WEBVTT - TNF Preview, Blowouts or Upsets & Nick’s Picks

0:00:00.440 --> 0:00:02.800
<v Speaker 1>If your football team had one option in their playbook,

0:00:03.000 --> 0:00:05.800
<v Speaker 1>the results probably wouldn't be great. The same could be

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:09.440
<v Speaker 1>said for your investments. Cibo index options like SPX and

0:00:09.600 --> 0:00:12.960
<v Speaker 1>xsp can help expand your investing strategies with cash settlement

0:00:13.080 --> 0:00:15.840
<v Speaker 1>and potential tax advantages. If you're ready for a more

0:00:15.920 --> 0:00:19.160
<v Speaker 1>dynamic game plan, head to Better with Options dot com.

0:00:19.280 --> 0:00:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Cibo life is better with options, your investments.

0:00:22.440 --> 0:00:23.119
<v Speaker 2>Could be too.

0:00:23.520 --> 0:00:26.159
<v Speaker 1>There are risks associated with Cibo company products. Review the

0:00:26.160 --> 0:00:33.920
<v Speaker 1>disclosures and disclaimers at cbo dot com. Slash us Underscore disclaimers.

0:00:42.479 --> 0:00:45.760
<v Speaker 3>Welcome. In episode one eighty five, What's Right with Nick Wright?

0:00:45.840 --> 0:00:50.360
<v Speaker 3>On a massive Thursday, we have the America gets the

0:00:50.479 --> 0:00:53.840
<v Speaker 3>gift of not having to wait in extra three days

0:00:53.880 --> 0:00:57.920
<v Speaker 3>to watch Patrick Mahomes play We've Got Thursday Night Football,

0:00:57.960 --> 0:01:02.360
<v Speaker 3>where the Chiefs try to continue the most dominant stretch

0:01:02.960 --> 0:01:05.880
<v Speaker 3>of one team over another team the NFL has seen

0:01:06.080 --> 0:01:11.520
<v Speaker 3>in fifty years since the seventies. In the NFL, the

0:01:11.600 --> 0:01:14.840
<v Speaker 3>all time record for consecutive wins over an opponent is twenty.

0:01:15.160 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 3>With a win tonight, it will be sixteen for the

0:01:17.959 --> 0:01:21.399
<v Speaker 3>Chiefs over the Broncos, and then they play again twelve

0:01:21.520 --> 0:01:23.920
<v Speaker 3>days later, and then they can get it or eleven

0:01:23.959 --> 0:01:26.520
<v Speaker 3>days later and they get noise that right, no, no,

0:01:26.560 --> 0:01:29.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm sorry, nineteen days later, and then they can get

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:32.320
<v Speaker 3>it up to seventeen and keep the street going. So

0:01:32.400 --> 0:01:35.560
<v Speaker 3>we've got that, We've got a gambling show that at

0:01:35.600 --> 0:01:39.600
<v Speaker 3>this point, I'm really frustrated with I'm frustrated with myself.

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:43.360
<v Speaker 3>I'm frustrated with Demanse for not listening to me on

0:01:43.440 --> 0:01:48.520
<v Speaker 3>his teasers. I'm frustrated with Vegas. I'm frustrated with everybody,

0:01:49.000 --> 0:01:53.840
<v Speaker 3>and I'm gonna lash out a bit. But I love

0:01:54.520 --> 0:01:57.760
<v Speaker 3>the picks this week. I love them, and I liked

0:01:57.800 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 3>them last week. I love them this week. There's five

0:02:01.400 --> 0:02:04.440
<v Speaker 3>of them. The only way to break out of this

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:06.600
<v Speaker 3>we go three and two, we go two and three,

0:02:06.640 --> 0:02:08.400
<v Speaker 3>we go three and two, we go two and three

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:12.679
<v Speaker 3>is by having a perfect week. A five in a week, Demonse,

0:02:12.840 --> 0:02:15.040
<v Speaker 3>And you know what, I'm gonna call it a six

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:17.280
<v Speaker 3>in a week because I'm including your teaser in it.

0:02:17.600 --> 0:02:22.120
<v Speaker 3>Because last week I told you you teased across the zero.

0:02:22.240 --> 0:02:24.920
<v Speaker 3>You screwed up. I gave you a bad grade. And

0:02:25.000 --> 0:02:27.080
<v Speaker 3>what was the only leg of the teaser you lost

0:02:27.160 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 3>last week? Demonse?

0:02:28.720 --> 0:02:30.640
<v Speaker 2>The one where I teased through the zero.

0:02:31.560 --> 0:02:36.000
<v Speaker 3>Exactly right, exactly right, so you know, and you know,

0:02:36.639 --> 0:02:40.160
<v Speaker 3>coincidentally or not coincidentally, all of a sudden, money's a

0:02:40.160 --> 0:02:42.919
<v Speaker 3>little tight for my guy, Like things are we gotta

0:02:42.919 --> 0:02:45.320
<v Speaker 3>win some of these bets, pal, We got to win

0:02:45.440 --> 0:02:48.000
<v Speaker 3>some of these bets. And so that's coming up in

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:50.359
<v Speaker 3>the B block. In the C block, you can put

0:02:50.360 --> 0:02:53.359
<v Speaker 3>in your questions. You also could do put in your

0:02:53.440 --> 0:02:56.480
<v Speaker 3>bets and have us grade them if they're sharper square.

0:02:56.840 --> 0:02:59.280
<v Speaker 3>The best way to determine if they're sharper square is

0:02:59.280 --> 0:03:01.160
<v Speaker 3>if you put a bed and Demonse likes it at

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:03.800
<v Speaker 3>square bet. All right, Demanse, what is what did we

0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:06.960
<v Speaker 3>miss on today's show? Here's what missed the cut not

0:03:07.200 --> 0:03:10.520
<v Speaker 3>on the show today. Kirk Cousins says the trade rumor

0:03:10.560 --> 0:03:12.920
<v Speaker 3>is not worth his time. Yeah, he has no trade clause.

0:03:13.240 --> 0:03:16.240
<v Speaker 3>He's not gonna ask right before free agency to go

0:03:16.280 --> 0:03:19.120
<v Speaker 3>in a new system or to a mediocre team and

0:03:19.280 --> 0:03:22.519
<v Speaker 3>tank his value. He at least is comfortable in Minnesota,

0:03:22.840 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 3>so he's gonna stay there. That's at least my take.

0:03:25.280 --> 0:03:30.320
<v Speaker 3>Diora chimed in on the group chat, concerned about Kai Jones.

0:03:30.720 --> 0:03:34.080
<v Speaker 3>Everybody should be concerned about kai Jones. This is he

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:38.240
<v Speaker 3>just got released by the Charlotte Hornets. He appears to

0:03:38.280 --> 0:03:42.120
<v Speaker 3>be going through something. And then whenever one of these

0:03:42.160 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 3>stories comes up, I then look and him, like, geez, man,

0:03:46.200 --> 0:03:49.920
<v Speaker 3>kai Jones is twenty two years old. He's twenty two

0:03:50.000 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 3>years old, got a few million dollars, and is just

0:03:53.480 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 3>making some really really poor decisions, it would appear, and

0:03:56.760 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 3>I feel for him. Go ahead, demanse, what is the guy?

0:03:59.640 --> 0:04:01.920
<v Speaker 2>What is the guy really done up until this point?

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:04.000
<v Speaker 4>Like, I know he got on the Instagram live video

0:04:04.560 --> 0:04:07.960
<v Speaker 4>he's busting a sweat, he was dancing barefoot near his car,

0:04:08.040 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 4>But like, is he hurting anybody?

0:04:10.240 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm confused, what's the No, that's.

0:04:12.480 --> 0:04:14.480
<v Speaker 3>Why he's not in jail, but he's got fire from

0:04:14.520 --> 0:04:14.960
<v Speaker 3>his job.

0:04:16.440 --> 0:04:18.080
<v Speaker 2>No, he is.

0:04:18.240 --> 0:04:22.039
<v Speaker 3>You're allowed to do these things and the authorities aren't

0:04:22.040 --> 0:04:25.640
<v Speaker 3>gonna arrest you, but you cannot be a public facing

0:04:25.720 --> 0:04:30.560
<v Speaker 3>person and be just objectively out of your mind on

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:34.640
<v Speaker 3>social media. And then also he publicly demanded a trade.

0:04:34.680 --> 0:04:35.880
<v Speaker 3>He did a bunch of dumb stuff.

0:04:35.880 --> 0:04:38.640
<v Speaker 4>Go ahead, all right, what about that guy that actually

0:04:38.640 --> 0:04:42.360
<v Speaker 4>got arrested though, And it's like back on the team.

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:47.400
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, no, that's no, it's fair. But Miles Bridges. Listen,

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:52.440
<v Speaker 3>what Miles Bridges did was absolutely terrible and or allegedly

0:04:52.480 --> 0:04:55.240
<v Speaker 3>did I guess I'm supposed to say, but A he

0:04:55.279 --> 0:04:58.560
<v Speaker 3>did miss a full year and is now suspended again.

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:03.640
<v Speaker 3>And B yeah, if Kai Jones was awesome at basketball,

0:05:04.320 --> 0:05:07.240
<v Speaker 3>then they'd probably, you know, look the other way on

0:05:07.400 --> 0:05:11.880
<v Speaker 3>these odd and concerning ig lives. But he's not. But

0:05:12.080 --> 0:05:15.520
<v Speaker 3>the only team invested in him is the team that's

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:18.120
<v Speaker 3>been a first round pick on him. And he torched

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 3>that bridge, and so I did. Listen, I just feel

0:05:23.040 --> 0:05:25.840
<v Speaker 3>I feel badly for the young man. He is making

0:05:26.680 --> 0:05:30.760
<v Speaker 3>very very bad choices at twenty two years old, like

0:05:30.800 --> 0:05:33.720
<v Speaker 3>a lot of us did, but they're gonna potentially cost

0:05:33.839 --> 0:05:37.240
<v Speaker 3>him his career. And in far less serious news, new

0:05:37.240 --> 0:05:41.200
<v Speaker 3>footage confirms Bigfoot exists is what the producers wrote. At

0:05:41.200 --> 0:05:44.360
<v Speaker 3>some point, I'm gonna have to have a real talk

0:05:44.400 --> 0:05:49.440
<v Speaker 3>with our producers fascination with the supernatural with I mean,

0:05:49.560 --> 0:05:52.760
<v Speaker 3>this is like grainy footage from a train or something

0:05:53.080 --> 0:05:56.680
<v Speaker 3>that they're saying confirms Bigfoot exists. I don't know about you, guys.

0:05:56.920 --> 0:06:00.400
<v Speaker 3>My phone has a pretty high resolution camera. If I

0:06:00.480 --> 0:06:03.880
<v Speaker 3>thought I was actually seeing Bigfoot. Instead of taking a

0:06:03.960 --> 0:06:07.960
<v Speaker 3>fully zoomed out video, I might take a single fully

0:06:08.120 --> 0:06:11.240
<v Speaker 3>zoomed in picture. That's just my take. But what do

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:13.760
<v Speaker 3>I know? All right, Deman, say, let's get to the show.

0:06:13.880 --> 0:06:14.800
<v Speaker 3>What are we starting with?

0:06:15.640 --> 0:06:15.960
<v Speaker 2>All right?

0:06:16.000 --> 0:06:19.080
<v Speaker 4>So the Chiefs obviously facing off against the Broncos and

0:06:19.120 --> 0:06:22.760
<v Speaker 4>they're struggling defense. So we know the Chiefs can't blow

0:06:22.760 --> 0:06:24.520
<v Speaker 4>teams out, or they don't have the tendency to blow

0:06:24.560 --> 0:06:27.440
<v Speaker 4>teams out. But if they can't blow out the Broncos tonight,

0:06:27.880 --> 0:06:29.800
<v Speaker 4>do you think it's time to make an emergency trade?

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:31.160
<v Speaker 2>No?

0:06:31.880 --> 0:06:36.919
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Why does no one understand what's going on with

0:06:37.000 --> 0:06:40.880
<v Speaker 3>the Chiefs except me? So a couple things. One is

0:06:41.480 --> 0:06:45.240
<v Speaker 3>I keep having to listen on the TV show about

0:06:45.240 --> 0:06:49.679
<v Speaker 3>how oh the Chiefs. You know, they take teams lightly,

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 3>or they get out to early leads and take their

0:06:52.800 --> 0:06:55.960
<v Speaker 3>foot off the gas, which is objectively true. Last year

0:06:56.040 --> 0:06:58.440
<v Speaker 3>in the Broncos game, they were up twenty seven to

0:06:58.480 --> 0:07:01.080
<v Speaker 3>nothing and then all of a sudden it was close.

