Speaker 1: Welcome to Buccaneers Inside on Live presented by Miller. Like
Speaker 1: Casey Phillips and Scott Smith here come into you live
Speaker 1: during this time of us working for moment, but we
Speaker 1: were so excited, we have figured out a way to
Speaker 1: do this so that we can still take some of
Speaker 1: your questions. So if you're not already watching on Facebook,
Speaker 1: make sure you've got on over there and in the
Speaker 1: comments section of the video on Facebook, you can leave
Speaker 1: your questions. We also love hearing where everybody's watching from,
Speaker 1: and we know with the draft just happening this last week,
Speaker 1: there are going to be so many questions and we
Speaker 1: have so much to talk about, which is great, so
Speaker 1: as we give people a chance to start submitting some
Speaker 1: of those questions on Facebook, Scott, I just wanted to
Speaker 1: hear your overall initial thoughts about the draft as a whole.
Speaker 1: We'll get into each of the draft picks, i'm sure,
Speaker 1: but for now, just what you thought of the Buccaneers
Speaker 1: draft class as a whole. Well, I can talk about
Speaker 1: it as a whole, but I think the most important
Speaker 1: takeaway is that the Bucks got their man in the
Speaker 1: first round. I think after we've seen what we've seen,
Speaker 1: after we've heard talk afterwards. I don't know if you
Speaker 1: saw the Peter King piece. He got to actually uh
Speaker 1: watch in for a lot of while Jason was Jason
Speaker 1: Lightlewis conducting his draft, and it became clear from all
Speaker 1: the evidence that priority number one, the biggest thing that
Speaker 1: needed to be accomplished was to get that offensive tackle
Speaker 1: and particularly Tristan Worse and uh admission accomplished. And if
Speaker 1: Jason Light was at least contemplating trades with every team
Speaker 1: from about seven on down, that's what it sounded like
Speaker 1: in the Peter King piece, then he was at least considering,
Speaker 1: I don't know if you can pull the trigger or not,
Speaker 1: but at least considering trading anything up to our second
Speaker 1: round pick. So it's really it's it's awesome that the
Speaker 1: Buckaneers got there, man, But it's also nice the way
Speaker 1: it fell out, and a trade up to eight, nine,
Speaker 1: ten wasn't necessary, or maybe in this case just wasn't possible,
Speaker 1: but it fell out. Okay, the Bucks only had to
Speaker 1: move up one, only had to give up their fourth
Speaker 1: round pick. I'm sure they would have loved to have
Speaker 1: kept that fourth round pick, but I think keeping the
Speaker 1: second and the third was really a win and still
Speaker 1: getting Tristan worse. So to me, that was the biggest takeaway. Okay,
Speaker 1: I thought that was really interesting about the trades that Um,
Speaker 1: some people were speculating that there weren't as many trades happening,
Speaker 1: you know, because of the virtual side of the draft,
Speaker 1: that they were afraid it was just gonna be difficult
Speaker 1: for teams. But it sounds like that wasn't it. For Jason,
Speaker 1: it sounded like it was just teams were happy with
Speaker 1: who they thought they were going to get. Yeah, based
Speaker 1: on the conversations in that piece, Uh, he would talk
Speaker 1: to a guy and then that that for the GM
Speaker 1: for another team, and the GYM would eventually just decided
Speaker 1: not to do a trade because they wanted to take
Speaker 1: the player that was there. You know, the Panthers wanted
Speaker 1: Derek Brown, and the Cardinals were ecstatic when Asaiah Simmons
Speaker 1: fell into their lap at eight. They didn't really expect
Speaker 1: that to happen from what their GM has said. And then, uh,
Speaker 1: the Jaguars wanted to take C. J. Henderson and so on, so, uh,
Speaker 1: you know, it could have been it easily could have
Speaker 1: been that the Buccaneers didn't get the man they really wanted.
Speaker 1: Unfortunately they worked out right. Nathan had asked, why you
Speaker 1: think they didn't want to trade for Leonard for Nett,
Speaker 1: either you know, before the draft or during that process.
