WEBVTT - LeBron James PREDICTION, Lamar Jackson's MASSIVE Top 100 slide, Kevin Durant TAKES SHOT at Nick

0:00:02.000 --> 0:00:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in What Driving Think Right episode for eighty. This

0:00:05.000 --> 0:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>episode of What Driving Thick Right is presented to you

0:00:07.360 --> 0:00:10.840
<v Speaker 1>by Boost Mobile. A reminder to you, guys subscribe to

0:00:10.880 --> 0:00:14.200
<v Speaker 1>the pod that way, you know, when these Bonus Friday

0:00:14.280 --> 0:00:17.239
<v Speaker 1>pods come out, we have a great We had a

0:00:17.320 --> 0:00:19.720
<v Speaker 1>great mail bag pod ready for you guys with some

0:00:19.760 --> 0:00:22.040
<v Speaker 1>great long form questions. You guys are really doing a

0:00:22.079 --> 0:00:27.520
<v Speaker 1>good job doing sending long, thoughtful emails to What's Rightmailbag

0:00:27.560 --> 0:00:30.040
<v Speaker 1>at gmail dot com. But we are pushing that to

0:00:30.280 --> 0:00:33.320
<v Speaker 1>next week because I did so much on the World

0:00:33.400 --> 0:00:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Cup on Thursday that there are these non World Cup

0:00:35.920 --> 0:00:39.160
<v Speaker 1>stories that I figured we could just get to right

0:00:39.240 --> 0:00:42.360
<v Speaker 1>here in this There were too many other stories that

0:00:42.400 --> 0:00:44.800
<v Speaker 1>we weren't able to get to. Adam Silver's press conference,

0:00:45.320 --> 0:00:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Kawhi's trade non trade, everything happening there, these NFL lists.

0:00:51.280 --> 0:00:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Lebron's future now, there is some belief in some circles

0:00:56.440 --> 0:01:00.520
<v Speaker 1>we are recording this Thursday afternoon, that Thursday evening, Lebron's

0:01:00.520 --> 0:01:03.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna announce where he's going. I don't I'm not one

0:01:03.000 --> 0:01:06.280
<v Speaker 1>of the people that believes that if he does, then

0:01:06.319 --> 0:01:09.760
<v Speaker 1>our Lebron portion of this will be useless. And you

0:01:09.760 --> 0:01:11.479
<v Speaker 1>can fast forward through. But I don't think he's gonna

0:01:11.440 --> 0:01:15.440
<v Speaker 1>announce it before you guys hear this. But again, if

0:01:15.440 --> 0:01:17.640
<v Speaker 1>you want to participate in the mailbag, What's Right mailbag

0:01:17.680 --> 0:01:21.360
<v Speaker 1>at gmail dot com. Demons's doing a little overtime today

0:01:21.560 --> 0:01:25.720
<v Speaker 1>because Lamar Jay. The bunch of lists have come out

0:01:26.200 --> 0:01:32.440
<v Speaker 1>and Lamar is not being respected on them. I'll let

0:01:32.520 --> 0:01:33.479
<v Speaker 1>you take it from there.

0:01:33.840 --> 0:01:36.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so my goy, Lamar has been getting crucified over

0:01:36.360 --> 0:01:39.240
<v Speaker 2>the course of the last few days. Sixty ninth in

0:01:39.280 --> 0:01:42.279
<v Speaker 2>the NFL Top one hundred. People are ranking him.

0:01:42.200 --> 0:01:46.000
<v Speaker 1>After being second last year. His number two the NFL

0:01:46.040 --> 0:01:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Top one hundred is voted by players. He was second

0:01:49.720 --> 0:01:52.880
<v Speaker 1>last year, sixty ninth this year, go ahead.

0:01:52.600 --> 0:01:56.040
<v Speaker 2>Right drops the sixty ninth amongst his peers. He's outside

0:01:56.040 --> 0:02:00.640
<v Speaker 2>of the top ten in multiple quarterback lists. What's going on?

0:02:01.200 --> 0:02:04.000
<v Speaker 2>Has everybody forgotten about Lafara Jackson?

0:02:06.560 --> 0:02:08.040
<v Speaker 1>So I want to get your take on it in

0:02:08.080 --> 0:02:14.720
<v Speaker 1>a second. But first, here's here's why this is not

0:02:14.720 --> 0:02:20.280
<v Speaker 1>nothing to me, and it's at least somewhat notable. It

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:27.359
<v Speaker 1>says to me, Demanse that there is some level of

0:02:27.600 --> 0:02:33.480
<v Speaker 1>concern amongst you know. So it's because it's a it's

0:02:33.520 --> 0:02:37.280
<v Speaker 1>a diverse array of lists, right, So Colin had his list,

0:02:37.320 --> 0:02:41.720
<v Speaker 1>he's out of the top ten the Scouts, Coaches Executives list.

0:02:42.080 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 1>He's out of the top ten the Player's ranking, which

0:02:45.320 --> 0:02:49.239
<v Speaker 1>is kind of a fuzzy list. He's going sixty nine.

0:02:49.320 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Is weird because it's like him versus every position. But

0:02:53.040 --> 0:02:55.840
<v Speaker 1>there are certainly going to be at least ten more

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:59.920
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks on the list, So he's out of that top ten, right.

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:06.640
<v Speaker 1>So it's a players people that work for teams media

0:03:07.040 --> 0:03:11.480
<v Speaker 1>with a level of Lamar's skepticism, and I think that

0:03:11.600 --> 0:03:16.840
<v Speaker 1>speaks to the fact that people are wondering two things.

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:24.120
<v Speaker 1>One does is he still a dynamic runner? Like last

0:03:24.200 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 1>year he basically lost as many yards in sacks as

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 1>he gained running the ball, Like is that as an

0:03:31.480 --> 0:03:35.560
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden a middle aged quarterback. Is that

0:03:36.760 --> 0:03:40.440
<v Speaker 1>out of his game? And how will that impact the

0:03:40.440 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 1>rest of his game? And the other thing I think

0:03:42.400 --> 0:03:47.640
<v Speaker 1>people are concerned about is has he now entered the

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:55.000
<v Speaker 1>injury prone category for quarterbacks? The problem with the injury

0:03:55.040 --> 0:03:57.880
<v Speaker 1>prone thing hurting his ranking is it's sure as hell

0:03:57.920 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem to be hurting Joe Burrows and Joe Burrow's,

0:04:01.640 --> 0:04:06.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, injured the same amount as Lamar. Like Joe

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Burrow and Lamar have actually over the last five years,

0:04:08.160 --> 0:04:10.440
<v Speaker 1>like played almost the identical amount of games, so you

0:04:10.480 --> 0:04:14.640
<v Speaker 1>can say they are equal injury concerns, even though I

0:04:14.640 --> 0:04:17.680
<v Speaker 1>think some people probably think Burrow's far more, that's not

0:04:17.680 --> 0:04:20.120
<v Speaker 1>really the case. But it's not hurting Burrow. So those

0:04:20.120 --> 0:04:22.640
<v Speaker 1>are the things that jump out to me. You know,

0:04:22.800 --> 0:04:27.719
<v Speaker 1>you really believe in Lamar and really like Lamar your

0:04:27.839 --> 0:04:29.920
<v Speaker 1>thought on all thoughts on all of this.