0:07:01.440 --> 0:07:03.680
<v Speaker 3>This year in the Jets game, they were up seventeen

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:05.719
<v Speaker 3>to nothing and then all of a sudden it was close.

0:07:06.200 --> 0:07:11.240
<v Speaker 3>Here is the request I have, Can folks stop concern

0:07:11.480 --> 0:07:14.760
<v Speaker 3>trolling about the Chiefs letting their foot off the gas

0:07:15.120 --> 0:07:18.280
<v Speaker 3>until they actually lose one of those goddamn games. Yes,

0:07:18.520 --> 0:07:21.560
<v Speaker 3>you're right, the Chiefs get up big and then they

0:07:21.600 --> 0:07:25.240
<v Speaker 3>go super conservative and they do things where they don't

0:07:25.280 --> 0:07:29.040
<v Speaker 3>look Chiefs like, but they don't lose, and there's no

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:33.840
<v Speaker 3>margin of victory bonus in the NFL, so it's a

0:07:33.960 --> 0:07:37.280
<v Speaker 3>nonsense concern. Be like, oh, last year they lost to

0:07:37.320 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 3>the Colts. Yes, they did take the Colts lightly and

0:07:40.840 --> 0:07:43.000
<v Speaker 3>lose to them, but that wasn't a game they had

0:07:43.040 --> 0:07:46.120
<v Speaker 3>a huge early lead on. So there's that part of it. Now,

0:07:46.160 --> 0:07:49.520
<v Speaker 3>as far as make a panic trade, there is if

0:07:49.640 --> 0:07:53.520
<v Speaker 3>there were, like, let's say the Bucks were as bad

0:07:53.560 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 3>as people thought they were going to be. Now, the

0:07:55.960 --> 0:07:58.520
<v Speaker 3>Bucks are actually good, but let's say the Bucks were

0:07:58.520 --> 0:08:00.800
<v Speaker 3>in the position the Vikings are in where they're like

0:08:00.880 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 3>one and four and things are going poorly and they're

0:08:03.960 --> 0:08:09.440
<v Speaker 3>considering doing a selloff. In that circumstance, would I potentially

0:08:09.480 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 3>be interested in Mike Evans an instant difference maker at

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 3>a discount. Sure, I would listen to that. But unless

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:21.920
<v Speaker 3>you're getting a player of that caliber, this idea, Oh,

0:08:21.960 --> 0:08:25.680
<v Speaker 3>bring McCole Hardman back because the Jets can't use him.

0:08:26.040 --> 0:08:26.200
<v Speaker 2>No.

0:08:27.240 --> 0:08:29.720
<v Speaker 3>And one of the things the Chiefs have done really,

0:08:30.320 --> 0:08:35.280
<v Speaker 3>really well is last year when people thought they needed

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:39.520
<v Speaker 3>help in the secondary, instead of going out and buying

0:08:39.559 --> 0:08:43.360
<v Speaker 3>a rental of the deadline of a veteran corner, they

0:08:43.480 --> 0:08:46.760
<v Speaker 3>let the young guys play through it. They let the

0:08:46.800 --> 0:08:50.280
<v Speaker 3>young guys get the snaps and the experience. And you

0:08:50.280 --> 0:08:54.400
<v Speaker 3>know what that's led to. Arguably right now, the best

0:08:54.440 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 3>pair of corners in the NFL are the Kansaity Chiefs.

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:02.720
<v Speaker 3>Greek Wollen and the rookie Weatherspoon in Seattle would have

0:09:02.800 --> 0:09:05.280
<v Speaker 3>something to say about it. I know there are some

0:09:05.360 --> 0:09:07.920
<v Speaker 3>other teams that are in the discussion, but especially now

0:09:07.960 --> 0:09:11.199
<v Speaker 3>that Digs went down, Jalen Ramsey isn't playing right now

0:09:11.480 --> 0:09:14.640
<v Speaker 3>that you could argue Lugerius Sneed and Trent McDuffie, two

0:09:14.679 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 3>guys on rookie contracts, are the best pair of corners

0:09:17.559 --> 0:09:19.920
<v Speaker 3>in football. So why do I bring that up? If

0:09:19.960 --> 0:09:22.680
<v Speaker 3>you go out and get trade for the Broncos for

0:09:22.760 --> 0:09:28.200
<v Speaker 3>Courtland Sutton, what you're doing is steyming the growth of Rashie,

0:09:28.280 --> 0:09:32.760
<v Speaker 3>Rice styming the growth of Canarius Tony. Now what I

0:09:32.800 --> 0:09:34.720
<v Speaker 3>do think the Chiefs need to do on the receiving

0:09:35.240 --> 0:09:39.600
<v Speaker 3>side of things is maybe they've given sky Moore a

0:09:39.760 --> 0:09:43.640
<v Speaker 3>lot of opportunities, a lot of snaps, a lot of

0:09:43.679 --> 0:09:46.079
<v Speaker 3>target well not really that many targets because he can't

0:09:46.120 --> 0:09:48.800
<v Speaker 3>seem to get open. What I like some of those

0:09:48.880 --> 0:09:53.800
<v Speaker 3>to go more to Justin Ross or to Rashi Rice. Sure,

0:09:54.360 --> 0:09:58.480
<v Speaker 3>but the solution is going to come from within now

0:09:59.160 --> 0:10:02.800
<v Speaker 3>on the Broncos game. Here are just some facts, all right.

0:10:03.679 --> 0:10:06.120
<v Speaker 3>Patrick Mahomes is eleven to zero against the Broncos in

0:10:06.120 --> 0:10:09.719
<v Speaker 3>his career. He's the first game ever the only game

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:12.480
<v Speaker 3>he played as a rookie was against the Broncos Week seven,

0:10:12.679 --> 0:10:16.080
<v Speaker 3>Week eighteen. He won it and has never lost to them.

0:10:16.360 --> 0:10:18.800
<v Speaker 3>That's first of all. Second of all, things that have

0:10:18.920 --> 0:10:22.000
<v Speaker 3>happened more recently than the Broncos have beaten the Chiefs.

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:27.480
<v Speaker 3>The Broncos have won a Super Bowl, the entirety of

0:10:27.600 --> 0:10:32.840
<v Speaker 3>Nikola Jokic's NBA career has happened since the Broncos last

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:39.439
<v Speaker 3>beat the Chiefs. We have had two different presidential elections.

0:10:39.840 --> 0:10:44.559
<v Speaker 3>Barack Obama was the president the last time the Broncos

0:10:44.840 --> 0:10:48.280
<v Speaker 3>beat the Chiefs. The lebron James has been to four

0:10:48.480 --> 0:10:52.960
<v Speaker 3>NBA Finals and scored sixteen thousand points since the Broncos

0:10:53.280 --> 0:10:57.480
<v Speaker 3>beat the Chiefs, and the idea that that streak is

0:10:57.520 --> 0:11:02.040
<v Speaker 3>going to end today on a short when the Broncos

0:11:02.120 --> 0:11:06.520
<v Speaker 3>have the worst defense through five weeks in the history

0:11:06.559 --> 0:11:10.320
<v Speaker 3>of the NFL is utter nonsense and no one actually

0:11:10.360 --> 0:11:10.800
<v Speaker 3>believe me.

0:11:10.760 --> 0:11:14.160
<v Speaker 4>The question wasn't necessarily about the Broncos. This was kind

0:11:14.160 --> 0:11:17.600
<v Speaker 4>of about the Chiefs and what they have and given

0:11:17.640 --> 0:11:20.440
<v Speaker 4>what teams have been doing to the Broncos, if they

0:11:20.440 --> 0:11:22.400
<v Speaker 4>can't blow them out, what does this say about them

0:11:22.440 --> 0:11:23.480
<v Speaker 4>for the rest of their season.

0:11:24.559 --> 0:11:27.800
<v Speaker 3>What if the Chiefs don't blow out the Broncos, it

0:11:27.880 --> 0:11:31.280
<v Speaker 3>is because they are not focused on blowing out the Broncos.

0:11:31.640 --> 0:11:35.200
<v Speaker 3>What I am trying to explain to the audience is

0:11:35.880 --> 0:11:39.840
<v Speaker 3>the Chiefs are playing a different game than the vast

0:11:39.880 --> 0:11:44.439
<v Speaker 3>majority of the league. The Chiefs are using these games

0:11:44.559 --> 0:11:50.520
<v Speaker 3>right now as sophisticated televised practices, and they are not

0:11:50.760 --> 0:11:55.080
<v Speaker 3>putting on tape all of what they are going to

0:11:55.240 --> 0:11:58.720
<v Speaker 3>need to beat the best teams. Now. They have games

0:11:58.760 --> 0:12:04.160
<v Speaker 3>remaining home games well, international game against Miami and then

0:12:04.240 --> 0:12:10.720
<v Speaker 3>home games against Philly, Cincinnati, and Buffalo, and two games

0:12:10.760 --> 0:12:13.800
<v Speaker 3>in the Division against the Chargers, including one in ten days.

0:12:14.480 --> 0:12:18.880
<v Speaker 3>Those games, the Chiefs are going to need to be

0:12:19.000 --> 0:12:22.960
<v Speaker 3>fully buttoned up. Those games, the Chiefs are going to

0:12:23.080 --> 0:12:26.000
<v Speaker 3>need to know exactly what they have in their receiving corps.

0:12:26.320 --> 0:12:30.280
<v Speaker 3>But right now, especially in a game where Kelsey's coming

0:12:30.320 --> 0:12:32.760
<v Speaker 3>off an injury and I think it snap count will

0:12:32.760 --> 0:12:34.920
<v Speaker 3>be down, I don't know if the Chiefs are gonna

0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:37.480
<v Speaker 3>light up the Broncos. I do know they're gonna win.

0:12:37.600 --> 0:12:40.040
<v Speaker 3>I also want to go go ahead and ask the

0:12:40.080 --> 0:12:41.040
<v Speaker 3>follow up real quick.

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:43.959
<v Speaker 4>You said that this could be Russ's last game as

0:12:43.960 --> 0:12:47.439
<v Speaker 4>a starter for the Broncos. Obviously, if this YEF, that's true,

0:12:47.640 --> 0:12:49.200
<v Speaker 4>how much will you miss him in the AFC?

0:12:49.559 --> 0:12:53.080
<v Speaker 3>Well, listen, I mean, if as long as the Broncos

0:12:53.120 --> 0:12:55.600
<v Speaker 3>don't get Caleb Williams, I won't be concerned about them

0:12:55.600 --> 0:12:59.320
<v Speaker 3>anytime this decade. But I want to say something about

0:12:59.360 --> 0:13:03.520
<v Speaker 3>Russ because there's a lot of you know, what you're

0:13:03.559 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 3>seeing on TV this week and you see it today,

0:13:05.960 --> 0:13:10.240
<v Speaker 3>is hey, look at Russ's stats, look at mahomes stats.

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:14.680
<v Speaker 3>They're similar, and in fact, Russ numerically has been better.

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:19.559
<v Speaker 3>This is why it's important if you're gonna talk about football.

0:13:19.960 --> 0:13:23.720
<v Speaker 3>To watch football, I know, it's like a wacky take

0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:26.240
<v Speaker 3>that like, oh, you can't watch all the games, Yeah

0:13:26.280 --> 0:13:30.120
<v Speaker 3>you can't. You can't. Actually, And here is what Russell

0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:34.040
<v Speaker 3>Wilson's numbers are good, but here's what is also true.

0:13:34.760 --> 0:13:39.800
<v Speaker 3>Week one against the Raiders, he was brutal in the

0:13:39.840 --> 0:13:43.560
<v Speaker 3>second half. They scored three points in the second half

0:13:43.840 --> 0:13:47.600
<v Speaker 3>and blew a halftime lead and lost seventeen sixteen. Week

0:13:47.679 --> 0:13:53.320
<v Speaker 3>two against the Commanders, Russ was awesome the opening quarter

0:13:53.360 --> 0:13:55.240
<v Speaker 3>and a half of that game. Awesome. They got up

0:13:55.240 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 3>twenty one to three. He then had a brutal fumble,

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:02.800
<v Speaker 3>a three and out, a three and out, a pick,

0:14:03.120 --> 0:14:06.040
<v Speaker 3>and all of a sudden the Broncos found themselves trailing

0:14:06.080 --> 0:14:09.800
<v Speaker 3>by double digits. And then Russ padded the stats with

0:14:09.880 --> 0:14:13.160
<v Speaker 3>that silly hail berry down ten late and then well

0:14:13.240 --> 0:14:15.360
<v Speaker 3>the down ten got some garbage time yards and then

0:14:15.360 --> 0:14:19.160
<v Speaker 3>the hail Mary. Week three, they allowed seventy points. Were

0:14:19.160 --> 0:14:21.240
<v Speaker 3>not putting anything on him, not blaming him for that.

