WEBVTT - Bitcoin Boom Looks Increasingly Perilous to Cumberland's Kotok

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg P and L Podcast. I'm Pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Bramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg P M L

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com. Adventures

0:00:32.520 --> 0:00:35.360
<v Speaker 1>in Muni Land. That's the author of the book that

0:00:35.479 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 1>David co Talk, the chairman and Chief investment officer of

0:00:38.120 --> 0:00:42.199
<v Speaker 1>Cumberland Advisors, co authored. He's based in Sarah Soda. He

0:00:42.400 --> 0:00:46.080
<v Speaker 1>is uh in California today and David, always a pleasure

0:00:46.120 --> 0:00:48.240
<v Speaker 1>to hear your voice, Um, and wonder if you could

0:00:48.680 --> 0:00:53.599
<v Speaker 1>maybe just explain how Adventures in Muni Land might actually

0:00:53.640 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 1>apply to Adventures in Bitcoin? Could that be a serial?

0:00:56.880 --> 0:00:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Do you think maybe? Is that your second volume coming up?

0:00:59.640 --> 0:01:03.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking Tim, Thank you very much, Happy holidays to you.

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:06.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking about writing that one, but we don't have

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:11.199
<v Speaker 1>enough experience yet in bitcoin we will, I suspect before

0:01:11.280 --> 0:01:13.640
<v Speaker 1>this is over. So what do you mean by that

0:01:13.760 --> 0:01:17.959
<v Speaker 1>before this is over? You're implying something here. Well, I'm

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:21.160
<v Speaker 1>in the camp that says something that can be created

0:01:21.319 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 1>infinitely with mathematical formulas and that is subject to hacking,

0:01:27.920 --> 0:01:33.119
<v Speaker 1>and the experiences we're seeing is not a value. And

0:01:33.200 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 1>so cryptocurrency that isn't backed by anything other than hope

0:01:39.160 --> 0:01:42.440
<v Speaker 1>or an algorithm which can be repeated a hundred times

0:01:42.440 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 1>and already is is not something I would invest in.

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Now there's another group. I just saw a forecast today

0:01:49.040 --> 0:01:53.520
<v Speaker 1>that said next year Bitcoin I'll hit eighteen thousand. Well,

0:01:53.720 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 1>price fantasy ratios have been around for a while, maybe

0:01:57.080 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 1>this is a new one. Well, David, you know you

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 1>did in a story published yesterday by Bloomberg News. Clients

0:02:05.120 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 1>bring up bitcoin all the time. You said, they think

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:11.080
<v Speaker 1>it's cool. It has the newness, which is attractive to

0:02:11.120 --> 0:02:13.960
<v Speaker 1>some people, though others would say newness is a risk

0:02:14.160 --> 0:02:18.200
<v Speaker 1>they don't want to take. When clients bring up bitcoin

0:02:18.320 --> 0:02:21.280
<v Speaker 1>with you, what do you say? I say, if you

0:02:21.320 --> 0:02:26.240
<v Speaker 1>want to speculate in this remarkable evolution that has a

0:02:26.280 --> 0:02:30.000
<v Speaker 1>couple of years of history, and that's all do so,

0:02:30.200 --> 0:02:33.000
<v Speaker 1>knowing you might make a lot of money in a

0:02:33.160 --> 0:02:37.240
<v Speaker 1>gamble and you might lose it all in managed accounts.

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:40.120
<v Speaker 1>We don't touch it. We don't touch any of the

0:02:40.160 --> 0:02:45.120
<v Speaker 1>ets funds or other organization old structures which are coming

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:50.120
<v Speaker 1>quickly to the market trying to reach them. I would

0:02:50.200 --> 0:02:56.760
<v Speaker 1>distinguish between lisa mathematically backed cryptocurrency, which by the way,

0:02:57.120 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 1>can work as a transaction medium, but it has no

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:04.440
<v Speaker 1>store of value that we're used to, and dollar back

0:03:04.600 --> 0:03:10.160
<v Speaker 1>cryptocurrency or gold back cryptocurrency, which is catching on and

0:03:10.480 --> 0:03:16.280
<v Speaker 1>is growing rapidly. It's actually growing more rapidly than the

0:03:16.360 --> 0:03:20.799
<v Speaker 1>mathematical backed cryptocurrency. And there's a reason. There's a lot

0:03:20.840 --> 0:03:23.240
<v Speaker 1>of players in the world who would like to use

0:03:23.880 --> 0:03:27.880
<v Speaker 1>a transactional medium and not have a record and not

0:03:28.040 --> 0:03:32.480
<v Speaker 1>have it go through a banking system. Unfortunately, they're the

0:03:32.600 --> 0:03:36.680
<v Speaker 1>kinds of folks that threaten the United States and others

0:03:36.800 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 1>who are engaged in more transparent commercial activity. Alright, so, David,

0:03:41.920 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad you you held back there on your opinion

0:03:44.640 --> 0:03:51.680
<v Speaker 1>about the cryptocurrencies. Is there is there something underneath this

0:03:51.760 --> 0:03:55.680
<v Speaker 1>though that says why they are popular? What is it

0:03:55.720 --> 0:04:00.000
<v Speaker 1>that has lent this air of sort of almost inevitable

0:04:00.000 --> 0:04:03.760
<v Speaker 1>ability about the emergence of these kinds of currencies. Why

0:04:03.760 --> 0:04:06.680
<v Speaker 1>do you think people are so attracted to them? Now, Well,

0:04:06.760 --> 0:04:09.240
<v Speaker 1>you've got human behavior, We've seen it before. There's this

0:04:09.280 --> 0:04:12.280
<v Speaker 1>wonderful new movie out. I don't know how popular it is,

0:04:12.600 --> 0:04:17.040
<v Speaker 1>toolip Fever with Judy Dench, and it attempts to replicate

0:04:17.120 --> 0:04:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the tool of Bubble of centuries ago, and it shows

0:04:21.080 --> 0:04:26.080
<v Speaker 1>how momentum drives up prices and it shows what happens

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 1>after the fact when they collapse. Are we having one

0:04:29.320 --> 0:04:32.640
<v Speaker 1>of those? Maybe? Are we having? And am I wrong?

