1
00:00:08,200 --> 00:00:11,040
Speaker 1: Hello, and welcome to Stephanomics, the podcast that brings the

2
00:00:11,119 --> 00:00:14,160
Speaker 1: COVID global economy to you. And I'm sorry to say

3
00:00:14,160 --> 00:00:16,560
Speaker 1: this is the last episode in this series of Stephanomics,

4
00:00:16,880 --> 00:00:18,960
Speaker 1: but I do hope to be back in a few months.

5
00:00:19,400 --> 00:00:22,360
Speaker 1: When this run began back at the start of April,

6
00:00:22,800 --> 00:00:25,360
Speaker 1: we were just getting our heads around this virus what

7
00:00:25,400 --> 00:00:28,600
Speaker 1: it could mean for people and economies around the world.

8
00:00:29,200 --> 00:00:31,440
Speaker 1: I think we've done our best to pull together the

9
00:00:31,480 --> 00:00:34,239
Speaker 1: pieces of that story in the past few months, with

10
00:00:34,360 --> 00:00:39,199
Speaker 1: reports from Wuhan to Atlanta and Stockholm to Johannesburg. I've

11
00:00:39,240 --> 00:00:41,680
Speaker 1: also got into what it means for policy now and

12
00:00:41,760 --> 00:00:45,560
Speaker 1: in the future with top economists such as Joseph Stiglitz

13
00:00:45,680 --> 00:00:49,120
Speaker 1: and Stephanie Kelton. This week, I wanted to try to

14
00:00:49,159 --> 00:00:51,440
Speaker 1: piece together some of what we've learned with two of

15
00:00:51,479 --> 00:00:55,360
Speaker 1: my favorite economists well known to Stephonomics, Adam Posen, former

16
00:00:55,400 --> 00:00:57,880
Speaker 1: interest rates center at the Bank of England, now president

17
00:00:57,920 --> 00:01:01,280
Speaker 1: of the Peterson Institute for International Economic and Stephen King,

18
00:01:01,520 --> 00:01:05,839
Speaker 1: former chief economist now senior advisor for HSBC, the author

19
00:01:05,880 --> 00:01:17,120
Speaker 1: of multiple books on the future of the world. Adam,

20
00:01:17,920 --> 00:01:20,120
Speaker 1: I might start with you because we spoke right at

21
00:01:20,160 --> 00:01:25,160
Speaker 1: the start of the series about economist understanding of this crisis,

22
00:01:25,720 --> 00:01:28,280
Speaker 1: and we were surprised then at how difficult it had

23
00:01:28,280 --> 00:01:30,680
Speaker 1: been in the early days for everyone to grasp the

24
00:01:31,400 --> 00:01:35,679
Speaker 1: magnitude and the pace of COVID's impact on the global economy.

25
00:01:36,160 --> 00:01:39,960
Speaker 1: Do you think that as a profession we economists have

26
00:01:40,319 --> 00:01:42,800
Speaker 1: can have done better since then? Have we managed to

27
00:01:42,840 --> 00:01:46,720
Speaker 1: sort of stay on top of what was happening? I

28
00:01:46,760 --> 00:01:49,560
Speaker 1: think yes, Stephanie. I think the economists, in terms of

29
00:01:49,560 --> 00:01:53,600
Speaker 1: their immediate policy advice, in terms of the relative unanimity

30
00:01:54,240 --> 00:01:57,240
Speaker 1: and being borne out by events, have done surprisingly well.

31
00:01:57,280 --> 00:02:01,400
Speaker 1: And it's reflected by the odd irony that central bankers

32
00:02:01,520 --> 00:02:05,600
Speaker 1: like j Palell and Christine Legard are basically getting away

33
00:02:05,640 --> 00:02:09,840
Speaker 1: with huge public support, while doctors and epidemiologists are the

34
00:02:09,840 --> 00:02:12,440
Speaker 1: ones being attacked. And if you had told me three

35
00:02:12,480 --> 00:02:15,520
Speaker 1: months ago central bankers would be more trusted than doctors,

36
00:02:15,560 --> 00:02:18,600
Speaker 1: I would have been pretty surprised. But I think when

37
00:02:18,600 --> 00:02:22,080
Speaker 1: we look to the longer term, meaning just in today's world,

38
00:02:22,120 --> 00:02:24,200
Speaker 1: just a few months down the road, I think we

39
00:02:24,320 --> 00:02:27,600
Speaker 1: may be reaching the limit of the economist success for

40
00:02:27,680 --> 00:02:31,720
Speaker 1: three reasons. First, we're getting to the really hard question,

41
00:02:31,880 --> 00:02:36,360
Speaker 1: which is when we get back to say, of recovery,

42
00:02:36,960 --> 00:02:40,239
Speaker 1: what do you do with all the people in hospitality, tourism,

43
00:02:40,360 --> 00:02:43,760
Speaker 1: local services, how do you restructure the economy? And then

44
00:02:43,840 --> 00:02:49,919
Speaker 1: the old ideological and genuine uncertainty divides among economists come back. Second,

45
00:02:50,400 --> 00:02:52,839
Speaker 1: I think we're in a world where politics is much

46
00:02:52,840 --> 00:02:56,040
Speaker 1: more powerful than it used to be, even though sort

47
00:02:56,040 --> 00:02:57,760
Speaker 1: of banks are getting away with stuff. As you and

48
00:02:57,800 --> 00:03:00,639
Speaker 1: I have discussed and you've discussed on this podcast, there's

49
00:03:00,639 --> 00:03:02,560
Speaker 1: an awful lot of politics, as we just saw with

50
00:03:02,600 --> 00:03:06,400
Speaker 1: the European deal, in in making any kind of judgment,

51
00:03:06,480 --> 00:03:09,079
Speaker 1: let alone the public health in the US. And the

52
00:03:09,120 --> 00:03:11,760
Speaker 1: economists can't predict that. And and so the question is

53
00:03:11,760 --> 00:03:15,160
Speaker 1: how do you get past that, not past that, overriding it,

54
00:03:15,440 --> 00:03:19,000
Speaker 1: past that makes sensible sense of it. The third difference,

55
00:03:19,040 --> 00:03:22,680
Speaker 1: which I think is really interesting intellectually and terrifying personally,

56
00:03:23,440 --> 00:03:27,120
Speaker 1: is the extent of essentially irrationality in large parts of