0:04:31.000 --> 0:04:34.800
<v Speaker 2>I think it's just a little recency bias, Like it's

0:04:34.839 --> 0:04:37.200
<v Speaker 2>a year he was banged up. I understand that, but

0:04:37.240 --> 0:04:39.120
<v Speaker 2>I just look at where a lot of people were

0:04:39.680 --> 0:04:42.400
<v Speaker 2>a year ago before last season. I just think that,

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:45.520
<v Speaker 2>and he also has like a lot of proof of concept.

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:48.400
<v Speaker 2>I don't know how he could have dropped this far down,

0:04:49.520 --> 0:04:53.320
<v Speaker 2>but I will say it's this is the type of year,

0:04:53.480 --> 0:04:55.480
<v Speaker 2>like he's got a new coach. It seems like everything's

0:04:55.520 --> 0:05:00.320
<v Speaker 2>kind of in place where if he doesn't if he

0:05:00.320 --> 0:05:03.440
<v Speaker 2>doesn't perform, that's just on him. And if he gets

0:05:03.480 --> 0:05:06.200
<v Speaker 2>injured again, then I do think it's fair for you

0:05:06.279 --> 0:05:08.920
<v Speaker 2>to be like he is an injury risk. But I

0:05:09.000 --> 0:05:11.480
<v Speaker 2>just think it's a big year for him, But I

0:05:11.520 --> 0:05:13.960
<v Speaker 2>also think that he's being disrespected at this point.

0:05:14.800 --> 0:05:18.279
<v Speaker 1>So listen, I think both of those things are objectively true.

0:05:18.600 --> 0:05:20.720
<v Speaker 1>I think it is a big year for him, and

0:05:20.800 --> 0:05:25.720
<v Speaker 1>I also think he is there is. He is one

0:05:25.880 --> 0:05:31.599
<v Speaker 1>year removed from back to back first team All Pro seasons,

0:05:32.400 --> 0:05:37.320
<v Speaker 1>and there is a lot like listen, he has not

0:05:37.480 --> 0:05:38.800
<v Speaker 1>been We've talked about it, you know, I have to

0:05:38.800 --> 0:05:42.320
<v Speaker 1>talk about it more here good in the playoffs, but

0:05:42.400 --> 0:05:45.000
<v Speaker 1>he's been better than Justin Herbert in the playoffs, and

0:05:45.080 --> 0:05:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Herbert is high on all these lists. You know what

0:05:47.560 --> 0:05:52.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean. He is injuries are a concern, but injuries

0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:55.119
<v Speaker 1>are a concern for Joe Burrow, and Burrow is high

0:05:55.160 --> 0:05:58.680
<v Speaker 1>on all these lists. So here is demand's a what

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:06.360
<v Speaker 1>I my gut feeling is about why he has had

0:06:06.400 --> 0:06:11.640
<v Speaker 1>this type of fall, And this is, you know, I guess,

0:06:11.800 --> 0:06:16.000
<v Speaker 1>somewhat controversial opinion for some people. I don't think it

0:06:16.120 --> 0:06:22.800
<v Speaker 1>should be. But whatever, despite the fact that Lamar has

0:06:22.960 --> 0:06:26.719
<v Speaker 1>one of a top three all time league passer rating,

0:06:27.400 --> 0:06:30.440
<v Speaker 1>and despite the fact that last year, even in an

0:06:30.520 --> 0:06:34.320
<v Speaker 1>awful year, he had a crazy good touchdown interception ratio

0:06:34.440 --> 0:06:37.279
<v Speaker 1>and a you know, a pretty good passer rating in

0:06:37.320 --> 0:06:43.360
<v Speaker 1>a bad year. I think there is still a belief

0:06:43.480 --> 0:06:47.240
<v Speaker 1>around the league in some circles, and by the way,

0:06:47.360 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 1>this is a belief that I share, that part of

0:06:54.440 --> 0:06:59.080
<v Speaker 1>what has allowed Lamar to thrive as much as he

0:06:59.279 --> 0:07:05.280
<v Speaker 1>has as as a passer is the threat of him running,

0:07:06.120 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 1>and that teams don't necessarily defend Baltimore's passing attack the

0:07:11.840 --> 0:07:16.320
<v Speaker 1>way they defend the passing attack of some of the

0:07:16.360 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 1>other elite quarterbacks, and that if Lamar is on a

0:07:23.600 --> 0:07:30.120
<v Speaker 1>significant downward trajectory as far as running frequency and effectiveness,

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:38.560
<v Speaker 1>and if teams finally start to treat him defend him

0:07:38.600 --> 0:07:42.960
<v Speaker 1>with less fear of his running, that that will drastically

0:07:43.040 --> 0:07:49.800
<v Speaker 1>impact his passing efficiency. That's what I think what these

0:07:49.920 --> 0:07:54.960
<v Speaker 1>lists are saying is they think the part of Lamar's

0:07:55.000 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 1>game that has made him the most special is deteriorating,

0:08:00.760 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 1>and that even though the numbers don't suggest it, his

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:08.760
<v Speaker 1>passing game, pure passing game has not.

0:08:11.120 --> 0:08:15.160
<v Speaker 2>You know, gone ability has gone down, You're.

0:08:15.080 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Right, has not. It has not evolved. It certainly has

0:08:18.400 --> 0:08:23.360
<v Speaker 1>a vault, but has not evolved enough to offset what

0:08:23.400 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 1>they're going to lose from the running threat. And that

0:08:27.760 --> 0:08:31.840
<v Speaker 1>he is going to be defended a little differently if

0:08:31.880 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 1>he's less of a running threat. And the sacks last

0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:36.200
<v Speaker 1>year were bad. It was a lot of sacks for

0:08:36.280 --> 0:08:40.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of yards, and that also speaks to a

0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:43.959
<v Speaker 1>lack of escapability. So I think all those things are

0:08:45.600 --> 0:08:49.559
<v Speaker 1>fair questions. But it does seem to me, and I'll

0:08:49.600 --> 0:08:51.080
<v Speaker 1>let you respond to this for it to move on.

0:08:52.720 --> 0:08:55.559
<v Speaker 1>I never thought he should have been rated, even coming

0:08:55.559 --> 0:08:59.200
<v Speaker 1>off the MVPs, the best quarterback in football, but he

0:08:59.240 --> 0:09:03.120
<v Speaker 1>has been on this US multiple times. That felt too extreme.

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:09.000
<v Speaker 1>This all these folks saying he's not a top ten quarterback,

0:09:09.720 --> 0:09:16.480
<v Speaker 1>that also feels far too extreme. I I am very

0:09:16.760 --> 0:09:20.120
<v Speaker 1>interested in how he's going to jive with first time,

0:09:20.160 --> 0:09:23.560
<v Speaker 1>with the new head coach, this new offensive coordinator, all

0:09:23.600 --> 0:09:30.440
<v Speaker 1>of that. Do you like what let me ask you

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:34.120
<v Speaker 1>this before you before we go or before we move on.