Speaker 1: I think that probably had a lot to do with
Speaker 1: the fact that they felt they could meet that need
Speaker 1: in the draft, which I think they believe they did
Speaker 1: with Keishaw Vaughn. Remember, we do already have Ronald Jones,
Speaker 1: and they have said many, many times that they like
Speaker 1: Ronald Jones. He broke out to some extent last year
Speaker 1: top two thousand yards from scrimmage, and they think he
Speaker 1: could do more. So maybe you don't need a Bell
Speaker 1: cow back. And a lot of not a lot of
Speaker 1: teams in the NFL right now in this day and
Speaker 1: age who actually just go with going Bell cow back.
Speaker 1: You know, your Christian Caffres and your sa Kwan Barkley's
Speaker 1: Ezekiel Elliott. There's a few, but most of them employe
Speaker 1: a roster off facts, and so maybe you don't need
Speaker 1: to put assets in cap space. It wasn't huge cap
Speaker 1: space from Lyard for it, but it was some folks
Speaker 1: don't have a lot after the Rob Gronkowski trained in particular,
Speaker 1: so I just think they felt it was a need
Speaker 1: they could meet more easily and more effectively and more
Speaker 1: cost effectively in the draft. And Vaughan, what were your
Speaker 1: thoughts on on him and what he could bring, especially
Speaker 1: to compliment Ronald Jones, and what are the skill sets
Speaker 1: there and how he could be to Lloyd, Well, he's
Speaker 1: a guy that they think can be a pass catcher
Speaker 1: out of the backfield. He didn't have huge receiving numbers
Speaker 1: in college. They're gonna try and they're gonna see what
Speaker 1: they can get out of them. That now, Um, Bruce
Speaker 1: Arians did say that Keishaan j Von is not David Johnson.
Speaker 1: He said the running back we got in the seventh round,
Speaker 1: Raymond Klai, is more like a very small, much smaller,
Speaker 1: but suped up version of David Johnson. Meaning he's a
Speaker 1: guy that you can split out wide and run actual
Speaker 1: receiver routes with. So I'm not sure they see the
Speaker 1: keyshaw Von having like a d catch potential, but I
Speaker 1: think they are going to find out what he can
Speaker 1: do in the in the passing game, and they think
Speaker 1: he can play on all three downs. So him and
Speaker 1: Ronald Jones that should give you what you need in
Speaker 1: the backfield. Okay, and yeah, I think is how you
Speaker 1: say this name asked? Is there a need for more
Speaker 1: depths on the O line now that we at least
Speaker 1: know we got Tristan Works and I mean, but just
Speaker 1: overall the depth of the old line where that stands,
Speaker 1: I think there may be some need for interior depth.
Speaker 1: I think you saw the Tristan Worst will probably be.
Speaker 1: I'm sure he'll have to compete for the right tech
Speaker 1: full job, but that's obviously who they want to be
Speaker 1: there on day one is Tristan Worst. But he did
Speaker 1: sign Joe Heg who has made a number of starts
Speaker 1: at both tackle positions, so he's kind of an ideal
Speaker 1: swing tackle with And there are a couple of guys
Speaker 1: like Brad Seaton that they like, Younger guys that haven't
Speaker 1: really had much of an opportunity yet, but I think
Speaker 1: they like as a chance to make it as that
Speaker 1: eighth or ninth offensive lineman. But I think they could
Speaker 1: use some depth on the interior line. And we haven't
Speaker 1: announced any of our undrafted free agency yet they I'm
Speaker 1: sure some fans have seen some names. Uh, we can't
Speaker 1: really talk about him until the Bucks announced it, but
Speaker 1: there's probably gonna be some offensive line candidates in there
Speaker 1: because they didn't hit it again after you know, after
Speaker 1: the first round in the draft. I thought they might
Speaker 1: try to take a guard or a center somewhere along
Speaker 1: the way, but there were just other players they had targeted. Okay,
Speaker 1: and Rodney asked about our kick return, punt return special teams, So, um,
Speaker 1: I wanted to get your thoughts on if any of
Speaker 1: these draft picks do you feel like could fill the
Speaker 1: actual position of the return in and then where they
Speaker 1: might also fit in terms of just being on the
Speaker 1: coverage teams just overall where you see our special teams
Speaker 1: units in that area. Well, yeah, if you're a third
Speaker 1: day pick, you should expect to be playing special teams
Speaker 1: and you should be hoping to play special teams because
Speaker 1: it's your way to make the roster and and and
Speaker 1: get some exposure and maybe get a bigger job as
Speaker 1: time goes on. So like um chappelle Russell as an example,
Speaker 1: the linebacker in the UH in the seventh round. He's
Speaker 1: a fast guy, he's not a huge guy. Um he
Speaker 1: I wouldn't expect him to unseat Devil White or Levante
Speaker 1: David or maybe even you serve Kevin Minter for the
Speaker 1: main backup spot right away. But that's a guy who's
Speaker 1: athletic traits profile would be a pretty good, UH special
Speaker 1: teams player off the right off the bat, I think
Speaker 1: there are some There are a couple of our draftees
Speaker 1: who could factor into the return game. Uh t J.
