Speaker 1: All right, thanks Scott Shannon, and thanks to all of
Speaker 1: you for being with us. Right down our toll free
Speaker 1: telephone number. You want to be a part of this
Speaker 1: Extravaganza's eight hundred and nine four one, Sean, if you
Speaker 1: want to be with us, We're going to get into
Speaker 1: the raid on Rudy Giuliani's apartment in his office. And
Speaker 1: the fact that apparently Google same well sorry not Google, Apple,
Speaker 1: the same Apple that wouldn't allow the FBI or help
Speaker 1: the FBI to get into the iPhone of the San
Speaker 1: Bernardino shooter, you know, didn't seem to have any problem
Speaker 1: at all allowing the investigators from whatever bureau get to
Speaker 1: Rudy Giulianni's eCloud. And apparently they did this in twenty
Speaker 1: nineteen while he was representing President Trump, at a point
Speaker 1: when presidential privilege and attorney client privilege was in full exist,
Speaker 1: and they knew everything that was going on, at least
Speaker 1: everything that's uploaded to the cloud, which a lot of
Speaker 1: people I think is everything. What the hell do I
Speaker 1: know about a cloud? Don't come to me for computer advice.
Speaker 1: I'm the worst guy to ask. Barely can download an app. Still,
Speaker 1: this is not gonna be good. This should be concerning
Speaker 1: to everybody here. So we all followed the case of
Speaker 1: Officer Chauvin and the guilty verdicts in the George Floyd case.
Speaker 1: Now he's waiting. It was about what I think we
Speaker 1: were going to wait eight weeks till setting thing. If
Speaker 1: I recall correctly and anyway, there might be a new
Speaker 1: basis for an appeal of that murder conviction because a
Speaker 1: juror failed to reveal to the court that he was
Speaker 1: a supporter of Black Lives Matter, and a photo recently
Speaker 1: emerged online of one of the jurors in this case
Speaker 1: wearing a Black Lives Matter T shirt. It has now
Speaker 1: sparked questions about his impartiality and the juror, Brandon Mitchell,
Speaker 1: could be seen in the photo wearing the T shirt
Speaker 1: emblaze him with a picture of Martin Luther King Junior
Speaker 1: and the phrases get your knee off our neck and BLM.
Speaker 1: And he's also wearing a Black Lives Matter hat in
Speaker 1: the photo. Now, during the jury selection process, each prospective
Speaker 1: juror is required to answer a questionnaire and that includes
Speaker 1: questions about participation and demonstrations and protests. Did you or
Speaker 1: someone close to you participate in any of the demonstrations
Speaker 1: or marches against police brutality that took place in Minneapolis
Speaker 1: after George Floyd's death. That was one of the questions.
Speaker 1: Another one was, other than that you have already described above,
Speaker 1: have you or anyone close to you participated in protests
Speaker 1: about police use of force or police brutality now? He
Speaker 1: told the Star Tribune that he replied no to both questions,
Speaker 1: but he also admitted that his t shirt the photo
Speaker 1: was actually taken at a rally in Washington, d C.
Speaker 1: Last summer commemorating mlk's famous nineteen sixty three I have
Speaker 1: a dream speech. I think I was being extremely honest,
Speaker 1: he says, regarding the jury selection process, I gave my
Speaker 1: views on everything on the case on Black Lives Matter.
Speaker 1: Jury consultant that was questioned by The Washington Post that
Speaker 1: his answers could lead to an appeal for Chauvin's attorney
Speaker 1: and the judge could also call in this particular juror
Speaker 1: for questioning and yeah, quote, this could change the outcome
Speaker 1: of things. If there's anything that makes him seem that
Speaker 1: he was not forthcoming, it could absolutely be an avenue
Speaker 1: for the judge to reconsider the case. I Meanwhile, civil
Speaker 1: rights attorney Brian Dunn told The Washington Post that the
Speaker 1: photo was undeniably suggestive of a possible bias in this juror.
Speaker 1: He said a more detailed review would be needed. At
Speaker 1: the worst part of this is that means, oh, this
Speaker 1: may not be over. There's an Axios piece out there.
Speaker 1: What's next? A violent summer on America's streets? They're writing,
Speaker 1: it appears to be likely given the homicides already that
Speaker 1: appeared to be trending above last year's record highs. Homicide
Speaker 1: rates historically spiked during summer months when the hotter weather
Speaker 1: puts more people on the streets, and vaccination coverage is increasing.
Speaker 1: In the pandemic and all its knock on effects won't
Speaker 1: be finished by then, Summer at twenty twenty one is
Speaker 1: going to be abnormally violent. I hope to god that's
Speaker 1: not true. John Roman, a senior fellow at the Economics,
Speaker 1: Justice and Society Group at NRC at the University of Chicago, writing,
Speaker 1: it's the new normal. Why do we have to accept
Speaker 1: that as the new normal? Why? Why should you know
Speaker 1: dozens of shootings every weekend in Chicago be acceptable? Why
Speaker 1: don't we hear? I mean, why isn't we only hear
Speaker 1: from the high profile cases or the case that involves
Speaker 1: the cop, which is the slimmest majority of cases. Why
Speaker 1: isn't there a focus like a laser bead on the
Speaker 1: most violent cities in America and the weekly statistics, the
Speaker 1: daily statistics. Sometimes you should have seen this video that's
Speaker 1: out there, woman randomly sucker punching and robbing, you know,
Speaker 1: someone in the New York City subway. I mean it
Speaker 1: was a harsh sucker punch and robbery caught on video.
Speaker 1: And you know, it's just none of this is good.
Speaker 1: You get all these videos that are out there. There's
Speaker 1: a video out there of a woman spewing horrible verbal
Speaker 1: attacks against an La County Deputy sheriff. The driver tell
Speaker 1: in the La County deputy calling him a murderer and
Speaker 1: a racist attack. Han on video. You'll you'll you'll never
Speaker 1: be white because you're a murderer. Yes, I started to
Speaker 1: record because you can't be on your cell phone while
Speaker 1: you're driving. Phone. I was recording you because you can't
Speaker 1: use your cell phone while you have your driver's license.
Speaker 1: It's it's at my apartment and I'm perfect legal and
Speaker 1: I'm a teacher. So then congratulations, you're a murderer. It's
Speaker 1: only citing you for using your cell phone and while
Speaker 1: you're driving. That's it for him being a Mexican racist?
Speaker 1: What is that name? Gas on the citation? Man? Here
Speaker 1: you go, Mexican racist. You're always going to be a Mexican.
Speaker 1: You'll never be white, you know that, right? Well, what
Speaker 1: is wrong with people? I mean, who wants to who
Speaker 1: wants to be a cop? Today? Get an employee in
Speaker 1: Seattle fired after refusing to serve a police officer at
Speaker 1: a chocolate chop. An employee fired for refusing to serve
Speaker 1: the officer last week, The store's owner said, in an
Speaker 1: about face after initially backing the worker's freedom of speech,
Speaker 1: good grief. Now you got this this image of this
Speaker 1: black lives amount of a a T shirt in the show case.
Speaker 1: That's just awful. Now we do have some numbers Chicago
Speaker 1: shootings and murder murders and now outpacing the record high
Speaker 1: of twenty twenty. It's unbelievable. And you know, you think,
Speaker 1: just when they can't get worse, it's getting worse. Now,
Speaker 1: just for give you the facts. The murders and shootings
Speaker 1: are outpacing twenty twenty eight hundred and thirty two shootings
Speaker 1: in Chicago eight hundred and thirty two as of April thirtieth,
Speaker 1: from which nine hundred ninety seven people were wounded. In
Speaker 1: other words, eight hundred and thirty two shooting events and
Speaker 1: ninety seven wounded. Police set announcing the statistics. The year
Speaker 1: to date figures show a stark increase compared to the
Speaker 1: last time this time last year, where there was only
Speaker 1: seven hundred and eighteen people that were struck, only six
Speaker 1: hundred thirty six and twenty three shootings. Don't you think
Speaker 1: that's record high? Is high enough? Now we're now we're
Speaker 1: up by a third, one hundred and eighty seven people
Speaker 1: so far killed from January first to April thirtieth in Chicago.
Speaker 1: Here's a question I have. Can any of you ask yourself?
Speaker 1: Do you know the names of anybody shot and killed
Speaker 1: in the city of Chicago? Can you think of anybody?
Speaker 1: Can you think of one name? Can you remember one name?
Speaker 1: Because we only hear about the names when it advances
Speaker 1: a political agenda. Doesn't every life matter many case? I'm
Speaker 1: sure some of these names are African Americans, Every life
Speaker 1: does matter. Chicago police have taken more than three thousand,
Speaker 1: six hundred guns, including one hundred and fifty so called
Speaker 1: assault weapons, off the street as they call them. You
Speaker 1: know the number of murders reported in April, I mean
Speaker 1: fifty three. Look, I'm just giving you the numbers. Most
Speaker 1: Portland Riots suspects won't be prosecuted, according to a US attorney,
Speaker 1: David Bouchard, admitting he put a Customs Border Protection officer
Speaker 1: in a chokehold and lo and behold. Charles Comfort was
Speaker 1: indicted by a grand jury of civil disorder for twice
Speaker 1: charging at the Portland Police Bureau officers, hitting number the
Speaker 1: makeshift shield, and then kicking a third officer while being arrested.
Speaker 1: Both men faced federal charges stemming from their actions during
Speaker 1: the summer of more than one hundred knights of violent protests.
Speaker 1: But Bouchard and Comfort, oh, they're just among dozens of
Speaker 1: Portland federal arrestees whose cases are dismissed, being deferred. Not
Speaker 1: a day behind bars, not one day for attacking a
Speaker 1: police officer. Want to be again? You want to be
Speaker 1: a cop? And then the obvious question, God forbid it
Speaker 1: happens to you who are you going to call? And
Speaker 1: what are you going to do? You ask me that question.
Speaker 1: I'm going to keep my answer to myself except to
Speaker 1: say that I take I will defend myself and people
Speaker 1: that I care about, and it's some people. It's unbelievable.
Speaker 1: I just can't get over this. We'll play this tape
Speaker 1: again of this woman. Why would this teacher? Now, if
Speaker 1: I was the head of a school district and this
Speaker 1: teacher is on tape talking to a cop this way,
Speaker 1: I would think that maybe that teacher is not qualified
Speaker 1: a teacher. But maybe I'm maybe I'm overreacting here. You
Speaker 1: you decide. I pulled you over because you're a murderer. Yes,
Speaker 1: I started to record because you can't be on your
Speaker 1: cell phone while you're driving. Phone. I was recording you
Speaker 1: because you can't use your cell phone while you have
Speaker 1: your driver's license. It's it's at my apartment and I'm
Speaker 1: perfectly legal and I'm a teacher. So there, congratulations, you're
Speaker 1: a murderer. It's only citing you for using your cell
Speaker 1: phone and while you're driving. That's it for him being
Speaker 1: a Mexican racist. What is that name? Gas on the
Speaker 1: citation man? Here you go, Mexican racist. You're always going
Speaker 1: to be a Mexican. You'll never be white, you know that, right,
Speaker 1: A murderer, a Mexican racist, you're always going to be.
Speaker 1: I don't even know what to say. I feel so
Speaker 1: bad for that cop. Guy's doing his job. What what?