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:41.200
<v Speaker 1>What do you think is more likely this season another

0:09:42.800 --> 0:09:48.400
<v Speaker 1>eight year where he is a top an MVP finalist,

0:09:48.920 --> 0:09:54.120
<v Speaker 1>top three MVP finish, or a year where a downward

0:09:54.240 --> 0:09:55.559
<v Speaker 1>trajectory continues.

0:09:55.720 --> 0:09:59.320
<v Speaker 2>The first one. I believe him. The first I think

0:09:59.360 --> 0:10:02.440
<v Speaker 2>that he'll have a good season over having a bad one,

0:10:02.640 --> 0:10:06.200
<v Speaker 2>and I just believe in him. And I think everything

0:10:06.320 --> 0:10:09.240
<v Speaker 2>is in place for him, and if you don't, if

0:10:09.240 --> 0:10:11.960
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't work out this year, then I do think

0:10:12.000 --> 0:10:16.160
<v Speaker 2>there are like serious discussions or ways you need to

0:10:16.200 --> 0:10:20.480
<v Speaker 2>start looking at it. Yeah, exactly. But I think that

0:10:20.559 --> 0:10:22.800
<v Speaker 2>if he had this season that he had last year

0:10:22.840 --> 0:10:25.120
<v Speaker 2>again this next season, then it would have been fair

0:10:25.760 --> 0:10:28.959
<v Speaker 2>where everybody's ranking him. But I just there wasn't enough.

0:10:29.559 --> 0:10:31.280
<v Speaker 2>It wasn't like last year was this guy?

0:10:31.720 --> 0:10:35.000
<v Speaker 1>It was one year? Right, Yeah, And I'm curious based

0:10:35.080 --> 0:10:39.199
<v Speaker 1>on this where the players are gonna have Mahomes well,

0:10:39.240 --> 0:10:41.160
<v Speaker 1>you know what I mean. Mahomes got hurt, Mames didn't

0:10:41.200 --> 0:10:44.560
<v Speaker 1>have a good year. So here is here's what else.

0:10:44.920 --> 0:10:47.840
<v Speaker 1>I think the most likely outcome for Lamar next year

0:10:47.960 --> 0:10:50.960
<v Speaker 1>is a solid year where he's like the sixth or

0:10:51.000 --> 0:10:53.199
<v Speaker 1>seventh best quarterback in football. That's what I think is

0:10:53.240 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 1>the most likely. But if you're telling me he's either

0:10:58.840 --> 0:11:01.640
<v Speaker 1>going to have a bad year an MVP year, I

0:11:01.679 --> 0:11:05.000
<v Speaker 1>think bad is more likely than MVP. I think that

0:11:05.120 --> 0:11:08.200
<v Speaker 1>it is the injuries and the lack of running and

0:11:08.240 --> 0:11:10.600
<v Speaker 1>that stuff. I think it's more likely that that is

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:17.040
<v Speaker 1>catching up to him than we see another unstoppable season. Now, again,

0:11:17.320 --> 0:11:19.920
<v Speaker 1>the most likely is neither of those and somewhere in

0:11:19.960 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 1>the middle. But I am I'm not quite as bullish

0:11:24.600 --> 0:11:27.160
<v Speaker 1>as you are, all right. Today's show is brought to

0:11:27.200 --> 0:11:30.680
<v Speaker 1>you by our presenting sponsor, hard Rock Bet sports book.

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:33.280
<v Speaker 1>If you haven't tried out hard Rock Bet yet, there's

0:11:33.280 --> 0:11:35.840
<v Speaker 1>no better time to get in the game than right now.

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:39.120
<v Speaker 1>We're down to the final two teams in the world's

0:11:39.160 --> 0:11:43.400
<v Speaker 1>biggest soccer tournament. Just one match remains before a champion

0:11:43.440 --> 0:11:46.800
<v Speaker 1>his crowned, and then that's it. You'll have to wait

0:11:46.840 --> 0:11:50.040
<v Speaker 1>four more years for soccer's biggest stage to return, so

0:11:50.120 --> 0:11:52.600
<v Speaker 1>don't spend the next four years wishing you were part

0:11:52.640 --> 0:11:56.080
<v Speaker 1>of history. Hard Rock Bet is a top rated sportsbook

0:11:56.840 --> 0:12:01.720
<v Speaker 1>and it is built to viva la copa. Their soccer

0:12:01.760 --> 0:12:04.520
<v Speaker 1>promos are some of the best out there. Check out

0:12:04.559 --> 0:12:06.600
<v Speaker 1>no goals, No Problem. If you bet on a team

0:12:06.640 --> 0:12:09.600
<v Speaker 1>to win in regulation and the match in scoreless after

0:12:09.679 --> 0:12:12.800
<v Speaker 1>ninety minutes plus stoppage time, you'll get a bonus bet

0:12:12.920 --> 0:12:14.719
<v Speaker 1>back up to two hundred and fifty dollars, So when

0:12:14.720 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 1>the goals go missing your bet doesn't. Then they're super

0:12:17.840 --> 0:12:20.720
<v Speaker 1>sub A great promo for player props. If the player

0:12:20.760 --> 0:12:23.400
<v Speaker 1>you bet on is subbed off, you still win if

0:12:23.400 --> 0:12:26.599
<v Speaker 1>their replacement fulfills the bet, same odd, same payout, and

0:12:26.640 --> 0:12:30.079
<v Speaker 1>the promos keep coming every match day. You can choose

0:12:30.120 --> 0:12:32.680
<v Speaker 1>your own offer, a profit boost to juice your winnings,

0:12:32.920 --> 0:12:35.200
<v Speaker 1>or a no sweat bet for a little extra security.

0:12:35.240 --> 0:12:36.920
<v Speaker 1>So if you're ready to try your first bet on

0:12:36.960 --> 0:12:39.840
<v Speaker 1>hard Rock Bet today, sign up and you score one

0:12:39.880 --> 0:12:42.240
<v Speaker 1>hundred fifty dollars in bonus bets. Just place a five

0:12:42.280 --> 0:12:44.679
<v Speaker 1>dollars bet and if it wins, you get not only

0:12:44.720 --> 0:12:47.200
<v Speaker 1>your winnings, but also an extra one hundred fifty dollars

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:51.320
<v Speaker 1>in bonus bets. Hard Rock Bet is Florida's only legal sportsbook,

0:12:51.520 --> 0:12:53.120
<v Speaker 1>but you don't have to be in Florida join this

0:12:53.200 --> 0:12:59.559
<v Speaker 1>summer party. Hardrock Bet is live in Arizona, Ohio, New Jersey, Indiana, Tennessee, Virginia, Illinois, Colorado,

0:12:59.600 --> 0:13:02.920
<v Speaker 1>and Mission with more states on the way. Download the

0:13:02.920 --> 0:13:05.560
<v Speaker 1>hard Rock Bet app today and don't let the Cup's

0:13:05.600 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 1>biggest games pass you by Roll with Us, Goal with

0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Us with hard Rock Bet offered by the Seminole Tribe

0:13:13.480 --> 0:13:16.960
<v Speaker 1>of Florida. Offered by Seminal hard Rock Digital, LLC and older.