Speaker 1: Logan will be back to so uh there's gonna be
Speaker 1: some options there. The return game definitely needs to get better.
Speaker 1: In fact, the Bucks Special teams overall need to get better.
Speaker 1: That doesn't Um that we need necessarily need more additions.
Speaker 1: Just you know, when you look at Matt Gay's final
Speaker 1: field goal percentage, it wasn't where you wanted it to be,
Speaker 1: but that was mainly just because of like a three
Speaker 1: game slump right at the end of the season from
Speaker 1: one to thirteen. You loved his numbers overall, So I
Speaker 1: think we have what we need. We just need to
Speaker 1: get better numbers this year. Yeah, that's a good point.
Speaker 1: Um Brandon asked, do you think o J will be
Speaker 1: on the team Week one at this point? Yes? Um.
Speaker 1: If there was gonna be a trade for o J,
Speaker 1: I think the more likely time would have been before
Speaker 1: the draft, because you would have liked to used that
Speaker 1: as an possibility to move up in the first round
Speaker 1: and and you know, take away some of the tension
Speaker 1: of getting the guy you wanted or getting some mid
Speaker 1: round picks. Um. You know, I think the Ravens got
Speaker 1: h a second and a fifth for Herst who they
Speaker 1: traded to Atlanta. So we certainly could have done that
Speaker 1: and really helped ourselves because obviously the Bucks are in
Speaker 1: win now mode. Uh So getting that trade done before
Speaker 1: the draft would have made a lot of sense. And
Speaker 1: I'm not saying it's impossible, and you can look to
Speaker 1: the future, but um, I think at this point, the
Speaker 1: way they're talking about how they do believe they can
Speaker 1: use all those tight ends, I think it's more likely
Speaker 1: that he's on the on the field on the team
Speaker 1: on Week one. Yeah, okay. Um Eddie asked would we
Speaker 1: consider signing another quarterback as a backup? He gave Cam
Speaker 1: Newton as an example, but just overall, what do you
Speaker 1: see as the quarterback situation? Do we have the guys
Speaker 1: on the roster we're gonna have what are your thoughts there? Well,
Speaker 1: we have three guys are on the roster that we
Speaker 1: know of. Obviously Tom Brady is your starter. Um, and
Speaker 1: you you like Um playing Gabet of course because he's
Speaker 1: familiar with the system, which is important, and Ryan Griffin
Speaker 1: for that matter too, which is important in this offseason
Speaker 1: when you don't know when you're going to get back
Speaker 1: on the field, you don't know how much work you're
Speaker 1: going to have before you're playing games, So I think
Speaker 1: they probably value that. And then right after the draft,
Speaker 1: when asked about the fact that the Bucks didn't draft
Speaker 1: developmental quarterback, say on Day three, Bruce arians said they
Speaker 1: did have their eye on a guy and undrafted free
Speaker 1: to see who they think has a lot of ups
Speaker 1: And again, we haven't announced names yet, but I'm sure
Speaker 1: fans can see on social media some of the names
Speaker 1: of potential undrafted free agents that are out there. So
Speaker 1: once we have our undrafted free agents in the fold,
Speaker 1: I think you're gonna have four quarterbacks. And really that's
Speaker 1: to me. Adding a fifth guy, like a veteran like
Speaker 1: Newton to that doesn't make a lot of sense, right
Speaker 1: um Sean asked, do you have any guesses on how
Speaker 1: many primetime games we might get when the schedules released?
Speaker 1: Oh a lot? What is the limit? Is it? Five? It? Maybe?
