WEBVTT - Fast, Good, Cheap

0:00:06.040 --> 0:00:08.799
<v Speaker 1>Hither and look into Trillions, the show about the Exchange

0:00:08.800 --> 0:00:11.360
<v Speaker 1>created fund better known as the e t F. I'm

0:00:11.440 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Joel Webber. I'm the editor of Bloomberg Markets Magazines and Americvalcionist,

0:00:15.160 --> 0:00:18.799
<v Speaker 1>an analyst with Bloomberg Intelligence. Now on Trillions, will be

0:00:18.840 --> 0:00:21.560
<v Speaker 1>talking about the e t F, which everybody has access to,

0:00:22.079 --> 0:00:23.640
<v Speaker 1>but a lot of people don't really know what they

0:00:23.680 --> 0:00:25.599
<v Speaker 1>are or how to use them. And we're calling the

0:00:25.640 --> 0:00:28.640
<v Speaker 1>show Trillions because of just how big e t f

0:00:28.720 --> 0:00:30.960
<v Speaker 1>s are getting. There are a lot of ways to

0:00:31.000 --> 0:00:34.440
<v Speaker 1>describe the growth of ETFs. I think the most astonishing

0:00:34.479 --> 0:00:36.280
<v Speaker 1>way is this bit of data here, which is that

0:00:36.360 --> 0:00:38.440
<v Speaker 1>it took e t f s eighteen years to get

0:00:38.440 --> 0:00:41.080
<v Speaker 1>to one trillion in assets, but then it only took

0:00:41.120 --> 0:00:43.920
<v Speaker 1>four years to get to two trillion. Now they've reached

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:46.840
<v Speaker 1>three trillion in just over two years, and they're headed

0:00:46.840 --> 0:00:51.199
<v Speaker 1>to four in just under two years. So basically, these

0:00:51.240 --> 0:00:53.199
<v Speaker 1>trillions are starting to stack up a little bit like

0:00:53.280 --> 0:00:55.959
<v Speaker 1>Lego blocks. Right, Yeah, I mean, look, I mean you've

0:00:56.000 --> 0:00:59.040
<v Speaker 1>got trillion after trillion coming in. But and it sounds like, oh,

0:00:59.120 --> 0:01:01.040
<v Speaker 1>this is a new finance trill industry thing that they're

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:03.040
<v Speaker 1>making a lot of money, and it's not true. Unlike

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:05.200
<v Speaker 1>hedge funds and mutual funds, which do produce a lot

0:01:05.280 --> 0:01:08.600
<v Speaker 1>of money for the financial industry, nobody's getting rich on ETFs.

0:01:08.640 --> 0:01:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Inside the financial industry, the investors are where the trillions

0:01:11.959 --> 0:01:15.280
<v Speaker 1>are because ETFs hardly charge anything, so ultimately those trillions

0:01:15.319 --> 0:01:17.320
<v Speaker 1>are really investors taking their money back. And when we

0:01:17.360 --> 0:01:20.560
<v Speaker 1>talk about trillions, though, there is some projected growth of

0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:25.040
<v Speaker 1>how big E t F could get globally bullish case,

0:01:25.480 --> 0:01:27.640
<v Speaker 1>how how how big are we talking? Okay, so the

0:01:27.760 --> 0:01:32.000
<v Speaker 1>most not sober cases twenty trillion by the year five.

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:34.880
<v Speaker 1>That's from State Street. That's crazy because there's only four

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:37.080
<v Speaker 1>point five trillion globally, so that would take a lot

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:40.399
<v Speaker 1>of things to fall into place. The more sober projections

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:43.360
<v Speaker 1>have them at ten to sixteen trillion in the US

0:01:43.400 --> 0:01:46.520
<v Speaker 1>alone in the next ten years. Again, that would take

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:48.600
<v Speaker 1>some step up years where you're seeing like literally a

0:01:48.680 --> 0:01:50.880
<v Speaker 1>trillion flow in in a year. But this year we're

0:01:50.960 --> 0:01:53.840
<v Speaker 1>almost gonna have five billion common, which is double almost

0:01:53.880 --> 0:01:56.360
<v Speaker 1>the old record. So anyway you look at this, it

0:01:56.480 --> 0:01:59.720
<v Speaker 1>starts to look like a hockey stick. And that growth

0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 1>is one of the things we're gonna be talking about here.

0:02:05.440 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 1>So before we go any further, let's explain it the

0:02:07.480 --> 0:02:11.280
<v Speaker 1>most basic level. What in eat F is, Eric, I

0:02:11.360 --> 0:02:12.919
<v Speaker 1>know that you like to say that in eat F

0:02:13.240 --> 0:02:15.880
<v Speaker 1>is like a marriage between a stock, which is a

0:02:15.960 --> 0:02:19.120
<v Speaker 1>share in a publicly traded company, and an index fund,

0:02:19.320 --> 0:02:23.400
<v Speaker 1>which is basically a compilation of all those different stocks. Yeah, exactly.

0:02:23.600 --> 0:02:25.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean I teach the new classes on ets here

0:02:25.840 --> 0:02:28.600
<v Speaker 1>to new hires, and everybody can identify with that. You

0:02:28.639 --> 0:02:30.320
<v Speaker 1>show a picture of a stock and an index fund.

0:02:30.400 --> 0:02:33.080
<v Speaker 1>And because look, a lot of products that people love

0:02:33.120 --> 0:02:35.880
<v Speaker 1>and no came from two things getting combined, and so

0:02:36.000 --> 0:02:37.760
<v Speaker 1>it makes sense. Sometimes you bring two things together, you

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 1>get something better in the end. Yeah, basically, I mean, take,

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:44.240
<v Speaker 1>for example, the Reese's Peanut butter cup chocolate and peanut

0:02:44.280 --> 0:02:46.639
<v Speaker 1>butter Right, I know you like those, God, I love this. Yeah.

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Or I mean your favorite band, Haul of Notates, Right,

0:02:49.440 --> 0:02:52.480
<v Speaker 1>you got Haul and Oats. They are really bad individuals.

0:02:52.600 --> 0:02:55.360
<v Speaker 1>You put them together, You've got like a twenty hit songs,

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:59.440
<v Speaker 1>so much better together than apart. Yeah, throwing the must fashion,

0:02:59.520 --> 0:03:02.600
<v Speaker 1>You've got basically a gold mine. The mustache was just gold.

0:03:02.800 --> 0:03:06.440
<v Speaker 1>So what are the advantages of the marriage in the

0:03:06.680 --> 0:03:09.359
<v Speaker 1>context of an ETF. So the good stuff people like

0:03:09.400 --> 0:03:11.720
<v Speaker 1>about stocks, right, You like it's easy to trade, there's

0:03:11.760 --> 0:03:15.480
<v Speaker 1>price transparency, it's convenient. Right. The stuff that people like

0:03:15.560 --> 0:03:18.760
<v Speaker 1>about index funds is they're cheap and they're diversified, so

0:03:18.800 --> 0:03:21.760
<v Speaker 1>you get a lot of stocks in one shot. Let's

0:03:21.760 --> 0:03:25.520
<v Speaker 1>actually dwell on that diversification idea for a little bit longer.