Speaker 1: What is wrong with people? Right as we roll along
Speaker 1: eight hundred and nine one sean you want to be
Speaker 1: a part of the program. Apparently hot mic moment, and
Speaker 1: it may be an indicator that Liz Cheney's days are
Speaker 1: numbered as a member of the House GOP leadership. Anyway,
Speaker 1: the newer report that is out says that Kevin McCarthy
Speaker 1: has done defending Congresswoman Cheney, signaling that, you know, the
Speaker 1: anti Trump lawmakers days as House Republican Conference chairwoman may
Speaker 1: be numbered. I know from a lot of people that
Speaker 1: I know in Congress that are Republicans, they don't want
Speaker 1: her in that position. And he said that he's lost
Speaker 1: confidence in Cheney during an off air hot mic moment
Speaker 1: with Steve Doocey on Fox and Friends. According to Axios,
Speaker 1: I think she's got real problems. I've I've had it
Speaker 1: with her, you know, I've lost confidence. Someone just has
Speaker 1: to bring emotion, but I assume that will probably take place.
Speaker 1: He stated in the interview that with do see that
Speaker 1: House Republicans are concerned about whether Cheney can continue her
Speaker 1: leadership duties as she continues to drive a wedge between
Speaker 1: Republicans with her critical comments regarding former President Trump. Look,
Speaker 1: I don't really care that much. I've never got too
Speaker 1: involved in this whole. You know, if you want to
Speaker 1: call yourself a Republican and you're not and help elect
Speaker 1: Joe Biden liked the Lincoln Project, I'm actually okay with that.
Speaker 1: I wish you'd be a little more honest about it.
Speaker 1: You can't say because Donald Trump governed conservatively, or say
Speaker 1: I like his policies, but I don't agree with this style.
Speaker 1: Just be honest. But they try and run around I
Speaker 1: wear a Republican, they're not Republicans, and I think this
Speaker 1: is where a lot of people. Well, what's frustrating, though,
Speaker 1: is Liz Cheney seems to just have her own agenda
Speaker 1: over that of the position that she holds. She may
Speaker 1: run for president. I don't even think she can get reelected.
Speaker 1: I don't think Mitt Romney can get reelected. I'm not
Speaker 1: I don't even think Lisa Murkowski, she's in trouble in Alaska.
Speaker 1: Not that I disliked them, I'm just saying that they're
Speaker 1: not where the base of this party is at this moment.
Speaker 1: All right, twenty five to the top of the hour,
Speaker 1: eight hundred and ninety four one, Sean, you want to
Speaker 1: be a part of the program, here's what I say.
Speaker 1: And some people want me to be worked up, want
Speaker 1: me to be angry, want me to be upset over
Speaker 1: the Lincoln Project and Mitt Romney's of the world than
Speaker 1: the Liz Chenneys of the world. You know. The sad
Speaker 1: thing in the case of both Say Romney and Liz
Speaker 1: Cheney is that the base of the party, you know,
Speaker 1: they went all in to support the Cheneys and the Romney's.
Speaker 1: They went all in, and many people that knew, for example,
Speaker 1: that maybe Mitt Romney wasn't as conservative as them, they
Speaker 1: still saw that he was a better option. In twenty twelve,
Speaker 1: I was the same option as two thousand and eight
Speaker 1: with John McCain, and you just you just don't have
Speaker 1: a choice. You go all in. And I was warning
Speaker 1: of the radicalism of Obama and his background and his
Speaker 1: associations and his black liberation theology is the chum gang
Speaker 1: Frank Marshall, Davis Olinsky And you know what is a
Speaker 1: community organizer The Church of g D America airs dorn
Speaker 1: unrepentant domestic terrorists. Yeah, I'll support anybody over that. That
Speaker 1: wasn't that hard and uh and it was amazing because
Speaker 1: the people that ran that campaign didn't have the smarts,
Speaker 1: the wherewithal, the fight in them to do these things.
Speaker 1: You know, when you know at the time, I've still
Speaker 1: to this day believe that the battle in the war
Speaker 1: on terror was justified and needed and necessary and based
Speaker 1: on the images of weapons of mass destruction it used
Speaker 1: on their his own people of Saddam Hussein, I still
Speaker 1: believe in the lead up to the war is probably moved,
Speaker 1: but I can't prove it. So it's it's a long
Speaker 1: ago discussion. And the good news for our military is
Speaker 1: military technological advancement has made has transformed future conflicts and
Speaker 1: how we're going to fight them with pinpoint accuracy. Guy
Speaker 1: in Tampa, Florida, can you know, take out anybody any
Speaker 1: place anywhere in the world at any time. I may
Speaker 1: look at the operation against Solomani, the world's biggest terror
Speaker 1: from the world's largest terror state of her own. It's
Speaker 1: a pretty amazing thing. So I don't get worked up.
Speaker 1: I do think that there is a disconnect. It's sort
Speaker 1: of like, and if Liz Cheney wants to run for president,
Speaker 1: let to run for president. But if she's going to
Speaker 1: make it about her and her agenda and her agendas
Speaker 1: at odds the rest of the caucus, then at that
Speaker 1: point I don't think she warned some position and leadership. Well,
Speaker 1: you conservatives are intolerant, you don't take people of different
Speaker 1: points of view. I have no problem with that. The
Speaker 1: agenda being a Conservative, I keep telling people, is very simple,
Speaker 1: keep it simple, stupid. The party of liberty, freedom, capitalism,
Speaker 1: and our great Constitution, including the First and Second Amendment.
Speaker 1: It's the party that believes in law and order and
Speaker 1: safety and security for every town and every city in America.
Speaker 1: Conservatism is about choice in public schools and breaking up
Speaker 1: the unholy alliance of teachers unions with the Radical Democratic
Speaker 1: Socialist Party. It's also about free market solutions for healthcare
Speaker 1: and yes, protecting preexisting conditions. In case you were wondering.
Speaker 1: We believe in people that will won't legislate from the bench,
Speaker 1: that are constitutionalists that they will serve their role only
Speaker 1: as defined by what it means to be in the judiciary.
Speaker 1: Original Ism constitutionalists. We believe in lower taxes, limited government,
Speaker 1: less government bureaucracy is possible so that we don't stifle
Speaker 1: and put a stranglehold on business. Same with taxes. You know,
Speaker 1: high taxes prevents investment. We believe in safe and secure
Speaker 1: borders and legal immigration. We believe in energy and dependence.
Speaker 1: We believe in peace through strength, the biggest badass military
Speaker 1: on the face of this earth, and free and fair trade.
Speaker 1: Tell me what I'm missing, because if you say you
Speaker 1: are a conservative, then those are the things that I
Speaker 1: have pretty much supported my entire career, thirty three years
Speaker 1: on radio. I can now just break it down into
Speaker 1: less than a minute. And that is what conservatism should
Speaker 1: be about. And yeah, you're gonna have variations. Reagan once said,
Speaker 1: if we agree eighty percent of the time, you're not
Speaker 1: my enemy. But they're making it personal now. If they
Speaker 1: have a problem with Donald Trump's style, state it fine.
Speaker 1: You have a problem with his style. He tweets too much,
Speaker 1: he's too combative, not presidential, whatever you want to say,
Speaker 1: I don't care. But he also fought and fought hard,
Speaker 1: something that prior to Trump many Republicans did not do.
Speaker 1: Being nice to Barack Obama and his campaign and ignoring
Speaker 1: Jeremiah Wright and airs En Dorn didn't really serve the
Speaker 1: McCain campaign. Well neither did you know? What happened to
Speaker 1: Hurricane Sandy did not help either. If you remember, the
Speaker 1: economic down turn at that time was rough, and that man,
Speaker 1: it became inevitable as a bit of a movement. Okay,
Speaker 1: they have wave elections all the time. That happens. Twenty
Speaker 1: twelve could have been one. I don't whoever advised Romney
Speaker 1: or if he's following his own council, to take his
Speaker 1: foot off the gas in that second and third debate.
Speaker 1: Especially the third debate, I remember screaming at his staff saying,
Speaker 1: what the hell have you done here? You just lost
Speaker 1: the election. It was such a bad debate performance and
Speaker 1: he was not aggressive enough, and that's what happens in elections.
Speaker 1: I have no problem whatsoever with some disagreement within the
Speaker 1: Republican ranks. So there's this three minute ad. We're gonna
Speaker 1: show part of it tonight as a preview because we'll
Speaker 1: be in California tomorrow. Caitlyn Jenner is running. It was
Speaker 1: a it's a fascinating Linda. Can you put that one?
Speaker 1: I sent it to you guys earlier today. Put it
Speaker 1: up on Hannity dot com. We'll tweet it out at
Speaker 1: Sean Hannity. And it's three minutes long, and it's very
Speaker 1: reminiscent in the lead up to this interview tomorrow night.
Speaker 1: And I know, I'm guessing, I don't know for sure.
Speaker 1: Caitlyn Jenner could have had an interview with anybody. And
Speaker 1: I think the reason is is because Caitlyn Jenner is
Speaker 1: serious about substance policy governance. And what really caught me
Speaker 1: in this ad that they put out. It's really well done.
Speaker 1: I mean this this thing was killer. It was a
Speaker 1: great and I look, I've looked at campaign ads my
Speaker 1: whole career, and it's actually worth playing. I wish you
Speaker 1: could see the images of it. Will show it tonight
Speaker 1: on Hannity. But again, it's three minutes. I'll run as
Speaker 1: long as I think you might be interested. But I
Speaker 1: thought it was a phenomenal ad. But just to finish
Speaker 1: the circle here is I think the reason that she
Speaker 1: decided to come and do my show is because she
Speaker 1: wants us to be about substance, about political substance and
Speaker 1: specificity in plans for a state that is way off course.
Speaker 1: The state with thirteen and a half percent income attacks
Speaker 1: is the highest in the country, a sanctuary state, a
Speaker 1: state that was basically shut down by a governor that
Speaker 1: was having his own fun times and restaurants when nobody
Speaker 1: else could listen. I've always been a dreamer. California was
Speaker 1: once the envy. We had what everyone else wanted. The
Speaker 1: American dream grew up here. Politicians and their policies have
Speaker 1: destroyed that dream. It's been locked away, closed, shut her,
Speaker 1: left in the dark, burned down. The government is now
Speaker 1: involved in every part of our lives. They've taken our money,
Speaker 1: our jobs, and our freedom. California needs a disruption, a
Speaker 1: compassionate discruction. I came here with a dream forty eight
Speaker 1: years ago to be the greatest athlete of the world.
Speaker 1: Now I enter a different kind of race. Are you
Speaker 1: agree my most important one yet? To save California. I
Speaker 1: don't care if you're a Republican Democrat. I'm ready to
Speaker 1: be governor for all Californias, to reflame our true identity,
Speaker 1: to bring back the gold, to the Golden State. Now
Speaker 1: is the time to achieve that something, to be the
Speaker 1: shining city on the hill, and together we'll restore and
Speaker 1: renew the California dream. It's about what happens you're here.
Speaker 1: It's not person it's about all of us. So it's
Speaker 1: it's well done. We'll put it up on Hannity dot com.
Speaker 1: Um a couple of interesting lines that she makes in
Speaker 1: this head. California needs a disruptor, a compassionate disruptor. I
Speaker 1: came here with a dream forty eight years ago to
Speaker 1: be the greatest athlete in the world. But when you're
Speaker 1: when that the cathalon that makes you the gold and
Speaker 1: you you become the greatest athlete in the world. There's
Speaker 1: so many different aspects to it. Um. One thing I've
Speaker 1: known about every athlete I've ever met in my life,
Speaker 1: any serious athlete, is the amount of work, the amount
Speaker 1: of commitment, what it takes to be to take even
Speaker 1: if you have natural talent to take it just even
Speaker 1: a notch higher where you need to be to be
Speaker 1: a super excelling athlete. It's unbelievable discipline and work. And
Speaker 1: you know I'm saying I came here forty eight years
Speaker 1: ago with a dream to be the greatest athlete in
Speaker 1: the world. Now I'm entering a different kind of race,
Speaker 1: arguably the most important one yet to save California. So
Speaker 1: I'm actually very interested. And I guess maybe thinking out well,
Speaker 1: the people of California recall Gavin Newsom and can Caitlyn
Speaker 1: Caitlyn Jenner win that race. There's probably gonna be a
Speaker 1: lot of people that get in. She must have what
Speaker 1: you know, name recognition, and it's but it's the substance.