0:13:17.040 --> 0:13:22.240
<v Speaker 1>States must be twenty one plus and physically president. In Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan,

0:13:22.240 --> 0:13:25.320
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey, Ohio, Tennessee, or Virginia. Play terms and conditions

0:13:25.360 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 1>apply concern about gambling In Florida, call one eight three

0:13:28.400 --> 0:13:31.360
<v Speaker 1>to three play wise. In Indiana, if you are somebody

0:13:31.400 --> 0:13:33.800
<v Speaker 1>you know as a gambling problem wants help, call what

0:13:33.920 --> 0:13:37.360
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred and nine with it. In Arizona, Ohio, Virginia,

0:13:37.360 --> 0:13:40.200
<v Speaker 1>call one eight hundred my reset gambling problem called one

0:13:40.240 --> 0:13:44.360
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred gambler. When you guys hear this, I guess

0:13:44.360 --> 0:13:48.600
<v Speaker 1>it's possible Lebron will have made his decision. I think

0:13:48.640 --> 0:13:53.920
<v Speaker 1>it is highly unlike. I think it's unlikely that he

0:13:54.080 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 1>decides on Thursday. We're recording this on Thursday. You guys

0:13:56.880 --> 0:14:01.600
<v Speaker 1>are gonna hear this on Friday. Understand that you know,

0:14:01.640 --> 0:14:04.920
<v Speaker 1>you guys this All the sixers have reached out to Bron.

0:14:05.440 --> 0:14:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Draymond and Bron are super tight. Steve Kerr, I think

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:13.480
<v Speaker 1>jokingly told some fans we got him. Here is how

0:14:13.559 --> 0:14:20.000
<v Speaker 1>I would handicap it. At the moment, I think Cleveland

0:14:20.120 --> 0:14:30.960
<v Speaker 1>is the clear favorite. I think Philly is more possible

0:14:31.040 --> 0:14:35.600
<v Speaker 1>than people are really giving it credit. And I think

0:14:35.640 --> 0:14:40.120
<v Speaker 1>the Warriors are the dark horse, and I think that

0:14:40.320 --> 0:14:44.480
<v Speaker 1>is the full list. I don't think it's Miami. I

0:14:44.560 --> 0:14:48.480
<v Speaker 1>never ever thought it was Minnesota. And while there was

0:14:48.560 --> 0:14:51.480
<v Speaker 1>a little buzz around Denver, I don't think that's likely.

0:14:53.360 --> 0:15:01.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that Philly makes a lot of sense, except

0:15:01.320 --> 0:15:06.680
<v Speaker 1>for it just would feel the weirdest of the three.

0:15:06.920 --> 0:15:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Golden State I don't believe has enough, and they haven't

0:15:12.200 --> 0:15:18.479
<v Speaker 1>seemed able to acquire Anthony Davis. And I think Cleveland

0:15:19.800 --> 0:15:23.560
<v Speaker 1>makes more sense basketball wise than some folks are giving

0:15:23.560 --> 0:15:29.720
<v Speaker 1>it credit. I think Harden is probably more movable than

0:15:30.240 --> 0:15:33.280
<v Speaker 1>people recognize if they were to need to do that.

0:15:33.880 --> 0:15:38.920
<v Speaker 1>And I'm going to add one little bonus thought that

0:15:39.000 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 1>I said to Colin, and this is again just reading

0:15:45.280 --> 0:15:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Tea leaves because they are keeping this close to the

0:15:47.520 --> 0:15:55.360
<v Speaker 1>vest I am not certain. I'm not certain that in

0:15:55.480 --> 0:15:58.320
<v Speaker 1>order to play with Draymond, Lebron has to go to

0:15:58.400 --> 0:16:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Golden State. I'm not saying I'm saying. In fact, that's

0:16:04.640 --> 0:16:08.200
<v Speaker 1>exactly what I'm saying that I am just not certain

0:16:08.840 --> 0:16:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the only way he can play with Draymond is go

0:16:11.240 --> 0:16:15.920
<v Speaker 1>to Golden State. Draymond obviously also opted out of his deal,

0:16:17.080 --> 0:16:24.320
<v Speaker 1>and I just think there is that in order to

0:16:24.360 --> 0:16:27.440
<v Speaker 1>play with Steph, he obviously has to go to Golden State.

0:16:27.760 --> 0:16:30.360
<v Speaker 1>In order to play with Draymond, he probably has to

0:16:30.400 --> 0:16:33.320
<v Speaker 1>go to Golden State. I don't know that he definitely

0:16:33.760 --> 0:16:35.560
<v Speaker 1>has to go to Golden State to play with Draymond.

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:41.840
<v Speaker 1>What I will say is and where I disagree with

0:16:43.320 --> 0:16:46.240
<v Speaker 1>my pal Bill Simmons vehemently, and I kind of agree

0:16:46.280 --> 0:16:49.680
<v Speaker 1>more with Zach Lowe on this one. If he were

0:16:49.720 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 1>to sign with Cleveland or Philly, that team absolutely can

0:16:55.200 --> 0:16:57.720
<v Speaker 1>make the finals. And if you could make the finals,

0:16:57.720 --> 0:17:04.000
<v Speaker 1>you can win the championship. Like the last team to

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:07.359
<v Speaker 1>make the to be draw truly drawing dead in the

0:17:07.400 --> 0:17:12.440
<v Speaker 1>finals was probably the heat against Lebron and ads Lakers.

0:17:12.960 --> 0:17:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Like we have seen underdogs win finals over the last

0:17:16.760 --> 0:17:22.639
<v Speaker 1>decade and certainly come really close it, particularly in the

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Pacers case. So I I think there is a better chance.

0:17:31.000 --> 0:17:34.480
<v Speaker 1>I think if Lebron goes out east and picks Philly

0:17:34.680 --> 0:17:38.200
<v Speaker 1>or Cleveland, that team can absolutely get to the finals.

0:17:38.280 --> 0:17:40.560
<v Speaker 1>You can get to the finals, you can win the championship.

0:17:40.880 --> 0:17:44.000
<v Speaker 1>And I think he Mike right now, if you were

0:17:44.040 --> 0:17:46.000
<v Speaker 1>to offer me an even money bet, my bet would

0:17:46.000 --> 0:17:49.719
<v Speaker 1>be Cleveland. I don't think Philly is out of it,

0:17:49.760 --> 0:17:52.920
<v Speaker 1>as weird as that would be potentially, and I think

0:17:52.960 --> 0:18:00.439
<v Speaker 1>Golden State right now, barring a significant transaction, is pretty

0:18:00.440 --> 0:18:03.159
<v Speaker 1>clearly in third place. How I read it?

0:18:06.720 --> 0:18:07.040
<v Speaker 2>All right?

0:18:07.080 --> 0:18:09.399
<v Speaker 1>I want to remind you guys, boost Mobile is proving

0:18:09.440 --> 0:18:11.800
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to overpay for great wireless Unlock the

0:18:11.800 --> 0:18:14.440
<v Speaker 1>savings with the twenty five dollars a month Forever Unlimited plan.

0:18:14.680 --> 0:18:18.000
<v Speaker 1>It's a permanent price with no contracts and no price hikes.