0:03:26.440 --> 0:03:30.680
<v Speaker 1>I like to think of diversification like a carton of eggs. Right,

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:34.600
<v Speaker 1>so there's twelve. Maybe you drop that carton and you

0:03:34.680 --> 0:03:37.360
<v Speaker 1>break one, but you haven't ruined the whole carton, right,

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:40.160
<v Speaker 1>you still have eleven others that are perfectly good. Is

0:03:40.200 --> 0:03:41.560
<v Speaker 1>that a little bit like what an e t F is.

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:43.600
<v Speaker 1>My wife would still yell at me for the one

0:03:43.680 --> 0:03:47.760
<v Speaker 1>that broke, but my issues aside. Yes, that's a great

0:03:47.760 --> 0:03:49.080
<v Speaker 1>way to put it. I'm a fan of metaphors, and

0:03:49.120 --> 0:03:50.840
<v Speaker 1>I think you just nailed it there. That's exactly what

0:03:50.920 --> 0:03:54.240
<v Speaker 1>diversification does for you. So as simple as I think

0:03:54.280 --> 0:03:56.840
<v Speaker 1>that sounds, I want you to try and explain it

0:03:56.960 --> 0:03:59.840
<v Speaker 1>to our producer who we've hired, because she actually knows

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:02.320
<v Speaker 1>nothing about E t F s. Jordan, Can you hear us?

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:05.520
<v Speaker 1>That's right? I can hear you and I don't know anything, alright,

0:04:05.600 --> 0:04:10.760
<v Speaker 1>E T S you know, Jordan is basically our audience. Yeah, totally.

0:04:11.160 --> 0:04:14.800
<v Speaker 1>So so let's actually like try and explain it to Jordan. Eric,

0:04:15.800 --> 0:04:17.480
<v Speaker 1>what's an example that you like to use when you're

0:04:17.480 --> 0:04:19.720
<v Speaker 1>explaining what in the E t F is? Okay, so

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Jordan's let's let's create a scenario here. Okay, Let's say

0:04:23.920 --> 0:04:26.479
<v Speaker 1>you live out in the suburbs, right, and you walk

0:04:26.520 --> 0:04:29.440
<v Speaker 1>outside and you see somebody putting solar panels up on

0:04:29.480 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 1>the roof across the street. Which, Jordan, you're from California.

0:04:32.440 --> 0:04:35.839
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you've seen that before. I've seen it go down. Yeah,

0:04:36.240 --> 0:04:39.240
<v Speaker 1>there's solar streets there, right, Yeah, So anyway, you see

0:04:39.279 --> 0:04:42.440
<v Speaker 1>solar or something going up, and you said yourself, you know,

0:04:42.680 --> 0:04:44.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm seeing a lot of this. This is something i'd

0:04:44.560 --> 0:04:48.200
<v Speaker 1>like to invest in. Now, you don't even know any

0:04:48.279 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 1>solar stocks. I don't. It's who does, right, So how

0:04:51.680 --> 0:04:53.120
<v Speaker 1>would you go about doing that? You'd have to go

0:04:53.240 --> 0:04:55.240
<v Speaker 1>research the stocks and all this Already you'll be like,

0:04:55.320 --> 0:04:57.960
<v Speaker 1>you know what, I'm late for the bus? That the

0:04:58.000 --> 0:05:01.239
<v Speaker 1>hell with it? Well? Eat, yes, make that very easy,

0:05:01.320 --> 0:05:04.120
<v Speaker 1>because like take the solar energy E t F as

0:05:04.160 --> 0:05:06.400
<v Speaker 1>a ticker Tan, which is one of the best parts

0:05:06.760 --> 0:05:10.240
<v Speaker 1>about E T F are these crazy names. Not all

0:05:10.240 --> 0:05:11.800
<v Speaker 1>the tickers are that good, but that that one's right

0:05:11.880 --> 0:05:14.560
<v Speaker 1>up there. But Tan easy to remember. But look Tan.

0:05:14.760 --> 0:05:17.120
<v Speaker 1>What it does is it serves up thirty solar stocks

0:05:17.160 --> 0:05:20.320
<v Speaker 1>in one shot. Tan does all that work. You buy

0:05:20.400 --> 0:05:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Tan and then you own those thirty stocks at once.

0:05:24.200 --> 0:05:27.159
<v Speaker 1>And Tan's actually a really good example to explain diversification

0:05:27.240 --> 0:05:31.240
<v Speaker 1>because there was a stock inside TAN called g T

0:05:31.360 --> 0:05:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Advanced Technologies and it declared bankruptcy after Apple had decided

0:05:36.200 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 1>not to use some of their glass and one of

0:05:38.440 --> 0:05:42.280
<v Speaker 1>the iPhone six screens. So the stock drop in one day.

0:05:42.640 --> 0:05:45.120
<v Speaker 1>So Jordan, if you had picked that stock, you would

0:05:45.160 --> 0:05:49.360
<v Speaker 1>be sucking win basically, oh my gosh. But that only

0:05:49.560 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 1>contributed to negative one percent of Tan's performance. So in

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:54.160
<v Speaker 1>other words, Tan barely felt it because it was just

0:05:54.279 --> 0:05:58.040
<v Speaker 1>one of thirty six stocks. And that essentially is why

0:05:58.120 --> 0:06:00.919
<v Speaker 1>you want to be diversified. So you avoided huge risk

0:06:01.440 --> 0:06:04.640
<v Speaker 1>of a single stock blowing up, but you also gave

0:06:04.800 --> 0:06:08.679
<v Speaker 1>something up to right. Yeah, So this is why stock

0:06:08.760 --> 0:06:11.120
<v Speaker 1>picking will probably never die as an art form because

0:06:11.800 --> 0:06:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Jordan's let's say you bought solar City a couple of

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:19.039
<v Speaker 1>years back, and that went up two in a year,

0:06:19.800 --> 0:06:24.000
<v Speaker 1>and that year Tan only went up. So that's the

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:27.320
<v Speaker 1>downside is you aren't gonna sort of win the lottery

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:29.840
<v Speaker 1>if you pick the right stock. So it's almost like

0:06:30.040 --> 0:06:33.840
<v Speaker 1>passive investing and diversification is you saying, you know what,

0:06:34.040 --> 0:06:36.599
<v Speaker 1>I'd rather give up a potential home run to ensure

0:06:36.600 --> 0:06:39.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't strike out, which passive investing. E t f

0:06:39.720 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 1>s are mostly passive. It's also worth noting that that

0:06:43.600 --> 0:06:49.000
<v Speaker 1>stock got booted out of TAN. Yes, so after declared bankruptcy,

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:51.560
<v Speaker 1>it was gone within a couple of days. That's the

0:06:51.640 --> 0:06:54.080
<v Speaker 1>thing with e t s. They track indexes, and those

0:06:54.120 --> 0:06:57.240
<v Speaker 1>indexes have all these rules that look for certain requirements.