57
00:03:27,120 --> 00:03:30,160
Speaker 1: the American public and some other publics with respect the

58
00:03:30,240 --> 00:03:34,920
Speaker 1: mass and social distancing. The economist view borne out recently

59
00:03:34,920 --> 00:03:37,840
Speaker 1: in Western Europe and East Asia is it's not really

60
00:03:37,880 --> 00:03:40,560
Speaker 1: the lockdowns that shut down the economy, it's people's fear

61
00:03:40,560 --> 00:03:42,800
Speaker 1: of getting the disease, which is why there's a lot

62
00:03:42,800 --> 00:03:46,120
Speaker 1: of evidence Bloomberg's reported on about like it didn't really

63
00:03:46,120 --> 00:03:48,600
Speaker 1: matter that much whether you were Sweden or Denmark in

64
00:03:48,720 --> 00:03:50,880
Speaker 1: terms of the economy, even though it mattered a lot

65
00:03:50,920 --> 00:03:53,720
Speaker 1: in terms of the disease. But in the US, the

66
00:03:53,760 --> 00:03:56,240
Speaker 1: assumption I've made, and most economis made is even if

67
00:03:56,240 --> 00:04:00,160
Speaker 1: Trump messes everything up eventually, most Americans would really is,

68
00:04:00,240 --> 00:04:02,000
Speaker 1: oh my god, I'm going to die or someone I

69
00:04:02,080 --> 00:04:04,000
Speaker 1: know is going to die if I don't pull back

70
00:04:04,600 --> 00:04:07,760
Speaker 1: and we're not seeing that happening yet, and if that continues,

71
00:04:07,920 --> 00:04:11,400
Speaker 1: that is just both horrifying from a part counter sective,

72
00:04:11,440 --> 00:04:16,000
Speaker 1: but impossible to model. To put it very well, Stephen,

73
00:04:16,200 --> 00:04:18,520
Speaker 1: I mean, I guess I put a similar question to you,

74
00:04:18,720 --> 00:04:21,400
Speaker 1: but also whether you whether you agree with those some

75
00:04:21,480 --> 00:04:25,040
Speaker 1: of those three points that Adams made. I mean, where

76
00:04:25,040 --> 00:04:29,120
Speaker 1: where do we stand in terms of our understanding of

77
00:04:29,560 --> 00:04:32,039
Speaker 1: the impact on the economy and what are the key

78
00:04:32,400 --> 00:04:36,600
Speaker 1: unanswered questions that we may find ourselves unable to find

79
00:04:36,600 --> 00:04:40,240
Speaker 1: a solution to. So one thing that I do think

80
00:04:40,600 --> 00:04:44,000
Speaker 1: has come through as a topic that I find puzzling

81
00:04:44,000 --> 00:04:47,200
Speaker 1: in many ways is the idea of the v shape

82
00:04:47,240 --> 00:04:50,680
Speaker 1: recovery the idea that people have confidence that everything is

83
00:04:50,720 --> 00:04:54,000
Speaker 1: coming back, largely in the back of I guess Google

84
00:04:54,160 --> 00:04:57,680
Speaker 1: activity data over the last two months. It's trask me

85
00:04:57,760 --> 00:04:59,760
Speaker 1: being very odd to argue that you can predict what's

86
00:04:59,760 --> 00:05:01,400
Speaker 1: going to happened in the future on the basis of

87
00:05:01,440 --> 00:05:03,840
Speaker 1: activity over the last two months, when lockdowns in some

88
00:05:03,920 --> 00:05:06,839
Speaker 1: cases have come to an end, and inevitably things have

89
00:05:06,960 --> 00:05:10,720
Speaker 1: improved a certain degree. The second thing where I think

90
00:05:10,800 --> 00:05:14,080
Speaker 1: I absolutely agree with Adam is still the sense of

91
00:05:14,120 --> 00:05:16,240
Speaker 1: this idea of scarring, this idea that we don't know

92
00:05:16,320 --> 00:05:19,520
Speaker 1: quite what's going to happen over the next few quarters.

93
00:05:21,200 --> 00:05:24,240
Speaker 1: As national lockdowns come to an end, you can be

94
00:05:24,320 --> 00:05:26,640
Speaker 1: more optimistic, but we also know it's gonna an awful

95
00:05:26,640 --> 00:05:29,760
Speaker 1: lot of what I described as external lockdowns, that countries

96
00:05:29,800 --> 00:05:32,400
Speaker 1: cannot relate to each other because they're in different stages

97
00:05:32,440 --> 00:05:36,719
Speaker 1: of dealing with the virus outbreak. And I also think

98
00:05:36,760 --> 00:05:40,240
Speaker 1: that there's a potential difficulty with regard to not so

99
00:05:40,279 --> 00:05:44,400
Speaker 1: much public debt, but corporate and personal debt in a

100
00:05:44,440 --> 00:05:48,400
Speaker 1: situation where incomes are so much more depressed than people

101
00:05:48,440 --> 00:05:51,279
Speaker 1: had expected six months or a year ago, and I

102
00:05:51,320 --> 00:05:53,840
Speaker 1: wonder whether that has an impact in terms of the

103
00:05:53,880 --> 00:05:57,479
Speaker 1: functioning of the financial system later this year until next year,

104
00:05:57,480 --> 00:06:00,200
Speaker 1: which itself could be a major drag on the of me.

105
00:06:00,960 --> 00:06:03,279
Speaker 1: So I think we all as economist had a pretty

106
00:06:03,279 --> 00:06:05,839
Speaker 1: good record over the last few months and understanding what

107
00:06:05,960 --> 00:06:10,400
Speaker 1: lockdowns and changes in social behavior would due to the economy.