Speaker 1: Maybe five? Um? It's it's gonna be a whole new
Speaker 1: day around here, even back in the it would take
Speaker 1: us back to the Super Bowl era. I think the
Speaker 1: year after the Super Bowl we might have had three
Speaker 1: Monday night games. Wouldn't shock me, you know, especially if
Speaker 1: you had in a Thursday. We even played a Sunday
Speaker 1: night game in forever. But I'd be one the bet
Speaker 1: we get one now, so four maybe five, I would think, Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's gonna be. That's gonna be crazy to speak. It's
Speaker 1: gonna be a lot of late night flights for us
Speaker 1: if that's the case. Um Rich asked, do you see
Speaker 1: there being any kind of moves they need to make
Speaker 1: to help the salary cap? Well? Probably, um, but those
Speaker 1: aren't always guys being cut or traded. Um, you can
Speaker 1: make ross I mean a contract restructuring pretty simply and
Speaker 1: free up some cap space pretty easily. A lot of times,
Speaker 1: the way you restructure a contract to free up cap
Speaker 1: space as you convert some salary into uh a signing
Speaker 1: bonus or just a bonus that the player gets right then,
Speaker 1: which then spreads the cap hit out over the remainder
Speaker 1: of the contracts. So and the players always like that
Speaker 1: because it means they're getting money right then that they
Speaker 1: would have had to wait for, So a contract restruction
Speaker 1: is pretty easy to do. Um, I don't know exactly
Speaker 1: which guys would be the top candidates for that, but
Speaker 1: you know, you do have to devote a certain amount
Speaker 1: of money. I think it maybe about seven million to
Speaker 1: get in your draft picks signs, So there may need
Speaker 1: to be some maneuvering, but I don't think it would
Speaker 1: be anything fust okay, and Yage asked, do you see
Speaker 1: any more moves being made to how with the secondary
Speaker 1: or are we good with who we have now? Well,
Speaker 1: now we've got Antoine Winfield. Um, I think we're probably good.
Speaker 1: I mean, I wouldn't expect any major moves. You'll probably
Speaker 1: have some undrafted free agents added to the mix, maybe
Speaker 1: a guy that's on the street right now. Usually have
Speaker 1: a handful of signings between the draft and training camp.
Speaker 1: But if you're talking about a name guy, I don't
Speaker 1: think so. I mean, it may have something to do
Speaker 1: with if Justin Evans is ready to get back on
Speaker 1: the field, and I don't know when we're gonna know
Speaker 1: that and when we're gonna be back on the field.
Speaker 1: You do have basically your three cornerbacks that you think
Speaker 1: will start in place and some depth behind them, and
Speaker 1: Ryan Smith and m J. Stewart. So it looks to
Speaker 1: me like the pieces are in place. I wouldn't expect
Speaker 1: any kind of big damage. Okay, and uh, we all
Speaker 1: sad a question from Eric who asked, is there any
Speaker 1: concern with the size of our safety room? I believe
Speaker 1: all our five ten or under m hm. Uh. I
Speaker 1: believe that's true about Jordan Whitehead and Antoine Winfield US
Speaker 1: Mike Awards. Yeah. I don't know about Justin Evans, But
Speaker 1: in any case, I don't think they're drafting these guys
Speaker 1: if they think their height is a concern. Um. Yeah,
Speaker 1: if you can have everything, If you could have everything
Speaker 1: Antoine Winfield brings to the field and he's also six
Speaker 1: for two, then great. But then maybe he's a mid
Speaker 1: first round pick, right, So um, you know, some guys
Speaker 1: just play bigger than they are. I don't think there's
Speaker 1: a big concern about Okay. Rob asked which of the
Speaker 1: new pickups, whether it's from draft or free agency, will
Speaker 1: have the biggest direct impact Week one. Well, the one
Speaker 1: that's most likely to start is obviously Tristan worse. I
Speaker 1: know it's an easy answer. Wait, do you mean all
Speaker 1: the free agency? Yeah? I think he was including free
Speaker 1: agency as well. So if you want to give an
Speaker 1: answer this draft picks and then a free agency answer,
Speaker 1: that might be best. I gotta go with Tom Brady.
Speaker 1: I mean, I know I'll get dange for making the
Speaker 1: obvious choice, but how can you not talk? How can
Speaker 1: it not be the quarter? How about your second choice? Then?