Speaker 1: And and that was the interesting part of you know,
Speaker 1: we had a short call. I said, I'd love to
Speaker 1: interview you and um and I said, I want this
Speaker 1: to be about real issues and anyway, so I hope
Speaker 1: you'll too in tomorrow. It's gonna be interesting. I'll show
Speaker 1: you some of us tonight on TV. Oh, by the way,
Speaker 1: they see a horrible video that came out, another beating,
Speaker 1: brutal beating of two Asian women, which has now become
Speaker 1: it's been happening way too often, and this time in Baltimore.
Speaker 1: A guy's now behind bars. I guess we should be
Speaker 1: thankful it didn't happen in New York because they'd be
Speaker 1: out of jail by now anyway, showing and pummeling two
Speaker 1: female Korean store owners with a cinder block. How could
Speaker 1: people treat other people like this in life? What the
Speaker 1: hell is wrong with them? How does that happen? So sad?
Speaker 1: By the way, is that picture, I'm sure it is
Speaker 1: if it's in the daily mail. It's a daily mail
Speaker 1: picture of Joe and Joe Biden maskless while sitting, you know,
Speaker 1: on top of like, right next to former President Jimmy
Speaker 1: Carter ninety six years old and his wife, Rosslyn ninety
Speaker 1: three years old. It's such a it's so phony, all
Speaker 1: of this coronavirus Joe stuff. I'm wearing to be extra
Speaker 1: careful outside. By the way, only thirty six percent of
Speaker 1: Americans Rasmussen called Biden's policy successful, that's it in his
Speaker 1: first hundred days of office. Forty one percent say they've
Speaker 1: been a failure. By the way, school kids, this was
Speaker 1: an interesting thing on Fox news dot Com. Students at
Speaker 1: a Virginia fifth grade classroom telling President Biden Joe Biden
Speaker 1: Virtual learning gave them the chance to eat, take naps
Speaker 1: at even fake technical glitches in order to avoid answering questions. Wow.
Speaker 1: Basically that Zoom calls schools were a disaster, not good
Speaker 1: at all. You have This is the most interesting thing
Speaker 1: I saw today. Top Biden economists urging the whole world
Speaker 1: to raise corporate taxes. Now, this is the second Biden appointee.
Speaker 1: Remember Janet Yellen said it. In this case, it's Cecilia Rouse,
Speaker 1: chair of the Council of Economic Advisors Biden administration, urging
Speaker 1: trading partners to adopt a global minimum tax on corporations
Speaker 1: to offset the effects of Joe Biden's domestic corporate tax increase.
Speaker 1: You know what that is, Let's conspire government to government
Speaker 1: against the people of all of our countries so that
Speaker 1: we can take as much money as possible from one
Speaker 1: group of people and redistributed to a larger group of
Speaker 1: people who become dependent on us, so we can stay
Speaker 1: in power and perpetuity. That's what that proposal is about.
Speaker 1: Another pole that Americans believe the country is more divided
Speaker 1: under Joe Biden. I thought everyone loved Joe Biden. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I guess not, Popsie Daisy. Sorry, didn't work out that way.
Speaker 1: And he's still lying. Anyone making less than fourter a
Speaker 1: thousand dollars a year will not pay a single penny
Speaker 1: taxes lie. If one economist, University of Maryland professor penning
Speaker 1: On op ed Biden's woke economics will lead to a disaster,
Speaker 1: I actually believe that too. And Hunter Biden still has
Speaker 1: a holdings in a Chinese investment firm in defiance of
Speaker 1: his father's promise. That was in biz Pack Review right
Speaker 1: an hour two Sean Hannity Show eight hundred and nine
Speaker 1: for one Sean, you want to be a part of
Speaker 1: this extravaganza. By the way, amazing out. Three major news
Speaker 1: organizations got a story about Mayor Rudy Giulianni wrong, you know,
Speaker 1: incorrect information supposedly from government sources that led let's see
Speaker 1: New York Times, Washington Post, NBC News to all get
Speaker 1: it wrong as they reported that the FBI had briefed
Speaker 1: Rudy Giuliani that he was the target of a Russia
Speaker 1: disinformation campaign during his efforts to dig up unflattering information
Speaker 1: about Joe Biden. You know the worst part of all
Speaker 1: of this, Unless you listen to a show like this,
Speaker 1: or watch Hannity on Fox and a couple of or
Speaker 1: listen to a couple of other shows, there's not a
Speaker 1: lot of US and maybe watch a couple of other shows,
Speaker 1: not a lot of us. You wouldn't know that the
Speaker 1: person that bought and paid for a dirty Russian disinformation
Speaker 1: dossier was Hillary Clinton. I know, maybe it just sticks
Speaker 1: in my crawl a little bit bit. The other utter
Speaker 1: hypocrisy of all of this. So we had Rudy on
Speaker 1: last night, and we spent a lot of time talking
Speaker 1: about these federal investigators that rated the apartment any office
Speaker 1: of Rudy Giuliani, America's mayor. And now we have as
Speaker 1: we move forward with all of this, a lot of
Speaker 1: unanswered questions that really need to be resolved. You know,
Speaker 1: another pre dawn raid. They're saying, well, Rudy's under investigation
Speaker 1: for a potential violation. A fairer violation is when you
Speaker 1: don't register fill out the proper government paperwork for foreign
Speaker 1: work with the US federal government. And I asked Rudy
Speaker 1: last night, I said, well, my understanding is is that
Speaker 1: most of your work, if not I found all of
Speaker 1: it had to do with the legitimate investigation into zero
Speaker 1: experience Hunter. We played it yesterday, you know, on Good
Speaker 1: Morning America. Any experience in oil, energy gaspe Nope, Nope,
Speaker 1: any experience in Ukraine. No, and then Joe bragging, You're
Speaker 1: not getting the million dollars unless you fire the prosecutor
Speaker 1: I got. Let's see you got. You got six hours
Speaker 1: to fire that prosecutor, and son of it be they
Speaker 1: did it? Who was the prosecutor? Why would it a
Speaker 1: vice president in the United States want a prosecutor in
Speaker 1: freaking Ukraine. I bet most people can't even find Ukraine
Speaker 1: on a map, except you might know it's next to Russia.
Speaker 1: Why would they want or Ukraine a Ukrainian prosecutor to fire?
Speaker 1: Because they're investigating Hunter Biden and Barisma Holdings, that's why.
Speaker 1: And Joe's leveraging taxpayer dollars to get it. So that
Speaker 1: raises questions, Well, what about zero experienced Hunter? How is
Speaker 1: that possible? Remember the grass Lee Johnson Senate report. We
Speaker 1: have gone into great detail on this program because Barisma,
Speaker 1: with no experience, was paying Hunter Biden and his company
Speaker 1: millions of dollars zero experience. Hunter made money from them
Speaker 1: Ukrainian oil gas giant owned by a sketchy Ukrainian oligarch.
Speaker 1: Remember you got the three and a half million dollars
Speaker 1: wired transfer to his company from the Russian oligarch no
Speaker 1: better known as the First Lady of Moscow. Five million
Speaker 1: dollars from a state backed Chinese company with ties to
Speaker 1: the Chinese military. Got the hundred thousand dollars shopping spreegue
Speaker 1: courtesy of a prominent Chinese national. Hundred thousand from a
Speaker 1: Kazakh oligarch earmark for a brand new car. You know,
Speaker 1: doesn't have any experience any of this. Never mind the
Speaker 1: one point five billion dollar deal. Nothing ever happens, and
Speaker 1: I keep bringing up this issue. Is there a dual
Speaker 1: justice system? Now? Let me play Rudy Giuliani reacting to
Speaker 1: The New York Times, Washington Post, NBC retracting stories about
Speaker 1: him The New York Times, Washington Post, and NBC. I
Speaker 1: believe they had to attract stories about you, your reaction,
Speaker 1: my reactions the headline of the Washington Post. Shuliani briefed
Speaker 1: on Russian connection. They've been trying to make me a
Speaker 1: Russian Asian for about three years, which is totally nuts.
Speaker 1: I'm probably the biggest anti communist you've ever met. There's
Speaker 1: no way that I'm a Russian Asian or anybody else's agent.
Speaker 1: I was a lawyer who was representing a client who
Speaker 1: was innocent. The biggest burden a lawyer can have is
Speaker 1: to represent an innocent man. And I did it damn well,
Speaker 1: and I have exposed that our president as one of
Speaker 1: the biggest criminals in the history of the country. All Right,
Speaker 1: So there you go. That's Rudy's answer. Now you might
Speaker 1: remember the San Bernardino shooter case. Remember the FBI is
Speaker 1: asking Apple if they can get into the iPhone of
Speaker 1: the San Bernardino shooter. This is Apple's Tim Cook answering
Speaker 1: that question, do you really want to plant the flag
Speaker 1: on privacy and safety on side for Ruke's iPhone? I
Speaker 1: think safety of the public is incredibly important, safety of
Speaker 1: our kids, safety of our families is very important. The
Speaker 1: protection of people's data is incredibly important. And so the
Speaker 1: tradeoff here is we know that doing this could expose
Speaker 1: people to incredible vulnerabilities. This is not something that we
Speaker 1: would create. This would be bad for America. Bad for America.
Speaker 1: Now here's the question. Rudy was pointing out that apparently,
Speaker 1: while he was representing the president of the United States,
Speaker 1: that in fact, investigators were reading his iCloud messages in
Speaker 1: twenty nineteen. This is all in the lead up to impeachment. Well,
Speaker 1: how is it that it's it's bad for America when
Speaker 1: it's the San Bernardino shooter, but not bad for America. Again,
Speaker 1: you're supposed to have privilege with your doctor, you know,
Speaker 1: patient client privilege, attorney client privilege as the President of
Speaker 1: the United States not afforded that. Apparently not Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: David Shone Civil liberties attorney Greg Jarrett hosts the two
Speaker 1: number one best selling books and also hosts of his
Speaker 1: podcast The Brief. Welcome both of you back to the program. Greg,
Speaker 1: I'll start with you. It's a lot to unpack there. Yeah,
Speaker 1: in terms of accessing Giuliani's iCloud, I would hope that
Speaker 1: the government followed the law, and that means they asked
Speaker 1: to obtain either a subpoena or a search warrant or
Speaker 1: some other court order, take it to Apple and demand
Speaker 1: they comply by opening up that account. Apple would then
Speaker 1: have two courses of action. They could capitulate and it
Speaker 1: could have been done covertly so that Giliani didn't even know,
Speaker 1: or they could contest it in court. We have no
Speaker 1: evidence that they ever did that. So the question then becomes, well,
Speaker 1: if they already access to his iCloud. Why would they
Speaker 1: seize his electronic devices and cell phone. Well, the answer
Speaker 1: is not everything on your cell phone goes to the cloud.
Speaker 1: It depends on how much you upload and when you
Speaker 1: last uploaded it. So you know they as I said
Speaker 1: to you last night on your television program, this smacks
Speaker 1: of political persecution masquerading as a potential criminal prosecution. And
Speaker 1: you can't do it against a lawyer who's not getting
Speaker 1: paid by Ukrainian sources, but rather his client is President
Speaker 1: of the United States. He's acting at the direction that
Speaker 1: behest to the president, making him a de fact a
Speaker 1: member of the administration, which means Ferret is an apply
Speaker 1: and also as a lawyer, he's duty bound to conduct investigations,
Speaker 1: fact finding, obtaining of evidence, collection of information from sources,
Speaker 1: including sources abroad, then conveying that to his client. He's
Speaker 1: the president's advocate, not a lobbyist. Well, let me get
Speaker 1: to that question with David shown here and to me,
Speaker 1: I think Professor Dershowitz's analysis and Greg I think agrees
Speaker 1: with this that a subpoena would suffice in this case
Speaker 1: not going to somebody's eye cloud or not a pre
Speaker 1: dawn raid on Rudy Giuliani, the president's attorney. Yeah right.