0:14:21.560 --> 0:14:25.480
<v Speaker 3>Week four, he did play well. Also, the biggest play

0:14:25.520 --> 0:14:27.880
<v Speaker 3>of the game was the strip sack by the Broncos

0:14:27.920 --> 0:14:32.800
<v Speaker 3>defense on Justin Fields. And Week five against the Jets,

0:14:33.320 --> 0:14:36.800
<v Speaker 3>he fumbled the game away. They got inside the five

0:14:36.880 --> 0:14:39.360
<v Speaker 3>yard line, settled for a field goal, inside the five

0:14:39.440 --> 0:14:42.000
<v Speaker 3>yard line, settled for a field goal, and then down

0:14:42.080 --> 0:14:45.280
<v Speaker 3>three with plenty of time, trying to drive for the

0:14:45.400 --> 0:14:48.760
<v Speaker 3>tying or winning score. He got stripped, holding the ball

0:14:48.800 --> 0:14:51.080
<v Speaker 3>like a loaf of bread and fumbled the game away.

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:55.480
<v Speaker 3>Do not not, you demonse the generic you do not

0:14:55.680 --> 0:14:57.760
<v Speaker 3>argue to me. Russell Wilson has played well this year.

0:14:57.840 --> 0:15:00.560
<v Speaker 3>He's played better than last year, and he's not the

0:15:00.560 --> 0:15:03.320
<v Speaker 3>biggest problem with the Broncos. But he has not been good.

0:15:03.880 --> 0:15:06.800
<v Speaker 3>And the reason I have argued this could be his

0:15:06.920 --> 0:15:09.600
<v Speaker 3>last start is Sean Payton is gonna look for a

0:15:09.640 --> 0:15:13.359
<v Speaker 3>fall guy. The obvious fall guy is his defensive coordinator.

0:15:13.520 --> 0:15:16.760
<v Speaker 3>The problem is he hired that decordinator a few months ago.

0:15:17.200 --> 0:15:21.720
<v Speaker 3>That's his decision. If all of a sudden demonsey this.

0:15:22.120 --> 0:15:24.840
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna use our podcast as an example again. This

0:15:25.000 --> 0:15:29.920
<v Speaker 3>podcast was just an utter disarray, a total failure. I

0:15:30.320 --> 0:15:33.960
<v Speaker 3>you know what I'd sure rather and even if none

0:15:34.040 --> 0:15:37.480
<v Speaker 3>of it was Daniel's fault. I didn't hire Daniel, I

0:15:37.560 --> 0:15:41.880
<v Speaker 3>did hire you. I'd rather blame him and say Daniel

0:15:41.960 --> 0:15:43.960
<v Speaker 3>screwed it up rather than be like, you know what,

0:15:44.360 --> 0:15:47.400
<v Speaker 3>Demonse's not doing good because that's a reflection on me.

0:15:47.680 --> 0:15:52.040
<v Speaker 3>I brought you on. Daniel was already here. He in

0:15:52.120 --> 0:15:55.320
<v Speaker 3>this instance, Daniel is Russell Wilson. By the way, you,

0:15:55.480 --> 0:15:59.320
<v Speaker 3>unfortunately in that example, are Vance Joseph. That's unfair to you.

0:15:59.360 --> 0:16:02.160
<v Speaker 3>But I'm just saying, in theory, if the podcasts were failing,

0:16:02.600 --> 0:16:06.720
<v Speaker 3>you would have some security because if you if me

0:16:06.920 --> 0:16:09.960
<v Speaker 3>saying you have failed as an indictment on me, Sean

0:16:10.000 --> 0:16:12.680
<v Speaker 3>Payton saying Van Joseph has failed as an indictment on

0:16:12.720 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 3>Sean Payton, me saying, ah, what was Blue Doc thinking

0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:20.760
<v Speaker 3>hiring this dope from Denver? Daniel? Sorry for the alliteration.

0:16:21.200 --> 0:16:24.040
<v Speaker 3>That's on them, just like Sean Payton's like I didn't

0:16:24.080 --> 0:16:26.800
<v Speaker 3>sign Russell Wilson. I didn't trade for Russell Wilson. And

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:29.440
<v Speaker 3>by the way, don't you anybody send me emails saying

0:16:29.440 --> 0:16:33.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm bullying Daniel again. He and I have reconciled. We're friends.

0:16:33.800 --> 0:16:36.480
<v Speaker 3>Now I'm allowed to make fun of him if I want. Next.

0:16:38.320 --> 0:16:41.240
<v Speaker 4>All right, So the Rock Party goes up and faces

0:16:41.280 --> 0:16:44.480
<v Speaker 4>against arguably the number one defense in the Cleveland Browns.

0:16:45.200 --> 0:16:46.680
<v Speaker 4>So when he goes out there and he looks like

0:16:46.760 --> 0:16:49.360
<v Speaker 4>Prime Brady. Who are you going to give the credit

0:16:49.400 --> 0:16:50.320
<v Speaker 4>to at the end of the game.

0:16:52.600 --> 0:16:55.560
<v Speaker 3>Didn't I give him credit after the Cowboys game? Did I?

0:16:55.720 --> 0:16:58.360
<v Speaker 3>Or did I not give him credit? A little bit

0:16:58.400 --> 0:17:00.920
<v Speaker 3>of party or I gave I gave him a little

0:17:00.920 --> 0:17:04.840
<v Speaker 3>bit of credit. I gotta see the game. Let me

0:17:04.880 --> 0:17:06.840
<v Speaker 3>see the game and see how it plays out. This

0:17:06.920 --> 0:17:12.160
<v Speaker 3>might show up in Knicks picks. I if I were

0:17:12.200 --> 0:17:14.720
<v Speaker 3>the Niners, I'd be a little nervous about this game.

0:17:15.440 --> 0:17:21.080
<v Speaker 3>The Browns coming off of by excellent defense, Niners potential

0:17:21.160 --> 0:17:25.879
<v Speaker 3>letdown spot. I've talked a lot about how the team

0:17:25.960 --> 0:17:29.800
<v Speaker 3>of the week is zero to five this year. If

0:17:29.880 --> 0:17:32.960
<v Speaker 3>we want to say, going into week one, the hot

0:17:33.000 --> 0:17:36.680
<v Speaker 3>team was the defending Super Bowl champs. They lost Week one.

0:17:37.080 --> 0:17:40.359
<v Speaker 3>Going into week two, the hot team was the team

0:17:40.400 --> 0:17:42.639
<v Speaker 3>that had just beaten the defending Super Bowl champs on

0:17:42.720 --> 0:17:47.040
<v Speaker 3>national television. They lost the Lions did Going into Week three,

0:17:47.160 --> 0:17:49.439
<v Speaker 3>the hot team was the Allas Cowboys, who had won

0:17:49.480 --> 0:17:52.359
<v Speaker 3>their first two games seventy to ten. They lost to

0:17:52.359 --> 0:17:56.040
<v Speaker 3>the Arizona Cardinals. Going into Week four, the hot team

0:17:56.080 --> 0:17:58.920
<v Speaker 3>was the Miami Dolphins, who had just scored seventy points

0:17:59.240 --> 0:18:02.200
<v Speaker 3>they lost to the Buffalo Bills, and going into Week five,

0:18:02.600 --> 0:18:04.919
<v Speaker 3>the hot team was the Buffalo Bills, who had just

0:18:04.960 --> 0:18:07.680
<v Speaker 3>beaten the Miami Dolphins by four scores. They lost to

0:18:07.680 --> 0:18:11.560
<v Speaker 3>the Jacksonville Jaguars. Going into Week six, the hot team

0:18:11.640 --> 0:18:14.440
<v Speaker 3>is the San Francisco forty nine ers. Be careful out

0:18:14.440 --> 0:18:18.040
<v Speaker 3>there in America. That's all I'm saying. Now. Well, if

0:18:18.080 --> 0:18:22.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm wrong and Purty carves them up, he is then

0:18:22.640 --> 0:18:26.679
<v Speaker 3>building the resume I asked him to build. Do it

0:18:26.920 --> 0:18:32.040
<v Speaker 3>against excellent defenses, do it in adverse circumstances, and with

0:18:32.240 --> 0:18:39.920
<v Speaker 3>new information I can tweak adjust my opinion. The point

0:18:40.040 --> 0:18:42.439
<v Speaker 3>that I would like to hammer home on the party

0:18:42.480 --> 0:18:46.159
<v Speaker 3>stuff other than the Jimmy G. Compson that with Shanahan.

0:18:46.359 --> 0:18:49.440
<v Speaker 3>All of this the point, as Demonse stares a hole

0:18:49.520 --> 0:18:52.440
<v Speaker 3>through me, that I think, you know what, I'm gonna

0:18:52.480 --> 0:18:55.920
<v Speaker 3>do a real test right now, right now, Demonse Brock

0:18:56.000 --> 0:19:00.960
<v Speaker 3>Purty is approximately the blank best quarterback in football Numerica.

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:07.919
<v Speaker 3>He's okay, there you go, So I am now sorry.

0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:13.159
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna build quite the bridge and you'll will end

0:19:13.240 --> 0:19:14.040
<v Speaker 3>up in the same place.

0:19:14.440 --> 0:19:14.679
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:19:14.800 --> 0:19:18.000
<v Speaker 3>Laslow Demont's a great, great radio host in Kansas, City's

0:19:18.000 --> 0:19:21.119
<v Speaker 3>hosted the show for twenty some years. Once upon a time.

0:19:22.040 --> 0:19:28.200
<v Speaker 3>He's a big uh. He's very very anti gun. He's

0:19:28.440 --> 0:19:32.119
<v Speaker 3>very he thinks the Second Endment has been misinterpreted. He

0:19:32.280 --> 0:19:37.520
<v Speaker 3>is very pro gun control. Twenty years ago, maybe he

0:19:37.520 --> 0:19:43.199
<v Speaker 3>held a debate with a local politician and he asked

0:19:43.280 --> 0:19:48.119
<v Speaker 3>the local politician this question. He said, should we be

0:19:48.280 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 3>able to If the local politician had made the case

0:19:53.160 --> 0:19:56.400
<v Speaker 3>that the reason the Secondmendment must not be infringed upon

0:19:56.440 --> 0:19:59.480
<v Speaker 3>it is because of a tour. You have to be

0:19:59.560 --> 0:20:02.640
<v Speaker 3>able to fight back against a tyrannical, oppressive government. That's

0:20:02.680 --> 0:20:05.159
<v Speaker 3>why it was written, That's what it says. And so

0:20:05.320 --> 0:20:08.680
<v Speaker 3>Laslow asked the question, should you be able as a

0:20:08.720 --> 0:20:13.560
<v Speaker 3>citizen then to buy a suitcase nuke, to buy an

0:20:14.119 --> 0:20:19.159
<v Speaker 3>anti aircraft gun, to buy a tank, Because if the

0:20:19.359 --> 0:20:21.760
<v Speaker 3>argument is he must be able to fight against an

0:20:21.760 --> 0:20:26.360
<v Speaker 3>oppressive government, your nine millimeter or even your AR fifteen

0:20:26.720 --> 0:20:31.960
<v Speaker 3>ain't doing it. They got drones, so should And if

0:20:32.040 --> 0:20:36.560
<v Speaker 3>your answer is no, you should not be able to

0:20:36.600 --> 0:20:41.200
<v Speaker 3>get an anti aircraft missile, a suitcase nuke, a tank,

0:20:42.000 --> 0:20:48.399
<v Speaker 3>then we actually agree that there should be some form

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:52.719
<v Speaker 3>of gun control. We just disagree on where it should

0:20:52.760 --> 0:20:56.479
<v Speaker 3>start like you have it starting you know at you know,

0:20:57.000 --> 0:21:02.760
<v Speaker 3>military grade large arms. I have it starting at assault rifles.

0:21:03.119 --> 0:21:06.360
<v Speaker 3>But we agree there should be some level. And it's

0:21:06.400 --> 0:21:11.200
<v Speaker 3>a very It was a very smart rhetorical trick he played,

0:21:11.280 --> 0:21:13.320
<v Speaker 3>but it was also accurate by the way in this

0:21:13.400 --> 0:21:16.520
<v Speaker 3>specific debate, the politician, once he had him cornered like that,

0:21:16.600 --> 0:21:18.119
<v Speaker 3>was like, you know what, I changed my mind. You

0:21:18.119 --> 0:21:20.320
<v Speaker 3>actually should be able to buy a suitcase nuke. You're right,

0:21:20.560 --> 0:21:22.600
<v Speaker 3>And Laslo was like, well, I guess you've checkmated me.