108
00:06:10,720 --> 00:06:14,000
Speaker 1: I think there are huge puzzles for the next few

109
00:06:14,000 --> 00:06:18,599
Speaker 1: months and quarters. We have had a very sharp bounce

110
00:06:18,680 --> 00:06:24,880
Speaker 1: back in many places, certainly on continental Europe and also

111
00:06:24,960 --> 00:06:28,640
Speaker 1: in parts of parts of the US. In Europe, particularly

112
00:06:28,680 --> 00:06:31,600
Speaker 1: where we seem to have broken the link between economic

113
00:06:31,640 --> 00:06:35,040
Speaker 1: activity and the virus coming back maybe in a more

114
00:06:35,080 --> 00:06:38,160
Speaker 1: effective way than we have in the US. Is it

115
00:06:38,240 --> 00:06:40,400
Speaker 1: is it plausible that we could continue to have a

116
00:06:40,480 --> 00:06:42,880
Speaker 1: v shaped recovery or do you think just inevitably we've

117
00:06:42,920 --> 00:06:45,000
Speaker 1: had the best of it in the last couple of

118
00:06:45,000 --> 00:06:48,760
Speaker 1: months as lockdowns were removed. Well, the removal of lockdowns

119
00:06:48,760 --> 00:06:51,400
Speaker 1: has clearly been enormously helpful in getting a rebound and

120
00:06:51,440 --> 00:06:54,040
Speaker 1: activity coming through. I think it's also fair to say

121
00:06:54,080 --> 00:06:56,360
Speaker 1: that track and trade systems are much better than they

122
00:06:56,360 --> 00:06:59,000
Speaker 1: would have been just a handful of weeks ago, let

123
00:06:59,080 --> 00:07:02,000
Speaker 1: alone months, So that's also good news. But I think

124
00:07:02,000 --> 00:07:06,320
Speaker 1: there are also difficulties that exist which would really be

125
00:07:06,400 --> 00:07:08,800
Speaker 1: on Europe's control. I mean, obviously we're talking about the

126
00:07:08,880 --> 00:07:13,000
Speaker 1: world whereby even though Europe is looking better, many other

127
00:07:13,040 --> 00:07:15,560
Speaker 1: parts of the world looking a whole lot worse. And

128
00:07:15,600 --> 00:07:19,600
Speaker 1: when it comes to trade flows of capital business flowing

129
00:07:19,600 --> 00:07:21,600
Speaker 1: in different directions around the world, I think a lot

130
00:07:21,640 --> 00:07:24,600
Speaker 1: of that will still be heavily constrained in the months ahead.

131
00:07:25,080 --> 00:07:28,320
Speaker 1: And alongside that, even with the rebound that we've seen,

132
00:07:28,320 --> 00:07:31,160
Speaker 1: there could be lots of areas of activity that are

133
00:07:31,160 --> 00:07:36,600
Speaker 1: likely to be permanently depressed. Whether it's retail, restaurants, air

134
00:07:36,640 --> 00:07:38,840
Speaker 1: travel and all these things are likely to be more

135
00:07:38,880 --> 00:07:41,400
Speaker 1: depressed they have been for really quite some time. So

136
00:07:41,440 --> 00:07:43,880
Speaker 1: it can be pockets of economy that we permanently weaker

137
00:07:44,240 --> 00:07:47,560
Speaker 1: and permanently scarring the economy as a whole in the

138
00:07:47,600 --> 00:07:50,440
Speaker 1: months and quarters ahead. I mean, Adam, you mentioned that

139
00:07:50,560 --> 00:07:52,760
Speaker 1: as one of the key challenges. I mean, we clearly

140
00:07:52,800 --> 00:07:55,800
Speaker 1: are at a different stage in terms of policy making

141
00:07:55,960 --> 00:08:00,840
Speaker 1: in places where the governments are gone from trying to

142
00:08:00,880 --> 00:08:02,840
Speaker 1: put a floor under the economy to actually try to

143
00:08:02,880 --> 00:08:06,000
Speaker 1: help it grow, but grow in a world that still

144
00:08:06,040 --> 00:08:08,760
Speaker 1: has to deal with covid um. I wrote something the

145
00:08:08,800 --> 00:08:11,800
Speaker 1: other day which talked about this trade off or the

146
00:08:11,880 --> 00:08:14,880
Speaker 1: decision that governments have to make about how much can

147
00:08:14,920 --> 00:08:18,960
Speaker 1: be protected and how much needs to be reinvented. Does

148
00:08:19,000 --> 00:08:23,400
Speaker 1: anyone have a good handle on how to approach that uncertainty? Right?

149
00:08:23,600 --> 00:08:27,520
Speaker 1: I'm gonna be slightly more optimistic than Stephen, I think,

150
00:08:27,600 --> 00:08:31,840
Speaker 1: but against a very grim baseline. I think the top

151
00:08:32,040 --> 00:08:35,920
Speaker 1: end of companies and people employed in those companies, top end,

152
00:08:35,960 --> 00:08:38,920
Speaker 1: not in quality and size and revenue, in market share,

153
00:08:39,559 --> 00:08:41,720
Speaker 1: they're going to be fine. And we've seen that with

154
00:08:41,880 --> 00:08:44,320
Speaker 1: the Fang companies and other companies, and we've seen that

155
00:08:44,400 --> 00:08:47,720
Speaker 1: even in airlines that as grim as it is for airlines,

156
00:08:47,760 --> 00:08:52,920
Speaker 1: they're successfully extracting bailouts from from the government's I think

157
00:08:52,960 --> 00:08:57,080
Speaker 1: the very micro businesses, people running very small restaurants they're

158
00:08:57,120 --> 00:09:00,679
Speaker 1: suffering is very real. But I also think that to

159
00:09:00,800 --> 00:09:03,959
Speaker 1: sound sort of dickenzie In or Milton Friedman, those are

160
00:09:04,040 --> 00:09:06,720
Speaker 1: people who are in those businesses because they had to adapt.

161
00:09:06,720 --> 00:09:08,680
Speaker 1: They were trying to make a living for their for

162
00:09:08,760 --> 00:09:13,360
Speaker 1: their for their families, their entrepreneurial they're used to having

163
00:09:13,360 --> 00:09:16,400
Speaker 1: business failures, frankly, and they're used to having to change jobs.

164
00:09:16,400 --> 00:09:19,520
Speaker 1: And I think their resilience. It's very sad, but I

165
00:09:19,520 --> 00:09:22,280
Speaker 1: think the resilience is going to surprise people. What I

166
00:09:22,320 --> 00:09:25,360
Speaker 1: think gets caught are the sort of mid the employment

167
00:09:25,400 --> 00:09:28,760
Speaker 1: in the middle tier, the employment in in those that

168
00:09:28,800 --> 00:09:31,440
Speaker 1: are not political or big enough to get the support

169
00:09:31,880 --> 00:09:34,839
Speaker 1: and that are too big to be just sort of

170
00:09:34,920 --> 00:09:38,120
Speaker 1: no capital, no reputation, just move on to the next thing.