0:04:33.320 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 1>And that could be a legitimate change in reserve currencies,

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:42.960
<v Speaker 1>where we're going to use algorithms to drive value instead

0:04:43.000 --> 0:04:47.080
<v Speaker 1>of gold or silver fiat currencies that we know, I

0:04:47.080 --> 0:04:49.240
<v Speaker 1>would say, in due time will find out. I'm on

0:04:49.279 --> 0:04:52.840
<v Speaker 1>the side that five thousand years of history with gold

0:04:53.480 --> 0:04:56.080
<v Speaker 1>is a little stronger than five years of history with

0:04:56.160 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 1>a bit Clinton. I think you know, underlying a certain

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:04.840
<v Speaker 1>only some of the enthusiasm is the fact that investors

0:05:05.080 --> 0:05:08.440
<v Speaker 1>want returns that are getting harder to get uh in

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:12.599
<v Speaker 1>traditional asset classes, and so bitcoin kind of represents something

0:05:13.120 --> 0:05:16.440
<v Speaker 1>that seems more limitless than say, bonds that are constrained

0:05:16.480 --> 0:05:19.120
<v Speaker 1>by very low yields or stocks that are constrained by

0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:23.120
<v Speaker 1>very high valuations. Do you present ever alternatives to these

0:05:23.160 --> 0:05:26.359
<v Speaker 1>investors that might be interested in bitcoin? That might be

0:05:26.440 --> 0:05:29.800
<v Speaker 1>higher yielding, and if so, what are they Well, sure

0:05:29.800 --> 0:05:33.960
<v Speaker 1>we do, Lisa, but you know you've you have reported

0:05:34.040 --> 0:05:37.320
<v Speaker 1>on interest rates and bonds for years. I've watched you

0:05:38.000 --> 0:05:41.760
<v Speaker 1>and you are in a period of time, and you know,

0:05:42.200 --> 0:05:44.240
<v Speaker 1>because I've heard your report on it. We are in

0:05:44.240 --> 0:05:49.840
<v Speaker 1>a decade long period of interest rates which are extraordinarily low,

0:05:50.279 --> 0:05:53.640
<v Speaker 1>driven by central bank policies with both you and Tim

0:05:53.680 --> 0:05:58.599
<v Speaker 1>have reported on many times which are exceptional and that

0:05:58.839 --> 0:06:02.200
<v Speaker 1>distorts behave year over time. Do you think about it?

0:06:02.440 --> 0:06:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Any professional in the financial services industry who's under forty

0:06:08.680 --> 0:06:14.120
<v Speaker 1>has never experienced a climate other than interest rates which

0:06:14.120 --> 0:06:18.360
<v Speaker 1>are rooted in the zero interest rate policy. They've read

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:21.479
<v Speaker 1>about it in books, but they've never experienced it. So

0:06:21.600 --> 0:06:25.760
<v Speaker 1>behaviors are entirely different, and that will not last forever.

0:06:25.880 --> 0:06:28.039
<v Speaker 1>In my opinion, what do I know? I'm an old goat,

0:06:28.120 --> 0:06:31.400
<v Speaker 1>So how do you know? Well, we're not going to

0:06:31.839 --> 0:06:34.760
<v Speaker 1>go come on, happy nays to yourself. We love speaking

0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:39.360
<v Speaker 1>with you. That's that's your new marketing slogan, right, David Kotak,

0:06:39.440 --> 0:06:43.279
<v Speaker 1>the old goat? Well, David, can you tell us? Uh?

0:06:43.800 --> 0:06:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Having said all this, what do you think is gonna

0:06:45.800 --> 0:06:47.320
<v Speaker 1>happen with interest rates. Do you think we're going to

0:06:47.400 --> 0:06:50.680
<v Speaker 1>get four increases next year, as Goldman Sachs has put

0:06:50.680 --> 0:06:54.520
<v Speaker 1>out to their investors, I do not. I'm watching things

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:59.520
<v Speaker 1>in the credit markets, credit card delinquency slightly rising, real

0:06:59.640 --> 0:07:05.760
<v Speaker 1>estate mortgage structures in growing trouble, twice as many vacancies

0:07:05.800 --> 0:07:10.960
<v Speaker 1>in the commercial space area as new construction. Questions about mortgages.

0:07:11.000 --> 0:07:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we're seeing elements warning signs, yellow lights that

0:07:15.200 --> 0:07:19.360
<v Speaker 1>things aren't just so perfect, and we also see a

0:07:19.400 --> 0:07:22.200
<v Speaker 1>flat yielder. We don't know how to how to interpret

0:07:22.240 --> 0:07:25.040
<v Speaker 1>it because of the distortion of the European Central Bank

0:07:25.080 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 1>negative interest rate policy, so we don't have the usual metrics.

0:07:30.360 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 1>I think we are in slow growth. You heard yelling

0:07:34.120 --> 0:07:37.880
<v Speaker 1>on her sort of exit remarks say, I'm not so

0:07:37.920 --> 0:07:40.560
<v Speaker 1>sure we're gonna have a big inflation. Maybe we got

0:07:40.560 --> 0:07:43.120
<v Speaker 1>to go more slowly here. And now we have a

0:07:43.120 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 1>whole new fit. We're gonna have an entirely new federal

0:07:46.240 --> 0:07:51.200
<v Speaker 1>reserve within a year that has no experience with ten

0:07:51.280 --> 0:07:54.360
<v Speaker 1>years ago, a credit crisis and all that sort of thing.

0:07:54.720 --> 0:07:57.840
<v Speaker 1>So we're in huge unchartered waters. Is great to go

0:07:57.920 --> 0:07:59.680
<v Speaker 1>to work every day. I feel like I spent the

0:07:59.720 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 1>last fifty years my life getting ready to be in

0:08:02.120 --> 0:08:04.920
<v Speaker 1>business at a time like this. David Kotak, thank you

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us, and have a wonderful, wonderful

0:08:07.920 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Thanksgiving thinking about bitcoin and the era of low rates.