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:27.840
<v Speaker 3>You know what, I have a But okay, so here's

0:21:27.880 --> 0:21:32.480
<v Speaker 3>why I tell that long story. You agree with me

0:21:32.600 --> 0:21:37.720
<v Speaker 3>on brock Party. It's just a question of degree, because

0:21:38.160 --> 0:21:41.800
<v Speaker 3>brock Party does not have the numbers of something like

0:21:41.840 --> 0:21:45.239
<v Speaker 3>the twelfth best quarterback. He has the numbers like the

0:21:45.280 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 3>best quarterback. He does not have the record of somewhere

0:21:48.840 --> 0:21:52.000
<v Speaker 3>in the top twelve best quarterback. He is the numbers

0:21:52.240 --> 0:21:56.440
<v Speaker 3>of the best quarterback by what he has accomplished. By

0:21:56.640 --> 0:22:00.879
<v Speaker 3>his stats. He is not only the best quarterback in

0:22:01.000 --> 0:22:05.879
<v Speaker 3>the league hands down, he is through this portion of

0:22:05.920 --> 0:22:10.640
<v Speaker 3>his career, one of the best quarterbacks in NFL history.

0:22:11.119 --> 0:22:15.240
<v Speaker 3>But you even you don't believe that, so we are

0:22:15.440 --> 0:22:21.840
<v Speaker 3>just arguing about degrees. You are giving downgrading him ten

0:22:22.000 --> 0:22:28.720
<v Speaker 3>spots ish based on the weapons, the system, Shanahan, all

0:22:28.760 --> 0:22:33.600
<v Speaker 3>of it, and I'm downgrading him eighteen spots. We're closer

0:22:33.640 --> 0:22:38.080
<v Speaker 3>than you think, because if someone wants to because he

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:40.240
<v Speaker 3>has the number, he has the highest passer rating in

0:22:40.359 --> 0:22:44.600
<v Speaker 3>NFL history, He's never lost a game. He has an

0:22:44.960 --> 0:22:48.520
<v Speaker 3>infinite touchdown interception ratio this year because he hasn't thrown

0:22:48.560 --> 0:22:53.120
<v Speaker 3>a pick. So if unless folks are arguing, you know what,

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:56.879
<v Speaker 3>he might be better than Mahomes, then we're all agree.

0:22:56.960 --> 0:23:00.400
<v Speaker 3>We all agree. It's a question of how far you

0:23:00.440 --> 0:23:03.800
<v Speaker 3>want to grade him on a curve. I grade him

0:23:03.840 --> 0:23:06.480
<v Speaker 3>on a harsher curve. It would appear than everyone other

0:23:06.520 --> 0:23:09.879
<v Speaker 3>than Steven Ruiz, who has him twenty third in the league.

0:23:10.119 --> 0:23:12.280
<v Speaker 3>And he's getting asked Brockbird, he's getting asked about it

0:23:12.280 --> 0:23:16.400
<v Speaker 3>by Peter King, Demandy's grading him on a slightly more

0:23:16.440 --> 0:23:21.840
<v Speaker 3>generous curve. But still not there's people should be arguing,

0:23:22.119 --> 0:23:24.520
<v Speaker 3>he might be the best quarterback we've ever seen. That's

0:23:24.520 --> 0:23:27.000
<v Speaker 3>what his numbers are. His numbers are, he might be

0:23:27.040 --> 0:23:28.720
<v Speaker 3>the best quarterback we've ever seen.

0:23:28.760 --> 0:23:31.600
<v Speaker 2>To top ten, I go back to top ten.

0:23:31.840 --> 0:23:32.880
<v Speaker 3>We went from twelve to ten.

0:23:32.960 --> 0:23:36.080
<v Speaker 4>All right, next, all right, there are a bunch of

0:23:36.119 --> 0:23:38.480
<v Speaker 4>teams with a chance, with chances to bow out. This

0:23:38.560 --> 0:23:43.840
<v Speaker 4>week you got Kansas City versus Denver, Miami versus Carolina, Philadelphia,

0:23:43.920 --> 0:23:48.199
<v Speaker 4>Philadelphia versus the Jets, and Buffalo versus the Giants. But

0:23:48.680 --> 0:23:53.439
<v Speaker 4>with great blowout potential is even greater upset opportunities. The

0:23:53.520 --> 0:23:58.480
<v Speaker 4>signage game in one of these categories blowout, easy win, close.

0:23:58.240 --> 0:24:01.959
<v Speaker 2>Game, or upset. Start off with Kansas City versus Denver

0:24:02.160 --> 0:24:03.440
<v Speaker 2>or I guess you do it however you want to

0:24:03.480 --> 0:24:03.720
<v Speaker 2>do it.

0:24:04.359 --> 0:24:06.919
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'll do it in the exact order that it

0:24:07.000 --> 0:24:11.520
<v Speaker 3>was listed, not by game but by category. Blowout is

0:24:11.560 --> 0:24:16.320
<v Speaker 3>the Bills Jet the Giants. I think the Bills particularly

0:24:16.400 --> 0:24:20.960
<v Speaker 3>coming off a loss, and the Giants just being just

0:24:21.160 --> 0:24:24.160
<v Speaker 3>dead on arrival. This is the exact type of game

0:24:25.160 --> 0:24:28.080
<v Speaker 3>the Bills win thirty seven to ten. That is their

0:24:28.240 --> 0:24:33.720
<v Speaker 3>mo o after a bad performance, to look absolutely lights out.

0:24:34.200 --> 0:24:40.600
<v Speaker 3>So I like the blowout to be Buffalo against the Giants.

0:24:41.880 --> 0:24:48.160
<v Speaker 3>The easy win, I am going to say Kansas City

0:24:48.280 --> 0:24:51.520
<v Speaker 3>versus Denver. I don't know that the Chiefs will blow

0:24:51.600 --> 0:24:55.520
<v Speaker 3>them out. I am very confident Denver will never have

0:24:55.600 --> 0:24:58.879
<v Speaker 3>the ball in the fourth quarter with a chance to

0:24:58.960 --> 0:25:02.440
<v Speaker 3>take the lead. The Chiefs will at a minimum keep

0:25:02.520 --> 0:25:06.720
<v Speaker 3>them at Bay up seven to ten throughout the game.

0:25:07.720 --> 0:25:13.360
<v Speaker 3>Close game. I'm going to say this is I honestly

0:25:13.400 --> 0:25:15.320
<v Speaker 3>think this is probably an easy win as well. But

0:25:15.359 --> 0:25:18.320
<v Speaker 3>if I have the assign of the category, I'm gonna

0:25:18.320 --> 0:25:22.159
<v Speaker 3>put Philly in the Jets. And here's why. I The

0:25:22.280 --> 0:25:26.520
<v Speaker 3>Jets cannot block Philly's front. They have no chance of

0:25:26.560 --> 0:25:29.399
<v Speaker 3>blocking Philly's front, and because of that, this could be

0:25:29.480 --> 0:25:34.560
<v Speaker 3>a disaster for Zach Wilson. However, I also think the

0:25:34.680 --> 0:25:38.480
<v Speaker 3>Jets defense right now is playing at a high enough level.

0:25:38.840 --> 0:25:42.680
<v Speaker 3>It's in New York and Philly, much like the Chiefs,

0:25:43.080 --> 0:25:46.919
<v Speaker 3>has been kind of doing just enough to win that

0:25:47.040 --> 0:25:50.360
<v Speaker 3>I could see this game being close. Even if they're

0:25:51.000 --> 0:25:54.120
<v Speaker 3>that they know that they can get they can get

0:25:54.119 --> 0:25:56.639
<v Speaker 3>to Zach Wilson at any point. But it's possible this

0:25:56.760 --> 0:25:59.920
<v Speaker 3>game gets way away from the Jets because Jalen Carter

0:26:00.080 --> 0:26:03.280
<v Speaker 3>in that Philly front annihilate them. By the way, speaking

0:26:03.320 --> 0:26:07.160
<v Speaker 3>of Philly Demons, have you looked at their schedule after

0:26:07.200 --> 0:26:10.600
<v Speaker 3>the Jets game? It is I'm just gonna tell you

0:26:10.640 --> 0:26:14.960
<v Speaker 3>real quick. Of their next eight games after the Jets game,

0:26:15.800 --> 0:26:18.960
<v Speaker 3>they are at Washington for one of them. Here are

0:26:19.000 --> 0:26:27.600
<v Speaker 3>the other seven Miami, Kansas City, Buffalo, San Francisco, Seattle,

0:26:27.960 --> 0:26:32.520
<v Speaker 3>and the Cowboys. Twice. Of their next eight games after

0:26:32.560 --> 0:26:38.600
<v Speaker 3>the Jets, they play seven games against what's the worst

0:26:38.640 --> 0:26:42.680
<v Speaker 3>team on there, the Cowboys, I guess right now, the Seahawks.

0:26:43.240 --> 0:26:48.160
<v Speaker 3>They are at Kansas City, at the Cowboys, at the Seahawks,

0:26:48.240 --> 0:26:51.680
<v Speaker 3>and home for the Dolphins, home for the Cowboys, home

0:26:51.720 --> 0:26:54.639
<v Speaker 3>for the Bills, home for the Niners. Just a So,

0:26:54.880 --> 0:26:58.320
<v Speaker 3>to Philly's credit, they needed to start five to zero

0:26:58.359 --> 0:27:01.280
<v Speaker 3>because that schedule is I mean, that's about as tough

0:27:01.320 --> 0:27:04.280
<v Speaker 3>as of an eight game stretch as you And by

0:27:04.320 --> 0:27:07.400
<v Speaker 3>the way, their one quote easy game unquote is one

0:27:07.440 --> 0:27:09.800
<v Speaker 3>of the only teams that beat them last year, Washington,

0:27:09.920 --> 0:27:13.919
<v Speaker 3>a divisional opponent on the road. So Philly needs that

0:27:13.960 --> 0:27:17.359
<v Speaker 3>spot now to if the last so the last question

0:27:17.720 --> 0:27:19.919
<v Speaker 3>or the last one there would be, I guess the

0:27:19.960 --> 0:27:25.440
<v Speaker 3>one upset would be Miami Carolina. To be clear, I

0:27:25.960 --> 0:27:32.640
<v Speaker 3>am not betting on that. However, Carolina is not gonna

0:27:32.680 --> 0:27:36.639
<v Speaker 3>go ozho to seventeen. And if there was a spot,

0:27:37.119 --> 0:27:40.439
<v Speaker 3>I'm not making the case there's a Carolina's not beating Miami.

0:27:40.680 --> 0:27:43.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm just not making the case. I don't think any

0:27:43.920 --> 0:27:48.960
<v Speaker 3>of these four teams lose out right, but I I

0:27:49.000 --> 0:27:53.119
<v Speaker 3>am interested in if there's all of a sudden a

0:27:53.200 --> 0:27:57.679
<v Speaker 3>game where Carolina looks competent offen like they it's been

0:27:57.720 --> 0:28:02.200
<v Speaker 3>a while. And Frank Reich had some quotes essentially kind

0:28:02.200 --> 0:28:05.119
<v Speaker 3>of confirming that he wanted CJ. Stroud but the owner

0:28:05.160 --> 0:28:07.399
<v Speaker 3>made him take Bryce Young. I don't know why he

0:28:07.480 --> 0:28:10.760
<v Speaker 3>said this publicly, but that's certainly the way people read it.

0:28:12.760 --> 0:28:17.000
<v Speaker 3>And so I, yeah, I this feels like a very

0:28:17.160 --> 0:28:21.919
<v Speaker 3>safe Survivor Pool week. Maybe there is a shocker, but

0:28:23.040 --> 0:28:27.040
<v Speaker 3>Denver can't beat Kansas City, the Jets can't block Philly

0:28:27.440 --> 0:28:29.879
<v Speaker 3>that there's no way the Bills are losing back to

0:28:29.920 --> 0:28:31.920
<v Speaker 3>back games with the second one being to the Giants,

0:28:32.359 --> 0:28:35.640
<v Speaker 3>and that just leaves Caroline against Miami. And I don't

0:28:35.680 --> 0:28:39.000
<v Speaker 3>see how Caroline is gonna be able to slow down

0:28:39.000 --> 0:28:41.680
<v Speaker 3>Miami enough. I just don't. But that would be I

0:28:41.720 --> 0:28:43.400
<v Speaker 3>guess the one that I had to take a flyer

0:28:43.440 --> 0:28:44.080
<v Speaker 3>on go ahead.

0:28:44.480 --> 0:28:47.160
<v Speaker 2>So the speed of the Giants. Danny Dimes and.

0:28:47.160 --> 0:28:50.040
<v Speaker 4>The Giants are said to play their fourth primetime game

0:28:50.120 --> 0:28:53.200
<v Speaker 4>in six weeks, and Daniel Jones is actually unlikely to

0:28:53.240 --> 0:28:53.920
<v Speaker 4>play right now?

