it becomes a sort of self 953 00:52:38,040 --> 00:52:41,640 Speaker 1: fulfilling cycle. And that's one reason why, um, the stock 954 00:52:41,640 --> 00:52:44,520 Speaker 1: price never comes down and the valuation gets really expensive 955 00:52:44,560 --> 00:52:46,840 Speaker 1: because there's nothing to sort of break the cycle of 956 00:52:46,880 --> 00:52:49,480 Speaker 1: new money flowing into it. But then on the other hand, 957 00:52:49,560 --> 00:52:53,040 Speaker 1: like you know, as long as Amazon doesn't go bust, 958 00:52:53,120 --> 00:52:56,560 Speaker 1: which it seems very unlikely to do. Maybe that doesn't 959 00:52:56,600 --> 00:52:58,560 Speaker 1: matter so much, right, It just becomes a sort of 960 00:52:58,600 --> 00:53:02,480 Speaker 1: like battle of money that rolls along, collecting more money 961 00:53:02,480 --> 00:53:05,680 Speaker 1: and getting even bigger. Right and again, to be fair, 962 00:53:05,760 --> 00:53:08,760 Speaker 1: like they do, these companies do seem to crush earnings 963 00:53:08,880 --> 00:53:12,160 Speaker 1: estimates year after year after year. So there's there's also 964 00:53:12,200 --> 00:53:18,320 Speaker 1: that that also helps helps a little bit, doesn't it. Yeah, alright, 965 00:53:18,560 --> 00:53:21,760 Speaker 1: shall we leave it there? Let's leave it there. Okay, 966 00:53:21,840 --> 00:53:24,560 Speaker 1: this has been another episode of the All Thoughts podcast. 967 00:53:24,600 --> 00:53:27,160 Speaker 1: I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me on Twitter at 968 00:53:27,160 --> 00:53:30,399 Speaker 1: Tracy Alloway and I'm Joe wi Isn't All. You can 969 00:53:30,440 --> 00:53:33,239 Speaker 1: follow me on Twitter at the Stalwart. And you can 970 00:53:33,280 --> 00:53:36,440 Speaker 1: follow our guest Rom Parmi Saran. He's on Twitter at 971 00:53:37,000 --> 00:53:41,960 Speaker 1: Underscore rom Underscore. Follow our producer Laura Carlson, She's at 972 00:53:42,080 --> 00:53:45,600 Speaker 1: Laura M. Carlson. Follow the Bloomberg head of podcast, Francesca 973 00:53:45,680 --> 00:53:48,640 Speaker 1: Levi at Francesca Today, and check out all of our 974 00:53:48,680 --> 00:53:52,759 Speaker 1: podcasts at Bloomberg under the handle at podcasts. Thanks for 975 00:53:52,800 --> 00:54:01,040 Speaker 1: listening to