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:17.240
<v Speaker 1>David Kotak, Chairman and Chief executive officer of Cumberland Advisors,

0:08:17.320 --> 0:08:21.880
<v Speaker 1>also the co author of the book Adventures in Muniland.

0:08:33.280 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 1>When Mark Dunklely arrived at Hawaiian Airlines, the airline depended

0:08:38.120 --> 0:08:41.400
<v Speaker 1>almost entirely on traffic from the United States mainland and

0:08:41.520 --> 0:08:45.920
<v Speaker 1>among Hawaii's islands. Well as chief executive, he has managed

0:08:45.960 --> 0:08:49.280
<v Speaker 1>to grab a large share of the international business. International

0:08:49.320 --> 0:08:52.199
<v Speaker 1>travel now accounts for about a fourth of the airline's revenue,

0:08:52.200 --> 0:08:56.200
<v Speaker 1>flights to such destinations as Japan, China, South Korea, Australia

0:08:56.520 --> 0:08:59.800
<v Speaker 1>and New Zealand. But Mark Dunckly has his own destination

0:08:59.840 --> 0:09:03.440
<v Speaker 1>and he is departing from Hawaiian Holdings, the parent company

0:09:03.480 --> 0:09:06.200
<v Speaker 1>of Hawaian Airlines. He joins us now, Mark Duncley, thanks

0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:08.160
<v Speaker 1>for being with us. Maybe you could tell us a

0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:12.280
<v Speaker 1>little bit about why are you moving on and what

0:09:12.320 --> 0:09:16.199
<v Speaker 1>do you believe your legacy will be at the airline. Well, then,

0:09:16.280 --> 0:09:18.120
<v Speaker 1>first all, it's great to talk to you again, as

0:09:18.480 --> 0:09:21.280
<v Speaker 1>it always is. Um. Yeah, you know, I've had the

0:09:21.320 --> 0:09:24.080
<v Speaker 1>great good fortune to run this business for fifteen years,

0:09:24.160 --> 0:09:27.320
<v Speaker 1>and at the same time, you know, I've been a

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:30.240
<v Speaker 1>long way away from from family. You can probably tell

0:09:30.280 --> 0:09:33.400
<v Speaker 1>them that being in Hawaiian, being British and having family

0:09:33.400 --> 0:09:36.560
<v Speaker 1>on the East Coast makes some of you know, keeping

0:09:36.600 --> 0:09:39.400
<v Speaker 1>touch with family a little bit difficult. So it seemed

0:09:39.440 --> 0:09:42.840
<v Speaker 1>like the right time to to make that move. In

0:09:42.960 --> 0:09:45.920
<v Speaker 1>terms of the legacy of our business. I think it

0:09:45.920 --> 0:09:50.240
<v Speaker 1>really just sort of demonstrates that a small carrier with

0:09:50.320 --> 0:09:53.520
<v Speaker 1>a real focus on the customer can compete and win

0:09:54.280 --> 0:09:57.680
<v Speaker 1>UH in a in a market of very big airlines.

0:09:59.000 --> 0:10:02.240
<v Speaker 1>In the story that we had on Bloomberg News in

0:10:02.280 --> 0:10:05.240
<v Speaker 1>the past few weeks, it noted how a number of

0:10:05.280 --> 0:10:10.120
<v Speaker 1>the big airlines United Continental, UH and Southwest Airlines have

0:10:10.480 --> 0:10:13.439
<v Speaker 1>expanded service or said that they were going to from

0:10:13.480 --> 0:10:16.920
<v Speaker 1>the mainland to Hawaii. You have said at the time,

0:10:17.040 --> 0:10:19.760
<v Speaker 1>had I known about this additional competition at the time

0:10:20.120 --> 0:10:22.840
<v Speaker 1>I started discussing my plans with the board of directors,

0:10:22.880 --> 0:10:27.960
<v Speaker 1>I would have stayed on. Can you explain that? Yeah? Absolutely,

0:10:28.000 --> 0:10:31.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, one of the reasons why you

0:10:31.120 --> 0:10:34.240
<v Speaker 1>get into the airline business and management capacities because you

0:10:34.320 --> 0:10:37.360
<v Speaker 1>like to fight. And uh, you know, we've had a

0:10:37.360 --> 0:10:40.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of competitive entry in our market during the period

0:10:40.200 --> 0:10:43.880
<v Speaker 1>of time when we've grown and developed ourselves. We've always

0:10:43.880 --> 0:10:47.680
<v Speaker 1>been able to beat back the competition, um in And so,

0:10:48.240 --> 0:10:51.960
<v Speaker 1>uh you know, I see no reason why this next

0:10:52.000 --> 0:10:55.559
<v Speaker 1>episode is going to be any different. And I would

0:10:56.240 --> 0:10:59.560
<v Speaker 1>very much liked to have been in the saddle to

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:02.640
<v Speaker 1>to take the fight to the to the additional capacity.

0:11:02.920 --> 0:11:05.320
<v Speaker 1>So Mark, let's say you were staying on, how would

0:11:05.320 --> 0:11:08.760
<v Speaker 1>you wage this fight? Well, I think we've got the

0:11:08.760 --> 0:11:13.400
<v Speaker 1>winning combination. To begin with, Hawaiian Airlines understands the Hawaii

0:11:13.480 --> 0:11:18.800
<v Speaker 1>traveler better than any other airline does. Um We've during

0:11:18.880 --> 0:11:22.439
<v Speaker 1>the period, you know, with each successive year, our rate

0:11:22.679 --> 0:11:25.880
<v Speaker 1>of you know, that margin by which we understand our

0:11:26.240 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 1>customer better has actually increased. Were in better competitive relative

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:34.600
<v Speaker 1>competitive shape today than we were, uh you know, four

0:11:34.679 --> 0:11:37.120
<v Speaker 1>or five years ago when we had another bout of

0:11:37.120 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 1>competitive entry. Um. So I think it's it's more about

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:45.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, leaving all of the the advantages that we

0:11:45.120 --> 0:11:48.280
<v Speaker 1>currently have. I don't think it's about finding a new