0:06:57.279 --> 0:07:00.480
<v Speaker 1>So if the stock gets weak, declares bank upsee, or

0:07:00.560 --> 0:07:04.000
<v Speaker 1>just just starts lagging and becomes a bad actor, it's

0:07:04.000 --> 0:07:06.360
<v Speaker 1>going to get kicked out of the index and replaced

0:07:06.360 --> 0:07:09.320
<v Speaker 1>by a stronger up and comer. So there's a regeneration

0:07:09.440 --> 0:07:10.800
<v Speaker 1>process to the index, so you don't have to do

0:07:10.840 --> 0:07:13.520
<v Speaker 1>any work. So even though you picked it, it's not

0:07:13.640 --> 0:07:16.040
<v Speaker 1>just those thirty six stocks in stuck in time. They

0:07:16.080 --> 0:07:19.480
<v Speaker 1>actually change and regenerate over time, so that you have

0:07:19.560 --> 0:07:21.280
<v Speaker 1>to worry about it. So, Jordan, do you have a

0:07:21.320 --> 0:07:25.120
<v Speaker 1>little bit better sense of what ETFs are about? Now? Yeah,

0:07:25.320 --> 0:07:27.960
<v Speaker 1>I can get an e t F in something I'm

0:07:28.000 --> 0:07:31.320
<v Speaker 1>interested in, but I, you know, diffuse my risk because

0:07:31.360 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 1>of how they're set up, but I also forego my

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:36.840
<v Speaker 1>chance that hitting it real big. There you go, she said,

0:07:36.920 --> 0:07:38.960
<v Speaker 1>diffuse my risk. I think she knows more than we think.

0:07:39.960 --> 0:07:41.520
<v Speaker 1>That's pretty good. Did you just pick that up from

0:07:41.560 --> 0:07:45.520
<v Speaker 1>our little discussion? Wow, Okay, we're on the right track, quick, learner.

0:07:46.640 --> 0:07:49.880
<v Speaker 1>So Jordan's understands what in e F is, and she

0:07:50.000 --> 0:07:53.440
<v Speaker 1>understands what TAN is. But Tan's like a really small

0:07:53.720 --> 0:07:56.840
<v Speaker 1>niche player here, right, Like, let's talk about like the

0:07:57.000 --> 0:08:00.320
<v Speaker 1>rest of the E t F landscape. Yeah, totally Tan is. Yeah,

0:08:00.400 --> 0:08:02.360
<v Speaker 1>niche is the right word. But it's just good for

0:08:02.440 --> 0:08:05.000
<v Speaker 1>a scenario, you know, solar energy everybody. And she, you know,

0:08:05.240 --> 0:08:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Jordan's a millennial, so I figured she'd respond to that

0:08:07.240 --> 0:08:10.360
<v Speaker 1>and she did. Um anyway, but most of the money

0:08:10.920 --> 0:08:13.520
<v Speaker 1>is going into what we call in the analyst world,

0:08:13.560 --> 0:08:15.960
<v Speaker 1>plain vanilla e t F s. TAN would be like

0:08:16.200 --> 0:08:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Rocky Road, a little more exotic, a little more volatile.

0:08:18.640 --> 0:08:20.600
<v Speaker 1>But most of the money goes into stuff like e

0:08:20.720 --> 0:08:23.000
<v Speaker 1>t s that just basically tracked the SMP five hundred.

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:25.520
<v Speaker 1>There's a couple of those, Yeah, there's a couple of

0:08:25.600 --> 0:08:30.520
<v Speaker 1>those called like Spy, Spy, Spider has one, black Rock

0:08:30.600 --> 0:08:32.800
<v Speaker 1>has one. Their brand is called I Shares, and Vanguard

0:08:32.880 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 1>has one. Most people out there probably no Vanguard at

0:08:35.920 --> 0:08:38.640
<v Speaker 1>this point. Vanguard's a pretty big player in the ETF space.

0:08:38.720 --> 0:08:41.680
<v Speaker 1>They are only plain vanilla. Black Rock does a little

0:08:41.679 --> 0:08:43.880
<v Speaker 1>of both, and the same with State Street. But like,

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:47.839
<v Speaker 1>take the SMP five majority tfs. They collectively account for

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:51.040
<v Speaker 1>nearly one five of all e t F sets. That's

0:08:51.040 --> 0:08:54.480
<v Speaker 1>how popular they are. And there's f so just buying

0:08:54.520 --> 0:08:58.600
<v Speaker 1>the SNP what these things are doing, I mean, that's

0:08:58.679 --> 0:09:00.679
<v Speaker 1>ultimately that's what Warren Buffett as to do. I mean,

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:04.200
<v Speaker 1>just buying the SMP five hundred is arguably the most

0:09:04.280 --> 0:09:07.280
<v Speaker 1>popular investment move right now. And are these buy and

0:09:07.400 --> 0:09:11.960
<v Speaker 1>hold investments or are people trading them? Good questions. So Spy,

0:09:12.160 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 1>which is the Spider product that was the first TTF,

0:09:14.480 --> 0:09:16.439
<v Speaker 1>that one has a lot of liquidity, trades a lot,

0:09:17.000 --> 0:09:18.839
<v Speaker 1>so that one's used a little more from like for

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:21.160
<v Speaker 1>traders going in and out of the SMP five hundred

0:09:21.600 --> 0:09:23.520
<v Speaker 1>black Rock and Vanguards are a little more used by

0:09:23.559 --> 0:09:26.599
<v Speaker 1>buy and hold investors. They're also a little cheaper, you know,

0:09:26.679 --> 0:09:28.719
<v Speaker 1>the low expense ratio attracts more of the buy and

0:09:28.760 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 1>hold investors. But ultimately all three could be used to

0:09:31.800 --> 0:09:34.520
<v Speaker 1>hold twenty years if you wanted, or twenty minutes. And

0:09:34.640 --> 0:09:38.560
<v Speaker 1>how cheap are these things? And let's kind of use

0:09:38.600 --> 0:09:42.520
<v Speaker 1>a real number. I'm gonna say I have, right, sure,

0:09:42.840 --> 0:09:44.800
<v Speaker 1>how much does this actually cost me? Right? So, say

0:09:44.840 --> 0:09:46.760
<v Speaker 1>you have ten thousand dollars, If you put that into

0:09:46.960 --> 0:09:50.319
<v Speaker 1>s p Y, they would basically take out nine dollars

0:09:50.400 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 1>and fifty cents a year. If you put it into

0:09:52.920 --> 0:09:54.600
<v Speaker 1>v O O, which is the Vanguard, they take out

0:09:54.640 --> 0:09:56.720
<v Speaker 1>five bucks a year. And if you put an IVV,

0:09:56.800 --> 0:09:58.800
<v Speaker 1>they take out four bucks a year. So talking about