0:28:57.440 --> 0:28:59.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean they bought into the giant type and

0:29:00.000 --> 0:29:02.480
<v Speaker 3>they shouldn't have. I am interested to see if Tyrod

0:29:02.520 --> 0:29:05.040
<v Speaker 3>Taylor looks better than Daniel Jones. That could be a

0:29:05.080 --> 0:29:08.120
<v Speaker 3>rough spot for him. All right, next, very rough.

0:29:08.440 --> 0:29:11.000
<v Speaker 4>All right, You've been super high on the Seahawks and Lions,

0:29:11.200 --> 0:29:13.640
<v Speaker 4>but neither have cracked your top seven in your tiers.

0:29:14.280 --> 0:29:17.480
<v Speaker 4>Seattle plays a resurgent Bengals and Detroit faces Baker in

0:29:17.520 --> 0:29:20.840
<v Speaker 4>the Bucks. Would a statement win from either team make

0:29:20.880 --> 0:29:23.120
<v Speaker 4>them good enough teams to be legit threats?

0:29:23.840 --> 0:29:24.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:29:24.440 --> 0:29:27.720
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, that's a great question either one of these teams.

0:29:27.960 --> 0:29:32.040
<v Speaker 3>For Seattle, it's just winning the game. For Detroit, if

0:29:32.080 --> 0:29:35.240
<v Speaker 3>they put it on Tampa when Tampa's coming off a bye,

0:29:35.720 --> 0:29:39.080
<v Speaker 3>then you have to start to ask yourself, is the

0:29:39.120 --> 0:29:42.600
<v Speaker 3>third team in the NFC not Dallas? Is it one

0:29:42.680 --> 0:29:45.600
<v Speaker 3>of these two teams? That would be a fair quest.

0:29:45.640 --> 0:29:49.560
<v Speaker 3>Like obviously San Francisco and Philly have separated themselves, most

0:29:49.600 --> 0:29:53.680
<v Speaker 3>people have despite the loss Dallas third, but I think

0:29:53.720 --> 0:29:57.719
<v Speaker 3>Detroit or Seattle can make a strong case there. All right,

0:29:57.760 --> 0:29:59.560
<v Speaker 3>go ahead, last one, all.

0:29:59.520 --> 0:30:01.240
<v Speaker 4>Right, So yeah, Actually just touched up on this a

0:30:01.240 --> 0:30:03.640
<v Speaker 4>few seconds ago. Head coach Frank w Reich took a

0:30:03.680 --> 0:30:06.800
<v Speaker 4>shot at Panthers' ownership for being too involved. If you

0:30:06.800 --> 0:30:09.080
<v Speaker 4>remember back, it seemed like the coaching staff was more

0:30:09.120 --> 0:30:12.040
<v Speaker 4>infatuated with CJ Stroud before the draft. Do you think

0:30:12.160 --> 0:30:14.720
<v Speaker 4>David Tepper forced the Panthers to take Bryce Young or

0:30:14.720 --> 0:30:15.120
<v Speaker 4>for CJ.

0:30:16.160 --> 0:30:20.520
<v Speaker 3>It sure seems like that. And the Frank the VEGA

0:30:20.680 --> 0:30:24.880
<v Speaker 3>member Vegas was convinced for months that CJ was going

0:30:24.960 --> 0:30:28.400
<v Speaker 3>number one, and then all of a sudden, the markets

0:30:28.440 --> 0:30:31.200
<v Speaker 3>flipped and they took Bryce. People thought I was being

0:30:31.200 --> 0:30:35.560
<v Speaker 3>too mean to Bryce Young. Here's the thing, He's too little.

0:30:36.920 --> 0:30:40.200
<v Speaker 3>It's just there. It is simple as that. Now CJ

0:30:40.840 --> 0:30:42.960
<v Speaker 3>has been way better than I thought he would be.

0:30:43.200 --> 0:30:46.120
<v Speaker 3>His offensive lines banged up, he doesn't have great receivers,

0:30:46.280 --> 0:30:49.760
<v Speaker 3>and he's been excellent. And I might owe the Texans

0:30:49.760 --> 0:30:52.720
<v Speaker 3>in apology because I gave the Texans a hard time

0:30:53.240 --> 0:30:56.160
<v Speaker 3>because they traded all that draft capital away to get

0:30:56.160 --> 0:30:58.600
<v Speaker 3>Will Anderson. And I was like, man, you're trading away

0:30:58.720 --> 0:31:01.800
<v Speaker 3>your own pick next year, which could be a top

0:31:01.880 --> 0:31:07.600
<v Speaker 3>three pick. They might be an eight win team. Dimiko's

0:31:07.640 --> 0:31:11.200
<v Speaker 3>done a great job. They've done more with less. CJ's

0:31:11.240 --> 0:31:14.440
<v Speaker 3>been excellent. The Panthers, on the other hand, traded all

0:31:14.440 --> 0:31:17.200
<v Speaker 3>that capital get up to number one. Then it looks

0:31:17.240 --> 0:31:20.680
<v Speaker 3>like took the quarterback the coach didn't want, and now

0:31:20.680 --> 0:31:24.120
<v Speaker 3>they might end up trading away the number one pick. Well,

0:31:24.120 --> 0:31:26.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean, they're definitely trading away their own pick, but

0:31:26.240 --> 0:31:28.280
<v Speaker 3>it might end up being the number one pick. Could

0:31:28.280 --> 0:31:34.440
<v Speaker 3>be a cataclysmic line of decisions for the Carolina Panthers.

0:31:34.440 --> 0:31:38.440
<v Speaker 3>Don't forget put your questions, comments, or your bets in

0:31:38.520 --> 0:31:41.640
<v Speaker 3>the YouTube comment section for us to get to in

0:31:41.640 --> 0:31:44.280
<v Speaker 3>the C block, we give out five and oh a

0:31:44.400 --> 0:31:47.480
<v Speaker 3>five and oh week coming up next on the Gambling Show,

0:31:47.480 --> 0:31:48.560
<v Speaker 3>We Do It Next, What's Right?

0:31:55.800 --> 0:31:58.560
<v Speaker 5>This episode is brought to you by Unstoppable. Discover the

0:31:58.600 --> 0:32:01.960
<v Speaker 5>inspiring true story about Thanny Roblest, who defined every expectation

0:32:02.040 --> 0:32:04.920
<v Speaker 5>to become a national wrestling champion, and Unstoppable, a new

0:32:04.960 --> 0:32:08.520
<v Speaker 5>original movie from Amazon, MGM Studios and director William Goldenberg.

0:32:08.640 --> 0:32:11.800
<v Speaker 5>Evoking the excitement and camaraderie of classic sports dramas and

0:32:11.840 --> 0:32:15.240
<v Speaker 5>thrilling wrestling matches. Unstoppable features an all star ensemble cast,

0:32:15.320 --> 0:32:18.840
<v Speaker 5>including Jerrell, Jerome, Jennifer Lopez, Don Cheatle, Michael Pania, and

0:32:18.840 --> 0:32:23.080
<v Speaker 5>Bobby Canavali Watch Unstoppable now exclusively on Amazon Prime Video.

0:32:23.960 --> 0:32:27.320
<v Speaker 3>All Right, I was stalling because I had another two

0:32:27.320 --> 0:32:30.000
<v Speaker 3>and three week and I am so sick of it.

0:32:30.880 --> 0:32:33.120
<v Speaker 3>So let's just show you the picks. It started off

0:32:33.160 --> 0:32:37.200
<v Speaker 3>so well, Jacksonville on the money line plus five and

0:32:37.200 --> 0:32:41.280
<v Speaker 3>a half against the Bills, then Arizona plus three and

0:32:41.320 --> 0:32:42.560
<v Speaker 3>alfagant Cincinnati.

0:32:42.960 --> 0:32:45.640
<v Speaker 4>All of a sudden, you gave me an one for

0:32:45.680 --> 0:32:47.680
<v Speaker 4>a teaser. I told you about that as it was

0:32:47.760 --> 0:32:48.680
<v Speaker 4>unfolding as well.

0:32:49.680 --> 0:32:52.800
<v Speaker 3>You know what fair point the Rams plus four and

0:32:52.840 --> 0:32:59.200
<v Speaker 3>a half against Philly Philly had been had they hadn't

0:32:59.240 --> 0:33:01.960
<v Speaker 3>been blowing people. The Rams needed the game, but I

0:33:02.000 --> 0:33:04.240
<v Speaker 3>should have known the Rams can't block them, can't stay

0:33:04.360 --> 0:33:08.400
<v Speaker 3>minus four at Minnesota, never a doubt. And then the

0:33:08.440 --> 0:33:11.920
<v Speaker 3>one indefensible bet Dallas plus three and a half at

0:33:11.960 --> 0:33:17.600
<v Speaker 3>San Francisco. Now, I gotta tell you that Dallas game

0:33:18.200 --> 0:33:23.920
<v Speaker 3>actually saved me. Not the Dallas game, but there was

0:33:23.960 --> 0:33:28.040
<v Speaker 3>some heartaches saved because you know how I've been on

0:33:28.080 --> 0:33:35.479
<v Speaker 3>this hot streak of live betting huge dogs. So I

0:33:35.560 --> 0:33:40.880
<v Speaker 3>did it again in the Panthers Lions game. So the

0:33:40.920 --> 0:33:46.080
<v Speaker 3>Panthers down twenty eight to seven, and I bet them

0:33:46.600 --> 0:33:50.440
<v Speaker 3>plus the Cowboys money line, and so a live bet

0:33:50.480 --> 0:33:53.320
<v Speaker 3>on the Panthers trailing twenty one and the Cowboys money line.

0:33:53.800 --> 0:33:58.480
<v Speaker 3>Those just two bets were started. That parlayd was seventy

0:33:58.600 --> 0:34:03.320
<v Speaker 3>seven to one. Seventy seven to one. Now, the Panthers

0:34:03.440 --> 0:34:07.440
<v Speaker 3>ended up obviously losing terribly, so the bet was dead.

0:34:07.880 --> 0:34:11.719
<v Speaker 3>But do you know how extra crushing that Cowboys game

0:34:11.760 --> 0:34:15.080
<v Speaker 3>would have been if the Panthers had come back? And

0:34:15.120 --> 0:34:17.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm like, all right, I just need that, like give

0:34:17.680 --> 0:34:20.320
<v Speaker 3>me a sweat here. And Dallas is instantly just getting

0:34:20.360 --> 0:34:23.399
<v Speaker 3>molly wopped in that game. Okay, all right, here's the deal.

0:34:25.600 --> 0:34:29.320
<v Speaker 3>I like all four of these bets. I'm taking four dogs.

0:34:29.800 --> 0:34:33.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm taking one tiny favorite who's in a desperate spot

0:34:33.280 --> 0:34:36.920
<v Speaker 3>and undervalued, and I'm getting great line value on all

0:34:36.960 --> 0:34:41.440
<v Speaker 3>these games. I'm getting some home dogs, I'm getting key numbers,

0:34:41.840 --> 0:34:44.759
<v Speaker 3>and for the love of God, I'm gonna go five

0:34:44.840 --> 0:34:47.000
<v Speaker 3>and zero. What's the first one? Demonse?

0:34:48.239 --> 0:34:48.520
<v Speaker 2>First?

0:34:48.520 --> 0:34:51.719
<v Speaker 4>When you got Cleveland plus seven versus San fran.

0:34:52.680 --> 0:34:56.960
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so let me explain the logic here. This line

0:34:57.000 --> 0:35:04.000
<v Speaker 3>was two and a half Sunday night before before Niners Cowboys,

0:35:04.239 --> 0:35:07.879
<v Speaker 3>it was Cleveland plus two and a half. I'm now

0:35:07.960 --> 0:35:12.960
<v Speaker 3>getting a full seven. Part of that, I know is

0:35:13.000 --> 0:35:16.840
<v Speaker 3>because the market's a little spooked that DeShawn might not play.

0:35:17.080 --> 0:35:21.120
<v Speaker 3>Deshaun's going to play. If DeShawn doesn't play, the team

0:35:21.200 --> 0:35:23.879
<v Speaker 3>will turn on him. They thought he was gonna play

0:35:23.920 --> 0:35:28.440
<v Speaker 3>Week four. He pulled himself out day of then they

0:35:28.480 --> 0:35:31.759
<v Speaker 3>had a bye, and now if they thought he was

0:35:31.800 --> 0:35:34.600
<v Speaker 3>healthy enough to play week four, it's now week six.