171
00:09:39,000 --> 00:09:42,320
Speaker 1: And I think at some point very soon government support

172
00:09:42,360 --> 00:09:45,000
Speaker 1: for those people, if they got any and those businesses

173
00:09:45,080 --> 00:09:48,160
Speaker 1: is going to run at um. But the place where

174
00:09:48,200 --> 00:09:52,680
Speaker 1: I get to be more optimistic is that I think

175
00:09:52,800 --> 00:09:56,720
Speaker 1: the governments that did a better job, like in Western

176
00:09:56,760 --> 00:10:00,200
Speaker 1: Europe and East Asia in dealing with the pandemic, will

177
00:10:00,240 --> 00:10:03,320
Speaker 1: also be more resilient going forward because they'll have more

178
00:10:03,440 --> 00:10:07,240
Speaker 1: faith from people and investors that that the situation can

179
00:10:07,280 --> 00:10:13,199
Speaker 1: be stabilized and vice versa. The US, Brazil, possibly India,

180
00:10:13,280 --> 00:10:16,079
Speaker 1: places that have really messed it up the UK to

181
00:10:16,200 --> 00:10:21,040
Speaker 1: orser degree but still real may suffer an ongoing penalty

182
00:10:21,320 --> 00:10:24,800
Speaker 1: that people are just less trusting the government can put

183
00:10:24,800 --> 00:10:28,400
Speaker 1: a flora under things. Is that going to affect how

184
00:10:28,440 --> 00:10:31,440
Speaker 1: investors look at the world. I mean, we've had we've

185
00:10:31,480 --> 00:10:33,800
Speaker 1: had this disconnect for some months now with you know,

186
00:10:33,920 --> 00:10:36,600
Speaker 1: there's a stock market acting as if basically the last

187
00:10:36,640 --> 00:10:39,920
Speaker 1: seven months has not happened, having gone way down, but

188
00:10:40,000 --> 00:10:43,160
Speaker 1: also now where up, but also betting on the US

189
00:10:43,320 --> 00:10:47,600
Speaker 1: relative to Europe. I think on the grounds that the

190
00:10:47,679 --> 00:10:50,559
Speaker 1: US is just in your words, Adam has just been

191
00:10:50,600 --> 00:10:53,080
Speaker 1: more resilient in the past, has been more able to

192
00:10:53,120 --> 00:10:57,400
Speaker 1: make these kind of adjustments. Um, if you're right, then

193
00:10:57,480 --> 00:11:00,680
Speaker 1: that might be wrong and we should actually be expecting

194
00:11:00,720 --> 00:11:04,000
Speaker 1: Europe to come out falster than this. I I thank

195
00:11:04,040 --> 00:11:06,120
Speaker 1: you for picking up on that, Stephanie, and I think

196
00:11:06,120 --> 00:11:09,160
Speaker 1: that is a direct implication of what I'm saying. Um

197
00:11:09,200 --> 00:11:13,920
Speaker 1: I I I am able to rationalize the stock market

198
00:11:14,000 --> 00:11:16,760
Speaker 1: generally for all the reasons that you've talked about with

199
00:11:16,800 --> 00:11:19,520
Speaker 1: others on this program and are well rehearsed. I think

200
00:11:19,559 --> 00:11:22,600
Speaker 1: the most important thing is to recognize in the U

201
00:11:22,679 --> 00:11:25,800
Speaker 1: S stock markets, in the in the UK stock markets,

202
00:11:25,800 --> 00:11:28,280
Speaker 1: and a lot of advanced economy stock markets, this is

203
00:11:28,320 --> 00:11:31,280
Speaker 1: a very particular section of the economy. This is mostly

204
00:11:31,360 --> 00:11:34,600
Speaker 1: multinational companies are large companies. It's the ones that happened

205
00:11:34,600 --> 00:11:37,920
Speaker 1: not to have been taken private. It's not represented the

206
00:11:37,960 --> 00:11:40,959
Speaker 1: economy as a whole. So in some ways they are,

207
00:11:41,040 --> 00:11:44,200
Speaker 1: knowing that they've survived, that they have political access, that

208
00:11:44,320 --> 00:11:46,960
Speaker 1: they're going to have more market power, frankly because some

209
00:11:47,000 --> 00:11:49,960
Speaker 1: of the competition is being driven out, that there's going

210
00:11:50,040 --> 00:11:52,560
Speaker 1: to be less wage pressure because so many people are

211
00:11:52,600 --> 00:11:56,080
Speaker 1: going to be unemployed. You can rationalize, frankly why the

212
00:11:56,120 --> 00:11:59,520
Speaker 1: stock market is up. But the rotation as it were,

213
00:11:59,559 --> 00:12:03,000
Speaker 1: between US versus Europe, I think, and frankly China and

214
00:12:03,040 --> 00:12:06,400
Speaker 1: East Asia is the right thing to consider. And and

215
00:12:06,480 --> 00:12:09,200
Speaker 1: one of the things I've most reconsidered over the last

216
00:12:09,240 --> 00:12:12,600
Speaker 1: three months is my general assumption that the US always

217
00:12:12,640 --> 00:12:16,600
Speaker 1: wins the least ugly contest. Um. I'm beginning to think

218
00:12:17,320 --> 00:12:19,800
Speaker 1: for obvious reasons, but I don't think the markets and

219
00:12:19,840 --> 00:12:23,280
Speaker 1: the currency markets in particular put this together yet that

220
00:12:23,679 --> 00:12:26,880
Speaker 1: the US is actually getting ugly or faster and Europe

221
00:12:26,880 --> 00:12:29,160
Speaker 1: has managed to get a little good plastic surgery in.