0:09:59.240 --> 0:10:02.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, a slice of pizza, you know, two slices

0:10:02.320 --> 0:10:04.679
<v Speaker 1>of pizza. Maybe not in penn station, but yeah, it

0:10:04.679 --> 0:10:09.480
<v Speaker 1>depends on where anyway, that's true. So for a couple

0:10:09.480 --> 0:10:13.120
<v Speaker 1>of slices of pizza, you can have the whole entire

0:10:13.200 --> 0:10:17.599
<v Speaker 1>stock market. That's a revolutionary moment totally. That That is

0:10:17.679 --> 0:10:21.640
<v Speaker 1>why these are powerful, you know, explosive tools that are

0:10:21.800 --> 0:10:23.640
<v Speaker 1>sweeping the nation literally, so you don't have to go

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:28.400
<v Speaker 1>out there and buy individual stocks and then try and

0:10:28.520 --> 0:10:32.559
<v Speaker 1>like manage that portfolio. You get one thing. Yeah, And

0:10:33.000 --> 0:10:35.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, when I wrote this book on et f s,

0:10:35.600 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 1>the word that kept coming back to when I spoke

0:10:37.800 --> 0:10:39.719
<v Speaker 1>to a lot of people about the advantages was convenience.

0:10:40.160 --> 0:10:43.040
<v Speaker 1>And ultimately I went through advantages of ETFs and at

0:10:43.040 --> 0:10:45.400
<v Speaker 1>the end, I'm like, it's really convenience. I mean, cost

0:10:45.480 --> 0:10:48.120
<v Speaker 1>is a big one, but you know, people love things

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:51.000
<v Speaker 1>that are convenient. Any business if you can serve up

0:10:51.040 --> 0:10:53.199
<v Speaker 1>convenience and make life easier. I mean, look at Amazon.

0:10:53.559 --> 0:10:54.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's not like anything to get on there

0:10:54.960 --> 0:10:57.800
<v Speaker 1>you can't get anywhere else. It's just convenient. And ETFs

0:10:57.880 --> 0:11:02.320
<v Speaker 1>ultimately provide convenience in multiple times over. So we talked

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:05.240
<v Speaker 1>about the plain vanilla side of the et F world.

0:11:05.760 --> 0:11:10.000
<v Speaker 1>What are some other sides? Right? So you got bonds, right,

0:11:10.080 --> 0:11:12.640
<v Speaker 1>So bond markets a huge thing, and there's I would

0:11:12.679 --> 0:11:15.760
<v Speaker 1>consider a few plain vanilla bond e t f s,

0:11:15.920 --> 0:11:17.640
<v Speaker 1>some that just give you like all bonds sort of

0:11:17.760 --> 0:11:20.679
<v Speaker 1>all collectively. Then there's things that are a little more risky,

0:11:20.760 --> 0:11:22.920
<v Speaker 1>like high yield debt. You know, some people call them

0:11:23.000 --> 0:11:25.200
<v Speaker 1>drunk bonds. There's an e t FS for that. Then

0:11:25.240 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 1>you've got areas like commodities, a big et F in

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:32.679
<v Speaker 1>the commodity spaces g l D which basically, you know,

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:36.160
<v Speaker 1>you think that some hundred is convenient. G LD essentially

0:11:36.720 --> 0:11:39.440
<v Speaker 1>gives you exposure to a bunch of bars of gold

0:11:39.520 --> 0:11:42.400
<v Speaker 1>sitting in a storage facility. So it's like having a

0:11:42.480 --> 0:11:45.000
<v Speaker 1>way to own goal with having to pay insurance, you know,

0:11:45.240 --> 0:11:48.000
<v Speaker 1>or to worry about anybody stealing it. Own a vault, right,

0:11:48.200 --> 0:11:50.200
<v Speaker 1>No need to own a vault. You can just own

0:11:50.240 --> 0:11:52.320
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of E t F. Yeah. I mean

0:11:52.360 --> 0:11:55.720
<v Speaker 1>you're essentially buying shares in physically back gold. So there's

0:11:55.720 --> 0:11:57.880
<v Speaker 1>a there's basically in g l D s case the

0:11:57.960 --> 0:12:00.319
<v Speaker 1>gold is stored in London, there's a guy there with

0:12:00.360 --> 0:12:03.440
<v Speaker 1>a machine gun, probably like standing outside the vault. Um,

0:12:03.480 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure if that's true, but I imagine that's true.

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:07.760
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, it's in a bank. It's a good mental image.

0:12:07.800 --> 0:12:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's just say it's secure. Okay. You know this isn't

0:12:10.240 --> 0:12:12.199
<v Speaker 1>like you know, the Pink Panther, where a group of

0:12:12.240 --> 0:12:13.720
<v Speaker 1>bandits are going to be able to get in there

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:16.280
<v Speaker 1>and steal it. But ultimately, and I hope one day

0:12:16.320 --> 0:12:18.560
<v Speaker 1>we can go look at the gold. You know, now

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:20.520
<v Speaker 1>that we're yeah we have this podcast, maybe I'll let

0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:22.400
<v Speaker 1>us look look at it and then we can interview

0:12:22.640 --> 0:12:28.920
<v Speaker 1>the gold. Yeah, it's going to be. So that's all

0:12:29.880 --> 0:12:35.319
<v Speaker 1>domestic stuff here in the US. What about international internationals?

0:12:35.559 --> 0:12:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Growing area definitely, And what I find interesting what ets

0:12:38.280 --> 0:12:40.800
<v Speaker 1>internationally is a lot of them. I mean they all

0:12:40.920 --> 0:12:43.599
<v Speaker 1>hold local shares in local markets. I mean used to

0:12:43.840 --> 0:12:47.080
<v Speaker 1>need a broker to get say like local Egyptian stocks,

0:12:47.240 --> 0:12:49.679
<v Speaker 1>right E t f s do that for you. So

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 1>even institutions use ets international play, but mostly the big

0:12:54.160 --> 0:12:58.600
<v Speaker 1>plain Venila international ones are for example, international developed, which

0:12:58.679 --> 0:13:01.400
<v Speaker 1>essentially is the countries that are more developed, like European

0:13:01.480 --> 0:13:04.839
<v Speaker 1>countries in Japan. They all package that in one E

0:13:04.960 --> 0:13:07.600
<v Speaker 1>t F Vanguard has a couple, black Rock has a couple.

0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:11.199
<v Speaker 1>Then you could look at something like emerging markets. Those

0:13:11.240 --> 0:13:13.280
<v Speaker 1>little more risky, but you package all of them together.

0:13:13.880 --> 0:13:17.920
<v Speaker 1>You get countries like China, right, Brazil, um in some

0:13:18.040 --> 0:13:20.400
<v Speaker 1>of them South Korea, and they put all those together,

0:13:21.080 --> 0:13:23.000
<v Speaker 1>and then you can go further out there's frontier market

0:13:23.040 --> 0:13:26.079
<v Speaker 1>e TF. Those are countries that are like on the

0:13:26.320 --> 0:13:30.400
<v Speaker 1>like JV of development and that they're not even emerging yet.