0:35:34.680 --> 0:35:37.719
<v Speaker 3>He hasn't hurt himself again, so I believe he's going

0:35:37.760 --> 0:35:42.759
<v Speaker 3>to play. It's the Niners, the vintage trap spot Sunday Night,

0:35:42.920 --> 0:35:46.840
<v Speaker 3>huge win, national television. Now you go cross country for

0:35:46.920 --> 0:35:51.320
<v Speaker 3>a one o'clock game against a rested team that needs

0:35:51.360 --> 0:35:55.080
<v Speaker 3>the game, with an excellent defense, and I'm getting a

0:35:55.080 --> 0:36:01.160
<v Speaker 3>full touchdown. I'm I'm all over it. Stefanski is got

0:36:01.200 --> 0:36:03.799
<v Speaker 3>a winning record against the spread as an underdog. He's

0:36:03.800 --> 0:36:07.040
<v Speaker 3>got a terrible record against spread as a favorite. The public,

0:36:07.440 --> 0:36:10.440
<v Speaker 3>which is on a red hot run right now, is

0:36:10.600 --> 0:36:14.160
<v Speaker 3>all over the Niners. That's why this line keeps moving.

0:36:14.520 --> 0:36:17.120
<v Speaker 3>It was it started at two and a half after

0:36:17.160 --> 0:36:18.080
<v Speaker 3>Sunday Night football.

0:36:18.080 --> 0:36:18.640
<v Speaker 5>It was four.

0:36:19.120 --> 0:36:25.439
<v Speaker 3>It by Tuesday afternoon it was five, and now it's

0:36:25.560 --> 0:36:28.040
<v Speaker 3>up to seven. I understand part of that is concerned

0:36:28.040 --> 0:36:30.759
<v Speaker 3>about Deshaun, but it's also because the public can't stop

0:36:30.840 --> 0:36:36.520
<v Speaker 3>betting the Niners and the Cleveland defense has no one forgetting.

0:36:36.560 --> 0:36:39.640
<v Speaker 3>No one's scoring, no one's getting into the red zone

0:36:39.680 --> 0:36:42.920
<v Speaker 3>on them, and so I like Cleveland plus seven. Demonds

0:36:43.080 --> 0:36:44.080
<v Speaker 3>your thoughts on this one?

0:36:45.920 --> 0:36:50.600
<v Speaker 2>Cleveland plus seven, I mean you don't like it. I don't.

0:36:50.680 --> 0:36:53.200
<v Speaker 3>I can tell you don't like it. Okay, that's fine.

0:36:53.239 --> 0:36:55.600
<v Speaker 3>You know what, I feel better about it. You are

0:36:55.640 --> 0:36:58.000
<v Speaker 3>not hot this year. You will be at some point.

0:36:58.160 --> 0:37:01.359
<v Speaker 3>But I am going to raising confident with the more

0:37:01.440 --> 0:37:03.439
<v Speaker 3>you dislike these bets. What's the next one?

0:37:04.360 --> 0:37:07.239
<v Speaker 2>You got? Seattle plus three at Cincinnati.

0:37:08.280 --> 0:37:11.799
<v Speaker 3>Seattle's better, They're coming off a bye. Seattle's all of

0:37:11.800 --> 0:37:15.120
<v Speaker 3>a sudden. With Seattle, we have not seen them as

0:37:15.200 --> 0:37:19.759
<v Speaker 3>healthy as they are right now. All year. Their offensive

0:37:19.760 --> 0:37:22.080
<v Speaker 3>linemen have been hurt, They've had a lot of guys

0:37:22.160 --> 0:37:25.200
<v Speaker 3>down all of a sudden with the bye that you

0:37:25.320 --> 0:37:30.000
<v Speaker 3>check the latest injury report, and while they had some

0:37:30.080 --> 0:37:33.480
<v Speaker 3>veteran rest days and they're still dealing with some guys

0:37:33.800 --> 0:37:37.839
<v Speaker 3>in the secondary, their offensive line, which had been decimated

0:37:37.840 --> 0:37:42.080
<v Speaker 3>by injury. Those guys are back at practice. Gino as

0:37:42.120 --> 0:37:47.680
<v Speaker 3>a dog has been excellent, and I believe Seattle has

0:37:48.480 --> 0:37:52.720
<v Speaker 3>the best pair of corners in the NFC, Reek Woolen

0:37:52.880 --> 0:37:56.480
<v Speaker 3>and Devin and Weatherspoon. Our Weatherspoon top five pick Greek

0:37:56.560 --> 0:37:59.200
<v Speaker 3>woollan second year player that was a steal in the draft.

0:37:59.560 --> 0:38:02.600
<v Speaker 3>I think will be able to what they're gonna be

0:38:02.600 --> 0:38:04.680
<v Speaker 3>able to do. And let me check, what's the what

0:38:04.920 --> 0:38:10.000
<v Speaker 3>is uh T Higgins? He was limited in practice yesterday,

0:38:10.640 --> 0:38:12.400
<v Speaker 3>so even if he plays, he's not gonna be one

0:38:12.440 --> 0:38:15.560
<v Speaker 3>hundred percent. What they're gonna be able to do is

0:38:15.680 --> 0:38:20.160
<v Speaker 3>double Chase and trust Weatherspoon one on one on Higgins.

0:38:20.520 --> 0:38:24.040
<v Speaker 3>I still think Joe Burrow is injured, even though he

0:38:24.160 --> 0:38:27.480
<v Speaker 3>played much better last week. Everyone's like, oh, Cincinnati got

0:38:27.520 --> 0:38:30.320
<v Speaker 3>their season turned around. Not if they lose this week,

0:38:30.480 --> 0:38:32.360
<v Speaker 3>then they have a bye and they play Buffalo in

0:38:32.400 --> 0:38:37.360
<v Speaker 3>San Francisco. West Coast teams who play consecutive road games

0:38:37.400 --> 0:38:40.120
<v Speaker 3>on the East Coast are fourteen to five and two

0:38:40.239 --> 0:38:43.800
<v Speaker 3>against the spread in the last twenty years the Seattle

0:38:43.840 --> 0:38:47.640
<v Speaker 3>applies there. The Bengals only cover this year was last week,

0:38:48.520 --> 0:38:52.279
<v Speaker 3>and I understand that Gino's history off a bye is

0:38:52.320 --> 0:38:55.320
<v Speaker 3>not great. He's owing three, but that really means nothing

0:38:55.320 --> 0:38:58.680
<v Speaker 3>to me because two of those it's such a tiny sample,

0:38:58.880 --> 0:39:01.279
<v Speaker 3>and two of those Regina was rookie in second year

0:39:01.520 --> 0:39:03.600
<v Speaker 3>when he wasn't the player he is now. I think

0:39:03.600 --> 0:39:06.880
<v Speaker 3>Seattle's really good. I think Seattle is going to go

0:39:06.920 --> 0:39:10.440
<v Speaker 3>to Cincinnati and win and I get three points. So

0:39:10.640 --> 0:39:12.000
<v Speaker 3>for all those reasons, I love it.

0:39:12.040 --> 0:39:16.440
<v Speaker 4>You hate it, Demonse, I'd stay away from betting against Cincinnati,

0:39:16.600 --> 0:39:18.399
<v Speaker 4>especially at plus three at home.

0:39:18.480 --> 0:39:21.239
<v Speaker 2>I just don't. I think it is Joe Burrow at

0:39:21.239 --> 0:39:21.799
<v Speaker 2>the end of the day.

0:39:21.880 --> 0:39:24.680
<v Speaker 3>That's two for two. I you know what, I am

0:39:25.440 --> 0:39:28.839
<v Speaker 3>more confident. What's the next one? What's the next one?

0:39:29.600 --> 0:39:32.040
<v Speaker 2>Tampa Bay plus three and a half versus Detroit.

0:39:33.239 --> 0:39:37.919
<v Speaker 3>All right, so Tampa again, coming off a bye, I'm

0:39:38.000 --> 0:39:43.080
<v Speaker 3>getting three points. They're at home. Tampa is still wildly

0:39:43.239 --> 0:39:46.600
<v Speaker 3>undervalued because the public does not believe in Baker Mayfield.

0:39:46.840 --> 0:39:49.239
<v Speaker 3>You know who does believe in Baker Mayfield, Demonse. His

0:39:49.400 --> 0:39:53.520
<v Speaker 3>teammates just named him a captain. And the Tampa has

0:39:53.640 --> 0:39:57.880
<v Speaker 3>looked bad in one game all year, Philly because they

0:39:57.880 --> 0:40:02.280
<v Speaker 3>couldn't handle the Philly pass rush to Detroit. Aiden Hutchinson's great,

0:40:02.520 --> 0:40:06.360
<v Speaker 3>but they don't have a great pass rush themselves. Detroit. Also,

0:40:07.000 --> 0:40:10.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm not saying Detroit can't win this game, but I'm

0:40:10.040 --> 0:40:13.200
<v Speaker 3>getting three and a half. So a twenty seven to

0:40:13.280 --> 0:40:18.239
<v Speaker 3>twenty four Detroit win I cover. Detroit also is on

0:40:18.320 --> 0:40:21.880
<v Speaker 3>a crazy covering spread. They're thirteen and two against the

0:40:21.920 --> 0:40:24.879
<v Speaker 3>spread in their last fifteen I actually like that from

0:40:24.880 --> 0:40:27.720
<v Speaker 3>my side of it, because I think Vegas is now

0:40:28.040 --> 0:40:33.240
<v Speaker 3>trying to like people keep firing on Detroit, they keep covering,

0:40:33.480 --> 0:40:37.000
<v Speaker 3>so they're gonna have to exaggerate the line to a degree,

0:40:37.000 --> 0:40:40.000
<v Speaker 3>which I think they've done here. Also, all the sharps

0:40:40.040 --> 0:40:43.479
<v Speaker 3>are with me on this one. Now, I don't love

0:40:43.560 --> 0:40:46.640
<v Speaker 3>Todd Bowles the head coach, I understand that, but I

0:40:46.760 --> 0:40:50.680
<v Speaker 3>do like the tamp I like Tampa's team, Pardon me.

0:40:51.760 --> 0:40:56.480
<v Speaker 3>I also Detroit coming off a blowout victory over Carolina. Tampa,

0:40:56.480 --> 0:40:58.279
<v Speaker 3>on the other hand, a bye week. They know how

0:40:58.280 --> 0:41:01.520
<v Speaker 3>big this spot is. I think Tampa wins outright. I

0:41:01.600 --> 0:41:03.319
<v Speaker 3>love them plus three and a half. Where do you

0:41:03.320 --> 0:41:05.200
<v Speaker 3>feel on this one?

0:41:05.480 --> 0:41:07.360
<v Speaker 2>Tampa Bay plus three and a half? I actually like

0:41:07.440 --> 0:41:07.799
<v Speaker 2>this one?

0:41:08.040 --> 0:41:11.520
<v Speaker 3>So oh Now, I'm a little screamish.

0:41:11.560 --> 0:41:16.000
<v Speaker 2>Next New England plus three at the Raiders.

0:41:17.080 --> 0:41:18.919
<v Speaker 3>All right, this is gonna be a This is gonna

0:41:18.920 --> 0:41:24.040
<v Speaker 3>be an ugly, poorly played down in the muck game,

0:41:24.520 --> 0:41:27.319
<v Speaker 3>and I'm getting three points. It's as simple as that.

0:41:27.840 --> 0:41:33.480
<v Speaker 3>I'm getting three points. Where this feels like a seventeen sixteen,

0:41:34.280 --> 0:41:38.240
<v Speaker 3>twenty one p twenty fourteen to thirteen type of game.

0:41:38.680 --> 0:41:41.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm not certain at all New England wins, but New

0:41:42.000 --> 0:41:48.719
<v Speaker 3>England is utterly desperate. Vegas is as poorly coached as

0:41:48.840 --> 0:41:54.000
<v Speaker 3>any team in the league. Belichick is really on the

0:41:54.080 --> 0:41:58.200
<v Speaker 3>ropes at this moment. The Raiders defense is one I

0:41:58.239 --> 0:42:01.960
<v Speaker 3>do not trust at all. Belichick will have a plan

0:42:02.080 --> 0:42:06.759
<v Speaker 3>for Max Crosby that the Packers didn't. And as bad

0:42:06.800 --> 0:42:10.440
<v Speaker 3>as Mac Jones is, we saw Jordan Love this week.

0:42:10.760 --> 0:42:16.280
<v Speaker 3>He was absolutely terrible and the Raiders almost blew that game.

0:42:16.920 --> 0:42:21.680
<v Speaker 3>And so for all those reasons, I understand Belichick is

0:42:23.000 --> 0:42:26.200
<v Speaker 3>on a cold streak against his former assistance. He's four

0:42:26.239 --> 0:42:29.279
<v Speaker 3>and ten against him over the last five years. I

0:42:30.200 --> 0:42:33.640
<v Speaker 3>think that changes this week. I get the three points.