0:11:48.320 --> 0:11:51.920
<v Speaker 1>formula I think our formula wins today. Mark just a

0:11:51.920 --> 0:11:56.160
<v Speaker 1>little bit on the competition because a little more rather

0:11:56.400 --> 0:12:00.600
<v Speaker 1>because we know, so okay, Southwest United there Lisa said

0:12:00.600 --> 0:12:05.080
<v Speaker 1>they're upping their their schedules, but not from the West Coast,

0:12:05.679 --> 0:12:07.640
<v Speaker 1>and I think that might be Can you just give

0:12:07.640 --> 0:12:10.120
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of color there, because the West Coast

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:13.400
<v Speaker 1>also has to do with your ability to maintain margins

0:12:13.440 --> 0:12:17.160
<v Speaker 1>and I'm wondering if you could speak to that issue. Yeah,

0:12:17.200 --> 0:12:19.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, with the exception of flying as far east

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:23.920
<v Speaker 1>as New York, which we which we fly, as you

0:12:23.960 --> 0:12:28.640
<v Speaker 1>well know, most of our services come off the West Coast. Um.

0:12:28.720 --> 0:12:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Again that's that that's a market we know very well.

0:12:31.200 --> 0:12:34.079
<v Speaker 1>Most of the people UM coming off the West Coast

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:38.439
<v Speaker 1>are flying on NonStop flights, are not making connections. Uh.

0:12:38.480 --> 0:12:41.840
<v Speaker 1>And they're the they're the uh. They're the sort of

0:12:41.840 --> 0:12:47.239
<v Speaker 1>customers who are most easily uh sort of directly marketed

0:12:47.400 --> 0:12:51.800
<v Speaker 1>to UM when you compare it to people in the

0:12:51.800 --> 0:12:54.880
<v Speaker 1>middle of the country who have to make connections. So UM,

0:12:54.920 --> 0:12:57.760
<v Speaker 1>when we go head to head off the West Coast,

0:12:58.640 --> 0:13:01.000
<v Speaker 1>as I say, we win an indeed, uh, if you

0:13:01.080 --> 0:13:03.920
<v Speaker 1>look at where we are now, we we have a

0:13:04.000 --> 0:13:08.480
<v Speaker 1>double digit revenue advantage over our competitors off the West coast.

0:13:08.880 --> 0:13:10.880
<v Speaker 1>All right, that's all right, So we got the West

0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:15.319
<v Speaker 1>coast challenge and strength. Tell us about the aircraft. Because

0:13:15.320 --> 0:13:19.000
<v Speaker 1>you're taking the new A three one Neo from air

0:13:19.120 --> 0:13:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Bus that's got twenty five fewer seats than the smallest

0:13:22.000 --> 0:13:25.080
<v Speaker 1>planes that you fly today on that West coast route,

0:13:25.360 --> 0:13:27.720
<v Speaker 1>and then you're also doing a reconfiguration of the A

0:13:27.880 --> 0:13:30.960
<v Speaker 1>three thirty, you're gonna have sixteen fewer seats which might

0:13:31.360 --> 0:13:34.400
<v Speaker 1>be able to offer that premium seating, and then it

0:13:34.440 --> 0:13:37.360
<v Speaker 1>offsets the other carrier's growth because it pulls a capacity

0:13:37.400 --> 0:13:40.520
<v Speaker 1>out of the market. Yeah. Well, we took the first

0:13:40.559 --> 0:13:44.520
<v Speaker 1>of our eighteen eight three one Neo aircraft into our

0:13:44.520 --> 0:13:46.520
<v Speaker 1>fleet just a couple of weeks ago. We're getting it

0:13:46.559 --> 0:13:49.719
<v Speaker 1>ready for service early in the new year. We're very

0:13:49.720 --> 0:13:53.880
<v Speaker 1>excited about this aircraft type. Um, you know, all airplanes are,

0:13:55.160 --> 0:13:58.199
<v Speaker 1>I mean, both manufacturers built terrific airplanes and they're all

0:13:58.600 --> 0:14:02.440
<v Speaker 1>optimized for certain kind of distances and certain market sizes.

0:14:02.960 --> 0:14:09.320
<v Speaker 1>It so happens aucle mile flight and the size nine

0:14:09.400 --> 0:14:14.880
<v Speaker 1>seats of the Neo makes it absolutely the best airplane

0:14:14.920 --> 0:14:17.839
<v Speaker 1>for the mission. And we think that is UH an

0:14:17.880 --> 0:14:23.120
<v Speaker 1>absolute competitive advantage of Visa the competitors flying other narrow bodies.

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:26.360
<v Speaker 1>With respect to our wide body fleet, we're just completing

0:14:26.920 --> 0:14:29.520
<v Speaker 1>UH the introduction of life flat seats on all of

0:14:29.520 --> 0:14:33.720
<v Speaker 1>our wide body aircraft and we're seeing a phenomenal uptake

0:14:34.960 --> 0:14:39.600
<v Speaker 1>of of demand for those. It's and you know, we

0:14:39.600 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 1>always understood that would be important in the international marketplace.

0:14:42.720 --> 0:14:47.160
<v Speaker 1>I think what's been surprising and encouraging is to see

0:14:47.840 --> 0:14:51.840
<v Speaker 1>just how important it's become to the domestic marketplace as well.

0:14:52.320 --> 0:14:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Mark Duckerley, thank you so much for joining us, and

0:14:54.520 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 1>best of luck in the next chapter. Mark Dunkerley was

0:14:58.200 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 1>among the longest tenure chief executive officers in the airline industry.