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:32.960
<v Speaker 1>And the difference between the emerging markets and that frontier

0:13:33.040 --> 0:13:36.559
<v Speaker 1>markets is pretty amazing. For the countries that are in them.

0:13:37.000 --> 0:13:39.120
<v Speaker 1>You've countries that are like, you know, really out there,

0:13:39.160 --> 0:13:42.240
<v Speaker 1>like Kenya and Vietnam, and there's ets that serve that up.

0:13:42.280 --> 0:13:44.719
<v Speaker 1>And there's there's et F T tracks Africa, like all

0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:47.599
<v Speaker 1>the stocks that are in African countries. So you go

0:13:47.720 --> 0:13:50.160
<v Speaker 1>down the list, I mean you throw out a country,

0:13:50.679 --> 0:13:51.920
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you how to play with. The t

0:13:52.120 --> 0:13:55.480
<v Speaker 1>S is basically the whole the whole world pictures like

0:13:55.520 --> 0:13:58.280
<v Speaker 1>a rememberable the game risk, you know, you put your

0:13:58.320 --> 0:14:02.160
<v Speaker 1>little men all over or propoily whatever. The whole world

0:14:02.280 --> 0:14:05.000
<v Speaker 1>has been e t F I. So if you want

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:06.959
<v Speaker 1>to say France, how do you want it? You want

0:14:07.160 --> 0:14:10.040
<v Speaker 1>individual France ETF? Do you want a Eurozone e t F.

0:14:10.440 --> 0:14:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Do you want a Pan European et F? Or do

0:14:12.640 --> 0:14:15.120
<v Speaker 1>you want that in international developed? So it goes from

0:14:15.200 --> 0:14:18.400
<v Speaker 1>more you know, very narrow, to more general and everything

0:14:18.480 --> 0:14:20.600
<v Speaker 1>in between. And now they'll do ones where it's like,

0:14:20.600 --> 0:14:22.440
<v Speaker 1>oh we'll give you French stocks, but will wait them

0:14:22.480 --> 0:14:25.560
<v Speaker 1>by their fundamentals. So I think when the average investor,

0:14:26.040 --> 0:14:30.120
<v Speaker 1>here's something like E t F. Not only do they

0:14:30.160 --> 0:14:32.520
<v Speaker 1>get a little confused, but they also get a little

0:14:32.880 --> 0:14:37.680
<v Speaker 1>scared because the financial industry is really good at coming

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:41.240
<v Speaker 1>up with scary acronyms, things like C d O S

0:14:41.760 --> 0:14:43.960
<v Speaker 1>that brought down almost brought down the world with the

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:46.480
<v Speaker 1>financial crisis. So they hear E t F and it's

0:14:46.560 --> 0:14:49.720
<v Speaker 1>yet one more thing. So, even though this thing has

0:14:50.120 --> 0:14:54.160
<v Speaker 1>grown so rapidly, I think there's still this apprehension around

0:14:55.360 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 1>here's this thing from the financial world. Should I trust it?

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:01.560
<v Speaker 1>That's a completely fair feeling for people to have. And

0:15:01.680 --> 0:15:04.480
<v Speaker 1>I feel the same way. I think the thing with

0:15:04.640 --> 0:15:06.800
<v Speaker 1>E t F though, is and again, like you said,

0:15:06.880 --> 0:15:09.800
<v Speaker 1>this is this acronym really the greatest name ever? Maybe not,

0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:13.200
<v Speaker 1>But the F is key. It's a fund, it's a

0:15:13.280 --> 0:15:15.640
<v Speaker 1>mutual fund. In fact, E t F s are registered

0:15:15.680 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 1>with the SEC under the same act as mutual funds.

0:15:19.880 --> 0:15:21.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, some people call them mutual funds with benefits.

0:15:22.320 --> 0:15:26.080
<v Speaker 1>And ultimately that's important understand because they are not derivatives.

0:15:26.160 --> 0:15:28.440
<v Speaker 1>They are actually funds. They just happen to trade on

0:15:28.440 --> 0:15:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the exchange their shares do. And so I think that's

0:15:31.040 --> 0:15:34.040
<v Speaker 1>a key point to feeling safer about using them is

0:15:34.080 --> 0:15:38.120
<v Speaker 1>that they are fiduciary vehicles approved by the SEC. Although

0:15:38.160 --> 0:15:40.320
<v Speaker 1>I should just sort of evolve what I just said

0:15:40.360 --> 0:15:43.360
<v Speaker 1>to say that there are some types of products at

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 1>the fringes. Right. What I just described is basically there's

0:15:47.800 --> 0:15:50.480
<v Speaker 1>some stuff at the fringes. Stuff that say tracks oil

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:55.720
<v Speaker 1>futures or three times leverage dtfs. Those are don't they

0:15:55.760 --> 0:15:57.320
<v Speaker 1>don't have much in assets, but they do get a

0:15:57.320 --> 0:16:00.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of attention. But those are not those are not

0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:02.840
<v Speaker 1>registered under the forty Act. Those would be called exchange

0:16:03.240 --> 0:16:06.520
<v Speaker 1>vehicles or or you know e t p s. Those

0:16:06.560 --> 0:16:08.320
<v Speaker 1>are a little different, and they sort of got under

0:16:08.400 --> 0:16:10.840
<v Speaker 1>the same sort of tent of e t F. But

0:16:10.960 --> 0:16:14.320
<v Speaker 1>ultimately I think for most investors they're going to use these,

0:16:14.480 --> 0:16:16.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, the plain vanilla e t F to get

0:16:16.120 --> 0:16:19.520
<v Speaker 1>exposures that are more normal. But you know, you will

0:16:19.560 --> 0:16:22.480
<v Speaker 1>find some investors will be curious and maybe go outside

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:23.960
<v Speaker 1>of that. But those are the areas where I think,

0:16:24.080 --> 0:16:27.360
<v Speaker 1>especially this podcast will let you know why there's some

0:16:27.800 --> 0:16:31.480
<v Speaker 1>areas and ETFs that are dangerous where you could lose money.