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:20.560
<v Speaker 1>You can keep your phone and your number, but you

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:23.720
<v Speaker 1>save up to six hundred dollars a year compared to

0:18:23.760 --> 0:18:26.840
<v Speaker 1>the major carriers. Stop overpaying and switch to a fair

0:18:26.920 --> 0:18:31.120
<v Speaker 1>price at boostmobile dot com today based on average annual

0:18:31.160 --> 0:18:33.520
<v Speaker 1>single line payment of AT and T, Verizon and T

0:18:33.680 --> 0:18:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Mobile customers compared to twelve months on the boost Mobile

0:18:37.160 --> 0:18:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Unlimited plan as of January twenty twenty six. For full

0:18:40.680 --> 0:18:44.359
<v Speaker 1>offer details, visit boost mobile dot com. All right, so

0:18:44.520 --> 0:18:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Adam Silver had his press conference. We'll get to the

0:18:47.040 --> 0:18:51.639
<v Speaker 1>QUI thing in a minute, but he said this about

0:18:51.640 --> 0:18:54.920
<v Speaker 1>the second apron. The purpose of this system is ultimately

0:18:55.000 --> 0:18:58.719
<v Speaker 1>to create competition throughout the league, and from that standpoint,

0:18:58.760 --> 0:19:02.000
<v Speaker 1>I think the system is work working incredibly well. He

0:19:02.080 --> 0:19:04.720
<v Speaker 1>went on to say, the goal isn't necessarily to have

0:19:04.760 --> 0:19:07.680
<v Speaker 1>a different champion every year, but we have had eight

0:19:07.720 --> 0:19:13.440
<v Speaker 1>different champions over the last eight years. So here's and

0:19:13.480 --> 0:19:17.960
<v Speaker 1>this is these are not ute opinions unique to just me,

0:19:18.680 --> 0:19:21.080
<v Speaker 1>but I do think it Warren's mentioning. So here's what

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:26.960
<v Speaker 1>I Here's where I think people are confused about the

0:19:27.000 --> 0:19:36.679
<v Speaker 1>way NBA salary works. The players get the same share

0:19:37.480 --> 0:19:44.280
<v Speaker 1>no matter what. It just changes who gets what. So

0:19:44.400 --> 0:19:49.720
<v Speaker 1>here's what I mean. The way the salary gap is

0:19:49.760 --> 0:19:52.359
<v Speaker 1>said is the players get I think it's forty nine percent,

0:19:52.400 --> 0:19:54.640
<v Speaker 1>but we're just gonna call it half. They get half

0:19:54.680 --> 0:19:58.359
<v Speaker 1>of basketball related income and then the owners get the

0:19:58.400 --> 0:20:00.760
<v Speaker 1>other half to do, you know, run the teams, do whatever,

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:07.440
<v Speaker 1>make a profit if and Windy did a good job

0:20:07.520 --> 0:20:10.639
<v Speaker 1>explaining this, and I've explained it before as well, but

0:20:10.720 --> 0:20:14.840
<v Speaker 1>it warn't repeating because I think people don't understand this

0:20:14.960 --> 0:20:21.720
<v Speaker 1>piece of it. That number down to the dollar is

0:20:22.600 --> 0:20:28.359
<v Speaker 1>the players percentage is the same every year under this

0:20:28.520 --> 0:20:34.920
<v Speaker 1>CBA and it and that all the aprons and max

0:20:35.119 --> 0:20:38.680
<v Speaker 1>salaries and winby not taking you know, the full max

0:20:38.720 --> 0:20:41.560
<v Speaker 1>and all those things do is it shuffles that money

0:20:41.640 --> 0:20:48.080
<v Speaker 1>to other players. And so if if guys, if there's

0:20:48.080 --> 0:20:51.560
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of teams going over the apron using bird

0:20:51.640 --> 0:20:54.720
<v Speaker 1>rights to re sign players and all, you know, all

0:20:54.800 --> 0:20:57.280
<v Speaker 1>of and all of a sudden that your holy shit,

0:20:58.119 --> 0:21:04.080
<v Speaker 1>players instead of getting their fifty percent again I think

0:21:04.080 --> 0:21:06.639
<v Speaker 1>it's forty eight percent, but I mean they're fifty percent

0:21:06.680 --> 0:21:09.840
<v Speaker 1>of the pie, the players as a whole got fifty

0:21:09.920 --> 0:21:14.359
<v Speaker 1>two percent of the pie. Then the players as a

0:21:14.359 --> 0:21:18.280
<v Speaker 1>whole have money clawed back and it goes to the owners.

0:21:19.440 --> 0:21:21.439
<v Speaker 1>And if at the end of the year, because guys

0:21:21.480 --> 0:21:25.800
<v Speaker 1>took discounts or some teams didn't spend enough, the players

0:21:26.240 --> 0:21:29.840
<v Speaker 1>didn't get their full piece of the pie, then the

0:21:29.840 --> 0:21:32.720
<v Speaker 1>owners at the end of the year write a check

0:21:33.080 --> 0:21:37.399
<v Speaker 1>to the players. And so the amount of money that

0:21:37.560 --> 0:21:45.320
<v Speaker 1>is going to the players is going to be to

0:21:45.520 --> 0:21:48.240
<v Speaker 1>the dollar at the end of the year the same,

0:21:51.000 --> 0:21:56.480
<v Speaker 1>no matter what players take discounts, what players sign for

0:21:56.520 --> 0:21:58.840
<v Speaker 1>the max, what teams are afraid of the apron, what

0:21:58.880 --> 0:22:03.879
<v Speaker 1>teams aren't. So it really it's it's not so much

0:22:04.520 --> 0:22:08.360
<v Speaker 1>that this is saving the owner's money as much as

0:22:08.359 --> 0:22:12.320
<v Speaker 1>it is is distributing the talent across the league, which

0:22:12.440 --> 0:22:15.240
<v Speaker 1>is what the league wanted. Now you can argue that's

0:22:15.359 --> 0:22:19.080
<v Speaker 1>not good, that that is, that that's been a failure

0:22:19.119 --> 0:22:23.359
<v Speaker 1>by the league, that they shouldn't want that, But I do.

0:22:23.520 --> 0:22:28.280
<v Speaker 1>I will defend, so to speak, Adam silver In that

0:22:29.440 --> 0:22:32.920
<v Speaker 1>it was their goal and it has achieved. That they

0:22:32.960 --> 0:22:36.760
<v Speaker 1>don't want super teams. They want player that they they

0:22:36.840 --> 0:22:40.280
<v Speaker 1>want you to have to have tough team building decisions. Now, again,

0:22:40.840 --> 0:22:43.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if that's what they should want. Should

0:22:43.880 --> 0:22:48.480
<v Speaker 1>they want teams to develop home draft and develop homegrown

0:22:48.520 --> 0:22:52.480
<v Speaker 1>stars that they want to keep but cannot because of

0:22:52.520 --> 0:22:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the financial penalties of it. I don't know that they

0:22:56.840 --> 0:22:59.320
<v Speaker 1>should want that. What I do know is I think

0:22:59.359 --> 0:23:03.159
<v Speaker 1>there has been a little confusion on how much the

0:23:03.160 --> 0:23:06.040
<v Speaker 1>players are getting screwed by the apron like hold on

0:23:06.480 --> 0:23:10.720
<v Speaker 1>NBA CBA BRI four players. I think it's forty eight percent.