Speaker 1: And by the way, there are special subpoena rules when
Speaker 1: an attorney's involved, and there has to be a tank
Speaker 1: team in place to make sure they're not getting privileged
Speaker 1: materials when they do it. But let's take a look
Speaker 1: at the bigger picture. The bigger picture here is shameless vindictiveness.
Speaker 1: Talk about turning things on their head Hunter boden of
Speaker 1: evades meaningful investigation when even the Wall Street Journal had
Speaker 1: called for that, had talked about the scandal years and
Speaker 1: years ago. But I'm going to suggest this to you.
Speaker 1: This administration is simply shamelessly vindictive. You know, President Trump
Speaker 1: had every right and through his Attorney general, to really
Speaker 1: thoroughly investigate and go after Hillary Clinton when he came
Speaker 1: into office. One would suggest that she certainly committed a
Speaker 1: crime with the destruction of the emails and the hard
Speaker 1: drive and all that. But they made a decision, whether
Speaker 1: political or otherwise, not to do that. This administration is
Speaker 1: taking the opposite tack. And I'm going to say this
Speaker 1: to you. You know, I don't want to be a
Speaker 1: Johnny one note, But we've talked in the past about
Speaker 1: Andrew Weisman, you have now in place the Deputy Attorney
Speaker 1: General who signs off on things now like surveillance, warrens
Speaker 1: and that sort of thing. Lisa Monico, who was an
Speaker 1: Andrew Weisman colleague, she worked at the FBI under Mueller
Speaker 1: as counsel like Weisman did. She was on the Enron
Speaker 1: Task Force. These are the sort of folks now being
Speaker 1: loaded into this administration. And when we talk about you know,
Speaker 1: surveillance tactics and now this partnership for domestic terrorists, surveillance
Speaker 1: supposedly circumventing the FIS accord and that sort of thing,
Speaker 1: you have a cabinet and other administration officials who were
Speaker 1: singly the most anti ally, especially anti Israel and pro
Speaker 1: Iran figures we've ever had in government. Probably this is
Speaker 1: a very scary situation we're facing. Well, it's beyond scary.
Speaker 1: Now you have to wonder where do you think they're
Speaker 1: going with this? It doesn't sound like Farah to me,
Speaker 1: Greg Jarrett. If Verdi Giuliani as the President's attorney is
Speaker 1: looking into what I thought was a slam dunk case
Speaker 1: about leveraging a billion dollars to fire a prosecutor investigating
Speaker 1: Joe Biden, then vice President's son, for getting millions with
Speaker 1: no experience. That kind of sounds a syndicate to me,
Speaker 1: it does. It sounds corrupt, doesn't it, which is a
Speaker 1: classic you know, FBI Department of Justice. It's as if
Speaker 1: James Cummy, Andrew McKay and Peter Struck never left the
Speaker 1: vindictive actions. As my friend mister Shawen describes, it is
Speaker 1: apparent for all to see where are they going for it?
Speaker 1: I frankly think that this, you know, the seizure of
Speaker 1: the electronic devices, they were using Farah as a pretext.
Speaker 1: Farah doesn't apply to Giuliani under these circumstances. So what
Speaker 1: are they doing. They're trying to dig up dirt. So
Speaker 1: they used Farah as a pretext to get their hands
Speaker 1: on Giuliani's electronic communications, hoping to find some other lawlessness
Speaker 1: that might be evidence therein. Look, I've known Giuliani for
Speaker 1: you know, twenty five thirty years. He is a careful,
Speaker 1: scrupulous law You may disagree with his politics, some people do.
Speaker 1: I haven't agree with his politics, but I doubt that
Speaker 1: they'll find any evidence of wrongdoing on those devices. Well,
Speaker 1: I don't think so either. I mean Rudy's a good
Speaker 1: lawyer on top of everything else. And you know, this
Speaker 1: goes back to a lot of the other cases too.
Speaker 1: I mean the pre dawn raid with mantaphor, guns a blazon,
Speaker 1: pre dawn raid for process crime, lying to Congress, Rogers
Speaker 1: Stone and uh, you know, guns drawn frogmen in the backyard,
Speaker 1: fake news, CNN cameras tipped off for the I mean
Speaker 1: the whole bit for lying to Congress, the very same
Speaker 1: referrals that went to top officials in the FBI, in
Speaker 1: the in the Horowitz report, David Show, that's right, and
Speaker 1: same people. And again you know Weisman's behind that. Now
Speaker 1: you have this, Lisa Monica, as I say, but there
Speaker 1: are a number of things driving this. And by the way,
Speaker 1: remember we saw these opinion pieces by Weissman and others
Speaker 1: a couple months ago already saying how the government could
Speaker 1: should go after President Trump, go after Roger Stone. It's
Speaker 1: never any battle. Instead of coming forward with positive policies,
Speaker 1: it's this vindictiveness. It's taking people out of the game.
Speaker 1: It's disenfranchising voters who would have voted for President Trump.
Speaker 1: That sort of thing. That's what the impeachment was about,
Speaker 1: you know. And that's what the effort to bar him
Speaker 1: from ever running again. But you have here with Giuliani,
Speaker 1: you have a couple of motivating factors. You have his
Speaker 1: former clients to leave Parnis. I spoke on a panel
Speaker 1: with his lawyer, talking on two different subjects, but his
Speaker 1: lawyer was telling the group about how actively his client
Speaker 1: is trying to so call cooperate with Congress to stick
Speaker 1: it to Giuliani. So people have different political motivations here
Speaker 1: all coming together. You know, well, you do, people, I
Speaker 1: understand now. The Biden administration, also, by the way, is
Speaker 1: considering using outside firms to track what they define as
Speaker 1: extremist chatter by Americans online. That's a little bit chilling
Speaker 1: to make. Greg Jarrett, Yeah, it's idiotic and a corrupt idea.
Speaker 1: It's classic Joe Biden. I say corrupt because Biden is
Speaker 1: deliberately seeking to circumvent the law that limits the government
Speaker 1: from covertly surveilling citizens online, like assuming false identities to
Speaker 1: gain access to private messaging, hacking encrypted apps to spy
Speaker 1: and tea people. Under the law, the Feds can only
Speaker 1: browse unprotected social media conversations. They're not allowed to infiltrate
Speaker 1: private messaging without a warrant based on probable cause. So
Speaker 1: what is the Biden administration now thinking about doing well?
Speaker 1: Outsourcing delegating the surveillance outside groups who were not legally
Speaker 1: constrained by the Constitution under the Fourth Amendment search and
Speaker 1: seizure rules. This is a sleazy maneuver. It violates the
Speaker 1: spirit of federal law prohibits that prohibits domestic spine without
Speaker 1: a valid warrant. This is another appalling example, Sean, of
Speaker 1: the devious, malevolent tactics that our intelligence agencies employ against
Speaker 1: its own citizens, violating their privacy rights and their civil liberties.
Speaker 1: It's smacks of facism, all right, powerful words. David Show
Speaker 1: and Greg Jarrett will continue to follow this. It's amazing
Speaker 1: though none of the people that got referrals, none of
Speaker 1: the people involved a premeditated fraud, and the fires a court,
Speaker 1: no consequences whatsoever. Really sad and it makes you, you know,
Speaker 1: feel like we don't have equal justice or application of
Speaker 1: our laws. At twenty five to the top of the hour,
Speaker 1: eight hundred nine four one, Sean, you want to be
Speaker 1: a part of the program. You know, I've said this before.
Speaker 1: It is amazing the anger that has come out against
Speaker 1: James Carville. James Carville, I've had actually I've had fun
Speaker 1: debating him a number of times. He's actually a fun
Speaker 1: guy to be around. He loves I mean, he loves
Speaker 1: LSU Tiger football. Oh my gosh. Actually, there was a
Speaker 1: speech before for a championship game was supposed to be
Speaker 1: a debate between me and him one year, and all
Speaker 1: he talked about was football, football, football, and that's all
Speaker 1: the crowd wanted to talk about. So I'm like, all right,
Speaker 1: I give up. I just sat down and I got
Speaker 1: entertained and paid at the same time. It said, fine,
Speaker 1: I don't have to work. It was It was pretty
Speaker 1: funny moment. And but one thing that he is not
Speaker 1: is stupid. The one thing that I think Bill Clinton
Speaker 1: did that was smart his entire campaign and his entire
Speaker 1: presidency and his entire post presidency is he had a
Speaker 1: kitchen cabinet not people I agree with, some of whom
Speaker 1: I don't even like. But it included carvillho I do like.
Speaker 1: It included Begala, and it included ram Rambo, Deadfish, It
Speaker 1: included Georgie Stephanopolis. And every day they went over the
Speaker 1: message of the day and had a deal with whatever
Speaker 1: controversy might be emerging, especially during impeachment Monica Lewinsky. I
Speaker 1: did not have sex with that woman on a single time.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna get back to work for the American people
Speaker 1: and all that sort of thing. Here's Carvill. It's fascinating
Speaker 1: to me because I think this is going to be
Speaker 1: far bigger in the minds of the American people in
Speaker 1: terms of the backlash against woke ism. Cancel cultureism. Listen.
Speaker 1: In my view, if you want to in politics, you
Speaker 1: should speak the language of the people. You should speak clear,
Speaker 1: direct English and address people as they address each other,
Speaker 1: not like the Humanities Department at Amherst wants you to
Speaker 1: address everybody. Is this the kind of an issue? Is
Speaker 1: this the kind of an issue, James? That is impossible
Speaker 1: to poll because people are gonna lie to a poster,
Speaker 1: But when they go in there and they close that curtain,
Speaker 1: they're going to do what they want to do. I
Speaker 1: don't have to poll all right. After the twenty twenty
Speaker 1: congressional elections, it was a huge eruption in the Democratic
Speaker 1: Caucus where people correctly pointed out that this whole defund
Speaker 1: the police cost US congressional seats I can look at
Speaker 1: the voting results and the Rio Grand Valley, I can
Speaker 1: look at the voting results in Miami day, I can
Speaker 1: relate conversations that I have with people every day. People
Speaker 1: want to live like they're scared to address an issue
Speaker 1: because it might come out the wrong way, and no
Speaker 1: one is using their language except for you know, some
Speaker 1: of our people on television. If you go to and
Speaker 1: if you need Walton, let's just go listen to NPR. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I'll leave it out of my truck radio so I'll
Speaker 1: never fall asleep. You gotta admit that's pretty funny, and
Speaker 1: James Carvel's not dumb, and I think, but it's only
Speaker 1: getting worse. You know. It was very very telling as
Speaker 1: we were leading into the joint speech before Congress of
Speaker 1: Joe Biden, how every squad member, led by Congresswoman Actio
Speaker 1: Quartez Alexandria Cossio Quartez, the real Speaker of the House,
Speaker 1: Pelosi speaker in name only, is that they all took
Speaker 1: credit for jose agenda. And the reality is the truth
Speaker 1: is she's right, and so is Congresswoman Omar and Congresswoman
Speaker 1: Pressley and other squad members, and they're all patting themselves
Speaker 1: on the back because they know they're setting the agenda.