0:16:31.520 --> 0:16:34.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm developing a rating system and I talked

0:16:34.400 --> 0:16:36.520
<v Speaker 1>about this in my book, where if you rated e

0:16:36.560 --> 0:16:39.360
<v Speaker 1>t f s like movies, you'd ultimately find there are

0:16:39.440 --> 0:16:41.680
<v Speaker 1>some R rated e t s. The bulk of the

0:16:41.760 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 1>assets and the bulk of the e t s would

0:16:43.600 --> 0:16:45.840
<v Speaker 1>be P, G and G, but they do go into

0:16:45.840 --> 0:16:47.640
<v Speaker 1>some areas that a little more risky. And this is

0:16:47.680 --> 0:16:50.720
<v Speaker 1>where the buyer beware thing comes in, because you ultimately

0:16:51.080 --> 0:16:52.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of need to know what you're buying. And the

0:16:53.120 --> 0:16:56.320
<v Speaker 1>risk here is that everything kind of looks the same. Yeah,

0:16:56.440 --> 0:16:58.840
<v Speaker 1>and the idea that the whole market has become so

0:16:59.000 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 1>easy to buy, no matter what corner of the market

0:17:00.920 --> 0:17:02.880
<v Speaker 1>you want, it's easy to buy is clicking buy and

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft shares. I agree, there is some degree of maybe

0:17:07.200 --> 0:17:11.240
<v Speaker 1>that's made stuff that's more dangerous seem less dangerous. But

0:17:11.320 --> 0:17:14.000
<v Speaker 1>again I take a step back from this because if

0:17:14.040 --> 0:17:15.480
<v Speaker 1>you look at the assets and e t F that

0:17:15.600 --> 0:17:19.359
<v Speaker 1>three trillion, almost every dime of it is in stuff

0:17:19.440 --> 0:17:22.040
<v Speaker 1>that is not dangerous. It's just you know, plain van

0:17:22.200 --> 0:17:25.080
<v Speaker 1>It's like stuff mutual funds hold. But yeah, at the fringes,

0:17:25.160 --> 0:17:28.000
<v Speaker 1>there are some products that are beloved by people who

0:17:28.080 --> 0:17:31.080
<v Speaker 1>use them, you know, stuff the tracks, the vix uh

0:17:31.119 --> 0:17:34.720
<v Speaker 1>stuff features. Yeah, there's some there's some stuff that you

0:17:34.800 --> 0:17:37.040
<v Speaker 1>know you might not even heard of that eat that

0:17:37.200 --> 0:17:40.479
<v Speaker 1>some ETFs track. But ultimately I think that's why it's

0:17:40.520 --> 0:17:42.480
<v Speaker 1>important to look at those. But they are not they're

0:17:42.520 --> 0:17:46.000
<v Speaker 1>the exception, not the norm. So ultimately et fs just

0:17:46.080 --> 0:17:48.960
<v Speaker 1>made things really easy because you can do all these

0:17:49.040 --> 0:17:50.960
<v Speaker 1>things that used to be really complicated and now you

0:17:51.000 --> 0:17:53.840
<v Speaker 1>can just do it on a button on your smartphone.

0:17:54.240 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 1>You know. Yeah, it kind of reminds me. There's a

0:17:56.640 --> 0:17:59.399
<v Speaker 1>phrase out they're fast, good, cheap, and they say that

0:17:59.480 --> 0:18:01.119
<v Speaker 1>as a con numor you can only get two of

0:18:01.160 --> 0:18:03.919
<v Speaker 1>those three things, right, So something's fast and good, it's

0:18:03.960 --> 0:18:06.240
<v Speaker 1>not cheap. It's cheap and fast it's not good, and

0:18:06.320 --> 0:18:09.520
<v Speaker 1>so on. And I think, you know, I feel like

0:18:09.720 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 1>the you know, there's a couple of things that that

0:18:11.520 --> 0:18:13.920
<v Speaker 1>basically blow that rule away and give you all three

0:18:13.920 --> 0:18:17.200
<v Speaker 1>at once. So one thing just personal to me is

0:18:17.280 --> 0:18:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Vietnamese restaurants. They really are fast, good, and cheap and

0:18:20.960 --> 0:18:22.879
<v Speaker 1>E T F S. I. I do believe they deliver

0:18:23.040 --> 0:18:25.840
<v Speaker 1>all three of those things in almost every case, not

0:18:26.000 --> 0:18:29.080
<v Speaker 1>every but that to me again, and this goes back

0:18:29.119 --> 0:18:30.480
<v Speaker 1>to when I got them in two thousand and six.

0:18:30.760 --> 0:18:32.840
<v Speaker 1>After you start sniffing around them and you kick the

0:18:32.920 --> 0:18:35.119
<v Speaker 1>tires on them, you realize, you know, they're they're a

0:18:35.160 --> 0:18:37.520
<v Speaker 1>special kind of structure. So, Eric, we've talked about the

0:18:37.560 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 1>growth of ETFs, We've talked about what these things look

0:18:40.840 --> 0:18:43.040
<v Speaker 1>like and what's in them. We've talked about the risks.

0:18:43.840 --> 0:18:48.280
<v Speaker 1>We broke it down for Jordan's where are we going?

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:52.200
<v Speaker 1>This is a question I ponder a lot. I think,

0:18:52.359 --> 0:18:54.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, when you look at the future of the whole,

0:18:54.400 --> 0:18:57.240
<v Speaker 1>the whole enchilada, right, I think you're just gonna see

0:18:57.320 --> 0:19:00.680
<v Speaker 1>more and more investors demanding free exposure based or low

0:19:00.760 --> 0:19:02.320
<v Speaker 1>low cost to the point where it's free. So I

0:19:02.359 --> 0:19:05.800
<v Speaker 1>think one evolutionary line of e t F growth is

0:19:05.880 --> 0:19:08.040
<v Speaker 1>going to be what we call a race to the bottom,

0:19:08.119 --> 0:19:12.040
<v Speaker 1>and the bottom being good here means zero fees. Right now,

0:19:12.200 --> 0:19:13.840
<v Speaker 1>like we said, e t F s are three, four

0:19:13.920 --> 0:19:16.160
<v Speaker 1>or five, maybe six basis points, especially in the plane

0:19:16.240 --> 0:19:18.919
<v Speaker 1>vanilla categories. You know those are being driven down. They

0:19:18.960 --> 0:19:22.840
<v Speaker 1>were fourteen basis points ago. Yeah. In fact, they did

0:19:22.880 --> 0:19:24.639
<v Speaker 1>a study over at et f dot com that showed

0:19:24.680 --> 0:19:27.639
<v Speaker 1>that the cheapest the e t F portfolio drops by

0:19:27.680 --> 0:19:29.359
<v Speaker 1>a basis point of year. So right now it's at

0:19:29.400 --> 0:19:31.400
<v Speaker 1>point oh six percent. I mean, you can get a whole,

0:19:31.440 --> 0:19:34.760
<v Speaker 1>fully diversified portfolio ets for point six percent all in

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:37.120
<v Speaker 1>that drops a basis point of year, So that puts

0:19:37.200 --> 0:19:40.120
<v Speaker 1>us on track to have free exposure in the next

0:19:40.320 --> 0:19:42.719
<v Speaker 1>five or six years. And I think most people think

0:19:42.720 --> 0:19:45.439
<v Speaker 1>that's going to happen, and that's a beautiful thing. I mean,

0:19:45.520 --> 0:19:47.919
<v Speaker 1>think about that concept. That is going to up end

0:19:47.960 --> 0:19:51.640
<v Speaker 1>the entire financial system. You think, you know Bernie Sanders,

0:19:52.119 --> 0:19:54.960
<v Speaker 1>he probably wouldn't even even imagine how much this is

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:57.479
<v Speaker 1>going to change things, and likely probably just gonna shrink

0:19:57.960 --> 0:20:01.720
<v Speaker 1>wall straight to a degree because just be way less money.