0:15:03.680 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 1>He is current president chief executive officer of Hawaiian Holdings,

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:10.040
<v Speaker 1>which is based in Honolulu, but he has said that

0:15:10.080 --> 0:15:12.840
<v Speaker 1>he will retire in March and be replaced by the

0:15:12.880 --> 0:15:18.200
<v Speaker 1>airline's chief commercial officer, Pete Ingram. This is after quite

0:15:18.200 --> 0:15:22.120
<v Speaker 1>a long tenure at the airline company. It seems like

0:15:22.760 --> 0:15:25.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know him. Would you leave Honolulu? I guess

0:15:25.880 --> 0:15:28.200
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't know. I've never lived there, but it seems

0:15:28.200 --> 0:15:43.960
<v Speaker 1>like a beautiful place to be Goldman Sachs has made

0:15:44.000 --> 0:15:49.320
<v Speaker 1>a big push into consumer lending via its Marcus online

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:54.480
<v Speaker 1>lending system after starting it up in recent years, we

0:15:54.520 --> 0:15:57.760
<v Speaker 1>are now getting some data about what their lone loss

0:15:57.800 --> 0:16:01.400
<v Speaker 1>expectations are, as well as who they are lending to

0:16:02.000 --> 0:16:04.480
<v Speaker 1>and with us. Is Dacan Campbell, a financial reporter for

0:16:04.560 --> 0:16:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News, to talk a little bit about what we're seeing. Dacon,

0:16:08.600 --> 0:16:12.800
<v Speaker 1>you wrote this fantastic story looking at how Goldman says

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:16.440
<v Speaker 1>that they're expecting loan losses that are lower than what

0:16:16.560 --> 0:16:18.800
<v Speaker 1>others in the industry would expect. Can you just sort

0:16:18.840 --> 0:16:22.160
<v Speaker 1>of lay out what you're talking about here? Yes, And

0:16:22.200 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 1>it's important to note that they actually didn't go as

0:16:25.280 --> 0:16:28.680
<v Speaker 1>far as you suggest they went. They didn't tell us

0:16:28.760 --> 0:16:31.600
<v Speaker 1>that the four percent losses that they disclosed in this

0:16:31.680 --> 0:16:33.720
<v Speaker 1>recent slide. They didn't say, those are going to be

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:38.520
<v Speaker 1>losses for our portfolio. They said, hey, analysts and investors,

0:16:38.520 --> 0:16:43.000
<v Speaker 1>these are losses for a hypothetical industry portfolio, for a

0:16:43.040 --> 0:16:47.600
<v Speaker 1>business built at scale. Now, many analysts looked at that

0:16:47.880 --> 0:16:51.280
<v Speaker 1>and said, Okay, these are the losses that Goldman is

0:16:51.320 --> 0:16:55.080
<v Speaker 1>assuming for their own business. But it's it's important to

0:16:55.120 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 1>note that they didn't actually come out and be all right. So,

0:16:58.440 --> 0:17:01.040
<v Speaker 1>so you got some pushback they basically from the story

0:17:01.120 --> 0:17:03.440
<v Speaker 1>saying that Goldman wasn't saying that this was their projections,

0:17:04.000 --> 0:17:05.439
<v Speaker 1>but that you know, they put this out as a

0:17:05.480 --> 0:17:09.280
<v Speaker 1>hypothetical and people are saying they're hypothetical is too low. Nevertheless,

0:17:09.320 --> 0:17:11.679
<v Speaker 1>it's a benchmark. It's a benchmark, and it's a fascinating

0:17:11.720 --> 0:17:14.560
<v Speaker 1>benchmark at a time when Goldman Sachs is trying to

0:17:14.600 --> 0:17:18.560
<v Speaker 1>recreate its identity and is trying to plow more into

0:17:18.680 --> 0:17:21.120
<v Speaker 1>an industry that has been dominated by both credit card

0:17:21.200 --> 0:17:23.959
<v Speaker 1>lenders and peer to peer online lenders. Uh, can you

0:17:24.000 --> 0:17:27.520
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit just about how ambitious Goldman Sacks

0:17:27.560 --> 0:17:31.000
<v Speaker 1>has been and why this is such a lucrative area

0:17:32.720 --> 0:17:36.879
<v Speaker 1>for banks. Sure, so, Uh, Goldman would like to A

0:17:36.920 --> 0:17:38.800
<v Speaker 1>couple of months ago, they told us they'd like to

0:17:38.880 --> 0:17:43.040
<v Speaker 1>originate thirteen billion in loans over the next three years

0:17:43.119 --> 0:17:46.160
<v Speaker 1>off of this platform. They started at thirteen months ago,

0:17:46.440 --> 0:17:50.240
<v Speaker 1>So they're ramping up very quickly. They've done two billion already,

0:17:50.320 --> 0:17:53.320
<v Speaker 1>so uh, they they'll need to do another eleven or

0:17:53.359 --> 0:17:58.080
<v Speaker 1>twelve billion. Uh. These are largely debt consolidation loans, so

0:17:58.440 --> 0:18:00.840
<v Speaker 1>they're going out to people who've got credit card debt

0:18:00.960 --> 0:18:04.800
<v Speaker 1>and offering them this money at a slightly lower interest

0:18:04.920 --> 0:18:08.679
<v Speaker 1>rate to retire that debt. As we all know, because

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:10.760
<v Speaker 1>of the credit card debt that we may or may

0:18:10.760 --> 0:18:13.840
<v Speaker 1>not have ourselves, those have high interest rates, and so

0:18:14.240 --> 0:18:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Goldman thinks that that they can get in UH at

0:18:17.359 --> 0:18:21.359
<v Speaker 1>a slightly lower interest rate but still high UH. This

0:18:21.400 --> 0:18:24.440
<v Speaker 1>would be very lucrative for them. I mean they they

0:18:24.440 --> 0:18:26.919
<v Speaker 1>told us that the net interest margin. I don't want

0:18:26.920 --> 0:18:29.840
<v Speaker 1>to get too jargon e, but it's UH. Banks now

0:18:29.960 --> 0:18:32.560
<v Speaker 1>have net interest margins of two or three percent for

0:18:32.600 --> 0:18:34.920
<v Speaker 1>their entire business. Goldman thinks they can get in net

0:18:34.920 --> 0:18:39.120
<v Speaker 1>interest margin of ten per cent on this business. Okay,

0:18:39.160 --> 0:18:41.080
<v Speaker 1>just let me get a couple of details in here.