Speaker 1: Bernie Sanders knows probably he couldn't have gotten his agenda
Speaker 1: this far had he been elected. And I think they're
Speaker 1: actually shocked by it. But the backlash to it, all
Speaker 1: the reckless spending, the policies that are job killing, it's
Speaker 1: never going to work, and it is a guarantee whiplash
Speaker 1: in terms of a political earthquake in the other direction.
Speaker 1: That's what the result of all of this is going
Speaker 1: to be. By the way, Linda, you know what everyone
Speaker 1: keeps asking me about, why does Why is Linda? Why
Speaker 1: won't she let her child be normal and have a
Speaker 1: happy meal? Everywhere I go everyone's asking about little Liam
Speaker 1: and why poor little Liam? And it doesn't get a
Speaker 1: happy meal. Never had a happy meal. It's five years old.
Speaker 1: Little Liam wants a happy meal, and they're actually asking
Speaker 1: me to see if I can have an intervention with you,
Speaker 1: an intervention. First of all, who wants to be normal?
Speaker 1: Can we start there? Nobody wants to be normal. My
Speaker 1: child is he's exceptional. Well, exceptional child does not when
Speaker 1: heat chicken nuggets from McDonald's. He wants to eat my
Speaker 1: air fryer chicken. Okay, but he's never he has nothing
Speaker 1: to compare it to. There's no baseline comparison. He's never
Speaker 1: had a McDonald's French fry in his life. This poor kid.
Speaker 1: So do you remember this from your parents When you
Speaker 1: were a kid, they used to say, be happy with
Speaker 1: what you got, and then when you get older, you
Speaker 1: realize that you were content with those things because you
Speaker 1: never had the other things. So if he makes a
Speaker 1: decision when he's, you know, a teenager, that he wants
Speaker 1: to fill his body with toxin, that's his decision. Okay,
Speaker 1: So you're not going to let this kid wat till
Speaker 1: he's twenty one make the decision that he can have McDonald's. Basically, yeah,
Speaker 1: an informed decision. See, I know what goes in those
Speaker 1: chick and nuggets. I've cut them open. It's disgusting. I'm sorry.
Speaker 1: I think that the audience agrees with me. They're just
Speaker 1: afraid to say it out loud. No, that doesn't mean no, no, no,
Speaker 1: the audience did not agree with you. We had a
Speaker 1: pole upon Hannity dot Com. I want eighty five to
Speaker 1: fifteen percent. I think that that pole is biased. Do
Speaker 1: you want to know why the poll was not biased.
Speaker 1: The pole was on the Sean Hannity website based up show. Okay,
Speaker 1: you know against me. Remember when I wanted to run
Speaker 1: the tape of Leo two point z Terrell. Oh that's true.
Speaker 1: You did lose that one time? Lost it. I mean
Speaker 1: I wanted to run out of the tapes when Leo
Speaker 1: used to I used to piss him off so much
Speaker 1: that he would rip off his mic and rip out
Speaker 1: his earpiece and he'd walk off the show. So funny story.
Speaker 1: So you know, Leo and I are good friends. We've
Speaker 1: known each other as long as he's been coming on
Speaker 1: the show, as long as I've been working here almost
Speaker 1: seventeen years. Scary and uh, it was really funny. I
Speaker 1: was talking to him the other day and he goes,
Speaker 1: remember when I hung up on you. I'm like, oh, yeah,
Speaker 1: I remember those days. I mean I used to like
Speaker 1: he'd have guest thing that's he gets so many He's like,
Speaker 1: I can't even talk to you, Linda. He'd hang up
Speaker 1: like so many times. And now he's like, I'm so
Speaker 1: sorry I did. I'll never do that again. Well, I
Speaker 1: mean it's such a good dude. I bet you he
Speaker 1: doesn't need McDonald's I bet she probably does he McDonald's.
Speaker 1: I bet you he does not. Look we'll do a
Speaker 1: quick poll here, all right, now, don't hang up after
Speaker 1: we ask one question. John and Missouri, do you like
Speaker 1: McDonald's Do you like fast Wendy's? You like fast food?
Speaker 1: I try not to, but it's not a matter of try.
Speaker 1: I try not to too, but you do like it.
Speaker 1: I should come to it, and I enjoy it when
Speaker 1: I ask you. All right, John, stay right there, we'll
Speaker 1: get back to it. Tony and Iowa. Do you like
Speaker 1: fast food? Do you like McDonald's. Well, I eat a
Speaker 1: one that it has all emo teenagers working there. They
Speaker 1: call it the unhappy meal, but a special No, I don't,
Speaker 1: but you know that's funny, right. Do you like a
Speaker 1: quarter pounder which cheese once in a while French fries? Yeah? Yeah,
Speaker 1: I do. Well, I don't know why everyone's so apologetic.
Speaker 1: It's not a big deal. I'm admitting I love it.
Speaker 1: Lou in Florida, do you like McDonald yay? Sean? Yeah,
Speaker 1: As a kid, I loved it. I got a chance
Speaker 1: to eat it. But now I'm a vegetarian. Oh, she's
Speaker 1: probably side. Now. I'm so sorry to hear about that.
Speaker 1: Hang on, LOUI, we'll get back to you. Thomas in Texas,
Speaker 1: do you like McDonald's fast food Wendy's because I liked
Speaker 1: them all. I'm a physician, part of the obesity pandemic
Speaker 1: and wish i'd never eating fast food? Do you really
Speaker 1: want that? For little Liam, who seems I think I
Speaker 1: didn't ask about talking about an obesity problem. I'm asking.
Speaker 1: He's a physician. You can't argue with him. Do you
Speaker 1: like to eat an occasional quarter pounder with cheese or
Speaker 1: a single or double with cheese from Wendy's. We all
Speaker 1: like things we shouldn't have. Thank you, doctor likes it.
Speaker 1: That's another vote for me. Becky in Michigan? Do you
Speaker 1: like fast food like Wendy's, McDonald's pizza, all the fun stuff? Yeah? Absolutely?
Speaker 1: And Kentucky Fried Chicken original recipe? Right, that's right? Yeah,
Speaker 1: all that off once in a while. Thank you. That
Speaker 1: is five for five. I'm not gonna go any further.
Speaker 1: I can, but I won't because I already won't. It's
Speaker 1: a different question. Nobody asking the questioning puke green shakes
Speaker 1: that you're eating every day or the disgusting orange shakes
Speaker 1: that you eat every day. They're as discussed, they're just
Speaker 1: as disgusting. First of all, you're not asking the right question.
Speaker 1: The question is not do we like you know, fast food?
Speaker 1: The question is not you know, do we like constant politans?
Speaker 1: Do we like beer? This is not the question. The
Speaker 1: question is is it good for you? And would you
Speaker 1: give it to your kid? Well, it's a different question. Well,
Speaker 1: hang on, it's not. It's not a big deal for
Speaker 1: a kid to have a stupid happy meal once in
Speaker 1: a while. Yes, it is because your body. Did you
Speaker 1: ever see that documentary Supersize Me? Yeah, okay, I see.
Speaker 1: That means I'm right stupid, but it's stupid. That's the
Speaker 1: one where the guy ate McDonald's morning every day for
Speaker 1: thirty days. Okay, I'm not talking about every meal every
Speaker 1: day for thirty days. I gained forty five pounds if
Speaker 1: I ever did that, right, So, what I'm saying is, though,
Speaker 1: is if you can keep your kid's body pure and
Speaker 1: not give them these things, their body never ever wants it.
Speaker 1: They never acclimate to it. You know, my son has
Speaker 1: no idea what the stuff is. It's the best thing
Speaker 1: in the world. Okay, quick break, we'll come back on
Speaker 1: the other side. And now I'm in the mood for
Speaker 1: a quarter pound of a cheese French fry and a coke.
Speaker 1: All right, as we continue, or a little discussion about McDonald's. Here.
Speaker 1: One day, when you're not looking, I'm taking that kid.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna I'm gonna snatch did you air really? Uncle
Speaker 1: Sean's gonna snatch the kid for an hour and get
Speaker 1: him a happy Meal and just just gonna say, just
Speaker 1: don't tell mom, and he'll be home playing with his
Speaker 1: happy Meal toy of Ronald. See. Look, this is the
Speaker 1: difference between you and me. Like when we were down
Speaker 1: and we were in West Palm and we were doing
Speaker 1: the interviews, and I was like, okay, I want to
Speaker 1: buy one toy for my son. And you go in
Speaker 1: and you're like pulling the whole shelf you and sweet
Speaker 1: baby Book. No, that's not what happened. It was me
Speaker 1: and sweet baby James and we had finished the trip.
Speaker 1: I'm exhausted, and you say, and I said, you guys,
Speaker 1: stop a Target and go get a toy for Liam.
Speaker 1: And I said, I said, I'm stopping at Target. You
Speaker 1: said you were, You said you wanted to stop at Target.
Speaker 1: You had promised to get Liam a toy get him
Speaker 1: a toy train. We stopped at Target. Okay, we all
Speaker 1: go in, all four of us. Me. You No, you're
Speaker 1: leaving out the part. Wait a minute, you leave it
Speaker 1: out a critical part, which is where I said, please
Speaker 1: don't come in with me, go by. I like to
Speaker 1: go shopping. No, you like to rush people, just like
Speaker 1: you rushed inside. We find the toy section. Then when
Speaker 1: we find the toy section, it's got like twenty different
Speaker 1: styles of trains, and Linda has to pick up and
Speaker 1: touch and play with and price out every single freaking
Speaker 1: train to that's right. Forty minutes and finally I had
Speaker 1: had enough and I've got a cart, and I bought
Speaker 1: all the trains and I threw them in the basket
Speaker 1: and I said, let's go. You can decide later give
Speaker 1: them all to the kid. Just so you know, America,
Speaker 1: forty minutes in Sean Hannity Land is like about three minutes.
Speaker 1: And everyone else's he has the patience that I named
Speaker 1: my daughter with Daddy Daughter Day. Of course, I know,
Speaker 1: why don't you remind the audience? Okay, the deal was
Speaker 1: she got to eat anywhere she wanted. Daddy Daughter Day right,
Speaker 1: and then we then we go to the mall. I say,
Speaker 1: now you can pick one store. I don't care what
Speaker 1: store it is. You have ten if I was very
Speaker 1: patient that day, fifteen minutes, get whatever you want. Then
Speaker 1: we're leaving. We're getting out of here. You knew patience
Speaker 1: is a virtue, right, that's patient. Some days I had fifty,
Speaker 1: I gave fifteen minute and now it was funny. She
Speaker 1: was like agonizing over picking out one toy, one whatever
Speaker 1: it was, and it would be like then finally one
Speaker 1: day I brought her friends and said they can do
Speaker 1: it too, and they're like, well, if you're gonna give
Speaker 1: them fifty's full of crap and that like loading up.
Speaker 1: They're not looking at anything except just as much as
Speaker 1: they can touch in ten minutes. They should have just
Speaker 1: gotten a gift card and maxed it out. That that's
Speaker 1: not fun, Yeah, but it was. It's the fun part
Speaker 1: that they get to hand. You should just make a
Speaker 1: Hannity happy meal, just buy gifts, sent it to Linda's
Speaker 1: house and she can give a gift with actual edible
Speaker 1: food to Liam. She always wanted to go to Subway,
Speaker 1: and Subway's okay. I don't love a way. But every
Speaker 1: time I'd be like, no, but they have healthy options nothing.
Speaker 1: She'd order a real meal, I don't know, maybe a
Speaker 1: steak or whatever she's eating. And then I said, well,
Speaker 1: what do you want for dessert? She goes, Dad, They're
Speaker 1: too expensive. I'm like, good grief. Did you eat McDonald's
Speaker 1: when you wear a kitchln? Yes? Of course I did.