0:20:01.760 --> 0:20:04.880
<v Speaker 1>The retail host organism is going to be tiny if

0:20:04.960 --> 0:20:08.439
<v Speaker 1>people keep going to that point and the people issuing

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:11.320
<v Speaker 1>the ETFs are dropping the fees. Why because people are

0:20:11.560 --> 0:20:14.520
<v Speaker 1>buying the cheaper ones. If a e t F, for example,

0:20:14.680 --> 0:20:18.040
<v Speaker 1>goes from tied for the cheapest to the cheapest, I've

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:21.040
<v Speaker 1>seen it happen, billions will go to the cheaper one

0:20:22.680 --> 0:20:26.240
<v Speaker 1>almost nothing like one basis point almost right. Yeah, it's

0:20:26.680 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 1>people are cost obsessed, and even we're talking to people

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:31.280
<v Speaker 1>who might not even know much about et f s.

0:20:32.080 --> 0:20:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Something shifted back in the nineties and eighties. It was

0:20:35.080 --> 0:20:37.879
<v Speaker 1>all about the hot manager, the five star manager. You know,

0:20:38.000 --> 0:20:40.760
<v Speaker 1>you talk about at the party, Hey, I picked the

0:20:40.800 --> 0:20:43.439
<v Speaker 1>best doc, or are the best manager? That's changing now

0:20:43.560 --> 0:20:46.359
<v Speaker 1>you go. People are bragging about how low cost their

0:20:46.440 --> 0:20:49.359
<v Speaker 1>portfolio is and how cheap they're getting things. So I

0:20:49.440 --> 0:20:51.679
<v Speaker 1>think that there's a cost obsession that is just going

0:20:51.760 --> 0:20:54.440
<v Speaker 1>to continue to drive fees lower on the plane vanilla side,

0:20:54.960 --> 0:20:58.600
<v Speaker 1>and ultimately that's going to be very tough if you're

0:20:58.640 --> 0:21:01.600
<v Speaker 1>in the financial industry, but it's going to be wonderful

0:21:01.680 --> 0:21:04.520
<v Speaker 1>if you're an investor. So great for investors, and you've

0:21:04.560 --> 0:21:06.960
<v Speaker 1>got that pressure pushing on this what you'll call like

0:21:07.160 --> 0:21:10.680
<v Speaker 1>an evolutionary line. There's this whole other evolutionary line though,

0:21:10.720 --> 0:21:13.320
<v Speaker 1>what do you see over there? So in the play

0:21:13.440 --> 0:21:15.679
<v Speaker 1>vanilla category, I just think a lot of investors are

0:21:15.720 --> 0:21:19.560
<v Speaker 1>just not satisfied with say a couple you know, the

0:21:19.600 --> 0:21:22.040
<v Speaker 1>stock market. It's like okay, yeah, okay, so I got

0:21:22.160 --> 0:21:24.440
<v Speaker 1>a SMP, I got a bond index, and you know

0:21:25.080 --> 0:21:27.080
<v Speaker 1>that's good and arguably if you just hold that for

0:21:27.160 --> 0:21:29.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty years, you'll probably do better than everybody. But people

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:31.560
<v Speaker 1>are itchy, they want to outperform, they want to try

0:21:31.600 --> 0:21:34.960
<v Speaker 1>to do better. There's a whole group of ETFs being

0:21:35.040 --> 0:21:38.120
<v Speaker 1>launched that allow you to try to outperform using strategies

0:21:38.640 --> 0:21:42.960
<v Speaker 1>right there, packaging trades, you've got themes, and that's in

0:21:43.160 --> 0:21:44.800
<v Speaker 1>for an analyst. That's where the fun stuff is. To

0:21:44.840 --> 0:21:46.560
<v Speaker 1>be honest with you, I like covering all the new

0:21:46.600 --> 0:21:49.040
<v Speaker 1>stuff they're launching, and over there you can charge a

0:21:49.119 --> 0:21:51.359
<v Speaker 1>little more because if your goal is to kind of

0:21:51.400 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 1>beat the market or provide some exotic exposure, something that's

0:21:54.600 --> 0:21:57.159
<v Speaker 1>new and fresh, Ultimately people are willing to pay a

0:21:57.200 --> 0:21:59.800
<v Speaker 1>little more. But even fees are still coming down over there.

0:21:59.840 --> 0:22:02.680
<v Speaker 1>But ultimately I think that is where you'll see sort

0:22:02.680 --> 0:22:04.000
<v Speaker 1>of a lot of the other like you'll see some

0:22:04.680 --> 0:22:07.879
<v Speaker 1>really wild stuff being launched the DTF. In fact, this

0:22:08.040 --> 0:22:13.840
<v Speaker 1>year's satire is tomorrow's new ETF. For instance, let's talk

0:22:13.880 --> 0:22:17.640
<v Speaker 1>about whiskey. Yeah, there's a whiskey et F, which essentially

0:22:17.800 --> 0:22:20.600
<v Speaker 1>is tracking stocks that are in the whiskey production. But

0:22:20.840 --> 0:22:23.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, honestly about whiskey, even though it sounds silly,

0:22:23.440 --> 0:22:25.760
<v Speaker 1>there is a fundamental story there. If you look at

0:22:25.800 --> 0:22:28.200
<v Speaker 1>the stock prices and some of these liquor companies, they've

0:22:28.240 --> 0:22:31.400
<v Speaker 1>been doing pretty well. There's a global demand for for alcohol,

0:22:31.640 --> 0:22:34.680
<v Speaker 1>and the guy who started. The whiskey TF is from Lexington, Kentucky.

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:38.480
<v Speaker 1>He's around that industry. So even the gimmicky ones, it's funny.

0:22:38.480 --> 0:22:40.040
<v Speaker 1>You start to unpeel a little bit and you realize

0:22:40.080 --> 0:22:43.400
<v Speaker 1>there's somebody who really believes in that industry. Somebody thinks

0:22:43.400 --> 0:22:46.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a fundamental story. But on its surface, do you

0:22:46.640 --> 0:22:48.919
<v Speaker 1>really need a whiskey et F in your portfolio. That's

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:50.840
<v Speaker 1>where people think it's gimmicky, it's you don't need it.

0:22:51.359 --> 0:22:53.840
<v Speaker 1>But ultimately that's an example I think of of the

0:22:53.920 --> 0:22:56.439
<v Speaker 1>kind of thematic ETF that you see launching a lot

0:22:56.520 --> 0:22:58.880
<v Speaker 1>more lately. That's one of the things that I think

0:22:59.000 --> 0:23:02.000
<v Speaker 1>is so fascinating about this particular space is that a

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:05.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of these things just started with somebody having an idea. Yeah.