0:18:41.560 --> 0:18:44.359
<v Speaker 1>The maximum amount you can actually borrow on the markets

0:18:44.440 --> 0:18:47.560
<v Speaker 1>platform is thirty thou dollars. Correct. They make a big

0:18:47.600 --> 0:18:50.680
<v Speaker 1>deal of saying that there is no fee associated with it,

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:54.480
<v Speaker 1>also that there is no pre payment penalty. First question.

0:18:54.560 --> 0:18:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Pre payment penalties are usually designed to make sure that

0:18:57.880 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Speaker 1>those who lend the money are given the feeling that

0:19:00.880 --> 0:19:04.800
<v Speaker 1>they will get this stream of interest payments continuously for

0:19:04.840 --> 0:19:08.200
<v Speaker 1>the life of the loan. What happens to those investors

0:19:08.320 --> 0:19:11.439
<v Speaker 1>or in the back of the situation, what happens to

0:19:11.480 --> 0:19:16.120
<v Speaker 1>those loans when they get prepaid? Good question. So one

0:19:16.520 --> 0:19:19.879
<v Speaker 1>competitive advantage that Goldman thinks they have is they're putting

0:19:19.880 --> 0:19:22.040
<v Speaker 1>all of these loans on their balance sheet, so they're

0:19:22.080 --> 0:19:25.760
<v Speaker 1>not selling any two investors. So in a pre payment,

0:19:26.040 --> 0:19:28.359
<v Speaker 1>if anyone takes the hit, they take the hit. Yes,

0:19:28.480 --> 0:19:31.200
<v Speaker 1>and they will take the money that's prepaid early, turn

0:19:31.320 --> 0:19:34.720
<v Speaker 1>right around and lend it out again. Okay, the second thing,

0:19:34.840 --> 0:19:38.119
<v Speaker 1>it says that you cannot use these loans for any

0:19:38.240 --> 0:19:44.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of remideration of student loan debt. Is that correct?

0:19:45.320 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 1>I believe so, and I believe that's a regulation. I'm

0:19:48.840 --> 0:19:52.000
<v Speaker 1>not exactly sure, but uh, they don't want you to

0:19:52.040 --> 0:19:53.840
<v Speaker 1>be doing that, all right. So this is really as

0:19:53.840 --> 0:19:56.400
<v Speaker 1>you just said, this is to try to consolidate your

0:19:56.440 --> 0:19:59.439
<v Speaker 1>loans and it's unsecured. This is this is this is

0:19:59.440 --> 0:20:03.480
<v Speaker 1>a large what a lot of the online lending marketplaces

0:20:03.520 --> 0:20:06.400
<v Speaker 1>have done, right, and this is lending club prosper It's

0:20:06.520 --> 0:20:10.720
<v Speaker 1>largely the same product. It's it's directly in competition with

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:14.439
<v Speaker 1>credit cards basically to try to get them a a

0:20:14.480 --> 0:20:18.480
<v Speaker 1>lower rate, although still at we're not talking low rate here,

0:20:18.880 --> 0:20:20.520
<v Speaker 1>but It is fascinating to me. The first of all,

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:23.880
<v Speaker 1>that Marcus is also plowing into non prime borrowers, which

0:20:23.880 --> 0:20:27.680
<v Speaker 1>is kind of interesting, uh in and of itself. Also,

0:20:27.720 --> 0:20:31.359
<v Speaker 1>how did Goldman Sachs do this, Because if they're lending it,

0:20:31.400 --> 0:20:33.160
<v Speaker 1>and they're putting the loans in their books, this comes

0:20:33.160 --> 0:20:35.840
<v Speaker 1>at a time when all the other banks are actually

0:20:36.040 --> 0:20:40.640
<v Speaker 1>reducing their consumer loans. Yes, and that's that was one

0:20:41.400 --> 0:20:43.880
<v Speaker 1>large part of our story, is that they're getting into

0:20:43.920 --> 0:20:47.719
<v Speaker 1>this business at a point when credit losses are lower

0:20:47.760 --> 0:20:50.800
<v Speaker 1>than they've almost ever been. So you're getting into a

0:20:50.800 --> 0:20:53.960
<v Speaker 1>business when credit losses are expected to go up. We've

0:20:53.960 --> 0:20:56.719
<v Speaker 1>had an eight year economic expansion. You've got to expect

0:20:56.760 --> 0:20:59.320
<v Speaker 1>that to come to an end at some point. If

0:20:59.320 --> 0:21:02.280
<v Speaker 1>you are doing the yourselves, you would not want to

0:21:02.280 --> 0:21:04.359
<v Speaker 1>get into a business at this point in the cycle.

0:21:04.480 --> 0:21:08.280
<v Speaker 1>It's almost the worst point to get into the business. Now.

0:21:08.280 --> 0:21:10.520
<v Speaker 1>What Goldman will tell you, and they've said this publicly,

0:21:11.040 --> 0:21:13.720
<v Speaker 1>is hey, we're getting this. We're building this for the

0:21:13.800 --> 0:21:16.919
<v Speaker 1>long haul, and doesn't really matter when we get into it,

0:21:16.960 --> 0:21:20.000
<v Speaker 1>because we'll take early losses and then a few years

0:21:20.000 --> 0:21:23.040
<v Speaker 1>down the line it'll be fine. This is you know,

0:21:23.200 --> 0:21:26.480
<v Speaker 1>multi year so take that for what you will, all right,

0:21:26.520 --> 0:21:28.760
<v Speaker 1>and thank you very much. They Can Campbell is our

0:21:28.800 --> 0:21:31.320
<v Speaker 1>financial reporter for Bloomberg News. You can follow him on

0:21:31.359 --> 0:21:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at Daycan Campbell, and I urge you to read

0:21:34.040 --> 0:21:37.359
<v Speaker 1>his story about Goldman Sachs and Marcus by Goldman Sax.