0:23:14.440 --> 0:23:18.639
<v Speaker 1>So let me I just I want to read this correctly.

0:23:21.560 --> 0:23:29.800
<v Speaker 1>The so this is just reading from Sportico. The NBA

0:23:29.920 --> 0:23:33.359
<v Speaker 1>released the final accounting of last season, revealing basketball related

0:23:33.400 --> 0:23:36.200
<v Speaker 1>income was eleven point six to eight billion, up from

0:23:36.240 --> 0:23:40.359
<v Speaker 1>ten point twenty five billion. The BRI means players and

0:23:40.400 --> 0:23:43.840
<v Speaker 1>owners will split an escrow of five hundred and eighty

0:23:43.880 --> 0:23:46.199
<v Speaker 1>million set aside to make the math work and the

0:23:46.240 --> 0:23:49.320
<v Speaker 1>shared revenue system laid out in the CBA. So the

0:23:49.359 --> 0:23:52.639
<v Speaker 1>CBA calls for players to receive fifty one percent of

0:23:52.720 --> 0:23:56.639
<v Speaker 1>BRI basketball related income in the form of salaries and benefits.

0:23:57.080 --> 0:23:59.680
<v Speaker 1>The NBA with holds this is the part I'm talking

0:23:59.680 --> 0:24:03.919
<v Speaker 1>about ten percent of player salaries each year to ensure

0:24:03.920 --> 0:24:09.160
<v Speaker 1>the revenue split is achieved. Then it talks about why

0:24:09.320 --> 0:24:12.840
<v Speaker 1>the revenue was heard a bit, okay, So this is

0:24:12.880 --> 0:24:16.199
<v Speaker 1>what I'm trying to get to. Total salaries and benefits

0:24:16.240 --> 0:24:19.639
<v Speaker 1>of the twenty twenty five twenty six season were six

0:24:19.680 --> 0:24:24.399
<v Speaker 1>point twenty seven billion above the fifty one percent threshold.

0:24:24.840 --> 0:24:28.920
<v Speaker 1>The ESCRO account was divided, so fifty four point eight

0:24:29.000 --> 0:24:31.840
<v Speaker 1>percent went to the owners and forty five point two

0:24:31.920 --> 0:24:35.440
<v Speaker 1>percent to the players to reach the fifty one percent mark.

0:24:35.920 --> 0:24:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Last season, more than ninety percent of the amount in

0:24:39.920 --> 0:24:45.600
<v Speaker 1>ESCRO went back to owners. So what that is saying

0:24:45.720 --> 0:24:49.440
<v Speaker 1>is they're supposed to basically have like a fifty to

0:24:49.520 --> 0:24:59.719
<v Speaker 1>fifty split, okay, but certain years given the way that

0:24:59.800 --> 0:25:02.919
<v Speaker 1>it's not a hard cap like the NFL, and I

0:25:02.920 --> 0:25:04.800
<v Speaker 1>hope this isn't too boring, but I want people to

0:25:04.840 --> 0:25:09.000
<v Speaker 1>understand it that you're not always going to actually get

0:25:09.359 --> 0:25:11.760
<v Speaker 1>If you were to just be like, hey, whatever contract

0:25:11.760 --> 0:25:14.800
<v Speaker 1>players have, they get paid out is you know, it

0:25:14.840 --> 0:25:16.919
<v Speaker 1>is what it is. You wouldn't truly get the fifty

0:25:16.960 --> 0:25:19.600
<v Speaker 1>one to forty nine split, but they have to get

0:25:19.640 --> 0:25:22.440
<v Speaker 1>the fifty one to forty nine split. So because of that,

0:25:23.119 --> 0:25:27.320
<v Speaker 1>everybody's salary, ten percent of it gets held. And some

0:25:27.600 --> 0:25:30.880
<v Speaker 1>years when the league underspins, if you will, guys get

0:25:31.200 --> 0:25:35.200
<v Speaker 1>a bump or a bonus, and some years guys take

0:25:35.200 --> 0:25:39.560
<v Speaker 1>a haircut. So Steph again from Sportico, let me just

0:25:39.600 --> 0:25:42.600
<v Speaker 1>read more from the article of the ten percent salaries

0:25:42.640 --> 0:25:46.639
<v Speaker 1>in ESCRO players received just under half back. For practical purposes,

0:25:46.960 --> 0:25:50.440
<v Speaker 1>it means each player for the twenty five to twenty

0:25:50.480 --> 0:25:53.680
<v Speaker 1>six season took a five and a half percent haircut

0:25:53.720 --> 0:25:57.679
<v Speaker 1>on their negotiated salary. A twenty million dollars player actually

0:25:57.720 --> 0:26:01.520
<v Speaker 1>earned eighteen point nine million. Zeph Curry got dinged the most.

0:26:01.800 --> 0:26:04.880
<v Speaker 1>His salary is fifty nine point eight, so he loses

0:26:04.920 --> 0:26:10.000
<v Speaker 1>three point three. So it's all in proportion. And so

0:26:11.560 --> 0:26:15.720
<v Speaker 1>if there were a year where the league didn't spend enough,

0:26:16.440 --> 0:26:19.360
<v Speaker 1>then that twenty million player would actually get twenty one

0:26:19.440 --> 0:26:21.959
<v Speaker 1>million like they would get the bump back. But the

0:26:22.000 --> 0:26:26.440
<v Speaker 1>reason I'm laying this out is the amount of money

0:26:26.480 --> 0:26:32.399
<v Speaker 1>paid out to the players doesn't is not affected by aprons.

0:26:32.480 --> 0:26:36.360
<v Speaker 1>It's just not. They get their fifty one percent no

0:26:36.400 --> 0:26:39.679
<v Speaker 1>matter what, no more, no less so what it is.

0:26:39.680 --> 0:26:42.320
<v Speaker 1>So it's not that it's saving the owner's money, it's

0:26:42.359 --> 0:26:45.600
<v Speaker 1>that it really is the owners think this is best

0:26:45.600 --> 0:26:48.680
<v Speaker 1>for competitive balance. I just don't know that I agree

0:26:48.920 --> 0:26:51.359
<v Speaker 1>that this is the type of competitive balance they should

0:26:51.359 --> 0:26:55.760
<v Speaker 1>be going after. The thing I think we all agree

0:26:55.840 --> 0:27:02.439
<v Speaker 1>on is the NBA treating the Kawhi Leonards skin like

0:27:03.560 --> 0:27:09.880
<v Speaker 1>a nuclear facility was breached and we need a five

0:27:10.000 --> 0:27:16.840
<v Speaker 1>thousand page governmental report on it is ridiculous. And the

0:27:17.000 --> 0:27:21.960
<v Speaker 1>latest updates on the aspiration deal with Silver saying this

0:27:22.119 --> 0:27:25.359
<v Speaker 1>investigation needs to be wrapped up before the beginning of

0:27:25.440 --> 0:27:31.480
<v Speaker 1>next season and hoping it ends this summer is wild

0:27:31.560 --> 0:27:40.480
<v Speaker 1>to me. And I think it is a failure by

0:27:40.640 --> 0:27:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Silver to allow this to be so loyally and prioritizing

0:27:52.680 --> 0:27:56.960
<v Speaker 1>dotting every eye and crossing every tee and following every

0:27:57.359 --> 0:28:02.280
<v Speaker 1>lead and every loose end rather than getting a resolution.