0:23:05.359 --> 0:23:07.480
<v Speaker 1>I was just talking to the guy who launched the

0:23:07.560 --> 0:23:11.000
<v Speaker 1>reverse market cap weight at et F, which essentially waits

0:23:11.080 --> 0:23:13.440
<v Speaker 1>the lowest stock in the SPF with the biggest waiting,

0:23:13.760 --> 0:23:15.960
<v Speaker 1>and he said, he just got the idea, and then

0:23:16.040 --> 0:23:18.119
<v Speaker 1>he back tested it looked good, and so he launched

0:23:18.119 --> 0:23:20.760
<v Speaker 1>then e t F. Ultimately, this is what I love

0:23:20.800 --> 0:23:24.240
<v Speaker 1>about the ETF industry. It is the Silicon Valley of

0:23:24.520 --> 0:23:26.840
<v Speaker 1>the financial world right now. This is where all the

0:23:26.880 --> 0:23:29.800
<v Speaker 1>innovation is happening from big companies like JP Morgan and

0:23:29.880 --> 0:23:32.879
<v Speaker 1>Goldman as well as small independent issuers. I call him

0:23:32.880 --> 0:23:35.720
<v Speaker 1>the indie the indie guys, sort of like indie rock. Yeah,

0:23:35.760 --> 0:23:38.600
<v Speaker 1>these are independent issuers. A big indie one that's been

0:23:38.720 --> 0:23:41.200
<v Speaker 1>hit it big was the robot which is the robotics industry.

0:23:41.920 --> 0:23:44.440
<v Speaker 1>That e t F is now almost two billion dollars

0:23:44.960 --> 0:23:47.280
<v Speaker 1>and it just had a good idea these stocks weren't

0:23:47.280 --> 0:23:50.280
<v Speaker 1>really represented other benchmarks, and then it outperformed like a madman.

0:23:50.440 --> 0:23:53.679
<v Speaker 1>And ultimately it is interesting seeing some of these smaller

0:23:53.800 --> 0:23:58.440
<v Speaker 1>niche independent ones actually work out for investors. And ultimately,

0:23:58.600 --> 0:24:00.840
<v Speaker 1>I think the idea of outperform warming or having something

0:24:00.920 --> 0:24:03.160
<v Speaker 1>that's got a little extra juice in it that will

0:24:03.200 --> 0:24:05.520
<v Speaker 1>never die. Performance chasing is as old as you know

0:24:05.760 --> 0:24:08.440
<v Speaker 1>the world, and you're going to have people who performance chase,

0:24:08.480 --> 0:24:10.679
<v Speaker 1>and that's why there won't only be the play ven

0:24:10.760 --> 0:24:13.320
<v Speaker 1>la side. You'll also have this side with people packaging

0:24:13.440 --> 0:24:16.040
<v Speaker 1>everything they can into an e t F. And we

0:24:16.160 --> 0:24:18.560
<v Speaker 1>just saw one that was coming out, like calling package trades.

0:24:19.200 --> 0:24:21.720
<v Speaker 1>There's ones that will go long say local stocks, and

0:24:21.760 --> 0:24:24.119
<v Speaker 1>then short the currency and a good example of one

0:24:24.200 --> 0:24:27.680
<v Speaker 1>that packaged in actual trade was clicks. It goes long

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:32.040
<v Speaker 1>online retailers like Amazon and short brick and mortar stores

0:24:32.240 --> 0:24:35.639
<v Speaker 1>like Sears and J. C. Penny and that you know, again,

0:24:35.960 --> 0:24:37.960
<v Speaker 1>you could do that on your own, but now they're

0:24:38.000 --> 0:24:40.600
<v Speaker 1>doing it for you. So now you see trades being

0:24:40.680 --> 0:24:44.080
<v Speaker 1>packaged into an e t F or strategies like value

0:24:44.240 --> 0:24:47.600
<v Speaker 1>or momentum. There is so much going on, it's it's fascinating.

0:24:47.640 --> 0:24:50.160
<v Speaker 1>And you you see about four e t F launch

0:24:50.240 --> 0:24:52.399
<v Speaker 1>a day in the world and about one in the US,

0:24:52.480 --> 0:24:55.560
<v Speaker 1>so every day there's something coming out. I mean, ultimately,

0:24:56.000 --> 0:24:58.040
<v Speaker 1>just like apps. You know, there's all these apps coming

0:24:58.080 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 1>out because the iPhone is bringing this to people. All

0:25:01.560 --> 0:25:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the money is going into et s, right, so that's

0:25:04.000 --> 0:25:06.800
<v Speaker 1>why you see a lot of innovation and on the

0:25:06.880 --> 0:25:09.600
<v Speaker 1>side that's more that does more niche stuff. Most of

0:25:09.640 --> 0:25:11.800
<v Speaker 1>those are going to fail. There's you know a lot

0:25:11.880 --> 0:25:14.000
<v Speaker 1>of them will just not have any buyers. But for

0:25:14.119 --> 0:25:17.040
<v Speaker 1>every twenty that fail, there'll be a robotics CTF or

0:25:17.080 --> 0:25:19.280
<v Speaker 1>a cybersecurity et have to get to billion dollars and

0:25:19.359 --> 0:25:22.440
<v Speaker 1>that's going to keep this independent spirit, which I think

0:25:22.520 --> 0:25:24.840
<v Speaker 1>is healthy for the industry. But at the end of

0:25:24.920 --> 0:25:27.119
<v Speaker 1>the day, the big money, the real money, it's going

0:25:27.160 --> 0:25:29.080
<v Speaker 1>to go to Vanguard, black Rock, State Street in the

0:25:29.119 --> 0:25:32.159
<v Speaker 1>plain videll stuff that costs almost nothing, which brings us

0:25:32.160 --> 0:25:35.439
<v Speaker 1>back to Trillions, because that's how much money is actually

0:25:35.480 --> 0:25:46.000
<v Speaker 1>pouring into these things. Thanks for listening to Trillions until

0:25:46.080 --> 0:25:48.160
<v Speaker 1>next time. You can find us on the Bloomberg terminal,

0:25:48.400 --> 0:25:51.399
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg app, Bloomberg dot com, as well as on

0:25:51.480 --> 0:25:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Apple podcast, Stitcher and probably a few other things I

0:25:54.800 --> 0:25:57.600
<v Speaker 1>don't know about yet. While you're there, take a minute

0:25:57.640 --> 0:25:59.960
<v Speaker 1>to rate and review the show. It helps other people

0:26:00.080 --> 0:26:03.040
<v Speaker 1>find us. We're also on Twitter and would love to

0:26:03.080 --> 0:26:06.560
<v Speaker 1>hear from you. I'm at Joel Webber Show. He's at

0:26:06.760 --> 0:26:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Eric Baltunas. Trillions is produced by Jordan Bell with help

0:26:10.680 --> 0:26:14.400
<v Speaker 1>from Magnus the Swede Hendriksen. Francesca Levie is the head

0:26:14.400 --> 0:26:24.159
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg Podcast. Bye M M M