222
00:12:35,880 --> 00:12:37,839
Speaker 1: Now we should lift our sites a little bit to

223
00:12:37,920 --> 00:12:41,520
Speaker 1: the longer term picture. And we've had quite a few

224
00:12:41,520 --> 00:12:44,079
Speaker 1: debates on the economics over the last few months about

225
00:12:44,720 --> 00:12:47,960
Speaker 1: whether things that had happened as a result of COVID,

226
00:12:48,040 --> 00:12:50,920
Speaker 1: possibly the acceleration of some trends we've had in the

227
00:12:51,000 --> 00:12:55,120
Speaker 1: past could end up forcing positive change in the world

228
00:12:55,280 --> 00:12:57,679
Speaker 1: or instead sort of set us on further on faster

229
00:12:57,800 --> 00:12:59,960
Speaker 1: on the path to doom as we had newer Rabini

230
00:13:00,000 --> 00:13:03,440
Speaker 1: he definitely believed. But Stephen, you've spent quite a lot

231
00:13:03,480 --> 00:13:06,439
Speaker 1: of time over the years thinking about the long term

232
00:13:06,640 --> 00:13:12,120
Speaker 1: prognosis for the world and some of these deep structural changes.

233
00:13:12,280 --> 00:13:18,000
Speaker 1: What are you currently thinking about how COVID interacts with those. Well,

234
00:13:18,000 --> 00:13:20,240
Speaker 1: I had a dream the other night which is all

235
00:13:20,240 --> 00:13:24,760
Speaker 1: about the World Health Organization being treated as a new

236
00:13:24,840 --> 00:13:30,120
Speaker 1: important international institution that would be respected by all comers

237
00:13:30,160 --> 00:13:33,080
Speaker 1: and would set new health protocols for every country around

238
00:13:33,120 --> 00:13:35,800
Speaker 1: the world, and we could suddenly trust each other in

239
00:13:35,840 --> 00:13:38,960
Speaker 1: ways that weren't plausible brieviously, and I woke up and

240
00:13:39,000 --> 00:13:41,920
Speaker 1: actually spotted the reality, which of course is fundamentally different,

241
00:13:42,679 --> 00:13:45,040
Speaker 1: with the U S having removed its funding of the

242
00:13:45,040 --> 00:13:47,880
Speaker 1: World Health Organization and the w h O effect of

243
00:13:47,960 --> 00:13:52,920
Speaker 1: being caught in a kind of US Sino spat. Actually

244
00:13:52,920 --> 00:13:54,400
Speaker 1: it's more than the spack now, of course, but that

245
00:13:54,480 --> 00:13:59,880
Speaker 1: basically is what has happened. And I fear that the pandemic,

246
00:14:00,120 --> 00:14:04,160
Speaker 1: although it's led to you know, huge amounts of scientific

247
00:14:04,200 --> 00:14:07,839
Speaker 1: cooperation around the world which is a glorious site to behold. Really.

248
00:14:08,360 --> 00:14:11,440
Speaker 1: There's also lead, I think to new language begining to

249
00:14:11,480 --> 00:14:15,160
Speaker 1: emerge in terms of national champions, strategic industries, the kind

250
00:14:15,200 --> 00:14:17,120
Speaker 1: of language we have seen back of the nineteen fifties

251
00:14:17,160 --> 00:14:20,160
Speaker 1: and nineteen sixties, perhaps, but it's kind of re emerging.

252
00:14:20,640 --> 00:14:24,280
Speaker 1: There are new questions about how fragile global supply chains are,

253
00:14:24,760 --> 00:14:27,360
Speaker 1: and that a lot of things I think are in

254
00:14:27,440 --> 00:14:30,400
Speaker 1: one sense being used as an opportunity to grab more

255
00:14:30,600 --> 00:14:33,600
Speaker 1: in the way of a nationalist agenda and isolationist or

256
00:14:33,680 --> 00:14:37,400
Speaker 1: protectionist agenda that was already there. But I fear at

257
00:14:37,400 --> 00:14:39,800
Speaker 1: the moment it is likely to become worse rather than

258
00:14:39,840 --> 00:14:44,520
Speaker 1: better in the years ahead. Adam, how are you thinking

259
00:14:44,560 --> 00:14:47,600
Speaker 1: about the future? And I guess one aspect there's one aspect,

260
00:14:47,600 --> 00:14:52,440
Speaker 1: which is about is this going to reverse globalization or

261
00:14:52,520 --> 00:14:56,080
Speaker 1: merely accelerate some of the things that we're already seeing

262
00:14:56,120 --> 00:15:00,080
Speaker 1: in the way of automation m for example. But I

263
00:15:00,120 --> 00:15:03,400
Speaker 1: think another side of that is doesn't change our attitude

264
00:15:03,440 --> 00:15:07,800
Speaker 1: to government in a lasting way. No, I think that's right, Stephanie.

265
00:15:07,880 --> 00:15:11,560
Speaker 1: The you know, so, I think about trends that were

266
00:15:11,600 --> 00:15:15,960
Speaker 1: accelerated or reinforced by the pandemic and the response. And

267
00:15:16,160 --> 00:15:18,640
Speaker 1: I think I think in terms of as I think

268
00:15:18,640 --> 00:15:22,960
Speaker 1: we've discussed the corrosion of globalization, rather than it rolling

269
00:15:23,000 --> 00:15:28,080
Speaker 1: back or forward, that that it becomes more brittle, more uneven, uh,

270
00:15:28,120 --> 00:15:31,400
Speaker 1: certain kinds of connections free, but it advances in other way.

271
00:15:31,560 --> 00:15:34,000
Speaker 1: So you know, you can have the EU of all

272
00:15:34,040 --> 00:15:38,200
Speaker 1: places putting on restrictions on exports and medical equipment at

273
00:15:38,200 --> 00:15:41,800
Speaker 1: the same time that the CPTPP nations are creating a

274
00:15:41,840 --> 00:15:45,040
Speaker 1: safe zone. So it's less even across the world, but

275
00:15:45,160 --> 00:15:48,640
Speaker 1: deeper in some places. I think the types of political

276
00:15:48,720 --> 00:15:52,680
Speaker 1: backlash we're talking about are likely but still to play

277
00:15:52,720 --> 00:15:57,160
Speaker 1: for Frankly, Um, when you see the economic nationalists like Bolson,

278
00:15:57,280 --> 00:16:01,040
Speaker 1: Arrow and Trump and Johnson and their Air Dowan and

279
00:16:01,120 --> 00:16:03,320
Speaker 1: do air Day not having a good run of it

280
00:16:03,480 --> 00:16:06,520
Speaker 1: dealing with the disease, that may in the end make

281
00:16:06,560 --> 00:16:09,600
Speaker 1: a difference, and that goes to the more positive side. Again,