Speaker 1: Did was opened in Franklin Square. The local Penny Saver
Speaker 1: had a free large McDonald's french fries. And this is terrible.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna confess these statute of limitations along past. But
Speaker 1: me and my friends we walked around the neighborhood and
Speaker 1: stole every penny Saver we could and we used that
Speaker 1: Oh he did that freak large McDonald's french fry. I mean,
Speaker 1: I'm probably in the course of three weeks that's all
Speaker 1: I lived on was McDonald's french fries. And it was great.
Speaker 1: I loved it. I have to say, I'm looking up
Speaker 1: the stats on chicken nuggets McDonald's chicken nuggets. Excuse me,
Speaker 1: this is h stirical. The burger happy meal. No, kids,
Speaker 1: my son doesn't eat cheeseburgers. He eats chicken nuggets. I
Speaker 1: don't know a lot of kids who eat burgers, not
Speaker 1: at least not in my neighborhood. Not with my kids.
Speaker 1: I mean they love chicken nuggets and French fries and
Speaker 1: or pizza, pizza, and that's it. And that's that's all
Speaker 1: my child is eating. Occasionally I get cheesy broccoli in there.
Speaker 1: So we're doing the interview with Caitlin Jenner tomorrow and uh,
Speaker 1: are you gonna offer a McDonald's. No, No, it's it's
Speaker 1: all in and out burger. How long have you worked
Speaker 1: for me for crying out loud? Too long? Well, you
Speaker 1: didn't know it was in an outbreak. I'm gonna get
Speaker 1: off the plane and just say, can you take me
Speaker 1: to the nearest in and out burger? Please? You know
Speaker 1: it would be a great video, you and Caitlyn going
Speaker 1: together and ordering together. I'd be glad, Tod that's good.
Speaker 1: Then I'll get get accused of the media paying for
Speaker 1: an interview. Did you watchnes Caitlyn Jenner? And what's that?
Speaker 1: Where's the fec when you need him? Right? Well, that's true,
Speaker 1: All right, Well we wasted a lot of time anyway.
Speaker 1: All right, we're gonna get to these calls. I promised John, Tony,
Speaker 1: Lou Thomas, and Becky. We're gonna get to you. I promise.
Speaker 1: Eight hundred and nine four one Sean is our number.
Speaker 1: Quick break right back, all right, duds, found up information
Speaker 1: overload our Sean Hannity Show. I promise your calls bottom
Speaker 1: of this half hour, eight hundred and nine four one Sean.
Speaker 1: You want to be a part of this extravaganza. Joe
Speaker 1: Concha is with us? Well? I mean when the Washington Post,
Speaker 1: NBC News, New York Times get this same story on
Speaker 1: Rudy wrong, and they got it from the same source.
Speaker 1: What does that tell you? Joe Concha, media expert columnist
Speaker 1: at The Hill on the media, and of course Fox News,
Speaker 1: a fellow Fox News employee, Sir amazing Sean, that again
Speaker 1: and again we have the Russian narrative rearing its ugly head.
Speaker 1: We saw it, as you said, for three years, with
Speaker 1: all those allegations of Russia collusion, and even right before
Speaker 1: election day remember that story about bounties on US soldiers
Speaker 1: by the Russians and the Taliband carrying that out. And
Speaker 1: then later, only later, only after all the votes were casting,
Speaker 1: did we actually see any sort of retraction, Because what
Speaker 1: does it matter at that point, right, Joe Biden was
Speaker 1: able to use it as ammunitions during that first debate
Speaker 1: and bringing it up repeatedly as if it were fact.
Speaker 1: And of course now we see this here with Juliani again.
Speaker 1: The same media outlets only make a mistake when it
Speaker 1: overwhelmingly is negative towards Republicans or conservatives or those who's
Speaker 1: appoint the support the president, right and in this case,
Speaker 1: obviously Rudy Giuliani. And here's the thing, the juice. The
Speaker 1: allegation presented as absolute fact always gets one hundred times
Speaker 1: the coverage as the exoneration. And do you think the
Speaker 1: other cable news networks who went apocalyptic and reporting the
Speaker 1: allegations against Rudy Giuliani marinated in a healthy dose of piousness,
Speaker 1: by the way, and sidenfreude, do you think that they're
Speaker 1: going to now get on the air and cover the retraction,
Speaker 1: the correction as much as they did the allegation. It's
Speaker 1: rhetorical Tuesday. You don't have to answer that, John, Okay,
Speaker 1: I won't answer. I won't take debate. But it's but
Speaker 1: it's so typical, you know, I noticed that fake Jake
Speaker 1: Tapper over at fake News CNN is out there sanctimoniously
Speaker 1: declaring that he's never going to interview Republicans because they
Speaker 1: don't tell the truth. That I'm like, do you have
Speaker 1: any level of self awareness about how screwed up your
Speaker 1: network is and what a propaganda outlet it has been
Speaker 1: exposed as? Are you that out of touch with truth
Speaker 1: and reality? Well, Jake Taffer, then therefore never interview anybody
Speaker 1: on his show again who pushed the Russia collusion narrative
Speaker 1: for example, Right, So you know, you better have some
Speaker 1: pretty consistent rules across the board. And look, this is
Speaker 1: what CNN has become. It's maybe to even the left
Speaker 1: of MSNBC, which is a very hard thing to do.
Speaker 1: But I think they think by being a cheerleader for
Speaker 1: this administration, in the Biden administration, and continuing just to
Speaker 1: be the thesis dons against Republicans, that that's somehow a
Speaker 1: winning formula. And then I look at their ratings. They
Speaker 1: are down since January sixty percent in primetime. That means
Speaker 1: six out of ten viewers who are watching your network
Speaker 1: just earlier this year are gone because they see through
Speaker 1: the BS. Well, I mean that's all true, and you
Speaker 1: know there's always a little dip after an election year,
Speaker 1: and that was predictable. It's always predictable. But these things
Speaker 1: are now heating back up. Pull it and you can
Speaker 1: see that the audience is back faster than ever. So
Speaker 1: I had this interview tomorrow with Caitlyn Jenner. They came
Speaker 1: out with a three minute ad, and political ads, generally speaking,
Speaker 1: don't capture my attention. They just that kind of rolls
Speaker 1: off me. I don't know if he saw the three
Speaker 1: minute ad, but I thought it was phenomenal. Well, you know,
Speaker 1: here we have somebody who is obviously very in tune
Speaker 1: with how to connect with people, right, I mean, I
Speaker 1: think Caitlyn Jenner is something like three million Twitter followers.
Speaker 1: Just to put this in perspective, Davin Newsom doesn't even
Speaker 1: have two million, and he's been the governor of California
Speaker 1: for a couple of years. Right, So there's definitely the
Speaker 1: name recognition in Caitlyn Jenner. I mean give her credit
Speaker 1: in terms of being true to her principles, knowing that
Speaker 1: if she's transgender that she at least according to the rules,
Speaker 1: the unwritten rules, she absolutely has to support Democrats. And
Speaker 1: she's saying, no, this is who I've always been in
Speaker 1: terms of how I look at the world and policies
Speaker 1: around X, why and Z, primarily being conservative. So yeah,
Speaker 1: if there's a runoff, remember Sean in California, you just
Speaker 1: need the most votes. It's not like Georgia where he
Speaker 1: needs like a majority. That's how you win, whoever gets
Speaker 1: the most votes. If Newsom is recalled wins the election,
Speaker 1: that makes the crap shot there is. But there's two questions.
Speaker 1: It's if he is recalled. That means on the ballot
Speaker 1: enough people have to vote to recall him, right, and
Speaker 1: then then it gets the question two, which is, Okay,
Speaker 1: of this list of people, who would you like to
Speaker 1: be governor? Now you start out, Kaylin starts out of
Speaker 1: my opinion with high name recognition. The thing that was
Speaker 1: interesting to me m and I called asked about the interview,
Speaker 1: and I had a long discussion, and I said, for me,
Speaker 1: this is about this is about policy politics. California is broken.
Speaker 1: You know, where's your level of commitment here? Now I
Speaker 1: don't want to give away too much of what the
Speaker 1: answer was, but the answer, let me just put it.
Speaker 1: The was a very good answer. And I think I think, like,
Speaker 1: for example, if if this was about anything other than
Speaker 1: really wanting to serve as a governor. I don't think
Speaker 1: I would be that interested in that interview, but I
Speaker 1: believe it is about wanting to be the governor of
Speaker 1: California and correcting this draconian, radical left wing wokeism, you know, disaster.
Speaker 1: I mean from everything from the environment out there. They
Speaker 1: won't even allow these controlled burns to stop the wildfires.
Speaker 1: They won't even allow farmers to have water. They put
Speaker 1: the priority of a little fish called the delta smelt,
Speaker 1: which is not even an endangered species, over the rights
Speaker 1: of farmers to have water so that they can raise
Speaker 1: their crops. It's about a thirteen and a half percent
Speaker 1: income tax. It's about illegal immigration as out of control
Speaker 1: as any other state, the sanctuary state of California. I mean,
Speaker 1: these are real issues here that you know, I think
Speaker 1: every candidate that is running for office is going to
Speaker 1: have to answer. And there's so much to attack right
Speaker 1: if you're a candidate looking to seeking this office right
Speaker 1: in California, for your leaders are think about the murderers
Speaker 1: row they have here. It's not exactly the forty nine Yankees.
Speaker 1: When Gavin Newson is your governor and Nancy Pelosi is
Speaker 1: one of your congresswomen who happens to be the Speaker
Speaker 1: of the House. And then you have Swallwell and Shift Boy.
Speaker 1: That is quite the lineup, isn't it. And you don't
Speaker 1: forget Diane Feinstein. Feinstein too right, and just think about
Speaker 1: everything that's going on out there, the record, homelessness, the exodus.
Speaker 1: The two states that have the biggest exodus by far
Speaker 1: by a country mile, is California and New York right now,
Speaker 1: that's according to United dan Lines who did a big
Speaker 1: survey on this and looked at their own data in
Speaker 1: terms of people moving out of places, and the states
Speaker 1: that are getting the most influx Idaho, Kentucky, and Florida.
Speaker 1: What are those all have in common? The red states?
Speaker 1: So yeah, people are getting taxed out of a zoo.
Speaker 1: They don't feel safe anymore. The migrant problem is a
Speaker 1: huge issue. So Caitlin Jenner is going to have a
Speaker 1: lot of targets that she can nail in this situation
Speaker 1: in terms of this is what's wrong and here's how
Speaker 1: I'm going to fix it. I'm telling you you haven't
Speaker 1: need some serious trouble either way. I don't disagree at all.
Speaker 1: I think, I think, really serious trouble, and and it
Speaker 1: just makes you wonder, is it now possible that California
Speaker 1: could go back to a more fiscally conservative policies. Now
Speaker 1: I'm not sure, and I'll find out when I do
Speaker 1: the interview whether this the ad that came out said,
Speaker 1: this isn't about Republican a Democrat. This is about what
Speaker 1: has happened to this great state of California. That needs
Speaker 1: to be open, that needs regulations to go away, that
Speaker 1: needs taxes to go down, that needs common sense environmental policies.
Speaker 1: But I think the radicalism of California, you know, will
Speaker 1: it now begin to adjust back to a more conservative
Speaker 1: state now, one that a presidential candidate can win. That's
Speaker 1: a stretch, but maybe on the local level, I actually
Speaker 1: think it might be possible. I'm loving enough to remember
Speaker 1: a guy named Arnold Schwarzenegger who came from the entertainment world.
Speaker 1: Everybody gave him zero chance whatsoever. If I heard one
Speaker 1: more joke in two thousand and three, get to the
Speaker 1: chop off like everybody thought. It was like a big joke,
Speaker 1: like come on, got please. The guy from Terminator is
Speaker 1: going to be the governor of California. And he won
Speaker 1: and that was a recall election that you may recall, Sean.