0:28:04.160 --> 0:28:15.080
<v Speaker 1>And I I don't I am surprised that. I'm not

0:28:15.200 --> 0:28:20.359
<v Speaker 1>surprised that the Clippers and the Raptors paused the trade.

0:28:20.560 --> 0:28:24.960
<v Speaker 1>I am surprised that Silver hasn't felt comfortable simply saying

0:28:25.200 --> 0:28:30.440
<v Speaker 1>here's the ruling, because it doesn't seem like we're anywhere

0:28:30.440 --> 0:28:33.240
<v Speaker 1>close to getting one. And I have no idea what

0:28:33.240 --> 0:28:36.080
<v Speaker 1>that means for brandon Ingram or Kawhi Leonard, or how

0:28:36.160 --> 0:28:39.840
<v Speaker 1>anybody's going to do their business, or for restricted free

0:28:39.880 --> 0:28:45.600
<v Speaker 1>agents the likes of which the Clippers might have an

0:28:45.600 --> 0:28:48.120
<v Speaker 1>offer sheet ready for, but they don't know who's going

0:28:48.200 --> 0:28:55.200
<v Speaker 1>to be on their team. And this should not have

0:28:55.280 --> 0:28:58.280
<v Speaker 1>taken ten months to get to the bottom of. And

0:28:58.560 --> 0:29:00.840
<v Speaker 1>I've never seen anything like it where we don't know

0:29:02.320 --> 0:29:05.120
<v Speaker 1>who brandon Ingram, Grady Dick, Kawhi Leonard are going to

0:29:05.160 --> 0:29:08.000
<v Speaker 1>play for next year, and because of that, we kind

0:29:08.000 --> 0:29:11.080
<v Speaker 1>of don't know if some of these restricted free agents

0:29:11.120 --> 0:29:14.120
<v Speaker 1>are going to get big offer sheets. I've never seen

0:29:14.120 --> 0:29:21.000
<v Speaker 1>anything quite like this. And then last but not least,

0:29:21.440 --> 0:29:25.160
<v Speaker 1>KD was on Instagram and answered one of these you

0:29:25.200 --> 0:29:30.240
<v Speaker 1>know ones got to go picture thing and said basketball

0:29:30.240 --> 0:29:33.200
<v Speaker 1>would actually move forward if get Nick Wright wasn't involved.

0:29:33.600 --> 0:29:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Hold up, I don't know why I said, hold up, now,

0:29:36.200 --> 0:29:40.040
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to say that, well, KD was just talking

0:29:40.040 --> 0:29:43.120
<v Speaker 1>about you know, bald nick right, shaved head nick right,

0:29:43.880 --> 0:29:46.720
<v Speaker 1>and he and I sense of mend defenses because I

0:29:46.800 --> 0:29:50.600
<v Speaker 1>thought we had mind defenses. But when this was I

0:29:50.720 --> 0:29:53.520
<v Speaker 1>was told about this because I'm not active on Instagram.

0:29:53.920 --> 0:29:59.960
<v Speaker 1>I then I did DM KD, and he was very

0:30:00.120 --> 0:30:02.680
<v Speaker 1>very funny to his credit, and I know what he

0:30:02.800 --> 0:30:06.680
<v Speaker 1>was doing, and I think it is cheeky, so to speak,

0:30:07.960 --> 0:30:10.560
<v Speaker 1>and so I one second, let me get get it

0:30:10.600 --> 0:30:18.320
<v Speaker 1>for you guys, and not surprisingly like I, I guess

0:30:18.320 --> 0:30:22.479
<v Speaker 1>I shouldn't be surprised by this. As soon as I

0:30:22.600 --> 0:30:25.880
<v Speaker 1>sent it, he responded, I sent the old question guy

0:30:25.880 --> 0:30:29.600
<v Speaker 1>emoji this guy, and I wrote, I thought we were cool,

0:30:29.600 --> 0:30:33.000
<v Speaker 1>now hate to see it. And his response to I

0:30:33.040 --> 0:30:35.800
<v Speaker 1>thought we were cool was what made you think that

0:30:36.960 --> 0:30:39.840
<v Speaker 1>it is legitimately funny? But I guess I had gotten

0:30:39.880 --> 0:30:47.440
<v Speaker 1>bad information. And again, I don't want to betray confidences,

0:30:47.480 --> 0:30:49.560
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think this is betraying confidences. And I

0:30:49.600 --> 0:30:52.880
<v Speaker 1>actually think Durant comes out looking really good here. So

0:30:53.000 --> 0:30:57.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to share the interaction with you guys. He

0:30:57.240 --> 0:31:00.240
<v Speaker 1>wrote to me, it's just an opinion on your skills,

0:31:00.640 --> 0:31:03.120
<v Speaker 1>but I don't matter. I'm not your bosses. They love you,

0:31:03.200 --> 0:31:06.560
<v Speaker 1>that's all that matters. And I, because I'm me and

0:31:06.600 --> 0:31:10.120
<v Speaker 1>I can't help myself, responded to him to be fair

0:31:10.200 --> 0:31:13.640
<v Speaker 1>in my craft, much like you and yours. My skills

0:31:14.120 --> 0:31:18.520
<v Speaker 1>are pretty unimpeachable. My opinions are, of course a matter

0:31:18.600 --> 0:31:23.520
<v Speaker 1>of debate. And then I wrote, you know, but all good,

0:31:23.600 --> 0:31:26.600
<v Speaker 1>no hard feelings, because I do think it's totally we

0:31:26.640 --> 0:31:30.040
<v Speaker 1>are in the business of critiquing, criticizing athletes. We have

0:31:30.120 --> 0:31:32.400
<v Speaker 1>to be totally fine when they do it back to us.

0:31:32.800 --> 0:31:38.240
<v Speaker 1>And then he was very funny in my opinion where

0:31:38.280 --> 0:31:42.280
<v Speaker 1>he really did try to put due to us which

0:31:42.440 --> 0:31:45.160
<v Speaker 1>I think he feels we do to them, which is

0:31:46.080 --> 0:31:48.040
<v Speaker 1>he wrote, you show up every day, so there's an

0:31:48.040 --> 0:31:51.280
<v Speaker 1>opportunity for you to move up on my all time list.

0:31:52.040 --> 0:31:55.920
<v Speaker 1>And so that's not the entirety of the interaction, it's

0:31:55.960 --> 0:31:59.120
<v Speaker 1>most of it. You get the gist of it. So

0:31:59.200 --> 0:32:01.400
<v Speaker 1>a few things on it. One, I got no issue

0:32:01.520 --> 0:32:06.680
<v Speaker 1>whatsoever if the I did take some cheap ish shots

0:32:07.200 --> 0:32:09.960
<v Speaker 1>at Durant when he was with the Nets. Again, I've

0:32:10.000 --> 0:32:13.760
<v Speaker 1>apologized for those. That's why I guess I said, I

0:32:13.880 --> 0:32:17.479
<v Speaker 1>thought we were cool, but maybe not if he you know,

0:32:17.600 --> 0:32:22.960
<v Speaker 1>if he is still upset about that, totally fair. And

0:32:23.200 --> 0:32:25.080
<v Speaker 1>if he's not still upset about that, but it's been

0:32:25.200 --> 0:32:29.160
<v Speaker 1>upset about things I've said after that, again totally fair.