282
00:16:09,640 --> 00:16:14,800
Speaker 1: I'm in the odd position of sounding more optimistic than many, um,

283
00:16:14,800 --> 00:16:16,320
Speaker 1: which just goes back to something you and I talked

284
00:16:16,320 --> 00:16:20,760
Speaker 1: about in the first episode, which is the there may

285
00:16:20,800 --> 00:16:27,080
Speaker 1: be greater demand for a European style economy, UM, particularly

286
00:16:27,200 --> 00:16:31,440
Speaker 1: in the Commonwealth countries and in East Asia than had

287
00:16:31,480 --> 00:16:36,360
Speaker 1: been seen previously. It's partly that the cost benefit of

288
00:16:36,640 --> 00:16:41,240
Speaker 1: being a free market totally lays a fair which exaggerates obviously,

289
00:16:41,280 --> 00:16:45,800
Speaker 1: but anyway, the more American Anglo American style hasn't prevented

290
00:16:46,040 --> 00:16:48,920
Speaker 1: either the crisis of two thousand eight or the bad

291
00:16:49,000 --> 00:16:52,880
Speaker 1: response of two thousand twenty. But it's also partly that

292
00:16:52,920 --> 00:16:55,640
Speaker 1: we're seeing in fact with the French and the Germans

293
00:16:56,120 --> 00:16:58,800
Speaker 1: and the Danes and the even the Italians and the

294
00:16:58,840 --> 00:17:01,880
Speaker 1: Greeks are doing is having pretty good results in terms

295
00:17:01,880 --> 00:17:06,240
Speaker 1: of keeping people back in employment and keeping firms open.

296
00:17:07,040 --> 00:17:09,359
Speaker 1: And then there's the issue, of course, that is my

297
00:17:09,400 --> 00:17:12,080
Speaker 1: colleague at Peterson Olivable and Chart has led the charge

298
00:17:12,080 --> 00:17:17,840
Speaker 1: on not exaggerating the the constraints on fiscal room, not

299
00:17:17,960 --> 00:17:23,520
Speaker 1: exaggerating the debt risks. Again, that's not a MMT carte blanche,

300
00:17:23,600 --> 00:17:26,159
Speaker 1: but it is it goes with this, and so I

301
00:17:26,200 --> 00:17:30,280
Speaker 1: do think there is a possibility that we we see,

302
00:17:30,359 --> 00:17:33,840
Speaker 1: if you're about performs, we see some shift to greater

303
00:17:34,520 --> 00:17:39,480
Speaker 1: acceptance of a demand for the European style state. I'm interested, Stephen,

304
00:17:39,960 --> 00:17:44,760
Speaker 1: do you think that's plausible. I think it's plausible in

305
00:17:44,800 --> 00:17:48,520
Speaker 1: the sense that What does emerge from this crisis is

306
00:17:48,600 --> 00:17:53,080
Speaker 1: the idea that countries regions that have a sense of

307
00:17:53,119 --> 00:17:56,760
Speaker 1: social responsibility supposed to individual freedom have tended to do

308
00:17:56,960 --> 00:18:00,240
Speaker 1: to date rather better than those that have oft the

309
00:18:00,240 --> 00:18:04,359
Speaker 1: focus on individual freedom. Certainly from a a sort of

310
00:18:04,720 --> 00:18:08,760
Speaker 1: British perspective, observing the debate in the US about wearing masks,

311
00:18:08,920 --> 00:18:11,720
Speaker 1: it strikes me as being a pretty odd debate, but

312
00:18:11,800 --> 00:18:15,680
Speaker 1: it's something that seems to be uniquely American perhaps rather

313
00:18:15,720 --> 00:18:19,040
Speaker 1: than European um. And when you've got those kinds of

314
00:18:19,040 --> 00:18:21,600
Speaker 1: differences in behavior, then perhaps it's not so surprising was

315
00:18:21,640 --> 00:18:24,119
Speaker 1: seeing differences in terms of outcomes with regard to the

316
00:18:24,200 --> 00:18:27,960
Speaker 1: virus UM. The difficulty, of course, is that it may

317
00:18:28,000 --> 00:18:30,560
Speaker 1: well be that Europe has a good crisis, but it

318
00:18:30,680 --> 00:18:33,439
Speaker 1: is also the case that Europe over a much longer

319
00:18:33,560 --> 00:18:36,280
Speaker 1: period of time has not really delivered an awful lot

320
00:18:36,320 --> 00:18:38,560
Speaker 1: of economic growth, and there are plenty of countries around

321
00:18:38,600 --> 00:18:40,280
Speaker 1: the world who would like to see more growth than

322
00:18:40,280 --> 00:18:44,200
Speaker 1: Europe itself has delivered. UM. So I think a big

323
00:18:44,280 --> 00:18:47,240
Speaker 1: question here is whether coming out of this crisis, Europe,

324
00:18:47,600 --> 00:18:50,520
Speaker 1: through these new fiscal packages and so on, can deliver

325
00:18:50,640 --> 00:18:53,560
Speaker 1: something which actually makes a monetary union at the fiscal

326
00:18:53,640 --> 00:18:57,080
Speaker 1: union work together in a politically sustainable fashion, and that

327
00:18:57,119 --> 00:18:58,919
Speaker 1: I think is still a very very big challenge for

328
00:18:59,040 --> 00:19:02,000
Speaker 1: the for the years ahead. I guess one final thing

329
00:19:02,119 --> 00:19:05,159
Speaker 1: is just about when we think about long term impacts,

330
00:19:05,760 --> 00:19:09,560
Speaker 1: often one is surprised by how behavior changes in response

331
00:19:09,600 --> 00:19:11,320
Speaker 1: to this kind of experience. And we all know, you know,

332
00:19:11,359 --> 00:19:14,120
Speaker 1: the evidence that suggests the big financial crisis can really

333
00:19:14,200 --> 00:19:18,960
Speaker 1: change people's attitude to too savings or to the kind

334
00:19:18,960 --> 00:19:22,359
Speaker 1: of financial assets they might might want. Is there a

335
00:19:22,400 --> 00:19:26,879
Speaker 1: possibility that this crisis does pave the way for inflation

336
00:19:27,040 --> 00:19:29,920
Speaker 1: down the road, not because of the sort of short

337
00:19:30,000 --> 00:19:34,000
Speaker 1: term impact of the money being pumped into the economy,

338
00:19:34,080 --> 00:19:37,880
Speaker 1: but because of a change in attitude towards borrowing and spending.