Speaker 1: So that's interesting. And we've had what Governor Jesse Ventura,
Speaker 1: We've had Mayor Jerry Springer, We've obvious had President Donald Trump. Yes,
Speaker 1: you can come from the entertainment sector and do quite
Speaker 1: well here because again, you don't have to worry about
Speaker 1: brand recognition or marketing yourself. For people getting to know you,
Speaker 1: they know already basically who you are. And that gives
Speaker 1: her Hitlin Jenner a huge head start here. So yeah,
Speaker 1: I don't see why she couldn't win in this situation
Speaker 1: because the competition is just so blode, seems at this point.
Speaker 1: Unless our friend Rick Renell jumped in, then we got
Speaker 1: a whole new conversation. He's been reluctant. I've had him
Speaker 1: on TV a number of times, and I happen to
Speaker 1: like Rick a lot. I think he did a great
Speaker 1: job as Director of National Intelligence, and he's a real warrior.
Speaker 1: He's a fighter. Um. I think he's smart, principled. I
Speaker 1: think he'd do a great job out there. But he's
Speaker 1: been reluctant to even give me a hint that he
Speaker 1: has any interest in running. Yeah, and that's a shame too,
Speaker 1: because you tell me who has better teeth in any
Speaker 1: political sphere, right? I know he was an acting director
Speaker 1: of Director of National Intelligence right before. That guy has
Speaker 1: some tremendous choppers. I mean I'd kill for those and
Speaker 1: not alone I think could help him in this situation.
Speaker 1: Oh of course, Jeff. And when do you get in
Speaker 1: your media show on Fox? I am advocating this now
Speaker 1: openly and publicly. I think you deserve a media show
Speaker 1: on Fox because you get that last last week, on
Speaker 1: last Friday on the on the netigin, I got more
Speaker 1: text by it have since I don't know, I think
Speaker 1: senior year, right, I mean, so you doing that situation,
Speaker 1: we'll take, you know, I take anyhow at this point,
Speaker 1: all right, quick break more with Joe Concho on the
Speaker 1: other side than your calls final half hour eight hundred
Speaker 1: nine four one sew on our number. If you want
Speaker 1: to be a part of the program, And as we
Speaker 1: continue with Joe Concho, then we'll get to your calls
Speaker 1: eight hundred and nine four one Sean. You know you follow.
Speaker 1: Look when I used to be on social media, which
Speaker 1: now seems like an entire lifetime ago. When I used
Speaker 1: to be on it, and I would, you know, engage
Speaker 1: with my public feuds with the likes of Jimmy kimmel
Speaker 1: um or Alec Baldwin, a couple of them that I had,
Speaker 1: By the way, they went down in history some of
Speaker 1: the best Twitter brawls ever. But when I had them,
Speaker 1: and it does take too much of your time, I
Speaker 1: noticed that there was this little cabal of all these
Speaker 1: blue check media people and they live in their own
Speaker 1: little bubble. Have you noticed that two on social media
Speaker 1: and they tweet out what the other one's doing, and
Speaker 1: what this one's doing, and that one is doing. And
Speaker 1: if you tweet my article or my piece on TV,
Speaker 1: I'll tweet your piece on TV. It's like they've got
Speaker 1: this left wing LoveFest never ending, and it's all rooted
Speaker 1: in the same radical left policies that Trump is bad,
Speaker 1: Republicans bad, Conservatives suck and we are the enlightened ones,
Speaker 1: we know better than the American people. It's like, you know,
Speaker 1: in journalism, it's more important for not just the media
Speaker 1: reporters and commentators that are out there, but just journalists
Speaker 1: in general. They are tickled if they could get just
Speaker 1: one retweet from Maggie Haberman or if you're like a
Speaker 1: Nicole Wallace on MSNBC, or you're a Don Lemon on CNN.
Speaker 1: It's not about winning an Emmy or a politiczer or
Speaker 1: anything like that. It's oh boy, you think that Stephen
Speaker 1: colbertil or Jimmy Kimmel will have me on their show
Speaker 1: and we get so excited about that. Yeah, so how
Speaker 1: is that possible? Considering their ratings are atrocious? On the
Speaker 1: worst night rating night on Hannity, we like double these people,
Speaker 1: And I'm trying to understand, you know, where are the
Speaker 1: media articles that actually analyze, Like I noticed that who
Speaker 1: what's that guy's name, Seth Myers? And I noticed that,
Speaker 1: you know, I mean, I started, I took a good
Speaker 1: shot back at him after he said something about me
Speaker 1: I don't even remember, and then I had my team
Speaker 1: pull up his ratings. He gets under a million viewers
Speaker 1: a night, and I'm like, why am I even talking
Speaker 1: to this guy? Why am I wasting my time? That's
Speaker 1: the old NBC Letterman spot before Letterman became really political,
Speaker 1: right twelve thirty NBC, and he would have millions more
Speaker 1: people watching because you got the escapism, you actually laugh,
Speaker 1: You watched stupid pet tricks and Paul Schaefer, and he
Speaker 1: always had great guests, and he just like it was
Speaker 1: a good thing to fall asleep too when you were
Speaker 1: in college. And now it's just like I'm hearing Seth
Speaker 1: Myers and Stephen Colbert arguing that the filibuster should be
Speaker 1: abolished and why we should have fifty one states and
Speaker 1: adding DC, and I'm like, wait a minute. If I
Speaker 1: wanted this, I'd watched the banners. The problem is hust Listen.
Speaker 1: If they were funny, I'd say they're funny. Like I
Speaker 1: can tell you that some of the people on social
Speaker 1: media that make fun of me for whatever reason, and
Speaker 1: some of the memes and some of the things they say,
Speaker 1: I mean, they literally they crack me up. They're clever,
Speaker 1: they're funny, they're smart, they're spot on in terms of
Speaker 1: they're making a point with however they're attacking me. And
Speaker 1: I look at it, and you know, I kind of
Speaker 1: on my hand, good job. I really like it. It's funny.
Speaker 1: These guys don't make me laugh. Jay Leno made me laugh.
Speaker 1: Letterman in the old days he made me laugh. Then
Speaker 1: Letterman became kind of a hardcore lefty leto stayed down
Speaker 1: the middle, kind of more in the tradition of Johnny Carson,
Speaker 1: and I thought that served him well all of those years.
Speaker 1: And what a mistake it was to get rid of
Speaker 1: Jay Leno. In my view, you'd still have a fastball
Speaker 1: Leno at this point, right and now, Jimo, I'm sorry,
Speaker 1: Jimmy Fallon. I mean, not even like one point five
Speaker 1: million viewers with Trust me It on the network, all
Speaker 1: the promotion that they give it at eleven thirties, they're
Speaker 1: not paying them all that money to bring in that
Speaker 1: sort of cash. And that's the shame about Falon. Falon
Speaker 1: used to be somewhat down, not down the middle, but
Speaker 1: he just did more entertainment. That's right, because he has
Speaker 1: a lot of talent. But then once Colbert and once
Speaker 1: Kimmel went completely and totally political, balance felt like he
Speaker 1: had no choice. And now he should have stuck to
Speaker 1: his guns. He got he panicked over the ratings for
Speaker 1: a short period of time. He needs to get back
Speaker 1: to that if he wants any chance in my view,
Speaker 1: All right, Joe Concho, thank you as always eight hundred
Speaker 1: and nine four one sewn you want to be a
Speaker 1: part of the program, quick break right back. Your calls
Speaker 1: on the other side straight ahead. All right, twenty five
Speaker 1: to the top of the hour. All right, let's get
Speaker 1: to our phones. John Missouri, you've been very patient, sir,
Speaker 1: thank you for being with us. Glad you called. I'm
Speaker 1: glad you like McDonald's. Well, thank you much for this opportunity.
Speaker 1: It's great honor to be able to speak with you today. Yeah.
Speaker 1: So I'm a teacher here in Missouri, and you know,
Speaker 1: after hearing all the things have been going on, it's
Speaker 1: it's really kind of struck a fire within me about
Speaker 1: why people aren't wanting to bring their chea it's back
Speaker 1: into the classroom. Well, I think it should for a
Speaker 1: lot of different reasons. Um, you know, I noticed Biden
Speaker 1: is telling younger kids that they need to get vaccinated. Now,
Speaker 1: I'm not sure if this was a real picture or not.
Speaker 1: It's in the Daily Mail. I trust the Daily Mail,
Speaker 1: but they have a picture of Jill and Joe Biden
Speaker 1: with Jimmy Carter and his wife Rosalind. Jimmy Carter's ninety
Speaker 1: six years old, Rosalind's ninety three years old. They didn't
Speaker 1: have a mask on. Um. Look, I think you know
Speaker 1: there's so much damage that people aren't really even factoring
Speaker 1: in now these kids, you know, wearing masks for eight
Speaker 1: hours a day. Um, they're getting rashes number one, number two. Um,
Speaker 1: that's so that's a problem when they're even in school,
Speaker 1: but being home they missed their friends, that they don't
Speaker 1: have the socialization. Uh, it's putting a stress on families.
Speaker 1: It's it's it's it's not helping anybody. And we've already
Speaker 1: proven in Florida because schools they have been open since
Speaker 1: August that it can be done safely and successfully. I
Speaker 1: don't know what, Well, that's the same thing we've gone
Speaker 1: on here. We've we've been open since August, and we
Speaker 1: knew on the onset that that we were trying to
Speaker 1: set improve a point that you don't have to go
Speaker 1: full distance learning. I mean, we have absolutely offered it
Speaker 1: as an option. But when we know what it takes
Speaker 1: to teach children, it takes relationships, It takes building academic
Speaker 1: success through giving them the accouragement, showing them what they
Speaker 1: can achieve. And especially in these middle school age groups,
Speaker 1: if you don't connect them to academic success, you put
Speaker 1: them on a whole complete path to failure later on
Speaker 1: down the road. Even in which but that said, though
Speaker 1: I'm not against online education for people to choose it.
Speaker 1: I know, for example, a lot of athletes do it
Speaker 1: so they can pursue their their sports ambitions. I'm fine
Speaker 1: with that, and that's but it's got to be a choice,
Speaker 1: and it's got to be a rigorous academic program. You
Speaker 1: just can't, you know, skate on through school and life
Speaker 1: without getting an education, because it's the latter to success,
Speaker 1: and an athlete's one injury away from you know, needing
Speaker 1: that education, but badly well. And one of the things
Speaker 1: that studies show is is, you know, like you said,
Speaker 1: distance learning, when you have the support at home and
Speaker 1: then things are available, it can be a very productive thing.
Speaker 1: But when you look at some of the statistics, you know,
Speaker 1: when it comes to you know, fostination, a lot of
Speaker 1: times schools are having problems promoting reading in the classroom.
Speaker 1: Kids are coming in the classroom about fifty percent of
Speaker 1: the time not being able to read at grade level.
Speaker 1: And even the studies on dyslexi, it's not something that
Speaker 1: can easily be done over line. It takes it takes
Speaker 1: that chance to meet with the kid to see where
Speaker 1: that that hitch is. The prison statistics and even in
Speaker 1: Texas show that forty eight percent of the prison population
Speaker 1: is dyslexic, with two thirds of them struggling with reading
Speaker 1: in the first place. And so when you have these
Speaker 1: kids that have struggled at home and can't really connect
Speaker 1: online or they don't have that added support, they very
Speaker 1: well take that path that really sets them up for
Speaker 1: failure throughout life. And this was a big part of
Speaker 1: broken communities. And so when these teachers and these teachers
Speaker 1: unions aren't wanting to be in the classroom, you know,
Speaker 1: I mean that is the same. I mean, you know,
Speaker 1: it all depends to the outcome. There are great teachers
Speaker 1: and great school districts, and they are allousy teachers and
Speaker 1: a lousy school districts, just as a matter of where
Speaker 1: you live. But you're right. The ideal situation with all
Speaker 1: the money we spend per capita pursudent on education with
Speaker 1: the worst results in the industrialized world. It's mind numbing.