0:32:29.400 --> 0:32:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Like that he is. Nothing he said there was out

0:32:33.080 --> 0:32:39.120
<v Speaker 1>of bounds, obviously publicly or privately. Why would he be

0:32:39.240 --> 0:32:41.560
<v Speaker 1>upset with me? As the question people are asking, I

0:32:41.600 --> 0:32:46.640
<v Speaker 1>have a few theories. One, you know, I know, you

0:32:46.640 --> 0:32:51.360
<v Speaker 1>know he thinks that I give a favorable coverage to

0:32:51.480 --> 0:32:54.440
<v Speaker 1>guys that I have personal relationships. I shouldn't say I know.

0:32:54.800 --> 0:32:57.400
<v Speaker 1>I have a feeling that he thinks I give favorable

0:32:57.440 --> 0:33:00.120
<v Speaker 1>coverage to guys I have a personal relationship with and

0:33:00.240 --> 0:33:03.600
<v Speaker 1>therefore maybe have been unfair to him. I try to

0:33:03.640 --> 0:33:06.920
<v Speaker 1>be very clear about any relationships or biases I have,

0:33:07.600 --> 0:33:11.720
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think I've been unfair to him, certainly

0:33:11.760 --> 0:33:14.440
<v Speaker 1>in the last few years. Again, I was a little,

0:33:17.480 --> 0:33:19.960
<v Speaker 1>as they would say in the World Cup season, cheekier

0:33:20.320 --> 0:33:22.400
<v Speaker 1>than I needed to be in some of the net stuff.

0:33:22.640 --> 0:33:25.280
<v Speaker 1>But I again I've since apologized for that. So there's

0:33:25.440 --> 0:33:29.720
<v Speaker 1>that piece of it. I don't think I do. Again,

0:33:29.760 --> 0:33:36.160
<v Speaker 1>this is just blind guessing that he thinks I don't

0:33:36.640 --> 0:33:40.240
<v Speaker 1>rank him as high as he deserves to be ranked.

0:33:40.240 --> 0:33:41.880
<v Speaker 1>I think he's one of the twenty greatest players of

0:33:41.920 --> 0:33:44.160
<v Speaker 1>all time. But I've been very adamant. I don't think

0:33:44.200 --> 0:33:45.960
<v Speaker 1>you can possibly make the argument he's one of the

0:33:45.960 --> 0:33:48.480
<v Speaker 1>ten greatest players of all time. Maybe that drubbed him

0:33:48.480 --> 0:33:51.560
<v Speaker 1>the wrong way. And last, but not least, I was

0:33:51.560 --> 0:33:55.760
<v Speaker 1>pretty critical this year about what I you know, the

0:33:55.840 --> 0:33:58.560
<v Speaker 1>social media stuff that I think wrecked the Rockets locker

0:33:58.680 --> 0:34:04.520
<v Speaker 1>room and his colpaville in that that is, I believe

0:34:04.520 --> 0:34:08.399
<v Speaker 1>I was more than fair there. But and again I'm

0:34:08.440 --> 0:34:11.480
<v Speaker 1>blind guessing any of those things could be a reason,

0:34:12.160 --> 0:34:16.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's displeased with me. It also might be

0:34:16.520 --> 0:34:19.279
<v Speaker 1>none of those things, just he's never likes me, or

0:34:19.360 --> 0:34:21.520
<v Speaker 1>he thinks I have shitty opinions, or he thinks I

0:34:21.520 --> 0:34:24.719
<v Speaker 1>don't know ball who knows. I just do know that

0:34:25.600 --> 0:34:28.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I get as no, I don't think

0:34:28.600 --> 0:34:30.359
<v Speaker 1>I know. I don't get as worked up as some

0:34:30.400 --> 0:34:35.520
<v Speaker 1>of my colleagues do. When these guys treat us the

0:34:35.560 --> 0:34:38.480
<v Speaker 1>way we treat them. We're also in the public eye.

0:34:38.600 --> 0:34:43.120
<v Speaker 1>We're also a level of celebrity. We also are public

0:34:43.160 --> 0:34:48.080
<v Speaker 1>figures that do an entertainment based job, and if those

0:34:48.160 --> 0:34:52.480
<v Speaker 1>folks want to criticize how we do our work the

0:34:52.480 --> 0:34:55.399
<v Speaker 1>way we criticize how they do their work, that is

0:34:55.640 --> 0:34:58.759
<v Speaker 1>a thousand percent fair, and everybody doesn't have to like

0:34:58.800 --> 0:35:02.000
<v Speaker 1>everybody with that set. I actually do like Durant. I

0:35:02.080 --> 0:35:05.279
<v Speaker 1>find him really fascinating. I think he's really interesting. I

0:35:05.280 --> 0:35:07.960
<v Speaker 1>don't think there's ever been an athlete quite like him

0:35:08.320 --> 0:35:10.680
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to the way he interacts with fans

0:35:10.680 --> 0:35:15.360
<v Speaker 1>and media and all of that. And I obviously have massive,

0:35:15.400 --> 0:35:19.440
<v Speaker 1>massive respect for him as a player. And so is

0:35:19.480 --> 0:35:21.879
<v Speaker 1>there a part of me that wishes like he thought

0:35:21.920 --> 0:35:25.000
<v Speaker 1>what I did was good? Sure? It probably is. Yeah,

0:35:25.120 --> 0:35:30.839
<v Speaker 1>a little sad, but it's what I'm not gonna do

0:35:30.880 --> 0:35:32.759
<v Speaker 1>is stare at the camera and be like this is

0:35:32.840 --> 0:35:38.520
<v Speaker 1>what No, what he said, It's totally fine. I don't, though, understand.

0:35:38.719 --> 0:35:41.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't think basketball would actually move forward if I

0:35:41.200 --> 0:35:43.840
<v Speaker 1>wasn't involved. I don't think I'm holding the sport of

0:35:43.880 --> 0:35:46.920
<v Speaker 1>basketball back. I will say that is my opinion. I

0:35:46.920 --> 0:35:50.120
<v Speaker 1>think that's overstating it just a bit. Enjoy the World

0:35:50.200 --> 0:35:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Cup Final, Enjoy your weekend. We'll be back next week again.

0:35:55.000 --> 0:35:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Morning episodes Tuesday, Thursday, and Friday, See you guys. Then,

0:35:58.680 --> 0:36:00.759
<v Speaker 1>thank you to boost Mobile, thank you hard Rock Bet,

0:36:00.960 --> 0:36:02.800
<v Speaker 1>thank you to Volume, thank you to Bluda. Talk to

0:36:02.840 --> 0:36:03.920
<v Speaker 1>you guys soon. What's right,