339
00:19:37,880 --> 00:19:39,560
Speaker 1: I mean, it could be that people from now on

340
00:19:40,320 --> 00:19:43,400
Speaker 1: just will not listen to politicians who tell them that

341
00:19:43,440 --> 00:19:47,240
Speaker 1: there are constraints on spending and borrowing, because they've seen,

342
00:19:48,280 --> 00:19:51,720
Speaker 1: when push comes to shove, that they can spend any

343
00:19:51,760 --> 00:19:54,000
Speaker 1: amount of money to get themselves out of a hole.

344
00:19:54,359 --> 00:19:56,159
Speaker 1: I don't know who, what, Stephen, do you think this

345
00:19:56,240 --> 00:19:59,200
Speaker 1: is when historians look back? Is this paving the way

346
00:19:59,240 --> 00:20:04,120
Speaker 1: for inflation? I'm let me go first, because I think

347
00:20:04,480 --> 00:20:12,640
Speaker 1: Stephen will very different. I'm inflating myself, um, I think

348
00:20:13,359 --> 00:20:18,080
Speaker 1: I think there's two opposing forces, Stephanie. On the one hand,

349
00:20:18,160 --> 00:20:21,200
Speaker 1: as you say, sort of the the the wolf has

350
00:20:21,240 --> 00:20:23,760
Speaker 1: been called out, and it doesn't mean that there's no

351
00:20:23,880 --> 00:20:27,439
Speaker 1: fiscal limit, but it means it matters a lot on

352
00:20:27,560 --> 00:20:30,359
Speaker 1: context what the fiscal limit is, and it matters a

353
00:20:30,400 --> 00:20:34,040
Speaker 1: lot on what you spend it um and both of

354
00:20:34,080 --> 00:20:37,480
Speaker 1: which have been largely absent from the discussion of fiscal

355
00:20:37,560 --> 00:20:42,320
Speaker 1: hawks and fiscal hawk politicians. And so I do think

356
00:20:42,400 --> 00:20:45,520
Speaker 1: there will be this sense of liberation, as it were.

357
00:20:46,040 --> 00:20:48,600
Speaker 1: But as we've seen with Japan and as we've seen

358
00:20:48,640 --> 00:20:52,440
Speaker 1: with Italy, you can have very long term accumulation of

359
00:20:52,480 --> 00:20:55,320
Speaker 1: a lot of debt and it doesn't necessarily lead to inflation.

360
00:20:55,800 --> 00:20:59,960
Speaker 1: And I think the countervailing force is large economic. Going

361
00:21:00,040 --> 00:21:04,560
Speaker 1: back to behavioral changes, is people save more, are more

362
00:21:04,640 --> 00:21:06,960
Speaker 1: risk averse in this kind of situation. I mean, think

363
00:21:07,000 --> 00:21:10,760
Speaker 1: about your children are too young, but maybe Stephen's children.

364
00:21:10,880 --> 00:21:14,320
Speaker 1: You know that they've seen their contemporaries and their peers

365
00:21:14,640 --> 00:21:18,080
Speaker 1: go through two rounds of large unemployment and two rounds

366
00:21:18,080 --> 00:21:21,480
Speaker 1: of setback, and they're going to like our grandparents in

367
00:21:21,520 --> 00:21:24,600
Speaker 1: the thirties, they're going to be more cautious and there's

368
00:21:24,680 --> 00:21:29,040
Speaker 1: fewer things to invest in. The risk adjusted investment propositions

369
00:21:29,040 --> 00:21:31,480
Speaker 1: are so and the one in private savings are going up.

370
00:21:31,480 --> 00:21:34,680
Speaker 1: At the second time public savings may be loosened, so

371
00:21:35,000 --> 00:21:36,920
Speaker 1: that battle I'm not sure how it works out. I

372
00:21:36,960 --> 00:21:39,919
Speaker 1: see both forces. But the political angle, and this is

373
00:21:39,920 --> 00:21:43,159
Speaker 1: why I made reference to Carter and the seventies is

374
00:21:43,359 --> 00:21:46,520
Speaker 1: you know, I have a a very retrograde vision of

375
00:21:46,560 --> 00:21:50,360
Speaker 1: inflation in the sense that it it's associated with political breakdounds.

376
00:21:50,400 --> 00:21:54,680
Speaker 1: It's associated with UK in the seventies and only the seventies,

377
00:21:54,760 --> 00:21:57,600
Speaker 1: Argentine in the eighties, when people lose faith that there

378
00:21:57,640 --> 00:22:03,040
Speaker 1: can be agreement that the government can raise taxes if necessary,

379
00:22:03,320 --> 00:22:05,359
Speaker 1: and even if they don't, you need that sort of

380
00:22:05,520 --> 00:22:08,800
Speaker 1: threat that they can raise taxes to establish credibility. And

381
00:22:08,800 --> 00:22:11,400
Speaker 1: if you have social political breakdown, you can't do that.

382
00:22:12,040 --> 00:22:14,840
Speaker 1: And that's when people start from the outside and inside

383
00:22:14,840 --> 00:22:18,040
Speaker 1: looking abroad. And so to me, that's really going to

384
00:22:18,040 --> 00:22:21,159
Speaker 1: be the determined of inflation. How much political division and

385
00:22:21,320 --> 00:22:25,119
Speaker 1: inoperability of government of legislatures we get, and then you

386
00:22:25,200 --> 00:22:28,800
Speaker 1: might get back to the us once again, it's not

387
00:22:28,920 --> 00:22:32,560
Speaker 1: really being attractive to people in a kind of fundamental way. Stephen,

388
00:22:32,760 --> 00:22:36,440
Speaker 1: And when I say Stephen, I mean Stephen, Thanks Stephanie,

389
00:22:37,200 --> 00:22:40,880
Speaker 1: Thanks Adam. Um So, I think one thing that has

390
00:22:40,920 --> 00:22:44,080
Speaker 1: emerged from this whole crisis is a sense of a

391
00:22:44,080 --> 00:22:47,760
Speaker 1: generational divide. And this is very unfortunate and probably quite