0:42:33.840 --> 0:42:37.719
<v Speaker 3>They're both bad teams, one bad team coming off back

0:42:37.760 --> 0:42:40.840
<v Speaker 3>to back terrible losses, so they're desperate. In New England,

0:42:41.080 --> 0:42:45.319
<v Speaker 3>another bad team coming off a nationally televised win, and

0:42:45.440 --> 0:42:47.880
<v Speaker 3>it's a short week. Give me New England plus the

0:42:47.960 --> 0:42:50.440
<v Speaker 3>three your thoughts on this one.

0:42:50.680 --> 0:42:53.319
<v Speaker 2>Don't like that one either, all right, So.

0:42:53.360 --> 0:42:56.279
<v Speaker 3>That's you know what, that's three out of four. You

0:42:56.320 --> 0:42:58.960
<v Speaker 3>don't like that. I love this is how we go

0:42:59.040 --> 0:43:02.560
<v Speaker 3>five and zero and then last one. Give it to me.

0:43:03.320 --> 0:43:06.239
<v Speaker 2>We got Dallas minus two and a half at the Chargers,

0:43:07.000 --> 0:43:07.439
<v Speaker 2>all right.

0:43:07.360 --> 0:43:09.120
<v Speaker 3>It says at the Chargers, but it's not.

0:43:09.880 --> 0:43:10.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean it is. No.

0:43:13.840 --> 0:43:17.160
<v Speaker 3>It's in Los Angeles, but that stadium is going to

0:43:17.239 --> 0:43:22.000
<v Speaker 3>be eighty five percent Cowboys fans, so it will be

0:43:22.040 --> 0:43:25.160
<v Speaker 3>the Chargers who have to deal with the silent count. Furthermore,

0:43:25.480 --> 0:43:28.839
<v Speaker 3>Dallas has to win this game now. The Chargers are

0:43:28.920 --> 0:43:32.000
<v Speaker 3>coming off a bye, and that part, you know it

0:43:32.200 --> 0:43:37.280
<v Speaker 3>plays in their favor. But Dallas is in a critical spot,

0:43:37.800 --> 0:43:41.440
<v Speaker 3>having just been dog walked by San Francisco and with

0:43:41.600 --> 0:43:46.560
<v Speaker 3>Philly playing the Jets this week. If Dallas loses all

0:43:46.600 --> 0:43:49.320
<v Speaker 3>of a sudden Philly's six to oh Dallas three and three,

0:43:50.360 --> 0:43:52.719
<v Speaker 3>the divisional race could be all but over before you

0:43:52.800 --> 0:43:57.320
<v Speaker 3>even get to Halloween. Dallas over the last three years,

0:43:58.400 --> 0:44:02.800
<v Speaker 3>they are ten and one against the spread. After a loss,

0:44:03.320 --> 0:44:07.840
<v Speaker 3>all the sharps are with me with fifty four percent

0:44:07.840 --> 0:44:10.000
<v Speaker 3>of the money, but only thirty eight percent of the bets.

0:44:10.520 --> 0:44:15.360
<v Speaker 3>Dak is twenty and five in his career straight up

0:44:16.000 --> 0:44:19.040
<v Speaker 3>as as a favorite. I shouldn't say in his career,

0:44:19.200 --> 0:44:21.200
<v Speaker 3>but over the last few years he's twenty and five

0:44:21.239 --> 0:44:24.879
<v Speaker 3>as a favorite and a field goal win covers at

0:44:25.160 --> 0:44:28.080
<v Speaker 3>minus three and a half. I might feel a little

0:44:28.160 --> 0:44:31.120
<v Speaker 3>differently at minus two and a half when this can

0:44:31.160 --> 0:44:34.359
<v Speaker 3>be a twenty seven to twenty four Dallas win and

0:44:34.400 --> 0:44:37.759
<v Speaker 3>I cover. I believe Dallas is going to win. It's

0:44:37.800 --> 0:44:40.440
<v Speaker 3>the only favorite I'm playing this week. So there are

0:44:40.480 --> 0:44:42.200
<v Speaker 3>my demonse your thoughts on it.

0:44:43.440 --> 0:44:45.759
<v Speaker 2>I don't love it, so it seems like you're a

0:44:46.760 --> 0:44:47.480
<v Speaker 2>four one.

0:44:48.239 --> 0:44:51.719
<v Speaker 3>Maybe I should change out that Tampa play. Maybe I

0:44:51.719 --> 0:44:54.680
<v Speaker 3>should just go with five demands. Doesn't love right now,

0:44:55.880 --> 0:44:59.520
<v Speaker 3>So here are my five bets. Cleveland getting seven at

0:44:59.520 --> 0:45:04.040
<v Speaker 3>home again San Francisco. I understand there's concern about whether

0:45:04.120 --> 0:45:07.040
<v Speaker 3>or not Deshaun's playing. Here's the deal on that, guys. Yes,

0:45:07.160 --> 0:45:10.040
<v Speaker 3>we could wait until we have clarity on Deshaun, but

0:45:10.120 --> 0:45:13.240
<v Speaker 3>if it once you get the clarity. If he is playing,

0:45:13.640 --> 0:45:16.200
<v Speaker 3>you're not gonna get the full seven anymore. It's gonna

0:45:16.239 --> 0:45:19.760
<v Speaker 3>drop down to probably six, and that full seven is valuable.

0:45:19.960 --> 0:45:21.720
<v Speaker 3>So I'll roll the dice on it because I believe

0:45:21.719 --> 0:45:25.520
<v Speaker 3>he's playing Seattle plus three at Cincy, Tampa plus three

0:45:25.560 --> 0:45:28.319
<v Speaker 3>and a half against Detroit, New England plus three at

0:45:28.320 --> 0:45:31.560
<v Speaker 3>the Raiders, and Dallas minus two and a half at

0:45:31.600 --> 0:45:35.000
<v Speaker 3>the LA Chargers in front of a partisan Dallas crowd.

0:45:35.040 --> 0:45:39.640
<v Speaker 3>All right, Demans, you're one for four on teasers. You

0:45:39.800 --> 0:45:43.040
<v Speaker 3>need to start winning. You need to start doing well.

0:45:43.120 --> 0:45:46.560
<v Speaker 3>I know you tweeted out like follow me on the teaser,

0:45:46.600 --> 0:45:49.719
<v Speaker 3>We're gonna win. It felt a little desperate. I'm not

0:45:49.760 --> 0:45:53.320
<v Speaker 3>gonna lie. We don't have to we don't have to

0:45:53.440 --> 0:45:56.600
<v Speaker 3>name names here, but you remember that tweet you sent

0:45:56.680 --> 0:46:00.640
<v Speaker 3>me from Again, we don't have to name names or professions,

0:46:00.680 --> 0:46:02.799
<v Speaker 3>but you sent me a tweet and you were like, man,

0:46:02.880 --> 0:46:06.319
<v Speaker 3>does this strike you as as desperate as it strikes me?

0:46:06.600 --> 0:46:08.000
<v Speaker 3>And I agreed with you on that.

0:46:08.200 --> 0:46:10.960
<v Speaker 2>You remember that, Yeah, I do. I do.

0:46:11.040 --> 0:46:12.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Well that's what I That's the exact emotion.

0:46:13.080 --> 0:46:15.560
<v Speaker 2>That's what it was giving.

0:46:15.840 --> 0:46:18.239
<v Speaker 3>I was like, oh man, Demanday's like trying to just

0:46:18.320 --> 0:46:21.840
<v Speaker 3>get some moral support on this bad tease across the zero.

0:46:23.040 --> 0:46:26.160
<v Speaker 3>But I I believe in you. I do. Well, go

0:46:26.160 --> 0:46:28.160
<v Speaker 3>ahead and lay out your teaser for this week. It's

0:46:28.160 --> 0:46:30.560
<v Speaker 3>another seven point plus one twenty teaser.

0:46:30.600 --> 0:46:33.480
<v Speaker 2>Go ahead, all right, folks.

0:46:33.520 --> 0:46:36.200
<v Speaker 4>This week we got another three team seven point teaser

0:46:36.239 --> 0:46:39.640
<v Speaker 4>at plus one twenty, like you teased. So we got

0:46:40.080 --> 0:46:43.680
<v Speaker 4>Denver from a plus sept from plus ten and a

0:46:43.719 --> 0:46:46.480
<v Speaker 4>half to plus seventeen and a half, and then we

0:46:46.560 --> 0:46:49.720
<v Speaker 4>got Houston from plus one and a half to plus

0:46:49.760 --> 0:46:52.560
<v Speaker 4>eight and a half. And then you got Tampa Bay

0:46:53.120 --> 0:46:54.640
<v Speaker 4>from plus three to plus ten.

0:46:55.320 --> 0:46:58.560
<v Speaker 3>Well, and it's also actually Tampa's Tampa's plus three and

0:46:58.560 --> 0:47:00.920
<v Speaker 3>a half now, so you actually get them plus ten

0:47:00.960 --> 0:47:02.919
<v Speaker 3>and a half, yeah, which is even better.

0:47:02.960 --> 0:47:06.880
<v Speaker 4>Go ahead, all right, guys, So we tease through the

0:47:06.920 --> 0:47:11.279
<v Speaker 4>key numbers here. We're doing the whole Book of Betts thing.

0:47:12.120 --> 0:47:15.040
<v Speaker 4>I feel very highly of this one. I think that

0:47:15.200 --> 0:47:17.600
<v Speaker 4>as long as the Chiefs do not blow out the

0:47:17.640 --> 0:47:21.080
<v Speaker 4>Denver Broncos, or if they do blow them out, you know,

0:47:21.280 --> 0:47:24.480
<v Speaker 4>just beat them by seventeen, Tampa Bay and Houston, I

0:47:24.520 --> 0:47:28.799
<v Speaker 4>honestly think those two games can be won. But that's

0:47:28.880 --> 0:47:31.040
<v Speaker 4>just how that's my stance in the situation.

0:47:32.080 --> 0:47:36.640
<v Speaker 3>Okay, can I jump in real quick? The Houston teaser

0:47:36.800 --> 0:47:40.319
<v Speaker 3>is a great You're getting every possible key number, so

0:47:40.440 --> 0:47:44.160
<v Speaker 3>I love that. And New Orleans coming off a blowout

0:47:44.280 --> 0:47:48.600
<v Speaker 3>victory when they don't blow people out. I love Houston

0:47:48.640 --> 0:47:51.479
<v Speaker 3>in this spot that if people we didn't talk about

0:47:51.480 --> 0:47:55.640
<v Speaker 3>that game, it's asking the Saints on the road to

0:47:55.760 --> 0:47:59.120
<v Speaker 3>win by more than a score. And I think you

0:47:59.200 --> 0:48:01.480
<v Speaker 3>agree with this. Hugh can win that game out right.

0:48:02.000 --> 0:48:06.319
<v Speaker 3>Tampa also big backdoor cover opportunity in that spot they're

0:48:06.360 --> 0:48:08.080
<v Speaker 3>coming off of by you think they can win the

0:48:08.120 --> 0:48:11.799
<v Speaker 3>game out right? You are if you were going to

0:48:11.920 --> 0:48:17.680
<v Speaker 3>tease Chiefs Broncos, which you are, you are teasing the

0:48:17.719 --> 0:48:20.759
<v Speaker 3>sharp side of it. Teasing a ten and a half

0:48:20.840 --> 0:48:24.160
<v Speaker 3>point favorite down to three and a half is brutal

0:48:24.800 --> 0:48:28.400
<v Speaker 3>like because you're not getting it through the three. Instead,

0:48:28.440 --> 0:48:31.840
<v Speaker 3>you take it all the way up through the thirteen,

0:48:31.960 --> 0:48:38.000
<v Speaker 3>the fourteen, and the seventeen. So my grade on this,

0:48:38.000 --> 0:48:41.160
<v Speaker 3>this is an A plus teaser here in A plus

0:48:41.200 --> 0:48:44.440
<v Speaker 3>your first maybe the first A plus of your life

0:48:44.840 --> 0:48:46.279
<v Speaker 3>certainly on the show.

0:48:46.360 --> 0:48:50.000
<v Speaker 2>But the that's incorrect, that was unfair.