Speaker 1: Since we knew that was just uh so if re
Speaker 1: signings count, um, maybe in domin Quin Sue, I mean,
Speaker 1: Shack Bett was the big priority there. But you know,
Speaker 1: sacks are kind of a fickle stat and go up
Speaker 1: and down. But a guy that's constantly eating up double
Speaker 1: team blocks and creating opportunities for pass rush for other guys, uh,
Speaker 1: that would be a big a guy who's probably making
Speaker 1: an impact on snaps. Um, if we're talking just new
Speaker 1: guys and they're not talking about Tom Brady, it's probably
Speaker 1: Tristan worse because he should be starting there in an
Speaker 1: offensive lineman play every snap generally barring injury, and uh,
Speaker 1: he's helping keep the pass rush off Tom Brady. Everything
Speaker 1: else has that has to happen first before you can
Speaker 1: utilize all these new weapons that you have. I give
Speaker 1: the quarterback in the first round draft pick as the answer.
Speaker 1: But it may be obvious, but it's also true, So well,
Speaker 1: that's how you want it. I mean, that's it would
Speaker 1: probably be a problem if you didn't feel about um. Sevastian,
Speaker 1: who's watching from Germany, wanted to know if we're sort
Speaker 1: of in the second wave of free agency now that
Speaker 1: the draft is over and there are any more potential
Speaker 1: free agents that might be signed now that we know
Speaker 1: who we've gotten in the draft. I think the second
Speaker 1: wave of free agency is actually late March and early April.
Speaker 1: The first wave is just the first couple of days
Speaker 1: when all the really coveted guys get contracts right away
Speaker 1: because teams know they have to act right away. But
Speaker 1: then there's generally some pretty decent signings in the back
Speaker 1: half of March and the early days of April. I
Speaker 1: would call this the third wave of free agency. And
Speaker 1: this is when UM teams get done with the draft
Speaker 1: and realized, not realized, but know that there was They
Speaker 1: may have had six things on their shopping list and
Speaker 1: they only got five. They didn't know what that's that
Speaker 1: one they missed was gonna be before the draft. Now
Speaker 1: they know, and so some team might need a fourth
Speaker 1: receiver or another safety for some death or something like that.
Speaker 1: So I think we're in the third wave of free
Speaker 1: agency right now. We've already talked a little bit about that.
Speaker 1: The Bucks have been so aggressive and they really were
Speaker 1: fortunate to meet what were there obviously biggest needs in
Speaker 1: free agency. I mean the draft right down to Tyler
Speaker 1: Johnson in the fifth round, the third receiver candidate there.
Speaker 1: So I think at this point for the Buccaneers the
Speaker 1: third wave is just about depth. Okay, and Devin asked,
Speaker 1: do you see Donovan Smith moving to right tackle and
Speaker 1: Works playing left tackle? I wouldn't think so, not this year.
Speaker 1: It could happen down the line. I would suspect Donovan
Speaker 1: Smith's days of left tackle for UM, the remainder of
Speaker 1: at least the remainder of this contract, which has a
Speaker 1: couple more years on it. Um. You know, Tristan Works
Speaker 1: has demonstrated that he can play right tackle. We already
Speaker 1: know that. Um. Again, we have to say this a
Speaker 1: lot of times when we talk about Donovan Smith. I
Speaker 1: think Pete fans and and and and people that cover
Speaker 1: the team maybe don't know the extent to which Diamond
Speaker 1: Smith is valued inside the building. I think that our
Speaker 1: coaches think he's very good. I think they think he
Speaker 1: had his best season last year. I don't foresee them
Speaker 1: making that move because then you basically have two new
Speaker 1: guys at two spots rather than one guy one new guy.
Speaker 1: And I know that it's it's not as easy to
Speaker 1: switch sides as everybody makes it seem, which you know,
Speaker 1: I know, it seems like, oh, they're both tackle positions,
Speaker 1: you just switch sides. But I've talked to multiple guys
Speaker 1: that had played tackle, including Donovan and other guys, and
Speaker 1: asked about it, and they're like, yeah, I mean everything
Speaker 1: is about muscle memory, and you've trained your body to
Speaker 1: be doing everything in this one direction. There'd be a
Speaker 1: learning curve as were just says, yes, it's the same position,
Speaker 1: but your body doesn't just automatically adjust to to doing
Speaker 1: everything is reactionary as it would have on the other side.