0:21:37.440 --> 0:21:53.320
<v Speaker 1>The online lending platforms Uber has disclosed that it paid

0:21:53.320 --> 0:21:56.080
<v Speaker 1>hackers a hundred thousand dollars in an effort to conceal

0:21:56.280 --> 0:22:01.280
<v Speaker 1>a data breach that affects fifty seven million accounts. But

0:22:01.359 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 1>this happened one year ago, So why are we only

0:22:04.119 --> 0:22:06.920
<v Speaker 1>learning about it now? Here to help us understand the

0:22:07.000 --> 0:22:10.959
<v Speaker 1>issue and its consequences, is Shira Ovid are Bloomberg Gadfly

0:22:11.200 --> 0:22:15.040
<v Speaker 1>columnist when it comes to everything technological? Sure, So maybe

0:22:15.040 --> 0:22:17.560
<v Speaker 1>just lay out some of the details as we know

0:22:17.720 --> 0:22:20.960
<v Speaker 1>them and what you believe the fallout will be right. So,

0:22:21.000 --> 0:22:26.640
<v Speaker 1>our colleague Eric Newcomer reported yesterday that Uber's board did

0:22:26.680 --> 0:22:30.080
<v Speaker 1>an investigation and discovered that there had been this data

0:22:30.119 --> 0:22:32.880
<v Speaker 1>breach in October of last year. So, as you said,

0:22:32.880 --> 0:22:37.159
<v Speaker 1>more than a year ago that affected personal information on

0:22:37.320 --> 0:22:42.639
<v Speaker 1>fifty seven million Uber writers and also hundreds of thousands

0:22:42.680 --> 0:22:47.160
<v Speaker 1>of US Uber drivers, and the company didn't disclose it

0:22:47.640 --> 0:22:51.159
<v Speaker 1>UM and instead paid hackers a hundred thousand dollars to

0:22:51.400 --> 0:22:55.280
<v Speaker 1>basically delete or say they would delete the personal information.

0:22:55.320 --> 0:22:56.600
<v Speaker 1>And that was kind of the end of it. It was,

0:22:56.680 --> 0:22:58.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, basically a cover up before we get to

0:22:59.040 --> 0:23:01.760
<v Speaker 1>the sort of ethic of not disclosing it. And the

0:23:01.800 --> 0:23:04.119
<v Speaker 1>fact that the New York Attorney General is now looking

0:23:04.160 --> 0:23:06.840
<v Speaker 1>into this and this could potentially add to the Uber's

0:23:07.400 --> 0:23:11.119
<v Speaker 1>legal woes. A hundred thousand dollars is nothing for what

0:23:11.240 --> 0:23:14.640
<v Speaker 1>these hackers charge, and it makes me wander, first of all,

0:23:14.680 --> 0:23:16.760
<v Speaker 1>whether this was sufficient. Second of all, what kind of

0:23:16.800 --> 0:23:20.000
<v Speaker 1>hack was this? Uh? And and third, you know, is

0:23:20.040 --> 0:23:22.600
<v Speaker 1>this uh? Is there more to this than perhaps they're

0:23:22.640 --> 0:23:24.840
<v Speaker 1>letting on? Yeah? These are all good questions. So I

0:23:24.880 --> 0:23:28.720
<v Speaker 1>will say that generally Uber has been regarded as having

0:23:28.840 --> 0:23:32.040
<v Speaker 1>a kind of robust security team. This is not a

0:23:32.040 --> 0:23:37.439
<v Speaker 1>company like Equifax, are previous giant cyber hack victim that

0:23:37.600 --> 0:23:41.359
<v Speaker 1>seemed fairly incompetent about keeping user data secure. Although the

0:23:41.400 --> 0:23:43.919
<v Speaker 1>irony of this Uber hack was that it happened at

0:23:43.960 --> 0:23:47.920
<v Speaker 1>the same time that Uber was trying to repair relations

0:23:48.440 --> 0:23:54.880
<v Speaker 1>with the Federal Trade Commission over previous misrepresentations of the

0:23:55.000 --> 0:23:59.679
<v Speaker 1>um security of Uber driver and writer information. So it's

0:23:59.720 --> 0:24:02.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of ironic that it was kind of being hacked

0:24:02.520 --> 0:24:05.600
<v Speaker 1>at the same time it was trying to repair relations

0:24:05.680 --> 0:24:09.480
<v Speaker 1>over previous breaches. Can you say this is a hack

0:24:09.560 --> 0:24:13.080
<v Speaker 1>and be hacked? Because isn't Uber the company that was

0:24:13.400 --> 0:24:18.119
<v Speaker 1>cited as being uh sort of the poster child for

0:24:18.480 --> 0:24:23.800
<v Speaker 1>using nefarious methodology in order to not only gain insight

0:24:23.880 --> 0:24:27.399
<v Speaker 1>into their competitors, to game the system of their competitors,

0:24:27.440 --> 0:24:32.880
<v Speaker 1>to flood the competitors system with bogus requests, and also,

0:24:33.040 --> 0:24:37.800
<v Speaker 1>as I recall, to manipulate the data that was accessible

0:24:38.320 --> 0:24:44.399
<v Speaker 1>to regulators in different municipalities. Yes, among the kind of

0:24:44.600 --> 0:24:48.639
<v Speaker 1>very long list of Uber's troubles over the years is

0:24:48.680 --> 0:24:54.520
<v Speaker 1>all of those things. In spied on writers um using

0:24:54.840 --> 0:24:58.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of an internal view of where people were going.

0:24:58.400 --> 0:25:01.640
<v Speaker 1>It used its data, manipulated its data to kind of

0:25:02.160 --> 0:25:05.000
<v Speaker 1>make sure that regulators who were trying to correct down

0:25:05.000 --> 0:25:08.720
<v Speaker 1>an Uber couldn't get rides and investigate your further. Yes,

0:25:08.760 --> 0:25:10.720
<v Speaker 1>all of those Okay, So if all right now, if

0:25:10.800 --> 0:25:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Uber says they're an asset light company, therefore they're not

0:25:13.800 --> 0:25:18.719
<v Speaker 1>a transport company, they're a technology company, what special sauce

0:25:18.800 --> 0:25:24.640
<v Speaker 1>does Uber now claim to have. That makes them distinctive

0:25:24.880 --> 0:25:29.439
<v Speaker 1>because if their technology is hackable, and clearly it is,

0:25:29.480 --> 0:25:32.200
<v Speaker 1>and they don't know how to disclose it. If they're