0:48:50.600 --> 0:48:52.480
<v Speaker 3>You know what, As soon as I said that. I

0:48:52.520 --> 0:48:54.879
<v Speaker 3>was like, you're being a dick. Why did you say

0:48:54.960 --> 0:48:58.479
<v Speaker 3>that to Demanse? I apologize. I wanted to take it back,

0:48:58.520 --> 0:49:02.640
<v Speaker 3>but I just couldn't help myself. Here's the only concern

0:49:02.760 --> 0:49:08.160
<v Speaker 3>I have, the emotional devastation if this teaser is dead

0:49:08.640 --> 0:49:13.920
<v Speaker 3>by nine pm West Coast time Thursday, if there is

0:49:14.000 --> 0:49:18.640
<v Speaker 3>a real sadness associated with the Thursday night football game

0:49:18.760 --> 0:49:22.359
<v Speaker 3>crushing your teaser. The flip side is there is a

0:49:22.400 --> 0:49:26.319
<v Speaker 3>real level of excitement and relief if you have one

0:49:26.400 --> 0:49:30.719
<v Speaker 3>leg done on Thursday. So I will be I will

0:49:30.719 --> 0:49:33.920
<v Speaker 3>be rooting for this teaser. I hope the Chiefs are

0:49:34.080 --> 0:49:37.000
<v Speaker 3>up what would how could this work? I hope the

0:49:37.080 --> 0:49:41.760
<v Speaker 3>Chiefs are up thirty four to ten with six minutes

0:49:41.840 --> 0:49:46.360
<v Speaker 3>left and the Broncos get a meaningless silly touchdown to

0:49:46.400 --> 0:49:51.080
<v Speaker 3>lose us. Yeah, and you get a nice bat at

0:49:51.120 --> 0:49:53.440
<v Speaker 3>that if they're down thirty four to ten. The ball,

0:49:53.600 --> 0:49:56.360
<v Speaker 3>it might be a moon ball from Jared Stidham, it

0:49:56.440 --> 0:49:59.960
<v Speaker 3>might not be Russ in the game, but I hope

0:50:00.080 --> 0:50:02.600
<v Speaker 3>you get a back door cover on it. And I

0:50:02.640 --> 0:50:04.760
<v Speaker 3>think this is a great teaser. And you know what, Demanse,

0:50:04.920 --> 0:50:07.239
<v Speaker 3>I might bet it as well. I might I might

0:50:07.400 --> 0:50:08.960
<v Speaker 3>trail you on this one.

0:50:09.239 --> 0:50:11.520
<v Speaker 4>This is this trying to like make up for for

0:50:11.600 --> 0:50:13.680
<v Speaker 4>saying this is my first A plus saying you're gonna

0:50:13.680 --> 0:50:15.160
<v Speaker 4>trail a little bit, you.

0:50:15.120 --> 0:50:17.239
<v Speaker 3>Know what a little bit. I'm gonna be honest, a

0:50:17.239 --> 0:50:19.920
<v Speaker 3>little bit. I feel I felt like that was really

0:50:20.000 --> 0:50:22.719
<v Speaker 3>mean and uncalled for by me. All Right, what's the

0:50:22.760 --> 0:50:23.600
<v Speaker 3>offer this week?

0:50:24.239 --> 0:50:27.640
<v Speaker 4>All right, we six offer the Vegas gold Knights thought

0:50:27.680 --> 0:50:31.200
<v Speaker 4>that they were slick copying our slot machine idea. I'm

0:50:31.200 --> 0:50:32.960
<v Speaker 4>gonna show you guys a week for those that are

0:50:32.960 --> 0:50:34.800
<v Speaker 4>watching on YouTube.

0:50:34.400 --> 0:50:38.239
<v Speaker 3>About that unbelievable Okay, yep.

0:50:39.400 --> 0:50:41.360
<v Speaker 4>Uh So let's so let's run it back to the

0:50:41.480 --> 0:50:43.160
<v Speaker 4>NFR NFL slot machine.

0:50:43.520 --> 0:50:44.280
<v Speaker 2>Uh the offer.

0:50:44.920 --> 0:50:47.160
<v Speaker 4>So we're gonna bring out the slot machine for those

0:50:47.719 --> 0:50:50.880
<v Speaker 4>watching on YouTube, those that watch on the podcast, you're

0:50:50.920 --> 0:50:52.440
<v Speaker 4>gonna hear a bunch of chiming, I assume.

0:50:53.440 --> 0:50:56.560
<v Speaker 3>Okay, that's fine, all right, sir, it is so let's

0:50:56.560 --> 0:50:59.719
<v Speaker 3>see it is. Go ahead, and I'm pulling the lever

0:50:59.800 --> 0:51:05.880
<v Speaker 3>ba An NFC South money line parlay. All right, So

0:51:05.960 --> 0:51:10.920
<v Speaker 3>you've got Washington at the Falcons with the Falcons as

0:51:10.960 --> 0:51:15.799
<v Speaker 3>a slight favorite, Carolina at Miami when Miami is a

0:51:15.840 --> 0:51:21.120
<v Speaker 3>massive favorite, and then you've got New Orleans at Houston.

0:51:21.760 --> 0:51:26.239
<v Speaker 3>New Orleans is a tiny favorite, and the last one

0:51:26.320 --> 0:51:30.200
<v Speaker 3>is Detroit at Tampa. Detroit is a small favorite. All right,

0:51:30.239 --> 0:51:33.200
<v Speaker 3>So this is what we're gonna do. We're gonna do

0:51:33.360 --> 0:51:38.960
<v Speaker 3>a two team moneyline parlay for one unit of the

0:51:39.000 --> 0:51:43.239
<v Speaker 3>Falcons and the Bucks money line that pays plus three

0:51:43.320 --> 0:51:47.600
<v Speaker 3>to twenty. Okay, we are then, so it's the Falcons

0:51:47.640 --> 0:51:52.640
<v Speaker 3>to win outright at home against Washington and the Bucks

0:51:52.680 --> 0:51:56.160
<v Speaker 3>to win outright at home against Detroit for plus three

0:51:56.200 --> 0:51:59.160
<v Speaker 3>to twenty. We are then going to take a quarter

0:51:59.360 --> 0:52:05.920
<v Speaker 3>unit and add to that bet for a little spice

0:52:06.080 --> 0:52:09.600
<v Speaker 3>the Panthers on the money line at plus six sixty

0:52:10.120 --> 0:52:12.799
<v Speaker 3>against the Dolphins, because they were the team that I said,

0:52:14.160 --> 0:52:17.919
<v Speaker 3>So all of a sudden, a Falcons Bucks Panthers money

0:52:17.960 --> 0:52:22.440
<v Speaker 3>line parlay demonse thirty one to one, so a ten

0:52:22.520 --> 0:52:25.040
<v Speaker 3>dollars bet would pay out three hundred and ten dollars.

0:52:25.480 --> 0:52:28.680
<v Speaker 3>So that is so we have our real bet is

0:52:28.760 --> 0:52:33.400
<v Speaker 3>Falcons and Bucks on the money line, with a tiny

0:52:33.440 --> 0:52:39.480
<v Speaker 3>little fun flyer on adding the Carolina Panthers to shock

0:52:39.560 --> 0:52:44.040
<v Speaker 3>the world and ruin Survivor content. The thing is, last

0:52:44.080 --> 0:52:49.000
<v Speaker 3>week was the safest week for survivor contests we've had

0:52:49.040 --> 0:52:54.200
<v Speaker 3>all year. There should be some carnage this week. I

0:52:54.360 --> 0:52:57.399
<v Speaker 3>wonder if it's the Panthers beating the Dolphins. That's what

0:52:57.440 --> 0:52:59.960
<v Speaker 3>we'll be watching for. All right, we grade your bet

0:53:00.080 --> 0:53:07.560
<v Speaker 3>at Sharper square. Next, what's right? All right? Time now

0:53:07.600 --> 0:53:11.239
<v Speaker 3>for Sharper square. Joe as demons, you go through them.

0:53:11.280 --> 0:53:15.920
<v Speaker 3>Go ahead, and we'll say what we think on these bets.

0:53:15.920 --> 0:53:17.680
<v Speaker 3>We don't need that. There, you go go ahead, pal.

0:53:17.840 --> 0:53:20.160
<v Speaker 4>Joe s says, Broncos plus ten and a half is

0:53:20.280 --> 0:53:21.120
<v Speaker 4>easy money.

0:53:22.320 --> 0:53:24.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, I don't know if it's easy money, but that

0:53:24.120 --> 0:53:27.000
<v Speaker 3>is the Sharper side getting ten and a half points.

0:53:27.040 --> 0:53:30.120
<v Speaker 3>That is the Sharps are gonna be probably, you know

0:53:30.600 --> 0:53:34.480
<v Speaker 3>a little on the Broncos side of things. Uh, tonight.

0:53:34.600 --> 0:53:37.279
<v Speaker 3>I'm not betting this game in either direction. I do Oh,

0:53:37.320 --> 0:53:40.680
<v Speaker 3>I forgot to tell you I do have I had

0:53:40.719 --> 0:53:43.520
<v Speaker 3>a ten point teaser that I placed earlier this week.

0:53:43.680 --> 0:53:46.800
<v Speaker 3>Would you like to hear it real quick? Yes, five

0:53:47.040 --> 0:53:53.080
<v Speaker 3>team ten point teaser. So here is my ten point

0:53:53.120 --> 0:53:57.720
<v Speaker 3>teaser for this week. I have the Chiefs teased down

0:53:58.560 --> 0:54:03.680
<v Speaker 3>to minus a half point. This is where I screwed up.

0:54:04.440 --> 0:54:08.400
<v Speaker 3>I have the Browns teased up to plus fourteen and

0:54:08.400 --> 0:54:12.040
<v Speaker 3>a half, which means I gave because they were only

0:54:12.080 --> 0:54:13.920
<v Speaker 3>four and a half point dogs at the time. But

0:54:13.960 --> 0:54:16.960
<v Speaker 3>now they're seven point dogs, So I that part I

0:54:17.040 --> 0:54:21.640
<v Speaker 3>screw screwed myself. I have the Seahawks teased up to

0:54:22.200 --> 0:54:27.720
<v Speaker 3>plus thirteen, I have Miami teased down to minus four,

0:54:28.360 --> 0:54:31.480
<v Speaker 3>and I have Philly teased through the zero to plus

0:54:31.480 --> 0:54:34.080
<v Speaker 3>three and a half. I gotta tell you something, as

0:54:34.120 --> 0:54:36.840
<v Speaker 3>I read this back live on the air, this is

0:54:36.880 --> 0:54:39.960
<v Speaker 3>a C minus teaser. I didn't get key numbers with C.

0:54:40.200 --> 0:54:42.160
<v Speaker 3>I did a bad I did a bad job there,

0:54:42.800 --> 0:54:45.360
<v Speaker 3>all right, let me go through these last few sharper

0:54:45.400 --> 0:54:50.600
<v Speaker 3>square bets. Ryan Goldfelder says thoughts on Chiefs Broncos over

0:54:50.719 --> 0:54:53.320
<v Speaker 3>forty seven total seems a bit low. I don't know

0:54:53.360 --> 0:54:54.960
<v Speaker 3>if the Broncos are gonna be able to score as

0:54:54.960 --> 0:54:59.520
<v Speaker 3>the problem. Uh, I'm not reading this guy's name, but

0:55:00.600 --> 0:55:05.200
<v Speaker 3>we'll just call him fat for twenty says Mahomes two

0:55:05.280 --> 0:55:08.400
<v Speaker 3>hundred and seventy or more yards, two touchdowns and Pacheco

0:55:08.480 --> 0:55:15.160
<v Speaker 3>one touchdown. Uh that's an easy money. That's easy money, right. Uh,

0:55:15.239 --> 0:55:17.919
<v Speaker 3>here's the problem. I think the Chiefs are gonna run

0:55:18.000 --> 0:55:22.000
<v Speaker 3>all over the Broncos tonight. I like Mahomes to throw

0:55:22.280 --> 0:55:26.120
<v Speaker 3>a bunch of short touchdowns, but I don't know if

0:55:26.120 --> 0:55:29.560
<v Speaker 3>he's gonna have a bunch of passing yards. Uh y

0:55:29.880 --> 0:55:33.239
<v Speaker 3>Yacht says, I gotta fire parlor. This parlay Cowboys minus

0:55:33.280 --> 0:55:35.200
<v Speaker 3>two bucks money line, Vikings minus two and a half

0:55:35.239 --> 0:55:39.279
<v Speaker 3>Broncos plus eleven. That's listen, it's just seventeen parlay. It's

0:55:39.280 --> 0:55:41.600
<v Speaker 3>a bad bet. Or sixteen parlay. It's just a bad bet.

0:55:43.000 --> 0:55:47.000
<v Speaker 3>And then we've got Matt Ford saying Bigfoot exists plus

0:55:47.000 --> 0:55:50.680
<v Speaker 3>three point fifty. You're gonna need plus thirty five thousand

0:55:50.719 --> 0:55:53.880
<v Speaker 3>on that. Matt is an odd duck. And that is

0:55:53.920 --> 0:55:57.520
<v Speaker 3>where we end today's show. Demon's a great work. As always,

0:55:57.760 --> 0:56:00.319
<v Speaker 3>we will talk to you guys on Tuesday. We're going

0:56:00.400 --> 0:56:04.680
<v Speaker 3>five and oh this week. Talk to you guys then bye,