Speaker 1: So I don't think that's quite as easy as a
Speaker 1: switch as people seem to think it is. Um Rodney,
Speaker 1: that was that was a good explanation of what I
Speaker 1: was trying to say. Thank you, Yeah, and it's funny
Speaker 1: because I I also if people want to google it.
Speaker 1: Tristan Works was asked about this and had a very
Speaker 1: funny answer about what it's like to try to switch sides,
Speaker 1: that it's it's a it's a rather colorful answer that
Speaker 1: I'll just let people go google on their own, but
Speaker 1: it is very funny. Rodney asked, what do you think
Speaker 1: about Tyler Johnson? Well, I know that they absolutely loved him. Um,
Speaker 1: you know, he was available in the fifth round for
Speaker 1: for two reasons. One, there was just so much depth
Speaker 1: in this draft at wide receiver. I think he probably
Speaker 1: would have been a second or third round pick in
Speaker 1: a normal draft. Uh, in a normal draft class of receivers.
Speaker 1: I did a little look at and did a story
Speaker 1: on buccaneers dot com about how the receivers fell in
Speaker 1: that draft and and as expected, there was a big
Speaker 1: run on just blue chip guys in the first round,
Speaker 1: and then there was the run continued all through the
Speaker 1: second round. I mean, the receivers were just flying off
Speaker 1: the board. But when you look at it, you probably
Speaker 1: had most of the teams that had receiver like a
Speaker 1: guy they need to be one of their top two
Speaker 1: starters as a need they were able to meet that
Speaker 1: in the first and second round, so then there was
Speaker 1: a lull on receivers. Only I think six more went
Speaker 1: in the third and fourth round combined, which isn't very
Speaker 1: many at all compared to most years. And my theory
Speaker 1: is that's because all the teams that really felt like
Speaker 1: they had to get a number one or two receiver
Speaker 1: had met that need in the first and second rounds
Speaker 1: because there were so many available. But then there's a lull,
Speaker 1: and then the fifth round came and the Buccaneers got
Speaker 1: the second receiver in that round, and then six more went.
Speaker 1: There were eight receivers taken in the fifth round, and
Speaker 1: you could hear the analysts on TV going, I mean
Speaker 1: about three or four him just I can't believe they
Speaker 1: got this guy in the fifth round. But that's just
Speaker 1: because what was available. That's the most receivers that have
Speaker 1: ever been taken in in any fifth round since the
Speaker 1: nineteen seventy merger. So I just think the draft fell
Speaker 1: right for the Buccaneers to get a guy that they
Speaker 1: wouldn't be able to get in normal years if they
Speaker 1: wanted to get that safety in that running back in
Speaker 1: the second and third round, and then there are some
Speaker 1: parts of his testing that don't jump off the page
Speaker 1: at you. And he didn't get to run at combine,
Speaker 1: so uh, you know it was probably that because from
Speaker 1: a production standpoint, from a route running standpoint, uh, from
Speaker 1: an ability to get to get open, the Bucks loved
Speaker 1: everything about him. So I think I think the Bucks
Speaker 1: are absolutely real about this pig announced. Marco asked what
Speaker 1: holes do the Bucks need to fill at this time
Speaker 1: if any? I don't think there's a starting job that
Speaker 1: really needs to be filled. Um, you know, we got
Speaker 1: the whole front seven backup and Karl Nassevuh, yeah, I don't.
Speaker 1: I don't think there's a starting hole. So it's just
Speaker 1: a matter of depth. You could maybe use a little
Speaker 1: more depth as we talked about earlier on the interior line. Um,
Speaker 1: I don't know. Okay, see I don't. I don't think
Speaker 1: there's a lot of holes on this on this dep tart,
Speaker 1: which is it's a really great point. I mean, that's
Speaker 1: that's what you that's what you want to hear. It's
Speaker 1: a it's an optimistic way to put it. You're you're
Speaker 1: hoping that everything you did works out and probably if
Speaker 1: you get your moves to work out. You're in great shape,
Speaker 1: but right now it's hard to look at the depth
Speaker 1: chart on paper and see if they which is that's
Speaker 1: what Bucks fans want to hear. I'm sure well that's
Speaker 1: gonna do it for us on this edition of Buccaneers
Speaker 1: Insider Live, present it by Miller Lte. Thanks to all
Speaker 1: of you for joining us. We'll see you back here
Speaker 1: next week. M M m