392
00:22:47,760 --> 00:22:50,320
Speaker 1: a sensitive topic to talk about, but the reality is

393
00:22:50,359 --> 00:22:53,720
Speaker 1: that the majority people who are particularly vulnerable to COVID

394
00:22:53,800 --> 00:22:57,159
Speaker 1: nineteen are relatively mature. The majority of people who are

395
00:22:57,160 --> 00:23:00,159
Speaker 1: particularly vulnerable to the economic consequences of lockdown and so

396
00:23:00,240 --> 00:23:05,080
Speaker 1: on are relatively young. And I'd also observed that although

397
00:23:05,080 --> 00:23:09,199
Speaker 1: Adam is absolutely right about the ability to have government

398
00:23:09,200 --> 00:23:11,320
Speaker 1: debt rising a lot further than we've seen so far,

399
00:23:12,359 --> 00:23:15,679
Speaker 1: we also know from wartime going back over two hundred

400
00:23:15,760 --> 00:23:17,680
Speaker 1: years or so, that when debt levels get to these

401
00:23:17,800 --> 00:23:21,480
Speaker 1: very high amounts, they eventually do find a way of

402
00:23:21,520 --> 00:23:24,600
Speaker 1: coming back down again. And they come down either because

403
00:23:25,240 --> 00:23:27,359
Speaker 1: you're very lucky to have very strong income growth that

404
00:23:27,480 --> 00:23:30,520
Speaker 1: denominators rising very quickly, as was the case from the

405
00:23:30,640 --> 00:23:35,439
Speaker 1: nineteen late forties nine fifties onwards, or it's because of

406
00:23:35,560 --> 00:23:39,880
Speaker 1: inflation has happened to particularly buy my Republic and Austria

407
00:23:39,880 --> 00:23:43,280
Speaker 1: and so on after World War One. Or it's higher

408
00:23:43,320 --> 00:23:46,159
Speaker 1: taxes of one kind or another, which is what William

409
00:23:46,200 --> 00:23:50,320
Speaker 1: Pitt the younger introduced in in order to fund the

410
00:23:50,400 --> 00:23:54,680
Speaker 1: Napoleon it was, And I just wonder whether we should

411
00:23:54,680 --> 00:23:56,840
Speaker 1: think about the inflation debate, not so much in terms

412
00:23:56,920 --> 00:23:59,119
Speaker 1: of whether inflation comes along almost by a mistake, but

413
00:23:59,240 --> 00:24:04,240
Speaker 1: rather it is one option to redistribute income from those

414
00:24:04,280 --> 00:24:07,240
Speaker 1: who have got wealth to those who are in debt.

415
00:24:08,040 --> 00:24:09,879
Speaker 1: You can do us through a wealth tax, but wealth

416
00:24:09,880 --> 00:24:14,000
Speaker 1: taxes themselves are a tricker to implement, often deeply unpopular,

417
00:24:14,000 --> 00:24:16,959
Speaker 1: and so on. So inflation actually is a mechanism by

418
00:24:16,960 --> 00:24:20,520
Speaker 1: which you could redistribute income and wealth from the older

419
00:24:20,560 --> 00:24:23,560
Speaker 1: generation to the younger generation. Of course, the problem with

420
00:24:23,640 --> 00:24:26,600
Speaker 1: us is that with boomers and the seventies and above,

421
00:24:26,720 --> 00:24:28,639
Speaker 1: the older generation is not going to really vote for this.

422
00:24:28,920 --> 00:24:30,560
Speaker 1: But there may come a time, and may come a

423
00:24:30,640 --> 00:24:33,399
Speaker 1: point what actually this does begin to come through. An

424
00:24:33,400 --> 00:24:36,520
Speaker 1: inflation could be, at least in the short run, an

425
00:24:36,520 --> 00:24:39,919
Speaker 1: easier option to take than trying to impose nasty taxes

426
00:24:39,920 --> 00:24:43,000
Speaker 1: and people who really want to resist them. Well, Stephen,

427
00:24:43,040 --> 00:24:44,840
Speaker 1: as well as giving us our insights. You have given

428
00:24:44,880 --> 00:24:49,480
Speaker 1: me an idea for a cracking new podcast series about

429
00:24:49,520 --> 00:24:53,359
Speaker 1: economists and their dreams, which I will invite you on.

430
00:24:53,640 --> 00:24:57,400
Speaker 1: Economists talk about the interesting dreams that they have had.

431
00:24:57,880 --> 00:25:00,920
Speaker 1: Now that was all. That was all excellent, and I

432
00:25:00,960 --> 00:25:05,600
Speaker 1: appreciate you helping me reach the end of our Stephonomics series.

433
00:25:05,680 --> 00:25:11,080
Speaker 1: Adam Posen, Stephen King, thanks for listening to this last

434
00:25:11,080 --> 00:25:14,119
Speaker 1: in the current series of Stephanomics. We'll be back in October,

435
00:25:14,200 --> 00:25:16,359
Speaker 1: I think, and do keep an eye on this feed

436
00:25:16,400 --> 00:25:19,080
Speaker 1: because if I talked to anyone really interesting before that,

437
00:25:19,320 --> 00:25:22,000
Speaker 1: we'll put it out as a special episode. Who knows

438
00:25:22,040 --> 00:25:24,160
Speaker 1: what the world will look like in a few months time.

439
00:25:24,480 --> 00:25:27,679
Speaker 1: But you can always find us on the Bloomberg terminal, website,

440
00:25:27,960 --> 00:25:30,560
Speaker 1: app or wherever you get your podcasts. And for more

441
00:25:30,600 --> 00:25:33,840
Speaker 1: news and analysis during the week from Bloomberg Economics, just

442
00:25:33,920 --> 00:25:38,960
Speaker 1: follow at Economics on Twitter. This entire series was masterfully

443
00:25:39,000 --> 00:25:43,120
Speaker 1: and patiently produced my Magnus Hendrickson, with help from executive

444
00:25:43,119 --> 00:25:46,800
Speaker 1: producers Scott Lammon and Lucy Meekin special thanks this week

445
00:25:46,800 --> 00:25:50,439
Speaker 1: too to Stephen King and Adam Posen. The head of

446
00:25:50,440 --> 00:25:52,800
Speaker 1: Bloomberg Podcast is Francesca Leaving