Speaker 1: But you sound like one of the good ones. John,
Speaker 1: Thank you, my friend, and keep up the good work.
Speaker 1: Chance our kids need good teachers. Tony is an Iowa.
Speaker 1: Hey Tony, thanks for being patient. Hey Hendy, thanks for
Speaker 1: getting me in. You're going to condense this the best
Speaker 1: they can, and hope I don't end up on a
Speaker 1: watchless for seeing this. But if any department has warranted
Speaker 1: defunding and restructuring, it's got to be the FBI, not
Speaker 1: the police. I mean, this goes all the way back,
Speaker 1: well way back. But I'm just gonna go back to
Speaker 1: the Hillary email, hard drive, Oh we lost our hard
Speaker 1: drive and Kobe saying out we don't got enough to
Speaker 1: prosecute him, you know, that kind of thing, And it's
Speaker 1: just the one thing after the other where it seems
Speaker 1: to be the FBI at the heart of the Oh yeah,
Speaker 1: this is a ballot investigation, and hopefully you know, twenty
Speaker 1: twenty twenty twenty two, excuse me, take back the House
Speaker 1: and the Senate, then maybe we can make that possible,
Speaker 1: where we you know, shake down the and restructure and
Speaker 1: start some investigations about, hey, what's going what's really going
Speaker 1: on the FBI, Like when they were farming out surveillance
Speaker 1: the third party, what was it two thousand nine or
Speaker 1: ten when Obama comes on and says, hey, everybody, we're
Speaker 1: gonna protect you for whistle blowing, and then about a
Speaker 1: week later, Snowdon Snowdon drops the bomb about how you know,
Speaker 1: he was one of the party people who was being
Speaker 1: put on the you know, watching people and going, hey,
Speaker 1: this isn't right. You know, we shouldn't be doing this.
Speaker 1: This isn't this isn't a private thing. This should be
Speaker 1: you know, we're closely guarded. This is way too loose
Speaker 1: for security. It's sad to me that we had our
Speaker 1: opportunity and Director Ray had his opportunity to clean up
Speaker 1: the FBI, which I think is one of the greatest
Speaker 1: law enforcement institutions in the world. I still you're never
Speaker 1: going to convince me that it is the rank and file,
Speaker 1: because I know too many rank and file FBI guys,
Speaker 1: special agents, and they are appalled at what some of
Speaker 1: the upper echelon seventh floor folks have been engaged in.
Speaker 1: And we missed our opportunity, or so it seems. Unless
Speaker 1: Dorham is up to something that none of us know,
Speaker 1: I have very little faith and hope that he's capable
Speaker 1: of doing the job that should be done, that needs
Speaker 1: to be done to clean it up. But you're right,
Speaker 1: it's dangerous for the country anyway. Good call, Tony, Appreciate it.
Speaker 1: Lou and Florida, Hello, Okay, Sean. Listen, my mother was
Speaker 1: a delegate Coronald Reagan in Arizona and at a young
Speaker 1: age in the fifties, we learned a lot about communism
Speaker 1: and what's happening right now in DC at the tip
Speaker 1: of the iceberg. I'm not talking your rank and file
Speaker 1: if you just said, but all the institutions, the intelligence, communities,
Speaker 1: law enforcement, and certainly our congressional bodies are all being
Speaker 1: headed as a will to power government. Okay, this is
Speaker 1: all will to power for a globalist pay to play agenda.
Speaker 1: That's exactly what this is. And there was a story
Speaker 1: today that will back up what you're saying. And it
Speaker 1: may not sound like a big deal or one that
Speaker 1: you want to pay attention to, but it really caught
Speaker 1: my attention. You have a top a cost for Joe
Speaker 1: Biden urging. Now this is on top of Janet Yellen
Speaker 1: the whole world to raise the corporate tax rate. And
Speaker 1: her name is Cecilia Rousse, chair of the Council of
Speaker 1: Economic Advisors for the Biden administration. And what they're trying
Speaker 1: to do is get every nation to engage in redistribution
Speaker 1: socialist policies. This way, there'll be no place for the
Speaker 1: rich to go to hide their money or save their money,
Speaker 1: and that they'll have access to it. When they have
Speaker 1: access to the money and they have people dependent on them,
Speaker 1: they have all the power. And that's what this game
Speaker 1: has always been about. That's never going to change. But
Speaker 1: see now they have the power and the prize of
Speaker 1: the United States now once they take the United States down,
Speaker 1: but dominoes go global all the way. What happened in
Speaker 1: Venezuela was the playbook of our twenty twenty election. That's
Speaker 1: a fact. And you can look at Cuba right now,
Speaker 1: which is on a very bad state. You look at
Speaker 1: all these totalitarian governments. And my sister, who's completely you know,
Speaker 1: she's a conservative, but she's like, oh, with the pendulum,
Speaker 1: it'll switch the other way. And I said, why does
Speaker 1: it switch the other way in China? How about Cuba.
Speaker 1: Let's run down the list. You think it's going to
Speaker 1: switch the other way in Venezuela. My proposal is that
Speaker 1: there'd be a name change today to the Democrat Party
Speaker 1: in this country to the Communist Democrat Party of America,
Speaker 1: because that's what Levin's new book is. You know that
Speaker 1: they're Marxists, and you know American Marxism. And I'll tell
Speaker 1: you what. I got criticized in the Jerusalem Post for
Speaker 1: calling Bolshevik Bernie Bolshevik Bernie. And I'm like the guy
Speaker 1: honeymooned in the former Soviet Union. He's praised, you know, regimes,
Speaker 1: murdering regimes like in the Soviet Union and Cuba's Castro
Speaker 1: and Nicaragua and Venezuela. I mean that that's it. I'm
Speaker 1: just speaking of fact. But anyway, good call Low. We
Speaker 1: appreciate scary times. Thomas, Texas Next Sean Hannity Show, It's up, Thomas.
Speaker 1: I'm a huge fan. Tried multiple times to get you.
Speaker 1: I want to segue off of Joe Biden. First, I think,
Speaker 1: how are he gotten office? In my opinion, should never
Speaker 1: be removed to show all Americans than the emperor's new clothes.
Speaker 1: As we say in Texas, he must ride that crutter
Speaker 1: to the ground. He placed an unconstitutional executive fiat regarding
Speaker 1: mask on federal property. He is the White House federal property.
Speaker 1: Now the other reason I called I have also a
Speaker 1: martial arts background as well as being a physician. And
Speaker 1: you mentioned thumbholes, you know, but humans on mind, body
Speaker 1: altering chemicals don't respond to painful stimuli and they don't
Speaker 1: behave Actually the police drop him off. And you know,
Speaker 1: we've discussed this in the past. That and that's a
Speaker 1: very good point that other you know, students, So I
Speaker 1: add one grand master actually call one day and bring
Speaker 1: that point up, and I agree with you. And and
Speaker 1: there were people that aren't feeling pain because they're on
Speaker 1: so much of this crap whatever is out there, pain killers.
Speaker 1: But in the what I saw, specifically in the case
Speaker 1: of George Floyd I was speaking specifically to, that was
Speaker 1: a guy that clearly was feeling pain and and being
Speaker 1: compliant and hadn't already been handcuffed. And you know, if
Speaker 1: you or how long have you been involved in martial arts,
Speaker 1: that was that was back in college. I didn't go
Speaker 1: all the way to black belt just because of what
Speaker 1: it carried with it. And I don't want to do
Speaker 1: the work to be a black belt. It's too much work,
Speaker 1: too much studying, too much, it's too hard. I'm going
Speaker 1: to get the crap beat out of me for eight hours. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I was one stripe away. But for us, the police
Speaker 1: pick up these people, they drop them off with us
Speaker 1: to either defeat the Graham Reaper or detox them. They
Speaker 1: put out arrest lawrants for them, and then when they're
Speaker 1: detox or sober, we've released them. Is there something that
Speaker 1: we can do to help the police in hospital? D Crowdy? Yeah,
Speaker 1: you got you gotta elect conservative politicians, conservative governors, conservative legislatures.
Speaker 1: You got conservatives to Congress, conservatives in the Senate, and
Speaker 1: yeah we need a conservative president. There you go, It's
Speaker 1: the only answer. Amen. Appreciate your brother, Iron Sharp, appreciate it.
Speaker 1: Becky Michigan, Hey, Becky, how are you? Thanks for being patient?
Speaker 1: Oh hey Sean, thanks for having me here. I'm just
Speaker 1: up here in lockdown, Michigan with Whitmer, and I just
Speaker 1: wanted to let you know that Fox seventeen put out
Speaker 1: an article today announcing that Governor Gretchen Whitmer is going
Speaker 1: to be receiving a Profile and Courage Award for her
Speaker 1: service during the COVID nineteen pandemic. So I went online
Speaker 1: to just do a little research to find out where
Speaker 1: the JFK Profile and Courage Award comes from. It comes
Speaker 1: from Massachusetts, so I was not surprised to see below
Speaker 1: it that Tom Romney also got the award for being
Speaker 1: the Republican to commit or to convict President Trump, and anyway,
Speaker 1: that's neither here nor there. I just wondered if they
Speaker 1: actually asked the people who live in these states about
Speaker 1: this type of thing in a face he think that
Speaker 1: she should receive this type of award, and what the
Speaker 1: people would say here in our state, because I know
Speaker 1: most people would not excuse me. Is this the same
Speaker 1: you know, Whitlas Whitmer that was out there lying to
Speaker 1: the people of Michigan saying she never left the state,
Speaker 1: but she did go down to Florida. The same governor
Speaker 1: whose husband at a time when nobody was allowed to
Speaker 1: get out on their boats, whose husband was out on
Speaker 1: his boat. Is this the same person that that screwed
Speaker 1: up this whole thing from start to finish. You know,
Speaker 1: it's sort of like, you know, Andrew Cuomo gets an
Speaker 1: m and Barack Obama gets a Nobel Peace Prize. I
Speaker 1: don't know what to tell you. Unbelievable. Yeah, I don't
Speaker 1: even have words for it anymore. So I just wanted
Speaker 1: to tell you because I know you feel our pains.
Speaker 1: Oh I do, and I have a lot of friends
Speaker 1: in Michigan. I'll tell you it's rough. There anyway, I
Speaker 1: appreciate the call. Thanks for your patients, Becky eight hundred
Speaker 1: and nine for one. Sean, all right, that's gonna wrap
Speaker 1: up things for today, Hannity. Tonight. We got a lot
Speaker 1: to get to tonight, including breaking news. We have let's
Speaker 1: see Congressman Jordan Ron Johnson all asking demanding the FBI
Speaker 1: for answers on these Fizer violations after new FISA court
Speaker 1: opinion has been issued. And of course the latest on
Speaker 1: the grass Lee Johnson memos slamming intelligence for partisan information leaks,
Speaker 1: and the CIA recruitment videos slammed as Wolke propaganda. I
Speaker 1: can't even believe we have to debate these things. We'll
Speaker 1: get into the horrible treatment of police officers as well.
Speaker 1: We'll show you the videotape, this horrible tape of a
Speaker 1: woman just vicious to this cop. So we'll get into that.
Speaker 1: We'll have Josh Holly on as well. He'll join us,
Speaker 1: Eric Trump from the Trump Organization, and we'll give you
Speaker 1: a preview of everything from California tomorrow in our interview
Speaker 1: with Caitlyn Jenner. Thanks for being with us as all
Speaker 1: you always see it tonight from the Golden State Tomorrow,