0:25:32.240 --> 0:25:34.720
<v Speaker 1>not a technology they know, they just decided not so

0:25:34.960 --> 0:25:36.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, but to be fair, I mean, you know,

0:25:36.760 --> 0:25:38.640
<v Speaker 1>I haven't heard from their you know, their side. But

0:25:39.080 --> 0:25:42.160
<v Speaker 1>if that's the case, so what is this special magic

0:25:42.240 --> 0:25:45.119
<v Speaker 1>that they have? What what that demands a seventy billion

0:25:45.160 --> 0:25:47.840
<v Speaker 1>dollar valuation? That is a fair question. Although will say

0:25:47.840 --> 0:25:53.160
<v Speaker 1>that the information that was attacked was not Uber's algorithm,

0:25:53.240 --> 0:25:57.200
<v Speaker 1>which is a sophisticated way of kind of matching writer

0:25:57.400 --> 0:26:00.840
<v Speaker 1>and uh just everybody's license for you know, the driver's

0:26:00.880 --> 0:26:05.439
<v Speaker 1>licenses and personal uh credit cards. Right, they breached a

0:26:05.520 --> 0:26:08.680
<v Speaker 1>database of some personal information, although Uber said that it

0:26:08.720 --> 0:26:11.760
<v Speaker 1>doesn't include things like credit cards. Although you know, if

0:26:11.760 --> 0:26:15.040
<v Speaker 1>you're if you're a driver and includes your license plate number,

0:26:15.080 --> 0:26:18.920
<v Speaker 1>you might have serious concerns about your that information leaking out.

0:26:19.720 --> 0:26:22.119
<v Speaker 1>My issue is, I mean, look, hacks are going to happen.

0:26:22.200 --> 0:26:25.199
<v Speaker 1>Everyone who we have on this show whose in cybersecurity

0:26:25.240 --> 0:26:28.119
<v Speaker 1>says it's not a matter of if another hack will occur,

0:26:28.240 --> 0:26:31.240
<v Speaker 1>but when so, you know, you can't necessarily say, well,

0:26:31.320 --> 0:26:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Uber is going to go under now because they were hacked.

0:26:33.400 --> 0:26:35.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is part of the course. Uh. The

0:26:35.320 --> 0:26:38.440
<v Speaker 1>question is the fact that they did not disclose this information,

0:26:38.440 --> 0:26:41.480
<v Speaker 1>and this raises some serious questions about the current CEO,

0:26:41.640 --> 0:26:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Kasar Shahi, what he knew, when he knew it, and

0:26:45.320 --> 0:26:48.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, how will his response determine the success of

0:26:48.640 --> 0:26:51.880
<v Speaker 1>this company. I think that's exactly right. The stunner here

0:26:51.920 --> 0:26:54.360
<v Speaker 1>to me is not so much the hack, although now

0:26:55.000 --> 0:26:59.040
<v Speaker 1>repeated breaches of personal information on Uber that is serious

0:26:59.080 --> 0:27:01.719
<v Speaker 1>and worrying. But you're right, it's the fact that they

0:27:01.760 --> 0:27:05.800
<v Speaker 1>didn't disclose this until for a year and and honestly,

0:27:05.840 --> 0:27:07.879
<v Speaker 1>based on some of the reporting I've seen today, they

0:27:08.000 --> 0:27:11.199
<v Speaker 1>might not have ever disclosed it except that Uber is

0:27:11.240 --> 0:27:14.280
<v Speaker 1>currently negotiating to sell billions of dollars in stock to

0:27:14.440 --> 0:27:17.760
<v Speaker 1>soft Bank, and the board believed that this was material

0:27:17.800 --> 0:27:20.880
<v Speaker 1>information that people who might sell shares to soft Bank

0:27:21.040 --> 0:27:23.399
<v Speaker 1>might want to know about, so we might not have

0:27:23.440 --> 0:27:26.480
<v Speaker 1>never known, And and the the techniques they used to

0:27:26.520 --> 0:27:29.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of cover this up raise more and more questions

0:27:29.560 --> 0:27:33.440
<v Speaker 1>about both the current and the former leadership at UPER,

0:27:33.480 --> 0:27:36.560
<v Speaker 1>which is why my column um yesterday was basically about,

0:27:37.040 --> 0:27:39.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, we need to know what. Travis Kallinik, the

0:27:39.400 --> 0:27:41.679
<v Speaker 1>CEO who got kind of pushed out over the summer,

0:27:42.000 --> 0:27:43.960
<v Speaker 1>What did he know about the cyber attack and the

0:27:44.080 --> 0:27:46.439
<v Speaker 1>cover up and why didn't he disclose it? Did he

0:27:46.480 --> 0:27:50.960
<v Speaker 1>tell the board? Did he tell the incoming CEO? Um,

0:27:51.080 --> 0:27:54.080
<v Speaker 1>There's just so many unanswered questions about his role in

0:27:54.119 --> 0:27:57.040
<v Speaker 1>this breach and his continued role of the company going forward.

0:27:57.480 --> 0:27:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Sure over Day, thank you so much for joining us.

0:28:00.080 --> 0:28:03.360
<v Speaker 1>As always, sure Oviday Bloomberg gad Fly columnists covering all

0:28:03.400 --> 0:28:06.440
<v Speaker 1>things tech. Her columns are great. You should read them

0:28:06.480 --> 0:28:09.920
<v Speaker 1>at Ni gad Fly on the Bloomberg or Bloomberg dot

0:28:09.920 --> 0:28:16.159
<v Speaker 1>com slash goad Fly on the web. Thanks for listening

0:28:16.160 --> 0:28:19.080
<v Speaker 1>to the Bloomberg P and L podcast. You can subscribe

0:28:19.080 --> 0:28:22.679
<v Speaker 1>and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whatever

0:28:22.720 --> 0:28:26.200
<v Speaker 1>podcast platform you prefer. I'm pim Fox. I'm on Twitter

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:30.000
<v Speaker 1>at pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at Lisa Abramo. It's

0:28:30.080 --> 0:28:33.080
<v Speaker 1>one before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide

0:28:33.119 --> 0:28:34.040
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio.